Selected quad for the lemma: body_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
body_n nature_n soul_n unite_v 6,882 5 9.6339 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A80790 The doctrine of faith. Or, The prime and principall points which a Christian is to know and believe. Handled in sundry sermons upon texts of scripture selected and chosen for the purpose. Wherein the method of the creed, (commonly called the Apostles Creed) is observed; and the articles thereof are confirmed, explained and applied, for the instructing of the ignorant, and the establishing of all in the truth. / By Christopher Cartwright, Minister of the Word at York. Cartwright, Christopher, 1602-1658. 1650 (1650) Wing C687; Thomason E1231_1; ESTC R14778 283,812 488

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

it up This he spake of the Temple of his body as it follows there v. 22. And when he was risen from the dead his Disciples remembred that he had said this unto them v. 22. Although Christs owne Disciples it seems did not understand the meaning of those words untill they were fulfilled that is untill Christ was risen from the dead yet Christ had so plainly at other times foretold his resurrection that the chief Priests and Pharisees could say unto Pilate when Christ was crucified dead and buried Sir we remember that that deceiver said while he was yet alive after three daies I will rise again And so the Prophets that were before Christs coming in the flesh did foreshew as other things concerning him that he should rise from the dead David in those words Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell nor suffer thine holy one to see corruption Psal 16. 10. did speak of Christs resurrection as is testified by S. Peter Act. 2. 31. He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ that his soul was not left in hell nor his flesh did see corruption And so by S. Paul Act. 13. 35 36 37. Wherefore he saith also in another Psalm Thou shalt not suffer thine holy one to see corruption For David after he had served his own generation by the will of God fell asleep and was laid unto his fathers and saw corruption But he whom God raised again saw no corruption So all the Prophets speaking of Christ his Priesthood and Kingdome induring for ever did consequently speak of Christs resurrection As * Or Solomon who by the title seems to have been the composer of that 72. Psalme David Psal 72. 17. 110. 4. And Daniel chapt 7. v. 14. Some from those and the like places of the Prophets falsly und●●stood did infer that Christ should not die Joh. ●● 34. But the Prophets had no such meaning but that though Christ did die yet he should rise againe and so abide for ever And therefore Christ called them fools and slow of heart to believe all that the Prophets had written who would not believe his resurrection when they were told of it Luk. 24. 25. And Paul professed that he did say no other things then those which the Prophets and Moses did say should come That Christ should suffer and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead Act. 26. 22 23. 3. All the foure Evangelists as we call them Matthew Mark Luke and John have carefully recorded Christs rising from the dead Though as in other of their relations so in this they differ in circumstances some relating one cireumstance some another yet they agree in the substance all relating this that he rose again They shew us also that Christ after his resurrection by many infallible proofs did shew himself alive as S. Luke speaks Act. 1. 3. That when his Disciples thought him to have been a spirit he said unto them Behold my hands and my feet that it is I my self handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have And when he had thus spoken he shewed them his hands and his feet Luk. 24. 39 40. And presently after it follows that he called for meat and did eat before them S. Iohn also relates how when Christ had appeared after his resurrection to the Apostles Thomas not being among them when he heard of it he would not believe it professing that except he should see in his hands the print of the nails and put his finger into the print of his nails and thrust his hand into his side he would not believe And that afterward Christ appeared unto them again Thomas being with them and that he spake unto Thomas saying Reach hither thy finger and behold my hands and reach hither thy hand and thrust it into my side and be not faithlesse but believe And that then Thomas cried out My Lord and my God Joh. 20. 24 25 26 27 28. The Evangelists also record that Christs resurrection was witnessed by an Angel from heaven Mat. 28. 5 6. Mar. 16. 5 6. Yea by more Angels then one Luk. 24. 4 5 6. 4. The Apostles did no lesse diligently preach and publish Christs resurrection Paul preached it as he testifieth 1 Cor. 15. 4. Where also in the verses following he doth largely insist upon the proof and demonstration of it So Act 13. 30. c. We find that in one of his Sermons he was much upon this point And so also was Peter Act. 2. 24. c. And it is said of all the Apostles in generall except Paul who was called to the Apostleship afterward that with great power they gave witnesse of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus Act. 4. 33. And Paul urgeth the force of this argument drawn from the preaching of the Apostles Yea and we are found false witnesses of God because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ whom he raised not up if so be that the dead rise not 1 Cor. 15. 15. 5. Divers reasons and arguments grounded upon Scripture prove that Christ did rise from the dead For 1. It was meet that as Christ did freely and voluntarily humble himself so again he should be exalted Those that honour me I will honour saith God 1 Sam. 2. 30. Therefore as Christ did honour God by submitting himself unto death so God would honour him by raising him from the dead He humbled himself became obedient unto death even the death of the Crosse Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him Phil. 2. 8. 9. Mansit in separatione inseparabilis unitas Bern. de Consid l. 5. c. 10. 2. Although when Christ died his soul and body were separated one from the other yet the divine nature was separated from neither the one nor the other Come see the place where the Lord lay said the Angel speaking of the grave where the dead body of Christ was laid Mat. 28. 6. which shews that the divine nature was still united to the body though the soul were separated from it And otherwise we could not rightly confesse as we do in the Creed that Christ the only son of God was buried Now there being this union betwixt the divine nature and Christs body it was not only meet but necessary that his body should be raised up and not be held under deaths dominion Though being man he died yet being God he rose again being put to death in the flesh his humane nature but quickned by the spirit his divine nature 1 Pet. 3. 18. 3. For the working out of our redemption it was requisite that Christ should not only die but also rise again Some when Christ did hang upon the Crosse blasphemed saying He saved others himselfe he cannot save Mar. 15. 31. Whereas that he might save others himself he would not save viz. not so as not to die But had he so died as not to rise again his death
