that Land when he had receiued it but is aduanced and lifted vp higher by a greater promise For thus he heareth God speake to him I am thy protectour and thine exceeding great reward So Dauid from temporall blessings riseth to that highest and last blessing Ps 73.26 The Lord is my portion for euer And Psal 16.5 The Lord is the portion of mine inheritance and of my cup thou shalt maintaine the lot of mine inheritance As on the contrarie the depriuation of that Land as being a signe of eternall life was acounted a curse But in the new Testament we are led the direct way without any turning vnto meditation of eternal life these earthly and grosse helps being omitted What is the other difference It is takē frō the Doctrin annexed to it or frō the maner of leading men to the fountaine and author of saluation and the knowledge of mercie in Christ for before the comming of Christ the administration was more burthensome troublesome and costly for God brought vp and led the auntient Fathers more straitly by laying vpon them the tuition and gouernment the teaching and obseruance of the Law a Gal. 3.24 4.1 2.3 with hard conditions and laying vpon them the yoake of many seuerall ceremonies b Act. 15.10 and the burden of his curse also But vs he intreateth more kindly and liberally without that hard strict exacting of the performāce of the Law the burthen of the curse being removed from our shoulders that intolerable yoak of ceremonies by the preaching of the Gospel Mat. 11.28 Come vnto mee all yee that are weary and heauie leaden and I will refresh you Take my yoake vpon you for my yoake is easie And from this adiunct doth Ierem. 31.31.32 take a difference betwixt the Old and New Testament by a Metonimie of the Adiunct for the Subiect calling the Lawe of Moses considered by it selfe and in it selfe a Legall and auntient Couenant because it was the law of creation whereby God tooke of vs assurance and full couenant for our perfect obedience to be performed by our owne strength a Gal. 3.12 Math. 19 19 17. Deut. 6.5 Luk. 10.27 But the Gospell couenanteth with vs that perfect obedience shall be giuen vs by him of his free voluntarie fauour is therefore a nevv and free Couenant b Ephes 2.8 Iohn 6.45 So also in respect of this adiunct the Apostle 2. Cor. 3.6.7.8.9.11 and Gal. 4.24 Compareth the Old testament or Law with the New testament or Gospell and the Old hee calleth the Letter the ministerie of death and condemnation consisting in the Letter and ingrauen in stones because the law in respect of them that heare it hath no more power then any writing in it selfe void of all force and can do nothing else but accuse vs of vnrighteousnesse wrap vp all mankind in the curse But the New Testament so farre forth as it is opposed to the law being considered by and in it selfe nakedly hee calleth the Spirit and the ministerie of the Spirit and righteousnesse that is the preaching of the Gospell because it reuealeth the mercie of God by which wee are iustified renewed by the spirit of Christ whom the Gospell hath being ioyned vnto it who also giueth to the elect that faith which he requireth of vs. Againe he calleth the Old testament a testament of bondage because it breedeth a seruile feare in our mindes because the law by adding a most hard and impossible condition can stirre vp nothing in our heatts but the feare of Gods wrath But the new he calleth a Testament of Libertie because it stirreth vp the beleeuers to a sonne-like trust in God Rom. 8.15 Yee haue not receiued the Spirit of bondage again vnto feare but the spirit of adoption by vvhich vve crie Abbafather What is the third difference It is taken from the qualitie and maner of reuelation for in the Old testament all things were set downe more darkly and the Old testament did shadow out Christ to come by promises types figures ceremonies and diuers rites and it was a portraying and sleight shadowing of the New testament for as the high priest himselfe was a type of Christ a Heb 8 1.2 9.7.8.9.11 likewise also the mercie seate b Rom. 3.24 So also were the sacrifices shadowes yea visible Sermons of Christs passion as also the purifications in the Law did shadow forth the only true expiation and pacification for sinnes which was to be made by the bloud of Christ as it is said Heb. 10.1 The Lavv had in it a shadow of good things to come not the very Image of the things But the new is administred more clearely plainely by the preaching of the Gospell by Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord it also giueth vnto vs the present inheritance and solid bodie or it sheweth vnto vs Christ who is giuen c Act. 1.8 Mat 26.28 And in respect also of this adiunct the New testament is opposed to the Old d Heb. 10.1 c. And the Old was confirmed by the slaughter of beasts and the sprinkling of their bloud but this by the bloud of Christ whereupon Christ saith at his Supper Luk. 22.20 This cup is the New Testament in my bloud The Old was temporarie and to be abolished is taken away by the comming of Christ because it had a resemblance of things to come but this because it giueth vs the bodie it selfe and the trueth of the thing it is eternall and shall neuer perish Psal 110.4 The Lord hath sworne and it shall not repent him Thou art a Priest for euer c. Thefore Augustine saith In the Old Testament is a hiding of the New in the new a manifestation of the Old What is the fourth difference It is taken from the measure of the Spirit because now is greater abundance of the Spitit in the New Testament and a greater knowledge then was before vnder the old testament if you consider the bodie it selfe of the Church a Act. 2 17 Iohn 7.38 39 Ierem. 