Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
book_n	aaron_n	people_n	succession_n	14	3	10.4020	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A14350	The common places of the most famous and renowmed diuine Doctor Peter Martyr diuided into foure principall parts: with a large addition of manie theologicall and necessarie discourses, some neuer extant before. Translated and partlie gathered by Anthonie Marten, one of the sewers of hir Maiesties most honourable chamber.; Loci communes. English	Vermigli, Pietro Martire, 1499-1562.; Simmler, Josias, 1530-1576.; Marten, Anthony, d. 1597.	1583 (1583)	STC 24669; ESTC S117880	3,788,596	1,858

no doubt but euerie one would haue fauoured his owne tribe and béeing so manie tribes as there were they would hardlie haue agréed all vpon one man And wheras Saule was of the least tribe of lowe degrée of base parentage if he should haue béene chosen by anie other means the matter might haue béen greatlie stomached of all sorts Num. 16 2. Core Dathan Abiram and others of their felowes stirred vp sedition against Moses and Aaron bicause they supposed them to haue vsurped the principalitie and preesthood by fraud and collusion Sundrie waies were the lots in old time Kimhi thinketh that all the people stood before the Lord for in deliberation and counsell of great matters it behooued the magistrate or prince to stand before the high préest So we sée in the book of Numbers Num. 27 22 that when Iosua was appointed to be captaine of the people he stood before Eleazar and the préest vsed to make answere through Vrim and Thumim So dooth Kimhi thinke that Samuel stood before the high préest and receiued the oracle of Vrim and Thumim that is to saie by those letters which were ingrauen in the pretious stones of the Ephod He saith moreouer that the arke perhaps was brought thither howbeit these things be vncertaine For there is here no mention made either of the préest or yet of the arke Rab. Shelomo thinketh that such was the maner of lots as that the names of euerie of the tribes were written in seuerall scrols which béeing throwne into a pot were afterward drawne by the chéefe préest It maketh for Kimhi that there is no mention made of lots Shelomo followeth the common opinion which is that Saules election was doone by lots which thing was not strange from the vse custome of the Iewes For of two hée goats Looke in Iudg. 20 8. Much vse of lots among the Iewes Leuit. 16 8. Iosua 13 6. 1. Par. 24 31 1 Sam. 14 41 Ionas 1 7. Acts. 1 26. it was chosen by lots which of them should scape By lots the land of Canaan was diuided among the tribes by lots the préesthood was appointed by lots Ionas Ionathas were found out and by lots Matthias was taken into the apostleship as we read in the first of the Acts. Wherfore séeing lots were in such sort vsed commonlie among the Iewes it should appeare that Shelomo did not thinke amisse in saieng that Saule was chosen by lots And whereas Kimhi saith that the high préest the arke of the Lord and the Ephod were present me thinketh it is not agréeable to truth For the arke at that time was in Kiriathiarim And if so be that the Ephod were there yet it followeth not of necessitie that therefore the arke was also there for we may sée how often those things were a sunder 1. Sam. 30● For when Dauid fled and came to Ceila he had Abiathar the préest to put on the Ephod and yet the arke was not carried with him in that flight The same thing was afterward doone in Siceleg when as yet the arke was present with him But thou wilt saie that in the text lots are not named I grant but yet there is another word there of the same signification For Lachad signifieth To get to laie hold on and to attaine by coniecture 3 But what lots those were I knowe not for as I said there were manie kinds of lots Cicero in his booke De diuinatione saith Many kinds of lots that When one Numerius Suffecius had cut in sunder a flint stone the lots made in an oke leaped out that at the same time an Oliue trée bid sweat honie and that therefore a little chest was made of the same trée into which the lots were cast these were called Praenestine lots which were verie famous in times past In Plautus we read of lots made of firre and poplar trées which were cast into a vessell of water and according as euerie lot arose first or last from the bottom so the matter was decréed Pausanias saith that lots were woont to be doone out of a pot made of claie and that one Cresphon in the diuision that was made of Peloponnesus to handle the matter that the field of Missena might fall out to his share he corrupted the préest Temenus for he dried others lots by the sun but Cresphons by the fier and therefore Cresphons lots béeing longer before they were made wet he obtained the féeld of Missena Darius the king of Persia in stead of lots vsed the neighing of a horsse And some haue obserued the first arising of the sun To vse lots is nothing else What is to vse lots but to doo something through which we may come by the knowledge of a thing that we knowe not Three kinds of lots But all kinds of lots may be reduced to thrée sorts For either we doubt to whom a thing should be adiudged as in the diuision that is made of féelds and possessions these lots are called lots of diuision either we doubt what is to be doone and such be called consulting lots or else we would faine knowe what should come to passe and this is called diuination