Selected quad for the lemma: book_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
book_n aaron_n altar_n son_n 14 3 4.0394 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A49796 An exposition of the Epistle to the Hebrewes wherein the text is cleared, Theopolitica improved, the Socinian comment examined / by George Lawson ... Lawson, George, d. 1678. 1662 (1662) Wing L707; ESTC R19688 586,405 384

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

was the blood of Calves and Goats with water for such were Sacrificed for Burnt-Offerings and Peace-Offerings The things sprinkled with blood were the Book wherein the Covenant was written and out of which it was read and the People who engaged themselves in the Covenant The time was when Moses had spoken every Precept to all the People according to the Law For the Covenant must first be made before it could be confirmed And this sprinkling upon the People was the confirmation of the Covenant on the People's part as the sprinkling of it upon the Altar was the confirmation on God's part This was the action described more fully then we find it in Exod. 24. 2. The words are added to the action to signify the use and end of that sprinkling which is to ratify the League and Covenant For in these words we have 1. A Covenant enjoyned by God 2. The Blood of this Covenant The History informs 1. Of a Covenant made 2. This Covenant enjoyned by God unto Israel It 's said to be enjoyned both because God having made and instimted it by Moses commanded it to be entred into and confirmed by the People but also because in this Covenant there were certain Precepts which were Articles and Conditions the observation whereof God did stipulate and require at their hands In Moses Exod. 24. 8. it 's said to be the Covenant which God had made with them and he is said to make it not only because he was the Authour of it but also because in it he was the principal party covenanting and binding himself unto the People by his promises which are so made that they prerequire the performance of the Precepts from them if they will either avoid the penalties threatned orattain the Blessings and Rewards promised 3. This Covenant once made must be confirmed by Blood and this Blood sprinkled For the meaning of the words This is the Blood of the Covenant is this That this is the Blood by which this Covenant is confirmed and made inviolable And as this so the New Covenant is confirmed by Blood as is evident from the words of our blessed Saviour in the Institution of the Eucharist saying This Cup is the New Covenant in my Blood which is shed for you Luke 22. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 25. Or This is my Blood of the New Testament which is shed for the Remission of the Sins of many Matth. 26. 28. Mark 14. 24. Where we have 1. A Now Covenant 2. The Blood of this New Covenant or the New Covenant in this Blood that is this New Covenant confirmed by Blood or Blood confirming this New Covenant 3. This Blood is the Blood of Christ shed for Remission of Sins This Remission of Sins is one principal Blessing promised in this New Covenant yet this promise had been in vain and to no purpose if Christ's Blood had not been shed to satisfy divine Justice and make Sin remissible For though Man should repent and believe yet his Sin could never have been actually remitted if not by this Blood made remissible So that this Blood of Christ is the firm and immovable basis upon which the Covenant is fixed Both these Covenants agree in this that they were confirmed by Blood and to manifest this is the intention of the Apostle and though the confirmation of both be the same in general yet as the Blood so the manner of confirmation was very different § 19. As there were several Ceremonials instituted by God for confirmation so there were some ordianed for purification therefore it followeth Ver. 21. Moreover he sprinkled with Blood both the Tabernacle and all the Vessels of the Ministry Ver. 22. And almost all things by the Law are purged with Blood and without sh●dding of Blood is no Remission IN these words with those that follow in the next Verse we have an explicate and full comparison in quality and both the parts are expressed For we find 1. The Proposition in these words 2. The Reddition ver 23. In the Proposition we may observe 1. The sprinkling of several things with Blood 2. The effect of this sprinkling which was purification 3. The necessity of this sprinkling for Remission 1. Several things were sprinkled with Blood the things thus sprinkled are either named in particular as the Tabernacle and the Vessels of the Ministery or signified by a more general term yet with some diminution and abatement The general term is all things the abating Particle is almost which signifies that many and the greatest part of them by far were sprinkled with Blood yet not all but some were excepted and were sprinkled and cleansed with water 2. The end of this was purging We do not read of the sprinkling of the Tabernacle with Blood in the Books of Moses we find that Aaron and his Sons with their Garments and the Altar were sanctified by Oyl and Blood Lev. 8. 