when as of olde the people were wont to communicate euerie daye and therefore hee calleth the Lordes Supper a daylie sacrifice The Papistes are so farre from reproouing the people for not communicating that they make prouision onely for one to eate and drinke at the Altar and not for manie and they inuite not the people to communicate with them but rather by the noueltie of their newe inuented religion they distinguishe the Altar from the Communion table and the Sacrifice from the SacrameÌ„t farre contrarie to the custome of the Primitiue Church who by a Metaphore called the Sacrament a Sacrifice and by the like Metaphore called the Communion table an Altar If anie man will rudely presse the wordes of Chrysostome expresse contrarie to his meaning let him vnderstand that the like forme of speaking is vsed in Holy Scripture where it is saide And no â—…an receiued his testimonie to wit the testimonie of Christ. The meaning is not that no bodie receiued the testimonie of Christ but that verie fewe receiued it Euen so the meaning of the words of Chrysostome is that verie fewe of the people did communicate And this hath bene verie judiciously marked by Master IEWELL that worthie Bishop in his disputation against master Harding To bee short in this head of Antiquitie of the Popish Masse Their bragging of Antiquitie is not vnlike to the Gibeonites shoos which were olde and put on of purpose to deceiue yet were not their shoos so olde as the shoos of GODS people which by the miraculous worke of GOD lasted fourtie yeeres in the Wildernesse and were not rent GODS people might haue bragged indeede of ancient and vnrent shoos but the deceitful Gibeonites they bragged and deceiued Gods people with antiquitie falsely pretended Such is the antiquitie of the masse and no better Before I leaue this head I will admonishe the Reader not to bee deceiued with olde Latine transations of Grieke Authors Socrates writeth of the fauourers of Paulinus that after hee died they communicated not with Flauianus bishop of Antiochia but they kept Assemblies apart by themselues Nowe the wordes of the Grieke language 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is better translated this way Separatim conuentus faciebant than as some olde Latine interpreters translate the wordes Separatim missarum celebrabant solennia howbeit the olde interpreters by missarum solennia vnderstand nothing but Ecclesiasticall conuentions IN the second head we haue the definition of the Masse to be set downe and to bee examined The Masse is called a sacrifice propitiatorie vnbloodie wherein the Priest offereth the bodie of the Sonne of God to the Father vnder the formes of bread and wine and that without suffering for the sinnes of the quicke and the dead From the worde of Sacrifice auncient Fathers did not abhorre but they called the Holy Sacrament a Sacrifice of thankesgiuing and a commemoratiue Sacrifice of the death of Christ the wordes of Augustine are these Hujus sacrifitii caro ante aduentum Christi per victimas similitudinum promittebatur in passione per ipsam veritatem reddebatur post ascensum Christi per sacramentum memoriae celebratur that is to say The flesh of this sacrifice was promised by sacrifices of similitudes In the suffering of Christ it was in verie deede exhibited and after the ascension of Christ it is celebrated by a Sacrament of His memoriall In these wordes Augustine distinguisheth a sacrifice prefiguratiue before Christes comming and a sacrifice commemoratiue after the Lordes ascension from the sacrifice of Christes bodie in veritie and actually exhibited vpon the crosse other sacrifices point out as types and figures the great sacrifice of the bodie of Christ once offered vpon the crosse but they are not that selfe same sacrifice except by a figuratiue manner of speach And like as the towne Nicopolis was not the victorie of Augustus Casar when hee faught against Antonius and Cleopatra but it was onely a memoriall of the victorie Euen so the commemoratiue sacrifice of the new Testament is not the true sacrifice of Christes bodie but only a memoriall of that blessed sacrifice Iustinus Martyr had good occasion offered vnto him to write of the sacrifices of Christes Church because Paganes slaundered Christians and called them Atheistes in regarde they offered not bloodie sacrifices nor incense vnto their God to whome Iustinus returned this answere That Christians offered to GOD such sacrifices as they knew to bee moste acceptable to Him to wit the sacrifices of prayer and thankesgiuing And as concerning the creatures of God appointed for the sustentation of mankinde we keepe them saith hee for our owne vse and for the sustentation of indigent people but we consume them not with fire If there had bene anie corporal sacrifice in the Church of the bodie of the Sonne of God vnder the formes of bread and wine Iustinus had occasion offered vnto him to haue spoken of it but hee knew no such sacrifice in his time Yea and the sacrament of the Lords Supper is called by Iustinus a Sacrifice of thanksgiuing who confidently affirmeth that prayer thanksgiuing are the onely sacrifices perfect and acceptable to GOD euen at that time when the Sacrament is ministred which putteth vs in remembrance of the Lordes suffering Testimonies out of the bookes of ancient Fathers should bee cited without fraude and deceite and should not bee wrested to another sense and meaning than they were spoken into by the Authors And so the worde Sacrifice could offend no man if it were spoken in such sense as ancient Fathers spake it The Romane Church shoulde doe well so to remember the names that ancient Fathers haue giuen to the Sacrament that they shoulde not forget that Holy Scripture calleth it a Communion of the bodie and blood of Christ. Then let it be such a sacrifice wherein many participates of one bread and one cup and thereby sealeth vp that they are all members of one mysticall bodie of Iesus Christ but not such a sacrifice wherein the people standeth gazing and looking and the Priest alone eateth and drinketh and distributeth nothing vnto the people They answere that the Priest who offereth at the Altar he communicateth with others who doe the like seruice in other places This is but falsehoode in reasoning arising vpon the deceitfull handeling of one worde hauing two significations The worde Communion importeth two things First a Communion in religion Secondly a participation of the Holy Supper in one place and an eating of one bread and drinking of one cuppe and in this second sense it is taken by the Apostle in the 10. Chapter of his first Epistle to the Corinthians in which sense their priuate Masse cannot be called a Communion The second word of the definition of the Masse is propitiatorie This word doeth signifie a sacrifice purchasing remission of sinnes as the Apostle witnesseth And this honour doeth onelie appertaine to the sacrifice of Christ who
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sub 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is wee offer in remembrane of his death and this which wee offer is a type to wit commemoratiue of that which he offered But because they hing by an haire and if any ancient Father cast out one worde albeit it were hyperbolically spokeÌ„ they fasten their gripes vpon it as if it made altogether for them Now Chrysostome saieth This Sacrifice which we offer is one and the selfe same Sacrifice which Christ offered Is it not good reason hee haue libertie to expounde the meaning of his owne words and so he doeth Our Sacrifice and Christs Sacrifice is one because we celebrate a remembrance of that Sacrifice once offered vpon the Crosse and of none other But that Sacrifice which Christ offered vpon the Crosse hath no neede to be reiterated saith Chrysostome in that same Homilie because it is like vnto a medicine which beeing once applyed hath a perfect vertue to saue vs from all our sinnes Hitherto I haue declared that the words of Consecration if they bee expounded as auncient Fathers expounded them they make nothing to proue the doctrine of Transsubstantiation Nowe let vs proceede further to see howe this definition of Transsubstantiation agreeth with the doctrine of the Apostles and of other auncient Fathers The Scriptures of God neither acknowledge an euanishing of the substance of bread and wine neither yet a chaunge of their substance into the substance of Christs bodie and blood For as much as the Apostle Paul speaking of the sacred elementes of the Lordes Supper at that time when they seale vp our conjunction with Christ which is not before the blessing breaking and distribution but after these holy actions the Apostle calleth the eating of the blessed bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the drinking of the blessed Cuppe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a communion of the Lords bodie and blood not excluding the substance of the elementes but expressely pointing out the wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the bread and the cuppe The moste ancient Fathers are moste vnacquainted with this Noueltie of Transsubstantiation for they all in one voyce for the space of 500. yeeres doe consent that the substance of bread and wine remaineth in the Sacrament after the wordes of Consecration albeit the vse of the elementes bee changed Iustinus Martyr saith that the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper are made the flesh and the blood of Iesus in that same forme that the eternall worde of God was made flesh but so it is that the substance of the diuine nature neither euanished nor yet was changed into the substance of flesh And in like manner the bread is made the body of Christ neither by the euanishing of the substance thereof nor yet by changing the substance thereof into another substance In like manner Ireneus when he saith that the holy Eucharist consisteth of things earthly and of thinges celestiall by mentioning of earthly things hee would declare that the substance of the bread and wine remaineth after the consecration And lest any man by shifting wordes shoulde saye that Ireneus meaneth not by earthly thinges the substance of bread and wine but rather the accidents hee expresseth his owne meaning in the 32. chap. that he is speaking of the bread and the cuppe Ambrose speaking of the operatiue vertue of the Lords word in the Sacrament he saith that the elementes remaine that same thing which they were they are changed into another thing because the substance of the elements remaineth and their vse is changed Like as a regenerated man in substance both of soule and body is that same man that hee was before yet in qualities and conditions there is a great change And who can interprete the words of Ambrose better than hee himselfe doeth illustrate them by the foresaide similitude Theodoretus in his first Dialogue saith that God hath honoured the elements in the Sacrament with the name of His bodie blood not by changing of their nature but by adding grace vnto nature And in his second Dialogue he saith that after the wordes of consecration the elementes remaine in their former substance shape and forme The wordes of Theodoretus are not more effectual to instruct vs in the right judgement concerning the nature of the Sacrament than the very purpose whereat hee aimeth in those his Dialogues They are written of purpose to refute the heresie of Eutyches who affirmed that after the diuine nature assumed the humane nature all became diuinitie and there was not two distinct natures in Christ but one only Theodoretus for refutation of this heresie bringeth a comparison taken from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper in the which the bread in substance remaining bread assumeth a name and vse that it had not before by diuine institution to be called the bodie of the Lord Euen so the diuine nature of Christ assumed the humane nature without any change of the one natuâ—…e into the other Moreouer he proueth the veritie of Christs humane nature by this That the elements in the Sacrament of the Supper are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is signes types and figures of the bodie and blood of Christ. And incase he had not a true body how could the elements in the Sacrament be figures of his bodie These speaches of Theodoretus doe import two thinges First that the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper remaine still in their owne substance and their substance is neither changed nor euanished Secondly that in the holy Sacrament of the Supper there are signes not accidentall but the elementes in their owne substance remaining are signes of the body and blood of Jesus Christ. And howe these two things can agree with the doctrine of Transsubstantiation let the judicious Reader consider Augustine in like manner is so farre from imagining that the substance of the bread is euanished or turned into another substance that he putteth a difference betwixt Sacramentum and res Sacramenti counting the elementes Sacramentum and the bodie blood of Christ res sacramenti Now concerning the elements that is the bread and the wine he affirmeth that some doe eate them vnto saluation others doe eate them vnto damnation but as concerning the body and blood of Christ which Augustine calleth res sacramenti in expresse tearmes he saith No man receiueth them but onely to eternall life Of this it is euident that Augustine calleth that Sacramentum which is eaten either worthily or vnworthily either to saluation or to damnation And he is speaking of the substance of bread and wine which can bee eaten drunkeÌ„ and not of accidents which no man can eat or drinke But wherefore doe I spende time to cite testimonies of Fathers to prooue that after the wordes of blessing the elements in the holy Supper neither change their substance nor yet doeth their