his owne power but by the touch of some other who had been buried in the same grave before As we read of one who being cast into the grave where the Prophet Elisha was buried by the touch of the dead bones of the Prophet revived 2 King 13. 21. And again the Evangelists record that Christ was laid in a sepulchre which was hewen out of a Rock and that a great stone was rolled to the door of the sepulchre and that the stone vvas sealed and a watch set to keep the sepulchre Mat. 27. 60 66. So that it could not with any probability be pretended that either by undermining or otherwise Christ was stolne out of the sepulchre 3. Christs burial was a further degree of his humiliation It was much for him to die and more to die the death of the Crosse and yet more to condescend and stoop so low as to be laid in the grave the common receptacle of the dead Job speaking of a man that is high and eminent in the world vvhile he liveth shevves that yet vvhen he dieth he shall be brought so low as to be laid in the grave Who shal declare his way to his face and who shal repay him what he hath done Yet shall he be brought to the grave and shal remain in the tomb the clods of the valley shall be sweet unto him c. Iob 21. 31 32 33. 4. This served to make Christs victory over death over him that had the power of death that is the Devill the more glorious that he not only died but also was buried death seemed to have ful conquest over Christ having gotten him into its den yet even there did Christ vanquish and subdue it Thus did he most gloriously triumph fulfilling that O death I will be thy plague O grave I will be thy destruction Hos 13. 14. Vse 1. This point concerning Christs buriall doth make much for the confirming of our faith in Christ to assure us that our sins are fully expiated and abolished by Christ that as they were nailed to his Crosse Col. 2. 14. so also buried in his grave never to rise up against us to our condemnation Christ bare our sins in his body on the tree 1 Pet. 2. 24. Therefore Christ being buried our sins also were buried with him so that we being united by faith unto Christ and having interest in him we are freed from sin and need Ioh. 1. not fear the imputation of it Ionah being cast into the sea and buried as it were in the belly of the fish presently the storm ceased and the Sea was calm So Christ being laid in the grave and buried our consciences though otherwise by reason of the guilt of sin full of vexation and horror have good cause to be calm and quiet Vse 2. Again here is good comfort and incouragement for us if we belong to Christ against the fear of death and the horrour of the grave Christ hath grapled with death and the grave and hath overcome them and therefore we need not to be afraid of them Christ having followed death into its den and there gotten victory over it we may assure our selves that though death prevail so far over us as to draw us into it's den yet it shall not be able to keep us there but Christ will make good that which is promised Hos 13. 14. I will ransome them from the power of the grave I wil redeem them from death So Christ assures us that the houre is coming in the which all that are in the grave shall hear his voice and shall come forth Joh. 5. 28. 29. In like manner the Apostle saith Then shall be brought to passe the saying that is written Death is swallowed up in victory O death where is thy sting O grave where is thy victory The sting of death is sin and the strength of sin is the Law But thanks be unto God who giveth us victory thorough Jesus Christ our Lord 1 Cor. 15. 54 55 56 57. The graves of the Saints are called beds wherein they lie and rest for a while but at length arise and come out of them They shall rest in their beds Isai 57. 2. So by Ecclesiasticall writers burying places 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Caemiteria are expressed by a word that properly signifies places to sleep in even as in Scripture death is usually termed sleep Vse 3. But if we would have such hope in Christ in that he was buried then we must be conformed unto him in respect of his buriall as he was buried literally so must we be buried mystically We are buried with him by baptisme saith the Apostle Rom. 6. 4. Our Baptism is a seal of our ingrafting into Christ and of our communicating with him and conforming unto him even in his buriall So Col. 2. 12. Buried with him in baptisme This is in respect of our old man as it is called Rom. 6. 6. that is our corrupt nature this must be crucified mortified and buried so as not to serve sin as there the Apostle doth expresse it Even as a dead body is laid in the ground and overwhelmed with earth so the corruption that is in us must be subdued and brought under that it may not reign in us nor have dominion over us Let not sin therefore reign in your mortall body Rom. 6. 12. The greatest tyrants and oppressours being in the grave all their tyranny and oppression ceaseth There the wicked cease from troubling Joh. 3. 17. So we being in the sense before expressed by way of analogy and resemblance buried with Christ sin shall not have that power over us as over the unregenerate I say not so as over the unregenerate But we must not think that whiles we are here we can be so conformed unto Christ so dead and buried with him as to be without sin to be quite free from it No If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves 1 Joh. 1. 8. In many things we offend all Iam. 3. 2. But if we have the spirit of Christ And if any have not the spirit of Christ the same is none of his Rom. 8. 9. then we are so in a spirituall sense dead and buried with Christ as not to be under the reigning power of sin and the dominion of it Sin shall not have dominion over you for you are not under the Law but under grace Rom. 6. 14. Again there is not the like reason of spirituall death and buriall and of that which it corporall For corporal death and buriall is finished at once but not so that which is spirituall this is done by degrees by little and little He that is already dead and buried in a spirituall sense that is he whose old man whose imbred corruption is as it were put to death and laid in the grave yet must still die in that kind and be buried still more and more because he hath still some reliques of the old man still some sin and