by lots But it behooueth verie much to knowe Vpon what principle lots depend vpon what principle lots doo depend For to saie that they be ordered by fortune that were a vaine thing by diuels that is superstitious by heauen and the stars that is plaine ridiculous wherefore they are ruled by God For as saith Salomon Lots are put into the bosome Pro. 16 33. but they are tempered by the Lord. And Augustine vpon the 30. psalme sheweth that lots are nothing else but a signifieng of Gods will when man standeth in doubt And digressing from hence he saith Lots a token of the will of God that predestination and grace may be called lots bicause they depend not vpon our merits but vpon the mercies of God For with God predestination is eternall and certaine though it séeme to come to passe by lots And to Honoratus he saith that In a great persecution all ministers ought not to flie awaie nor yet all abandon themselues vnto perill but those must be retained which shall be sufficient for the present vse and the rest to be sent awaie that they may be reserued till a better season But here what maner of choosing shall be had Those must be retained saith he whom we shall thinke to be the more profitable and better for the people which remaine But if all shall be alike and all shall saie that they would tarie and die then saith he the matter must be committed vnto lots And in his booke De doctrina christiana he saith If there happen to méet with thée two poore men whose néed presentlie is alike and thou hast not then wherewith to helpe them both but one thou canst helpe there is no better waie than to deale by lots How and when lots must be vsed 4 But

also promises of him both to be and to be performed Wherefore that name of Iehoua is properlie attributed vnto God of the similitude of which word Iupiter being desirous to be reputed for a God commanded himselfe to be called Ioue The Rabbins saie that those letters wherof that word consisteth are spirituall What the word spirit signifieth And vndoubtedlie God is a spirit and a spirit first signifieth things that be without bodies or that haue light bodies as vapors and exhalations the which in shew are light and thin but yet they are of excéeding great strength For by them earthquakes are stirred vp the huge seas are troubled the storms of wind are blowne abroad Wherefore that word began afterward to be applied to the soule of man to angels and to God himselfe for these things which otherwise séeme but slender doo bring great things to passe Others saie that those letters whereof the word Iehoua is written be resting letters and that is verie agréeable vnto God No waie to find quietnes but in God onlie For séeing we doo all séeke for rest and felicitie there is no waie to find the same but in God onelie thus much hitherto of the word Iehoua signifieth the chéefe being wherevpon Plato had that his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or essence And that this may be the more manifest some of the names of God are deriued from his substance Names deriued from Gods substance and other from some propertie Substantiall names be Iehoua Ehi that word signifieth I will be For there is no creature that may saie I will be For if God drawe backe his power all things doo straitwaie perish God doubtlesse may trulie saie so bicause he cannot faile nor forsake himselfe Names referred vnto his properties Other names are referred to some propertie of God as El vnto might Cadoseh vnto holines Schaddai vnto sufficiencie howbeit these things in God be no accidents but onlie as we comprehend them in our cogitations For whereas God is infinite and we cannot wholie comprehend him yet by certeine tokens and effects we doo in some part vnderstand of him thereof are those names which signifie some propertie of God The Iewes being led of a certeine superstition pronounce not that holie name Tetragrammaton but in the place thereof they put Adonai or Elohim and so thinke that they worship the name of God more purelie and reuerentlie but God requireth no such kind of worship And hereby it commeth to passe that in translating of the holie scriptures the Grecians for Iehoua haue made Lord as in stead of Iehoua liueth they haue said The Lord liueth And whereas in the new testament Christ is so oftentimes called Lord his Godhead is nothing atall excluded by that word as some vnpure men doo babble but is rather established Vndoubtedlie Thomas ioined both togither Iohn 20 28. My Lord saith he and my God Finallie God In Iudg. 2 verse 1. to the intent that the knowledge of him might not be forgotten hath accustomed to put men in mind of those benefits which he hath bestowed vpon them and would that those should be as certeine words expressing vnto vs his nature and goodnes And hée beginneth alwaies the rehersall at his latter benefits and of them he claimeth to himselfe titles or names attributed vnto him vnder which he may both be called vpon and acknowledged For euen at the beginning God was called vpon as he which had made heauen and earth afterward as he that was the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob after that as the deliuerer out of Aegypt then a deliuerer out of the captiuitie of Babylon but lastlie as the father of our Lord Iesus Christ ¶ Of the omnipotencie of God looke Peter Martyr in his Treastise Of both natures in Christ set foorth at Tygure 1563. pag. 4. 