Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n aaron_n call_v holy_a 28 3 4.9100 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A46811 Annotations upon the remaining historicall part of the Old Testament. The second part. to wit, the books of Joshua, Judges, the two books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles, and the books of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther : wherein first, all such passages in the text are explained as were thought likely to be questioned by any reader of ordinary capacity : secondly, in many clauses those things are discovered which are needfull and usefull to be known ... and thirdly, many places that mights at first seem to contradict one another are reconciled ... / by Arthur Jackson. Jackson, Arthur, 1593?-1666. 1646 (1646) Wing J65; ESTC R25554 997,926 828

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

or else they were not seen without that is the staves were drawn out so little that in the most holy place they might be discerned or happely at the very doore where they went out of the most holy place into the Temple but further out in the Temple they could not be discerned Vers 9. There was nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone For though the pot of Manna Exod. 16.34 and Aarons rod Numb 17.10 and the book of the Law Deut. 31.26 were laid up before the ark yet they were not put into the ark as were the two tables of stone and accordingly we must understand that place Heb. 9.3 4. And after the second vail the tabernacle which is called the holiest of all Which had the golden censer and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold wherein was the golden pot that had Manna and Aarons rod that budded and the tables of the covenant Vers 10. And it came to passe when the priests were come out of the holy place that the cloud filled the house of the Lord. When the priests had set the ark in his place and were come out immediately there were an hundred and twenty priests with trumpets and the Levite-singers standing at the east end of the altar with their Cymballs Psalteries and Harps appointed to sound forth the praises of God and whilest they were thus employed suddenly the house of the Lord was filled with a cloud so that the priests were not able to minister no not in the court where the brasen altar stood for thus it is expressed 2. Chron. 5.11 c. Vers 12. Then spake Solomon The Lord said that he would dwell in the thick darknesse Solomon standing where he saw how on a sudden the house was filled with a cloud to wit upon the brasen scaffold that was built for him in the outward court which was therefore it seems right before the door of the priests court through which he might look 2 Chron. 6.13 For Solomon had made a brasen scaffold of five cubits long and five cubits broad and three cubits high and had set it in the midst of the court and upon it he stood c. apprehending rightly that it was sent of God as a signe of his presence in that rapture of his joy he brake forth into these following words the Lord said that he would dwell in the thick darknesse c. that is the Lord hath said he would appear in a cloud Levit. 16.2 I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat and by a cloud he hath usually testified his presence amongst his people as in the leading of the Israelites by a cloud Exod 13.21 in the thick cloud that was upon mount Sinai at the giving of the law Exod. 19 16. in the cloud that covered and filled the tabernacle so soon as it was reared up by Moses Exod. 40.34 and therefore saith Solomon doubtlesse by this cloud the Lord doth shew us that he hath favourably accepted our service in building this house and that he hath taken it to be the settled place wherein he will abide for ever Vers 14. And the king turned his face about and blessed all the congregation of Israel For hitherto he had stood with his face toward the altar observing what was done at the carrying in of the ark Vers 16. Since the day that I brought forth my people Israel out of Egypt I chose no city out of all the tribes of Israel to build an house c. See this more fully expressed 2. Chron. 6.5 6. Vers 18. Thou didst well that it was in thine heart See the notes 2 Sam. 7.5 6. Vers 22. And Solomon stood before the altar of the Lord c. That is having turned himself from the people he stood upon the brasen scaffold with his face toward the altar and then kneeling down upon his knees as is expressed vers 54. and 2. Chron. 6.13 he lift up his hands towards heaven and so prayed unto the Lord. Vers 25. Therefore now Lord God of Israel keep with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him That is seeing thou hast kept with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him in raising me his son up to build a Temple for thee therefore now also keep with thy servant David my father that thou promisedst him saying There shall not fail thee a man in my sight to sit upon the throne of Israel c. Vers 27. Behold the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee See the note Deut. 10.14 Vers 30. And hearken thou to the supplication of thy servant and of thy people Israel when they shall pray towards this place Or in this place as it is in the margin even herein as in other things was this Temple a type of Christ As the prayers of Gods people were the more accepted of God when they prayed in the Temple or but with their faces towards the Temple so are now the prayers of Gods righteous servants accepted of God because they are put up in Christs name with an eye of faith fixt upon him as their Mediatour Joh. 14.13 14. Whatsoever ye ask in my name that I will do c. And when thou hearest forgive This clause is added first because pardon of sin is the chief thing to be begged of God in all our prayers for hereby a way is made for the obtaining of other blessings and besides there is no true comfort in obtaining any blessing if our sins should still remain unforgiven and secondly because the best are subject to so many failings in prayer that should not the Lord pardon the sin of their prayers there would be no hope that any prayer of theirs should do them good Vers 31. If any man trespasse against his neighbour and an oath be laid upon him c. That is if a man be charged that he hath trespassed against his neighbour and be brought before the altar to clear himself by oath as in case where sufficient proof and witnesse was wanting they used to do Exod. 22.8.11 Numb 5.12.19 do thou accordingly deal with the man that takes the oath punishing him if he be faulty and acquitting him if he be innocent Vers 33. When thy people Israel be smitten and shall turn again to thee and confesse thy name c. To wit thy Justice by laying all the blame upon themselves acknowledging that they have deservedly suffered and thy mercy and power by seeking to thee for pardon and succour Vers 34. And bring them again unto the land which thou gavest unto their fathers This may be meant either of those that were taken prisoners in battel to wit that upon the prayers of their brethren in the Temple or their own prayers towards the Temple the Lord would be pleased to bring them again into the land or else of those that by the enemy should be driven out of their dwelling places yet not out of the land of Canaan to
