natures to be absorpt or abolished or that there is a confusion of natures as in the commixtion of water honey neither of them retaining the same name or nature or that out of these two natures a third commeth forth compounded of them both as in the commixtion of the elements 2. Neither is this uniting to be too much extenuated as to thinke the union to consist only in assistance as the Angell stood by Peter Act. 12. or onely in a certaine conjunction as when two divers metals are put together But they are so united as that the properties of both natures remaine and yet there is but one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one person subsisting of them both like as the body and soule are united together and the fire and red hot iron Concerning the communication of graces 1. The divine nature received not any increase of grace as it can have no imminution being in it selfe most perfect and unchangeable But the humane was perfited by this union and received increase of gifts 2. The graces communicated are either created and finite or uncreated and infinite the created and finite graces as wisdome knowledge holinesse and the rest are not in Christ as he is man the essentiall properties of the Deitie but effects only thereof infused into Christs humane nature being finite and created as the humanitie it selfe was 3. Yet they are given unto Christ without any limitation and measure as in the Saints they are limited and given by measure 4. These graces were not all at once in the highest perfection appearing in Christ in the dayes of his flesh but they received increase because of the infirmities of the humane nature which he assumed as it is said Luke 2.52 that Iesus increased in wisdome But after Christ was glorified they then shined in Christ in the greatest perfection Beside these finite and created gifts there are other which are not finite neither can bee referred to the first sort as the universall dominion over all creatures the power of remitting sinnes of judging the world adoration vivification infinite glorie 1. These being peculiar to the divine nature yet by vertue of this union are communicated even unto the man Christ who is made heire of all things and Judge of the world and whose flesh giveth life 2. But these divine gifts are not formally and essentially in the humane nature nor as the first gifts for this were to make the two natures equall and to confound their properties 3. Yet is it more than a verball communicating for as Nazianzene saith Talis est communicatio qualis est uni◠Such is the communication as is the union As the one is reall though not essentiall so is the other like as in iron made red hot with fire neither hath the iron lost its former qualities of coldnesse blacknesse which returne unto it againe and yet it giveth light heateth and burneth not by any essentiall physicall qualitie infused into it but by the reall union and conjunction of the fire so the Godhead shineth and worketh really in the humane nature of Christ. 4. The divine nature then of Christ worketh not now by it selfe alone as before his incarnation sed cum ea per eam c. but with it and by it it exerciseth and sheweth it selfe So the humane nature of Christ est vivifica omniscia omnipotens quickeneth knoweth all things is omnipotent not formally and essentially by it selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in it owne being as the Godhead doth but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in having the divine nature inseperably united unto it by the vertue whereof it doth all these things even as the hot iron burneth and heateth by the vertue of the fire which is in it 5. As before was shewed that the gifts and graces conferred upon the humane nature of Christ did not appeare in their perfection all at once so this communion of these divine properties did not wholly shew it selfe in the dayes of Christs flesh for though the Godhead was united to the humanitie in the verie first conception yet cohibuit operationem suam it did somewhat restraine the operation thereof because of the worke of our redemption Divina natura in Christo quievit ut humana mori posset The divine nature did rest in Christ that the humane might die 6. But Christ after his ascension is said to sit at the right hand of God neither in respect of the divine nature which was never absent from thence nor yet as though his humane nature did not sit there before seeing in the verie conception the humane nature was united to the divine but because then the power and kingdome of Christ was made manifest to all the world which before lay hid in him the divine nature plene operante working now fully by the humane humana virtute illius omnia administrante and the humane by vertue thereof administring all things To this purpose Marbach But in this his declaration which I have abridged somewhat must be qualified for there is in Christ betweene his divine and humane nature a communication reall and personall the graces created and finite are really communicated to Christs humanitie as his wisdome knowledge holinesse but the gifts which are infinite and peculiar unto God as to be omnipotent omnipresent knowing all things are imparted only personally as the man Christ is omnipotent omnipresent and knoweth all things but not the manhood of Christ for our blessed Saviour himselfe saith that the Sonne himselfe that is in his humanitie knoweth not of the day and houre of his comming to judgement Mark 13.32 And this further is to be considered that the manhood communicateth not any propertie to the Godhead in Christ really for the divine nature receiveth nothing but giveth all but onely personally and as we say in concret◠not in abstract◠as Marie is called the mother of God Christ not of his Godhead and God suffered for us but not the Godhead but the Deitie of Christ communicateth to his humanitie both really and personally 5. Places of controversie 1. Controv. Of the apish imitation of the priestly garments among the Heathen Vers. 1. THey made the holy garments of Aaron Gallasius heere noteth the superstitions of the Gentiles which imitated in their idolatrous services the glorious apparell of Aaron As Numa King of the Romans who raigned there 800. yeares after the giving of the Law prescribed the like apparell to his Priests as a pictured and wrought coat with a plate of brasse which the Priest did weare upon his breast and a stately bonnet with a high top upon his head which things either were received by imitation from the Hebrewes or invented by Satan to adulterate the rites and ceremonies instituted by God 2. Controv. Of popish priestly apparell SImlerus by occasion of this place sheweth the superstition of the Romanists in their priestly apparell as Aaron had an Ephod a robe a linen coat a bonet so their Priests have an albe
of plants in growing and increasing of beasts in sense and moving of God and Angels in understanding 2. As God can doe all things by his power so man by wit reason and are doth compasse many difficult things 3. As God is the principall end of all things so man is the secondary end for whose use all things were created and he for the glory of God I will also set downe more at large the divers conceits of Augustine of this creating of man according to Gods image 1. He thinketh this image and similitude chiefly to consist in the soule and secondarily in the bodie because it was made to bee obedient to the soule and of an upright forme to behold the heavens lib. 83. quest 51. 2 Hee placeth Gods image in man in this that as all things are of God so all men had their beginning from Adam qu. 45. ex vet test 3. Hee thinketh this image to consist in mans dominion over the creatures de Genes cont Manich. c. 22. 4. The soule is like unto God because it is whole in the whole body and in every part thereof it neither increaseth nor decreaseth with the body 5. The soule expresseth the image of the Trinity in the understanding will memory which are three faculties yet make but one soule 6. The soule liveth by it selfe and doth also quicken the body as God quickneth all things 7. The soule beareth the image of God in reason the similitude of likenesse of God in charity lib. de spirit anim c. 39. Thus Augustine varieth placing this image sometime in one thing sometime in another But to put all out of doubt the Apostle sheweth how we are to understand the image of God in man Eph. 4.24 Which after God is created in righteousnesse and true holinesse Coloss. 4.10 Put on the new man which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him This image then consisteth not so much in the substance of the soule or in the naturall faculties thereof as of understanding free will memory but in the knowledge and illumination holinesse and justice of the soule which are now wrought in man by grace and then were given by creation Our reasons are these 1. If this similitude and image were in the spirituall essence and substance of the soule both wicked spirits and wicked men should have the image of God for the substance of spirit and soule remaineth in them 2. Ambrose thus reasoâ—eth Deus non damnat imaginem suam c. God doth not damne his owne image or send it into hell fire c. but the soules of the wicked are damned ergo the image is not in the substance of the soule imago illa c. that image wherein thou wast made after the likenesse of God is not condemned but crowned Serm. 10. in Ps. 119. but the righteousnesse and holinesse of the soule only is crowned 3 That image after which men are naturally begotten is not the image of God for it were absurd if not impious to say that Gods image may naturally be propagated but men by nature receive the image of â—he â—â—asonable soule as Adam begat Seth in his owne likenesse after his image Gen. 5.3 that is like unto him both in soule and bodie wherefore the image of God consisteth not in the substance of the reasonable soule 4 That image of God after the which Adam was created is by his fall utterly lost and extinguished for otherwise this image need not to bee renewed and revived in us as it is by Christ as the Apostle sheweth Ephes 4.24 Coloss. 3.10 the fore-cited places but the substance of the reasonable soule with the naturall faculties and powers thereof are not lost therefore therein is not expressed this image To this purpose Augustine that the whole man both in his inward and outward part inveteravit is waxen old and decayed by sinne the inward man is renewed now by grace the outward man shall bee restored in the resurrection lib. 24. contr Faustum Epiphanius therefore had no reason to note this as an heresie in Origen for saying that Adam had lost by his transgression the image of his creation epist. ad Ioann Hierosol He might as well charge the Apostle with heresie who saith the newe man is renewed after the image of him that created him but there need no renewing where is not first a decaying nor a restoring of that which is not lost QVEST. XXIX Why it is added God created them male and female Vers. 27. THâ—â— God created man in his image c. 1. To take away all ambiguitie lest man might be thought to have beene created according to his owne image it is added in the image of God created he him 2. Thrice in the same verse Moses maketh mention of the creation of man left any might imagine with the Philosophers that man had no beginning but was eternall 3. Mention also is made of male and female that both man and woman should be knowne to be made according to Gods image though man first and as the more principall Iun. 4. And Moses saith he created them male and female not created him contrary to the conceit of Plato and some Hebrewes which thinke that Adam was at the first created both a man and woman and afterward divided in twaine Mercer QVEST. XXX Of mans rule and dominion over the creatures Vers. 28. RVle over the fish of the sea the foule of heaven and over every beast Theodoret thinketh that the great Whales were exempted from the dominion of man q. 20. in Gen. but his conceit is contrary to the text which giveth man rule overall the fish and Basil reporteth that he had seene great whirlpooles of the sea taken and subdued by the will and industrie of man hom 10. in Genes This rule and dominion of man was absolute before his fall for then both man should have beene of more excellent government by reason of his excellent wisdome to keepe the creatures in subjection and the beasts also by Gods providence should have had a naturall inclination to obedience a president whereof we have Gen. 2. when all the creatures presented themselves before Adam to receive their names of him Since Adams fall this preeminence and dominion of man over the beasts is greatly diminished and impaired that as he first disobeied his Creator so they also have cast off mans yoake yet not withstanding though now men have not so absolute a command over the creatures his Lordship and authority remaineth still which he exerciseth over the creatures by these foure wayes and meanes First there remaineth yet a naturall instinct of obedience in those creatures which are for mans use as in the oxe asse horse wherein Gods mercy appeareth that though man by his sinne be deprived of his authority over the wilde and great beasts as lyons beares yet the more necessary and serviceable creatures are kept in subjection still such a naturall
vanish howsoever some in their heat and intemperance are not afraid to call them Sabbatorum errores yea hereticall assertions a new Jubile Saint Sabbath more than either Jewish or Popish institution God grant it bee not laid to their charge that so speake or write and God give them a better mind 2. Doct. The soule is not part of Gods substance SEcondly where it is said God breathed into the face of Adam the breath of life we are not thereby to gather that the soule of man is part of the divine substance to the which opinion Lactantius seemeth to have inclined lib. 2. divinar institution for as the breath is no part of his substance that doth breath so neither is the soule of Gods essence that gave it for then the soule of man if it were of the divine nature it should be immutable and without beginning from all eternity as God is 3. Doct. There is but one soule in a man THirdly from hence it may be concluded that there is but one soule in man and that all the other faculties of sense and powers of nature are but handmaids to the soule waiting upon it and departing with it therefore God is said to have breathed into man the spirit of lâ—â—e that is the reasonable soule because the body no longer doth breath or live than the soule is present We doe therefore refuse Origens conceit upon these words Mat. 24.51 The Lord will divide or cut him off that is the spirit of the wicked shall returne to God and their soule shall goe to hell hee maketh A difference betweene the spirit and soule contrary to the Apostle who saying be ye renewed in the spirit of your soules and minds Eph. 4.24 sheweth 〈◊〉 the spirit belongeth to the mind or soule as the purer part thereof 4. Doct. Paradise was a place not altogether unknowne FOurthly whereas Paradise is described by the countrey of Eden where it was situate and by the knowne rivers of Tigris and Euphrates we inferre that Paradise then was not a place secret and unknowne as Bellarmine supposeth lib. de grat prim hom c. 12. for if it had beene unknowne in those dayes the Lord needed not to set the Cherubims to keepe it with A sword shaken And if it be objected that Paradise was never found out by any the answer is easily made 1. because it was kept by the Angels with great terrour that none durst approach 2. The Infidels and incredulous persons regarded it not 3. The faithfull looked for a much better Paradise in heaven and therefore sought not after it And herein we have the judgement of Pererius against Bellarmine one Jesuit against another lib. 3. in genes qu. 5. de paradis 5. Doct. The terrestriall Paradise is not now extant FIfthly whereas Bellarmine affirmeth that the terrestriall Paradise is yet remaining and that Henoch and Elias are there kept it appeareth by the description of Paradise to bee a meere fable 1. Paradise was planted where the knowne rivers Tigris and Euphrates ran together which is either in Armenia or Mesopotamia or some of those knowne countries then if Paradise were now extant in the world it is like that in all this time it should have beene found out by the inhabitants of those places 2. The floud over-flowed the highest hils 15. cubits Gen. 7.20 then Paradise also was covered with the water where if Henoch then was he must have also perished in the waters being out of Noahs Arke 3. The scripture maketh mention now of no other Paradise but heaven 2 Cor. 12 13. S. Paul calleth it the third heaven Paradise 4. Pererius sheweth Ruperius and Gregory to have beene of this mind that Henoch was not translated to the terrestriall Paradise to the which he subscribeth against Bellarmine 6. Doct. Marriage is not to be prohibited to any SIxthly whereas the Lord saith vers 18. It is not good for man to bee alone wee enforce this text against the popish forced virginity for whereas God saw it was not good neither for Adam then present not for his posterity which should have more need of the remedy to bee alone they contrariwise constraine their Priests and votaries to live alone depriving them of that mutuall helpe and society which God hath appointed for their comfort and to be a remedy against sinne and that this place is understood not of the marriage of Adam only but of all the faithfull Bellarmine confesseth lib. de Matrim cap. 2. 7. Doct. Polygamie condemned SEventhly vers 24. They shall be one flesh and as this place is alleaged Matthew 19. 5. They two shall bee one flesh This place sheweth the corruption of polygamie which is the having of many wives for if God had seene it good for one man to be joyned to two or divers women he would have made at the first to one man more helpes than one 5. Places of confutation 1. Confut. Experimentall knowledge of evill not to be desired 1. THe Maniches objected why did God forbid man to eate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evill would he have him like unto bruit beasts that cannot distinguish betweene good and evill Augustine answereth this experimentall knowledge of evill which Adam got by transgression was not the wisdome of an happie but the experience of a miserable man for Christ knew no sinne by his experience though he knew it by his saplence or wisdome 2. Confut. Why God gave a commandement that man would not keepe 2. WHy did God give a commandement that man should not keepe and why did he not make him so that man should not have fallen Ans. 1. God gave man this precept that hee might shewe his obedience and though he foresawe he would sinne yet he also provided a remedie and redeemer for his sinne 2. Though hee be in a better state that cannot sinne at all yet his state is good and not to be complained of that if he will cannot sinne lib. cont adversar leg c. 14. 3. Confut. against Celsus 3. CElsus derideth this storie of the making of the woman and counteth it a fable Origen answereth if you will not beleeve Moses why doe you credit Hesiod your Poet who hath the like narration how Vulcan made a woman out of clay whom all the gods adored Venus gave her beautie Pallace comelinesse of bodie Mercurius wit whereupon she was called Pandora which opening the lidde or cover of the tunne divided care and griefe unto men that lived without before Origen lib. 4. cont Câ—lsum 4 Confut. Paradise planted in a knowne place 4. THe Papists object thus Bellarmine would proove that Paradise was an unknowne place because it is said the river that went out of Eden did divide it selfe into 4. heads But there is no such river in Mesapotamia Bellar. lib. 1. de grat prim homin c. 12. For further answer to this objection I referre the reader to q. 13. before these 4. streames might be known in former
