the Institution 2. The authority of these is not divine but meerly humane 3. It was an ancient custom in Tertullians time to give milk and honey in Baptism to the Infant yet the Papists themselves do not keep it So that unlesse we had Christs institution we cannot do it especially knowing that it is dangerous to add to any essential part of the Sacrament such as the wine is But then they are most ridiculous when they will make a mystical signification in this that the union of the water with the wine must signifie the union of the people which is denoted by waters Revel 17. with Christ Thus Bellarmine But it signifies not this union either naturally for then it would signifie so in common feasts nor by divine institution for then then the Scripture would have delivered it Besides Rev. 17. Great waters not a few drops signifie the people and that not of believers but Heathens and if it signifie the communion of the people with Christ why do they deny it them The drink then used being called the fruit of the vine Matth. 26. 29. it is evident that there was no mixture of water for then it had not been the fruit of the vine but another drink compounded of water and wine Some say this reason is not of force for he that drinks vinum dilutum drinks the fruit of the grape as well as he that drinks merum And therefore that our Saviour Christ and his Apostles ever mingled water with wine in the sacramental Cup cannot be shewed by any testimony out of the word of God As for the water gushing forth with the bloud out of our Saviour Christ it is frivolous the wine in the Cup is not a Sacrament of the bloud of Christ which was shed after that he was slain but of the bloud which he shed before his death This was an ancient custom Iustin Martyr makes mention of it and Cyprian pleads for it yet Iansenius doth ingeniously confesse that there are evident testimonies of Scripture for wine but none for water though Bellarmine impudently affirm That there is as much proof for the one as the other viz. Tradition for both Scriptures for neither and labours violently to wrest the plain places another way yet at length he doth not deny but it is Calix Domini though there be no water in it and he tels us that the greater part of Divines hold that water is not de necessitate Sacramenti Iansenius saith it appears by Scripture though not expresly yet implicitely that there was water in the Cup which Christ consecrated because there was wine in it and in those hot Countreys they used not to drink meer wine but allayed with water this is an uncertain conjecture The beginning of it was lawful because there were in the Church that could not beat the strength of the wines especially in the East and South Countreys where the wines are strong The Christians in the Primitive Church had a custom of mixing water with the wine as there came water and bloud out of Christs side which how ever it might have a natural reason because of the heat of the Countrey to correct the heat of the wine with water yet it was by them used for a mystical sense to expresse the mixture whereof this Sacrament is an effectual instrument of all the people who have faith to receive it with Christs bloud water being by the holy Ghost interpreted for people and Nations The Aquarii used onely water in the Eucharist in pretence of Sobriety which Cyprian confuted onely upon this ground viz. That this practice was not warranted by the Institution of Christ wherein Christ ordained wine and not water only In the Scripture we finde the fruit of the vine but not water therefore we account not that to be of any necessity in the celebration of the Lords Supper In the Primitive Church water was used first of Sobriety then of Ceremony at length it grew to be counted of necessity Dr Fulk against Martin Of the Consecration of the Elements Christs actions in the administration of the Sacrament were four First He took bread into his hand and so likewise wine which signifies the purpose of God decreeing to give Jesus Christ in the flesh to work out our Redemption Secondly Christ blessed it and gave thanks and sanctified it to that use by his own prayer to God which as it is effective to make the elements now fit for a spiritual use so it is significative representing the action of God wherein he fitted Christs manhood in the fulnesse of his Spirit and power to work out our Redemption Thirdly He brake the bread which signifies the action of God satisfying his justice in Christs manhood for the sins of all the Elect by breaking him in the Garden and on the Crosse especially besides other sufferings throughout his life and by rending his soul and body asunder Fourthly Christ gave it to every one signifying that God doth offer particularly to every one and give to the Elect the body and bloud of Christ with the merit of it and power of the same to blot out their sins and free them more and more from the same The Text saith of the Bread He blessed it and of the Cup When he had given thanks By the which word Blessing he implieth a consecration of this Sacrament The Papists attribute it to the repetition of these words Hoc est enim corpus meum For this is my body For this is my bloud Hence they call them Verba operatoria and say there is such a power and operation in them that by them the bread is turned into the body of Christ. The Elements of which the Sacrament is composed are natural the things having nothing of themselves whereby they may be Sacraments and therefore an institution is necessary whereby they may be made what they are not Now we say this is done by reciting the institution of Christ and by prayer The Papists order that the Priest should reade all the other words with a loud voice yet when he comes to this For this is my body he speaks it secretly so that none can hear him and this is one of their reasons because Christ prayed alone what is this to the consecration did he so at the Sacrament time 2. The Minister or Priest speaks it secretly because if he speak aloud he cannot be so intent to what is said why then do they command such loud noise by their Organs in singing How can they be attentive then 3. Least that form of words should be vilified Why not then in Baptism It is most expedient 1. For the receiver to receive the Bread and Cup into his hand This custome saith Vossius was long in the ancient Church It is unseemly to have the Bread put or the Wine poured into the mouth by the Minister this custom came from a superstitious worshipping of the signs 2. The receiver must
and worst idolaters that ever were as upon my soul saith he it is not Adoration is not commanded in the institution of it 2. Nothing is to be worshipt with Divine Worship but God Of Transubstantiation The word Transubstantiation as the Papists grant was not used of any ancient Fathers and it was not so named among them before the Councel of Laterane which was 1215 years after Vocabulum ante Concilium Lateranense inauditum The Jesuites which call Protestants in scorn Tropists because they defend a tropical and figurative sense in that speech of Christ This is my body are yet themselves constrained to acknowledge six tropes in the other words of Christs institution of this Sacrament a figure in the word Bread another in Eat a third in Given a fourth in Shed a fifth in Cup a sixth in Testament B. Morton of the Masse lib. 6. cap. 2. Sect. 4. The Papists to avoid one signe runne into many strange ones by the demonstrative Hoc they understand they know not what neither this Body nor this Bread but an individuum vagum something contained under the accidents of Bread which when the Priest saith Hoc it is Bread but when he hath muttered out Meum it is Christs body By the copulative Est is they understand either shall be as soon as the words are spoken or is converted unto or by Body they understand such a Body as indeed is no body without extension of place without faculty sense or motion The very term Matth. 26. 26. manifestly evinceth the truth This What That which he took viz. Bread therefore it must needs be a figurative speech 1 Cor. 10. 4. The Apostle speaking of the Bread being consecrated still calleth it Bread six times at least He calleth it indeed the Bread and this Bread to shew the difference of it from other Bread and the excellency of it above other bread but yet bread Therefore it is still bread of the same substance as other bread is though in respect of use incomparably better And so for the wine Matth. 26. 29. after consecration he saith I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the Vine He doth not say in general Of the fruit of the Vine but particularly with a demonstrative pronoun Of this fruit of the Vine viz. that which he had blest and delivered to the Apostles Transubstantiation was first occasioned by the unwary speeches of Damascene and Theophylact they were hyperbolical in their expressions about the real presence of Christ in the Sacrament Some of the ancient Fathers speaking of the sacramental Elements after consecration being then set apart from common use called it a mutation saying that the Elements were changed into another nature but withall they expresse their meaning to be not the changing of their substance but their use from being common bread and wine to become sacramental or sacred 1 Cor. 11. 27. The Apostle distinguisheth these four things Bread Body Cup and Bloud the Bread and Wine therefore receive no other change but that of use signification and relation 1 Cor. 10. 16. He distinguisheth also Bread from the Body Bread is the subject of the proposition and the Communion of his Body the predicate Reasons against Transubstantiation First Then Christ must hold himself in his own hands eat and drink his own flesh and bloud for the Papists say He did eat the Sacrament with his Disciples Secondly Christ must needs have two Bodies the one broken and having the bloud separated from it in the Cup the other whole and having the bloud in it which holds the Cup. Thirdly Christs bloud then should be shed before his crucifying and so a propitiatory Sacrifice offered to God before the Sacrifice of Christ upon the Crosse. Fourthly One body should be now in a thousand places at a time Fifthly A true body should be without bignesse void of all dimensions Corpus non quantum Sixthly Accidents should be without a subject but Aristotle saith Accidents are entis rather then entia Accident is esse est inesse the very essence of an Accident as it is an Accident is to be in some subject Vide Aquin. 1a 1ae Quaest 90. Artic. 2. Seventhly The same thing should be and not be at the same time or should be before it was Eightly This is an inhumane thing none eat mans flesh but Cannibals Ninthly Then the senses should be deceived we see bread we smell bread we touch bread and taste bread Tenthly There is no alteration in the sign of Baptism and there is the same use of the sign of the Lords Supper Matth. 26 26. Iesus took bread and blessed and brake it and gave it to his Disciples and said Take Eat This is my Body What our Saviour took that he blessed what he blessed that he brake what he brake he delivered to the Disciples what he delivered to them of that he said This is my Body But it was Bread that he took the Evangelist so saith and Bread therefore that he blessed Bread that he brake Bread that he delivered and Bread consequently of which he said This is my Body The universal custom of the Scripture in all places where like kinde of speaking is used plainly leades us to a figure see 1 Cor. 10. 4. The Hebrews wanting a proper word to set forth that which we mean by signifying do ever in stead of that use the word is When Ioseph had heard Pharaohs dream he saith The seven years of good corn are seven years of plenty and the seven thin ears seven years of dearth Gen. 41. 26 27. so the seven fat kine are seven years that is by way of signification and representation So Ezek. 37. 11. Dan. 2. 38. 7. 17. whence it comes that in the New Testament where the manner of speaking by the Hebrews is imitated the word is in matter of signs is used for the word signifie So in the Parable That which is sowed upon stony ground is he that heareth and after The seed is the Word Luk. 8. 11. the Reapers the Angels so I am the Vine Revel 17. 12. The ten Kings are ten horns Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia 2. The Apostle Paul clearly goes before us in this interpretation for he saith the bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ because it was appointed for a certain means of making us partakers of his body Our Saviour said long before viz. John 6. 63. that the flesh profiteth nothing that is the flesh by eating of it profits nothing for in no other sense can it be said to profit nothing See 2 Cor. 5. 16 17. Their Legend tels us that some Boyes getting by heart and pronouncing the words of Consecration Hoc est Corpus meum turned all the Bakers bread in the street into flesh In the Book of the Conformities of St Francis there is a miracle recorded for Transubstantiation that on a time Prier Francis
controversie wherein the pronoun Hu can signifie nothing but He or It both which are all one in effect in this place Fourthly They should likewise be expert in all the liberal Arts especially in Grammer Logick Rhetorick general Philosophy and History All the Treasures of wisdom and knowledge are hid in the Scriptures the Treasures of natural Phylosophy in Genesis of Moral Phylosophy in Exodus Deuteronomy and Ecclesiastes of the Politicks in the Judicials of Moses and the Proverbs of Solomon of Poetry in the Psalms of History in the Books of Chronicles Iudges and Kings the Mathematicks in the dimensions of the Ark of the Temple of the Metaphysicks in the Books of the Prophets and Apocalyps Fifthly They must consider 1. The several words 2. The phrases In the several words they must consider 1. Whether the word be taken properly or tropically and that they may the better understand the words an inspection 1. Of Lexicons is needful some of which observed the order of the Alphabet but so as they distinguished between the roots and the Derivatives as Pagnine hath done for the Hebrew and Stephanus for the Greek The best Lexicons for understanding the Hebrew Text are Buxtorf Avenarius Forster Schindler Mercer on Pagnine and Marinus Brixianus his Arca Noae for the Greek are Stephanus Budeus Scapula my own two Critica I hope may be useful for understanding both Testaments 2. Of Concordances some much extoll Buxtorf for the Hebrew Kirchers is a very useful one both for the Hebrew and the Septuagint Stephanus for the Greek is the best Cottons Concordance as it is now inlarged by Newman is esteemed the best for the English See Dr. Featlies and Dr. Gouges Prefaces to it commending it and shewing the use of Concordances in general They must 1. Consider the Text exactly in it self the Grammer of it must be sifted the nature of every word by it self and the alteration it admits in diversity of construction 2. The Rhetorick whether any word leaving the proper signification receiveth a borrowed 3. Above all the Logick as to know what he proveth and by what 2. Compare paralel places and obscure with plainer To interpret that place This is my body make use of that other The Bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ because both places are not onely concerning the Eucharist but also one and the same kinde Illyricus calls the conference of places Ingens remedium saelicissimam expositionem sanctae scripturae Paul is much in this compare Heb. 3. 7 11 15 17. with Chap. 4. 4 5 9. ye shall see he makes out the sense of Psal 95. 7. by comparing it with other Scriptures 3. Make use of Paraphrases and Versions among which the Chaldee and the Septuagint for the Old Testament the Syriack and the Arabick for the New excel 4. For the knowledge of the phrase they must proceed the same way and to understand the better both the words and phrases they must diligently consider of the scope and circumstances of the place as the coherence of that which went before with that which follows after and of the matter whereof it doth intreat 5. All Expositions ought to agree with the Analogie of faith Rom. 12. 6. Analogy is either of faith comprehended in the Doctrine of the Creed L P. Command Sac. and gathered out of evident places of Scripture or of the Text by the coherence of Antecedentia Consequentia by the propriety of the phrase 6. The Jewish Expositors the ancient Fathers and other Interpreters ancient and modern Popish and Protestant are useful for the right understanding of the Scripture if they be read with judgement Not many but a few and those the best Commentaries are to be consulted with of the Hebrew Interpreters and Rabbins two were most learned R. David Kimki and Rabbi Aben Ezra saith Dr. Rainolds The pure Masters of the Hebrews saith Mayerus in Philologia Sacra are specially Maymonides Rabbi David Kimchi wise Aben Ezra Rabbi Solomon Iarchi although the last two much favor Talmudical dreams The Cabalists and many of the Rabbines are very fabulous and men in a burning fever cannot dream of things more ridiculous then some of the Rabbines have seriously written and taught saith Muis against Morinus Vide Spanhâ—m Dub. Evangel parte tertia Dub. 21. Dub. 129 Glass Philol. Sac. l. 2. partem primam Tract 1. Thalmud liber fabulosissimus Chamier Abarbanel hath done well on the greatest part of the Old Testament Scriptor famâ—sissimus saith Buxtorf of him in Dâ—â—alogo Iudaeorum doctissimus L'Empereur on Dan. Authorest perquà m solidi ingenii Doctrinae Muis Assert 3. veritat Heb. Yet he was unknown it seems to Mercer for he doth not mention him The most curious that ever handled the Tongue though not the soundest saith Broughton The Jews say of Rabbi Moses Ben-Maymon that From Moses to Moses there arose not such a Moses He was the first of the Rabbines that ceased to dote Maimonides antiquus celeberrimus inter Iudaeos Scriptor Capellus de Literis Ebr. Mr. Gregory stiles him the very learned Maimon The Church of God is much beholding to the Hebrew Rabbines * being great helps unto us for understanding holy Scripture in many places as well of the New Testament as the Old Vide Capel Critic Defens p. 59. There are divers places both in the Old and New Testament which cannot be well understood unless we borrow Candle-light from the Hebrew Doctors as Exod 6. 3. Ruth 4. 7. Isa. 1 29. 12. 13. Ier. 16. 7. Ezek. 8. 14. and 9. 4. Matth. 5. 22. and 21. 9. and 23. 7 8. and 26. 23. Mark 7. 11. Rom. 5. 7. Iohn 7. 37. and 3. 20. 1 Tim. 3. 8. Rev. 4. Cálverts Annotat. on the demonstrat of the true Messias 2. The Fathers Doctores scil probati antiquae ecclesiae qui scriptis Fidem suis illustrarunt as Voâ—tus speaks not one of them but hath his error because God would have them known to be but men Of the right use of the fathers see Daille's excellent 〈◊〉 They are called Fathers in respect of their age they preceding our times many hundreds of years and in respect of their Doctrine which they diligently inculcated to those that then lived and endeavoured to propagate many of their worthy labours being transmitted to posterity Rivet de Patrum Authoritate cap. 1. There was an eminency of Office and Dignity in them because they were Pastors and Teachers in the Church Of Time because they were neerer to the Apostles Of Science because they were more learned then many of those that succeeded and of Conscience because they were of an unblameable life lesse subject to ambition covetousnesse envy and other evil affections with which the succeeding generations were too much tainted Those Fathers of the first six hundred years we reverence more and rather admit then those of the thousand years following because they were freer
