have disputed concerning the calling of the Elect according to the purpose of God is contrary unto the opinion of the Fathers and the mind of the Church But it is sure that the Massilians were Semipelagians And Arnobius on Psal 108. hath this note Mark saith he that it was of his will that he would not Because of the heresie which saith God hath predestinated some unto blessing and others unto damnation In a word whosoever pleaseth to search for this heresie he cannot find that ever there was such an one but that the Pelagians or Semipelagians have used the name to discredit the sound doctrine of Augustine and they seeing his books to be in high esteem and authority in the Church were afraid to put it upon him and they did wrest some conclusions out of his books which they did brand with the odious name of such an heresie 17. At this time was Published an Exegesis or Commentary on thirteen The Exegesis of the Epistle of Paul by Remigius is vindicated Epistles of the Apostle Paul which was lately Printed at Rome under the name of Remigius Rhemensis which lived about the year 540 a Jesuit Baptista Villapand gave out that he had found it at Saint Caecilia in Rome and did publish it as a rich treasure lying so long time in a manuscript Andr. Rivet in Critic sacr lib. 4. cap. 27. sheweth the vanity of the Jesuit seeing the same book was Printed above 30 years before that at Paris two several times and in the Book is mention of Gregory and Beda I add another reason that Exegesis on 2 Thess 2. at these words Except there come a falling away first All Kingdoms shall fall away from the Roman Empire and the man of sin to wit the Antichrist who although he is a man yet shall he be the fountain of all sins Be revealed and made manifest and the son of perdition i. e. a son of the Divel not by nature but by imitation and is called perdition because perdition shall come by him ..... He shall sit in the Temple of God shewing himself as if he were God This may be understood two waies And here he hath first that opinion that Antichrist shall be born at Babylon of the Tribe of Dan c. and then he addeth Or also he shall sit in the Temple of God i. e. in the Church shewing himself as if he were God for as the fulness of God-head did rest in Christ so in that man who is called Antichrist because he is contrary unto Christ the fulness of all wickedness and iniquity shall dwell because in him shall be the head of all wickedness the Divel who is the King above all the children of pride In these words the Apostle demonstrates unto the Thessalonians that the Lord shall not come to judgment untill there be a defection of the Roman Empire Note which now we see fulfilled and Antichrist appearing in the World who shall kill the Martyrs of Christ So far there It is true Chrysostom and others had long before expounded that Text in the same manner but none did apply it in that manner neither could it be applied before that time seeing the Empire of Rome though sometimes more weakned than at other times yet was never solow before the daies of Lotharius then every Nation had their own King and Lotharius had a part of France and a part of Italy and his Successour had no more but a part of Italy As for the appearing of Antichrist we have heard before in Sect. 14. what Gunther and Thietgaud writ unto Pope Nicolaus and in Sect. 15 what Luithpett writ unto King Lewis both which agree with this exposition and application Hence it followeth that this Commentary That Exegesis is not for but rather against Transubstantiation could not be written before this time Next consider for what cause the Jesuit and after him others do commend this Commentary to wit thereby they would prove the fancy of Transubstantiation to have been so old for on 1 Cor. 10. it is said The Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ Certainly first it is consecrate and blessed by the Priests and the Holy Ghost and then broken and now although it seem videatur or is seen to be Bread in verity it is the body of Christ of which Bread whosoever communicates he eats the body of Christ And again it is said there That Bread doth pass transit into the body of Christ neither are they two bodies but one body Because the explication of this testimony may serve for clearing many other such testimonies I will set before you the words preceding and following and then confer all together First a little from the beginning of that Chap. it is said He saith not The Rock did signifie Christ but as if it had been in truth The Rock was Christ though certainly it was not so by substance but by signification Likewise speaking of the two sons of Abraham he saith not These signifie the two Testaments but These are the two Testaments Christ then in respect of firmness is the Rock not by substance and the water which did flow out of the Rock signifieth the doctrine of Christ and the grace of the Holy Ghost of which in the Gospel Who thirsts let him come to me and drink c. It is also called a spiritual and following Rock because it signifieth spiritually Christ who followed them of which spiritual Rock following them they did drink because when human help failed them Christ was at hand giving help by whose powet who is the Word of God the Father they were delivered out of the Land of Aegypt and brought into the Land of Promise So far there And in the other place it is written thus The Cup is called Communication i. e. partaking because all do communicate of it and receive a part of the blood of Christ which it containeth in it And the Bread which we break on the Altar is it not a partaking of the Body of Christ Certainly first it is consecrate and blessed by the Priests and Holy Ghost and then it is broken and now although it seem videatur or it is seen to be bread in verity it is the body of Christ of which bread whosoever communicateth they eat the body of Christ because one Bread to wit of Christ and one Body to wit of Christ we many are who eat that Bread the flesh which the Word of God the Father did assume in the Virgins womb in the unity of person and the bread which is consecrate in the Church are one body of Christ for as that flesh is the body of Christ so that bread doth pass transit into the body of Christ neither are they two bodies but one body for the fullness of the God-head which was in him filleth also that bread and the same God-head of the Word which filleth Heaven and Earth and all things therein the same filleth the
body of Christ which is sanctified by many Priests through all the World and maketh it to be one body of Christ and as that bread and blood do pass into the body of Christ so all which in the Church do eat worthily are the one body of Christ as he himself saith He who eats my flesh and drinketh my blood abides in me and I in him Nevertheless that flesh which he did assume and that bread and all the Church do not make three bodies but one body and as they which do communicate of the body and blood of the Lord are made one body with him so they which do wittingly communicate of things offered unto Idols are one body with the Divel And in the next Chap. he saith Christ having ended the solemnities of the old Passover .... immediately he passeth unto the new Passover which he left unto his Church to be frequented or frequently observed in remembrance of his Passion and our redemption He did break the bread which he gave unto his Disciples to shew the breaking of his Body and his Passion was not to be without his own will as he had said I have power to lay down my life Take ye eat ye this is my body which shall be delivered for you As the flesh of Christ which he did assume in the Virgins womb is his true body and was killed for our salvation so the bread which Christ gave unto his Disciples and unto all them which are predestinated for eternal life and which the Priests do consecrate in the Church daily with the vertue of the God-head which filleth that bread is the true body of Christ neither are they two bodies that flesh which he did assume and that bread but they make one true body of Christ In so far that when the Bread is broken and eaten Christ is sacrificed and eaten and yet he abideth whole and alive and as that Body which he did lay on the Cross was offered for our salvation and redemption so daily that bread is offered unto God for our salvation and redemption which although it is seen to be bread is the body of Christ for our Lord and Redeemer providing for our frailty because he knew that we are frail unto sin did deliver unto us this Sacrament that because he cannot now die and we do sin daily we might have a true sacrifice by which we may be expiated Therefore because they make one body and are offered for our redemption he said This is my body which shall be delivered for you and he did add Do this that is sanctifie this body Into my remembrance that is of my Passion and of your Redemption because I have redeemed you with my blood The Lord leaving this wholsom Sacrament unto all beleevers that he might fasten this into their hearts and memory did after the manner of a man who approaching unto death leaveth some precious gift unto a certain friend saying Have this with all diligence by thee in remembrance of me that when thou seest it thou mayest remember me Which friend receiving that gift of his most dear friend if he did love him withall his heart cannot but condole and be sad for the death of his friend whensoever he beholdeth that gift left by his friend Likewise we how oft soever we come to consecrate or receive the Sacrament of that eternal gift which the Lord being to suffer left unto us to be kept in remembrance of him should come with fear and compunction of heart and with all reverence calling to mind with how great love he did love us which did offer himself for us that he might redeem us Likewise and the Cup understand he gave unto them after he had supped saying This Cup is the new Testament in my blood i. e. the Cup which I give unto you signifieth the new Testament as Fulgentius or it confirms the new Testament in my blood or by my blood Here are all the words of that book which concern the change or sacrifice in the Sacrament and we see mention of a change and a real change and a real sacrifice but no word of a change of a substance of the bread which still remaineth and is broken after consecration in remembrance of Christ's Passion and of our redemption And observe these words The bread which Christ gave unto his Disciples and unto all which are predestinated for life eternal and which the Priests do consecrate daily with power of the God-head which filleth that bread is the true body of Christ neither are they two bodies the flesh which he did assume and that bread but they make one true body of Christ Now what bread is that which he giveth unto all them which are predestinated for life but even which he did assume in the unity of his person in the Virgins womb And the Elementary bread is no more said to be his body than it is said The Rock was Christ and it is his body as all which do eat worthily are his body or made one body with him and that is not by Transubstantiation although really but in a mystery or spiritual manner albeit also the manner of the union between the Bread and Christ's body and between Beleevers and Christ's body be different in the special kind of mystery The bread doth pass into the body of Christ really in the own manner not by change of substance but of use signification office and condition And that bread is the very sacrifice of Christ in remembrance as the gift which one friend leaveth unto another in remembrance of his love so that whensoever we do sin we may have daily in remembrance that true sacrifice whereby we may be expiated And the consecrating of that bread is the sacrifice of Christ as the eating of the Lamb was the Passover the one in remembrance of their ancient deliverance out of Aegypt and the other in remembrance of Christ's Passion and of our Redemption And that bread is the body of Christ so that after the blessing or consecration it is seen to be bread and is broken and eaten These all are spoken there of that bread and therefore according to that testimony the bread is not transubstantiated but is a remembrance of Christ's Passion and sacrifice if we will speak properly And moreover at that time all Beleevers did communicate and take part of the Cup for which cause it is said there the Cup is called the communication of Christ's blood When the whole testimony is considered it serveth more against the Romish Church now than for them But to return to the Authour of the book it was Printed That Exegesis was not written by Haymo at Paris under the name of Haymo Bishop of Halberstad but as the learned Antiquary Bishop Usher hath observed in Histor Gottesc neither is it his for though the Argument before every Epistle be said to be Haymo's yet before none of them is it said that the Exegesis is his And I add
be considered as they are in themselves but as they have reference to another thing for a pledge is of that for which it is given and so is an Image the resemblance of that whose similitude it representeth .... wherefore it is the body and blood of Christ which the Church celebrateth but as a pledge and resemblance The conclusion is Wherefore most noble Prince let your wisdom consider that it is most clearly shewed by testimonies of Scripture and words of the holy Fathers that the bread which is called the body of Christ is a figure because it is a mystery and that there is a great difference between the mystery of his body and his body it self .... And we add saith he that the Bread and Cup which are called the Body and Blood of Christ do represent and are in remembrance of the Lord's death as he said Do this in remembrance of me and Paul expounds How oft ye eat this bread ... shew forth the Lord's death Now some Popish Indices have forbidden this book altogether as unlawfull and those of Doway perceiving that the forbidding of it did occasion men to look after it thought it better to let it go abroad but in some places maimed and in others perverted as where it is said visibiliter they will have it invisibiliter and where it is said secundum creaturarum substantiam they bid to expound it secundum externas species sacramenti Likewise Bishop Usser in Histor Gottes cap. 11 writes that he had seen other books of Bertram in manuscripts and containing the same doctrine especially his book De Praedestinatione which he writ in defence of the doctrine for which Gotteschalk did suffer is extant under the name of Ratrannus Monk of Corbey 22. Remigius Bishop of Altisiodor or of Auxerre about the year 880 was called Doctor Sententiosus he writ many works On Psal 10. he saith All my faith is in Christ by him only do I beleeve to be justified and saved he is my mountain and my refuge for he is my Lord which is God by nature but all ye who are men are infirm as I. On Psal 18. The Heavens declare the glory of God to wit that he saveth not by works of righteousness which we have done but of his own righteousness for all men have sinned and stand in need of the glory of God being justified freely This is the declaring of God's glory that is his mercy which is shewed by the Sun wherein God is glorified ...... So long as we are in this body it cannot be but sin is in us then it reigneth when we consent and make our will subject unto it wherefore the Apostle saith Let not sin reign in your mortal bodies therefore O Lord cleanse me and spare me but so that I be not subject to my own thoughts nor the inticement of others On Psal 21. Adam made the old people by conformity unto him to wit he was a servant but the Lord hath made the new people because he justifieth freely without our preceding merits for we made our selves sinners but the only mercy of God makes us righteous ..... The poor shall eat me that is shall receive the Sacrament of my body and blood and they shall be filled by following me and denying themselves because to eat the Lord is to have a will to follow him in all things and to be one with him On Psal 29. Eternal life is not by merit because we could fall of our selves but we could not rise of our selves but through his will that is only of mercy On Psal 33. Truly they only are blessed they only are saved which are justified by grace and not by their merits On Psal 39 When we live well let us ascribe nothing to our merits but all to the grace of God On Psal 55 If we will offer sacrifice to God we need not seek any thing without to offer within us is the Incense of praise and the sacrifice of faith On Psal 64. Propitiation is miseration shewed after sacrifice So Christ willing to shew mercie propitiari on his people became a Priest praying unto the Father with hands lifted up upon the Cross he offered a sacrifice because he offered himself on the Altar of the Cross he is the Priest he is the Sacrifice the Propitiator and the propitiation On Psal 85. God the Father could give no greater gift unto men then that he made his Word by which he made all things to be a head unto them and did fit these men to be as members unto Him so that He is God with the Father and Man with men who both prayeth for us and prayeth in us and is praied unto by us He prayeth for us because he is Priest and Sacrifice interceding daily with the Father for us He prayeth in us because he is our head neither is this any wonder if Christ and the Church be in one voice because they are in one bodie He is prayed unto by us as our God he is prayed unto in the form of God he prayeth in the form of man there the Creator here a creature On Psal 70. It is a great gift of God and a great knowledge of man to observe and understand that whatsoever he is he is nothing without the grace of God and he is nothing of himself for he which will be any thing of himself he tendeth not to be but who studieth to be something by the grace of God abideth in true being in vero esse This is grace by which we were made when we were not of ungodly we were made godlie of slaves free of damned were assumed into the Kingdom On Psal 96 Let them be confounded who glory in Images for Images are not to be adored neither is an Angel to be adored because it is said in the Revelation See thou do it not Catal. testat veri libr. 10. 23. Paschasius Rathbert Abbot of Corbeyen at the same time writ a book De Eucharistia He saith Ca. 1. Christ hath left unto us his Church no greater thing then this Sacrament and Baptism and the holy Scriptures in all which the Holy Ghost who is a pawn unto his Church doth work inwardly the mystical things of our salvation unto immortalitie But in them is nothing wondrous unto unbeleevers and yet unto them who beleeve nothing is better nothing is given more wonderfull in this World Not that these wondrous things lie open unto the eies but by faith and understanding they are savourie with divine mysteries and in them immortalitie and participation of Christ in the unity of body is granted unto mortal men Ca. 5. We drink Christ's blood spiritually and we eat his flesh spiritually wherein eternal life is beleeved to think otherwise according to flesh is death and to eat the flesh of Christ spiritually is eternal life Ca. 6. Unless one abide in Christ and Christ in him he cannot eat of Christ nor drink his blood And what is it that men eat Behold
respicere digneris c. 3. When the Priest takes the hosty into his hands before he communicateth he is ordered to pray in this manner Corporis sanguinis tui Domine Iesu Christe Sacramentum quod licet indignus accipio not sit mihi judicio condemnationi sed tua prosit pietate corporis mei animae saluti 4. When he takes the Cup he is ordred to say Gratias tibi ago Domine Sancte Pater omnipotens .... precor ut hoc Sacramentum salutis nostrae quod sumpsi indignus peccator non veniat mihi ad judicium neque ad condemnationem Whence we see that both before the consecration as they speak and after the consecration that which is received is called Bread and the Cup out of what the people offereth from what God had given them and it is prayed that God would look graciously on these things even on that Bread and Cup as he was pleased to look on the offering of Abel and that Bread and Cup is two several times called the Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood and the Sacrament of our salvation Wherefore certainly according to the Canon the Bread is still Bread and the Sacrament of Christ's body and the Sacrament of our salvation and it is not transubstantiated into Christ's body But saith the Jesuit Io. Hart against Io. Reinolds yea the Bread and Cup do tropologicè signifie the very Body and Blood of Christ I answer This is a begging of the question for we hold that there is a trope or figure in the words of Christ This is my body which they deny And why should that be denied more than to be affirmed in the words of the Canon and the rather that in the same Canon and in the prayers after consecration the Bread and Cup are expressly called the Sacrament of Christ's body and the Sacrament of our salvation A Sacrament is not the thing signified but a sign and seal of it and therefore according to the Canon there is no transubstantiation of the Bread and Wine Thirdly Concerning the 3. The denying of the Wine unto the People Communicants it is to be observed that the Canon is conceived in form of a Prayer and in the name of the People and therefore by the way I say it should be pronounced so that the people may hear and pray in the mean time but it is said now with a low voice lest the people hear and understand But to the purpose in the Canon it is said Supplices te rogamus Omnipotens Deus ..... ut quotquot ex hac Altaris participatione sacro sanctum Filii tui corpus sanguinem sumpserimus omni benedictione Coelesti gratia repleamur i. e. We humbly pray thee Almighty God that so many of us as shall in partaking of the Altar receive the holy body and blood of thy Son may be filled with all Heavenly blessing and grace Hence it is apparent that they who receive the one element should also receive the other since they are conjoined in the Canon And not any Papist can deny that the custom was otherwise at that time and some hundred years thereafter Fourthly 4. Mens merit Concerning the merits of men it is true they pray after the Agnus Dei is sung in these words Haec sacro sancta commixtio corporis sanguinis Domini nostri Iesu Christi fiat mihi omnibusque sumentibus salus mentis corporis ad vitam aeternam promerendam capescendam praeparatio salutaris per eundem Christum Dominum nostrum But whether the word capescendam doth not declare the other word promerendam to be taken there improperly or if the word promerendam should be taken properly for deserving let it be judged by the words of the Canon where it is said expressly Nobis quoque peccatoribus famulis tuis de multitudine miserationum tuarum sperantibus partem aliquam societatem donare digneris cum tuis sanctis Apostolis Martyribus ...... cum omnibus sanctis tuis intra quorum nos consortium non aestimater meriti sed veniae quaesimus largitor admitte per Christum Dominum nostrum that is We beseech thee that thou wouldest be pleased to give freely unto us sinners thy servants hoping in the multitude of thy compassions some part and fellowship with thy holy Apostles and Martyrs and with all thy Saints into whose society we beseech admit us thou not reckoning our deserving but grant us pardon for Christ our Lord's sake Who weighing these words seriously can imagine that the first contriver of the Canon could plead for salvation by his own merits or deservings Certainly these words of the Canon do renounce all our merit and teach us to rely upon the mercy of God for Christ's sake And therefore unless the first prayer be contrary unto the Canon the word promerendam is declared by capescendam that is they pray that the Communion may be a saving preparation for attaining eternal life And hereby we may learn how to expound that word mereamur in many passages of the Ancients as I have touched before I conclude this point seeing the Canon hath nothing of proper sacrifice in it nor of transubstantiation and ordereth that they who receive the bread should also receive the cup and it takes away the merit of mens work it is the mighty providence of God for the conviction of the Romish Church that the Canon continueth when so many changes have been made in the Missal and also it is a singular I will not say prudence or wisdom but policy of the Bishops and Priests that they will not pronounce the Canon so that the people may know and understand it lest the people know those errours which are so plainly contrary unto the Canon I have also observed another place A notable 〈◊〉 and change in a prayer after the Pax there is a prayer in these words O God Father fountain and original of all goodness who being moved in mercy wouldest that thy only begotten Son should for us descend into the lowest part of the world and assume flesh whom unworthy I hold here in my hands I adore thee I glorifie thee and I praise thee with my whole mind and intention of my heart and I pray that thou wouldest not forsake thy servants but forgive us our sins that we may be able to serve Thee the only true and living God with a pure heart and chast body for the same Christ our Lord's sake We see this prayer is directed from the beginning to the end unto God the Father and so have the first contrivers ordered it But now in the Missal is a division and between the words I hold in my hands and I adore thee c. the rubrick saith Hic inclinet se sacerdos ad hostiam dicens Te adoro te glorifico c. as if the words preceding were only directed unto the Father and the words following were directed unto the hosty
and to teach the people but let him teach these things that he hath learned from God and not of his own heart or the mindes of men but what the holy ghost teacheth Dist 9. cap. 6. As the truth of the old Books is to be examined by the Hebrew Books so the truth of the new craveth the rule of the Greek Language Dist 99. cap. 3. The Bishop of the first See should not be called the Prince of Priests nor the highest Priest or any such way but onely the Bishop of the first See but let not even the Bishop of Rome be called universal Dist 95. c. olim In old time he was a Bishop that was a Presbyter and ere that by instinct of the divel factions and schisms were in Religion and it was said among the people I am Apollo's and I am Cepha's the Churches were governed by the Common Counsel of the Presbyters so let Bishops know that by custom more then by truth of the Lord's dispensation they are greater then the Presbyters and that they should govern the Church in common Caus 1. qu. 1. c. Augustinus Take the word from the water and what is it but water the word is added unto the element and then it is a Sacrament whence is this vertue unto the water that it toucheth the body and washeth the heart the word doth it not because it is spoken but because it is believed for in the word it self the passing sound is one thing and the abiding vertue is another De Consecra Dist 2. c. Comperimus We have found that some when they have taken onely the portion of the holy body do abstain from the cup of the holy blood who without doubt because I know not by what superstition they are taught to be restrained should either take the whole Sacrament or be debarred from all because the division of one and the same Sacrament cannot be without great sacriledge Ca. prima quidem Till this world be finished the Lord is above and yet the truth of the Lord is also here with us for the body in which he arose must be in one place but his truth is diffused every where C. Hoc est The bread is after a maner called the body of Christ whereas indeed it is the Sacrament of his body and the offering which is by the hand of the Priest is called Christ's passion death and crucifying not in truth of the thing but in a signifying mystery Where the Gloss saith The bread i. e. the Sacrament which truly representeth the flesh of Christ is called his body but improperly that is it signifieth Ca. In Christo What do we then do we not offer every day yea but in remembrance of his death it is done in remembrance thereof what is done Ca. Quia corpus Because he was to remove his body from our eyes and carry it above the Stars it was needful that on the day of the Supper he should consecrate the Sacrament of his body and blood to the end it should be always reverenced in a mystery which was once offered in payment Many such passages are in these Decrees which differing from the doctrine of the Church of Rome now do prove that the Romish Church now is not such as it was then Pope Eugenius did approve all these Decrees and ordained that these should be read in Schools and Universities instead of all Canons and Decrees that so he might the more easily draw them all under one yoke 30. Peter Lombard Bishop of Paris at the same time followed the footsteps Some notes of Lombard's sentences of Gratian and gathered the sum of Divinity into four Books of sentences out of the writings of the Fathers but as I said of Gratians Decrees with adding mincing and changing of words and letters and suitably unto his time and these sentences were authorised as the Text in all Schools to the end none from thenceforth should search antiquity and truth any more from Fathers or Councels under no less danger then guiltiness of heresie Hear what Cor. Agrippa De vanit scient cap. 97. saith of this Scholastick Theology It is saith he of the kinde of Centaures a two-fold discipline blown up by the Sorbon of Paris with a sort of mixtion of Divine oracles and Philosophical reasonings written after a new form and far different from the ancient customs by questions and slie syllogisms without all ornament of language but otherwise full of judgement and understanding and profitable to convince hereticks It cometh to pass that the faculty of Scholastick Theology is not free from error and wickedness these cursed hypocrites and bold Sophists have brought in so many heresies which preach Christ not of good will as Paul saith but of contention so that there is more agreement among Philosophers then among these Divines who have extinguished ancient Divinity with opinions of men and new errors c. Here Barth Gravius a Printer at Lovane about the year 1565. giveth us some light In his Epistle before his Edition of these Sentences he telleth that he had a purpose to reduce all the testimonies unto the first fountains in sincerity but to his great admiration he was informed by the Masters there it could not be so because albeit in other Editions innumerable places were corrected yet many errors as yet were remaining and these not little ones and not a few things as in the Edition at Paris were changed not according to the truth of the old books but in conjecture yea and the old words were corrupted oft times through an immoderate desire of amending and in not a few places the worse was put for the better and saith he this may not be dissembled that the genuine reading of the Master in quoting the testimonies of the ancient writers is very oft changed into the truth of its original especially no old Copy witnessing that he had left it so written for the Master was not so solicitous to repeat all their places wholly but thought it sufficient to propound the matter briefly and leave out many lines in the middle and therefore it were not according to his minde to fill up what he hath omitted yea they have found by sure arguments that he had transcribed many things not from the very fountains but from Hugo Victorian and especially out of the Glossa Ordinaria where these passages are not found in a continued context as in their own Authors but maimedly and sometimes but in broken pieces as it were out of sundry Books and Chapters and mixed together as in a hotchpotch and so if any thing be corrupt in the Master it must not be reduced unto the first fountains but rather unto the Books of the Glossa because it was last taken thence And also he was sometimes deceived in reading it wrong possibly and lead into error in which case to amend him according to the square of his Author were most absurd and madness they said also that in quoting the Authors he
for the remission of sins This profession of our faith is confirmed by the words of Christ which are written by the Evangelists and Holy Paul Unto this profession may be added this body of Christ and his blood should according to the institution of Christ and his Church should be taken in both kindes of bread wine in remembrance of his death and of his blood shed as he said Doe this in remembrance of mee Then this death of Christ as it is declared in the Gospel and the fruits of his death should be preached as also the hope of his blood shed as the Apostle witnesseth saying So oft as ye eat of this bread and drink of this cup ye shall shew forth the Lords death untill He come Thirdly according to the sure knowledge of spiritual truth of which the Euangelist John doth write as also for assurance of giving taking using and of truth by faith in hope as the Lord saith Take and eat Take and drinke Fourthly for the conjunct use for according to the institution and practise of Christ and the primitive Church the Priest should then administer when the necessity of believers requireth and he should receive with them as He saith Doe yee this in remembrance of mee And Paul saith The cup which we blesse is it not the communication of the blood of Christ and the bread which we break is it not the partaking of the body of Christ for wee many are one bread and one body who are partakers of that one bread and one cup. Fifthly for distinction of believers from the unbelievers and unworthy and for excommunication and rebuke of those who being defiled with the spot of vices do refuse to amend Of this saith Paul I would not have you partakers with the Devils yee can not drinke of the cup of the Lord and the cup of Devils And again he saith Put away the evill from yourselves for if any who is called a brother among you be covetous or a fornicator or an idolater or a dronkard or a railer or a thief with such a one eat ye not Behold this is our faith most Gracious King concerning the body and blood of Christ which as we are afraid to change or forsake these things which our Lord JESUS hath been pleased to testifie and for which end we doe now declare it so neither dare we add any thing unto it which the Lord of the Sacrament hath not added as also the primitive Church which followed Christ in poverty and affliction in singleness of heart hath not altered the ordinances of his law Concerning this Sacrament which our Lord through his great mercy hath ordained for love of his elect have many contentions arisen in opinions expositions and addition of sanctions or decrees so that contrary unto the intention of the Lord's institution they have furiously raged against others even to take away their lives But we for eschuing so great mischief have our refuge unto the faith of Christ even unto his words and meaning so often repeated in his word so that what He commanded to believe we do believe it simply and what He hath commanded to do we would do it faith fully truly we doe not only believe that that bread is His body which being taken and blessed and broken He testifieth to be his body but also if He had taken a stone and said This is my body we would have fully believed it Because of this our simple faith and because we will not suffer ourselves to forsake it for the opinion of men wee are called hereticks likwise for the actuall use unto which the word of Christ and his Apostles and the example of the work of the same sacrament doe invite us because we doe and use it so with upright faith in remembrance of the death of Christ wee are condemned judged worthy of prison and are afflicted for wee being tied unto Christs command and dissuaded by his forbidding doe worship him with reverence and honour due unto him and we feare to worship any other thing as him only sitting at the right hand with the Father and the Holy Ghost Wherefore gracious King let your highness understand that we do so not in contumacy or any contempt but for feare of God and in obedience unto him and wee pray that your Highness would shew compassion on us who are condemned for the faith of Christ as wee wish that the most High would of his grace be pleased to preserve and keep your honour from his wrath By the same faith we believe that the ordination of priests is truly from the high Bishop and great priest that in stead of the embassage of Christ the ministery preaching of the gospell doctrine judging offering of prayers by men thanksgivings and praises may be done unto God by them And it is from God unto men that the promise of God may be verified in hope of the received true faith and by excommunication the wicked may be debarred from that good And by the same faith wee confesse that the promises of God may be verified in hope of the received true faith and by excommunication the wicked may be debarred from that good And by the same faith wee confesse that they who intend to ordain others should follow the example of Christ and should consummate his ambassage with a right mind without respect of persons free from covetousness and simony By the same faith we declare that they which are to be ordained or promoted to higher or inferior orders should excell other believers in a godly life and faith in Christ for a lively faith sanctifieth and maketh fit unto all offices and possesseth the blessing and life for good works of an honest conversation are the garments and ornaments of a priest to the glory of the heavenly Father and example of the people and shew the vertue of the word they should also have more aboundant gifts of the Holy Spirit to wit more servent love toward Christ confidence of their own and their nieghbours salvation trust in God equity of mind a wholsome feeling of faith in a good conscience theire feet prepared unto the Gospell of peace prudence of Spirit knowledge of Gods law discerning of Spirits and the like What clerck soever by such an ordination is advanced unto the priesthood wee professe that such an ordination is a Sacrament because it is a signe of the true priesthood of Christ Jesus and of his ordination by God the Father and a forme of the ministry as of the head of his Church to offer unto God the incense of truth in Christ Wee approve that three things are necessary unto the full gradation of a presbyter first the the triall of his life faith gifts and fidelity in lesser things that are intrusted unto him another prayers with fasting thirdly the giving of power with words suitable there unto and the imposition of hands for corroboration By faith wee doe testify that marriage is a lawfull honest and
