concerning the Sacrament Other thinges will I set in order when I come 16 Granting what is not necessarie hee spake of ordering matters concerning this Sacrament to receiue the wine aswell as the bread was no part of their present disorder whose misbehauiour at the Lords Table did minister mere iust occasions to Saint Paul then long beardes did to the Councell of Constance to denie the vse of the cup might Christs bloud and bodie which he had iointly rendered to all be vpon any occasion iustly seuered by man in the administration of his last Will and Testament Whatsoeuer the number or qualitie of the guests bee the great Lords Table must be alwaies so furnished as it was at the first institution for he hath no respect of persons If a rich stately Prelate come in with a gold ring in goodly vestiments a poore honest Layicke in vileraiments he saith not to him in Pontificiall roabes come sit you here at my messe where you may drinke of my wine aswell as eate of my bread nor to the poore Layicke stand thou there a part or sit downe here vnder my footstoole where thou maist bee partaker of the crummes which fall from my table though not of my cup which must be kept for thy betters High and low rich and poore all were redeemed with one price all at this offering equal all alike free to tast of euery dish so they come with wedding garments without which euen the best must be cast out as vnworthie to tast of any part if not of all That part which the Counsels of Constance and Trent vpon pretences of reuerence to the LORDS Supper haue detained from Moderne Christians the Corinthians had receiued vnworthily yet was not the Cuppe for this reason held superfluous by Saint Paul who onely sought to represse the abuse as knowing the vse of it to bee most necessarie The matters then hee meant to order when he came was to set out this Heauenly banquet with greater decencie and solemnitie not to abridge them of any substantiall or materiall part thereof 17 Nor doe the Trent Fathers if wee may trust them vpon their words For they desirous as it seemes to make the whole Christian World as sottish as themselues were impious would make men beleeue they could iuggle away the Cuppe and neuer touch the very substance of the Sacrament as if the wine were not as substantiall a part of the Lords Supper as was his bloud of his bodie or humanitie An integrall or materiall part they cannot denie it to bee and such if it bee there Apologie is as shamelesse as if a man should let out most of anothers bloud cut of his arme or legge or maime him in some principall part and plead for himselfe I did not meddle with his substance meaning as the Councell I take it heere doth his essence seeing he is yet as truly a reasonable Creature as before 18 But to debarre them of that refuge it may be they sought or their followers may yet hope to finde in the equiuocation of this word substance importing as much sometimes as a material or integral sometimes as an essential part If the cup be an essential and substantiall part of this Sacrament the Councell by their owne confession did souly erre in prohibiting Communion vnder both kindes If no such part it bee they might by their owne rule haue altogether denied the vse of it so much as to the sacrificer or consicient but so the verie vse and end on which the essence of the Sacrament as of all other matters of moral practise immediatly depends and by whose expiration instantly must determine should vtterly haue perished The end and vse of this sacred institution as our Sauiour expressely teacheth and the Councell grants was to represent the testators death yea so to represent it as we migh be partakers of his bodie and bloud not spiritually onely but withall as the Trent Fathers contend sacramentally Admitting then all they can pretend against the necessitie of the Cuppe That whole Christ were in the bread alone yet this will not preserue the true and fruitfull vse of the Sacrament nor salue that deadly wound the essence of it must perforce receiue from frustration of the end necessarily ensuing the cuppes absence For this Sacrament was ordained as to represent so to exhibit Christs bodie vnto all faithfull Communicants not as intire and whole his bloud not as it was inclosed in the vaines but the one as torne and rent the other as shedde and powred out vpon the crosse This is my bloud of the new Testament saith our Sauiour which is shed for many for all that receiue it faithfully for the remission of sinnes His bloud then as shed and powred out is as the loadstarre of penitent and contrite hearts whereon the eyes of their faith that seeke remission of sinnes in this Sacrament must bee fastened for as the Apostle saith without sheding of bloud is no remission This was the complement of that inestimable all-sufficient Sacrifice that which represents his precious bloud thus powred out the principall part of this Sacrament aswell