But it seemeth that this great defection was about the seventh age for then Lamech of Cains race tooke unto him two wives then the Lord tooke away righteous Henoch that he should bee no longer grieved with the wickednesse of the world Then the world being replenished with great multitudes which are ring-leaders for the most part unto evill as it is written thou shalt not follow a multitude to doe evill began to give themselves to all kinde of wickednesse adultery oppression cruelty multiplicity of wives unlawfull lust even against nature and to fill the earth with uncleannesse 3. And although in this seventh age iniquity was come to the full height yet it began long before even in the dayes of Enos when as the righteous abhorring the great wickednesse of Cains posterity separated themselves and a part beganne to call upon the name of God Iun. 4. The Hebrewes note that at the beginning women were not so multiplied as afterward by whom they tooke occasion to sinne and therefore it is added there were daughters borne unto them c. vers 1. but this clause sheweth not a more speciall multiplying of that kinde but that when the world began to be stored both with men and women then they gave themselves to wantonnesse QVEST. III. The particular sin of the old world here noted Vers. 2. THey saw the daughters of men that they were faire c. 1. Their fault was not onely in that they of the righteous seed matched into Cains stocke Calvin 2. Or that they respected onely beauty having no regard to their piety and vertue Marlorat 3. But they by violence tooke unto them not to their wives but women for so with Mercerus and Iunius I rather interpret the word nashim from all men whatsoever as Iunius readeth both virgines and wives they cared not whom 4. Some Hebrewes here understand also the filthy sinne of buggery that they tooke all they liked even from among the bruit beasts but Moses speaketh onely of the daughters of men QVEST. IV. Who were these sonnes of God Vers. THen the sonnes of God 1. These sonnes of God were not the Angels which some have supposed to have fallen for their intemperancie with women and to have begotten of them spirits as Ioseph Philo Iustine Clemens Alexandrinus Tertullian conjectured who so expoundeth that place of S. Paul that women should be covered because of the Angels lest they should bee tempted with their beauty This opinion is easily confuted 1. Because the world was punished and God was angry not for the sinne of Angels but of men vers 3. My spirit shall not alway strive with man 2. Chrysostome urgeth that place Matth. 22. in the resurrection they neither marry nor are married but are the Angels Ergo Angels are not subject to carnall affections as men are 3. If Angels fell first for the love of women then they sinned not for 1000. yeares after the creation whereas the Scripture sheweth that the Devill was a murtherer and a liar from the beginning Ioh. 8.44 QVEST. V. Devils not corporall nor mortall IT is also absurd and improbable that these were devils which did company with women and of them came Gyants as thinketh Franciscus Georgius who affirmeth devils to have bodies and a generative faculty and to company with women Of the like opinion is Psellus that the devils have bodies and they are nourished by sucking and attraction as spunges and that they are males and females at their pleasures some are of a fiery some ayrie some a watery some of a terrene nature But these are fables and fictions fit rather to be laughed at than worthy to be confuted 1. The Devils are of a spirituall not corporall nature it appeareth by that story Luk. 8. where we reade that in one man there was a legion that is six thousand Devils how could so many spirits if they were corporall be included in one body 2. If they were of a fierie watery or earthly so of an elementall nature they should bee subject to corruption mutability and mortality and so some have imagined also as Plutarch writeth of the death of the great Pan a famous Devill among the Pagans and Cardane reporteth that he heard his Father say who was above thirty years familiar with the Devils that he learned of them that they doe die decay revive againe but this fancie is contrary to the Scripture which testifieth that the Devill hath beene a murtherer from the beginning of the world Ioh. 8 44 Ergo he hath continued from the beginning of the world and how should the soule of man be immortall if these spirits which are of a more subtill nature were mortall 3. Though it were granted that Devills have a kinde of airie bodies yet could they not ingender for the power of generation agreeth onely to perfect bodies which have their materiall and distinct parts and receive nourishment 4. And they being as they say male and female should ingender among themselves in their owne kinde 5. Or if they did company with women they could not beget men but multiply their owne kinde or at the least a mixt kinde as the mule is engendred of an horse and an asse and so some likewise have conceited that the Faunes and Satyres were the off-spring of such generation As Hierom in the life of Antonie reporteth that such an one appeared unto him in the wildernesse with goats feet long crooked nailes and hornes upon his head and spake unto Antonie but either this may be held to be a fable foisted under Hieromes name or if there were any such thing it might be some monster of the wildernesse which the Devill used as his trunke to speake out of QVEST. VI. Spirits doe not generate BUt much more absurd is the opinion of Paulus Burgensis that thinketh these which companied with the daughters of men were spirits called Incubi which doe assume bodies of the aire for a time representing the shape sometime of men sometime of women in the act of generation and then they are called Succubi and thus saith he were the Giants engendred and Tostatus approoving this conceit of Incubi and Succubi seemeth to give credit to that report of Merlin that he was begotten by a spirit In these assertions and uncertaine conjectures of men some what is true some part false 1. True it is that the Devill may appeare in the shape of man or woman and dissemble and counterfeit the act proper to both not that the spirits have any delight in such carnall acts having no true but assumed and counterfeit bodies but they doe it more strongly to delude men and women and entice them to that abominable sinne of the flesh which they know hath corrupted the hearts of many excellent men as of David Salomon 2. Though spirits can take upon them the shape of bodies yet they are but so to the eye they are not true bodies being easily
but Iacob used thus to doe that Laban might have some increase of his colour although by this meanes the stronger fell out to be Iacobs QUEST XV. Whether Iacobs device were by miracle or by the workes of nature THis device of Iacob by the sight of particoloured rods to cause the eawes and goats to be conceived with young of the like colour 1. Is neither to bee held altogether miraculous as Chrysostome thinketh non erat juxta naturae ordinem quod fiebat c. it was not according to the course of nature that was done but miraculous and beyond natures worke hom 57. in Genes much lesse doe we receive the fabulous conceit of one Hosaias an Hebrew that the eawes â—onceived alone without the males by the sight only of the rods in the water ex Mercer 2. Neither do we ascribe this altogether to the work of nature although the cogitation and conceit of the minde be very much in the forming of shapes and therefore as Plinie noteth plures in homine quam in caeteriâ— animalibus differentiae there are more diversities of shapes among men than bruit beasts because of the variety of their conceits lib. 7. c. 12. Galen writeth of a woman that by beholding of a faire picture by a deformed husband had a faire childe libr. de theriaca Quintilian writeth of a Queene that upon the like conceit brought forth an Aethiopian Hypocrates maketh mention of a woman that being delivered of a beautifull childe much unlike both the parents should have beene condemned of adultery but was freed by a learned Physitian that imputed it to a picture which she had in her sight ex Perer. The Hebrews report of an Aethiopian that had a faire child and a Rabin being asked the reason thereof shewed the cause to be a white table that was in her sight at the time of conceiving The like report is that a woman brought forth a mouse because a mouse chanced to run before her when she was with childe Mercer The like operation hath the object of the sight in bruit beasts for this cause the fashion is in Spaine to set before the mares when they are horsed the most goodly beasts of that kinde Muscul. The like practice is used by the Dove-masters that they may have a brood of faire pigeons Isydor libr. 12. Etimolog Although then that nature had her worke yet we cannot say that nature wholly did it 3. Wherefore God wrought here together with nature and that after an extraordinary manner first because this devise was revealed vnto Iacob by the Angell of God in a dreame Genes 31.11 Secondly God gave a rare effect to this devise that it failed not whereas if it had beene according to the ordinary worke of nature there might have beene some change and alteration and it is well noted by Valetius that both the male and female concurred in the same imagination and fantasie of the parti-coloured which was the cause that they alwaies brought forth of the same colour lib. desacr philos c. 11. QUEST XVI Of the naturall reason why the imagination should be so strong to worke upon the body NOw further that we may see the naturall reason why that Iacobs sheepe brought forth party-coloured 1. That sheepe by drinking of certaine waters doe change the colour of their wooll Aristotle maketh mention as there is a River in Assyria called Psychrus of that coldnesse which causeth the sheepe that drinke thereof to yeane blacke lambs in Artandria there are two rivers the one maketh the sheepe white the other blacke the river Scamander doth dye them yellow Aristot. lib. 3. de histor animal c. 12. But this alteration is caused by the matter and quality of the water being received and drunke whereas Iacobs sheepe conceived by the very sight 2. The phantasie and affection is very strong to worke upon it owne body sometime upon another children have beene bewitched by the malitious sight of those that have intended them hurt some by immoderate joy have presently dyed as Philippides the Comicall Poet for his unexpected victory of his fellow Poets and a woman for the returne of her sonne whom shee supposed to have beene slaine in the warres in the extremity of joy ended her life as the Romane histories testifie hence it is that the very sight of that which goeth against the stomacke procureth vomit some by the seeing of others bloud have sounded others for feare looking downe from a steepe place have tumbled downe they which are strucken with sudden feare doe was pale in their face their hands tremble their voyce is taken away and all the body is distempered such is the operation of the conceit of parents in the conception of their children which causeth such variety of shapes of colour gesture ex Marâ—il ficin lib. 13. de Platon Theolog. cap. 1. 3. As we see by experience that the imagination of the minde doth bring forth such effects in the body so the reasons thereof may be yeelded to be these 1. The power and dominion which the soule hath over the body the one is the moover and stirrer the other the thing mooved the soule is to the body as the workeman to his worke which he frameth and fashioneth according to the idea and conceit of the mind and so it is in the conception and generation of children Tosta q. 10. in c. 30. 2. Another reason may be taken from the nature and property of imagination Imaginari non est neque animi neque corporis sed conjunctim to imagine is not proper to the soule or body apart but to them both together as the rest of the affections of love and hatred and the like are the mind then is like to that which it imagineth and the body with the mind begetteth that which is like to it selfe so it commeth to passe that the likenesse which the phantasie imagineth the body begetteth Valles 3. A third reason is from the nature and power of the seed which as it floweth from all the parts of the body and therefore worketh materially the similitude of the same parts so also is it procured by the minde and phantasie and therefore expresseth also that quality in the birth which was in the minde from whom it was sent Perer. ex Valles 4. Places of Doctrine Doct. 1. Abrahams seed begotten by the power of God Ves. 21. GOd opened her womb c. In that God made Leah and Rachel fruitfull of whom came the promised seed it sheweth that it was not the worke of nature but the gift of God Muscul. And as Abrahams carnall seed was propagated by God so much more the Spirituall which are borne not of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Doct. 2. The children of the barren wombe most excellent Vers. 24. SHe called his name Ioseph as the children of the barren are noted in Scripture to have beene most excellent as Isaack of Sarah
was the sonne of seventeene yeares now he cannot be the sonne or birth of so many yeares before they are expired the father must be before the sonne so is this phrase used Gen. 17.25 where Ismael is said to bee the sonne of thirteene yeares that is so many complete when Abraham was 99. yeare old for Ismael was borne when Abraham was 86. yeares old Gen. 16.16 And bee it granted that the Latine might agree in sense with the Hebrew yet it is too great boldnesse in a translator to change the number to put downe 16. for 17. 2. Now to say that the Latine interpreter did this not without the instinct of the spirit is in effect to say that the Hebrew writer had not the instinct of the spirit or that the instinct of the spirit is contrary to it selfe if both he that writeth sixteene and he that numbreth seventeene years in the same place and of the same person were moved by the same spirit But the Latine translator was led by the same spirit to write here 16. for 17. which moved him Gen. 8.4 for the 17. day of the moneth to write the 27. day which is a manifest errour and so is this here Hence then appeareth the grosse blindnesse of the Tridentine chapter which maketh the Latine translation authenticall without acception 2. Confut. A concubine not simply or properly a wife Vers. 2. WHereas Zilpah and Bilha are here said to be Iacobs wives Pererius noteth that Iacobs concubines were simply his wives though not his principall wives as Rachel Leah were Perer. in Gen. 37. nume 9. Contr. The Scripture maketh a manifest difference between a wise a concubiner for the concubine was still under the government of the wife as Hugar after she was given to Abraham is still called Sarahs maid Gen. 16. and the sonne of the concubine did not inherit as the sonne of the wife yet sometime she that was properly a concubine is called improperly a wife as Zilpah and Bilha here either because the principall wives being dead they succeeded in their place or for that their sonnes were privileged to be co-heires with the sonnes of Lâ—ah and Rachel which was not usuall but onely for the sonnes of the principall wives to inherit See more of this quaest 8. in Gen. 25. 3. Confut. Against free-will Vers. 4. THey could not speake peaceably unto him So our Saviour saith to the Pharises How can you speake good things seeing you are evill Matth. 12.34 Hence is confuted the popish doctrine of free-will that a man of his owne power is apt to chuse that which is good Iacobs sonnes abounding with malice could not speake peaceably to Ioseph nor the Pharises being a generation of vipers could speake well of Christ for an evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit Matth. 7.18 Muscul. 4. Confut. Our election unto life not by works Vers. 6. HEare this dreame c. Ioseph obtained this great favour with God to have the preeminence over his brethren not by any merit or worthinesse in himselfe but of Gods meere grace and favour toward him for as yet Ioseph had not shewed his faithfullnesse and chastity in Potiphars house The purpose of God then to exalt Ioseph revealed in these dreames went before any merit of Iosephs part Calvin So also Gods free and gracious election in setting us apart to everlasting salvation is without all respect of works in us as the Apostle teacheth That the purpose of God might remaine according to election not by works c. Rom. 9.11 5. Confut. Against the Sadduces of the immortality of the soule Vers. 21. LEt us not kill him or verbatim smite his soule Hence the Sadduces did inferre that the soule is not immortall because it may be smitten and killed But Augustine answereth this objection That here by the word soule the life is understood the effect by the efficient as in Iob where Satan is forbidden to touch his soule that is his life for otherwise concerning the nature and substance of the soule it cannot be killed according to the words of our Saviour Feare not those which after they have killed the body cannot kill the soule Matth. 12. 6. Confut. Sheol in this place not taken for hell Vers. 35. I Will goo downe into the grave mourning c. 1. The word sheol here used is neither to bee translated gehenna hell the place of torment after this life as the Chalde and some Hebrewes for Iacob did not suppose that Ioseph was in hell or that he should goe thither 2. Neither is it taken here for Limbus patrum the dungeon of darknesse where the soules of the fathers remained till Christs comming as Perer. and other popish writers for that place of rest and joy where Lazarus was in Abrahams bosome could be no part or member of hell where there is no joy to be found 3. Wherefore it is better translated the grave and cannot be otherwise in this place understood as even now shall appeare But because Pererius here fighteth with his owne shadow and goeth about to prove that sheol in the Scripture is not alwayes taken for the grave but sometime for hell properly as though the protestants so affirmed that the word was never found used for hell I will first set downe the divers acceptations of the word sheol in Scripture I find therefore that this word is used in foure severall senses 1. It is taken for hell metaphorically that is for the deepe plunging in extreme sorrow misery and danger as Psal. 86.13 Thou hast delivered my soule from the nethermost hell 2. It is taken for the locall place of hell properly as Proverbs 15. Hell and destruction are before the Lord. 3. It signifieth the grave Prov. 30.16 The grave and the barren wombe are reckoned among those things that are never satisfied where Pererius will have the word taken for hell not the grave for the grave saith he is soone filled and satisfied ' it holdeth not above one body Contr. 1. This is a very childish answer seeing the Wise man speaketh not of any one particular grave but of the condition of the grave in generall which is never satisfied with dead bodies but receiveth more still as in the same place saying The earth cannot be satisfied with water he meaneth not any severall peece or lumpe of earth which may be soone drenched with water but of the quality nature of the earth in generall 2. So that in this sense the grave is rather sheol than hell because it is more craving for to hell goe none but the wicked but the grave receiveth the bodies of all both good and bad 4. Sheol is taken to signifie the lower deepe and remote parts of the earth as without any relation to the place of punishment as Psal. 139.8 If I ascend into heaven thou art there if I lie downe in hell thou art there also sic Mercer 7. Confut. Against Pererius exposition of that place Psal. 16.10 FUrther whereas