Brethren and did conferre in the doctrin of faith of them he writes unto Nicol. Hausman to 2. epist pag. 167. saying Pighardi judge so of the sacrament that Christ is not bodily under the bread as some say they have seen blood and the babe there ..... but spritually or sacramentally that is he that receives the bread visibly verily receives naturally the blood of him which is at the right hand of the Father but receives it invisibly I can not blame them more for this And that they do not worship the bread they say it is for the same cause that he is not there visibly as we speak of seeing but invisibly and he is at the right hand of the Fathet Here is the Bohemians their judgement and Luthers approbation thereof Then Ab. Schultet in Annal. ad Ann. 1524. shewes that when Andrew Carolstad was still at Wittembergh he was scandalised at some words of Luther who said Christ is in the bread of the Supper tantus quantus in cruce pependisset so bigg as he did hang up on the cross and that this was an occasion of alienation of their minds We have seen other causes of their schisme On August 22. Luther preached at Jena against the fanaticall spirits of Anabaptists pretending revelations and at that time he said Of the same Spirit are the breakers of images and Sacramentaries Carolstad was present and took these words as spoken against him because he had noted and challenged Luther upon these former words After Sermon they meet in an Inn and in end Luther provoketh Carolstad to writ concerning that question of the Supper and so began that Sacramentary strife Luther hath written of that Conference at Jena one way Scultetus saith falsly and Martin Rheinhard preacher at Jena at that time hath writen of it another way Within two dayes Luther went to Orlamund where Carolstad was preacher at that time but he would not speak with Carolstad yet some of his hearers disputed with Luther and did maintain that what they had done in breaking down images was warranted by the word of God so that Luther went away being almost ashamed Not long after by the means of Luther and at command of John Frederik Duke of Saxony Carolstad was exiled out of Thuringia and so was Rheinhard who had written the Conferences at Jena and Orlamund Carolstad wrot Letters unto Orlamund these were read in a publick meeting and all the people did weep at the reading of them the subscription of the two Letters was this Andrew bodeynstein neither heard nor convicted yet exiled by Luther Bodenstein was his fathers sirname When Luther heares of this subscription he writes to Amsdorfius saying you see how I which should have been a Martyr am come so far to make martyres you can scarcely believe how largely this doctrine of Carolstad concerning the Sacrament hath spread Carolstad went to Basile and there he converseth with the Anabaptists only and set forth sixe little books concerning the Lords Supper Upon which occasion Erasmus wrote unto Henry Stromer 4 id Decembr saying Carolstad hath been here and scarcely did visite Oecolampade he hath set forth sixe little books the printers were imprisoned on the third day after at the command of the Magistrate especially because as I heare he teaches that in the sacrament the very body of Christ is not None can endure this for the vulgare sort are offended that God is taken from them as if God were in no place unless he be under that signe and the learned are moved by the words of holy Scripture and decrees of the Church This business will breed a huge tragedy when we have too many tragedies So far he The sum of Carolstad's doctrin concerning the Supper is The body of Christ neither is nor can bee eaten with the mouth but there is a celebration of the remembrance of his body broken for us and of his blood shed for us So he acknowledges a figurative speach in the words of institution and the word This he expoundes not of the bread but of the body as if the meaning must bee Take eat this bread in remembrance of mee for here is the body that was given for you He addeth there must be a trope necessarily lest we be forced to maintaine that the bread was crucified for us and that the Scripture commandeth us to eat his flesh which is false and that flesh profiteth which is also false and that his body is given and broken for us in the use of the Supper which is also false In the book which he called Of the un-Christian abuse of the bread and cup of the Lord he pleadeth against their errour which bid men seek remission of sin in the sacrament and he asserts that the Sacrament should be often celebrat to declare the Lords death and the annunciation of his death to flow from the remembrance of Christ and this remembrance to flow from the discerning of his broken body and shed blood and that the body is discerned and not the bread or the sacrament when we distinguish his body and blood from other bodies and bloods and that we then discern the body and blood of Christ when we consider that his body was broken for us and his blood was shed for us they who consider not these things are guilty of the body of the Lord even as the wicked men which killed him because such do eat of the bread of the Lord and drink of his cup Therefore a man should examin himself to wit whether he thinkes rightly upon the death of Christ and whether he be such as Christ would have him to bee He denieth also that the sacrament can be called an earnest or pledge of redemption by Christ because what is proper unto Christ and his Spirit should not be attributed unto the bread and wine and the Scripture saith not that consciences are quieted by the bread and wine but rather the Apostle commandeth that a man should first examin himself and then eat of that bread which examination were superfluous if one were made more sure of the remission of his sin by the Supper The Senate of Zurik were offended at the newness of this doctrine and therefore had forbidden the selling of these books But both Zuinglius and Oecolampade had spoken of a trope in the words of institution long before they knew how to make it cleare and thereupon Zuinglius in a Sermon exhorts the Magistrat to let the books pass and be read that so the victory of truth may be the more ingenuous and he said Carolstad was lyke unto a souldier which hath arms and a good mind to fight but hath not skill of arms and puts his helmet on his shoulder and takes his brestplate as a buckler in his hand .... so Carolstad is sensible of the truth but because he knowes not throughly the proper nature of tropes hee disposeth and places the words not in a right ordet Likewise Oecomlapade wrote unto severall friends
Writer of the Historie saith lib. 2. there was great contention concerning the Latine Translation and in the end they did conclude that it is to be approved as authentical yet so that they who are more diligent should not be forbidden to quench their thirst out of the Hebrew and Greek Fountains And after that Councel two other Editions were published by Pope Sixtus the V. and Clemens the VIII with infinite alterations as followeth in the 16. Century 11. The Popes did indeavour to take libertie of marriage from the Clergie The single life of Church men is opposed and where they could prevail adulterie and murther of babes was multiplied as is touched In sundrie Nations great opposition was made for Arnulph Bishop of Metensis was the father of Anchises the father of Pipin Britain would not receive this bondage In Creet John a Priest had a wife and therefore was reproved by Pope Vitalian What may I speak of one Greek The Greeks are for the most part married untill this day In the fourth Councel at Toledo Cap. 43. Marriage was approved and Fornication prohibited More of this hereafter 12. Divers Nations then received the faith the Gothi and Suevi in Spain Some Nations hear of Christ forsook Arianism by authoritie of their King Reccared Ghent brake down the Altar of Mercurius whom they had served and began to serve the true God by the preaching of Amand a French-man an 613. who was exiled for reproving King Dagobert of luxurie and venerie Other Flandrians were converted by his Countrie man Aegidius an 649. The sound of the word had been through the world but the Nations persevered not and being instructed but in few persons Paganism continued and the Barbarians disturbing the Realms did also disturb the estate of religion 13. In that Centurie lived sundrie Divines although not equal to their forefathers John Bishop of Alexandria called the Almons an 610. who for Some worthy men his rare example of hospitalitie and bountifulness to the poor is no less worthy to have place amongst good men than he is followed of few He was wont at all occasions to propound unto the people questions out of the Scriptures because multitude of heresies were then on foot and he exhorted the people to propound their doubts unto him If any did presumptuously move curious questions he could cunningly turn to another more profitable When any of the unlearned moved trivial doubts he accepted them calmly and commanded that thereafter such persons should not be admitted to the end others seeing such men checked should be the more wary In the daies of Boniface the IV. John Bishop of Gerunden a Spaniard was instructed at Constantinople in the languages and reading of Scriptures thence he returning into his Countrie did with dexteritie refute the heresie of Arrius and therefore was exiled to Barchinona but after the death of the Arrian King Lemungild he returned and wrote many books Of the same country was Europius Bishop of Valentia worthy of remembrance for godliness of life and sinceritie of faith Then also lived Ildefonsus Bishop of Toledo who as another Augustine is called the Hammer of Hereticks France did never want famous witnesses of the Gospel at that time was the fore-named Arnulph Bishop of Metensis Projectus a Martyr in Aquitania an 610. Eustathius Abb. Luxovien the Disciple of Columban an 624. Modoald Bishop of Trevers Renald the successour of the above-named Amand we have heard of Serenus Bishop of Marsilia where succeeded Projectus who is said to have suffered martyrdom in agro Cameracen an 678. Eustasius a Preacher in Bavier an 640. Lambert Bishop of Tungri was put to death an 658. because he rebuked Pipin for marrying another wife the first being yet alive Dodo the brother of the second wife was the Executioner and shortly thereafter died of vermine Ulfranius Bishop of Senonen hath been a diligent labourer in the Lord's harvest in Frisia an 660. Leodagarius Bishop of Augustodunen suffered death at the command of Theorick King of France because he oft reproved him of tyrannie Victor Bishop of Carthage an 646. writing to Pope Theodore retains the old Titles saying Unto the most blest and honourable Lord his holy brother Theodore Pope the works of your most blessed brother-hood are acceptable unto God c. There he affirmeth that all the Apostles were of equal authoritie and honour 14. Isidorus Bishop of Hispala called the latter did write many books of the Christian faith and the History from Adam untill his own time 624. Isidor Hispalen he hath many errours but in many things is sound In his book de summo bono cap. 28. he saith In the holy Scriptures as on high mountains both the learned find sublimities of knowledge whereunto as Harts they may lift up the steps of their contemplation and the simple men as lesse Wights may find mean things for their capacitie to which they may humbly have refuge the holy Scripture seems unto the babes of understanding to be base in words in respect of the historie but it wadeth more deeply with the more learned opening unto them the mysteries thereof and it remains common to the learned and unlearned Lib. 7. etymolog cap. 9. Peter received his name from the Rock which is Christ on whom the Church is built the Rock hath not the name from Peter but Peter from the Rock therefore the Lord saith Thou art Peter and upon this Rock which thou hast confessed will I build my Church for the Rock was Christ upon which Peter himself was built Lib 8. cap. 5. he noteth it as a fault in the old Catharists that they did glorie in their merits and that they denied forgiveness of sins to the penitent Lib. 6. cap. 19. The Sacraments are baptism and chrism the bodie and blood of Christ Here he nameth but two because the custom was then to anoint them who were baptized De offic lib. 1. cap. 18. Bread because it strengthneth the bodie is therefore called Christ's bodie and Wine because it worketh blood in the flesh therefore it hath relation to Christ's blood these two are sensible but being sanctified by the Holy Spirit are changed into the Sacrament of the Lord's body The Papists now in our daies would gather out of these words Transubstantiation but hereafter God willing it shall appear that neither word nor thing was thought upon in 500. years after that time and Isidore saith Transeunt in Sacramentum And de doctrin fide art 33. saith That marriage is evil or to be compared with fornication and to believe that meat is evil or the cause of evil unto the eaters is not Christian but properly Manichean or Encratitish 15. Agrestin was Clark to King Theodorick and then entred the Abbey Lexovien with all his Wealth he became wearied of the superstitious rites Agrestin and left the Abbey Then he went to Aquileia which for that time was not under the yoke of the Romish Pope and
elected that they may beleeve for the Lord himself declareth this when he saith Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you for if they were therefore chosen because they did beleeve they did first chuse him by believing in him that they may deserve to be chosen But he takes this away altogether who said Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you And certainly they did chuse him when they did beleeve in him therefore for no other cause saith he Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you except because they did not chuse that he should chuse them but he did chuse them that they might chuse him because the mercy of God did prevene them with grace and not according to debt This is the immovable truth of predestination and grace In the same place he addeth God hath predestinated us ere we were he called us when we were averse he justified us when we were sinners he glorified us when we were mortal If God be thus with us who shall be against us He who will be against them who are predestinated by God against them who are called justified and glorified let him prepare himself to fight against God if he can For when we hear If God be with us who can be against us None can harm us but he who overcometh God Beda is large on this purpose there out of Augustine Of the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament he saith on Luk. 22. He breaketh the bread which he giveth that he might shew that the breaking of his body was not without his own accord when he saith Do this in remembrance of me the Apostle expoundeth it when he saith How oft ye eat of this bread and drink of this cup shew forth the Lord's death till he come because bread strengthneth flesh and wine worketh blood in the flesh the one is referred unto his body mystically and the other unto his blood And on 1 Cor. 10. at the words The cup of blessing which we bless he saith What ye see is bread and a cup which even your eys declare unto you but what faith requireth to be taught the bread is the body of Christ and the cup his blood This is spoken briefly which possibly may suffice faith but faith requireth instruction he took up his body into the Heaven whence he will come again to judge the quick and the dead there he is now sitting at the right hand of the Father How then is the Bread his Body And the Cup or what is contained in the cup how is it his blood Brethren these things are Sacraments for in them one thing is seen and another thing is understood c. When he saith The Lord breaketh the bread and the bread strengthneth flesh and it is referred unto the body mystically and even our eys declare it to be bread c. Certainly he thought not upon Transubstantiation Beda did translate the Gospel of John the Psalms and some other parts of the Scripture into the Saxons language and he writ an Epistle unto Ecbert Bishop of Lindsfarn wherein he admonisheth him of negligence in his calling and exhorteth him to translate some books of Scripture into the Saxon language that people may read them he telleth him he ought to admonish the King and correct false Monks and the builders of Monasteries if they respect their own ease more then solid vertue Ecbert returneth him answer thanking him for his Christian admonition and thereafter did translate some books of the Bible into the vulgar language as appeareth by the book of Will Butler against the common Translation In Hist Angl. lib. 1. cap. 1. he testifieth that at that time the Island of Britan did with five several languages confess one and the same knowledge of the highest truth and of true sublimity to wit the English Britans Scots Pichts and Latines which last by meditation of the Scriptures is become common unto them all Here he acknowledgeth that the faith of all the four Nations in the Island was one and the same Nevertheless he did observe and deplore the waxing corruption of the Church for in that Epistle to Ecbert he did not approve the specious and spacious buildings of Monasteries and in Samu. lib. 4. cap. 2. he saith Let the Reader behold with tears a thing worthy of tears how far the Church slideth daily into a worse or to speak moderately unto a weaker estate He did write many books as Io. Bale in Cent. 2. testifieth he lived 72 years and died An. 734. 2. In the year 724. Jua King of the West-Saxons was perswaded by his Peter's pence wife Ethelburga to go unto Rome in a Monkish habit and first did grant that a penny should be payed unto the Pope out of every fire-house of his Kingdom which was called Peter's pence and was ever almost payed until the year 1533 when King Henry the VIII shook off the Pope Ethelbert King of the East-Saxons went to marry the daughter of Offa King of Merceland and Offa did perfidiously cause him to be murthered Thereafter his pride was turned into so great repentance that he gave the tenth part of all that he had unto the Church and several lands to the Church of Hereford and then he went to Rome and gave unto the Pope a yearly penny as Jua had done An. 793. Henry Spelman in Concil reporteth out of a book De Vita Offae pag. 171. This penny was given not as a Tribute unto Saint Peter but as an alms for the help of an English Colledge at Rome and it was called Peter's pence because it was ordained to be payed on Peter's day yet certainly thereafter it was called Peter's tribute 3. About the year 786. Charls the Great King of France made a league A League between France and Scotland with Archaius King of Scots which hath continued inviolate untill our time The Saxons and others had spoiled off France by incursions and Charls did seek to adorn his Kingdom with Letters as well as Arms therefore he sought the favour of the Scots and did intreat King Archaius to send unto him Professours of the Greek and Latine languages and of other learning for his University of Paris amongst whom Archaius did send Albinus or Alcwine John Meilrosius so named from the Abbey Melrose Claudius Clemens Antoninus Florent reckoneth them amongst Hereticks who followed the Greek Church because they did oppose the Romish Rites John Meilrosius became Abbot of the Augustinians at Ticino and Claudius was Bishop of Altisiodore or Auxerre They both writ several works as Io. Bale sheweth in Cent. 14. 4. We have mentioned Boniface Bishop of Ments he was an English Boniface alias Winefrid man and called Winefrid he had boldly reproved Ethelbald King of Merceland for Adultry and Tyranny therefore the King sought his life he fled unto Rome where Pope Gregory the II. did regard him for his liberty and sent him into Germany for conversion of the Saxons then of a
Evangelists say For many and one For you because the Disciples are amongst the many but none saith For all And lest I be judged to search thus rashly holy Jerom expounding that Text The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve and to give his soul a ransom for many saith When he took the form of a servant that he might shed his blood for the World and said not he would give his soul a ransom for all but for many that is for them which were to beleeve in him In this exposition according to the Catholick faith he teaches that only Beleevers are understood ....... Who dare contradict so clear lights confirming their doctrine by Evangelical sense but which are not ashamed to appear without light And that I may speak with leave and reverence of so great a man John Bishop of Constantinople Chrysostom not seeing this sense flowing from the fountain of the Gospel when he expounds that of the Apostle That by the grace of God he should tast death for all men not for Beleevers only said he but for all the World and truly he died for all men But what if all men beleeve not He hath done his part But when he thought thus he hath not confirmed it by a Divine testimony And if any hath shewed or shall shew unto your Excellency that one Faustus hath written far otherwise of the things credit ye not him who erreth c. 21. At the same time was also question of the presence of Christ's body in the Sacrament Charls the Bald gave in command unto Bertram a Priest at Corbey to search and write what was the doctrine of the Fathers and ancient Church in this article Trithemius saith Bertram was singularly learned of an excellent eloquence and utterance pregnant in judgment and no less famous for holiness of life and writ many excellent Treatises whereof few have come to our hands In obedience unto his Soveraign he did compile a Treatise De Corpore Sanguine Domini which is all inserted in Catal. test ver lib. 10 and was lately translated into our language and Printed at Aberdeen so that who pleaseth to read it may easily find it Only the estate of the question I set down here with an argument or two and his conclusion your high Excellency desireth to understand Whether that Body and Blood of Christ which is received by the mouth of Beleevers in the Church be taken in a mystery or according to literal verity that is whether it contain some secret thing which is only manifest to the ey of faith or without the vail of any mystery if the eys of the body behold that outwardly which the soul and mind do behold inwardly Unto this he adjoineth another Whether it be the same body which was born of the Virgin Mary and which suffered and died Concerning the first he shews that the word literal verity signifieth a demonstration of a thing in its proper and manifest signification as when it is said Christ died And that in a figure is when a thing is signified in an over-hallowing vail or trope as when Christ saith I am the Vine such speeches say one thing and signifie another saith he His first reason is If the Sacrament of Christ's body and blood be celebrated without any figure it is not properly called a mystery wherein is no secret thing nothing removed from our corporal senses But that Bread which by consecration of the Priest is made the body of Christ shews one thing to the outward senses of men and crieth another thing inwardly to the souls of Beleevers outwardly the bread is the self-same that it was before for we see the same shape and colour and the same tast is perceived but inwardly a far more excellent different and precious thing is signified and exhibited because it is heavenly and divine that is the body of Christ is shewed unto us yet not seen with fleshly eys but is seen taken and eaten by the looking of a beleeving soul The wine also which by consecration is made the Sacrament of Christ's Blood representeth one thing outwardly and contains another thing inwardly for what see we outwardly but the substance of wine tast it and it is wine smell it and it savoureth wine look on it and you see the colour of wine But if it be considered inwardly in the mind it tasts not as wine but as the blood of Christ unto the beleeving soul and it is acknowledged such when it is seen and so it is approved when it is smelled These to be such it is manifest because none can deny but that bread and wine is only figuratively the body and blood of Christ for as is clearly seen and known no flesh is in that bread nor can any drop of blood be pointed forth in that wine whereas nevertheless after consecration they are not called bread or wine but the body and blood of Christ After thirty other arguments proving a figure in these words This is my body he comes to the other question and hath this argument The flesh of Christ which was crucified did shew no more outwardly then it was in it self because it was the flesh of a very man to wit a true body under the form of a true body But we must consider in that bread not only the body of Christ but the bodies of all Beleevers are also represented in it for which cause it is made of many grains of wheat because the body of the Church is made up of many beleevers of the word of Christ for this cause as in the mystical bread the body of Christ is understood so also in the same mystery the members of the Church are represented to be one in Christ and as not corporally but spiritually that bread is called the body of the Church or beleeving people after the same manner also it must be understood to be the body of Christ not corporally but ........ Also the things which are alike are comprehended under the same definition But concerning the true body of Christ it is said He is very God and very Man who in the latter time of the World was born of the Virgin and these things cannot be said of the body of Christ which is consecrated in a mystery in the Church therefore according to a certain manner only is it to be the body of Christ and that manner is by a figure and in resemblance that so the truth of the thing it self may be the more sensibly understood In the prayers also which are said after the mystery of the body and blood of Christ and wherein the people answer Amen the Priest uttereth these words We beseech thee O Lord which are partakers of the pledges of eternal life that what we touch in resemblance in this Sacrament we may receive it in the manifest participation of the thing it self Now we know that a pledge or resemblance is of another thing resembled that is they are not to
of the elements and blowing on them and crossing them I know not how often the thwarting and lifting up of their Arms the joining and unjoining of the Priest's thumb and fore-singer with such other rites which have no such foundation in nor relation unto Christ's Institution nor his Apostles doctrine or practice and do smell of charming or heathenism more then of true piety and the rather is the word to be forsaken because their Priests are not ashamed to say Qui creavit me dedit mihi creare se qui creavit me sine me creatur à me 25. Raban speaks so not that he meaneth the bread to be turned into the body of Christ although Io. Eckius in tom The Bread is he Body figuratively 4. homil 31. doth cite his words unto that purpose For Transubstantiation was not then hatched as I shall shew God willing and Raban was reckoned amongst Hereticks for the contrary doctrine as is touched before but because the Bread and Wine are the visible figures and resemblances and seals of Christ's Body and Blood and because with the signs the Believers receive the Body and Blood of Christ Raban's words which I have related in the former Section do clearly shew his mind in these words and so we may judge of many others writing in this manner although their words have been wrested to another sense 26. Observe he saith Prayer unto God But in all this Institution is not one word of praying unto the Bread I know they The Bread was not worshipped do quote the Ancients for adoring the bread and especially they alledge Theodoret. dial 2. But by one we may understand the meaning of all others his words are these The mystical signs after sanctification do not depart from their nature for they remain in their former substance figure and form and they may be both touched and seen as they were before but they are understood to be those things which they are made and are beleeved to be and they are adored as those things which they are beleeved to be compare therefore the Image with the exemplar or patern for the figure should be like the truth In these words Theodoret. denieth Transubstantiation and the bodily presence and he calleth the Bread and Wine signs mystical the Image of the exemplar and figure of the truth and thereby we may easily understand what kind of adoring or reverence he would have given unto the signs and not that they should be adored as Christ himself And to shew the impudency of the Romanists I add another testimony which they do object out of August in Ps 98. saying No man eats it before he adore it They object these words as if Augustine were speaking of the bread But his words are Of the earth he Christ took earth because flesh is of the earth and of the flesh of Mary he took flesh because he walked here in the same flesh and did give us the same flesh unto salvation and no man eats that flesh except he first adore it c. Here Augustine speaks not of the Sacrament but of the flesh which Christ took of the flesh of Mary and who denieth that flesh should be adored Some words after these may be understood of the Sacrament and they are clear for he expoundeth the words of Christ The words which I have spoken unto you are spirit and life as if the Lord had said Understand ye spiritually what I have spoken ye shall not eat this body which ye see nor drink this blood which they shall shed who shall crucifie me I have commended unto you a certain Sacrament which being spiritually understood shall quicken you and although it be necessary that the same be celebrate visibly yet it must be understood invisibly So August Nothing can be spoken more plainly and directly against the gross and carnal manner of the presence of Christ's body in the Sacrament 27. It is certain that our Saviour is the Authour of this Prayer and who hath ordained it to be sung Rites at saying Pater noster I know not But Io. Beleth cap. 47. testifieth that in his time the people did stand when this prayer was said if it were a Feast-day and if it were not a Feast the people were prostrate and the Priest said it with a loud voice except these words But deliver us from evil which the people did answer 28. As Christ did ordain that all Believers should eat in remembrance of Communicating now left of him so in ancient times was an order that all should communicate who will not be excommunicate Gratian. de consecr dist 2. cap. Peracta Comperimus Where was then the private Mass wherein the Priest alone consumeth the Sacrament This order of communicating hath ceased through the sloth of Priests and people saith Cochlaeus de sacrif Missae and Harding's answer to the first article of Bishop Juel's challenge And for remedy it was provided that two Deacons should communicate with the Priest Gratian. de consecr dist 1. cap. Hoc quoque Omnes And Pope Sergius the II. ordained And the rite is turned to a mystery that the Bread should be broken into three parts according to the number of Communicants which rite of breaking remaineth yet although the Priest be alone but they have drawn it to signifie a mystery Lombard lib. 4. dist 12. F. saith The part which is offered and cast into the Cup signifieth the body of Christ which rose again the part which is eaten signifieth him walking on the earth and the third part lying on the Altar till the end of the Mass signifieth the body lying in the grave for untill the end of this world the bodies of the Saints shall continue in the graves The Authour of Specul Curator saith two parts are reserved and the third is cast into the cup to signifie that the sacrifice is profitable for three things unto just men for increase of grace unto sinners for taking away their sins and unto those in Purgatory for taking away their punishment So uncertain are they in their errours And in that direction of the Curats it is specially provided that only the Priest shall eat that part which is cast into the Cup. So that now the Communion is for the most part turned into a theatrical eating and drinking of the Priest alone Cassander cannot wonder enough how they have departed so far from the Institution and how they dare so clearly violate the Acts of Councels c. Consult art 24. 29. Christ did not put the Sacrament into his Apostles mouths but every one received the bread with his hand Receiving is altered and such was the custom of the Church untill the sixth Synod saith Jesuit Salmeron on 1 Cor. 11. disp 19. But this was altered when the Roman Church ordained that for reverence sake people should not touch it with their hands but so oft as they communicate the Priest should put the bread into their mouths
Hence is arisen another novelty that whereas the bread was wont to be broken and distributed out of the same loaf now they break not the bread they say for reverence as if the Apostles and primitive Church had not been reverent or Believers now cannot be reverent and therefore lest Wafers people do break Christ's body with their teeth they do provide Wafers which may melt away in the mouth Cassander in Liturg. saith This is religion many waies despised 30. He mentioneth the receiving of bread only nevertheless it is certain the distribution of the Cup also was ordained by Drinking is out of use Christ and it continued in use For Raban in the same book chap. 31. saith The Lord would have the Sacraments of his body and blood taken by the mouth of Believers Now this custom was not forbidden untill the Councel at Constance An. 1415 Cassand Consul art 22 and again it was permitted unto the Bohemians An. 1438. by the Councel at Basil Yea Pope Gelasius the I made a Decree that who would not communicate in both should be excommunicated from both This Decree stood in force about the year 1200 and is registred by Gratian. de consecr cap. 2. Comperimus his reason is because the division of one and the same mystery cannot be without great sacriledge Upon these words the Gloss saith This is understood of the Species .... therefore it is taken under both kinds as a Pupil must approve all which a Tutor doth or refuse all yet saith he a sick man who may not drink wine or any other in necessity may take the body without wine When and by whom came this alteration Jesuit Coster in Enchir. tracta de commun sub utraque spe saith Not by commandment of Bishops but it crept in by the practice of the people the Bishops winking at it It is likely the communion of bread only came by practice of Priests after that Thomas Aquin. had devised concomitancy lest any thing might seem superfluous 31. This is the second time that Kiss the Priest saluteth the people Biel in Expos Miss lect 16. noteth three salutations with the particular reasons as they may be Io. Beleth cap. 48. saith The Priest takes this kiss from the Eucharist or as some think from the Altar and gives it to the Deacon or sub-Deacon that by them it may go unto others but saith he with this caution that men give it not unto women lest some wantonness or carnality creep into the thoughts The Rhemists would derive this custom of the Mass from Rom. 16. 16 but Paul did not kiss the bread nor the Altar nor did he command it as a part or pendicle of the Mass As it is a fashion among us for men meeting or parting with friends to shake hands so it was among the Jews and some other Nations as appears by many places in both Testaments for men to kiss men which custom Christians did also observe and therefore the Apostle doth moderate that custom that it should be with holiness and as that secular custom did wear out of use so it ceased also in the Church 32. Beleth hath the words Lamb of God who takes away the A change in the words Agnus c. sins of the world and not the words following but also faith these be said thrice to wit twice with Have mercy upon us once with Give us peace but neither of the two when it is a Mass for the dead but only with Give them rest Raban and others before him knew not this distinction 33. The lawfull The use of communicating use of the Lord's Supper is the remembrance of his death to the salvation of the beleeving receiver But afterwards it was provided that if any theft was committed in a Monastery and the Monks were suspected then the Abbot should say a Mass and all the Monks should communicate and thereby declare that they were innocent Gratian. caus 2. qu. 5. cap. Saepe contingit sheweth that Pope Nicolaus ordained these words to be said unto each one of them The body of the Lord be unto thy trial This Decree was abrogate by contrary Decrees of Popes because the body of Christ should not be given unto him who is suspected of a crime Tho. Aquin. pag. 3. qu. 80. ar 6 ad 3. Nevertheless it is turned to worse for in all their Treasons and Plots either against Nations or Church they make the Sacrament to be the bond of their bloody intentions 34. Beleth saith this is the last part of the Mass called The Thanksgiving and beginneth at the Communion which is also called Completio But I find no words of Thanksgiving here so thankfulness is worn out of use 35. Some say the blessing was ordained by Pope Leo the I Ite Missa est but it is more ancient to bless the people at their dismission 36. Poly. Virgil. de invent rer lib. 4. cap. 11. saith The saying of Ite Missa est is from a custom What was done with the remainder of the Priests of Isis 37. He hath no mention of what was done with the remainders of the elements Bellarm. de Euchar. lib. 4. cap 4. sheweth out of Justine that the Deacons were wont to carry the Eucharist unto the sick or them who could not come to the publick meetings And cap. 5. The reliques was given unto children to be eaten by them because they thought not the element to be holy but in use But now they keep their Osty for adoration and pompous procession which custom is contrary unto the Institution as Cassander proves by many testimonies in Liturgic cap. 30. 11. This Many rites are added was the form of Gregory's Mass and all that was in the daies of Raban far different from the first Institution of the Lord's Supper but since that time it is as far changed even so far that if Raban were alive and could say Mass no better he would be called an ignorant Curat It hath indeed more shew and pomp now then before but as a painted Image hath more accoutrements then the man hath yet it hath no life in it so the additions and changes make it more glorious to the eye of a natural man but the liveliness and spirituality of it is gone For at first was but one sort of celebrating but now they have a publick form and a private and a solitary one for Sundays another for Week daies another for Feast daies another for Fasts c. 2. The people understood all and had their part in praying and singing but now the Priest doth all in an unknown language except that a Deacon or Clark say some few words 3. As some exhortations and prayers are now put away whereof I have now noted some so many other things are added As first the Introitus must be sung twice on some daies and thrice on other daies 2. There is a Tractus which must be sung with long or slow pronunciation 3. There be
that time was great contention in England between the Monks and Contention between Priests and Monks the Clergy whereas before all Cloisterers and Priests were called Clergy or Clarks but then they which did profess a single and more strict life were called Monks and Regulars and others were called Seculars This was so hot that where a Monkish Bishop had place Secular Priests were thrust out and likewise the Secular Bishops did with the Regulars During this difference Dunstan Arch-Bishop of Canterbury obtained from the Pope a Palle and a Bull to cast all the Priests who had wives out of some Monasteries which by consent of some other Bishops they had lately taken from the Monks Many did dispute and Preach against him Antonin hist tit 19. par 3. cap. 6. remembreth a Scot which did especially resist Dunstan and Alfred Prince of Mercia took part with the Priests Pol. Virgilius in histor Angl. writes that in a Synod it was debated and concluded that Priests should be restored and immediately a voice was heard from the wall whereon was the Image of Christ saying They think amiss who favour the Priests That was received as a Divine Oracle and the Priests were secluded from their Benefices and Monasteries They say None heard the words but the King and the Bishop and the Priests and their adherents became dumb and spoke no more But Sir Hen. Spelman in Concil pag. 491. shews that no mention is of this miracle in Florent Wigorn. who about that time writ the life of King Edgar and saith The Synod was dissolved because of a variance in the election of a new King and Hoveden writing next after Florent hath nothing of it All do agree that in this Synod the one part did maintain their liberty by testimonies of Scripture ancient Canons practise of the Church in all ages On the other side Dunstan advanceth the late Canons and the Papal Bull and when he saw that his Gorgon had no force and the Synod would determine of the Priests Ranulph hist lib. 2. cap. 11. saith that he raised the Divel to speak out of the Image these former words The adverse party protests to the contrary and would not consent because they knew that God would not work miracles for confirming errours contrary to his own word Catal. test ver lib. 11. Because at that time all did not agree the King sent into Scotland craving some learned men to be sent unto a Synod that was called for that cause Io. Bale Cent. 14. saith Fathard or as some call him Etheldrad possibly they were two singular for learning eloquence and authority went and in Synodo Calnensi did confirm the marriage of Priests by Scriptures and strong arguments to be lawfull that the Monks being blinded with the light shining so brightly had nothing to say against him Dunstan said he was old and could not attend such disputes and although ye seem to prevail it will not be for long space nor shall ye have your will and so by his art he caused the beams or joists of the house to fall some were killed many were wounded only Dunstan was safe with his chair that was fixed on a Pillar So the controversie was ended with Divelish cruelty Catal. test ver 6. In the end of this Century Elfrick Abbot of Malmsbury became Arch-Bishop of Canterbury by him a Sermon was appointed to be read publickly on Easter-day before they received the Communion It was Printed at London An. 1623 and afterwards at Aberdeen together with Bertram's treatise In it is written thus Men have often searched and yet do search So this was questioned before Berengarius how bread that is gathered of corn can The change of the elements in the Lord's Supper be turned into Christ's body and wine that is pressed out of many grapes is turned through one blessing into the Lord's blood The answer is made thus Some things be spoken by signification and some by things certain a true and certain thing it is that Christ was born of a Maid he is said to be bread by signification and a Lamb and a Lion he is called bread because he is our life he is said to be a Lamb for his innocency but yet Christ is not so by true nature neither bread nor a Lamb. Why then is the holy Housel or Sacrament called Christ's body or his blood if it be not truly what it is called without they be seen bread and wine both in figure and tast and they be truly after their hallowing Christ's body and blood through ghostly mystery .... Much is between the body of Christ wherein he suffered and the body which is hallowed to Housel truly the body wherein Christ suffered was born of the flesh of Mary with blood and bone with skin and sinews in human lims with a reasonable soul living but this ghostly body which we call the Housel is gathered of many corns without blood or bone without lim without soul and therefore nothing is to be understood there bodily but all ghostly Mark this distinction between the two bodies or the sign and the thing signified Whatsoever in that Housel gives substance of life that is of the ghostly might therefore is that Housel called a mystery because one thing is seen in it and another thing is understood that which is seen there hath bodily shape and that which we do understand hath ghostly might Certainly Christ's body which suffered death and rose again from the dead is eternal and impassible that Housel is temporal not eternal it is corruptible and dealed into several parts chewed between the teeth and sent down into the belly howsoever after ghostly might it is all in every part many receive that holy body and yet it is so all in every part after a ghostly mystery though some chew less yet there is no more might in the greater part then in the lesser because it is whole in all after the invisible might This mystery is a pledge and a figure Christ's body is the truth it self we keep this pledge mystically untill we come to the truth it self and then is this pledge ended Truly it is as we have said Christ's body and blood not bodily but ghostly and ye ought not to search how it is done but to hold in your beleef that it is so done So there It is true in that homily are some suspicious words as it speaks that the Mass is profitable unto the quick and dead and a report of two miracles but are judged to be an addition because they stand in that place unfitly and thâ— matter without them both before and after doth agree most orderly and these purposes are different from the scope of the Authour The same Author hath two other Treatises one directed to Wulfsin Bishop of Shirburn and another to Wulfstan Bishop of York in both which he hath the same doctrine of the Sacrament saying That lively bread is not bodily so nor the self-same body wherein