the power of death but wilt raise me againe from the dead And so consequently the Article of Christs descending into hell whereof these words are the foundation imports no more but that Christ went into the other world was in the state of the dead and under deaths dominion to wit untill his Resurrection This Exposition keeps the propriety of the words and the order of the Creed neither is there any thing that I know of weight against it The Hebrew word Sheol and the Greek Hades which are rendred sometimes hell do signifie the estate of the dead or the power of death Hell and destruction are before the Lord Prov. 15. 11. Jansenius a learned Writer of the Church of Rome upon the place notes that by hell and destruction Per infernum perditionem significatur status mortuorum non solum damnatorum ut nos ferè ex his vocibus auditis concipimus sed in genere status defunctorum Jansen ad loc is signified the state of the dead and not onely of the damned as we usually when we hear these words do conceive but the state of those in generall that are departed out of this life Thus also Genebrard another Romish Author and a skilfull Hebritian on Psal 30. 3. as we reckon Ab inferno id est è statu mortuorum liberasti Geneb ad loc where David sayes O Lord thou hast brought up my soul from Sheol hell our Translators have the grave Genebrard I say interprets it thus From hell that is out of the state of the dead hast thou delivered me And so that Psal 89. 48. What man is he that liveth and shall not see death and shall he deliver his soul from the hand of Sheol of hell So * Viz. That in the Booke of Common-Prayer Infernus significat totum mortuorum statum Gen. ad loc one of our Translations hath it the last Translation hath of the grave that likewise doth Genebrard expound in like manner though first he would draw it to their fained Limbus before-mentioned yet upon second thoughts which use to be wiser he addes Hell doth signifie the whole state of the dead And it is evident that by hell there cannot be meant the hell of the damned for David would not make it a thing impossible for any to escape that hell as he doth make it for any to escape the hell that he speaketh of Therefore by hell he must needs mean either the grave and then the word soul is not taken properly or the state of the state of the dead from which without extraordinary dispensation none is exempted Thus also is the Greek word Hades used 1 Cor. 15. 55. O Hades O hell so our Translators in the Margent render it though the Textuall reading be O grave where is thy victory There is no other hell but the state of the dead and the power of death which is vanquished and destroyed at and by the Resurrection of which the Apostle there speaketh So Rev. 20. 16. Death and hell were cast into the lake of fire that is death and the power of death For the hell of the damned the place of torment cannot there be meant by hell that hell being the lake of fire into which hell there spoken of is cast The meaning of the words is that at the Resurrection there shall be no more death nor any power of death any where but only in that lake of fire the place where the damned are in torment whose condition because of the wretchednesse of it is called death the second death Rev. 20. 6. And thus both Ecclesiasticall and Heathen Authors do use the word Hades making all that are dead and so under the power of death to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in inferno See B. Usher in hell as we English it And thus have some of the ancients expounded Christs descending into hell This is the Law of humane necessity saith Hilary Humanae ista Lex necessitatis ut consepultis corporibus ad inferos animae descendant Quam descensionem Dominus ad consummationem veri hominis non recusavit Hil. in Psal 138. that when the bodies are buried the souls descend into hell he means by hell the state of the dead in generall and the power of death keeping the soul separated from the body which descent the Lord Christ to prove himself true man did not refuse in like manner other of the Ancients S. Peters words also do confirm this Exposition Acts 2. 24. where speaking of Christ he saith Whom God hath raised up having loosed the pains of death because it was not possible that he should be holden by it The word in the Originall signifies to be holden 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by force and strong hand to be holden under ones power and dominion And to prove that Christ could not possibly be thus held by death he alledgeth the testimony of the Prophet David who speaking in the Person of Christ said Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell So that by Peters Commentary upon these words of David it appears that Christs not being left in hell signifies nothing els but his not being left under the power of death from which he was freed by his Resurrection of which Peter saith that David did speak in those words Acts 2. 31. And consequently Christs being in hell which is implied in these words of David Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell and expressed in the Creed imports nothing els but his being under the power of death under which he was kept for a while though not long So that of S. Paul Rom. 6. 9. Christ being risen from the dead dieth no more death hath no more dominion over him that also intimates that Christ being dead untill he rose from the dead death had dominion over him not whether he would or no but through his own permission Joh. 10. 18. Ob. But may some say according to this Exposition there is nothing more signified in the Article of Christs descending into hell then in the other that he died Answ I answer Yes there is more signified in the one then in the other For that Christ died imports only that his soul was separated from his bodie but that he descended into hell imports that his soule and bodie continued for a while in the state of separation to wit untill his Resurrection when they were again united one to the other Such difference as there is betwixt B. Usher birth and life here such also is there betwixt death and descending into hell Death performs its work in a moment but hell continues this work to wit the separation of the soule from the body untill the body rising again the soule and it are reunited together Therefore it may seem to be said Rev. 6. 8. that hell followed after death and thus both soul and body are said to be in Sheol or Hades or hell whilest they remaine separated one from
spirit For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body whether we be Jews or Gentils whether we be bond or free and have been all made to drink into one Spirit 1 Cor. 12. 13. The Apostle there speaks of baptizing and drinking because the Sacraments Baptisme and the Lords Supper are outward tokens and testimonies of the union of the Saints as they are here upon earth but still he mentions the spirit as that whereby the union is indeed wrought And as union so communion which flows from union For as it is in the naturall body so is it also in the mysticall the members being united one to another have communion one with another because as the members of the naturall body partake all of one soul so the members of the mystical body partake all of one spirit Because the Saints have the communion of the Holy Ghost 2 Cor. 13. 14. the fellowship of the spirit Phil. 2. 1. therefore they have communion and fellowship one with another Now the Saints being some in heaven and some on earth there ariseth a fourfold communion or fellowship which the Saints have one with another 1. There is a communion which the Saints in heaven have one with another They certainly rejoyce one in anothers happinesse and praise God one for an other Here men and even sometimes good men through the corruption that is in them envy one another as Aaron and Miriam did Moses Num. 12. 1. But the Saints in heaven are wholly free from this distemper they are made perfect in love and charity which envieth not 1 Cor. 13. 4. rejoyceth not in iniquity but rejoyceth in the truth v. 6. 