we haue more largely treated in the place concerning God The humane Nature of Christ is that whereby hee holdeth the same Essence with vs both the manner of subsisting or being a person and the vitious accidents and sinnes of the substance being excepted For neyther is the humane nature of Christ any thing by it selfe subsisting without dependance but being without subsisting was assumed in the singularnesse of person without any eyther confusion of natures or division of person c Phil. 2.6 Ioh. 1.1 Neyther could any contagion of sinne infect that humane nature of Christ the substance whereof being otherwise in it selfe corrupt originally the vnspeakable operation of the holy Spirite sanctified and most fully purged from every spot nor yet ought to infect as being that wherein the purging of our sinnes was to be performed d Luc. 1.35 Heb. 4.15 These thinges excepted Christ tooke our true and Reall Nature the same both whole and perfect according to the substance properties and infirmities thereof The Substance for Christ had both our whole Nature and the Essentiall parts of it whole Our whole Nature for hence is he called in the Scriptures The seede of the Woman e Gen. 3. 22.16 the seede of Abraham the seede of David according to the flesh or the fruite of his loynes f Act. 2.30 and very where the Sonne of man The Partes for hee had both a reasonable Soule and an Instrumentall body A reasonable Soule this the Scripture and g Ioh. 10.17 Mat. 26.38 the end of his Incarnation prooveth for that which is not assumed is incurable The Verity of Nature because the other partes of man haue their beauty by the Soule An Instrumentall Body this proued the verity of his humane Nature which requireth a limitted matter that is a fleshly and an earthly body h Luc. 22.42 the verity of satisfaction which ought to bee made in a body truly passible mortall Lastly the verity of demonstration for Christ shewed even by signes that hee had a body not phantasticall or heavenly but fleshly and earthly i Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 The properties which Christ coassumed are eyther of the whole nature to witte to bee created and to bee finite or of the partes as of the Soule for he had vnderstanding k Mat. 26.28 and will l Luc. 22.42 the operations of both and of the body for hee had a shape quantity and circumscription and all the properties and naturall actions of a body m Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat. 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 Infirmities for it was behouefull for the end of his Incarnation that hee should wholy take vnto him all naturall defects sinne excepted for of defects some are simply miserable as Augustine tearmeth them and some damnable or as Damascene calleth them Detestable those Christ wholy tooke because they were no let to his perfection knowledge and grace n Ioh. 1.14 1. Tim. 3.16 Heb. 5.7 but these hee did not so because they had hindered our Redemption Of these natures the necessity and verity whereof hath beene declared there are divers operations o 1. Pet. 3.18 for there are two natures in Christ as it were two inwarde and effectuall beginninges out of which formally Actions and their manners are deduced wherefore as all thinges in Christ his subsisting onely excepted are two-fold or of two sorts to witte his Nature Properties Will Knowledge p Mat. 11.27 23.37 Ioh. 2.19 1. Cor. 15.27 Luc. 2.47 so are there two-folde operations some divine some humane distinguished by their beginninges manners of doing and the particular Actions of each of them By their beginninges because looke how many Natures there are so many formall beginnings of actions there are By the manners of doing for every beginning worketh according to it owne manner and condition the God-head after a supernaturall and divine manner the man-hoode after a Naturall and Humane manner By particular Actions for the Worde worketh that which is of the Word and the Flesh that which is of the Flesh without any confusion of Natures in the vnity of Person Thus much concerning the Natures the other thing followeth concerning their Subject that is the person and both the vnity and operations thereof Of the Person of Christ there is vsually held and declared a double respect in the Scriptures the one in regarde of the Essence of the Word the other in regard of the office and dispensation In respect of Essence Christ being considered or severally or without commixture as Nazianzene speaketh is in the divine Essence another person from the others but not another thing In respect of the dispensation which wee consider of in this place he is that second person of the God-head Incarnate that is that person who tooke mans Nature by creating it in the singularity of his subsistance immediately and by his person vnited the same with the divine nature mediately so as Christ is one of both Natures not two into both one and the same without time begotten of the Father the Sonne of God without mother and in time begotten of the Virgine the Sonne of man without Father the naturall and consubstantiall Sonne of both This Vnity of Person three things doe proue first the authorities of the Scripture for Christ is as the Prophet teacheth Emanuel r Esa 7. as the Angell teacheth the same Sonne of God which should bee borne of Mary Å¿ Luc. 1.35 as the Evangelist teacheth the Word made flesh t Ioh. 1.1 as the Apostle teacheth the same who came of the Father according to the flesh who is God aboue all things to be praysed for ever u Rom. 9.5 Secondly the end of his Incarnation because that God and man might bee made one in the Covenant It was behoofefull that one should bee made God and man in person not by participation of grace but by verity of nature not by confusion of substance but by vnity of Person Thirdly the denominations of both natures attributed to the same Subject for as those thinges are not incident to the divine nature which are proper to the humane nor those vnto the humane which are peculiar to the divine so all in common and according to truth are vttered of the person according to both Natures x Act. 20.28 1. Cor. 2.8 therefore the one and the same person is Eternal and not Eternall Infinite and Finite holding all the divine and humane properties those from everlasting as he is God these in time assumed as he is man both really yet Intransitiuely as he is man-God This Person is the common beginning of those actions which the Greeke Fathers haue called divinely Humane for the actions of Christ are not onely some humane some divine but also some of common operation which Christ effecteth both as he is Man-God by Nature and as hee is Mediator
doe in the lawfull vse of the Lords Supper but by neyther of both ways is that Popish consecration proved III. OVr Consecration Christs differ not in Substance but in degree for that which is Christs is nothing else but an appointing or dedicating of the bread and wine to the holy and divine vses made by the word of Institution according to his Free will but that which is ours doth all and wholy depend vpon the verity power and ordinance of God not vpon the secret recitall and muttering of wordes IIII. THe will of Christ consecrating is not to bee separated from the Sacramentall manner and Rite of consecration because as the one is the cause Efficient of the consecration so the other also is the materiall and formall cause thereof If you respect the Efficient Christ consecrated it with his will alone if the materiall and formall he consecrated it with the solemne word of Institution and with those Rites of dispensing which hee himselfe vsed commaunded vs to vse V. TO doe this in the Institution of the Supper is not to consecrate the outward signes or symboles but to doe all that which Christ commaunded his Disciples to doe Neyther did Christ vtter these wordes This is my Body to the end hee might consecrate the signes for he vttered them after the blessing breaking of bread but that he might declare vnto his Disciples the manner or nature of the Sacrament VI. THere is no change made in a Sacrament by vertue of the wordes but of the divine Institution and ordinance And that which is made is not made in Substance in quantity or in naturall qualities but in relation onely that is in vse and office Neyther doth eyther the custome of the church proue any other thing which vsed a shewing holding forth of the Eucharist not for adoration but eyther that they might prepare the people to the communion or that thereby out of the offering of private men a certaine part being set aside for the peculiar vse of the Sacrament might be shewed or the costom of the Greeke Fathers who never vsed this Rite of Elevating since the beginning vnto this day VII IT is manifest that those words which were not spoken over the bread or to the bread but to the Disciples communicating were spoken to instruct the people and not to change the breade neyther doe the most auncient Lyturgies gaine-say this which joyne together the wordes of consecration with the whole action of the Lordes Supper or doe the Fathers who when they affirmed that the Eucharist is made by a mystical Prayer by calling on the name of God by solemne blessing by thanksgiving or some certain consecration had no respect to those fiue wordes alone and that they with them would not haue consecrated the bread of the Sacrament by any Substantiall change their owne most evident expositions doe plainely shew In Defence of the Matter constituting the Lordes Supper and first against Concomitancy Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 21. I. AN Argument drawne from the hypostatical vnion of God man and that which is naturall of the Flesh and the Soule to concomitancy is of no force because it is one thing to treate of flesh and bloud which are things substantiall and entire partes of humane nature but another thing as they are given vnto vs for meate and drinke according to the voluntary and Testamentall disposition of Christ neither is therefore the Hypostaticall vnion of God and man broken which was not broken in death howsoever the soule and bloud were separated from the body II. THe spirituall eating whereof onely the order of the Text in the Chapter cited sheweth that mention is made ought to bee distinguished from the Sacramentall eating whereof here the question is neyther ought that which is spoken Synecdochically of eating in some places be taken exclusiuely seeing also in other places there is very often mention made of drinking III. FRom false ambiguous and impertinent Principles a false ambiguous and impertinent consequence is drawn Now the first Principle is false for we doe not acknowledge any reall or visible presence of Christs body bloud in the Supper In respect of the signes it is wholy Sacramentall in respect of the thing signified meerely spirituall IIII. THe second Principle is ambiguous because the body and bloud of Christ are two wayes considered one way as they are the partes of Christes humane nature all which being vnable to bee sundered liveth glorious the other as they are represented vnto vs Sacramentally in this action of the Supper to witte as both the body was offered vnto death for vs on the crosse and his bloud out of the body powred forth for the wordes added to the Institution doe plainely testifie that the body and bloud of Christ as things separated in the sacrifice of the Crosse are offered and exhibited vnto vs in the Supper V. THe third Principle is impertinent and different from the question now in hand because wee treate not here eyther of the vniversall presence of Christs Divinity which pertayneth nothing to the speciall kindes for if the adversary vnderstand the presence of nature Christ shall bee aswell any where else as in the Supper because he filleth all things if the presence of grace he affirmeth nothing that is proper to the bread but what pertaineth to all the faithfull or of the Hypostaticall vnion of the two natures in respect wherof notwithstanding we wil never affirm that the Divinity of Christ is with his humanity by a Concomitancy because that were a Nestorian heresie VI. THe Fathers which are cited eyther spake Synecdochically by the body vnderstanding the whole humane nature of Christ as Cyprian Hillarie Ambrose or of the whole person wherof in the Supper we are made partakers as Basil Hierome Chrysostome Origen the Nicene Synode or Sacramentally they vttered that of the signe which is proper to the thing signified as Augustine Cyril both he of Ierusalem and that other of Alexandria VII The body of Christ vnder the shew of bread is Sacramentally offered vnto vs in the Supper as it was crucified and broken and his bloud as it was shed for Christ instituted the Supper for a remembrance of his death and yet is not his carkasse eaten because Christ by his death purchased merite of life for himselfe and his VIII It is one thing to speake of the body bloud of Christ as touching themselues and another thing according to the manner of a Sacrament as touching themselues the bloud of Christ cannot bee plucked from the body that was done once on the Crosse but as touching the nature of a Sacrament they ought distinctly to be considered partly because in the Supper they represent that vnto vs which was once done and partly also because the perfection of our refreshing in Christ is exhibited in the eating of Christes flesh and in the drinking of his bloud IX MIracles are not to be drawne into vse and rule because every