began to profess that the Divinity of the Poets was true at last he was challenged and condemned by the Patriarch Peter But many in Italy Sardinia and in Spain followed the same impiety and were punished some with the sword and some with fire Rodolp Histo l. 2. c. 12. 3. Berno excellent in all learning was set over the Augianes anno 1008. he wrote many Books in Marc. Evang. sect 3. he saith In the holy Scriptures do hang the armor of our salvation Serm. de concor offic c. 5. Our weakness can do nothing without God as Lazarus could not rise by himself Serm. de ascend Dom. Christ is the head of the whole Church and all the elect are his members At that time lived Oecumenius and Olympiodorus two famous Greek writers Guthet Bishop of Prague was famous for learning and holiness and was put to death by the enemies of the faith Platin. in Benedict 8. and in Benedict 9. he saith Gerard a Venetian and Bishop of Hungary a good and learned man suffered martyrdom the Infidels tied him to the wheel of a Cart and let it run from the top of an high mountain so that he was all crushed yet he suffered it with joy 4. Fulbert Bishop of Charties or Carnatum was a learned man sundry Sermons and Treatises that are among the works of St. Augustine are said to be his He wrote an Epistle to Adeodatus wherein he first reproveth a gross opinion of some men who held that Baptism and the Eucharist were naked signs Then he proveth that these should not be considered as mere and outward signs but by faith according to the invisible vertue of mysteries The mystery of faith it is called saith he because it should be esteemed by faith and not by sight to be looked on as the spirit and minde and not as sight of body seeing onely by faith beholdeth the secret of this powerful mystery for what seemeth outwardly bread and wine now inwardly it is the body and blood of Christ we being encouraged by the authority of our true Master when we communicate of his body and blood we confess boldly that we are transfounded into his body and that he abideth in us Taste and see how savoury that meat is unless I be mistaken it tasteth like Angels food not that thou canst discern it with thy mouth but mayst taste it with thy inward affection open the mouth of faith enlarge the hope and the bowels of love and receive the bread of life even the food of the inward man from faith of the inward man proceedeth the tasting of the inward food while certainly by the infusion or preception of the gracious Eucharist Christ floweth into the bowels of the communicating soul when a godly soul receiveth into her chaste corners in that form wherewith she beholdeth him present with her under remembrance of the mystery and as the Spirit revealeth to wit as an infant lying in his mothers bosome or offered upon the alrar of the cross or lying in the grave or verily having trampled death under foot and rising again or carried high in glory above the heavens according to which forms Christ entreth into the acceptable habitation of the communicant and refresheth his soul with so many to speak so several blisses as are the ways that the eye of holy meditation can behold him neither let it seem a vain thing unto thee that we say that according to the beholding of a desirous soul Christ is found within the bowels of the communicant seeing thou art not ignorant that our fathers sojourned through the wilderness and were refreshed with Angels food to whom a fertile rain brought meat of one colour but of divers tastes and according to the appetite of every one it gave sundry delights of taste that whatsoever their appetit did covet the secret dispensation of the Giver did furnish the same to whom their gust gave what their eye could not see because it was one thing which was seen and another which was taken therefore wonder thou no more What Manna under the law did signifie by shadow the revealed verity of Christ's body layeth open in which body the divine Majesty condescendeth mercifully unto our weakness that with what sort of punishment mans body is punished he should taste the same in his body sensibly but God performeth this in the breast as he saith himself He who cometh of me shall live by me Now therefore the scruple or doubt is to be removed seeing he who is the Giver is a witness of the truth Then he illustrateth the same by comparison of a baptised man who albeit outwardly he be the same he was before yet inwardly he is another being made greater then himself by increase of invisible quantity that is of saving grace c. here is no word of substancial change of the elements the bread is still bread but we finde two other changes to wit the faithful are transfounded into the body of Christ and Christ is infounded into the habitation of a faithful soul yet so that Christ's body remaineth in the heavens and by the revelation of the Spirit faith beholdeth Christ present or lying in his mothers bosome and dying and rising and ascending and he entreth into the gracious habitation of a faithful communicant and refresheth him so many ways as is said Here also we see that the substance of bread remaineth as the substance of him who is baptised remaineth albeit inwardly he be another Biblioth part de le Bigne tom 3. 5. Berengarius Deacon of St. Maurice in Angiers was his disciple who hearing Math. Parisiensis calleth him Archiepisc Turonen a contrary error unto the former was broached in his days to wit that the bread of the Eucharist was the very body of Christ and the wine his blood substantially or properly Berengarius I say hearing this taught that the body of Christ is onely in the heavens and these elements are the Sacraments of his body and blood as followeth The occasion of this controversie at that time is written by Guitmund in his second book against Berengarius to wit when Lanfrank Abbot of Bec-heloin in Normandy was a boy in Italy it hapned that a priest as he saith saying Mass found very flesh upon the altar and very blood upon the chalice he burned to take them and immediately declared the matter unto the Bishop who assembling with moe Bishops ordained that that flesh and that chalice with the blood should be kept in that altar for ever as a most worshipful Relique From this deceiving Impostor many were moved to believe that the body and blood of Christ was present in the elements not onely sacramentally as the Fathers spake but substantially Berengarius wrote and preached against this Capernaitis error and therefore Adelman Bishop of Brixia wrote unto him In the beginning he saluteth him his holy and beloved Brother and condisciple under Fulbert Bishop of Carnatum Then he sheweth he heard it reported that Berengarius
decent union in Christ of twoe persons man and woman keeping a chast bed without breach and it is a signe of a great truth to wit the coupling of Christ with the Church and a believing soul By faith wee affirme that if God give a contrite and humbled heart for sin unto a falling sinner having the true faith of Christ and if with heart and mind and really he repent of his former sins such a one being so truly disposed if he find a presbyter able to discerne good from evill and whose lips preserve the knowledge of Gods law he should reveale uprightly unto such a priest his sins by confession by whom as a judge ruling in stead of God and the Church according to the law of the Lord the weight of the fault may be rightly discerned to the end he may be ashamed and being corrected he may have advice of repentance unto reformation of himself and being either loosed or bound by Christs keyes he may obey humbly and that such humble contrition of the heart is a sacrament that is a signe of true grace bestowed on the repentant But if there be not a heart contrite humbled through faith abhorring vice and an afflicted Spirit embracing the will of God and also confession with relaxation of the fault and moreover if fained satisfaction be added wee pronounce it to be a vain signe and void of the grace of Christ The anointing of the sicke containes two things in it first a cause of a more ready approaching unto the diseased for this it is not a sacrament the other is the thing signified by that unction which is given by God in Christ for which thing prayer especially should be made in true faith that it may be given unto the sick believer as blessed James commandeth saying Is any sick among you let him call for the Elders of the Church and let them pray for him anointing him in the name of God and the prayer of the faithfull shall save him and the Lord wil relieve him and if he be in sins they shall be forgiven him By faith of the sick the signe of unction assures him of the forgiveness of sins When wee have declared the faith of the Catholick Church and her truth by which truth holiness is given unto her it remaines to declare by the same certainty of faith the communion of Saints The communion of the Saints is when the members of the Holy Church doe for common benefite use the good free saving and administring grace of God which is given without repentance and they exercise themselves according to the grace of God given unto them to the common utility of others It is cleare then that the elect only are partakers of true faith grace and righteousness in Christ by his merite unto the glory of eternall salvation as also they receive the sacraments to the evidence of faith albeit they have been seduced yet damnation shall not ceize upon them But the wicked of unformed faith albeit they communicate truly in the Sacraments digniries administrations and publick manners if they he destitute of true faith they communicate unworthily as hypocrites and if they follow the erroneous by their leading they fall into seduction and deceit By faith of Christs grace wee pronounce freely that who communicateth with a lively faith by the same he attaineth through Christ true remission of his sins and also because he partaketh of the Sacraments of the Church he getteth by the same faith and certainty the relaxation of crimes and at the time of the last judgement in the resurrection the glorification of his soul Amen The Letter which they sent with this Confession is worthy of reading But for brevity I omit it When the Confession was delivered their adversaries ceased not to accuse them still as if they had writen otherwise then they did believe or practize and so the King went on in cruelty against them Wherefore they sent another Apologie where in they tooke God to witness of the injuries done unto them by their adversaries and that they had writenin singleness of heatt nor did their tongue dare to speak what their heart did not believe There also they expresse them selves more clearly in some particulares as concerning the Eucharist they say Wee do not only believe and confesse that the bread is the naturall bodie and the wine is the naturall blood sacramentally but also that the bread is the Spirituall bodie and the wine is the Spirituall blood And to believe this we are induced by the saying of the Apostle Paul The bread which we break is it not the communion of the body of Christ and the cup ..... for wee that are many are one bread and one bodie for wee are partakers of one bread and of one cup ...... The Redeemer of mankind hath commanded to take eate and to doe that in remembrance of him but no command is given unto believers to worship the sacramental subsistence of Christ's body and blood for Christ gave unto his disciples sitting what they should use and they obeying him did eat and drink but did not worship the sacrament And the Apostles and their successours for a long space of time went to the houses of believers and break the bread with joy and certainly they did not worship the sacrament nor in so doing did they erre nor were called hereticks But they did worship the personall subsistence of Christ at the right hand of the Father And unto the true worshippers of the Divine Majesty it is commanded in both the Testaments the old and new to worship and adore Christ very God and Man not in the sacramentall existence but in his naturall and personall subsistence at the right hand of his Father For the old Testament as the triumpher over Satan tempting him remembreth saith It is wrtiten Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and him only shall thou serve The vessell of election explaines the New when he saith God hath exalted him and given him a name which is a bove every name that at the name of JESUS every knee should bowe .... The incarnat truth confirmes this when he saith That all men should honour the Sonne as they honour the Father But none doeth worship the Father in any creature but only in heaven as that prayer published by Christ testifieth Our Father which art in heaven c. In the words following because they were accused that they did not worship the Virgine Mary nor the Saints they shew that they did esteem of the Virgine as blessed above all women not only for that she was sanctified but also for that the Sonne of God did assume a body of her body and they esteem of all them who were sanctified by faith in the grace of God through Christs merite and so as blessed of God they doe honour them with due honour they love them and would follow them but they can not give them more honour than Gods word directs them 10. When
Bessarion being a wretched Clerk in Trapezus became a gloriou Cardinal and almost Pope Luthet answered He seeth not what more affinity is between Christ and the Pope than there is between light and darknes nothing in all his life had hapned unto him more happily than the severity of Leo by the gracious providence of God for at that time he had only seen the abuses of indulgences and the Pope might have easily commanded him if his adversaries in that matter had been subject unto the lawes of equity but being provoked by the writings of the Master of the holy palace by the reproaches of Cajetan and severity of Pope Leo he took the whole matter into more diligent consideration and had espied more intolerable errours which he could not in conscience dissemble nor hide from others-and whereas he the Legate professeth himself not to be a Divine and that appeares by his reasons that he accuseth his doctrine of novelty yet he can not be ignorant that Christ and his Apostles and the antient fathers lived not as the Pope and his cardd and bb do now Nor can these arguments taken from the broiles in Germany strick against his doctrine but in the conceit of men which know not the Scriptures seing where ever the word of God is preached truly such stirres arise that the father is against the son but this is the power of the worde that who believes it he shall live and who spurneth against it is the more guilty And this is a most known errour of the Romane Church that they will underprop with humane reasons the Church of Christ as if it were a seculare Estate but such reasons are foolishness with God and that the councel may go well and bring good unto the Church it is not in the power of him who is but a mean man but rather of the Pope if he will let it be free that Gods Spirit may only preside and rule and laying aside all interests and usurpations and crafts of men let controversies be judged according to the Canon of the sacred Scripture If it were so he for his part will promise all Christian sincerity and charity and not to gain the favour of the Pope or of any mortal but only for the glory of Christ and for establishing the peace and liberty of the Church Nor can so great good be expected unless God be reconciled by casting away hypocrisy and by earnest repentance for our sinns .... Nor doth he regard the examples of Sylvius Bessarion these darke shewes can not move him .... yea the Legate and the Pope shall embrace his faith rather than he will forsake it Histo Concil Tride lib. 1. The same Vergerius dealt with other Preachers in Wittembergh and other places where he came he found no acceptance among them and where any did speake submissely he made no great account of them they were but few and he thought they could do little The same year Charles Duke of Savoy was persuaded by the exiled Bishop of Geneve to take arms against that City they had aid from the Swisers especially from Berne and gave the repulse the Swisers conquered all the land between them and the lake of Geneve Jo. Sleida Ibid. XXXI In the year 1536. the Preachers of the Cities which had The agreement in the question of the Ls Supper Ann. 1536. presented their Confession differing from the Augustane in the question of the Sacrament considering that the Pope might make his advantage upon that difference if the Councell shall hold at Mantua thought good to seek agreement with Luther and others So Capito Bucer went from Stawsburgh and others from Essling Memming Frankford Ausburgh Furfeld and Reutling and made accord with the Divines of Wittembergh On these articles following 1. We believe according to the words of Irenaeus that the Eucharist consists of two parts an earthly and an heavenly and we think and teach that the body blood of Christ is truly and substantially present with and given taken with the bread wine 2 albeit we deny transsubstantiation nor think that there is any locall inclusion in the bread or any durable conjunction with out the use of the sacrament yet we grant that the bread is the body of Christ by a sacramental union that is we think when the bread is given the body of Christ is also present and is truly given for without the use extra usum when it is keept in a boxe or is shewed in processions as a mong the Papists we thinke Christs body is not present 3. We think that the Institution of Christ is powerfull in the Church and that it dependeth not upon the dignity of the Minister or receiver Wherefore as Paul saith even the unworthy do eat the Sacrament so we think that the body and blood of Christ is truly reached unto the unworthy and the unworthy receive it where the words institution of Christ are keept but such do receive to their judgement as Paul saith because they abuse the sacrament when they use it without repentance and faith for it is institute for this end that he may testify that grace and the benefites of Christ are applied unto them and that they are ingrasted into Christ and washed in his blood who do repent and lift up themselves by faith in Christ If followes Because few of us are conveened at this time and this business belongeth unto other preachers and Magistrats of both parties we can not yet conclude the matter of concord before it be reported unto others also but seeing all the Divines here present do professe that in all the Articles of the Confession and of the Apology we would think and teach wholly the same we wish and earnestly crave that the Concord may be made and begun and if other Divines of both parties shall approve this article concerning the Lords supper we hope that a firme Concord may be made among us The above named Divines eleven in number did subscribe so did Luther Cas Cruciger Melanthon Jo. Bogenhagius Justus Menius and Frid. Myconius Hence it is cleare that then was no other difference in the articles of Confession and who hath made the difference after that time Osiander calleth this Formula Concordiae Wittebergensis others calleth it Concordia Smalcaldica But in the year 1537. was a solemn meeting of the Protestants at Smalcald by the advice of the Princes and Divines Luther wrote The meeting at Smalcald 1537. the Heads of Doctrin to be propounded and defended in the Councel which were approved and subscribed by the Ministers The article concerning the sacrament of the altare as they called it was thus Of the sacrament of the altare we judge that the bread and wine in the Supper are the very body and blood of Christ and not only given unto and received by the godly but also by the evill and wicked Christians and that not one kinde only should be given for we have not need of
acknowledge nothing in the Supper but bread and wine and ascribe nothing unto the sacraments but that they be badges of Christian profession But now I affiâ—e before the Lord unto his Church as my diuâ—lged books can testify that I was never of that mind or did think that in the holy Supper nothing â—â— given or distributed but bread and wine as empty signes of the Lords body and blood and not also the body and blood of the Lord. Likewise albeit in the sacraments I did speak of that as a main thing that they are the badges of our profession yet I never denied that the Lord gives those also for recommending his mercy and exhibiting the giâ—ts of life yea and the same gift not in one place only The only thing that I did impugne was that the sacraments do of themselves confirm faith seing that is the work of the Holy Ghost But when the dispute continued and Luther had declared all the matter of the sacrament more fully I saw that he neither did unite the Lords body and blood by any naturall ty unto the bread and wine nor did inclose them locally in the bread and wine nor did ascribe unto the sacraments the proper virtue whereby they of themselves can bring salvation unto the receivers but he did assert only a sacramental union between the Lords body and the bread and between his blood and the wine and that he did teach that the confirmation of faith which is asscribed unto the sacraments is by virtue not which cleaveth unto the external things by themselves but which belongs unto Christ and is dispensed by his Spirit by means of the Word and the holy Sacraments So soon as I did observe this it was my serious purpose to shew and recommend it unto others and so I desire to testify in this place unto all men who shall read this that Luther and others who are truly with him and follow his teaching rightly doth not hold any impanation in the holy supper nor any local inclosing of Christs body in the bread or of the blood in the wine neither attributeth any saving power unto the external actions of the sacraments of themselves But they hold a substantiall presence and exhibition of the Lords body and blood with the bread and wine in the holy supper and the reby they declare plainly the words of the Lord and the testimony of the Apostle which presence and exhibition is certain by the Lords word and institution without any natural union of the Lords body and blood with the elements for the Lord doth not come down again from the heavenly glory into the condition of this corruptible life They do also acknowledge and preach the saving presence and exhibition but by virtue of the Lords and noâ— of the external action and that the communicants enjoy it when with true faith they partake of the sacraments Certainly our Saviour did intend as in all his actions so especially in the sacraments to advanoe our salvation which if wee enioy not it must be through our own fauâ—â— For the bread which wee break is the communication of the Lords body and the cup of thankes-giving is the communication of his blood and unboubtedly unto the end that both the communion of Christ may groweâ—h us and all salvation may be perfected Therefore who knowing this mystery can doubt that all who are religiously partakers of the Lords table by the same partaking have their â—aith into Christ more confirmed that is more full salvation not indeed by the benefit of the external action of itself but through the good pleasure of our heavenly Father and power of our Lord Jesus Christ which he shewes toward us in the ministry of the holy Church For the more gravely and with the more religious ceremony the redemption of Christ and the communion is set forth in the holy table pious hearts that believe the promises of the Lord are the more commoved and do the more earnestly embrace the tendered communion of Christ and afterwards are the more zealous in confidence and duty unto Christ And therefore what either I in my former Enâ—â—rations or others have written against the natural union of the bread and Christs body or that local inclosing think not godly reader that those were against Luther and them that stand rightly with him for those neyther hold nor teach any such thing neither do the words which they do use carry such an opinion by themselves as even I thought some time for which only cause I did carpe at their words and I doubted not that their mind was any way more sound Huldric Zuinglius whom all that knew him know to have been Zealous and of admirable dexterity in windicating the Church unto Christ from the tyranny and superstition of the Pope when M. Luther and others contended that the bread is the body of the Lord or that the Lords body is in the bread did persuade himself that they thought the Lords body either to be turned into the same substance with the bread or to be inclosed locally in the bread and therefore he did alwayes alledge against the first If the bread be the Lords body the bread was crucified for us and against the other those passages which â—estify that the Lord left the earth and went into the heaven and sits at the right hand of the Father out of those he began to expound Is in the words of the Lord This is my body for signifieth and by the heat of contention he was so carryed that when he would impugne only the impanation and local inclosing or presence of Christ after the manner of this world and said that the Lord is more absent then present in the holy supper and that the signes are rather given here then the body and blood of the Lord and yet it was not his judgement that the Lord is simply or wholly absent from the supper or that the symboles are given without or altogether empty of the Lord body and blood as he himselfs professed afterwards when he was here treating about the agreement of the Churches in this particular and so did he write in the Apology unto the Princes of Germany for he there did maintain the presence of the Lord by the words of Augustine So sometimes when he would beware that men sought salvation by the external work of the â—acraments he averred plainly that the sacraments are but badges of Christian society and conferre nothing unto salvation But in other places he writes plainly that the sacraments do help faith Whence it it cleaâ—e that when he writes Sacraments do confer nothing unto salvation nor confirm faith thereby he understood that the sacraments that is the outward actions of the sacraments have of themselves no power to strenghthen the conscience with encrease of faith for when he intended to prove that his saying The sacraments give not salvation nor confirm faith he alledgeth that to confirm or encrease faith is the work
from above from the Father of lights 15. The priest distributing the Sacrament of the Supper speaketh unto every one of the communicants in these words Receive thou grace from the Lord and mercy from God our Saviour 16. Unto these words he who receives the mysteries of the holy Supper answereth Son of God make me partaker to day of thy mystical Supper I shall never deny thee I shall not kiss thee as Judas did but as the thief I will confess thee remember mee Lord in thy Kingdom 17. They sing not in time of communicating but al the spectators do meditate on these holy mysteries with singular devotion 18. When the communion is finished is a thanksgiving and a prayer then the priest turning toward the people blesseth them in this manner The blessing of the Lord be upon you And all the people say Amen Demetrius told mee those things concerning the Masse which is celebrated four times a year as I have said But in their dayly meetings the same Demetrius told mee the Christians have this custom 1. The priest beginneth with a blessing as in the Masse 2. Publick prayers are made a lesson is rehearsed out of the holy Scriptures and there is a short Sermon 3. When the prayer is finished bread is distributed without wine they call not this bread the body of the Lord but it is given in token of mutuall brotherly-love that their mindes being admonished by this sign may be united who eat of the same bread 4. When they have eaten that bread they are dismissed with this blessing The blessing of the Lord be upon you So Heming XIV It may be required here why is not mention made of the tares which the ill man did sowe among the wheat in this Century I intended indeed to have marked those heresies but partly because these are collected already and partly that this Compend hath swelled bigger then I intended I leave them and only will writ a little of a late kind of Monks in the Roman Church these are the Jesuits They had their first hatching Of the Iesuites from Johannes Petrus Carafa a Venetian who became Pope Paul IIII. But because he brought not that Order to an establishment his name is forgot in their genealogy and Ignatius Loyola is called their first father This was a Spanjard and a Captain When the Frenches beseeged Pompejopolis his one leg was broken and the other was wounded with a bâ—llet when his wounds were cured so as might be he saw that he could not follow the warrs as he intended thereupon he took himself unto a reteered life and reades the Legend's of Saints as they are called and went to Jerusalem for devotion after his returning he began to studie in Compluto Salamantica and then at Paris where he became Master of Arts An. 1536. Then he intends to begin a new order and hearing what Carapha had intended he will prosecute that project for upon occasion he lived at Venice He takes with him ten fellowes of his minde and go togeher for confirmation of their Order The Cardinals opposed him because the world was complaining of the multitude of Orders and Monks and indeed there was more need to restrain the number then add new But Loyola said The Franciscans and Dominicans who were wont to be stout Champions for the Apostolical See had failed of their duty but if his Order were confirmed he and all his fellowes will oblige themseves to do what they can for confirming the Papal power Upon this motive Pope Paul III. confirms the Order with this limitation that their number should not exceed sixty but in the year 1543. the Pope understanding of their diligence takes off that restraint of the number What sort of men those are may be wel known by two litle books one under the name Aphorismi Doctrinae Jesuitarum printed An. 1608. another called Anatomia Societatis Jesu printed An. 1643. The first saith They maintain all thearticles determined by the councel at Trent and namely these 1. The Pope hath spiritual and temporal power to command forbid to excommunicat and escheat to set up and cast down Emperours Kings and Princes and who believe not this is an heretick 2. All clergy-men Monks and Nonns and all their priviledges are al together free from obedience censures and taxations of Magistrats all Princes should commit their chief castls and fortresses unto church-men rather then to laicks 3. Unto the pleasure of the Pope belongeth the authority of the Scripture the interpretation and power of changing it and the Pop's Decrees are absolutly necessary unto salvation and they are firm and obligatory 4. Albeit the Pope be a man yet seing he is the Vicar of God on earth and therefore Divin honor should be given unto him he cannot err in matter of faith albeit all other men yea and councels may erre and for this cause appeals may be from Councels unto the Pope but not contra 5. All capitulations constitutions leagues fraternities priviledges of Emperours Kings Princes and States whereby any other religion is permitted excep the Romish religion are of no validity although they had been ratified by solem oaths 6. All Papists every where should endeavour to oppress by fire sword poison powder warre and whatsoever engines all hereticks especially Lutherans and their abbetors even these Politick Catholicks who would rather observe peace then contribute to oppress hereticks 7. But if Papists do fear that enterprices shall be in vain and dammage may befall the Romish religion in this case may be a toleration and they may wait for better occasion 8. When Popish subiects have in an assembly judged an Emperour King or Prince to bea tyrant then they may cast him off and deliver themselfs from all obligation but if they can not assemble then any subject taking the advice of a Jesuit or any such Divine may yea he doth meritoriously to kill that King or Prince 9. If subjects have a Lutheran or Calvinian Prince who would compell them into heresy those subjects are free from all homage and fealty and they may expell or kill him 10. Yea Emperours Kings and Princes may be killed if Jesuites or other grave Divines judge them tyrants 11. The Pope may give unto Catholiks the Kingdoms dominions and territories of all hereticks and infidels and such donations are validâ— 12. Jesuites and other Catholick priests when examined by heretical Magistrats may use equivocations fained names and cloaths and they may deny the truth for insinuating themselves abroad or for bringing their designements to pass 13. Jesuites and other Papists may use equivocations when he who is demanded thinks that that Judge hath not lawfull power to question him or his adversary hath not just cause to plead 14. Neither is every catholick tied to answer according to his mind unto privat catholicks but he may equivocat and deceive his demanders 15. This equivocation is a profitable Art and a new prudence These Aphorisms are proved particularly by
them 166. what are these Books 88. e. 103. m 112. e. 333. e. 435. m. 487. b. 477. b. 501. m. those are the Rule of all Doctrine 367. b. 369. b. 475. b. 502 543. e. and Judge of all Controversies 545. m. they should be expounded as the Writer would have them to be understood 96. m. how to finde the true sense of them 96. m. they are very profitable and sure 101. m. 213. m. 215. b 216 m. 217. m. 222. b. 224. b. the use of them is for the good of men 215. b. and for the ages then to come 172. m. 212. m. Children should be instructed in the Scriptures 216. m. they are a buckler against all Heresies 213. m. and the singular ground of Faith 221. e. 266. m. the Old and New Testament are alike and of the same Authour 213. e. 214. what the Scriptures reveal not we should not enquire 213. b. they should be translated into vulgar Languages 98. e. 99. b. 496. b. 501. m. how the Translations are to be examined 367 b. S. 31. b. Every family in Scotland was ordained to have a Bible and Psalm Book S. 401. The Scriptures were made subject unto the judgement of the Pope 249. m. they were rejected by the preaching Friers 488. and became unknown to many Church men S. 26. e. 27. b 166. e. 179. e. 182 m Some Signs of Christ's second coming 480. God only can forgive Sin 481. m. 550 m. when Sin is forgiven punishment is also forgiven 550. m. 551. b Simon Thurvey an arrogant Disputant became ignorant on a suddain 383 e Singing in Christian Churches began and was abused 141. m The King of Spain was called The Catholick King 518. m. the Spanish Inquisition S. 155. e The first Stations 13. A meeting of the Protestants at Smalcald S. 102. e. another there S. 105. a third there S. 109. Sweden becometh Christian 269. and Reformed S. 92. Some Scythians called Rhositi become Christians 184. m The Supper of the Lord. In the Lord's Supper the Bread and Wine were divided unto all 29. m. 334. m. 367 m. S 288. e. the unworthy eat not Christ but the Sacrament of Christ 102. m. 175. e. 183. e. the Bread was called the Figure or Sacrament or remembrance of Christ's Body 112. e. 133. m. 139. m. 146. e. 175. e. 181. m. 162. b. 228. e. 296. b. 367. m. e. 503. b. the Antient and Primitive form of administring the Supper 36. b. it was received daily and then each Lord's day 138. m. the Bread was not worshipped 146. m. 481. m. all did receive the Elements 146. e. 147 184. b. the Cup when denied unto the People 147. e. what was done with the Reliques 148. e. it should not be given unto the dead 176. e. the Bread remaineth after Conâ—ecration 505. b a forged distinction of oral eating visibly and invisibly 259. the Body of Christ is not in two places at once S. 16. e. a Book of the Lord's Supper was found in Holland and sent unto Luther and Helvetia S. 156 157. how the Controversie of the Lord's Supper begâ—n among the Reformed S. 85 agreement was â—ought S. 104 105. Bucer made a Retractation of what he had thought of Luther's opinion S. 160 165. Sursum Corda what these words in the Mass do teach 145. m Superstitions have a two fold influence S. 329. m T Taxes paid out of France unto Rome 428 429. The Tartars conquered the Lands of the Turks and lost them again 440. The Templaries or red Friers were condemned and their cause 455. Theophylact Bishop of Bulgaria his Doctrines 212 219. he is vindicated from the Romish Errours of Free-will Election by fore seen Faith or Works and of Transubstantiation and of Peter's Primacy 218 221. Thomas Arundel the cruel Bishop of Canterbury was plagued by God 557. m Thomas Becket 376. 377. The Thoughts of men are ruled by God 28. b Tithes should be paid 189. m. 190. m. 415. m. S. 348. Tithes were taken by the Piâ—hts from the Church and within less then ten years they lost Land and all 186. Transubstantiation 152 176. b. 181. m. 219 220 254. m. 255. A Decreet of a Roman Synod is contrary unto Transubstantiation 257. e It was not believed in Lombard's time 372. e It was made an Article of Faith 387. b It begot many new questions 417. m. 420. e How it came to be believed in England 227. m. and afterward was condemned 228 229. and in Italy 254. m. 552. It was not understood at Trent S. 264. Treason is punished 8. m The first Torches in Churches 13. m Many knew the Truth and durst not profess it 481. b Truth was called the greatest crime 477. b The Turks resist the Saracens 94. e. and overthrow them 271. Their first Emperour was Ottoman 492. e They take Constantinople 512. m. 525. Their cruelty and revenues 554. A dispute of a Turk with a Christian S. 151 153. V The Vandals become Christians 224 270. Vandalica Reformatio what 375. Ubiquity of Christ's Body is denied 373. b Vertue in men is of God's work and not mans 37. m The holy Vessels 144. e The holy Vestures of the Altar and of Priests and Bishops 144. 149. m The Priests of the Eastern Churches had but usual Vestures 144. m The Vestures of Preachers 385. The Title Vicar of Christ 322. m Vigiliae Siculae 395. m Vision concerning the estate of the Church 481. e. 539. b A Visitation of the University of Aberdein S. 362. The University of Paris began 99. e The University of St. Andrews began 557. b. and enlarged 559. Universities erected in Germany S. 4. e No Union in the Roman Church in respect of doctrine 489. m. S. 297. e. nor in their service S 280. e The title Universal Bihop was oppugned 9. and affected and obtained 13. where it is also expounded An Usurper reigneth craftily and wickedly 5. W Wafers in the Sacrament 147. e The Waldenses began 350. their number 351. their Doctrine is declared generally by the testimones of Romanists and Protestants 352. Articles imputed unto them 354. objections against them are answered 355. the occasion of their separation from the Roman Church 353. how they were persecuted 356 420. e. 423. e. 475. m. 476. their Articles and Disputes with the Dominicans 423 e 424. their Supplication to King Uladislaus and the Confession of their Faith S. 9. the Clergy would have them all in Merindol to be killed but King Lewes the XII would not S. 23. m. they are persecuted again S. 131 e. 140. e. they had liberty in Savoy S. 141. m. The Wars of Jerusalem began 271. at the first some did espy the finistrous ends of that expedition 272. m Westphalia becometh Christian 61. m Whitgift Bishop of Canterbury his earnestness for Rites his fawnâ—â—g on the Queen and his different genius from his Predeâ—essor S. 337 338. Free-Will is by God's grace 28. e. 96. e. 100. e. 134. e. 160 215. 180 b 211. e.
