Selected quad for the lemma: body_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
body_n bread_n call_v consecration_n 6,545 5 11.1766 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33984 Utrum horum, or, The nine and thirty articles of the Church of England, at large recited, and compared with the doctrines of those commonly called Presbyterians on the one side, and the tenets of the Church of Rome on the other both faithfully quoted from their own most approved authors / by Hen. Care. Care, Henry, 1646-1688. 1682 (1682) Wing C535; ESTC R2383 50,749 167

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the most part of Godfathers are appointed they especially that are Rich at the time of Baptism take hold of the Rope and as the Suffragan sings before as is wont to be done in Baptizing of Children they all make the Responses and after name the Bell which as Christians use to be is then dressed in new Garments And after they have a sumptuous Feast and the Suffragan is rewarded liberally This is sure something more than a Metaphorical Baptism I shall only add one more strange Doctrine of the Church of Rome touching Baptism and that is That a Child may be Baptized in its Mothers Womb by a Pipe This I find Asserted in a Treatise Intituled Compendium Dianae The Words pag. 201 are these Pueri si moriantur in utero matris nihil obstat quo minus possint Baptizari si Actio Ministri possit ad ipsum puerumetiam in utero matris existentem pervenire ut si fistula possit pertingere ad ipsum Infantis Corpusculum vel propter Matris Cicatricem aspersio aquae possit ad illum pertingere hoc etiam si acceleretur matris mors dummodo sit certo moritura tunc enim etiam ipsa mater tenetur permittere ut proles Baptizetur Res 12. In English thus If Children dye in their Mothers Womb nothing hinders but that they may nevertheless be Baptized if the action of the Minister may extend to the Child it self although remaining in its Mothers Belly as if a Pipe may reach the Infants Body or by or through the Cicatrix of the Mother I must leave the Reader here to guess at his meaning the sprinkling of the Water may reach thereunto And this although thereby the Death of the Mother be hastned provided she must certainly dye for then even the Mother her self is bound to permit that her Child be Baptized But I suppose the Reader as well as my self is nauseated with such fulsome Poposh Divinity Le ts therefore hasten to another Article The eight and twentieth Article of the Church of England Of the Lords Supper THE Supper of the Lord is not only a sign of the Love that Christians ought to have amongst themselves one to another but rather it is a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christs Death Insomuch that to such as rightly worthily and with Faith receive the same the Bread which we break is a partaking of the Body of Christ aud likewise the Cup of Blessing is a partaking of the Blood of Christ Transubstantiation or the change of the substance of Bread and Wine in the Supper of the Lord cannot be proved by Holy Writ but it is repugnant to the plain Words of Scripture overthroweth the Nature of a Sacrament and hath given occasion to many Superstitions The Body of Christ is given taken and eaten in the Supper of the Lord only after an Heavenly and Spiritual manner And the mean whereby the Body of Christ is received and eaten in the Supper is Faith The Sacrament of the Lords Supper was not by Christs ordinance reserved carried about lifted up and worshipped The Presbyterians That Doctrine which maintains a Change of the substance of the Bread and Wine into the substance of Christs Body and Blood commonly called Transubstantiation by Consecration of a Priest or by any other way is repugnant not to Scripture alone but even to common Sense and Reason overthroweth the Nature of the Sacrament and hath been and is the cause of manifold Superstitions yea of gross Idolatries In this Sacrament Christ is not offered up to his Father nor any real Sacrifice made at all for Remission of Sins of the quick or dead but only a Commemoration of that one offering up of himself by himself upon the Cross once for all And a Spiritual Oblation of all possible Praise unto God for the same So that the Popish Sacrifice of the Mass as they call it is most abominably injurious to Christs one only Sacrifice the alone propitiation for all the Sins of the Elect. The Papists If any one shall deny That in the Sacrament of the most Holy Eucharist is contained truly really and substantially the Body and