especially when he hath no power committed unto him by God and the Church of repelling the wicked from this holy Communion 4. Because the punishment denounced against unworthy receivers is appropriated to them who thus offend and reacheth not to the innocent because they are in their company 1 Cor. 11. 29. It were much to be desired saith M. Downame that all wicked persons were excluded from this outward Communion with the Saints for what have dogs to do with holy things or swine with pearls and it were a great comfort to the godly if none but such as are like unto themselves had fellowship with them at this feast our Love Zeal and Devotion is more enlivened in this action by our mutual prayers when with one minde and heart we joyn together yet it should not wholly discourage us from coming to this sacred Feast though wicked persons be there present if we our selves be duly prepared For though we would not willingly eat with slovenly persons nor permit them to put their unclean hands into our dish yet if we have a good appetite and cannot help it we will rather admit such inconvenience then for want of food pine with hunger Theodosius the Emperour being a man guilty of rash effusion of bloud coming upon a Sabbath-day to the place of publick worship would have received the Sacrament Ambrose seeing him coming goes and meets him at the door and speaks thus to him How dare those bloudy hands of yours lay hold on the body and bloud of Christ who have been the shedders of so much innocent bloud Which speech did so startle him that he went away and was humbled for his sinne and afterwards came and made his publick confession and then was received in Whence we may see that Kings yea Emperours have been kept back from the Sacrament The Canons of our Church Can. 26. straitly charge every Minister That he shall not in any wise admit to the Communion any of his flock which are openly known to live in notorious sin without repentance Whether Iudas received the Sacrament of the Lords Supper M. Gillespie in his Aarons Rod blosâ—oming chap. 8. holds he did not and chap. 9. questions Whether he received the Sacrament of the Passeover that night in which our Lord was betrayed and chap. 10. saith If it could be proved that Iudas received the Lords Supper it maketh nothing against the Suspension of known wicked persons from the Sacrament One saith The evidence of this fact hath ever appeared so fully to the Church that this alone hath been ground sufficient to deduce their right of free admission D. Drake in his Barre to free Admission to the Sacrament pag. 5 6. urgeth reasons that Iudas did not receive the Sacrament and saith that it makes nothing for free Admission if he did M. Selden De Synedriis veterum Ebraeorum cap. 8. saith Seriò perpendatur Judam ipsum Furem Proditorem Scelestissimum hisque nominibus satis notum publicè peccantem in ipsa institutione cum reliquis undecim Sacramenti Eucharistiae juxta plerosque Veterum Recentiorum participem fuisse nec omninò ea interdictum He hath much more there out of divers ancient and modern Writers to confirm that opinion At what time the Lords Supper was instituted Christ instituted it at night because occasion so required we have not the like occasion therefore are not bound unto it In Trajans and Tertullians time Christians did celebrate the Sacrament before day Tempore antelucano because of persecution they durst not receive it in the day time in St Augustines time Tempore Antemeridiano so now It behoved that Christ should suffer at the time of the Passeover to shew himself the true Passeover 1 Cor. 5. 7. and immediately after the eating of the last Passeover should institute this Sacrament to shew that now he abrogated the Jewish Ordinance and did appoint this in stead of it A fair intimation that Baptism follows in the room of Circumcision as the Lords Supper doth the Passeover The consideration of this circumstance should be of great force to make us respect and reverence the Sacrament seeing Christ instituted it then when he was about to depart out of this life and to suffer death for us we usually remember the words of a dying friend The Elements of the Eucharist They are two not only differing in number but also in their kinde Bread and Wine the first of which is solid and belongs to meat the later liquid and serves for drink The body is sufficiently nourished if it have bread and drink Christ cals himself both Iohn 6. 58. Bread because it strengtheneth the body is therefore called Christs body and wine because it turneth into bloud is therefore called Christs bloud Isidor These two creatures are 1. Of ordinary use not rare gotten in every Countrey 2. Such creatures as God of old made representations of his grace Isa. 25. 6. and 55. 3. 3. They are creatures best in their kinde of all things we eat bread is most nourishing and universally necessary for all kinde of bodies Panis à pascendo and wine of all drinks 1 Cor. 10. 17. We are all one body in as much as we are partakers of one bread The Analogy standeth thus as many grains of Corn make one loaf of bread and many Grapes make one measure of wine in the Cup So many Christians partaking faithfully of this Sacrament become one mystical body of Christ by the union of faith and love The Lord hath appointed those Elements to shew that men should come with an appetite and thirsting to receive the Sacrament in ancient times was as much as desiderare è cujus manu desideravit In Baptism we have one sign as the material part in the Supper we have two signs partly to note out our whole full and perfect nourishment in Christ having whatsoever is requisite for our salvation and partly to shew a fuller remembrance of his death for the wine which is a figure of his bloud doth as it were represent it before our eyes Attersol of the Sacr. l. 3 c. 5. Vide Aquin. Sum parte 3. Quaest. 74. Art 1. There are two representing signs in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 1. That we might know thaâ—â—â— Christ wâ— have whole and perfect spiritual nourishment and whatsoever is â—â—qâ—isite to â—alâ—â—â—ion 2. For a more â—â—vely representation of Christ his death and pâ—ssion in which his bloud was separated from his body These elements are to be administred in both kindes severally Christ at his last Supper delivered first bread by it self and then wine and not bread and wine together in a sop or bread dipt in wine In the sop the wine is not dâ—unâ— but eaten Of receiving the Sacrament in both kindes Bread and Wine The Communion was instituted by Christ in both kindes as three Evangelists shew Mark 14. 23. Luke 22. 20. Matth. 26. 27. It was
administred by the Apostles in both kindes 1 Cor. 11. 26 28. 10. 16. It was received in the ancient Church for the space of fourteen hundred years in both kindes as it is confessed by their own Councel of Constance and that of Trent also This was constantly practised in the Church for divers hundred years untill the Councel of Constance in the year of the Lord 1414. Some Northern Councels there are saith Bellarmine Tom. 3. de Sacr. Eccles. l. 4. c. 28. where wine is not to be had therefore for uniformity sake the Church thought fit that every where the Sacrament should be administred but in one kinde Although there be not wine or wheat in some Countreys yet it may easily be carried to all as much as sufficeth for the use of this Sacrament Aquinas part 3. Quaest. 74. Art 1. Object Some saith Bellarmine are abstemious and abhorre wine they cannot endure it and it may offend sickly persons Answ. Extraordinary cases must not justle out ordinary laws and custom Vinum in modica quantitate sumptum non potest multum aegrotanti nocere Wine moderately taken cannot much hurt the sick Aquin ubi supra Object Whosoever shall eat this bread or drink this Cup unworthily shall be guilty of the body and bloud of Christ the conjunction Or say they doth so dis-joyn both kindes that it is free to take one without the other Answ. If this be true then it shall be lawful also to take the Cup without the Bread that disjunctive is put not for that it is lawful to take one kinde and omit the other but that greater caution may be used and he spake of both severally because irreverence may be used in both signs and to shew that it sufficieth not to carry our selves holily in part unlesse we finish the whole action holily otherwise in the same place Bread and Wine are joyned together eight times Object Act. 2. 42. 20. 7. Answ. Suppose the bread of the Lords Table be there meant yet it is a Synecdoche whereby the part is put for the whole otherwise you may as well say they had no thanksgiving because Luke maketh only mention of prayers as to say they had not the Cup because mention is made only of bread vers 46 speaking of the common Table from the similitude whereof the Lords Table is taken he useth the same phrase of breaking of bread without making mention of any drink he saith breaking bread they took bread which can hardly be said of the Lords Supper Christ as fore-seeing the sacriledge of the Papists commandeth all not to eat of the bread but to drink of the Cup Matth. 26. 27. Mark 14. 23. 1 Cor. 12. 13. and Mark saith They all drank of it Certainly I perswade my self that our Saviour expressed the note of universality viz. in delivering the Cup to all saying Drink you all of this and not so in giving the bread of set purpose to prevent that abuse which the Romish Church of late hath brought by taking away the Cup. As in like manner the Apostle saith of marriage It is honourable in or amongst all men Heb. 13. 4. and he saith not so of Virginity or single life although it be honourable because the holy Ghost foresaw that some hereticks would deny marriage to be honourable amongst all and prohibit it to some viz the Clergy Which two Texts of Scripture the Romanists leudly pervert and ridiculously contradict themselves in the interpretation of them extending all to the Laity in the one and excluding the Clergy and extending all to the Clergy in the other and excluding the â—aity Marriage is honourable among all say they that is all save Priests Drink you all of this that is all save the people Doctor Featleys Grand Sacriledge of the Church of Rome ch 2. Drink you all of this saith the Author of the Sacrament he saith not expresly Eat you all of this as foreseeing that impiety which in time humane presumption should bring in upon and against his own institution fulfilled in the Church of Rome at this day B. Mountag Answ. to the Gagger of Protest Sect. 36. The Papists say That the universal particle All belongs to the twelve Apostles who were Priests say they and alone present at the institution of this first Supper and therefore it belongs only to Priests not Lay-men and they receive the bloud with the body ratione concomitantiae By this reason they may as well take away the bread from the people The Apostles in the first Supper did not represent the order of Priests but the whole Church of Communicants and Christ administred the Sacrament to them not as Apostles but as Disciples therefore Paul extends this particle All to all the Christians in the Church of Corinth and to men of all order condition state and sex 1 Cor. 11. 25 26 27 28 29. The Sacrament represents Christs death and his bloud shed out of his veins Matth. 26. 27 28. That Helena of concomitancy which the Lutherans also admit as we may see in Gerhard doth abound with so many absurdities and was so unknown to antiquity that it is a wonder that judicious men will defend it only that they may maintain their figments of Consubstantiation and Transubstantiation This Argument from Concomitancy proveth as well that they may drink the wine only and not receive the bread 2. Though Christ wholly be sealed to us in the use of the bread really yet not wholly sacramentally Vide Pâ—cher de missa cap. 4. Object Bellarmine de Eucharist l. 4. c. 25. saith There is a plain difference between the Bread and Cup for 1 Cor. 11. he saith of the Bread absolutely Do this but of the Cup conditionally As oft as ye do it therefore those words do not signifie that the Cup should alwayes be given when the Sacrament is administred but they only prescribe the manner that if it be so then it should be done in memory of Christs passion Answ. But this is a most frivolous cavil for the words do both command the thing and also shew the end of doing it In the verse immediately following the Apostle hath those words speaking as well of the Bread as Cup. As often as ye eat of this bread and drink of this Cup. Therefore there is one and the same reason of both the Bread and the Cup. We must take and eat the one and take and drink the other and whensoever we do so we must do it in remembrance of Christs death Object More irreverence will be shewed to the Sacrament by spilling of it to which in a great multitude of Communicants the wine must needs be subject to Answ. Reverence due to the Sacrament consists in a religious partaking of it not in a necessary abstinence from one of the Elements The Papists have cut out their Sacrament according to the measure of their doctrine for as they teach Christ to be but half a Saviour by making their works joynt-purchases
of their salvation with him so they minister half a Sacrament of salvation Cartw. against the Rhem. on Iohn 6. Our practice and profession is the receiving the Communion in both kindes for which I joyn issue with all Papists living that it is the prime original institution of our Saviour which giveth birth and being to a Sacrament that it is sacriledge to alter it therefrom that it was never otherwise used in the Church of God for above two thousand years after Christ. Let all the Papists living prove the contrary and I will subscribe to all Popery B. Mountag Answer to the Gagger of Protest Sect. 36. This was the custom in all the Fathers times as I could deduce almost out of every one This is every where the custom in all the world unto this day but in the Romane exorbitant Church as Cassander saith and was not quite abolished in that Church till about thirteen hundred years after Christ and by much art colluding and fine forgery was retained from being cast out of that Church in the late Conventicle of Trent only kept in for a faction but mightily opposed by learned honest and conscionable Catholicks Id. ibid. First If none may drink of the consecrate wine but the Priests then none should eat of the bread but Priests for to whom Christ said Take and eat to those he gave the Cup and said Drink ye The signs being both equal all Communicants must drink of the one as well as eat of the other there being the same warrant for the one that there is for the other Secondly The Cup is a part of Christs Will and Testament Galat. 3. 15. Hebr. 9. 16 17. the dead mans Will may not be changed The Lords Supper is a Sacrament proper to the New Testament Luke 22. 20. Thirdly The bloud of Christ shed upon the Crosse belongeth not onely to the Pastors and Teachers but to all the faithfull that come to the Table of the Lord Matth. 26. 28. Luke 22. 20. why then should the Cup of the Lord be barred from them Fourthly All the faithful that come to the Lords Table must shew forth his death untill be come and this is done by them as well by drinking of the Cup as by eating of the bread therefore all the Communicants must receive the Sacrament under both kinds To which these reasons may be added 1. From the institution for Christ commanded them to drink the wine as well as to eat the bread therefore this is a violation of Gods command 2. The Apostle bids every one to try themselves and so to eat of that bread and drink of that wine so they did not only eat and drink then but they were commanded so to do 3. To celebrate the Sacrament otherwise is to make void Christs two main ends in appointing the Sacrament 1. To represent his death and bloud shed out of the veins 2. To shew that Christ is full nourishment to the soul as bread and drink to the body The bread and wine being the matter of the Sacrament may not be changed in the Lords Supper Reasons 1. The institution of the Supper and the example of Christ himself whom the Church is to imitate and follow 1 Cor. 11. 25. 2. No other signs are so significant and effectual as these are for this purpose to strengthen and comfort them that are in trouble and almost in the present estate of death Psal. 104. 14 15. Prov. 31. 6. 3. The matter and form of every thing do constitute its essence So it is in the Sacraments where the signes are the matter and the words of institution the form 4. If the bread and wine might be changed in the Supper and yet the Sacrament in substance remain then in like manner water in Baptism might be changed and yet be true Baptism but the Minister cannot baptize with any other liquour or element then with water as the matter of that Sacrament 5. If we grant a change in the signs at the pleasure of men why may we not also change other parts of the Sacrament why may we not in stead of the Minister appointed oâ— God and called by the Church admit private persons and receive other alterations inforced upon the Church by the Papists Bucan institut loc 48. Beza Epist. 2. think that where there is no store of bread and plenty of wine sufficient for this purpose some other thing may be taken in stead of them Thus it may come to passe saith Attersol that we shall have nothing which Christ commanded and sanctified by his example and yet boast that we have his Supper and do that which he appointed For whereas we make four outward parts of this Sacrament the Minister the Word the Signs and the Receiver There are which hold there is no necessity of the Minister Others that there is no necessity of the words of Institution Others that there is no necessity of the Signs Others that there is no necessity of the Receiver So if we once admit any alteration in any of the parts we open a gap to all innovation and being in great uncertainty in the Sacraments Whether the breaking of the bread be an indifferent Ceremony Some make the breaking of the bread to be simply necessary and an essential part of the Supper so that without it there can be no Sacrament 1. Because the Sacrament is called the breaking of bread and this breaking of bread is said to be the Communion of the body of Christ â— Cor 10. 16. 2. Others make this breaking to be meerly indifferent and not necessary accidental and not of the substance 3. Others hold a middle way between both extreams that it is necessary yet not as an essential but an integral part The Ceremony of breaking bread was continually observed by Christs first institution by the practice of the Apostles by the ancient and universal custom of the whole Church of Christ as well Greek as Latine This act of breaking of bread is such a principal act that the whole celebration of this Sacrament hath had from thence this appellation given to it by the Apostles to be called breaking of bread it is also a Symbolicall Ceremony betokening the crucifying of Christs body upon the Crosse 1 Corinth 11. 24. But the Papists yet doe not break it but gâ—ve it whole and this they pretend to doe for reverence sake least some crums of bread should fall to the ground Three Evangelists mention the breaking of the bread It is not material whether the bread be broken or cut but it is more probable that Christ broke it from the custom of the Jews saith Vossius but Balduinus the Lutheran saith they receive a perfect Sacrament who intermit this fraction in the use of the Supper because Christ broke the bread that he might distribute it therefore say Gerhard and he Perinde est sive in ipsa actione coenae sive antea â—rangatur Balduin quotes Beza