shaved and made a Monk And Aventin in Annal. saith When Volarad a Bishop and Burchard Abbot of Saint Dionis at Paris were sent to understand the Pope's judgement his answer was I find in the sacred story of Divine Scriptures that the people fell away from their wretchless and lascivious King who despised the counsel of the wise men and created a sufficient man one of themselves King God himself allowing their doings all power and rule belong unto God Princes are his Ministers in their Kingdomes and rulers are chosen for the people that they should follow the will of God the chief ruler in all things and not to do what they list he is a true King that guideth the people committed to his charge according to the prescript and line of God's Law all that he hath as power glory riches honour and dignity he receiveth of the people the people create their King and the people may when the cause so requireth forsake their King It is lawfull therefore for the French and Germans to refuse this unkind Monster and to chuse one who may be able in War and Peace by his wisedom to protect and keep in safety their wives children parents goods and lives So Pope Zachary giveth his advice and pretendeth not any interest into the matter Then he writ unto Boniface Bishop of Mentz that he might anoint Pipin King of France and declare all his Subjects free from their Oath of Allegiance unto their lazy Soveraign And now the Reader may judge what Pipin did receive from Pope Zachary This was the work of many years and so ended An. 752. Here observe that Pipin was anointed but anointing The custom of anointing Kings is late or borrowed from the Iews of Kings was not in custom amongst Christians in the daies of Lactantius who in Institut lib. 4. cap. 7. speaking of Christ's name saith It was commanded unto the Jews to make an holy oil wherewith those were anointed who were called unto the Priesthood or Kingdom and now among the Romans the Robe of Purpure is the sign of their royal assumed power so unto them the anointing with oil gave the name and royal power And Augustine on Psal 45. saith It was the custom only of the Jewish Nation to anoint Kings and Priests whereby was taught that among none other but the Jewish people was the King and Priest of the world to be born Anastasius Patriarch of Constantinople did anoint Emperour Leo the I. and thereafter that came into custom to shew that the Emperour was a true Christian and free from heresie They want no colours for bringing into the Christian Church Jewish or Heathenish rites 5. John Damascen who was called Chrysoras for distinction from another Iohn Damascen of that name who lived about the year 300. had been amongst the Sarazens and for fear of death did make profession of Mahumetism but being escaped did write in defence of the Orthodox faith and began the first systeme of Divinity amongst the Greeks as afterwards Pe. Lombard among the Latines he was a maintainer of images but in many other things was an adversary to the present doctrine of Rome Lib. 1. de Orthod fide cap. 1. he saith All that is given unto us by the Law and Prophets Apostles and Evangelists we embrace acknowledge and reverence seeking no further God therefore being ignorant of nothing and providing whatsoever is profitable for us to know hath revealed it but he hath hid in silence those things whereof we could not indure the weight therefore let us love these things and abide in them neither should we pass beyond the bounds appointed by his eternal will not transgress the Divine Tradition any way Lib 3. Cap. 17. The Lord's flesh is inriched with Divine Efficacy because of the hypostatical union neither doth it fall or hath it exceeded its proper nature nor its natural properties And Cap. 18. he saith The communication of Omnipotency unto Christ-man or his Man-hood may be declared two waies First That this man Christ is almighty by communication of properties Next The proper works of God are given to the flesh as the instrument of the Deity And Lib. 4. Cap. 18. After he hath at length recommended the reading of the Scriptures he reckoneth the Books of the Old-Testament according to the Hebrew and then he saith The Wisedom of Solomon and of Jesus son of Sirach are pleasant and good but are not numbred among the Prophetical books nor were put into the Ark. And in Cap. 25. he commendeth Virginity and then he addeth this we say not derogating from marriage God forbid for we know that God blessed marriage by his presence and it is said Marriage is honourable amongst all men In Cap. 14. he saith By invocation and by working of the Holy Ghost the Bread and Wine and Water are supernaturally changed into the Body and Blood of Christ The Papishes make use of this testimony for their Transubstantiation but there is also a supernatural change of the Water in Baptism and yet no Transubstantiation neither do the Greeks believe it to this day but only a mystical change in regard of the use and effect 6. In the Epistles of Pope Zachary to Boniface it is evident that divers Many in Italy and Stain did oppose the Popes Bishops and Priests contemned the pretended Apostolical authority and his excommunications In the Epistle of Pope Adrian it appeareth that Leo Patriarch of Ravenna with-held many things from the See of Rome and that he despised the Judges whom the Pope sent thither and that he opened the Letters that were sent by some of his Diocy unto the Pope Also Regimbald and other Bishops of Lombardy did allow their Clergy to marry against the Decree of Rome Ex Epist Adrian ad Carol. When Maurice Bishop of Istria professed himself to be the faithfull servant of Saint Peter and required Pensions there unto him the people pulled out his eys and said their land was the Territory of Charls and not of the Pope Catal. test ver lib. 8. Paulin Bishop of Aquileia in his book against Felix and Eliphand Bishops of Uurgelita and Tâ—leâ—o commendeth the Holy Scriptures and condemneth all opinions whatsoever that cannot be proved out of them he saith The Church is built upon the Rock Christ and it may be shaken by Hereticks but cannot be drowned because it is strengthned by the right hand of Christ he saith Teachers and every Christian should fight against heretical opinions and refute them for a Souldier of Christ should not be basely afraid for the force of approaching Battel nor by straying seek the lurking holes of harmless escaping but being girded with the weapons of their own Warfare should couragiously pierce the hearts of their enemies with spiritual darts out of the Bow of the Scriptures 7. Aponius a French man then writ several books in Cant. lib. 1. he saith Aponius The Lord hath given his fiery word unto this World in the
should be used in all Churches and Chappels But many did expound that sign the contrary way and would not receive it till Charls did command all Bishops and Priests to use it thorow his Dominions he caused the Mass of Ambrose to be burned and threw many Priests into prison who refused to accept the new Mass The Church of Millain would not change Walafrid Strabo who lived about the year 900. testifieth in his book de Exordiis rer cap. 25. that in his time the Roman Mass was not universally in all Churches but almost saith he in all the Churches of the Latines and no Benedictine Monk did read it In the sixth tom of Biblioth Patr. de la Bigne are many books of several Authours explaining at that time the signification of the Ceremonies injoined in that Mass Their Dedicatory Epistles and Prefaces shew that they were put upon that work by the authority of the King and some time-serving Bishops and the great number of those books is an evident proof of great opposition against that Mass and the rites thereof although the books of the Adversaries have been kept down by the prevailing party Hereunto serveth what Antoninus de Voltelina a Dominican said in the Councel at Trent as is written hist lib. 6. It is clear by Histories that of old every Church had their own Rituals of the Mass brought in day by day rather of custom than by judgement or constitution and that the lesser Churches did follow their Metropolitan or their neighbour greater Churches but the rite of the Roman Church was received in many Provinces for gatifiing the Pope and nevertheless there be yet many Churches whose rites differ very much from the Roman Even in Italy remaineth the rite of Millain differing from the other in the principal parts thereof and that the same Roman hath suffered many changes is clear unto any who readeth the old book called Ordo Romanus Neither in ancient time only but within these few ages certainly before 300. years the rites of Rome were not the same which the Priests observe now in the City of Rome but which the Order of the Dominicans do retain Moreover said he the Vestments Vessels and other Ornaments both of the Ministers and of the Altars which are now in use are so new and transchanged as is easie to be observed by looking on the Books and Pictures that if the old things were brought into the World again none would know them Wherefore if the Fathers will bind themselves to approve the only rites of the Roman Church they cannot want reproof as by prejudice condemning antiquity and the rites of all other Churches and so expose themselves unto the sinistrous interpretations of men wherefore it were better to set upon those things which concern the essence of the Mass without any mention of the rites And in declaring the differences betwixt then-present custom of the Romans and that which was called Ordo Romanus he nameth especially that in this the Communion was given under both the species unto the people Some were offended at his freedom of speech and the Bishop of Quinquecclesiensis did openly profess that the Frier had spoken truly neither could any who loveth truth be offended with him Hence it appeareth clearly that the Church of Rome hath been subject to novations from time to time and the Missal now is not the old book of Pope Gregory the I. More of the Mass followeth in the next Century 10. In the sixth tom of the fore-named Biblioth Patr. is a remarkable piece Amularius Fortunatus of Amalarius Fortunatus Trithemius calleth him Hamularius a very learned man in the Latine and Greek languages a Monk of Luxovia In the Preface he sheweth that he had written another book of Divine Service and thereafter he went to Rome to enquire of the reasons of the rites different there from other Churches and so he did write four other books wherein he describeth what he had heard and what he thought himself on the contrary yet in a mild and moderate way whether for fear to offend or in hope to prevail with fair information it is uncertain He saith In all that I write I hang on the judgement of godly men and holy fathers and withall I say what I think What things are done in the celebration of the Mass are done in the Sacrament of the Lord's Passion as he commanded saying How oft ye do this do it in remembrance of me Therefore the Priest in offering Bread and Wine and Water in the Sacrament representeth Christ the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament do represent his Body and Blood Sacraments should have a similitude of those things whereof they are a Sacrament wherefore let the Priest be like unto Christ so the offering of the Priest upon the Altar is like unto that of Christ on the Cross that which is offered in resemblance of Christ the Priest commendeth it unto God the Father Let the judicious hearer consider for whom are the prayers that the Priest saith after the Communion and he shall find that they sound for them who are refreshed with the heavenly bread No prayer for the dead Lib. 3. in prof It is sufficient that the Bishop or Priest do only bless the Bread and Wine whereby people may be refreshed as in ancient times it was done by the Apostles Lib. 1. Cap. 14. he saith No creature do I by reverencing adore but God all substance which is not God is a creature and a creature is not God the Cross of Christ may be set before me but in my mind I hold Christ as hanging on it The very words of the prayer declare whom we adore we say We adore thy Cross O Lord and we commend and glorifie thy holy resurrection Here are no words of praying but of shewing the adorable Cross and the commendable resurrection of our Lord. And in another place we say God who by the precious blood of thy only begotten Son our Lord Jesus Christ hast been pleased to redeem us grant graciously that who come to adore the life-giving Cross may be freed from the bonds of their sins to whom I pray him I adore I am cast down in body before the Cross but in my soul before God I reverence the Cross by which I was redeemed but I pray unto him who hath redeemed me Then he hath a story of Oswald King of England whom he calleth faithfull and most Christian how he being in danger of his enemies caused a Cross to be set up on a Tree that came first unto his hand in the Field and said unto his Army Let us all bow our knees and all pray together unto the Almighty living and true God that he of his mercy would defend us from our proud and fierce enemy for he knoweth that we have undertaken Wars for the safety of our Nation They all did as he commanded and in the dawning they obtained Victory according to their faith Here Amular gathereth no conclusion
together to fight for life and land and killed him An. 812. Zonar and his son Stauratius was wounded in the fight and escaped into Adrianople where he was declared Emperour but after three months Michael Rangabis his brother in-law shut him into a Monastery Then were mutual Embassadours betwixt the two Emperours and a perpetual peace was concluded An. 813. as was touched in Century 8. in Amalarius All these particulars shew evidently that the power of transferring the Empire did not appertain unto the Bishop of Rome and seeing now we have Emperours nearer us they shall be the subject of this History so that some mention shall be of the Eastern Empire 2. CHARLES the Great was crowned Emperour An. 800. in the 33. Charls the Great had care of Religion year of his reign and the 58 year of his age he did fight many battels and was alwaies victorious he had Wars with the Heathenish Saxons for the space of 30 years he did oft times overcome them and granted them liberty upon condition they would imbrace the Christian faith but on every occasion their Duke Wedekind cut off both Loyalty and Christianity At several times when Charls had obtained a Victory he erected a new Bishoprick he founded seven Bishop-Cities in that Province giving them Princely power because he did judge that the fierce people might be tamed by religion rather than by Arms these were Breme Verda Minda Padeburn Osnaburg Hildesem Halberstad Crantz in Saxon. lib. 2. cap. 23. and in cap. 22. he saith Although Charls gave unto the High-Priests power of governing yet the Nobles did not altogether lose their administration whence it came to pass that when the War was ended the Secular power beyond Visurg or the river Veser was acknowledged by them all to belong unto him At last because they had revolted he removed ten thousand of them with their wives and children into Brabant and Flanders and set some French into that Province and left his son Charls there with an Army to keep them in obedience Charls understood that the Latine Translation of the Bible was much corrupted He causeth the Latine Translation of the Bible to be amended through the negligence of Writers and gave it in charge unto Alcwin to amend the Translation who did correct both the Old and New-Testament so doth Baron tom 9. ad An. 908. testifie as also that he had an ancient Copy in Biblioth Valitella carrying Alcwin's name and Alcwin in his Epistle before his sixth book on John speaketh of that his work at the command of the King He laboured much for conversion of the Pagans in Germany and erected publick Schools at Paris Ticine and Osnaburg and furnished them with store of books he received gifts from the Calipha of Aegypt his sons Pipin and Charls died before him In the year 813. when he was grown unable to govern he sent for his son Lewes and for Bernard son of Pipin and in presence of his Peers said unto Lewes Come Lewes and with joy put this Crown upon thy head not for ornament of dignity but for safety of Our Kingdoms and Christian-Commonwealth and henceforth govern thou the Empire with happy success and the Peers did swear fidelity unto him Nor did Lewes look unto the Pope for coronation or anointing untill Pope Stephen fled for refuge unto him as followeth and then he was Crowned again at Aken Charles died in February An. 814. He began a Grammar of the German language but ended it not he changed the names of the Winds and Months from the heathenish manner He writ many books In the Epistle to Alcwin before his books De Divinis Officiis he His testimony in some articles of the faith saith When Christ was at Supper with his Disciples he broke the bread and gave the cup to them in figure of his body and blood and left a great Sacrament which is profitable unto us Lib. 1. cap. 15. The mercy of our Mediatour is above the Legal and Evangelical Precepts through which mercy we are saved not by our works which we have done nor by our willing or running but by his mercy Lib. 3. cap. 25. The miracles which they say have appeared in images if they did not appear truly as no authentical Of Miracles History sheweth were but lies if by some imaginary overshadowing they did appear to deceive mens minds it is most dangerous lest that old enemy by his subtile art by shew of wonders perswade deceitfully to do unlawfull things But if these things did verily appear which cannot be proved by any certain warrant we should understand that when many and wondrous things are done at the pleasure of God by some creatures or in whatsoever creatures they be done yet these things are not to be worshipped by which or in which these wonders are made because the Almighty God who sheweth many signs unto men by visible and palpable things to mollifie the hardness of mens hearts by these visible things doth not work these signs to confirm the worship of any creature for he hath commanded to worship and adore him alone Because God spoke out of a bush unto Moses should the bush therefore be worshipped Because a woman was healed by touching the hem of Christ's garment should hems therefore be worshipped Lib. 4. Cap. 2. The Holy and Catholick Church professeth to serve God not by images nor by men nor aetheral powers but by Christ our Lord Catal. test ver lib. 8. Charls made many Laws and Ecclesiastical Constitutions His Ecclesiastical Constitutions which Ansegisus or Angisus Abbot of Lobien and then Arch-Bishop of Senonen gathered together with the Constitutions of Lewes and divided them into seven books Sinderus testifieth that they were in the Abbey of Saint Gallus and were Printed lately at Paris In the Preface he saith he had appointed these Constitutions with advice of his Priests and Counsellers and that he had followed the example of King Josias who indeavoured to bring the Kingdom which God had given him unto the worship of the true God Lib. 1. He commanded to try the learning and conversation of Intrantes he did forbid private Masses and appealed to the See of Rome but indirectly Ca. 10. He forbiddeth confusion of Diocies or that no Bishop should medle with any Parish of another Diocy he forbiddeth any books to be read publickly but what were approved by the Councel at Chalcedon cap 20. And cap. 42. he forbiddeth to worship Saints Cap. 82. He commandeth that Bishops suffer not the Priests to teach the people other things then are contained in or according to the Holy Scriptures Lib. 2. cap. 3. Although the authority of the Ecclesiastical Ministry may seem to stand in our person yet by the authority of God and ordinance of man it is known to be so divided that every one of you in his own place and order hath his own place and ministery hence it is manifest that I should admonish you all
being prepared thereby may be the more attentive to the rest After this a Chanter singeth Responsorium 13 so named because when one resteth another answereth The same is also called Graduale because it is sung upon the steps of the Pulpit After it Halelujah 14 is sung to lift up the minds of the people unto Heavenly things and raise them unto Divine contemplations Then the Gospel is 15 read in audience of the people by the Deacon with great authority that his doctrine may be heard and his vertue be understood by the Gospel the mystery of whose body is then celebrate Then the offerings 16 are made by the people and the Offertorium 17 is sung by the Clarks which hath the name from the causes as if one would say The Song of the Offerers And the Pallium corporale 18 is laid upon the Altar which signifieth the cloath wherein Christ's body is wrapped it is of pure linnen and not of silk or purple nor of litted cloath as we find to have been ordained by Pope Sylvester Then are laid down the holy vessels 19 which are the Cup and the Platter upon the Altar these two somewhat resemble the Lord's burial because as then Christ's body being anointed with odours was laid in a new Tomb by the obedience of the Saints so now his mystical body being embalmed with holy prayer is given in the holy vessels to be received by Believers in the ministry of the Priests After all this the Mass 20 is sung by the Priest who when he hath spoken of the lifting up the heart 21 unto the Lord he exhorts the people to give thanks 22 unto the Lord and he filling his mouth with praises praieth that the Almighty God the Father to whom the Heavenly powers do serve would of his grace command that the professions of men may be conform to their voices After this prayer followeth a song made of the songs of Angels and Men 23 to wit Holy Holy Holy is the Lord God of Hosts c. Now is the consecration 24 of the Body 25 and Blood of the Lord and earnest prayer unto God 26 and in the mean time the Lord's Prayer is tooned 27. For when they come to communicate 28 and receive 29 the body 30 they give one to another the kiss of peace 31 and they sing The Lamb of God 32 who takes away the sin of the world that 33 we in peace perceiving the Sacrament may be made of the number of thy children and have all our sins forgiven us After the Communion and a song of that name 34 and the blessing 35 of the people by the Priest a Deacon intimateth unto the people that the Mass is ended 36 and dismisseth them 37. 12. Methodius a Bishop of Moravia Juliamentana went with one Cyril The Bible and Worship in vulgar language into Poland in the daies of Lewis the Godly and converted many of the Sclavi unto Christianity He found the Vandal Letters and translated the Scriptures into that language and in their Liturgy they used the vulgar language therefore he was summoned to Rome he went and defended himself by the testimony of Paul Rom. 14. Every tongue shall confess unto the Lord and he did shew the inconvenience of speaking in an unknown language among these new Proselytes So Pope Nicolaus granteth liberty unto the Scalves and Polonians to use their own language When he returned from Rome he dealt with others in Dalmatia and Illyticum to put away the Latine and serve God in their vulgar language The Bishops and Priests were so offended with him that he was constrained to return into Moravia where he died Catol test ver lib. 9. 13. Huldricus or Uulrik usually called Saint Ulrik Bishop of Augusta Against the 〈◊〉 single life of the Clergy Vindelicor did write unto Pope Nicolaus the I against the Decree for single life of Priests After a modest and grave Preface he saith Since there are very many proofs both in the Old and New-Testament let it not I beseech be grievous unto thy Father-hood that a few of many be inserted into this page The Lord in the old Law ordained marriage unto the Priests which he is never read to have forbidden again But in the Gospel he saith ... because of fornication let every man have his own wife The hypocrites say falsely this belongeth especially to Laicks and they themselves although entred into the Holy Orders spare not to abuse other mens wives After other testimonies of the Scriptures he citeth unto this purpose some testimonies out of Regula Clericor and out of Augustine out of Tripartita Historia he citeth the History of Paphnutius in the Councel of Nice then he bringeth the practice of Pope Gregory the I who once condemned marriage of Priests and when he saw so many heads of babes even more then 6000 which were taken out of his pond he condemned his own Decree and said It is better to marry then to give occasion of murther And then Ulrik inferreth If they had read such an accident as I have I beleeve they would not possibly judge so rashly .... Unto so fond filthy suggestion of this command I will not say counsel they have further said It is more honest to have dealing with many women secretly then openly in the sight and knowledge of men to be knit with one Which surely they would not say if they were of him or in him who said Wo to you Pharisees hypocrites who do all things to be seen of men c. The late Romanists have great spight against this Epistle and call it a Lutheran fiction their Iudices expurgatorii have ordained that it shall not be Printed again and they have forged arguments against it from the name of the Authour and the Age wherein he lived c. But the more they study to darken it it is the more cleared as may be seen in the Treatise of Bishop Hall The honour of the married Clergy lib. 3. sect 2 3 4. One proof of it is thâ—t Aeneas Sylvius de morib German speaking of Ausburg saith Udalrik is the Saint of this Title who did reprove the Pope concerning Concubines So he nameth lawfull wives 14. Gunther Bishop of Colen and Thietgaud Bishop of Trevers went Bishops call the Pope a Wolf c. with a Commission from their Nation unto Pope Nicolaus and were hardly dealt with because they freely delivered the grievances of their Nation They escaped with their lives and did write back complaining of the wrongs which he had done them and then they say The eternal Emperour hath furnished his Empress and Spouse with spiritual and everlasting stuff and beautified her not with frail or perishing dowry .... Which benefits thou as a briggaud interceptest and takest from the Church of God and transferrest unto thee thou art a Wolf unto the Sheep and thou killest the living thou drawest the strong from above and by thy wonders thou thrustest down to Hell ... thou bearest
and what it is to eat his flesh and to drink his blood He who eats my flesh and drinketh my blood abides in me and I in him that is to eat his flesh and to drink his blood to abide in Christ and to have him abiding in us and therefore who abides not in Christ or in whom Christ abides not without doubt neither eats he Christ's flesh spiritually although carnally and visibly he do press with his teeth the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ but rather he eats to his own judgment the Sacrament of so great a thing who being unclean did presume to come unto the Sacrament of Christ which no man takes worthily but who is clean Hence we see that Haymo thought wicked men cannot eat the body of Christ but only the Sacrament of it and whosoever eats Christ's flesh abides in Christ and is immortal therefore he did not beleeve Transubstantiation And here again he confirms the perseverance of them who have true grace In the Homily De Passtone Christi secundum Matth. he saith After he had supped he gave them bread and wine to wit in a mystery of his body and blood for because bread strengthneth the heart of man and wine augmenteth blood in man justly is the bread turned into the body of Christ and the wine into his blood not by figure or by shadow but in truth for we beleeve that it is the flesh of Christ in truth and likewise his blood but because human frailty is not accustomed to eat raw flesh and to drink blood therefore the same flesh is translated into bread and his blood into wine And in the next page he saith He gave it unto his Disciples and said Take ye eat ye This is contrary unto them which give the Eucharist unto dead men for when the Lord had said Take ye presently he adds And eat ye because it is not sufficient to take unless each do eat it to his salvation because what they could not take in their life they shall not be able to take after death Likewise taking the Cup he gave thanks and gave it unto them and said Drink ye all of it that whosoever takes should drink Here is Transubstantiation will a Romanist say But observe first How can the opinion of Transubstantiation stand with the preceding testimony 2. He speaks here as Remigius did before to wit not a substantial change but a real change in respect of use and condition 3. He saith Christ's flesh is translated into the bread as well as he saith the bread is turned into his body but this they will not maintain and neither of them is done substantially and yet both really to wit as he saith in the first words in a mystery 4. He saith expressly Christ gave them bread and commanded to eat therefore it is still bread and must be eaten The bread is such bread as strengthneth the heart and the wine is such wine as augmenteth blood therefore the substance of bread and wine doth remain And here he condemns another practise of the Romanists which although they do not profess in writing yet I have heard credibly reported that they do as baptize dead children so put bread or the hosty into the mouths of the elder persons when they are dead This Haymo writ also a large Commentary on the Revelation wherein though he fail in the application of the Prophetical part as not knowing what was to come yet is he Orthodox in doctrine and contradicts the present Romish Church in many particulars and as once I have said before we look upon the pure mettle and leave the dross In lib. 1. at the words Grace and peace he saith It is to be noted that it is not said Peace and Grace but grace is premitted and peace follows because none can attain the peace of reconciliation unless the grace of mercy prevene him because that we may come to the peace of God we are prevened by the grace of God and generally all things which we have from God whether in faith or in work in abstinence fasting and other things are given to us freely of his only mercy On Cap. 2. at the words I will make him a Pillar in the Temple he saith None doubteth that the Temple of God is the Church of the Elect .... The Lord then saith Who overcometh understand ye the temptations of the Divel worldly lusts and carnal delights I will make him a Pillar in the Temple of my God that is I will make him strong in good work that he shall not fear any loss but moreover by the strength of his fortitude that is by his example and doctrine he may sustain the Church And where it is said He shall not go forth any more it is manifestly known that he had gone forth .... but being recalled he shall go no more forth that is he shall be separated no more from the grace of Christ As in this place so in a hundred more of that Commentary he calleth the member of the Church the Elect and he speaks oft of their perseverance In lib. 2. on cap. 3. at these words I will sup with him he saith The head supped with the members and the members with the head because Christ died for the Elect and the Elect die with him that they also may perfect the will of the Father Christ feedeth us because he inlightneth us with his faith and on the other side we feed Christ when we do delight him with our faith and works On cap. 8. at these words And another Angel came and stood before the Altar he saith This other Angel is the man Christ-God of whom the Prophet saith His name shall be called the Angel of the great Counsel for he is the messenger of the Father's will which came and stood before the Altar with a golden Censer to shew that he is the true High-Priest of good things to come for it is the ministry of a Priest to stand at the Altar and diligently to burn the Incense being prepared with spices for he is the Angel of Angels and the High-Priest of Priests Moreover before the Altar that is before all the Church which burneth with the fire of God's love and offereth unto God a true sacrifice that is a contrite heart killing kimself that he might be a living and reasonable sacrifice For before this Altar standeth the Angel that is the true High-Priest by whom we send all our Sacrifices unto God the Father wherefore also the Priests in all their prayers make mention of him that by him they may be heard saying Through our Lord Jesus Christ ..... To this Angel the Incenses are given that he should offer them unto the Father upon the Altar that is upon himself by whom the godly do direct unto the Father their prayers and all their works as it is written If any man sin we have with the Father an Advocate Jesus Christ the just and he is the propitiation for our
Canon as being not the work of Christ nor of his Apostles as Gregory confesseth lib. 7. ind 2. Epist 63 but either his own or as he seemeth to say there of one Scholasticus yet it is the mighty providence of God for the conviction of the Romish Church that the Canon is continued For they hold Out of the Canon is confuted 1 The doctrine of the sacrifice first That in the Mass is a true singular and proper sacrifice 2. That the Bread and Wine are transubstantiated into the Body and Blood of Christ 3. That the People should not pertake of the Wine 4. That men attain salvation or eternal life by merit of their works but all these are clearly confuted by the words of that Canon First concerning the Sacrifice it saith a little from the beginning Petimus uti accepta habeas benedicas haec dona haec munera haec sancta sacrificia illibata Here observe first that the words are in the plural number gifts sacrifices But Christ is not many gifts nor many sacrifices he is one gift Ioh. 4. 10. and one sacrifice Heb. 9. 2◠10. 10. therefore Christ is not signified by these words 2. The Canon saith We pray that thou wouldest accept and bless these gifts Should we think that Gregory would have men to pray for the acceptation of Christ and for a blessing unto him who is the dearly beloved of the Father eternally I beleeve Gregory did not understand the words so And after the words which are called The Consecration it is said Supra quae propitio ac sereno vultu respicere digneris accepta habere c. that is On which be pleased to look with a favourable and gracious countenance and accept them as thou were pleased to accept the gifts of thy servant Abel and the sacrifice of our Patriarch Abraham and the holy sacrifice and immaculate hosty which thy High-Priest Melchisedek offered unto thee Whether shall we believe that the offerings and sacrifices of Abel Abraham and Melchisedek were acceptable unto God through Christ or that they were the paterns of accepting the sacrifice of Christ I beleeve certainly that Gregory did not think the first but the second and so that he would have Believers to pray for the acceptation of their offerings in and through Christ and so it is said in the beginning of the Canon Most gracious Father we humbly beseech thee for Jesus Christ thy Son our Lord's sake and we pray that thou wouldest accept ... these gifts Moreover in the same Canon it is said Hanc oblationem servitutis nostrae sed cunctae familiae tuae quaesumus domine ut placatus accipias i. e. O Lord we beseech thee that thou being pacified wouldest accept this oblation of our sacrifice or of us thy servants and of all thy family Who can think that Gregory did mean by these words the oblation of Christ Again it is said Quam oblationem tu Deus omnipotens c. i. e. Which oblation O thou Almighty we beseech thee that thou wouldest be pleased to make in all respects blessed ascribed ratified reasonable and acceptable Can these words be meaned of the offering of Christ and not rather of the offering of the people And so it may be said of these words We offer unto thy excellent Majesty of thy gifts and of what thou hast given And these be all the words at least the greatest part of the Canon concerning a sacrifice and since these be not understood of a proper and singular sacrifice certainly in the Mass no true and proper sacrifice is offered But they will say the words are Haec sancta sacrificia illibata which cannot be understood of the offerings of the people and therefore must be understood of Christ's sacrifice Answer First for the word sancta it may be understood of the peoples offerings in respect of dedication as well as the sacrifice of Melchisedek is called holy and immaculate hosty and the more if we take them with the words preceding We beseech thee humbly for Christ's sake that thou wouldest accept and bless these holy oblations As for the word illibata Alcwin who was the Teacher of Raban as some write de Divin Offic. saith Illibata dicuntur id est non praegustata id est Illibata is not as yet tasted but abiding whole Yea and in the same place he saith By dona munera sacrificia one and the same thing is commended with several names and what is offered upon the Altar is called munera as the Lord saith If thou offer thy gift It is clear that he understood the gifts of the people and consequently not a singular and proper sacrifice I know also that Illibata signifieth not offered and that signification doth more confirm what I have said Secondly 2. Transubstantiation concerning Transubstantiation the Canon saith Quam oblationem tu Deus ... benedictam .... facere digneris ut nobis corpus sanguis fiat dilectissimi Filii tui Domini nostri Iesu Christi Here they say are both the sacrifice and transubstantiation But first If all these words be considered together it is clear that as I said the words Quam oblationem benedictam ratam ascriptam rationabilem acceptabilemque are not meaned of the body of Christ because it is craved that the oblation may be blessed .... to the end it may be the body and blood of Christ for what we crave that it may be made the body is not as yet the body 2. I trust none is so ignorant to think that the word fiat doth necessarily signifie to be made a sacrifice and to be transubstantiate and if that word can in that place admit another signification it proves not either of the two and far less both and so we see how great a work is grounded upon the uncertainty of the signification of one word I have already twice shewed how Raban expoundeth the word for a sign figure seal and representation and here I add the words of Augustine Epist 23. ad Bonifa Christ was once sacrificed in himself and is every day sacrificed unto people in the Sacrament neither is it falsely said that he is sacrificed for Sacraments have a similitude of the things whereof they are Sacraments and for this similitude they oft have the names of the very things as in a certain manner the Sacrament of the body of Christ is called the body of Christ and the Sacrament of Christ's blood is called his blood So far Augustine and I could add the like testimonies of other Ancients but I said I would prove it from the words of the Canon Then observe first in the words immediately following it is said Qui pridie quà m pateretur accepit panem 2. After the consecration Offerimus praeclarae Majestati tuae ex donis tuis ac datis hostiam puram .... panem sanctum vitae aeternae calicem salutis perpetuae supra quae propitio ac sereno vultu
good works as is clear by the words following for when the Text saith That we may be holy and without blame before him he addeth Lest it come into ones mind that God hath chosen whom he willeth to be saved and thereupon one be slack and think it is not any more needfull to study unto vertue that one may attain life seeing they are already chosen according to the pleasure of God and there is no more hope unto others unto this he saith God hath chosen us that we should be holy and without blame that is that we should live in that holiness which God hath given unto us who have been washed in baptism therefore let us continue and keep a godly life Whence it is clear that he judgeth the moving cause to be the only will of God and thereupon follows that scruple which he removeth and this may be cleared from his words on v. 2. ch 2. 10. 3. Porsena marketh in the margine and Transubstantiation at the words of institution in Matth. 26 Panis qui sanctificatur in altario corpus caro Domini est non figura and the words in the line are When he saith This is my body he sheweth that the bread which is sanctified on the Altar is the same body of Christ and not an answering figure for he said not This is a figure but This is my body for by unspeakable operation it is transformed although it seem unto us to be bread because we are infirm and do abhor to eat raw flesh especially the flesh of man and therefore it appears bread and is flesh And on Mar. 14 When he had blessed that is had given thanks he broke the bread which also we do adjoining prayer This is my body this I say which ye take for the bread is not a figure only and some exemplar of the Lord's body but the body of Christ is converted into it For the Lord said The bread that I will give you is my flesh he said not it is the figure of my flesh but it is my flesh And again Unless ye eat the flesh of the son of man But you will say How is not the flesh seen O man that is because of our infirmity for because bread and wine are of such things wherewith we are accustomed we abhor them not but if we saw blood and flesh set before us we could not indure them but would abhor them therefore the mercifull God condescending unto our weakness keeps still the forms of bread and wine but transelementateth them into the vertue of flesh and blood These be his words without any fault in the translation Now behold the vanity of man's mind when it is fond on a thing Ixion as the fable is would so fain have had Iuno that he thought he had her in his imbracement when he had but the wind or cloud So the Romanists think they have here their transubstantiation when they have but words far different from what they do fancy In these testimonies they lay hold on two passages First The bread which is sanctified is the same body of Christ and not an answering figure I would they could conjoin the words on Mark It is not a figure only and some exemplar of the Lord's body Where the Authour denieth not simply or absolutely that the bread is a figure and exemplar of Christ's body but saith he It is not a figure only or it is not only a figure and some exemplar therefore according to his mind It is a figure and some exemplar but more then a bare figure and a special kind of exemplar Against whom is this said I have read it imputed unto some that the bread is a meer sign of Christ's body but I never read any who hath so affirmed except Socinians or Anabaptists So then in these words Theophylact speaks according to the mind of the Reformed Church But he saith It is the same body of Christ And so saith Christ himself This is my body and so say we Therefore the question is in what sence the bread is his body Next they say It is by transubstantiation of the bread into the body of Christ Here first mark that the former passage proveth it not 2. Where saith Theophylact so they say in these words By unspeakable operation it is transformed although it seem to be bread I answer In so great a matter the words ought to be considered attentively What is transformation it is two-fold if we speak properly external and internal External is when the outward form of a thing is changed into another but this is not in the Sacrament which keeps still the forms of bread and wine as it is said expressly in the words on Mark. Internal transformation is when not only the outward form is changed but the inward nature and essence of a thing is changed into another which was before as when Lot's wife was turned into a Pillar of salt or Moses's rod into a Serpent But Theophylact saith It appears bread and is flesh Wherefore he meaneth not a proper transformation but an improper kind and so saith the Reformed Churches The Romanists say he saith The bread is transformed into the body of Christ Where saith he so not on Matthew for his words are But the body of Christ is turned or converted into it It is one thing the bread is transformed into the body of Christ and another thing Christ's body is converted into the bread and therefore he saith God transelementeth the bread into the vertue of flesh So neither on Matthew nor Mark either first or last doth Theophylact assert a transformation or transubstantiation of the bread into the body of Christ but in the first place he speaks of a converting of Christ's body into the bread and in the other he speaks of a transelementation of the bread into the vertue of flesh and the Papists do hold neither one nor the other As yet I speak not of the truth of the matter nor of the meaning of the Authour but shew how the Papists delude themselves with his words As for his meaning in this matter unless his words be contrary one to another the first words must be expounded by the latter that is when he saith The body of Christ is converted into the bread he meaneth God keeps still the forms of the bread and wine both outward and inward but transelementates them into the vertue of Christ's flesh and blood that is from bare and earthly things he translates them into another rank for this is the proper signification of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to set in another file or rank of things even of spiritual things even of sealing and conveying unto us the vertue of Christ's body and blood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly is to remove a souldier from one file into another and then the souldier changeth not his nature but his place and use and so it is with the elements of the Sacrament And we may be the more