Sacramentall Trope For as Christ sayed This is my Body when he gaue but the signe of his body so our bodies are sayed to bee cherished nourished and fed with the body and bloud of Christ when in very deede they are nourished with those thinges which are the Signes of the body and bloud of Christ VI. THe Fathers who spake of the Adoration of Christs flesh treated not of that which was done in the mystery but in the celebration of the mystery for that flesh hypostatically vnited to the eternall Son of God is rightly adored of vs as oft as the Supper of the Lord is celebrated VII THe Fathers who required of Communicants a feare trembling and faith did not put any essentiall change of the thing signified into the signes but they required a certain feare least the signes for their vilenes should be contēned but faith they required that that thing which is not seene might yet be beleeved and by faith receyved VIII THe Fathers who affirmed that a myracle was wrought in the Eucharist vnderstood no miraculous Trāsubstantiation of the bread into the body of Christ but the majesty of this mystery which they compared with the greatest miracles and by a Catachresis called it a miracle because by a wonderfull and incomprehensible manner God worketh in the hearts of the godly as oft as by a true faith they celebrate this mystery Of the Presence of Christ in the Supper against Bellarmine Lib. 1. Cap. 1. I. FIgures are eyther so called oppositely as they are opposed to the body as also shadowes to the Image or Relatiuely as in generall they figure signifie some thing else besides that which is seene In the first signification the Figures of the olde Testament are not opposed to the sacraments of the New but to the fulfilling of those things which were prefigured in the second signification the Figures or Sacraments of the old Testament are badly opposed to the Sacraments of the New Testament whether as touching their quality or as touching their excellency Because albeit by the word of Institution they agree in the generall partes the Relation and the end yet they differ in the measure vertue and easinesse of signification In which respect the Sacraments of the New Testament are saide to bee more excellent then the Sacraments of the Olde Testament II. AGainst Bellarmine cap. 5. 6. The Sermon which treateth only of the matter of the Sacrament and the communion thereof and not of the Signe as the very sence of the place the Interpretation of Christ the Analogy of Faith doe most evidently proue cannot proue the reall presence of Christs body vnder the formes or kindes of the Signes for the Spirituall eating is to be distinguished from the Sacramental because that is internall and invisible this externall and visible and though it bee granted that in that place there is speech made of the Sacramentall eating yet the foure arguments which are from thence drawne cannot proue that presence Not the First because the bread Synecdochically is taken for meat and the meat Figuratiuely for the flesh of Christ Wherefore in the place cited the bread is not the Subject but the predicate of the flesh Not the Second because Christ by correcting reproved and by reproving corrected the Capernaits and his Disciples as verse 61.62.63 doe evidently shew Not the third because the wordes of eating and drinking are taken Figuratiuely and as the Text declareth they are of the same force with these maners of speaking to belieue in Christ and to abide in Christ Not the Fourth because Christ confirmeth his censure before going shewing that then they shal consider their error when they shall see the sonne of man ascending III. THe Arguments which in cap. 9.10 are taken from the words of the Institution are aboue confuted in the distinctions of the Efficient cause IIII. THe three arguments which are drawne out of the 10 chapter of the former to the Corinthians haue no consequence not the first because it is a fallacy of that which is not the cause as the cause For the blessing or consecration is not the cause of the Sacramentall conjunction of the thing signified with the Signe but the Institution onely and the divine ordinance declared and confirmed by the blessing Not the Second for the breaking which is properly sayde to bee of the bread is improperly and Figuratiuely spoken of the Body Not the Third because the word Communion signifieth an Vnion ioyning together in fellowshippe properly of our persons with the person of Christ beeing indeed that same which is spirituall supernaturall if you respect the manner yet reall and true if you respect the bound and object thereof V. LIb. 1. cap. 13. The argument which is taken out of the 11. chapter of the former Epistle to the Corinthians concludeth nothing because the apostle treateth not of the eating of his body but of the outward receyving of the bread and wine which indeede with the former is conjoyned in the lawfull vse thereof but in the vnlawfull vse of them that communicate vnworthily is alone and yet maketh the communicant guilty of the body and bloud of Christ because the vnworthy taking and handling of the signes redoundeth vnto the reproach of the thing signified VI. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged throughout the whole Second Booke we haue aboue answered VII LIb. 3. cap. 3. The profes which are alleadged from the omnipotency of God doe inferre no corporall presence of Christ in the Supper Not the First because the omnipotency of God excludeth both things contrary to his nature and things contradictory and not to be able to doe those things is not a point of weakenesse but of infinite power and constancy Not the Second because his first apparition was heavēly which nothing furthereth the presence of Christ on earth The second was in the night which appeared not to the eyes but to the minde Not the Third because the Fathers treated eyther of the presence of Christ as touching his person as Chrysostome or of the Sacramentall presence of his body in the Supper as Ambrose or of the effect of the eating of his body as Cyrill and Theophilact or lastly they spake Hyperbolically as Augustine Not the Fourth because to reason from the divine nature to the humane and from the one part of man which is spirituall to the other which is corporall is even proportionally inconsequent Not the Fift because it is one thing to treate of the mysteries which goe beyond Nature but another thing of the miracles which overthrow nature Not the Sixt because of those things which are equally vnited the one cannot be any where else where the other is not or may not be and to attribute to Christ two bodies equally vnited were a monstrous thing VIII CAp. 6. Lib. 3. The proofes which are taken from the illocality of the body are false The First because the consequence is of no validity from a
thing possible to be to reason that there is absolutely a being and partly because hee which taketh from bodies the spaces of places destroyeth the verity of a body The Second because the conclusion is of no strength from an Allegoricall forme of speaking to the proper The Third 4ª 5ª 6ª 7ª because there is no consequence from a miraculous pearcing through of dimensions from a singular prerogatiue of Christs Nativity which pertayneth not to the Essence of the body from the rowling backe of the stone done immediately by an Angell at the time of Christs resurrection from the Ascension of Christ into heaven which wâ—â— done as the Scripture speaketh by the opening and dividing of the Heaven from the punishment of the daÌ„ned all which destroy not the verity of a body from like miracles which are aboue nature but not against nature and detract not any thing from the substance of the thing from these I say to the â—llocality of the body there is no consequence IX CAp. 8. Lib. 3 The profes which are â—aken from the truth of God doe faile many wayes The First a Petit Principium iterateth the same matter in question for proofe or proveth one doubt with another The Second layeth down a false position for the truth and ancientnes of the consent of the church ought not to bee taken from the testimony of some certaine persons and from the times of Lanfrancus but from the testimonies of Scripture and the times of the Apostles The Third in their owne cause is suspitious For the Authority of Popish councels neyther can nor ought to prejudice the truth The Fourth reasoneth in consequently from humane authority in divine matters The Fift insisteth vpon the actions and narrations of persons which were eyther fabulous or farre set digressions The Sixt concludeth from Miracles the truth wherof is in controversie or the superstition noted or the falshood manifest X. CAp. 21. From the authority of the Romish church and of the counsels by the same celebrated nothing is concluded because the truth is to bee preferred before all humane judgementes XI THose things which are spoken concerning congruency according to reason or the manner are worthily rejected as incongruent and contrary to reason The First indeed concerning the absence of the Substance of Bread because neyther the Lords body is substantially vnder the accidents of Bread nor is the flesh of Christ simply adored as if it were vnder the bread but because it is hypostatically vnited to Christs Divinity neyther are the foode of the mind and the foode of the belly receyved with the same Instrument but the one is of the body and the mouth the other of the soule and faith nor doth abstinence from the vse of the mysticall bread cause fasting as neyther doth the receyving and vse breake off fasting But the Second concerning the accidents remaining because the accidents of Bread make not the Sacramentall Signe but the Substance of bread because no reall and substantiall change is made in the Supper but onely that which is Sacramentall both boundes of Relation nevertheles remayning because this is alone the merite of faith to trust to the merite of Christ because he which eateth not flesh in the proper forme thereof eateth not flesh really OF THE CHVRCH The Part Confirming CHAP. XIIII AFter that wee haue discerned the application of our redemption by Christ by the Degrees thereof the outward Meanes which God is wont to vse for the accomplishment of the same Now let vs see according to order concerning the Subiect of that application that is concerning the Church which Christ redeemed with his owne bloud and vnto which alone by the gratious election of God the vse and profession of the great and singular benefite of Redemption pertaineth For the Knowledge of this Subiect or Church a two fold explication is very necessary the one Nominall the other Essentiall the former whereof Generally expoundeth the EquivocatioÌ„ or divers signification of the word the latter the very manner or nature of the church in particular The Nature of the very word ought to be considered and expounded two wayes Etymologically and Logically Etymologically the Church is a company called forth by publicke authority Logically the Church is of the number of those thinges which the Logicians call Collectiue and gathered together that is such which are not some one thing absolutely but containe in themselues two things whereof the one is like to a multitude and a matter dispersed but the other to an vnity order and gathering together Being both wayes considered the Church hath a threefold signification the first most Generall vnder which not onely the Angels are comprehended but also Politically every civill assembly and Catachtestically the false church which is called Ecclesia malignantium the Congregation of the wicked a Psal 26.5 Apoc. 3.9 is vnderstoode The second is more Speciall and signifieth th t whole multitude of all persons which generally is esteemed by the outward â—allingling and profession The Third is most Speciall most properly signifying that part of men which is knit together vnto everlasting life which signification is vsually distinguished from the â— former as it were by foure properties and attributes that it is One Holy Catholicke and Apostolicke One in the Author of Salvation in â—he consent of Doctrine in the Subministration of the Spirite and in the holy communion of the members b Can 6.8 Eph. 4.4 1. Cor. 3.11 Holy in vse office affection and proceeding lastly in effect and perfection in Christ for it is sanctified for Gods vse it desireth after holinesse is perfectly cleansed by the bloud of Christ e Mat. 26 28. 1. Cor. 1.2 Eph. 2.20 Apostolicall in the Ministery and truth of doctrine Lastly Catholicke in resepct of the Places Persons Time and Partes d 1. Cor. 12 13 4.27 In this place we are to treate of the Church in the second third signification whereof according to that double significatioÌ„ there issueth a double notioÌ„ the one visible in which acording to the outward forme of the church others also are mingled with the good who properly are the Church that pertain not to the same but only because of the outward profession of the christian faith and calling e Mat. 18.17 Mat. 13.24 Luc. 3.14 The other Invisible which according to the Essentiall forme thereof comprehendeth the predestinated and Elect onely whose Faith cannot be discerned with the outward eyes f 2. Tim. 2 19. Rom. 11.3.4 The Former is esteemed by the outward calling generally the latter by the inward calling properly and particularly g Eph. 3 15. According to both Notions the Church is of vs to be defined both Generally and Distinctly Generally the Church is defined to bee the company of them whome God by his free calling doth call forth to the communion of his grace and glory h Mat. 11 29. Distinctly the Church visible is defined to be
same pertaineth to a Divine and to the Principall end of Divinity which is Salvation is generally limitted as it were within 2. boundes of places and times for wee must necessatily know and discerne a double estate of man the one in this life while hee is in the way the other after this life when hee shall attayne to the last Gaole eyther of felicity or eternall death In this life wee are wont ought to consider a double estate of man according to the distinction of the works which indeede passe from God to the creatures by an outward and temporall action the one of nature the other of grace that belonging to man as he is naturall as touching himselfe this as hee is to bee advanced by the grace of God aboue his nature and naturall condition The Former State of man in this life which is according to nature ought to bee discerned and distinguished according to the divers condition and consideration of Nature Now the Nature of man is two wayes considered one way according to his Beginning and first Originall condition and creation the other way according to the Change and Corruption which followed after as man fell from his Naturall goodnesse by his owne mutability and fault into the evill of Nature and guilte or sinne wherevpon there ariseth a double Estate of Man in Nature the one of Integrity the other of Corruption OF THE STATE OF Integrity or first Creation of MAN according to the Image of GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. II. THe State of Integrity or the first creation of man before his Fall is a singular worke of God in Nature whereby hee made man a Reasonable creature being of a compound or double nature according to his Image for his owne glory and the good of Man himselfe The Efficient Cause is Iehovah Elohim The Lord God or God in the Plurality of Persons and Vnity of Essence for there is but one finishing or perfecting of the worke of one Essence though according to the distinction of the persons the order of working is distinct For the Father created by the Sonne through meanes of the power of the Spirite himselfe Now God effected it both by a cōmon consultation will and consent going before a Gen. 1.27 and by a manner of of effecting or creating partly immediate if you respect the soule which God of nothing created by infusing and infused by creating b Gen. 1.7 partly mediate if you respect the body which was brought forth from a matter pre-existent The Matter or Subject of this first estate is humane nature endued with all perfections which in thēselues might befitte for a thing created according to the condition thereof Now whereas wee call it a matter wee vnderstand not onely that which is incorporeall or the corporeal onely but that which is composed and as it were tempered of both for there are two essentiall partes of this Subject or humane nature whereof wee treate the Body and the Soule the truth whereof ought to be discerned and distinguished by their first Beginning Substance and Qualities By their first beginning because the bodies of our first Parents were created of a matter preexistent or having a fore-being eyther neere as the body of Eue of Adams ribbe and the body of Adam of the dust c Gen. 2.7 22. 