ever a whit the more question these divine Oracles Surely the Scripture is the Churches Magna Charta whereon all our priviledges and all our hopes depend as we are Christians and therefore I hope none that professe themselves fellow-citizens of the saints will suffer such a treasure as this to be taken from them No but the more violently Satan rageth against it the more we should prize it and the more diligently we should exercise our selves in the study of it Now Reader if herein this which I send forth abroad for the good of the Church shall afford thee any help blesse God for it and pray for him who is Thine in the Lord Jesus ARTHUR JACKSON Faults escaped Page 19 line 14 for now they reade and so now they p. 56. l 7 devided r. decided p. 8. l. 13. into parts r. into two parts p 135. l. 11. Ephraim quarrelled r. Ephraims quarrell p. 149. l. 10. retained r. reclaimed p. 181. l. 26 Michael r. Michal and l. 27 Michaels r. Michals p. 291. l. 4 understanding r. undertaking p. 301. l 45. pillars r. pillows p. 337. l. 4. and lived r. that is he lived p. 429. l. 29. it is Isaiah r. is that Isaiah p. 468. l. 17. after set out adde for the most holy place p. 507. l. 3● after what God adde required p 513. l. 30. between r. from p 514 l. 3 indeed after r. indeed because after p. 656. l. 7. were carried r. were not carried l 40 off him r. off to him p. 669 l. 4. foure r. foure and twenty l. 31. we r. a●e p. 684. l. ult 2. 6. r. 2. Sam 6 p 712. l. 1. observed r. offered p. 736. l. 17. was absolute r. was not absolute and for also r. all p. 741. l. 24. at least r. at last p. 757. l. 20. the readily r the more readily p 760. l 37. Hanani r. Nehemiah p 773. l. 3 quality r. quantity l 4. durst do r. durst not do p. 805 l. 43 dele him ANNOTATIONS Upon the book of JOSHUA CHAP. I. NOw after the death of Moses the servant of the Lord it came to passe that the Lord spake unto Joshua c. Here begins the history of Israels commonwealth under the government of Joshua and therefore is this book called the book of Joshua Some adde also that it was so called because it was written by Joshua which may be judged the more probable first because the example of Moses herein who wrote the State of Israels common-wealth in his time might be a strong inducement to Joshua to do the like and secondly because that place chap 24.26 And Joshua wrote these words in the book of the Law of God c. is an evident proof that he wrote some part of this book if not that he wrote it all It is true there are some passages in this book which could not be written by Joshua as 1. That mention which is made of the book of Jasher Chap. 10.13 And the Sunne stood still and the Moon stayed untill the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies Is not this written in the book of Jasher for this book of Jasher was written after Davids time as is evident 2. Sam. 1.18 where it is said that David bid them teach the children of Judah the use of the bow behold it was written in the book of Jasher 2. That story of the expedition of the Danites when they took Laish mentioned in this book of Joshua chap. 19.47 which was long after that Judges 18.1 c. and 3. The relation of Joshua his death and buriall chap. 24.29 30. These things and some others that might be picked out could not indeed be written by Joshua but though the book it self were written by Joshua yet these passages might be inserted afterwards by some other Penman of the holy Ghost for so also in the foregoing books which all men yield were written by Moses we find some passages too that could not be written by Moses himself but were afterwards added by some other as is noted upon that relation of the death buriall of Moses Deut. 34.5 c. However sufficient it is for us to know that whoever wrote this book he wrote it by the inspiration of the holy Ghost for hereto there is a testimonie given in the new Testament where some passages thereof are cited as parts of the sacred Scripture the word of God as that which in this chapter is spoken to Joshua and cited by S. Paul Heb. 13.5 I will never leave thee nor forsake thee As for this first passage wherewith this book begins it shews how Joshua received a command from God to lead the Israelites over Jordan into the land of Canaan the Lord had before appointed that Joshua should succeed Moses in the government of Israel Numb 27.18 and upon the laying of Moses hands upon him he had received an extraordinary measure of the gifts of Gods spirit to inable him for the government Deut. 34.9 And therefore doubtlesse immediately after the death of Moses Joshua took upon him the supreme Magistracy But here now we are told how either at that time so soon as Moses was dead or rather after the thirty dayes that were spent in lamenting the death of Moses Deut. 34.8 the Lord spake unto Joshua the sonne of Nun Moses minister and gave him that charge which is here after related Whether God spake this to Joshua by an audible voice by the secret instinct of his spirit in some dream or vision or by the high-priests inquiring for him by the Vrim and Thummim we cannot conclude because we find it not expressed onely we find that God had formerly promised that Eleazar the priest should ask counsel for him after the judgement of Vrim before the Lord Num. 27.21 But for this title given here to Joshua that he was Moses minister the Lord spake unto Joshua Moses minister we may well think that was purposely added to imply one reason amongst others why Joshua was most fit to succeed Moses in the government to wit because having been so many years together his minister by his continuall daily conversation with Moses he could not but learn much thereby to prepare and fit him the better for this service Vers 2. Moses my servant is dead now therefore arise c. Here the Lord exhorts Joshua that since Moses was dead he should now lead the Israelites over Jordan and carry them into the land which according to his former promises made to their fathers he was now ready to conferre upon them Now in mentioning the death of Moses he useth this expression Moses my servant is dead first and principally to imply what it was he required of him to wit that as their captain and supreme governour he should now conduct them into the land of Canaan for Moses is here called Gods servant in regard of the supreme magistracy whereto God had advanced him and so the drift of the words is that since Moses