31 34 Isa 11.9 54 13 Iohn 6.45 1 Cor. 2.10 1. Ioh 2 20.27 For although there were many vnder the Old testament who seeme to haue beene endewed by God with greater gifts then any vnder the New yet wee must iudge of the abundance and greater efficacie of the spirit vnder the new Testament not in respect of euery particular man amongst the faithfull but of all in generall or the whole Church together Hereupon Ioel. 2.28 I will poure out of my Spirit vpon all flesh that is I will giue it in great abundance Hence also the old testament is called by Paul a testament of the Letter c 2. Cor. 13.6 But the new is Spirituall because God doth shew more power of the spirit in the preaching of the Gospell then of the Law What is the last difference It is in the largenesse and newnesse of the people of God gathered together out
of the Iewes and Gentiles or the whole company of them who are receiued into the couenant for the Old couenant properly belonged to Abraham and the Israelites his posteritie Deut. 32.8 VVhen the most high God diuided to the nations their inheritance when he separated the sons of Adam he appointed the borders of the people according to the number of the children of Israell d Gen. 15.18 17.7 for the Lords portion is his people Iacob is the lot of his inheritance But the new couenant belongeth to all nations to whome God hath vouchsafed the light of the Gospell Mark 16.15 Go yee into all the world and preach the Gospell to euerie creature Hee that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued c. Act. 10.15.34.35.43 Rom. 1.16 3.29 As in many other places But may not God seeme mutable or vnlike himselfe seeing hee hath changed that which once hee purposed No in no case for neither hath hee changed his purpose nor done any thing disagreeing with it but hee sheweth himselfe most wise because in diuerse ages he knoweth how to vse diuerse meanes to bring his elect to the knowledge of their saluation in Christ according as hee saw the estate of both that is as both old and latter times required Euen as the Physition taketh one course of cure in a childe another in a man of ripe age according to the diuersitie of their constitutions and yet can hee not therefore bee tearmed inconstant or vnlike himselfe Therefore Paule Ephes 3.10 calleth this dispensation of the couenant the manifolde and diuerse wisdom of God because God in his wisdome doth in other maner call the Gentiles then in old time he did the Iewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhat therefore is the Old Testament It is a solemne maner of confirming the Couenant comprehended in the Morall Law the ceremonies and Sacrifices ordained to this end that the promise of grace and eternall life for Christes sake might bee kept with condition of faith obedience through faith on mans part to be performed What is the new Testament It is a full manifestation of Gods grace which hath shined to the world since Christs comming into the world which is effected without the strict and hard exacting of the Law and the administration of the ceremonies VVhen was this ordained In Paradise straight after the fall of our first parents for at that time was vttered the first promise pertaining to the Gospell concerning Christ to come a Gen. 3.15 and afterwards it was made to a certaine familie namely of Abraham b Gen. 12.3 17 4 5 19. 22 18 It was performed at the time when Christ was exhibited and confirmed by his bloud and death But why is one and the same Testament called Old and New c Luk 22 20 It is Old in regard of the promise New in regard of Christ alreadie exhibited Also it is Old in respect of the adiunct For the publishing of the Lawe did in time goe before the sending of Christ and that ample declaration of the Gospell or new as it were renewed as Iohn 13.34 The Lord there calleth the commaundement of Loue a new commaundemen wholy renewed or which must be euer new Besides because it was confirmed by Christs death For a Testament is confirmed and in force when the testator is dead otherwise it is not of force whilst he liueth who made it Heb. 9.17 Who made this will or Testament The sonne of God VVho are the hearers All that beleeue VVhat is the inheritance All the benefits which the death of Christ hath procured vs. VVhat are the tables of the Testament The holy