1. Cor. 15.45 or remote of the 4. Elements which Synecdochically are vnderstoode by the name of earth as being an Element for substance and quantity predominant but the soules were created of nothing by the vertue of Gods infinite power as after the same manner God createth new soules in every body for they are not brought forth from the body d Per traducem by derivation but are brought into the body by creation e Psal 33.14 Zach. 12.1 Heb. 12.9 nor are they forced out by the power of the matter as other living creatures as well perfect as imperfect for they are simple spirites which are neyther divided nor changed nor corrupted By Substance because the bodies are compound substances furnished with diverse Organes or Instruments by which the soules exercise their powers and faculties but the soules are substances both simple and immateriall for being compared to other materiall thinges they consist of no matter and that they haue not any materiall matter their beginning and originall hath taught as also immortall not absolutely by themselues by the Law of nature or composition for God alone being life it selfe is by himselfe immortall but by the grace of God the creator and his divine will which created the same to be such that though it had a beginning yet it should not haue an end f 1. Tim 6.16 Luc. 16.22 23.43 By Qualities because even their bodies had also an incorruptibility not in their owne nature absolutely for everything composed of contraries is corruptible but by Gods grace whereby man was able as touching his body not to die vnlesse through his g Gen. 3.19 Rom. 5.12 Iac. 1.15 owne fault hee had voluntarily brought on himselfe the first and second death also a Bewty so that there was not any Infirmity or deformity but a convenient proportion and a most godly well ordered constitution but the Soules which are humane and as they are so had two principall faculties the vnderstanding and the will according as the obiect of them is two-fold to witte Being and Goodnesse to which faculties as beeing Subalternall all the other are referred For the vnderstanding apprehendeth Being and Truth the vniversall indeede by it selfe but the particular by sense The Will inclineth forward to good which because it is in the things them selues it doth not properly draw and take vnto it the very things but is drawne of them The Forme of this first Estate of man is limitted in the condition and consideration of the Image of God according to which man was created Now we call the Image of God that likenesse whereby man resembleth the nature of his Creator after a convenient manner of his nature partly in the soule properly partly in the body because of the Soule Last of all partly in the whole and entire person by reason of the vnion of both In the Soule whether you respect the Nature thereof and the faculty of substance or the Faculties or lastly the qualities of the habites wherby they are perfected The Substance of the Soule resembleth the Nature of God according to her condition and the measure of the condition for three causes first because as that so this also is one though it cōsist of many faculties as her essentiall partes For of one singular thing there is but one substantiall forme Secondly because as that is so also is this simple spirituall immateriall Simple in respect of the materiall i Act. 17.26 Spirituall in respect of the bodies k Gen. 2 9 Immateriall in respect of Originall l Gen. 2.7 Thirdly as that is so is this also incorporeal
immortal For it hath neyther the dimentions or limitations of a body nor shal haue end of life m Ezec. 37 4.5 Mat. 10.28 1. Cor. 15.19 The Faculties of the Soule which resemble the nature of God are chiefly two Vnderstanding and Will the one expressing the Image of God in the faculty of vnderstanding al things n Col 3.10 Eccl. 17.6 the other in the liberty of willing and choosing every object o 1. Cor. 7 37. Both as well the facultie of vnderstanding as the liberty of will is two-fold the Facultie of vnderstanding the one is Passible or suffering as mans mind is of it owne nature capable of all things the other Actiue or doing which effecteth that those things which in power may bee vnderstoode by Act bee vnderstoode Liberty or freedome the one is from compulsion because man is not compelled to that which is straÌ„ge from a Free-will the other from Impediment because he is not violently letted or hindered from that which he seeketh after with a free will p 1. Co. 7.37 Rom. 8.7 Rom. 8.2 1 Wherefore the first man could will the good and refuse the evill and againe refuse the good and chuse the evill The Habites which performe those faculties are two For wisedome perfecteth the vnderstanding but righteousnesse the will Wisedome is an excellent and perfect knowledge both of the supernaturall good whereby he knoweth God and his felicity in God and of the Naturall whereby he knoweth the things created and their natures q Col 3 10. Rom. 12.2 Righteousnesse is that vprightnesse of the mind whereby perfectly that is inwardly and outwardly it obeyed Gods will according to the whole law which righteousnesse was not onely of person but of nature because the first man was created in it and vnto it as the originall and roote of mankind â—herevpon also it is called Originall r Eph. 4.24 1. Thes 5 23. Eccl. 9.29 And this is the manner of Gods Image in the Soule Now in Body man resembleth the Image of God not according to the partes or according to it selfe in respect eyther of Substance or Figure but partly in respect of the soule whose Instrument it is partly of the Person a part whereof it maketh For it doth most readily execute things both well vnderstood and holily defined in the soule and in person as it were in a most cleare glasse it also representeth the whole world being the verity and dignity of the very Creator Originall or first patterne thereof Lastly in the whole and entire person the Image of God shineth forth because of the vnion of the soule and body both in respect of the constitution of that whole man which even the faithfull themselues haue so admired that by it they acknowledged Gods Image as also in respect of his rule over all in former thinges whereof the first man receyved from God not onely the right and power but also the vse and execution Å¿ Gen â— 19. Psal 8.6 The End of that first state of Man principall and chiefe is the glory of the Creator t Architectonicus Prou. 16.4 Psal 113.5 1 Cor 10.31 but subordinate the blessednesse and felicity of the Creature u Psal 144 15. Ioh. 17.3 OF THE FIRST Estate of Man The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS In Defence of the Verity of Gods Image according to which man was created against Bellar. Cap. 3. I. THe Grace that maketh gratefull taketh not away the naturall condition of man and his originall righteousnesse but proveth it For Man had from that Grace both the verity of Nature and the quality thereof II. THe Habite of Grace which maketh gratefull differeth from originall righteousnesse in the manner onely not in very deede or nature because that very righteousnesse wherewith the first man was indued of God was that habite of Grace for which man became gratefull and acceptable to God Against Bellarmine Cap. 4. THe Grace of God is two-fold the one whereby wee could if wee would not sinne the other whereby not onely wee could but also would not sinne The first was given to Adam but not the second and so wanted the one and receyved the other in his creation and the necessity of this special Grace and assistance in Adam doth Augustine plainely shew in his Treatise of Corruption and Grace Neyther do the Testimonies which are alleadged proue the contrary Against Bellarmine Cap. 5.6 I. A Thing is tearmed Naturall ambiguously eyther Causally which is from nature or Subiectiuely which is in Nature or lastly by propagation which is communicated with nature so also a thing is called Supernaturall which eyther our nature as touching it selfe cannot comprehend or is not capable of so is beyond or aboue the condition of nature or in which nature no way worketh but grace alone or lastly which is not propagated by naturall meane but by divine manner is communicated aboue the order of Nature Original Righteousnes is sayd to be natural partly because God hath communicated the same in Nature and with nature partly because by a naturall spreading it was to bee communicated to the posterity of Adam if hee had stoode or continued but supernaturall it can no way bee called II. THe condition of man in respect of one part whereof the place of Gen. 3. treateth taketh not away his condition in respect of the other or the whole for whole man both in body and in soule was made wholy according to the Image of God neyther doth the place of Ecclesiasticus inferre the contrary who treateth eyther of the outward ornaments of men onely or of their vertue not supernaturall but naturall as the very wordes do manifestly declare neyther doth the Parable out of Luke 10. which setteth out not the state of man after his fall but the duety of charity towardes them that are fallen and are in misery III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged deny not that that Integrity in Adam was naturall but testifie that grace was added to nature which indeed wee confesse and teach very gladly IIII. THe reasons which are alleadged are vaine or Idle The First because God conjoyned the matter and Forme though things most different to the naturall bond of peace and loue The Second because the corruption followed not from that Integrity wherin Man was created but from his mutable condition which with it was conjoyned The Third because there is a divers respect of Adams sinne by which hee revolted from that first Originall integrity and of our actuall sinnes The Fourth and Fift because the manner of reparation and recreation is not the same as that of the first creation For that was done in nature but this is done aboue Nature Neyther is it absurde that the name of the Sonne of God was granted to Adam in that state of Integrity as beeing hee who in that natural condition resembled the Image of God according to which hee was created OF THE SECOND Estate of MAN
Instrumentall beginning thereof In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Actuall Sinne. I. IN Actuall Sinne there are two thinges Being and Iniquitie Of Being God is the Author and Principall Efficient of Iniquity the Will of Man II. A Thing is sayde to be done by Gods permission two wayes eyther by it selfe or by Accident That which is done God permitting it by it selfe hath the respect of good but that which is done by Accident God permitting the selfe same in respect of God permitting it by accident is evill because God permitteth not evill as it is evill but as it is a meane of his glory In Defence of the Matter of the first SINNE That the first Sinne was not Pryde but vnbeliefe against Bellarmine Lib. 3. de Amiss Gratiae Cap. 5. 6. I. EEccles 10.14 There is a fallacy of the sense or vnderstanding of the word For Pride is not the beginning or cause of backe-sliding or departing from God but on the contrary the very backe-sliding departing from God which is comprehended in vnbeliefe is made the beginning and cause of pride II. TO b. 4. Ans The place treateth not of the order of diverse actes in the first sinne but of the Effect of Pride to witte Perdition the beginning whereof is truely and properly attributed to Pride yet not exclusiuely III. ROm. 5. Ans Disobedience comprehendeth the whole Sinne of Adam to witte the violating or breaking of Gods commaundement which if it should bee resolved into it owne parts the first shall bee not Pride but vnbeliefe IIII. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged eyther do not â—reate of the order of the first sinne â—ut of the next Adjunct thereof or Synecdochically they vnderstand by pride vnbeliefe it selfe as the immediate â—ause thereof V. THe inner actions are two wayes discerned eyther in respect of the Inâ—ention or in respect of the execution whereof the one properly respecteth the end the other the meanes but when there is speech made of the first sinne it is not inquired what was the first thing in the intention of Adam Eue but what was the first act of committing the Sinne. In Defence of the matter of Original Sin That Originall Sin is a quality or Concupiscence against Bellar. Lib. 5. cap 15. I. THe Positiue cause of original Sin is held to be three-fold the First the actuall sinne of Adam Secondly the Law of Nature originally passing the third the Iustice of God II. THe positiue quality is traÌ„sferred to the posterity after the same manner as the Sinne it selfe is not as a certaine accident of nature concreated or together with it created which should follow or accompany the substance by it self but as a whole corruption of the whole maÌ„ which hath a foundation in Adam as in the first instrument of nature it selfe neyther are the habits gotten convayed into the ofspring as they are personall but as in the name of the whole Nature one for all gotte them III. IN Concupiscence two things concurre the very Act of lusting or coveting which by it selfe is not evil and the deformity of that act of that God is the Author of this he must by no meanes bee the Author IIII. THe first sinne was not onely the sinne of the Body but also of the Soule Wherefore it was not onely the eating of the fruit forbidden but also vnbeliefe and pride in the soule and so whole Sinne is transmitted into body and soule not onely by the law of generation by which man formeth or yeeldeth forth man but also according to the corruption of him that generateth wherby man as hee is corrupt begeteth corrupt man V. THe Quality was not diminished both because then it passed as it were into another nature as also because it cannot eyther bee diminished or abolished but by the singular grace of God VI. THe Concupiscence of the Flesh against the Spirite doth not onely signifie those first motions voyde of consent but also the very roote of evill and the whole corruption which is not onely of the coveting but also of the other faculties of the Soule VII ORiginall Sinne is taken away in this life by the regeneration of Baptisme not that it might not be but that it might not be imputed for sinne In Defence of the matter of Actual sinne against the distinction of Sinne Veniall and Mortall Bellar. Lib. 1. Cap. 9.10 I. THe Testimonies of Scripture doe not proue or confirme the Verity of the distinction according to the mind of the adversary Not the First Mat. 5. for hee treateth of the inequality not onely of sinnes but also of punishments by an allusion to civill or politicke punishments Not the Second Mat. 23. for hee treateth of the nature of Hypocrites who being carefull in small matters doe openly neglect the chiefest things and make not a difference betweene those things which by themselues and alwayes are necessary and those whereof not the want but the contempt doth make vs guilty or culpable Not the Third Luc. 6. for he treateth of them who hunt after prayse by the reprehending of others but doe neyther know nor reproue themselues being in others very quicke sighted but in themselues blind Not the Fourth Luc. 12. for hee speaketh of the duety of loue towardes our neighbour whereby wee are bound after the example of Gods goodnesse to forgiue even the least sinnes Not the Fift 1. Cor. 3. for hee speaketh of doctrine and the manner of teaching that by a supposition applyed to the Doctors of the Corinthians Not the Sixt Iac. 1. for hee speaketh of the degrees of sinnes which are three Vitiousnesse a vitious motion and vitious action And of all these Death is made the reward or wages Not the two Last Math. 12. for hee speaketh of the nature of Sinnes even the least or lightest for which notwithstanding we are presented guilty before God Eph. 5. because both the heavinesse of sinnes and the effect of the same are expounded Synecdochically II. THe Testimonies of Councels and Fathers are either suspected or in controversie as of the Tridentine Councell and of the Popes both Pius and Gregorie or doe treat of the inequality and divers degrees of sins as the Councell of Milevitum and of the Fathers Augustine Origen Chrysostome and Hierome III. THe reasons which are alleadged proue nothing Not the first because it is grounded vpon a double false presupposall Vppon the one that sinnes in the faithfull are not mortall For the Wages of Sinne of whatsoever manner it be vnlesse it bee forgiven is Death Vpon the oâ—her that the sinnes of the faithfull are lighter then the sinnes of the vnfaithfull and so in their Nature Veniall For in that sinnes are Veniall in the faithfull it is not from the nature of the sinnes but from the Grace of God and in that they are not so in the vnfaithfull it is not from God but from the nature both of the sinnes and sinners Not the Second because Sinne is not sayde