38. Neither do we find there signified or here expressed by the Apostle what kind of purging or sanctification this here mentioned is There is a purging of Consecration of Sanctification or Explation Consecration is a separation from common use Sanctification is a purging from pollution Expiation is a freeing from guilt These two last seem here to be understood at least principally yet we may distinguish between the cleansing of things and persons Things may be considered as common or polluted as common they are purged by Consecration as polluted by re-consecration Persons are impure and as such they must be sanctifyed or guilty and as such they must be restored by expiating Blood sprinkled Some give the reason why things as the Tabernacle and Vessels and other things must be purged by by Blood to be this because man being himself polluted polluteth those things which he useth and this is something though not all that may be said in this particular 3. The necessity of this sprinkling is because without Blood there is no Remission Where we have 1. Blood shed 2. Remission 3. No Blood shed no Remission 1. By Blood shed we must understand the Blood of some living thing to be Sacrificed and this Blood shed upon the slaying of the Sacrifice and not only shed but usually sprinkled before it could purge 2. Remission may be Consecration in respect of things and Expiation and Sanctification from pollution in respect of persons For Remission is not here to be taken strictly for freeing a person from guilt and obligation to punishment Neither is it in this place any cleansing from spiritual pollution of the Conscience or freedom from the spiritual and eternal penalties but it 's only a Legal Remission of Legal guilt and impurity 3. If where there is no Blood shed there is no Remission then it follows that unto Remission Blood shed is necessary not only as an antecedent to a consequent but as a cause to the production of an effect It 's true that the causality is not naturall but morall By this God even then did signify
Israelites from the first-born of other Families to the Tribe of Levi For we read that the were set apart for the Service of the Tabernacle Numb 1. 50. And this done by Command of God to Moses Ver. 48. This was the Reason why they were not numbred non had a several distinct part of the Land as the rest of the Tribes In this the Lord did punish shew Mercy and gave Honour He punished that Tribe in scattering them throughout all the Tribes according to the words of Jacob who denounced this Judgment against them for their dissimulation and cruelty exercised upon the Shechemites Gen. 49. 7. He shewed Mercy to the rest of the Tribes in that they were dispersed in every part amongst them to teach them the Laws of God He honoured these Levites in that he consecrated them to his Service and setled the Priest-hood in that Tribe And this seems to be a Reward for their Service in assisting Moses when he punished their idolatrous Brethren Therefore said Moses Consecrate your selves to day unto the Lord c. Exod. 32. 29. So wonderful is the Wisdom of God that by one Act he can both punish and reward the same parties and shew Mercy unto others Of this their separation and taking them for the first-born we may read Numb 3. 12. Yet though all the Sons of Levi did minister in holy things all were not Priests for of the Sons of Levi onely the Family of Aaron received the Office of Priest-hood and were Priests the rest of that Tribe were assistant and subservient to the Priests These had their Office not by Usurpation or the voluntary consent and suffrage of Man but by the ordination and determination of God without whose Power intervening so great an alteration in the Translation of the Sacerdotol Power could not have been valid or just In the Christian Church the Office of Ministers answers to this which could neither be necessary or effectual except Christ had instituted it And onely such as enter upon this Function according to his Institution are legal Ministers 2. The parties tythed were their Brethren though descended of Abraham The Priest-hood with their inferiour Ministry must be maintained and it seemed good to the Divine Wisdom to appoint the Tythes for that end as the sitrest and most convenient maintenance of all other and if duly paid according to his order the least subject to inconveniences And seeing they did serve and minister for the good and benefit of their Brethren sequestring themselves from other employments Justice and Epuity did require that they should maintain them and give them their Tythes The same Rule in general holds good in the times of the Gospel For saith the Apostle if we have sown unto yo● spiritual things is it a great matter if we shall reap your carnal things 1 Cor. 9. 11. Yet profane World●ings who make no account of spiritual Blessings will say It is a great thing an heavy charge and we desire to be freed from it yet carnal things are nothing to spiritual These Brethren were descended of Abraham as well as the Levites and Priests and both as Brethren and as descended of Abraham were equal Yet they must acknowledge themselves and that by paying of Tythes unto the Priests to be inferiour to them who vvere nearer God and did represent him in the highest Acts and Service 3. But by what Warrant and according to what Rule did these Priest receive Tythes of their Brethren They had a Warrant and a Rule and both from God For 1. He gave a Command they should be paid and a Rule how they should be given The Command did presuppose the Power and signified the Will of God so that the People were bound to give them and the Priests had Power to demand them as due For the Effect of this Command was to make them due to be given by the People and unto them and to none other After this Command they could not be a meer Benevolence God did often signify in the Books of Moses that Tythes were his and he had given them to the Sons of Levi and the Priests That they are the Lord's and holy unto him we find Levit. 