necessarily required that he might be meet to become our righteousnesse in his sufferings But this is frivolous because as I noted before he being perfect God as well as perfect man had beene in his sufferings an All-sufficient satisfaction for our sinnes though hee had never submitted himselfe to the obedience of the Law But the divine Nature of the Sonne of God and the dignity of his person as it made his sufferings all-sufficiently satisfactory for our sinnes to redeeme us from hell because they were the sufferings of God the blood of God c. so it made his obedience all-sufficiently meritorious to constitute and make us righteous and to make us Heires of Eternall life because it was the obedience or righteousnesse of God For the Sonne of God was made under the Law that he might not onely redeeme us who were under the Law by his sufferings but also that by his meritorious obedience we might receive the Adoption of sonnes But he proveth Christ to bee our righteousnesse onely in his passive obedience because it onely was both prefigured in the types and figures of the Law and also represented in the sacraments As touching the types and figures of the Law which prefigured Christ they were either figures of his person and office or they represented his benefits as namely and especially justification or â—…anctification And those which figured his benefit of justification either represented the remission of sinne by his sufferings or acceptation with God by his obedience or both The ceremony of changing their clothes when they were to come before God did import that those who desired to please God must be clothed with Christs righteousnesse which is also signified by the wedding garment and the holy attire wherein the Priests were to appeare before God The high Priests wearing of the golden plate with this inscription Holinesse of the Lord who is Iehovah our righteousnesse was to this end that the iniquity of the holy things which the children of Israel should hallow in all their holy gifts being taken away they might bee accepted before the Lord. The high Priests offering of incense upon the golden Altar resembled the pleasing obedience of Christ in his life and death and his intercession for us The Arke of the Covenant was a Type of Christ the Mediator the cover upon it of his propitiation the tables of Covenant within it of his fulfilling the Law for us The sanctification of the first fruits which were a type of Christ who is the first fruits of all that shall bee saved 1 Cor. 15. 23. was imputed to the whole increase or store Rom. 11. 16. So â—…aith Athanasius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That the fulfilling of the Law performed by the first fruits so he calleth the flesh of Christ is imputed to the whole lumpe c. § XXIII But come we to the Sacraments which hee truely saith are the soules of that righteousnesse which is by Faith And yet saith he Baptisme signifieth onely the washing of the soule by the bloud of Christ the Eucharist representeth onely his body broken and his blood shed for our sinnes Answ. Though some parts onely of the benefits of Christ are represented in the severall Sacraments yet the substance of each Sacrament is the participation of Christ wholly with all his merits and benefits Thus in Baptisme we are incorporated into Christ and in it we put on Christ who is our righteousnesse And it is the Sacrament not only of remission of sinne and of justification but also of regeneration and sanctification we being therein conformed to his death and resurrection Rom. 6. 3 4 5. In the Lords Supper we have communion with Christ being not only united to him as bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh but also have communion with him both in his merits by imputation and in his graces by influence from him as our head Other arguments are used by the same authour but because in them he taketh two things for granted which hee cannot prove the one that justification consisteth onely in remission of sin the other that wee ascribe remission of sinne to Christs active obedience I will not trouble the Reader with them Onely let him call to minde the errours which the Authors of this opinion doe runne into for the defence thereof First that remission of sinnes is the matter of justification which is imputed to us Secondly that the Law is fully satisfied by bearing the penalty alone Thirdly that by one act of obedience we are made just as wee were by one act of disobedience made sinners Fourthly that neither by his disobedience Adâ—…m did transgresse the Law nor Christ by his obedience unto death obey it Fifthly that Christ obeyed the law not for us but for himselfe Sixthly that justification consisteth wholly and onely in remission of sinnes Which being for the most part consequents of this opinion doe prove the antecedent to be false CAP. V. That the formall cause of Iustification is the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse § I. YOu have heard the private opinions of some