other parts make seruice in his Church without letters of recommendation 14. Let a Pres byter leauing a lowe place and presuming to an higher incurre that same punishment which a Bishop deprehended in the like fault should incurre 15. A Presbyter who attaineth to a Church by giuing money for it let him be deposed 16. Let tythes bestowed vpon Churches by aduise of Bishops be faithfully distributed to the poore by the Presbyters 17. The families of Bishops shall bee instructed in the summe of the true faith In the knowledge of the retribution to be giuen to good men and the condemnation of vngodly people and of the resurrection and last judgement and by what kinde of workes eternall life may bee promerited and that the Homelies containing these instructions shall bee translated into Rusticke Latine language to the end that euery person may vnderstand them Marke in what estimation the Latine language hath bene at this time that instructions in Rusticke and Barbarous Latine are counted better than instructions in good French Language 18. It is the duetie of the Bishop to instruct his Presbyters concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme what it is that they should desire the people baptized to renounce namely they should renounce the deuill all his works his pomps Now the works of the Deuill are murther fornication adulterie drunkennesse and other such like faultes But the pompes of the Deuill are pride ostentation swelling conceites vaine glory lostinesse and such other faultes as spring vp from such groundes 19. Presbyters are precisely to bee admonished that when they say the Masse and doe communicate they doe not distribute the Lords bodie indiscretely to children and to all persons who happen to bee present who if they bee entangled with great sinnes they procure vnto themselues rather damnation than any remedie to their soules according to the saying of the Apostle Whosoeuer eateth this Bread and drinketh this Cuppe vnWorthilie hee shall bee guiltie of the bodie and blood of the LORD Let a man therefore trie himselfe and so let him eate of this Bread and drinke of this Cuppe By this let the judicious Reader marke that euen in the dayes of Carolus Magnus priuate Masses had no place but they who were duely prepared did communicate with the Priest 20. Presbyters shall not suffer the holy Chrisme to be touched by euery man 21. Presbyters shall not resort to Tavernes to eate or drinke 22. Bishops and presbyters shall prescribe to sinners who haue confessed their sines pennance discretly according to the weightinesse of their fault 23. Chanons who dwell in Cities let them eate in one Closter and sleepe vnder one roofe to the ende they may bee readie to celebrate their Canonicall houres From the 24. Can. vnto the 32. are contained Constitutions concerning Monkes and Nunnes which I ouer-passe with silence fearing to bee prolixt Can. 32. All men should studie to peace and concorde but especially Christians forsaking hatred discorde and enuie 33. Lordes and Iudges should bee obedient to the wholsome admonitions of their bishops and bishops on the other part should reuerentlie regarde them to the ende they may bee mutually supported euery one with the consolations of another 34. Lordes and Iudges are to bee admonished that they admitte not vile and naughtie persons to beare witnesse in their judicatories because there are manie who for a contemptible price are readie to make shipwracke of a good conscience 35. Let no man for his decreet receiue a rewarde for diuine Scripture in manie places for biddeth this as a thing that blindeth the eyes of the wise 36. Let euerie man bee carefull to support indigent persons of his owne familie and kinred for it is an impious and abominable thing in the sight of God that men abounding in riches should neglect their owne 37. Christians when they make supplications to God let them in humble manner bowe downe their knees following the example of the Martyr Steuen and of the Apostle Paul Except vpon the Lordes daye and other solemne dayes on the which the vniuersall Church keepeth a memoriall of the Lordes resurrection and at such times they are accustomed to stand and pray 38. Faithfull people must be admonished not to enter into the Church with tumult and dinne and in time of Prayer and celebration of the Masse not to be occupied in vaine confabulations and idle speaches but euen to abstaine from wicked cogitations 39. Let not the Consistories and Iudgement seates of secular Iudges bee in the Church or portches thereof in any time to come because the house of God shoulde bee an house of Prayer as our Lord Iesus Christ saieth 40. Let it bee forbidden that Merchandize be vsed vpon the Lordes daye or Iustice Courtes because all men should abstaine from seruile laboures to the ende this day may bee spent in praysing and thanking God from Morne till Euen 41. Incestuous persons parracides and murtherers are found who will not hearken to the wholsome admonitions of Church men but perseuere in their vitious conuersation who must bee reduced to order by the discipline of the secular power 42. Let the people bee admonished to abstaine from Magicall Artes which can bring no support and helpe to the infirmities of men and beastes but they are the deceitfull snares of the Deuill whereby hee deceiueth mankind 43. A frequent custome of swearing is forbidden wherein men vpon euery light occasion willing to purchase credite to that which they speake they take God to bee witnesse of the veritie of their speaches 44. Manie frie subjectes by the oppression of their Masters aro-redacted to extreame pouertie whose causes if our clement Soueraigne please to examine hee shall finde that they are vnjustlie redacted to extreame indigence 45. A false measure and a false ballance is an abomination vnto the Lord as Salomon recordeth The 46. Canon containeth a regrate that tythes were not duely payed to the Church notwithstanding that the Church had giuen in their complaint to the ciuill Magistrate whereby it came to passe that not onely Lightes in the Church and steependes to the Clergie beganne to inlacke but also the very Paroch Churches became ruinous 47. When generall Fastinges are appointed for any impendent calamitie let no man neglect the fellowship of the humbled Church for desire to fearce his bellie with delicate foode 48. Drunkennesse and surfetting are forbiddē as offensiue both to soule and and bodie and the ground of many other sinnes 49. Lords and Masters are to bee admonished not to deale cruelly and vnmercifully with their subjectes yea and not to seeke that which is due vnto themselues with excessiue rigour 50. Let Laicke people communicate at least thrise in the yeere vnlesse they bee impeded by some hainous sinnes committed by them 51. In the last Canon mention is made that they diligently examined the cause of them who complained to the Emperour that they were disherited by the donation of landes which their fathers and friends had bestowed
the Essenes a sect of the Iewes of whose customes Iosephus accurately writeth And indeede the similitude of the maners of the Monkes and the Essenes conuerted to Christian Religion agreeth in many points for they had all things common they laboured with their hands were men accustomed with long abstinence from meate and drinke Eusebius reserreth the beginning of the Monasticke forme of liuing to the auditors of the Euangelist Marke in Alexandria for a number of them inclined their minds to the contemplation of diuine mysteries and separated themselues from the companie of the multitude who dwelt in townes and they had their habitation in the wildernes about the lake Maria or Maris This place was called the Wildernesse of Nitria Eusebius confirmeth this opinion by the testimonie of Philo. Finally some referre it to the time of the tenne Persecutions at what time many fled to the Mountaines to the Wildernesse and to solitary places wherein they contracted such a custome and habite of solitary liuing that euen in time of peace and when Persecutions were ended they continued still liuing in the Wildernesse Whatsoeuer was the originall of the Monasticke life it is certaine there was a greater show then substance of Religion in it for bodily exercises they profite little the not sparing the bodie is counted by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a voluntary Religion which men haue inuented to themselues and GOD hath not commanded it True it is that men doe well if they subdue their bodies as Paul did to bring it in subjection lest by any meanes when he had preached to others he himselfe should be reproued And as true it is on the other part that incase men repose vpon these outwarde exercises as thinges in themselues meritorious and referre them not vnto the right ende as Paul did yea and if they joine not with abstinence from meate an abstinence also from sinne the LORD regardeth not the outwarde affliction of the bodie as the Prophet Isai clearely declareth in these wordes â—…s it such a fasting that I haue chosen that a man should afflict his soule for a day and to bow downe his head as a bulrush and to lie downe in sacke-cloth and asshes Wilt thou call this a fasting or an acceptable day to the LORD In the very originall ground of the Monasticke life I see this infirmitie That men imagined by changing of place to bee free of the snares of the Deuill But it is otherwise Adam was tempted in Paradise CHRIST was tempted in the Wildernesse and Sathan is ready to spreade his nette both in the prison and in the palace and by changing of place we cannot be free from his malice In the Epistle written by Basilius Magnus to Gregorius this is illustrate by the fit similitude of a man who saileth in a ship and findeth himselfe to bee sicke and secretely in his owne mind blameth the greatnesse of the vessell whereinto hee saileth but when hee steppeth downe into the little bote that accompanieth the ship his sicknesse continueth and is not abated whereby hee is compelled to come to a consideration of the right cause of his sicknesse that it is neither the great vessell nor the little vessell that is the cause of his grieuance but rather the corrupt humours that lurke within his owne bodie Euen so the permutation of place will not make vs free of the tentations of the Deuill as some men imagined And like as the consolations of GOD are not tyed to any certaine place for Moses in Arabia and vpon Mount Horeb was delited with the sight of GOD and in Pisga with the long expected sight of the promised land and the Apostle Iohn in the Isle of Pathmos saw many comfortable reuclations euen so the perilous snares of Sathan are spred out euery where no lesse then the consolations of GOD are The Monkes of olde were not all of one ranke for some of them were called Coenohitae or Conventuales Others were called Anchoritae The conuentuall Monkes albeit they were separated from the fellowship of the common people yet they had a fellowship amongst themselues and some of them dwelt in the Wildernesse such as the Conuentuall Monkes of Aegypt dwelt in the Wildernesse of Nitria and Schethis but the Conuentuall Monkes of Syria Persia Armenia and other places not so neere approaching to the Equinoctiall line as those of Aegypt were they dwelt in Townes and Villages because the inclemencie of alterable weather permitted them not to dwell in the Wildernesse as the Monkes of Aegypt did Notwithstanding some of the Conuentuall Monkes of that part of Syria which is called Interamnis or Mesopotamia as it were striuing against nature ouer-went the Monkes of Aegypt in that which the Apostle calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a not sparing of the bodie for the Monkes of Aegypt dwelt in little Cottages and ate some quantitie of bread after long abstinence but the Monkes fore-saide had their remaining vpon the Mountaines and were couered with no roofe of any shop or lodge defending them against the injurie of the weather except onely with the roofe of Heauen and they ate no bread but only refreshed their hungrie bodies with the rootes of hearbes which they houcked out of the ground and for this kinde of pasturing the people called them Greges Of this ranke of conuentual monks about Nisibis Mount Sigeron were the monks following famous and much renowned to wit Batthaeus Eusebius Barges Abbos and Lazarus who afterward was ordained a Bishop and Abdaleos Zenon and Hetrodorus an olde man of whom Sozomen in the place aboue specified maketh particular mention To all these Conuentuall Monkes wheresoeuer they dwelt this was common that they were diuided into Conuentes and euery Conuent was gouerned by one Gouernour whom they reuerenced as children reuerence their father The Anachorites were Monks who dwelt in the Wildernes seuerally by themselues not deliting in fellowship as the Conuentual monks did Ruffin maketh the more reuerend record of the Anachorites or Eremites of Aegypt because he visited them had the honour to be blessed by imposition of their hands such as two Eremites bearing the name of Macarius Isidorus Pambus Moses Benjamin Scyron Helias Paulus in Apeliote Paulus in Focis Poemen Ioseph in Pispiri of whom there are large treatises in the Ecclesiâ—…sticall Historie Some of the Anachorites were so rude and iâ—…mane that they bowed their faces to the ground and ate 〈◊〉 and hearbes as beastes doe and if they had seene another mâ—…n they fled from him hid themselues as if they had no bâ—…ne procreated of the race of mankind The brethreÌ„ of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of whom Plutarch writeth are to be set by as vnworthie of any further remembrance And the common people justly called them Armenta that is Cattell There was yet another ranke of Eremites
