the Scriptures 1 The New Testament in his Blood 2 The Blood of the New Testament 3 The Cup of the Lord. 4 The Communion of the Blood of Christ The blessed Eucharist consisting of both kindes is styled in Scripture 1 The Lords Supper And in what regards it is so called The Papists dislike the frequent use of this Phrase Casaubone confutes Justinian and Maldonate the Jesuites and calls it The Great Supper The most Divine Supper The Arch-Symbolicall Supper 2 The Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10.21 With us it is commonly called Christ his last Supper And the reasons why it is called the last Supper In the Fathers it hath these titles 1 The Communion of Saints in the Apostles Creede 2 Peace of Christ Ignatius and Cyprian 3 A New Oblation Irenaeus 4 Mystery is a common appellation Augustinē 5 Life so called by the Africans Augustinē 6 The Oath and strictest band of Religion Augustinē 7 The Mysticall bread Augustinē 8 The holy Offering in regard of the offerings for the poore Augustinē 9 The Supper of God and the Lords Banques Tertullian 10 The Lords Testament or Legacie 11 A Communion prohibiting schisme and division and inclining to Peace and Vnion 12 A blessing 13 A giving of thankes 14 The Authentique performance of the Type Theodoret. 15 The Latines name is Missah the Masse which word some derive from the Hebrew or Chaldee and say it signifies A Tribute of a Free-will Offering of the hand Cevallerius dislikes that derivation The Heathen Greeke Priests dismissed their people with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Pagan Romans with these words I licet Missa est Whence the Christian Roman Church borrowes their Masse 16 The Greeke Church calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Ministration 17 Sacramentum Sacramentorum c. Nicolaus de Cusa 18 God Tertullian Fol. 656 Par. 4 Eleventh Generall Wherein is inquired what speeches were used by our Saviour in the Coenaculum After the third Supper was administred The gratious Sermon of Christ His Prayer to God An Hymne 658 Tricoenium Christie Or the threefold Supper of Christ in the Night that he was betrayed 1 The Passeover wherein I consider 1 The occasion of this Discourse 2 The Introductories 1 What the Jewes used to doe at their ordinary meales 2 What they used to doe at their feasts 3 The Paschall Supper it selfe 1 As it was observed by the Jewes of those daies Here consider 1 What things the Iewes were commanded Which were of 2 sorts some were 1 Temporary In this I consider 1 The 7. great Passeovers recorded in the Old Testam 2 The 4. Passeovers specialized in the New Testament at which Christ was present Besides one more from which he was absent 3 How many Ceremonies were transitory namely 6. 1 They might chuse a Lambe or a Goate 2 They prepared it 4. daies before-hand 3 They bloodied their doores 4 They ate the Passeover in great haste shod girt staved rather standing than sitting rather sitting than lying downe at the first Passeover 5 They went not out of doores 6 They chose their next neighbours 2 Perpetuall to continue during the Iewish politie these were either 1 Propitiatory 14. 1 They were to chuse a Lambe 2 An unspotted one 3 A Male Lambe 4Vnder a yeare old 5 A Proportionable number were to eat it 6 All these were to be of the Iewish Church 7 It was to be killed on the first moneth of the Jewish yeare The yeare of the World when this first began is here handled 8 On the 14. day of that Moneth 9 Betweene the two Evenings 10 At Jerusalem 11 In one house 12 The People and not the Levites onely might kill the Lambe 13 They must dresse it whole In this are 5. other precepts 1 Rosie it with fire 2 Eate it not raw 3 Not sodden with water 4 The head with the legs 5 And with the purtenance 14 Every one was to bring an Offering according to his ability 2 Sacramentall properly only 3. 1 To eate the Passeover 2 To eate it with unleavened bread 3 To eate it with sowre herbes 3 Subsequent ceremonies 6. 1 A bone was not to be broken 2 The flesh was not to be carried out of the house 3 The Table-talke appointed 4 They continued the feast of unleavened bread seven dayes after 5 They were to leave none of the flesh untill the morning 6 What was left was to be burnt with fire 2 What they performed voluntarily 1 They washed 1 All of them their hands 2 Many their feete 3 Some their whole bodies 2 They consecrated their 1 Wine 2 Bread 3 Flesh 3 They imitated 13. of the Roman fashions saith Pererius A full intire tractate against Pererius who groundlesly holdeth that the Iewes in Christs time did conforme themselves in their feastings to 13. fashions of the Romans 2 As Christ and his Apostles kept it So farre as the Old Testament inforced New Testament hath related Whether at the eating of the Pascall Lambe were any servants present and administrant The summe of all as it were in a picture 3 The third Supper or Supper of the Lord the most blessed Eucharist Vide lib. 3. TRICAENIVM CHRISTI IN NOCTE PRODITIONIS SVAE The threefold Supper of Christ in the night that he was betrayed LIB 1. CHAP. 1. The Contents of the first Chapter 1. The occasion of this Discourse 2. The praesumptuous ignorance of some Caco-zelotes 3. The state of the question 4. Foure points propounded Three preparatory One decisive and determining These Preparatory 1. What course the Iewes tooke at their ordinary meates 2. What they used to doe at their Festivalls 3. What they especially practised at their Passeover 4. The mayne point is what religious or civill rites our Saviour more particularly observed when he kept the Passeover in the night of his apprehension PARAGRAPH 1. WHen I administred the thrice-blessed Sacrament of the body and blood of our Saviour Iesus Christ to my Parishioners among many other things I bad them take heed of the leaven of those refractory Ignorants swarming otherwhere who at and in the receiving of the holy Communion where so devour prayers are made where so sacred things are conferred refuse to kneele and to their chiefe objection that they must imitate our Saviour and his Apostles who did not kneele but sit or leane or lye downe PARA 2. I Answered that these presumptuous silly ones know onely the outside and not the inside of these mysteries that it is not clearely revealed in any place what posture was used or what was the bodily situation at the giving or taking of the body of our Lord but to build their pretended conformity on uncertaine and unknowne things is not conformable to reason much lesse religion sithence they by so doing doe make their imagination their onely originall their crooked will their onely rule PAR 3. THen did I enlarge the poynt that Christ and his holy Apostles except Indas who went out before the
three dayes o Exod. 10.23 Exod. 10.23 neither doe I thinke that the Israelites had beene able to see to choose Lambes or Kids if they had gone into the Aegyptian Territories where one might feele darkenesse or darkenesse might be felt Exod. 10.21 Exod. 10.21 Therefore they must needes and did provide the Lambes and Kids foure dayes before hand Seventhly to put them in minde that as they provided themselves for a departure so it was to an holy departure Reason 7 and the beginnings of labouring for Canaan must be sacred and their first footing not to be moved till God had beene devoutly served which cannot be done suddenly nor hastily nor was here done without foure dayes preparation and diligent circumspection Reason 8 Lastly the Lambe was to bee chosen and as it were in their sight for foure dayes perhaps to signifie either that Christ was publikely to be seene knowne made manifest by his open workes of his ministery about foure yeares e're he was offered up a day being set for a yeare in Scripture phrase or else to fore-signifie that Christ should come foure dayes to Hierusalem before the passion and so he did when they cryed Hosanna as if they had found the perfect Sacrifice their redeemer being in sight and welcomed with the extraordinary applause of the multitude that went before and that followed after p Matth. 21.9 Matth. 21.9 from the mount of Olives to the Citie and through a good part of it from the Citie into the Temple even in which temple the children tontinued crying and said Hosanna to the Sonne of David vers 25. Now the most of those reasons saying in future times for they were gone out from among the Aegyptians and they needing no such testimonies of the faith they had no such stinging threate as the death of their first-borne nor wanted such a spurre to quicken their preparation for a speedy journey as they were not commanded so neither did they practise in future times to gather up the Lambes foure dayes before hand PAR. 9. AEGidius a Aegid Hunnius comment in Matth 26. Hunnius hath it thus Apostoliparant agnum masculum anniculum immaculatum per quatriduum â reliquo grege separatum mactantes juxta legem that is the Apostles prepare a Lambe a male of a yeare old without spot separated foure dayes from the rest of the flocke slaying it according to the Law in which opinion he is both singular and singularly false and did not distinguish the temporary rites from the perpetuall PAR. 10. THe third ceremony peculiar to the first passeover was the striking or the sprinkling of the blood on the two side-posts and upper doore-post of the house Exod. 12.7 Exod. 12.7 PAR. 11. THe sprinkling of blood was an ordinary ceremony in the Leviticall Law and sometimes it was done with the finger alone b Num. 19.4 Num. 19.4 Eleazar shall take of the blood with his singer and shall sprinkle the blood of the red Heifer directly before the Tabernacle of the Congregation seven times Sometimes sprinkling was used by other mediate things c Heb. 9.19 Heb. 9.19 Moses tooke the blood of Calves and goates with water and scarlet Wooll and Hysope saying this is the blood of the Testament which God hath enjoyned unto you and he sprinkled with blood both the Tabernacle and all the vessells of the Ministery In the old Testament it was enjoyned unto the people as a part of their Covenant to be sprinkled with blood to which words of Moses our Saviour alludeth in his consecration d 1 Cor. 11.25 1 Cor. 11.25 This cup is the New Testament in my blood which is shed for you or as it is varied e Matth. 