Selected quad for the lemma: body_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
body_n	nature_n	soul_n	unite_v	6,882	5	9.6339	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A13155	An abridgement or suruey of poperie conteining a compendious declaration of the grounds, doctrines, beginnings, proceedings, impieties, falsities, contradictions, absurdities, fooleries, and other manifold abuses of that religion, which the Pope and his complices doe now mainteine, and vvherewith they haue corrupted and deformed the true Christian faith, opposed vnto Matthew Kellisons Suruey of the new religion, as he calleth it, and all his malicious inuectiues and lies, by Matthevv Sutcliffe.	Sutcliffe, Matthew, 1550?-1629.	1606 (1606)	STC 23448; ESTC S117929	224,206	342

Finally Bellarmine and Coster saie that Calum was eaten vp with lice and died blaspheming and calling vpon the diuell a diuelish slander refuted by Galasius Beza and the publike testimony of the city of Geneua a litle before his death say they he called his fellow ministers vnto him exhorted them with many words full of piety and affection and departed this life rather like to one falling a slepe then dying Beza is charged for affirming that Christ had two hypostases or personall subsistences but his aduersaries deale with him calumniously for he confesseth and teacheth that Christ was one person albeit the same Christ was very God and very man the two natures being vnited in one person and the soule and the body being vnited in one man Feuardentius in Iacob 3. and Stapleton in prompt hebdom 3. quadrages and others raile at Beza for his verses which he made being a yong man But Beza did first condemne those verses himselfe as being made while he was an impure Papist and yet compare them with the Italian rymes that are euery where extant and with the verses of Casa and other Italians they may seeme modest and chast in respect Finally of late time the shamelesse Iebusites of France published a pamphlet of Bezaes recantation and reconciliation to the Pope fraught with diuers lies but Beza himselfe refuced their impudent lies and now the Papists themselues selues will not deny but that this was a lying and impudent pamphlet This is also the practise of Papists from time to time to sclander and to bely the seruants of God In the 8. session of the conuenticle of Constance the Masse-priestes charge Wicklesse that he taught that God must obey the diuell a matter no where sound either in termes or in sense in his writings they said also how he taught that Princes being in mortall sinne are not to be obeied his drift was only to shew that prelates liuing loosely were vnworthy of their places albeit he did not detract from the efficacy of sacraments ministred by them the right of kings against the vsurpations of the Clergy he stoutly mainteined In the same wicked assemblie Iohn Husse was accused that he taught that there was a fourth person besides the trinity and that he called Gregory a rymer neither did it auaile him that he denied these accusations most constantly for his accusers were heard and his defences little regarded he was also most falsely charged with driuing the Germans out of the vniuersity of Prague wheras it was proued that the Germans did voluntarily depart thence for that they pretended their ancient priuiledges to be infringed Against Bucer they giue out that dying he turned Iew and blasphemed the name of Christ a matter deuised without proofe or probability and conuinced by all that were present with him at his death Grineus was present at the end of Oecolampadius and testified that he died most quietly godlie and christianlie and with him concurreth Wolfangus Capito yet are not the Papists ashamed to giue foorth that the Diuell st angled him of whom I would but aske only one question to wit who these witnesses were that saw the Diuell committing this act Our English Papists seeke matter to obiect against bishop Iewell of reuerend memory but finde none only they tell vs diuers false allegations are found in his bookes but all their accusations are answered and rest so without replie although the shamelesse aduersaries desist not to alledge matters diuers times answered they saie further that D. Stephens and William Raynolds were cōuerted to Popery by reading his bookes but the first was a simple fellow and drawne away with hope the second ranne away forced by despaire Against Bishop Granmer they haue denised diuers slanderous tales as if he were vnlearned inconstant and caried about his wise in a tronke but for the first his learned writings and disputes wil testifie that it is vntruth furthermore very vnlike it is that he should haue beene emploied in so great affaires if he had not beene singularly learned his constancy appeareth in his continuall trauailes against the Popes authority and Popish errors the last is an improbable tale deuised by some standrous Popish parasite and well deserue they to be cased in cloke-bagges that doe beleeue