How to compute the time from the birth of Boaz to the birth of David is a matter of great difficulty for from the going of the Israelites out of Egypt to the building of the temple it was 480. years and therefore from the Israelites entring the land of Canaan to that time it was 440 years out of which deducting 24 years for the age of Solomon when he began to build the temple 50. years for the age of David when Solomon was born which is most probable it will then be found that it was 366. years from the Israelites entring into Canaan to the birth of David and it was not sure long after the Israelites took Jericho ere Salmon married Rahab by whom he had Boaz. But yet granting that both Boaz begat Obed when he was a very old man and so Obed Jesse and Jesse David it might well be that in 366. years there might be no more then these generations ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of SAMUEL Otherwise called The first book of KINGS CHAP. I. NOw there was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim c. The two books of Samuel are so called because they contain the storie of the life and death of Samuel and of the Common-wealth of Israel under his government and likewise the storie of Saul and David who were both anointed kings by Samuel and so shew how the prophecies of Samuel concerning them both were exactly fulfilled Yet by the Greek and Latine Interpreters they are usually called the two first books of the Kings because therein is related how the government of Israel came first to be changed from that of Judges to that of Kings and because they contain the storie of Saul and David the two first Kings of Israel By whom these books were written is no where expressed but that they were written by the inspiration of the holy Ghost whosoever the penmen were is evident by the testimonie of the Jews to whom were committed the Oracles of God and who did alwayes acknowledge them to be a part of the sacred canon of the Scripture and it is likewise confirmed in the new Testament where some passages of these books are cited as a part of the Scripture as we may see Matt. 12.3 4. where that passage concerning Davids eating the shew-bread 1. Sam. 21.6 is cited by our Saviour Have ye not read what David when he was an hungred did and they that were with him how he entred into the house of God and did eat the shewbread c. and again in those two testimonies cited by S. Paul the one Rom. 15.9 As it is written For this cause I will confesse to thee amongst the Gentiles and sing unto thy name which is taken out of the 2. Sam. 22.50 and the other Heb. 1.5 I will be to him a father and he shall be to me a sonne which is alledged from 2. Sam. 7.14 As for these first words Now there was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim c. wherein we are told what Elkanah the father of Samuel was we must know first that whereas elsewhere the town where Elkanah dwelt is called Ramah as in the 19. verse of this chapter And they rose up in the morning early and came to their house to Ramah and so again chap. 2.11 here it is called Ramathaim-zophim Ramathaim in the duall number because it consisted of two towns that were called Ramah two Ramahs joyned in one and Zophim either because it was situate in the countrey or region of Zuph whereof we reade chap. 9.5 And when they were come to the land of Zuph Saul said to his servant that was with him Come and let us return c. or else because of the high situation of the place standing upon some notable high hill in regard whereof it may well be that there were some watch-towers there for that the name seems to import because Zophim signifieth watch houses or towers or else as some think because there was there an Universitie or school of Prophets who are usually in the Scripture called watchmen as Ezek. 3.17 Sonne of man I have made thee a watchman to the house of Israel secondly that whereas in setting down the genealogie of Elkanah it is said that he was the sonne of Jeroham the sonne of Elihu the sonne of Tohu the sonne of Zuph it seems in the 1. Chron. 6.26 27. that three of these were also called by other names for Elihu is there called Eliab and vers 34. Eliel and Tohu Nahath and vers 34. Toah and Zuph Zophai and thirdly whereas it is said that Elkanah was an Ephrathite thereby is meant that he dwelt in mount Ephraim Elimelech and his two sonnes are called Ephrathites Ruth 1.2 because they were of Bethlehem Ephratah and Jeroboam is called an Ephrathite because he was of the tribe of Ephraim 1. Kings 11.26 but Elkanah is here called an Ephrathite onely because he dwelt in mount Ephraim for that he was a Levite of the familie of the Kohathites to whom indeed certain cities were allotted in the tribe of Ephraim Josh 21.20 and of the posteritie of Korah that wretch that was in so fearfull a manner destroyed in the wildernesse for his rebellion against Moses is evident 1. Chron. 6.22 23 c. so that it is no wonder though the sonnes of Korah were spared whilest the father was destroyed since the Lord had determined from this cursed stock to raise up to the Israelites such a glorious Prophet as Samuel was Vers 2. And Peninnah had children but Hannah had no children Hannah is reckoned in the foregoing words in the first place and it is probable therefore which some conceive that Hannah was his first wife and that afterwards he took Peninnah to wife because Hannah was barren For in those times they counted it an extraordinary crosse to die without issue yea because the temporall promise made to that nation depended much upon their carnall generation though the Lord allowed not their polygamie yet he was pleased to tolerate this infirmitie in his servants till the Messiah came when the Church should no longer be tied to one nation but spirituall children should be begotten unto God from all nations and it may be they did conceive that Gods promise to Abraham of multiplying his seed as the starres of heaven did implie a dispensation granted to them for having many wives Vers 3. And this man went up out of his citie yearly to worship and to sacrifice to the Lord of hosts in Shiloh At Shiloh the Tabernacle had stood ever since the seventh yeare of Joshua Josh 18.1 thither went Elkanah yearly that is at those three solemne feasts wherein all the males were bound to appear before the Lord Deut. 16.16 He might go at other times as a Levite to do service in his course at the Tabernacle but here doubtlesse his going up yearly at those great feasts is onely intended when his familie went with him yea the women also such was their devotion though