assured that this is the mind of Theophylact because for confirmation he adds The Lord said The bread that I will give you is my flesh and on these words in Ioh. 6. he saith Note well that the bread which is eaten by us in the Sacrament is not only some figuration of the Lord's flesh but the same flesh of the Lord for he said not The bread that I will give is a figure of my flesh but it is my flesh for by mysterious words it is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost into the Lord's flesh And at the words Vnless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man he addeth When we hear unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man ye shall not have life we must in taking the Divine mysteries or Sacrament hold undoubted faith and not ask what way for the natural man that is who follows human and natural thoughts is not capable of spiritual things which are above nature and so he understandeth not the spiritual eating of the Lord's flesh of which they who are not partakers are not partakers of eternal life because they have not received Iesus who is eternal life for it is not the flesh of a meer man but of God and is able to Deifie us to wit being united unto the God-head That flesh is also verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted as corruptible food but it is a help unto eternal life In these his words we see that he speaks not absolutely as he did seem to speak on Matthew but as he spoke on Mark The bread is not only some figuration and then he saith It is transformed by mystical blessing and accession of the Holy Ghost And then he saith In taking the Divine mysteries we must hold undoubted faith then they who have not faith undoubted cannot eat that mysterious Sacrament And we must not ask what way to wit as they do now whether the substance of the bread be turned into the substance of Christ's body or whether the substance of the bread is turned to nothing and Christ's body comes into the form of the bread or c. Theophylact is far from asserting any of these waies And when he saith That flesh is verily food because it indureth not for a little time nor can be corrupted he speaks not of the visible bread which experience teacheth to be corruptible but he speaks of the Lord's flesh which we receive by faith In a word then Theophylact speaks nothing of transubstantiation but rather against it and the Papists delude themselves and abuse his words A fourth thing they object out of Theophylact that he asserts the Primacy of Peter when he saith on Joh. 21 He who durst not ask concerning the Traitour but did commit the question unto another now the government of all is concredited unto him And on the margine Porsena addeth Praefectura omnium Petro tributa and it follows as if Christ were saying unto Peter Now I bring thee forth that thou mayest govern the world and follow me and on the margine Praeest Petrus orbi But to expound these words as if Peter were the only governour of the World and the government of the World were wholly concredited unto Peter alone is far contrary unto the words and mind of Theophylact as we have heard from him on Gal. 2. where he asserteth that Paul was equal unto him and on Matth. 16 where he asserteth that all the Apostles were of equal authority Peter therefore was a governour of the world but not the only governour for all the Apostles were as much governours as he in respect of power since the power was given unto them all with one and the same words as Theophylact asserts and whatsoever power they had yet they had no civil power because as we have heard from Theophylact on Rom. 13. all souls even Apostles must be subject unto the Civil Magistrate Neither do the words of Porsena insinuate so much as they would have for Praefectura and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is but a subordinate power and a little jurisdiction yea and for the most part a conjunct power as Praefectus urbis which at Rome were two conjunct and subordinate unto the power of the former So this is all the power which they can bring unto Peter from the words of Theophylact and we may see how in many particulars he differeth from the Tenets of the Romish Church and favoureth them not in the main things wherein they pretend to have his consent 4. Radulph a Benedictine of Flaviak in this Century writ 20 books on Leviticus and 14 books on the Epistles of Paul as witnesseth Gesner In the Preface on Levit. he saith Although it should move us not a little to beleeve that the world was contrary unto the faith and now is subject unto the faith and that the faith was declared by so many miracles and testified by the blood of so many Martyrs yet the singular ground of faith is in the Scriptures when it is clearly seen to be fulfilled in our daies which we know was prefigured and foretold so many years by the Sacraments of the Fathers and Oracles of the Prophets Here by the way note that not only Radulph but many others of the more ancient Fathers do use the word Sacrament for the rites of religion yea and for mysteries and very largely or homonymously Lib. 1. cap. 1. Our Lord Jesus Christ is our Altar because we lay our oblation on him for if we do any good thing we hope that by him it shall be accepted of the Father and therefore the Apostle Peter saith Offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable unto God through Jesus Christ ..... The authority of the Holy Scripture doth furnish unto us matter of holy thoughts Ibid. Scarcely can any good work be perfected without admission of some sin it is therefore to be feared lest when the reward of perfect devotion is expected the punishment of our guiltiness be required of us Lib. 2. cap. 2. That Angel is none other but our greatest High-Priest of whom we speak to wit he was sent by the Father unto men and sent again from men unto the Father to plead the causes of men before the Father he being the Mediatour of God and men Ibid. cap. 4 Whatsoever man can do for himself were no way sufficient to obtain forgiveness unless the immaculate sacrifice of that Just one did commend the repentance of sinners Lib. 5. cap. 3 When ye do any good thing ascribe not the very affection of godliness unto you as if ye could do it of your self for it is God which worketh in us at his good pleasure both to will and to perfect ..... he who ascribeth grace unto himself must necessarily lose grace for which he was not thankfull Lib. 6. cap. 3. He dieth who discovereth his head because while he expects salvation another way then by the grace of Christ he doth
he suffered neither is that holy wine the Saviour's blood which was for us in bodily things but in ghostly understanding both be truly the bread his body and the wine his blood as was the heavenly bread which we call Manna CHAP. V. Of COUNCELS 1. IN this Century were no Synods assembled for doctrine or discipline A Synod at Rhemes opposeth the power of the Pope as in other times all Nations were so pestered with wars as is touched now only for some personal causes were some Synods among them all one is remarkable at Rhemes in the year 991. where Arnulph Bishop of the place was deposed for some trespass against the King and Gerebert Afterwards Pope Sylvester the II. was placed in that See And here by the way we may see what power Kings had then in deposing and investing Bishops Some of the Bishops would have had Arnulph's cause referred unto Pope John and others did alledge a Canon of the Synod at Carthage of 227 Bishops and Augustine was one of them Causes should be determined where they are begun that there is no need of Appeals unto Bishops beyond Sea that is as they understand it unto the See of Rome Then stood up Arnulph Bishop of Orleance and made a long Oration whereof a part is Let it be far from this holy assembly to defend or accuse any man against Divine or Human Laws .... We deserve to be drawn before the Thrones of Kings if we seem to contradict Divine Laws in any thing .... Most reverend Fathers we do reverence the Church of Rome for the memory of Saint Peter nor indeavour we to resist the Decrees of the Roman High-Priests yet following the authority of the Councel of Nice which the Church of Rome hath also reverenced continually But there are two things that we must alwaies look unto that is whether the silence or new constitutions of the Roman Pope seem to prejudge the received Laws and Decrees of former Councels If his silence shall prejudge then all Laws shall be silent when he is silent and if new Constitutions do prejudge to what end do all Laws serve which are made when all things are governed at the pleasure of one Ye see that these two things being once admitted the estate of the Churches of God is in danger and when we seek Laws by Laws we have no Laws But ô lamentable Rome who broughtest forth so many lights of Fathers unto our Grand-fathers and pourest forth in our time most monstrous darkness and infamous to the following ages Of old we hear of worthy Leo's and great Gregory's what shall I speak of Gelasius and Innocentius There is a long role of them which have filled the World with their doctrine The Universal Church might have been committed and was not committed unto them who for their good life and doctrine excelled all the World howbeit in their happiness this thy priviledge or intended usurpation was opposed by the Bishops of Affrick fearing as we think these miseries rather then the stamp of thy Dominion For what have we not seen in these our daies We have John surnamed Octavian walking in the puddle of uncleanness conspiring against Otho the Emperour whom he had Crowned Augustus Malefacius an horrible monster succeeds going beyond all the World in wickedness and defiled with the blood of former Popes and he also was condemned in the great Synod and chased away Shall it be Decreed that unto such Monsters void of all knowledge of Divine things Where was then the head of Omni-science in his breast innumerable Priests should be subject who are famous throughout the World for knowledge and godly conversation What is this Reverend Fathers and in whose default shall it be thought to be it is our it is our fault our ungodliness which seek our own things and not the things that concern Jesus Christ for if in any man who is elected unto a Bishoprick gravity of manners be required and good conversation and knowledge of divine and human things what is not to be required of him who seeks to be the Master of all Bishops What think ye Reverend Fathers of him who sits in a high Throne and glorieth in his gold and purple cloaths He is more like to Nero than to Peter or Paul nay that is not enough to wit if he be destitute of charity and puffed up with a conceit of knowledge he is Antichrist sitting in the Temple of God and shewing himself as if he were God But if he be destitute of knowledge nor hath charity he is an Idol in the Church of God from whom to seek responses is to advise with an Idol Let any Iesuit answer unto this dilemma for both the parts are sharply pointed and they cannot truly find a third Whither then shall we go the Gospel shews us that a certain man sought fruit thrice on a Fig-tree and because he found none he would cut it down but after intercession he delaied Let us therefore await our Primats and in the mean time let us search where we may find the green Pastures of God's Word Here is a right way of seeking resolution Some witnesses present in this sacred assembly shew that there may be found some worthy Priests of God in Germany and Belgia who are our neighbours Wherefore if the anger of Princes do not hinder the judgment of Bishops might be sought thence rather then from that City whien weigheth judgment by the purse Then he alledgeth and refuteth the Canons that were wont to be cited on the contrary and reports the like practices of the Church of France And then he saith If passage to Rome were stopped with Armies of besieging Barbarians or if Rome were serving a barbarous Prince at his pleasure or were advanced into some Kingdom shall there be no Councels in the mean time or shall the Bishops of the World to the damage of their own Countries await for Councels and Councels of ordering their affairs from their enemies And truly the Canon of Nice which by the testimony of the Romish Church goeth beyond all Councels and all Decrees commandeth that Councels be held twice every year and prescribes nothing therein concerning the authority of the Bishop of Rome But to speak more plainly and to confess openly after the fall of the Empire this City hath lost the Church of Alexandria and Antiochia and omitting mention of Asia and Affrick now Europe goeth away for the Church of Constantinople hath withdrawn her self the inward parts of Spain know not her judgments therefore there is a departing as the Apostle speaks not only of the Nations but of the Churches also that Antichrist seemeth to be before the dores whose Ministers have occupied all France and do oppress us with all their might And as the same Apostle saith now the mystery of iniquity is a working only who with-holds shall with-hold untill he be taken away that the son of perdition may be revealed the man of sin .... Which now is
did teach that the body and blood of Christ which are offered upon the altar throughout the earth are not the very body and blood of Christ but onely a figure or certain similitude howbeit indeed Berengarius had said nothing so To the intent Adelman may bring his Brother from this opinion he intreateth him brotherly not to depart from the doctrine of their master Fulbert and of the Catholike Church Then he appealeth to the testimony of Augustin Ambrose and Jerome who never taught any transubstantiation or impanation He writeth also that the very flesh and blood of Christ was given unto the Apostles at the first institution and are still given unto faithful communicants for he who said in the beginning Let there be light and the light was made of nothing why saying of the bread This is my body may he not cause it to be the same Afterwards he sheweth how Christ worketh this by the mystery of man for when he was made immortal and going up to heaven he said Behold I am with you unto the end of the world because he was compersonate of two natures one circumscribed another uncircumscribed by his circumscript nature he went from place to place by his uncircumscript nature he is whole every where illocally and abode with them yet he did not separate the Son of Man from the Son of God and when the Son of Man ascended up to heaven he was there as the Son of God as he witnesseth himself No man ascendeth up to heaven but he who came down from heaven the Son of Man who is in heaven If therefore he was there by the unity of person whether he had not ascended by property of nature for in the same unity he abode still on earth with men after he had ascended up to heaven Therefore that faith may be exercised in believing because that vital Sacrament appeareth not under a bodily shape it is hid profitably as the soul in the body Last of all The water in Baptism seemeth to be common water and a baptised man What seemeth he but what he was before he declareth this at great length that neither sense nor reason can reach to comprehend this mystery where sense judgeth that water to be an humide liquor cold in substance and which may be turned into air or earth but how by the water and the Spirit a soul is regenerate and forgiveness of sin is given unto this unsearchable mystery neither sense nor reason can attain and nevertheless we must surely believe That the unbodily soul is created by bodily water c. Mark here as Christ's body was not in heaven when he said Behold I am with you and yet even then he was in heaven wholly in respect of his person so now his body is in heaven and not on earth where notwithstanding he is personally Again mark We have here an union of the water and the Spirit to the regeneration of the soul but who ever thought that that water is the Spirit or that the thing signified is corporally or locally in the water or who can imagine that the body is turned into the soul when the body and soul are united And yet Adelman writeth that the union of bread and wine with the body and blood of Christ is like to these two unions to wit by these comparisons he would shew that though the elements remain still the same and Christ's body be always in the heavens till he come again to judge yet there is a real and sacramental union twixt the sign and the thing signified and that the faithful certainly communicate of both together What answer Berengarius did return to his con-disciple we cannot finde But he wrote an Epistle to the forenamed Lanfrank declaring the abuses of the Sacrament and commending the book of John Scotus on that question And he wrote expresly that the body of Christ is not in the Sacrament but as in a sign or figure or mystery He spake also in his preachings against the Romish Church in the doctrine of Marraiage and necessity of Baptism Io. Oecolampad epist lib. 3. fol. 154. print at Basil anno 1536. And Bellarm. in praef before his Books de Pon. Rom. witnesseth that Berengarius called the Church of Rome the Malignant Church the Council of Vanity and the Seat of Satan and he called the Pope not Pontificem vel Episcopum sed Pompificem Pulpificem It happened that Lanfrank was not at home and the Convent opened the Letter of Berengarius and sent it with a Clerk of Rhemes unto Pope Leo IX The Pope summoned a Synod at Verceles Berengarius was advised not to go himself but send some Clerks in his name to answer for him The two Clerks were clapt in prison Scotus was condemned 200. years after his death and the doctrine of Berengarius was condemned yet nothing done against his person at that time because many favored him Lanfrank was now a pleader for him but he was commanded by the Pope to answer him under no less pain then to be as great an Heretique as he Lanfrank following the sway of the world for afterwards he was made Bishop of Canterbury performed the charge In that Book he sheweth that Berengarius in the words of Institution This is my body did appoint them this that is this bread and the bread remaineth saith he bread so that it becometh what it was not to wit the body of Christ sacramentally Even as Ambrose said The Sacrament consisteth of two things one visible another invisible the thing signified and the sign which thing signified if it were before our eyes on earth it were visible but since it is lift up to the heavens and sitting at the right hand of the Father it cannot be brought until the time that all things be restored Again Lanfrank saith Thou believest the bread and wine of the Lord's Table to remain unchangeable in respect of the substance that is to have been bread and wine before the consecration and to be bread and wine after the consecration that they are called the flesh and blood of Christ because they are celebrated in the Church in remembrance of his flesh which was crucified and of his blood which was poured out of his side to the end we being admonished thereby may call to minde the Lord's passion and when we call it to minde we should incessantly crucifie our own flesh and the vices and infections thereof What absurdity could be in these words worthy of so many curses and what was against the Scriptures But Lanfrank hoping to catch some advantage by these last words as if Berengarius had said These signs are naked signs he did beat the air and nothing impugned the true doctrine of Berengarius for this is the special argument of Lanfrank against him The doctrine of the Apostles ordained to be preached that the flesh and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ is eaten with the mouth of the body and with the mouth of the
soul that is both bodily and spiritually seeing with the mouth of the body we eat and drink corporally as oft as we receive the Lords body from the altar by the hands of the priest but it is eaten and drunken spiritually with the spiritual mouth of the soul when sweetly and profitably as Augustine saith it is called to memory That the onely begotten Son of God for the salvation of the world took upon him our flesh hang on the cross rose again appeared ascended and will return again to judge Of the spiritual eating the Lord said to his disciples Take eat Augustine endeavored to demonstrate the spiritual eating Tract 26. in Iohan. when he said Eat the heavenly bread spiritually bring innocence unto the altar This then is the bread which cometh down from heaven that whosoever eateth of it shall not die but which belongeth to the vertue of this Sacrament and not to the visible Sacrament who eateth inwardly not outwardly who eateth with heart and not who cheweth with teeth Here if Lanfrank by his bodily eating or eating with the mouth of the body will have both the signs and the signified thing to be taken bodily his argument against Berengarius is silly or if he meant it onely of the signs Berengarius saith the same But Guitmund Bishop of Aversa turned further aside and wrote more bitterly and less truly against Berengarius Who can hold laughter saith he when he heareth Berengarius expounding the words of our Lord concerning the Sacrament This is my body i. e. this bread is my body O most impudent foolishness why may not the teeth touch that which the hand toucheth If the body of the Lord was touched by the hands of Thomas after his resurrection and by the holy women why may it not to day be touched more easily and surely touched that is chewed by the teeth of the faithful He therefore who gave himself to be handled after the resurrection he will not flee from our teeth for uncleanness c. Nevertheless Berengarius abode constant and was in high estimation both with Nobility and People and therefore Pope Victor the II. gave direction to the Bishops of France to take order with him They assembled at Towres anno 1056. there was Hildebrand and the Priests legate Berengarius eluded the Council rather then open his minde for he professed generally That he followed the sentence of the Catholique Church that is said he as the Scriptures Fathers and Primitive Church have taught And more particularly he said that the bread and wine became the flesh and blood of Christ not as in a shadow but truly Pope Nicolaus II. hearing that Berengarius was honored of many summoned him again to a Synod at Rome anno 1059. and there as Baron ad ann 1059. saith without any disputation he condemned his own error But Vsser de succes Eccles c. 8. hath marked that Sigon de reg Ital. lib. 9. when Berengarius with many arguments defended that the Sacrament to speak properly was the figure of Christ's body and Cardinal Albericus who was nominated to dispute against him could not by voice resist him and neither of the two would yield to the other Albericus sought the space of seven days to answer in writing as also it is remembred by Leo Ostien in Chron. Cassin lib. 3. And at last when disputation could not prevail against him it was given him in option Whether he would recant or burn The old man for fear of death as Pa. Masson Annal. Franco lib. 3. speaketh made that beastly recantation a perpetual argument of his dastardly courage and of the brutish ignorance of that Council which was penned by Cardinal Humbert and is registred by Gratian. de consecr dist 2. Ego Berengarius Nevertheless the words of the recantation are as far from Romish transubstatiation as white from black These are the words so far as they concern our present purpose faithfully translated I Berengarius do consent unto the Apostolique and Roman See and with my mouth and heart confess that the bread and wine which are laid on the altar after the consecration are not onely the Sacrament but also the very body and blood of our Lord Jesus and sensibly not onely in Sacrament but in truth are handled with the hands of the priest broken and chewed with the hands and teeth of the faithful c. John Semeca the Glossator of the Decrees expresly condemneth the words of this recantation and saith If thou understand not the words of Berengarius soundly thou shalt fall into a greater heresie then he did for we break not Christ's body into pieces nisi in speciebus Lombard li. 4. Dist 12. E. 1. saith Not in the substance of his body but in a Sacrament that is in specie And Bellarmin de Concil lib. 2. c. 1. saith In signo non in se When they say understand soundly they understand clean against the Text for if by species and sign they understand not bread and wine as the ancient Fathers did certainly mean and speak they deceive the world seeing whiteness and such other qualities can never be broken without some substance neither are these qualities the sign of Christ's body wherefore the substance of bread remains after the blessing And when they condemn the confession of Berengarius and call it his words they consider not that they condemn their Pope Nicolaus and their Council of one hundred and fourteen Bishops prescribing it and ordaining Berengarius to subscribe it and which sent that confession unto the Bishops of Italy Germany and France as Catholique It is certain that Berengarius returning home returned also to his former doctrine and wrote in defence of it so that as Blondus saith he was summoned again by Pope Gregory the VII anno 1079. and then subscibed another recantation and an Act was made That thenceforth none may dispute nor teach another concerning the body and blood of our Lord except for bringing unto the faith them that are gone astray It seems that as yet Gregory was not resolved of his doubt Bercold a Priest of Constance ad ann 1083. saith Albeit Berengarius abjured that heresie in face of Synods yet he ceased not to return unto his vomit Some have written that Berengarius denied the baptism of Infants but saith Ja. Usser In so many Synods held against him We never finde any such thing laid to his charge And unto the said Usser it appears that who in those days were charged to deny the baptism of children did hold no more but this Baptism conferreth not grace ex opere operato So Berengarius died holding his first doctrine at Towres in the Isle of St. Cosina and was buried in S. Martins where his Tomb was reared and Hildebert Bishop of Caenoman and then of Towres made his Epitaph which is in Guil. Malmesbu de Gest Anglo lib. 3. And this is a part of it Quem modò miratur semper mirabitur Orbis Ille Berengarius non obiturus
nor can they likewise love Christ because they lift up their hands to mammon Behold how they walk glancing and attired clothed with various colours as a bride coming out of her chamber if unawares you saw one of them walking far off would ye not say it were a bribe and not the groom whence think ye can flow this abundance of things splendor of clothes prodigality of tables heaps of gold and silver vessels but of the brides goods and in the mean time she is left poor needy and naked in her face to be pited rough-haired and pale this is not to adorn but to spoil the bride not to keep but to destroy her not to defend but to cast her out not to instruct but to prostitute her not to feed the flock of Christ but to kill and devour her as the Lord saith of them Psalm 52. They eat up my people as they eat bread And again Psalm 78. They have devoured Iacob and laid his land desolate And in another Prophet Hos 4. They eat the sins of my people As if he had said They crave the prices of sins and have no care of the sinners Whom will ye name among all the Bishops who is not more careful to empty the peoples purses then to root up their vices who is he that will soften his wrath where is he that preacheth the acceptable year of the Lord therefore let us leave these which are not Pastors but Traitors and let us follow them who while they did live have planted the Church with their blood and indeed these have come into the place of their Ministery but not in their zeal all would be successors but few are their followers O that they were vigilant in their charge as they run gladly into their chair then they would watch diligently and take heed unto the Church which is committed unto them yea they would take heed unto themselves lest it be said of them My friends and neighbors gathered against me and stood afar off Psal 37. certainly it was a just complaint and can be applied to no age more justly then to ours It is a small thing that our Pastors do not keep us unless they also destroy for they being grievously drowned in the sleep of oblivion are awakened with no thunder of divine threatning so much as to fear their own danger hence it is that they save not their people because they save not themselves but do kill and perish together And what shall I say more the Bishops and Priests of these days how diligent are they to keep the holiness without which none shall see God of chastity both of soul and body truly the Lord saith in the Gospel Luc. 12. unto Bishops without doubt in the primitive Church Let your loins be girded not approving onely but commanding chastity The holy Ghost witnesseth also in the Law 1 Reg. 21. None might eat the shew-bread but they who were clean and namely from women and therefore Achimelech would not give that bread unto David craving it for himself and his Soldiers until he knew that they were clean from women as David said If you speak of women these three days they have been clean The holy Ghost at that time shewing that none should come unto Christ's table and unto that bread of Angels unless he be pure both in minde and body lest that which the grace of God hath prepared unto believers for their salvation be turned into judgement and condemnation unto them that take it unworthily But how do these keep the badge of chastity which are given over into a reprobate minde and commit things not convenient for it is filthy to speak the things that the Bishops do in secret therefore I think it better to dissemble this and delay rather then to speak that which may offend the innocent but why should I blush to speak what they do not blush to do yea and what the Apostle spareth not to write and preach for the excellent Preacher saith Rom. 1. Men with men wrought filthiness and they received the wages of their error Brethren I am unwise but ye have compelled me So far there Here were bold rebukes but what followed thereupon I have not read in any History but I observe somewhat from Bernard De Consider lib. 3. where he writeth unto Pope Eugenius saying Did not thy mouth pronounce these following Articles in the Councel at Rhems who hath kept them who keepeth them thou art deceived if thou think that they are kept if thou thinkest not thou hast sinned either in ordaining what should not be kept or in dissembling when they are not kept Thou wilt say We have commanded that both Bishops and Clerks should neither in superfluity nor in variety of colours nor in the cutting of their clothes nor in rasing give offence unto beholders unto whom they should be a pattern but rather by their actions condemn faults and by their conversation shew forth the love of innocence as the dignity of the order of Clerks requireth And if being admonished by the Bishops they do not obey within fourteen days let them be deprived of their Church-Benefices by the Authority of the same high Priest And if the Bishops shall neglect to execute the foresaid punishment because the faults of inferiors can be imputed unto none more then unto the idle and slothful rulers let them abstain from the Pontifical Office until they do punish their Clerks as is now ordained by us This also we thought good that none be an Arch-Deacon or Dean but a Deacon or Priest And the Arch-Deacons Deans and Provests who are under these Orders if they be negligent to keep in order the disobedient let them be deprived of their honor We forbid also that these foresaid honors be confirmed on yong men or that are below these holy Orders unless they be remarkable in wisdom and merit of conversation Thou didst ordain these things but what hath been done as yet yong men and who are below these holy Orders are promoved in the Church As for the first head prodigality of clothes was forbidden but it is not restrained punishment was appointed but it hath not followed Now there be four years since we heard that Order given and we have not lamented for any Clerk deprived of his Benefice nor from any Bishop suspended from his Office but it deserveth most bitter sorrow what hath followed what is that impunity the daughter of carelesness the mother of pride the root of shamelesness and the nurse of sin c. Mr. Fox in Act. Monim saith That in this Councel at Rhems it was ordained that no Monk should baptise nor be a witness at baptism nor hear confessions nor visit the sick nor be present at burials Hence it appeareth how impudently the Jesuit Duraeus did sometime scold with W. Whitaker for saying that good men did resist so far as they could until the mystery of iniquity had overtaken all the Church and gone through all the
corporally present in Transubstantiation the Sacrament Whence it was questioned Whether the bread evacuateth or the substance of it be changed into Christ's body Lombard could not define the question and sheweth the different opinions of others Lib. 4. Dist 11. Innocentius setteth it as an Article of faith that the bread and wine are transubstantiated into Christ's body and blood cap. 1. In cap. 2. the doctrine of Joachim is condemned but not himself In cap. 3. all men are cursed who hold not the faith which is in cap. 1. and they are ordained to be punished by the Magistrate and if they be Laicks their goods shall be confiscated or if they be Clerks their goods should return to the Church where they had their Benefice He ordained that all Magistrates should swear at their admission to banish all who are discerned Hereticks by the Church which if they be slack to do they should be accursed and if after excommunication any shall continue a year the Metropolitan should give notice unto the Pope who shall absolve all the subjects from obedience and give his Land unto others who will expel the Hereticks Item He who is declared an Heretick should not be admitted unto the Sacrament nor unto Christian burial nor should alms nor oblations be received from such Item All Bishops should twice or at least once in the year visit all their Diocy where is any suspicion of heresie and cause three or more men of best account or if need require all of the bounds should be compelled to swear whether they know any Hereticks there or if there be any privy meetings or any persons different in maners from the common conversation of others Cap. 10. Because the food of God's word is necessary unto Christian people and Bishops are hindered by many occasions from teaching their people therefore they should employ sufficient men to preach and visit and they should provide necessaries unto such This was a safe-guard unto unqualified and non-resident Bishops Cap. 13. There should be no more religions or society of Monks because there are too many already if any will be a Monk let him go to one of those sorts that are approved and if any will found a new Monastery let him take one of the former rules Cap. 19. We will not let this pass without correction that some of the Clergy adorn the Churches with their own and other mens goods that they are more like to Laicks houses then to the Churches of God Ca. 21. All believers when they come to the Auricular confession years of discretion should confess all their sins unto his own Priest once a year and accomplish the pennance that shall be enjoyned and should communicate at least at Easter unless his own Priest think good that he should abstain Neither may a Priest reveal unto others what hath been confessed These private confessions were in use before but then made necessary as also here it appeareth that before were no confessaries but the Priests until afterwards the Monks obtained this priviledge Ca. 22. Because when one is sick and the Physician biddeth send for a Priest the patient often despaireth of health and so falleth into greater danger therefore the Physician shall at the first bid send for the Physician of the soul Ca. 29. Plurality of Benefices is forbidden unless the Pope think good to dispense with some persons who are to be honored Ca. 31. Because Patrons detain the Church-revenues so that in these Countreys scarcely is found any Parish-Priest that hath but the least knowledge of letters therefore we ordain that a sufficient portion be assigned unto the Parish-Priest who should serve not by a Vicar but personally c. Ca. 42. As we would not that Laicks usurp the power of Clerks so we will that Clerks usurp not the power of Laicks Ca. 46. Magistrates should not exact taxations from the Clergy unless the Clerks will willingly contribute when they see the necessity of common burthens and even then not without the advice of the Pope Ca. 50. The prohibition of marriage should not exceed the fourth degree of blood or alliance because there are but four humors in mans body or it consisteth of four elements This is a fair pretence but it was a remedy saith Po. Virg. de inven lib. 5. cap. 5. against the Decree of Pope Julius who had ordained that marriage should not be within the seventh degree by which severity it came to pass that men could not finde marriage within their City and this Decree is observed saith he but he might have added unless men will pay for a dispensation and so no degree hindereth marriage as I have touched elsewhere and experience sheweth Likewise Pope Celestin the III. gave a judicial sentence If a married person fall into heresie the other spouse may marry another But this Innocentius ordained contrarily that heresie should not be a cause of divorce Extra de divort c. Quanto The election of the Pope was restrained unto the Cardinals by Pope Celestin the II. and this Innocentius confirmed that Act and added that the holy Colledge of Cardinals should have jurisdiction in all places and have authority over all men and power of judging the causes of all Princes and of bringing them into their Kingdoms or depriving them Cumi Ventura in Thesor Politic. pag. 388. printed at Frankford An. 1610. Peter King of Arragon made his Realms of Arragon and Sardinia tributary unto the Chair of St. Peter for the salvation of his soul forsooth in the days of this Innocentius He sat eighteen years and seven moneths After his death he appeared unto Ludgardis when she saw him compassed with so great fire she asked Who he was He answered I am Innocentius She groaned and said How is it that our common father is so tormented He answered I am so tormented for three causes which most justly had condemned me unto eternal punishment if by the intercession of the most holy Mother of God I had not repented at the last gasp I have indeed escaped eternal death but until the day of judgement I am tormented with most cruel punishments and that I could come unto thee to seek thy prayers the Mother of mercy hath obtained it from her Son And having spoken so he vanished The Nun declared his necessity unto her sisters that they would help him and lamenting his case she afflicted her self wonderously Let the reader understand saith my Author that I am not ignorant of those three causes which Ludgardis told me but for reverence of so great an high Priest I will not report them Bellar. de gemitu col lib. 2. cap. 9. ex Suri in vita Ludgar 2. HONORIUS the III. confirmed the Order of Dominicks and gave them priviledge of preaching and hearing confessions albeit they had not cure of souls or parishes He confirmed also the Orders of Franciscans Augustinenses and Carmelites He ordained that every one should bow their knee at the lifting up of the
them the Books of his Court as the But of their faith when they enquire they ask nothing but Believest thou in the Church of Rome and if it be answered affirmatively they say But the Church of Rome judgeth this proposition heretical and scandalous unto godly ears or derogatory unto the power of the Church and so they compel the man unto a recantation But if he who is examined do profess to maintain his opinion by testimony of Scripture or by reasoning they make a noise and blowing their cheeks they say You have not to deal with Batchelors or raw Students but with your Judges you come not to argue and jangle but you must answer simply whether you will acknowledge the Decree of the Roman Church and revoke what you have said If the man will not they shew him faggots and say We must deal with Hereticks not by arguments and Scripture but by these c. A third sort of locusts were the A third Order Carmelites a more ancient sort indeed for they had been many ages at mount Carmel even under the Soldan but when they changed their habit they were all banished and coming into Europe were confirmed by Pope Honorius the III. Their habit was white their rule was to accept from any man and do nothing but at command of their Superior to deceive the people with glossing words under pretence of long prayer Those were once conjunct with the Franciscans in the Inquisition but when they saw the people hated them for the cruelty of that office they forsook it as I. Bale in Catal. pag. 546. hath marked from the Bull of Pope Alexander the IV. A fourth sort was the Crucigeri which began as Pol. Virg. de inven rer lib. 7. cap. 3. hath it in this maner INNOCENTIUS the III. directed against the Albigenses a great number of Soldiers intended against the Turks they had received their badge of the cross Those all were slain and the Pope canonized them all and for their honor he began such an Order and gave them priviledges Pope Alexander the IV. dreamed that he saw St. Augustin and therefore he called all the Augustinians out of the woods and desarts and caused them to dwell in Cities and gave them exemptions and priviledges So about that time began many other Orders both of men women apart in their own Monasteries and some of both men and women in the same Monastery but for shame in divers parts and both sorts under the command of a woman as the Order of St. Clara the Sister of Francis the Minorite and of St. Briget About the year 1252. the Minorites began to teach Aristotle that they might be the more able to deceive with Sophistry Innocentius the IV. thereupon said Now Philosophy sitteth like a whore to wit saith Matth. Parisien as another Caiaphas he prophesied truly If he knew that she was a whore why did he suffer her to occupy the chair of her Mistress because he would shew that wittingly and willingly he had given a bill of divorcement unto the holy Scriptures Scholastick Theology was the proper exercise of these two Sects of Friers and they did still extinguish the few and little sparks of truth For the Scholastick Divinity had as it were three ages the first from the year 1120. until the year 1212. the Doctors of Their ages this age are reckoned Anselm Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Hugo de St. Victor a German Richard de St. Victor a Scot Gratian the Compiler of the Decrees Peter Lombard Master of the Sentences his colleague Blandinus Rupertus Tuitiensis Hugo de Ponto Hugo the Cardinal and first Compiler of Concordantiae Biblicae Leo Tuscus Gulielm Altisiodorensis Vincentius Gallus Alexander de Ales alias Fons vitae an English who wrote the first Commentaries on Lombard Gualter Pictaviensis Alfonsus Tostatus or Abulensis c. The second age began with Albertus Magnus Professor once at Paris and then at Colein his disciple Thomas de Aquino Doctor irrefragabilis Aegidius Romanus Primate of Aquitania Johannes Scotus Subtilis Doctor Richardus de Media villa Alanus de Insulis Augustinus de Ancona Nicolaus de Lyra Cardinal Bonaventura Sepharicus Doctor Durandus de St. Portiano not the worst of them Gulielmus Occam about the year 1330. c. These were diligent in studying reading and writing but as the Arrians Novatians and other Hereticks in former times did trust in their subtil disputes so these for the most part forsake the certainty of Scriptures despise the simplicity of the Fathers delight in the subtilty of distinctions and curious questions and were readier to wrangle and jangle with ostentation of wit then to search the truth in love desirous to maintain opinions that they have coyned and not to follow Divine oracles faining new words and pratling of verbalities realities hecceities and what other frivolous words they can devise to paint and disguise their errors And when they have talked so highly that few can understand their discourse then they are called sublime Doctors and what one did coyn another did oppose and refute In their disputes they seldom bring texts of Scripture for confirmation or grounds but so saith the Philosopher or so saith the Master meaning Aristotle and Lombard or so saith such a Father And others among them whose sagacity cannot soar aloft do write of the power of the Pope and miracles of Saints they forge plausible or terrible fables advance the reliques and Histories of this or that Saint still mixing their own lyes I leave the third age of Scholastick unto its own place These of that second age have added Their novations 1. Transubstantiation 2. Auricular confession many errors unto the former as for example 1. Peter Lombard could not tell whether the change of the bread in the Sacrament were formal or accidental but these held transubstantion and concomitancy From this root sprang a wood of intricate questions that the world knew not before which demonstrateth the novelty of the error as 1. What giveth immediately the form unto the Sacrament Pope Innocentius the III. lib. 4. de Myster cap. 6. saith Christ used no words in the consecration but onely did consecrate by his Divine power But Tho. Aquin. in Sum. par 3. qu. 76. ar 1. ad 1. saith Against this are the words of the Gospel which say Christ blessed and certainly that blessing was done by some words therefore the words of Innocentius are spoken opinative magis quà m determinative For clearing this point he sheweth a little before a new distinction between this Sacrament and all other Sacraments to wit the form of other Sacraments import the use of the matter but the form of this importeth onely the consecration of the matter which saith he consists in consubstantiation 2. Whether the substance of the bread remain after the consecration they conclude this negative 3. Whether the substance of the bread be turned into nothing or into materiam primam or into the body of Christ 4.