in respect of representing his death as in applying remission of sinnes thereby in generall purchased and by this Sacramentall Type sealed to euery one in particular especially if the Trent Councels Doctrine be true that Christs verie bloud which was shed vpon the crosse is really present in the Chalice and might be as immediately sprinkled at least vpon the lips or dores of euerie faithfull receiuers heart as the bloud of the Paschal Lambe was vpon the doore-posts of the Israelites Thus as Sathan the Father of lies so false opinion suggested by him draw men with pleasure into those euils for whose practise in the end they become their chiefe accusers That opinion which first brought in neglect of the Chalice and as the Trent Councell presumed would haue warranted them in making this decree doth most condemne them for the measure of their iniquitie could not haue beene so fully accomplished vnlesse they had held a transubstantiation of the wine into Christs bloud 19 What part of Scripture can wee presume they will spare that dare thus countermand the most principal of all Gods Commandements what reckoning may wee thinke they make of our Sauiour Christ that aduenture thus shamefully to disanull and cancell his last will and testament defrauding almost the whole Christian World of halfe their Lord and Maisters royall allowance partly without any shew of Scriptures either to restraine or otherwise interpret these Soueraigne precepts partly vpon such idle and friuolous allegations as may further witnesse their sleight estimate of Gods Word saue onely so farre as it may bee wrested to serue their turnes 20 But grant the places there alleaged by the Councell did so mitigate either the forme of the institution or the peremptorie manner of our Sauiours speeches in the sixth of Iohn as to make it disputable in vnpartiall iudgements whether
in what subiect soeuer will bee acknowledged in them by these men that dare thus deny a necessity of communicating Christ in both kindes imposed vpon all in these wordes Verely verely I say vnto you except yee eat the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke hisâ— bloud you haue no life in you onely because it is said in the words going before If any man eat of this bread he shall liue for euer Of how much better insight in Scriptures then these graund seers of Rome would blind Homer had he liued in their time haue proued For he neuer denied his fained Gods their Nectar because Ambrosia was an immortall meate And would hee or any man not more blinde in heart and minde then he was of bodily sence collect against Christs expresse wordes that his bloud the true heauenly Nectar was not necessary because his flesh doth strengthen to eternall life especially if hee considered their captious interpollation against whom in that place hee disputes which caused him not to expresse his minde so fully there as elsewhere hee had done albeit afterwards he ingeminates the necessitie of drinking his bloud aswell as eating his flesh in such precise and formall tearmes as if he had euen then bethought himselfe that such Antichristian Spirits as these Trent Fathes might happily dare to elude his most sacred precept by such Satanicall glosses as in that decree they haue done 12 He had told the Iewes asmuch as was pertinent to their obiection that hee was the liuing bread which came downe from Heauen much better then Manna which their Fathers had eaten Bread he called himselfe in opposition vnto Manna not restrayning this to his bodie or flesh onely albeit what he meant by bread he expounds partly by his flesh And the bread which I will giue is my flesh which I will giue for the life of the World Besides that bread in the Hebrew Dialect containes all sorts of food the manner of giuing this An brosia was such as did affoord Heauenly visible Nectar too For whilest hee gaue his flesh vpon the crosse hee powred out his bloud withall But the Iewes catch at this speech ere he had expounded his full meaning How can this man giue vs flesh to eate Then Iesus said vnto them verely verely I say vnto you except ye eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his bloud ye haue no life in you Which wordes considered with the former circumstances to any mans capacitie not infatuation import thus much Doe yee murmur that I should profer you my flesh verily I say vnto you and yee may beleeue me Vnlesse ye drinke my bloud as well as eate my flesh yee haue no life in you For so hee addes my flesh is meate indeede and my bloud is drinke indeed that is both are as necessarie to eternall as meat and drinke to corporall life 13 For these and many like reasons necessarily arising from the text some aswell of their greatest Schollers as best interpretors denie the former places to be meant of Sacramentall eating otherwise vnable to conceiue any possibilitie either of auoiding the inconueniences vrged by vs or of defending