2. There is a communion which the Saints in heaven have with the Saints on earth They wish them that happinesse which themselves have attained to and in generall as we may conceive pray for them For though they be not acquainted with the particular estate of the Saints here below yet in generall they know that as they in heaven are triumphant so their fellow-members on earth are militant and therefore charity as the Apostle saith never failing they have a fellow-feeling 2 Cor. 13. 8. of their case so far forth as is consistent with their own happinesse and a care for them 3. There is a communion which the Saints on earth have with the Saints in heaven They rejoyce in their happinesse praise God for them and follow their faith and conversation that so they also may partake of the same happinesse with them Thus far forth the Scripture doth warrant our Communion with the Saints in heaven For the memory of the just is blessed Prov. 10. 7. All generations shall call me blessed said the Virgin Mary Luk. 1. 48. And the Apostle bids Be followers of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises Heb. 6. 12. But for praying to the Saints departed as they of the Church of Rome teach we have no Scripture to countenance any such Communion but it is quite dissonant and repugnant to Scripture God is he to whom we must pray Call upon me Psal 50. 15. As for me I will call upon God Psal 55. 16. For this shall every one that is godly pray unto thee Psal 32. 6. After this manner therefore pray ye Our Father c. Mat. 6. 9. Neither must we pray in the name of any but of Christ only For there is one God and one Mediator betwixt God and man the man Christ Iesus 1 Tim. 2. 5. Besides the Saints departed do not understand our particular affairs When a man is dead he is ignorant of the estate of such as had most near relation unto him His sons come to honour and he knoweth it not and they are brought low but he perceiveth it not of them Job 14. 21. 4. There is a Communion which the Saints on earth have one with another this is that communion of Saints which the Scripture chiefly speaeth of They are kindly affectioned one towards another Rom. 12. 10. They rejoyce with them that rejoyce and weep with them that weep v. 15. They have the same care one for another If one member suffer all the members suffer with it if one member be honoured they all rejoyce with it 1 Cor. 12. 25 26. They bear one anothers burthens Gal. 6. 2. As every one hath received the gift so they minister the same one to another as good stewards of the manifest grace of God 1 Pet. 4. 10. More particularly the Saints on earth have communion one with another 1. in respect of spirituall things they joyn together in the use of Gods Ordinances Thus it is said of the primitive Christians that they continued stedfastly in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and in breaking of bread and in prayers Act. 2. 42. And v. 46. that they continued daily with one accord in the Temple c. And the Apostle exhorts saying And let us consider one another c. Not forsaking the assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is Heb. 10. 24 25. According to their places and callings they teach and admonish one another Col. 3. 16. They exhort one another Heb. 3. 13. 10. 25. They comfort and edifie one another 1 Thes 4. 18. 5. 11. They pray one for another Ephes 6. 18. Jam. 5. 16. 2. In respect of temporall things they succour and relieve one another It is recorded of the Saints in the Apostles time that they had all things common and sold their possessions and goods and parted them to all men as every man had need Act. 2. 44 45. So Act. 4. 32. And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul neither said any of them that ought of the things that he possessed wa● his own but they had all things common v. 34. 35. For as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them and brought the prices of the things that were sold and laid them down at the Apostles feet and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need This example of the primitive Saints the Anabaptists before these times have abused inferring from thence that meum and tuum all propriety of goods ought to be taken away from among Christians and that all things should be so common among them that none should have right to any thing more then another But this is over-grosse For 1. What was done by a few living together in one City cannot conveniently be done by all throughout the vvorld Neither then in the Apostles time was that communion injoyned none was required to part with the interest that he had in any thing as is clear by that of Peter to Ananias Whiles it remained was ● not thine own and after it was sold was it not in thine own power Act. 5. 4. This shewes that Anamas might have chosen whether he would fell his possession or no and when he had sold it whether he would bring
and reviving of the dead bones is shewed that God would Si figmentum veritatis in imagine imag● ipsa in veritate est sui Necesse est esse prius sibi quàm alii configuretur De vac●o similitudo non competit de nullo parabola non convenit I●● oportebit ossium quoque credi reviscerationem inspirationem qualis dicitur dequa poss●t exprimi Judaicarum rerum reformatio qualis aff●ngitur Tertull de Resurrect c. 30. certainly restore the people of the Jews out of captivity though they seemed to be quite dead and past recovery that parable I say doth presuppose the Resurrection of the dead as a thing well known and certainly believed by the people of God and therefore the parable drawn from thence is used to confirm their faith touching the deliverance there promised unto them Thus the Scriptures of the old Testament give sufficient proof of the Resurrection of the dead but much more clearly and fully do the Scriptures of the new Testament speak of it The hour is coming said our Saviour in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice and shall come forth c. John 5. 28 29. I know that he shall rise again in the Resurrection at the last day said Martha of her brother Lazarus John 11. 24. The Apostle 1 Thes 4. 14. and so on to the end of the Chapter speaks of the Resurrection of the dead and so 1 Cor. 15. thoroughout the whole Chapter Besides these direct and expresse testimonies of Scripture there are divers arguments reasons grounded upon confirmed by Scripture which do further prove the Resurrection of the dead 1. That is recovered in and by Christ which was lost in and by Adam This argument the Apostle useth to prove that the dead shal be raised For since by man came death by man came also the Resurrection of the dead For as in Adam all die even so in Christ shall all be made alive 1 Cor. 15. 21 22. viz. all that are Christs as he explains it v. 23. 2. Christs Resurrection doth necessarily inferre the Resurrection of those that belong unto Christ How the Apostle both 1 Cor. 15. and also in other places proves the Resurrection of Christians by Christs Resurrection and also in what respect this inference is of force I have shewed before speaking of the resurrection of Christ Serm. 19. towards the end 3. Gods Covenant with his people that he will be their God Gen. 17. 7. Jer. 31. 33. this Covenant I say is an everlasting Covenant death cannot dissolve nor disannul it after Abraham Isaa● and Jacob were dead yet God stiled himself their God Exod. 3. 