matter is two-fold the first and that which springeth from the first Of the first matter there is a double knowledge the first in the purenesse of it owne nature absolutely and by it selfe the other with a respect vnto other thinges as the beginning first subiect of which thinges are made and consist In both notions it is described of Moses first as touching the substance in that it is partly earthly partly watery for herevnto tend the names of earth and water Secondly as touching the quantity in that it is a i Jngens moles huge heape and yet not onely a k Plasma rationis worke of manner or fashion but in very deed a Being layde or spreade vnder all thinges Thirdly as touching the quality in that it was darke obscure which the Spirite of God lay vpon l Gen. 1.1.2 c. The matter of the Secondary creation to witte being that which of the first sprung is wont to be shewed by the Name of Nature by the Philosophers as by the names of heaven and earth in the scriptures m Psa 124 8. 134.3 Esa 37.16 For of the thinges drawne forth of that first matter there are two sortes plainely differing between themselues although Analogically they are referred to the common respect of one kind for some are Compound Elementall and Materiall in this world which are manifested by the name of Earth other some are Simple and Immateriall aboue this world in the heavenly places by God set in order which are made knowne by the Name of Heaven By the manner of them a two-folde Nature is made to witte an Inferior and Superior the one is considered in this vniversalnesse of thinges naturall in which man also is the other in the vniversality of thinges put aboue the nature of this world in which also are the Angels the truth and manner of both may more conveniently be concluded by the forme of Creation The Forme of Creation to wit of that which is Primary is both that hidden force of divine Power put into that first matter according to the being and conditions of the same as also the Externall Immediate and instant bringing forth of the matter the state thereof without shape and order But of that which is Secondary the Forme Internall is that common and hidden nature of the whole frame which God hath imprinted into all thinges after a common meane and manner but the externall whereof speech is here is that powerfull bringing forth of all thinges out of the first matter in the beginning of time by the space of sixe dayes as also the most godly disposing of the same both in themselues and among themselues n Gen. 1. per totum caput Now the truth of this bringing forth and disposing is two wayes discerned according as the Nature of the thinges brought forth and disposed is two-fold the one is Inferior or elementall materiall the other superior simple and Immateriall o Heb. 1.10 Of this Inferior Nature there are two parts Elementall and Ethereall The Elementall part is of bodies by their Nature subiect to change below the Region of the skie whether they be simple or compound The Simple Bodies are the Elements the beginnings of things compound which in a most godly most convenient order were at first created p Ge. 1. to v. 10. The compound bodies were coÌ„pounded eyther of two elements or of three only or of all the fower those are called imperfectly these perfectly mingled Of these some are without life some having life those which haue life are eyther onely growing as Plants q 1 Gen 1.11.12.13 or growing feeling as the brute beasts r Gen. â— 20 21. or lastly growing sensible reasonable as man Å¿ Gen. 1 28 of whome wee shall speake in the third booke of this Institution Of the part of this Inferior and Etheriall Nature there are two sorts of Orbes or Spheres with starres and without starres Those with starres are both the moueable Firmament every way shining with the thicker partes of the Spheeres as also the skie of the Planets contayning in compasse thereof seaven Orbes t Gen. 14.15.16 Those without starres are both the Superior Orbe or the Primum mobile which turneth about in compasse all the Inferior partes as also the inferior Orbe which is in the ayrie skie Of the superior or super-celestial nature there are two partes the one contayning which Empireum the first and vnmoveable in Scripture called the u Act. 1.11 Eph. 4.10 2 Chr. 16.14 Heaven of Heavens the other contayned which besides the blessed Soules of whome wee will speake about the end of this Institution are the Angels of whome in the Scriptures a description is expressed both in a generall and particular manner In a generall manner as touching their Essence for they are things truly subsisting or x Psa 104.4 spirituall substances incorporal indivisible as touching the properties of their Essence Internall they are indued with vnderstanding and will and according to theyr owne naturall perfection being opposite to thinges corporate they are simple substances but externall in propriety of nature finite in place definite the Administers of God their Creator y Heb. 1. v vlt. 1. Ring 22 20. By a particular manner they are discerned eyther as they are good or else as they are evill Good who continued and were confirmed z Mat. 18.10 2â— 30 vnchangeably in their naturall dignity wherein they were created by the speciall grace of the Creator whose worke and office is to serue God and men after God eyther immediately in respect of their owne nature a Mar. 6.10 Psal 103.20.21 or mediately by dispensation of the assumption of bodies eyther b Gen. 13.2.4 Heb. 13.2 Mat. 28.3 humane or fiery c Esâ— 6.2 Ezec 1. â— 2 Kin. â— But evill who from that their naturall dignity freely malitiously fell whose worke is being proper and voluntary both to worke evill of themselues in themselues and by themselues as also to tempt and induce other to the working of the same d Io. 8.4 Iud. ver 6. Iob. 1.11 1. Pet. 6.8 but being improper and not voluntary it is to serue God to restraine and yeelde all their power whether illuding or lying or actiue and effectuall vnto his own will so as they can vse the same neyther otherwise nor to any other end then God most wisely hath decreed e 1. Kin 22 20. Iob. 16. 2.1 The End of Creation is two-fold the furthest highest is the glory of God the worker in his goodnes wisedom power for the faculty or vertue put nâ—o the things commendeth f Ge 1.31 Psal 0â— 24 Prou. 16.4 his goodnes the order of them his wisedom the maner of both his power the neerest end is of the worke g Gen. 1.28 Psal 8.7 Heb. 2.7.8 that all thinges by their vses should serue for
Virgine according to the natures because according to the divine Nature he is coessentiall with the Father but according to the humane coessentiall with the Virgine Ioh. 2.19 Ans The conclusion from the Natures to the person is of no force for the person of Christ is not called the Temple but his Manhood in which the Godhead dwelt bodily Heb. 7.3 The Nativity of Christ is two-fold the one without Mother according to the divine nature the other without Father according to the humane and both were vnited in the one and the selfe same Subject For the quality of Natures I. COncrete or conjoyned names are not multiplyed vnles the Subjects be multiplyed but whereas there is but one Subject alone in Christ of necessity there is but one Christ alone II. THe Actions and Passions are of the person and not of the natures now a conclusion from the persons vnto the natures is in consequent For the Hypostaticall vnion and the communications of Properties against the Vbiquitaries I. A Thing is vnited three wayes Essentially when of many there is made one Essence Accidentally when the Accidents are ioyned to the Subjects Substantially when the substance which otherwise of it selfe might exist is drawne to the being of another Subiect and dependeth on it as a part of 〈◊〉 it II. WEe must make a difference betweene the God-head sending and the person sent and there is one consideration of the Worde by reason of the Essence and another by reason of the office III. VVHatsoever thinges are pronounced of Christ eyther they are divine simply pertayning to his divine nature or humane pertaining the humane or coÌ„mon mediately pertayning to the whole person therefore glory Power and other things when they are pronounced of Christ are these three wayes to bee considered as divine and then they are Essentiall and Incommunicable as humane and then they are proper to Christ in the forme of a servant as mediatory which are proper to the person of Christ in both natures together and in common IIII. SVch as is the substance of every thing such also is the manner of being but there is but one substance of Christs body therefore but one manner of being which is proper to bodies that is circumscriptiue not definitiue which is proper to the spirits nor repletiue which is proper vnto God V. FRom Christ being maÌ„ to Christs manhood the conclusioÌ„ is impertinent for neither the nature ought to be confounded with the nature the persoÌ„ with the nature or the abstract with the concrete VI. THe imitation b Exoequatio equalnesse or communication of Essence or properties maketh not an vnion but the copulation of nature in one subsistence VII WE must distinguish betweene whole Christ and the whole of Christ the first whereof respecteth his person the second his natures for that which is true of whole Christ cannot conveniently or truely be pronounced of the whole of Christ The Places of Scripture Mat. 26. Act. 2. Ephes 1. The right hand is one thing and to sit at the right hand is another Christ is one thing and the man-hood of Christ is another thing the figured signification of right hand is one thing and the proper is another for in the Scriptures the right hand of God importeth two thinges besides the proper signification to witte Power and Glory both Christ hath communicated vnto him as hee is a person God-man whence it is that the Schoolemen affirme Christ to bee ascended vnto his sitting at the Fathers right hand c Aequaliter Aliqualiter equally according to the divine Nature in some sort according to the humane as a double descent is given him in the Scriptures one according to his e Exiâ—anitionem debasement as being God the other according to the locall places as being man Mat. 28. Phil. 2. Col. 3. Ephes 4. The properties of the one nature are attributed to the whole person because of the vnity of the Subject for all that power dignity exaltation is proper to the office and person of the Mediator and not to the natures now they are attributed to Christ being man partly by grace of the vnion and partly because of that exaltation of Christes person which was made aboue every Name OF THE OFFICE OF CHRIST The Confirming Part. CHAP. VII FRom the person redeeming wee passe to the manner of Redemption which the office of Christ doth circumscribe for whereas the manner of Redemption comprehendeth all that action course and manner of Christ which he hath performed according to the ordering disposing and dispensation of both his Fathers will and his owne wee must throughly discerne them by their degrees and the degrees of the office of Christ Now wee discerne them partly Generally according to a common maner partly singularly according to their speciall kindes and partes Generally the office of Christ is defined to be an office of mediation committed to the Sonne a Heb. 5 5. Ioh. 3.17 by the Father and of the Sonne both voluntarily receaved b Ioh. 10.18 Heb. 10.7 and in both natures perfectly fulfilled c Phil. 2.8 Rom. 5.19 that hee might vnite and reconcile vs to God and God to vs for ever d Ioh. 11.51.52 Rom. 4.25 The Cause efficient of this office essentially is God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost e Heb. 1.9 Esa 61.1 but yet the order of proceeding being kept to witte both that which is inward of the persons among themselues and that which is outward as touching the things created for in respect of both it commeth to passe that the Father from whome is both the Essence and vertue of working according to the beginning is sayde to be the Efficient cause of this office of whom the Sonne is annoynted both as touching the calling and as touching the bestowing of Gifts the latter whereof properly pertayneth to the humane nature the former to both Now the forme is sayde to bee the meane or mediating cause by order of person from the Father but by dispensation of office subordinate e Ioh. 14.28 to the Father The matter of this office is considered two wayes Subjectiuely and it is both the natures of Christ f Ioh. 6.33 not severally but joyntly together for there are two parts or offices of Mediatorshippe the first in the thinges that concerne God the second in the things that concerne vs and therefore Christ must bee as a Mediator in office so the middle-one in person betweene God and vs that communicating with both by nature hee might bee a Mediator betweene both by office Secondly effectually and they are all actions which hee performed Divine as God humane as man one and indivisible as Mediator whence it is that they are called Divine-humane because as there is but one Worker of the Workes of both Natures so is there but one absolute ending for the working is of the person but the beginnings of the workings are of the Natures The forme is the manner