In what subject do the accidents of the bread and wine remain 5. Whether the transubstantiation be done in a moment of time 6. Whether the dimentions of Christ be wholly in this Sacrament 7. Whether the body of Christ be in this Sacrament locally 8. Whether the body of Christ doth move according to the motion of the hostie 9. Whether any eye even a glorified one can see Christ's body in the Sacrament 10. Concerning the truth of the words Hoc est enim copus meum are innumerable controversies as Whether hoc signifie bread or whether it importeth demonstrationem ut conceptam non ut exercitatam or ad intellectum non ad sensum that is This that is the thing signified by this is my body Or whether it demonstrateth to the sense but is to be understood according to the instant or moment not of pronouncing it but of pronouncing the last syllable as when one saith Now I will be silent Thomas Aquinas first did write those and innumerable more such questions and after him many have debated them and many other questions of that subject and nature 2. Before it was voluntary excepting the case of scandal to confess their sins and no Laws were against them which did not confess yea Lombard Lib. 4. Dist 17. B. saith It may be said that without confession of the mouth or payment of outward punishment sins are blotted away by contrition and humility of the heart for after that one doth with a grieved minde propound to confess his sins God forgiveth because there is confession of the heart albeit not of the mouth and by this confession the soul is inwardly cleansed from the spot and contagion of committed sin and the debt of everlasting death is forgiven and therefore saith he these sentences of the Fathers which he hath quoted before concerning repentance and confession are to be understood of the confession of the heart or of inward punishment But after that Decree of Innocentius the III. the School-men held that he is not to be accounted a Christian who confesseth not all his sins particularly As for the circumstances the Canon biddeth the Priest be discreet in searching the circumstances of the sinner and of the sin But the School-men press every man to confess particularly every circumstance of his sin so far as possibly he can Concerning the person who should hear confessions Lombard lot cit D. teacheth that a man should diligently seek a Priest because God hath given the power of binding and loosing unto Priests but if a Priest cannot be had The Confessors one may make his confession unto his neighbor or companion and he speaketh no where of a Monk or Frier But afterwards the Dominicans got power from the Popes and the Priests were neglected 3. Gratian in his Decrees and 3. Pardons and Indulgences Lombard in his Sentences have no word of pardons or Papal indulgences But when avarice had possessed the Clergy and the people were blinded with ignorance and superstition and both were contented with an outward formality then publick declarations were redeemed with sums of money which they called alms for the use of the poor or for building Hospitals or Churches or Bridges and the discharge of the publick declarations was called indulgence or pardon The School-men finding this practise to be so gainful unto Bishops and the pardons so acceptable unto the people did commend them in their preachings yet so that among themselves some made question of the truth of them for some as Tho. Aquin. Supplem qu. 25. ar 2. said These pardons were but a kinde of pious deceit whereby the Church draweth men into some sort of devout actions as a mother allureth her childe unto some steps by shewing him a golden peny which she giveth him not Some said they were available in the Court not of God but of the Church others held they were useful in both Courts And they made the ground of this power to be the treasures of Christ's and the Saints sufferings which they had suffered more then was needful for the propitiating their sin and everlasting punishment all which their sufferings of supererrogation make up the treasure of the Church and the Bishops or Priests may bestow a part of that treasure on them which have not merits of their own And truly any man might perceive as the Germans did in their grievances which they sent unto Pope Hadrian the VI. that these were cunning frauds to purchase money unto the Pope and the Friers and others their partners We read that in the primitive Church when discipline was strict they would remit somewhat of their severity as they saw the persons affected but in that Century not so much the punishment already enjoyned but to be enjoyned was dispensed with for money in former time the dispensation was granted lest the penitents did faint under the burthen and that they might the sooner be received into the communion again nor were they granted for money But at that time and in times following they were pardoned from all satisfaction both for sin committed and to be committed if they would give moneys which trick was coloured with pretext to say Masses for them or for use of the holy wars And these pardons were at most thought to avail onely unto the living until Boniface the VIII did extend their vertue unto the souls in Purgatory Co. Agrip. de vanit scien cap. 61. Unto the more clearing of this point hear what John Roffen saith contra assert Luthe art 18. seeing Pol. Virg. de inven rer lib. 8. cap. 1. and others do cite the same as truth Possibly many saith he do not value indulgences because the use of them is known to have come but lately among Christians unto them I answer It is not certain who gave them first nevertheless there hath been some use of them very ancient as they say among the Romans which may be gathered by the Stations None who is Orthodox here he would say Popish or a follower of the Pope doubteth whether there be a Purgatory of which there is no or very little mention among the ancients yea and mong the Greeks it is not believed until this day and neither did the Latins conceive the verity thereof at one time but by little and little nor without dispensation of the holy Ghost that after so many years both the faith of Purgatory and use of indulgences was generally received by the Romish Church so long as there was not fear of Purgatory no man sought pardons for upon it doth all the account of pardons depend if ye take away Purgatory what use have pardons therefore pardons began after that people stood in aw of Purgatory So far he saith Polydore which thou perhaps seeing they are of so great moment didst expect as more certain from the mouth of God But Roffensis saith further If there be no Purgatory we shall not have need of pardons considering therefore how long time
Purgatory was not known and then it was believed by some by degrees partly by revelations and partly by Scriptures and so at last it was believed generally by the whole Church we may easily understand some cause of pardons Seeing then Purgatory was so lately known who can now admire that there was no use of pardons in the primitive Church c. 4. A fourth device of the Friers 4. Meritum ex congruo condigno was the distinction of merit ex congruo condigno some holding the one part onely and some both parts but it was never universally approved among them seeing always some did abhor to say A man by his merits is worthy of the Kingdom of heaven Of which number were Guiliel Parisien Jo. Scotus Gregorius de Arimino Biel c. This particular leadeth to another consideration Their contrary doctrines of these Friers that as they do differ in degrees the latter sort for the most part being worse or more erroneous then their fathers and ready to produce a worse generation so they did and still do differ in contrary opinions for they preach not Christ of good will saith Agrip. de vanit scien cap. 97. but for contention so that there is more hope of agreement among Philosophers then among these School-men seeing they have darkened and killed all maner of Divinity with opinions of men and new errors c. and the posterity sweareth into the words or tenets of their Master and they are led captive by his opinion so that they will not yield unto contrary reasons nor Scripture This is clear by the families or Sects of Thomists and Scotists striving the one against the other not in Philosophical or indifferent points but in matters of greatest moment As for example 1. Thomas saith A man is accepted of God not for his vertue but by the grace of God which is the fountain of these vertues In 2. Sent. Dist 26. q. 1. ar 4. But Capreolus on that place bringeth Scotus Durand and Aureolus holding the contrary 2. Thomas saith A man deserveth glory ex condigno 1 2. qu. 114. ar 3. yet to make this smooth he hath devised that distinction that a work deserveth either as it proceedeth from free-will or as it proceedeth from God's grace and so on that part of Rom. 6. Jâ—ct 4. he saith If good works be considered in their own nature or as they proceed from mans free-will they deserve not eternal life ex condigno but onely as they proceed from the grace of the holy Ghost But Durand in 2. Sent. Dist 27. qu. 2. refuteth both the tenet and that frivolous distinction 3. Thomas proveth that a man cannot understand supernatural things without the light of grace In 2. Sent. Dist 28. qu. 1. ar 5. But Durand on that place striveth for the contrary 4. Thomas saith No man in this life without habitual grace can eschew all and every sin 1 2. qu. 109. But Scotus holdeth the contrary In 2. Sent. Dist 28. 5. Thomas saith None without the help of God can sufficiently prepare himself unto habitual grace loc cit ar 6. and there he declareth what it is to prepare himself to wit to turn unto God as he which hath his eyes turned from the Sun prepareth himself to receive the light of the Sun when he turneth himself unto the Sun Against this doth Durand dispute in 2. Sent. Dist 28. qu. 5. 6. Thomas saith Grace differeth really from vertue as the soul from the faculties in 2. Sent. Dist 26. qu. 1. ar 4. Scotus holdeth the contrary on that place 7. Thomas holdeth that want of original justice in babes is a sin ibid. Dist 30. qu. 1. ar 2. Durand on that place holdeth the contrary 3. Thomas saith Original sin cannot be properly called a quality or absolute form inclining to ill actions 1 2. qu. 82. ar 1. Gregor de Armi. on 2. Sent. Dist 30. qu. 1. ar 2. teacheth that according to Augustin original sin is a positive quality or carnal concupiscense by which man is inclined to sin actually 9. Thomas holdeth that every action of man if it be evil is properly a sin 1 2. qu. 21. ar 1. Gregory in loc cit holdeth the contrary 10. Thomas proveth that every act of man as it is an act is from God De malo qu. 3. ar 2. Capreolus on 2. Sent. Dist 37. qu. 1. ar 1. bringeth Durand Gregory and Aureolus disputing in the contrary 11. Thomas teacheth that to the goodness of an action is required the goodness of the matter and of the form and intention Capreolus on 2. Sent. Dist 38. bringeth sundry School-men holding that the goodness of intention is not necessary 12. Dominicans generally hold that the Sacraments do work grace after the maner of a knife cutting and framing a thing and not a vessel containing grace But the Franciscans deny all effective power in the Sacraments but bring the vertue of them from the onely power of God's promise so oft as the Sacrament is administred They do agree in the opere operato and differ in the maner Concil Trident. lib. 2. 13. Dominicans held that the Sacraments of the old Testament did not confer but onely fore-signifie grace which was to be given after the sufferings of Christ The Franciscans held the contrary ibid. 14. Thomas par 3. qu. 75. ar 4. saith It is necessary to believe that the body of Christ is in the Eucharist by the change of the substance of the bread into it But Bellarmin De Euchar. lib. 3. cap. 23. saith Scotus held that transubstantiation was not thought a doctrine of â—aith before the Lateran Councel and that there is not express Text of Scripture which without declaration of the Scripture can convince one to admit transubstantiation Certainly the opinion of Thomas was according to the sense of the article which Innocentius the III. did decree and howbeit the Romanists hold still the word transubstantiation yet they are all for the most part fallen upon another conceit that the substance of the bread evanisheth or is annihilated and the body of Christ cometh in stead of it And hence ariseth many questions among them as whether the body of Christ be eaten with the teeth and go into the belly whether the wicked do eat the body of Christ They who will read any School-man on Lombard Lib. 4. Dist 10 11. will finde many such questions concerning the Sacrament In a word all the huge volumes of Thomists and Scotists upon the Sentences are so many monuments of controversies betwixt antagonists in the Romish Church as lately Dr. T. Mortan hath proved the Protestant faith by testimonies of these School-men or as he speaketh even the enemies being judges Therefore all the boasting of Papists concerning the unity of their Church is indeed but to delude them which are not acquainted with their books Thus the Church was pitifully divided with these Sects and when the disciples of these School-men went abroad to preach one
small like a tree Then the Spirit of the Lord said unto me It signifieth the condition of the Roman Church Again he saith As I was the same way exercised I saw in the Spirit and behold a man walking in the same habit carrying sweet bread on his shoulders and very good wine by his side and he held in his hands a round stone biting it with his teeth as an hungry man biteth bread but he did nothing then two heads of Serpents came out of the stone and the Spirit of the Lord instructing me said This stone is unprofitable and curious questions wherewith the hungry souls are turmoiled when they leave substantial things And I said What meaneth those two heads He said The name of the one is Vain Glory and the other is Overthrow of Religion It is to be observed that about that time the chief questions in the Schools were Whether the bread of the Mass be turned into the body of Christ or whether the substance of it evacuateth what eateth a mouse when she eateth the Sacrament wherein subsisteth the accidents of the bread whether in Christ's body or by themselves c. Again he saith I saw a clear Cross of Silver like to the Cross of Tolouse but the twelve apples of it were like to vile apples that are cast out of the sea What is this Lord Jesus The Spirit said The Cross is the Church which shall be clear with pureness of life and shril with the clear voice of the truth preached Then I said What meaneth those rotten apples The humiliation of the Church-men which shall come to pass Here he prophecied of the Reformation Possevin in Apparto 2. calleth this Robert An excellent Preacher of the Word Mornay in Myster pag. 427. 6. Marsilius Paravinus wrote the book Defensor pacis about the year 1324. there he debateth the question between the Emperor and the Pope and by the holy Scriptures Laws Canons and Histories Ecclesiastical and Civil he maintaineth these positions Christ is the only head and foundation of Rare Theses in those days the Church He made none of the Apostles to be universal Vicar of the Church nor made he the other Apostles subject unto Peter It is more probable that Peter was never at Rome far less had he his seat there who had no fixed seat as also not any of the Apostles The fulness of power in any man is a manifest lye an execrable title the beginning of many evils and the use thereof should be discharged in a good Councel The authority of the keys is that judiciary power that consisteth in dispensing the Word the Sacraments and Discipline Christ whose Vicar the Pope calleth himself did never exercise temporal authority on earth he was subject unto the Magistrate and so were his Apostles after his ascension and they taught others to obey Princes If a Pope usurp temporal authority Princes should by the Law of God resist by word and deed or they are unjust and sin against God and those who fight for the Pope should be accounted the Soldiers of Satan Unto the Pope belongeth not the election nor confirmation of the Emperor but contrarily the Christian Prince with consent of Clergy and People should name the Pope or if one be chosen in his absence he should confirm him If the Pope go astray or be accursed the Emperor should reduce him into the way and judge him in a Councel When Peter lived he might have fallen and erred neither hath the Pope any priviledge against error That that Christ said to Peter I have prayed for thee is to be extended unto the other Apostles Only the Canon of the Bible is the fountain of truth against which Canon we may not believe either Pope or Church Concerning the sense of Scripture or any Article of the faith we may not believe the Pope and his Cardinals seeing not once have they seduced silly souls into hell The Christian Church is the universality of believers and not the Pope and his Cardinals she is represented in a lawful and general Councel A Councel should be assembled by the Emperor with consent of Christian Princes as anciently it was always The Word of God should be the only rule and chief judge in deciding causes Ecclesiastical Not only the Clergy by Lay men also if they be godly and learned should have voice in general Councels The Clergy and Synagogue of the Pope is a den of thieves c. This book was printed at Basil An. 1522. In another Treatise he saith Good works are not the efficient cause of salvation but causa sine quanon Mornay ibid. pag. 452. He was condemned as an Heretick by Pope John the XXIII Catal. test ver lib. 18. Consider what a Modern could say more of this matter and whether they shew not themselves to be ignorant of antiquity who accuse us of novelty 7. The same positions were held by John de Janduno or Gandanensis at the same time as is manifest by his books printed at Venice and Florence So wrote also Luitpold Bishop of Bamberg namely in a Treatise De Translatione Imperii printed Lutet An. 1540. he saith The Authority of governing the Empire belongeth unto the Emperor so soon as he is chosen and the Coronation by the Pope addeth nothing since Caesar is not his vassal nor feudatory The donation of Constantine is but a fable He was also condemned by Pope John Catal. test ibid. Michael Cesenas General of the Franciscans was bolder saying expresly The Pope is the Antichrist and Rome is Babylon drunk with the blood of the Saints Therefore Antonin par 3. tit 21. cap. 5. reckoneth him among the poor men of Lions For the Valdenses still suffered persecution in sundry Countries and under divers names as the adversaries pleased to brand them Many errors are imputed unto them by the writers of those times but because they did abhor the Pope and his Court they were reviled as we have heard from Arnold de Villanova and sought out to the fire as An. 1302. Nogaret the Father of him who took Pope Boniface the VIII was burnt in Aquitania Clemens the V. caused it to be proclaimed to take up the flag of the Cross against them and destroyed 4000 near the Alps whether they had sled Platin. Others went higher unto the mountains of whom some remained in his days saith Antonin par 3. tit 22. cap. 10. From them were the in-dwellers of Angronia and adjacent parts continuing until the Councel at Trent Trithemius testifieth of many that were burnt in Austria about that time howbeit he believing the reports of malice imputeth many errors unto them yet he testifieth that they abhorred the Mass calling the Hosty a god invented by man the Church of Rome a Synagogue of unbelievers and not the flock of Christ they denied all mens merits intercession of Saints the difference of days and meats c. He witnesseth also that the professore of the same doctrine were innumerable in Bohemia Austria
his Progenitors time out of minde have been possessed with special priviledges and custom observed from time to time that no Legate from the Apostolick See should enter into the Land or any of the King's Dominions without calling petition or desire of the King and for as much as Richard Bishop of Winchester and Cardinal of S. Eusebie hath presumed to enter as Legate not being called nor desired by the King Therefore the said Proctor in presence of the Council of England then in the house of the Duke of Glocester Lord Protector in the King's minority did protest that it standeth not with the King's minde by advice of his Council to admit or approve the coming of the said Legate in any way or to assent to the exercise of this his Legantin Authority either attempted or to be attempted in this respect contrary to the foresaid Laws and custom c. By these Acts it is manifest that the usurpation of the Popes was odious unto the Nations and that their avarice and innovations were restrained but the Kings did not exclude them especially in England the persecution that was begun in the latter days of Edward the III. continued all the time of King Richard the II. and Henry the IV. and V. though not always with a like cruelty But in Scotland their Acts had more strength for when James Kennedy Arch-Bishop of Saint Andrews who founded and perfected the most famous Colledge of Scotland now called the Old Colledge of Saint Andrew's died An. 1466 his Brother of the same Mother Patrick Graham was elected by the Canons to succeed but he could not obtain the King's consent for the Courtiers perswaded him that he should not admit such elections because by such means the greatest honors were in the power of the basest men to wit Canons gave Bishopricks and Monks made Abbots and Priors whereas said they all should depend on the King that he may reward punish and forgive according to the service done unto him Wherefore that Patrick went to Rome and easily obtained The first Arch-Bishop of Saint Andrews from Pope Sixtus the IV. not only confirmation of the election but likewise the Title of Arch-Bishop of Saint Andrew's and that all the other Bishops should be subordinate unto that See and power to be Legate for three years for preventing the dangers insuing unto the Church Notwithstanding all this his authority he durst not return into Scotland for fiye years but abode at Rome for he knew that the people were exclaiming against the contempt of the Laws In the year 1472. he would adventure to return but sent before him the Bull of his Legation They which were advanced or hoped for advancement by the King did fear that this Legation would be to their prejudice and they ceased not to shew the King that his authority was contemned by that Bull his Acts were annulled and the liberties of the Realm were turned into the hands of the Romans Then by Act of Council an Herauld was sent unto Patrick at his landing before he entred into any house to inhabit him from attempting any thing in any of these Offices untill such things as were to be laid unto his charge were examined before the King Thereafter he was reconciled unto the King but with express charge that he attempt nothing beyond the custom of his Predecessors Nor had any in that place so little authority for he was excommunicated by the Rector and then again accursed by Husman the Pope's Inquisitor and the Arch-Deacon Sevez was placed in his Chair and Patrick was hurried from place to place as to a stronger prison whether justly or unjustly it is not certain since the cause nor process is not made known except that he paid not the money for his Bull of priviledges Others were so affraid at his miseries that they attempted not to recover that priviledge of election from the power of the King and whom the King did recommend unto the Pope were all accepted Hence it came to pass that Benefices were bestowed upon unqualified men at the pleasure and suit of Courtiers so great corruptions followed Buchan lib. 12. 7. About the year 1465. a Carmelite preached at Paul's Cross that Christ on earth was poor and begged The Provincial of that Order and others held the same opinion But others did inveigh bitterly against them as teachers of pestiferous errours The fame of this controversie went over the Alps and Pope Paul the II. writ his Bull into England informing his Prelates that it is a pestiferous heresie to affirm that Christ had publickly begged and it was of old condemned by Popes and Councels therefore it should now be declared as a condemned Heresie In the year 1473. John Goose or as some write John Huss was burnt on the Tower-hill for the doctrine of the above-named Martyrs The next year an old Matron about 90. years of age Johan Boughton was burnt at Smith-field and her daughter the Lady Young was in danger An. 1498. a godly man at Babram in Norfolk was burnt and in the same year and place a Priest was burnt whom all the Clarks of Canterbury could not remove from his faith The next year another was burnt at Smithfield Io. Fox in Acts Mon. 8. About the year 1492. Robert Blaketer went to Rome for his confirmation The first Arch Bishop of Glascow a persocuter in the Bishoprick of Glascow he obtained from Pope Alexander the VI. the Title of Arch-Bishop and that three other Diocies should be subject unto him Sevez Arch-Bishop of Saint Andrews would not acknowledge him nor his Title because it was in prejudice of his former Title Upon this occasion both Clergy and Nobility went into factions at last they were reconciled so that they both should be called Arch-Bishops but Saint Andrews should precede In the year 1494. by this Robert was summoned before the King and Councel thirty persons from Kyle and Cunningham among these George Campbel of Cesnok Adam Reed of Barskyning John Campbel of Newmills Andrew Shaw of Polkennet c. The Articles laied unto their charge were 1. Images should not be worshipped 2. Nor Reliques of Saints 3. Christ gave power unto Peter and not to the Pope to bind and loose 4. The Pope is not the Successour of Peter but where it was said unto him Go behind me Satan 5. After the Consecration bread remains and the natural body of Christ is not there 6. The Pope deceives the people by his Bulls and Indulgences 7. The Mass profiteth not the souls which are said to be in Purgatory 8. The Pope exalts himself against God and above God 9. Priests may have wives 10. True Christians receive the body of Christ every day by faith 10. Faith should not be given unto miracles now 11. We should pray unto God only 12. We are not bound to beleeve all that Doctours have written 13. The Pope who is called the head of the Church is the Antichrist They were accused upon other
change any of their Ceremonies Then he craved the subscriptions of other Nations The Bishops of Menon and Moldoblachia consented but the Bishop of Trapezus refused And the Bishop of Iberia went away privily and before his departure he shewed unto every one of the Bishops that he had Letters from the Patriarch of Antiochia that they should not yeild to add nor diminish an Iota or the least point When he was gone the Pope thought it might help to speak with the Oratour of Iberia privately before the finall conclusion and said unto him I hear that ye are Christians and famous men loving the Church but the Roman Church is the Mother of all Churches and the Governour of it is the Successour of Saint Peter and Vicar of Christ and the universal Shepheard and Doctour of all Christians ye must therefore follow the Mother of Churches and approve what she approveth and be subject unto her high Priest that ye may receive the salvation of your souls c. The Noble-man answered By the grace of God we are Christians approving and following our own Church and our Church hath constantly maintained whatsoever she received of the Doctrine of our Lord Jesus Christ and the Traditions of the holy Apostles and the universall Synods and the most famous holy Teachers of the Church neither hath it declined in any measure from their Doctrine neither hath it added nor impaired any thing But the Church of Rome hath added and transgressed the bounds of the holy Fathers wherefore we have cut her off and departed from her in so much as we behold the purity of the Fathers and hence is she deprived of many and famous children Therefore your blessednesse should with diligence seek those whom you have lost and be reconciled and united with them and this may be easily done if you will put that addition out of the holy Creed which you may easily do since all the generation of the Latines applaud your order and judgement for they esteem you as the Successour of Saint Peter and reverence your Doctrine if then you will put away that additament not onely the Iberians but all the Nations of Christians will be subject and united unto the Roman Church truly and will acknowledge her and thee also as a true disciple of Christ and the prime Sucessour of St. Peter and they all will follow thee with sincere love then shalt thou be the prime Pope and Father of many Christians and then shall be one Shepheard and all shall be one Flock under thee The Pope was confident to have gained this Iberian as a rude and unlearned man but when he heard these words he spake no more The same Iberian went with my Authour to hear a Sermon that was preached before the Pope and then he said unto the other I heard him often name Aristole but I desire to hear of Peter Paul Basile Gregory Chrysostom and such others but what have we to do with Aristotle Aristotle and with some kinde of pity he scorned the Preachers gesture and noddings but more them who would seek union with such Doctours On June 4. the Emperour shewed the subscriptions unto the Pope and hoped that he had given all satisfaction but the Pope said If now ye be brought into acknowledgement of this truth I am glad of it and I wish that your Fathers had been partakers of the same but all this is not sufficient to make up the union there be other differences between us and those must also be amended The Emperour thought this strange and when the Patriarch who had given order to pack up his baggege thinking that all was done heard of the Pope's words he was amazed and June 10. sitting at supper he died and so neither returned home nor saw the Decreet of union which afterwards was penned Some days before his death he sent for some of the dissenters and said The Pope hath promised to pay the money that he oweth us for these five moneths and an half and to send us home in six Ships and the Venetians will send Convoys with us and he hath promised to send twenty Ships in March for any service that our Emperour will imploy them unto this work will be to the great advantage of our Nation and of the Christian World and since all these things have succeeded so happily do not withdraw your consent any more c. Because they did refuse alledging that their conscience and danger of their souls was more dear unto them then all the World he said Behold ye do that I shall never see my Countrey for if my dearest friends be not with me I shall never return I speak unto you as a father and a friend if ye will obey me it shall go well and if not the Synod will take notice of it and will not let you go but will do unto you as ye deserve They answered We are ready to suffer whatsoever the Synod will decern against us After the Patriarch's death the Emperour had all the burthen and dealt with the advice of three onely to wit the Bishops of Russia and Nice and his Secretary The Cardinals went unto him often and importuned him to consent unto other three particulars to be contained in the Decree of union to wit 1. That both the Churches may retaine their own custome of the bread whether leavened or unleavened 2. Concerning Purgatory 3. Concerning the Primacy of the Pope The Emperour consented unto these without the knowledge of any Greek but of those three The Latines did much press the Emperour to take away a Prayer out of the Liturgy concerning the unbloody Sacrifice for they said The bread and wine are consecrated by the words of the Lord Take eat this is my body and therefore to pray after the saying of these words is as if the blessing of the Lord were not sufficient to consecrate the Sacrament Here was much debate at last the Emperour said If ye will believe truth the antient Fathers and all the Eastern Churches have kept this custome as it is in our Books Cardinal Julian said Can your Majesty swear that your Books have not been changed since the days of the Fathers and if you cannot how shall we believe them The Pope also required the Emperour to cause all the Greeks to assemble into his Palace and there he did upbraid them that they wasted so much time and would conclude nothing But neither the Emperour nor other Greeks would yeild in this head but the Bishops of Russia and Nice Then was great debate concerning the form of the Decree in whose name it should be framed the Emperour would have it in his name as the Decrees of universal Synods were wont to be but the Pope would have it in his name after long contention the Emperour must yeild Then the Pope would have them to chuse a Patriarch either an Italian or a Greek The Emperour seeing that the Pope would never make an end if his demands were
intend to hold unto our last breath wee firmly believe of the Holy Ghost wee believe the Holy Ghost and in the Holy Ghost Of the Holy Ghost that he is the one true God with the Father and the only begotten Sonne distinguished in this only that he proceeds from both by vertue of which faith quickning renewing reforming every one attaineth the participation of Christs meritorions grace justification truth fortitude and perfect salvation by which Spirit also the Holy Church is grounded in the faith of Christ against which the gates of hell are not able to prevaile which also by the same Spirit in the members of true faith he washeth justifieth sanctifieth ordereth governeth gathereth strentheneth fructifieth As also by the same Spirit were the Holy Scriptures inspired and are known by him the members of the Church are vnited from him are the gifts of ruling the Church and many other things which by the same Spirit are made perfect unto the life of glory Wee believe the Holy Ghost when wee fully consent unto the Divine Scriptures or Apostls of God Wee believe in the Holy Ghost when with clear knowledge and unfained faith wee love him and with the members inspired by him wee keep his revealed truth unto eternall glory By the same fulness of formed faith wee believe that the holy Catholick Church in respect of the foundation of lively faith is the number of all the elect from the beginning of the world unto the end thereof whom God the Father in Christ by his Spirit hath chosen justifieth calleth unto the glory of salvation and magnifyeth without which is no salvation unto man But in respect of ministry and dispensations wee believe that the holy Catholick Church is the congregation of all Ministers and people subdued by obediente obeying the will of God from the beginning of the world unto the end of it whom God only sendeth inspired by his Spirit giving them the word of truth peace reconciliation that they may bring forth the fruit of salvation in the unity of the Church and their travell be not disappointed of the saving reward whose names and number He only knoweth because he hath writen them in the book of life That first Church hath none that shal be damned and the other is mixed untill the appointed time of the last judgement But the Church of malignants seekes them that are of that evil one whom Satan sendeth in this time of mortall life to the perdition of the world and tryall of the elect On this Church all the curses and sad things that Christ his Apostls have foretold shall be heaped to wit that they who are unworthy of ecclesiastical honour may rule over them by their power The promises also of renovation are fulfilled in her And yet wee arrogate not so much unto us as that we would be called or bee the only Catholick Church as if salvation were to be found with us only but wee endeavour with all diligence to be partakers of the ecclesiasticall truth and wee are afraied to be subject unto orobey evill workers whom wee find to be enmies of the Church and its truth for fear of everlasting damnation and for obedience unto Christ and because they doe minde speak and doe unto his Church things contrary unto his law Wherefore wee willingly endure oppression tauntings and calumnies for the salvation of our souls for un less Holy fear and the horrour of hell did withhold us we would embrace the liberty of the world with it's vanities wherin one may live as he listeth But wee would rather choose the strait derided and sad way in which our Redeemer Christ and the Church his spouse condemned by the world and despised yet following the example of Christ have walked than to taste and follow the momentany pleasures of the world The first and chief ministry of the Church is the Gospell of Christ whereby grace and truth that were painfully purchased by the torment of the cross is revealed which grace is given for salvation by the Holy Ghost and God the Father unto the Elect which are called by the gift of faith Another necessary ministry of the Church wee declare to be the word of teaching by which the saving truth is known in the sense of faith through which knowledge the life of grace and glory is administred unto the men of good desire Likewise wee declare that the seven sacraments are useful unto the Church of Christ by which Sacraments the promises of God are signified to be fulfilled unto believing people and by them entrance into the Church of God for keeping unity among them that walk unto glory is ministred Faith which God gives causeth us think of baptisme the first Sacrament these things whosoever of ripe age by hearing Gods word believeth and believing is renewed in soul and is enlightened such by outward washing for argument of inward cleanness attained by faith should be baptized in the name of the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost into the vnity of the holy Church Our profession is also extended unto children which by the decree of the Apostles as Dionysius writes should be baptized and then by the guidance of their God-fathers being instructed in the law of Christ should be invited unto and accustomed with the life of faith By faith received out of the Holy Scriptures wee professe that in the dayes of the Apostls this was observed whoesover in their young years had not received the promises of the gifts of the Holy Ghost such did receive them by prayer and imposition of hands for confirmation of aith Wee thinke the same of infants Whosoever being baptized shall come to the true faith which he purposeth to follow through adversities and reproaches so that new birth appeareth in his spirit and life of grace such a one should be brought unto the Bishop or priest and being demanded of the truths of faith and of Gods commandements and of his good will and constant purpose and works of truth and shall testify by confession that all these things are so such a one is to be confirmed in the hope of attained truth and he is to be helped by the prayers of the Church that the gifts of the Holy Spirit may be increased in him for the constancy and warrefare of faith and finally for confirming the promises of God and the truth that he hath he may be associated into the Church by laying on of hands in vertue of the name of the Father of the Word and of the Holy Spirit By this faith which we have drunk from the Holy Scriptures we believe and confesse with our mouth Wheresoever a worthy priest with believing people according to the mind and purpose of Christ and order of the Church shall shew forth his prayer with these words This is my bodie and This is my blood immediatly the present bread is the body of Christ which was offered unto death for us and so the present wine is his blood shed