lying narration with lying miracles wrought at the sepulchres of Iosâ—…phat some time King of India and Barlaam an Eremite whose bones hee alleadgeth were transported by King Baracbias out of the Wildernesse into the Countrey of India but I leaue Damascene lying and I proceede Vnder the shadowe and coloure of all this counterfeit glorie aboue mentioned from the sixe hundreth yeere of our LORD vntill our owne time horrible abominations hath beene hatched so farre surpassing the defections preceeding the sixe and seuenth hundreth yeere of our LORD as the darknes of the winter night goeth beyonde the darkenesse of the summer night Beside the doctrine of Images where of Monkes were the principall authors yea and Paulus Cyprius before hee coulde procure the gathering of the second Councill of Nice entred into a Monastrie as it were into the shop and office house of Sathan and with his vntimous sorrowing moued the Empresse Jrene to gather the Councill fore-saide But beside this I say Monks were the first forgers of the doctrine of Transsubstantiation for Damascene expreâ—…ely writeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the very Bread and Wine are changed into the Bodie and Blood of the LORD And againe he saieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the Bread and the Wine are not a figure of the Bodie and Blood of CHRIST but the verie Dei-fied Bodie of our LORD This errour was receiued dispersed and propagated the more willingly in Monastries because it was forged by the braine of a Monke Likewise the doctrine of the merite of mens workes cuen such workes as are superstitious and not commanded in the Law of GOD This doctrine I say as a banner displaide against the merites of the sufferings of CHRIST it was chiefely spred out in Monastries wherein the grand our of great and legible letters made their opinion knowne to the worlde ORDO SERVAT US DUCIT AD VIT AM that is The keeping of order to wit Monasticke rules leadeth to life Other points of erronious corrapt doctrine where of they are not the first inuenters they are the principall propagators of them as namely prayer for the dead and the opinion of purgatorie these errours inuented of old had died out long agoe as the fires of Aetna and Vesuvius haue done if that the fables of Monkes dayly renewed had not beene like vnto fewell intertaining the flame of foolish opinions The vilde and vnchaste conuersation of the Monkes from the sixe hundreth yeere of our LORD vntill our time he who vndertaketh to describe it vndertaketh an â—…nnecessarie worke as they did who of olde commended Hâ—…rcules whom no man did 〈◊〉 euen so they who presume to describe the vnchastitie of Monastries and Nunneries they spend time in vaine to prouâ—… that thinâ—… which no man can denie yea and their owne speaches contâ—…ine a confession oâ—… the Guiltines of vnchaste liuing When any of their number is dâ—…prehended in whoredoâ—…e and aduâ—…rie they do not aggre gâ—… thâ—… fault as a shame and dishonouâ—… done vnto their holy Order but rather extenuâ—…e the horrour of sinne saving it is better to bee a secrete whore-monger than an open Heretique The commendation that the Poet Nigellus giueth to the Nunnes of the Gilbertine order in our neighbour Countrey is but slender namely this that when they were aged they left off bearing of children This Order began in ENGLAND ANNO 1140. The Monkes and Nunnes of our owne Countrey where they were best knowne they were worst liked and â—…hey might haue suffered a triall of anie persons except of neighbours and such as knew them well In other Countreyes albeit the turpitude of an vnchaste life was couered with lesse transparent vailes alwayes GOD is like vnto himselfe and hee hateth the workers of iniquitie Let S. Adonei a Monke of Rowâ—…m bee an examplarie type of the maners of manie others when hee fell ouer the bridge in the night time and drowned in the water of Seane the good and euill Angels stroue for his soule because it was to bee doubted whether his foote-steps led to the Church or to his harlot And in ende the decision of this controuersie was referred to RICHARD Duke of Normandie It appeareth by this fable inuented by Normand Monkes that their purpose was not only to excuse the villanie of Adonei and to count him a Saint but also to encourage themselues to lasciuiousnesse because the good Angels woulde striue for the soule of a villane who was cled with an holie Monkish habite and at last the decision of the controuersie must bee referred to some mortall man not vnlike vnto Paris who was more fauourabiie inclined to Venus then hee was either to Iâ—…no or Minerva Now it is time to speake of the multiplied number of the orders of Monkes not to make a perfect reherâ—…all of them but to let the Reader vnderstand that the woride groned vnder the charge of an importable burthen which neither were they willing to shake off nor able to beare it Ouer and beside the multiplied number of the branches of the Augustine and Benedictine Orders aboue specified other Orders also sprang vp such as the order of the Charterus Monkes where of Brâ—… a man bo ne iâ—… Colne was the author ANNO 1080. It is rumored that a certaine man in Paris died who was renowned for the honestie of an vnreproueable life notwithstanding after his death in audience of the people who were assembled to performe the last funerall duetie to him hee sate vp in the bire and vttered terrible wordes that hee was accused and in the righteous judgement of GOD condemned Bruno was present and heard these tragicall wordes and saide vnto the people If so bee that this man bee condemned it is not possible that any man can bee saued except hee renounce the worlde And so being accompanied with a few followers he went into a Wildernesse neâ—…re to Gratianopolis and was the author of a new Order of the Charterus Monkes whose continuall abstinence from flesh vnmanerly silence and purging with fire the footesteps of women was in their opinion a renouncing of the world If this bee true the people of Aethiopia called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue renounced the worlde and are neerer to the Kingdome of GOD then the Charterus Monkes By the like Diabolicall inuention the Order of Catherina de Senis was found out ANNO 1455. The marks of CHRISTS sufferinges the spousing Ring shee receiued from CHRIST with foure pretious Pearles of inestimable value the emptying her body of her owne heart to the ende the heart of CHRIST might bee thrust in place of it What are all these forgeries but as the filthie exhalation of a stirred mire of vncleanenesse yet are these fables published to the worlde in that booke laden with lies called Chronica Chronicorum yea and this woman was canonized by Pope Pius the seconde ANNO 1470. And the Order of S. Catherene was receiued amongst other holy orders Hospitalarii Templarii Teutonici gladiatores
Nestorius Hee was present likewise at the second Councill of Ephesus and consented to the restitution of Eutyches Hee was deposed in the Councill of Chalcedon receiued in fauour againe after humble confession of his fault This is that famous author whome the Romane Church citeth for the fable of the Assumption of the Virgine MARIE When hee returned to Ierusalem a number of turbulent Monks arose vp against him and desired him to accurse the Councill of Chalcedon which when hee refused to doe they chused another bishop called Theodosius but the Emperour Martianus commandement was strait to fetch Theodosius aliue vnto him therefore he fled and Juvenalis returned againe vnto his place The names of Anastatius and Martyrius who followed Iuvenalis for their assenting to Basiliscus and to Petrus Gnapheus are not worthie to be insert in this catalogue Of other Pastors and Doctors THeodoritus was B. of Cyrus a towne in Syria whose builder seemes to haue beene Cyrus King of Persia a man of excellent learning liued vnder the Emperours Theodosius 2. Valentinian 3. and Martianus Hee had the ouersight of eightie parishes lying within his ample diocie He is bold to affirme in a cerraine Epistle written to Leo bishop of Rome that by his trauailes a thousand soules within his bounds were reclaimed from the heresie of Marcion Hee fell into many lamentable troubles The ground of all was the extraordinare loue hee caried toward his owne Patriarch Iohn B. of Antiochia For like as he accompanied him to the Councill of Ephesus so likewise hee concurred with him in the deposition of Cyrillus B. of Alexandria and Memnon B. of Ephesus but the Councill gathered at Ephesus tooke triall in the cause of Cyrillus and Memnon and absolued them and damned Iohn B. of Antiochia his complices Theodoritus was one of the number The second trouble followed vpon the necke of the first for by instigation of his patriarch John he wrote against the 12 heades or 12. theses of Cyrillus written against Nestorius wherein he mistaketh the doctrine of Cyrillus as if he had falne into the errour of Apollinaris but after that Cyrillus wrote a declaration of his owne meaning it was found that both Cyrillus and Theodoritus professed one faith and they were reconciled Neuerthelesse Theodoritus was damned in the second Councill of Ephesus for writting against Cyrillus neither beeing cited accused nor conuict of any fault Theodoritus complained to Leo B. of Rome of the outrage of Dioscorus bishop of Alexandria who had damned him in a Councill before hee was heard Leo absolued him and the Councill of Chalcedon after hee had pronounced Anathema against the errours of Nestorius and Eutyches they in like maner absolued him And finally after his death in the 5 generall Councill his writings against the 12. heades of Cyrillus were damned All these troubles proceeded from one and the selfesame ground to wit vpon the extraordinarie loue hee caried toward his patriarch Iohn This one thing laid aside he was nothing inferiour to the most wise acurate and learned writers of the ancient time In the first of his learned dialogues called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he prooueth that the Word became flesh without changing of the diuine Nature into the humane Nature or the humane Nature into the diuine Euen as in the Sacrament of the Supper of the LORD the bread becomes the body of the LORD not by changing the substance of it but by assuming by grace an other vse than it had the very symbol obtaineth the name of the thing represented by the symbol When Papists doe read the dialogues of Theodoritus let them leaue off to brag of the antiquitie of the doctrine of Transsubstantiation and take them to the Monke Damascene the first author of their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he continued at least 30 yeeres in his ministrie and ended his life as is supponed vnder the reigne of Leo the first Augustine in his young yeeres was infected with the errour of the Manicheans His mother Monica watered her face many times with teares in her prayers begging