administration and the tearme or end thereof Of Administration there are two times the present as of this world the future as of the other In this world Christ administreth or ordayneth his church two wayes by Prescription and by Execution of Lawes The Prescription of Lawes is two-fold outward whereby Christ by the Ministery of the Word prescribeth vnto his Subjects Lawes of u Iac. 4.12 Eph. 4.11 1. Cor. 12.18 beleeving and living Inward whereby he moveth by his holy spirite the hearts of the Elect vnto the obedience of his commandements with a feeling of his present grace and a sure hope of his future glory x Ioh. 1.16 Act. 26.18 1 Ioh. 1.3 The Execution is finished in two partes In the gracious distribution of Rewardes and Benefites whereby all corporall and spirituall things necessary for salvation are ministred to the church vnder a certaine condition of the crosse y Ioh. 14 18. Heb. 13.5 Iac. 1.5 and in the just inflicting of punishments whereby he dealeth with the enemies of his church whether they be corporall or spirituall by repressing and restrayning some z Psal 110 Rom. 16.20 but by punishing and vtterly destroying other some a Rom. 7.24 â—5 1. Cor. 5.36 In the other world Christ administreth his church with a perfect consummation both of Rewardes b Rom. 14 7. Apoc. 21.4 1 Cor. 2.9 and punishments c poc â— 2.8 2 Thes 1.6 the Antecedent wherof shall bee the vniversall judgement the consequent Eternity The terme and end of this kingdome in respect of d Oeconomiae the ordering thereof shal bee when the Sonne being about to deliver vp this kingdome of Mediatorshippe to God and the Father shall be subject vnto him who hath made all things subject to himselfe that GOD may bee all in all e 1. Cor 15 28. for hee shall solemnely professe his voluntary subjection towardes God the Father by a singular and glorious yeelding vp of this Oeconomicall Kingdome receyved of him as touching his Person from the Fathers hand And this is the manner of Christs Office according to the speciall kinds thereof Now concerning the parts wee must in few wordes consider Of Christs Office there are two parts or as they are commonly called two Estates of Christ God-man Humiliation and Exaltation for in these that whole dispensation of Salvation and the execution of Christes threefold Office consisteth wherefore looke what is the manner of Christes Office from the Natures in the person or from the person according to both Natures the same also is the manner of his Humiliation and Exaltation Humiliation is that base and voluntary condition of Christ God-man vpon earth whereby hee debased himselfe as touching both Natures that he might both die and by dying satisfie as touching his Divine Nature he debased himselfe both by a voluntary subjection of his Person and by a hiding of his glory and maiesty before men for the time f Phi. 2.7.8 as touching his Humane Nature both by taking vnto him the Infirmity of our Nature and secondly by his most humble Obedience of Life and Death g Esa 53.5 Ioh. 19.34 Exaltation is the condition of Christ God-man whereby hee was advanced into the glory and dignity which was meete or convenient for the person of a Mediator and that according to both natures according to the divine nature by relation or by a divine manifestation of that maiesty which he hid during the time of his abasement h Rom. 1.4 Act. 2.38 according to the humane partly by the deposition of his servile conditioÌ„ and partly by the receiving gifts in body in soule concurring together vnto the perfection and blessednesse of his humane nature aboue all nature i Phil. 3.21 Ephe. 1.20 2. Heb 2.9 Of both states there are proper degrees opposite one to the other Of Humiliation and first of that which is outwarde or of his Submission vnto death there are three degrees death with the curse conjoyned k Gal 3.13 Burial that the truth of his death might bee ratified l Luc. 23 53. Descent into Hell or that voluntary debasement of Christ to suffer and as it were with wrestling to overcome the paines of Hell which Christ chiefly felt in his soule when he was assaulted first with heavinesse afterwardes with the sorrowes of both deaths m Act. 2.24 Eph. 4.4 To these are opposed three degrees of Exaltation Resurrection in which by divine power having subdued death hee raysed vp himselfe vnto life everlasting d Mat. 28.6 1 Cor 13.4 n Ascension whereby through the same power hee verily and visibly translated his body into the Heaven of the blessed o Act. 1.9 Eph. â— 11 sitting at the right hand of the Father whereby Christ was actually endued with all fulnesse both of glory and power p Heb. 1.3 Psal 110.1 1 Cor. 15.25 OF THE OFFICE OF CHRIST The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of Christs Office in Generall I. THere is wont to bee a three-folde signification of the Word Office for eyther it importeth an endeavor or deede wherevnto for some man wee are dutifully employed or an action of vertue as Cicero defineth or lastly an action or worke vnto which when a man is appointed he accordingly executeth the same and in this last signification it ought to bee taken when we treat of Christs Office II. IN the Office of Christ three thinges are to bee distinguished Vocation which in person hee had immediately from God Gifts by Vocation which immediately hee receyved in the Humane Nature Administration which was in person according to both Natures which three the outward vnction in the olde Testament signified III CHrist is sayd to be Mediator partly as hee is middle partly as he is mediant middle in Person mediant in Office IIII. OFfice ought to be distinguished either by the Substance thereof or by the manner of execution by substance according to the partes and speciall kindes of it by manner which hath respect both vnto the person to the natures in the person for the agent is one and the action one in respect of the Person yet there are two powers of the Agent and two beginnings of actions in respect of the Natures In Defence of Christs Propheticall Office CHrist is called a Prophet for three respects first in respect of person for hee is the wisedome of the Father not subiectiuely residing in the Father but impressiuely expressing the same in the Person 2. in respect of Office because he hath taught his Church immediately eyther according to eyther nature in the old or according to both in the new Testament 3. In respect of Ministery mediately teaching men by meÌ„ which were called eyther ordinarily or extraordinarily vnto the office of teaching In Defence of his Priestly Office I. THe Worde Sacrifice is taken in Scripture eyther Analogically or properly Analogically or by a certain resemblance it signifieth the duties of Piety
both of his bloud shed are giveÌ„ in Baptisme and of his body crucifyed in the Supper For the passion of Christ is as it were the materiall and meritorious cause of our salvation l 1. Pet. 1.7 2. Pet. 1.19 Mat. 20.28 Of his Benefites because looke what things Christ hath and did hee testifieth m Ioh. 6.53 Ioh. 15.4 Rom. 8.32 by visible signes in every Sacrament that hee had them to our good and did them for vs. Now the Scripture proposeth foure things which in very deed are the benefits of Christs person and the fruites of his merite n 1. Cor. 1.30 Righteousnesse which is the remission of sinnes and the absolution of the sinner before God Wisedome which is the perfect and true knowledge of Gods wil which no man hath without Christ Sanctification which is the denying of our selues joyned together with repentance and new life Redemption which is both a full deliverance from all evils yea even from our last enemy Death as also a small glorification And these are those things which are sealed in all Sacraments which of the Divines are otherwise wonte to bee expressed by the name of an invisible Grace as the signe it selfe by the name of a visible Forme From this consideration of the signe and the thing signified the agreement and difference of both may bee concluded The Difference because they are divers both in nature for the Signe is visible the thing signified is invisible and in the Obiect for the signe goeth but into the body the thing signified into the soule and in the Manner of communication for in respect of the signe the manner is corporall but of the thing signified it is spirituall the Agreement because those things which were otherwise really and very farre separated are joyned together by a Sacramentall vnion The inward and proper forme of a Sacrament is that excellent agreemeÌ„t of the Signe with the thing signified and the mutuall relation of the one vnto the other whereof that properly consisteth in the comparison and similitude of the Effects this in the ordayning of the signe to the thing signified Now this conjunction of the Signes and the thing signified in the SacrameÌ„ts is not naturall by a substantiall contraction or knitting together or by the vniting of the accidents and substances IndistantiaÌ„ Inexistentiam nor locall by the neerenesse and beeing of the one in the other nor yet spirituall as immediately quickning the very signes themselues but it is wholy Relatiue and Sacramentall consisting specially in three thinges in the signifying in the sealing Praebitione and in the exhibiting of the thing signified In the signifying because the signes by a most agreeable similitude and proportion as it were by a certaine introduction doe represent the o Gen. 17 10.11 1. Cor. 11.15.16 Ioh. 6.33 spirituall mysteries that is the things invisible by things visible In Sealing because the Signes are and are called the Seales or stampes of the thinges signified both for that they confirme the truth of the similitude betweene the signe and the thing signified and that also they necessarily and most surely seale the efficacy of both conjunctions in the lawfull vse thereof p 1. Ioh. 1.7 And this is called a coupling of the Sealing In Exhibiting because that in very deede is exhibited which is figured by the signes for God mocketh not by instituting Signes whereof there should be no truth but as in the audible word so also in the signe that is in the visible word he in very deed performeth what he promiseth and sheweth q 1 Pet. 3.2 Rom. 4.11 Eph. 3.7 And yet the exhibiting or receyving of the the thing signified are not referred to the Instruments of the body but to the heart of the beleever because it is spirituall according as the exhibiting and receyving of the Signes is corporall wee say spirituall for a double respect both by reason of the Efficient that is the hidden operation of the holy Ghost which is done in very marvailous maner that by the means of Christs flesh mystically communicated to vs the bloud and vertue of Christ-merite pearceth even vnto our soules Å¿ Col. 6.7 Ioh. 1.26 and by reason of the Instruâ—ent be cause faith by which we rece ue them is a spirituall instrument by the bond whereof the spirit most straitly conjoyneth those things together Col. 26.7 Ioh. 1.26 which otherwise are very faire distant each from the other t Eph. 3.17 From this inward forme of a Sacrament and the mutuall disposition of the signe and the thing signified doe arise two speciall kinds of Sacramentall Predications vsed in the Scriptures the first when the signe is pronounced of the thing signified that is when the signe is sayde to be the very thing signified as when Christ is called our Circumcision our Covenant our Paschall Lambe u 1. Cor. 5.7 Gen. 17.10 Act. 7.8 the other when the thing signified is pronounced of the signe that is when the very thing signified is sayde to be the signe as when the bread is called the body of Christ the wine the bloud of Christ x 1. Cor. 11.24 Mat. 26.28 And these Predications are wont to bee called Relatiue Analogicall and Metonymycall Relatiue because when the one separated thing is pronounced of the other a mutuall relation and respect of things like the one to the other is necessarily presupposed Analogical because the changing of the names is made in regard of the Analogy and exceeding great agreement betweene themselues Metonymycall because the signe is put for the thing signified so contrariwise The reason of these Predications in the mater of a Sacrament is the vnion which as it coÌ„sisteth in three in the signifying sealing and spirituall exhibiting so it maketh these Sacramental Predications true because of the signifying sealing and exhibiting The End of a Sacrament is two-fold Proper and Accidentall The Proper is eyther Primary or Secondary That is the visible sealing of Gods invisible grace and our conjunction with Christ y Rom. 6.4 1. Cor. 10.16 Gal. 3.27 This is a testifying of godlinesse towards God of loue towards our neighbour and of open profession whereby as by a marke wee are severed from other Synagogues of Sathan z 1 Cor. 10.17 Eph. 4.5 1. Cor. 11.29 The Accidentall is the condemation of them that vnworthily communicate for albeit the vnfaithfull receiue the SacrameÌ„ts yet for the abuse of the signes reproachful contempt against the thing signified they are made guilty of the contempt of Christ and therefore also of everlasting death and condemnation By this a An alysi opening of the definition through all the causes it may easily be coÌ„cluded what those things are which most properly may hold the name and nature of a Sacrament to witte those wherein there may be a concurrence of all these causes and of the conditions that issue out of these Such Sacraments as these are