26.28 Matth. 26.28 This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sinnes PAR. 12. ANd in this third ceremony these things are farther observable as most probable first that those houses in Goshen needed not to be sprinkled where no people were where no Lambe was killed where all the inhabitants entred into other houses to make up the full number in Communicants PAR. 13. SEcondly in the houses that were sprinkled with blood according to the Law whether the doores were open or shut it was all one the destroyer was not to doe harme but was to passe by it and to enter no other way or ope whatsoever though the entrances might be many and questionlesse were many by the chimneyes by the windowes and other in-lets of ayre PAR. 14. THirdly that the striking of the blood on the two side-posts and upper doore-post of the houses was used in no other Sacrifice PAR. 15. FOurthly this puncto is most certaine that this ceremony was onely peculiar to this Passeover and to no succeeding Passeovers for they had not the same cause The generall consent of the Jewish Rabbins is that it was never used after f Beza ad Matth. 26.20 Beza saith Summo consensu Doctores omnes Hebraurum testantur that is the Jewish professours with an universall agreement witnesse that the sprinkling of the doore-posts and lintell and superliminary belonged onely to that night when they were to goe out of Aegypt PAR. 16. THe reason following maketh it apparent this was commanded to prevent the destroying Angel and to keepe the first-borne of the Israelites from being slaine as the first-borne of the Aegyptians were slaine which is most firmely grounded on g Exod. 12.13 Exod. 12.13 The blood shall be to you for a token upon the houses where you are and when I see the blood I will passe over you and the Plague shall not be upon you to destroy you and it is also confirmed h Heb. 11.28 Heb. 11.28 Thorough faith Moses kept the Passeover and the sprinkling of blood lest he that destroyed the first-borne should touch them When this occasion was removed and no such cause of feare they omitted ever after that ceremony and Sublatâ causâ totali tollitur effectus nor was ever mention made afterward of this ceremony as practised from that time but the words to the Hebrewes seeme to restraine it to the first passeover by Moses rather then by others PAR. 17. I Dare not say that the sprinkling of the side-posts and upper doore-post had no reference unto Christ who saith of himselfe i Ioh 10.7 Ioh. 10.7 Verily verily I am the doore of the Sheepe and without that addition ver 9. I am the doore I am sure this doore was be sprinkled with blood on all sides before and behind his head and his armes as the superliminary both sides of him as the side-posts and his feete as the threshold Mundans aerem terramque suo sanguine cleansing both aire and earth with his blood and all mankinde in them of such as beleeve in him which was a more perfect smell or unction then the precious oyntment of Aaron was that runne downe upon his beard and went downe to the skirts
that it should be Holy and without blemish Ephes 5.26 27. Aqua quae benedicitur purgat illuminat hominem The water which is blessed doth purge and illuminate man saith Gregory Nyssen in lib. de Baptismo Caro abluitur ut anima emaculetur the body is washed that the soule may be made cleane saith Tertullian de resurrectione carnis From whence in all likelihood Augustine tract 80. in Johannem propounded that assevering interrogation unde tanta vis aquae ut corpus tangat cor abluat from whence is that powerfull vertue of water that the body being touched the soule is washed The blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist is more powerfull than over Paschal was Tertul. de resurrectione carnis thus Caro corpore Christi sanguine veseitur ut anima de Deo saginetur our flesh feedeth on the body and blood of Christ that our soules may be filled and fatted with God Bernard in primo Sermone de coena Domini pag. 145. Who can quell so fierce raging wilde motions of concupiscence who can beare the itchings bitings or akings of this wound Beleeve Gods grace is sufficient for men And that ye may be secure saith Saint Bernard you have the investiture that is a new acquist and possession of the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ For that Sacrament worketh two things in us Et sensum minuit in minimis ingravioribus peccatis tollit omnino consensum it infeebleth and diminisheth sin in the smallest matters but in more grievous sins it wholly taketh away our consent If any of you find not so sharp motions to anger envie luxury or the like let him thank the body and blood of our Lord because the vertue of that Sacrament worketh effectually in him and let him rejoyce that the fowlest ulcer beginneth to heale I conclude this passage with the memorable words of our Saviour at the institution of the holy Eucharist Mat. 26.28 This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins Thus doe the Sacraments of Grace remit quell and mortifie sin whereas the divine Apostle speaking of the Sacraments of the old Law is expresse Heb. 10.4 It is not possible that the blood of Goats and Bulls should take away sins PAR. 3. A Third Reason for its Institution was to prefigure Christs death and going out of the world John 13.1 Jesus knew his houre was come that he should depart out of the world unto the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ut transeat that he might Passe out of the world having apparent reference both to the old and new Passeover on the Crosse All Sacraments of the old Law were figures of the Eucharist And they did also finally designe and typifie Christs death Therefore the blessed Eucharist must needs adumbrate Christs death also Indeed the Egyptian Passeover by the sprinkling of whose blood the Israelites were freed from the exterminating Angel doth most lively typifie Christ slaine and his blood delivering us But the Paschal Lamb which afterward was yeerely slaine did more resemble the Sacrament of Christs body and blood and yet both the first and the succeding yeerely Passeover may all of them and each of them in a true and fitting sence be said to prefigure not only the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ but the very Crucifixion of our blessed Saviour Jesus Christ PAR. 4. A Fourth Cause of Christ's superinducing of the blessed Eucharist was to be a remembrance to us of Christs death till he commeth againe 1 Cor. 11.24 Doe this in remembrance of me so verse 25. As often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye doo shew the Lords death till he come ver 26. The Paschall was a memoriall of their deliverance from Egypt and of their passing the Red-sea without danger whilst the Sea stood as two Christall walls on the right hand and the left and they passed through dry-footed Exod. 14.22 Againe when in after times their children were to ask What mean you by this service Ye shall say It is the Sacrifice of the Lords Passeover who passed over the houses of the children of Israel in Egypt when he smote the Egyptians and delivere dour houses Exod. 12.26 c. But the Eucharist is a memoriall of our deliverance from Sin Hell and the power of Satan Therefore so farre as spirituall deliverances are above temporall as the soules are above the bodies heaven above earth so farre doth our holy Eucharist antecede their Paschal and bringeth with it more certaine fruit and fuller Grace infused not only Sealing and Signifying Grace but Conferring and Exhibiting it by it selfe in the true use I urge not this effect so farre as to exclude Baptisme from working remission of sinnes nor as if the sacred Sucharist did remit the Same Individuall sinnes which were Before remitted by Baptisme or as if it did remit sins that never were Repented of God doth not so much But the Sacrament of the body and blood of our Lord forgiveth such sins as have beene committed betweene the receiving of Baptisme and it and such sins as have overborne us since our hearty Contrition and Repentance yea where sins are perfectly forgiven before the holy Communion yet doth the Holy Communion Enseale and Ratifie the former remission if I may so speake and the Eucharist in the right use maketh an Attrite man a Contrite One A Contrite man to be Justified A Justified man to be Holy An Holy man to be More holy and the Holiest One to be more lively spiritfull and prompt in religious services than I think he would have beene if the Sacrament had beene omitted Thus I doubt not but if the Thrice-blessed Virgin Mary had received the consecrated Eucharist as in likelihood she did though she were full of Grace according to the Angels salutation when she received it yet it would not have beene uneffectuall to her Good for she was not so full of Grace but that shee was still capable of more and greater additaments of Grace Many more Reasons there are why Christ Jesus did superinstitute the blessed Eucharist destroying and abolishing thereby the old Passeover I will instance only in some of them and that very briefly PAR. 5. A Fifth Reason why Christ did institute this Sacrament was to unite us to Himselfe 1 Corinth 10.16 The cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the Communion of the body of Christ The cup is so necessary that the Apostle placeth it before the bread 6. To breed brotherly love and to unite us to Christ and one to another For we being many are One Bread and One Body For we are all partakers of that One Bread 1 Cor. 10.17 Hence floweth that great Article of our Creed The communion of Saints Hence is that Sacred Eucharist called Communio A Communion John 6.56 He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my