it for he had sent his wife away before into Germany and had he not yet this deuise is improbable if not impossible Sanders Rishton Stapleton Parsons and their pewfellows haue published diuers slanders against king Henry the eight Queene Elizabeth of blessed memory and diuers of their loyall subiects but it is not to be maruelled if fugitiues and traytors raile against their Princes and all that fauour the state The vnwritten traditions of the Synagogue of Rome are nothing but lies deuised and falsely fathered vpon the Apostles and their successors Bellarmine de verb. dei lib. 4. c. 3. esteemeth the canon of the Masse to be a tradition yet was the same denised since the Apostles times and is not found in that forme of Masse which is in the old Romish ordinall in the Apostles time certes Christians neither praied for Popes nor for Emperors nor did Cosmas and Damianus and other Saints mentioned in the canons liue in the times of the Apostles or their next successors Innocent the third c. cum Marthae de celebratione missar determineth that these words of the canon tum leuauit oculos in caelum ad patrem and mysterium sidei and such like not mentioned in the gospell are receined from Christ by tradition but of his assertion he alledgeth no proofe neither can he shew reason why Christ should omitte words now reputed so necessary The worship of Images in the second councell of Nice is called an Apostolike tradition yet neuer doe we reade that any Apostle or Apostolike man did teach it Naie the law of God doth expressely forbid the making of all Images or similitudes to the end they should be worshipped Some say that praiers and sacrifices for the dead are confirmed by Apostolike traditions yet our Sauiour sheweth that we are to worke while we haue light and appointed the eucharist to be receiued of the communicants and not to be offered for quicke and dead The kissing of the altar and blessing of incense Masse-priests doe beleeue to be commanded by tradition from the same founteine doe issue the washings of hands turnings of the Priest the swinging of the chalice here and there the adoration of the host the pompous perambulation of the host in the pixe and other ceremonies of the masse but these traditions are founded vpon lies and fables and are partly Iewish partly Heathenish and all of them mere humane inuentions and deuises nay som of them are fond and rediculous as the kissing of stones and stocks some repugnant to scriptures as the adoration of the sacrament with that honour that is due to God In the missall salt is exorcised for the saluation of such as beleeue and water is hallowed for the driuing

Christs humane nature as Aquinas 3. q. 5. art 2. confesseth if hee had taken a heauenly body as Valentine beleeued saith Aquinas then could not the truth of Christs humane nature haue beene saued which requireth flesh and bones In the 24. of Luke our Sauiour sheweth that he had a body that both had flesh and bones and was to be selt and seene 31. In their abominable masse they make their polshorne Priests mediators for Christ making them to pray that God would looke vpon the body and bloud of Christ with a propitious and serene countenance supra quae saith the Priest looking vpon the sacrifice as they call it of Christs body and bloud propitio ac sereno vultu respacere digneris accepta habere c. 32. They compare also the sacrifice of the body bloud of Christ to the sacrifice of brute beasts offered by Abel and to the sacrifice of Melchisedech praying that God would accept Christs body and bloud as hee accepted the sacrifices of Melchisedech and Abel which is a most blasphemous comparison 33. In the masse also they confesse their sins to God to Angels and Saints iointly and not to Christ. nay they vse the mediation of Christ in their confession of sinnes to Angels and Saints preferring them as much before Christ as a Prince is to be preferred before mediators and hushiers 34. In a certaine prouincial constitution beginning authoritate de sentent excom they excommunicate by the authority of God Almighty and of Saints and leaue out Christ 35. They say Masses in honour of Angels and Saints but he in whose honour a sacrifice is offered is greater then the sacrifice doth it not then appeare that while they pretend to offer Christs body and bloud in honour of Angels and Saints that they make him inferiour to Angels and Saints 36. They call the Pope the head king spouse and foundation of the church but this cannot bee without extreame wrong to Christ for one king dome cannot admit two kings nor a viceking while the king is present nor can one woman haue two spouses or one body two heads or one house two diuers foundations the Apostle 1. Cor. 3. sheweth that no man can lay other foundation then that which is alreadie laid Ephes 5. he saith Christ is the head of the church the Sauiour of his body the synagogue of Rome therfore sheweth her selfe a strange beast that will needs haue two heads and two foundations being altogether