was the blood of Calves and Goats with water for such were Sacrificed for Burnt-Offerings and Peace-Offerings The things sprinkled with blood were the Book wherein the Covenant was written and out of which it was read and the People who engaged themselves in the Covenant The time was when Moses had spoken every Precept to all the People according to the Law For the Covenant must first be made before it could be confirmed And this sprinkling upon the People was the confirmation of the Covenant on the People's part as the sprinkling of it upon the Altar was the confirmation on God's part This was the action described more fully then we find it in Exod. 24. 2. The words are added to the action to signify the use and end of that sprinkling which is to ratify the League and Covenant For in these words we have 1. A Covenant enjoyned by God 2. The Blood of this Covenant The History informs 1. Of a Covenant made 2. This Covenant enjoyned by God unto Israel It 's said to be enjoyned both because God having made and instimted it by Moses commanded it to be entred into and confirmed by the People but also because in this Covenant there were certain Precepts which were Articles and Conditions the observation whereof God did stipulate and require at their hands In Moses Exod. 24. 8. it 's said to be the Covenant which God had made with them and he is said to make it not only because he was the Authour of it but also because in it he was the principal party covenanting and binding himself unto the People by his promises which are so made that they prerequire the performance of the Precepts from them if they will either avoid the penalties threatned orattain the Blessings and Rewards promised 3. This Covenant once made must be confirmed by Blood and this Blood sprinkled For the meaning of the words This is the Blood of the Covenant is this That this is the Blood by which this Covenant is confirmed and made inviolable And as this so the New Covenant is confirmed by Blood as is evident from the words of our blessed Saviour in the Institution of the Eucharist saying This Cup is the New Covenant in my Blood which is shed for you Luke 22. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 25. Or This is my Blood of the New Testament which is shed for the Remission of the Sins of many Matth. 26. 28. Mark 14. 24. Where we have 1. A Now Covenant 2. The Blood of this New Covenant or the New Covenant in this Blood that is this New Covenant confirmed by Blood or Blood confirming this New Covenant 3. This Blood is the Blood of Christ shed for Remission of Sins This Remission of Sins is one principal Blessing promised in this New Covenant yet this promise had been in vain and to no purpose if Christ's Blood had not been shed to satisfy divine Justice and make Sin remissible For though Man should repent and believe yet his Sin could never have been actually remitted if not by this Blood made remissible So that this Blood of Christ is the firm and immovable basis upon which the Covenant is fixed Both these Covenants agree in this that they were confirmed by Blood and to manifest this is the intention of the Apostle and though the confirmation of both be the same in general yet as the Blood so the manner of confirmation was very different § 19. As there were several Ceremonials instituted by God for confirmation so there were some ordianed for purification therefore it followeth Ver. 21. Moreover he sprinkled with Blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry Ver. 22. And almost all things by the Law are purged with Blood and without shâ—dding of Blood is no Remission IN these words with those that follow in the next Verse we have an explicate and full comparison in quality and both the parts are expressed For we find 1. The Proposition in these words 2. The Reddition ver 23. In the Proposition we may observe 1. The sprinkling of several things with Blood 2. The effect of this sprinkling which was purification 3. The necessity of this sprinkling for Remission 1. Several things were sprinkled with Blood the things thus sprinkled are either named in particular as the Tabernacle and the Vessels of the Ministery or signified by a more general term yet with some diminution and abatement The general term is all things the abating Particle is almost which signifies that many and the greatest part of them by far were sprinkled with Blood yet not all but some were excepted and were sprinkled and cleansed with water 2. The end of this was purging We do not read of the sprinkling of the Tabernacle with Blood in the Books of Moses we find that Aaron and his Sons with their Garments and the Altar were sanctified by Oyl and Blood Lev. 8. 38. Neither do we find there signified or here expressed by the Apostle what kind of purging or sanctification this here mentioned is There is a purging of Consecration of Sanctification or Explation Consecration is a separation from common use Sanctification is a purging from pollution Expiation is a freeing from guilt These two last seem here to be understood at least principally yet we may distinguish between the cleansing of things and persons Things may be considered as common or polluted as common they are purged by Consecration as polluted by re-consecration Persons are impure and as such they must be sanctifyed or guilty and as such they must be restored by expiating Blood sprinkled Some give the reason why things as the Tabernacle and Vessels and other things must be purged by by Blood to be this because man being himself polluted polluteth those things which he useth and this is something though not all that may be said in this particular 3. The necessity of this sprinkling is because without Blood there is no Remission Where we have 1. Blood shed 2. Remission 3. No Blood shed no Remission 1. By Blood shed we must understand the Blood of some living thing to be Sacrificed and this Blood shed upon the slaying of the Sacrifice and not only shed but usually sprinkled before it could purge 2. Remission may be Consecration in respect of things and Expiation and Sanctification from pollution in respect of persons For Remission is not here to be taken strictly for freeing a person from guilt and obligation to punishment Neither is it in this place any cleansing from spiritual pollution of the Conscience or freedom from the spiritual and eternal penalties but it 's only a Legal Remission of Legal guilt and impurity 3. If where there is no Blood shed there is no Remission then it follows that unto Remission Blood shed is necessary not only as an antecedent to a consequent but as a cause to the production of an effect It 's true that the causality is not naturall but morall By this God even then did signify