taking the spirituall sealing within vs both of Christ himselfe and of his benefites by the Instrument of faith is declared The Eating and Drinking is an outward and sacramentall vse and taking of the signes according to Christes Prescription whereby the inward and spirituall eating and drinking of his body and bloud is sealed by divine ordinance for as first there are two persons administring the Supper the one of the Pastor doing that which is done outwardly and openly the other of Christ effecting by his Spirit that which is done inwardly Secondly as the whole Action of the Lords Supper consisteth in two things the one an earthly bodilie perceyuable for the senses the other heavenly spirituall and intelligible for the vnderstanding of the faithfull Thirdly as there are two partes of man the one the body the other the soule so there are two givings and eatings the one outward which is called Sacramentall the other inward which is tearmed Spirituall yet that was instituted of Christ that it might bee a certaine expresse shape or Image of this The wordes Definitiue and Sacramentall are those which declare the inward matter or thing signified and vtter the same whether it bee of the bread or of the cuppe sacramentally of the bread as This is my body which for you is delivered and broken f Luc. 22.19 but of the cuppe This is my bloud which is shed for many g Mat. 26.28 Both expositions are wont two waies to be considered eyther in each words apart and by themselues considered or in the whole exposition together Being considered apart they note eyther the Subject or the Attributes or the Copula The Subject is the Pronoune demonstratiue this not adjectiuely but substantiuely taken for it doth not signifie h Individuum vagum any singular thing but the verie bread which Christ Tooke Brake and Gaue to his Disciples and the Wine which he held in his hands according as the order of the Text i Mat. 26 26.27 the interpretation of Paul k 1 Cor. 11.24.25 and the Analogy of Faith doe demonstrate The Attribute in the first proposition is the Body of Christ not the mysticall which is the church but the proper and the true which for vs is given and broken and that as it was such a body In the second is the bloude of Christ which for vs is shedde and even that as it was such a bloud according as the other member of these Attributes which is pronounced by an Enallage of the present tense for the future Tense dooth most evidently proue The Copula whereby the Attribute is knit with the Subject is the Verbe Substantiue IS which ought not nor may bee taken Substantially wheras by no meanes at all the vnlike cannot properly and Essentially be affirmed of his vnlike but figuratiuely for a mysticall and Sacramentall Being whereby the thing which signifyeth taketh the name of that thing which it signifyeth because of the Analogy of the one with the other for by that litle word Christ taught not what the bread and wine were by nature or substance but what they were by signification office and vse for by nature they are bread and wine by signification they are the body and bloud of Christ The whole Attribution or Predication is not proper or regular whereas neyther the proposition is Identicall nor the body of Christ can properly be affirmed of the bread to witte wheras the Body of Christ is neyther the Generall nor the Speciall nor the difference nor the property nor the accident of bread but it is Figuratiue and Sacramentall Figuratiue not simply Metaphoricall and Allegoricall but Metonymycall to witte such whereby the name of the thing signified is given to the Signe which Metonymycall speaking is very familiar in the Scriptures Sacramentall because the exhibiting of the thing signified is withall promised and yet there is no swerving from the word spoken or pronounced wheras wee retaine the word spoken being Sacramentall which is altogether different from regular Predications and to bee expounded with an interpretation aunswerable to the nature of Sacraments The Expositiue wordes are these by which Christ expounded or layde open the end of this holy action to witte l 1. Cor. 11 16. the remembrance of his death which is not a naked or idle remembrance of a thing past but an effectuall and healthfull apprehension of Christs merites and an explication of the same privately with our selues or properly vnto our selues and withall a solemne Eucharisticall Thanksgiving in the vse of this Sacrament for so great a benefite and this is the manner of the Efficient Cause being principall or that which instituteth the Supper and of the Institution it selfe The Cause Efficient Administring or Instrumentall are the Ministers of the Church called by lawfull ordination by whome God as by active instruments offereth and representeth vs those things outwardly by the signes of breade and wine which by the inward operation of the holy Ghost hee effecteth in vs. Of these Instruments if you respect the Office it is to administer the Lords Supper with those rites of dispensing them in the very which Christ went before by his owne example If the Quality so they lawfully execute their office in the preaching of the Word the administration of the Sacraments it nothing addeth to or detracteth from the efficacy of a Sacrament sith the authoritie of Sacraments if they bee considered in themselues dependeth not vpon the qualitie of the Minister but vpon the Institution verity and power of Christ The Matter of the Lords Supper is two wayes vsually considered eyther as that which partaketh the Supper or as that which constituteth the Supper whereof the one hath the manner of the Subject the other of the partes The Matter or Subiect partaking the Supper are all they who being by Baptisme made the members of the Church and now being of yeares professe sound doctrine and haue the testimony of a holy life m 1. Cor. 11.20 12.13 From the circumscription of this Subiect are excluded first the dead or they that are departed this life from whome both the power of vsing the Sacrament is taken away and vnto whome all the vse thereof is in vaine ineffectuall as also the vse of the preaching of the Gospell whereof the Sacraments are appendents Secondly the Sicke like to die for Christ would haue this communion not to bee private and domesticall but ecclesiasticall and publicke neyther doth the want but the contempt of the same hurt the partie that doth not communicate though peradventure there bee another respect to bee had concerning them that haue slipped and that are Excommunicated out of the church and concerning prisoners who are to bee punished and are now penitent Thirdly Children and Infants for to speake properly the Supper is meat for the stronger and the further grown in yeares and not for Infants neyther can they yeeld a reason of their Faith nor examine themselues
of the bread and Wine into the Lordes body and bloud or by k Impanationem a passing into the bread or by locall inclusion or lastly l â—nex stentâ—am IndistantiaÌ„ by a beeing in or closenesse but it is Sacramentall and Spirituall which Gods will and authority declared by the worde of Institution effecteth Sacramentall because according to the nature of Sacraments it consisteth in a disposition and relation by which Christ together with the signe exhibiteth the thing signified to the Communicants and sanctifyeth the breade and wine that they may be the signes of the thing signified being conjoyned together by a Sacramentall vnion Spirituall because the body and bloud of Christ being not simply and as they are in themselues things subsisting but Intellectually and vnderstandingly to be considered are proposed in these mysteries and are offered to the mind not to the body to Faith not to the senses being also with the mind and with faith alone to be taken and receyved Of this maner there are three grounds The Institution the Verity and Manner of Christs body and the Nature of the Sacraments The Institution for Christ instituted the Sacrament of our communion with his body and bloud whereof wee are spiritually partakers by Faith for after no other manner can it bee beleeved that the present body of Christ is exhibited in the Supper but as it is truely receyved as the spirituall meat of the soule vnto life The manner and verity of his body for seeing the body of Christ being coessentiall with ours is circumscriptiuely in Heaven wheresoever he will and cannot be in earth by a maner invisible incircumscribed infinite indefinite al and every of which maners overthrow the verity of a body we must altogether confesse that Christ being bodily in heaven is neverthelesse after a Sacramentall manner in body present in the Supper m Heb. 2.17 Luc. 24.29 The Nature of the Sacraments for Faith should cease in the Sacraments if the very thing which is beleeved were otherwise present then after a sacramentall manner n 1 Cor. 11.17 neyther indeed doth the omnipotency of God or a miracle invert or evert this sacramentall manner of presence Not Gods Omnipotency because when there is speech made of that effectuall and actuall power of God the will of God revealed in the word must needes goe before To which will if any thing be contrary it is from it necessarily excluded as that also which is by nature contradictory not a Miracle because neyther miracles which are indeed aboue nature should be sayde to be against nature taking away and withall leaving a substance or naturall quality nor is it probable that a thing which is extraordinary is done in an ordinary Sacrament of the Church And these things haue wee spoken concerning the Presence of Christes body and bloud in the Supper Now are we to see concerning the Communicating and the eating It is needfull that both the ground and the manner of the Communicating of Christs body be considered and discerned The Ground is the vnion in the Supper and the same two-fold the one of the body and bloud of Christ with the bread and wine which is called Sacramentall and pertaineth to the Forme of the Sacrament the other of the same body and bloud of Christ with the beleevers pertaining to the end of the Sacrament The Former consisteth in 2. thinges in the conjoyning of the Signe and the thing signified whereof wee haue spoken and in the joynt receyving of both in the lawfull vse because in the vse instituted they are receyved o Simul licet non similiter together though not alike both conjunctions are not naturall nor corporall nor yet simply obligatory or binding but Sacramentall whereby the thing signified is conjoyned to the Signe and the matter of the Sacrament to the Sacrament and are ioyntly perceyved in the true and lawfull vse thereof The Latter is our Essentiall Reall and spiritual communion with Christ p Eph. 3.16.17 5.29.30 1. Cor. 6.15.17 1. Ioh. 3.24 Essentiall if the things which are vnited be respected Reall if the truth of the Vnion Spirituall if the manner whereby the vnion is made bee considered The things which are vnited are Christ and his Church the Verity thereof the name of Vnion confirmeth and divers similitudes in Scriptures doe shadow forth the Manner is not simply Intellectuall or vulgarly Supernaturall but plainly Spirituall Divine and Heavenly whereof the question that it is is manifested vnto vs by the word of God both simple and Sacramentall but the question how it is is so mysticall and secret that even an Angell cannot comprehend the mystery thereof r Ep. 5.30.32 From this two-fold vnion a twofold manner of Communicating also ariseth The one is Sacramentall or Externall of the Signes which is made by the taking of the bread and wine as according to the Institution ordinance of Christ they are the holy signes of his body and bloud Å¿ 1. Cor. 11 26. For as the bread and the cuppe of the Lord is corporally eaten and drunke so is the same eaten and drunke Sacramentally wherof the bread and the cuppe are a Sacrament even after that manner as the Sacrament of his body is called his Body and the Sacrament of his bloud is called his Bloud by a Sacramentall manner of speaking And this maner of eating is Temporall and may bee iterated The other is Spirituall and mysticall to witte the very receyving of Christs body and bloud in veritie by the Spirite by which Christ is spiritually applyed vnto vs that wee beeing made one with him might by his spirite be quickned to life eternall t Ioh. 6.46 48. and so this spirituall communicating doth not onely signifie Faith but also application which is made by faith our communion with Christ whereupon sometimes it is called faith in Christ sometime the communion of Christes benefites and sometimes our ingraffing and incorporating into Christ Now it is called Spirituall partly because it is effected by the worke of the holy Spirite u 1. Cor. 12.13 Partly because it is by faith onely receyued and partly also because it pertayneth to the Spirituall life And this manner of communicating is dayly continuall incessant From both we exclude the corporall or all communicating of Christs body and bloud in the Supper From the First because the signe is receyved with the mouth and not the thing signified From the Second because a spirituall thing cannot be receyved bur Spiritually The Adoration or Bread-worshipping remayneth which by a false supposition both of the presence and of the communicating of Christs body bloud superstition hath devised For albeit all the godly doe worthily confesse that this Sacrament is to be handled with great Religion and Reverence which Reverence the Fathers sometimes called by the name of Adoration and Christ himselfe is to bee worshipped in the mysteries both as hee is God as he is
God and man yet wee must not stay in the very signes neyther are the eyes of faith to be lifted vp to the place of the bread but vnto heaven x Col. 3.1 That this popish Adoration is Idolatrous both in it selfe and in the Adiunct Ceremonies wee proue divers waies In it selfe by three Arguments drawne from the cause from the manner and from the kindes of Adoration for seeing the cause of the Adoration of Christ is proper in his God-head for nothing is properly to bee adored but that which is God the worshipping eyther of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be translated to the outward signs theÌ„selues without manifest sacriledge then seeing the manner of Christs adoration requireth that neyther the person be divided nor the natures equalled or the difference of them takeÌ„ away the bread cannot at all bee worshipped or the bodie in the bread but either the nature and the properties thereof should be confounded while the presence of Christs bodie is judged to bee in the bread or that which is not fitte for a humane nature but in regard of the person should Idolatrously bee attributed not onely vnto him simply and as touching himselfe but also vnto his Sacrament Lastly seeing there are two kindes of Adoration Praying Thanksgiving neyther of them can be applyed to the bread neyther properly nor Sacramentally whereas both belong to Christ as being God and man In the Ceremonies it is idolatrous whether you respect the reserving of Reliques the inclosing or carrying about or the Elevation of the Eucharist for albeit there were certain beginnings of these ceremonies in the ancient church yet seeing they were prescribed neyther by Christ nor his Apostles or observed in the most ancient and purest church they were for the good cause taken away in the churches of the Gospell OF THE LORDS Supper The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Interpretation and signification of the NAME I. THe Supper of the Lord signifieth eyther the signe or the action that is eyther it is taken Relatiuely or Absolutely Being Relatiuely it signifyeth the Symboles or Signes of Gods grace Absolutely taken 〈◊〉 signifyeth the whole Action comâ—â—sed of the visible and corporall 〈◊〉 â—ing of the Signes and of the invisible and Spirituall receiving of Christ and his benefites II. THe Lords Supper is considered eyther abstractly as touching it selfe or applyedly in the lawfull vse this way it is properly called a Sacrament that way it is not but abusiuely and improperly III. THere are fowre formes of speaking concerning the Supper of the Lord the sense whereof and manner of vnderstanding them is the same the First is wherein the Name of the thing signified is layed on the Signe as the Supper is the New Testament The 2. wherein the thing signified of the Supper in respect of the effect and efficacy thereof is given to the Signe as the Supper maketh vs partakers of the new Testament Thirdly wherein the offices of the signes are expounded in their proper signification as the Supper is the signe of the Covenant The fourth when in the lawfull vse of the Supper the Sacrament is conjoyned with the promise of grace as he which receiveth the bread and wine worthily shall eate the body and drinke the bloude of Christ Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause principall and First for the Subiect of Predication against Bellar. Lib. 1. De Sacra Euchar. Cap. 10. I. THe Pronounes demonstratiue and Relatiue aswell with the Greekes as Latines doe not alwayes according to rule agree with the substantiue following but sometimes also with that which goeth before and contrariwise not alwayes with that which goeth before but with that also which followeth Moreover the thing which is only a note in the vniversall and