of our Divines concerning the matter of justification now let us examine the unsound opinions of some others concerning the forme For as the former made remission of sins the matter which is imputed to justification so these make it the forme And as the former teach that justification consisteth wholly in remission of sinne so doe these And yet the former hold it to bee but the matter and these but the forme Indeed if it were both the matter and the forme they might well say that justification doth wholly consist therein But being according to their owne conceipt but the one or the other and according to the truth neither of both but an effect of the true forme for by imputation of righteousnesse we have remission of sinne their opinion must needs be unsound But the thing wherein chiefely they erre is that with Socinuâ—… the heretike they deny the imputation of Christs Righteousnesse and consequently do hold that neither the active nor passive obedience of Christ is that which is imputed to us for righteousnesse What then forsooth the act of faith Of these mens errour I shall not need to say much in this place because besides that which hath already beene delivered in the third Chapter I have plentifully and fully proved in my whole fourth booke that the righteousnesse of Christ is the matter which is imputed to justification and in my whole fifth booke that the imputation of Christs righteousnesse is the forme of justification Only I will note their depravation of our Doctrine and point at their errours § II. As touching the former when we say that the imputation of Christs righteousnesse is the formall cause of justification because by imputation of Christs righteousnesse God doth justifie us they will needs with the Papists make us hold that we are formally righteous by
it will follow that Christ by his obedience and sufferings in the humane nature had merited to bee God but this hee had not by purchase but by nature and therefore himselfe prayed a little before his death Ioh. 17. 5. And now Father glorifie mee with the glory not which I have merited by my death but with that glory which I had with thee before the world waâ—… And it is evident that the glory whereunto Christ in this place is said to be exalted is proper to God himselfe Esay 45. 22. And this may suffice for this point for I will not trouble the Reader with those two other allegations of our Rhemists the one out of Apoc. 5. 12. that the Lambe which was slaine was worthy to receive power and as they read Divinity from whence they should prove if they prove any thing that Christ by his sufferings in his humanity merited his Divinity The other Heb. 2. 9. that Christ because of the passion of death was crowned with glory and honour where the words are thus to be construed according to the distinction and interpretation of the Fathers wee see Iesus crowned with glory and honour who for a shorâ—… time was made lesse than the Angels viz. by hiâ—… incarnaâ—…ion for the suffering of death that is that hee might suffer death or as the Apostle speaketh that by the grace of God hee might viz. in the humane nature assumed tast of death for all § XIII Object 3. If Christ obeyed the Law for us that by his obedience we might be justified then shall not wee need to obey the Law but the consequent is absurd therefore the antecedent I answere that we need not to obey the Law to that end that we may thereby be justified for from that yoke of most miserable bondage excluding us from 〈◊〉 if we doe noâ—… perfectly fulfill the Law in our owne persons our Saviour Christ hath freed us the condition which the Law requireth to justification being utterly impossible to us by reason of the flesh But howsoever we cannot perfectly fulfill the Law that we must thinke our selves bound sincerely to keepe it that is we must have an 〈◊〉 desire an unsained purpose a serious care an upright endevour to walke in the obedience of Gods commandements in this study and practice of piety consisteth our new obedience which we must be carefull to performe not to be justified thereby but to glorifie God to obey his will to restifie our thankfulnesse towards him to edifie our brethren to gather sound testimonies to our selves and assurance of our justification and so to make our calling and our election sure § XIV Object 4. If wee be justified by the obedience of Christs life what needed he to dye for us Answ. the chiefest part of his obedience was to be performed at his death His totall obedience was his fulfilling of the whole Law for us The Law since the fall is fulfilled neither by an obedience conformable to the commandements alone because wee are all sinners nor by suffering the punishment alone but by both And therefore Christ performed both for us that by both we might be justified But this objection I will requite with § XV. Our fourth reason If wee bee justified altogether by the death and passion of Christ onely to what end and purpose serveth his habituall righteousnesse and actuall obedience by