so diuers 37. S. Iames sheweth that there is but one lawgiuer of the Church that is able to saue and destroy the doe therefore spoile Christ of his honour that giue this title of lawgiuer to the Pope 38. They doe also preferre the Pope before Christ for Christs body when the Pope goeth on progresse is sent before with the baggage and when the Pope is neere goeth out to meet him while all the gallants of rome attend on the Pope 39. They giue authority to the Pope to draw soules out of purgatory by his indulgences and to make portsale of Christs merits but he that is sold is neuer equal to the seller neither can the Papists shew that euer Christ deliuered one soule out of Purgatory 40. Papists beleeue that the Pope hath often times created his creator or at the least made Christs body and bloud but that Christ made the Pope it cannot be shewed doth it not then appeare that by many degrees the Pope excelleth Christ in the opinion of Papists 41. Nay they make S. Francis and Dominicke equall to Christ in diuers things and in some things superiour as their bookes of conformities and legendes doe testifie they call S. Francis Iesum typicum that is a figuratiue Iesus and say that Dominicke and Francis did more miracles then Christ but the Pope gaue both these two all their credit he must therefore needs surpasse Christ in accompt of Papistes 42. In the conuenticle of Trent Cornelius Bishop of Bitonto said papa lux venit in mundum the Pope the light came into the world and Simon Begnius in the councell of Lateran called Leo the tenth the lion of the tribe of Iuda and cried out Te Leo beatissime saluatorem expectauimus that is we blessed Leo haue looked for thee our Sauiour 43. Beno the Cardinall sheweth that Gregory the seuenth cast Christs body into the fire burning the Sauiour of Papists Pius the fifth also is said to haue cast an agnus Dei into the fire as Catena in his life reporteth into this contempt haue the Pupists brought their Gods 44 Theodorie à Niem lib. primo de schismate sheweth that Vrbane the Pope melted crosses and images of siluer to paie souldiers thus that which they pretend to honour as God they sell and giue away in seruice of the Diuell 45 They giue equall honour to a crosse of woode and mettall and to Christ and looking on a wooden crucifixo they say thou hast redeemed vs. who then seeth not what little accompt they make of Christ 46 A trentall of Masses the Masse-priests sell for lesse sometimes than sixe pence and yet they say Christs bodie is offered in euery Masse are they not therefore more wicked traitors than Iudas who would not fell Christ for lesse then 30. pence 47 The Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech is proper to Christ by the Apostles doctrine but the Papists make euery pild pated companion a Priest after the order of Melchisedech Finally the office of mediator properly belonging to Christ they communicate with the virgin Mary whom they suppose to be more mercifull then Christ they giue it also to Angels and Saints and Masse-priests Turrecremata summae lib. 1. c. 40. speaking of Priests saith they are mediators reconciling sinners to God ministerium peragunt mediatoris omnipotenti Deo qui offensus fuerat peccatores reconciliando the schoolemen say also that Saints may be called redeemers and that is confessed by Bellarmine lib. 1. de indulgentijs Infinite it were to report all the blasphemous speeches and practises of Papists against the honour of Christ Iesus but this may serue to shew that they rather blaspheme than honor Christ speaking so wickedly of his person so blasphemously of his bodie so falsly of his actions and taking away his honour and giuing the same to others CHAP. VII The strange contradictorie and false opinions of Papists concerning the sacraments AS Sacraments are seales of Gods grace and holy mysteries by the which God worketh our sanctification so are they enemies of Gods grace and the sanctification of Christians that peruert the Apostles doctrine and Christs institution concerning sacraments how then the doctors of the synagogue of Rome shal be able to excuse themselues and to prooue themselues not to be enuious of the good of Christians I report me to their common doctrine and practise concerning this argument for first they denie that the sacraments of the law of Moyses did open heauen and thereupon thrust all the