not in the particular according as bread was in the Supper is most vsually vttered by a Nowne vniversall of the Neuter gender II. THose things which are to be vnderstoode Tropically according to the nature of a sacrament ought not or may not be properly and simply taken Now there is a double Trope in the proposition touching the cuppe for by a Synechdoche the cuppe is put for the wine in the cuppe and by a Sacramentall Metonymy the Effect of the thing signified is given to the Signe In Defence of the whole Predication to Cap. 9. I. THe Stile of Scripture doth most manifestly proue that the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament as also Testaments compacts and covenants are found to haue beene instituted in Figuratiue wordes and the precepts to haue beene vttered Figuratiuely II. AN Argument drawne from a Figuratiue speaking to the obscurenesse of the same is inconsequent for it followeth not that if it be Figuratiue therefore it is not perspicuous or on the contrary if it be perspicuous that therefore it is not Figuratiue III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers are Sacramentally to be taken that is to bee expounded according to the maner and Trope which is agreeable to Sacraments Whence it is that they all haue judged that Christs words are to bee expounded not according to the Word spoken but according to his meaning IIII. THe appellation of the Word spoken or the sence of the wordes is taken sometimes in a larger and sometimes in a straiter signification in a strayter in regular Predications in a larger in those which are Figuratiue Wherefore in the very wordes of the Supper we retayne the very word spoken but sacramentall wherein not so much the letter and the sound of the words as the sure and certaine meaning thereof is to bee followed to wit that which may agree with the nature of a Sacrament Of the Wordes of Consecration against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 13. I. THe wordes of the Institution of the Lords Supper are of two partes some are the words of the Evangelists and some of Christ himselfe those are not onely recited as a history but doe admonish as well the Ministers as the Communicants what Christ did what he commaunded likewise to bee done of both These serue for consecration yet so that neyther the rest ought to bee omitted nor consecration bee circumscribed with foure or fiue wordes onely or lastly Prayers and Thanksgivings bee excluded seeing as well the former as the latter words of the Institution doe finish the consecration and the Substance of Bread and Wine is not changed by a certaine hidden vertue of those few wordes but on the contrary the consecration which is made in the Eucharist is called in the Scriptures a hallowing with thankesgiving II. THere was a double respect of the Apostles in that first Supper one of Pastors and dispensers of Gods misteries but the other of the church or the vniversall company of the faithfull which they represented in the first respect the commaundement to Doe ought to bee referred to all that which Christ did concerning the bread and wine in the second to all that which the Communicants ought to
miracle is vnwonted and vnusuall but those which are cited were eyther devised of superstitious men or false and put forth to deceyue the simple or lastly brought forth by the helpe and furtherance of the Devil according as Christ and Paul foretold of Antichrist Against the Communion vnder one kinde onely Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 24. I. TO reason from the Signes and Sacraments of the olde Testament which differ in the outward adjunctes in the circumstance of time in the maner of signifying and in the quality and number of the Signs to the Sacraments of the New Testament is inconsequent neyther is it needefull to require both kindes in those which eyther were not capable of both or in the lawfull vse whereof there is not extant a commaudement for both II. FRom a particular indefinite propositioÌ„ we badly conclud exclusiuely for albeit in some places there bee mention made of eating the other kinde therefore is not necessarily excluded for there is else where mention made of flesh and bloud together of eating and drinking the same yea foure times in the selfe same chapter III. THe consideration of meate and ordinary bread and of the mysticall and Sacramentall bread is altogether different not as touching the naturall substance quantity or quality but as touching the vse and office Now there was both in that miracle of the feeding of the people and in the Supper at Emaus not a Sacrament of Grace but a feast of nature Neyther haue the Fathers interpreted the bread concerning the true and naturall body of Christ but concerning the mysticall that is the church IIII. SYnecdoche is that which by name of the part compreheÌ„deth the whole very familiar in the Hebrew tongue wherein by the breaking of bread they are wont to signifie a dinner supper any feastes whatsoever from which feastes notwithstanding as drinke neyther ought nor can bee excluded so neyther may it from this Sacramentall feast whereof mention is made in the cited places whence it is also that the same Paul to whome this breaking is attributed expounding the Lordes institution teacheth that this Supper consisteth of bread and of the cup. V. IT is true that the Manichees communicated vnder the one kind of breade onely for they thought that the wine was the gall of a Dragon but that the ancient Church did not therefore reprehend them it is most false even those very men doe proue the contrary whom the adversary would haue to stand on his side to witte Leo the Bishoppe and Gelasius the Pope the former wherof called this mangling a sacrilegious counterfeiting and the latter a great Sacriledge VI. THe Consequence is of no force which is from examples whereof the former is of doubtfull credit as of which Chrisostome himselfe maketh no mention and because of the cunning and craft of a womanish wit ridiculous but the latter of a false and contrary credite as being that which by most certain proofe evidently sheweth that the communion was vsually and necessary vnder both kindes VII FRom extraordinary cases of necessity and those particular there is no conclusion to that which in lawfull ordinary and publicke celebrations of the Eucharist ought to bee observed Adde further that in all those rites and ceremonies though not alwayes yet for the most part there was vse of both kindes according as the constitution and custome of the Primitiue church doth most manifestly proue VIII TO reason from the authority of the Councels and Fathers for the establishing of some error is inconsequent Adde further that in the Primitiue Church the Communion for a long time was retained vnder both kindes even in the monasteries vntill the thousand three hundred yeare the mangling or maiming thereof was first by a publicke decree brought in by the Councell of Constance in the yeare 1484. IX FRom discommodities or inconveniences an argument concludeth nothing both because they leane vpon superstition and because the collection is faultie drawne from particulars and lastly because they being foreseen by Christ and the Apostles hindered not the Institution of the communion vnder both kindes In Defence of the Forme against Transsubstantiation Bellar. Lib. 3. Cap. 19. FRom a bad and insufficient Enumeration of the partes a false conclusion is drawn for every change is eyther Essentiall of the very Substance that is of the naturall matter and forme or Sacramentall of the office condition vse of the Elements both are true but after their manner that true Essentially by the manner of nature but this Sacramentally by the manner of Grace Now whatsoever change is in the Supper it is not essentiall or naturall but Sacramentall that is a Consecration appointment and setting apaâ—t of the Signes from a common to a holy and mysticall vse To the Testimonies of the Fathers which by Bellarmine are cited in the 20. and 21. cap. of the third booke and the whole second Booke I. THose Fathers who called the Eucharist the body and bloud of Christ vsed a Sacramentall manner of speaking wherby it commeth to passe that the names being changed the signe or Symbole is called by the tearme of the thing it selfe Now they vsed this for three causes First that they might declare whereto Christ had ordayned the Eucharisticall bread SecoÌ„dly that they might expresse the Analogy betweene the Signes and the things signified Thirdly That by the change of the names they might teach that there is a most true and indivisible conjunction of the things signified with the signes themselues in the lawfull vse II. THe Fathers who haue called the Eucharist the precious body the reverend mysteries the pledge of Salvation our ransome spake Hyperbolically of the very bread sanctified and not of any other body present by transubstantiation Now they vsed those Hyperbolicall Phrases for three causes First that they might extoll the dignity of the mystery Secondly least eating they should sticke in the outward signes Thirdly that with a great affection of godlinesse and reverence they might approach to that holy Communion III. THe Fathers which affirmed that the Body of Christ is touched seen and chewed with the teeth spake Figuratiuely For there is a double signification of the Sacrament and body of Christ to bee held for as a Sacrament is sometime taken Figuratiuely for one part and sometime properly for both parties so also is the body of Christ sometime properly and somtime Figuratiuely for the outward signe onely and â—n this sense by a figured and Metonymycall vse of speech the Fathers haue affirmed that the body of Christ is touched and seene that is the signe of his body IIII. THe Fathers who spake of the changing of the bread and wine in the Eucharist treated of the Sacramentall change whereof wee haue spoken in the first distinction and therefore willed and taught that their wordes should bee taken Figuratiuely and effectiuely V. THe Fathers who taught that our bodies are cherished nourished and fed with the body and bloud of Christ vsed a
a society of men called forth by an outward calling or communicating of the preaching of the word and Sacraments to the worshippe of Gods Glory i Mat. 18.17 And the Invisible Church the Society of men predestinated which are called forth by an effectuall and saving calling out of the state of corruption vnto the dignity of being adopted the children of God and are vnited vnto Christ as to their head not onely to the service and worshippe but also to the fruition of the glory of God k Luc. 1.33 Rom. 11.4 The Efficient Cause of both Churches is the one Primary the other Instrumentall or Serviceable The Primary and Principall ought 2. wayes to bee expounded according to the constitution of the church and according to the administration and ordering thereof The Cause Efficient of the Constitution of the church is God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost as the beginning of all good in nature and aboue nature l Rom 2.29 Of this Efficient cause or beginning in respect of the vnity of the Essence there is one and a common Operation but in respect of the distinction of the Persons there is a distinct Manner of working A Common Operation because in divine matters the cause of working is common the worke it selfe the same The Cause of Working in the constituting of the Church is the good pleasure of Gods will whereby from everlasting thee hath appointed to call forth some of Mankind to the communion of his Grace m Eph. 1.5 Tit. 2.14 But the Worke it selfe is the n Eph. 1.13 fulfilling or complement of the church which is to bee consummated with those degrees of meanes and periods of times wherewith it pleased God Of which decree and worke God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost is the common beginning but the maner of Working is distinct For the Father is the Efficient cause of the Church of the Invisible by election but of the Visible by Creation The Sonne is the Efficient cause of the Invisible by effectuall Redemption but of the visible by the common offering of the same Redemption by the preaching of the Gospell the Holy Ghost is the Efficient cause of the Invisible by saving sanctification and new creation in Christ but of the visible by outward calling whereby hee worketh more or lesse And this is the manner of the Efficient cause in the constituting of the Church Now the cause efficient neerest of the Administration and ordinance thereof is Christ God and man by a voluntary disposition and dispensation of Grace whereby God the Father made and appointed Christ the head over all to his Church which is his Body o Rom 12 5. 1. Cor. 3.11.12 Col. 1.18 And it is so not by order of nature but by the divine ordinance of saving Grace for the Church is not sayde to be a Physicall and Mathematicall but a mysticall body of Christ Wherefore also by the same benefite of divine Ordination Christ ought to bee helde and esteemed the head of his body not many heades but one for the church is neyther without head nor yet having many heades But as the condition of the head over the body doth chiefly consist in three thinges in Order Perfection and Power in Order towards the members in Perfection in it selfe in Power towardes the whole Body so Christ also in order perfection and power performeth all duties after a most excellent manner which can or ought to be performed of the best head In Order because he being true man and true God holdeth the chiefty in all things having the supreminence not onely of dignity but also of Regiment and power whence it is that the Scripture doth very often affirme him to haue Beeing before all things and to be placed aboue all things In Perfection because Christ alone is the King Prophet and High Priest having all things in himselfe from the Father which any way may be required for the perfection of the head In Power and Efficacy because hee alone inspireth vigour sense motion and spirituall life into his members and is alone knit fast vnto the body by the bond of the Spirit yeelding that whole ioyning and fastening together of the members among themselues and with God to the whole Church The Cause of the Church Instrumentall and serviceable is Generally the word of God what way soever revealed and communicated whether inwardly or outwardly or ioyntly both wayes p Heb. 4.12 Act. 2 4â— 2. Pet. 2.23 1. Tim. 3.15 Whence it is also that the Word is in Scripture called the seede of the Church and the rule measure foundation of the truth which the Church hath as it were hanged vpon a pillar and as a sure prop vpholdeth the same But Specially the Instrumentall cause of the church Invisible is faith it selfe which sith it is inward is not indeede knowne by the judgement of men but yet it marketh or noteth out the true and essentiall manner and forme of a member of the church as being the onely Instrument of that inward and effectuall calling of God But of the Church visible chiefly and Primary are the Ministers of the Gospell who for that cause are called in the Scripture Builders and Master-builders q 1. Co. 3 10. Eph. 4.12 1. Pet. 3.5 to witte instruments vsed of God and the Lord Iesus Christ for the knitting together of the Saints for the worke of his Ministery and for the common edification of the Body of Christ r Eph. 4.7 2. Cor. 4.1 Now both the calling of these Instruments and their Office according to the Calling must be expounded Their Calling I meane whereby they are holily and lawfully called to a holy publicke function in the communion of Christ and of his Church Now they are called eyther of God inwardly by the Spirite or outwardly of the Church next after God in a holy and lawfull order The first manner if it be alone maketh the calling immediate and extraordinary which God alone causeth for the singular begetting and raysing of his church such as was that of the Prophets and Apostles whome the Lord extraordinarily called and informed by a singular revelation that their authority in teaching and writing might bee plainely divine Å¿ Luc. 21.14 Act. 13.1 Act. 21 4. The latter with the former maketh a calling mediat ordinate which God together with the church causeth by Order Ecclesiasticall t 1. Tim. 5 17. Of this Order there are two Essentiall partes The Choice and Confirmation the First is whereby a holy and lawfull examination is made both of life and doctrine u Tit. 2.7 2 Tim. 2.24 1 Tim. 3.10 The other is whereby a consecration and ordination to the Ministery is first made with Imposition of hands by the Cleargie the body of the Church therevnto consenting by Signe speech or free siâ—ence x Act. 6.6 â— Tim. 4.14 2. Tim. 1.6 And this calling for that it is Ordinary is also Successiue