their infallible Church from errour in this decree Yet saith the Councell howsoeuer they be vnderstood according to the diuerse interpretations of Fathers they inferre no such necessitie No not if most Fathers as Maldonate contends did hold them to be directly meant of Sacramentall eating Why then did Iansenius and Hesselius renounce the Fathers in this surely to defend their mother whose credit they haue much better saued vpon supposition that these wordes are meant onely of spirituall manducation then Maldonate otherwise acute but most peruersely sottish in his Apologie for this decree hath done And yet to speake the truth the same inconuenience will follow as necessarily though not so perspicuously at first sight albeit we grant them to be meant of spirituall eating primarily For * in that they are meant primarily of spirituall they cannot but be meant of Sacramental eating also seeing these two as elsewhere I haue obserued are not opposite but subordinate Whence if we grant that Christs bloud aswell as his flesh must bee communicated to vs by faith or spirituall manducation the consequence will bee Therefore the cuppe as well as the bread must bee administred in the Sacrament because Christ saith in the institution that the cup is his bloud and the bread his bodie or flesh that is the one is the sure pledge oâ— instrument whereby his flesh the other whereby his bloud which wee must spiritually eate as well in the Sacrament as out of it must bee communicated vnto vs. For as the auncient Fathers haue obserued our Sauiour Christ did in his institution exhibit that vnto vs sensibly which before hee had promised as inuisible so that the precept of eating Christs bodie and drinking his bloud sacramentally doth binde all capable of this Sacrament as strictly as that other of eating his bodie and drinking his bloud Spiritually seeing this latter is the seale and assurance of the other And as our aduersaries acknowledge an absolute necessitie of preâ—pt for eating Christ Sacramentally and Spiritually though that precept concerne not infants so in all reason they should grant an equall necessitie of precept for eating his flesh and bloud distinctly in the Sacrament though this bee not necessarie to all men at all times if without negligence or contempt they cannot be partakers of both For impossibilitie vpon what occasion soeuer not caused through their one default exempts them from that generall precept of eating Christ vnder both kindes as want of yeares or discretion doth children from any iniunction diuine or humane of communicating so much as in one kind For notwithstanding the former precept except ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud yee haue no life in you as peremptorie as any can be for communicating aswell sacramentally as spiritually in both kindes it were vncharitble to mistrust Gods mercie towardes such poore soules as long for the cup of saluation which no man giueth them yea which the Romish Church hath by decree as peremptorie as she could make denied to all the Laitie without exception to al the Cleargie except such as may by a peculiar right challenge his bloud as their owne by way of exchange because they haue made him a bodie which hee had not before 14 Yet is it a small thing with this great whore to depriue the Christian World of the Lords vnlesse shee vrge it instead thereof to pledge her in the cup of Deuils full of the wine of fornication coloured with her adulterate Scriptures authorized no doubt for such purposes Where our Apostle Saint Paul saith that he and his fellow Ministers were stewards of the mysteries of God the vulgar Romane edition renders the Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the Latine dispensatores and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rightly rendred in this place
and nasus simus is al one so in their language is the Church and the Church of Rome This Church tels him he may not take vpon him to trie of what spirit the Pope is not examine his determinations decisions or interpretations of any Scripture by other known places of Scripture or the analogie of faith acknowledged by all Vnto this decree or sentence of the Church although hee haue it but at the second hand or after it haue passed through as many Priests and Iesuites mouthes as are Post Townes from London to Edenburgh hee yeeldes absolute obedience without acknowledgement of farther appeale either vnto Scriptures or other authoritie whatsoeuer further manifestation of Gods will hee expects none Let all the reformed Churches in the World or all the Christian World besides exhort threaten or adiure him as he tenders the good of his owne soule as hee will answere his Redeemer in that dreadfull day of finall iudgement to examine the Church or Popes decrees by Gods written Lawes his answere is he may not he cannot doe it without open disobedience to the Church which to disobey is