Bible or holy Scripture VVhat seales are there to this Testament The Sacraments which in the Old testament were circumcision and the Passeouer but in the new Baptisme the Lords Supper What is the vse of this Doctrine It sheweth that there was alwaies one way to attaine saluation namely by faith in the free promise of Christ and that there was one and the same Church in the old and new Testament What opinions are against this Doctrine 1. The errour of Sernetus and certaine Anabaptists who faine that the people of Israell was fatted pampered in this life without any hope of heauenly immortalitie euen as swine or beasts are for the slaughter 2 The madnes of them who falsely imagined a threefold way of saluation namely the Law of Nature the Law of Moses and the Law of Christ as if there had beene three seuerall couenants of God differing in substance The three and twentieth common place Of the passion and death of Chist What vnderstand you by this terme of the passion of Christ 1 I vnderstand by a Synecdoche a part for the whole whatsoeuer Christ suffered from the first moment of his conception as for example his lying in the maunger when hee was newely borne when there was no roome for his mother in the Inne Luk. 2.7 And afterwards when vpon the eight day after his natiuitie hee shed his bloud in the circumcision the same Chap. vers 22. and from thence vntil the time wherein hee was offered a sacrifice for vs vpon the Altar of the crosse but especially all kinde of iniuries and that horrible punishment which was executed vpon him vnder Pilate 2. The passions of Christ are called the crosses or calamities of Christes mysticall bodie which is the Church or of his members which must bee heere accomplished vntill all the members in their certaine manner and measure become conformable to Christ by the crosse Whereupon the Apost Colos 1.24 saith thus I fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church that is for the comfort of the Church a for as Leo the first saith The iust hau◠receiued not giuen crownes and from the fortitude of the faithfull are sprung examples of patience not gifts of righteousnesse 3. Metonimically the adiunct for the subiect by passion is vnderstoode the Historie describing Christ passion VVhat is the Lords passion or suffering It is a part of Christs obedience whereby he himselfe beeing innocēt became a sacrifice for the guilty or thus It is a propitiatory sacrifice wherby the son of God being made man offered himselfe to the father that hee might merit for all that beleeue in him eternall iustification sanctification deliuerance from sinne and eternall death and in the end eternall life as Christ himselfe doth expound the matter Ioh. 17.19 I sanctifie my selfe that is I offer my selfe to the Father for them to be an holy and pacifying sacrifice that they also may be sanctified for euer VVhat are the efficient causes of Christs passion There are three efficient causes thereof God Sathan and men and all these in diuerse respects 1. The Counsel and determination of God the most absolute and high will of God that is his ordinance whereby from eternitie he hath so disposed of this businesse that therein he
was identical rightly expressed in these words this is the bloud of the couenant But Christ gaue to his disciples wine contained in the cup and sacramentally signified the thing by the signe of wine Therfore in the enuntiation of Christ this namely the wine which was contained in the cup is one thing that bloud of the new Testament that is the thing it selfe of that sacrament is an other thing And therfore the enuntiation of Christ is rightly expressed in these words hoc est sanguis this is bloud What is the new testament in the bloud of Christ They acknowledge that the name of Testament is the same here that Couenant is who do take it to answere to the Hebrew name Berith and therfore to declare 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is an agreement begun betweene them which first did disagree which signification doth especially heere accord although it commeth all to one reckoning whether we vnderstand the new couenant begun by the bloud of christ or the wil of christ dying which is signified by the word testamēt established confirmed by his own bloud shed For the particle In in the Hebrew phrase doth not signifie a simple coniunction inexistence or reall concomitancie as though it had beene said with my bloud but the cause the manner the instrument and the adiuuant cause of any thing as Psal 33.16 The King is not saued in multo exercitu that is by the multitude of an host and Rom. 5.2 In the bloud of Christ that is by the bloud as it is expounded Coloss 1.22 Rom. 3.14 But this Testament is not any corporal draught of the bloud of Christ or drinking of wine but it is the couenant of grace reconciliation or agreement and a couenant betweene God and the beleeuers wherein God doth promise vnto vs that he forgiueth vs our sins and giueth the holy Ghost righteousnes