at GOD his conuersione to the trueth GOD heard her prayers hee was sent to Millan to be a teacher of Rhetoricke by the preaching of Ambrose B. of Millan and the deuote behauiour of the people in singing Psalmes to the praise of GOD the like whereof Augustine had neuer seene in any place before for men in earth praising GOD with ardent affection seemed to represent the Angels of heauen who incessantly praise GOD with vnspâ—…akable delite Also with the reading of the life of Antonius the heremite he was wonderfully moued begâ—…n to dislike his former conuersatioÌ„ which he had spent in worldly pleâ—…sures and went vnto a quiet garden accompanied with Alipius with many teares he bewaâ—…led the insolencie of his bypast conuersation wishing the time to be now come whereinto without farder delay his soule should be watred with the dew of the conuerting grace of GOD. And as he was powring out the griefe of his wounded heart to GOD with a flood of teares hee heard a voyce saying vnto him tolle lege and againe tolle lege that is to say take vp and read take vp and read At the first heating he took it to haue bene the voyce of boyes or maides speaking in their play such wordes one to another but when he looked about and could see no body he knew it to be a celestial admonition warning him to take vp the booke of holy Scriptuâ—…e which he had in the garden with him and read Now the first place that feâ—…l in his hands after the opening of the booke was this Not in gluttonie nor drunckennes nor in chambering nor wantonnesse nor in strife or enuying but put on the Lord Jesus Christ and take no thought of the flesh to fulfill the lâ—…stes thereof At the reading whereof he was so fully resolued to forsake the vanities of the world to become a Christian that immediatly thereafter he was baptized by Ambrose B. of Millan with his compenion Alipius and his sonne Adeodatus After this he returned to Africke and was coadiutor to Valerius B of Hippe as Chrysâ—…stome was to Flauianus in Antiochia and â—…fter them also with extraordinarie giftes of knowledge but the writers of this time especially Evagrius who concludeth his historie with the death of Mauritius bringeth in many famous men in this Centurie gifted with power to worke miraculous workes But when I consider the ende of these miraculous workes they are brought in either to confirme the sanctimonie of the monasticke life the adoration of the Grosse or some other grosse superstition Zosymas a Monke is commended by him for his propheticall foreknowledge of the ruine of Antiochia and for the miracle of the Lion who slewe the Asse that caried his victualing to Caesarea and likewise the Lion by his mandate was compelled to beare that same burden which the Asse had borne to the portes
Verely vcrely I say vnto thee except that a man be borne of Water the Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdome of God was the occasion that both August in the 4. Centurie and Chrysostome in the 5. Centurie thought that they who died without Baptisme were in the estate of those who are condemned howbeit the want of Circumcision 40. yeeres in the wildernesse not vpon contempt but onely vpon necessitie because they knewe not what time the cloud would remooue was not preiudiciall vnto the soules of the Infants all this time yea and if they had circumcised their children and had not permitted them to rest after the wound their children had died in the Wildernes Many faults are laid to their charge such as Idolatrie Fornication murmuring c. Why is not this fault also laide to their charge that they circumcised not their children in the Wildernesse Doubtlesse the Apostle in this point hath seene them to be faultlesse that they despised not the Sacrament of the Couenant of GOD but they were hindred byâ—… the necessitie of their iourneying to circumcise their children This intermission of the Sacrament was helped at Gilgal and the Campe remooued not vntill the time they who were circumcised were whole This historie might haue taught both Augustine and Chrysostome to vnderstand that the Couenant of GOD is not annulled when the holy Sacrament is neither neglected nor contemned but children are preueened by death before they can be presented to the holie Sacrament Notwithstanding these same Fathers were compelled to make exceptions from their owne rigorous sentence for they who gaue their liues for the testimonie of CHRIST before they were baptized in CHRISTS Name the forementioned Fathers were compelled to say that their Martyrdome supplied the want of Baptisme and that they were baptized in their owne blood Moreouer Ambrose who was more ancient than either Augustine or Chrysostome writing of Valentinian the second who was slaine before hee was baptized he sayes of him that as Lazarus rested in the bosome of ABRAHAM euen so the Emperour Valentâ—…nian rested in the bosome of IACOB But now to leaue speaking of ancient Fathers who were compelled both to correct other mens opinions and to make exceptions from their own opinions In this Centurie whatsoeuer was incommodiouslie spoken by ancient Fathers it is not amended but made worse by their suffrage and vote all bypast sini es are said to bee pardoned in Baptisme as Pharao was drowned in the red Sea but no word of comfort to them who beeing hindered by necessitie are preueened by death before they be baptized The simple forme of baptizing in water in the Name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost was long agâ—…e perueâ—…ted and men added oyle vnto the institution of CHRIST wherewith diueâ—…se parts of the bodie of him who was baptized was annointed but in this Centurie none amendement of preceeding errours but a continuall progresse to further superstition Albeit it came to passe by the prouidence of GOD that the holy Supper continued ministred vnto the people in both formes and the holy Cup was not withdrawne from the people by no Ecclesiasticall ordinance before the Councill of Consiance ann 1414. Notwithstanding the holy Supper was abused in making it both a Sacrament distributed to the liuing and likewise a sacrifice offered for the quicke and the dead especially for those who were alledged to betoâ—…mented in Purgatorie Surely this was a beginning of the dishaunting of the Lordes holy Sacrament for the people beeing once informed that there was as great berefite redounding to their soules by seeing the sacâ—…ifice celebrated and farre lâ—…sse hazard and danger than to communicate of the Sacâ—…ament of CHRIST his bodie and blood the ignorant people were gladly conâ—…ent to bee oft present at the sacrifice but they lothed the frequent 〈◊〉 of the blessed Sacrament of the Lords Communion Finallie in this Centurie good thinges were abused euill ma'adâ—…es were increased desection from the Faith was mightily aduanced all thinges tended vnto a lamentable decay and I conclude this second booke of the Arrian and Eutychian persecution with this exhortation to beware of the beginnings of Apostacie for albeit the shadowes of the Euening doe not vtterly spoyle vs of light yet within a shorte time after our eyes are so dimmed with multiplied and thickned shadowes that we stagger and we know not where we are walking The Lord of his vnspeakable fauour continue with vs and our posteritie the light of his euerlasting trueth AMEN FINIS Faultes escaped In the 4. Centurie in the treatise of Coâ—…ncills PAG. 126. LIN. 10. patrone read patterne In the 5. Centurie Chap. 1. PAG. 5. LIN. 15. 〈◊〉 read Rithimer In the Inscriptions of the Treatises PAG. 38. LIN. 3. Fourth read Fifth Ibidem in the treatise of mans Free-will PAG. 43. LIN. 28. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the treatise of Originall sinne PAG. 52. LIN. â—…4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ibidem Cent. 5. PAG. 56. LIN. 1 than read noâ—… Cent. 6. In the treatise of the worshipping of Images PAG. 42. LIN. 3. 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 PAG. 53. LIN. 3. knee read kine Ibidem in the treatise of Satisfaction PAG. 57. LIN. 20. Christs read Christ. Ibidem PAG. 60. LIN. 29. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 CENTVRIE VI. CHAP I. OF EMPEROVRS Anastatius AFTER ZENO succeded ANASTATIVS and gouerned 27. yeeres Hee was a patrone of the heresie of Eutyches He banished Euphemius B. of Constantinople because hee would not redeliuer vnto him that letter which he had subscribed before his Coronation wherein he was bound to attempt nothing against the true faith naâ—…ely against the Council of Chalccdone In like maner hee banished Macedonius the successour of Euphemius for the same cause for he had the custodie of the hand-write of Anastatius and the Emperour gaue secret Commandement to make him out of the way at Gangra the place of his banishment Xenoeas B. of Hierapolis a firebrand of Sathan stirred vp the Emperours minde to great rage partly by gathering a Councill at Sidon wherein they damned the actes of the Councill of Chalcedon partly by stirring vp the Emperor to wrath against good men such as were principall defenders of the true faith â—…mely Flavianus B. of Antiochia Helias B of Ierusalem The people of Aâ—…chia were very friendly to their Pastor finding that a great number of Monkes fauouring Eutyches errour had assemblâ—…d in the towne of Antiochia to compell Flavianus their bishop to accurse and abiure the Councill of Chalcedon they set vpon the Monkes and slâ—…we a number of them others leaped into the riuer of Orontes where they found a meet buriall for seditious Monkes On the other part a great number of the Monkes of Syria Caua came to support the troubled estate of Flavianus For these things as if he had bene a contentious man
of the blood that was brought within the moste Holie place Notwithstanding of all these differences betwixt the Leuiticall priesthood and the priesthood of Christ yet there was some agreement betwixt them namely this that both of them were instituted by God But the sacrifice of the Masse ouer and besides all other differences whereby it is distinguished from Christes sacrifice it is not the institution of God but a foolishe inuention of the braine of man The next part of the definition that Christes bodie is offered vnder the accidents of bread and wine agreeth not well with the glorie whereinto Christ entered by his ascension for like as the resurrection of Christ hath glorious priueledges he beeing ra sed from death death hath no more dominion ouer him Euen so the ascension of Christ to Heauen hath glorious priueledges for he who ascended to Heauen he sitteth at the right hand of the power of God and will come againe in the cloudes of Heauen and it repugneth as farre to the glorie of his ascension to appeare againe in a base similitude as it repugneth to the glorie of his resurrection to die againe But so it is that the accidentes of bread and wine are a base similitude to the blessed and glorified bodie of Christ to put on yea and baser than the shape of a seruant wherewith he was cloathed before his ascension Concerning the sacrifice of Melchisedek and their confident assertion that in the sacrifice of the Masse Christ is offered without suffering I remit these questions vnto the last head of this TREATISE The last part of the definition of the Masse containeth that it is a sacrifice for the quicke and the dead If it bee that selfe same sacrifice which Christ offered vpon the crosse not different from it in substance but only in forme of offering then behooued it to bee of infinite valour as the sacrifice offered vpon the crosse was But the multitude of Masses saide for the relieuing of one soule out of purgatorie declareth that there is not infinite and perfect valour in the sacrifice of the Masse Ergo it is not that same sacrifice in substance which Christ offered vpon the crosse Euen as a Physition who adhibiteth a plaster vnto a wound hauing full vertue to cure the wound by once applying it hee will not applie it the second time because the wounde is perfectly healed by one sole application Euen so if the Masse had perfect valour to saue as the sacrifice of Christ offered vpon the crosse had what neede were it to say manie Masses for the reliefe of one sou'e out of purgatorie More-ouer if they offer a sacrifice for the dead it is not for them who hath died in infidelitie mis-beliefe for their soules are buried in Hell and there is no redemption out of that euerlasting prison But they offer sacrifice for weake Christians of whome notwithstanding holy Scripture saieth that they die in the Lord they rest from their labours and their works follow them so weake Christians when they die their soules are not carried to purgatorie to bee tormented but vnto the place of rest and refreshment and retribution of all the good thinges which they haue done like as the Lord hath freely forgiuen them all euill which they did in