6. And hence our Saviour confuted the Sadduces who denied the Resurrection But as touching the Resurrection of the dead have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God saying I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob God is not the God of the dead but of the living Mat. 22. 31 32. In some sense God is the God of the dead as the Apostle saith that to this end Christ both died and rose and revived that he might be Lord both of the dead and living Rom. 14. 9. But in the Sadduces sense God is not the God of the dead that is not so of the dead as if they should be alwaies dead so they supposed and should never live again For all live unto him said our Saviour immediately after the words before cited as S. Luke records chap. 20. v. 38. All live unto God both in respect of his power and also in respect of his purpose he both can quicken the dead and also will quicken them as that very speech shews wherein he calls himselfe the God of those with whom he had entred into Covenant though now they were dead when he thus spake of them Ob. Some may say that God may be the God of his people in respect of their souls though their bodies never rise again Answ I answer that this is not sufficient the soul is not the whole man but a part only the body also is a part as well as the soul But God is by Covenant the God of his people in respect of the whole man and not in respect of a part only And therefore this argument drawn from Gods Covenant and the everlastingnesse of it proves a necessity of the Resurrection of the body 4. The body is partner with the soul either in sin or righteousnesse and therefore also it must be partner with the soule Non possunt separari in mercede caro anima quas opera conjungit Tertul. de Resur cap. 8. cap. 15. Age scindant jam adversarii nostri car●is animaeque contextum priùs in vitae administratione ut ita audeant scindere illud etiā in vitae remuneratione Negent operarum societatem ut meritò possint etiam mercedem negare Non sit particeps in sententiâ caro si non fuerit in causa Et cap 38. Secundum collegia laborum consortia etiam decurrant necesse est praemiorum hereafter either in reward or punishment As soule and body work together here so they must be recompensed together hereafter Ery one must receive the things done in the body according to that he hath done whether it be good or evil 2 Cor. 5. 10. As the things were done in the body so the recompence and reward must be received in the body And this is one reason as I have shewed * Serm. 24 before why besides the particular judgement which passeth only upon the soule there must be a generall Judgement wherein both soul and body must be judged Vse 1. Now if this be so that the dead must rise againe then even in this respect there ought to be a respect had unto the dead to bury them in a devout manner Nature it self doth teach this that the bodies of the dead are to be committed to the earth the Heathens generally did use it excepting some who were more barbarous then others As it is said of the Hyrcanians that they used to cast dead bodies to dogs to be devoured The Romans in later times used to burne the bodies of the dead but more anciently as Plinie Plin. Hist l. 7. c 54. testifies they did use to inter them and that custome of burning Sylla as the same Author relates brought in fearing least some should deale with him and his adherents after their death as he had dealt with his adversary Marius whose body he had caused to be digged up after it was buried But to speak of Gods people they have shewed themselves very carefull to perform this office of buriall unto the dead The Story of Abraham in this respect is recorded Gen. 23. where we find how sollicitous he was about the burying of Sarah when she was dead So it 's said Act. 8. 2. that devout men carried Stephen to be buried It was a
said Blessed be the Lord God of Israle who hath visited and redeemed his people And hath raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David where observe that Christ is described still more particularly as being not only the seed of Abraham but of David and so called the son of David Mat. 1. 1. immediately he addes As he spake by the mouth of his holy Prophets which have been since the world began Luk. 1. 68 69 70. So Stephen speaking to the Jewes Which of the Prophets said he have not your Fathers persecuted And they have slaine them which have shewed before of the coming of the just One of whom now ye have been the betrayers and murtherers Acts 7. 52. Peter also in his Sermon to Cornelius and the rest that were with him speaking of Christ saith To him give all the Prophets witnesse that thorow his Name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sinnes Acts 10. 43. And as Moses and the Prophets did in words testifie that Christ is the only Saviour so from the time of Moses untill the coming of Christ there were many types and figures whereby this was signified Some of these types and figures were extraordinary and transient some were ordinary and permanent Of the former sort was the brazen Serpent which by Gods appointment Moses made and set upon a pole that the people being stung with fiery Serpents looking upon it might be healed as we read in Numb 21. * This was a figure of Christ lift up on the Crosse on whom whosoever being stung by that old Se●pent the Devil looketh with the eye of faith he shall be healed Our Saviour himself shewes this to have prefigured him and the benefit that cometh by him As Moses saith he lift up the Serpent in the wildernesse so must the Son of Man be lift up that whosoever believeth in him might not perish but have everlasting life Joh. 3. 14 15. So the cloud which went before the Israelites in the wildernesse when they journeyed and was a guide unto them and when they rested abode over their heads and kept off the scorching heat of the Sun from them this cloud I say of which see Exod. 13. 21 22. was likewise a type of Christ by whom alone we are protected from the fire of Gods wrath and are directed to the heavenly Canaan The Apostle saith that the Israelites were baptized unto Moses in the cloud It was a kind of Baptisme unto them it was to them as baptisme is to us a Sacramentall sign pointing at Christ and shadowing forth salvation by him and him only And so also the Sea as the Apostle sheweth in the same place viz. 1 Cor. 10. 2. the Sea thorough which the Israelites passed when Pharoah and the Egyptians pursued them and were ready to destroy them wherein also their adversaries were drowned as the story is recorded in Exod. 14. Of this nature also was Manna wherewith God did feed the Israelites Exod. 16. The Apostle calls it Spirituall meat 1 Cor. 10. 3. because it had a spirituall signification it signified Christ and the body of Christ even as now the bread in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper doth that true bread which doth feed the soul unto eternall life as Christ sheweth at large in Joh. 6. So also was the rock out of which God gave drink to the Israelites in the wildernesse Exod. 17. That Rock was Christ saith the Apostle 1 Cor. 10. 