respuunt they beleeued not also that children dying yong should possesse the kingdome of heauen and doe not all sects of Monkes and Friers among the Papists exclude married folkes out of their cloisters doe not the Masse-priests also exclude all children dying before baptisme yea where it was much desired out of the kingdome of heauen 33. Priscillian saith Augustine haeres 70. disioined married folkes his words are coniuges disiungens his followers to hide their filthie opinions and beastlinesse make no account to forsweare themselues propter occultandas contaminationes turpitudines suas habent in suis dogmatibus iura periura secretum prodere noli they refuse also to eat flesh as vncleane meat and come not the Papists neere them in these points that separate Monkes and Priests that doe marrie from their wiues and teach their schollers to forsweare themselues the Rhemistes in Act. 23. say that oathes taken against Papists which they falsly call Catholikes may and must be broken vnder paine of damnation this periury is also allowed by 2. rinegued English traitours Allen and Parsons in their resolutions of cases of conscience wherein they teach their schollers to play the villaines and to periure themselues with a good popish conscience the Carthusians also and diuers Monkes forsweare eating flesh which they cannot doe in reason but that they thinke it lesse cleane than fish 34. The Helcesaites make Christ in heauen to differ from Christ on earth as Theodoret. de haeret fab c. de Helcesaeis doth testifie Christum non vnum dicunt saith he sed hune quidem supernè illum infernè so Papists aboue make Christ visible and palpable but in the Sacrament neither visible nor palpable 35. The Eutychianistes deny that Christ after the vnion of the two natures had a true body but as Leo signifieth ser 6. de teiumo 7. mensis a body without shape dimensions or circumscription they said also that Christ was both in heauen and earth at one time against whom Vigilius disputing lib. 4. contr Eutych c. 4. saith that the flesh of Christ when it was on earth was not in heauen and being now in heauen is not on earth and these points of Eutychianisme the Papists haue reteined for they say Christs body is really in the eucharist where no shape nor dimensions of a body do appeare they saie also that Christs body is both in heauen and earth at one time which taketh away all circumscription from Christs body and is contrarie to the doctrine of Vigilius Theodoret also Dial. 2. doth refute this heresie by similitude of the eucharist for that the substance of bread remaineth in the Sacrament after consecration 36. The Papists also in many points conspire with the enemies of Gods grace the Pelagians Augustine de haeres c. 88. saith that they hold that without grace a man may performe all Gods commandements and Bellarmine de grat lib. arb lib. 5. c. 5. 9. hath these words solis naturae viribus posse aliquem ad breuissi●ū tempus omnia sernare scilicet diuina mandata he shifteth off the matter by adding quoad substantiam operis but the Pelagiani no doubt being pressed would say so much nay if man haue freewill as well to obserue the law as to breake the same then must he needes be able alwaies to performe all the law by force of his freewill The Pelagians beleeue that a man may bee without all sinne so likewise doe the Papists in effect for they say that euery man hath freewill to abstaine from all sinne and Bellarmme lib. 4. de iustific c. 11. saith that man is able to performe the law of God perfectly of which it followeth necessarily that he may be without sinne for he that performeth the law of God perfectly is without all sinne They teach that concupiscence by baptisme is sanctified and being before euill doth afterward beginne not to be euill as may be collected out of S. Augustine lib. 6. contr Inlianum c. 6. and their argument is for that the guilt of concupiscence is remooued by baptisme the Papists also hold that concupiscence after baptisine is no sinne and of this it followeth that concupiscence is sanctified by baptisme The Pelagians say that we haue a strong and firme freewill not to sinne and the censurers of Colein̄ and Bellarmine in diuers places affirme that sinne is subiect to our will and that man by freewill hath power to doe good and to abstaine from euill he that list to fee diuers other points of concordance betwene Papists and Pelagians let him read my last challenge Andradius handling the point of freewill saith that Philosophers by force of their freewill were able to atteine true faith and iustice by which they might be saued doe not then Papists come neere Pelagians 37. The Donatistes as S. Augustine saith haeres 69. beleeued that Christs church was confined in Afrike and remained in the faction of Donatus quod ecclesia Christian Africa Donati parte remanserit they rebaptized also catholike Christians the Papists likewise confine the church within the iurisdiction of Rome and saction of the Pope they presume also to rebaptize better Christians then themselues 38. As the Circumcellions so the Papists thinke it meritorious to kill all that are opposite to their sect as the practises of Pius the fifth Sixtus the fifth and other Popes against Queene Elzabeth the French King Henry the third and fourth Prince Maurice and diuers other Christian Kings and Princes the massacres of France and Flanders doe shew Sixtus Quintus did commend the execrable murder committed by Iames Clement a Dominican Frier Iohn Ghineard a Iebusite was hanged for mainteining the bloody doctrine of murdring Princes excommunicat by the Pope 39. Sigebertus Gemblacensis doth accompt