their life time because they haue repented and beleeued in Christ their Sauiour The offering of sacrifice for the dead doe not only presuppone purgatorie but also that some helpe may bee procured by them who are aliue to shortē or to mitigate the paines of them who are departed this life This opinion also repugneth to Holie Scripture which admonisheth vs to seeke the Lord in a time when he may be found that is to seeke the Lord in our life time for it is vntimous seeking of the Lord after the soule be separated from the bodie Some men seeke the Lord in a wrong place some seeke him in a wrong manner and some seeke him in a wrong time as the foolish Virgines did But of all sort of seekers of the Lord they are most vnfortunate who seeke him in a time when he cannot be found and when the doore of his wedding chamber is shut and locked For others who haue sought the Lord in wrong places that is in the synagogue of Sathan where nothing was taught but a doctrine of lies and they haue sought God in a wrong manner inuocating Sainctes and worshipping Images yet afterward when they haue receiued better instruction they haue sought the Lord in a right place and in a right manner and haue found the Lord but they who seeke the Lord in a wrong time shall neuer find him IN the last head of this Treatise I promised to speake of the absurdities of the Masse which albeit they be many in number yet I shall reduce them vnto a few heads First I begin at the blasphemous Canon of the Masse whereunto the Councell of Trent hath giuen such a glorious testimonie that it is perfect absolute voyde of all errour and therefore not to bee changed or abrogated I call the Canon of the Masse that rule which prescribeth what shoulde bee saide or sung in the Popish liturgie or Masse It is not a worke composed by one author but rather a rapsodie patched vp by many authors and especially by Popes Celestinus deuised the preamble or introit to the Masse Gregorius added kyrie eleson Telesphorus gloria in excelsis Deo Gelatius the first the Collations Pelagius a commemoration of the dead Leo the third added incense Innocentius the first added the paxe Sergius the first ordained agnus Dei to bee sung other partes and members of the Masse are assigned to their seuerall authors and inuentors In it the Priest is commanded to bowe himselfe before the hostie say I worship thee I glorisie thee I praise thee Can there bee any Idolattie more monstrous than this for like as GOD hath appointed some creatures to leade vs to our God in so far as he is our Creator euen so he hath appointed other creatures to leade vs to our God in so far as he is our Redeamer Now like as it is Idolatrie to subsist in the Sunne Moone and starres and to worship them because they are but creatures leading vs to the knowledge of God our Creator Euen so it is horrible Idolatrie to worship the bread and wine in the Sacrament because they are but creatures appointed by God to leade vs to the knowledge of God our Redeamer More-ouer in the Canon of the Masse the Priest is commanded to praye such prayers as import that Hee is a Mediator betwixt Christ and his Father for hee beseecheth GOD to receiue the oblation which he offereth and in all things to make it blessed Nowe the oblation which he offereth as they affirme is the bodie of Christ. And shall a sinfull Priest be a mediator betwixt Christ and his Father Heere they forget the doctrine of Augustine who
saith that the Mediator of Intercession prayeth for vs but no man prayeth for Him And to the ende it might appeare the they are countenanced by antiquitie they insert some prayers vsed by holy Fathers in time of celebration of diuine mysteries but by a deceitfull transposition of their wordes they vtterlie peruert the right sense and meaning of the words of the ancient Fathers as namely when Ambrose saieth Command thou these to wit oblations to bee caried by the hands of thine holy Angell vnto the high Altar in Heauen Ambrose spake of the bread and wine that God would vouchsafe vpon those elements the high honour that they might represent vnto vs the blessed body blood of Christ which was like vnto an eleuation of the elements vnto the Heauen But by a deceitfull transposition of the words of Ambrose inserting them after the words of cōsecration they ordaine their sinfull Priest to pray for the body of the Sonne of God which is a notable abusing of the words of Ambrose Likewise in the Canon of the Masse there is inuocation of Saincts farre contrarie to the auncient custome of the Church who albeit they made a reuerend commemoration of the names of holy men when they celebrated diuine mysteries yet they inuocated them not as Augustine clearly testifieth saying The names of Martyres are commemorated in their owne place and order as men of God yet are they not inuocated by the Priest who offereth sacrifices The seconde absurditie of the Masse consisteth in the verie grounds thereof which I referre first to the superstition of some Christian people who had a zeale to God but not rightly ordered with knowledge Some Christian people were so superstitious that they were not content to eat the Communion bread at the holy Supper in the Church but also they carried a part of it home to their houses they ate it secretly in their chambers Of this the defenders of the Masse inferreth If it was lawfull for them to communicate alone in their chamber much more is it lawfull for the Priest to communicate alone in the Church Vpon such sandie ground is the Popish Masse builded The secōd ground of the Masse is the timorous minds of simple people who being informed by their deceiuing teachers that they might haue like benefite with lesse hazard and danger by seeing of the sacrifice as they had by participation of the Sacrament The people began to loathe the frequent resorting to the holy Sacrament and they came to see the sacrifice of the Masse Both these groundes of the Masse are abuses of the Lords holy Supper In the first ground that which Christ cōmandeth to be presently eaten in remembrance of him a part thereof is reserued to be eaten in the chamber contrary to Christs institution as is already declared In the second ground the Apostolicke precept is neglected which commandeth vs to trie our selues and so to eat drinke at the Lords table but he forbiddeth vs not to approach to the Lordes holy table if we be duely rightly prepared neither giueth hee allowance to this new forme of communicating that the people shall stand only gazing and beholding and shall communicate by the mouth of the Priest alone They who brag of antiquitie and follow new inuented toyes they haue no honour by their bragging The third absurditie of the Masse consisteth in the rotten pillars whereupon the Masse standeth to wit Trans substantiation and Purgatorie for incase the bread bee not changed into the substance of Christs bodie the priest cannot offer Christs bodie to His Father And incase there be no soules tormented in Purgatorie how doeth the priest offer a sacrifice for the dead So it is manifest that these are the two rotten pillars vpholding the Masse I shall refute the doctrine of Transsubstantiation GOD willing in its own place for the present I say If there be Transsubstantiation in the holy Sacrament then is the spirite of man corporally fedde and the body of Christ is eaten by many in the Sacrament to whom hee is not promised in the Word which is an absurd thing once to imagine it And if such a place as Purgatorie had beene then Christ who hath reueiled vnto vs all thinges necessarie to be knowne hee woulde haue reueiled that mysterie also vnto vs. But Christ hath tolde vs of the pleasures of Heauen and of the terrours of Hell but neuer a word of Purgatorie If a house builded vpon sandie grounde and leaning vnto rotten pillars can stand then possible the Masse also may consist and stand if not the Masse also is in danger to fall The fourth absurditie of the Masse is a vile abusing of places of holy Scripture for vpholding the sacrifice of the Masse In the olde Testament they confirme the sacrifice of the Masse by the fact of Melchisedek who brought foorth bread and wine to refresh the wearie armie of Abraham but not to offer these elements in a sacrifice to God And the ancient Fathers who translate the Hebrew word obtulit in stead of protulit yet their opinion is that Melchisedek offered bread and wine to Abraham for his refreshment but not to God in a sacrifice But suppose the words of Moses did sound to that sense that Melchisedek offered a sacrifice of bread wine vnto God What belongeth that to the sacrifice of the Masse wherin they say that bread and wine is not offered vnto God but the verie bodie of Christ vnder the accidents of bread and wine This was not the sacrifice of Melchisedeck Also the words of the prophesie of Malachi are mis rably abused for confirmation of the sacrifice of the Masse whereas hee saieth For from the rising of the Sunne vnto the going downe of the same my Name is great among the Gentiles and in euerie place ncense shall bee offered vnto my Name and a pure offering for my Name is great among the Heathen saith the LORD of hostes The Prophet expoundeth his owne meaning so clearelie that there is no neede of any other commentarie for hee is speaking of the calling of the Gentiles to the kingdome of God and vnder one point of the true worship of God namelie inuocation of his blessed and glorious Name hee comprehendeth all other points of Gods worship such as faith obedience and confession of God before men Tertullian Eusebius and Chrysostona expounde this pure sacrifice to bee prayer and thankesgiuing vnto GOD. Iustinus Martyr citing this place of Malachi affirmeth that this prophesie was performed at that time when Grecians and Barbarians Hamaxobii and Nomades and Scenitae offered prayers and thankesgiuing vnto GOD the Father and Creator of all thinges in the Name of IESVS who was crucified In the newe Testament besides the wordes of Christ spoken at the institution of the holie Supper where of I haue spoken already two other places are mightily abused First the place of the Epistle to the Hebrewes
and the holie Sacramentes were seldome ministred and with filthie addition of ceremonies inuented by the braine of man to Baptisme and a sacrilegious with-holding from the people the cuppe in ministring vnto them the holie Supper and so the fountaines of liuing water were stopped and cisternes were opened and the wholsome foode of GODS people was turned into ashes and in steade of preaching GODS Worde sincerelie all Church-seruice was turned into a dumbe guise of the Masse and in reading of prayers and passages of Scripture into an vnknowne language so the people for fault of good instruction withered as grasse when it is not refreshed with dewe and raine Yea and SALOMON saieth Where there is no vision the people decay PROV 29. 18. The thirde and moste venomous consequence of the Masse is procession and adoration for hosties consecrated in time of Masse although not broken and eaten they are counted CHRISTES bodie and carried about in procession and worshipped This was not the ancient custome of the Church for the sacrament consisting in the action and vse thereof so long as the blessing and the actions of breaking distributing and eating lasted the bread was counted holie and represented the bl◅ssed bodie of IESVS but after these holie actions were ended the rest of the bread that was not vsed in the Sacrament it was distributed to the poore but it was not kept in boxes to bee carried in procession and to bee adored and worshipped by ignorant people And of all thinges that are deficient in Poperie I haue of◅ times obserued that antiquitie whereof they principallie bragge is moste deficient and lacking in them The ground of Popish procession no doubt was the sending of the Sacraments to those who were sicke and absent by some necessitie But they reade not in IVSTINVS nor in any other ancient writer that people who met the deacon carrying the Eucharist to sicke persons fell downe vpon their knees and worshipped it This abominable idolatrie more vile than the idolatrie of the Gentiles was not of ancient time in vse in the Church Nowe the LORD who hath redeemed our soules from death and who hath called vs from darknesse vnto His marucilous loue establishe our soules in the trueth of GOD through CHRIST IESVS our LORD AMEN FINIS THE VIII CENTVRIE CHAP. I. OF EMPEROURS PHILIPPICVS AFTER IVSTINIAN the second was slaine PHILIPPICVS reigned two yeeres and nine monethes Great dissention fell out betwixt the Emperour Philippicus and Constantine Bishop of Rome for razing as appeareth the pictures of Fathers who were present at the sixt Generall Councell which beeing pictured in the Temple of Sophia were abolished by the commandement of Philippicus Constantine Bishop of Rome declared the Emperour