27. 30 31 c. and they are commanded to bring them to the Priest Deut. 14. 22. And that he gave them the Children of Levi for their service is evident Num. 18. 21. and they were their Inheritance And whosoever deteineth them robs God and is cursed with a Curse Mal. 3 8 9. Work and Hire Service and Tythes the Preaching of the Gospel and Maintenance go together before the Law under the Law and in the time of the Gospel Commands and Laws do not onely define the Persons that must obey and the thing to be done but many times if not alwayes the manner of performance So it was in Decimation for the Law determined not onely the Persons that must give them but of what they must be given and at what time they must be paid and into what place they must be brought and where they must be laid up So that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies the Command and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Rule and both are parts of the Law of Tything Some think these words are brought in by the Apostle to prove the Superiority of the Priests above their Brethren because their Brethren gave and they received Tythes and it 's true as Tything them they were above them Others conceive that in them he answers the Objection That Tything and Decimation would not prove the Greatness of Melchizedec above the Levitical Priests for these as well as he did decimate And they understand the Apostle to return this Answer That though they received Tythes yet it was but from their Brethren who being the posterity of Abraham were far inferiour unto Abraham whom Melchizedec tythed yet this answer is not given by him in these words except in part For the principal part followeth § 14. For we read in the next words Ver. 6. But he whose Descent is not counted from them received Tythes of Abraham c. In which words we may observe two Propositions The 1. Negative That Melchizedec's Pedegree was not reckoned from them 2. Affirmative Yet he received Tythes of Abraham The first informs us that he was not descended from Levi neither was his Priesthood of their Order or derived from them If he had descended from their Tribe and his Priest-hood from the House of Aaron then they would have said that he received Tythes because he was of their Order and would further alledge that if one as great as Abraham should be found amongst their Brethren they had Power by vertue of their Priesthood to decimate him But all this he prevents by denying his Descent from them The second tells us plainly that he tythed Abraham who was far above Levi and the Levitical Priests and much more above their Brethren Yet this is not all he not onely tythed Abraham but He blessed him
dear Affection to them who are enriched with them So that sinful Men may hope for this City yet upon condition that they will be Pilgrims and Strangers in this World and desire above all other things this better and heavenly Country For to clear this Doctrine more fully we must observe That the World morally and spiritually considered is divided into two Societies the one is of the Devil the other of God This distinction the learned Father took notice of when he wrote his excellent Treatise De Civitate Dei For all men either seek their Rest and Happiness on Earth or an eternal Peace in Heaven and by Nature till God transplant us we are not only in but of this earthly Society and in the Kingdom of Darkness and under the Power and Dominion of Satan and whilest we are in this Kingdom of Satan we are Strangers to the Common-wealth and City of God But when God out of his unspeakable Mercy hath called us made us meet to be partakers of the Inheritance of the Saints in Light and delivered us from the Power of Darkness and hath translated us into the Kingdom of his dear Son Colos. 1. 12. 13. Then we are no more Strangers and Forreigners but Fellow-Citizens with the Saints and of the Houshold of God Ephes. 2. 19. Being once naturalized and made Burgesses of Heaven we have our Conversation in Heaven and carry our selves as Children of a Celestial extraction and the Progeny of the eternal King This Doctrine doth not only inform us of our Duty but ministreth unspeakable Comfort if we do perform it For if our Goods and earthly Estates be sequestred plundred o● any wayes taken from us we have a better Estate in Heaven If we be disgraced and reproached in this World yet we shall be Kings and Priests and for ever honoured in Heaven If we be banished and persecuted from place to place so that we can find no Rest and Safety but are wearied out with Removals yet we have a place of Rest and Safety and eternal Abode in Heaven and of this no man can dispossess and diffeisin us If our Sufferings be grievous many and continue long yet we have a City where is no Suffering Pain Persecution Poverty Sorrow where God will wipe away all Tears In this City are eternal Riches Pleasures Honours Peace Safety and full Joy there is nothing wanting which the heart of Man can desire This is that City which as it is the expectation so it 's the universal Comfort of the Sons of God And though the time of our Pilgrimage seem long and tedious yet it will shortly expire and then begins our everlasting Rest for God hath prepared a City for us § 17. The Apostle proceeds in proposing Abraham unto us as a Pattern of Imitation and instanceth in a fourth Work or Effect of his Faith for thus we read Ver. 17. By Faith Abraham when he was tryed offered up Isaac and he that had received the Promises offered his only begotten Son Ver. 18. Of whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called Ver. 19. Accounting that God was able to raise him up even from the dead from whence also he received him in a Figure IN these words we may observe 1. Abraham's Obedience 2. His Faith whereby he performed this Obedience In this Obedience we have A Description of the Party obeying Act of Obedience 1. The Party obedient who was Abraham is described in reference to this Act of Obedience 1. As tempted 2. As having received the Promises 3. As one to whom it was said That in Isaac shall thy Seed be called 1. He was tempted or tried The party tempting or trying him was God not that God tempts any Man to Sin but that he would try and manifest unto Abraham himself his Faith and Love to God that so he might be a rare Example in both to all future Generations who should be informed of it The means whereby he tryed him was by giving him this singular and extraordinary Command of sacrificing his Son Isaac This Command we read of in the Books of Moses and this it is Take now thy Son thine only Son Isaac whom thou lovest and go thou to the Land of Moriah and offer him there upon one of the Mountains which I will tell thee of Gen. 22. 2. The End of this Command was to try whether Abraham loved God or his Son Isaac more The Effect of it was an Obligation of Abra●● to perform this Service and to offer his Son Neither in this was God's preceptive Will contrary to his decretive Will for the decretive Will binds God absolutely to do that which he hath decreed and is indispensable but the preceptive Will bound only Abraham to do this yet so that God reserved a Power to dispense with him and to hinder the Performance And this was fulfilled instantly upon the signifying of his Will unto Abraham who instantly upon the Knowledg thereof was bound whether he did or did it not There was no decretive Will of God or Intention that Isaac should be slain and offered This Command was just and no wayes contrary to that other Command of God Thou shalt not kill for though it 's true that it is unjust and contrary to that Law for any Man to take away the life of a party innocent not guilty of any Capital Crime which is the thing there forbidden yet it is just and God may justly command Man to take away the Life of such an innocent Person And the reason hereof is not only this that that Law did not bind God but only Man but because he is the Supream Lord and hath absolute Power of Life and Death which no Creature hath or can have Again he could restore Life taken away which Abraham could not do nay it was above all created Power So that the Reason whereby God in this Command is freed from all Injustice is taken à Potestate Potentia Dei for his Power was absolute and supream and his strength was Almighty 2. Abraham had received the Promises of the Land of Canaan of a numerous Posterity sufficient to inhabit it of Christ in whom all Nations should be blessed 3. He was fully assured by God that in Isaac who was the Son of Promise all these Promises should be fulfilled For God had excluded Ismael and that peremptorily and had several times expresly signified that in Isaac and his Posterity and in none else these Promises should be accomplished Neither need we here trouble our selves about the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for it may be turned to whom that is to Abraham or of whom that is of Isaac it was said c. This was the Description of the Party obeying The Act of Obedience was this that he offered up Isaac he offered up his only begotten Son that Son of whom it was said In Isaac shall thy Seed be called The Sacrifice commanded as commanded was bloody and required the Death and
ministreth unto you the spirit and worketh Miracles amongst you doth he it by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith Chap. 3. 5. Where he doth imply 1. That he did not so many and great Miracles amongst them to confirm the Doctrine of the Law but to confirm the Faith that is the Gospel 2. He did not minister the Spirit and gifts of the Holy Ghost by the preaching nor they receive the Spirit by the hearing of the Law but of the Gospel 3. That God to testify the excellency of the Gospel above the Law did concurr to work Miracles and give the Spirit in confirmation of the one not of the other Therefore if the Gospel in so many respects be more excellent then the Law then to let it slip to recede from it to neglect it is a far greater sin and therefore makes us obnoxious to far more grievous punishment So we are come to the principal Conclusion which is to take heed of departing from or neglecting of this Doctrine of so great Salvation § 8. The application of this is to be made unto all and every one who having the use of reason hath heard the Gospel Let every one of them seriously consider that God speaks in it he speaks not by Angels but his own Son it 's the most clear full and powerful Doctrine that ever was revealed from Heaven a Doctrine of eternal Salvation it 's confirmed by most glorious works and the excellent Gifts of the blessed Spirit It 's a discovery of profoundest wisdom a manifestation of greatest love and the last warning God will give No other knowledg so useful so excellent so absolutely necessary as this Therefore receive it readily lay it up in your hearts never forget ever remember it prize it never neglect it never depart from it If the love of God cannot perswade you let the fear of his eternal displeasure and the love of your own Salvation prevail with you What will you despise his sweetest mercy reject the tender of Salvation bring upon your