damnation of soule and bodie But O fooles and slow of heart to beleeue and obey from the heart that doctrine whereunto yee were deliuered Know ye not that to whomsoeuer yee giue your selues as seruants to obey his seruants ye are to whom yee obey whether it bee the man of sinne vnto death or obedience vnto righteousnesse Ofall Mankinde are onely Roman Catholiques not bought with a price that they may thus alienate their soules from Christ and become seruants of men that they may consecrate themselues by solemne vow to the perpetuall slauerie of most wicked and sinfull men euen monsters of Mankind CHAP. IIII. That in obeying the Romish Churches decrees wee doe not obey Gods Word as well as them but them alone in contempt of Gods principall Lawes 1 BVt the simple I know are borne in hand by the more subtile ort of this generation That thus obeying sinfull men they obey Christ who hath enioyned them this obedience vnto such That thus beleeuing that sence of Scripture which the Church their mother tenders vnto them they doe not beleeue her better then Scriptures because these two beleefes are not opposite but subordinate that they preferre not her decrees before Christs written Lawes but her interpretation of them before all priuate expositions This is the onely Citie of refuge left them wherein prosecuted by the former arguments they can hope for anie succour but most of whose gates alreadie haue beene all shortly shall bee shut vpon them 2 That they neither beleeue nor obey Gods Word whilest they absolutely beleeue and obey the Church without appeale is euident in that this Church vsually bindes men not vnto positiue points of Religion gathered so much as from any pretended sence of Scripture expounded by it but to beleeue bare negatiues as that this or that place of Scripture either brought by their aduersaries or conceiued by such amongst themselues as desire the knowledge of truth and right information of conscience haue no such meaning as the Spirit of God not flesh and bloud as farre as they can iudge of their owne thoughts hath reuealed vnto them 3 But the Spirit may deceiue priuate men or at least they may deceiue themselues in their triall of Spirits They may indeed and so may men in publique place more grieuously erre in peremptorie iudging priuate men because obnoxious to errour in the generall erroneous in this particular wherein they ground their opinions vpon Gods Word plentifull to euince it at least very probable reasons they bring manie and strong whereunto no reasonable answere is brought by their aduersaries whose vsuall course is to presse them onely with the Churches authoritie which appeares to be of farre greater waight then Gods word vnto all such as yeeld obedience to her negatiue decrees without any euidence or probabilitie either of Scripture or naturall reason to set against that sence and meaning of Gods Lawes wherevnto strength of arguments vnrefuted and probable pledges of Gods Spirit vndisproued haue long tied their soules Doe wee obey God or beleeue his word whilest we yeeld obedience to the Church in such Commandements as to our consciences vpon vnpartiall examination seeme condemned ere made by the very fundamentall Lawes of Religion and all this oftimes without any shew or pretence of Scripture to warrant vs that we doe not disobey God in obeying them 4 But doth the Romish exact absolute obedience in such pointes as if it were possible they could bee false may endanger the very foundation of true Religion without euident demonstration that their daily practise neither doth nor can endanger it Yes For what can more concerne the maine foundation which Christians Iewes and Mahumetans most firmely hold then those precepts in number many all plainely and peremptorily forbiding vs to worship any Gods but One or any thing in the Heauen or Earth but him onely The Romanists themselues grant that cultu latriae God alone is to bee adored that so to adore any other is Idolatrie and Idolatrie by their confession a most grieuous sinne O how much better were it for them to hold it none or Gods Word forbidding it of no authoritie then so lightly to aduenture the hourely practise of it in contempt of such fearefull threatnings as they themselues out of Gods Lawes pronounce against it vpon such broken disioincted surmises as are the best they can pretend for their warrant 5 To beleeue Christs flesh and bloud should bee there present where it cannot be seene or felt yea where we see and feele another bodie as perfectly as wee can doe ought is to reason without warrant of Scripture but a sencelesse blinde beleefe But grant his bodie and bloud were in the Sacrament rightly administred yet that out of the Sacrament either should bee in the consecrated host whilest carried from Towne to Towne for solemne shew more then for Sacramentall vse is to reason ruled by Scripture to say no worse more improbable Now to worship that