Yet here it is further to be considered that there were two sorts of high places for some were consecrated to idolatry as those which Salomon had built about Jerusalem for Ashteroth Chemosh and Milchom which places Iosias defiled 1 King 23.14 There were other high places where the Priests of the Lord offered sacrifice to the Lord whom Iosias also put downe not suffring them to come up to the Altar of the Lord but onely to eat of the unleavened bread among their brethren 1 King 23.9 who if they had beene idolatrous Priests could not have beene permitted to eat of the unleavened bread Tostat. quast 44. QUEST XXVI How God is said to come and goe and how he is said to be in the world Vers. 24. I Will come unto thee c. 1. God neither commeth nor goeth by moving from place to place for that which is infinite and in every place cannot move or change the place for where any moving is there one place is left to goe unto another but God being of an infinite essence is in all places alike 2. Yet though God be in every place yer he occupieth no place Nihil magis indivisibile minùs occupans quà m Deus Nothing is more indivisible and lesse occupying a place than God is An Angell cannot enter into a mans soule Deus tamen illabitur ei totus intus manet c. Yet God doth enter into a mans soule and wholly remaine within it 3. There is some similitude herein betweene God who is an infinite Spirit and the other finite spirits as namely the soule of man which is said to be tota in toto corpore tota in qualibet parte whole and all in the whole body and whole and all in every part which is to be understood not after one and the same manner There is a threefold union betweene the soule and the body unitur ei ut finis it is united unto it as the end for the body is ordained to this end to be perfected by the soule secondly it is united unto the body as the forme thereof for by the joyning of the soule to the body as the forme a man is distinguished in his kinde from all other creatures and in this sense the soule as the forme is whole in the whole body Thirdly the soule is united to the body tanquam motor as an agent and mover so it giveth power to the eye to see to the eare to heare and to every other part a severall faculty and power and thus also the soule is said to be whole and all in every part Now then as the soule is in the whole body and yet in no one part more than in another so is God in the world comprehending all and himselfe not being comprehended 4. Further thus it may be shewed that God is not in any place neither moveth from place to place for other finite spirits because they are compositi ex actu potentia they consist of an act and a power or possibility they being in one place have a power or possibility to be in another therefore God because he is purus act us a pure act must of necessity be every where for otherwise he should not be altogether in act if being in one place hee had not a power or possibility to be in another for then he should not be actually there but in power and possibility only 5. As a finite spirit is said to be in that place in quo applicat virtutem suum where it doth exercise and apply the power as the soule is in the body because it only exerciseth the vertue and power in the body so God because hee exerciseth his power in and over all the world must needs bee in every place of the world 6. God therefore is said two wayes to be in the world secundùm potentiam virtutem according to his power and vertue and secundùm essentiam according to his essence And yet God is so in the world as yet he is not included and limited in the world and he is so without the world as yet not excluded out of the world as Augustine saith Deus est in mundo non inclusus extra mundum non exclusus supra mundum non elatus infra mundum non depressus God is in the world but not included without the world but not excluded above the world yet not elevated or lifted up and under the world yet not depressed or put under c. which must be understood according to Gods essentiall presence for according to his power and working he is only in the world because he worketh in the world 7. And although the power of God be infinite so that if there were other worlds beside this thither Gods infinite power would extend it selfe yet the action or exercising of that power in the world is finite quia actio non potest esse major quà m id quod sit the action cannot be greater than that which is wrought or made therefore because the world is finite the action or exercising of the divine power in the world is finite and determinate likewise yet the divine power in it selfe remaineth infinite 8. Now then God is said to goe from place to place not in respect of his essence but of his power and vertue and of this power of God there is a double action one generall whereby God governeth the world and worketh in every place and so God cannot be said to goe from place to place because this generall power worketh in all places and at all times there is a speciall action or operation of the divine power as when he worketh miracles and wonders and sheweth manifest signes of his power and presence more in one place than in another And according to this speciall operation the Lord is understood to goe and come thorowout the Scripture Tostat. qu. 46.47 And so in this place he saith I will come and blesse thee Veniam occulta inspiratione benedicam corporali spirituali benedictione I will come by secret inspiration I will blesse thee both with corporall and spirituall blessings Gloss. interlinear QUEST XXVII Whether it were not lawfull to goe up by steps to the Altar Vers. 26. THou shalt not goe up by steps unto mine Altar 1. All kinde of ascending unto the Altar is 〈◊〉 forbidden for the Altar being three cubits high chap. 27. the Priests could not minister without some ascent and rising up to the Altar there was therefore Quidam ascensus sin◠gradibu◠punlatim ascendendo A certaine ascent or going up without steps rising by little and little as ◠Salomon thinketh Lyran. Ascensus erat continuns de terra the going up was continued by the rising of the earth Tostat. 2. Therefore all steppings up being forbidden for the reason after alleaged lest their nakednesse should be seene magis vetantur gradus scalae ligneae the steps or scales of woodden ladders are more forbidden for by such climing
them with all which the Lord had commanded him and then immediately they began to worke upon the Tabernacle To this effect Tostat. qu. 3. 3. So that the whole time which was spent in the making of the Tabernacle was the space of seven moneths as Tostatus thinketh they began in the beginning of the sixth moneth and finished in the end of the twelfth But Vatablus holdeth that Moses came downe from the mount the second time about the tenth day of Tisri which answereth to our September and then in the Autumne he thinketh the Tabernacle began to be made And this seemeth to be the more probable for Tostatus to bring Moses second comming downe to the end of the fifth or the beginning of the sixth moneth maketh but two or three dayes betweene Moses first comming downe which was as hee thinketh about the seventeenth day of the fourth moneth namely June and his going up which hee ghesseth to have beene upon the eighteenth day and then he stayed fortie dayes more to the end of July or the beginning of August the sixth moneth But all that which is rehearsed to have beene done in the one and thirtieth Chapter which came betweene his first comming downe and his second going up as the peoples mourning in putting away their best apparrell the removing of the Tabernacle by Moses without the host his usuall conference with God in that Tabernacle all these things could not be done in the space of two or three dayes lesse cannot be well allowed than halfe a moneth so that it was in all likelihood toward the end of the sixth or beginning of the seventh moneth when Moses came downe and as soone as he came downe he began the worke of the Tabernacle 4. The place also is evident where the Tabernacle was made and set up which was while they encamped about mount Sinai where they lay almost a whole yeare for thither they came in the beginning of the third moneth in the first yeare and departed thence on the twentieth day of the second moneth in the second yeare Numb 10.11 5. They then are deceived which thinke the Tabernacle to have beene made before Moses second going up unto the Lord of which opinion are Rupertus and Calvin for it is not like if it had beene finished so long before that Moses would have deferred the setting of it up six or seven moneths See more hereof quest 12. chap. 33. with other reasons there alleaged against their opinion QUEST II. Why they brought their worke to Moses Vers. 33. AFterward they brought the Tabernacle to Moses 1. Because fuit quasi sequester c. he was as a Mediator between God and his people And therefore it was fit that as he had received the commandement from God and given them direction so hee should have the approbation of the worke Simler 2. Beside the people had chosen him themselves to goe between the Lord and them and therefore hee was meet to bee an Arbiter and Judge in these things 3. And the people in offering their worke to the judgement and approbation of Moses therein shew their obedience to Gods commandement and their faithfull diligence in performing all things as the Lord had commanded them QUEST III. How Moses is said to have blessed them Vers. 43. ANd Moses blessed them 1. Tostatus referreth this not unto the persons that wrought in the Tabernacle and brought these things but unto the things themselves which hee blessed that is as it were consecrated and applyed unto the service of God quest 3. But the consecration of these things followeth afterward When hee had set up the Tabernacle then Moses anointed and sanctified it Numb 7.1 Neither is it like that Moses seeing that they had done everie thing as the Lord commanded would dismisse the people without a publike commendation of them and an approbation of their woâ—ke 2. Vatablus understandeth that Moses blessed the people yet he thus expoundeth it laudavit eos he praised and commended them but to blesse is more than to praise or commend 3. Gallasius 〈…〉 pro gratiarum actione for Moses giving thankes unto God as holy men used to give God the praise when they had finished any great worke But here is more signified than thanksgiving unto God for Moses blessed them 4. Osiander taketh it for Moses prayer whereby hee craved of God to bestow upon them both spirituall and temporall blessings 5. Simlerus so understandeth it that Moses hereby declared unto them Deum eorum observantiam gratam habere c. that God accepted of their service 6. But as Calvin well noteth whom Marbachius followeth non fuit simplex precatio sed mercedis promissio it was not simply a prayer but also a promise of reward Moses assured them hereby that God would reâ—compence their faithfull service So also Pelargus 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. No will-worship is acceptable unto God Vers. 1. THey made the holy garments for Aaron as the Lord commanded This clause Simlerus noteth to be repeated seven times Pelargus nine severall times in this chapter which sheweth that the work-men did not swerve a jot from that direction which Moses gave them from the Lord whereby all Gods servants are admonished ut se contineant intra limites verbi Dei c. that they containe themselves within the limits of Gods word and bring nothing into the service of God of their owne invention Simler For this the Apostle calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will-worship or voluntarie religion Col. 2.23 2. Doct. Of the union of the divine and humane nature of Christ and the abundant graces conferred upon his humanitie ALL the holy garments for Aaron Aaron was herein a type of our blessed Saviour and these goodly and beautifull raiments did shadow forth those heavenly graces which were powred upon Christ beyond measure in whom the fulnesse of the Godhead dwelleth bodily Coloss. 2.9 by which uniting of the divine and humane nature Christ as man was endued with plentifull and abundant grace Here then two things are briefly to be explaned the union of these two natures of Christ in one person and the communication of these graces Concerning this blessed union 1. The humane nature of Christ assumed not the divine but the divine assumed and tooke unto it the humane nature the divine nature of Christ was a person subsisting of it selfe from all beginning in the union of the blessed Trinitie the humane had no subsistence of it selfe before it was so assumed but as soone as it began to be it was assumed into the unitie of the person of the Son of God so that this humane nature consisting of body and soule which Christ assumed became the peculiar body and soule of the Sonne of God as the Apostle saith that God purchased the Church with his owne bloud Acts 20.28 2. But in this uniting of these two natures of Christ wee must take heed of two errours 1. That by uniting them we imagine not either any of the
beginning of the creation or being of things 2. Neither is it to be understood causally in the beginning that is for the beginning as for Israels cause or for the law as the Hebrewes for God created all things for himselfe Prov. 16.4 It is also a forced exposition by this beginning to understand Christ although the doctrine bee most sound that all things were created by him 4. Nor yet as Abeâ— Ezra is this clause in the beginning used here syntactice in construction with the next word as though this should be the sense in the beginning of creating or when God created and so the sense should bee suspended till the second or third verse for then hee would have said barâ— in the infinite not bara in the praeâ—ertence as it is vsed Chap. 5.1 5. Wherefore Moses saith in the beginning in respect of the things created that in that beginning when God purposed to create the world hee made first heaven and earth of nothing Mercer Iunius QVEST. III. Hebrewes curious observations Vers. 1. GOd created heaven and earth c. 1. The Hebrewes have here many curious observations which I will not stand upon as 1. by the letters of the two first words bereshith bara they note the time from the beginning of the world untill the Messiah Aleph and beth signifie 3000. râ—sh shin tau 900. jod 10. that is â—910 which doth not much differ from the just time according to the computation of some from the creation to the Messiah 2. They note the duration or continuance of the world for 6000. yeeres because aleph is six times found in the first verse 3. By the 7. words of the first verse they would have signified the 7. dayes of the weeke and the 7. planets These observations are more curious than profitable 2. So is that question which is controversed among the Rabbins whether the heaven or earth were made first they thinke that heaven being first named was first made but that reason is not firme for the earth is named before the heavens Gen. 2.4 and the manner of the Scripture is to mention that last which is treated of first as in the second verse Moses beginneth againe to speake of the earth Paguin Wherefore it is most like that God made the heavens and earth together in their first matter as the cup and the cover as in an egge the yolke and the white as in a circle the center and circumference Mercer And this first creating of the heaven and earth was a part of the first dayes worke Luther For otherwise the Lord had not made all things in six dayes contrary to the Scripture Exod. 20.11 QVETS IIII. How the earth is said to be without forme and void Vers. 2. THe earth was without forme 1. The earth is here so called by way of preoccupation for it was not yet so called till the third dayes worke vers 10. Vatab. 2. The heaven was also without his forme though not altogether so confused as the earth for there being no light yet created both the heaven and earth were unformed and imperfect 3. The earth is said as yet to be tohu and bohu emptinesse and vacuity this tohu was not that materia prima which the Philosophers dreamed of and bohu to be the forme of things not yet applied to the matter as though the heavens and earth had beene made of some precedent matter whereas indeed God made the heaven and earth of nothing which long continued not in this imperfect estate the light being the same day created 4. The darknesse here spoken of was neither the element of fire as some Hebrewes imagine which if it bee is bright and transparent neither is it the same with tohu before mentioned as R. Levi neither was it any thing created and a farre greater darknesse than that which afterward was called the night wherein there is some light of the starres but it was a meere privation of light afterward created 5. The waters here mentioned which covered the deepe as a garment in the beginning Psal. 104. 6. were before comprehended vnder the name of earth as all the inferiour elements beside as the superiour parts of the world are insinuate by the heaven Mercer QVEST. V. What is meant by the Spirit moved upon the waters THe Spirit of God moved c. By the Spirit here 1. wee neither understand an Angell which is the dreame of Cajetanus for God needed not the ministery of Angels in making the world 2. Nor yet the wind as Tertullian lib. cont Hermog 3. Nor the aire as Theodoret. qu. 8. in Genes If God had no use of the Angels to make the world much lesse of inferiour creatures 4. But this was the Spirit of God whereby the creatures were fostered and formed Iob. 26.13 His Spirit hath garnished the heavens QVEST. VI. What was the light created the first day Vers. 2. GOd said let there be light c. Some doe thinke that this was a spirituall no naturall or corporall light August lib. 1. in Genes ad lit c. 3. Rupert 1. lib. de Trinitat c. 10. but that cannot be seeing this light made a visible and apparent difference betweene the day and night 2. Some thinke it was the perfect light of the Sunne which was created the first day but afterward rehearsed to bee made in the fourth Catharinus but this is contrarie to the text for the Sunne was made the fourth day 3. Others thinke that it was a bright and lightsome cloud which was carried about and gave light to the world as Beda Lyranus Magister Sentent c. 4. Others that it was a light without a subject afterward fastened to the body of the Sunne as Basil. homil in Genes 6.5 Others that it was an exceeding bright shining light such as no mortall nature could behold being whole and altogether and therefore it was afterward dispersed into divers bodies of the Sunne Moone and Starres so Nazianzene Theodoret qu. 14. in Genes 6. Some thinke it was the light of the Sunne yet imperfect afterward perfected inlarged and beautified Aquinas part 1. qu. 67. art 4. Thus we see how variable and inconstant mens opinions are when they search into curious matters and enquire after hid things but it sufficeth us to know that God made the light before the Sunne that we should not attribute that to the creature which was the worke only of the Creator what manner of light it was where placed how it moved how long it continued because in Scripture there is no certainty busily to search it were curiosity it is most like that it was a certaine light which was not extinguished when the Sunne was created but rather increased Vatab. Mercer And it is not unlike but that this light proceeded from the element of fire as thinketh Damascene lib. 2. de sid c. 7. and Iunius as an effect thereof and whereas it may be objected that this light was moveable from one hemispheare to another as causing