People as a third part 1. In making the Covenant in signifying God's Will unto the People and returning the People's Answer unto God Exod. 19. 2. 2. In confirming it by Blood as an indifferent distinct person Exod. 24. To which place the Apostle doth allude as we shall understand hereafter in the illustration This is the meaning of the first Proposition The second may be divided for explication and made two 1. Christ by means of Death expiated Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. By means of this Death the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance The first implies 1. That there were Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. That there was a Redemption of these Transgressions 3. This Redemption was by the Death of Christ. The first is clear enough for Moses Aaron David and the Saints of God from the times of Moses till the exhibition of Christ had their sins much more others not sanctified The second cannot be doubted of for if there was no Redemption of those Sins and Transgressions then they could not be saved they must suffer eternal punishments as they did temporal By Redemption here is meant Expiation and Propitiation whereby their sins were made remissible and upon certain terms and conditions performed actually to be remitted The third will be granted in general that the Expiation was by Death and Blood but that they were expiated by the Blood of Christ many of the Jews denied Yet if they had understood the Books of Moses they might have known that the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not expiate the Sin of Man a rational and immortal Creature not free from the eternal Punishment Some Legal frailties and infirmities they might expiate and avert some temporal penalties Therefore there must of necessity be some other Death and Blood that must do it And this was the Blood of Christ which all their Ilastical Sacrifices and Lustrations did typify Yet this is not so to be understood as though their Sins were not remissible and remitted till Christ dyed and offered his Sacrifice for by vertue of this Death fore-seen and fore-accepted they were in their Life-time upon their Repentance Faith in Christ to come and their fervent Prayers pardoned They did not rely upon their Legal Sacrifices nor expected Remission from them but relyed upon this Death of Christ to come according to the Promise That in him all Nations should be blessed This Proposition is not to be understood exclusively as though Christ's Death did expiate no Sin but that which was committed under the first Covenant but emphatically to singnify 1. That there was no Expiation for Transgressions under the Law 2. That if Christ's Death expiate former Transgressions under the Law much more will it expiate such as are committed under the Gospel 3. That there was no reason as some observe why they should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing without his Death and Blood neither they nor their Fathers could be saved but must suffer eternal penalties The second part of this second Proposition informs us that 1. There is an eternal Inheritance 2. There is a Promise of it 3. The called receive this Promise 4. By means of Christ's Death they receive this Promise For in the words we have an Inheritance the Heirs the Conveyance the Purchase or rather the price whereby it 's purchased The Inheritance is eternal Happiness the Heirs are the called the Conveyance is by Promise and Covenant the price of the purchase is Christ's Death and Blood 1. The Inheritance is that blessed and glorious Estate which is to be enjoyed upon the Resurrection for the full possession and enjoyment is reserved for Heaven where it 's said to be laid up and reserved It 's said to be eternal in opposition to the Land of Canaan which was the temporal Inheritance of them and their Fathers and to be enjoyed with the Blessings thereof so long as they kept the Covenant of their God and this was the Inheritance promised in the former Covenant and to this which formerly was called God's Rest the Apostle seems to allude as a Type of this which was far more excellent and glorious of eternal continuance in respect of the Inheritance it self the parties enjoying it and the enjoyment thereof 2. This eternal Inheritance was promised there was a Promise of it It was God's and the disposal of it was at his Will Man for his sin was cast out of Paradise and forfeited Heaven with the eternal Bliss thereof yet it was in his mind to give it sinful Man who deserved it not so great was his mercy and bounty and Man must know this For this end he promised it and by his Promise bound himself to give it and in it did signify his Will The Effect of this Promise was Obligation on God's part and a Right unto it on Man's part an Hope to obtain it and a Comfort upon this Hope And here it 's to be observed that our Title to eternal life depends immediately upon the Promise and is derived from it for as the Israelites had the Land of Canaan and held it by Covenant and Promise so do all the Children of God expect the heavenly Canaan and hope to have it by Promise of the new Covenant Some do ' understand by the Promise of eternal Inheritance this Inheritance promised yet there must be a Promise received before we receive the thing promised 3. After the Inheritance and the Promise and Conveyance follows the Heirs which are here said to be the called Some are not called at all these have no Promise of the Inheritance Such were the Gentiles before the Gospel was preached unto them they were Strangers from the Covenants of Promise having no Hope and without God in the World Ephes. 2. 12. Some are called and have the means of Conversion but reject the terms of the Covenant and refuse to enter into it and engage themselvs such were the unbelieving Jews and many others Some are called enter the Covenant and solemnly bind themselvs to the observation of it yet do not observe it In respect of these two last it is that Christ saith Many are called but few are chosen Matth. 22. 14. None of these are Heirs Some are called and are obedient to the heavenly Call and keep the Covenant these receive the eternal Inheritance promised and first acquire the Title and after that the Possession Some were called before the Exhibition of Christ some after the former are here principally meant though the latter with them receive the Inheritance 4. These called Ones of former times with us receive this Promise by vertue of Christ's Death expiating their sins and of his Blood purging their Conscience To understand this you must consider that none but such whose Sins are expiated and their Consciences purged can be Heirs for they must be regenerated and acted by the Spirit and adopted Sons before they can be Heirs For as the Apostle argues If Sons then Heirs
Israelites from the first-born of other Families to the Tribe of Levi For we read that the were set apart for the Service of the Tabernacle Numb 1. 50. And this done by Command of God to Moses Ver. 48. This was the Reason why they were not numbred non had a several distinct part of the Land as the rest of the Tribes In this the Lord did punish shew Mercy and gave Honour He punished that Tribe in scattering them throughout all the Tribes according to the words of Jacob who denounced this Judgment against them for their dissimulation and cruelty exercised upon the Shechemites Gen. 49. 7. He shewed Mercy to the rest of the Tribes in that they were dispersed in every part amongst them to teach them the Laws of God He honoured these Levites in that he consecrated them to his Service and setled the Priest-hood in that Tribe And this seems to be a Reward for their Service in assisting Moses when he punished their idolatrous Brethren Therefore said Moses Consecrate your selves to day unto the Lord c. Exod. 32. 29. So wonderful is the Wisdom of God that by one Act he can both punish and reward the same parties and shew Mercy unto others Of this their separation and taking them for the first-born we may read Numb 3. 