would abuse the souls of the dead at his pleasure to deceive the living secondly it is no way likely that the Lord who had so lately refused to answer Saul by the Prophets would now raise up Samuel from the dead to answer him we see what was said in a like case to the rich man in hell Luke 16.31 If they heare not Moses and the Prophets neither will they be perswaded though one rose from the dead thirdly even the mantle wherein he appeared vers 14. was an evident signe that all was counterfeit for did Samuel think we carry his mantle with him into heaven or into the grave fourthly had the Prophet Samuel been sent of God which is the onely evasion the Papists have to maintain this errour the witch they say did not conjure him up but God sent him to appear to Saul he would never have said as this counterfeit Samuel did ver 15. that the witch by Sauls means had raised him up Why saith he hast thou disquieted me to bring me up It was therefore doubtlesse by the witches inchantments that this Samuel was raised and consequently it was not Samuel indeed but the devil in Samuels likenesse and therefore called Samuel here when the woman saw Samuel c. and that it was that made her cry out so violently as soon as she saw him when the devil was raised it seems according to the accustomed manner the witch was presently possessed vvith a spirit of divination and hereby knevv Saul for vvhom she had done this and hereupon cried out as apprehending he vvas come to ensnare her that having discovered her he might put her to death Why saith she hast thou deceived me For thou art Saul all vvhich shevvs plainly that the Authour of that Apocryphall book of Eccclesiasticus vvrote not by the inspiration of the holy Ghost vvho saith of Samuel as in relation to this history chap. 46.20 After his death he prophecied and shew the king his end c Vers 13. And the king said unto her be not afraid for what sawest thou Hereby it appears that Saul saw not the apparition at the first though afterward he was admitted to the sight of it and that happely because the woman was at first apart by her self as witches indeed use not to be seen when they work their feats And the woman said unto Saul I saw gods ascending out of the earth This she spake either because he appeared in such an attire c. that she might easily perceive it was some Magistrate or personage of great eminencie and worth and such are called Gods Psalme 82.6 I have said ye are Gods or else because this evil spirit now a counterfeit Samuel did rise up with such a divine kind of splendour and brightnesse as we know he can change himself into an Angel of light 2. Cor. 11.14 That the poore woman unacquainted with such apparitions was even astonished with beholding it Vers 14. And Saul perceived it was Samuel and he stooped c. Saul at length is admitted to the sight of this counterfeit Samuel though it seems he were not by when the witch first conjured him up vers 12.13 and so Saul addressing himself to enquire of this infernall prophet the witch it seems withdrew her self as appears vers 21 where it is afterwards said The woman came unto Saul and saw that he was sore troubled Vers 17. And the Lord hath done to him as he spake by me That is to David the man to whom the Lord hath betaken his favourable presence since he departed from thee Vers 18. Because thou obeyedst not the voice of the Lord nor executedst his fierce wrath on Amalek c. When Saul was in consultation about sparing Agag the Amalekite the devil no doubt then suggested whatever might encourage and embolden him thereto but now when he come to be affrighted with the apprehension of Gods wrath even that fact of his he alledged against him thereby to adde to his terrours and to drive him to despair and that under a colour of speaking as a Samuel Vers 19. And to morrow shalt thou and thy sonnes be with me That is ye shall be slain and so not be any longer amongst the living but with me amongst the dead But how came the devil to be of Gods counsell that he can so certainly determine the period of their lives I answer first that the devil can and doth many times by strong conjectures foretell many future things which accordingly come to passe Secondly that he doth not here define the time of their death certainly but speaks darkly and deceitfully for to morrow doth not onely signifie the day immediately following but also the time to come indefinitely Exod. 13.14 And it shall be when thy sonne asketh thee in time to come or to morrow what is this thou shalt say unto him c. and Matth. 6.34 Take therefore no thought for the morrow c. as indeed it seems it was not the very next day that Saul and his sonnes fell before the Philistines and so we see in another particular he speaks ambiguously Thou and thy sonnes shall be with me which might either be meant of their dying onely as spoken with respect to Samuel or of being with Sathan and then that as concerning Jonathan we are sure he lyed grossely but thus will the devil still preach comfort to those at last that will not away with the preaching of Gods prophets when they sharply reprove them for their sinnes Vers 21. And the woman came unto Saul and saw that he was sore troubled c. Hereby it appears that the witch had withdrawn her self whilst Saul and her familiar spirit then Samuels counterfeit had been talking together CHAP. XXIX Vers 1. NOw the Philistines gathered together all their armies to Aphek A town in the tribe of Asher Josh 19 24 30. Vers 2. But David and his men passed on in the rereward with Achish Though Achish was king of Gath onely which was but one of the five principalities of the Philistines yet it seems he was the chief among all the princes and had therefore the honour of leading up the rereward and that therein too he had given the honour to David and his men of being as it were his own life guard and therefore it is said that they marched on with Achish in the rereward Vers 3. Then said the princes of the Philistines what do these Hebrews here This is not meant of those Lords that were subjects to Achish the king of Gath as is indeed evident by the roughnesse of their language vers 4. And the princes of the Philistines were wroth with him and the princes of the Philistines said unto him make this fellow return c. but of the princes of the other places of Palestina for these all joyned their forces with Achish in this invasion of the land of of Israel the common sort had indeed as much cause to suspect Davids perfidiousnesse and to provide for