3 The words which be in the second booke of Samuel the seuenth chapter In 2. Sam. 7 verse 23. Looke In Gen. 18. at the beginning And In 2. Sam. 23 verse 2. verse the 23. namelie The gods came that he might redéeme vnto himselfe a people are a sharpe corsie vnto the Hebrues which will not acknowledge thrée persons in the diuine nature Som bicause it is said Gods refer it to the opinion of men Such is that saieng of Paule There be manie gods and manie lords 1. Cor. 8 5. For neither can they admit or alow of a multitude of gods But forsomuch as the intreating here is of a singular or particular fact this place must in anie wise be vnderstood of the true God Kimhi thinketh that Dauid said Gods for honor sake euen as men also to speake the more pleasinglie and ciuilie doo oftentimes vse the plurall number in stead of the singular But if it be so what new religion entered straitwaie into Dauid Why did he straitwaie adde Thou Lord in the singular number For we must heape vpon God all the honours that we can Others had rather refer this saieng vnto Moses and Aaron who were sent to deliuer the people out of Aegypt but this cannot be for in the booke of Chronicles all these things are spoken of God himselfe by name 1. Chro. 17 verse 11. For so Dauid speaketh Thou camest to redeeme thy people Wherefore we shall much more rightlie and trulie vnderstand the thrée persons in one diuine nature The Trinitie namelie the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost which being thrée persons yet are they shut vp vnder one substance This opinion is true sound and catholike whether the Hebrues will or no. But those words which be added And might doo great things for you some would by Apostrophe or conuersion of speach refer them to the Iewes which me thinke is not probable For Dauid talked not of these things with the people but secretlie with God Wherefore I had rather thus to vnderstand them of God himselfe and to ascribe these maruellous things to one God in thrée persons But God came to deliuer his people when he sent Moses Aaron vnto them for when he appointed Moses to that message he added withall And I will be with thee God doubtlesse is in euerie place at all times Exod. 3 12. but then he is said to come How God is said to come Exo. 12 12. when he dooth some great or new thing And so he was said to be among the Iewes when he smote the Aegyptians and their first borne Againe when Pharao followed the Iewes going foorth of Aegypt and that they began to murmur thinking that they should euen then haue perished Moses on this wise recomforted them God shall fight for you and ye shall be still Exo. 14 14. yea the Aegyptians themselues also did perceiue the same For they said Let vs flie awaie Ibidem 25. for God himselfe dooth fight for them Yea and afterward when the people had worshipped the golden calfe and that God was angrie he would not go foorth with them

place he addeth that these grosser sort of pleasures which belong vnto the senses are not single but mixt for they haue alwaies some sorrowe ioined with them for as we haue said the néedines of nature bréedeth gréefs Neither are the pleasures of this kind brought foorth anie longer when the naturall want is satisfied for meate liketh not them that be satisfied and haue their fill neither is drinke welcome to them which haue droonke abundantlie But and if it happen to be otherwise Naturall necessitie being satisfied pleasure seaseth as otherwhile we sée it dooth to them which be droonkards gluttons there is another cause of the pleasure than naturall want namelie an ill disposition or else some other thing which is not now fit time to declare séeing we treat of naturall pleasures How the name of pleasure is vnderstood by Aristotle 4 Howbeit Aristotle put not these differences of words but those delectations which as well belong vnto the mind or reason as those which be of the senses he called pleasures that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yea and in the seuenth booke the eleuenth chapter he will that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is happie is so called of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to reioise and he speaketh of pleasure which he ioineth with blessednes Certeinlie he speaketh not of this pleasure wherewith the sense and grosser part of the mind is possessed for that is only ioined with the felicitie which shall be of the mind which as I haue said of a mingled word is named pleasure And perhaps Aristotle would not change the name bicause he thought to speake as most men did although he agréed with Plato as touching the difference of the thing Wherein Aristotle and Plato differ concerning pleasure But yet herein they differ one from another that Aristotle thinketh not as Plato and the old philosophers did that pleasure is a motion or action but rather an affect cleauing vnto the motion or operation Wherefore these differ after a sort although in the subiect they agrée And if at any time Aristotle himselfe or any Peripatetike called pleasure a motion that proposition which commonlie in the Schooles they call Identica must be ascribed vnto them for as it hath béene said both the affect and motion or action are in subiect all one Wherefore the generall word therof is the Predicament of qualitie The generall word of pleasure and pleasure belongeth to the third kind thereof and the same is called a passion or passible qualitie It is called in Gréeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereby we are swéetlie affected with the presence of some good thing agréeing with our nature And as beautie is a qualitie which riseth of a iust and right temperature of the bodie of wel-fauourednes and of a comlie colour so pleasure ariseth of a conuenient motion and action Wherfore thus it shall be lawfull to define the same Pleasure is an affect wherwith we are swéetlie mooued The definition of pleasure by reason of an action which procéedeth from a nature that is of good constitution or else from an habit according to nature without impediment For the actions both of eating and drinking and procreating séeing they arise of nature doo alwaies to him that is in health bring pleasure with them for they be not hindred by sicknes nor weakenes nor yet by saturitie and fulnes Euen so contemplations and the actions of vertues since they spring from an habit of the mind they be readie and easie and are a present good thing which agréeth with the nature of man therefore haue pleasure alwaies ioined with them Aristotle in the tenth booke of Ethiks prooueth That pleasure is no motion that pleasure is not a motion bicause it is all whole togither as is a vision and pleasure hath no succession except it be accidentallie For if it followe actions which haue successe the same in like maner is prolonged as it happeneth in eating and drinking but if the action be momentanie as is a vision hearing and vnderstanding then is all the pleasure had at once euen as the whole vision is at once if the vertue and power of seing be perfect if the thing that is séene be set before the eiesight all at once if the light going betwéene be not obscured and a conuenient distance come betwéene A motion is not perfect in his parts but pleasure is whole all at once therefore it is no motion Motion cannot be at one moment or instant but pleasure may The properties of motion be swiftnes and slownesse and these things are not answerable to pleasure For while a man reioiseth he neither reioiseth the swifter nor the slower for if pleasure endure for an houre it is all whole at once while the houre lasteth How long pleasure may continue 5 Since we vnderstand by the definition now brought that the power must be perfect and the habit firme and that the action must be without impediment and the obiect principall and excellent it is gathered how long pleasure can endure It so long abideth as the obiect and ablenes or power of dooing doth remaine whole for if the obiect fall from the excellencie thereof or that the facultie be not vehement and earnestlie bent delectation dooth not followe Hereof it commeth that when in working men be tired pleasurs are oftentimes diminished Which thing also happeneth when anie thing is taken awaie from the excellencie of the obiect Whie new things so greatlie delight It appéereth also why new things doo so greatlie delight bicause the mind so soone as anie noble and excellent thing offereth it selfe to be beheld dooth behold the same earnestlie and attentiuelie which after it is knowne the mind rebateth his earnestnes and so the pleasure ceasseth but if anie other new thing be put in place of the former obiect then the vnderstanding enforceth his studie againe in beholding of the same and the pleasure returneth and by this meanes we euer delight our selues in new things Besides this it is shewed héereby that the actions which are doone before we attaine to an habit bréed not pleasure bicause they be not easilie and readilie doone but with some difficultie and labour These things are opened by that definition That pleasure differeth in kind Now must we shew what pleasure is by hir forms and kinds Neither is it anie doubt but that pleasures are diuided among themselues in kind séeing actions doo differ But pleasure as we knowe is the perfection of an action and the thing which should be doone being changed the perfection also thereof is changed For these be of those sort of things which be compared one with another Neither is anie man ignorant that there is one prefection of a chest another of an house another of a plant and another of a man Wherefore since that actions be diuided one from another so shall the pleasures whereby they are performed differ Furthermore they striue one

motions of the mind vnto things forbidden wicked deliberations naughtie indeuours corrupt customs Wherefore the apostle vnder the name of sin comprehendeth both the root it selfe and also all the fruit of the same Neither must they be hearkened vnto which babble that these things be no sinnes for séeing the holie Ghost calleth them by this name I sée no cause why we also ought not so to speake and stand vnto his doctrine And moreouer the ●erie etymologie of the word it selfe dooth shew The etymologie of the word sinne that the first motions of the mind and corruption of nature be sinnes for this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Sinne commeth of this verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth To erre from the right scope appointed by what means soeuer the same commeth to passe The rule of our nature And séeing it is the rule of our nature and of all our actions that we should be verie conformable to God in all things surelie we being then prone vnto those things which be forbidden vs by the lawe of God and euen at the first push are carrie streight headlong vnto them without all controuersie we must be said to