12. Yet though all the Sons of Levi did minister in holy things all were not Priests for of the Sons of Levi onely the Family of Aaron received the Office of Priest-hood and were Priests the rest of that Tribe were assistant and subservient to the Priests These had their Office not by Usurpation or the voluntary consent and suffrage of Man but by the ordination and determination of God without whose Power intervening so great an alteration in the Translation of the Sacerdotol Power could not have been valid or just In the Christian Church the Office of Ministers answers to this which could neither be necessary or effectual except Christ had instituted it And onely such as enter upon this Function according to his Institution are legal Ministers 2. The parties tythed were their Brethren though descended of Abraham The Priest-hood with their inferiour Ministry must be maintained and it seemed good to the Divine Wisdom to appoint the Tythes for that end as the sitrest and most convenient maintenance of all other and if duly paid according to his order the least subject to inconveniences And seeing they did serve and minister for the good and benefit of their Brethren sequestring themselves from other employments Justice and Epuity did require that they should maintain them and give them their Tythes The same Rule in general holds good in the times of the Gospel For saith the Apostle if we have sown unto yoâ— spiritual things is it a great matter if we shall reap your carnal things 1 Cor. 9. 11. Yet profane Worldâ—ings who make no account of spiritual Blessings will say It is a great thing an heavy charge and we desire to be freed from it yet carnal things are nothing to spiritual These Brethren were descended of Abraham as well as the Levites and Priests and both as Brethren and as descended of Abraham were equal Yet they must acknowledge themselves and that by paying of Tythes unto the Priests to be inferiour to them who vvere nearer God and did represent him in the highest Acts and Service 3. But by what Warrant and according to what Rule did these Priest receive Tythes of their Brethren They had a Warrant and a Rule and both from God For 1. He gave a Command they should be paid and a Rule how they should be given The Command did presuppose the Power and signified the Will of God so that the People were bound to give them and the Priests had Power to demand them as due For the Effect of this Command was to make them due to be given by the People and unto them and to none other After this Command they could not be a meer Benevolence God did often signify in the Books of Moses that Tythes were his and he had given them to the Sons of Levi and the Priests That they are the Lord's and holy unto him we find Levit. 27. 30 31 c. and they are commanded to bring them to the Priest Deut. 14. 22. And that he gave them the Children of Levi for their service is evident Num. 18. 21. and they were their Inheritance And whosoever deteineth them robs God and is cursed with a Curse Mal. 3 8 9. Work and Hire Service and Tythes the Preaching of the Gospel and Maintenance go together before the Law under the Law and in the time of the Gospel Commands and Laws do not onely define the Persons that must obey and the thing to be done but many times if not alwayes the manner of performance So it was in Decimation for the Law determined not onely the Persons that must give them but of what they must be given and at what time they must be paid and into what place they must be brought and where they must be laid up So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies the Command and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Rule and both are parts of the Law of Tything Some think these words are brought in by the Apostle to prove the Superiority of the Priests above their Brethren because their Brethren gave and they received Tythes and it 's true as Tything them they were above them Others conceive that in them he answers the Objection That Tything and Decimation would not prove the Greatness of Melchizedec above the Levitical Priests for these as well as he did decimate And they understand the Apostle to return this Answer That though they received Tythes yet it was but from their Brethren who being the posterity of Abraham were far inferiour unto Abraham whom Melchizedec tythed yet this answer is not given by him in these words except in part For the principal part followeth § 14. For we read in the next words Ver. 6. But he whose Descent is not counted from them received Tythes of Abraham c. In which words we may observe two Propositions The 1. Negative That Melchizedec's Pedegree was not reckoned from them 2. Affirmative Yet he received Tythes of Abraham The first informs us that he was not descended from Levi neither was his Priesthood of their Order or derived from them If he had descended from their Tribe and his Priest-hood from the House of Aaron then they would have said that he received Tythes because he was of their Order and would further alledge that if one as great as Abraham should be found amongst their Brethren they had Power by vertue of their Priesthood to decimate him But all this he prevents by denying his Descent from them The second tells us plainly that he tythed Abraham who was far above Levi and the Levitical Priests and much more above their Brethren Yet this is not all he not onely tythed Abraham but He blessed him
Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood These words are added to signify that no man of that Tribe had right to officiate as a Priest For before he had said that no man of that Tribe did serve at the Altar but this was but matter of Fact for though none of Judah did serve at the Altar de facto yet some might de jure as having a right to officiate But these prove as none did serve so none could jure justly and lawfully do it For it they could they might prove their title out of the Books of Moses Yet this cannot be done because Moses never wrote of any such thing there is not in all his Books the lest tittle of the right of any of Judah to officiate as a Priest And the rule of the first Constitution of the legal Priest-hood is to be found there and no where else These words imply that a negative argument from the Scripture in matters of Religion is valid For that which is not to be found in the Scriptures truly understood either expresly delivered or by consequence to be deduced cannot be of divine authority so as to bind men to believe it or do it But those arguments which prove a Negative not only from the silence but also from exclusive terms are the strongest And in this particular cause we find Moses not only silent and saying nothing of the Tribe of Judah concerning the Priest-hood but also speaking so positively of the Levitical Priest as that he so confirms him to the Tribe of Levi and the House of Aaron that he peremptorily and clearly excludes all other persons of all other Tribes from that Office And here we may take notice of the wisdom of God which contrived this business so that he made Augustus though he thought of no such thing an Instrument of this evidence For though the Cense and Enrolment was general of all Countries within the Roman Empire whereof Judea was one yet by this he brought Mary to Bethlehem when she was ready to be delivered of Christ that so he might be born there according to the prophesy of Micah and that it might be evident that he was of the linage of David and so of the Tribe of Judah § 21. Hitherto the Apostle hath manifested that the Priest-hood was changed because the Tribe was changed and another Priest was risen of another Tribe But not content with this he proceeds to make this far more evident For so it followeth Ver. 15 16. And it is yet far more evident for that after the Similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another Priest Who is made not after the Law of a Carnal Commandment but after the power of an endless life HEre the Apostle seems to insist upon two words in the Text of the Psalm 1. After the Order or Similitude of Melchisedec 2. A Priest for ever after that Order By both which he is thought to prove the change of the Priest-hood and the Law by the Introduction of a Priest of another Order and a Priest for ever The former proof was evident and sufficient yet