inspiration of the holy Ghost is clear not onely by the testimony of the Church of the Jews who did alwayes acknowledge them as a part of the sacred Canon of the Old Testament but also by the testimony of the Apostle Paul who in his Epistle to the Romanes cites a passage from hence to wit that in the 1. Kings 19.14 as a part of the holy Scripture as we may see Rom. 11.2 3 c. Wot ye not saith he what the Scripture saith of Elias how he maketh intercession to God against Israel saying Lord they have killed thy Prophets c. But now who were the holy Ghosts pen-men in writing these books we cannot determine onely that which some hold seems the most probable namely that they were written piece-meals by severall Prophets successively in their severall ages and then afterward collected compacted into one continued history by some holy man of God who was guided therein by the spirit of God and that First because it is manifest that many passages in these books were formerly recorded by Nathan Ahijah and Iddo 2. Chron. 9.29 Secondly because it is also evident that the greatest part of the 18 19 and 20. chapters of the second book of the Kings was taken out of the prophecy of Isaiah as we may see Isa 36.1 c. And thirdly because the story of Zedekiah which we have in the latter end of the second book of the kings seems to have been taken almost word for word out of the latter end of the prophecie of Jeremiah As for the dependance of this history upon that which went before in the end of the second book of Samuel though the last thing there recorded be the staying of the pestilence sent for Davids sinne in numbring the people by his rearing of an altar in the threshing floore of Araunah and offering sacrifices thereon as God had commanded yet we must know that Adonijahs insurrection which is the next thing here recorded did not follow immediately upon that but many other things intervened between which are recorded in the eight last chapters of the first book of Chronicles for after the Lord had at that time it seems revealed to him that the Temple should be built by his sonne Solomon in that very place where now he had reared an altar in the threshing floore of Araunah 1. He made great preparations of all materialls requisite for that work and set workmen at work about them to make them ready for the building 2. He set in order the courses of the Priests and Levites for their attendance upon their severall services in the Temple 3. He made known in a publick assembly of the Princes and Rulers of the people what the Lords pleasure was for Solomons succeeding him in the throne and encouraged Solomon to build the Temple and perswaded the Princes and people to assist him therein giving Solomon withall a pattern in writing how all things were to be made according as God had revealed it to him And 4. in another assembly he perswaded the people to contribute willingly to the building of the Temple which accordingly they did It is evident I say that all these things recorded in the eight last chapters of the first of Chronicles were done whilest David was able to go abroad for it is said 1. Chron. 28.2 that he stood up upon his feet in the assembly of the Princes and Rulers and spake unto them and therefore they were done before this usurpation of Adonijah when David lay bedrid and not able to stirre as it is said here and that to shew that hereupon Adonijah took the advantage of making himself king King David was old and stricken in years yea so weak he was that lying bedrid they covered him with clothes but he gat no heat and so thereupon vers 5 Adonijah the sonne of Haggith exalted himself saying I will be king It is much indeed that David should be so farre spent with age before his death for though this were a little before his death he lived in all but threescore and ten years 2. Sam. 5.4 David was thirty years old when he began to reigne and he reigned fourty years and we see in these dayes that many at these years are farre from this weaknesse but yet considering his many labours warres troubles sicknesses and sorrows which do usually much empair the strength of man A broken spirit saith Solomon drieth the bones Prov. 17.22 it is no wonder though David in his old age sunk apace and was sooner decrepite and bed-rid then other men Vers 2. Wherefore his servants said unto him Let there be sought for my Lord the king a young virgin c. David had at this time many wives concubines but these were all it seems well in years and therefore his servants the Physitians advised that some well-complexioned young virgin should be sought out for him to stand before him to cherish him and to lie in his bosome as judging the heat of youth fittest to cause heat in his cold body especially where it had not been empaired by breeding and bearing of children which made them advise that she should not onely be young but a virgin too Now though there be no mention here made of Davids taking such an one to be his wife or concubine but onely of his taking her to lie in his bosome in a medicinall way yet that this was supposed and intended severall reasons may induce us to think 1. Because it is no way probable that David would have yielded to such a way of curing the coldnesse of his body had she not been taken under the name of a wife or concubine which was generally esteemed lawfull in those dayes the other way would have been so ridiculous and scandalous that it cannot be thought that David would ever have given his consent to it 2. Because it is noted ver 4. as an evidence of the great decay of his body that though she lay in his bosome yet he knew her not which doth clearly enough imply that she was taken in such a conjugall way that he might lawfully have known her had he not been disabled by that extreme weaknesse which lay now upon him and thirdly because had not Abishag been taken as Davids wife or concubine Solomon would never have suspected as he did chap. 2.22 that Adonijah in seeking to take Abishag to wife after his fathers death had a plot thereby to get away the kingdome from him to have married the wife of the deceased king might have advanced his purpose some way amongst the people but had Abishag been taken onely to attend on the king in his weaknesse or to lie in his bosome onely in a physicall way there would have been no colour to think that when he should again lay claim to the crown his marriage with such an one would have added the least strength to his title and therefore it was surely the meaning of Davids Physicians that a young wife or