as God which to our vnerring sences is a Creature vpon such blind supposals that Christs bodie by one miracle may be there by another vnseene is worse then Idolatrie committed vpon delusion of sence So to adore a wayfer onely a wayfer in all appearance without strict examination nay without infallible euidence of Scriptures vrged for the reall presence is more abhominable then to worship euerie appearance of an Angell of light without triall what spirit it were Sathan or some other that so appeared And if we consider the olde Serpents vsuall slight to insinuate himselfe into euery place wherein inveterate custome or corrupt affection may suggest some likelihood of a diuine presence vnto dreaming fancies as he did delude the old World in Oracles and Idols the probabilitie is farre greater his inuisible substance by nature not incompatible with any corporeall quantitie should be annexed to the
elsewhere vpon carelesnesse rather then any intention of harme as I am perswaded by the Latine sacramentum Whether vpon set purpose of some more learned in that Councell presuming to gull the simple and illitterate by their cunning as Chemnitius probably thinkes or whether the mysterie of iniquitie as is more probable wrought vnawares in the braines of the ignorant which were the maior part and as some haue related did ouersway the learned vncapable of such impudency as should giue countenance to this ignominious decree partly from the equiuocation of the Latine dispensatores partly from the synominall signification which the vulgar hath made of mysterium and sacramentum the beetle-heads haue hammered out an interpretation of Saint Pauls words before cited so scurrilously contrarie to his meaning that the blacke Dogge which is said to haue appeared vnto Cardinall Crescentius might hee haue spoken in the Councell could scarce haue vttered it without blushing For the Apostle meant such dispensatores or Stewards as our Sauiour speakes of in the foure and twentieth of Saint Matthew such as should giue their fellow seruants their inst portions without purloyning such as daily expected their Masters returne to cal them vnto a strict account of their stewardship For so it is expressely added Moreouer or as much as belongs vnto our office it is required of Stewards that they be all sound faithfull Not to dispute of the Churches authoritie in disposing of Sacraments nor to exagitate the impietie of this decree be the one for the present supposed as great the other as little as they list to make it onely this I would demaund of any that is so himselfe whether he can imagine any men sober or in their right mindes would not assoone haue vrged that text The foole hath said in his heart there is no God for establishing Atheisme or Saint Peters checke vnto Simon Magus to prooue Simonie lawfull as deriue the Churches authoritie for detayning the least part of the word of life much lesse the cup of saluation from these wordes Let a man so thinke of vs as of the Ministers of Christ and disposers of the secrets of God What secrets of the Gospell before hid but now to be published to all the World of which the same Apostle elsewhere had said Anccessitie is laid vpon me and wee vnto mee if I preach it not Of the vse or necessitie of the Lords cup not a word in this place not a syllable for the Lord had sent him not to administer this Sacrament but to preach the Gospell of which the Doctrine of the Lords Supper was a part indeed but where expressely and directly he deliuers that doth hee intimate by any circumstance that either it had beene was or might bee otherwise administred then according to the patterne prescribed by our Sauiour at the first institution Rather his often repetition of these coniunctiues This bread and this cuppe eating and drinking the bodie and bloud c. Argue he neuer thought the one should be receiued without the other that this prohibition of the cup was a particular branch of the Mysterie of iniquitie not to breake out till latter ages hid from his eyes that had seene the Mysterie it selfe begin to worke As often as yee shall eat this bread saith the Apostle and drinke this cup yee shew the Lords death till hee come Wherefore whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke the cuppe of the Lord vnworthily shall bee guiltie of the bodie and bloud of the Lord. Let a man therefore examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. For he that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth and drinketh his owne damnation because hee discerneth not the Lords bodie Yet vnto the Trent Councell Saint Paul in the former place where hee had no such occasion as not speaking one word either of the Doctrine necessitie or vse of the Sacraments seemes to intimate and that not obscurely the Churches authoritie in dispensing them as the Trent Fathers haue done What then might euery Minister of Christ euerie distributer of Gods