it an heresie to beleeue that the Pope can assoile subiects from their obedience or excommunicat such as will not rebell against Princes haresis saith he pestilentissima populū percellit yet this heresie doe Papists mainteine both by their doctrine and practise 40. The Audeans or Anthropomorphites did imagine God to haue a shape and figure like to a man which if the Papists doe not beleeue then why doe they worship God the father in the similitude of an old man and if this bee not the likenesse of God but of an apparition why doe they giue Gods honor to their owne fancies 41. Origens heresie was that he beleeued that the damned might in the end be saued as Augustine de haeres c. 43. sheweth from this they digresse not far that beleeue that Traiaus soule was fetched out of hell by the praiers of Gregorie furthermore if Purgarorie be in hell why may not soules as wel be fetched out of other partes as that part of hell 42. Eunomius taught that so a man were of his religion it skilled not greatly what sinnes he committed asseuerabat saith S. Augustine de haeres c. 54. quod nihl cuiquam obesset quorumlibet perpetratio ac perseuerantia peccatorum

the doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets and therefore we may not thinke that they taught that Christ had a bodie inuisible or inpalpable or that his body was in heauen and earth at one time and yet not continued to it selfe or that his soule was omnipotent or omniscient or that Christians were to beleeue that dogges and hogges did eat Christs body and yet that all the communicants saue the Priest were to be excluded from the cup of the new Testament or that Christ is onely the meritorious cause of our iustification and saluation and that formally we are iustified and saued by our owne workes or that remission of sinnes cannot be obtained vnlesse we come to auricular confession and haue the Masse-priests absolution or that the Pope by his indulgences out of superfluous merits of Saints is able to deliuer soules from purgatory or other popish heresies and wicked doctrines before mentioned for these doctrines are contrarie to the holy scriptures in which the summe of the Apostles preaching is conteined Gregory the first lib. 4. epist 32. doth dislike the title of vniuersall bishop and calleth it sacrilegious and prophane he doth also condemne the worship of images lib. 7. epist 109. and lib. 9. epist 9. and commendeth Serenus the bishop of Massilia for reproouing the adoration of images neither doth he allow any more than the historicall vse of them that Purgatory which Gregory the Dialogist speaketh of differeth much from popish purgatory being rather designed for veniall sinnes than for satisfaction for temporall paines after the fault remitted lib. moral 19. c. 16. hee sheweth that the bookes of the Machabees are not canonicall scriptures and lib. 14. moral c. 32. that Christs body is solide and not like a spirit and lib. 4. dial c. 55. that things aboue in the eucharist are vnited to things below summa imis consociantur of which it followeth that there is no such presence as the Papists imagine nor any transubstantiation for if the bodie of Christ residing aboue be vnited to things below then is not Christs body included within the accidents of the host nor is the bread and wine abolished Augustine the Monke brought with him a crosse and the image of our sauiour in a table and did sing litanies as Bede testifieth lib. 1. hist Angl. c. 25. but we doe not read that hoe filled Churches with images or that hee worshipped Christs image or the crosse with latria or that in his litanies he called vpon Saints or Angels Bede saith they praied to God litanias canentes c. domino supplicabant If then we cannot find the points of popery which we refuse in the writings of the Apostles or in any record mentioning the doctrin of Ioseph of Arimathaea Eleutherius Gregory or Austen but rather find them to bee opposite to their doctrine and denised afterwards then vnlesse we meane to remooue the ancient limits and bounds set downe to vs by our fathers and to refuse the counsell of the holy ghost Prouerb 22. wee may not returne to popery forasmuch as the first conuerters of the inhabitants of this land were no authours nor fauourers of popish superstition heresies impieties and blasphemies CHAP. XV. That popish religion is most falsely termed Catholike religion and Papists Catholickes CAtholicke religion as Vincentius Lirinensis in his commonitory chap. 3. doth teach vs is that which alwaies hath beene beleeued and of all Christians wee are to hold saith he that which alwaies hath beene beleeued of all Christians for that is properly Catholicke but the faith of the Romish church conteined in the Popes decretales and disputes of the canonists and schoolemen hath not alwaies beene beleeued of all Christians their faith therfore is not catholike the assumption is proued not onely by the nouelties of the decretales glosses of Canonists and summes and resolutions of the schoole