thing of that which his father had gotten till himself fell from God chap. 5.4 therefore it is thought that this Rezon did elsewhere shelter himself or lived by secret robbing and pillaging till Solomons declining dayes and that then he brought Damascus to an open revolt and became king thereof and was an enemy to Solomon on the north as Hadad the Edomite was on the south Vers 26. And Jeroboam the sonne of Nebat an Ephrathite c. An Ephrathite that is of the tribe of Ephraim and so in this tribe all the kings of Israel that raigned over the ten tribes had their chief residence and herein was that prophesie fulfilled that Ephraim should be greater then Manasseh Gen. 48.19 now of this man it is said that he lift up his hand against the king to wit by revolting from him and becoming the head of the ten tribes in rending the kingdome from his sonne for though perhaps after he had heard the prophesie of Ahijah he might entertain thoughts of disloyaltie against his Soveraigne and perhaps secretly sow some seeds of sedition among the people for which he was glad to fly into Egypt vers 40. yet we read of nothing he openly attempted against Solomon or against his house till Solomon was dead Vers 28. He made him ruler over all the charge of the house of Joseph That is he made him receiver or treasurer for all the kings revenues in the two tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh Vers 29. When Jeroboam went out of Jerusalem c. To wit to enter upon the office and charge which Solomon had honoured him with the prophet Ahijah found him in the way who is called the Shilonite because he was of Shilo where the Tabernacle was many years together he was one of them that wrote the Acts of Solomon 2 Chron. 9.29 and they two were alone in the field If therefore Jeroboam went attended out of Jerusalem according to the honour of the charge whereto Solomon had now advanced him it seems the Prophet desired to have some private conference with him and then when they were alone delivered his message to him Vers 30. And Ahijah caught the new garment that was on him That is the new garment wherewith the Prophet who now represented Gods person the absolute disposer of the kingdome newly erected in the house of David had clad himself Vers 31. Behold I will rend the kingdome out of the hand of Solomon and will give ten tribes to thee That is all besides Judah and Benjamin some conceive that Simeon was the onely tribe which joyned with that of Judah as having their lot within the lot of Judah Josh 19.2 but this cannot be because those of the tribe of Simeon that joyned themselves with Asa are expressely said to be such as revolted from the kingdome of Israel 2 Chron. 15.9 Neither need it seem strange that the tribe of Simeon having their portion within that of Judah should notwithstanding belong to the kingdome of Israel for it seems that the Simeonites in Davids time went forth with Colonies and planted themselves in other places as is manifest 1 Chron. 4.31 39. However by foretelling Jeroboam what should happen the Lord took order that he should know that whatever should occasion that revolt of the ten tribes from the house of David yet it was by the providence of God who had now conferred the kingdome upon him See the note also vers 13. Vers 33. Because that they have forsaken me and have worshiped Ashtoreth c. This is the reason given for that he had said before vers 31. I will rend the kingdome out of the hand of Solomon c. But why should Rehoboam suffer in the losse of ten tribes for the peoples idolatry I answer first because Solomons giving way to his wives idolatry proved a snare to the people and occasioned their revolting from God and secondly even the people suffered as well as Rehoboam hereby this rent in the kingdome proving the occasion of continuall warre between them of Judah and them of Israel which brought in many miseries from forraigne nations upon both kingdomes Vers 36. And unto his sonne will I give one tribe that David my servant may have a light alway before me c. That is unto one of his posteritie sitting in the throne of David See the note 2 Sam. 21.17 Vers 39. And I will for this afflict the seed of David but not for ever For at length Christ arose out of the tribe of Judah to whom God gave the throne of his father David to reign over the whole house of David for ever Luk. 1.32 33. Vers 40. Solomon sought therefore to kill Jeroboam and Jeroboam arose and fled into Egypt c. Hereby it appears that Jeroboam had some way discovered that which the Prophet had so secretly imparted to him and perhaps began to alienate the hearts of the people from the king and so to escape Solomons fury he fled to Shishak king of Egypt and sheltered himself there till Solomon was dead and yet was this Shishak Solomons brother in law if he were as generally it is thought he was the sonne of that Pharoah king of Egypt whose daughter Solomon had married Vers 41. All that he did and his wisedome are they not written in the book of the acts of Solomon The acts of Solomon were written by Nathan Ahijah and Iddo prophets that lived in Solomons time 2 Chron. 9.29 but this book here mentioned seems to have been some complete historie not now extant of the reigne of Solomon gathered out of the severall writings of these prophets and other records of those times wherein many particulars of his life were recorded not expressed in the sacred storie and amongst other things doubtlesse that of his repentance for though it be not here expressed yet that he did repent before his death may be evidently gathered from other places of Scripture as 2 Chron. 11.17 So they strengthened the kingdome of Judah and made Rehoboam the sonne of Solomon strong three yeares for three yeares they walked in the way of David and of his sonne Solomon where Solomon and David are joyntly commended and from that promise made concerning Solomon Psal 89.33 Neverthelesse I will not utterly take away my loving kindnesse from him nor suffer my faithfulnesse to fail but especially from the book of Ecclesiastes which questionlesse was written as the publick monument of his repentance and that which we reade 2. Pet. 1.20 21. where all the penmen of Scripture are said to have been holy men of God CHAP. XII Vers 1. ANd Rehoboam went to Shechem for all Israel were come to Shechem to make him king Though Solomon had seven hundred wives and three hundred concubines chap. 11.3 yet we reade but of three children that he had two daughters Taphath and Basmath that were married to two of his own Princes chap. 4.11.15 and this his sonne Rehoboam who was born to him of Naamah an Ammonitesse chap. 14.21 a