4. That is it did represent and signifie Christ like as Christ called the bread in the Sacrament his body and the wine his blood which blood of his was also represented and signified by that water out of the Rock which therefore the Apostle there calls Spirituall drink in respect of the spirituall signification of it These types and figures of Christ I call extraordinary and transient because they were only appointed upon occasion and to continue but for a short time But there were other types and figures of him which were of a more solemn institution and of a more durable nature which therefore I call ordinary and permanent Of this kind was the Passeover or the Paschall Lamb the blood whereof being sprinkled on the doors of the Israelites they were preserved when the first-born of the Egyptians were destroyed Exod. 12. That Lamb was a figure of Christ the Lamb of God Joh. 1. 29. by whose blood we are saved whenas all that are not sprinkled with it shall be destroyed what is spoken of that Lamb Exod. 12. 46. is applied unto Christ and alledged as meant principally of him Joh. 19. 36. So all the sacrifices and other rites and ceremonies of the Law had reference unto Christ and did typifie him as the only Redeemer and Saviour Which are a shadow of things to come saith the Apostle speaking of some of them but the body is of Christ Col. 2. 17. The Law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ Joh. 1. 17. Grace in opposition to the Morall Law and truth in opposition to the ceremoniall Law which was but a shadow of those things the truth whereof is in Christ For the Law having a shadow of good things to come and not the very image of the things c. Heb. 10. 1. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sin v. 4. No it 's only the blood of Christ which was typified by the blood of those creatures that can do it See there what follows in the same Chapter And indeed the scope of the whole Epistle is to shew that the ceremoniall Law did but shadow out Christ and therefore is now abolished Christ being come and having accomplished that which it shadowed Thus in the Scriptures of the Old Testament is Christ set forth as he in whom alone salvation is to be found But much more clearly and fully is this revealed in the Scriptures of the New Testament We use great plainnesse of speech And not as Moses that put a vail over his face c. saith the Apostle 2 Cor. 3. 12 13. The Text in hand doth plainly tell us that there is not salvation in any other c. So Mat. 1. 21. it 's said that therefore he is called Jesus because he doth save his people from their sins And S. John saith God hath given unto us eternall life and this life is in his Son He that hath the Son hath life but he that hath not the Son hath not life 1 Joh. 5. 11 12. Every where in the New Testament such sentences and sayings are obvious But for the fuller manifestation of the truth of this Doctrine let us further consider that all the links of the golden chain of salvation viz. Election Redemption Adoption Justification Sanctification and Glorification all have reference unto Christ and dependance upon him 1. Election God hath elected such as shall be saved God hath chosen you unto salvation 2 Thes 2.
desire a better country that is an heavenly wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God for he hath prepared for them a City Heb. 11. 11. 14 15 16. 3. Abrahams bosome as the place is called where the souls of the godly were before Christ could be no such place as that which they call Limbus Patrum For 1. Lazarus was carried thither by Angels Luk. 16. 22. But Angels the good Angels as they were should rather carry to heaven then to hell as they make their Limbus to be 2. It was a place of comfort Luk. 16. 25. But where hell Nondum inveni adhuc quaero nec mihi occurit Inferos alicubi in bono posuisse Scripturam duntaxat Canonicam non autem in bono accipiendum sinum Abrahae illam requiem quò ab angelis pius pauper ablatus est nescio utrùm quisquam possit audire Aug. de Gen. ad lit l. 12. c. 33. in Scripture is taken for a place of comfort let them look Augustine confesseth that he did seek but could not find it and thought this a good argument why by hell should not be meant Abrahams bosom 3. There was a great space a great gulfe betwixt the place called Abrahams bosome where Lazarus was and the place of torment where the rich man was Luk. 16. 26. Whence also Austin inferreth that Abrahams bosome is no part and as it were a member In his ipsis tanti magistri verbis ubi ait dixisse Abraham Inter vos nos Chaos magnum firmatum est satis ut opinor ipparet non esse quandam partem quasi membrum inferorum tantae illius faelicitatis sinum Aug. Epist. 99. Jansen Concord cap. 97. of hell which the Papists make it to be Jansenius a learned Papist being much more ingenious then Bellarmine and Gregory Martin who would gladly fasten upon Austin that which is quite contrary to his meaning confesseth that Austin by discourse and argumentation did gather that Abrahams bosome was no part of hell neither doth he nor any other that I know indeavour to answer the reasons that induced Austine to be of this judgement 4. Christ promised to the believing thief saying This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Now Bellarmine himselfe handling another Bellar. de Beatitud Sanct. l. 1. c. 3. point holds Paradise there to be heaven as the word is used 2 Cor. 12. 4. compared with v. 2. Now how doth this stand with that assertion of theirs that the souls of the Saints were not in heaven untill Christs ascension or that Christs soul went to Limbus a place very farre distant and different from heaven Some say that the Thief to whom Christ spake descended with Christ into Limbus and that it was then Paradise when Christ was there But this as a reverend Author saith well B. Vsher of Christs descent into hell Bellar. de beat Sanc. l. 1. c. 6. is to turn the third heaven into the third or fourth hell 5. Bellarmine proves that the faithfull now since the coming of Christ go immediately after death to heaven except Purgatory stop them a while and that because God is not more prone and ready to punish then he is to reward therefore seeing the wicked go immediately to hell there is no reason to conceive but that the godly go immediately to heaven And that the wicked when they die go immediately to hell he proves by the example of the rich man mentioned Luk. 16. Now if this argument be of force as I grant it is then it proves as much for the faithfull that were before Christ For that of the rich man Luk. 16. shewes that then before Christs death the wicked immediately after death went to hell where the damned are in torment and neither will the Papists however deny that And therefore why should they deny that the godly then did go immediately to heaven God being no lesse ready to reward then to punish These reasons there are against that Limbus which they speak of and so against their Exposition of the Article of Christs descending into hell But some Objections they make which are to be answered Object They object that Gen. 37. 