refuse if upon no other account yet ro save themselves from suspition But when he had sent his Nuntio unto them severally none of them would consent every one had their own excuse and a common one was the hindering of the Councell and yet saith Pe. Soave many thought the raising of the Councell had not been displeasing unto him seing he did alwaies furnish occasions of fomenting that opinion Of his relation unto the Councell more followes in that place After the Councell he published a Bull which is annexed to the Canons of the Councell out of it I have extracted these words The duty of the Apostolick service which is committed unto us requires that the things which the almighty Lord hath vouchsafed for provident direction of his Church to inspire from above unto the holy Fathers assembled in his name Wee should speedily execute the same to his praise and glory Observe what false and hypocriticall pretenses Therefore seeing according to the disposition of the Tridentine Councell all who shall hereafter happen to be advanced unto Cathedrall and superiour Churches or who shall happen to be Overseers of dignities chanonries or other Church-Benefices having the cure of souls are obliged to make open profession of the orthodox faith and to promise and sweare that they shall continue in obedience unto the Romane Church Wee willing ..... that the tenour it self which is noted by these presents be published .... and observed and under paines .... wee command that it be framed by Apostolick authority .... after this and no other forme .... to wit I. N. do with firme faith believe and professe all and every thing contained in the summ of faith which the holy Church of Rome useth to wit Here is the Confession of Athanasius and immediatly it followes I most firmely embrace the Apostolicall and ecclesiasticall traditions and other obseruances and constitutions of the same Church I do admitt the holy Scripture according to that sense which the holy mother the Church held and holdeth unto which Church it belongeth to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the Scriptures nor shall I ever accept or expound the Sctiptures but according to the unanimous consent of the Fathers I confesse also that there be truly and properly seven sacraments of the new law instituted by Jesus Christ for salvation of mankind albeit they be not all necessary unto every one these are baptisme confirmation the eucharist pennance extreme unction orders and marriage and that these do conferre grace and of these baptisme confirmation marriage should not be reiterated without sacriledge I receive and approve all the received and approoved rites of the Catholick Church in the solemn administration of all the forenamed sacraments I embrace all and every thing that was defined and declarad concerning originall sin and justification in the Synode of Trent I professe also that in the Masse is offered unto God a very proper sacrifice of attonement for the quick and the dead and that in the most holy sacrament of the Euchatist is verily really and substantially the body and blood together with the soul and Deity of Christ Jesus and that there is a conversion of the whole substance of the bread into his body and of the whole substance of the wine into his blood which conversion the Catholick Church calleth Transsubstantiation I confesse also that all and whole Christ and the very sacrament are received under one kind only I hold constantly that there is a purgatory and that the souls there-in are aided by the prayers of believers also that the Saints reigning with Christ are to be worshipped and invocated and that they offer prayers unto God for us and that their relicques are to be worshipped I most constantly affirme that the images of Christ and of the mother of God ever a Virgine and of other Saints should be had and retained and that due honour worship should be given unto them That the power of indulgences is left by Christ in the Church and that the use of them is very profitable to the salvation of Christians I acknowledge that the holy Catholick and Apostolick Church of Rome is the mother and Mistris of all Churches and I promise and swear obedience unto the Romane Pope the successour of blessed Peter Prince of the Apostles and Vicar of Jesus Christ And all other things that were delivered defined and declared by holy canons and Occumenicall Councells and especially by the most holy Synode at Trent These do I undoubtedly receive and professe And also all contrary things and whatsoever heresies were condemned rejected and anathematized I also doe condemne reject and anathematize And the same true catholicke faith without which no man can be saved which I do at this present willingly professe and sincerely hold I the same N. doe vow and swear that I shall have care so farre as lieth in mee that the same faith shall be kept whole and unviolated most constantly with the help of God untill the last breath of my life and that it shall be kept and taught preached by my subjects or by such as I shall have charge of in my calling So may God help mee and these holy Euangels of God Wee will that these present Letters be read in our Apostolicall Chancelary ...... Given at S. Peters in Rome An. 1564. Novembr 13. and fifth year of our Papacy These were read and puplished Decembr 9. Here is a tenure of Episcopall profession and it is a summ of Papistry After the Councell the Pope thought himself secure and spent the rest of his time in building sumptuous houses and entertaining some Princes with Princely feasts He built in the Vatican a place like unto the amphitheater for all such games He was most expert in dissembling addicted to all pleasures of meat wyne and venery which were thought to have hastened his death for he died ex nimia venere Decembr 9. An. 1565. Jac. Thuan. CHAP II. Of EMPEROVRS CHARLES V. the nephew of Maximilian and King of Spain c. was chosen King of the Romanes he had the largest Dominions of any Emperour for many hundred years he was crowned at Aken An. 1520. and held a Diet at Worms An. 1521. where unto Luther was summoned there it was ordained that Luthers books should be burnt and himself be bannished out of the Empire but of his Acts concerning Religion we will God willing speak more hereafter The Pope had been his Tutour and the King of France was prevailing in Lombardy wherefore the Pope and the Emperour made a League against France and they drewe in Henry VIII King of England with them Charles began his warrsin Lombardy but was not there personally at the battell of Pavy Francis was taken prisoner and carried to Madrid afterwards he was dismissed and gave his two sonnes in hostage and marryed Leonor the Emperours Sister But Francis got from Pope Clement a dispensation of his oath which he had given to Charles for
that they would not judge amisse of Carolstad for albeit he had not attained what he would yet in the substance of the matter he hath not erred much And albeit the Anabaptists knew what difference was between Zuinglius and Carolstad in this particulare yet they follow Carolstade and spread his books far and wide After the divulging of these books Zuinglius wrote unto Matt. Alber Pastor at Reutlinga saying Hitherto we have erred from the But or mark neither Leo Juda nor other brethren nor I do altogether disallow the judgement of Carolstad but many are offended at the obscurity of his words and his immoderat scoffs especially our Tigurines because he hath a little departed from the way wherein he should have walked And then he teaches that to eat the body of Christ is no other but to believe that Christs body was broken and died for us and he proves this from John VI. where it is written of Spirituall eating whereof the signe is in the sacrament 2. from the words of the institution where he expounds Is by Signifieth as the following words do evince Do this in remembrance of me 3. from the words of Luke This is the new Testament in my blood therefore it is not the very blood c. Likewise the Diuines at Strawsburg to wit Wolfgang Capito in October and Mart. Bucer with whom all the other Ministers did subscribe in December of the same yeare did by their published papers exhort all men to leave strife and think upon the right use of the holy Supper that is as Bucerspeakes we should eat the bread drink the wine and then come to that which is spirituall the remembrance of Christs death for we should so eat the bread and drink the wine that we remember how Christs body blood was once offered for us and so we eat his flesh and drink his blood spiritually Luther was vexed with the successe of Carolstad's doctrin and in wrath writes in the same December unto Amsdorf saying We have no other cause but to be humbled for Carolstad's venom spreades very wide and unto his opinion is joined Zuinglius of Zurik Leo Judaeus and many others affirming constantly that in the sacrament is only bread as in the market c. The next year this contest grew hoter betwixt Luther and Jo. Bugenhagius in Pomer on the one side and Zuinglius and Oecolampade on the other In a third piece which Zuinglius wrote in October answering to Bugenhagius he proves that his doctrin was not new as the other had called it but the very mind of Christ of the Apostles and the Fathers and that they have not expounded the tropes albeit they have spoken with tropes and he professeth he knew there is a trope in the words of the institution but he knew not in what word the trope is untill he had read an epistle of a Batavian teaching that the words of Christ The flesh profiteth nothing speak not of a carnall understanding because the text presseth another thing and who will say that The flesh profiteth he makes two wayes of salvation c. The same Abr. Schultet testifieth that when Carolstade saw the books of Zuinglius and Oecolampade he forsook his interpretation of the particle This. Afterwards more oile was added unto this flamme when Brentius heard of the Ubiquity which Faber Stapulensis had imagined I do not intend to handle controversies but of this purpose for clearing the history I add two passages one from Ab. Schultet Annal ad An. 1525 Oecolampad at Basile with his Collegues teaches the same with Zuinglius when it was reported that he was a Carolstadian his friends did entreat him to declare his mind concerning the Sacrament and the same year he publishes a book Of the genuine exposition of the Lord's words THIS IS MY BODY Therein he shewes that orall eating had its beginning from Pe. Lombard or Gratian or if it be more antient from Damascen the later that Lombard in condemning them of heresy who say that Christ useth the same phrase in these words This is my body as Paul had used in these The rock is Christ did condemne all the antient Teachers which were of the same judgement Then he answereth the objection What things are above our capacity men should not search iherefore we should not search into the sacrament And he proves that the sacraments are not of the sort of incomprehensible things seing in the Lords Supper is no miracle nor any thing exceeding mans capacity Thirdly he wipeth-off the calumnies of some preachers who clamorously said that the Gospell was denied and Christ's God head and all Christianity was overthrown by them who deny orall eating of Christs flesh and he affirmes that the Holy Ghost hath spoken in such a way lest any take occasion of errour and he would have some passages a little darkly to the end that some seeing shall not see and knowledge or revelation should be acknowledged to be a gift of Gods Mercy Then he comes to the point and proves the words This is my body to be spoken with the same trope as these of Paul Therock was Christ This is not a strange exposition nor is the phrase seldom used in the Scripture as nothing is more inconvenient than the exposition of the Synusiasts a trope certainly is in the words and many absurdities follow otherwise all the Fathers were for a trope in these words he confirmes the same and refutes the contrary by many reasons according to Scripture The Senate of Basile ask Erasmus his judgement of that book he answereth He had read it and in his judgement it is learnedly and well written and I would say sayd he very Christian if any thing can be called Christian which is contrary unto the decrees of the Church from whose judgement it is dangerous to decline The other passage that I add is in Osiander Cent. 16. Lib. 1. Cap. 36. where speaking of these three Carolstade Zuinglius and Oecolampade he saith The judgement of all these three Divines was the same to wit that Christs body is not given in the holy Supper with the bread and wine but are present above only in the highest heaven and no where els before the last day In after times saith he Caluin did seem to reject their expositions but indeed was of the same mind with them for in his agreement with the Divines of Zurik he writtes that the body of Christ is as far distant from us as the heaven is distant from the earth but deceitfully did Calvin teach the same impiety in other smoother words so that he blinded the eyes of many learned and good men and drew them into Zuinglianisme So far he I marke these two that the Reader may see how these do prevaricate or wrangle which have been for consubstantiation they will not understand any thing to be spoken against them and as if blew green and purple were all white because they are not all black so how beit
a small number of men we must set the decrees of the antient and general councels and judgement of the approved fathers and specially we should give place to the testimonies of Scripture being expounded by the interpretation of the Church lest hereticks brag and say They alone have the Worde of God As for the other point If those words This is my body have not so greata force as they sound and seem to have why are they repeated by all the three Evangelists and by Saint Paul why did not the later Evangelists or the Apostle expound these words as the Sacramentaries do this is the minde of the Testator which should not be reiected this was the mind of all the antient fathers that not only the bread is given but the very body of Christ really He concludes with those words I will yeeld unto your opinion of the Sacrament except yee pointing unto the Ministers think that Jesus Christ in his flesh is not in this world from the time of his ascension and that he hath some other body then that which is visible and except ye think he is otherwise in the sacrament then in the Word if ye think it all one to put on Christ in baptisme and to eat his body and drink his blood and briefly that he is so in heaven that he is not also on the earth and that he is otherwise in the sacrament then he is in a myre And then abjuring all those dangerous opinions he exhorts the King and Queen to maintain the antient faith and protested in the name of the Prelats that they would live and die in defence of that Doctrine which he had declared All the clergy came before the King and Cardinal Turnon in their name protested again This was the Confession of their faith which they would seal with their blood and which the King should embrace and if these who are separated will not subscribe the same they should not be heard but be bannished and they crave most earnestly that the King would so do The Ministers were afraid that the King would not admit them at another day and therefore was the more earnest that the King would be pleased to hear a reply presently but that could not be obtained By supplication they procured continuation of the Conference but in a more private place where were the King and Queen and king of Navar the Prelats twelve Ministers and a few others Beza declared what the Church is and distinguished it according to the twofold calling then he spake of the Notes of the Church and of the succession and calling of Pastors in ordinary calling he said three things are necessary examination election and imposition of hands and in extraordinary calling it is lawfull by Gods authority albeit one or two or all these conditions be wanting as for working of miracles it is not alwayes conjoined with extraordinary calling unless we will talk of things whereof we have no testimony Then he spoke of the authority of the Church and whether it may err and he shewed out of the Cardinals words that the Church may err in particular members and congregations As for the general Councel he said Men have not the more learning that they become Commissioners and many times the Prelats of sound judgement have been absent and they who should have been most sound have been most corrupt as Bernard complained in his time and therefore the authority of the Scriptures is above the authority of the Church for which cause Augustin wrote unto Maximin the Arrian that he will not obiect the councel of Nice nor will have the councel of Arimino obiected against him but let the Scriptures be Judge for both And yet we despise not the judgement of councels and fathers if they agree with the Scriptures but as Jerom writes the errours of the antiens should not be followed but the authority of the Scriptures may never be despised I feare said he that I have been too prolixe and therefore lest I give offense I will continue or leave off to speak of the sacrament as it shall please your Royal Majesties The Cardinal beckned unto Claud. Espensius a Sorbonist he said He oft had wondred how the Ministers had entred into the Church seing they neither entred ordinarily by ordinary authority and imposition of hands nor by any extraordinary way seeing they are not confirmed by working of miracles nor by express testimony of Scripture and therefore their Ministry is not lawfull From that he turned to speak of the sacrament at the command of the Cardinal Lorrain that he might bring the Ministers into controversy with the Germans as was said To the same purpose spake a white Monk of Sorbon Xainctius but more despite fully against the Ministers and to the offence of both parties Beza complained of his impertinency and did supplicate the Queen that she would provide against reviling words and digressions then he said Our Ministers were chosen and approved by our own Churches and so have two parts of ordinary calling and if imposition of hands be wanting unto any the calling is lawfull because these two are the substantials and the other is less principal And in so great confusion of all things in the Roman Church we would not seek imposition of hands from them whose vices superstition and false doctrine we disallow for they be open enemies unto the Trueth as the Prophets had not such enemies then as the Priests neither sought they confirmation of their offices unto which God had called them Neither are miracles necessary in extraordinary calling as is manifest by examples yea Paul in evidencing his calling speaks not of miracles that he had wrought but of the fruits of his preaching the which wee also may say of so many Nations and Provinces which have received the Gospel by our preaching nor can there be a greater confirmation of any Ministery seeing the power of God is manifest in us which neither imprisonment nor banishment nor fire could hinder Espenseus said Bring mee one example in those 1500. years like to yours All things said Beza are not written that have been done and however it hath been it followes not that our calling is not manifest enough and set forth from God in his due time He is not now bringing a new Gospel but restoring the old which was sufficiently confirmed before and now by a singular way he hath caused his light to shine He spake also of traditions but was oft interrupted by Xainctius and the Cardinal fearing that his incivility were checked by the Queen would end the controversy as if the question had been sufficiently cleared and the Sorbonists spoke as if the victory had been on their side Then the Cardinal said in the name of the Prelates that they would proceed no further unless the question of the Sacrament were handled and then he asks the Ministers Whether they do embrance the Augustan Confession Here he playd the fox for if they denied
of Christ by the Holy Ghost Which argument is like unto this God healeth by the power of nature therefore a Physician oâ— medicin help nothing thereunto Certainly only Christ worketh whole salvation in us and that not by the power of any other thing but by his only Spirit and nevertheless for the same effect in us he useth his word both visible in the sâ—craments and audible in the gospell and by them exhibiteth and bringeth remission of sins communion of himself and eternal life Zuingliâ—s did acknowledge this therefore when he denied that the sacraments give grace he understood the outward action of itself can do nothing to this purpose but all thing belonging to salvation is from the inward action of Christ and the sacraments are his instruments in some manner And it was Luther who first of all men did impugne this tenent of the School-men that the sacraments of themselves conferr grace without any good motion of ourselves and wihtou faith And so in this question Zuinglius did impugne what Luther taught not The same happened unto Oecolampade whom none doubteth to have been an excellent Divine if they read his works as he did read the Scriptures with singular modesty and reverence and was well acquainted with the fathers and did much esteem of them so he wrote very reverently and religiously of the sacraments howbeit he thought that Luther's wordes did import an impanation or local inclosing of Christs body and upon this account did impugne them for he writes so in his last dialogue when he would declare the difference The difference saith he is rather in the manner of the presence and absence then in the very presence and absence for none is so blunt to affirm that Christs body is every way absent or present Some hold that the Lords bread is the very body of Christ so that whosoever whether godly or ungodly do eat it they eat not only the bread and the sacrament but also the body of Christ bodily and let it down into the stomack But we speak against this and affirm that the element is not so honoured as that the most excellent of all creatures would unite himself into the same and natural substance of it or that he is so naturally contained in it that by it as a midle pipe grace is conveyed which the Holy Ghost gives unto believers and by the touch and tast of it even the ungodly do touch and eat the very body of Christ and are partakers of grace From those his words who may not see that Oecolampad impugneth three things only that the body of Christ is united with the bread into one and the same natural substance contained naturally in it and that by the touch or tast of bread all both godly and ungodly are partakers of grace But Luther did never affirm any of these albeit not a few did judge that those things were in the words which he did use in this purpose especially when he did deny any trope in the words This is my body I will also adioyn a whole epistle of Oecolampad where in he plainly avouches his faith concerning this point It is thus John Oecolampade unto N. a brother in Christ Grace and peace from God the Father I have need to be informed by thee my brother and thou comest unto mee and violently pressest mee unwilling to answer Is this thy tyranny tolerable and yet in Christ it is to be comported for it is friendly and brotherly and yet upon this condition that I may have the same power over thee and thou shalt impart unto mee thy judgement mutually when thou shalt receive mine Receive then plainly what I believe The sacramentall signes whereby the sacramentall promise concerning the remission of my sins that it may be more believed by my infirm conscience are not unto mee bread and wine for I who seek higher things make no reckoning what sort of bread and wine be given but I desire more admirable things and powerful to streng then my weak soul and those are no other but the very body and the very blood not the figure of the body and blood but the body that was given and suffered for my sins and which the Angels of heaven do enioy deliciously which Christ promised to give and did give to be meat not carnal but spiritual and the blood which flowed out of his body and was shed for my sins for that doth powerfully seal the promise of purging mee from all mine iniquity and for this I believe simply the words of Christ saying This is my body which shall be given for you and This is my blood of the new testament which is shed for you Whereby he testifieth that that body is a seal that sins are forgiuen unto him who believes and eates spiritually seing he suffered for this cause The word of Christ went first which the effect hath sealed by the holy seal I hunger and thirst for this bread and drink not that it as bodily meat may be converted into mee but that I may be turned into it and may become spiritual by spiritual meat that when I shall be in Christ Christ also abiding in mee to wit being received in the sacrament may by his grace work his own works that so I may be ready to obey all the members of Christ albeit it were to die for them as he died for mee and so I may be a true member in that his mysticall body not in the body of Antichrist because I desire not a portion with him but I desire to be a member of Christ though the lowest I can not speak more plainly take this in good part do with courage and trust in the Lord. Basile Aprile 19. By the providence of God saith Bucer this epistle is amongst the epistles of Zuinglius and Oecolampad which other ways were not happily published for in that book some epistles that were published in the first heat of the disputation came abroad again which annoy not so much the concorde of the Churches which the Lord gives at this time as the sincere and solid knowledge of those mysteries amongst not a few Moreover when I heard that those epistles were a printing and intended in a preface which might have been prefixed unto the work in name of some man in Basile to supply some things that were written in these epistles slenderly concerning the sacraments and therefore might offend many that the readers might understand how even that Church approves the right faith of the sacraments even as they had embraced it long ago and doth profess it soundly Some man the Lord forgive him caused the preface be published in my name And so when it is said in the beginning of the epistle When wee set forth those episâ—les many did judge that I had caused these epistles to be divulged and thence did inferr that I do not intend the agreement of the Churches in the doctrine of the sacrament And because at this time I can
that the Masse and the opinions which they teach the people concerning it be laid to the square of the first institution that the world may know whither their teachers had offended or not in that which they have affirmed whither the action of the Masse be not expressely repugnant unto the last Supper of the Lord Jesus whither the sayer of it commit not horrible blasphemy in vsurping The sayer of Masse is a blasphemer upon the offices of Christ Al. Anderson denied that the Priest takes upon him Christs office A masse-book was brought and it wat read out of the beginning of the Canon Suscipe Sancta Trinitas hanc oblationem quam ego indignus peccator offero tibi vivo Deo et vero pro peccatis toâ—ius Ecclesiae vivorum et mortuorum Then said the Minister If to offer for the sins of the whole Church be not the proper office of Christ only let the Scripture judge and if a vile man whom ye call priest proudly takes the same upon him let your own books witnes Al. Anderson said Christ offered the propitiatory and none can do that but we offer the remembrance It was answered We praise God that yee deny a sacrifice propitiatory in the Masse and we offer to prove that in moe than an hundred places of your Papisticall Doctors it is affirmed that the Masse is a sacrifice propitiatory But whereas ye alledge that yee offer Christ in remembrance we aske first Unto whom do yee offer him and next By what authority are ye assured of well-doing In God the Father falleth no oblivion and if ye will shift and say that ye offer not as if God were forgetfull but as willing to apply Christs merits to his Church we demand of you What power and commandement have ye to do so We know that our Master commanded his Apostles to do what He did in remembrance of him and plain it is that Christ took bread gave thanks brak the bread and gave it to his disciples saying Take eat ..... here is a command to take and eat to take and to drink but to offer Christs body either for remembrance or application we find not and therefore we say To take upon you an office which is not given unto you is uniust vsurpation and not lawfull power Then Alexander vseth some words of shifting but the Lords require him to answer directly Then said he I am better acquainted with philosophy than with Theology Then John Lesley then Parson of Vne and immediatly was sent by the Bishops and their faction to be agent in their business with the Queen and thereafter was called Bishop of Rosse was demanded to answer unto that argument After some litle pause he said If our Master hath nothing to say unto it I have nothing for I know nothing but the Canon-law and the greatest reason that ever I could find there is Volumus and Nolumus The Nobility seeing that neither the one nor the other would answer directly say Wee have been miserably deceived for if the Masse may not obtain remission of sin to the quick and to the dead wherefore were all the Abbeys so richly doted and endowed with our lands Hereby it is clear as also by what is written of the Parliament that the Papists had liberty to plead for their Religion and were required to say what they could not only with safety and assurance of protection but they did appeare and shew their weakness At that time the book of Discipline was not allowed nor reiected but delayd and thereafter it was approved by the Counsell for their own part but not authorised and some additions were noted and this provision expressely added That the Bishops Abbots Priors and other Beneficed men who had already adioined them unto the Religion shall enioy their benefices during their lives they upholding and sustaining the Ministery and Ministers for their part The issue of this provision was many Church-men gave away and sold their Manses gleebs tyths and other things to the prejudice of the Church so that the entertainment of Ministers was very small in many places nothing at all and the gleebs could hardly be recovered XIII At Edinburgh December 20. An. 1560. was the first Nationall assembly where conveened the Ministers and Commissionares from Shires The first assembly of the Church and Burghs about the number of 44. persons 1. They designe Ministers and Readers unto severall parishes throughout the Countrie 2. It was appointed that in time coming the election of Minister Elders and deacons shall be in the publick church and premonition to be on the sunday preceeding 3. It is found by the law of God marriages may be solemnized betwixt parties of the second or third degrees of consanguinity and others that are not prohibited by the word of God and therefore to desire the Lords and Estates to interpose their authority and make lawes thereupon 4. It is appointed that for punishment of fornication the law of God be observed and these shall make publick repentance which vse carnall copulation betwixt the promise and solemnization of their marriage 5. that earnest supplication be made unto the Estates of the realm and to the Lords of Secret counsell that all Judges ordinary and Judiciall Officers as Lords of the Session Shireffs Stewarts Balives and other ordinary Judges be professours of the trueth according to the word of God and all Ministers of the word to be removed from such Offices according to the Civill law 6. To supplicate the Parliament and Secret Counsell that for eschuing the wrath of the Eternall and removing the plagues threatned in His law Sharp punishment be ordained against idolaters and mantainers thereof in contempt of Gods true Religion and Acts of Parliament namely which say Masse or cause it to be said or are present thereat And a catalogue of their names is writen They appoint Comissioners to attend the Parliament if any shall be called with these supplications It is to be observed from the fift Act that Ministers of the word were forbbidden to be Judges in Civil causes which is against the former practise when Bishops and other prelats were Lords of Parliament and sat in Civill Courts No Parliament was called as was expected but a Convention of Estates was appointed to be in May before which time Papists resort to Edinburgh in great numbers and began to brag of their power The Commissioners which were appointed In a Convention of the Estates An. 1561. Papistry is again forbidden by the Assembly of the Church conveen May 17. An 1561. and draw up these articles to be presented unto the Convention that idolatry and all monuments thereof should be suppressed throughout the realm that the sayers maintainers and heareâ—s of the Masse should be punished according to the Act of Parliament 2. That câ—rtain provision be made for maintenance of the Superintendents Ministers and Readers that Superintendents be planted where none are That punishment be appointed for
articles collected as they said out of the books of Zuinglius and Luther and they commanded the Divines to confirm their opinions by holy Scripture by Apostolicall traditions and approved Councels by authorities of the holy Fathers to use brevity and avoid superfluous questions they who were sent by the Pope should speak first then they who were sent by the Emperour and in the third place the Secular Divines after the order of their promotion and lastly the Regulars after the precedence of their Orders This method pleased not the Italian Divines and they said It is a novelty condemning all School-Divinity which in all difficuities vseth reasouning in the first place as Thomas and others have done and the collecting of Sentences out of the Fathers and Scriptures is a faculty of the memory and full of toil in writting it was used in old times but it is known to be insufficient and unprofitable as appeares by those Doctors who in these 350. years have defended the Church yea it is to grant the victory unto the Lutherans who do alwayes overcom by those weapons for they know many tongues and read many Authors But those reasons had no place IX In sundry congregations they censured ten articles of the Eâ—charist little is noted worthy of memory untill they came to the framing of the Decrees Some would had anathematisms only condemning the contrary doctrine as they had done in the other sacraments Others said The first order was better decerning the positiues with the anathematisms as was done in Justification The Italians cherished this opinion because they thought it to be some mean of regaining their former reputation The Cownt of Montfort Ambassade of the Emperour and the Orator of King Ferdinand dissuade to make any Decree concerning the communion with both kindes because it would offend the Protestants who certainly shall not be brought unto the Synod if that be put in Decree and so both the Emperour and Councel have laboured in vain These shew also that the Of a Safe-conduct Emperour had given a safe-conduct unto the Protestants and they are not content with it alledging that it was decreed in the Councel at Constance and also executed that a Councel is not tied to the Safe-conduct of any man and therefore they demand a Safe-conduct from the Synod and the Emperour hath promised it unto them as also he hath commanded them to crave and purchase it The Presidents referred the answer unto the next Session or rather unto the Pope and the Ambassade said It is not fit that the points of the Eucharist be debated before their coming especially seing they want not matter of reformation where is no controversy The Legate answered This method is already decerned An account of all those is sent to Rome where the Safe-conduct found variety of opinions Some said It should not be granted because the like was never done but at Basile and that should not be followed because it is a prejudice unto the Synod to tie themselves unto rebels especially when there is no hope to gain them Others said Not for hope to gain them but to take from them all excuse it were not amiss to give them all probable satisfaction seing the Emperour is so earnest for it As for prejudices it may be so framed that it shall tie little or nothing for if it be conceived generally of Ecclesiastical and Secular persons in the German Nation and of every condition it may be said afterward that the Protestants are not comprehended or that it is meaned only of the Catholiks and a special mention is necessary for the Protestants Or the Synod may give a Safe-conduct and the Pop's authority shall be safe According to this opinion a form of a Safe-conduct was sent to Trent and a direction to omit the question of the cup and to expect the Protestants but not beyond three months neither to be idle in the mean while but hold a Session within 40. dayes and treat of pennance While this consulation was a Rome they were proceeding at Trent as is before but when they came to declare the manner how Christ is in the sacrament and of transsubstantiation a contention arose between the Dominicans and Franciscans The Dominicans said All the Contention for transsubstanâ—â—ation substance of the bread is turned into Christs body and the body is in the place where the bread was and because the whole bread is turned that is the matter of the bread is turned into the matter of his body and the form of the bread into the form of his body therefore it is called transsubstantiation and so there be two sorts of Christ's existence both real and substantial the one natural as he conversed on earth or is now in heaven and the other as he is in the sacrament which is a proper manner of his existence and can not be called natural nor sacramental as if yee would say He is not there really but as in a signe seing a sacrament is but a signe Vnless by sacramental yee understand a real existence proper unto this sacrament The Franciscans would have it said One body by Gods omnipotency may be truly and substantially in many places at once and when it comes into a new place it is in it because it goeth thether not by a successive mutation aâ—leaving the first place but in an instant it getreth the second without losing the first and God hath so ordained that where the body of Christ is no other substance â—hall abide there but by annihilation because the body of Christ succeeds in steed of it so it is truly called transsubstantiation not because the one substance is made of the other but because the one succeeds unto the other The manner of Christs being in heaven and iâ— the sacrament differ not in substance but in quantity only because in heaven the magnitude of the body possesseth a place proportionable unto it and it is substantially in the sacrament not possessing a place therefore both sorts are substantial and natural in regard of the substance but in respect of the quantity the existence in heaven is natural and in the sacrament is miraculous differing only in that in heaven the quantity is truly a quantity and in the sacrament it hath the condition of substance Much dispute was for hearing and understanding this matter but none could give satisfaction namely unto the Nuntio de Verona who for the time had the place of moderating October 11. was the Session the decrees of faith with the anathematisms and of reformation were read with express reserving some points of faith untill the coming of the Protestants and the Safe-conduct was framed according to the direction from Rome yet so that the Presidents caused all the same things be first concluded in the congregations The French Orators appeared not to receive answer to their protestation for they had received order not to contest nevertheless the Councel framed an answer denying that they were
created and which is common unto us with the unbelievers and ungodly but that grace which is by faith in JESUS CHRIST which is given unto those only who have faith by which grace a new will is not created nor is will compelled unwillingly but being infirm it is healed being corrupt it is amended and of bad is turned into good and is drawn by a certain internal motion that of unwilling it is made willing and gladly consents unto the Divine call ..... If any of the Schoolmen hath spoken inconveniently of this liberty of will that should be reckoned among the opinions of privat persons and the more wholesom writtings of others should be opposed unto them c. It is to be marked that he wrote this Consultation after the Councel at Trent and yet he takes not notice of their decrees but accounteth them as the opinions of private persons and under that name would bury them all and as if the Reformed speaking against those errors did unjustly accuse the Church of Rome On the 22. Article he saith Concerning the administration of the Holy Eucharist it is most sure that the universal Church untill this day and the Western or Romance for a thousand years or more Marke heer he distinguisheth between Vniversal and the Roman Church in the solem dispensation of this Sacrament did give unto all members of Christ both the Kinds of bread and wine which is manifest by innumerable testimonies of antient both Greek and Latine Authors and this they did because Christ had so ordained and practized in giving both unto his Disciples representing the person of believing communicants ......... But those antients thought it not so necessary as if upon necessity or any weighry cause the one could not be giveâ— without the other or that it was not a true Sacrament if the one only were taken ..... and therefore they call not the dispensation of one Kind wicked and sacrilegious for whatsoever cause it be done ..... Nevertheless I think there is none if he consider this more diligently but if the antient custom of the Church were restored ... he would rather have the vvhole and entire Sacrament then one part only And on the 10. Article he saith This article of the Lords Supper is set down severall wayes in the confession for in the first Latine edition it 's written thus In the Supper of the Lord they teach that the body and blood of Christ are verily there and given unto them who eat in the Lords Supper But the Dutch edition being translated word for word saith thus Concerning the Lords supper it is taught so that the very body and blood of Christ is verily present in the Supper under the kinds of bread wine and is given and taken there But in another edition this way Of the Lords supper they teach that with the bread and wine the body blood of Christ are truly given unto them who eat in the Lords Supper In the Apology this article is expressed in those words They teach that in the Lords supper the body and blood of Christ are truly and substantially present and truly given with those things that are seen the bread and wine unto those who receive the sacrament and the Apology witnesseth that this Article being propounded in this manner was not disproved by his Caesarean Majesty But although they who follow the opinion different from the followers of this confession and is set up by Calvin do contend that they agree well with this expression because they think that thereby no carnal or substantial presence of Christs body blood with the signes of bread wine which may be received equaly by the bad good men is concluded yet afterwards the followers of this confession have in their writtings declared their mind plainly enough to wit the body and blood of Christ in the bread wine are received not by faith only but even by the mouth of the Body by the unworthy as wel as by the worthy But in all these expressions of that Augustan confession the controversy yet remaines Whether the body and blood of Christ be present in the very eating only This is now taught plainly by them all and expressly declared in the confession of Saxony where they say Men are taught that the Sacraments are actions instituted by God and without the the appointed use those things have not the nature of a sacrament but in the appointed use in this communion Christ is truly and substantially present and truly tendered unto the receivers of the body blood of Christ seing not only the present Church but also the antient and Catholick did everthink and reach that this sacrament stands not in the action and use only but after the consecration which is done by the Lords words and invocation of the Divine name the body and blood of Christ is made of the substances of the bread wine and the virtue of the blessing is not losed especially if it be reserved for the use of the sick to which purpose are many testimonies ................... Those are madd therefore who say that the mystical benediction ceaseth after the sanctification if any part remain untill the next day for the holy body of Christ is not changed c. The faithfulness of the author in this article will be best known by inspection of the quoted places Certainly there were alterations of this article in sundry editions of the Augustan confession but who will read the Saxons confession will soon find that he wrongeth them for they say expressly Without the use whereunto they were ordained the things themselves are not to be accounted for a sacrament but in the use appointed c. Neither do they add one word of the remaining of Christs body after the use as neither do they alledge any testimony to that purpose So that his weakness appeares in nothing more than in this article and specially in that madd conclusion which followes no way upon those testimonies for though Irenaeus saith That which is from earth after it hath received the calling of God is not now common bread but the Eucharist consisting of two things an earthly and a heavenly and others speak in that manner will it therefore follow that they are mad who say that the Elements are not the Sacrament without the use And again that the doctrine of Calvin concerning the Sacrament was set up or begun by him the author shewes his weakness seing an egg is not liker unto another than that which Calvin taught is like unto those testimonies of the antients quoted in the same place Of the Roman Highpriest he saith on the 7. Article Whereas for unity of the Church they require the obedience unto a chief Rector who hath succeeded to Peter in ruling the Church of Christ and in feeding his sheep it is not different from the consent of the antient Church Truly Ambrose calleth the Roman Bishop in his time the Rector of the whole