Aretius Zanchius to that purpose to shew that â—raction may be omitted in the very act of the Supper But Zanchy in an Epistle to a noble man hath this passage The bread is to be broken before the people after the example of Christ the Apostles and all the ancient Church and also to expresse the mystery of the passion and death of Christ which are lively represented by that action The breaking of the bread signifies 1. How we should be broken in humiliation for our sins and the pouring out of the wine how our bloud and life should be shed and poured out for our sins if we had that we deserve 2. They represent unto us how the body of Christ was broken and his bloud poured out for our sins M. Perkins Not the Palatine the French or English Churches have lately invented or brought in the breaking of the bread but the whole Apostolical ancient Church above 1500 years ago and since that time have used it according to Christs command Do this Paraeus de Ritu fractionis in S Eucharistia c. 5. See his 6th Chapter where he shews how frivolous that argument is Frangere Hebraica phrasi nihil aliud est quà m distribuere and gives this rule Where ever in Scripture the word Break concerning bread is put alone it is an Hebraism and signifies to distribute because the Hebrews above other nations used not to cut bread with a knife but to break it with their hands when they took it themselves or gave it to others to take but when the word â—ive is expresly added to it it signifieth the true breaking or dividing of the whole bread into parts as Matth. 14. 19. Mark 6. 41. Luke 9. 26. Matth. 15. 36. Mark 8. 6. and in the institution of the Supper Mat. 26. 26. Mark 14. 22. Luk. 22. 19. It is not necessarily required that the Lords Supper be administred in unleavened bread For bread is often times named and repeated but the word unleavened is never added Wherefore as it is in it self indifferent whether the wine be red or white and whatsoever the kinde or colour be if it be wine so it is not greatly material whether the bread be leavened or unleavened so it be bread Attersol of the Sac. l. 3. c. 5. The Papists pretend the institution of Christ who say they made the Sacrament of unleavened bread instituting it after he had eaten the Passeover which was to be eaten with unleavened bread according to the Law of Moses neither was there any leaven to be found in Israel seven dayes together We deny not saith Attersol but Christ mâ—ght use unleavened bread at his last Supper having immediately before eaten the Paschal Lamb yet no such thing is expressed in the Gospel The Evangelists teach He took bread but make no mention or distinction what bread b he took nor determine what bread we should take no more then limit what wine we shall use but leave it at liberty to take leavened bread or unleavened as occasion of time place persons and other circumstances serve so we take bread If Christ on this occasion used unleavened bread it was because it was usual common and ordinary bread at that time as we also should use that bread which is common It is therefore no breach of Christs Ordinance nor a transgression of the first original institution of the Lords Supper to eat either the one or the other The Papists give a mystical reason why the bread must be unleavened because hereby is signified our sincerity but this is ridiculous for if unleavened bread because it is unmixed must signifie my sincerity then the wine because it is mingled with water must signifie my duplicity and hypocrisie Whether it be leavened or unleavened bread we will not strive but take that which the Church shall according to the circumstance of the times and persons ordain Yet this we dare boldly say That in the use of leavened bread we come nearer to the imitation of Christs action then those which take unleavened For our Saviour took the bread that was usual and at hand there being only unleavened bread at the Feast of the Passeover and no other to be gotten We therefore taking the bread which is in ordinary use and causing no extraordinary bread to be made for the nonce are found to tread more nearly in the steps of our Saviour Christ. Therefore unlesse you will renew the Jewish Passeover of banishing all leaven at the time of the holy Communion your precise imitation of unleavened bread is but apish Although Azymes were used by Christ it being then the Paschal Feast yet was this occasioned also by reason of the same Feast which was prescribed to the Jews Protestants and Papists both grant it not to be of the essence of the Sacrament that it be unleavened but in its own nature indifferent When the Ebionites taught unleavened bread to be necessary the Church commanded consecration to be made in leavened bread The Grecians use leavened bread the Papists unleavened and that made up in such wafer-cakes that it cannot represent spiritual nourishment We hold either indifferent because in the institution we reade of bread without commanding leavened or unleavened De panis qualitate nos non contendimus si modo verus sit solidus panis quod de hostia Papistarum vix potest affirmari Ames Bell. Enerv. Tom. 3. Disp. 32. Cassander himself complaineth that the Papists bread is of such extream thinnesse and lightnesse that it may seem unworthy the name of bread Whereas Christ used solid and tough bread which was to be broken with the hands or cut with the knife The custome of the Christian Church by the space of above a thousand years was to put upon the sacred Table after Christs and the Apostles example a solid loaf which was broken into pieces among the Communicants for all the people did communicate Now this quantity of bread is reduced into round and light wafers in the form of a peny whereof they give this mystical reason because that Christ was sold for thirty pence and because that a peny is given for a hire unto those that have wrought in the Vineyard Matth. 20. 10. Upon these Hostes they have put the Image of a Crucifix Pet. du Moulin of the Masse lib. 1. cap. 7. lib. 3. cap. 3. The use of the Wafer-cake is defended by the Papists and some Lutherans as Gerh. loc commun Tom. 5. de Sacra Coena c. 7. but Christ used it not whose action is our instruction and also there is no Analogy or a very obscure one between the sign and thing signified Whether it be necessary to mingle water with the Eucharistical wine Aquinas saith Water ought to be mingled with wine but it is not de necessitate hujus Sacramenti Some Papists for mingling water with wine pretend the Antiquity of Councels and Fathers But we say 1. There is no such thing in
2. Psalmi videntur data opera versi in contumeliam Latini Sermonis Chamier Ierom praefat in Prov. saith That he had allotted himself but three dayes for the translating of the three Books of Salomon viz. the Proverbs Ecclesiastes and the Canticles which yet a man will hardly be able to reade over well and exactly in a moneth by reason of the great difficulties he will there meet withall as well in the words and phrases as in the sense And neverthelesse if the pretences of the Church of Rome be true this little three dayes work hath been so happy as to be not only approved and esteemed but even canonized also by the Councel of Trent Now whether the will of God be that we should receive this Translation of his as his pure word or not I shall leave to those who have a desire and ability to examine However I dare considently affirm that Saint Hierome himself never had any the least thought or hope that ever this piece of his should one day come to this honour it being a thing not to be imagined but that he would have taken both more time and more pains in the thing if ever he had either desired or foreseen this Daille du vrai usage des Peres l. 2. c. 3. The vulgar Latine of the New Testament is no lesse corrupted then of the Old Matth. 6. 11. The English Papists at Rhemes who translated the New Testament into English not out of the Greek Text but out of the vulgar Latine reade Give us to day our super-substantial bread the Latine hath it Panem super-substantialem for Quotidianum Daily bread The Rhemists note upon the same is By this Bread so called here according to the Latine and Greek word we ask not onely all necessary sustenance for the body but much more all spiritual food viz. the blessed Sacrament it self which is Christ the true Bread that came down from Heaven and the Bread of life to us that eat his Body Our Saviour Christ which condemned vain repitition and by a form of prayer provided against the same is made here of the Jesuites to offend against his own rule for that which is contained in the second Petition they teach to be asked in the fourth Secondly They lodge in one Petition things of divers kindes and farre removed in nature spiritual and corporeal heavenly and earthly yea the creature and the Creator Thirdly Hence it should follow that he taught them expressely to ask that which he had neither instituted nor instructed them of and whereof his Disciples were utterly ignorant Salomon from whom our Saviour seemeth to have taken this Petition confirms that exposition of things tending to uphold this present life Prov. 30. 8. Lechem Chukki The Bread which is ordained for me The Jesuites will never be able to justifie the old Interpreter which translateth one word the same both in syllables and signification in one place Supersubstantial and in another viz. in Luke Quotidianum or Daily against which interpretation of his he hath all Antiquity before that Translation and some of the Papists themselves retained the words of Daily Bread Bellarm. l. 1. de bonis operibus c. 6. prefers Quotidianum and defends it against the other Tostatus applieth it to temporal things The Syriack saith Panis indigentiae vel sufficientiae nostrae Luke 1. 18. Plena gratia for gratis dilecta as Chrysostome renders it Hail Mary full of grace for freely beloved The word signifieth not any grace or vertue inherent in one but such a grace or favor as one freely vouchsafeth and sheweth to another the word retained by the Syriack in this place is Taibutha and signifieth happiness blessedness goodness bountifulnes Tremellius turneth it gratia which may and ought to be Englished favour as the Greek word signifieth and is expounded by the Angel and the Virgin Mary themselves the Angel adding in the same verse The Lord is with thee meaning by his special favour and in v. 30. saying She had found favor with God The Virgin in her thankful song magnifying the mercy of God toward her that he had so graciously looked on her in so mean estate as to make her the mother of her own Saviour after so marvellous a manner They foolishly salute her who is removed from them by infinite space and whom their Hail cannot profit being in Heaven as the salutation of the Angel did and might do whilst she was here in the vale of misery Their Alchymie also is ridiculous to make that a prayer unto her which was a prayer for her to make it daily that served in that kinde for one onely time to make it without calling which the Angel durst not do unless he had been sent Ephes. 5. 32. Vulg. Sacramentum hoc magnum est and the Rhemists This is a great Sacrament for great mystery Sacraments are mysteries but all mysteries are not properly Sacraments How can it be a Church Sacrament which hath neither element nor word of promise Secondly Sacraments are the peculiar and proper possession of the Church of Christ how can that be a Sacrament which is and lawfully may be used out of the Church amongst the Turks and Jews to whom the benefit of Matrimony cannot be denied The old Interpreter Coloss. 1. 27. translateth the same word a mystery or secret Chemnitius reckons this place among those which the Papists abuse not among the corrupted for Sacrament is the same with the Ancient Latine Divines that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is with the Greeks Chamier Heb. 11 21. The vulgar hath Iacob adoravit fastigium virgae the Rhemists adored the top of his rod whereas the words are He worshipped upon the top of his staff and not as they have falsely turned it so also doth the Syrian Paraphrast read it The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used elswhere in the New Testament for a walking staff agreeth fitly unto Iacob who being both old and sick had need to stay himself thereupon whilst he praised God Ioseph was no King and therefore had no Scepter to fall down before In the Hebrew Gen. 47. for top we read head which by a metaphor signifies the top because the head is the end and highest part of man and consequently of any thing else And for staff we now read in the Hebrew bed which fell out because the word mittah there extant pricked with other vowels signifieth a staff for in the Hebrew matteh is a staff and mitteh a bed The Septuagint whom the Apostle follows read it matteh and so translated it staff otherwise then we now read it in the Hebrew Text. If we follow the Hebrew Text as it is now extant the sense will be That Iacob because he could not raise his body out of his bed therefore he bowed his head forward upon his beds head and so worshipped God Beza speaking of the divers Latine Translations of the New Testament onely he saith of the vulgar Latine That
great blame that have scarce ever directed our minds to the contemplation and fruitful meditation of this great act of God among the rest for any good spiritual and holy intent Scholars sometimes in their Philosophical studies stumble upon these questions and set their wits on work to finde out the natural reason of them but alas in how unsanctified a manner so as not at all to inforce the thing upon their souls for making of them more thankful and obedient But for the plain man that is no Scholar though he have wit enough for all things else yet he hath no wit to enter upon these cogitations and when he findeth the matter so far above his reach yet to tell himself that this is one of Gods works and so to call on himself to fear know and obey him this this is that we must every man lament in himself as a just and due cause why the Scripture should ascribe brutishnesse unto us and we unto our selves and why we should present our selves before the divine Majesty with bashful and lowly confessions of our wrong done to God in robbing him of the honour due unto him for his works which our selves have the fruit of Secondly to our selves in depriving our selves of the best and most excellent fruit of them which is to be led by them above themselves vnto him This may exhort every one of us to take this work of God from David and to make it as it were our theame or the object of our meditations Whosoever applieth himself to raise up such thoughts shall finde a great unaptnesse in himself and a kinde of wearinesse to them with a vehement inclination to entertain other â—â—ncies and the Devil will take occasion hence to disswade him from doing the duty at all as if it were as good omit it as perform it so weakly it is a falâ—e tale which Satan tels for God hath promised acceptance to the weakest endeavours in calling himself a Father but to accept of the non-performance he hath never promised for even a Father cannot do that Lastly we must learn to seek unto God and trust in him for spiritual stability of grace in our souls and must thus importune him Lord when there was never an earth thou mad'st one and didst lay the foundation of it so sure that no force nor skill can move it O thou canst also create a frame of holinesse in my heart and soul and so stablish settle and confirm it that it shall never be movâ—d I beseech thee do it and trust that thâ—u wilt do this as thou hast done the former One prime use to which we must improve these natural benefits is to quicken our prayers and confirm our faith in begging and expecting such as are spiritual When God will confirm the faith of his people and win them to call upon him for good things he puts them in minde of these wonders in nature they must make use of them therefore for this purpose The second Element is water so necessary a creature as nothing can be more dangerously or uncomfortably wanting to the life of man It is an Element moist in some degree and cold in the highest therefore it cools the body and tempers the heat that it grow not excessive It hath manifold uses constantly Triplex maxime aquarum est usus in irrigando in abluendo in navigando Vossius 1. We and our Cattel drink of it and neither can continue without water or something made of it our bread must be kneaded with it and our meat boyled with it 2. It serves to wash our bodies and the apparel we weare if our hands and feet were never washt what an evil smell should we carrie about 3. It makes the earth fruitful The Husband-man looseth his labour if after sowing there come no rain it is 1. Of large and common use no Country can want it neither rich nor poore man nor beast 2. Of constant use we must have it daily or something made of it and our beasts also 3. Very profitable we drink it and wash with it and our meat is prepared by it and beasts drink it Because of so many good things in water God himself in his word hath so often â—ompared the grace of his Spirit with it Isa. 55. 1. Iohn 4. 14. Rev. 22. 17. Divine grace purgeth the soul from sin extinguisheth the heat of anger lust and other perturbations satisfies the desires of the soul thirsting after God It reprehends us that so ungratefully enjoy and devoure this benefit without lifting our hearts up to God and praising him for it A secret Atheisme prevails in our hearts which is the cause of this great blockishnesse and ingratitude and corrupts all things to us and forfeits them and provokes Gods justice against us Say Lord thou mightest justly choak me for the time to come for want of water that have not been particularly thankful to thee for this mercy We should bring in the parcels of Gods goodnesse for bread water fire when thou washest thy hands let thy heart be lifted up to God that made the Element Stay O that I could praise love and obey him that hath done this for me The usefulnesse abundance and easinesse to come by doth highly commend this benefit and the giver of it shewing water to be very good and our selves much beholding to him that giveth it Anciently in thâ—se warmer Countries especially water was the usual drink of men therefore in the description of the cost of families in house-keeping when we reade of so many Oxen and Sheep slain and so much meale and fine flower we reade not of any wine which would have been mentioned if it had been usually drunk 3. The Aire or all the void place between the clouds and the earth giving breath of life to all things that breathe this is the third Element light and subtil moving upward not downward because it hath no heavinesse in it It is divided into three regions or stages The highest is said to be exceeding hot and also dry because it is neer the fiery Element and Stars by the force of whose beams it receiveth the heat which is much encreased by following the motions of the Heavens The lowest region is they say hot and moist hot by the reflection of the Sun-beams meeting with the earth and moist from its own proper nature and by reason of the vapours exhaled out of the earth and water or rather it is variable now hot now cold sometime temperate differing according to times and seasons of the yeer and places also or several climates The middle region of the aire is cold in respect of the two other because it cannot follow the motions of the Heavens as the upper region doth being hindered by the tops of mountains 2. Being free from the reflex beams of the Sun by which the lower region of the aire is made hot The aire is most thin without light or colour but apt to