an heretique and commanded that his name shoulde bee rased out of charters This was the first great direct and violent opposition that the Bishops of Rome attempted against noble Emperours Philippicus was taken and his eyes were put out by Anastasius otherwise called Artemius his Secretarie who reigned in his stead ARTEMIVS ARTEMIVS otherwise called Anastasius reigned one yeere and three monethes hee deposed Ihonne patriarch of Constantinople who kept not the true faith and placed Germanus in his steade Hee was taken by Theodosius and sent prisoner to Nice and from thence to Thessalonica where hee was compelled to renounce his Emperiall dignitie and to be cloathed with the habite of a Monke THEODOSIVS THEODOSIVS reigned scarce one yeere and when hee heard that Leo Isaurus gouernour in the East partes was saluted Emperour by the armie hee willinglie gaue ouer his Emperiall dignitie and liued a priuate and peaceable man LEO ISAVRVS LEO ISAVRVS reigned twentie foure yeeres great commotions were in his time both in Church and policie In Church-affaires hee was an hater of Images and burnt images made of wood other images hee melted and misfashioned against whome Gregorius the seconde puft vp with antichristian pride hee opponed himselfen ◅t only allowing worshipping of images but also forbidding to paye tribute to the Emperour Leo. The Emperour on the other part irritated with the proude attempts of Gregorius the second he vsed indirect meanes to cut him off but the enterprises of his deputies Marinus Paulus Eutychius and their followers succeeded vnprosperously Moreouer the Bishop of Rome sought support from the Lombardis who had beene at all times preceeding enemies to the chaire of Rome yet in Leo his dayes they were bounde with the bishop of Rome in a couenant of friendship for none other cause but this onely to shake off the yoke of the Emperours obedience And when the bishop of Rome sawe that the Emperour had great businesse in warres against the Saracens he thought it a sit occasion to drawe the dominion of Italic vnto his owne subjection and therefore with aduise of his Clergie hee both excommunicated the Emperour as a destroyer of the images of the Saincts and disauthorised him of his Emperiall soueranitie So early began the increasing grandour of the Antichrist to sende foorth the thuńder-boltes of cursinges against the annointed of the Lord. In this Emperours dayes the Saracenes passed ouer the Straites inuaded the kingdome of Spaine slewe Rodericus king of Gothes and his sonne and put an ende to the kingdome of the Gothes in Spaine after they had reigned 346. yeeres and being incited by Eudo Duke of Aquitania they marched towardes France but thorowe the valour of Carolus Martellus a man of noble birth in France they were so encountered that three hundreth thousand and threescore and ten thousand Saracenes were slaine and the countrey of France was made free of the feare of the Saracens CONSTANTINVS COPRONYMVS AFTER LEO his sonne CONSTANTINVS COPRONYMVS reigned 35. yeeres Chytreus reckoneth onlie 23. yeeres because hee hated the worshipping of images which errour had taken deepe roote in this age the writers of the historie of this time haue dipped their pennes in gall and worm-wood to blaspheme the honourable name of Constātinus but whatsoeuer Paulus Diaconus or zonaras haue written to his disgrace his name will bee in honourable account and regarde in the Church of CHRIST The Senate and the people of Constantinople addicted to the worshipping of images hated the Emperour and were glad of the false rumoured tithings of his death when hee went to fight against the Arabians they chose Artabasdus to bee Emperour in his steade But Constantine returned to Constantinople besieged the towne and recouered his owne kingdome againe Hee gathered a Generall Councell in Constantinople anno 755. wherein the worshipping of images was damned as shall bee declared God willing in its owne place In this Emperours dayes were warres betwixt the kings of Lombardis and the Bishops of Rome but the Romane Bishops begged the helpe of Carolus Martellus against Luitprand and the helpe of Pipinus against Aistulphus and the helpe of Carolus Magnus against Desiderius all kinges of Lombardis and so by continuall imploring the helpe of the Nobles Kinges of France the
argumentes whereby the seconde Councell of Nice endeuoured to approue the adoration of images are all refuted in the Councell of Frankford as I haue declared alreadie in a Treatise concerning worshipping of Images Concerning the argument taken from the authotitie of Epiphanius who in his booke called Panarium reckoneth not the worshippers of images in the roll of Heretiques it is answered by the Councell of FRANKFORD that incase Epiphanius had counted the haters of the worshippers of images Heretiques hee had likewise inferted their names in the catalogue of Heretiques but seeing hee hath not so done the Councell of Nice had no just cause to triumph so much in this friuolous argument which maketh more against them that it maketh for them More-ouer in the Councell of FRANKFORD the Epistle of Epiphanius written to Ihonne bishop of Hierusalem was read wherein hee disalloweth the verie inbringing of images into Churches and this Epistle was translated out of Grieke into the Latine language by Ierom. The Epistle is worthie to bee read Reade it in the Magdeburg Historie Cent. 8. Chap. 9. TREATISES Belonging to the VIII CENTVRIE A TREATISE Of Transsubstantiation SATHAN is a vigilant enemie setting himselfe in most opposite manner against euerie thing that is a comfort and refreshment vnto the sheepe-folde of God Now the principall comforts of the sheepe of God are the pastures wherein they feede and the waters wherewith they are refreshed Doubtlesse these two comforts are the preaching of the word and the ministration of the Lordes holy Sacraments If Sathan by any meanes can hinder the true preaching of the worde and the right ministration of the Sacramēts then his malice against Gods people is descried as the malice of the Philistimes of olde against Isaac and his cattell was manifested when they stopped with earth the foūtaines of water which Abraham had digged whereof the cattell of Isaac were accustomed to drink It cannot bee sufficiently expressed in words what malice Sathan hath born against the true preaching of the word of God the right ministration of the Sacraments The sixt persecution of Ethnick Emperoures was so directly set against the Preachers of Gods worde as the worlde might easily discerne that the intention of Maximinus was to vndoe the sheepe-folde of God for lacke of pastures and of refreshing waters For this cause let not our cogitations be rauished with admiration when we heare or reade that manie questions haue beene mooued concerning the holie Sacrament of the Lords Supper If there were not plenty of spirituall consolation to bee receiued by the right participation of this holy Sacrament Sathan had neuer busied himselfe so earnestly against it as if the throate of his kingdome were cut if this Sacrament be rightly ministred by the Preachers rightlie receiued by the people Let the Christian Reader remember that of olde vnder the tenne persecuting Emperoures the receiuing of the holy Sacrament of the Lordes Supper was called the banquet of Thyestes This proceeded from none other ground but from the malice of the Deuill hating the Lords holy banquet Secondly the Manichean heretiques so peruerted the Lords holy Sacrament that Augustine to whom their secret mysteries were not vnknowne was compelled to call their Communion Execramentum and not Sacramentum that is an execrable thing and not a Sacrament Thirdly the Donatists in ministring the Lords Sacraments were in an opinion That the Sacrament was onely effectuall when it was ministred by one of their owne number But seeing the malice of Sathan is an infinite thing and hath not a period wherein it endeth For defacing of the right vse of the holy Sacrament Sathan filled the heart of an hereticall Monke called Damascene with a lewde opinion to affirme That the bread in the holy Sacrament was transsubstantiate into the body of Christ and that the wine was transsubstantiate into His blood Which opinion I may justly call a Noueltie because it was neither in worde nor writ hearde before the seuen hundreth yeere of our Lord. But it is the custome of Papists to follow Nouelties and in the meane time to bragge of Antiquitie What abuses of the holy Sacrament followed after the seuen hundreth yeere of our Lord God willing shall bee declared in its owne time for the present thus much I say That vpon a time I saw the images of Cain and Abel pictured by an vnlearned painter with such habite as the Germanes are appareled with in our dayes These pictures made mee not to thinke that the Germane habite was in vse in the dayes of Cain and Abel but rather that the painter was a foolishe man destitute of vnderstanding Euen so when I reade the works of Damascene albeit I was at that time but young in yeeres yet I thought not that the opinion of Damascene was agreeable to Apostolicke doctrine but rather that Damascene was a foolishe and doating Monke and somewhat ambitious also desiring to be coūted the author of some new opinion which no man had maintained before him IN this TREATISE I shall first declare God willing what it is that they call Transsubstantiation secondly howe absurde an opinion it is and thirdly with what relùctation it was insinuated into the bosome of the Latine Church but euer vntill this daye was rejected of the Grieke Church Nowe Transsubstantiation as they saye is an euanishing of the substance of bread and wine after the wordes of consecration and a substitution of the bodie blood of Christ in place of the euanished substance of bread and wine the accidents of bread and wine alwayes remaining without inherence into anie subject Albeit the worde Transsubstantiation seemeth to import a change of one substance into another and the moste part of them define it to bee a chaunge of the substance of bread into the substance of Christes bodie yet some of them doe forsee a great inconueniencie if Transsubstantiation be defined to a chāge of the substance of bread into the substance of Christes bodie namely this that Christes bodie in heauen cladde with a most glorious and celestiall brightnesse and Christes bodie in earth ouershaddowed with the accidentes of bread and wine shall not bee counted one and the selfe same bodie in respect that the bodie of Christ that is in heauen was formed by the holy Spirit of the substance of the Virgine Marie and the bodie of Christ in the Sacrament woulde bee founde to bee made of the substance of bread This is the cause wherefore they who are more subtile than the rest abstaine from the grosse definition afore-saide Howsoeuer concerning the word Transsubstantiation I admonish the Reader that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an euanishing or disparition hath no affinitie with Damascenes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth a change of one thing vnto another thing that is better so that there is no good agreement amongst themselues concerning the signification of the word Transsubstantiation Concerning consecration of the elementes there are diuerse opinions The