diuines but also by the falsehood and contrarieties of the doctrine therein conteined Nicholas in his decretale ego Berengarius de consecrat dist 2. teacheth that Christs body sensually is handled with the hands of Priests and torne with teeth but this is contrary to scriptures fathers and truth Innocent in the chapter firmiter de sum trinit fid cath saith that the bread is transubstantiat into Christs body which is false for Christ saide of bread which hee tooke this is my bodie The Canonists honour the Pope as a God on earth as the head foundationmonah rcand spouse of the Church the schoolemen brabble one with another and sometimes change their owne opinions Bellarmine lib. 2. de purgat c. 3. confesseth that Thomas Aquinas changed his opinion concerning the merit of soules in Purgatorie most schoole-men build doctrines of faith vpon Philosophicall grounds and vary both from scriptures and fathers in their doctrine of the diuine attributes of Christs body and soule of merits of sacraments and diuers other points how then can we repute these doctrines to be catholike It is the Property of Catholikes saith Vincentius Lirinensis commonit c. 34. to keepe the doctrine committed to them and left with them by the auncient fathers and to auoid profane nouelties but the doctrine of schoolemen concerning the diuine attributes concerning the examples of the persons of the Trinitie brought by the master of sentences the eating of Christs body by brute beasts and diuers other points is ful of profanenesse and nouelties their reasons also are more philosophicall and sophisticall then Apostolicall all the points in controuersie betwixt vs and them are mere nouelties as the decretales whereon they depend declare Leo epist 81. saith that there is one true only perfect and inuiolable faith whereto nothing can be added and from which nothing can bee taken but vnto this faith the Popes haue added their determinations concerning traditions the carnall reall presence of Christs body and blood in the sacrament of the Lords supper transubstantiation the communion vnder one kind the Popes vicarship generall and vniuersall power purgatory indulgences the worship of images and diuers other pointes of doctrine doth it not then appeare that popery is nothing else but a corruption of doctrine comming in after the publication of the Christian Catholike faith and added vnto it Furthermore as the Apostolike doctrine is catholike and vniuersall so hereticall opinions are particular and peculiar to certaine sects and persons and times but wee haue shewed that Popery is nothing else but a packe of old and new heresies Lastly by many particulars it may be proued that the doctrine of Papists hath neither beene taught at all times nor imbraced of al christians nor spred ouer al the world which doth plainly declare that neither the doctrine is catholike nor the professors thereof truely termed Catholickes First they teach that the scriptures are an imperfect rule and vnsufficient without traditions and speake lewdly of them calling them a nose of waxe a killing and dead letter a matter of strife and what else they list to deuise in their

of her image there to be idolatrous 14. They celebrate the feast of our Ladies conception and of the assumption of her body into heauen as appeareth by their missals and breuiaries but Catholickes drslike both as grounded vpon apocryphall fables and lying legends S. Bernard epist 174. speaking against the feast of her conception saith she needed no false honours 15. Catholickes neuer beleeued that Christ had a body inuisible impalpable and not comprehended in a place S. Augustine de essentia diuinitatis saith that Christ according to his humane nature is visible corporal and local but our aduersaries teach that his true body is in the sacrament where it is neither seene felt nor circumscribed in a place 16. They speake reuerentlie of Christs body and hold it blasphemy to say that the same may be cast into the fire or eaten of dogs or hogs or other brute beasts but the Papists doe not so much as goe about to cleare themselues of this blasphemy 17 They teach that Christ had a body like to ours in all things sin except the Papists beleeue that his body is really in the sacrament and conteined in the compasse of a consecrated host and that the same is inuisible and able to penetrat other solide bodies without the dissolution of their substance but such abodie no man euer yet had nor by nature can haue 18 They beleeue that euery body is continued to it self or as Logicians call it continua quanutas but Papists beleeue that Christs body is in heauen and earth and euery altar and yet not in the middle places whereby it followeth that Christs head in heauen is not continued to his feet being in a consecrated host in earth 19. Vigilius lib. 4. cont Eutych saith that Christs body being now in heauen is not on earth and that is the faith of Catholickes but the false and pretended catholickes beleeue that his body is both in heauen