which hee was obedient to the Law in the whole course of his life doing alwayes those things which are pleasing to God performing all righteousnesse fulfilling the Law and whatsoever the Law requireth to justification These things as I shewed before he did not for himselfe therefore for us and in our stead To this some of our aforesaid Divines doe answer that Christ indeed fulfilled the Law for our sakes but they put a difference betweene pro and propter saying that Christ obeyed the Law pro se not pro nobis sed propter nos that is for our sakes but not for us or in our stead which some expresse thus that he might be sanctus Ponâ—…ifex and sacra Victima an holy Priest and an holy Sacrifice Others thus that these things are required in Christ that in his blood hee may bee righteousnesse unto us Answ. 1. That there is no such distinction in the Scriptures but the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this very point of Christs doing or suffering for us are used indifferently 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Cor. 8. 11. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ioh. 17. 19. Rom. 5. 8. Luk. 22. 20. 1 Cor. 11. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Matth. 26. 28. Mark 14. 24. 1 Ioh. 2. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Matth. 20. 28. Mark 10. 45. Neither is this distinction acknowledged by the Fathers who acknowledge that Christ obeyed pro nobis Cyril de rect â fide ad Reginam Theodoret. therapeut 10. pag. 148. that hee was baptized pro nobis Aug. tract 4. in Ioan. tract 111. that he who dyed for us liveth pro nobis Cyril Thesaur lib. 9. cap. 2. That he was made a Priest pro nobis Idem in Ioan. lib. 2. cap. 1. pro omnibus mortuus pro omnibus resurrexit c. Answ. 2. This to me seemeth but a shallow conceit For who is the Priest and what is the Sacrifice Was not the Priest the Son of God both God and Man Was not the Sacrifice the flesh or human nature of the Son of God Surely if Christ had never submitted himselfe to obey the Law yet he being God had been a most holy Priest his body and blood being the body and blood of God had beene a most holy and all-sufficient Sacrifice Neither was it the holinesse of the humanity that sanctified the sacrifice or gave the vertue of satisfaction unto it but the dignity of the person and the vertue of the Godhead which made the righteousnesse of the Man Christ as well active as passive to bee meritorious and satisfactory for others Iesus Christ therefore being both God and Man was and is our high Priest who offered the sacrifice of his humanity upon the altar of his Deity which sanctified the sacrifice and made it an all-sufficient satisfaction for the sinnes of all that beleeve It is the Spirit saith our Saviour Christ that giveth life the flesh by it selfe profiteth nothing Ioh. 6. 63. the sufferings or obedience of Christ as hee is Man considered apart from the Godhead are neither satisfactory nor meritorious for others but being the sufferings of God they are a sufficient price of ransome to free us from hell and being the obedience of God is of sufficient merit to entitle us unto the kingdome of heaven § XVI Our fifth reason There are two parts of justification the one the absolving from the guilt of sinne and damnation the other the accepting of a beleeving sinner as righteous unto life the former is wrought by the sufferings of Christ
by Faith Act. 15. 9. We overcome the world by Christ Ioh. 16. 33. We overcome the world by Faith 1 Ioh. 5. 4 5. We are the Sons of God by Christ Ephes. 1. 5. We are the Sons of God by Faith Gal. 3. 26. We have an heavenly inheritance by Christ Gal. 4. 7. We have an heavenly inheritance by Faith Act. 26. 18. We attaine to Eternall life by Christ 1 Ioh. 5. 11 12. We attaine to Eternall life by Faith Ioh. 3. 16. 5. 24. 6. 47. We are saved by Christ Ioh. 3. 17. Matth. 1. 21. We are saved by Faith Ephes. 2. 8. All which benefits are attributed to faith not absolutely but relatively in respect of the object which it doth receive being no otherwise caused or procured by faith but as it is the hand and instrument whereby we receive Christ who is our life Ioh. 14. 6. Col. 3. 6. our righteousnesse Ier. 23. 6. 1 Corinth 1. 30. our propitiation Rom. 3. 25. 1 Ioh. 2. 2. our peace Ephes. 2. 14. our sanctification Tit. 2. 14. our victorious conqueror of all the enemies of our salvation Col. 2. 14 15. our Redeemer and Saviour who also is eternall Life 1 Ioh. 5. 20. whom whosoever hath he hath eternall life 1 Ioh. 5. 