made better 2 Cor. 7. 10 11. 1. In general it is a marvellous help to Repentance it brings forth Repentance never to be repented of There are two comprehensive duties Faith and Repentance Repentance is the turning of the soul from evil unto good it stands chiefly in our affections and consists in turning them from evil godly sorrow and hatred do this 2. More particularly it worketh great care and fear of being overtaken with sin indignation and zeal it makes the soul very humble 3. It is an excellent help to patience and meek subjection to the hand of God I will bear the indignation of the Lord because I have sinned against him Some think it is a crime to mourn for their own sins and those that would be counted Christians of the higher form they say Ministers which presse this duty are legal the Gospel taketh not away the conscience of sinne though it doth the fear of damnation To scoff at mourning and humiliation was once a badg of prophanenesse Those that say justified persons must not mourn for sins may as well say they must not have an heart of flesh Marks of godly Sorrow Consider 1. When we mourn whether we grieve for sinne when we are quiet from crosses and when our sinne is kept from the world and when we have no terrours of conscience then our sorrow for sin is because we have offended God Sin is made grievous indeed by the other effects and when they come the sorrow is made more and more troublesome 2. For what sins we mourn If for such sin as will not bring discredit in the world yet if they offend God more we grieve more this is a good sign 3. In what sort we behave our selves in mourning if we go to God complain against our selves to him confesse to him lament before him seek to reconcile ourselves to him Iudas ran crying to the high-Priest Peter wept to God in secret Motives to godly Sorrow First It is a great evidence of thy love to God Ezekiel 16. later end the Church mournes when he was pacified to her to thinke how she had grieved him Secondly Often meditate of the wonderful fruit godly sorrow brings forth in the soul of man the mournfull Christians which grieve when God cals for sorrow are the most fruitful in afflictions Means or Helps to godly Sorrow 1. Meditation 1. Of the necessity and profit of it if we bewail not our sins we cannot attain pardon of them for Christ is sent to binde up the broken in heart to comfort mourners to refresh and give rest unto the weary soul Zech. 12. 10 12. 13. Iames 4. 8 9. Voluntary sorrow or remorse of heart whereto the soul doth of it own accord strive to work it self by taking pains with it self is exceeding medicinable it hath a purging power a healing vertue Gods Spirit doth work with and by it to the making clean of the heart and hand Godly sorrow breedeth Repentance that is Reformation of heart and life Only the bloud of our Lord Jesus Christ can cleanse from the guilt of sinne and deserve by way of merit the remission of the punishment thereof but the tears of penitent sorrow will help to wash away the stain and filth of sinne and to break the dominion of it from off the soul and to confirm the heart against it a man must grieve for his sins here or howl for them hereafter and by this he shall prevent many chastisements and be armed against carnal sorrow and be made capable of sound consolation 2. Prayer to God that he would perform his promise of taking away the stony heart and giving a fleshy heart in stead of it 3. A good man must represent his sins unto his own soul as exceeding grievous and dangerous and loathsome He must aggravate sinne to himself and cause his understanding to apprehend it a very vile thing worthy to be lamented and wept for more then any thing in all the world besides and to that end he must consider 1. How exceeding many and innumerable his sins are 2. The greatnesse of some of them in regard of aggravating circumstances most grosse and palpable for matter presumptuous for manner against plain and evident light conscience reproofs purposes vows and all helps made even a trade of them I know your great sins saith the Prophet And this people hath committed a great sin saith Moses and so David Forgive mine iniquity for it is great 3. The hatefulnesse of sin in regard of the vile effects thereof First It doth wrong and offend God in his Soveraign Authority and greatnesse and in his wisdom and in his right to the creatures who is so excellent and great Secondly It hath brought much misery upon all the creatures the earth is barren the Sea troubled the air infected and every thing out of order because of sinne We have lost the state of innocency are cast out of Paradise deprived of Gods favour his Image the dominion over the creatures that we had forfeited our right to heavenly glory lost our knowledge of God and of all his excellent creatures The soul of man is dead in sins by reason of sin and his body mortall and both subject to eternall death We are cursed in all that we put our hands to because we have transgressed the Law of God Thirdly Consider Christs sufferings in which we may see the odiousnesse of sinne Fourthly The torments of hell which the damned do suffer because they did not in time bewail their transgressions and we shall endure if we grieve not Fifthly Call to minde the examples of those which have mourned for sins David Peter Mary Magdalen The affections of the irascible appetite follow viz. those which respect their object with difficulty of attaining or avoiding of it CHAP. XXV Hope and Fear I. Of Hope 1. THe Nature of this Affection Philosophers call it Extentionem appetitus naturalis It is an earnest and strong inclination and expectation of some great good apprehended as possible to be obtained though not without difficulty It is a great Question Whether it be more difficult to trust in God for spiritual or temporal blessings The promises for temporal things are not so expresse and they are not fulfilled in the letter On the other side there are more natural prejudices against pardon of sinne then daily bread We do not so easily believe Gods supply of temporal blessings because bodily wants are more urgent He that will not trust in Christ for provision for his body will not trust in him for salvation of his soul. First The object about which it deals is some great and sutable good especially salvation Gal. 5. 5. Col. 1. 3. The good is thus qualified 1. It is Futurum Hope is of good things to come Joy is in a good present fear is of evils to come 2. Possibile else we never expect it herein it differs from despair 3. Difficile because it ever
so called because it is to be received Sacramente Tertullian was the first that used this word the Church hath used it a long time it being above fourteen hundred years since he wrote Some think the names of Gods appointing are better then what are given by Ecclesiastical custom II. The Proper Nature of a Sacrament It is an applying of the Covenant of Grace to Gods people for their good by visible Signs Signum est quod praeter speciem quam ingerit sensibus aliud quidpiam in cognitionem inducit A sign is that which represents one thing to the eye and outward senses and another to the minde Circumcision is called a sign and a seal Rom. 4. 11. See Gen. 17. 11. Some signs are only significant as the ivie of wine some obsignative as the seal the thing contained in the Writ some exhibitive as anointing the Prophetical Kingly or Priestly Office The Sacraments do not only signifie the promise of Grace in Christ but also seal and exhibit the thing promised Vossius de Sacramentorum vi efficacia The Sacraments are signs to represent Instruments to convey Seals to confirm the Covenant Others thus distinguish of Signs First Some only serve to signifie and call to remembrance as the Picture of a man is such a sign as cals him to remembrance Secondly A ratifying sign as a Seal if one conveys Lands or Goods to another and sets his Seal to it this further clears his Title Thirdly Which exhibit the putting on a Cap or Ring makes him a Master or Doctor the delivering of one a Staff is the making of him a Lord Chamberlain the Sacrament is all these Christ cals to thy remembrance and sets before thy eyes all the benefits that come by him and shews thee all thy duties thou owest him 2. It is a sealing sign so circumcision is called Christ Grace the Promises Heaven are thine 3. It is an exhibiting sign brings Christ to the beleever communicates him more to him What ever other Ordinance the Church hath wanted ever since the Lord had a Church on earth it hath had this When man was perfect God gave him Sacraments even in Paradise the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Some Sacraments God gave unto man 1. In his innocent estate which were two 1. The Tree of Life 2. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. 2. In his corrupt estate 1. Either before Christ prefiguring him 2. Or after Christ as memorials of him The Sacraments before Christ were 1. Either such as did belong to all sorts of people 1. The Flood and Noahs preservation in it 2. The Rainbow 2. Such as were peculiarly appointed to the Jews 1. Extraordinary during but for once or a short time and answering either to Baptism as 1 Cor. 10. 1. The Red Sea 2. The Cloud or to the Lords Supper 1. Manna 2. The Water flowing out of the Rock 2. Ordinary as 1. Circumcision answering to our Baptism Col. 1. 2. 2. The Passeover answering to the Lords Supper The Sacraments after Christs coming to continue till the end of the world were 1. Baptism 2. The Lords Supper III. What is the use of the Sacraments in the Church and what benefit the people of God receive from them They convey the mercies of the whole Covenant of Grace therefore Circumcision is called the Covenant Gen. 17. All the benefits of Christ are applied in the Sacraments the water out of the Rock is called Christ 1 Cor. 10. God doth nothing by the Word or Prayer but this Ordinance doth the same thing the one of the Sacraments is for begetting of life the other for confirming it It is an application of the whole Covenant of grace in a sign IV. The Parts of a Sacrament A Sacrament taken in its full extent comprehendeth two things in it 1. Rem terrenam That which is outward and visible which the Schools call properly Sacramentum And 2. Rem coelestem That which is inward and invisible which they term Rem Sacramenti the principal thing exhibited in the Sacrament 3. This sign must have the expresse Commandment of Christ for none can institute a Sacrament but he that can give the inward grace 4. There must be a promise of divine grace else it is no seal and it must be annexed to the Sacrament by God The command is for our warrant the promise for our encouragement In Baptism 1. the signum is washing with water 2. the signatum the bloud of Christ applied by the Spirit Iohn 3. 5. Tit. 3. 5. This was represented by the vision at our Saviours Baptism of the holy Ghost descending upon him in the similitude of a Dove As in our natural birth the body is washt with water from the pollution it brings with it into the world so in our regeneration or second birth the soul is purified by the Spirit from the guilt and pollution of sinne See Ezek. 16. 4 5. and Iohn 15. 5. 3. Christs command is Matth. 28. 19. Go and baptize 4. His promise is He that beleeves and is baptized shall be saved So in the Eucharist the outward and visible sign is the Bread and Wine 2. There is an Analogy between Bread and Wine which nourisheth the body and Christs body and bloud which nourisheth the soul. 3. A promise of saving grace to all that use the outward rites according to Christs institution Matth. 26. 28. V. The Necessity of the Sacraments They are necessary only Necessitate Praecepti not medii men may be saved without them That is necessary to the salvation of man without which he cannot possibly be saved These things are either 1. Simply necessary on mans part acknowledgment of sinne faith in Christ Jesus and repentance 2. So farre necessary as that the contempt or neglect of them bars a man of salvation Such are the Sacraments and outward profession The neglect of Circumcision and of the Passeover and the abuse of the Sacrifice of Peace-offerings by eating the same in uncleannesse wittingly was to be punished with cutting off No man was circumcised in those fourty years in which the Israelites were in the wilderness but many were born and died in that time Mark 16. 16. he saith He that beleeves not shall be condemned not he that beleeves not and is not baptized shall be condemned See that place Iohn 3. 5. answered in my Annotations VI. The Efficacy of the Sacraments The Papists say the Sacraments conferre grace by the work wrought as the pen of itself writeth the hand of the writer moving it so the Sacraments of themselves sanctifie being administred by the Minister They hold the efficacy of the Sacraments to be so great that there needeth no preparation or qualification of the receiver The Reformed Churches maintain That except the receiver be thus and thus qualified he loseth the benefit of the Sacraments See Acts 10. 47. Sacraments do not conferre grace by the actual doing and
Covenant of grace is sealed and personally applied the body and bloud of Christ may be held forth in a Sermon God renews unto them all that he hath promised Matth. 26. 22 This Cup is the New Testament in my bloud as the New Testament is founded in the bloud of Christ so it is exhibited and sealed therein 2. It serves for the nourishing and building up of his people in all graces it is called eating and drinking He that eats my flesh and drinks my bloud Two things are comprehended under nourishment 1. The maintenance and preservation of the stock of spiritual life which we have got already as by our meat and drink we are preserved and continued in our life 2. In children it serves to augment their parts make them larger stronger the Lords Supper was appointed by Christ to be one of the great means of our spiritual augmentation The Sacraments are not properly Seals unto our faith but of the Covenant They may be said to be seals of our faith consecutivè by a consequence of speech because as seals confirm a thing so faith is confirmed and strengthened by receiving but they are not formaliter in a true proper sense seals unto any thing but the Covenant All graces are nourished and increased by the Lords Supper because the new Covenant is sealed but three cardinal Graces especially as in the body nourish the stomack liver brain heart lungs nourish them and you nourish all the rest 1. The in-dwelling vertue of the Spirit of God they receive an increase of the Spirit 2. Faith nourish that and you nourish all it is called the life of faith Faith is the condition of the Covenant and we seal to our condition 3. Love to God and his people it doth enflame thy love to God and his people it is a communion we are all made one Spirit This Sacrament doth not beget but increase and strengthen Grace where it is already wrought Christ is conveyed in this Sacrament by way of food The Word was appointed to work conversion Faith cometh by hearing This ordinance is not appointed for conversion but it supposeth conversion it seals mens conversion therefore in the Primitive times they let all come to the hearing of the Word and then when the Sermon was done there was an Officer stept up and cried Sancta Sanctis Holy things for holy men and then all others were to go out and therefore it was called missa though the Papists did corrupt it and so called it the Masse afterwards by mixing their own inventions in stead of the Supper of the Lord but it had that name at first because all others were sent away and only such as were of the Church and accounted godly stayed Reasons 1. The nature of it being the seal of the Covenant of Grace requires it it must be supposed that all which come hither must be in Covenant with God The condition of the Covenant of Grace is Believe and be saved therefore it is appointed for believers Secondly It is the Ordinance of spiritual nourishment there must be first life before there can be any nourishment received in If it be appointed to nourish and increase grace then surely there must be grace before Thirdly We are required to examine our selves 1 Cor. 11. and of our godliness examine what work of God hath been upon the soul. Fourthly It is a Sacrament of Communion with God and with the Saints and What Communion hath light with darknesse Or What fellowship hath Christ with Belial All ignorant prophane scandalous persons and such as are meerly civil are hence excluded Conversion is sometimes and that improperly in Scripture as Matth. 