selves eternal and unavoidable misery It will be the greatest Sin that you can commit and make you obnoxious to the greatest punishment if you shall refuse to hearken to this great Propher Shall the word of Angels transgressed be so severely punished and shall no Offender escape And shall the word of the eternal Son of God be disobeyed and any Offender guilty in this particular escape everlasting penalties Let not any slatter themselves and think to escape For how shall we escape if we neglect c Ver. 5. For unto the Angels hath he not put in subjection the World to come whereof we speak § 9. The words are difficult to be understood and must be explained before the scope of the Apostle in them can be discovered The subject matter of them is the World to come and God's subjection of it The greatest difficulty is to know what 's meant by the World to come which many think referrs to the state of glory and the World which follows the Resurrection Thus à Lapide and some of the Antients Riverae understands the Church-Christian as opposed to the Church of former times especially under the Law This is the more probable sense For the Apostle speaks of these last times wherein God spake unto men by his Son and it 's opposed to the times wherein he spake by his Prophets and Angels Yet we must not understand it of the Church exclusively as though God had not subjected other things even Angels for the good of the Church That World and those times whereof the Apostle speaks are here meant but he speaks of the times of the Gospel The proposition is negative God subjected not the World to come to Angels In former times God had used very much the ministery of Angels in ordering the Church and put much power in their hands to that end Yet now in this last time he made Christ his Son who by reason of his suffering was a little lower then the Angels to be the administratour-General of his Kingdom the Universal Lord and subjected the very Angels unto him The expression seems to be taken from Esay 9. 6. for whereas there amongst others Titles given to Christ one is ●verlasting Father the Sep●uagint turn it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Father or Governour of the World to come which seems to be the genuine sense of the Hebrew words The sum is that God did not subject the Church in the times of the Gospel nor the World of those times to Angels but to Christ. The words thus understood may inform us 1. That Christ is more excellent then the Angels 2. If the Law and Word spoken by Angels when neglected and disobeyed was so severely punished much more severely shall they who neglect the Gospel spoken by Christ be punished 3. That if it was the duty of the Fathers and those who lived in former times to hearken to the Word spoken by Angels which are but Servants Then it 's much more the duty of us who live in these last times to hearken unto the Word of so great Salvation spoken by Christ made Lord of All. From hence we may understand the scope of the words to be the same with that of the former and that may be considered either a●part of the former reason why we should hearken to Christ and not neglect the Gospel or they may with the latter words following contain another distinct reason and in this manner that seeing God hath not to the Angels subjected the World to come but to Christ who by his Suffering and Death was for a little time made lower then the Angels and for that suffering afterward made Lord of all even of Angels then we ought to give the more earnest heed to his Doctrine Crellius understands by the World to come Heaven but without any reason but rather contrary to reason and to the purpose of the Apostle § 10. The former Text being negative doth not express but imply that the World to come was put in subjection to Christ. But in these words he doth not only express it but prove it And to this purpose he alledgeth the words of Psal. 8 4 5 6. In this testimony we may observe the allegation or the words alledged application of them The manner of the allegation we need not examine the Authour neither names the Book of Psalms as a distinct part of the Scriptures of the Old Testament nor the particular Psalm which is for number the 8th nor the Authour of the Psalm David But saith 1. That one or a certain man testifieth 2. He testifieth in a certain place This he did not through ignorance or defect of memory but out of some other reason He knew that the testimony or thing testified was the principal thing and that these Hebrews were well acquainted with the Scriptures and especially with the Book of Psalms To return to the words alledged out of the holy
Scriptures of the Old Testament received by the Jews as Divine and from God the difficult Question is of whom that Psalm speaketh and whom he meaneth by man the Son of man so minded so visited by God so humbled so advanced Some will have it to be man in the day of his Creation some think it's man fallen some determine it to be man restored in Christ some are resolute that it is Christ himself as man Thus Cramerus Tarnovius and the Lutherans generally who bitterly inveigh against Calvin interpreting otherwise Calvin had his fellows followers Others tell us that it agrees to Man in the literal to Christ in the mystical sense others that there are two literal senses the one whereof agrees to Man the other which is the principal agrees to Christ. Vatablus seems to agree with this Cramerus teckons this amongst the prophetical Psalms The intention of the Psalmist is to praise God for his glorious works wherein he manifested his power