11 12. § VII But if we doe not receive and embrace Christ by a lively assent at the least working in our hearts an unfained desire to be made partakers of him and in our wils a settled resolution to acknowledge him to bee our Saviour and to rest upon him alone for Salvation without this speciall apprehension and application at least in desire and intent Christ and his merits doe not availe them that are adulti and come to yeeres of discretion unlesse it be to their greater condemnation who not caring to lay hold upon Christ and to apprehend and apply his merits unto them suffer as much as in them lyeth his precious blood to be spilt in vaine as it is in vaine to them who doe not apprehend and seeke to apply it to themselves For though the obedience of Christ both active and passive bee a robe of righteousnesse and our very wedding garment to cover our nakednesse and our sinnes yet it will not cover us unlesse it bee put on Though his stripes and sufferings be a soveraigne salve to cure our soules yet it will not cure them unlesse it be applyâ—…d Though his Body be meate indeed and his Bloud bee drinke indeed to nourish us unto eternall life yet they will not yeeld nourishment unto us unlesse we eate his Body and drinke his Bloud all which is done by faith apprehending and applying Christ whereby we put on him and his righteousnesse apply the salve of his sufferings eate his Body and drinke his Bloud The which because the Papists want and wanting reject they are faine to flee to their outward formalities wherein their religion consisteth and to their opus operatum in the Sacraments as if they without a true and lively faith were able to justifie and to save them without which notwithstanding our blessed Saviour himselfe doth not availe men to salvation He that beleeveth and is baptized shall be saved but he that beleeveth not being adultus though hee bee baptized and receive all the Sacraments of the Romance Church hee shall notwithstanding be condemned Mar. 16. 16. Ioh. 3. 18 36. It is therefore plaine and evident that the faith which doth justifie must not bee a bare assent but a lively beleefe or assent specially apprehending and embracing and in desire at the least and purpose applying Christ unto us For actuall application cannot bee made untill wee finde our selves to have the condition of the promise which is that former degree of faith which being had and finding our selves to have it wee are actually to apply the promise and by application to gather assurance which some call speciall faith § VIII Now let us see what the Papists can object against this cleare truth There are two things or rather names which they dispute against viz. fides specialis and fiducia speciall faith and affiance which dispute notwithstanding hindreth not anything which I have spoken of the nature of justifying faith as it justifieth us before God For of justification taken in a large sence there are two degrees though of that which properly is called justification before God there neither are nor can bee any degrees as I have shewed The former is the justification of a sinner before God in the Court of Heaven by imputation of Christs righteousnesse apprehended by a lively assent or beleefe The second is our justification in the Court of our owne Conscience when wee are perswaded and in some measure assured of our justification which assurance of some is called fides specialis by which wee are not first justified before God but is then wrought in us when being already justified by faith the holy Ghost the Spirit of promise shedding abroad the love of God in our hearts sealeth us after wee have beleeved Eph. 1. 13. How beit the former degree of faith is also truely called speciall both in respect of the speciall object which is Christ and in regard of the speciall effect which is the speciall apprehension or embracing of Christ not onely in the judgement by a lively assent but also in the heart that is the will and affections by a desire to bee made partaker of him and his merits and by a setled will and resolution to acknowledge him to bee our Saviour and to rely upon him alone for salvation And in this sence that faith by which we are justified before God is a speciall faith But if that onely be called speciall faith by which we are justified in our owne Consciences that is assured of our justification that assurance arising from the actuall application of the promise to our selves then I say and avouch that this speciall faith is not that by which we are justified before God For we must have a justifying faith being the condition of the promise before we can proceed to application and first wee must bee justified before God before wee can have any assurance thereof in our owne Consciences when as therefore the Papists dispute against tâ—…is speciall faith proving that by it we are not â—…ustified before God they plead besides the purpose And yet for all their proofes it is truely called a justifying faith because by it we are justified in the Court of our owne Conscience § IX The like is to be said of Fiducia or affiance which is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 against which the Papists hotly dispute proving that it is not of the essence of justifying faith when notwithstanding divers of their owne Writers as well as of ours have expounded credere by fidere and fides by fiducia But they should understand that many of our Writers by affiance meane assurance which is the plerophorie of faith unproperly I confesse but