this seems to make the change more evident and not only more but far more evident And so the words may be taken as by our Translatours they are turned That this must be understood we may consider 1. What that thing or proposition is which is made far more evident 2. How it is far more evidenced The thing evidenced is the change and abolition of the Levitical Priest-hood and the Law A thing is made evident when it is so clearly represented to the Understanding that if it be rightly disposed it must needs assent unto the truth of it once received as it is represented This evidence may be either immediate from Connexion of the terms distinctly understood or mediately from a third Argument This evidence of this change abolition abrogation is mediate And that argument whereby it 's made so evident is 1. That there must be and then was risen a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec 2. His Priest-hood must be personall and perpetual In the words we may observe two propositions The 1. That another Priest ariseth after the Similitude of Melchisedec The 2. This Priest is made not after the Law of a carnal Commandment but after the power of an endless life In this Proposition you must 1. Remember what hath been said formerly concerning the explication 2. You must note that Order mentioned before and Similitude here are the same and to be a Priest after the Similitude is the same with being a Priest after the Order of Melchisedec so that if Christ be of the same Order then he must be like unto Melchisedec By Order is meant a distinct and different kind of Priest-hood and though Christ's Priest-hood be like both to Aarons and Melchisedec's yet it was far more like unto Melchisedec which was far more exellent then that of Aarons This Order might be the better known if we knew the Law and Covenant whereof he was a Priest which was not only the Law of Nature according to which he did minister and serve the most high God as Creatour and Judge of this World but of the Law of Grace according to which he worshipped God as Redeemer by Christ promised to Abraham Seth Enoch Noah Shem and the rest of the Patriarchs before him who believed in Christ to come yet not as to descend from Abraham Whereas it 's said That another Priest ariseth you must know that his rising is his constitution manifestation and beginning of his Officiation And the rising of him was the fall of the Levitical Priest and the abolition of that Priest-hood The force of this proposition considered as a reason is in this That this other Priest is not only of another Tribe and in particular of Judah but after another Order For it might have been said That though Christ was a Priest of the Tribe of Judah yet he might be after the Order of Aaron and so he might be essentially the same kind of Priest though accidentally he might differ from the rest of the Levitical Priests as they were of that Tribe To take away all colour of any such conceit this is added That he was after the Similitude of Melchisedec and not of Aaron This doth prove the change far more strongly and therefore the evidence is far greater The second proposition to evidence the difference yet to be far greater informs us according to what Law he was made a Priest and this is done 1. Negatively not after the Law of a carnal Commandment 2. Affirmatively after the power of an endless life In the Negative we have 1. A Commandment 2. A carnal Commandment 3. The Law of a carnal Commandment 1. By Commandment we may understand the whole System of the Ceremonies and Mosaical Rites prescribed from God by Moses to that People For whatsoever else it may signify or include here yet these are principally if not solily meant 2. This Commandment or body
offer and the offering of that was a far more excellent service and therefore Christ's Ministry was far more excellent then the Ministry of the Levitical Priest And because their service and offering was a shadow of an heavenly service and offering therefore Christ's service must needs be heavenly and far more excellent then their's That this is the intention of the Apostle is implyed in the words following Ver. 6. But now he hath obtained a more excellent Ministry by how much also he is the Mediatour of a better Covenant established upon better promises § 5. BY these words He hath obtained a better Ministry we are given to understand from the former Discourse of the Apostle ver 3 4 5. 1. That Christ must have a Ministry 2. That that Ministry of his was far more excellent then that of the Levitical Priest because the Levitical Service and Ministry was but a shadow of an heavenly Service and Ministry which was proper to Christ. And now the Apostle hath demonstrated that Christ is a more excellent Priest 1. In respect of the Sanctuary whereof he is a Minister 2. In respect of the ministry and offering it self for both are heavenly But not content with these two Arguments he proceeds in these words to a third and proves him more excellent in respect of the Covenant where of he was a Minister and Mediatour So that the subject of the following Discourse is that better Covenant whereof Christ is the Mediatour and the scope of the Authour is to prove Christ to be a more excellent Priest then the Levitical by this better Covenant And to this exâ—â— he 1. Frames his argument and then produceth it 2. Proves the Covenant whereof he affirms him to be Mediatour to be better 3. He proves it to be better 1. By the Promises which are better 2. By the abolition of the one and the stability of the other 1. His argument in form is this He that is the Mediatour of a better Covenant hath obtained a better Ministry But Christ is a Mediatour of a better Covenant Therefore he hath obtained a better Ministry Before we can understand the force and validity of this argument we must first explain the words wherein we have 1. A Covenant of Promises 2. Of better Promises 3. This Covenant established upon better Promises 4. A Mediatour of this Covenant 5. A Ministry 1. The word here used in the Original is sometimes translated a Covenant sometimes a Testament though very seldom For in the Septuagint it 's used mostly for a Covenant and sometime for a Law or Command And in this place as in many more it so signifies a Covenant is that the Covenant is a Law or implies one A Covenant may be defined to be a Convention between parties mutually binding themselves upon certain terms For in a Covenant there must be 1. Several parties two at the least 2. These parties must both agree 3. They agree upon certain terms which bound and limit the agreement 4. They mutually bind themselves one to another for some performance and this is done by promises which are voluntary obligations The parties covenanting may be such as were at no variance yet free from any obligation of one to another They may be such as are enemies or at difference and then there is some need of a Mediatour who may only intercede to bring them to terms of agreement or besides that may be a Surety and he may undertake for performance on one part or both It may be made between parties equal and equally free or between parties unequal as Soveraign and subject The one binds himself to protect the other to be faithful subject and obedient A Covenant may be 1. Private or publick 2. Between Man and Man 3. Between God and Man This Covenant is between God-Redeemer and sinful Man and therefore between unequals For God may bind Man as his Subject to subjection and obedience though Man never voluntarily by promise bind himself unto God and this he may do by a Law wherein we have precepts and prohibitions binding Man to obedience and promises binding God to reward upon performance of obedience on Man's part and comminations binding Man to penalty if he rebel or disobey And in respect of these promises annexed and subjoyned to the Commands as the terms and conditions It may be said to be a Covenant though it be not properly such till Man voluntarily bind himself as God requires him to do and deals with him as a rational free Creature And these Covenants are ordinarily confirmed by solemn Rites as by the Blood of federal Sacrifices Gen. 15. By Circumcision Gen. 17. By Blood of Sacrifices sprinkled Exod. 24. By washing with Water or Baptism Matth. 