Selected quad for the lemma: body_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
body_n church_n head_n mystical_a 8,581 5 10.6663 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A17301 Grounds of Christian religion laid downe briefly and plainely by way of question and answer / by H.B. Burton, Henry, 1578-1648. 1631 (1631) STC 4143; ESTC S734 16,088 50

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

formes of bread and is not the cup then superfluous A. Neither is Christs body carnally vnder the formes of bread nor is the bread sufficient alone to represent Christs death without the cup which powred out doth represent the shedding of Christs bloud for vs as the bread broken doth the breaking of his body And Christs ordinance must in no sort be broken Q. But doth not the bread wine after the words of consecration cease to be bread and wine their substance being changed or transubstantiated into the very body and bloud of Christ nothing but the colour and sauour of the elements remaining A. The bread and wine being consecrated by the word prayer receiue a change indéed in regard of their vse being now sacred which before were common but not in regard of their substance which remaineth one and the same still Q. But is it not said of the bread This is my body and of the wine This is my bloud And are not Christs words true A. Yes Christs words are true and because they are true therefore the substance of the bread is not changed into the substance of Christs body and so of the wine Q. But is not God omnipotent Cannot he change the substance of bread into the substance of Christs body A. God is omnipotent and therefore he cannot lye But such a change must néeds import and imply a lye for 1. Christs body is in heauen and therefore cannot be in earth and in many places at the same instant 2. Christs body was made of the substance of the Uirgin and therefore not of the substance of a peece of bread Q. Why doth Christ say then This is my body A. He saith no otherwise of this Sacrament then he doth of all the rest both of the old Testament and of the New For so circumcision is called the Couenant being but a signe and seale of it as Gen. 17. 10 11. The Paschall Lambe is called the Passeouer Exod. 12. 11. though it were but the sacrifice and memoriall of the Passeouer v. 27. So baptisme is called regeneration Tit. 3. 5. though it be but a signe and seale of it And thus the Sacramentall bread is called Christs body so that this is the constant language of the holy Ghost in all the sacraments both of the old and new Testament to call the signes by the name of the thing signified that we might not be deceiued in the meaning of the holy Ghosts words Q. But are the Sacramentalll elements bare signes Doe they not worke grace effectually of themselues A. They neither worke grace effectually of themselues nor are they bare signes but these signes are called by the name of the thing signified to signifie that they are meanes ordained of Christ to confirme to the faithfull receiuer the thing signified not of themselues but by vertue of Christs institution where the conditions of faith and repentance be obserued Q. What then is euery man to doe before he come to the Lords Table A. He must examine himselfe 1. Cor. 11. 28. Q. Wherein is a man to examine himselfe A. In two things 1. touching his knowledge of the Sacrament 2. touching his knowledge of himselfe Q. What is a man to know touching the Sacrament of the Lords Supper A. He must be able to discerne the Lords body 1 Cor. 11. 29. Q. How is that Lords body discerned A. By two things 1. by the outward elements of bread and wine as they are consecrated to an ●oly vse which must not be receiued as ●●●●mon bread and wine secondly by the analogy or proportion which they beare to Christs body Q. What analogy or proportion do the consecrated bread and wine hold with Christs body and bloud being receiued by the faith of the Communicant A. A twofold proportion one in respect of the benefits of Christs body and bloud to euery faithfull receiuer signified by the benefits which the body receiueth by the bread wine the other proportion in respect of the communion of Christs mysticall body signified by the nature of the bread wine Q. What be the benefits which the body receiueth by the bread and wine A. These Nourishment strength and comfort bread strengthening and wine comforting mans heart and so becomming one with our body Q. What doe these signifie A. That Christs death receiued and applyed by faith in the Sacrament doth strengthen our faith and comfort our consciences in the pardon of our sinnes and so nourisheth vs to eternall life Christ becomming one mysticall body with vs by faith liuing in vs. Gal. 2 20. Q. What is the other proportion which the bread and wine doe beare of Christs body A. They beare a proportion of the communion of his mysticall body Q. What call you Christs mysticall body A. The whole company of the faithfull elect vnited in one mysticall body of Christ. Q. Wherein stands their communion A. In two things in the vnion of euery true beléeuer to Christ the head 2. In a communion with the members among themselues all ioyned to that one Head Q. How is euery member vnited to Christ the Head A. By the holy Ghost and by a holy faith 1. Cor. 12. 12 13. Gal. 2. 20. Q. How are all the mysticall members of Christ vnited in a communion together as of one body A. By charity and by the vnity of the spirit Eph. 4. 2 3 4 5 6. Q. How doth the Sacramentall bread and wine signifie or represent this communion of Christs mysticall members in one body A. As one and the same bread is made of many graines and one and the same mysticall body of Christ is made vp of many members euen all the faithfull whereof consists the holy Catholike Church the Communion of Saints Q. What vse make you of this knowledge concerning the sacramentall signes A. It leades me to the examination of a second knowledge namely concerning my selfe before I come to communicate at the Lords Table Q. What are you chiefly to examine concerning your selfe before you come to the Communion A. Two things especially my faith and my charity Q. Why these two especially A. Because by hauing faith and charity I come to discerne the Lords body while by faith I am vnited to Christ my Head and by charity to the mysticall body of Christ the communion of Saints Q. How is your faith to be examined A. By the nature of sauing faith and by the fruits of it Q. You shewed me before the nature of sauing and iustifying faith which you must examine in your selfe whether it be truely in you or no according to that of the Apostle 2. Cor. 13. 5. Tell me therefore what be the speciall fruits and signes of sauing faith A. They are especially two to wit repentance and charity Q. What is true repentance A. It is a godly sorrow causing repentance vnto saluation not to be repented of 2. Cor. 7. 10. Q. Why is it called a godly sorrow A. Because it is a