18. 3. taken for the renewed exercise of faith and repentance in one that is already converted but the Question is Whether the first work of Regeneration the infusing of the first habits principles and seed of grace be effected by the Lords Supper received It is one thing to be converted at a Sacrament another to be converted by the Sacrament There is some expounding praying It is one thing intentionally to convert as an Institution and another accidentally to convert as an occasion Philip Goodwins Evangelical Communicant The Assembly upon these grounds thought it fit that scandalous sinners though not yet cast out of the Church should be suspended from the Sacrament 1. Because the Ordinance it self must not be prophaned 2. Because we are charged to withdraw from those who walk disorderly 3. Because of the great sinne and danger both to him that comes unworthily and also to the whole Church The Scriptures from which they did prove all this were Matth. 7. 6. 2 Thess. 3. 6 14 15. 1 Cor. 11. 27. to the end of the Chapter compared with Iude v. 23. 1 Tim. 5. 22. Another proof added by the Assembly was this There was power and authority under the Old Testament to keep unclean persons from holy things Levit. 13. 5. Numb 9. 7. 2 Chron. 23. 19. And the like power and authority by way of Analogy continues under the New Testament for the authoritative Suspension from the Lords Table of a person not yet cast out of the Church Wicked men saith Master Hildersam should not be admitted to the Table of the Lord Ezra 6. 21. holy things are prophaned thereby Ezek. 22. 26. 1 Cor. 5. 6. There should be a publick confession for scandalous sins David was more honoured for this Psal. 51. then dishonoured for his sinne Salomon left his Ecclesiastes as a monument of his Repentance Paul frequently mentions his faults Tertul. de poenit and others speak of it Ebrius infantes erroneus atque furentes Cum pueris Domini non debent sumere corpus It was their great sinne in the Church of Corinth that they did not cast out the incestuous person and it was a commendation to that Church Revel 2. that they could not endure the Nicolaitans A prophane person in Augustines Chrysostoms time Tertullians and Cyprians time in Pauls in Iohns time could not come to the Sacrament They are called Tremenda mysteria mysteries which the soul is to tremble at the Fathers call it the most terrible day and hour as if it were a day of Judgement This Suspension is called by the Schoolmen Excommunicatio minor The power of suspending one from the Sacrament is given not uni but unitati to the Eldership not to any one either Minister or Elder M. Gillesp. Aarons Rod bloss l. 3. c. 1. Church-officers should not admit all promiscuously but be careful whom they admit to the Supper That they be not cruel to the souls of them they admit and to the Nation and their own souls by being guilty of other mens sinnes Pareus said to those of Heidelberg When I see your Sacrament prophanation I wonder not at the warre Of receiving with the wicked It is lawful to joyn with a known unsanctified man in the service of God 1 Sam. 15. 30 31 Christ knew Iudas
eat the Bread and drink the wine which signifies the particular applying of Jesus Christ with all the benefits of his mediation to ones own soul. Whether Christ be corporally present with the symboles in the Eucharist Corpore de Christi lis est de sanguine lis est Lis est de modo non habitura modum Christ is ascended into heaven and he is contained there Acts 3. 21. till he come to Judgement therefore he is not there under the shape of bread and wine See Matth. 26. 11. Iohn 16. 7. Acts 3. 21. 2. All the circumstances about the first Institution of the Sacrament do declare that Christ was not bodily there especially Christ eating and drinking of it himself which Cloppenburg Peter du Moulin and D. Featley hold urging Matth. 26. 29. Mark 14. 25. for that purpose Those words say they necessarily imply that before he uttered them he had drunk of the Cup which he gave to them Aquinas also holds this and the Fathers likewise saith Peter du Moulin The nature of the action saith Peter du Moulin in the place last quoted required that Christ should communicate to shew the Communion he had with us as also he did partake of our Baptism Matth. 3. 16. from whence cometh the custome of the Church that the Pastor first communicates and the people afterwards When the publick Authority of this Land were for the Papists subscription was not urged upon such violent and bloudy terms unto any Articles of their Religion as unto that of the real presence D. Iack. Epist. to the Read For the same Christ was not visibly at the Table and spake and yet invisibly under the bread and wine he did not eat and drink himself The end of the Sacrament is a remembrance of Christs death Do this in remembrance of me and You shew forth his death till he come Now how can there be any remembring of him when he is present His corporal presence and eating is made unprofitable Iohn 6. though Christ said his flesh was meat indeed yet he did not mean that it should be eaten and and drunk corporally the flesh profiteth nothing but his words are Spirit and Life Our Union and Conjunction with Christ is inward and spiritual which consists in Faith and Love it is true we are united to his body but not after a bodily manner It is against reason and sense We believe Christ to be present spiritually in the hearts of the Communicants sacramentally in the Elements but not corporally Real is 1. Opposed to that which is imaginary and importeth as much as truely 2. To that which is meerly figurative and barely representative and importeth as much as effectually 3. To that which is spiritual and importeth as much as corporally or materially The presence of Christ in the Sacrament is reall in the two former acceptions of real but not in the last for he is truly there present and effectually though not carnally or locally Doctor Featleys Transubstantiation Exploded Really and corporally are not all one that which is spiritually present is really present unlesse we will say that a Spirit is nothing The bloud of Christ is really present in Baptism to the washing away of sinne Christ is really present to the faith of every true believer even out of the Sacrament Downs Defence against the Reply of M. N. We deny that Christ is so present in the Sacrament under the forms of bread and wine as that whosoever receive the Sacrament do truely receive Christ himself The Papists say Christs natural body is present we that the merit and vertue of his body broken upon the Cross and of his bloud shed upon the Cross is present to the believing soul in the Sacrament The body of the Sun is in heaven in its sphere locally and circumscriptively but the beams are on the earth And when the Sun beams shine into our house we say here 's the Sun though it be the beams not the body of the Sun So the Scripture saith of the Sacrament This is my body Christ ascended up into Heaven as for that exception he is visibly in heaven but invisibly here it answereth not those testimonies which prove he is so there that he is not here Mat. 28. 6. q. d. he could not be in both places at once an angelical argument Aquinas saith It is not possible by any miracle that the body of Christ should be locally in many places at once because it includeth a contradiction by making it not one for one is that which is not divided from it self It is impossible say the Papists according to the course of nature but not absolutely impossible by divine miracle it may be Consubstantiation overthroweth the grounds 1. Of reason the body of one and the same man cannot be present in many places all together but must needs remain in some definite and certain place 2. Religion because Christ was taken up into heaven there to abide till the end of the world It was above a hundred years before Transubstantiation They did adore Christ as co-existent with the bread which perhaps gave occasion to Averroes to say That Christians did adore their God and then eat him Averroes his resolution was Quandoquidem Christiani adorant quod comedunt sit anima mea cum Philosophis The quarrel between Luther and Zuinglius was about Christs presence in the Sacrament which Luther held to be by way of Consubstantiation which how it could be unlesse the body of Christ were every where Zuinglius and others could not conceive Luther being pressed therewith he and his followers not being able to avoid it maintained that also But how By reason of the hypostatical Union and Conjunction thereof with the word For the word being every where and the humane nature being no where severed from it How can it be say they but every where The humanity of Christ according to its Essence or natural Being is contained in one place but according to its subsistence or personal being may rightly be said to be every where Zanch. Misc. Iud. de Dissid Coen Dom. and D. Field lib. 3. c 35. of the Church The Papists constant Doctrine is That in worshipping the Sacrament they should give unto it Latriae cultum qui vero Deo debetur as the Councell of Trent hath determined that kinde of service which is due to the true God determining their worship in that very thing which the Priest doth hold betwixt his hands This is artolatry an idolatrous worship of the bread because they adoâ—e the host even as the very person of the Sonne of God It is true they conceive it not bread but the body of Christ yet that doth not free them from bread-worship for then if the Heathen did take his stone to be a God it did free him from idolatry Hence saith a Jesuite If the bread be not turned into the body of Christ we are the greatest
saying Masse did finde a Spider in the Chalice which he would not cast out but drink it up with the bloud Afterward rubbing his thigh and scratching where it itched the Spider came whole out of his thigh without any harm to either It is a spiritual eating because it is wrought by the aid of the holy Ghost and this mystery is perceived by faith which the Spirit of God works in our mindes and this excellent nourishment belongs to a spiritual and eternal life Sadeel de spirit manducat corporis Christi c. 1. A conjunction includes a presence and as the conjunction between Christ and us is spiritual so also is his presence Of the keeping of the Eucharist We grant that in antiquity there was a custom of breaking of some pieces of Bread which was blest and sending of it home to some that were sick or to other Parishes as a testimony of Communion but this is nothing to that reservation of it in the pix and to carry it up and down for Adoration Now we say contrary that the Sacraments are no longer then the meer use of them that they are not absolute and permanent things but relative and transient Now that all such reservation is unlawful appeareth 1. By the expresse precept even for the eating as well as the taking of it so that if it be not taken it is no Sacrament 2. A promise is not to be separated from the precept now the Sacramental promise is only to the Bread in the use of it Take Eat This is my Body that is this Bread so blest so distributed so eaten 3. The Bread is called a Body in reference to us now as a stone which is a Bound-mark removed remaineth a stone but ceaseth to be a Bound-mark So here 4. As the water in Baptism is not an actual Sacrament till sprinkled so neither Bread and Wine unlesse used The reserving of the Eucharist which the primitive Christians used for the benefit of those who either by sicknesse or persecutions were withheld from the meetings of the Christians as in those dayes saith Iustin Martyr many were is by the Papists now turned into an idolatrous circumgestation that at the sight of the Bread the people might direct unto it the worship that is due only to the person whose passion it represents Of the Circumgestation of the Sacrament and the Popish Processions For the solemn Circumgestation of this Sacrament Cassander hath confessed that seeing it is but a late invention it may well be omitted without any detriment unto the Church yea with emolument Some among our Adversaries have noted these pompous processions to have proceeded from an imitation of heathenish Rites and Ceremonies and to be most ridiculous and sotish as they use them The ancient Fathers concealed heretofore as carefully as they could the matter and the rites used in the celebration of the holy Sacrament the Papists shew it now openly and carry it publickly abroad every day through the streets and sometimes also go in solemn Procession with it which custom of theirs is of very late standing among Christians and heretofore would have been accounted rather prophane and unlawful Daille of the right use of the Fathers l. 2. c. 6. CHAP. X. Of the Masse THe Papists call the Lords Supper by this name which implies horrible Idolatry The Fathers using of the word was the occasion of that dangerous errour if we would keep out the errour we must likewise keep out the name The very name of Masse is against private Masse and quite overthrows it For missa is as much as missio or dimissio à dimittendis Catechumenis antequam Sacrificium inchoaretur It signifies as much as dimission or sending away of such out of the Church as were not prepared and fit to receive before the Sacrament began to be celebrated Probabilissima est Bellarmino eorum sententia qui missam dici volunt à missione seu dimissione populi D. Prid. de missae Sacrificio Rhenanus in Tertul l. 4. advers Marcion Picherellus and Sadeel think it is a Latine word which signifies as much as missio so remissa is used for remission both by Tertullian and Cyprian Chemnitius in parte secunda Exam. derives it from the Chaldaical signification of the word missa for the sufficiency of the Papists is from the Masse Una potissima quaestura regni Pontificii est cauponatio nundinatio privatarum missarum Chemnit ubi supra Vide Drus. in Deut. 6. 16. Some dispute hard to derive the word Masse from an Hebrew root either Gnasah to do and sometimes to sacrifice or from Misbeach an Altar others fetch it from Mas a Tribute But the learned Papists as Bellarmine and others do wholly reject this for this reason if it had been an Hebrew word the Apostles and Grecians afterward would have retained it as they have done Amen Hallelujah and Hosanna but they did not Dr Taylor saith The word is neither Hebrew Greek nor Latine nor taken from any other language of any Nation but raked out of the bottomlesse pit without all signification unlesse it agree with our English word Masse that is an heap a lump a chaos of blasphemies and abominations The Masse is like a beggars cloak patcht up with many pieces whereof some were put in an one time some at another one Pope puts in one patch another another and it was not fully patcht up as now it is till twelve hundred years after Christ. Acts and Monum p. 1274. Christ hath ordained the holy Communion in remembrance of himself Men do neither retain any remembrance of Christ nor yet Communion but have changed all the whole matter into a gay shew and almost a stage-play Paul saith That Christ hath once entred into the holy place and hath with one only Sacrifice and with one oblation made perfect all things Men say that they can sacrifice Christ himself again every day in very deed and that in infinite places B. Iewel on 1 Pet. 4. 11. For the thing it self It is a work in which the Priest in whispering over those five words Hoc est enim Corpus meum makes Christ of the Bread as the Papists suppose and offers him to the Father as a Sacrifice for the expiating of the sins of the living and the dead First As soon as he hath rehearsed the words of consecration and by the uttering of them made his Maker as they conceive he presently bowing his knees adores the host consecrated by him and likewise the Cup. After he hath worshipped it he riseth up and turning from the people with great reverence lifts up the Host with both his hands over his head and shews it to the peoples view that they may worship it as Christ himself and in the like manner after also the Cup. While the Sacrament is elevated a little Bell rings by which as by a signe given the people with great veneration worships the Sacrament as Christ himself We