Romane Church supposeth that the wordes of Consecration are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that is Take eat this is my bodie And againe these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Drinke all of this for this is my blood of the New Testament which is shedde for manie for remission of sinnes But the Graecian Church thought that the blessing or consecration was not only made by the words afore-saide but also by prayer as Iustinus Martyr calleth the elements 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The foode blessed by the Worde of prayer Let no man separate the thinges that CHRIST hath conjoyned together to wit prayer and the wordes of the holie institution and wee shall easilie accorde about the consecration of the elementes The time in the which the elementes are thought to be consecrated is not the time in the which these wordes This is my bodie c. are begun to bee vttered but rather when they are ended So that the consecration is not an action fashioned by partes but wholly in one minute and at once perfected when the wordes are ended Albeit I agree to this opinion with full consent of my mind yet I could wish that the Romane Church who haue auouched the same would make no exception against their owne doctrine But when they speake of the intention of the consecrating Priest which is continually vnknowne to the people the people are left in a doubt whether they are partakers of Christes bodie or not And this is not the forme of the teaching of Christ to leaue the people in a suspence and doubting but to manifest clearely vnto them the mysterie whereof they doubt if so bee it bee necessarie to bee knowne as Christ manifested to his Disciples the parable of the sower and the seede and of the husbandrie and the tares c. The first word of Consecration is the principall word impugning Transsubstantiation for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a demonstratiue pronowne and it pointeth out something and Scripture conferred with Scripture is the best Commentarie to declare what is pointed out by the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle Paule in his first Epistle to the Corinthians expoundeth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is This bread and the seconde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hee expoundeth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is This cuppe So we see that the substance of the elementes in the Sacrament of the Supper are neither changed nor euanished but remaining in their former substaÌ„ce they are honoured with a great honour to bee made Sacramentes of the Lordes blessed bodie and blood but their substance is not changed as saide is The next words of coÌ„secration are these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is is my body The bread is the Lordes body because it is the Sacrament of the Lords body like as the Sacrament of faith to wit Baptisme saith August after a maner is faith euen so the Sacrament of the Lordes body after a maner is the Lordes body the wordes secundum quendam modum and quodammodo that is to say after some maner of way so oft repeted by August is forget by papists insomuch that they remember when August saith ferebatur Christus in manibus suis quando commendans ipsum corpus suum ait hoc est corpus meum that is Christ was borne vp in his owne handes when as deliuering his owne bodie hee saieth This is my bodie but they forgette the expositorie wordes in the which Augustine manifesteth his owne meaning namelie these Accepit in manus suas quod norunt fideles ipse se portabat quodammodo cum diceret hoc est corpus meuâ—… that is Hee tooke into his handes as is knowne to the belieuers and did beare after a maner himselfe in his owne hands when he said This is my body It is better in singlenesse of hart to make a true rehearsall of the words of ancient fathers in that same sense the they spake than with deceitfull speaches to abuse the simplicitie of the Reader who possibly will not take paines to search out in what sense Augustine said that Christ did beare himselfe in his owne hands In like maner Augustine writing against Adimant saieth that the blood is the life euen as Christ was the Rocke Nowe the Apostle saieth not Petra significabat Christum but saieth Pâ—…ra erat Christus quae rursus ne corporaliter acciperetur spiritualâ—…m illam vocat id est spiritualiter intelligi docet that is the Apostle saith not the rocke signified Christ but hee saieth the rocke was Christ which againe lest it should bee taken in a corporall sense hee calleth it a spirituall rocke teaâ—…hing vs that wee should spiritually vnderstand it Then if we fellow the exposition of ancient Fathers it cannot be inferred of these wordes this is my bodie that the bread is transsubstantiated into the substance of Christes bodie for such vaine conceits neuer entered into their mindes Papistes doe grant that after consecration Sainct Paule calleth the elementes bread and wine because they haue the shewe and shape of bread and wine as the brasen Serpent was called a Serpent and Angels in Scripture are called men because they so appeared But this is a friuolous shift because the Apostle when he speaketh of bread and wine after the words of consecration he speaketh expressely of bread that is eaten and of wine that is drunken This cannot bee the shape and accidentes of the elementes but their verie substance The Angels did not appeare only in the shape of men but also had mens bodies indeede so that their feete were washed and they did eate and drinke with Abraham and Lot The brasen Serpent was not in shewe but in substance and altogether of brasse These examples helpe not An euill cause hath more neede of a true confession than of a false defence as August writeth and Chrysost. saith most truely that albeit a bitter roote may sende foorth sweete and pleasant fruites yet a roote of bitternesse can neuer produce sweete and pleasant fruites warning vs thereby to beware of men who disseminate and propagate erroures and obstinately striue against the knowne trueth of God The last wordes of the consecration are these Doe this in remembrance of mee Marke the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for albeit Christ only suffered but once yet it is his will that wee should keepe a continuall remeÌ„brance of his death because the death of Christ is the fountaine of our life Now when we offer the Sacrifice of thankesgiuing vnto God in the holy Supper because hee hath saued vs by the death of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ. This Sacrifice which wee offer differeth from that which Christ offered vpon the Crosse because that Sacrifice was but onely once offered and was receiued into the most holy place as Chrysostome speaketh but this which we offer is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
substance euanishe when I haue brought tenne times moe testimonies than I haue already done I shall receiue this answere returned vnto mee That whatsoeuer was the opinion of these Fathers the generall Councell of Lateran anno 1215. which was wiser than these fore-mentioned Fathers haue taken a deeper consideration into this matter than these Fathers did and they haue allowed the doctrine of Transsubstantiation Howsoeuer let me obtaine this fauour at the hands of the Christian Reader that he may consider that they who brag so much of Antiquitie are driuen backe to seeke refuge in the Noueltie of late Councels THE latter part of their definition wherein they say that after consecration the accidents of bread and wine such as whitenesse roundnesse and rednesse doe remaine in the Sacrament without inherence into any subject In this part I blame them againe of Noueltie No ancient Father euer spake of accidents without a subject And albeit M. Harding impudeÌ„tly citeth the testimonie of Basilius Magnus to prooue that accidentes may subsist without a subject because in the first dayes creation there was light this light had no subsistance in any subject This citing of the authoritie of an ancient Father expresse contrarie to his owne meaning and wordes is an intolerable abusing of the writinges of Fathers The words of Basilius are these as is well obserued by the learned Doctor IEWEL 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to saye The aire was lightened or rather it had the whole light whollie mingled with it selfe Hee saith not that the light was an accident without a subject but hee pointeth out the subject wherinto it had inherence euen before the creation of the Sunne to wit the aire But seeing they haue refuge continually to the Omnipotent power of God when they vtter pointes of new and absurde doctrine and they saye that God by his Omnipotent power can make that accidents shall subsist without a subject To this I answere That our disputation with them is not about the power of God but about the will of God in the matter of the Sacrament And it is the will of God in the Sacrament of the Supper to leade vs vnto Christ as the onely bread of life by whome our soules are nourished vnto eternall saluation And the Lord vseth the externall signes to leade vs to the thing signified What are we that wee should despise the simplest meanes of the working of God Not only doeth the externall signes leade vs to Christ but also the analogie and similitude that is betwixt the bread Christs body leadeth vs to a consideration of the nourishing vertue that is in Christs body to feede vs vnto eternall life But Papistes by taking awaye the substance of bread and wine and leauing only naked accideÌ„ts in the which there is no nourishing vertue they vndoe the nature of a Sacrament taking awaye the similitude betwixt the signe and the thing signified without the which Augustine affirmeth that a Sacrament cannot subsist but let vs heare Augustines owne words Si enim sacramenta quandam similitudinem earum rerum quarum sunt sacramenta non haberent omnino sacramenta non essent that is If sacramentes had not some similitude with those thinges whereof they are sacramentes they coulde not bee sacramentes at all And Theodoretus in like manner saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is The types must needes haue some similitude with the veritie IN the second head of our TREATISE the Absurdities of TRANSSVBSTANTIATION are to be considered First this opinion repugneth to the priuiledge alloted to the blesâ—…ed bodie of Christ in holy Scripture to wit that the body of the holy one of God should not see corruption but this substance which is in the Sacrament after the wordes of consecration it may putrifie and rotte therefore it is not the true bodie of Christ otherwise than sacramentallie Secondly this substance that remaineth in the Sacrament after the words of consecration is knowne to be capable of poyson for Emperours Kinges and Popes haue bene poysoned by the consecrated hostie such as the Emperour Henrie the seuenth and Pope Victor the third was poysoned in the Challice therefore it cannot bee the reall body of Christ which fâ—…edeth the soule cannot empoyson the body but it is called Christs body sacramentally Thirdly if Christes body after the words of consecration bee corporally present in the Sacrament then is it at one time both in heauen and in earth in heauen vnder a glorious similitude and in earth inuisible and ouer-couered with the accidentes of bread and wine which aggreeth not with the nature of a true humane bodie to bee at one time in diuerse places whereof I shall speake at greater length hereafter God willing Onely at this time I affirme that the Papistes are vntimously serious to proue the corporall presence of Christs body in the sacrament which position if it were granted yet are they nothing nearer to their purpose neither are we put backe in any thing whereunto we shoot and aime because if Christ were corporally present in the Sacrament as they speake yet no vertue can be drawne out of him to the comfort of our soules but onely by spirituall touching by faith as appeareth in the woman diseased with the bloodie issue The doctrine of Trans substantiation not only importeth corporall presence of Christs body in the sacrameÌ„t of the Supper but also corporal manducation of the body of Christ which is common both to godly vngodly men and this they deny not only they say that godly men eat Christs body worthily vngodly meÌ„ eat Christs body vnworthily But I affirme that if vngodly men eat the body of Christ corporally in the holy Supper then is his body receiued in the sacrament by them to whom it is not promised in the worde which is an absurde thing For like as a seale affixed to a charter sealeth vp nothing to him to whome the charter promiâ—…eth nothing Euen so the sâ—…crament cannot seale vp a fellowship with Christ to an vnbeleeuing maÌ„ because Gods promises are made onely to the beleeuers They will answere True it is the vnbelecuers haue no fellowship with Christ no not although they eat his body corporally because they eat it vnworthily But to this I answere that this their doctrine is new and vnknowne to antiquitie For ancient Fathers acknowledge a worthie vnworthie eating of the Sacrament of Christs body but not a worthy vnworthy eating of the body of Christ in respect Augustine saith Res veroipsa cujus sacramentum est omni homini ad vitam nulls adexitium quicunque ejus particeps fuerit that is to saye But the matter of the Sacrament to wit CHRISTS bodie by eueric man who is partaker thereof is receiued to life and by no man to destruction And this mooueth AVGVSTINE in another place to saye That IVDAS did eate the bread of the Lord but not the Lord himselfe who