not vnto them but vnto God represented by them A. No for we are forbidden to make any image or picture of God at all much lesse are we to worship God in or by it Deut. 4. 15 16. Q. True God forbad them to make no similitude of him because they saw no forme of God in the mount But may we not make the picture of Christ and so pray before it or a crucifixe A. No in no wise for to make such a picture were to make a lie because a false representation for first no man now for 16. hundred years almost euer saw Christs body as he was before his death And secondly no mortall eye can behold his face in heauen which passeth the brightnes of the sun And thirdly though we had the true picture of his body yet it is not lawfull to pray before it as hauing no warrant in Scripture for it but against it as in the second commandement Q. But may we not pray for our friends departed A. No it is vaine because all that die goe immediately either to heauen or to hell When Dauids child was dead he ceased praying for it saying Wherefore should I fast or pray any longer And there is no example nor rule in Scripture for praying for men departed so as it is against our faith in Gods word Q. But is there not a third and middle place namely Purgatory where souls must be purged before they come into heauen into which no vncleane thing can enter A. Purgatory is a méere deuice of mans braine to pick fools purses who must pay swéetly for so many masses for their friends soules And it is a blasphemous doctrine destroying the blood of Christ which alone doth purge euery true beléeuer from all his sins 1 Ioh. 1. 7. It leaues neither spot nor wrinkle nor any such thing Eph. 5. 27. And for Purgatory it is not so much as once named in all the Scripture as heauen and hell are And if purgatory or any materiall fire could purge away sinne as it neuer can then Christs blood was spilt needlesly and in vaine And it is against nature for a materiall fire to work vpon a spirituall substance as mans soule is Q. Is faith in Christ then sufficient to carry a man straight to heauen A. Yes surely for so Christ saith Ioh. 5. 24. Q. But no man is saued out of the Church which is then the true Church of Christ visible A. That Church whose faith is guided by the onely rule of Gods Word and hath the due administration of the Sacraments Q. Cannot that be a true Church of of Christ visible which denyeth the Scriptures to be the onely rule of faith A. It cannot Because the onely rule to know the true Church by is the Scripture Secondly because humane Traditions being against the Word of God and yet added to it as an equal rule of faith and of equall authority quite razeth the foundation of faith Because such Traditions destroy the Scriptures and in vaine do such worship to God teaching for doctrines the commandements of men Mar. 7. 7. And will worship separates from Christ. Col. 2. 19 23. Q. But is not that a true yea and the onely true Church of Christ on earth visible which hath one visible head as the Pope A. No. Such is neither the onely true Church no nor yet a true member of the true Church of Christ visible on earth Q. Why so A. Because such a visible Head must needs be the great Antichrist who vsurpes that title and office which is proper to Christ alone for such a one as the Pope saith in effect I am Christ because hee takes vpon him all the offices and prerogatiues of Christ ouer his Church He vsurpes Christs Kingly office challenging subiection of all men great and small vnder paine of damnation Secondly hee vsurpes Christs propheticall office challenging a freedome from and an impossibility of erring a power to determine all matters of faith Thirdly the Pope vsurpeth Christs Priestly office in challēging a plenary power to pardon sinnes and in setting vp a breaden Christ in the masse to be a propitiatory sacrifice for quick and dead And thus be is that Antichrist spoken of 2. Thes. 2. who sheweth himselfe that he is God Q. What becomes then of that body which cleaues to such a head A. He is so powerfull in all deceiueablenes of vnrighteousnes and hypocrisie that those doe perish who trust vnto him such as are possessed with a strong delusion to beléeue lies that they all might be damned who beléeued not the truth but had pleasure in vnrighteousnesse 2 Thes. 2. Q. But is not that the onely true Church of Christ visible which only can shew a visible vninterrupted succession of Bishops sitting in Peters chaire euer since the Apostles times Is not this visibility of succession an infallible mark of the true Church of Christ visible A. No surely for first for Peters chaire that 's but made of cunning net work to inclose and catch the silly fish And if euer Peter had béene Bishop of Rome what is Peters chaire without Peters faith and doctrine They haue quite destroyed Peters doctrine 2 Pet. 5. 2. who said féed the flocke of God c. taking the ouer sight of it not by constraint but willingly not for filthy lucre but of a ready mind neither as being Lords ouer Gods heritage but being ensamples to the flocke But the Pope and his Clergy doe quite contrary Secondly visible succession of Bishops is no true mark of a true Church of Christ vnlesse it can shew a true succession of doctrine from the Apostles writings For may not errours and heresies créepe vpon the same particular visible Church and so in time insensibly like a gangrene eate into the very heart of it and so leaue it nothing but the very carcasse of a Church as it hath done with the Church of Rome Thirdly the succession of Romish Bishops hath had many interruptions so as the chaire hath béene empty for many yéeres together the body wanting a head or els hauing sometimes two sometimes thrée heads at once while thrée Popes were at once Once a woman Pope made the interruption And so many hereticall Popes so many Simoniacall so many exercising diabolicall artes haue made a fearfull interruption neuer to be made vp againe Q. But how can the Protestant Churches proue themselues true Churches while they cannot shew an vninterrupted line of succession of such and such Doctours as haue from age to age conueyed the Doctrine of Christ and of his Apostles downe to our very times A. This is as friuolous as it would be a tedious taske It sufficeth vs that we can shew our faith to be euidently grounded vpon doctrine of the Apostles and so we are sure wee succéede them in their doctrine and faith though perhaps wée cannot punctually and particularly number vp all those Doctours by whom we haue receiued it from hand to hand It sufficeth