the yeere past was then gathered and seed time began anew and so it is with us the autumne is counted the beginning of the yeere for matters of husbandry and yet wee in the computation of yeeres begin in the spring at the Annuntiation It is true also that the yeere of Jubile then tooke beginning but it is notwithstanding called not the first but the seuenth moneth Levit. 25.10 the reason is why it began then because all workes of husbandry and labours of servants which then used to begin did cease in the Jubile 2. Concerning the other objection of ripe fruit we shall not need to answer as some doe that the fruit did hang still upon the trees till the autumne or that some trees in Paradise bare fruit in the spring some in the autumne or that they might beare fruit twice in the yeere as Plinie reporteth of India and Solinâ—â—s of the Island Teprobane but I rather thinke this first bearing of fruit being supernaturall that the trees againe bare fruit the same yeere according to their naturall course And this may seeme to bee gathered by S. Iohns allusion to the tree of life that bare fruit every moneth Revel 22.2 that in the beginning trees did beare fruit in the yeere more than once 3. I thinke it therefore more probable that the world was created in the spring for these reasons 1. Ambrose useth this reason upon these words germinet terra let the earth bud forth the bud of the herb Dedit formam fructus c. God gave and prescribed a forme for the fruits to grow ut initio cujusque anni that in the beginning of every yeere herbs should sprout forth This we see to be done only in the spring 2. He useth also another reason Vt ostenderet Scriptura veris tempora in constitutione mundi ait mensis hic vobis initium mensium to shew that it was spring when the world was made the Scripture saith this shall be unto you the beginning of moneths Moses then brought in no new institution but it is more like he revived the old use of beginning the yeere from March which was discontinued in Egypt by another custome of that country 3. Further whereas God blessed the creatures and bid them increase and multiply which blessing presently tooke effect who knoweth not that for most kinds of creatures especially the fish and fowle the fittest time to engender and increase is in the spring And whereas God gave them the greene herb for meat it is not like that presently the greene herb with frost and cold began to wither and decay Adam also was thrust out of Paradise to till the ground but the spring time is apter for tilling than the autumne or winter season 4 Beda beside his owne opinion maketh mention of a synode holden in Palestina by Theophilus Bishop of Cesarea wherein it was agreed that the world was made in the spring and that Christ was crucified the same day that Adam was created at which time he also transgressed that the first Adam herein might be a type of the second 5. This also may be proved by comparing the time of Noahs floud with the time of the creation for seeing there are accounted full yeeres 1656. from the creation to the deluge they must fall out both about the same season But that the floud came in the spring not in the autumne may appeare by divers reasons which I reserve for that place Chap. 8. quest 10. And of this opinion that the world was made in March Pererius nameth many though he dissent from them as Eusebius Cyrillus Hierosolym Athanasius Nazianzen Damascen Ambrose Beda with others About this question there is a great controversie betweene two famous Rabbins R. Iosua who holdeth the world to be made in the spring and R. Eleazer in the autumne but the other opinion is more probable as I have shewed QVEST. XVIII When the Sunne and Moone were created Vers. 14. GOd said let there be lights in the firmament c. 1. These lights then were neither made the first day and but placed now in the firmament as the Hebrewes thinke 2. Neither was the Sunne made the first day the Moone the next the Stars the third as Eugubinus but they were all made upon the fourth day 3. Neither yet doe we thinke that the celestiall bodies were made in order as Basil conceiveth but rather that they were created all at once Mercer 4. And whereas the light created the first day is called Or but the Starres are called meoroth as of the light hence it may appeare that these lightsome bodies were made the receptacles of that light then created which was now increased and united to these lights Mercer rather than to thinke that the element of fire was that first light as Iunius 5. But wee explode those Jewish fantasies that the Sunne and Moone were created of equall light in the beginning but when the Moone envied the light of the Sunne God brought it into subjection and ordered that from thenceforth the Moone should receive light of the Sunne and of the light starre-beames which the Moone was deprived of they say God made the rest of the lesser Starres ex Mercer QVEST. XIX Of the greatnesse of the Sunne and Moone Vers. 16. GOd made two great lights That these two great lights are the Sunne and Moone there is no question and that the Sunne is the greatest of all the celestiall bodies it is also questionlesse Anaxagoras did hold the Sunne much greater than Peloponesus a countrey in Grecia Anaximander to be as big as the earth Plutar. lib. 2. de placitis Philosophor c. 21. but since the Mathematicians have found that the Sunne exceedeth the earth in bignesse 166. times and none of the other Starres which they call of the first magnitude whereof there are 15. to exceed the earth above 18. times The Moone though some among the heathen have judged it bigger than the earth as the Stoikes and equall to the Sunne as Parmenides and some among the Christians have thought it in bignesse next to the Sunne because it is here trained to bee a great light as Basil upon this place and Augustine yet since by more diligent search it is found to be lesse than the earth 39. times and to be the least of all the Starres except Mercurie Moses therefore here speaketh according to the opinion and capacity of the vulgar sort to whose sight the Moone seemeth greatest next to the Sunne because it is nearest of all the Starres to the earth and for that it is greatest in operation and hath the government of the night The reason of the greatnesse of these lights is their farre distance from the earth Empedocles saith the Moone is twice so farre from the Sunne as it is from the earth but the Mathematicians say it is 18. times so farre from the Sunne Eraâ—osthenes affirmeth the Sunne to be 804000000. furlongs distant from the earth
and of the soule or life of beasts which was produced out of the earth contrary to the opinion of Porphirius and the Pythagoreans who taught that the soule of man tooke beginning from the elements as the life of other creatures 5. Doct. That God hath no humane shape 5. LEt us make man after our image vers 26. which image was shewed before to be in the graces of the soule and not in the body against the heresie of the Anthropomorphites who imagined God to be of a humane shape like unto man 6. Doct. God not the author of evill 6. Vers. 31. GOd saw all he had made and â—oe it was very good From hence we conclude that God only is the author of good and that whatsoever the Lord doth is very good Against the Manichees who affirmed that the God of the law was the Prince of darknesse and anchor of evill 7. Doct. Marriage made free for all men 7. Vers. 28. BRing forth fruit and multiply This Scripture sheweth 〈◊〉 marriage had the institution in mans innocency and that this blessing to increase should have taken place though 〈◊〉 had not fallen against the heresie of the Tatiâ—â—i and Maâ—ichees which condemned marriage as a work of the devill Againe seeing God giveth here a liberty to all men and women by marriage to increase and multiply it maketh strongly against the Popish inhibition of marriage in Ecclesiasticall persons and Monasticall enforced vowes for by both these this generall liberty given of God is restrained To this argument divers answers are framed 1. That this precept of multiplying was onely to hold â—ll the world was replenished Magister lib. â— distinct 2â— 2. This precept was not given to all but onely to the multitude Thomas 2.2 quast 152 art 2.3 This precept was not for all times but only in case of necessâ—ty when propagation failed Scotus 4. Some say this precept did hold onely till Christ. 5. Some that this increasing is to be understood of â—â—â—ctifying in the soule not in the body But all these answers mislike the moderne Papists And therefore now their answer is that these words increase and multiply containe not a precept but an institution of nature and a promise of fecundity â— for the same words are uttered untâ— other creatures which are not capable of precepts and if iâ— were â— precept iâ— should binde all to increase and multiply by marriage and so injury should be offered to Christ to Mary and other holy Virgins thus Bellarmine de Clericis lib. 1. c. 21. Pererius in Genes lib. 4. p. 657. Contra. 1. Our adversaries fight here with their owne shadow for neither doe wee say that this is an absolute precept binding all to marriage but a liberty granted to all that will marry that thereby mankinde may still be propagated like as where Christ faith if they persecute you in one City flye into another hee doth not take away this liberty that flyeth not having received a greater gift of strength and patience to stay and endure the utmost triall but he which shall deny this remedy to the weake So they offend not against this grant of marriage for increase that need it not but are indued with a more excellent gift of continency but they which deny it to those that are apt to generation 2. Though bruit beasts are not capable of mans precepts yet when God biddeth the creatures understand in their kind and obey Ion 2.10 God spake to â—he fish and it cast up Ionah upon the dry land 3. If it bee an institution of nature then they tyrannize by their superstitious lawes over the bodies of men forcing them to single life against the generall inclination of nature 5. The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is places of confutation out of this first chapter 1. Confut. Against the Manichees and Atheists I Will briefly first set downe the objections of the Manichees and ancient Pagans concerning the creation because they are sutable to the impious conceits of the Atheists in these dayes 1. Object If God in the beginning made the world what did hee before was hee weary in doing of nothing Answ. God as Augustine saith nec cessando torpuit nec operando laboravit neither was idle in resting nor weary in working neither received he any happinesse by the things created without which he was happy but when it pleased him he made the world to manifest his glory and declare his mercy August cont aedvers leg lib. 1. c. 2. 2. Object If God created light hee was before in darknesse Answer God needeth no corporall light which was made but dwelleth in a spirituall and uncreated light Aug. de gâ—n cont Manic cap 4. 3. Object If God made the light who made darknesse Answer Darknesse is nothing it need no creation being but the absence of light as nakednesse is the want of cloathing silence the ceasing of a sound ibid. 4. Object If the spirit moved upon the waters then were they the habitacle or mansion of the spirit Ans. The Sunne is carried above the earth yet is not the earth the habitation thereof and the spirit did so move upon the waters as the workman over the worke which he intendeth to make Aug. ibid. c. 5. 5. Object But who made the waters whereupon the spirit moved Answ. It is comprehended under the name of the earth which was covered with the waters made at the first as an unformed lumpe or matter whereout other creatures were made Aug c. 7. 6. Object God saw that the light was good it should seeme he knew it not before Answ. It followeth not that because God approveth the light being made he knew it not before Christ wondred at the Centurions faith which he himselfe had wrought God saw it before in his intention and now approveth it brought forth in action 7. Object How could there be light or the distinction of daies and nights before the Sun was made Cels. lib. 6. Orig. and so object the Manichees Ans. Augustine answereth that there was a division of the day and night before the sunne but a more exact division afterward de genes cont Manich. c. 15. Ambrose saith the light of the day is one thing the light of the sunne another as wee see by experience that there is a light before the sunne rise and after he is set lib. 4. Hexemer c. 3. But we doe againe say that God is not tyed to the creature as though hee could not make light without the sunne â—ee that made the â—unnâ— was able to make light before and without the sunne see more hereof in the Theologicall explanation upon vers 3. I will now touch some of the Papists objections 2. Confut. Sacraments doe not conferrâ— grace BEllarmine by the moving of the spirit upon the waters enforceth that the Sacrament of Baptisme conferreth grace as those waters concurred to the making of naturall things so the water of baptisme toward spirituall regeneration lib. 2. de sacram ca.
verse the negative particle lo not must be supplyed which is but once in the beginning of the verse expressed This interpretation we preferre before either that of the Hebrewes 1. who referre this verse to that which followeth and joyne it not with that which goeth before but make this sense that as yet there were no plants or herbs that appeared above the earth but lay yet hid till God sent raine whereby the earth was prepared for the creation of man and the plants watered so R. Sel. But this is a vaine conceit for upon the third day trees were made which appeared above the earth and the earth having beene so lately covered with the waters was yet moist enough 2. Either that of Eugubinus who saith it rained the second day and then the plants were brought forth the third for upon the second day the waters were gathered together from covering the earth so that no raine was then needfull 3. Mercerus distinguisheth the times the 5. verse hee understandeth of the first growing of the plants in the creation which was done without raine or dew but the 6. verse hee referreth to that ordinary course which God appointed afterward by dewes and raines to refresh the earth 4. Musculus will have the 6. verse of the ascending of vapours to be understood of the very time of creation that God used those helps of nature but this were to tye God unto meanes wherefore I take it with Iunius to be an explanation of the former verse that it had neither yet rained nor any mist had ascended when God onely by his word caused the plants to grow out of the earth this is the exposition of R. Saadia which Kimâ—i preferreth before all the rest QVEST. IX Whether Paradise were terrestriall Vers. 8. THe Lord planted a garden eastward in Eden c. Hierome readeth for eastward à principiâ— from the beginning whereas the word is Kedem the East translated by the Septuagint 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so that Hieromes conceit that God made Paradise before the heaven and earth tradit in 2. gen is grounded upon the false interpretation of this place and how could Paradise which was upon the earth be planted before the earth was founded 2. Their conceit is removed that imagine Paradise to bee no terrene or corporall place but to be spiritually understood as Philo lib. de mund opâ—fic and Origen whom Epiphanius confuteth by this reason that where there are true rivers as Euphrates which is confessed of all to bee one of the rivers of Paradise where were also very trees and plants there Paradise must bee a terrestriall place epist. ad Ioann Hierosâ—l 3. Neither can the whole earth be taken for Paradise as some have thought because it is said here to bee planted in Eden which was the name of a speciall country Esech 27.23 Harah Canneth Eden are joyned together QVEST. X. Where Paradise was situate LIkewise for the situation of Paradise 1. it was neither in a remote place beyond the Ocean which opinion is attributed to Ephrem 2. nor a place higher than all the earth Damasc. lib. 2. de fid orthodox c. 14. 3. nor next unto heaven as Rupertus de Trinitat c. 37. 4. nor reaching up to the Moone as some other have imagined 5. nor in the aire though not so high as the Moone as Alexander Hales and Tostatus 6 nor under the Equinoctiall Bonavent in 2. senten c. 17. for these rivers Tigris and Euphrates which flowed out of Paradise and the country Eden where Paradise was came not neare the Equinoctiall and they are knowne to be in Asia not in any remote and unknowne countrey in earth not in the aire or next to the Moone All these are ridiculous childish fancies and need no long confutation QVEST. XI Of the tree of life Vers. 9. THe tree of life c. 1. This was a visible tree planted in the midst of Paradise in a visible place not spiritually or allegorically to be understood as Origen thinketh 2. neither is it called the tree of life because it was able to give immortality and to preserve from death for ever as Tostatus or onely because it was able to preserve man from death till such time as hee should bee translated to immortality as Scotus in 2. lib. sent dist 19. qu. 1. and Thomas with others 4. Neither need it bee disputed whether the tree of life had this power to preserve from death by a supernaturall gift as Bonaventure or by a naturall faculty as Hugo Thomas Pererius upon this place 5. For it is evident that this tree had no power to give immortality at all by the taste of the fruit thereof 1. because that no corruptible food can make the body incorruptible but the fruit of this tree could not nourish nature without corruption and alteration and without nourishment it could not give life to the body 2. Againe man had by his creation power given him to dye if he had not sinned wherfore immortality was the gift of his creation not effect of the eating of the tree 3. And if it could have giveÌ„ immortality it must have had a power to preserve from sin for by sinning man became mortall so that if it could not defend him from sin it was no more the tree of life in regard of the effect than any other tree of the garden for if he had not sinned he should not have dyed what fruit soever he had eaten of that only tree of knowledge of good and evill excepted 6. Then our opinion is this that it was called the tree of life not so much for the operation though we confesse it might give strength and vertue also to the body Mercer but chiefly for the signification because it was both a signe of life received from God and a symbole of Christ who is our true life and herein we approve rather the opinion of Augustine Eugubinus in Cosmopeia who thinketh it was called the tree of life not effective but significative not effectually but significatively as a signe of true immortality which he should receive of God if he continue in obedience First it is the tree of life as the other was of knowledge of good and evill which was not so called because it gave knowledge but was a seale unto them of their miserable knowledge which they should get by experience in their transgression Magister lib. 3. distinct 17. therefore the tree of life must be so called because it was a seale and pledge of life secondly thus the Scripture significatively and simbolically expoundeth the tree of life Prov. 5.18 Wisdome which is Christ is a tree of life Revel 2.7 To him that overcommeth will I give to eat of the tree of life see more of this Synops 17. cont err 5. QVEST. XII Of the tree of knowledge of good and evill vers 9. THe tree of knowledge of good and evill First we affirme that this was a visible materiall tree not
be worshipped as God but onely in knowledge to be like unto God neither can Adam be properly charged with covetousnesse as Hugo S. Vict. doth unlesse it be taken for an immoderate desire of any good thing more than is fit of the other sort is Cajetan who would lessen the womans offence both in the thing desired which was the knowledge of good and evill the externall act in coveting the fruit which was faire to the eye in regard of her sex being a woman and the weaker vessell But this notwithstanding the womans offence in the nature thereof was the greater as before is shewed QVEST. XIII Whether Eve added to the commandement and spake doubtfully Vers. 3. NEither shall ye touch it lest ye dye c. 1. Ab. Ezra noteth that the serpent useth the name Elohim speaking of God not Iehovah because hee knew it not But that is not the reason for the woman useth also the name Elohim who was not ignorant of Iehovah but Satan of purpose forbeareth to use that name Iehovah which is a name of mercy and urgeth in the name Elohim the severity of God Mercer 2. Neither doth the woman adde any thing to Gods precept that they should not touch it but faithfully expoundeth the meaning of the precept some Hebrewes think that Satan took occasion hereby to move the woman to touch the fruit that seeing she died not by touching shee should though the Hebrew particle pen be not alwayes so taken yet it appeareth so to bee used by the woman because Satan hereby taketh occasion to put her out of doubt that shee should not dye at all See Muscul. Iun. though Mercerus herein dissent from them QVEST. XIIII Why Eve gave to her husband Vers. 6. SHe gave to her husband with her c. 1. This sheweth not that Adam was at this time with Eve as some Hebrewes thinke he might come before the tentation was finished The meaning is that he might eat with her that is as she had done 2. Some thinke that before the woman did forbeare to eat of the fruit supposing it was poyson and so present death but the truth is that hitherto she had abstained in obedience to the commandement 3. Neither did she give it to Adam lest if she died he might have taken unto him another woman as some Hebrewes imagine for shee was the onely woman in the world but she was desirous to make her husband partaker of her happinesse as she thought Mercer QVEST. XV. How many wayes the eyes of the body and minde are said to be opened Vers. 7. THeir eyes were opened Their eyes of the body and minde are said divers wayes to bee opened the eyes of the body three wayes 1. When they that are blinde are made to see as Christ caused the blind to see 2. When he that hath his eyes seeth somewhat which he saw not before as Balaam his eyes were opened when hee saw the Angell with a naked sword 3. When they which see discerne that which they perceived not before as the Disciples discerned Christ in the breaking of bread The eyes of the minde are opened likewise three wayes 1. When men are brought from ignorance and darknesse to the knowledge of Christ. Act. 26 18. 