Blood together of our Lord and so whole Christ but shall say That he is in it only as in a Sign or Figure or by his Vertue or shall say that the substance of Bread and Wine remains or shall deny that wonderful and singular Conversion of the whole substance of the Bread into the Body and of the whole substance of the Wine into the Blood the species only of Bread and Wine remaining which Conversion the Catholick Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation Let him be Anathema If any one shall say That Christ exhibited in the Eucharist is eaten only Spiritually Let him be Accursed The nine and twentieth Article of the Church of England Of the Wicked which eat not the Body of Christ in the use of the Lords Supper THE Wicked and such as be void of a lively Faith although they do carnally and visibly press with the Teeth as S. Augustin saith the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ yet in no wise are they partakers of Christ but rather to their Condemnation do eat and drink the Sign and Sacrament of so great a thing The Presbyterians Although ignorant and wicked Men receive the outward Elements in this Sacrament yet they receive not the thing signified thereby but by their unworthy coming thereunto are guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord to their own Damnation The Papists All Communicants do eat the Very and Natural Body of Christ Jesus If an Infidel receive the Sacramental Species he eats Christs Body under the Sacrament Thom. Aquinas p. 3. A. 3. ad 2. The Body of Christ saith Claudius de Sainctes Repet 2. cap. 6. is as truly and really received of Vnworthy as of Godly Communicants And Bonaventure in 4. d. 9. A. 2. q. 1. calls it the common Opinion of the Doctors Certitudinaliter verum a most certain Truth Nor is this all but they hold That the very Body of Christ may be received by Beasts and Vermine If a Dog or a Mouse saith Aquinas in the place just now cited ad Tertium eat the Sanctified Host the substance of Christs Body ceaseth not to be there as long as the Species do remain Nay Durandus adds That the Devil himself may eat Christ His Words are these Competit Bruto Angelo cuicunque vel Bono vel MALO species Sacramentales sumere A Brute or any Angel Good or BAD may receive the Sacrament Durand in 4. dist 9. q. 3. num 6. ad primum 'T is true some of their ancient Schoolmen were not arrived to such irreverent conceits Peter Lombard l. 4. d. 13. A. puts the Question What does the Mouse eat when she gets part of a Consecrated Host And Answers modestly Deus novit God knows And Bonaventure in 4. d. 13. a. 2. q. 1. could not endure to hear That Christs
Body should be in a Mouses Belly or in a Privy But most of their Followers count them too precise And Vasques in 3. q. 77. a. 8. disp 195. cap. 5. concludes Vera Constans opinio sit c. The true and constant Opinion is That Christ is so long under the Species in any place whatsoever though never so base and filthy as the outward forms would conserve the nature of Bread if it were there Nor matters it saith he that by this means we must grant that Christs Body may descend into a filthy and unclean place nor ought Godly Catholicks thereat be scandalized Now since Christs Sacred Body may be in the Body of any Beast or Vermine and that it is to be Worshipped and Adored with no less than divine Honour wherever it be a Question ariseth Whether he be to be Worshipped for Example in the Belly of a Sow pardon Christian Reader the Instance for 't is the Papists own For Biel on the Canon of the Mass lect 84. starting the same question returns this Answer Ubicunque five in ventre SUIS sive in ore viri vel mulieris ibi esse venerandum adorandum intus in Anima licet non exterius in opere Wherever he is believed to be either in the Belly of a SOW or in the Mouth of a Man or Woman there he is to be Worshipped inwardly in the Soul though not externally in Work Another scruple likewise they have since the outward forms may happen especially by the Sick to be Vomited up again what must be done in the Case To which Albertus in his Compend Theol. verit l. 6. cap. 19. answers Si Infirmus Corpus domini Rejiciat suscipiatur c. If the Sick Spew up Christs Body he must take it again as well as he can or if he be not able himself the Priest must do it for him or some discreet or cleanly Boy And Biel in the place late cited gives this Counsel Si Ejiciatur per Vomitum c. If Christs Body be cast up by Vomit so that you can but yet discern the outward signs and appearance of Bread from the other Garbage