secrets haue vsed the like authoritie before the Church representatiue did at least by tacite consent approue the practise This place doubtlesse proues either altogether nothing or thus much for the Apostles wordes are indefinite for their litterall sence equally appliable to euerie faithfull Minister or priuate dispenser of such secrets not appropriate to the intire publique bodie Ecclesiastique or the capitall or Cardinall partes thereof Of the Corinthians to whom he wrote one said I am Pauls another I am Apollos the third I am of Cephas all boasting in the personal excellencies of their first Parents in Christ as the Papists now doe in Saint Peters and his successours Catholique Primacie To asswage these carnall humours in his children their Father that great Doctour of the Gentiles seekes more in this then in any other place of all his Epistles to debase himselfe and diminish others high esteeme either of his owne worth or of his calling Who is Paul then and who is Apollos but the Ministers by whom ye beleeued and as the Lord gaue to euerie man I haue planted Apollos watered but God gaue the increase So then neither is he that planteth any thing neither hee that watereth but God that giueth the encrease And he that planteth and hee that watereth are one and euery man shall receiue his wages according to his labour For wee together are Gods labourers ye are Gods husbandrie and Gods building And after a serious incitement of master builders to fidelitie with the like admonition to Gods husbandrie or building not to reioyce in men he concludes as he had begun Let euery man esteeme vs such as I haue said Ministers of Christ and disposers of the mysteries of God Of whom were they so to esteeme Of Saint Paul himselfe and euery faithfull Minister Doth he then intimate here any such prerogatiue aboue the meanest of his brethren as the Romish Cleargie vsurpes ouer the whole Christian World any authoritie to prohibit either the dispensors of Gods mysteries from administring or men so carnally minded as were these to whom he wrote from communicating Christs bloud aswell as his bodie So the Trent Fathers thinke and as if for their wilfull deniall of the Lords cup vnto the people the Lord had giuen them the cup of giddinesse to cast them into a Babilonish slumber whilest they consulted about this decree and their Scribes through retchlessenesse had written what their rauing Masters in their sickly or drunken dreames had vttered wee finde in the same Decree another place of Saint Paul immediately annexed though as disproportionable to the former as it is placed in their discourse as a mans head to an horses necke both as vnsutable to their intended conclusion as a super addition of finnes or feathers would be to such a monstrous Hippocentaurique combination The place is Saint Pauls conclusion of that discourse
they did plainely inioyne any necessitie of communicating vnder both kindes the former decree notwithstanding would manifestly inferre an vsurpation of Soueraigntie â—uer Gods word quite contrarie to the generall Analogie of faith reason and conscience by all which in cases doubtfull and for the speculatiue forme of truth disputable with eqall probabilitie affirmatiuely or negatiuely wee are taught to frame our choice when wee come to practise according to the difference of the matter or of consequences which may ensue more dreadfull one way then the other alwayes to preferre either a greater good before a lesse or a lesse euill before a greater though both equally probable Suppose then these two contradictorie propositions The deniall of the cup is a mutilation of Christs last will and testament the deniall of the cuppe is no mutilation of Christs last will and Testament were for their speculatiue probabilities in iust examination equipendent yet the doctrine of faith deliuered in Scripture reason and conscience without contradiction instruct vs that to alter abrogate or mutilate the sonne of Gods last will and testament is a most grieuous most horrible most dreadfull sinne but to permit the vse of the Chalice hath no suspition of any the least euill in it Had the Trent Fathers thus done they had done no worse then our Sauiour then his Apostles then the Primitiue Church by their owne confession did This excesse of euill without all hope of any the least compensatiue good to follow vpon the deniall should haue swaied them to that practise which was infinitely more safe as not accompanied with any possibilitie or shew of danger although the speculatiue probabilitie of anie diuine precept necessarily inioyning the vse of the cup had beene none Thus peremptorily to aduenture vpon consequences so fearefull whereto no contrarie feare could in reason impell nor hopes any way comparable allure them thus imperiously to depriue the whole Christian World of a good in their valuation testified by their humble supplications and frequent