not by naâ—ure as once the posterity of Aaron the Levites but by Ordinance and Institution But the Office of these Instruments â—s to administer the affaires of the Church according to Gods prescriptiâ—n Now the affaires of the church doe â—oncerne eyther the Doctrine or the â—ignes and Sacraments or lastly the â—cclesiasticall Iurisdiction and Disciâ—line of the Church Wherefore the â—ffice of all Ministers is contayned or â—ounded in the administration of Doâ—trine Sacraments and Ecclesiasticall â—overnement The Administration of Doctrine â—onsisteth in two partes in the assertiâ—n of the truth and in the contrary reâ—â—tation of falshood the right object of â—oth is the word of God y 2. Tim. 2 15 Tit. 1.9 The Administration of Sacraments hath two considerations one of the Persons to whome the Sacraments eyther ought or ought not to bee administred The other of the Manner that they bee wholy conveniently and intelligently administred Wholy as touching the Substantiall and Conveniently as touching the outward quality and forme Intelligently as touching the common Edification of the Church z 1. Cor. 1.23 Luc. 22 19 The administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline is chiefly exercised in two thinges in the punishing of faults and in the execution of Ecclesiasticall judgements as afterwards wee shall shew more at large a 1. Cor. 5.4 2. Cor. 2 8 The Matter of the Church hath respect eyther of the parts or of the Subject The Partes of the Church generally and materially are two The one Superior the other Inferior That 〈◊〉 the head of the Church to which the church is subject and from which alâ— vertue 〈◊〉 into the Church This is the body vnto which the members among themselues and with the head are vnited for the mutuall relation of these partes the one to the other maketh an essentiall manner or nature of the church But particularly the entire parts of the church Invisible are two according as there is vsually had a double respect of this church the one in the Beginning and progresse the other in the Perfection thereof that is commonly called the Militant this the Triumphant both which as touching the Essentiall nature of the church it selfe are but one albeit for the difference of the qualities which are in these partes they are as touching the place very diversly distinguished so that the one is in heaven which triumpheth and the other on earth which is in warfare b Heb. 12 22. Apoc. 21.2 Eph. 6.11.12 but of the church Visible as it is so considered there are two maine partes the Guides and the Flockes the Instructers and the Learners though extraordinarily it often happeneth that the one part is separated from the other the essentiall forme of the church it self still remayning The Subiect of the church Generally is Mankind c Mat. 28.19 Ioh. 10.16 Rom. 1.16 of which partly some are called dayly by the grace of God whosoever are ordained to life eternall and partly others are also called who being convicted of the grace offered might become for ever inexcusable But Particularly the Subject of the church visible are all those in generall which are called and outwardly professe the same faith in which common assembly of the church not onely the godly and elect are but also the vngodly and reprobate Those as touching the verity of the inward and outward forme these according to the shew and resemblaÌ„ce or counterfeiting of godlinesse Those Elect and called these called onely not elect Those the liuely these the dead members of the church d Luc. 8.13 Mat. 22.14 but of the church Invisible are they onely that are predestinated to life who indeed are inwardly affected with the calling of God and perceiue the same by faith according to the election and operation of Grace e Rom. 8.9 Eph. 1.23 Ioh. 14.23 Neyther are eyther the newly catechised Novices though yet not baptized nor those which are excommunicated if they repent excepted out of the visible church not those because albeit they haue not as yet receyved the outward signe yet being indued with faith and baptized with the inwarde Baptisme they ought to be taken for the members of the church according to the perfection thereof Neyther is it lawfull to exclude those from the communion of the church whome the Scripture doth not exclude from the communion of Salvation Not these because as they were conditionally excluded till there be hope of repentance so they must conditionally bee of the Church Now all Reprobates and those that liue wickedly without any pricke of conscience are excluded because whether they seeme to bee inwardly of the church or whether they are outwardly of the church yet they haue beene alwayes separated and continued so from the vnity of this church For this church is the communion of Saintes the Spouse and body of Christ without blemish the Temple of God the holy city c. The Forme of the church both generally according to it selfe wholy and specially according to the double notion thereof ought to be expounded as hath beene done in the causes precedent Generally the Forme of the church is two wayes considered Severally in it selfe and the Efficient cause thereof or ioyntly in her Subject After the former manner the Forme of the church is that divine and precious calling wrought in heaven according to the purpose of Gods will wherby hee decreede from everlasting the communion of himself with the church and of the church with himselfe in his beloved Sonne e Eph. 1.4.5 Ioh 10.27.48 Rom. 8.30 After the latter maner the forme of the church is a divine and gratious calling whereby the church of God is in this world fashioned and waiting vntill after the course of her calling here consummated it be advanced in Christ Iesus to the fruition of the heavenly calling And of this calling as the nature as touching it selfe is most perfect so the manner of the same is also two-fold the one immediate the other mediate that which God by himselfe maketh through the vertue of his Spirite this which he maketh outwardly by speech signe or working ordinarily or extraordinarily as it pleaseth him to make it known vnto men Specially the forme of the church Invisible is an effectuall and inwarde calling and by vertue of that effectuall calling that communion of Saintes both with their head and of themselues each with other g 1. Ioh. 1.12 And of this calling as the nature in respect of God is perfect so the inward and effectuall meane thereof is two-fold the Spirite and Faith the one in respect of him that calleth the other in respect of him that is called by the one God offereth and conferreth the effectuall calling by the other wee take holde of that which is offered and make answere to Gods calling for it is needefull that these two concurre together that the calling bee effectuall to witte the calling of God by the vertue and efficacy of his Spirite and our correspondent
if we know which is the true church the other if by meanes of the times wee can adjoyne our selues to the same XI FRom a false definition layed down a false proofe is drawne and therefore both the Antecedent and Consequent of the Argument is denyed XII THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are cited doe eyther treate of the inward forme of the Church as that of Origen and Cyprian or of the Eternity of the Church and not of the Visibility therof as that of Chrysostome or lastly of the Particular Churches of some certaine time as that of Augustine In Defence of the matter of the Church and first that they which are not baptized and the Catechized or novices belong to the Catholicke church Against Bellarmine Lib. 3. Cap. 5. I. COr 5. It is one thing to treate of the not baptized by reason of their vnbeliefe and another of the not baptized because of their vncapablenes eyther of age or profession of faith and to be without and not to be baptized are things different for as they are sometimes without which are baptised so on the contrary they are sometimes within which are not baptized II. ACT. 2. there is a two-fold adding to the church the one according to the judgement of the truth and the inward nature of Christianity the other according to the judgement of charity which is beleeved to be because of the outwarde communion of the Signes that is proper to the Church invisible but this to the church visible and of this but not of that doth the place treat III. THe Body of the Church and Baptisme are so called ambiguously for the body is eyther outward or mysticall and spirituall Baptisme likewise is eyther outward or inward eyther of water or of bloud all which are baptized with water are of the outward body of the Church but all those which are baptized with the bloud of Christ are of the mysticall and spirituall body of the Church IIII THe Catechized or Novices with the Fathers are two wayes distinguished the one according to the opinion of the common people for they were not numbred amoÌ„g the Christians who might not seeme to belieue albeit they beleeved The other according to the forme of the Church To which because they pertain not properly they are thought not to bee of the Church though they bee the members of the Church invisible V. THe respect of right is one and of the fact is another he hath right to the Sacraments which hath faith Now by Fact none are admitted to the outward communion of the sacraments but those which professe faith Secondly that those which are excommunicated belong to the Church Invisible against Bellarmin Lib. 3. Cap. 6. OF Persons Excommunicate there are two sorts for some are justly excommunicated and some vnjustly those which are justly excommunicated are cast foorth out of the particular churches but not simply out of the catholicke Church For Excommunication is a censure not of the catholicke church but of the particular they which are vnjustly are neyther cast out of the visible church by right nor out of the invisible by right or fact Now the Testimonies of the Scriptures or of the Fathers which are alleadged doe eyther treate of those which are iustly excommunicated or of the Excommunication of particular Churches whereof there is no question Thirdly that the predestinate alone pertaine to the Invisible Church against Bellarmine Lib. 3. Cap. 7. I. TO be in the Particular church and to be of the catholicke church are thinges different the one is for a man to adjoyne himselfe to that outward society of the faithfull but the other to bee as a member ingraffed and conjoyned vnto Christ Wherefore also these are two thinges different namely to be cast out of the particular church and to be cast out of the catholicke church That is done by Excommunication but this by no means can ever â—e done Now the places which are cited Mat. 3. Mat. 15. Mat. 25. 1. Cor. 5. 2. Tim. 2. are true concerning the particalar outward churches and not concerning the Catholicke Adde further that the Argumentes drawne from Parables are of small waight beyond the meaning of the Holy Ghost II. A Man is sayde to be of the church two wayes eyther according to Gods Election or Predestination or according to the outward Temporall calling the one way every faithfull man is a member of the catholicke church even from everlasting the other way no man is indeed to be a member of the visible church vnlesse he bee called in time Paul then was of the catholicke church even when he was not of the visible church before his calling but Iudas was not of the catholicke church though hee was of the visible church as touching his outward calling III. PRedestination is two wayes to bee considered eyther abstractly or absolutely as it comprehendeth that decree of God from eternity or compositiuely and Relatiuely as it comprehendeth all the meanes which are necessary for the execution of that decree as Vocation Iustification c. After the first manner every Person Predestinate is called a member of the catholicke church after the latter maner no man is called a member of the visible church but as hee is called Iustified c. IIII. THe Respect of brethren and of the church is not the same For they are called brethren which are eyther joyned together in an outwarde society and profession of faith or who haue the same Right of adoption with vs. Those are knowne these are not In like manner the Church is considered eyther as Catholicke or Particular the Predestinate are called the members of the Catholicke church and not of the Particular generally Of the FORME of the Church first of the Markes thereof against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 4. to the End of the booke I. THe manner of reasoning from Names is inconsequent For according as the things are certaine so Names which are of Imposition are accidentall voluntary and therefore vncertaine Neyther can that bee a marke of the Church whereby the true may bee discerned from the false which eyther cannot be seene because of the vniversality it selfe which is only to be perceyved by the vnderstanding or is commonly vsed according to that which is spokeÌ„ of others who liue without the Churches II. ANtiquity as beeing a thing accidentall separable common by sense not perceiuable cannot bee a Marke of the Church It is a thing accidentall because it maketh not the Essence of the Church but happeneth therevnto because of the processe of time It is a thing separable because without this the Church was somtimes knowne both the old church in the time of Adam and the churches of the New Testament in the time of Christ and of the Apostles It is a thing common because a lye or heare-say haue also their antiquity It is a thing by sense not perceiuable because antiquity it selfe can be discerned by the vnderstanding and reason onely III. THe