of me Luke 22.19 and hallowed the Cup with its proper consecration His countenance was divided between the Sacred Eucharist and his Disciples Somtimes he beheld one somtimes another as the matter required He viewed the bread when he began to say This is my Body which is broken or given When he proceeded It is given or broken for you he earnestly beheld his Apostles and the whole Church in Them Idealiter Likewise when he said concerning the Cup Drinke yee all of it c. His Eyes passed along with his Words his Words with his Heart viewing the varied objects as was meet flitting and moving from the Apostles when he commanded All of you drink or Drinke you All But when he added Drink ye all of it for this is my blood of the new Testament it cannot bee but hee earnestly beheld the consecrated Wine or his own Blood All this I likewise suppose to be done by our Heavenly Saviour as he stood on his Feet And this doth the Church or ought to do imitating him and fulfilling his commandement Do this in remembrance of me which he spake not only of the Bread and the forme of its consecration Luke 22.19 and perhaps of Identity of Gesture but also of the Cup and the Consecrating of the Wine in its proper forme as himselfe had done 1 Cor. 11.25 And either in Heaven or from Heaven taught his Apostle S. Paul Whilst each of them did eat he beheld the Eater severally and when they drank All of it as they All drank of it Marke 4.23 So he beheld them especially and singly one after another The Prayer I Must needs acknowledge O all-knowing God that the humblest way that I can I do Worship thee both in soule and body and yet I apparently discerne I do not sufficiently Adore thee Accept holy Father my devout wrestling rather than performances Pardon my imperfections confirme and increase in mee all goodnesse and give O give mee such a taste of thee in this life that I may be filled and satisfied with thee and by thee in thy glorious Kingdome Amen CHAP. VI. And the second Section of the seventh Generall Wherein is shewed what Actions and Words Christ used in the Consecrating of the blessed Eucharist 1. The first Action He Tooke Bread Christ never took any thing into his hand in a religious manner but it was bettered Ignatius was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the child whom Christ took in his armes Christs Sâ—â—urge had more vertue than an ordinary whip Christs Touch imparâ—â—â—â—th vertue 2. The second Action He Blessed the Bread What it is to Blesse Many kindes of Blessings Gods Blessing what it is The effects of Gods Blessing Joseph a Prophet Christs Blessing of the five loave caused their multiplication not in Number but in Magnitude Christs Blessing is like Gods Blessing it consisteth not in meere words It is effectuall in operation Christs Blessing of the bread was not the Consecration of his Body Parents Blessing Priests Blessing and the effects thereof Illyricus would have altered the doctrine of the Keyes Christs Benediction consisted partly of Prayer Tankesgiving Giving of Thankes and Blessing sometimes used promiscuously Piscator's observation How God Christ blesseth How Man blesseth God Why the blessed Sacrament is called the Eucharist In the Celebration of the blessed Sacrament Blessing Giving of Thankes all one The power of Blessing greater than the power of Nature Mans blessing of God a superlative kinde of Thankesgiving Christs blessing of God what it is The vertue of Christs blessing Mans blessing of Man what it is Christs Thankesgiving and blessing in the Sacrament what it was The Jews had distinct Graces for their Suppers Christs Benediction of the Bread in ihe Sacrament not the Consecration of it Lyranus Hugo Innocentius and S. Ambrose taxed in this point The properest use of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 amongst Men. How Christ in the blessed Sacrament did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Blesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Give thankes Probable that Christs blessing was not without Imposition or lifting up of his hands Heave offerings in the old Law types of this Wave offerings in the old Law types of this Possibly Christ might use Elevation and waving of the Bread at the Benediction 3. The third Action He Brake it The end why he Brake it Maldonat saying Breaking of the bread and Giving of it is all one is exploded Christ in Breaking the bread followed the Hebrew custome Breaking of the bread did properly signifie the breaking of his body on the Crosse How Christs body was broken Breaking of the bread sheweth the ancient custome of Imparting the Sacrament to the Standers-by Lorinus in saying the bread was cut with a Knife is against three Evangelists and S. Paul The ancient Fathers do not use the terme of Cutting but Breaking of bread The Not-Breaking of the bread in the Sacrament is a transgression of the first Institution The Church of Rome herein censured The practise of the Primitive Church both in receiving of the Bread and Wine The Papists taxed for Barring the Laity the Cup. Broken and Divided not all one as Gaspar Sanctius ridiculously thinks The Rabbin that taught Baronius Direct against Lorinus The form of bread at the Jews ordinary Feasts described by Baron cut Lozinge-wise The forme of the Panis decussatus religiously used among the ancient good Christians A Crosse or Christ crucified on the Crosse was in ancient times impressed on the mysticall bread The picture of a Dove of the Holy Lamb and of a Shepheard with a sheep at his back and the mysticall signification of them 4. The fourth Action He gave it to his Disciples He Himselfe gave it to every of his Disciples particularly The consecrated bread given by Christ was unleavened bread We may consecrate either Leavened or unleavened bread It is probable Christ gave the Cup Himselfe to every of his Disciples Musculus censured therein Aquinas saying The Sacrament is many things materially but one thing formally He gave it to his Disciples The Communicants at this Eucharist were none of the Common Disciples but onely the Eleven Apostles They in some sort represented the rest of the Priesthood onely Christ never gave power to any Lay-man to administer his sacred Body Common persons are not to meddle with holy things Gods judgements upon such prophane persons Christ at this Eucharist gave his Apostles power to Consecrate the sacred Eucharist After his Resurrection and before his Ascension he seconded this power The Apostles in another regard represented the whole company of all his Disciples Christians in generall Christ when he Consecrated the blessed Eucharist represented the body of the Clergie Idealiter But when he received it he represented the whole body of the universall Church both Clergie and Laitie The Apostles quâ Apostoli Discipuli represented the body of the Clergie Laitie 5. Secondly His words First word Take He said or Saying were not spoken by Christ neither are they part of his
not themselves from the usance of the Church in this specialtie For Augustine Tom. 7. contra literas Petiliani 2.23 pag. 22. saith to Petilian and his adherents I doe instance and make rehearfall unto you of a man who lived with you into whose hands yee placed or put the Eucharist Ruffinus Ecclesiastica Historiae 6.33 saith of Novatus or Novatianus That when he divided the Sacrament to the people he held the Hands of the Receivers till he made them sweare by what they held in their Hands and then they did Sumere They did accipere manu Sumemere ore Tooke it with their Hand and received it with their Mouth And I doubt not but these holy ancient Fathers followed Christs celebration in such things as he commanded When they did Reserve the Sacrament and carry it to their houses I hope they tooke it not into their Mouths they carried it not in their Mouths but tooke it in their Hands Accepto corpore Domini reservato saith Tertullian in the end of his booke de Oratione It was first received and this was not within their Mouths but with their Hands If it had beene in their Mouths it was not so fit to be Reserved And how vaine had it beene to take it out of their Mouths and to reserve it to that end that they might put it another time into their owne Mouthes or into other folkes Mouthes either If you plead it was reserved for the sicke Gregorius Nazianzenus Oratione 11. in laudem Gorgoniae saith If Gorgonia's Hand treasured up any part of the Antitypes of Christs honoured body and blood shee bedewed it or mingled it with her teares The word If not betokening any doubt but implying a certainty that sometimes shee did weepe over the consecrated mysteries which her Hand had Reserved The word If being taken for When. So it is used 1 King 8.46 If they sinne against thee for there is no man that sinneth not I conclude with the binding Rubrick of out Lyturgy that the Priests or Priest must deliver the Communion to the people in their Hands Kneeling Maldonate on Matth. 26. confesseth it further proofe needed not Yet was Maldonate too blame to say The same Church with better Counsell begins to give the Sacrament not into their hands but into their mouthes because there was both more reverence and lesse danger To call that better Counsell which varied from Christs Institution I like not Nor doth Maldonats similitude hold For if the Churches are the Eucharist fasting varying from Christ yet they had Apostolicall Authority to guide them which the Handlesse and Mouthlesse Receivers wanted Some Reject things really Given and Tendred Matth. 