53. I will go down to the grave to hell as they read it to my Son c. Thus spake Iacob concerning his son Joseph when his brethren had sold him and made Jacob believe that some wild beast had devoured him The Hebrew word there used viz. Sheol which we sometimes translate grave somtimes hell they say cannot there signifie grave but must signifie hell viz. that part of hell which they call Limbus Patrum Jacobs meaning say they was that he would go mourning thither whither Joseph as he supposed was gone before him And they prove that the grave cannot there be meant because Jacob imagined Ioseph torne in pieces by some wild beast and so not to have been buried Answ But this place makes nothing for their purpose all that Iacob meant was that in vain did they go about to comfort him for he would not be comforted but would mourn unto death even as Joseph he thought was dead It 's not unusuall for those that mourn for their friends being dead to say that they will go unto them Aben Ezrae a Jewish Rabbin doth upon that very place Gen. 37. 33. reprove them that take Sheol for hell See B. Usher of Christs descent meaning that they also will die as they died As for the word Sheol it signifies the estate of the dead as hereafter I shall shew and so the grave yet not properly an artificiall grave but a naturall grave such an one as nature one way or other doth provide for every one whatsoever the manner of his death be It 's reported of the Hyrcanians that they were so barbarous as to cast dead bodies unto doggs to be devoured And that thereupon Diogenes used to say that if he were torne in pieces by dogs yet he should have an Hyrcanian buriall so if Ioseph had been devoured by a wild beast the very belly of the beast had been a grave unto him Object But again they object likewise that Joh. 14. 2. I go to prepare a place for you thence they infer that before Christs ascension none did go to heaven Answ But this inference is not good for as was shewed before Christs death and so his resurrection and his ascension was effectuall from the beginning as by vertue of Christs death the faithfull that were before Christ had their sins remitted so also by vertue of his ascension did they go to heaven Object But say they againe the Scripture plainly tells us that the way into the holiest of all was not yet made manifest while as the first Tabernacle was yet standing therefore during that time none did go to heaven Answ This doth not follow the meaning of those words is only this as Aquinas himself Acquin ad loc doth expound them that Christ who is
nature properly being capable neither of the one nor of the other As man he suffered was crucified dead and buried and descended into hell and so as man he rose again ascended into heaven and sitteth at the right hand of God The divine nature is said to be humbled not properly as if it's glory was indeed diminished but that assuming to it self humane nature subject to infirmity its glory did lie hid and not appear So also it is said to be exalted not properly as if any glory indeed were added unto it but by the exaltation of that humane nature which it assumed it 's glory is made to appear and shine forth Now this glorious exaltation of Christs humane nature did belong unto it by vertue of the hypostaticall union and so was due unto Christ at the first moment that the two natures were united together in one person but by dispensation for the working out of our Redemption Christ did not enter into the possession of his glory till after his passion Ought not Christ to suffer these things and to enter into his glory viz. after his suffering Luk. 24. 26. It was his glory that which of right did belong Quomodo suam si oportuit quomodo oportuit si suam Si glorii ejus fuit quomodo ut a● illam intraret pati oportuit Sed suam propterff se oportuit propter nos Si aliter venisset pervenisset sed non subv●nisset Hugo de S. Vict. unto him even as man that man being God also yet for our sakes that our Redemption might be essected by him it behoved him first to suffer as he did and then to enter into his glory Vse 1. Here then we may see the glorious and transcendent excellency of Christ even as man and so in him the wonderfull exaltation of our humane nature Lord what is man that thou art mindfull of him and the son of man that thou visitest him Thou hast made him a little lower then the Angels and hast crowned him with glory and honour Psal 8. 4 5. Yea the man Christ is made a great deal higher then the Angels We see Jesus saith the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrews having cited these words of David who was made a little 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or for a little while lower then the Angels for the suffering of death crowned with Glory and Honour Heb. 2. 9. Christ for a while that he might suffer death for our Redemption was lower then the Angels being a man subject to infirmity but now he is crowned with glory and honour whereby he is far above the Angels Caution But here we must beware of that errour which some have faln into We must not think that because Christ as man doth sit at the right hand of God therefore Majesty and Glory properly divine and infinite is communicated to Christs humane nature This is exceeding grosse and the very heresie of Eutyches who because he would not with Nestorius divide the person of Christ therefore falling into another extreme he would confound his natures making the humane nature to be swallowed up as it were by the divine nature But Christs glory doth not take away the truth of his humanity it is exalted but not Gloria humanitatem non tollit sed extollit non interfi●it sed perficit Gerson abolished And therefore neither must we as some do from Christs sitting at the right hand of God infer the ubiquity of Christs body as if therefore it were every where For ubiquity or being every where is proper and peculiar to the divine nature the humane nature is not capable of it He is not here viz. in respect of the body for he is risen Luk. 24. 6. So he is not here in that respect Secundùm hanc formam non est putandus ubique diffusus Cavendum enim est ne ita divinitatem astruamus hominis ut veritatem corporis destruamus Aug. Epist 57. for he is ascended into heaven and there sits at the right hand of God Indeed Christ as God when he was upon earth was also in heaven Ioh. 3. 13. And so now in that respect being in heaven he is also on earth Mat. 28. 20. But as man he was not in heaven when he was on earth neither is he in that respect now on earth when he is in heaven Vse 2. This also makes exceedingly for the comfort of all such as belong unto Christ and are his they need not fear either to want any good or to suffer any evill seeing he to whom they belong is so exalted over all and therefore able to protect them and to provide for them Are we afraid of the rage and malice either of men or Devills Though they be too strong for us yet Christ is too strong for them and much lesse are they able to resist him then we are to resist them This was enough to animate and incourage Stephen notwithstanding the fury of his adversaries that he saw Christ standing at the right hand of God ready to defend him Acts 7. 55 56. So let us with the eye of faith look up unto Christ and not fear what men or Devills can do unto us When Saul persecuted the members of Christ upon earth Christ from heaven spake unto him and let him know that he did persecute him and that he had a hard match of it Saul Saul why persecutest thou me I am Jesus whom thou persecuiest it is hard for thee to to kick against the pricks Acts 9. 4 5. So Eph. 1. 22. it is said that all things are put under Christs feet and that he is head over all things to the Church or for the Church that is for the comfort and welfare of the Church Again doth the guilt of sin sting and wound our consciences Let us consider what a mighty Redeemer Mediatour and Advocate we have Who when he had by himself purged our sins sate down on the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 1. 3. Who is he that condemneth it is Christ that died yea rather that is risen again who is even at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for us Rom. 8. 34. Again do we want any thing that is good and needfull for us We may go with boldnesse unto God and ask of him in the Name of Christ whom he hath so exalted as to set him at his own right hand Adonijah thought himself sure to speed when he had Bathsheba whom Solomon did so honor to intercede for him and so had his request been just and reasonable it had been granted See 1 King 2. 17 18 19 20. How much more may we be assured that having Christ to mediate and intercede for us we shall obtain what we ask in his Name Whatsoever you ask the Father in my Name he will give it saith Christ Joh. 16. 23. Therefore let us come with boldnesse to the Throne of grace that we may obtain mercy and find grace