3. 28. and many other places and the obligation is renewed by the Sacrament of the Eucharist By all this it 's evident That a Covenant is a Covenant of promises for there is no Covenant without Promises neither is there any Law of God without Promises 2. This here meant is a Covenant of better promises This implies That there is another Covenant which hath promises but not so good either in respect of the things promised or the terms and conditions This other Covenant was that made with the Israelites in the Wilderness before Mount Sinai as will appear hereafter For in that The things promised were far inferiour to the things promised in the Gospel and yet the terms were more difficult The things promised were carnal and temporal and the condition Do this and continue in all these things 3. This Covenant was established upon better promises The word 〈◊〉 here used in the passive signifies sancio to establish confirm and ratify because Laws are usually confirmed and made of force and sometimes unalterable We read That God said to Moses I will give thee Tables of stone and a Law and 〈…〉 which I have written that thou mayst teach them Exod. 24. 12. The word which in Hebrew signifies to teach them is translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to estalish them solemnly by Blood sprinkled upon the Book the Altar and the People This was properly a Sanction and the word there used by the Septuagint is here taken up by the Apostle 4. Christ is the Mediatour of this Covenant To be a Mediatour in this place is not meerly to mediate as Moses did between God and Israel For a Mediatour is needful not only when there is a difference but when there is a distance and great imparity between the parties confederating and this Christ might be as a Prophet But to be a Mediation in this place is far more For the parties God and sinful Man were not only at a vast distance of imparity but at a great difference of enmity And God stood upon these terms 1. That his justice must be satisfied and that by Blood and the Death of some innocent and emineut person and the repentance and reformation of sinful Man
and of our Title to eternal Life and of our perseverance it might be though an high degree of Faith and separable from true and sincere Faith in many but the object of this full Assurance is the Word and Promise of God considered antecedently to the application of them to this or that particular Subject or our selves and to the conclusion we deduce from thence concerning our own particular estate And it 's necessarily required in every one who will draw near to God The confidence and reliance which is grounded upon God's Promise is not an assurance that God hath justified us already or that he will justify and save us absolutely but that he will justify save and reward those who by Repentance and Faith in Christ diligently seek him and by consequence that he will save us seeking him in that manner For the Promises of God include the Duty of Man and bind God only unto such as perform the Duty And he that comes to the Throne of Grace without a full assurance of Christ's Merit and God's Promise and the performance of it to them that do their Duty they come not aright their Worship is not acceptable their Prayers not effectual Therefore said the Apostle If any man lack Wisdom let him ask it of God c. But let him ask it in Faith nothing wavering c. For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of God Jam. 1. 5 6 7. Where by a wavering man some understand not only a man not assured of the truth of God's Promises or doubting of them but one not resolved to perform the Conditions of the Covenant For any such unresolved man to think that he shall receive the mercies promised and prayed for is plain Presumption Therefore this full assurance is necessarily required in every person drawing nigh to God even then when he draws nigh and converseth with his God We must therefore draw near to God and pray every where lifting up holy hands without Wrath or Doubting 1 Tim. 2. 8. Doubting is as prejudicial to Prayer as Wrath or impure hands This is the qualisication of actual Worship 3. The qualification of the Party followeth which is the purification of the heart and body For 1. Our hearts must be sprinkled from an evil Conscience 2. Our Bodies washed with pure water and the Apostle seems to presuppose them thus qualified because Believers The expressions are taken out of the Books of Moses in which God prescribed a two-fold purification one by bood which we have spoken of another by water And no person legally impure might draw nigh to God to worship him in the Tabernacle or Temple before he was purified And by this was signified that no man guilty and conscious of sin is fit to draw nigh unto or to worship God before he be purged from Sin The Ethiopick Translation is not here so wording as many other Translations be but is a Paraphrase and gives the true sense thus Our hearts being purged and our selves purified from Sin The reason hereof is this God heareth not Sinners Joh. 9. 31 But for the more distinct explication of the words we must observe 1. Our Hearts 2. The sprinkling of our Hearts 3. The sprinkling of them from an evil Conscience 4. The purifying of our Bodies with pure water 1. By Hearts are meant the rational appetite and will as subject unto the power of God and bound by his Laws This Heart and Will is the principal efficient of our actual Sins and proper and primary subject of Unrighteousness If this be pure all is pure if this be polluted all that issues out of it is polluted For out of the heart proceed evil Thoughts Murders Adulteries c. Matth. 15. 19. 2. If this be unclean it must be sprinkled that is purged and cleansed for that 's the true meaning of the word For under the Law the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an Heifer were sprinkled upon the unclean and their Bodies being sprinkled with this Blood with these ashes were sanctified to the purifying of the Flesh so that the sanctified might be admitted into God's holy Tabernacle or Temple to Worship God with the rest of the People which were clean So under the Gospel such as are morally and spiritually unclean must be spiritually sprinkled and purged by the Blood of Christ which doth not only justify but sanctify the penitent Believer So that to have our hearts sprinkled is to have them justified and sanctified by the Blood of Christ. 3. The thing from which they must be cleansed is an evil Conscience which the Aethiopick Translatour interprets to be an evil Work or Sin For Evil here is Sin and an evil Conscience is the Sin whereof we are guilty and conscious For nothing doth spiritually and morally pollute us but Sin which makes us not only guilty and liable to punishment but also filthy and unfit for Communion with God 4. The Body must be washed with pure water Some understand the Body in proper sense as contra-distinct to the Heart and Soul and this water to be the water of Baptism which is sprinkled upon the Body and though not physicially yet sacramentally and mystically doth purge it and the Soul too from Sin This it 's said to do by virtue of the Institution by the merit of Christ's Blood and the power of the Spirit For Baptism is the washing of Renegeration by the renewing of the Holy Ghost Tiâ— 3. 