third chapters of this book Vers 44. And at that time were some appointed over the chambers for the treatreasures for the offerings for the first fruits c. Which the people had newly covenanted to bring in yearely according to the law for the priests and Levites Vers 47. And the Levites sanctified them unto the children of Aaron That is the tithe of their tithes the Levites set apart for the priests CHAP. XIII Vers 1. ON that day they read in the book of Moses c. This I conceive hath not reference to that which is immediately before related concerning the dedication of the walls of Jerusalem for the walls were begun to be built within a while after Nehemiahs first coming to Jerusalem and were finished within two moneths or lesse chap. 6.15 nor is it likely that it was long after ere the walls were dedicated but rather to the day whereon they sealed the covenant whereof he had spoken before in the ninth and tenth chapters when upon reading of the law amongst other evils this also concerning their marriages with heathens and the joyning of their children to the congregation of the Lord was discovered and reformed by separating all the mixed multitude from the children of Israel as is noted before chap. 9.2 and here repeated again vers 3. and this as it seems by that which follows vers 4 5 6. was about the two and thirtieth yeare of Artaxerxes some twelve years after Nehemiahs first coming to Jerusalem when having been with Artaxerxes in Persia he returned again to Jerusalem and reformed such abuses as in the time of his absence were crept in amongst them see the note chap. 2.1 and chap. 5.14 And therein was written that the Ammonite and Moabite should not come into the congregation c. No nor their children unto the tenth generation Deut. 23.1.3 concerning which see the notes there And though there were many passages in Moses law that were against the polluting of the seed of Israel by mariages with the nations about them yet this is here alledged concerning the Ammonites and Moabites rather then any other because it did so expressely discover the great sinne of Eliashib mentioned afterwards vers 4.5 in joyning himself in affinity with Tobiah who is often called the servant the Ammonite yea and honouring him so farre as to allot him a chamber in the very Temple Vers 3. They separated from Israel all the mixed multitude This is added to aggravate the sinne of Eliashib the high priest related in the following verses who was so farre from a sincere desire to reform this abuse discovered by the law that notwithstanding the people did unanimously separate all the mixed multitude from the children of Israel yet he immediately after Nehemiah was gone into Persia which was vers 6. in the thirty second yeare of Artaxerxes reigne received Tobiah amongst them yea and gave him a lodging in the very Temple howeuer he had happely dissembled these his purposes so long as Nehemiah abode in Jerusalem Vers 4. And before this Eliashib the priest having the oversight of the chamber of the house of our God was allied unto Tobiah That is before this reading of the law and the reformation thereupon following mentioned in the former verses Vers 5. And he had prepared for him a great chamber where afore time they laid the meat-offerings c To wit not when he was first allyed to Tobiah but long after when Nehemiah was gone into Persia vers 6. However he carried the matter when Nehemiah being then present upon the reading of the law the people separated from Israel all the mixed multitude vers 3. yet so soon as Nehemiah was gone into Persia in the thirty second yeare of Artaxerxes reigne Eliashib discovered himself preparing that is making ready and furnishing for his friend and ally Tobiah the Ammonite a great chamber even in the chambers of the Temple which was done it seems by laying many chambers into one the partitions being taken down as may be gathered from vers 9. where it is said that Nehemiah having cast out Tobiahs houshold-stuffe caused the chambers to be cleansed Vers 6. For in the two and thirtieth yeare of Artaxerxes king of Babylon came I unto the king c. Twelve years after his first coming to Jerusalem which was in the twentieth yeare of Artaxerxes chap. 2.1 Vers 9. Then I commanded and they cleansed the chambers To wit by casting out the houshold-stuffe of Tobiah and happely by sprinkling them with the water of purifying because they had been polluted and profaned by the lodging of strangers therein that were not of the seed of Israel Vers 10. And I perceived that the portion of the Levites had not been given them The people had not long since by covenant with God bound themselves to the contrary chap. 10.35 c. but it seems out of indignation against Eliashib for lodging Tobiah in the treasuries of the Temple and because they feared thereupon that what they brought thither was diverted some other way and not imployed as it ought to be they wholly forbare to bring in the Levites portions as they had formerly done Vers 11. Then contended I with the rulers and said Why is the house of God forsaken They had said before when they made that solemn covenant with God We will not forsake the house of our God chap. 10.39 and now therefore Nehemiah upbraids them as it were with their own words and condemnes them out of their own mouthes Why is the house of God forsaken Vers 14. Remember me O my God concerning this and wipe not out my good deeds c. He brags not but prayes not claiming any thing of merit as due in justice but producing the good which through the grace of God he had done he beggs of God to remember him in goodnesse and mercy to accept of these his endeavours to serve him according to the sincerity of his heart and not to reject them because of his many failings as is more fully expressed vers 22. Remember me O my God concerning this also and spare me according to the greatnesse of thy mercy yea herein also he intimates that he knew well enough that perhaps from men he should have no thanks but he sought not the praise of men if it proved so he beseeched the Lord however to remember him and then he had his desire Vers 15. In those dayes saw I in Judah some treading winepresses on the sabbath c. Which was also contrary to their former promise when they solemnly renewed their covenant with God chap. 10.31 Vers 16. There dwelt men of Tyre also therein which brought fish and all manner of ware and sold on the sabbath c. Keeping their very markets upon the sabbath dayes and this they did too which is added in the last words as a great aggravation of their sinnes in Jerusalem that is even in the city Jerusalem which God had chosen to himself for his habitation Vers