because the Popish Party understood it that works are necessary to make up justification and to promerite salvation At last in a Conference at Altemburgh in the year 1568. the question was debated and they agreed in these terms New obedience and good works both external and internal are necessary unto believers and such who turn unto God But they could not condescend to use the words necessary unto salvation The Wittebergers said Works are necessary not indeed by necessity of efficiency but of presence and those of Jena denyed not the necessity of presence but they said Such a phrase should be shunned because of scandal and for fear of error or mistaking for why should we use dangerous words with the erroneous sophisters and then parget or plaster them with glosses when we have safer words 2. A more grievous contention was renewed for the Vbiquity of Christs body here I wil use the words of George Calixtus Professor in Julia in his Consultatio de Tolerantia Certainly seing the omnipresence of Christs flesh was not known nor heard in the vniversal Church even untill Stapulensis Luther it might yet have been not known albeit it were built upon a solide foundation and a necessity of believing it might have not been layd upon the vulgare or the learned And indeed but two passages one out of the book PERI TOU RETÃ’U and another ex Majore Confessione are the only at least the main whereupon Luther buildes the Vbiquity and that was done by him when he was earnest against his adversaries to establish any way the presence of the Lords body in the Eucharist the former book was published in the year 1527. and the other in the next year in the year 1529 by procurement of Philip the illustrious Landgrave of Hass was the Conference at Marburgh there Luther and Zuinglius agreed in all articles excep the Eucharist .... And Luther neither did judge nor press the omnipresence as a point of doctrin wherein he craved assent In the Confession of Ausburgh the third article is of those mysteries but with no or very slender touch of omnipresence Neither at that time nor any time following in the disputations between the Reformed and the Popish came the omnipresence into question or controversy therefore Luther suffered it to be buried in silence Yea and in the year 1537. when he wrote the articles of Smalcald he averred expressly that there was no controversy between him and the adversaries the Papists concerning the Trinity the Incarnation the Person of Christ seing said he we confesse the articles on both sides But what the Papists have taught or do teach concerning those articles may be known by their writings especially the vnanimous consent of the Schoolmen and seing in all these is not a jota concerning the omnipresence it is manifest also that Luther did leave it and prosess agreement in the doctrin of the Person of Christ with them who did not acknowledge vbuiquity ........ And so while Luther lived that question was asleep which some men did waken up again about the year 1562. of whom the principals were John Brâ—ntius and Jacob Andreae Neither have I pleasure nor is it necessary to repeat all the history but it is certain this later man spared no travell untill he persuaded some to embrace Vbiquity and forced it upon others and nevertheless the could not persuad all that embrace the Augustan Confession or as they speak the Lutherans not the Danes not the Holsatians nor those of Norinberg Helmstad and many more Therefore some of those who are called Lutherans are at this day for Vbiquity and against them are all other Christians both Greeks or of the East part of the world and Papists and Calvinians So far Calixtus For justifying his words concerning the Danes I add the testimony of Nic. Hemingius Professor of Divinity and Preacher in Coppenhaghen at that time In his Catechism he expounding the Article of Christs ascension saith This Article must be understood of Christs true body and the bodily placing thereof in heaven lest we think either that the humane nature in Christ is swallowd up by the Divine or that it is diffused into the whole world with the Divine seing both these do most openly deny Christs manhood Is not Christ every where Yes truly by communication of properties according to that Joh. 3. None ascends into heaven but he who came from heaven But it 's certain that when the Lord spake these words with Nicodemus his body was circumscribed on the earth wherefore the saying of Christ must be understood by communication of properties So Cyprian He ascended into heaven not where the Word God was not before but where the Word made flesh sat not before to wit by bodily placing Again he speaking against the errors concerning the Lords Supper saith What say you of them who say that the manhood is every where with the Godhead These for eschuing the error of them who deny that we receive the flesh and blood of the Lord in the Supper fall into this horrible error that they assert the manhood of Christ to be every where with the Godhead whose opinion is above in the Article of ascension clearly confuted and the Angel said plainly unto the women He is risen he is not here Here truly either the Angel lied which is horrible to think or they are deceived who say that the humanity of Christ is everywhere with the Divinity by which he filleth all things or is every where Also Paul saith Phil. 3. that our bodies shall be made like unto the glorious body of Christ But who daraver that our bodies shall be infinite that they may be every where Truly thus the trueth of humane nature should be destroyed Therefore neither was Christs body made infinite after his resurrection Moreover the Holy Fathers confess that Christs body is circumscribed For Nazianzen saith that the same Christ is circumscribed and uncircumscribed earthy and heavenly comprehensible and incomprehensible for that is the diversity of the two natures humane and Divine which Diversity because the Eutychians denyed they were justly condemned of heresy How then say the Catholicks that Christs body and blood is truly in the Supper The true body and blood of Christ are in the Supper together with the bread and wine not by conjunction of nature but Sacramental For Luther and the Holy Fathers testify that it is not carnal nor an including of the body in the bread or of the blood in the wine so that place and body touch one another and the place yields unto the body Wherefore unto this true presence of Christs body and blood in the Supper it is no way necessary that his manhood be every-where with the Godhead but it is enough to believe thaâ— as at the institution of the Supper the Lord sat with a circumscribed body and nevertheless he gave unto his disciples his body to be eaten and his blood to be drunken and that â—ruly according
to his words This is my body This is my blood So now sitting in the glory of Majesty he reaches by the hands of Ministers Such is his Divine virtue and power unto communicants his body and blood Therefore the Latine Church was wont to pray before the communion Let us lift up our hearts unto the Lord For as in the first institution of the Supper the Disciples had their eies fixed on the Lord who sitting at table reached unto them the Holy Supper So we should lift up our hearts unto the heavens unto him who sitting in the glory of Majesty reaches in the Supper by the hands of Ministers unto communicants his true body and blood that it may be the meat drink of the inward man who thereby is fed nurished and groweth unto everlasting life Whence Bernard speaking of the Supper saith This is the food not of the belly but of the soul for it is not given to repair the ruin of this life which is a vapor for a litle time but to confer eternal life unto the soul And as the water being sprinkled in Baptism hath done it's part so the bread eaten and the wine being drunken in the H. Supper have done their part but the spirituall virtue is possessed by faith and the verity of Christs body and blood is also maintained So Heming About the year 1571. this controversy waxed hote for in Witteberg Cas Cruciger the later Chr. Pezelius Fr. Widebram Henry Moller and others were against the Vbiquity and for it were these of Iena chiefly and with them were sundry other towns as Brunswic Luneburg c. In the same year Augustus the Elector of Saxony conveeneth the Divines of Witteberg and Leipsich into Dresda there they declared that they held no other doctrin but what was in the Confession of Ausburgh and agreeth with Luther and Melanthon's writings and they published their consent Against this consent Lucas Osiander and Selneccer and Jacob Andreiae did publish other books The Wittebergers wrote their Apology This contention waxeth hoter and hoter untill the year 1577. when George Count of Henneberg in a private conference said unto the Elector The Divines of Witteberg do foster some errors which can not be dissembled nor approved by the sincere Ministers of the Church neither is there hope of true peace among the followers of the Augustan Confession until these errours be noted and condemned The Elector answered I wish an harmony and that the corruptions were marked and that there were some beginning of so necessary and profitable a work I for my part will further it according to my power George undertook it At that time the Papists did upbraid them with their divisions and said There be so many parties among them of the Augustan Confession that if any would leave Papistry they know not unto what sect they shall cleave Osiandet histo Lib. 4. c. 2. shewes another ground of their variance that since the time of that unhappy Interim the corruptions and errors which began at that time could not be amended And it may be added that in all the periods of attempting reconciliations some did hold the points where-in they did agree at those several times and others would not accept them And Melanthon whose authority was much respected did for peace smooth his Common places in the year 1546. and again in the year 1558. for which cause the rigider sort called him a temporizer as also in the year 1552. he wrote a Confession of faith to have bin presented unto the the Councel at Trent This was and yet is called The Confession of Saxony and was subscribed also by the Ministers of Misnia In the year 1578. the Elector and the Count of Henneberg meet again at the marriage of Lewes Duke of Wurtembergh After the solemnity these three being together the Count shewes the Duke what conference had been before for removing the scandal of division then by common advice Lucas Osiander and Balthasar Bidembachius two Divines of Wurtembergh were appointed to pen some Overtures for removing those controversies Liber Concordiae This was done so privily that no other knew it but those Princes yea their Secretaries heard not of it When those two had written their judgement were assembled at Maulbron two Divines of Wurtembergh two of Hennebergh and one of Bada They examin and change as they thought expedient Osiand Lib. Cit. Cap. 3. Then their work was sent unto the Elector of Saxony and he cailed for Jacob Andreae Chemnitius and Selneccer and gave them the book they judge it too brief and enlarge it with other arguments and other questions This book was sent then unto sundry Vniversities and towns to be freely censured that if any thing were to be amended added or empaired they should admonish ingenvously Ibid. Cap. 4. The Electors of Saxony and Brandeburgh caused it to be subscribed by 8000. to wit by sundry Princes Imperial Towns and their Ministers and it was printed in the year 1580. with the title Liber Concordiae It was not examined in a publick Synod and was still conceiled from those Churches which did oppose Vbiquity and some within these Princes Dominions were displaced for refusing to subscribe it and without any reasoning So it turned into the Book of discord and made the greatest rent of all The book contained elleven Heads having first layd this ground that the books of the old and new Testament are the only rule whereby the doctrine of faith is to be judged and all other writtings may be vsed as witnesses only The first Head is of original sin where they teach that it is neither the nature nor any part of the nature of man but a corruption of nature leaving in man nothing sound or uncorrupt and can be known by the revealed word of God only II. of the free-will in the first act of regeneration that God worketh the conversion by the means of the word preached and by opening the heart to hearken so that it is the work of God only making man who is ignorant and unwilling to see and will III. Of righteousnes before God they declare it to be the righteousnes of Christ God-man for which God absolves us from our sins without any respect of the merite of our good works either by past present or to come And faith trusting in Christ and working by love is the only instrument whereby we apprehend the same Neither should a true believer doubt of the remission of his sins notwithstanding his sins of infirmity IV. Concerning good works they hold that these are not the cause of justification nor of eternall life but all men especially the regenerat are debters of good works yet so that they condem those positions Good works are necessary to salvation No man was ever saved without good works and it is impossible to be saved without good works And faith in Christ can not be lost and the elect do retain the Holy Ghost even though they fall into
adultery or other crimes and continue in them V. Of the law and the gospell they say Whatsoever in the holy Scripture is against sin belongs unto the law and the gospell properly is the doctrine teaching what man who hath not satisfied the law should believe to wit that Christ hath satisfied for all our sins and hath obtained remission but in a large sense the doctrine of repentance may be called the gospell And they condem it as pernicious and false to say The gospell properly is the doctrine of repentance or that it is not the only preaching of Gods grace VI. concerning the use of the law Albeit believers be free from the curse and coaction of the law yet they are not lawless but the law must be preached both unto the unconverted and converted yet with this different issue that those who obey for fear of the curse are said to do the works of the law and who being regenerat do obey willingly as if there were no curse nor reward are said to obey the law of Christ and the law of the mind neither are they under the law but under grace VII concerning the Lord's Supper they first condem those as crafty and deceiving Sacramentarians who believe the true presence of the very substantial and lively body and blood of Christ and that the presence and eating of it is spiritual by faith next they hold that the body and blood of Christ is truly and substantially there and is truly distributed with the bread and wine and received not only by them who come worthily but by the unworthy albeit by the one sort unto their confort and the other to their judgement and damnation unless they repent And the grounds of this their faith are 1. Jesus Christ is very God and man in one person undivided and inseparable 2. the right hand is every where and Christ in his manhood is set at the right hand of God 3. the words of the institution are not false 4. God knowes many wayes and can be present as he pleaseth neither is he tied to that only way which the philosophers call Local And so the body of Christ is present not only spiritually but also bodily yet not Capernaiticaly but in a spirituall and heavenly manner in respect of the sacramental union Thirdly they condem Popish transsubstantiation the sacrifice the refusing of the cup c. VIII of the person of Christ they say albeit the Godhead and manhood of Christ retain their several properties yet they are vnited personaly not as two planks conioined but as iron and fire or he soul and the body Wherefore among other articles they condem them who hold that only the manhood suffered and only the Godhead is present with us in the sacrament and in all our crosses or that this presence is not in respect of his manhood and the Sone of God doth not all the works of his omnipotency in and with and by his manhood and Christ in respect of his manhood is not capable of omnipotency and other Divine properties IX Concerning Christ's descending into hell they say It should not be curiously disputed but be believed simply that he descended into hell and overcame the power of death and Satan but when and how it can not be known in this life X. concerning Eclesiastical ceremonies which are not commanded nor forbidden in the Worde they say those are not any part of Divine worship and may be changed as the edification of the Church in several times and places shall require yet without levity and scandal and in time of persecution when a constant confession is required nothing should be yielded unto the enemies of the gospell or for their sake XI Concerning eternal predestination first they distinguish between prescience and predestination prescience say they is common to the estate of the godly and ungodly and is not the cause of sin in any man but predestination or election concerneth the godly only this can not be searched among the hid decrees of God but in the reveeled word which teaches that God hath shut up all men under unbelief that he might have mercy on all and willeth not that any man should perish but rather that all men should repent and believe in Christ neither is any saved but who believe in him And where it is said Many are called but few chosen it is not to be so understood as if God would not have allmen to be saved but to shew that the cause of the damnation of the wicked is their not-hearing or contempt of Gods word And they have no mention of reprobation They have a twelth Head against the heresies of Anabaptists Arians and Antitrinitarians This book was the occasion of an open separation The next year the Divines of the Palatinate reply under the name of Admonitio Neostadiana confirming the ortho doxe doctrine concerning the Person of Christ and the Supper shewing the false imputations of errors examining the authority and true sense of the Augustan Confession discovering the indirect means of penning and seeking subscriptions of that book and demonstrating the uniust condemnation of the true doctrine When this book was published some that had subscribed the former book declared that they had subscribed with limitations and not absolutely as the book was published and they recalled their subscriptions and the contrivers of that book replied under the title Apologia Erfurtensis So much was written pro and con The points wherein they insist most were the question of the Lord's Supper the communication of the Divine attributes unto the manhood and vniversal grace Unto those of the Palatinate were joyned the Princes and Ministers of Anhalt and Nassaw the Helvetians and many Cities of Germany besides those of other Nations Untill this day it is cleare that those Vbiquitaries inveigh most bitterly against their adversaries and impute many errors unto them falsely by which two means they a lienate the simpler sort from all reconciliation This difference occasioned the compacting of the Harmony of Confessions After that time there were other Conferences between these parties but all in vain V. In Constantinople the Muffti or highpriest of the Turks dealt with Troubles in the Greek Church Amurathes to take all the churches of the city from the Christians The Greeks Armenians and other Christian Nations did interceed in the contrary alledging the liberty that was granted by Mahomet 2. and others his successors The Muffti answered That liberty was granted when few Turks were in the city but now when there be so many of their own Religion Christians should have no place within the walls Two churches were taken from them and Amurathes turned all his wrath against the Patriarch and caused lead him in an iron-chain through the city and then banished him unto Rhodes Sundry causes were alledged as that he had caused the Christians receive the new Calendare of Rome to the scandal of many he had pronounced a Sentence of divorcement against a Noble
Greek who had made apostacy and turned to Mahumet and when Amurathes was sending a multitude of Greeks as a Colony unto some desert places the Patriarch called â—t an uniust thing One Pachomius reported this unto Amurathes and he was made Patriach Da. Chytrae in Saxon. Lib. 27. The Christians at mount Libanus were subdued by the Turk in the year 1585. whereas before they had preserved their liberty Cas Consaluus a Lusitanian writes that the Island of Iapan in the Indian sea is divided into 60. Princedoms of which Francis of Bungo Brotasius of Arimo Bartholemew of Omuran were becom Christians and sent their Ambassadors who after three years journying arrived at Rome to acknowledge the Pope Gregory 13. a litle before his death But I will believe it saith Osiander when Iesuits shall leave off to ly VI. The year 1584. was sad unto Belgio They looked for the returning Sad things in the Netherlands of Francis Duke of Anjow their Governor from France But he fell into a dangerous sicknes yet in May he recovered so far that he went to tilting and the next day he took a potion to purge away the dregs of his malady and died on the morrow When he saw the danger of death he confessed that nothing did more grieve him as that he had followed the bad Counsel of wicked men in the administration of Belgio and now he could not amend his former errors as he had intended But by writing and by his Counsellers he advised his Brother the King to be a Protector of those Lands He would not admit his Confessor but professed sorow for his miscariages and his faith in the mercy of God throgh JESUS CHRIST the only Mediator and altogether rejected the Romish rites as extream unction c. Within a month after his death William Prince of Orange was traiterously killed in Delff by a Burgundian who was immediatly apprehended and punished The same year Ghent and Yper and some other towns in Flanders which before were Reformed were necessitat to make agreement with the Duke of Parma and so was Antwerp in Brabant the next year VII In these two now named years were many sturres for the Troubles in Riga for the new Calendar New Calender I will name one in Riga of Livonia Steven King of Pole had erected a colledge of Jesuits there in the year 1581. and he commanded that they should keep Christmes according to the new Style The people would not be present But when the 24 day of the old Style was come they entreated the Senate that they might have Sermon the next day as before It was refused Nevertheless they assembled in the Churches about 8. of the cloke in the morning and praised God with their psalms and the Rector preached in the school unto his Scholares many people hearing George Neuner the Minister stirred up the Burghgrave Nicolaus Eik against the Rector and he sent for him to come into the court When the Rector appeared he was detained there The word is spread through the town that the Rector and some citizens were to be beheaded that night for that preaching The Conrector Valentin Rascius and some others did supplicat the Burghgrave to dismiss the Rector and would have engaged themselves for his compearance again when it should be required and if this be denied they told that the people could not be stayd from a tumult Because the Burgrave would not yield the scholares and people break up the court-doores and took out the Rector whether he would or not Then they pulled down the houses first of Neuner then of Eik and of a Syndic Gothard Welling The next day they gather again and complain among themselves openly what before they had endured with silence that Jesuits were brought in the Popish Religion was restored their liberties were taken from them c. They shut the gates of the town and call the Senate to shew whether those things were done by their consent and then understood that all those things had been done by a few seeking the Kings favor and for their privat interest This broil continued fourtien dayes in the end they agreed to restore unto the Burgrave and others all their damages that there should be an Act of oblivion and the new Style should cease c. When the gates were opened Eik Neuner and the others went unto the King with their complaints He sent a Cardinal to be Governour of the town annulled all the Treaty consisting of 68. articles and caused a greater sum of money to be payd unto the plaintifs Chrytrae ibid. VIII The Frenches who had left their native Land and dwelt at A conference at Monpelgart Monpelgart in the Dutchy of Wortembergh did in the year 1586. solicite the Divines there and then the Duke Frederik that there might be a publick Conference of the German and French Divines hoping for some union of the above named controversies They assemble in March the Duke was present all the time On the one side was Iacob Andreae Chancelar of Tubing Lucas Osiander Chappellan of Wurtembergh and two Civilians from Duke Lewes and on the other side were Theo. Beza and Anton. Fajus from Geneve Abra. Musculus and two Civilians from Bern and Claud. Alberius from Lausan Many others were hearers The Theses or propositions are long and many and the Disputation was longer I give the sum briefly and faithfully The first day to wit Marc. 21. the Wurtembergers according to the order prescribed give in write Theses of the Lords Supper shewing that all do agree that all believers eat Christs flesh and drink his blood spiritually all condem the renting of Christs flesh with mens teeth as also transsubstantiation and physical or local presence So that the only question is Whether in the Supper the very body and blood of Christ be verily and substantially present and be distributed and be received with the bread and wine by the mouth of all them who receive the Sacrament whether worthy or unworthy believers or not believers yet so that the believers only receive confort and the unbelievers do eat to their own condemnation We hold the affirmative say they that is By those words IN with and under the bread we understand nothing but that they who eat that bread and drink that wine do receive Christs body and blood with the bread and wine 2. By the words Substantially Essentially Really and Orally we mean no other but the very eating and presence of his body and blood 3. They argue from the trueth of Christs words This is my body and the almighty power of Christ seing his words declare his will and by his power he can give his body unto all receivers 4. The manner how the worthy and unworthy receive Christs body is not expressed in the Scripture and we say It is supernaturall and incomprehensible by the wit of men and should not be disputed nor searched curiously These theses were given unto Beza as it was
appointed and the next day he brought his answer and propositions The sum is A Sacrament in the strict sense is a sensible thing appointed by Divine institution to be separated from common use to signify spiritual and holy things and this signification consists not in a bare representation whereby the mind is admonish'd to conceive the thing signified this is the use of pictures but on Gods part with the signs is also a very giving of those things which are signified and offered unto our souls 2. We teach that according to Christ's institution by the bread is signified Christs body by the wine his blood by breaking the bread and powring out of the wine are signified those grievous torments which He suffered for us in his body and soul by outward giving the bread and wine the spiritual giving the things signified by Christ unto our souls by outward taking the signes is signified the spiritual receiving of Christ by faith Sacramentaly and truly For He hath commanded not only what things are to be used but also what we should do 3. The Sacramental union of the signes and things signified consists in a mutual relation as is now said for the verity of Christs body which is local and circumscribed both before and after his glorification can not consist otherwise Again many passages of Scripture that shew the true and physical ascending of Christ from the earth and his returning from heaven unto judgement do confute the doctrine of consubstantiation Thirdly that Paul saith We are absent from the Lord and We desire to be with him Lastly this was the continual consent of the Church concerning the true absence of Christs flesh from us and the continual circumscription of his body not on the earth but in heaven which can not consist with any other conjunction but this relative 4. When the word Sacrament is taken in a more large sense it consists of two things one earthly and another heavenly We teach that earthly things are received by earthly instruments to wit the hand and mouth but the heavenly things are apprehended only spiritually by faith because albeit Christs body is a truly organical body yet analogy requires that such as the nurishment and end thereof is such also must be the manner of receiving it but the nurishment and end thereof is spiritual that is they concern our spiritual union with Christ and eternal life through him therefore the manner of receiving those must also be spiritual by the proper instrument of the soul which is faith and therefore seing the bodily receiving of the signes is a pledge of the spiritual receiving these words eat and drink as they are properly spoken of receiving the signes so are they spoken figuratively of the thing signified to wit by asacramental metony my whereby that which agreeth unto the signes is spoken of the things signified and so both those receivings can not be by the mouth Again if the substance of Christs body were received bodily it should remain in the faithfull at least and they should become the substantial or bodily members of Christ and so the Church were not his mystical body but a body verily and substantialy consisting of the substance of His body and of the bodies of all believers 5. The proper effect of the Supper is the saluation of the worthy communcants by confirming their spiritual vnion in Christ and another effect but by accident is the condemnation of them who come unworthily that is ignorant of this mystery or meerly incredulous and without repentance and this condemnation proceeds not from the Supper but from the unworthy vsing of it Then unto the question as it was propounded Beza answered negatiuely not denying that the body of Christ is truly offered unto all that come but to be received by faith and not by the mouth and therefore albeit the wholl sacrament be tendered unto all that come yet unbelievers receive only the signes and they are guilty of Christs body and blood not which they have received but which they contemned Unto the two arguments he answered We deny not the truth of Christs words but we expound them according to the analogy of faith contained in the Creed unto which faith consubstantiation is contrary and albeit Christ as he is God is almighty yet his manhood is not almighty and as he is God he can not do what he hath not decreed to do or what is contrary unto his decree not because he is not almighty but because to change his will and so to be mutable is not a power but an infirmity But God hath ordained that Christs body should be local and circumscribed c. On this article the disputation continued three dayes the one pressing the truth of the words This is my body and Beza urging the analogy of the faith and the like phrase of other sacraments Neither of the two would yield and then they passed unto the article of the person of Christ First the Wurtembergers say both agree that the Sone of God hath assumed the nature of man and became like unto us in all things excep sin that he hath assumed this nature into the unity of his person and he is one person so that the two natures are most strictly united not by confusion or commistion or absorption or transmutatioâ— of either of these natures before nor after his ascension for unto the perfect person of the Mediator both natures are required neither can the properties of the one nature be the properties of the other for then would follow an abolition of one of these natures also the properties of the humane nature are the gifts that were given unto him without measure by which he excelleth all men and Angels In the person of Christ is a communication of properties whereby the properties of both natures are spoken of his person and the properties of the one nature are given unto the other by that docttine which is called doctrina idiomatum and so when it is said The Son of God communicates his properties unto the assumed nature to wit his omnipotence or omnipresence it is not understood as if he powred into the assumed nature as a thing is powred from a vessell into another his properties as if humane nature by itseif or of itself or considered in abstracto without his person had proper omnipotency neither may we think that his humane nature is made an infinite substance or uncircumscribed or extended unto all places or is every where in such a manner as God is every where When we speak of the real communication of properties we mean not that one nature passeth into another but we oppose real unto verbal communication which makes only names common unto the natures Then the question is Whether for the personal vnion there be a real or a very and true communication of properties between the two natures in his person or that the one nature communicates its properties unto the other and how far this
276 nor in Africa 280. nor in antient Britain 282. nor in Ireland 304. It is questioned whether at the first there were Bishops in Rome 283. The ground and first platform of Prelacy 285. m. their ordination at first 285. e. the rise of their Jurisdiction 286 289. their Election 15. m. 8â— b. The tendency of Episcopacy S. 338. m. a Supâ—lication of Scotland against it 350. another of England against Bishops and their Rites 461 462. Obj May not Bishops be good men Answ S. 459. Obâ— May not a good man take a Bishoprick Ans 460. They got the Power of the Sword in England and used it cruelly 556 Three sorts of Bishops S. 374. m. other three sorts of them S. 390. b. They were cast off in Scotland 402. e. 491. b. The first step of bringing them in agaâ—n S 540. the second step 541. Boniface Bishop of Mentz was opposed in Tyranny and Rites 99 100. The Insurrection of the Bowrs in Germany S 90. Bulgaria becometh Christian 184. Bread and Wine in the Lord's Supper representeth his Body and Blood 92. m 98. e. and both were distributed 29. m. 566. b. 572. m. the mixing of the Wine with Waâ—er was a departing from the Institution 93. m. See the Supper of the Lord. Britain became Christian 283. b C The new Calender S. 282 m. The Greeks had espied an Error in the Calender but because of inconvenients would not change 411. m. Calo Johannes Greek Emperor his Oration before his death 307. False Calumnies aspersed on Professors of Truth 334. e. 350. e. 424. m. 472. e. S. 81. m. S 134. e 206. e. 227. Candles and Torches in Churches 93 m. The Canons that are called Apostolical are not such 266. e. the Canonical hours 251. e. The Canon of the Mass must be read with a low voice 143. m. The beginning of the Canons or Chanons 289 291. The Canonization of Saints 81 e. 328. b The beginning and rise of Cardinals 422. their Colledge hath power over all Men and all Causes 388. m. go in Scarlet 391. m. The Order of Carmelites 416. m Carolstad and Luther fell into variance S. 76. The unjust Censure of two Cardinals revenged by God 360. â— The indifferency of Ceremonies 304. they may be judged variously but not reinduced S. 351. â— Charls the Great his Authority in Rome 80. m. 81. b e sundry Articles of Doctrine which he held 112. Charls the Hard Duke of Burgundy 526. Charls Prince of Spain Martyred S. 156. m. The Church The Church is built on the Rock Christ 89. m. 97. m. 113. b. 131 e. 133. b. it consisteth of the Elect 176 m. 340. b. or of Believers 348. e. S. 25. b. Why called Catholick 97. m. 340. b. 348. e. S. 11. m. In what sense the Church cannot err 529. e. how it is led by the holy Ghost 551. b. It hath certainty from the Faith and not contrary 173. e. S. 20. m. sometimes lurketh 175. b. 210 211 231. e. In her worst times thousands bowed not their hearts unto Baal 541. m. 551. e. 558. b. Church-affairs should be judged in Ecclesia non in palatio nec ex authoritate humana S. 336. m. e. The main grounds of corruption in the Church 38. e. 412 b. 421. m. e. Satan sought to undo the Church first by Heathens and then by Heresies Schisms c. 267. b. m. 343. m. S. 16. e. The Discipline decaieth in the Church 105. b. 115. m 334. e The corruption of the Church was seen and bewailed 156 252. m. 266 267 268 324. e. 339. e. 334 m. 343 398 527. e. S. 19. e. 25. m. e. 26. The difference of the Church in several ages 482. e. 485. m. The division of the Christian Churches 22 23 102. m. The division of the East and West Churches 429. 430 483. Church-Men The dissolute lives of Church-men 190 191 210 325. e. 329. e. 330. m. 332. b. 335 342 345 358 359 360. Canons were made strict in favors of Church-men but it had been good these had not been so strict 259 260. The gross ignorance of Church men S. 26. e. 27. b. 29. e. They were exempted from taxations unto Princes 388. Churches for the Houses Churches were dedicated to Saints 15 e. were made places of refuge 16. e. Processions about them 17. b Chaplains 131. e Confession of sin unto men was not judged necessary 133. b. Auricular Confession was established 387. e. and pressed with new circumstances 418. m. and was opposed 499 e Confession of Faith in use about the year 840. 133 134. The Confession of Ausburgh S. 97. e Conrade Bishop of Utrecht his Oraâ—ion against the Pope 267 268. A Contention betwixt the Bishops and Friers 421. another between the Sorbonists and Friers 434. another between the two Arch-Bishops in Scotland for their titles 563. m. one between the Bishop of Mentz and the Abbot of Fulda for precedency 312. e. one between the Sorbonists and R. Stephanus S. 123. one in Scotland between the Noble men and the twenty three Bishops for the place 449. m The word Consecration is dangerous 145. e The Commandments of God imply not mans ability now to obey 28. m. All the commandments of God are turned into two words Give money 497. e Commenda's how begun and abused 560. No Comedy nor other Play should be made of the Sacred Scriptures S. 385. b The consultation of G. Cassander with the occasion and some heads of it S. 286. A rare example of religious Constancy in a Prince S. 108. e Constantinople taken by the Turk 525. b. 554. there the Christians were troubled contrary to their granted liberties S. 311. Councels or Synods General and National At Bracara An. 610. p. 62. in Bojaria 63. at Toledo 63. at Altiâ—idior 64. at Toledo 64. at Cabilon 64. at Herford in England 65. the sixth general Councel at Constantinople 65. at Toledo 66. at Rome 78. e. under Carloman 104. e. at Clonesho in England 105. at Constantinople about Images 105. another there 106. at Nice 106. at Frankford 106. e. at Paris 107. at Rome for Reformation 1. 8. b at Constantinople 123 124. at Carisiac 158 165. e. at Bonoil 166. at Saponaria 166 e. at Celicyth in England 185. at Mentz 188. at Worms 189. at Rhems 190. at Cabilon 190. at Aken 190. at Melda 191. at Rome 191. at Valentia 191. at Macra 193. a great Synod at Rome 198. c. at Worms 235 236. at Brixia against the Popes 238 as also at Rome 239. at Garstung and at Mentz both against the Popes 267 268. at Papia against the Popes 327. at Rhems for Reformation 345 at Lateran under Innocentius the III. 386. at Lions 391. at Pisa against the Popes 507. at Pisa called A General Councel 564. at Rome this was dissolved by an Owl 564. at Constance 565. at Papia and Sena 571. at Basile 571. at Ferraria and Florence 576. at Towrs against the Pope and another at Lions S 2. at Pisa against the Pope