7.9 Yee Reject the Commandements of God Jeremy 8.9 Some rejected the Word of the Lord. Luke 7.30 The Pharisees and Lawyers rejected the Counsell of God against themselves 1 Samuel 10.19 The Israelites rejected their God Is not in those words included a plaine offer and withall a Not-accepting of the Tendry Remarkably is it said Joh. 12.48 He that rejecteth me and receiveth-not my words the same Word shall judge him at the last day Rejecting is expounded by Not-receiving if it signifie not worse also So some Refused to heare Gods Word Jeremy 13.10 Ammon refused to eate 2 Sam. 13.9 though the cakes were powred out before him Elishah though he was urged to take a gift yet refused 2 Kings 5.16 Yet for all this I cannot think but when Christ said to his Disciples Take they did Take it and when he said Eate they did Eate For it argueth Obedience to their Master and their conformity to partake of the mysteries of Christ PAR. 6. THe next part of our Saviours words is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eate That Christ gave Judas a Sop is cleare a dipped Sop Joh. 14.26 that Iudas received it I hold as cleare Iohn 14.30 He then having received the Sop went immediately out That Iudas did eate it is not expressed nor so cleare He might possibly Take it and not Eate it but let it lie on his trencher Besides the Sop beeing given for a Manifesto that Iudas was the onely Traytor perhaps he was not willing to swallow the Disgust as he accompted it and the Sop also But it may be well answered Iudas was so surprized with the unexpected Offer his reason wit and senses so clouded his soule amazed with such arisings and fumes of his treasonable plot in one word so given over to Satan that what another man yea what he himselfe would have done at another Time either not Receive or not Eate he certainly received and in likelihood swallowed If the words of Scripture be closer followed and more forcibly urged That Iudas having received the Sop went out immediately and therefore he did receive it onely but not Eate it I answer The end of his Receiving was onely to Eate it and there was no great distance of time betweene the Receiving and Eating of the Sop but he might put his hand to his mouth even almost in an instant or in tempore penè imperceptibili in the twinckling of an eye and swallow without chewing a moystned soft little glibbery Sop that his going out immediately excludeth not his Eating Besides the word Receive may extend not onely to his Taking of it with his hand but to the Eating of it also For there is a receiving into Ones mouth and it is not possible to be proved that Iudas did not So receive it nor Eate it And it may be well beleeved because so many holy Fathers have declared themselves to think He did Eate the Sop. I know but few that deny it but many affirme it Some indeed say He carried away the Sop and shewed it to the High Priests and thence framed a forged accusation against Christ or an excuse for his own treachery as if without cause he would not have betrayed him A man having his hidden sinnes revealed groweth worse and more madd in sinning Per scelera semper sceleribus tutum est iter said One The safest way to commit sinne Is by new sinnes still to beginne Lucas Brugensis on Matth. 26. saith That after the word Eate the reason was given And the word Enim is to be understood Indeed it may well be understood because at the delivery of the Cup it is expressed Matth. 26.28 For this is my blood of the new Testament And yet the sense seemeth to me as full Take Eate This is my Body as if it had beene written Take Eate For this is my Body I would not willingly adde any new sense to Scripture no more than I would diminish a letter from it especially if as it is the sense may be well accepted Carolostadius and never any before him that I have read of fancieth That when Christ said these words This is my Body he put his finger to his breast shewed himselfe and meaned thus Here sitteth my Body which shall be given for you This Sleidan reporteth in the Fift booke of his Commentaries
And this may seeme to favour him Jesus said to the Iewes Destroy This Temple and in three dayes I will rayse it up Joh. 2.19 And the holy Apostle expoundeth it Christ spake of the temple of his body verse 21. Tolet in his Commentary on the place saith It is certaine that when Christ said This temple he did by his Gesture and the motion of his hands demonstrate Himselfe and pointed not at the materiall Temple built of stone so might he here doe Tolet his Collection is but probable For Christ might point at either at neither but leave them in suspence Many times did Christ use verball aequivocations as I have proved in my Miscellanies that is he so spake that his words might have a double Construction though he adhorred mentall Reservation Concerning Carolostadius I must needs say he was one of them who in those precipitious and whirling times did strive to rayse his owne name by inventing most new devices And this was one of them which is not seconded by any other Christian Divines which I have seene but disliked by many For when Christ said This is my Body which shall be given for you as Carolostadius hath it is as if he pointed at and did meane his naturall passiive body What did they eate They did eate none of That body nor was it Broken till after the Celebration of the holy Eucharist he did suffer But the holy Scripture hath it in the Present tense Luk. 22.19 This is my Body which Is given for you And vers 20. This Cup Is the new Testament in my Blood which Is shed for you Can you think O Carolostadius that when he gave them the Cup he touched his breast and pointed at and meaned the blood in the veynes lanes and hidden alleys of his mortall body So 1 Corinth 11.24 This is my body which Is broken for you And this Cup Is the new Testament in my blood vers 25. Likewise Matth. 26.28 This is my Blood which Is shed and so Mark 14.24 For though it be a truth most certaine that Christ his naturall body and naturall blood was broken given and shed afterwards in his Passion yet Carolostadius was too blame to change the Tense to invent an imagined gesture of Christ which is impossible to be proved Lastly to broach a new opinion contrary to all Divines from which refulteth That they did eate onely bare Bread but no way the Body of the Lord and dranke onely the fruit of the Grape but no way dranke the Blood of the Lord. Indeed the Vulgate hath it Frangêtur in the Future tense is Shall be broken for you But it starteth aside from the Originall Nor standeth it with sense reason or example that the Future is taken for the Present tense since it is a retrograde course against nature But the Present tense is often used for the Future foreshewing the infallible certainty of what will or shall come both in Propheticall and Evangelicall Writings Esay 60.1 The glory of the Lord Is risen upon thee And yet he speaketh of Christ and his comming And Revel 22.12 Behold I come quickly and my reward is with me And Yet he commeth not though it were said above fifteene hundred yeares passed But most undoubtedly He Shall come quickly Celeritate motus though not celeritate temporis when he beginneth to come he shall come speedily though he shall not quickly begin to come PAR. 7. IT succeedeth This is my Body Matth. 26.26 which is Given for you Luk. 22.19 Which is Broken for you 1 Corinth 11.24 This doe in remembrance or for a remembrance of Me as both S. Luke and S. Paul have it And he tooke the Cup and gave thankes and gave it to them saying Drinkeyee All of it for this is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sinnes Matth. 26.27 c. It is thus changed Mark 14.23 He gave it to them and They all dranke of it And S. Mark leaves out these words For the remission of sinnes S. Luke maketh the alteration thus Likewise also he gave them the Cup after Supper saying This Cup is the New Testament In my blood which is shed for You Luk. 22.20 Another diversity is yet 1 Corinth 11.25 Likewise after Supper he tooke the Cup when he had supped saying This Cup is the new testament In my blood This doe yee as oft as yee drinke it in remembrance of mee Matth. 26.29 Christ saith I will not drinke henceforth of the fruit of the Vine And this was After the sacred Supper But saith Adam Contzen A Matthaeo non suo ordine ad finem coenae recitantur ea verba de Genimine vitis S. Matthew reciteth not in Order the words concerning the fruit of the Vine nor were they spoken After Supper Perhaps say I they were spoken Twice Here if ever is an ample field to expatiate in these words have tortured the wits of the learnedst men since the dayes of the Apostles Et adhuc sub judice lis est And yet they are not determined And as the Areopagites in an inexplicable perplexity deferred the finall determination till the last day so the Roman Church might have deferred their definitive sentence and over-hard censure even till then especially since they confesse that the manner of Transubstantiation is inenarrable Whereupon I am resolved to forbeare farther disquisition and to lose my selfe in holy devotion and admiration that I may find my Christ The sayle is to large for my boat This Sea is too tempestuous for my Shallop The new Cut of Erasmus Sarcerius in his Scholia on the place of S. Matthew thus shuffleth it The Materiall causes are Bread and Wine and the things under them understood and present the Body and Blood The Formal causes are to Eat and to Drink The Efficient causes Christ who did institute it and his Word The Effectuall causes to have Remission of sins I say this may rather go among the finall causes And to make Effects to be Effectuall causes introduceth new Logick new Termes into Logick Besides he omitteth the Finall cause which is the first mover to the rest Divinity and the mysteries of it are not to bow down to any ones Logick Oh! but will you now say leus in the last Act in the last Scene Will you be silent where he and she Apprentices where Women and illiterate Tradesmen rayse themselves upon their startups prick up their eares and tyre their tongues 1. I answer If I should enter into the lists of controversie and take upon me to decide and determine all the doubts which concerne the holy Sacrament of the Eucharist and to untye all the knots which may be made from those words I am perswaded you might sooner see an end of me than I of this Work For I am wearied and tyred already This toyle which I have performed and the labour which I have bestowed hath cost me full deare My sedentary life hath made my