reared and sacrifices offered thereon which was doubtlesse to teach them that there was no way to obtain the pardon of their sinne and the removall of their present judgement but by faith in that propitiatory sacrifice which their promised Messiah was to offer up for them but why was this altar appointed to be reared in the threshing floore of Araunah the Jebusite I answer first to intimate the end of this sacrifice to wit that it was to stay the plague that it might go no further there it was that the Angel appeared in a visible shape with a drawn sword 1. Chron. 21.15 The Angel of the Lord stood by the threshing floore of Ornan the Jebusite thither therefore David was sent to rear up an altar and to offer sacrifices secondly because of Davids fear the Lord having a gracious respect herein to the sad condition of his poor servant which we find expressed 1. Chron. 21.29.30 The tabernacle of the Lord which Moses made in the wildernesse and the altar of tht burnt offerings were at that season in the high places at Gibeon But David could not go before it to enquire of God for he was afraid because of the sword of the Angel of the Lord that is he durst not give over interceding there to go unto Gibeon for fear of the slaughter that might be made in the interim by the sword of the Angel amongst the inhabitants of Jerusalem or else he was so weakened with the terrour of seeing the Angel with a drawn sword that he was not able to go thither and when he could not go to Gibeon what place was then sitter to reare an altar in then that where the Angel appeared with a drawn sword thirdly to signifie the calling of the Gentiles for Araunah being of the stock of the Jebusites though doubtlesse at present a proselite that is one that was converted to the faith of Israel the Lords appointing David to rear an altar in his threshing●floore did notably shadow forth that the day should come when God would dwell amongst the Gentiles and be worshipped by them and fourthly because God had determined in this very place to have the Temple built as is evident 2. Chron. 3.1 Then Solomon began to build the house of the Lord in Jerusalem in mount Moriah where the Lord appeared unto David his father in the place that David had prepared in the threshing floore of Ornan the Jebusite and so the Lord would have this place consecrated as it were and endeared to the people by the sacrifice that procured so great a blessing for them as was the staying of this raging pestilence Vers 22. Behold here be oxen for burnt sacrifices and threshing instruments and other instruments of the oxen for wood In 1. Chron. 21.23 there is added that he offered him also his wheat for a meat-offering Lo I will give thee the oxen also for burnt-offerings and the threshing instruments for wood and the wheat for the meat-offering I give it all partly because of the terrour he was stricken into by seeing the Angel with the drawn sword for as it is noted before from 1. Chron. 21.20 both he and his sonnes had seen the Angel and hid themselves and partly because he was told that the altar and sacrifices intended were for the removing of that heavy judgement that lay now upon the people in stead of selling he proffered to give unto David not the threshing floore onely but the oxen also the threshing instruments wheat and all not caring how much he gave for so good a use Vers 23. All these things did Araunah as a king give unto the king The most Expositours do hereupon inferre that this Araunah had been king of the Jebusites and embracing the faith of Israel was content to live as a private man and to let David reigne as king in Jerusalem and indeed in the Hebrew it is All these things did Araunah a king give unto the king but this ground methinks is not sufficient to warrant this conceit rather I conceive this expression is used by way of extolling the bounty of Araunah that he did herein as it were match David the king in bounty carried himself more like a king then a private subject in this his princely bounty Vers 24. And the king said unto Araunah Nay but I will surely buy it of thee at a price c. Some conceive that David would needs give the full price for these things because he would not take away that which was anothers to give unto God as knowing well that sometimes a kings request is in effect a command that subjects do often give what they would not part with but that they dare not but give it but because David might well see that Araunah offered these thing freely it is better said by others that this was from the ingenuity of David because he was not willing to serve God cost-free So David bought the threshing-floore and the oxen for fifty shekels of silver 1. Chron. 11.25 It is said that David gave to Ornan for the place six hundred shekels of gold by weight which seeming difference is thus reconciled to wit that he bought the thresning-floore and the oxen as here for fifty shekels of silver but for the whole place and the ground with the houses where afterward the Temple was built he gave six hundred shekels of gold Vers 25. So the Lord was intreated for the land and the plague was stayed from Israel And this the Lord testified by sending fire from heaven to consume the sacrifices as is expressed 1. Chron. 21.26 and he answered him from heaven by fire upon the altar which must be meant onely of burning the burnt offerings for the sacrifices of peace offerings were not burnt upon the altar but were to be eaten as a holy feast so that it seems the burnt-offerings were first offered on the altar which were miraculously consumed by fire from heaven and then afterwards the peace-offerings were offered upon the same altar ANNOTATIONS Upon the first book of KINGS Otherwise called The third book of the KINGS CHAP. I. NOw king David was old and stricken in years and they covered him c. The scope of these two following books is to declare the history of the Commonwealth of Israel when it was divided into two several kingdomes under the command of the severall kings of Judah and Israel and therefore it is that they are called The books of the Kings The history of Saul and David were related in the two foregoing books of Samuel because they reigned over the whole people of Israel united in one body Onely Solomons reigne is here described and the death of David as making way thereto because in his reigne we are to see the first cause of that following schisme and rending of the kingdome of Israel into two severall kingdomes to wit that of Judah and that of Samaria By whom these books were written we cannot say that they were written by the