2. When men are brought by affliction to know themselves as the prodigall childe is said to come to himselfe Luke 15.17 3. When a mans sinne when it is committed presenteth it selfe as Iudas sinne did when hee had betrayed Christ. Thus the eyes of Adam and Eves minde were opened to see their sinne and the eyes of their body were opened to see and discerne the deformity of those parts which were comely before Muscul. QVEST. XVI How their eyes are said to be opened Vers. 7. THeir eyes were opened and knew that they were naked 1. Not that they were either blinde before for how could Eva have seene the fruit of the tree that it was faire to the eye if shee had beene blinde 2. Neither as Iosephus thinketh lib. 1. antiquit c. 1. by the eating of the forbidden fruit had they gotten a sharper wit and understanding for then the eating thereof had bin a gaine unto them 3. Neither is it so said as R. Salomon conjectureth because now first they began to have knowledge of evill for as they had knowledge of good before so as by the contrary they had the knowledge of evill also but now indeed they know evill by miserable experience 4. But now their eies were opened the eyes of their minde and conscience to see and acknowledge their sinnes and disobedience wherein they were blinded before and to feele the rebellion and disobedience of their members in their disordered and unruly motions which maketh them for shame to cover them which use of vailing and covering the secret parts even nature hath taught the barbarous nations which even in their baths as Augustine writeth will not have their unseemely parts uncovered the like Strabo reporteth of the Indians and Diodorâ—â— Siculus of the Aethiopians that going naked in the rest of their body use to cover their secret parts QVEST. XVII Why they made aprons of fig-leaves ANd they sewed fig-tree leaves 1. Not because the fruit thereof whereof they had tasted was forbidden for they would so much more have abhorred the leaves thereof 2. Neither to betoken the desire of the flesh now procured by sin which they say is provoked by the rubbing of the fig leaves 3. Nor yet as the testimony of repentance because fig leaves doe pricke and sting the flesh 4. Neither yet need wee run to allegories that this covering with leaves or with fruit betokeneth the vaine excuse and defence of sinne 5. But they made them aprons of fig leaves both being fit for their breadth and ready at hand for no other cause than to hide their nakednesse whereof they were now ashamed QVEST. XVIII Why man was created naked NOw if it be further asked why man was created naked I answer 1. with Basil lest his mind might have beene occupied in seeking for outward things and so withdrawne from better meditations God having a purpose to cloath his body with some excellent brightnes such as is in the Angels 2. Or with Ambrose that being not naked and destitute of the ornaments of vertue they lesse needed outward ornaments 3. Whereas clothing serveth for necessity to defend from the cold and for honesty and comelinesse Adam before his fall in neither respect needed cloathing being neither subject to heat or cold nor yet having any uncomelinesse in his members 4. Adde hereunto that whereas other creatures were created with their naturall cloathing birds with feathers beasts with haire and wooll fish with scales man was created naked that hee might exercise his wit and be profitably occupyed in the invention of arts for the necessary use of man QVEST. XIX Why the voyce of the Lord was heard in the coole of the day Vers. 8. THey heard the voyce of the Lord walking
them that gave them their several tongues hom 11. in Numb But the text it selfe overthroweth this opinion v. 9. The Lord Iehovah did confound their languages 3. Confut. Against Celsus that saith Moses borrowed of other writers THirdly Celsus objected that Moses borrowed this story of the towre of Babel of those that write of the Gyants called Aloides how they cast downe a great towre But Origen answereth that the writers of that history were after Homer who was after Moses so that he could not take any thing from them lib. 4. cont Cels. It is more like that they corrupted the true story of Moses with the Poeticall fictions 4. Confut. Against the Pagans that fable of the beasts that they had sometimes one language 4. CErtaine Pagans not beleeving that the world was not any time of one language compare this narration of Moses to that fable of the beasts that sometime they had all one language and one understood another till such time as they sent an embassage to the Gods that they might bee alwayes in their flourishing youth and never be old and for this their proud request their speech was confounded that now one understandeth not another The like truth say they is in this narration of Moses For how is it like that they could in that instant every man forget his former speech ex Philone But this is a doltish comparison betweene reasonable men and unreasonable beasts those being no more capable of speech than they are of reason And seeing all the world tooke beginning from one man before the floud from Adam after the floud from Noah why should it seeme incredible that the world used one language And why should it seeme unpossible that God to whom all things are possible in that instant could make them forget their language seeing that some diseases as the Lethargy doe bring such forgetfulnesse as that the patient knoweth not how to call things by their names and Pliny writeth of Corvinus Messala that he forgot his owne name 5. Confut. Against Philastrius that all the world was of one language not divers before 5. PHilastrius counteth it an hereticall opinion that all the world was of one language before the tower of Babel they are said so to be saith he that although they spake divers languages yet they one understood another and so in effect it was but as one But the text is contrary that the whole earth was of one language and one speech not of one understanding but of one lip as it is in the hebrew that is they framed their words and language after the same manner And how could every man understand so many languages which are held of most to have beene not so few as seventy without a miraculous gift such as the Apostles had and whereas Moses maketh mention of divers languages in the 10. chap. v. 5.20.31 there that is spoken by way of anticipation And here Moses setteth forth the beginning and occasion of the diversity of languages by a certaine figure called hysterosis which declareth that last that was done first setting the effect before the cause 6. Confut. Against Philo that this division of tongues is to bee understood historically not in allegory 6. FOurthly Philo draweth this story of the confusion of tongues to an allegory to signifie the confusion of vices Hoc est nunc propositum sub figura confusionis linguarum dijicere constipatuâ— vitiorum cuneum This is Moses purpose under this figure of confusion of tongues to cast downe the conjoyned muster of vices for to speake properly this parting of one language into many is a separation rather than a confusion Contra. 1. After this manner the whole story of Genesis may bee allegorized so that we should have neither creation of the world nor inundation of the same in true history but in devised allegory 2. This division of tongues is called a confusion not in respect of the divers speech which was indeed divided not united or confounded but of the speakers who were confounded in their affection in being astonished at so suddaine an alteration in their memory in forgetting their accustomed speech in their understanding because they one understood not another in their worke which was confused the server bringing one thing when the builder called for another 7. Confut. Against Plato and Aristotle 7. PLato his opinion is that words have their force and meaning from nature Aristotle that they were first framed as it pleased man But here wee learne that God gave unto man speech and he infused into men at once diversity of languages 8. Confut. Against the Lutherans that make an omnipresence of Christs body 8 Vers. 5. THe Lord came downe the Lutheranes Vbiquitaries that maintaine an omnipresence and ubiquity that is an every-where presence of Christs flesh being pressed by this argument that Christs body doth move from place to place therefore it is not every where doe answer out of this place that God is said to move and descend and yet he is every where But the reason is not alike for to ascend and descend is spoken of Christs body truly and properly but of the God-head only metaphorically and figuratively 9. Confut. Against the latine service in popery 9. Vers. 9. THerefore the name was called Babel because their language was so confounded that they one understood not another so what is the Church of Rome to bee counted but another Babel and synagogue of confusion where the people understand not the Priest noâ— one another in their latine service and prayers Muscul. 10. Confut. Against Pererius the marrying of the uncle and neece unlawfull 10. Vers. 29. THe name of Abrahams wife was Sarai who is held to be the daughter of Haran Abrahams brother which marriages were not then forbidden by any law but afterwards they were where the errour of the papists and namely of Bellarmine and Pererius may be noted who affirme that it was not forbidden by Moses law for the uncle to marry his neece for Othoniel the younger brother of Caleb married Achsa Calebs daughter Iud. 1.13 Contra. 1. To marry in this degree is forbidden in Leviticus by necessary collection Levit. 18.12 Thou shalt not uncover the shame of thy fathers sister for she is thy fathers kinswoman doth not the same reason hold for the other sex thou shalt not uncover the shame of thy fathers brother for hee is thy fathers kinsman Where the degree is prohibited in the male it holdeth also in the female sex unlesse they will say because the law saith thou shalt not cover thy neighbours wife and expresseth not thy neighbours husband that therefore the one should bee lawfull and not the other 2. Othoniel was not the brother of Caleb but either his nephew as the Septuagint read Othoniel the sonne of Kenez adelphon the brother of Caleb namely Kenez for so is the construction in the greek or else as Iunius collecteth Othoniel and Caleb were brothers children Caleb
Sodomites 2. That Abraham might have occasion to shew his valour in redeeming Lot from his enemies 3. That hereby might be signified the separation of Abrahams posterity in the Israelites and of Lots in the Moabites and Ammonites 4. That Lot might see by experience the difference betweene dwelling with good men and evill 5. Lot though he lived among the evill consented not to their sinnes as some of the Hebrewes thinke but was grieved with their unjust conversation as Saint Peter saith 2 Epist. 2.7 Therefore the Hebrewes are injurious to Lot to thinke that of purpose he chose to dwell among the Sodomites because they were evill and like to himselfe for Lot was ignorant of the manners of that place as it seemeth Abraham also was by his prayer which he made for Sodome supposing that there were many righteous there onely here was Lots oversight that he made choice of the Countrey by his eye not enquiring after the Inhabitants ex Mercer QUEST VII Whether Lot went from Abraham from the East or toward the East Vers. 11. HE tooke his journey from the East Thus most translators doe read and hereof ariseth a great question how Lot is said to goe from the East when indeed he went toward the East for Bethel where Abraham now was from whom Lot departed is West-ward in respect of Sodome whither Lot went 1. R. Sel. is deceived who thinketh that Lot indeed went toward the West for Sodome is situated Eastward in respect of Bethel as the Maps doe shew 2. Neither did Lot depart from Abraham before he went downe to Egypt as some thinke when Abraham pitched his tents in a Mountaine Eastward from Bethel Gen. 12.8 for Lot came up with Abraham out of Egypt Gen. 13.1 3. Neither yet with Oukelos whom Fagius followeth it is a proper reading to say Lot departed from Abraham first as the Chalde Paraphrast interpreteth 4. Nor yet need we with some Hebrewes to flie unto Allegories that Lot departed from the East that is from the place of light unto a place of corruption and unhappinesse to his owne destruction 5. Therefore the true reading is that Abraham went not from the East but toward the East for so the word here used Micchedem is taken Gen. 2.8 God planted a Garden Michedem toward the East not from the East Iun. Mercer QVEST. VIII Of the sinne and wickednesse of Sodome Vers. 13. THe men of Sodome were exceeding wicked against the Lord. 1. Some reade before the Lord as the Sept. and Chalde Paraphrast whereby Tostatus thinketh that their unnaturall sinne which still retaineth the name of Sodome is signified which is one of the three crying sinnes murther is one as the bloud of Abel is said to cry out of the earth oppression is another Exod. 2. the cry of the Israelites came up before the Lord and the uncleannesse of Sodome is the third Gen. 18.21 Some thinke that they sinned against their conscience and so in the sight of God Pererius that the greatnesse of their sinne is thereby expressed as the Hebrewes use to adde the name of God as a note of excellency as they say the Cedars of God or the Mountaines of God for great and high Cedars or Mountaines but by this phrase is expressed their impudencie and obstinacie that sinned without any feare of God or man as appeareth Gen. 19. when they furiously beset Lots house to obtaine their filthy pleasure so cap. 6.11 the earth was said to be corrupt before God Iun. 2. Iosephus writing of the sinnes of Sodome saith they were In homines contumeliosi erga Deum impii contumelious toward men and impious toward God So the Prophet Ezekiel saith The sinnes of Sodome were pride fulnesse of bread abundance of idlenesse they stretched not the hand to the poore and among other sinnes that sinne against nature did reigne amongst them which Saint Paul sheweth to have beene familiar among the heathen Rom. 1.27 The men burned in their lust one toward another yea the Philosophers and wise men among the heathen were Patrons of this sinne as Cicero complaineth of Plato Further this pollution of their bodies sheweth they were corrupt also in their religion and given to Idolatry as Saint Paul sheweth one to bee the consequent of the other Rom. 1.26 QVEST. IX Whether Abraham saw all the land of Canaan Vers. 14. LIft up thine eyes c. 1. Abraham neither could see the whole land of Canaan at once that was promised him 2. Neither was it shewed unto him in vision as Occolampad 3. Neither was an image or idea of the Countrey represented unto him as Pererius thinketh the like was exhibited to Moses Deut. 34. and Matth. 4. to our Saviour Christ which were nothing else but to turne a true storie into an imagined fantasie and to make this more probable he brought in a forged tale out of a forged Author the Dialogues that goe under Gregorie his name how Benedict saw the soule of Germanus inclosed in a firie speare which represented the world it seemeth strange that so learned and judicious a man would foist in such frierly tales among other necessary matter 4. But Augustines solution is here sufficient that God doth not onely promise Abraham so much as hee seeth but that also which hee is bid to walke thorow vers 17. so they must bee put both together Abraham might from some high place as out of Mount Ebal or Garizim as Tostatus thinketh see a great part of the Countrey Muscul. and the rest he walked thorow Iunius QVEST. X. How the land of Canaan was given to Abraham Vers. 15. I Will give unto thee Yet Abraham had not so much as the breadth of a foot Chrysostome sheweth well how this may be Multa in altis dicuntur in aliis implentur in the Scriptures many things are said of some and fulfilled in others as Noah saith of Canaan that he should be a servant to his brethren which was not fulfilled in him but in his posterity the Gibeonites so Iacob saith concerning Levi I will divide him in Iacob c. which came to passe in the Levites which were of his seed so that which is here promised to Abraham was accomplished in his posterity QVEST. XI How the Israelites were said to be in number as the dust of the earth Vers. 16. I Will make thy seed as the dust c. 1. Hereby is signified the great increase both of Abrahams carnall and spirituall kindred that should be in number as the dust of the earth 2. Some of the Hebrewes as Rabbi Salomon taketh this to be spoken of the reprobate which are compared to the dust because they are not had in any remembrance or number before God True it is that the elect are numbred with God and he knoweth also the numbers of the wicked but regardeth them not Like as he that buildeth an house numbreth not the stones that goe to the building yet the principall parts and divisions in the house he keepeth
called Vers. 25. HE that came out first was red c. 1. In that Esau came out red it betokened his bloody disposition in comming forth all hayrie as a beast it shewed his savage and cruell nature Muscull 2. This birth of Esau was extraordinary for children are borne usually with haire only on the head eyelids and eye browes in the other parts it groweth afterward and such hairy conceptions are not without much griefe and trouble causing loathsomenes in the stomacke heart-burning and such like Perer. 3. Hee was called Esau that is already made and perfect of the word gnasah to make which is passively to be taken that he came forth with haire as a perfect man not actively as though he should be active and prompt in his businesse Mercer 4. He had three names Esâ—u because he was compleat Edom of the red pottage and Seir that is haire Perer. QUEST XXXVI Of Iacobs holding Esau by the heâ—le what it signifieth Vers. 26. AFterward came his brother out and his hand hold Esau c. 1. It is not to be supposed that Iacob at the time of the birth as he came forth held Esau by the heele and that one birth immediatly followed another for this had beene against the common course the head of the infant first comming forth and might have put the mother in danger but it is like rather that Iacob before his birth put forth his hand holding his brothers heele which by the mid wife was put into his place againe and then after a while he was borne also and came out orderly with his head first Mercer 2. for so is the usuall and naturall manner for the head of the infant to appeare first to come out footling that is with the feet first is against nature as Nero was borne and hereupon they which were borne with such difficultie had the surname of Agrippa Varro writeth that the infant in the wombe is pitched upon his head with his feet upward as a tree hath the branches uppermost Perer. 3. Hee was called Iacob of gâ—achabh which signifieth to supplant taking it in the proper sense because he held Esau by the heele not in the metaphoricall to deceive as Esau wresteth the word to bring his brother into hatred Genes 27.36 yet this name was a prediction of that which fell out afterward that Iacob should supplant and overthrow his brother Perer. 4. The conceit of Rasi is but weake that Iacob was first conceived in his mothers wombe though Esau were borne first and that therefore the birthright did belong unto him for the right of birthright consisted not in the priority of time but the election of grace 5. Yet this is strange in Iacobs birth as Aben Ezra noteth that Iacob putting forth his hand did breake that rimme or skin wherein the infant is inclosed which did prognosticate that he would breake in upon his brothers birth right QUEST XXXVII Of the divers studie and profession of life in Esau and Iacob Vers. 27. ESau was a cunning hunter c. 1. Hunters and hunting in Scripture are for the most part taken in the worst sense as Nimrod is called a mighty hunter not because this exercise is unlawfull but for that it is more sutable to men of fierce nature Muscul. 2. Otherwise the delight it selfe is lawfull and commendable both profitable to keepe the body in health by moderate exercise as also to prepare and accustome it to labour and make it fit and serviceable for warre Perer. 3. Iacob was a simple man without fraud and lived a quiet life dwelling in tents which the Hebrewes expound of frequenting the tents of Sem and Heber for knowledge but it is a description of those which keepe cattell and follow tents as in this sense Gen. 4.20 Iubal is said to be the father of them that dwell in Tents and of such as have cattell Iun. 4. Esau is said to be a man of the field not as the Latine translateth an husbandman but one continually conversant in the field because of his game a field man as the Septuagint 5. By the lives and dispositions of these two Gregorie noteth the divers studies of worldly men that hunt after the pleasures of this life as Esau did and of holy men that give themselves to the contemplation and studie of vertue with Iacob lib. 5. moral QUEST XXXVIII Why Isaack loved Esau. Vers. 28. ISaack loved Esau c. 1. By this we see that parents are carried with blind affection to fansie those children which are evill conditioned Muscul. 2. But Isaack is not said simply to love Esau but for his venison sake he loved not his evill conditions Cajetan 3. He loved him because he saw him active and well exercised his forward qualities he thought might in time be allayed 4. Some thinke that Esau by his flattery insinuated himselfe and so doe make a metaphor of these words hunting was in his mouth but the other sense is more agreeable Mercer 5. Rebecca loved Iacob not so much thereunto inclined by the oracle received as mooved by the gentle and obedient behaviour of Iacob Mercer QUEST XXXIX Of Iacobs red pottage and Esaus greedie demanding of it Vers. 30. ESau said to Iacob let me eat c. 1. It is but a toy devised here of the Hebrewes that Abraham died this very day when Esau sold his birth-right when he was 15. yeares old lest he should live to see the wicked manners of Esau for upon this day they say Esau killed a man ravished a woman betrothed and Iacob sod lentils they say which used to bee set before those which mourne for the dead thereby conjecturing that he mourned for Abraham But these are uncertaine conceits having no ground in Scripture ex Mercer 2. This was rather the usuall food which Iacob prepared for himselfe for if it had beene common for the whole house Esau might have had otherwise accesse unto it Perer. 3. Esau was very hungry as hunters commonly are and seemed to be very ravenous and unsatiable for 1. he saith feed me or let me swallow at once so the word lagnat signifieth only found in this place as Camels are fed by casting gobbets into their mouth 2. Beside for haste he doubleth the word this red red Mercer 3. He saith he must die if he have it not as men of appetite cannot governe themselves but they must die if their humour be not satisfied Perer. 4. The Hebrewes note that as Esau was red so he delighted in red things in red pottage which beside the rednesse of the lentiles might be coloured with saffron or such like he dwelt also in a red soyle called therefore Idumea c. Mercer 5. Although this may seeme to be but a light matter which passed betweene Esau and Iacob yet considering that they were of discretion to know what they did and Esau was of yeares and strength to follow hunting till hee was wearie Iun. and beside his parents upon this accident