acknowledge that in the Sacrament there is a solemn praising of God which sometimes is called a Sacrifice as likewise that the believers did offer up charitable alms which sometimes is called a Sacrifice as likewise that there is a representation and commemoration of Christ who was our Sacrifice But to hold that here by the Priest is offered up again the body and bloud of Christ though after an unbloudy manner is a falshood and many that swear by the Masse know not the horrible impiety of it They hold that the offering up of this to God is efficacious for the quick and dead and those in Purgatory The Fathers oft term the Lords Supper a Sacrifice partly in regard of the spiritual Sacrifice therein offered and partly because it is a lively representation and commemoration of Christs Sacrifice once offered on the Crosse and partly also because it succeedeth in the room of the Passeover and those other Sacrifices that in the Old Testament were offered But that they ever dreamed of any other Sacrifice distinct from the Sacrament no Papist shall ever be able to prove M. Gatak of Transub p. 113. In Sacrificiis offerimus in Sacramentis accipimus Beza A Sacrifice and a Sacrament cannot stand together for by a Sacrifice something is offered to God but by a Sacrament something is received from God Therefore the Paschal Lamb was not a Sacrifice as the offering up of Bullocks and Lambs but only a Sacrament and sign of our redemption by Christ Heb. 7. 10. there needs no other expiatory oblation Why should I offer then to expiate sin when it is expiated already The Papists say It is a Sacrifice properly so called The whole essence of a Sacrifice depends upon the institution of Christ say Suarez and Salmeron if any Sacrifice had been instituted it must have appeared by some word or act of Christ neither of which can be found 1 Cor. 11. after the words Do this Paul ver 25. immediately expounds what was meant by doing expressing the acts of doing As often as you shall eat which was spoken generally to all the faithful in Corinth not to the sacrificing Priests They prove it from Virgils Calf Cum faciam vitulâ pro frugibus ipse venito See Iansen Concord c. 13. p. 904. Rhemists on Luke 22. 20. Object Almost all things are by the Law purged with bloud and without shedding of bloud is no remission Heb. 9. 22. But in the Sacrifice of the Masse there is no effusion of bloud therefore there is no remission made for sins and by consequent it is not a propitiatory Sacrifice 1. Nothing therein is properly sacrified not the Bread and Wine for they are transubstantiated say they before the Sacrifice not Christs body for no living thing can properly be sacrificed unlesse it be slain but Christ being once dead dieth no more 2. The Papists say it is an external Sacrament yet Christ there appears to no sense but is concealed under the accidents of Bread and Wine 3. They say it is Sacrificium incruentum an unbloudy Sacrifice yet Christs bloud is there truly and really shed and drunk by the Communicants with the mouth 4. It is a perfect and allsufficient Sacrifice yet they repeat it daily Propitiatory is either that which pacifieth the wrath of God and pleaseth him by its own vertue and efficacy which is only the Sacrifice of Christ in his own self or else by Gods gracious acceptance and indulgence Rom. 12. 1. Heb. 13. 16. Phil. 4. 18. Heb. 9. 10. the Apostle from the iteration of Sacrifices doth conclude the insufficiency of them for if Christ be offered again and again he is an imperfect Sacrifice and we need something else The Apostle also in those Chapters doth often inculcate the once offering and once oblation by Christ offering up of himself once we are free from the guilt of our sins Heb. 3. 9. The entrance of Christ into the heavens is compared with the old High-priests entrance into the holiest of holies and therefore as none but the High priest might go in there so none could offer this Sacrifice but Christ himself and withall it implieth that to the perfection of Christs Sacrifice is required his continual appearing in heaven for us Malachy 1. 11. useth the word offering which was properly a part of the service used in the Church in his time to signifie the Gospel-service which succeeds in the New Testament and to expresse it more particularly he cals it a pure offering no longer carnal and grosse but wholly spiritual Irenaeus by the pure offering in Mal. 1. 11. understandeth the Eucharist now in use and many of the Ancients suppose it resembled in that action of Melchisedech Gen. 14. 18. And they call it the Christians Sacrifice succeeding in the room of the Jewish Sacrifices the Sacrifice I say of the Eucharist not their Sacrifice of the Masse M. Gatak of Transub The pure prayers and worship of God that should be in all Churches under the Gospel as Tertullian Eusebius Ierom and Augustine expound it M. Shâ—p Reply to M. Ball. Vide Grot. in loc There was a Controversie of late years fomented by some through Popish compliances That the Lords Supper might be stiled a Sacrifice the Table an Altar which produced in the discussion of it as all controversies do in the issue some further truth the discovery of this true decision of it That it was not a Sacrifice but a feast after and upon Christs sacrificing of himself Participatio Sacrificii as Tertullian cals it a sacrificial feâ—st commemorating and confirming all those ends for which the only true and proper Sacrifice of Christ was offered up Private massing or the alone communicating of the Priest is not according 1. To the institution of Christ saying in the plural to them Drink ye all of this 2. To the practice of the Apostles Act. 2. 46. The Councel of Trent saith We commend the Priests communicating alone which is as good as conferring or covenanting alone The Apostle 1 Cor. 11. 28. requires that every man first examine himself and then eat and he testifies vers 23. That what he delivered he received also of the Lord. And so we know that the Lord himself gave unto all which were present with him and suffered none only to be by and look on 2. It is against the nature of the Sacrament for it is a spiritual Feast 3. It is against the name of the Sacrament for it is commonly called a Communion which name seems to be fetched from 1 Cor. 10. 16 17. but what Communion is there when one alone receiveth and not them which are present with him 4. Against the Canon of the Masse the Priest ever speaks in the Plurall number The words of our Saviour Take Eat this is my Body Mat. 26. 26. were spoken to all future Communicants as well as to the Apostles then present for they contain in them an
institution of a Sacrament to be celebrated in all Christian Churches till the end of the world as the Apostle teacheth us from 1 Cor. 11. from vers 23. to 28. especially at the 26. vers as often as ye eat this Bread and drink this Cup. ye shew the Lords death till he come This the Apostles in their persons could not fulfill for they lived not till Christs second coming they must of necessity therefore be extended to all that in succeeding ages should be present at the Lords Supper who are as much bound by this precept of Christ to communicate with the Priest or dispenser of the Sacrament as the Apostles were to communicate with Christ himself when he first in his own person administred it otherwise if the precepts Takâ— Fat Do this in remembrance of me appertained to the Apostles only What warrant hath any Priest now to consecrate the elements or administer the Sacrament Nay what command have any faithfull at all to receive the Communion The Sacrifice of the Masse being idolatrous it is not lawful to be present at it 1 Cor. 10. 20. In their Masse-book they call the Crosse it self our only hope Those Texts are against going to Masse Psal. 26. 4. 1 Cor. 10. 7 14. 2 Cor. 6. 14 16 17. 1 Ioh 5. 21. Many will say They keep their hearts to God though they be present at a Masse This is as if a man should catch his wife in the act of adultery and she apologize that the other had her body but he her heart 1 Cor. 6. 27. Rom. 11. 4. Gods people have their knees for God as well as their hearts 1 Kings 19. Origen said he could not bend the knees of his body to God and the knees of his heart to Satan See B. Daven Determ 7. Revel 7. 3. They have a mark in the fore-head because they must not be ashamed of their profession that mark is obvious to all the world Our Saviour by this policy might have over-reacht the devil himself who required only externall bowing keeping his heart still unto God Matth. 4. 10. In some case a man may be present at Masse and not sin As 1. When he is there by violent compâ—lsion this is not his sinne but theirs 2. If in travel a man be in a fit place to see and observe their folly so as he shews no reverence at all or approbation by bending his knee uncovering his head or otherwise King Edward the 6th would not suffer the Lady Mary to have Masse in her house Foxes vol. 2. p. 653. The bowing of Naaman spoken of in 2 King 5. 8. was genuflexio obsequii not imitativa a bowing to the King not to the Idol 2. Elisha's words do not necessarily import an approbation or permission of that which was propounded but a meer form of valediction as if he had said in our language Adieu or Farewell or there may be an Enallage temporis very usual in the Hebrew and have relation to the time past Of private Receiving of the Lords Supper The Passeover was to be eaten in such a Family Exod. 12. 46. to signifie that the Church was then but a handful or houshold in respect of the fulnesse of the Gentiles which were to follow but the Lords Supper was not to be eaten in a private separated Family but the Church was to come together and to stay one for another 1 Cor. 11. 33. that in the confluence of the people and publicknesse of the action the increase and multitude of the Church might be expressed 1 Cor. 11. 22. Paul opposeth the Congregation wherein the Lords Supper should be taken unto a private house where men satisfie their hunger It is noted of a Christian Jew desperately sick of the Palsie that he was with his bed carried to the place of Baptism The purest and best reformed Churches this day in Savoy Germany France and divers others administer the Sacraments only in the ordinary meetings In my judgement saith Master Cartwright it is unmeet to administer either of the Sacraments in private houses and it is lesse tolerable in the holy Supper which hath a special mark and representation of brotherly Communion more then Baptism The Necessity of the Eucharist The administring of the Communion to Infants is a Rite as ancient as Cyprians time and a Rite that did continue in the Church above 600 years Innocentius the first and Augustine concluded a necessity of childrens receiving this Sacrament from Iohn 6. 53. it may well conclude for those which are of years and capable of that mystery for though it speaketh rather of a spiritual eating and drinking yet because the sacramental is a sign and pledge of that and whosoever doth indeed spiritually eat the flesh of Christ and drink his bloud cannot choose but also be willing and forward to do it sacramentally when opportunity is offered and there is no impediment to hinder Christ requireth in all persons about to communicate three principal acts of reason one is before and two are at the time of receiving The first is 1 Cor. 11. Let â— man examine himself The second to discern the Lords body The third is to remember the Lords death untill his coming again All which three being acts of judgement cannot agree unto Infants being persons void of judgement The Ends for which God hath instituted the Sacrament of the Lords Supper They are four First The remembrance of the death of Christ Luke 22. 19. This do in remembrance of me 1. Christs person Phil. 3. 8 9. we can have no interest in his benefits till we be united to him Cant. 5. 10. to the end 2. His actions and sufferings 1 Cor. 11. 24 26. 3. The benefits that flow from these all that Christ did and suffered was not only satisfactory but meritorious Luke 22 20. 4. With what affection Christ instituted this Sacrament his bowels were then full of compassion to his people it was the last solemn act of his life Secondly It is a strengthening Ordinance the Lord hath appointed it onely for those that are new-born the elements there are our greatest matter of nourishment Thirdly It is a sealing Ordinance The New Testament in my bloud Fourthly An Ordinance of the Communion of Saints whereby that should be renewed all are one bread and one body Iohn 6. 54. 1 Cor. 10. 16 17. The Lords Supper is 1. A badge of a Christians profession 2. A seal of the Covenant of grace 3. A map of heaven 4. A means and pledge of our Communion with Christ 1 Cor. 10. 16. The Supper promotes this Communion 1. Because it is a visible profession of our union with Christ. 2. A lively resemblance of it meat and drink are converted into our substance made a part of us there are significant rites invested with a promise and the assurance of a blessing 3. It is a pledge and seal Christ is there conveyed over to a believers use This is my
Body a pledge whereby whole Christ with all his merits and all that he is is made over to a believer 4. A means of exhibiting Christ to the soul. The Sacraments are Instrumenta quadantenus moralia they are accompanied with the power and vertue of the holy Ghost We must therefore receive the Sacrament To confirm our faith Communion with Christ and all saving graces in us to keep in remembrance the Lords death untill he come again and to testifie our love one towards another 1. Our Faith God is able and willing to save us 1. Able to save to the utmost look upon him 1. In his Natures God-man Man that he might suffer God that he might satisfie 2. In his Offices he is a Prophet Priest and King Mat. 8. 2. 2. Willing he died to save humble and penitent sinners Rom. 8. 34. Rom. 4. ult if he spared not his life for us he will spare nothing else There is merit and grace enough in him what ever my sins are or have been for pardon of them and salvation 2. Communion with Christ and all saving graces in us Gods end in instituting of Ordinances is that we might meet him there and have Communion with him Exod 20. 24. it should be our end in frequenting Ordinances Gods eye is specially on our end in all religious duties Matth. 11. 7 8. Hos. 7. 14. Zech. 7. 5. 1. He pondereth the heart 2. He judgeth of our actions by the end 3. The answer will be sutable to our end The Sacrament is the nearest and visiblest Communion with Christ on earth We come to God by Christ in prayer as our Intercessour in the Word as our Teacher in the Supper as the Master of the Feast Rom. 6. 11. 3. To keep in remembrance the Lords death until he come again 1 Cor. 11. 26. that is 1. The Doctrine of it the bread represents his body the wine his bloud we shew our belief of this Doctrine 2. The Necessity of his death we hereby testifie to God our consciences fellow-Christians the world our need of Christ as bread is necessary for our bodies 3. The Sufficiency of Christs death no two creatures are more universally sufficient for all sorts of men then bread and wine therefore God made choice of them for this purpose 4. The Application of Christs death it is the receiving of bread and wine into our stomacks that nourisheth us when the conscience beginneth to be oppressed with the hainousnesse of sinne and the fear of Gods vengeance we should consider Christ bare the curse for our sins upon his body that we might be delivered from them and made perfect satisfaction to his Fathers justice that we might be received into favour Rom. 8. 34 35. 4. To testifie our love one toward another that I shall speak of afterward Of duâ— Preparation for the Sacrament We must labour to perform all holy duties in a right manner God requires preparation to every service to the Sabbath Sacrament Some say the scope of the first Commandment is that Iehovah alone must be our God whom we must worship of the second that he must be worshipt alone with his own worship of the third that he must be worshipt after his own manner God is more delighted with Adverbs then Nouns None might approach to the holy things of God having his uncleannesse upon him Nadab and Abihu through carelesnesse or hast brought common kitchin fire whereas it should have been heavenly fire therefore God punisht them God makes admirable promises to prayer yet if we perform it not in that manner which God requires he abhors it Psal. 109. 8. The word is the power of God to convert and strengthen us 2 Cor. 2. 16. The Sacrament is a seal of the Covenant yet if it be received unworthily it is a seal to a blank Iudas took the Passeover at least and the devil entred into him See 1 Cor. 11. 18 20. so the great duty of fasting if not rightly performed is unacceptable Isa. 14. 12. See 2 Chro. 25. 2. and prayer Prov. 15. 8. Reasons 1. Because the Lord requires and orders the manner as well as the matter our obedience must have Gospel-perfection sincerity and integrity In the Passeover the Lamb must be perfect of the first year the man and the Lamb prepared and it offered in the appointed time See Exod. 12. 9. 2 Chron. 30. 18 19. There were four dayes preparation for the Passeover the Lords Supper both succeeds and exceeds it The Ark was to be carried on the Priests shoulders 1 Chron. 15. 13. God made a breach on them because they sought him not after the due order 2. The manner of performing the duty is the most spiritual part of it Non tantum considerandum est id quod agimus sed etiam quibus circumstantiis This shews the true cause why our attending upon God proves so unprofitable and uncomfortable to us because we rest in the work done Secondly We should labour to perform the Ordinances aright and that we may do so 1. The person must be accepted God had regard to Abel and his offering Cains Sacrifice for the matter was as good as Abels the person is onely accepted in Christ This is my beloved Son in whom I am well-pleased in him with us 2. Ever bring God the best thou hast in thy approaches to God bring the best devotion affection Cursed is the deceiver that hath a whole one and brings a blemished one Mal. be troubled thou canst bring no better 3. Come in faith rest upon the promise of Christ that thy services shall be accepted mingle faith with hearing prayer 4. Bring an humble Spirit Let thy soul be rightly possest with the majesty and holinesse of that God to whom the duty is tendred Revel 4. 3. The Lord is to be lookt on as a King in his Glory in his Throne we have a principle of envy in us whom we envy we undervalue 5. Bring a right estimation of the excellency and ends of the Ordinance Isa. 2. 3. Hear and thy soul shall live Take heed how you hear with what measure you mete it shall be measured to you again according to your diligence in the duty will God measure out his blessing 6. There must be a serious meditation before-hand of the spiritual manner of performing the duty Heb. 12. 28. Do not utter indigested prayers a Minister should speak as the Oracles of God 7. One should labour to stir up the graces sutable to the duty and keep down the sins opposite thereto 1 Pet. 2. 1 2. Iam. 1. 18 19. It is the duty of Christians in a special manner to examine themselves that they may come prepared to the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 11. 20. to the end the Apostle proves the necessity of preparation both from the nature of the Ordinance or the institution of it the benefit that we reap by coming prepared and the mischief that befals those that come