sinne that is to erre from the scope and from the end appointed vnto vs. The like signification there is of the Hebrue word for that which is in that toong called Chataa is deriued from the word Chata which thou shalt find in the booke of Iudges verse 16. the 20. chapter vsed in the selfe same sense wherein I declared the Gréeke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be taken that is To misse the marke For it is there written of the seuen hundred children of Beniamin that they were woont so to throwe stones out of a sling as they could hit euen a heare and would not misse one whit Besides this experience it selfe teacheth how gréeuous these euils are euen in vs which be regenerate for we be so hindered by them as we cannot fulfill the lawe the which neuerthelesse we are bound to obserue in euerie poinct Exod. 12 17 We are also commanded not to lust to the which precept euerie one giueth his secret consent and is witnes to himselfe how much he dooth withstand by reason of our pronesse vnto sinnes and first motions vnto vices In what sort the law is fulfilled in men regenerated But if the Fathers doo séeme to write sometime that the lawe may be fulfilled by men regenerated in Christ they spake of an obedience begun and of such a kind of fulfilling as hath much imperfection ioined therewith For they pronounce them to be perfect They be perfect which perceiue their owne imperfection Matt. 6 12. and to performe the lawe of God which can perceiue their owne imperfection that they maie dailie saie with others Lord forgiue vs our trespasses and acknowledge with Paule that they haue a great waie further to go Also the same Fathers doo confesse that there is found none no not the holiest The most godlie man hath not performed all vertues that hath most perfectlie loued all vertues For as Ierom saith He that excelleth other in one vertue dooth oftentimes faile in another And he citeth Cicero who said that There cannot easilie be found one which is most excellent either in the knowledge of the lawe or in the art of Rhethorike but to find one that excelled in both kinds together it was neuer heard of Wherfore that the apostle maie make famous and renowmed the entire benefit of God through Christ bestowed vpon vs he not onelie toucheth originall sinne but also comprehendeth vnder one name of sinne all kinds of vices which doo flowe from thence By Adam as by the common roote and masse sinne entered 46 Now we must sée by which one man it is that Paule saith sinne had such an entrance into the world The same vndoubtedlie was the first Adam who was as a certeine common lumpe or masse wherein was conteined all mankind which lumpe béeing corrupted we cannot be brought foorth into the world but corrupted and defiled The fault is ascribed to Adam not to Eue. And although Eue transgressed before the man yet is the originall of sinning ascribed vnto Adam because the succession is accompted in men and not in women Howbeit Ambrose by One man vnderstood it to be Eue. But séeing that word One in that place is the masculine gender the signification therof cannot but hardlie and with much wrestling be applied to the woman Others doo thinke that vnder the common name of man both of them as well Adam as Eue are vnderstood so that this spéech maie not differ much frō that which is in the first chapter of the booke of Genesis Male and female created he them Gen 2 27. Neither doo they much regard this adiectiue Gen. 2 24. One because the scriptures testifie that Adam and Eue were all one flesh The first interpretation is the more sincere and easie therefore I willinglie followe the same But we must remember what Paule writeth vnto Timothie 1. Tim. 2 14. that although both those two first parents sinned yet there was not one maner of transgression in them both Paule saith that Adam was not deceiued for he saith that Adam was not deceiued Which is gathered by that which they answered God when he reprooued them for the woman being asked wherefore shée did it shée accused the serpent Gen. 3 13. The Serpent saith shée deceiued me But Adam when he was demanded the same question said not that he was deceiued but he said The woman Gen. 3 12. whom thou hast giuen me deliuered me an aple and I did eate These things must not so be vnderstood as though we affirmed that no error did happen vnto man when he transgressed An error was in Adam that transgressed for as it is plainelie taught in the Ethiks In euerie kind of sinne there alwaies happeneth some error This onlie we be taught that man was not seduced by so grose a guile as the women was And this did verie much further Paules reason for in the same place he willed the woman to kéepe silence in the church bicause she was an instrument fit to deceiue And this he confirmed by the example of the first parents for she that persuaded man to sinne it is not likelie that she can rightlie instruct him and she that could be seduced by the diuell and deceiued by the serpent it is not méete for her to beare office in the church Eccle. 25 33 saith that sinne began at the woman Yet the booke of Ecclesiasticus saith that sinne had his first beginning from the woman whch is not to be denied if we consider the historie of the booke of Genesis But Paule as we haue alreadie said dooth kéepe the vsuall maner of the scriptures which ascribeth succession and procreation vnto men and not vnto women For his purpose was not to teach at that