conceived or had heat C. in the ramming or conceiving time of the strong or well bodyed sheepe B. G. T. chashar to joyne together whereof they are called well bodyed or strong sheepe v. 42. When the ewes brought forth he did not put them S. when the ewes were feeble B. G. when they were put together late or in late ramming time H.C.T.P. guataph whereof is derived the word behagnatoph in bringing forth late the not marked were Labans the marked Iacobs S. the late brought forth were Labans the timely or firstlings Iacobs C.H. the feebler were Labans the stronger or well bodied Iacobs T.B.G.P. v. 43. camels asses and mules S. camels and mules câ—t 3. The Explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Whether Rachel envied her sister Vers. 1. RAchel envied her sister 1. Some thinke that this was a kind of zeale rather than envie she grieved rather at her owne infecundity or barrennesse than that her sister was fruitfull Perer. 2. But the text is evident that shee envied her sister shee was offended that her sister was fruitfull and she barren Neither is there any inconvenience to yeeld to those holy women their infirmities they were not Angels Merc. chavah signifieth both to envie and strive with emulation or zeale QUEST II. Of Rachels impatient and immoderate desire of children GIve me children or else I die 1. She saith not so as though Iacob of purpose had restrained his naturall force as R. Levi. 2. Neither is it her meaning that Iacob should by his prayer obtaine children for her as Isaack had done for Rebecca for then Iacob would not have beene angry with her 3. Neither did she thus say as though she did not know that God was the giver of children which she confesseth vers 6. God hath given sentence on my side 4. But thus in her womanly heat she breaketh forth as though the fault was in her husband seeing she should otherwise die either for griefe or that she might as good be dead as beare no children Mercer and that her name by this meanes should die with her Perer. 5. Three reasons made her so desirous of children 1. Her envy for her sisters happinesse 2. That she might be the more deare to her husband 3. Because of the promised seed Perer. QUEST III. Of the causes of barrennesse Vers. 2. IAcob was angry and said Am I in Gods stead c. 1. There are naturall causes of sterility or barrennes either some originall defects in the birth as some are borne unapt for generation or else it may come by diseases sometime the constitution of the body is an impediment as in fat bodies where nature is turned into the nutriment of the body Aristot. lib. 2. de generat animal c. 2. 2. There is a supernaturall cause of barrennesse when it pleaseth God to restraine the wombe as in the women of Abimelecks house Genes 20.18 Foure keyes to open and shut are in Gods hand which the Lord hath not commited to any other either Angell or Seraphim the key of raine Deuter. 28.12 The Lord shall open his good treasure the heaven to give raine the key of food Psal. 104.28 Thou openest thy hand and they are filled the key of the womb the key of the grave when the dead shall be raised Perer. ex Tharg Hierosolym 3. Plato himselfe confesseth that procreation was the gift of God Quamvis in mortali animante fiat restamen divina est pregnatio genitura ab immortalib est Generation though it be done in a mortall creature yet it is a divine thing procured by an immortall power Plat. in Symp. QUEST IV. In what sense Rachel saith she shall beare upon my knees Vers. 3. SHee shall beare upon my knees 1. Not as though Rachel should be her midwife or nurse as Onkelâ—s 2. Or that by her example Rachel should the sooner conceive as the Hebrewes 3. But that as it followeth Rachel might have children by her maid for the children of the bond-maids were accounted as the dames her meaning is that she might dandle them upon her knees and play with them as mothers doe with their children so is this phrase taken Isay 66.12 them shall ye sucke ye shall be borne upon her sides and be joyfull upon her knees 4. Rupertus doth fitly allegorize this saying of Rachel lib. 7. comment in Genes 36. as they which Bilha brought forth were borne upon Rachels knees so qui per prâ—dicationem invidentis auâ—ivit verbum teneat in Catholica ecclesia verae perfectionem fidei ita nihil differet à legitimis filâ—â—s so he that heard the word by the preaching of envious teacherâ— holding the true faith in the Catholike Church may differ nothing from the lawfull children of the Church as the sonnes of Iacobs hand-maids received their inheritance and had their lâ—t amongst their brethren QUEST IV. Whether Ruben brought unto his mother mandrakes Vers. 14. GIue me of thy sonnes mandrakes c. 1. It is most like that they were rather pleasant and sweet flowers where with they used to strew their husbands bed than that heâ—be which is called mandrakes for these reasons 1. Ruben was now but a child of 5. or 6. yeares old and not above for he was borne in the beginning of the 7. last yeares and therefore had no discretion to make choice of flowers for their vertue but for their colour or smell 2. It was now wheat harvest in the spring time which in those countries was in the beginning of May when the Mandrake apples are not ripe for so the Septuagint read Mandrake apples 3. The Mandrakes have a strong smell which the Arabians call Iabrochin of the ranke savour of goats whereas these herbs called dudaim are commended for their sweet smell Can. 7.13 The mandrakes have given a smell and in our gates are all sweet things Iun. 2. Whereas Augustine saith of the mandrakes Rem comperi pulehram suaveolentem sapore in sipido I found them to be faire in shew sweet in smell vnsavory in taste lib. 22. com Faust. c. 56. he may speake of that kind of mandrakes which grew in those hot countries in Africa which might have a more fresh smell but otherwise concerning the mandrakes knowne to us Plinie a diligent searcher of the nature of herbes saith Odor ejus gravis sed radicis mals graviâ—r c. sic noxiâ— vires gravedinem afferunt ipso â—lfactu The smell is very strong specially of the root and apple the force thereof â—ery hurâ—full the very smell bringeth heavinesse Plin. lib. 25. c. 13. Levinus Lemnius confirmeth this by experience that by laying of a mandrake apple in his studie he became so drousie that he could not shake it off till the apple was removed lib. de herb 3. Epiphanius thinketh that the mandrake inciteth and provoketh either man or woman to lust as it is held that they have vertue to cause women to conceive and that Rachel desired
of the Pharsaliam battell Tertullian writeth that the Nasomannae and Celtae used to consult with the dead at the tumbes of their parents and of warlike men lib. de anima Such was the vaine opinion which the heathen had of this magicall art which Plinie himselfe derideth as vaine and foolish because Nero that wicked and bestiall Emperour who was given over to all lewdnesse yet could not be induced by Tyridaetes whom he greatly advanced and gave him a Kingdome solliciting him thereunto and bringing Magitians unto him to give any credite unto Necromancie Plin. lib 30. cap. 2. 2. Now this vaine or rather prophane profession of summoning of the dead and consulting with them may evidently be convinced to be nothing else but the Devils sophistry and forgery for first the soule being separated from the body hath no power to move or exercise any body but that which it did give life unto being the forme thereof which being now dead is an unapt organ or instrument for the soule and therefore such soule being once departed from the body can neither assume it nor any other body Secondly the soules that are departed are either in heaven at rest and over the soules of the holy and righteous which are in the hands of God the Devill hath no command or they are in hell and from thence there is no returning againe as is manifest in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus where it was denied unto the rich man that any could goe from thence to be a messenger to the living 3. True it is that the Lord by his power hath called againe into the bodies and caused to appeare some that were departed of the which we finde three sorts some were restored to life and their soules joyned againe to their bodies as the daughter of Iairus the widdow of Nains sonne and Lazarus others appeared in their true bodies and came out of the graves yet not to converse among the living but to bee witnesses of the resurrection of Christ Matth. 27.53 And yet wee reade of a more strange apparition of Moses and Helias in mount Tabor where our blessed Saviour was transfigured who appeared not out of their graves but from heaven in their glorious persons We deny not but that God hath and can at his pleasure cause the Saints departed to appeare unto men but not out of purgatory as Pererius imagineth or to the end to bee patrons and helpers to his Church for wee have alwayes the presence of Christ and of his Angels neither yet can we beleeve that so many Martyrs have appeared at their Tombes as some Ecclesiasticall histories make mention for as Christ is gone out of the world not to returne till the day of judgement so because he saith where I am there shall my minister bee Ioh. 12.26 so wee cannot but thinke that the Saints departed attending upon Christ are not now to bee seene in the world This then being granted that the Lord hath power over the soules of men departed to command them to their bodies for a time for some speciall service and to send them into the world at his pleasure yet this is no warrant at all to thinke that Satan or his ministers can doe the like for seeing this is as great a miracle for the spirits of the dead to appeare as to raise the dead to cause the borne blinde to see or to doe any such great worke and God being the only worker of miracles this cannot fall under Satans jurisdiction Such visions then and apparitions when dead men appeare in their bodily shape though not with true bodies and in their wonted apparell counterfeiting their voice and behaviour while they lived are to bee held meere illusions of Satan that can transforme himselfe into an Angell of light so I conclude this point with that saying of Tertullian Et si quosdam revocavit Dei virtus in documentum juris sui non id circo communicabitur fidei audaeciae Magorum falaciae somniorum licentiae Poetarum c. Although the power of God hath called some againe to shew his dominion yet this power is not communicated to the confidence and boldnesse of Magicians to the deceitfulnesse of dreames or to the libertie of Poets QUEST XVIII Why Satan doth counterfeit the spirits of the dead THe Devils then doe counterfeit the spirits and soules of the dead as Chrysostome sheweth Homil. 29. in Matth. and August lib. 10. de civit Dei cap. 12. for these causes 1. By this meanes the Devill more strongly deceiveth seeing men are ready to heare their parents and friends departed 2. By this subtilty the Devill perswadeth men that hell is not so fearfull a place nor so enclosed but that there may bee a respite and going forth 3. Thus that opinion is nourished of the passing of soules from one body to another as Pythagoras taught 4. And it commeth also to passe that the living are afraid of the dead whom they imagine doe appeare unto them and so to please and reconcile them they superstitiously worship them and offer unto them Ex Perer. 5. Tertullian addeth further that these apparitions bred a conceit that all wicked men goe not to hell but their spirits wander up and downe 6. Et judicii resurrectionis fidem turbant And they doe hinder the faith of the last judgement and of the resurrection if they could assume their bodies being dead which the Christian faith holdeth to sleepe in the grave untill the resurrection QUEST XIX Of the divers kindes of miracles NOw to proceed and draw neere to the principall question in hand concerning these wonders wrought by the Egyptian Magicians two things in generall are briefly to be touched first concerning the divers kindes of miracles then of the difference betweene true miracles and false Concerning the first A miracle is taken three wayes first simply and absolutely in respect of any nature whatsoever so there is no miracle for unto God the author and framer of nature to whom all things are possible there is nothing strange or miraculous that is called a miracle which either excelleth ones power or understanding but God both knoweth all things and can doe all things 2. A miracle is called in respect of men those things which are unusuall and whose causes they are ignorant of men use to wonder at and in this sense not only spirits and their ministers the Sorcerers but wise and cunning men may doe miraculous and strange workes 3. But properly that is a miracle which exceedeth the nature and power of things created and is beside the ordinary course of naturall things And this kinde of miracle last spoken of is effected three wayes 1. The miracle is either in the thing that is made or done which nature can by no meanes bring forth as for the body of man to bee made immortall and to remaine in the heavens and this is the highest degree of miracles 2. Or else the
of the house of bondage thou shalt not have other Gods beside me OF THE TEN COMMANDEMENTS IN PARTICVLAR Of the first Commandement 1. Questions upon the first Commandement QUEST I. Whether it is better read strange Gods or other Gods 1. THou shalt have no strange Gods 1. Oleaster thinketh it better here to expound ach â—rim other as it is taken Iob 31.10 Let other men bow downe upon her and then the meaning is this that we should not acknowledge any other God beside the Lord that made heaven and earth But seeing the word acherim signifieth also strange it is so better translated strange Gods because there are no other Gods beside the Lord and in other places in stead of acherim another word is used hanechar strange as Samuel saith Put away strange Gods from among you 1. Sam. 7.3 2. The Scripture here speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to mens opinion not that there were indeed any Gods beside the Lord but because they were so reputed and taken in the world Iun. 3. So they are called Gods because they counted them so which worshipped them and strange quia non sunt illi qui coli debebant because they are not such as ought to be worshipped Tostat. quaest 3. 4. The words in the originall are strange Gods shall not be to thee which the Latine translateth non habebis thou shalt not have which also is our English phrase which signifieth that we must make no account or estimation of any other God beside the Lord Neminem estimabis Deum c. Thou shalt esteeme none to be God but the Lord that created heaven and earth Rupert Habetur Deus mente We have God and none other in our minde when wee acknowledge no God beside him in our affection when our love is toward him in our will when we obey him Marbach QUEST II. Why they are called strange Gods STrange Gods 1. Some thinke they are called strange Gods qui à Deo vero impediunt because they doe hinder alienate and estrange us from obeying and serving of the true God Pellican And therefore R. Salomon thinketh that all kind of idolatry is here forbidden whether it be with image or without image because it estrangeth from God But all imagery and idolatry is forbidden in the next Commandement 2. Some thinke they are called strange Gods because they are alieni à rerum natura strange and not to be found in the nature of things as when they make images of compounded and mixed shapes as they pictured Iuppiter Ammon in Egypt with a mans body and a Rammes head there being no such thing in nature Tostat. Lyran. But this is too strict and but one particular branch of idolatry and the speciall prohibition of all kinde of graven images followeth afterward 3. Therefore they are called strange both because they were worshipped among strange people Oleaster as Iunius well translateth Gen. 35.2 Put away saith Iakob deos alieni populi the gods of strange people which word people must bee supplied for Elohim Gods is in the plurall and hanechar strange in the singular and so cannot agree as the substantive and adjective As in respect of the strange people that worshipped them they are called strange Gods so also in regard of that which was worshipped because they are not that which ought to bee worshipped they are called strange Tostat. as before qu. 1. QUEST III. Whether any kinde of externall idolatry be forbidden in the first Commandement WHereas then there are two kindes of idolatry one internall and spirituall in the mind another externall in the adoration of some Image or Idoll 1. Some thinke that all kinde of idolatry both internall and externall is here forbidden as R. Salomon cited before but then the next prohibition Thou shalt make thee no graven image should be superfluous 2. Some make this distinction of idolatry there is one kinde Cùm professione colitur alius Deus When professedly another God is worshipped and this is the most grosse idolatry and properly belongeth to this Commandement There is another when another God is not professedly worshipped but the true God after a false manner which is forbidden in the second Commandement Vrsiu But the same matter or subject must belong unto the same precept and all manner of Idols whatsoever or similitudes of any thing made to worship are in generall words forbidden in the second precept 3. Therefore I preferre here their opinion which thinke that the spirituall and internall worship of God is properly commanded here and the contrary forbidden Here such idolatry is forbidden which was committed without any images or Idols as Varro testifieth how that the Romanes worshipped the goddesse Vesta without any image only they set fire in the Temple of Vesta for they held Vesta to be the fire Tostat. So also Procopius saith that the first Commandement concerneth such invisible powers quas divinis honoribus nullis positis idolis prosequuntur which they prosecuted with divine honour without any Idols Hereunto subscribeth Calvin Nec dubium est quin istis verbis comprehendatur interior Dei cultus c. There is no doubt but the internall worship of God is comprehended in these words seeing this precept differeth from the next wherein externall idolatry is forbidden QUEST IV. Of the meaning of these words Before me Vers. 3. BEfore my face 1. Some doe understand it as though the Lord should say you shall preferre no Gods before me make them superiours unto me or set them above me for so the preposition ghal signifieth super above But this were to give way unto their superstition which received other inferiour Gods besides the Lord whereas the Lord commandeth none to be acknowledged at all for God beside himselfe 2. Cajetane thus understandeth super facies upon my face tanquam tegens facies Dei as covering the face of God For when any of Gods divine properties or attributes as of wisdome justice providence are given unto any other the Lords face is as it were covered and his goodnesse obscured But this may seeme to any man to be too curious 3. Some interprete thus against my face that is in despight of me to provoke mine indignation as if the wife should commit adultery inspectante marite while her husband looketh on Piscat But this sense onely sheweth the indignity and injury committed against God herein it comprehendeth not all 4. Oleaster saith mecum with mee that is in my Temple but it was not lawfull for them no not in their hearts nor privatly to acknowledge any other God 5. The best reading therefore is before me that is in my presence neither publikely nor in the heart for wheresoever it be there is the presence and face of God Iun. The Chalde and Septuagint reade praeterme beside mee in the same sense but they doe not expresse the word in the originall And further this sense is induded that whereas they had now received the Lord to be their God and