like Paracelsian Physick if it do not cure it will kill 4. None do lose such high services Matth. 7. 22 23. they do not the work of the Gospel with a Gospel-spirit and out of a Gospel principle 5. Satan will insult and triumph over none so much as Gospel-sinners Matth. 12. 43 44. 6. The worm of conscience will not feed so fiercely on any Mar. 9 43. when he compares his former hopes with his present irrecoverable condition because no sinners had those helps nor were raised to those hopes Ponder on your own sins what they are and what they have deserved Look on original corruption the foul sea of all wickednesse which is called a body of sinne Rom. 6. 6. A Law in our members Rom. 7. 23. Consider that thou hast a naughty nature whereby thou art averse from God and goodnesse and extreamly prone to all sin Psal. 51. 5. Isa. 48. 8. all men in every part are under the guilt and power of it Rom. 3. 16 23. 2. Humble thy self Labour to be base for this though thou hast not committed such foul sins as others yet if God should leave thee to thy self and thine own evil heart thou wouldst soon be as bad as the worst 3. Call to minde likewise the grosse actual sins thou hast committed before or since thy calling Wast not thou given to all manner of pollution before the Lord gave thee knowledge of him and since thy calling 4. Consider thy continual daily slips and infirmities thy sins of omission and commission how apt thou art to be angry impatient thy carnalnesse in good duties and distraction in the performance of them thy forgetfulnesse of God and thy later end 5. Consider also whether there be not some unknown secret fault that thou hast not yet repented of and pray to God to discover it to thee Lastly Call to minde what sins thou hast committed since the last Sacrament and bewail them Meditate also on the sufferings of Christ for these grosse sins and daily iniquities His great abasement Psal. 22. 6 7 14. to 19. v. Isa. 53. 3 4 5 6 7. to the 11. v. He was born like a beggar lived like a beggar the Devil tempted him he was falsly accused betrayed by one of his Disciples denied by another forsaken by the rest He was amazed with fear and incompassed with sorrow Mark 14. 34. Two of the most tormentful passions was in an agony and did sweat drops of cloddy bloud in such abundance as it fell to the ground was condemned mocked spit upon whipped with rods after the manner of the Romans crowned with thorns laden with the Crosse nailed on it stretched and retched in all his joynts He suffered much in his body but his chief sufferings were in his soul Isa. 53. 10 11 12. He took our soul as well as body and came to redeem it that being the chief part Quicquid induit Christus obtulit He suffered 1. As a publick person as the second Adam Rom. 5. 14. 2. For our sakes and benefit Isa. 53. he is said six times to bear our iniquities 3. Not only for our good but in our room Heb. 7. 22. not onely nostro bono but nostro loco 1 Tim. 2. 6. Mat. 20. 28. for otherwise he should have suffered no more then other men the Martyrs suffered for the good of the Church Col. 1. 24. 2 Tim. 2. 10. 4. He took upon him the burden of our sins by way of imputation 1 Pet. 2. 24. 2 Cor. 5. 21. Smite on your brests and say For my worldlinesse anger all these evils befell my Saviour Lord for thy mercy sake in Christ pardon and heal me Shall I pollute my body with uncleannesse when Christ suffered so bitter things Shall I ever be angry again O Lord by thy grace I will not Let me have thy power to kill these sins See the strictnesse of divine justice and the dreadfulnesse of Gods wrath God spared not his own Sonne and when his Fathers wrath lighted on his soul he was much troubled and the great evil of sinne it caused Christs humane nature to be â—â—raid Matth. 26. 38. The desert of sinne is seen in Christs suffering 1. In respect of the person who suffered for it Gods only Son who never provoked him Iohn 3. 16. Rom. 8. 31. 2. In respect of the penalties he underwent for sinne it made him to cry sweat and pour out strong supplications Isa. 53. 10. The Law shewed the filthinesse and evil of sinne by the many Sacrifices and aspersions of bloud which it required but they were of beasts and their bloud but the Gospel shews the demerit of sinne more fully and how odious it is to God since Christ must die to expiate it and also the abundant love both of the Father in delivering his own Sonne to death for the salvation of sinners Iohn 3. 16. 1 Iohn 4. 9 10. Rom. 8 32. and of Christ in taking upon him our nature and in exposing himself to so much misery here on earth and at last to an accursed death for us Phil. 2. 7 8. We are to remember Christ in the Sacrament 1. Because the Lord will have in the Sacrament of the New Testament the great end of the Passeover to be accomplisht Exod. 12. 14. 2. That we may answer the goodnesse of Christ to us he hath us alwayes actually in remembrance Exod. 28. 21 29. 3. Because if we have any benefit by this Sacram nt God must remember Christ for us 4. Upon our actual and affectionate remembrance of Christ depends all our benefit by this Sacrament We have dispatched the examination of our sins in the next place our graces are to be examined The graces that must be tried and examined are our Knowledge Faith Re 〈…〉 Love and hungring after Christ the truth growth or wants of them 〈…〉 examined The truth of them 1. Knowledge The words examine shew forth discern and judge all betoken knowledge We must get Knowledge 1. Of the Law of God 2. Of the Doctrine of Redemption by Jesus Christ. 3. Of the Nature Necessity and Use of the Lords Supper We must know our estate by nature and by grace 1. Because otherwise we cannot be thankful to God for his benefits as we ought 2. In the Sacrament Christ is offered and the Covenant sealed By nature we are dead in sin and bondslaves of Satan by grace we come to be children of God and heirs of salvation We must know what the elements and actions in the Sacrament signifie That the bread signifies the body of Christ and the wine his bloud that the breaking of bread betokens the crucifying of Christ that the giving of the bread and wine notes the action of God the Father offering Christ to all and bestowing him effectually upon every worthy receiver the receiving of the bread and wine signifies our receiving and feeding upon Christ by faith 2. Faith is required in those that come worthily to the
consideration of our Saviours death for our sins should be unto us a most powerful motive to repentance Two things are necessary in the point of repentance for sins past to confesse and lament them before God humbly craving pardon and for the time to come to reform and amend our lives casting away all our transgressions and applying our selves to all holinesse and righteousnesse Now to the performance of this duty the death of Christ must needs be to him that considers of it the most effectual argument and mighty motive in the world Do we not here see that the sins we have lived in are most loathsome to God for had he not hated them with infinite hatred would he have inflicted such horrible punishments upon our Saviour his only Son by them Do we not see that they are most dangerous to our selves exposing us to the suffering of intollerable evils unlesse by vertue of Christs death we be freed from them which can never be but upon our Repentance God hath in the death of Christ discovered such infinite abomination of sin and withall such infinite grace to the sinner that this should prevail with us Paul saith All we which are baptized into Christ are baptized into his death and we are buried with him by baptism into his death and we are crucified together with him that the body of sinne may be abolished We must be made partakers of the death of Christ if ever we will be made partakers of his resurrection we must be made conformable to his death if ever we will live and reign with him Marks to know whether our repentance be right 1. If it be speedy and without delay Satan alwayes saith it is either too soon to repent as in youth or too late as in old-age 2. Constant not cast it aside because we repented at our first conversion 3. Voluntary and so a filiall not a forced repentance voluntary repentance speaks love to God forced love to our selves 4. It must be deep and thorow repentance sutable to our sins the greatest sinners if gracious have the greatest sorrow and their joy is the more full after Psa. 22. 4. 2 Sam. 14. 14. III. Love This is a special grace of the Gospel it is a longing desire for the good of our brethren or a willing that good to one which is proper to him There is a double Union First Mystical with Christ the Head by faith and with one another by love Secondly Moral an agreement in judgement and affection Ioh. 17. 11. See 21 22 23. v. Act. 4. 32. Christ was 1. Incarnate for this end that his people might be one Ephes. 1. 10. 2. This is often inculcated in Christs Sermons Iohn 15. 17. He came from heaven on purpose to propound to us a patern of charity Ephes. 5. 2. Unity is the beauty strength and safety of the Church Act. 1. 14. See Isa. 11. 6. 3. Christ died for this end Isa. 2 15 16. 4. Christ aimed at this in his Ascention and pouring out of his Spirit Ephes. 4. 5. 5. It is the end of Christs Ordinances in the Church of Baptism 1 Cor. 12. 13. and of the Lords Supper 1 Cor. 10. 17. Every one is bound to love four things saith Augustine First God who is the chiefest good and therefore deserves the chiefest love Secondly Himself God gives no commandment for one to love himself because he commands one to love God as the chiefest good and so to love him as to enjoy him which one cannot do without love of himself Thirdly To love man as man 1 Thess. 3. 12. Fourthly To love all the Saints the brotherhood 1 Pet. 3. 17. those which love Saints as Saints or because Saints must needs love them all Ephes. 1. 15. Col. 1. 4. Philem. 5. Our love must be 1. Sincere or without hypocrisie Rom. 12. 9. it is so when we cleave to what ever is good in him and abhor what is evil in him 2. Fervent 1 Pet. 1. 22. 3. Constant a friend loveth at all times We must also love our enemies Matth. 5. 44 45. It is reported of Iohn that in his old-age being unable by weaknesse to speak long unto the Congregation he would stand up and â—n stead of a long Sermon ingeminate this precept Diligite filioli diligite Little children love love one another The subject of his Epistle is love 1 Iohn 3. 18. He is called the beloved Disciple because he was so full of it himself Christ cals it the new Commandment because excellent or because solemnly renewed by him Iohn 13. 34. These are my Commandments that you love one another This is the great grace which distinguisheth the children of light from the children of darknesse Iohn 13. 35. He that loves not is not of God There are high Elogies of it 1 Cor. 17. We must love our neighbour as our selves Iam. 2. 8. We must neither wish nor do them any more hurt then we would wish or do to our selves 2. We should really promote his good as our own 1 Cor. 10 24. We are 1. To pray for them Heb. 13. 3. 2. Counsel them Heb. 3. 13. 3. Relieve them in their wants Mat. 25. lat end The Sacrament is a Seal of our Communion that we are all one bread and one body It is evident that Christ upon his death instituted that Supper As to be a seal of that Covenant of grace between God and us ratified therebâ— So also to be a communion the highest outward pledge ratification and testimony of love and amity among his members themselves M. Thomas Goodwins Christ the universal Peace-maker part 2. Sect. 2. Yet the great wall of separation between the Papists and us is the Sacrament of the Altar and those that are called Lutherans and Calvinists the Lords Supper And this is a grace pressed with the like necessity toward man that saith is toward God The Christians in the Primitive Church did kisse each other at the Sacrament this was called Osculum pacis the kisse of peace in sign of love D. Clerk Some keep themselves from the Sacrament because they are not in charity These men shew manifest contempt to Christ and his blessed Ordinance that rather then they will forsake their malice they will want it 2. Such professe they will live still in malice and have no desire to be reconciled for if they had they need not refuse to receive 2 Cor. 8. 12. The Love-feasts were appointed to signifie their mutual love one to another they were immediately before the receiving of the Sacrament 1 Cor. 11. 21. St Chrysostome makes the love-feasts to be after the taking of the Eucharist They were used to have a great Feast to which all the poor people were invited on the charges of the rich This they did partly in imitation of our Saviour who instituted the Sacrament after a full Supper and partly in expression of their perfect love towards all men These Agapae or Love feasts
we come to see that the Sacraments are the Lords Ordinances and that those things which he promiseth in the Covenant of Grace and sealeth in the Sacrament are farre better then all profits and pleasures in this world By it we come to be stirred up to desire and long after these benefits and so to covet them that nothing in this world will satisfie us without them We should exercise faith at the Lords Table view the arguments the Ordinance it self affords 1. Here is Christ crucified before thine eyes and he clearly offers it to thy soul in particular he applies it to thee This is my body which was broken for thee and my bloud which was shed for thee Run over the sad story of Christs agony and say This was done by my Lord for my poor soul. 2. The Lord cals thee hither on purpose because thou art weak He will cherish weak beginnings Mat. 12. 20. For our affections we must behave our selves with joy comfort and reverence See 2 Chron. 30. 21. Mat. 26. 30. Thy heart should be cheerful in God and thankful praise him Thankfulnesse and joy are the effects of faith the Ordinances are often compared to feasts and banquets because of the spiritual delight and rejoycing which the soul ought to take in them Hence the very Sacrament is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of the giving thanks unto God for his mercies The outward duty is comfortable Circumcision was a bloudy rite yet this is nothing to the inward sweetnesse Iohn 4. 32. In one of the Evangelists it is said Christ blest the bread in another it is said Christ gave thanks Christ when he instituted this Sacrament gave thanks to God the Father that he was pleased to send him into the world to die for poor souls Fear is proper to the duty of the Supper because of those excellent mysteries Chrysostom cals this Table Horribilis mystica mensa Psal. 68. 35. mixt affections do best in a mixt state in the whole worship of God Psal. 2. 11. Hos. 3. 7. For our thoughts We must meditate 1. On the outward signs and what they signifie 2. On the dainties prepared 3. The love of him that prepared them 4. On our communion with Christ his Graces and faithful people The effect of these affections and thoughts will be stirring up the heart to thanksgiving When we taste the wine we should consider its properties Psal. 104. 15. Iudg. 9. 13. so there is satisfaction to God and comfort to the creature in the bloud of Christ wine ingenders new spirits warms and refines them the bloud of Christ infuseth a new vigour into the soul. Our Communion with Christ in the Supper is not only with his gifts and graces but with his Person whole Christ. There are two Elements to signifie this Bread his Body and Wine his Bloud Our Communion is with his whole Person with Christ invested with all kinde of Offices to do us good and furnished with rich graces and comforts 1 Iohn 5. 16. We partake of his wisdom as a Prophet righteousnesse as a Priest grace and glory as a King What must be done after the Sacrament We must endeavour to finde an increase of faith love and all saving graces in us abounding more and more in well-doing We should speak of the sweetnesse of Christ to others Psal. 34. 8. Some Disciples have gone from this Supper triumphing and trampling upon Satan as Lions breathing fire saith Chrysostome terrible to the Devils themselves If we finde not the fruit of this Ordinance presently either it may come from want of preparation or from trusting in our own preparation 2 Chron. 26. 15 16. or want of thankfulnesse for our preparation 1 Chron. 29. 14. or from want of stirring up the graces we have received in that duty Isa. 57. 8. 2 Tim. 1. 6. Or Because we were not humbled for former neglects Psal. 32. 4 5. God may deny us the present sense of our benefit 1. To train us up to live by faith 2 Cor. 5. 7. 2. To try our graces 3. That we may more diligently search into our own souls Psal. 77. 6. How oft ought the Sacrament to be received Amongst the Papists the people communicate only once a year viz. at Easter which superstitious custom many of our ignorant people follow Calvin 4. Institut 43. 46. roundly professeth that it behoveth that the Eucharist be celebrated at least once a week The Christians in some parts of the Primitive Church took the Sacrament every day because they did look to die every day Now in many places it is administred every moneth Object The Passeover unto which the Lords Supper succeedeth was celebrated once a year and therefore once only for this Sacrament is sufficient Answ. God ordained that the Passeover should be celebrated but once only in the year and on a certain moneth and day the Jews had many other visible signs to represent Christ and his benefits they had Sacrifices every day and legal washings but he hath appointed that this Feast of the Lords Supper should be often solemnized and that we should come often unto it 1 Cor. 11. 25 26. That the frequent celebration of the Sacrament is a duty is inferred from this Text by Peter Martyr Calvin Musculus Aretius Hyperius Tossâ—nus Pareus Piscator Dickson and Mr Pemble See Iohnsons Christian Plea Chap. 14. In the time of the Apostles the purest age of the Church they solemnized it every Lords day Acts 20. 7. yea it was their daily exercise as often almost as they had any publick meeting for the service of God Acts 2. 42. And this custom long continued in the Primitive Church after the Apostles times not only in the dayes of Iustin Martyr and Tertullian but also of Chrysostom and Augastine as appeareth by their writings untill by mans corruption and Satans malice the commonnesse of the action exposed it to contempt We should come often to the Sacrament there is no exception but want of occasion or some just impediment There was in old time a custom there should be a Communion every Lords day every one not receiving without lawful excuse being excommunicated which Charls the Great in some sort renewed and which Bucer advised K. Edward in this Land to restore again Whether if an Ordinance and namely the Sacrament of the Lords Supper though there seems to be the like reason in other Ordinances cannot be so administred but that by some which partake of it it will notoriously be prophaned that be a sufficient reason for the non-administration of it Or Whether for want of order and government to keep off such as are notoriously unworthy the administration of the Sacrament may and ought to be suspended Again Whether a Minister may lawfully and with a good conscience continue there in the exercise of his Ministery having a Pastoral charge where he hath not power to administer the Sacrament of