5. Yet this purifying cannot be by washing away the filth of the Flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God by the Resurrection of Christ 1 Pet. 3. 21. It 's true that not only the Soul but the Body are polluted with Sin and both by reason of Sin are liable to punishment and both must be cleansed by the sprinkling of Christ's Blood and the Sanctification of the Spirit and this is the principal sense of the words The thing to be observed is That 1. No man unconverted unregenerate not sanctified by the Holy Ghost is fit to draw nigh to God 2. The regenerate who are in the State of justification and sanctification if they contract new guilt must by Repentance Faith in Christ's Blood and Prayer for the Spirit to sanctify them first cleanse themselves before they come to God The Body is but once washed with water and that is in Baptism but as it 's taken here it must be often washed and cleansed by the renewing of out Repentance and Faith So that by Heart and Body is meant the whole man and by sprinkling and washing is understood justification and sanctification not only begun upon our first conversion but continued by our Repentance and Faith continued habitually and re-iterated and actually exercised especially upon our relapfes and contracting of new guilt and pollution David knew this qualification to be necessary and therefore said I will wash my hands in innocency so will I compass thine Altar Psal. 26 6. To
dear Affection to them who are enriched with them So that sinful Men may hope for this City yet upon condition that they will be Pilgrims and Strangers in this World and desire above all other things this better and heavenly Country For to clear this Doctrine more fully we must observe That the World morally and spiritually considered is divided into two Societies the one is of the Devil the other of God This distinction the learned Father took notice of when he wrote his excellent Treatise De Civitate Dei For all men either seek their Rest and Happiness on Earth or an eternal Peace in Heaven and by Nature till God transplant us we are not only in but of this earthly Society and in the Kingdom of Darkness and under the Power and Dominion of Satan and whilest we are in this Kingdom of Satan we are Strangers to the Common-wealth and City of God But when God out of his unspeakable Mercy hath called us made us meet to be partakers of the Inheritance of the Saints in Light and delivered us from the Power of Darkness and hath translated us into the Kingdom of his dear Son Colos. 1. 12. 13. Then we are no more Strangers and Forreigners but Fellow-Citizens with the Saints and of the Houshold of God Ephes. 2. 19. Being once naturalized and made Burgesses of Heaven we have our Conversation in Heaven and carry our selves as Children of a Celestial extraction and the Progeny of the eternal King This Doctrine doth not only inform us of our Duty but ministreth unspeakable Comfort if we do perform it For if our Goods and earthly Estates be sequestred plundred oâ— any wayes taken from us we have a better Estate in Heaven If we be disgraced and reproached in this World yet we shall be Kings and Priests and for ever honoured in Heaven If we be banished and persecuted from place to place so that we can find no Rest and Safety but are wearied out with Removals yet we have a place of Rest and Safety and eternal Abode in Heaven and of this no man can dispossess and diffeisin us If our Sufferings be grievous many and continue long yet we have a City where is no Suffering Pain Persecution Poverty Sorrow where God will wipe away all Tears In this City are eternal Riches Pleasures Honours Peace Safety and full Joy there is nothing wanting which the heart of Man can desire This is that City which as it is the expectation so it 's the universal Comfort of the Sons of God And though the time of our Pilgrimage seem long and tedious yet it will shortly expire and then begins our everlasting Rest for God hath prepared a City for us § 17. The Apostle proceeds in proposing Abraham unto us as a Pattern of Imitation and instanceth in a fourth Work or Effect of his Faith for thus we read Ver. 17. By Faith Abraham when he was tryed offered up Isaac and he that had received the Promises offered his only begotten Son Ver. 18. Of whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called Ver. 19. Accounting that God was able to raise him up even from the dead from whence also he received him in a Figure IN these words we may observe 1. Abraham's Obedience 2. His Faith whereby he performed this Obedience In this Obedience we have A Description of the Party obeying Act of Obedience 1. The Party obedient who was Abraham is described in reference to this Act of Obedience 1. As tempted 2. As having received the Promises 3. As one to whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called 1. He was tempted or tried The party tempting or trying him was God not that God tempts any Man to Sin but that he would try and manifest unto Abraham himself his Faith and Love to God that so he might be a rare Example in both to all future Generations who should be informed of it The means whereby he tryed him was by giving him this singular and extraordinary Command of sacrificing his Son Isaac This Command we read of in the Books of Moses and this it is Take now thy Son thine only Son Isaac whom thou lovest and go thou to the Land of Moriah and offer him there upon one of the Mountains which I will tell thee of Gen. 22. 2. The End of this Command was to try whether Abraham loved God or his Son Isaac more The Effect of it was an Obligation of Abraâ—â— to perform this Service and to offer his Son Neither in this was God's preceptive Will contrary to his decretive Will for the decretive Will binds God absolutely to do that which he hath decreed and is indispensable but the preceptive Will bound only Abraham to do this yet so that God reserved a Power to dispense with him and to hinder the Performance And this was fulfilled instantly upon the signifying of his Will unto Abraham who instantly upon the Knowledg thereof was bound whether he did or did it not There was no decretive Will of God or Intention that Isaac should be slain and offered This Command was just and no wayes contrary to that other Command of God Thou shalt not kill for though it 's true that it is unjust and contrary to that Law for any Man to take away the life of a party innocent not guilty of any Capital Crime which is the thing there forbidden yet it is just and God may justly command Man to take away the Life of such an innocent Person And the reason hereof is not only this that that Law did not bind God but only Man but because he is the Supream Lord and hath absolute Power of Life and Death which no Creature hath or can have Again he could restore Life taken away which Abraham could not do nay it was above all created Power So that the Reason whereby God in this Command is freed from all Injustice is taken à Potestate Potentia Dei for his Power was absolute and supream and his strength was Almighty 2. Abraham had received the Promises of the Land of Canaan of a numerous Posterity sufficient to inhabit it of Christ in whom all Nations should be blessed 3. He was fully assured by God that in Isaac who was the Son of Promise all these Promises should be fulfilled For God had excluded Ismael and that peremptorily and had several times expresly signified that in Isaac and his Posterity and in none else these Promises should be accomplished Neither need we here trouble our selves about the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it may be turned to whom that is to Abraham or of whom that is of Isaac it was said c. This was the Description of the Party obeying The Act of Obedience was this that he offered up Isaac he offered up his only begotten Son that Son of whom it was said In Isaac shall thy Seed be called The Sacrifice commanded as commanded was bloody and required the Death and
