Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A26746
|
An answer to the Brief history of the Unitarians, called also Socinians by William Basset ...
|
Basset, William, 1644-1695.
|
1693
(1693)
|
Wing B1048; ESTC R1596
|
64,853
|
180
|
or_o be_v not_o god_n this_o will_v easy_o appear_v from_o our_o examination_n of_o his_o argument_n themselves_o which_o be_v these_o argum._n 1._o p._n 5._o if_o christ_n be_v himself_o god_n there_o can_v be_v no_o person_n great_a than_o he_o but_o himself_o say_v joh._n 14._o 28._o my_o father_n be_v great_a than_o i_o answ_n i_o deny_v the_o consequence_n because_o though_o the_o son_n be_v less_o than_o the_o father_n in_o some_o respect_n yet_o he_o be_v equal_a to_o the_o father_n in_o other_o none_o of_o the_o former_a do_v destroy_v his_o divinity_n but_o the_o letter_n do_v prove_v it_o for_o 1._o the_o son_n be_v less_o than_o the_o father_n in_o regard_n of_o his_o humane_a nature_n and_o office_n but_o these_o we_o shall_v prove_v be_v not_o inconsistent_a with_o his_o divinity_n and_o 2._o in_o regard_n of_o his_o sonship_n for_o the_o father_n be_v of_o himself_o but_o the_o son_n be_v of_o the_o father_n whence_o episcopius_n infer_v a_o subordination_n of_o person_n but_o yet_o establish_v the_o doctrine_n of_o a_o trinity_n so_o the_o nicene_n father_n teach_v that_o the_o son_n be_v god_n of_o god_n that_o be_v god_n of_o and_o from_o the_o father_n but_o yet_o withal_o assert_v that_o he_o be_v of_o the_o same_o substance_n with_o the_o father_n and_o consequent_o be_v god_n as_o the_o father_n be_v and_o indeed_o this_o subordination_n can_v destroy_v his_o divinity_n because_o it_o do_v not_o destroy_v his_o nature_n for_o the_o inequality_n arise_v not_o from_o the_o essence_n but_o from_o the_o order_n and_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n but_o 3._o in_o other_o respect_v the_o son_n be_v equal_a to_o the_o father_n this_o the_o apostle_n assert_n phil._n 2._o 6._o who_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n think_v it_o not_o robbery_n to_o be_v equal_a with_o god_n viz._n the_o father_n now_o if_o he_o think_v it_o no_o robbery_n it_o can_v be_v no_o robbery_n and_o if_o no_o robbery_n he_o must_v be_v equal_a and_o if_o equal_a he_o must_v be_v god_n by_o nature_n as_o the_o father_n be_v this_o lead_v to_o the_o true_a sense_n of_o those_o word_n be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n for_o though_o ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d of_o itself_o strict_o signify_v not_o substance_n so_o much_o as_o accident_n not_o so_o much_o the_o nature_n as_o the_o appearance_n of_o thing_n whence_o erasmus_n and_o the_o socinian_o will_v have_v these_o word_n to_o signify_v not_o that_o he_o be_v god_n but_o that_o he_o be_v like_a to_o god_n yet_o however_o the_o apostle_n must_v here_o intend_v it_o substantial_o that_o be_v his_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n must_v signify_v that_o he_o be_v god_n as_o his_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o a_o servant_n signify_v that_o he_o be_v a_o servant_n and_o the_o reason_n be_v because_o his_o equality_n with_o god_n be_v here_o infer_v from_o his_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n but_o there_o can_v be_v a_o equality_n between_o a_o thing_n and_o the_o mere_a likeness_n of_o it_o between_o a_o real_a nature_n and_o a_o bare_a similitude_n whence_o erasmus_n understand_v the_o force_n of_o the_o word_n but_o not_o the_o reach_n of_o the_o apostle_n argument_n though_o erasmus_n do_v not_o deny_v the_o divinity_n of_o the_o son_n yet_o because_o he_o think_v this_o text_n do_v not_o respect_v his_o nature_n i_o shall_v therefore_o oppose_v to_o his_o sense_n the_o judgement_n of_o the_o ancient_n as_o arnob._n &_o serap_n conflic_a l._n 2._o novat_fw-la de_fw-fr trin._n c._n 17._o hilar._n pict_n epist_n de_fw-fr trin._n l._n 8._o &_o 10._o greg._n nys_n tom_fw-mi 2_o cont_n eunom_fw-la ora._n 7._o etc._n etc._n which_o judgement_n of_o they_o i_o shall_v confirm_v by_o these_o argument_n viz._n 1._o by_o the_o matter_n of_o the_o apostle_n argument_n he_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n and_o in_o the_o form_n of_o a_o servant_n if_o this_o text_n speak_v he_o not_o god_n but_o like_a to_o god_n it_o must_v also_o speak_v he_o not_o a_o servant_n but_o like_a to_o a_o servant_n but_o that_o he_o be_v a_o servant_n he_o say_v himself_o mat._n 20._o 28._o i_o come_v to_o minister_v and_o therefore_o he_o must_v be_v god_n because_o