adultery when one alone either man or woman is married and the other not married as if Ioseph had abused his Mistresse here if the woman were either married or contracted both were to die if the woman be single we reade no Law of death there is also a double adultery when both the man and woman are married as David and Bathsheba which deserves death also by the Law so married folks do break this Law in regard of others Also secondly in regard of themselves both for the entrance into matrimony and use of it for entrance by a sinfull choice and a sinful proceeding Choice if one choose one within degrees prohibited as he in Corinth his fathers wife his step-mother or one formerly contracted and not justly severed from another Also for manner of proceeding when it is without consent of parents such a marriage is unlawful And so much for the breach in the entrance in the use it is by aversnesse to each other and by abuse These are the things directly forbidden in this Commandment indirectly there are forbidden all occasions of filthinesse and all appearances of it occasions to ones self and others To others by garish and overcostly attire especially the manner of the attire when it is light and fantastical also by impudent and immodest carriage Occasions of lusts to ones self are chiefly three 1. Idlenesse and sloth when men do give themselves leave to neglect their calling this we have examples of in Sodom David and this the Heathens by light of nature have discovered Quaeritur Aegystus quare sit factus adulter In promptu causa est desidiosus erat Secondly Intemperance provokes and nourisheth lust whether it be in meat or drink the Sodomites after fulnesse of bread fell to strange flesh especially drinking wine and strong drink to the inflaming of the body Drunkennesse and uncleannesse commonly go together Hosea 4. 11. Ephesians 5. 18. Iames 5. 5. 1 Pet. 4. 4. Reasons 1. The body is enflamed and the minde then made uncapable of those wise and holy considerations which should resist Satans temptations wine takes away the heart the reason turns a man into a Swine and then into a Goat or Horse 2. Intemperance banisheth modesty which is the keeper of chastity Prov. 47 8 13. Tit. 2. 3. Thirdly Another occasion of lust to ones self is indiscreet venturing upon solitary places chiefly in the dark and conversing with such persons as a man findes himself inclin'd unto in this affection for then is a man out of Gods protection then the Angels cease to guard him and the Spirit to confirm him These be occasions of evil appearances also are light behaviour light attire suspected company Lust is 1. Unseemly for man it makes us unlike God and the holy Angels Alexander knew by two things that he was not God by his lust and sleep 2. It makes us unlike Christians and like Heathens 1 Thess. 4. 5. The Turks keep their Festival-day on Venus-day and the happinesse they did look for is a Paradise of bodily pleasures nay this makes you like the beasts 2. Full of vanity it doth not satisfie Ezek. 16. 18 29 30. Messalina was tired but not satisfied with her lust 3. Full of vexation how many are the fears jealousies and quarrels in the pleasures of lust CHAP. IX The eighth Commandment THou shalt not steal THe sixth Commandment gave charge for preservation of mans life the seventh for the honesty and chastity of the body to keep it holy and undefiled now the Lord cometh a degree lower and sheweth that he doth not onely care for our lives and for our bodies that they may be kept holy but also for our goods and cattel our corn our wares our gold and silver and whatsoever they have that they may be in safety This Commandment enjoyneth men a due carriage in regard of worldly goods This carriage is 1. Inward in judgement will thought affections 2. Outward which concerns the goods of every mans self and of others For our own goods in regard of getting keeping using For getting here is required the having of a lawful Calling and using it lawfully with diligence discretion cheerfulnesse and moderation For keeping is required thrift for using liberality Now for the goods of others there is required justice that is the vertue of giving every one his own The common rules of which are Do as you would be done to and Serve each other in love and the parts are truth and fidelity plainnesse and equity There are several kinds of Iustice. 1. Commutative consisting in a right exchange of one thing for another the principal sorts of which are 1. Buying and selling 2. Setting and letting with taking 3. Borrowing and lending 4. Hiring and labouring for hire 5. Partnership 2. Distributive Iustice stands in a right division and parting of things all things civil in four chief things Matter of Law about meum and tuum publick Lands and Stocks publick Payments and forfeitures and in things sacred Things profane and common wherein we have to deal with man must be rightly distributed and so must things sacred wherein the Lord of Heaven is interessed But one observes that it is an error to be noted among the Expositors of the Decalogue that they rank Sacriledge as a sin of the eighth Commandment when it is a sin of the first Table and not of the second a breach of the loyalty we immediately owe to God and not of the duty we owe to our neighbour To steal or alienate that which is sacred is to rob God not man for he is the proprietary of things sacred Mal. 3. 8 9. He that commits this sin indirectly and by consequent robbeth men too viz. those who live of Gods provision Iulian the Apostate robbed the Church of the Revenues thereof and took away all contributions to Schools of learning that children might not be instructed in the liberal Arts nor in any other good literature He exaggerated also his Sacriledge with scornful jests saying that he did furthâ—r their salvation by making them poor seeing it was written in their own Bibles Blessed are the poor for theirs is the Kingdome of Heaven All manner of stealing is expresly forbidden Ier. 7. 9. Ephes. 4. 28. Theft is a taking away secretly of another mans goods the owner not knowing of it One is guilty by consenting and agreeing with a thief Rom. 2. or giving him counsel or hiding his fact This is so peculiar a sin in servants as the Latine words which now signifie theeves did at first signifie servants onely as fur was a servant Quid facient Domini audent cum talia fures So latrones robbers were first those which did à latere stipari Object God commands the Israelites to borrow of the Egyptians Exod. 3. 22. to borrow and not to pay is a sin against this Commandment Psal. 37. 21. Answ. 1. The use onely of things is in us the propriety is
maxim praese ferant detestari privatum spiritum ii huic ipsi indulgeant omnium maxime Enimverò quis docuit prophetiam illam â— Psalmo 72. Adorabunt cum omnes reges terrae omnes gentes servient ei impletam esse in Leone decimo Chamier â—â—â— 1. de Scripturae interpretatione l. 16. c. 1. Vide Cameron ad 2 Pet. 1. 20. Mat. 23. 8 9 10. Matth. 17. 5. Soli Scripturae vel Spiritui in Scriptura loquenti competum requisita summi Iudicis quae tria sunt 1. Ut certo sciamus veram esse sententiam quam pronunciat 2. Ut ab illo ad alium judicem non liceat provecare 3. Ut nullo partium studio ducatur Wendelinus in Prolegom Christ. Thcol. cap 3. n Cathedram in Coelo habet qui corda docet Aug. Luk. 10. 21 22. Jer. 31. 33 34. Convenit inter nos adversarios Scriptur as intelligi debere eo Spiritu quo factae sunt id est Spiritu Sancto Bellarm. lib. 3. de verbo Dei cap. 3 11. * Dr Rainolds against Hart. The number of Ancient Fathers whose Works are yet extant who lived within six and seven hundred years after Christ are recorded to have been about two hundred Bishop Morton of the Masse lib. 7. cap. 6. Nos in hoc Romanenses absque iniquitate summa culpare non possunt qui quà non libertate sed temeritate Patrum authoritatem rejiciant quoties ea ipsis contrariatur non jam dicam cùm id antea à viris Doctissimis nominatiw à Cl. Riveto in Tractatu de auctoritate Patrum viro Doctissimo Jacobo Laurentio in Conscientià Iesuitica cauteriata praestitum abundè sit Vedelii Rationale Theologicum l. 3. c. 6. The Fathers wrote some things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to consute the adversaries with whom they had to deal and in these they erre sometimes somethings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to praise the Saints of God and stir up others to their vertue wherein they overlash Rainolds against Hart. Of the means to finde out the true sense of the Scripture Oratloni lectio lectioni succedat oratio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a There must be a comparing of obscure places with such as are more evident Gen. 11. 35. with Gal. 3. 16. of like with like Exod. 12. and 1 Cor. 11. 24. unlike with unlike Iohn 6. 53. with Deut. 5. 23. b Contra ignota signa magnum est remedium linguarum cognitio Latina quidem linguae homines duabus alliis ad scripturarum cognitionom opus habent Hebraica Graeca August 2 Tim. 2. 15. Tit. 1 9. c Dr. Featley in a Sermon on Psal. 2. 10. Logick teacheth the Preacher to Analize and divide his Text. It teacheth to collect true and proper Doctrines from it assisteth him in confuting of Heresies and in resolving all questions d Lexicon Chaldaicum talmudicum rabbinicum opus immensi laboris atque fructus incomparabili multorum annorum industria patris atque filii Johan Buxtorfii claboratum Bootius e Concordantiae Bibliorum hebraicae editae à Joh. Buxtorfio juniore magni patris majore filio Arnoldus Bootius Henrici Stephani maximae absolutissimae Concordantiae f This Bread is my body 1. the communion of my body The Prophets explain the books of Moses and the New Testament interprets the Old g Analogia fidei nihil aliud est quam constans perpetua sententia Scâ—ipturae in apertis minimè obscuris Scripturae locis quales sunt articuli fidet in symbolo quaeque continentur in oratione Dominica in Decalogo Whitakerus Rainoldus de lib. Apoc. Plura Rabbinis debemus nos praesertim qui accuratum istud interpretandi genus sectamur quam quisquam existimet Drus. observ Sac. l. 15. c. 6. h Censura in exercit â— 4. Morini c. 80. Doctissimus Hebraeorum Grammaticus idem que interpres Kimchius Fuller Miscâ—l l. 5. c. 8. vide l. 2. c. 3. l. 3. c. 12 l. 4 c. 18. David Kimchius è cujus Grammatica Lexico sive radicum librâ— tanquam ex equo Trojaxo prodiit quicquid Grammaticorum Lexicorum Hebraicorum ubique videmus Morinuâ— l. 1. exercit 6. c. 4. Ebraeorum Interpretum Coryphaeus Kimchi Amama Antib Bibl. R. David Kimchi sive Kamius scriptor tersus styli Biblici aemulus scriptor â—orâ—atior et à Thalmndicis fab liâ— alienior Amamae consilium de studio Ebraico feliciter in â—ituendo Ingeniosissimus ille Hebraeorum doctorum David Kimchi Hispanus dictionario suo Hebraico nunquam satis laudato quod inscripsit Sepher hasâ—hurschim Librum radicum Waserus de num Heb l. 1. c. 1. Aben Ezra meritò audit Philol. Sac sapientissimus Ebraeorum Mayerâ—s in R Aben Ezra Hispanus Chacâm sapiens seu doctus cognominatur Waserus dâ— num Heb. l. 1. c. 1. vide Buxâ—oâ—sium Abberâ—iat de Hebr. p. 34 Rabbi Solomon Iarchi Campensis Gallus tantae est apud Hebraeos authoritatis ut cogâ—omentum retulcrit Raschi quasi capitis tribuam Israel ac universa Biblia Hebraica doctissimis quidem sed argutis ad moaum Commentariis illustravit Was. ubi supra One of special credit among the Jews and therefore usually stiled with an Epitheâ—e Aben Ezra the wise man Nettles Answer to the Jewish part of the History of Tythes Sect 5. Aben Ezra utait Sixt Senens sapiens cognomento dictus est ab Hebraeis commentariis versati sunt is est qui iâ— Grammaticus Philosophus â—strologus Theologus magnus â—erte ut sciunt qui in Hebraeis sacris scripturis ex intima lingua cognitione quod attiâ—â—t ad verba omnium Rabbinorum scientissime est versatus Rainold de lib Apoc. praelect 116. A Mose Propheta ad Mosen hunc â— Aegyptium non surrexit sicut Moses qui seilicet doctrina cruditiòne Mosi legislatori esset aequiparandus Dilherus Elect. l. 1. c. 5. Ebraeorum communi judicio doctissimus Rabbi Moses Aegyptius saith Rivet of him Exam. Animad Hugon Grot. Is anno is ab hinc amplius quadringentis scripsit Fullerus In Aegypto educatus studiis consecratus unde vocatur Moses Aegyptus Buxtors de Abbreviat Hebraic Rabbi Ben Maimon commonly called Rambam the most judicius Rabbin that ever was known to the Christian world Dr. Casaubones Treatise of use and custom R. Mose Ben Nachman â—uem Ramban per Nuâ— in fine qui Moses Gerundensis cum alius R. Mose Ben Maimon qui Rambam per Mem in fine vocatur sit qui R. Moses Aegyptius dicitur uterque vir insignis Mercer in Gen. Ralbag that is Rabbi Levi Ben Gerson he wroâ—e Commentaries upon all the Bible on Radak that is Rabbi David Kimchi Rashi that is Rabbi Solomon Iarchi he hath commented upon all the Bible and almost all the Talmud Solent Judaei ad hunc usque diem cum notantur initialibus literis quaedam vocabula ex illis vocem unam conficere ut quia primariae literae Rabbi Solomon Iarchy sunt 〈◊〉
either for necessity or Christian delight Prov. 30. 8. It signifies that portion of temporal things which thou hast assigned as most fit and convenient for us so Beza interprets it Panem cibarium vel panem nobis sustentandis idoneum Bread fit for meals or convenient to sustain us This Exposition is the safest because it is made by the Greek writers and also because it agreeth with the Syriack interpretation Da nobis panem necessitatis nostrae B. Downam See Dr Gouges Guide to go to God Under this title Bread are comprised meat and drink yea food raiment sleep physick and other things needful for our bodies even for preserving or recovering the health and strength of them and such a competent estate also as is meet for the place wherein God hath set us for the charge of children and others which he hath committed to us and for that function and work which he hath appointed for us together with peace and all manner of prosperity Doctor Gouges Guide to go to God Oratio verè quotidianaâ— quam docuit ipse Dominus unde Dominica nuncupatur delet quidem quotidiana peccata cum quotidie dicitur Dimitte nobis debita nostra quando id quod sequitur non solum dicitur sed etiam fit â—icut nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris Sed quia fiunt peccata ideo dicitur non ut ideo fiant quia dicitur Per hanc enim nobis voluit salvator ostendere quantumlibet juste in hujus viâ—â— caligine atque infirmitate vivamus non nobis deesse peccata pro quibus dimittendis debeamus orare cis qui in nos pecâ—â—â—â— ut nobis ignoscatur ignoscere Aug. de civ Dei l. 21. c. 27. Forgivenesse of sinne is a free and full discharge of a sinner from guilt and punishment whereby he is received into favour with God Justification is actus individuus in reference to ones state wrought simul semel it is one continued act from vocation to glorification * Mr Lyford on Tit. 3. 5. Though the fins of justified persons be not actually remitted yet they are virtually and in respect of their state Mr Bedfords Examination of the chief points of Antinomianisme chap. 4. See Mr Burgess of Justification from Lecture 14. to 25. Vide Baldunum de Cas. Consc. lib. 2. cap. 2. Cas. 6. Matth. 6. 12. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 See 14. 15. v. Salvator peccata appellat debita idiotismo linguae Syriacae Forsterus Miscel. Sac. l. 4. c. 1. Duplex est debitum 1. Officii quod quis expraecepto juris tenetur facere â—ic mutua charitatis offitia sunt debita quia lex Dei illa prâ—cipit Rom. 13. 8. 2. Supplicii quod quis ex sanctione juris tenetur pati si officium suum neglexerit â—ic peccata sunt debita ut in oratione Dominica Matth. 6. 12. Et morâ—â—terna est debita Rom. 6. 23. debitum posterius contrahitur ex insoluto priori ita ut si quis debitum officii plenariè dissolveret faciendo id quod lex imperat non teneretur aliquo debito supplicii ad patiendum id quod lex minatur Sanders de Iâ—ramenti promissorii obligatione Praelect 1. Sect. 12. Luke 1. Knewstub Lect. on l. 6. 12. There is a reason given in this Petition more then in any other because when the soul is once awakened with the apprehension of sinne we have more need to have our faith confirmed in this then any other Petition Matth. 18. 35. Not that we or any creature can forgive sins because no man can satisfie for sinne which is directly against God and a breach of his righteous Law therefore we can never satisfie Gods infinite justice The meaning therefore is that we put away malice and all desire of revenge against them that have wronged us M. Dod. Induci in tentationem est superari à tentatione non itaque petimus ut ab omni tentatione simus liberi sed ne ab ea vincamur Egardi Medulla S. S. Theol. Tentatio sumitur pro periculum experimentum capere vel fidei vel patientiae c. ut in Abrahamo Deinde Deus hominem tentat cum hominem in suas cupiditates tradit aut occasionem peccandi offert non adigit quempiam ut hoc faciat sed cum summa oblectatione quisque peccatum patrat Non facit illud tanquam approbator mali quod fit sed tanquam justus judex qui gravissime peccantes gravissimis suppliciis iniquitatem coercet Cartw. in Harmon Evangel Though Satan doth tempt us yet he cannot prevail over us but by our selves John 14. 31. so he found nothing in Adam but he yeelded to him Iob stood under greater temptations then Adam fell It s no sin to be tempted of the world and Satan 1. Every sinne is actus proprius the soul that sinneth it shall die 2. Actus deordinatus a declining from that integrity God bestowed on us We have no power over the world and Satan B. Downam See Elioâ— Dr Gouges Guide to go to God The Article doth not necessarily imply that the devil onely should be here meant yet he may be included among other evils The word is of all genders and may comprise all evils under it It is best where there is no circumstance of restraint as here is none to expound the Scripture in the largest extent especially in such a summary as this where so much matter is comprised under these words D. Gouge See Joh. 17. 13 â— Cor. 1. 10. B. Down * Vide Scult Exercit. Evang. l. 2. c. 33. These words are not found in the Evangelist Luke but in Mat. 6. 3. they are expressed and it is sufficient that one Evangelist hath recorded them Elton Cartw. on the Rhem. Test. Some say from Dan. 7. 14. Haec verba adjecta sunt ut siduciam nostram firment stabiliant Quemadmodum ergo pleni fiducia in Dei bonitatem potentiam â—xorâ—i dicentes Pater noster qui es in Coelis ita tandem finimus dicentes Quia tuum est Regnum Potentia Gloria in aeternum Discrimen inter Regnum Potentiam Gloriam hominum Dei Homines habent Regnum Potentiam Gloriam sed 1. Non habent à seipsis sed à Deo 2. Non habent sibi sed Deo cujus sunt loco 3. Habent ad breve tempus Egardi Medulla S. S. Theol. This prepositive Article importeth two things 1. A generality God is King over all the earth 2. Superiority He is King of Kings and Lord of Lords Bishop Andrews The end of our Petitions why we should have them granted is that Gods Kingdome Power and Glory may be advanced By this also our faith is strengthened in the hope to obtain our requests 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in secula 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quasi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist. lib. 1. de Coelo Saculum Latinis spatium est centum annorum Itaque multitudine saeculorum