De corona cap. 5. Deus auditum in auribus fodit visum in oculis accendit gustum in ore conclusit odoratum in naribus ventilavit contactum in manibus astimavit per haec exterioris hominis ministeria interiori homini ministrantia fructus munerum divinorum ad animam deducuntur à sensibus God hath bored hearing in the eares because into them it descendeth as into an hole He hath kindled sight in the eyes for the eyes do sometimes sparkle with fire and are of a fiery nature He hath shut up tasting within the mouth for he hath bounded it within that compasse He hath winnowed or vanned smelling in the nostrils by the playing of the wind He hath made the hands the judicatories of touching which touching being diffused over all the body yet is more used by the hands He concludeth divinely By these ministeriall bodily Organs serving the inner Man the blessings and fruits of heavenly gifts are from the Senses conveyed to the soule Much more might be added of other parts I will end all in this addition They defraud their Knees of the chiefest office and greatest honour who refuse to bend them in holy times and places especially at the receiving of the blessed Sacrament which I would take after I had fallen on my Face and used groveling Adoration if the Church so appointed me or if scandall would not arise from such extraordinary Gesture THE PRAYER O Lord thou knowest my heart and that with Soule and Body I Reverence and Adore thee in thy divine Eucharist I humble my selfe as much as I can and I would humble my selfe lower even unto the gates of Hell if I could confessing my worthinesse in nothing but that I am worthy to be condemned In such contemplations quakeing and terror take hold of my heart and I am horribly afraid of thy Iudgement Abraham Isaac and Jacob shall be in a sweat at the day of Iudgement as good children shall be in a dread to see their father angry with his rebellious children The earth shall melt away like wax the heavens shall tremble and the pillars of Heaven shall shake to whom shall I fly to whom shall I say Cover me but unto thee most compassionate Saviour for thou art my rocke thou art the buckler of my defence under the shadow of thy wings do I desire to rest as thou wert superexalted because thou didst humble thy selfe so grant good Lord I may so fall down before thee that I may bee taken up by thee and that the greatnesse of my humility may bring unto mee by thy favour the riches of thy glory the exaltation both of my soule and body Lord heare my prayer and let my cry come unto thee for Iesus his sake Amen CHAP. VIII Which containes the ninth tenth and eleventh Generals Wherein is declared 1. What Gesture we are to use at the Receiving of the blessed Eucharist 2. What Names have been given to it 3. What Words were spoken by our Saviour after the Third Supper before he departed out of the Coenaculum 1. What Gesture we are to use at the Administration of it to others Receiving of it our selves Both handled promiscuously The English Liturgy our best guide At the Repeating of the Law the people must Kneele Receiving of the same the Israelites did no lesse Never Patriarck Prophet Evangelist Apostle nor holy Man nor Christ himselfe prayed Sitting when there was opportunity of Kneeling The Monkes of Egypt did pray Sitting The Rule of Saint Benedict mentioneth Sitting at the Reading of three Lessons Rising up at Gloria Patri c. Severall Gestures are to be used both by Priest and People upon severall occasions The Priest never Kneeles while the people stand but he may stand when they kneele Great reason why the people should kneele at the Receiving of the Body and Blood of Christ No superstition nor Idolatry then to Kneele But obstinate Irreverence if not blasphemy not to Kneele Prayer most an end used with bâ—nding of the Knees The Pharisee Stood Christ Kneeled when he prayed The Rubrick of the Communion Book is to be followed by all obediently 2. The Minister is to deliver the Communion to the people Kneeling in both kindes into their Hands Maximus would have Men to wash their hands Women to bring clean linnen that will Communicate The Nicity of former times questioned The sixth Synod Canon 3. against it The consecrated bread must be carefully delivered and received To let any crumb or particle thereof fall to the ground accounted a great sinne by Tertullian and Origen Pope Pius the first punished those who let any of the Lords blood fall upon the ground or Altar S. Cyril of Hierusalem gives a Cave at to this purpose Little Tables set before the Communicants in former times as now we hold Linnen clothes saith Baronius The usuall fashion of receiving the Consecrated bread between the Thumb and a Finger or two disliked Receiving the holy bread in the Palme of the hand a safer way In Tertullians dayes the Christians did stretch abroad their hands like Christ upon the Crosse in their private prayers Damascene would have us receive the Body of Christ crucified with our hands framed like to a Crosse The right Hand being upward open and hollow to receive the bread This accounted the safer way S. Cyril commandeth the same kind of usance Other manners of Taking it not sinfull In things indifferent we must not love singular irregularity All unseemely Motions and Gestures are so many profanations of the Lords Supper Seven Generall Rules to be observed against the profanation of the Lords Supper The word Amen explaned and Kneeling at Receiving the blessed Sacrament pressed 3. Tenth General What Names are given to the blessed Sacrament by the Scriptures and Fathers the Latine and Greek Church The hallowed Bread is called in the Scriptures 1. The Lords Body Broken for us 2. The Communion of the Body of Christ And the Reasons thereof 3. Breaking of Bread from house to house 4. Holy Bread Blessed Bread Eucharisticall Bread Heavenly Bread Joh. 6. In the Fathers 1. Taking of the Lords Body Tertullian 2. Earthly Bread sanctified by prayer consisting of Earthly and Heavenly things Irenaeus A Medicine of immortality an Antidote against death procuring life purging sin driving away all evils idem 3. Christs Dole to his Church Tertullian The Plenty Aboundance and Fatnesse of the Lords Body The Wine is called in the Scriptures 1. The New Testament in his Blood 2. The Blood of the New Testament 3. The Cup of the Lord. 4. The Communion of the Blood of Christ The blessed Eucharist consisting of both kinds is styled In Scripture 1. The Lords Supper And in what regards it is so called The Papists dislike the frequent use of this Phrase Casaubone confutes Justinian and Maldonate the Jesuits and cals it The Great Supper The most Divine Supper The Arch-Symbolicall Supper 2. The Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10.21 With Vs it is commonly
should receive the blessed Sacrament sitting or leaning on his elbow or halfe-sitting halfe-kneeling or looking on the one side or smiling or using unseemly motion though those Gestures be not in singled particularities forbid yet they are a profanation of the Lords Supper as being forbidden in the Generall Rules First That comeliest and devoutest Gesture be used in holiest matters Sancta sanctè Secondly Let all things be done to edifying 1 Cor. 14.26 Thirdly Let all things be done in order vers 4. The rest will I set in order when I come saith S. Paul 1 Cor. 11.34 Fourthly Rom. 14.17 The Kingdome of God is not in meats nor drinks but righteousnesse and peace and joy in the holy Ghost For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace as there followeth Fiftly Let all things be done decently 1 Cor. 14.40 A comelinesse is commended Ecclesiastes 5.18 1 Cor. 11.13 It is comely that a women pray unto God uncovered Comelinesse is taught by nature as it there followeth Sixtly The meetings in sacred convocations are for good nor for evill We are come together for the better not for the worse And the contrary is reproved by Saint Paul 1 Cor. 11.17 Lastly God ruleth things Inferior by Superior things farther off by things nearer to him The people must not prescribe to the Magistrates nor to themselves Laws in things indifferent but the Governors and Pastors to the People Whosoever therefore at the receiving of the blessed Eucharist doth any thing misbeseemingly sinneth against these or some of these Rules and so sinneth against Christ I proved before that at the holy Receiving a prayer is preparatory and made for every one of us And as the Minister devoutly prayeth doth not thy heart say Amen and is not Amen truly explaned and enlarged thus O Lord I confesse this is thy Body this is thy Blood yea it is thine own Selfe which thou vouchsafest unto me and I do now Receive Oh preserve my body and soule unto everlasting life I eat in remembrance that thy Body was broken and that thou dyedst for me I drink in remembrance that thy Blood was shed and powred out for me Lord I am thankfull and I feed on thee in my heart by Faith Lord I beleeve pardon my wandring thoughts unite me unto thee make me from henceforth holy and conformable to thy selfe and let this spirituall food strengthen me in the way to Heaven To conclude in the Divine M. Hookers words Oh my God thou art True Oh my Soule thou art blessed He who useth not these or some of these or the like faithfull thankfull precatory ejaculations both at the instant act of receiving of the sacred Communion and presently after yea and whilst the Minister is praying for him he hath an obdurate heart he discerneth not the Lords Body but eateth and drinketh his owne damnation Now Reader judge again if a man will not kneele when the Minister prayeth for him and that openly If he will not kneele when he powreth out his hearty prayers unto God whether he sinneth not haynously Certainly God condemneth his foolish obstinacy and so I passe to another point PAR. 3. THe next is What names are given unto the holy Sacrament And here I will first speak of the Bread and of the Wine severally and shew you what names have been given them both in the Scriptures and by the Fathers and then will I speak of them joyntly together The hallowed Bread in the