find this to be so § 9. Because the Faith and Doctrine of Jesus Christ taught by the Apostles is as Christ himself the same yesterday to day and for ever therefore the Apostle dehorteth them thus Ver. 9. Be not carried about with divers and strange Doctrines for it is a good thing that the heart be established with Grace and not with meats which have not profited them which have been occupied therein THese words are a Dehortation and in it we may consider 1. The Sin dehorted from 2. The reason why they should take heed of it 1. The Sin is to be carried about with divers and strange Doctrines Doctrines divers and strange are all such as are different from the Gospel which is a Doctrine of perpetual and immutable truth and alwayes uniform the same Therefore the word divers may signify such as are different from it and different amongst themselves as all false and heretical Doctrines are though the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies new or absurd and such all errors in Religion are They are new because invented and vented after the Truth was revealed and absurd because all such are irrational and many of them very gross They are also strange as having not the same Original with the Truth which was revealed from Heaven and of another stamp and quality By these some think he means Judaism and Philosophy and the Errors and Superstitions of the Morinthians and Cerinthians who attempted to make up one Body of Religion by joyning Judaism and Christianism together yet not only these but all other Heresies whatsoever are here intended They must not be carried away or about with these this is the Duty The Metaphor seems to be taken from Wethercocks or Ships which turn every way as the Wind carries them to be so carried about implies that they turn from the truth of the Gospel believe these false Doctrines and so are deceived as the word in the Original may signify and it signifies the inconstancy of such as receive them as not being firm and fixed in the saving Truth For if we once turn away from that we fall first into one Error then into another and are first of one Sect after that of another and can settle no where We have had sad experience of this in our times wherein many forsaking their Orthodox Teachers and the antient and apostolical Doctrine turned Anabaptists Seekers Quakers and men above the Ordinances of Scripture Sacraments Sabbaths Such we must not be not so erroneous heretical unstable This Text agrees with many others as Rom. 16. 17. Ephes. 4. 14. Colos. 2. 8 16. and many more noted by Curcellaâ—s Great is our frailty in this particular because of the imperfection of our Understanding the corruption of our Hearts the subtilty of the Devil and Seducers therefore let us he well informed in the Truth endeavour to live according to the Truth certainly known pray for the Spirit of Truth to guide us For it is not wit or learning without the Grace of God can preserve us from these Doctrines which carry us away from Christ and cause us to wander in by-wayes that lead our Souls into Destruction 2. The reason is 1. Because the Doctrine of the Gospel can save us 2. These strange Doctrines cannot promote our Salvation it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For 1. It 's good the heart be established with Grace not with Meats By Grace may understand the Truth and the Truth of the Gospel so it 's taken Tit. 2. 11. And it 's called Grace because it 's the Word or Doctrine of Grace Act. 20. 24 32. which manifests the Grace of God in Christ and the Knowledg and Love of it is a Grace and Mercy of God To have the heart established therewith is to understand it believe it be affected with it so as to adhere unto it and make it our care in seeking eternal Life And then the heart is thus established with it when the Spirit of God writes it in our hearts so that we know it more clearly and are effectually moved to follow and practise it It must be deeply imprinted in our hearts and our hearts must be firmly fixt in it And this is good and profitable for Sanctification and Salvation but meats are not so By Meats is understood the Doctrine of Meats and by Doctrine of Meats may be meant Doctrine of Ceremonies such we find in the Books of Moses yet all abolished by the Gospel The Jews were perswaded that they were sanctified by the observation of Mosaical Ceremonies and the Traditions of their Elders This also was the perswasion of all Superstitious Wretches whether Heathens or Hereticks For Meats may here signify not only false Doctrines and Ceremonial Observations of the Jews but also all other various strange and different Opinions and Superstitions of all others whose hearts were not stablished by Grace And though men's hearts be never so pertinaciously fixed in them yet they could not advance their Salvation For it followeth which have not profited such as were occupied or as the Greek word signifies walked therein To walk in them is to profess and in their practise constantly to observe them Not to profit them is not to sanctify justify them or make them acceptable to God For that is truly profitable in this kind which makes a man more holy brings him nearer unto God and renders him more capable of eternal Life The sum is they must take heed of all false Doctrines and adhere to the truth of the Gospel And the reason is 1. Because establishment in the truth of the Gospel is good and certainly conduceth to eternal Life 2. The belief profession practice of any other Doctrine is not so cannot further our happiness § 10. There is another reason why they must not return to Judaism or any other Doctrine different from the Gospel For Ver. 10. We have an Altar whereof they have no right to eat which serve the Tabernacle IN these words we have 1. A benefit or priviledg 2. A right unto it granted unto Christians denied unto Jews and others The Propositions are two 1. We have an Altar 1 2. They who serve the Tabernacle have no right to eat of it 1. Altar here is the Priest or Sacrifice offered upon and sanctified by the Altar The Sacrifice is that of Christ's Body slain and offered by the eternal Spirit without spot unto God To have this is to have a right unto it so as to eat and be partakers of it The expression and phrase is Legal and Levitical For in the Law there were certain Sacrifices whereof part was given and offered to God part was given to the Priests to eat thereof part was allowed to the People which brought the Sacrifice and they might eat thereof before the Lord in the Tabernacle or the Temple The same Custom many of the Gentiles had To this the Apostle doth allude and doth imply that the Body of Christ was slain and offered unto