is the true bread The doctrine of Transsubstantiation importeth also accidentes without a subject as hath beene touched in a part before in the definition of Transsubstantiation This is admirable that the Scholasticke Doctors who make Aristotle to be Master Caruer of this most holy banquet who haue acquainted themselues better with his Preceptes than with the heauenlie doctrine of the Apostles yet in this point they haue forgotten euen the doctrine of their Schoole-master Aristotle who saieth that accidentes can haue no subsistence but into a subject as if a man bee talking of blindnesse hee must also talke of eyes that are blinded and if hee talke of deafenesse hee must also talke of the eare and if hee talke of lamenesse hee must talke of some member of the bodie that is maimed and finallie if hee talke of a disease hee must also talke of some bodie either of man or beast that is diseased and this hee must doe either expressely or couertly because accidentes haue no subsistence without a subject There can bee nothing imagined more absurde more repugnant to reason than to talke of whitenessâ—… roundnesse and rednesse and in the meane time to saye there is nothing that is white round or redde The recourse which they haue to the Omnipotent power of God who is able to make accidents to subsist without a subject declareth that they neuer rightly considered the cause wherefore the Omnipotent power of GOD is mentioned in holie Scripture to wit to bee one of the strong pillars of our faith which faith commeth onely by hearing Then let this order bee kept First let GOD speake in His owne worde Secondlie let vs beleeue the worde of GOD by faith Thirdlie let the assured pillars of the Omnipotent power and infalâ—…ible trueth of GOD vpholde our faith as it did the faith of ABRAHAM But let vs not grounde vpon the Omnipotent power of GOD in matters whereof wee haue no assurance in His written worde as some of the wise men of PERSIA did who assured both themselues and others that incase they woulde distribute all their goods to the poore and throwe themselues headlonges from eminent places then their soules shoulde bee transported immediatelie to Heauen This madnesse fell out about the yeere of our LORDE and Sauiour IESVS CHRIST 759. What was this leaning of theirs to the Omnipotent power of GOD without assurance of his word but only the conceits of braine-sicke men And so let Papistes talke what they please In this purpose that God by his Omnipotent power can make accidentes to subsist without a subject I will conclude that the Omnipotent power of God is ordained to bee a confirmation to our faith and not to be a citie of refuge to foolish fables The doctrine of Transsubstantiation also importeth that the body of Christ at one time may bee in infinite places which repugneth vnto the nature of a true body which like as it is circumscribed and may be seene so likewise at one time it is onely in one place as Augustine writeth to Dardanus in these wordes Tolle spatia locorum corporibus nusquam â—…runt nec â—…runt that is to say Take from bodies the rowmes of places and they shall be no where and consequently they shall not bee at all And Theodoretus prooueth that the body of Christ is a true humane body albeit it be glorified euen in the latter daye when hee commeth to judge the quicke and the dead because it shall bee seene according as it is written Matth. 26 64. Yee shall see the sonne of man comming in the cloudes of heauen and like as it may be seene so likewise it is circumscribed and consequently it is in a place and is not turned into his diuine nature which is both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is it cannot be seene and it cannot bee circumscribed as the humane nature is It is well remarked by that learned Preacher Du Moulin that in the last edition of S. Augustines workes at Parise anno 1571. a notable place of the foresaid epistle of Augustine to Dardanus is vtterly left out by aduice of the Fathers correctors of the writings of the Auncientes namely this Destrai naturam humanam Christi si non detur ei certum spatium quo more aliarum rerum corporearum contineatur that is The humane nature of Christ is destroyed if a certaine place be not attributed vnto it wherein it is contained according to the custome of other corporall thinges What credite is to bee giuen vnto Popishe Doctors when they cite testimonies of auncient Fathers after they are deprehended to be deceitfull deprauers of their bookes Ancient Fathers a long â—…ime before the question of Transsubstantiation of the substance of the elementes in the holy Supper came in head they were reâ—…soning of the two natures in Christ to wit the diuine and humane nature and that the one nature was not turned into the other they could not find a fitter similitude than that which is borrowed from the Sacrament as I haue alreadie declared Alwayes they thinke that if any man shall imagine that by vertue of these wordes This is my body the substance of bread was chaunged into the substance of Christes body as many doe thinke euen vntill this day then in steade of one Transsubstantiation of the substance of bread into the substance of Christs body there should be two Transsubstantiations and the substance of Christs body should againe be turned into bread for like as Christ speaking of bread saith This is my body euen so Christ speaking of his body calleth it corne of wheat in these words Verily I say vnto you except wheat corne fall into the grounde and die it abideth alone but if it die it bringeth foorth much fruit If by vertue of the former wordes bread bee changed into the substance of Christes body then in like manner by vertue of these words for both are spoken out of one blessed mouth the body of Christ should be turned into the substance of corne of wheat I grant there is a difference betwixt a Sacrament and a metaphore yet in neither of them is there such vertue in the word is to change the substance of any thing IN the last head let vs consider with what strife and reluctation this erronious doctrine was intruced vpon the Church I holde the Monke Damascene to bee the first author thereof who perceiuing that his opinion was repugnant to the doctrine of ancient Fathers namely to the doctrine of Basilius Magnus who calleth the bread and the wine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is figures of the body and blood of Christ. He forgeth a friuolous shift to excuse his contradiction to Basilius because saieth hee Basilius calleth them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before the wordes of the blessing but after the pronouncing of the wordes of the blessing they are no longer figures but the very body and
blood of Christ. It is hard to bee a prolocutor for an euill cause for it is like vnto a bulge in a wall which falleth and bruiseth him who woulde sustaine it which cannot sustaine it selfe It is certaine that the bread and wine are not types and figures of Christs body before the words of consecration for it is after the words of blessing that the elements receiue this great honour to be called Christs bodie and blood that is signes externall wherewith Christes bodie and blood is spiritually exhibited vnto vs. And therefore Sainct Ambrose calleth the bread before the wordes of consecration panis usitatus that is common bread but it is after the wordes of consecration that they receiue this honour to beare the names of things represented by them as Theodoreius in expresse words writeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is â—…ee hath honoured the visible signes with the appellation of his bodie and blood not changing their nature but adding grace to nature Which place clearly prooueth that the elementes obtaine not that great honour to bee called Christes body or types of his blessed body vntill the time that by diuine grace they bee consecrated to that holy vse Mailrosius Scotus liued vnder the reigne of Charles the Great about the yeere of our Lord 800. and likewise RABANVS Bishop of Mentz these two had so acquainted themselues with the doctrine of Augustine that they could in no manner of way giue allowance to the doctrine of Transsubstantiation And about the yeere of our Lord 840. Carolus the second the sonne of Ludouicus Pius and brother to Lotharius and Ludouicus Germanicus he writ to Bertramus a Presbyter to haue his resolution concerning the mysterie of the Sacrament and after what manner of way the body and blood of Christ was present in the Sacrament To whome hee returned this answere That in the Sacrament of the holy Supper there were some thinges that were perceiued with bodily senses other thinges were taken holde of onelie by faith And the bread and the wine were to vs the body blood of Christ as MANNA and the waters of the spirituall rock were Christs body and blood to the people of the Iewes in the wildernesse This opinion aggreeth well with the doctrine of Paul that the Fathers in the wildernesse ate that same spirituall food which we eat which they could not doe by corporall manducation of Christs flesh because as yet the word was not made flesh So this opinion of Transsubstantiation did no sooner put out its head but assoone also contradiction was made vnto it About the yeere of our Lord 1020. Berengarius maintained the opinion of Augustine and other auncient Fathers hee was a presbyter of Angiers in Fraunce and denied the doctrine of Transsubstantiation and the Romane Bishops were coÌ„mooued with great indignation as appeareth by the number of Councels assembled against one poore man who durst presume to speake against the opinion once embraced by the Romane Church Leo the ninth gathered a Councel at Rome in the which he condemned the opinion of Berengarius and excommunicated him euen before he was warned to be present at the Councell and before hee was heard Hee assembled also another Councell in Vercellis about the yeere of our Lord 1051. in the which Borengarius was not present but Messengers who came to pleade his cause were imprisoned and casten into bands and the booke of Ioannes Scotus Mailrosius De Eucharistia was condemned By the way if any equitie had beene kept in these Councels looke by what reason they condemned Ioannes Scotus whose opinion Berengarius followed by the like reason they shoulde haue condemned Augustine Bishop of Hippo whose opinion Ioannes Mailrosius followed But the Romane Church cannot erre ' Another Councell was assembled by Pope Victor the successor of Leo the ninth in the which the Decree of the CouÌ„cell of Vercellis was allowed Yet all this coulde worke no contentment in their heâ—…rtes because the people of Angiers and Towrs in Fraunce liked the doctrine of Augustine Mailrosius and Berengarius about the Sacrament of the Supper Therefore another Councell was assembled at Rome by Pope Nicolaus the seconde anno 1058. in the which Berengarius yeelded to the opinion of the Pope and his Councell and his weaknesse strengthened the errour already receiued in the Romane Church mightily But the number of them who abhorred this newe found out doctrine was exceeding great therefore the Romane Church after the yeere of our Lord 1079 and after the dayes of pope Gregorie the seuenth put hand to worke And being now mightie strong they stirred vp Kings and Princes to persecute with fire and sword and all kind of hostilitie as heretiques all those that spake against worshipping of Images corporall presence and manducation of the body of Christ in the Sacrament of the holy Supper So it is manifest that this doctrine of Transsubstantiation was mightily contradicted vntill the dayes of pope Innocentius the third who in the Councell of Laterane anno 1215. gaue full allowance thereunto But when all this is done râ—…member that the vniuersall Catholicke Church dwelleth not in one countrey or city When the Romane Church was miserably infected with this miserable scabbe of pestilent errour what consent gaue the Churches of Asia and all the Grieke Churches They euer disâ—…ssented from this doctrine vntill this daye as appeareth by the last Sessions of the Councell of Florence anno 1439. Therefore let the Romane Church bragge of Antiquitie as they please the doctrine of Transsubstantiation shall neuer be found an ancient doctrine but a doctrine newe false absurd and borne out more by might of the preuailing authoritie of men than power of argumentes grounded vpon holy Scripture God teach them to returne to the ancient trueth from which they haue sliden To whom be praise and glory for euer Amen A TREATISE Of the Sacrament of Pennance IN this CENTVRIE it was a receiued custome to men to confesse their sinnes secretly to Presbyters and to receiue from them such forme of injunctions as they counted satisfactions for their faultes as appeareth clearly by the Councell gathered in Fraunce anno 742. in the which Bonifacius bishop of Mentz was Moderator In the first Canon of that Councell it was statuted and ordained That no man of the Clergie should put on armour and goe to warre-fare except one or two bishops with their presbyters and chaplens to prescribe pennance vnto them who should happen to confesse their sinnes By this it is euident that the custome of secret confession of sinnes to presbyter poenitentiarius which was excluded out of the Church in the dayes of Nectarius Bishop of Constantinople yet it returned againe and it was in vse in the VIII CENTVRIE Now in the inseription of this TREATISE I call it a SacrameÌ„t as the Romane church in our dayes call it not as though I were in the opinion that in this age the number of seuen Sacramentes