sacred Word of God is called the Lords Body broken for us 1 Cor. 11.24 discernable to be the Lords body vers 20. stiled also the Communion of the Body of Christ 1 Cor. 10.16 which Communion is not in the use of Scripture a proper name of the Eucharist but a declaration of its power and efficacy by making us one with Christ and by partaking the Sacrament with our brethren being a speciall meanes to the Communion of Saints though the Fathers make it a proper appellation saith Casaubone Act. 2.46 it is said They continued Breaking of Bread Domatim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at home or from house to house In which place it is varied Communicabant in fractione Eucharistiae They did Communicate in breaking of bread where the Translator makes use of a Greek word which he doth not often It is farther called Panis Sanctus Panis Benedictus Panis Eucharisticus Panis Coelestis Holy Bread Blessed Bread Eucharisticall Bread Heavenly Bread John 6.32 The Fathers appellations for it Oratio solvenda est Corpore Domini accepto Tertullian de Oratione cap. ultimo Upon taking the Lords Body we end our Prayers The same in lib. de Idololatria cap. 7. saith some did Manus admovere Corpori Domini move their hands to take the Lords Body Irenaeus lib. 4. cap. 34. E terrâ panis percipiens invocationem Dei non jam communis panis est fed Eucharistia ex rebus duabus constans terrenâ coelesti Earthly bread Sanctified by prayer is not now common bread but the Eucharist consisting of earthly and heavenly things It is a Medicine of immortality an Antidote against death procuring life purging sin driving away all evils Tertullian Adversus Judaeos in fine calleth the Eucharist Dominicae gratiae quasi viscerationem Christs Dole to his Church And least you may think it to be a poore Dole a Leane Thin Hungry gift the same Tertullian in lib. de Pudicitiâ expresseth it better thus Opimitate corporis Domini vescitur Hee eateth of the Plenty Abundance and Fatnesse of the Lords Body and our Soule is fully satisfied fatted crammed with God of which testimony hereafter The Cup is the new Testament in his blood 1 Cor. 10.25 This is my blood of the new Testament Matth. 26.28 and it is termed The Cup of the Lord vers 7 So it is also called 1 Cor. 10.21 Ye cannot drink the Cup of the Lord. The Cup of blessing which we blesse is the Communion of the Blood of Christ vers 16. The blessed Eucharist consisting of both kinds hath these glorious Tittles In the Scripture it is termed the Supper of the Lord 1 Cor. 11.20 And the Lords Supper in all these regards First because the Lord did Institute it Secondly did Take it Thirdly did Administer it to his Apostles Fourthly did appoint the Church to do the like in remembrance of the Lords death The Papiâ—â—s as before I observed dislike the frequent use of this phrase See Casaubone confuting Justinian the Jesuit in that point and against Maldonate whilst Casaubone from the Ancients calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Great Supper the Most Divine and Arch-symbolical supper By a Metonymie of the subject a Table that is the food set on that Table 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Table of the Lord 1 Cor. 10.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords Testament or Legacy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Communion as prohibiting Schisme and Division
Ioh. 7.8.10 11.14 verses But I remember not that ever the Feast of Pentecost was called a Feast singly and directly And I am sure the Passeover is called so divers times more then any other Feast View these proofes f Luk. 2 42. Luk. 2.42 They went up to Hierusalem according to the custome of the Feast and that feast was the Passeover as is proved by the precedent verse Againe The Iewes would take Iesus by subtilty and kill him but not on the Feast day g Math. 26.5 Mat. 26.5 And by that word Feast is the Passeover meant as appeareth ver 2. Lastly if you looke for the use of the same word in Saint Iohn you shall finde in h Ioh. 13.29 Ioh. 13.29 Buy those things we have need of against the feast but by the word Feast onely the Passeover is meant in that place as is evident ver 1. Briefely summe it thus Pentecost is never called by it selfe a Feast the Passeover is divers times above other feasts solely and simply called a Feast therefore by these words of the Evangelist Ioh. 5.1 There was a feast of the Iewes and Iesus want up to Hierusalem Pentecost was not understood but the Passeover in the fayrest way of argumentation must be meant It is prefixed After this there was a Feast of the Iewes that is after all things before recorded in the 2 3. and 4. Chapters Christ ascended againe into the Holy City healed him who lay at the poole of Bethesda thirty and eight yeares ver 9. And did livers other things PAR. 13. THe next passeover being the third after Christs publique ministery Christ went not to Hierusalem nor did take the Passeover at least in its appoynted usuall time and place nor was he at the following feast of Pentecost being seven weekes after A reason was this The Iewes sought to kill him Iohn 7.1 i Ioh. 7.1 And therefore he walked in Galilee and therefore he would not walke in Iury ibid. But certainely the Scribes came to him from Hierusalem to Galilee because he did not at these feasts come to them and he disputed with them about keeping the Tradition of the Elders a Math. 15.1 Mar. 7.1 Math 15.1 Mar. 7.1 See the many admirable things done by Christ in the space of sixe moneths namely from the Passeover till the Feast of Tabernacles in the excellent Itinerary of Christ made by Franciscus Lucas Brugensis When the murtherous rage of the Iewes was somewhat cooled though still the Iewes hated Christ b Iohn 7.7 Ioh. 7.7 About the middest of the feast of Tabernacles Iesus went up into the Temple and taught ver 14. PAR. 14. THe exact keeping of the Passeover was not so strictly appointed but many occasions might cause it to be differred Christ was not bound to cast himselfe into the mouth of danger whilest they ravenously thirsted for his blood but as sometimes he withdrew himselfe by disappearing and passed through the middest of them so here he thought fit not so much as to come among them Nor is our spirituall passeover so meerely necessary or so absolutely commanded but it may be omitted sometimes though never neglected much lesse contemned Sickenesse locall distance danger and the astonishing or stupifying consideration of sins unrepented of may excuse one from receiving for a while I dare not pronounce that profound humility to be sin When Peter fell downe at Iesus knees saying depart from me for I am a sinfull man O Lord c Luk. 5.8 Luk. 5.8 I suppose Christ was seldome nearer joyned to him in love And I have knowne him who in holy thoughts of his owne unworthinesse sinlesly as I conceive abstained Want of Charity is a sinne not receiving when men want Charity is not sin to receive then were a double sin d Math. 8.8 Math. 8.8 The Centurion said Lord I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roofe yet none in Israel had so much faith as he To the woman of Canaan who accounted her selfe as a dogge unworthy to eate bread at the Table content with the crummes which fell from the Masters Table e Math. 15.27 Mat. 15.27 Christ said her faith was great and be it unto thee as thou wilt ver 28. Subjecting his power to her desires And thus much of the third passeover during Christs publicke manifestation by our blessed Saviour or omitted or privately kept The Prayer MOst gracious God and blessed Saviour who hast commanded all those who are heavy laden to come unto thee and hast promised to refresh them and hast appoynted thy blood of the Testament to be shed for many for the remission of sinnes be mercifull unto the sins of us all make us walke strongly and Christianly by the strength of thy Sacraments all the dayes of our lives and let us so feed on the holy consecrated signes that we may never be separated from the thing signifyed even holinesse it selfe Iesus Christ our Lord. Amen CHAP. VI. The Contents of the sixt Chapter 1. In what manner Christ kept his last passeover with its particular rites cannot bee sooner found then by the Iewish observation of the Sabbath in those times 2. The Iewes had a liberty at the first to choose a Lambe or a Goate for the proper rosted Paschall Sacrifice 3. A Lambe and a Kid are not all one against Paulus Brugensis 4. The difference betweene the Pascha and the Chagigah 5. The reason of some Iewes and some late good Christians confuted 6. Rupertus his over-nice observation 7. The Lambes or Kids in the Aegyptian Passeover were called out foure dayes before 8. This was also a temporary rite divers reasons why they then chose the Lambe or Kid so long before hand in their first Passeover 9. Hunnius erreth in this point 10. The striking or sprinkling of the blood on the two side-postes and upper doore-post was not any of the durable rites but appropriated to the first Passeover 11. Sprinkling of blood much used of old 12. Empty houses in Goshen needed not be sprinkled 13. The Angelus exterminator could not hurt when the blood was sprinkled 14. Such a sprinkling as this was used in no other sacrifice 15. The Iewes generall consent that such sprinkling was never after in use 16. A true reason why this ceremony ceased 17. Christ was the doore thus besprinkled 18. Hannibal his imitation 19. The first Passeover was eaten in great haste 20. The succeeding Passeovers were not eaten in such haste 21. Faire meanes and foule were used to hasten the Israelites out of Aegypt 22. Vatablus his opinion of the foure Ensignes under which the Israelites marched 23. They went out rather bene cincti then quintati 24. Reasons why they went not onely five by five in a ranke 25. Yet some went well armed and some were unarmed 26. The most probable manner of their departure out of Aegypt described at large 27. The Israelites had abundance of lesser standards but foure chiefe ones in severall quarters 28.