and Timothy together and enjoy their blessed Society 1. Timothy was set at Libetry Who this Timothy was both by Birth Education Office and Employment we we may easily understand from the Acts of the Apostles Paul's Epistles and especially from two written and directed to him in particular He was a Jew by his Mother a Christian by Paul's Conversion of him a Minister of the Gospel an Evangelist and an Assistant unto Paul in the Work of the Ministry and though he was but young yet he was eminent and famous in the Churches planted by Paul a Person of Integrity and Fidelity This Timothy was set at Liberty which implies that he was bound imprisoned or some wayes restrained of his Liberty but where and how is not expressed in Scripture Yet now he was set at Liberty God had delivered him out of the hands of his Enemies and they must know it as a matter of Joy and Comfort It was a sad thing that such a Man as Timothy so faithful so serviceable to Paul and the Church of God should be restrained and he knew that to hear and have certain Intelligence and from him that he was released must needs comfort and rejoice their hearts So also we when we hear of the Liberty and Peace of the Church and especially of pious and eminent Ministers should be glad and should render Thanks unto our God for so great a Mercy 2. Yet there was a further degree of Comfort for he gives them hope that as Timothy was ser at Liberty so he would come unto them shortly and would see them and give them a Visit in his own Person And not only Timothy but he himself would come with him and see them together with him that they might mutually comfort and rejoice one another and this Meeting and Society would be sweer To hear of their Liberty was good News but to be certified of their speedy coming together to see them was better God's Servants cannot alwayes converse together on Earth that Happiness is reserved for Heaven yet their hearts do rise and much rejoyce when they can see and enjoy one anther though but for a time § 21. The fifth part of the Close of this Letter is spent in Salutations Ver. 24. Salute all them that have the Rule even you and all the Saints They of Italy salute you THE Saulutations are 1. Of Paul 2. Of them of Italy For Paul and they of Italy were the Persons saluting and their Guides and the rest of the Saints were the Persons saluted True and hearty Salutations are an Expression of our Love and good Affection towards the Persons saluted and they are either of Persons present or absent When we salute Persons present we express our Affection by words of Peace Health Happiness and by Embracements or Kisses or both according to the Custom of the Time and Places But when Friends are absent we signify our good desires by Writing or words of Messengers and so embrace one another at a Distance There are some who are not capable of Salutation to whom we must not say God speed 2 Joh. 10. Some are capable but not of a Christian Salutation because not capable of spiritual Grace and Peace in Christ Yet these Salutations are Christian 1. From Paul a Christian to the Hebrews Christians 2. From the Saints and Christians of Italy to the Saints and believing Hebrews Paul is the first in sending Salutations the Persons by him saluted are 1. Their Guides or Ministers put in the first place because of their Office and Eminency 2. The People which by Profession of Faith in Christ their Baptism and Society with the Church were Saints The Persons saluting in the second place and that by Paul were they of Italy that is their Brethren Saints and Believers in Italy and of the Church of Churches in Italy the Persons saluted are the same saluted before To salute anciently amongst the Jews and Israelites was to wish Peace under the Gospel Grace and Peace The Syriack turns these words Desire ye the Peace of your Guides c. but he is singular These Salutations though good in themselvs are much abused and made words of Course and Custom or turned into Complements devoid of reall and hearty Love § 22. The last part of the Conclusion is a Benediction in these few words Ver. 25. Grace be with you all Amen THis is so a Salutation as that it is a Benediction pronounced with Apostolical Power and was effectual upon all such as are capable This is a Benediction proper to Paul and usually if not alwayes written with his own hand which then was well known in many Churches though the Epistle it self might be written by some other whom he used for his Scribe It is so proper unto him that we find it used by none other of the Apostles neither James nor John nor Peter nor Jude Only John doth conclude and shut up the Revelation with it but that was not written with Paul's own hand And by this in those times this Epistle might certainly be known to be his We use to salute one another at our first Meeting and also at our Parting which latter is called a Valediction So Paul in all his Epistles excepting this begins with Grace and Peace and that 's his Salutation and he ends this as all the rest with Grace and this is his Valediction and Benediction This Benediction we find sometimes briefer sometimes larger and the largest of all closeth up the second Epistle to the Corinthians and we must know that the briefest contains all the matter of the largest though not expresly The usual Blessing both of old and of latter times is The Lord be with you For if the Lord be not against us but for us and with us we must needs be so far happy yet the Lord may be with us and in Mercy many wayes but to be with us in the Grace of our Lord Jesus Christ is the highest and happiest degree of God's presence tending to our eternal Bliss Therefore the Apostle's Blessing is The Lord be with you all greater Blessing than this there cannot be By Lord is meant Jesus Christ our God-Redeemer whom the Father out of greatest Love sent to save us in whom and by whom we receive all spiritual Blessings which are signified by Grace which presupposeth here the Love of the Father the Redemption by Christ and the Communion of the Spirit the Effects of all which in us is Remission Reconciliation Adoption Sanctification heavenly Joy and Comfort For this Grace is sufficient to make us in time though by degrees fully and for ever happy And by Grace here is meant the continuance encrease and perfection of Grace This Grace he desired prayed for and pronounced upon them all as Believers for none but such are capable of it Amen is added to Petitions Doxologies Confessions and Benedictions as here it is to confirm his Benediction and to seal it up unto them The God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ be blessed for ever FINIS * Though the principal subject be the prophetical and sacerdotal office yet there is mention made several times of his Regal excellency b I take prophecy in a large sense * 1 Pet. 4. 22. * Beza upon the place Ver. 6 7 8 9 c. Ver. â— * He signifies 1. That the Hebrews had no reason to be offended with the death and humiliatiof Christ. 2. That this humiliation was no hinderance of but a means unto his exaltation and it was so ordered by the wisdom of God for the unspeakable benefit of man who â—ould â—ot he saved but by this being lower then the Angels * There is no need to distinguish between 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 between videre â—â—d cernere †It may be a word which suited with the metaphor of a Cup wherein is contained some bitter poâ—ion which torments him who tasts of it Therefore Christ compares his sufferings to such a Cup ' when he saith Let this Cup passe from me Ver. 13. Ver. 14. * Therefore the Sacraments in publick Assemblies were called Exhortations * Many think that Priesthood is of Institution * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * The Aethiopick and Arabick have not the word Imposed Some Copies read not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Voluntas est ambulatoria * For we find the word Megillah taken for a Roll. Ezra 6. 2. Ezek. 2. 9 3 1 2 3. †The Psalmist seems chiefly to intend the Books of Moses which were written before his time * Yet in this the Apostle may allude to the purifications under the Law By Ceremonial understand Typical * 1 Cor. 15. 18. * Conscience may be taken for the Heart and the intention of the Heart