embassages to that Councell so inestimable without any other good possible to redound vnto the deniers saue onely vsurpation of Lordly Dominion ouer Christs heritage plainly euinceth that the Church is of farre greater authoritie with them then GOD Word either written in the Sacred Canon or their hearts then all his Lawes either ingrafted by nature or positiue and Supernaturall For 21 Admit this Church representatiue had beene fully perswaded in conscience rightly examined and immediatly ruled by Scripture that the former decree did not preiudice the institution vse or end of this Sacrament yet most Christians earnest desire of the Cuppe so publikely testified could not suffer them to sleep in ignorance of that great scandall the deniall of it needes must giue to most inferiour particular Churches Wherefore the rule of charitie that mooued the Father of the Gentiles to that serious protestation If meate offend my brother I will eate no flesh while the World standeth that I may not offend my brother should in all equitie diuine or humane haue wrought these Prelats hearts to like profession If want of their spirituall drinke offend so many Congregations and such a multitude of our brethren we will rather not vse our lawfull authoritie acknowledged by all then vsâ—rp any that may be offensiue or suspicious vnto others though apparantly iust vnto our selues for they could not be more fully perswaded this decree was iust then Saint Paul was that all meates were lawfull to him 22 But may we thinke these Prelates had no scruple of conscience whether the very forme of this decree were not against our Sauiours expresse command bibite ex hoc omnes drinke yee all of this For mine owne part whiles I call to minde what else where I haue obserued that the Iewes were neuer so peremptorie in their despitefull censures of our Sauiours doctrine nor so outragiously bent against his person as when their hearts were touched in part with his myracles or in some degree illuminated with the truth he taught The Councels extraordinary forwardnesse to terrifie all controuenaries of this decree makes mee suspect they were toe conscious of their own shallow pretended proofes to elude Gods word whose light and perspicuitie in this point had exasperated their hardned hearts and weake-sighted faith to be so outragious in the very beginning of that session as if they had meant to stiâ—fle their consciences and choake the truth lest these happily might crosse their proceedings or controule their purposes if this cause should once haue come to sober and deliberate debatement For as theeues oftentimes seeke to auoid apprehension by crying loudest turne the theefe so these wolues hoped well to smother their guilt and preuent all notice taking of their impietie by their grieuous exclamations against others monstrous impious opinions in this point interdicting all vpon penaltie of the causes following ere they had determined ought to teach preach or belieue otherwise then they meant to determine 23 Yet though the Councell accurse all that holde communication vnder both kindes as a necessarie Doctrine it doth not absolutely inhibit all vse of the Chalice but leaues it free vnto their Lord the Pope to grant it vpon what Conditions he please either vnto priuate men or whole Nations vpon what conditions then may wee presume will it please his Holinesse for to grant it vpon any better then Satan tendered all the Kingdomes of the Earth vnto our Sauiour for this fained seruant of Christ a true Gehazi repining at his Lord and Masters simplicitie that could refuse so faire a profer made after Sathan in all hast saying in his heart I will surely take somewhat of him though my Master spared him and pretending a message in his name to whom all power was giuen in Heauen and in earth hath got an interest in the chiefe Kingdomes of the World disposing such as hee can best spare or worst manage to any potent Prince that will fall downe and worship him and his copartner the Prince of darkenesse who of late yeares haue almost shared the whole World betwixt them the one ruling ouer infidels the other ouer professed Christians And seeing the Pope because his pompe and dignitie must bee maintained by Worldly wealth and reuenewes dares not part with the proprietie of so many Kingdomes at once as Sathan who onely lookes for honour profered hee hath found out a tricke to supply his wants for purchasing like honour and worship by his office of keeping Saint Peters keyes if earthly Prouinces or Dominions faile him Gods Word his sonnes bloud and bodie all shall be set to sale at this price Fall downe and worship him For no man we may rest assured no Nation or Kingdome whom hee can hinder shall euer tast of the Lords Cup vnlesse they will first acknowledge lawfull authoritie in him to grant denie or dispose of it at his pleasure which is an homage wherewith the Deuill is more delighted then if wee