and earth and diuers distant places at one time 20. Catholickes beleeue that Christ only is our redeemer for so the Apostle teacheth vs Rom. 3.1 Cor. 1. and diuers other places but Bellarmine in his first booke of indulgences teacheth vs that saints and others may be called redeemers all his consorts also teach that the Pope by his indulgences redeemeth soules out of purgatorie 21. Catholickes acknowledge that Christ is our iustice for so the Apostle 1. Cor. 1. expresly saith they beleeue also that we are iustified by faith in him as we read Rom. 5. but Kellison in his suruey and his consorts teach that he is onely the meritorious cause of our iustification and that we are formally iustified and saued by our owne workes 22. Catholickes doubt not to make their election sure and being iustified by faith haue peace with God and are perswaded that nothing shall separate them from the loue of God for all this is Apostolike doctrine but Papists teach their followers to doubt of their election and of the grace of God towards them and depriue them both of peace of conscience and of all assurance of Gods grace 23. Catholickes beleeue that Christ was wounded for our transgressions and that he hath borne our infirmities and that by his stripes we are healed for so the Prophet Isay cap. 53. teacheth vs. but the pretended popish catholickes do lash themselues and hope by their owne stripes to heale their sinnes and to satisfie for them and without this satisfaction they beleeue that no man can obteine remission of sinnes 24. Catholickes euer spared their owne bodies but certaine heretickes and idolaters did vsually afflict their bodies and lash themselues before their idols in lashing of themselues therefore the Papists imitate the Priests of Baal and not true Catholickes 25. Catholickes beleeue that their sinnes are purged by the bloud of Christ as we read Hebr. 1. but Papists beleeue that their sinnes are purged in purgatory and by their owne satsifactions 26. The Greekes to this day neuer beleeued Purgatory neither doe any of the ancient fathers beleeue that after our sinnes are remitted Christians are to satisfie for temporall paines either in this life or in purgatory the doctrine therefore of purgatorie will neuer be proued Catholicke 27. The Apostles and ancient fathers neuer knew nor heard of the doctrine and treasure of the Popes indulgences this doctrine of Papists therefore is to bee abolished as not Catholicke 28. True Catholickes neuer beleeued that Christians were iustified by mariage the master of the sentences saith it is onely a remedy against sinne but Papists hold they are iustified by marriage aswell as by other Sacraments 29. The doctrine of the conuenticle of Florence concerning the forme of priesthood popish confirmation extreme vnction and their number of seuen sacraments cannot bee proued to be Catholicke 3. Bellarmine lib. 2. de effectu sacrament c. 3. and other his consorts affirme that Christians are instified by the sacraments ex opere operato or by their owne act and worke wrought whereby it followeth that they are iustified by greasing crossing and such like acts but this doctrine is not catholicke the Greekes to this day acknowledge no such doctrine nor is any such thing to bee found in ancient writers 31. The Greekes to this day renounce the Popes supremacy the ancient fathers neuer heard of a triple crowned Pope with a crossed slipper and a guard of Suitzers the doctrine therefore of the Popes generall vicarship taught by Bellarmine in his bookes de pontisice Rom. and by others is not Catholicke 32. Papists teach that some sinnes are done away by holy water and without repentance and that such sinnes deserue not death but the Apostle Galat. 3. sheweth him to be accursed that abideth not in all the words of the law to doe them and Rom. 6. saith that the wages of sinne is death this is also the faith of all Catholickes but of the efficacy of holie water to doe awaie sinnes true Catholickes say nothing 33. Papists offer the sacrifice of the masse pro redemptione animarum suarum for the redemption of their soules but Catholikes doe not hope for redemption but by the sacrifice of Christ once offered vpon the crosse 34. They make Christians eaters of mans flesh and drinkers of mans blood really and literally as their words in the chapter ego Berengarius dist 2. de consecrat do import but our Sauiour saith that the spirit quickeneth and Saint Augustine tract 25. in loan sheweth that Christs flesh is not to be receiued with our mouth or teeth vt quid paras dentem saith he why doest thou prepare thy teeth 35. They make their Priests creators of their creator as Innocentius in his bookes de myster missae stella Clericorum and Boner in his speech to the Priests in Queene Maries time in expresse words doe declare but Christians and Catholikes abhorre to heare Priests called creators or God to be made a creature 36. They make the Priest to intercede for Christs bodie and blood saying supra quae propitio