and ministerie was to be executed 3. And there betweene the doore and the Altar was the brasen Laver where Aaron and the Priests were to wash themselves before they put on the holy garments thither therefore are they called because there they were to be washed with water Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST V. Why Aaron and the rest are washed and how Vers. 4. ANd wash them with water 1. Not with common or every water but with that which was in the brasen Laver chap. 30.18 Iun. 2. But here we must consider that alwayes the order of time is not set downe in Scripture in setting downe the storie of such things as were done for the brasen Laver wherein they were to be washed is afterward appointed to bee made chap. 30. Tostat. quast 2. 3. They were washed not onely their hands and feet as in their daily ministerie chap. 40.33 but in their whole bodie as thinketh Rab. Salomon because their first consecration required a more solemne oblation and washing than their daily ministration And like as the oyle was powred upon Aarons head but ran downe along upon his beard and other parts so it is like the water was applied to his whole bodie Lyran. Tostat. And this washing was a figure of Christs baptisme who went into the water when he was baptised Matth. 3. Simler 4. It was fit they should be washed before they put on the holy garments both for decencie and comelinesse that the soile of their bodie might be cleansed before they applied the precious and glorious apparell and for signification that they might thereby be admonished to cleanse and purge themselves from their sins and corruptions QUEST VI. Of the Priestly apparell which Aaron put on and why the girdle is omitted Vers. 5. PVt upon Aaron the tunicle c. 1. Tostatus thinketh that this was the linen garment which was common to Aaron and the inferiour Priests But it is shewed before chap. 28.39 that the high Priests linen coat was embroidered and so were not the other Priests linen coats 2. Tostatus also hath another conceit that the high Priest did put on this linen coat supervestes communes upon his common wearing apparell qu. 2. But that is not like for Aaron put off his cloaths when he was washed and then he is immediatly cloathed with his Priestly apparell 3. Because no mention is here made of the girdle Cajetan thinketh that cingulum erat commune pontifici sacerdotibus that there was one common girdle for the high Priest and the rest and therefore afterward vers 9. mention is made once for all of the girdles of the Priests But it is evident chap. 28.39 that the high Priests girdle was embroidered of needle worke whereas the common girdles were onely of linen Levit. 16.4 This rather is to be supplied out of Levit. 8.8 where he is girded with a girdle upon his coat and so Oleaster thinketh well that Aaron hath seven ornaments put upon him beside the linen breeches the tunicle the robe the Ephod the pectorall the girdle the miter and golden crowne 4. And whereas it is said and shall cleanse them with the broidered gard of the Ephod Tostatus following Iosephus thinketh that this was the girdle wherewith his garments were girded all together qu. 2. whereas it was the broidered gard which was in the nether part of the Ephod the laps whereof below did gird the Priest in the waste as a girdle Iun. Lippoman Simler Vatab. QUEST VII How Aaron was anointed and with what Vers. 7. ANd thou shalt take the anointing oyle 1. Though it be called oile yet was it more than oile for it was a precious ointment made of Rosin Myrrh Cinamom and other things as it is prescribed chap. 30. Iun. 2. The high Priest was anointed in his head but it is not expressed how the inferiour Priests were anointed it is like but in their hands though Tostatus useth but a slender conjecture to prove it because now their Bishops use to be anointed in the head the inferiour Priests but in the hands to signifie that the one receive a superioritie in their consecration the other but a kinde of service and ministerie for what warrant have they to use the Jewish rites and ceremonies under the Gospell in their consecrations 3. Now because it would seeme an uncomely thing that all Aarons garments should be besmeared with this ointment if it had beene powred on Aarons head R. Salomon thinketh that Moses tooke his finger and dipped it in the oile and so strake it on Aarons forehead But the text is against his conceit both in this place because it is said and shalt powre it upon his head and likewise Psal. 133. where it is expressed that the ointment ran downe upon Aarons beard and so to the skirts of his cloathing Tostat. qu. 2. QUEST VIII How the ordinance of the Priesthood is said to be perpetuall Vers. 9. THe Priests office shall be theirs for a perpetuall law 1. Whereas the like phrase is used chap. 28.43 This shall be a law for ever c. which some restraine unto the particular precept of wearing linen breeches because the law of comelinesse and decencie is perpetuall here it is evident that it is generally meant of the exercising and execution of the whole Priesthood Calvin 2. Therefore this ordinance is said to be eternall and perpetuall in respect of the subject because it was to continue toto tempore quo durarent sacrificia all the time that the sacrifices were to continue the sacrifices then in Christ being determined for the Jewes themselves at this day forbeare to sacrifice nay they would chuse rather to die than offer sacrifice out of the land of Canaan and especially because they have no Tabernacle nor Temple where onely by the law they were to sacrifice the law of the Priesthood must also cease the sacrifices wherein the Priesthood was exercised being abolished Tostat. cap. 28. qu. 21. 3. Augustine giveth another reason why it is called perpetuall quia res significaret aeternas because it signified eternall things So also Gloss. interlin it is so called quia perpetuam futuram id est Christianam religionem significabat because it signified the Christian religion which should be perpetuall And Calvine also approveth this sense Hac vera est ceremoniarum perpetuitas c. This is the true perpetuitie of the ceremonies that they have their being in Christ the substance and truth of them QUEST IX The spirituall application of Aarons manner of consecration NOw this manner of consecrating of Aaron by offering sacrifices washing putting on the Priestly apparell in being anointed hath this signification 1. The presenting of the bullocke to be sacrificed Aspersionem designat sanguinis Domini nostri doth signifie the sprinkling of Christs bloud Beda The two rams doe set forth Christ ex anima corpore c. consisting in his humane nature of bodie and soule Strabus or they signifie duplicem populum c. the two people
word is chaâ—â—n which signifieth to give to bestow to shew grace the other is racham that betokeneth to be inwardly moved with pitie and compassion Oleaster The first then signifieth that favour which is seene in bestowing of gifts the other in remitting of sinnes and delivering from evill QUEST XLII Of the divers kindes of mercie which the Lord sheweth I Will shew mercie There is mercie of divers sorts 1. First there is a generall mercie which the Lord extendeth toward all both good and bad as in granting the Sunne and raine indifferently to all 2. There is a peculiar mercie toward his owne children which also is shewed in divers manner 1. As in the remission of great sinnes as David prayeth as Psal. 51.1 Have mercie upon mee according to thy loving kindnesse c. 2. There is mercie also seene in forgiving sinnes of ignorance as S. Paul saith I was received to mercie because I did it ignorantly 1 Tim. 1.13 3. There is a mercie which they taste of that are in Gods favour and doe love him which is seene not only in the remission of sinnes but in the heaping of blessings upon them as the Lord sheweth mercie unto thousands upon them that love him 4. And mercie is also exercised toward them which being unable to performe any thing of themselves are thereunto assisted and aided by grace as the Apostle saith It is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercie Rom. 9.16 This mercie here mentioned is of that kinde which is peculiar to Gods chosen Procopius QUEST XLIII Of the divers kindes of visions and sights of God Vers. 20. THou canst not see my fate That wee may arise by degrees to come to the handling of Moses Sinai sight first is to be premised the consideration of the divers wayes and kindes of the vision or sight of God We are said to see either with the eyes of our bodies or with the eyes of our minde and each of these hath a threefold distinction or difference for there is of each an ordinarie or extraordinarie sight in this life but the same imperfect and in the next a perfect sight so there are six kindes of visions in all three of the body and three of the minde First concerning the ordinarie sight of the body 1. It is that whereby wee see and behold sensible things which are object to the eye which discerneth nothing but that which is of a finite and circumscriptible nature 2. The extraordinarie when God in vision sheweth him in some externall forme and shape which is of two sorts either in corporali speciâ— in some corporall shew Quod voluntas elegit non quod natura formavit Which it pleased God to chuse not of natures forming Augustine The other is in humani corporis veritate in the assumption of a true humane body so Christ was seene in humane flesh 3. Then in the next world when our bodies shall be glorified wee shall see more perfectly as Iob saith I shall see God in my flesh Secondly the sight of the soule also is divers 1. There is an ordinarie sight which is of two sorts either common which is the sight and knowledge of God that commeth by the creatures Rom. 1.20 or peculiar to the children of God which is the sight of him by faith whereby the heart is purified Acts 25.9 and the eyes of the minde cleared 2. There is an extraordinarie sight and illumination by the minde as when God did manifest himselfe unto the Prophets by inward visions and revelations As when Peter fell into a trance and saw that foure cornerd sheet Acts 10. 3. And in the next life our inward sight of God shall be perfected as Saint Paul saith Now wee see thorow a glasse darkly but then face to face now wee know in part but then shall wee know even as wee are knowne Now in order it shall be discussed by which of these kindes of vision God may be seene and apprehended of man QUEST XLIV Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the body in this life FIrst it is not possible to see God in this life with the eyes of the body 1. For it must needs follow that God should be of a corporall and materiall substance if he might be seene with carnall eyes for nothing by the eyes of flesh can bee discerned but that which is visible finite and circumscriptible but the Lord is infinite Anthropomorphites and Audiâ—â— Heretikes did hold indeed that God himselfe had an humane and visible shape and that man according to his body is the image of God which heresie is contrarie to the Scripture which saith that God is a Spirit therefore of no bodily shape 2. And God being of a spirituall nature cannot be seene by the eyes of the body for that which is of a spirituall nature non cadit sub sensus corporis doth not come under the sense of the body Simler 3. It is said that God is love which sheweth his substance noâ— a qualitie as our love is then as faith hope and love in us cannot be seene much lesse can God 4. The image of God in man which is the inward renovation of the minde cannot bee seene much lesse God himselfe whose image we beare 5. The minde also of man is invisible mulâ—o magis simplicissima illa infinita mens much more that most pure and infinite minde Simler 6. Chrysostome giveth this reason Deus simplex omni concoctione abjunctuâ— nulla forma aut figura effigiatus God is of a simple nature without any composition he hath no forme or figure c. But nothing is perceived of the sense but that which is of a mixt and compound nature that hath forme and fashion 7. Gregorio Nyssene Est interminabilis divina natura interminabile comprehendi non potest The divine nature is infinite and not to be confined or limited and that which is not to be limited cannot be comprehended c. And that God cannot be confined or determined he thus sheweth Quod continet majus est contento That which containeth is greater than that which is contained and it is also heterogeneâ— natura of another nature as the fish is confined in the water and the bird in the aire But nothing is greater than God and he being perfectly good that which should confine him being of a divers kinde must be perfectly evill So it would follow Deum vinci à malo that God should bee overcome of evill 8. Cyrill useth this argument God is said to have beene seene of divers of the Saints but none of them did thinke that they saw the verie nature of God Aliter alius vidit aliter Esaias aliter Ezechiel c. Therefore everie one saw God after a divers sort otherwise Esaias after another manner Ezechiel saw him c. If they had seene the verie substance of God then God must be of a divers nature and
substance for he was diversly seene 9. And that it is impossible Oculis corporis substantiam Dei aspicere with the eyes of the body to see the substance of God it is evident by our blessed Saviours answer unto Philip who desired Christ to shew them the Father He that hath seene me hath seene the Father insinuating thereby that God cannot otherwise be seene of us than in Christ his Son who is the verie engraved forme of his person And if Christ would not grant any such carnall vision of God unto his Disciples who were conversant with him in the flesh who can in this life expect it 10. Whereas then the Prophet Isaiah saith I saw the Lord sitting upon an high throne and he is said to have beene seene of other of the Saints wee must not thinke that they saw Gods substance with their carnall eyes sed juxta possibilitatem humanam non ut est sed ut voluit se videre but as mans nature could see him not as hee is but as it pleased him Hierom who in the same place reproveth the Jewes who affirme that Isaias was slaine of their fathers because he writeth he saw God with his eyes whereas Moses saw only Gods back-parts for seeing Moses also writeth that God talked with him face to face interficite Mosen cum Esaia yee might as well have killed Moses as Isaias QUEST XLV Whether we shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life BUt it is a greater question whether the Saints shall not in the next life see the Divine Essence with their bodily eyes which some doe affirme upon these reasons 1. Iob saith he shall see God in his flesh Iob 19. that is in the resurrection 2. S. Paul also saith that then we shall see face to face 1 Cor. 13.13 3. We shall then be like unto the Angels which doe behold the face of God 4. Our bodies shall then be spirituall and therefore wee shall even with our bodily eyes see and discerne Spirits 5. Otherwise if our eyes should not behold God what use should there be of our sight Contr. 1. The Hebrew Interpreters expound that place of Iob of his sight of God in this life but taking it rather to be spoken of his state and condition in the resurrection as most of our writers doe interpret we deny not but then the Redeemer who is cloathed with our flesh shall be seene of us even with these our eyes as Iob there saith But it is one thing to see the person of the Mediatour another to see the divine essence and nature 2. Saint Paul speaketh not of the â—ight of the bodily eyes but of the sight of the minde as hee expoundeth himselfe Now I know in part but then shall I know even as I am knowne 3. The likenesse similitude which we shall have with the Angels holdeth not in everie thing as that we shall have the like nature or knowledge but in that wherein the resemblance is made as that we shall neither marrie nor be married nor need meat and drinke but in that respect shall be as the Angels and yet neither doe the Angels fully comprehend the divine nature as afterward shall be shewed 4. Our bodies are said to be spirituall not as opposite to the nature of our bodies now which shall remaine but as set against the corruptible and earthly qualities thereof our bodies shall be bodies still but not earthly naturall corruptible bodies as they are now therefore the argument followeth not 5. And this shall be the use of our heavenly sight wee shall see God in his workes but after a more cleere manner than now we shall see the elect we shall behold Christ himselfe Upon these reasons Simlerus concludeth In futura vita nos oculis corporis corpora tantum visurâ—s In the next life we with our bodily eyes shall see onely bodies and not the essence of God Thomas Aquine also thus interpreteth Iobs words I shall see God in my flesh I consisting of body and soule shewing Quod suâ— modo visionis illius erit particeps corpus That the body also after a sort shall be partaker of that vision not that the eyes of the body shall see the Divine Essence Sed quia oculi corporis videbunt Deum hominem factum But because the eyes of the body shall see God which was made man Videbunt etiam gloriam Dâ—i in creatura refulgâ—â—tem They shall also see the glorie of God shining in the creatures But this further must bee added that though the divine essence of God shall not bee seene of our bodily eyes then because God is of an infinite and incomprehensible nature yet the blessed Spirits the Angels and Ministers of God shall bee seene of the elect Angelorum beatorum omnium consortio conspectu colloquio fruemur We shall enjoy the fellowship fight and conference of the Angels and of all the blessed Buâ—an For if the eyes of the young man were so opened at the prayer of the Prophet that he saw the Lords heavenly host which appeared in the likenesse of fierie horse and charriots much more shall our eyes then be so cleared as that we shall see the Angels themselves though not in their very spirituall nature yet in such sensible manner as that we shall both converse have conference with them QUEST XLVI Whether the Divine Essence can be seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life NOw it followeth to be considered seeing Gods essence cannot be seene by our bodily eyes either in this life or the next whether that in our minde and understanding here in this life wee may attaine to the fight and knowledge of God where that position of Thomas Aquine is to be held Impossibile est animae hominis secundum hanc vitam viventis essentiam Dei videre It is impossible for the soule of man in this life to see the essence of God the reasons whereof are these 1. Because the soule being in the body naturally knoweth not any thing nisi quâ— habent formâ—â— in materia but such things as have their forme in some matter or may be knowne by such things but the essence of God per naturas rerum materialium c. by the nature of materiall things cannot be knowne Thomas 2. Almost all our knowledge initium habet à sensibus taketh the beginning from the sense but God cannot be perceived by sense Simler 3. Ambrose likewise saith Anima carnis hujus maculis coâ—â—â—vionibus obumbratae faciem Dei sâ—ncere videre non possunt The soules being shadowed and obscured with the spots and blemishes of the flesh cannot cleerely here see the face of God c. And he further giveth this reason Qui faciem Dei videt esse â—ine peccato He that seeth the face of God must be without sin as our Saviour saith Blessed are the pure in heart for