and your Stomach will serve you to do it without loathsomness and danger of re-spuing you must take it again but if the Party be nauseous then it must be laid up honourably with the other Reliques But others say it must be burnt and the Ashes reverently laid up by the Altar And Paladanus in 4. d. 9. q. 1. a. 3. moving the Question what was to be done if a Beast should eat the Sacrament says he 't was to be killed and the Host to be taken out of the Maw and if a Man had so much zeal as to endure to eat it he were much to be commended provided he do it fasting And thereupon tells a Story out of Hugo Cluniacensis how one Goderane took a parcel of the Eucharist which had been vomitted up by a Leper The same Author advises That the Sacrament be not given to those that have a Scowring or the Flux lest the Body of Christ should pass away through his Belly into the Draught c. I have recited these Horrid Blasphemies in their own Words That my Countreymen may detest a Religion Compos'd of such impious Phrensies and I beg the Readers excuse for ossending his Ears with such stuff For Popish impudence has this advantage they write such things as Christian Doctrine which a modest Man can scarce endure to Rehearse The thirtieth Article of the Church of England Of both kinds THE Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people For both the parts of the Lords Sacrament by Christs Ordinance and Commandment ought to be Ministred to all Christian men alike The Presbyterians They speaking of the Papists have stoln or snatcht away one half of the Lords Supper from the greater part of the People of God and only allow the Cup to a small parcel of shaveling Priests The Ministers are to take and Break the Bread to take the Cup and to give both to the Communicants Private Masses or receiving this Sacrament by a Priest or any other alone as likewise the denial of the Cup to the People are contrary to the Nature of this Sacrament and to the Institution of Christ The Papists This Holy Synod Declares and Teacheth That Laicks and Clerks not Consecrated are by no Divine precept bound to receive the Sacrament under both kinds and that it may in no sort be doubted without prejudice to Faith but that the Communion of one kind is sufficient to Salvation If any one shall say That by Gods Command all the Faithful of Christ ought to receive in both kinds or shall deny That the Church was moved with just Causes and Reasons to order the Laity to Communicate but in one kind or shall say she erred therein Let him be Accursed The one and thirtieth Article of the Church of England Of the one Oblation of Christ finished upon the Cross THE Offering of Christ once made is that perfect Redemption Propitiation and Satisfaction for all the Sins of the whole World both Original and Actual and there is none other Satisfaction for Sin but that alone Wherefore the Sacrifices of Masses in the which it was commonly said that the Priest did offer Christ for the Quick and the Dead to have Remission of pain or guilt were Blasphemous Fables dangerous Deceits The Presbyterians In this Sacrament Christ is not offered up to his Father nor any real Sacrifice made at all for Remission of the Sins of the Quick or Dead but only a Commemoration of that one offering up of himself by himself upon the Cross once for all and a Spiritual Oblation of all possible Praise unto God for the same So that the Popish Sacrifice of the Mass as they call it is most abominably injurious to Christs one only Sacrifice the alone Propitiation for all the Sins of the Elect. The Papists In this Divine Sacrifice of the Mass the same Christ is contained and unbloodily Sacrificed who once offered himself bloodily on the Altar of the Cross This Holy Synod therefore Teacheth That this Sacrifice is truly Propitiatory And that thereby if with a true Heart and right Faith in Fear and Reverence we being contrite come to God we do obtain Mercy and find Grace in a seasonable help For by the oblation hereof God being pacified granting the Grace and Gift of Pennance does forgive Crimes and Sins even the greatest and most heinous It is one and the same Host Christ who then offered himself on the Cross now offering the same by the Ministry of the Priests the manner of offering being only different The Fruits of which Oblation viz. The Bloody one are most plentifully received and conveyed by this so far is That from being any ways derogated from by This for which reason it is offered not only for the Sins Punnishments Satisfactions and other Necessities of