wisdom and special mercy The works are not only those of Creation but of his special providence over Man and amongst those works of special providence that of restauration of Man by the humiliation and exaltation of Jesus Christ who is the principal subject of the Psalm according to the parts of it alledged in the New Testament where we find ver 2 6 8. applyed to Christ. Upon this ground Cramerus Tarnovius and others understand it only of Christ It 's true that some things here mentioned do agree to Man in the state of Creation yet the special care of Man in respect of his spiritual and eternal estate appears most of all in Christ to whom set at his right hand he subjected all things for this end That he might convert man and make him converted for ever blessed So that in the words alledged we may observe 1. God's special care of Man and his singular love towards him 2. The same manifested in a most glorious manner in the humiliation and exaltation of Christ. 3. The admiration or rather amazement at such a stupe●dious manifestation of such stupendious love All the works of God are in themselves excellent and wonderful but the work of Redemption by Christ is matter of greatest wonder and astonishment even to the Angels § 11. The Application follows where the Authour takes special notice of the last words cited out of the Psalm They are these Thou hast put all things in subjection under his Feet These are not the last words of the Psalm but of the words alledged out the Psalm These understood of Christ proves that which he intended That unto the Angels God hath not put in subjection the World to come but to some other even to Man that special Man whereof the Psalmist speaks Concerning these words he delivers two Propositions The first as a conclusion The second upon the By. The first as a conclusion is this That he left nothing that is not put under him this necessarily follows if God put all things under his Feet Therefore he is the Lord of the World to come and Angels are subjected as included in the word all That these words are understood of Christ and not of any other Man as Heinsius would have them to be is evident from 1 Cor. 15. 27. For he hath put all things under his Feet but when he saith All things are put under him it is manifest that he is excepted who did put all things under him Where two things are observable as clear and evident 1. That it was Christ risen from the Dead and set at the right hand of God under whose Poet as his Foot-stool all things were put 2. That nothing is excepted as not put under but God who subdued all things unto him The second Proposition upon the By is But now we see not all things put under him The meaning whereof is that though God hath given him Dominion over all things and all things are subject to his Power yet he hath not as yet exerclsed his Power to destroy all Enemies and reduce all his People to subjection And this we shall never see till the last Saint be converted and Death the last Enemy destroyed which cannot be before the Resurrection whereby all his Servants and Vassals shall be made immortall and fully and for ever freed from Death Ver. 9. But we see Jesus who was made a little lower then the Angels c. This is the second Application of those words of the Psalmist Thou hast made him a little lower then the Angels thou hast crowned him with Glory and Honour Which we find differently expounded translated read pointed Yet the matter is plain and it 's evident they speak of Christ and concerning Him deliver two things 1. His Humiliation 2. His Exaltation 1. His Humiliation in three things 1. That he was lower then the Angels 2. He suffered 3. He suffered Death for all men And the substance of the whole is That though in the state of his humiliation and mortality in respect of his suffering Death he was a little or a little while lower than the Angels yet he rose again and is now crowned with Glory and Honour at the right hand of God and made Lord of All. And there was a special reason why for a time he should be mortal and suffer Death even because that was the way unto Glory and the means of eternal deliverance determined by God Though all this be clear yet the place is wofully obscured and especially by Henisius whilst he tediously endeavours to make it more plain I will not trouble the Reader either with his pointing the words or his manner of rendring them or his exposition in all which he thinks T●cla's Manuscript doth favour him which it doth not § 12. In these words these things are manifest 1. That the subject of them are the words of Psal. 8. 5. 2. That he applys them unto Christ. 3. That in them he observes the Humiliation and Exaltation of Christ. 4. Gives the reasons why Christ must first be humbled before he can be exalted and to shew this last is the scope of the Apostle in the rest of the Chapter unto the end It 's not to prove that Christ is Man as some do think nor to make a digression to speak of his Priest-hood as others tell us That he mentions some acts of Christ as a Priest and other things agreeing to him as Man and as a Priest or King it 's upon the By. In them we find three Propositions 1. That we see Christ for the suffering of Death Crowned with Glory and Honour 2. This Christ is he that was first made a little lower then the Angels 3. One end why Christ was made lower then the Angels was that by the Grace of God he might ●asto Death for every Man The meaning of the first Proposition is easy For it affirms 1. That Christ was Crowned with Glory and Honour 2. And that for suffering Death 3. They