where the sides joyned together for then the bars could not conveniently have beene thrust thorow them but by the corners are meant the sides neere unto the corners as it is said afterward that the barres were in the rings by the sides of the Arke Tostat. qu. 1. QUEST II. Why it is said He made where the Lord said before to Moses Thou shalt make Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat c. The phrase must be observed that whereas chap. 25. the Lord saith to Moses Thou shalt make an Arke thou shalt make a candlesticke thou shalt make a table and so of the rest here it is said He that is Bezaleel made the Arke he made the table he made the candlesticke The reason hereof is to shew the obedience of Moses and the people lest they might have beene thought to have received many precepts of the Lord and performed few of them In that therefore the Lord said to Moses Thou shalt make there the charge and commandement is given But now where it is thus rehearsed and he made the dutifull and carefull performing is expressed of that which was given them in charge Pellican QUEST III. In what forme the branches of the candlesticke went up Vers. 18. SIx branches came out of the side thereof 1. Pellican seemeth to thinke that these branches went up erectis calamis with their stalkes upright 2. But their opinion seemeth more probable who thinke that the branches in their going up semicirculos effecisse made halfe circles for both that forme and fashion was more comely to sight and beside if they had gone upright this inconvenience would have followed that the lamps above where the oyle was put for the lights would not have stood right up but leaning one way which had been unfit both for the droppings of the oyle and the lights would not have burned so cleare nor so bright if the lamps had not stood even and levell Gallas The rest of the questions concerning these instruments and ornaments of the Temple which are described in this chapter are before discussed chap. 25. and chap. 30. in the beginning of the chapters 4. Places of Doctrine 1. Doct. Christ our true propitiatorie and Mercie-seat Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat The Mercie-seat signified Christ our true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Propitiatorie who hath reconciled us to God his Father The Cherubs upon the Mercie-seat doe represent the holy Angels whose ministerie Christ useth in the government of his Church Pelargus As the Apostle saith They are sent forth to minister for their sakes that shall be heires of salvation Hebr. 1.14 Marbach 2. Doct. Christ both God and man THe making of the Arke of wood within and gold without did set forth the two natures in our blessed Saviour joyned together in one person the divine and humane Simlerus In the Propitiatorie and Mercie-seat are typically set forth the benefits that we have by Christ that as the Propitiatorie covered the Arke wherein was the Law so Christ Legem nos accusantem tegit doth cover and hide the Law which accuseth us Simler But more particularly the Apostle rehearseth the benefits which we have by Christ saying that he is made of God unto us his wisdome righteousnesse sanctification redemption 1. His wisdome in that Christ hath revealed unto us the will of his Father to give his Sonne for us That whosoever beleeveth in him should have eternall life 2. He is our Iustice in that hee imparted to us both his active righteousnesse in fulfilling the Law and his passive obedience in bearing the punishment due unto our sinne so the Apostle saith Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to everie one that beleeveth 3. Christ is our Sanctification in that hee doth not only impute unto us his righteousnesse by faith but doth also sanctifie and regenerate us by his Spirit inabling us in some measure to keepe his Commandements as the Lord saith by his Prophet I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walke in my statutes 4. He is our Redemption in that he hath by his innocent death appeased the wrath of God toward us as the Apostle saith Who shall condemne us it is Christ which is dead c. Marbachius 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against such hereticks as erred concerning Christs divine or humane nature AS Christ is shadowed forth in the Arke to be both God and man so all such are condemned which doe erre concerning the divine or humane nature of Christ. As touching Christs divine nature 1. Some utterly deny it making Christ a meere man and not to have beene before he was conceived of the Virgin Marie in which heresie were Cerinthus Ebion contrarie to the Scripture which saith that the Word which was made flesh was in the beginning c. Ioh. 1.1 2. Some confesse another nature in Christ beside his humanitie but not of the same substance with God yet of an higher nature than any creature so held Carpocrates Basilides Arrius but our blessed Saviour himselfe saith I and my Father are one Ioh. 20.30 3. Some affirmed that Christ beside his humane nature consisted also of a divine yet not begotten of the Father but making one person with God the Father as well as being of one substance so the Sabellians and Patropassians whereas the Apostle saith God sent his Sonne made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The person then of the Sonne and not of the Father was made man for us Concerning Christs humane nature 1. Some affirmed that he was not a true man but onely in outward appearance as the Manichees and Marcionites who are confuted by Christs owne words Luke 24.39 Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me have 2. The Valentinians and Anabaptists hold that Christ had not his flesh of the Virgin Marie but brought it with him from heaven contrarie to the Apostle who saith That hee was made of the seed of David according to the flesh Rom. c. 3. 3. Some taught that Christ had a true humane nature but in respect of his body onely not of his soule as Apollinaris Bishop of Laodicea who is convinced by the words of our Saviour Matth. 26. My soule is heavie unto death 4. Some grant that Christ tooke upon him our whole nature but not our humane infirmities But the Apostle teacheth the contrarie that Christ was in all things tempted in like sort as we are yet without sinne There are two kinde of infirmities some are personall as leprosie blindnesse sicknesse diseases these Christ was not subject unto there are naturall infirmities which doe belong unto the whole humane nature as wearinesse hunger griefe and such like these our blessed Saviour undertooke that he might be in all things like unto us 5. Some hold that Christ had a true humane nature but after the uniting thereof in one person to his Godhead it was absorpt of his divine nature which only remained this was
powder of the Idoll 59. qu. Whether by the drinking of the water any visible signe of difference was made among the people who had most deepely offended about the golden Calfe 60. qu. How farre Moses fact herein is to bee imitated 61. qu. How Moses maketh Aaron the author and cause of his sinne 62. qu. Why Idolatrie is called a great sinne 63. qu. Why Moses onely rebuked Aaron and forbeareth further punishment 64. qu. What things are to be commended in Aarons confession what not 65. qu. Whether Aaron dissembled in not confessing plainely that he made the Calfe 66. qu. In what sense the people are said to be naked 67. qu. Why Moses stood in the gate and what gate it was 68. qu. VVhether all the Levites were free from consenting unto this idolatrie 69. qu. Of the authoritie which the Levites had to doe execution upon the idolaters and the rules prescribed them 70. qu. VVhether the Levites did not make some difference among the people as they went and killed 71. qu. VVhy none came unto Moses but onely of the tribe of Levi. 72. qu. Of the number of them which were slaine whether they were three thousand or twentie three thousand as the vulgar Latine readeth 73. qu. How the Levites are said to consecrate their hands 74. qu. Of the time when Moses came downe from the mount and when he returned againe 75. qu. VVhy Moses urgeth the greatnesse of their sinne 76. qu. Why Moses speaketh as it were doubtfully If I may pacifie him c. 77. qu. Why Moses againe intreateth the Lord seeing he was pacified before vers 14. 78. qu. What booke it was out of the which Moses wished to be raced 79. qu. How the Lord is said to have a booke 80. qu. VVhether any can indeed be raced out of the booke of life 81. qu. Of the two wayes whereby we are said to bee written in the booke of life 82. qu. VVhether Moses did well in wishing to bee raced out of the booke of life 83. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will put out of my booke 84. qu. What day of visitation the Lord meaneth here 85. qu. When the Lord plagued the people for the Calfe 86. qu. Of the difference betweene the act of sinne the fault staine and guilt 87. qu. How God may justly punish twice for one sinne Questions upon the three and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest At what time the Lord uttered his commination 2. qu. Whether the narration of Moses Tabernacle in this Chapter be transposed 3. qu. How God saith he will send his Angell and yet not himselfe goe with them 4. qu. Why the Lord saith hee will not goe with them himselfe lest he should consume them 5. qu. What ornaments they were which the people laid aside 6. qu. Why in publike repentance they used to change their habit 7. qu. Why the Lord thus spake unto Moses 8. qu. In what sense the Lord saith I will come upon thee 9. qu. VVhether the people put off their ornaments twice 10. qu. In what sense the Lord saith That I may know 11. qu. Why it is said They laid aside their good rayment From the mount Horeb. 12. qu. What Tabernacle Moses removed out of the campe 13. qu. Why Moses pitched his Tabernacle without the host 14. qu. How farre from the campe this Tent was removed 15. qu. VVhat is called the Tent of the Congregation 16. qu. Why the people stood up unto Moses and looked after him 17. qu. Whether there were two clouds or one to cover and conduct the host 18. qu. Why the Lord spake to Moses in a cloud 19. qu. How the Lord spake to Moses face to face 20. qu. Why Joshua is here called a young man 21. qu. Whether is here understood Joshua not to have departed from the Tabernacle 22. qu. When the Lord thus said to Moses 23. qu. How Moses desireth to know whom the Lord would send with them seeing hee had promised before to send his Angell 24. qu. Whether the sole government and leading of the people were here given to Moses without the administration of Angels as Burgensis thinketh 25. qu. When and where God thus said to Moses 26. qu. How the Lord is said to know Moses by name 27. qu. What Moses meaneth saying Shew me the way 28. qu. In what sense Moses saith That I may finde grace c. which he was assured of 29. qu. What is understood by Gods presence 30. qu. What rest the Lord promised to Moses 31. qu. Whether Moses here rested in Gods answer or begged any thing further 32. qu. Why Moses addeth Carrie us not hence seeing even in that place they had need of Gods protection 33. qu. Why it is added people upon the earth People upon the earth Gen. 25. 34. qu. Whether Moses desired to see the very divine essence of God 35. qu. VVhat imboldned Moses to make this request 36. qu. Whether Moses shewed any infirmitie in this request to see Gods glorie 37. qu. What the Lord meaneth by All my good 38. qu. How the Lord is said to passe by and why 39. qu. How the Lord is said to proclaime his name 40. qu. Why these words are added I will shew mercie c. 41. qu. Why the Lord is here doubled 42. qu. Of the divers kinds of mercie which the Lord sheweth 43. qu. Of the divers visions and sights of God 44. qu. Whether God may be seene with the eyes of the bodie in this life 45. qu. Whether wee shall see the divine nature with the eyes of our bodies in the next life 46. qu. Whether the divine essence can bee seene and comprehended by the minde of man in this life 47. qu. VVhether the Angels now or the soules of men shall fully see the divine substance in the next life 48. qu. VVhether Moses had a sight of the divine essence 49. qu. Of the meaning of these words No man shall see me and live 50. qu. VVhat place this was in the rocke which the Lord here speaketh of 51. qu. How the Lord is said to cover Moses with his hand 52. qu. VVhy the Lord covered Moses with his hand 53. qu. VVhy the Lord put Moses in the cleft of the rocke 54. qu. VVhat is here understood by the Lords back-parts 55. qu. VVhat manner of visible demonstration this was here shewed unto Moses 56. qu. VVhere the Lord promised that Moses should see his back-parts Questions upon the foure and thirtieth Chapter 1. QUest VVherefore the second tables were given 2. qu. VVhy the Lord saith to Moses Hew thee 3. qu. VVhether the Lord or Moses wrote in these tables and why 4. qu. VVhether Moses was to bee readie the next morning and why 5. qu. VVhy none are suffered to come up now with Moses 6. qu. VVhy their cattell are forbidden to come neere the mount 7. qu. VVho is said here to descend and how 8. qu. VVho proclaimed the name Jehovah God or Moses 9. qu. VVhy the name
the heresie of Swencfeldius But wee are otherwise taught in the Scripture that Christ ascended in a true visible humane body and that he shall with the same returne againe into the world at the latter day Acts 1. Marbach 6. Morall Observations 1. Observ. That we neglect not the time of grace and mercie Vers. 6. HE made the Mercie-seat Oleaster hereupon well observeth that God appointed a place in the Tabernacle from whence hee was ready to shew mercie but hee assigned no place for judgement whereby is signified that now is the time of mercie but afterward commeth judgement We are taught hereby not to neglect the time of grace and mercie but to seeke the Lord while hee may be found as the Prophet saith Prepare to meet thy God O Israel Amos 4.12 2. Observ. We must eat and drinke as in Gods presence Vers. 10. ALso hee made the table of Shittiâ— wood c. This table whereon was set the shew bread which was offered in the name of all Israel signifieth that men as being alwayes in the presence of God sancte uterentur dâ—nis Dei should reverently use the gifts of God Simler As the Apostle admonisheth that whether we eat or drinke or whatsoever we doe else all should be done to the glorie of God 2 Cor. 10. CHAP. XXXVIII 1. The Method and Argument IN this Chapter 1. Is set downe the making of such things as belong to the ministerie and service of the Tabernacle first of the holy instruments as the Altar and Laver of brasse with the fashion of them and the things thereto belonging to vers 9. Secondly of the holy place namely the outward Court where these holy instruments were to be imployed and used to vers 21. 2. In the other part of the Chapter are expressed 1. The order and disposing of these things when they were made to whose charge and care they were committed vers 21. 2. The matter both whereof they were made as gold silver brasse and what things were made of each of these metals vers 23. to the end 2. The divers readings Vers. 8. Of the glasses of the women which came together by troupes I. which assembled and came together B.G.P. better than which exercised themselves A. or which fasted S. or prayed C. or watched L. the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tzâ—ba signifieth to gather an armie these devout women came in troops together as an armie Vers. 21. These are the things numbred I.P.C. or this is the summe B. the things visited A. better than these are the instruments L. or this was the construction of the Tabernacle S. or these are the parts G. the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pekudai numbred counted See the rest of the divers readings before chap. 27. 3. The questions discussed QUEST I. Whether there were more than one Laver made Vers. 8. ALso he made the Laver of brasse 1. R. David thinketh there were two Lavers one whereat the Priests washed the other wherein they washed and cleansed their sacrifices wherof mention is made 1 Sam. 2.14 how the Priests boy would come while the flesh was seething and thrust his flesh hooke into the kettle caldron pot or pan and take out that which came next to hand ex Oleastro 2. But seeing mention here is made but of one Laver of brasse it is like there was no more made by Moses direction but this one to wash in which might serve both for the Priests to wash in as also to cleanse the sacrifices as is before shewed quest 25. chap. 30. whither I referre the Reader That caldron mentioned 1 Sam. 2. was to another end for therein the flesh of the sacrifices was sod and boiled QUEST II. Of the forme and fashion of this Laver. COncerning the forme and fashion of this Laver it is described before quest 24. chap. 30. where it is resolved that it stood upon a shanke or foot and that the Priests did not wash their hands and feet in it but that the water out of the Laver was let out by certaine pipes as is seene in fountaines and therewith the Priests washed Gallasius setteth downe another forme describing the Laver like unto a great bowle or bason standing upon a square frame with bars and rings on the sides wherewith it was carried But this forme is inconvenient 1. Because they could not come by the water the Laver standing upon the frame and it having no other feet of it owne it could not stand of it selfe to hold water 2. Neither is it like it being a great massie and weightie vessell that it was carried by bars on the Levites shoulders 3. And if it had had any such bars and rings they should not have beene omitted in the description as the Arke Table of shew bread the brazen Altar and Altar of incense are set forth with their bars QUEST III. How the brazen Laver is said to be made of the womens looking-glasses HE made the Laver of the glasses 1. Cajetan thinketh that the Laver was not made of the womens looking-glasses but that the Laver is for the smoothnesse and brightnesse compared to looking-glasses wherein the women might see themselves And so he readeth the text thus He made the Laver of brasse in glasses for so the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beth signifieth Herein Marbachius also concurreth with Cajetan Contra. 1. By the same reason the brazen Altar which was covered with bright and polished brasse might be said to be made of glasses 2. To what end should the women behold themselves in the Laver as in a glasse they which came of a religious devotion had no minde to tricke up themselves there 3. The preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 beth sometime is taken for ex of as chap. 35.35 to worke all manner of worke in blue silke c. that is of blue silke c. 2. Some thinke that the women brought their looking-glasses and they were set by the work-men into the brazen Laver wherein the Priests as they washed might see whether any spot remained on them still Oleaster Lyran. Pellican Lippom. But this had beene verie inconvenient to hang or set in glasses where they washed neither needed they to spie in the glasse the spots of their hands and feet which were alwayes in their eye 3. Osiander giveth this interpretation bemaroth in the vision and sight of the women was the Laver of brasse which were to worship at the doore of the Tabernacle But this had beene then added to small purpose He made the Laver in the sight c. and beside the word maroth which commeth of raah to see is by the most Interpreters translated glasses L.S.C.A.P.V. 4. Some think that the Laver was made of the womens glasse-cases which were of brasse R. Salom. Tostat qu. 4. But the text saith they were made of the glasses themselves which were divers from the cases 5. Therefore the truth is that the brazen Laver was indeed made of the womens