the_o same_o phrase_n and_o sense_n apply_v to_o each_o nature_n must_v import_v the_o reality_n of_o the_o one_o as_o well_o as_o of_o the_o other_o 2._o the_o order_n of_o the_o part_n speak_v our_o sense_n for_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n i._n e._n while_o he_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n he_o take_v upon_o he_o the_o form_n of_o a_o servant_n therefore_o that_o form_n be_v before_o this_o but_o there_o be_v no_o such_o difference_n in_o the_o part_n of_o his_o life_n or_o condition_n upon_o earth_n that_o one_o shall_v merit_v to_o be_v call_v the_o form_n of_o god_n the_o other_o the_o form_n of_o a_o servant_n therefore_o his_o be_v in_o the_o form_n of_o god_n must_v be_v antecedent_n to_o his_o humane_a life_n 3._o this_o be_v his_o choice_n and_o voluntary_a act_n for_o he_o take_v upon_o he_o the_o form_n of_o a_o servant_n but_o he_o have_v no_o liberty_n of_o choice_n in_o this_o world_n because_o his_o condition_n here_o be_v determine_v and_o foretell_v whence_o himself_o say_v luke_n 24._o 44._o that_o all_o thing_n must_v be_v fulfil_v which_o be_v write_v in_o the_o law_n of_o moses_n and_o in_o the_o prophet_n and_o in_o the_o psalm_n concern_v i_o therefore_o this_o choice_n be_v before_o this_o life_n and_o consequent_o must_v be_v the_o act_n of_o the_o divine_a not_o of_o the_o humane_a nature_n so_o evident_o do_v this_o text_n respect_v the_o nature_n of_o christ_n and_o therefore_o declare_v he_o to_o be_v equal_a to_o god_n the_o father_n as_o be_v god_n by_o nature_n as_o the_o father_n be_v this_o equality_n our_o saviour_n himself_o do_v prove_v joh_n 5._o 17._o my_o father_n work_v hitherto_o and_o i_o work_v whence_o the_o jew_n conclude_v v_o 18._o that_o he_o make_v himself_o equal_a to_o god_n upon_o which_o he_o do_v not_o explain_v himself_o as_o if_o they_o misunderstand_a he_o which_o he_o do_v in_o the_o case_n of_o eat_v his_o flesh_n and_o drink_v his_o blood_n but_o v_o 19_o he_o prove_v this_o equality_n what_o thing_n soever_o the_o father_n do_v these_o ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d the_o very_a same_o the_o son_n do_v likewise_o whence_o he_o must_v be_v equal_a to_o the_o father_n in_o operation_n and_o consequent_o in_o power_n so_o ambrose_n the_o fid_fw-we l._n 1._o c._n 13._o and_o greg._n naz._n orat._n 36._o hence_o he_o require_v v_o 23._o that_o all_o man_n shall_v honour_v the_o son_n even_o as_o they_o honour_v the_o father_n which_o import_v a_o equality_n of_o honour_n flow_v from_o a_o equality_n of_o operation_n for_o the_o reason_n of_o the_o duty_n instruct_v we_o in_o the_o nature_n of_o the_o duty_n itself_o this_o honour_n be_v owe_v from_o their_o work_n but_o they_o both_o do_v the_o same_o work_n therefore_o they_o must_v both_o have_v the_o same_o honour_n hence_o joh._n 10._o 30._o ay_o and_o my_o father_n be_v one_o that_o be_v not_o in_o concord_n only_o as_o the_o socinian_n pretend_v but_o in_o power_n because_o the_o context_n speak_v not_o of_o will_n and_o affection_n but_o of_o keep_v his_o sheep_n none_o shall_v pluck_v they_o out_o of_o my_o hand_n because_o none_o be_v able_a to_o pluck_v they_o out_o of_o my_o father_n hand_n for_o which_o he_o give_v this_o reason_n i_o and_o my_o father_n be_v one_o which_o must_v be_v one_o in_o power_n and_o if_o they_o be_v one_o in_o power_n they_o must_v be_v one_o in_o nature_n unless_o you_o make_v a_o almighty_a creature_n which_o be_v not_o only_o a_o absolute_a contradiction_n but_o also_o confound_v the_o essential_a property_n of_o god_n and_o the_o creature_n which_o be_v a_o much_o vile_a absurdity_n than_o they_o can_v with_o any_o shadow_n of_o reason_n pretend_v against_o our_o doctrine_n that_o gloss_n then_o of_o athanasius_n cont_n ari._n orat._n 4._o must_v be_v admit_v viz._n this_o show_v ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d ãâã_d the_o sameness_n of_o the_o godhead_n and_o the_o unity_n of_o power_n for_o indeed_o the_o abscribe_v to_o the_o son_n the_o same_o infinite_a perfection_n and_o the_o same_o honour_n but_o not_o the_o same_o nature_n with_o the_o father_n as_o the_o socinian_n do_v proclaim_v not_o only_o the_o perverseness_n of_o the_o disputant_n but_o the_o idolatry_n of_o the_o professor_n too_o in_o that_o case_n of_o his_o be_v the_o messiah_n he_o send_v man_n to_o his_o work_n who_o nature_n and_o agreeableness_n to_o ancient_a prophecy_n do_v sufficient_o declare_v the_o point_n so_o here_o he_o first_o assert_n his_o equality_n with_o the_o