lesse Quando suppetet Pascha beatius cibusque coelestis in Regno Dei since hee had a more blessed Passeover and a heavenly banquet in the Kingdome of God PAR. 2. IT is a true Rule that not onely the prepositions before after untill unto from and the like which denote or signifie the bounds limits either of time or place either initiall or finall and determinative but all other descriptions or circumscriptions of time space or place are ambiguous and sometimes include sometimes exclude those very bounds assigned out Before the day of the Passeover the word before saith Illyricus sometimes includeth sometimes excludeth the very day of the Passeover when it is to be understood inclusivè the sense is Ante diem Pasche terminatum vel finitum before the day of the Passeover was terminated or ended yet commonly it is used exclusivè so after three dayes Christ shall rise againe Marke 8.31 and after three dayes he said he would rise againe Matth. 27.63 by which expressions is not meant that he would rise againe the fourth fifth sixe or seventh day or any time after that but the third day is included not excluded for his Resurrection was fore-prophecied of by Christ himselfe that it should be accomplished on the third day Matth. 16.27 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 raised againe the third day and accordingly it was performed Christ rose againe the third day saith the Apostles Creed He rose againe the third day 1 Cor. 15.4 according to the Scriptures After sixe dayes Jesus taketh Peter and James and Iohn and bringeth them unto an exceeding high mountaine Matth. 17 1. Marke 9.2 yet is it varied Luke 9.38 about an eight dayes after The reconciliation is faire the word after in S. Matthew and Marke excludeth dies terminales It was not in any part or parcell of the sixe dayes they were fully ended and passed but the preposition after in S. Luke excludeth them So Christ became obedient unto death Phil. 2.8 and though the word unto be often exclusive yet because Christ came not onely to the gate doore or chamber of death but passed through them and really truely was dead therefore death is not here excluded but included in the word usque or unto 1 Sam. 15.35 Samuel came no more to see Saul untill the day of his death usque ad that is from the houre neither before nor then nor after I have the more insisted on this Rulebecause it removeth many seeming contradictions in Scripture which the ignorant are not able to reconcile but swallow downe with their difficulties and now I descend unto the word Donec or untill to the further clearing of these difficult words Donec or untill the first is affirmative Matth. 28.20 I will be with you unto or untill the end of the world which promise proveth not that he would not be with them after the end of the world but rather that he would be much more with them in another world though he would not desert them here Psa 110.1 Sit thou on my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footestoole grosse is the man who hence inferreth that Christ shall not sit at Gods right hand when Christ shall tread upon his enemies now he doth raigne over them even whilst there is opposition and shall much more hereafter when they shall be under his feete here Donec also affirmeth of the future times PAR. 3. THe second force of Donec is negative defuturo for the time to come Matt. 1.25 non cognoscebat eam donec peperit He knew her not untill shee had brought forth c. he meaneth not that after her sacred child-bearing Ioseph knew her for it is an Hebrew Idiotisme 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 donec the word untill excludeth without exception expressely till such a time and leaveth it implicitely to be understood that much lesse was it done or to be done afterward Rem nunquam factam certo tempore exprimit non factam quô videri facta poterat scireque necessaria erat non factam Excellently saith Lucas Brugensis he expresseth a thing never done by the not doing of it at a certaine time viz. at such a time as in all likelihood all others would have knowne their wives upon a new marriage but Ioseph did not so much no not at that time much lesse did he so afterward Michal the daughter of Saul had no child untill the day of her death 2 Sam. 6.23 Stupid is he who concludeth that she had children or a child after her death The Resultance is rather and firmer thus If shee had no child till her death much lesse had shee one after Ioseph knew not the blessed ever-Virgin Mary till she was delivered much lesse did he after that In both these passages the force of donec is negative So here I will not any more eate thereof till it be fulfilled not here much lesse hereafter in heaven where we shall have a more blessed Pascha sine intybis vel amaritudine without any bitter Sallet the like may be said of the word untill in the 18 verse but what is the kingdome of God Or how is the Passeover fulfilled in the Kingdome of God I answer by the Kingdome of God in this place is not meant the Militant Church but the Triumphant Origen Euthymius and others here appropriate it to the future world and in the world to come the Passeover is thus then fulfilled and perfected because the Iewish Passeover was to be eaten with bitter herbs and that Passeover was accompanied with a second Supper nor were all and every one blessed that tooke the Passeover therefore was it in a manner imperfect but blessed are all and every one who are called to the Marriage-Supper of the Lambe Rev. 19 9. and in that Supper is nothing wanting all sorrow excluded all joy prefected the Type being drowned in the glory of the great antitype an happier Supper an happier Passeover shall be in heaven This manner of speech perhaps hence arose saith Illyricus because the Writer would determine onely for his owne time or the time he propounded to handle and cared not to speake of further or remoter times as it was principally intended and all things were accordingly prepared that Christ might eate the Passeover Marke 14.12 So it is most true Christ sate not as an idle spectator but he did indeede eate the Passeover and promised never to eate it more PAR. 4. WHat else Luke 22.17 He tooke the Cup and gave thankes and said Take this and divids it among your selves for I say unto you I will not drinke of the fruit of the Vine untill the Kingdome of God shall come that this was not the Eucharisticall Cup appeareth by the Sequell where he instituted the blessed Sacrament of his body and blood PAR. 5. BUt what mean these words I will not drinke of the fruite of the Vine untill the Kingdome of God shall come What is the fruite of the Vine which then shall be drunken the
would not neglect the preaching of the Word of God nor exclude themselves from It to serve Tables In this sense S. Paul said 1 Corinth 1.17 Christ sent me not to Baptize but to preach the Gospel yet both Baptising and Serving at Tables especially the Sacred Ones were divine offices Christ was given for us in the Sacrifice was given to us in the Sacrament In the first per modum victimae as an offring in the last per modum epuli as Bishop Andrews hath it as in a Banquet Who knoweth not Banquets are commonly set on Tables In the Feastings of our great Ones you may perhaps find out the Jewish fashion of Feastings For as oft times our people arise when the first and second courses are removed and other meat and messes carried away and go to another Table and Banquet of Sweet-meats as the close of all So very well may it be that when Judas was excluded out of that room and gone down staires and forth of doores Christ and his Apostles might arise from their former Feasting and at another Table apply themselves to this Sacred banquet of the Holiest Heavenliest Sweet-meat since more devotion was required at this most Sacred food than at their other repast of which hereafter Besides I desire to see one proofe where ever any of Christs Apostles or any Jew of those times did feed from the Ground Floore or Pavement when they did eat in any house well-furnished I cannot omit another place 1 Cor. 10.21 Ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the Table of Devils That the Apostle speaketh of the sacred Eucharist in the first place appeareth by the precedent verses The Cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ The Bread which wee breake is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ vers 17. Here are both Species both Kinds Christ blessed the Cup and so do we before and in the Consecration and this is the Communion of Christs blood Giving of thanks preceded consecration The Heathen had Altars on which they made offrings to their Gods the Devils and they had also Tables from which they did participate of things Offered It was lawfull to go to the Tables and Feasts of the Gentiles and to eate whatsoever was set before them 1. Cor. 10.27 But they might not approach to the Pagan Altars to partake of them Nor eat any thing in Idolio in the Idols Temple Nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As a thing offred to Idols no though a man did but say so vers 28. Yet Christians partaked even of the Sacrifices which were upon and taken from the Heathen Altars on which they were Sacrificed if they knew it not as the Gentiles and Jews also Deuteronomy 18.1 c. though not Altars but Tables were principally ordained to eat upon Yet they who waited at the Altar are partakers with the Altar 1 Cor. 9.13 Christ could not expect an Altar in an upper chamber of a private man Altars were no part of chamber-furniture The Jews might have no other permanent Altars after their setting in Hierusalem bu two The Altar of Incense and the Altar of Sacrifice Christ may be said in a sort to be the Altar the Offring and the Priest when he was Sacrificed on the Crosse Other than a Metaphoricall Altar he used not he was not The poore mans box or chest shall be set neare to the high Altar Injunction the 29. But he consecrated the saving