the members of a Church to Covenant together about those things that concern them viz. for the reforming or preserving of the Church from grosse corruptions that have got or are likely to get into it Thus Asa and the people of Judah entred into a Covenant as we read 2 Chron 15. But ordinarily such a Covenant is not necessary We read of many Churches planted by the Apostles yet of no such Covenant only we find that the members of the Church were admitted into it by Baptism by which all do vertually Covenant one with another Then they that gladly received the word were baptized and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls And they continued stedfast in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship and breaking of bread and prayers Act. 2. 41 42. For by one spirit are we all baptized into one body 1 Cor. 12. 13. There is one body and one spirit c. one Lord one faith one baptisme Ephes 4. 4 5. Having hitherto spoken of those notes of the True notes of the Church Church which the Papists and others do erroneously assign I come now to the true notes of it and they are these 1. The sound preaching of the word this is 1. The second preaching of the word a principall note whereby the Church is to be discerned For 1. The word is that whereby the members of the Church are begotten Being born again not of corruptible seed but incorruptible by the word of God 1 Pet. 1. 23. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized Act. 2. 41. And so by the preaching of the word the Lord added to the Church daily such as should be saved v. 47. 2. The word is that whereby the members of the Church are nourished As new born babes desire the sincere milk of the word that ye may grow thereby 1 Pet. 2. 2. And he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ c. Ephes 4. 11. 12. And now brethren I commend you to God and to the word of his grace which is able to build you up c. Act. 20. 32. 3. The ministery of the word being taken away the Church ceaseth I will remove thy candlestick out of his place except thou repent Revel 2. 5. As if he should say I will dischurch thee I will make thee cease to be a Church viz. by taking away the word and ministry For in that respect Churches are called candlesticks Revel 1. 20. because they hold forth the light of Gods word by the ministry and dispensation of it A false and corrupt Church is known by false and corrupt doctrine Therefore on the other side a true and sound Church is known by true and sound doctrine True it is false doctrine may get into a true Church and through the prevalency of false teachers may bear sway in it but if it come to prevail so far as that all must either subscribe to it as in the Church of Rome or els they can have no communion with it then it ceaseth to be a true Church I mean such as wherein it is lawfull to abide but there is a necessity of making separation from it Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins c. Rev. 18. 4. and so far forth as any Church is infected with false doctrine so far forth it degenerateth into a false Church I marvel that you are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another Gospell Gal. 1. 6. I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed on you labour in vain Gal. 4. 11. the Apostle feared least by that corruption of doctrine that was in the Churches of Galatia they would quite be dissolved and come to nothing And Christ speaking to the Angell or Pastor of the Church in Pergamus in the name of the whole Church saith thus But I have a few things against thee because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam who taught Balak to cast a stumbling block before the children of Israel to eat things sacrificed unto Idols and to commit fornication So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans which thing I hate Repent or els I will come unto thee quickly c. Revel 2. 14 15 16. 2. Another true note of the Church is The 2. The right administration of the Sacraments right administration of the Sacraments When Christ sent his Apostles to gather his Church he commanded them as to preach so also to baptize Mat. 28. 19. Go ye therefore and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost That of the Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 17. Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel is not to be taken simply and absolutely that the Apostle was not at all sent to baptize for no doubt he had the same Commission as the other Apostles had and besides he there testifieth that he did baptize some though not many v. 14. 16. whereas if Christ had not sent him to baptize he might not have baptized any It is therefore spoken comparatively like that Receive instruction and not silver Prov. 8. 10. that is rather then silver and that I desired mercy and not sacrifice Hos 6. 6. that is rather then sacrifice So here Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospell that is not so much to baptize as to preach the Gospell But though in that Commission Mat. 28. 19. onely Baptisme is expressed as being the Sacrament of initiation that whereby we solemnly enter into the Church yet there is also the Sacrament of the Lords Supper which is to be administred in and celebrated by the Church See 1 Cor. 11. 23. c. These Sacraments as they are seals of the Covenant which God hath made with his Church so are they badges and cognizances whereby the Church is knowne and discerned For by one Spirit we are all baptized into one body whether we be Jewes or Gentiles whether bond or free and have been all made to drink into one Spirit 1 Cor. 12. 13. As these Sacraments are more or lesse purely administred so the Church is more or lesse pure 3. A mutuall connexion and due order of 3. A mutuall connexion and due order of the parts and members of the Church the parts and members of the Church this is also a note and mark of it As in a naturall body the parts and members are united together and fitly ordered so is it in the mysticall body the Church 1. There must be union and connexion of the parts and members Let us not forsake the assembling of our selves together as the manner of some is Heb. 10. 25. Mark those that cause divisions c. Rom. 16. 17.