Eucharist on a Table and therefore is it called the Lords Table And because Christ did so all other Christians were the apter to do so and for a while called the Church-Altars Tables in reference to Christs first Institution upon a Table For in times of persecution they could well use none but Tables and therefore doth the Primitive Church oft call them Tables and seldome Altars unto which they were not admitted to administer the Sacrament of the body and blood of the Lord. Nor did they carry Altar or Altars from house to house from City to City from Countrey to Countrey as they Communicated in severall Houses in severall Cities and Countreys and for a while daily so communicated but used the Tables such as they were made by Art wheresoever they came Nor perhaps did they stand on the particular consecration either of Tables or of Cups and Vessels to hold the Body and Blood of Christ but in the fiery furnace of persecution were content sometimes to make use of such things as could be had and rather made them holy than found them holy But he who from hence will think that the name of Altar is unlawfull or of a late invention or that they were excluded from Christian Churches or that there were Tables allowed and every where set up in the Churches Or that Altars were destroyed generally or for the most part Or that even Altars themselves were not sometimes called Tables with an eye to Christs first institution Or that will cry-up Tables to cry-down Altars He knoweth not the different usances of the Church in times of persecution and cut of it but taketh advantage of words to set asunder things which well may stand together and runneth with a strong by as to his own works Neither would I have my speciall friend to precipitate himselfe into the other extreame or so to fix his mind on Altars so to undervalew Tables as to maintain or publish that Christ did not celebrate the Heavenly Eucharist on a Table and that he instituted it on a plain Floore or pavement which opinion I think was scarce ever heard off a thousand yeares after the first Institution of the Sacrament The extract or exempt especially appropriated to our purpose is this Not only the Devils in a kind of imitation of God Almighty this worship had by the Heathen Tables erected and consecrated to them of which they took part and were allowed their divident or portion on which they fed sometimes in the Temples of their Idols sometimes at home But even the holy Christians in their best perfection had diverse Tables on which they did administer the Lords Supper and partaked of the holy Communion and they were called the Tables of the Lord. For the Lord himselfe and his holy Ones a long time after him administred the blessed Eucharist on Tables PAR. 6. THe second point held probable was and is The holy Eucharist was administred by Christ on a Table different and variant from the Paschall and Ordinary Supper-Table Object Yea but what proofes have you for that Sol. I answer what proofes have you to the contrary And why was not the Heavenly food consecrated on a distinct Table Or which opinion is like-liest In this so uncertaine a point we are not forbidden but rather commanded to search for the truth 1 John 4.1 Beleeve not every spirit but try the spirits whether they are of God 2 Thess 2.2 Be not soon shaken in mind or troubled But 1 Thess 4.21 Prove
resultance but though Rabbi Solomon and Vatablus after him may safely conclude it was moved or shaken round about yet which quarter of heaven they began at and which they ended at wanteth proofe and the Rabbins differ in judgement one from another I will not say but it is possible Christ at the Benediction might use Elevation in signification that he should be Lifted up to the Crosse yea waving of the bread in the sight of his Apostles and toward them or toward heaven and if he did he did it with a divine signification that God commanded this and that this ordinance was from heaven perhaps with more than one onely But it seemeth not probable to me that when and where he abrogated part of the Leviticall Law Then and There he used the Ceremony of the said Leviticall Law or that his Offering was not every way perfecter than the Oblations of the Old Law which savoured more of the Terrestriall than Celestiall Canaan Sed quisque abundet sensu suo Let every one opine as he pleases yet thus conclusively I shall never beleeve but the Benediction was with some sacred extraordinary Solemnitie Ceremony or Action more than if it had beene used or was used at an ordinary refection For by the breaking of ordinary bread Christ was not knowne nor was discerned nor could be discerned from any other man But when he so solemnly Tooke bread and Blessed it and Brake and Gave it them just as he did before in the Eucharist by his Actions and the devout manner of them in their Circumstances were their eyes opened to know him Luk. 24.30 c. PAR. 3. WHen Christ had Taken the bread he Blessed it He Gave thankes He Brake it His Breaking of it is now to be considered If the Priest alone had been to take it there needed little breaking or rather none unlesse the Priest are all the broken pieces The Breaking implieth it is so done for more than one and for this end was Fractio panis The Breaking of bread It is ridiculous what is in Maldonate Matth. 26.26 on the word Fregit It is called the Breaking of Bread not because it is truely Broken but because it is Given As if Bread could not be Broken and yet not Given As if they could not also Give whole loaves Did whole loaves and not rather Broken bread signifie Christs body which was Broken for us And did not Christ Give his Disciples the Sacred Bread after it was Broken How then is Breaking all one with Giving He saith our reasoning proceedeth from great Ignorance Judge Reader if this supervice exposition doe not arise from pride and presumptive confidence that he can cast dust and blinde the eyes of the world Even in this particular also it seemeth Christ followed the Hebrew custome For the Talmudists report that at their Home-feasts among the Jewes the Head or Father of the Family Tooke Bread Gave Thankes and Brake it And in truth Breaking had a proper signification to demonstrate That his Body should be Broken on the Crosse For though a Bone of him was not Broken John 19.36 yet were they Out of joynt Psal 22.14 yet his Flesh was Broken in many pieces His holy Temples and Head pierced with many thornes thornes beate in with a Reede or Cane Matth. 27.30 His tender backe so cruelly whipped that the Psalmist Psal 129.3 compareth the executioners to ploughmen the dints ruptures and slices made by the Roman rods to no lesse than furrowes than long furrows The ploughers plowed upon my backe and made long furrowes I know no interpretation of this Scripture so proper as this that I have delivered His innocent hands and feete they bored thorough with great vast nayles so great that a bridle was made of them as Eusebius records The Psalmist sayth Psal 22. vers 16. They Digged my hands and my feet as the Hebrew well beareth it intimating the wide orifices of the wounds Lastly so great an hole was made in his side that Thomas thrust his hand into it Joh. 20.27 in signe of these Breakin gs well might he Breake the Bread The word of Breaking sheweth the ancient custome of Imparting the Sacrament to the By-standers And it was Broken by the Hand of the Breaker or rather with a Knife saith Lorinus on Act. 2. because unleavened bread is glutinous or clammy and so is easier divided That a Knife shall be said so propely to Breake bread as an Hand I cannot beleeve And I discerne no such clamminesse or cleaving of the Unleavened Bread above the Leavened as should cause a Knife to be used rather than an Hand and the Hand may easily enough divide it And if the Knife did prepare it yet the often repeated word of Fraction induceth me to think the Fingers did Breake the divided Bread into lesse and fit pieces But Lorinus brings in that invention of the Knife and preferreth it before the Breaking with the Hand contrary to three Evangelists and S. Paul who name not Cutting but Breaking of bread Nor doe the ancient Fathers name the Cutting but urge the Breaking And when Christ said Doe this It is as cleare as the light of the Sunne he meaned Take the bread Give thankes Breake it c. And so the not Breaking of the Bread is a trangression of the first Institution How ill then doth the Church of Rome to leave off Breaking of the Bread as it hath done for a long time and to consecrate Singulos panes seu minores hostias ad vitandum periculum decidentium micarum the loaves by themselves or lesser hostes or sacrifices to avoyd the danger of the crumbes falling downe and that the Laicks and other sacred Administrants must be contented with a lesser host than the sacrificer hath saith Lorinus Yet Christ Brake the Bread without feare of crumbes falling say I and the Primitive Church appointed men to receive the sacred bread into their Right hands with their fingers close and not open and the women to receive it in cleane Linnen so to prevent the falling of the crumbes Likewise concerning the sacred Wine The Laicks were wont of old Cannâ haurire Dominicum sanguinem è calice with a Cane to drink out of a Chalice the Blood of our Lord and so was no danger of spilling one drop Pellican calleth it argenteum calicem Fisiulam quâ Laici Dominicum exorbeant sanguinem A silver Mazor or Cup or Chalice and a Pipe Reed or Cane by which the Laicks sucked and supped the Blood of our Lord. See Beatus Rhenanus in his preface before Tertullian de Corona Militis and Tertullians testimony in his book de Corona Militis is expresse that they had a great care of the sacred Mysteries Calicis aut Panis etiam nostri aliquid decutian terram Anxiè patimur We are soretroubled and passionately suffer if one drop of the sacred Wine or one crumb of sacred Bread fall to the ground Which in despight of some novellists I will apply to the