and life eternall of his meere mercie by faith for the bloud of Christ shed vpon the crosse and wee in like manner to binde ourselues to God to receiue these his benefits by true faith in Christ and to shew thankfulnes by true obedience towards him in the whole course of our life Of which couenant Esay speaketh chap. 59.24 and Ier. 31.31 and 32.40 Heb. 9 15. Gal. 3.17 Why said not the lord This is my body of the new Testament as he said this cup is the new testament in my bloud Because although the Testament or new couenant was established by the oblation of whole Christ and by the intercession of his death Heb. 9.15.16 yet notwithstanding his death was more euident in the bloud shed then in the matter it selfe of the flesh Therfore vnder the old couenant Moses said Exo. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 Behold the bloud of the couenant which the Lord hath made with you And therfore Christ that the relation of the truth might be more plaine he applied the appellation of the New Couenant rather to his bloud then to his bodie yet so that he excluded not his bodie the bloud whereof was shed from the confirmation of the couenant and redemption of the soule Add to this that when Christ had made mention of drinking wine which he calleth his bloud he remembred the new couenant because vnder the old the vse of bloud was forbidden a Leuit. 17. Verse 10.16 which in the other signe of bread was not necessarie to expresse Which is the other branch Which for you in Luke and for many in Mathew and Marke is shed for the remission of sinnes The subiect of which speech is the Relatiue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which and it is referred properly to the bloud not to the wine Truly if you look to the construction of the words in Luke it must be referred to the cup but because neyther the cup nor the wine was shed for vs that subiect is altogether to be vnderstood of the bloud The predicate Effunditur is shed again by Enallage for Effundetur shall be shed as the common translation doth also expound it Yet the Lord doth seeme vpon set purpose in the institution of this mystery although speaking of a thing to come yet to haue vsed in both places the words of the Present Tense that the Disciples might be admonished that this is the vse of these signes that with the eyes of faith the things forthwith to be should be seene as it were alreadie present in them like as we must behold them in this action by faith as it were being before our eyes although alreadie performed long agoe that is to say the whole historie of the passion as if with these our eyes wee did see the bodie of Christ hanging and pierced through and the bloud dropping out of his wounds Therefore it is shed saith hee that is to say vpon the Crosse not into the cup or into a mouth whereby againe is signified in what manner the bloud of Christ is liuing drinke to vs not simplie as it is now clarified but as shed for vs and truly for you and for many Marke 14.24 although not for all but for the elect onely that is for their cause for the remission of sinnes which is a most exceeding wholesome end of the bloud of Christ shed not of the drinke of wine For of this it is said In remembrance of me but of the shedding of bloud For the remission of sinnes From whence doe you gather besides that Christ spake Tropically 1 From the nature and sacramentall speaches of all other Sacraments alreadie instituted from the beginning of the world wherein it commeth to passe that the name of the thing signified is giuen to the signe it selfe or the signe is named for the thing signifyed as Genes 17.10.13 Circumcision is the Couenant that is the signe of the Couenant Exod. 12.11.27 The Lambe is the Passeouer that is the signe and memoriall of the Lord The Rocke was Christ that is a signe of Christ a Exod. 17.6 1. Cor. 10.4 2 From the knowne speech concerning the same Sacrament in Paule 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we breake is the communion of the bodie that is to say Metonymically like as the Gospell is called the power of God that is the effectuall instrument of God Rom. 1.16 And VVe that are many are one bread and one bodie And 1. Cor. 11.29 He that eateth and drinketh vnworthily eateth drinketh his owne damnation which things vnlesse a trope be vsed cannot be vnderstood and the bodie it selfe of Christ cannot be said to be eaten but tropically 3 Because the Ascension of Christ into heauen and the veritie of the humane nature which hee tooke admitteth not a proper speech For Augustine teacheth That one place is not to bee interpreted so that it may be contrarie to many others but so that it may agree with many other De Doct. Christ 4 Because the Fathers had the same meate and drinke not only among themselues but also with vs that is to say in respect of the matter
the spirit also they must be shod or booted with the preparatiō of the gospell and prepared to make great increasings in the Gospell or prepared by the knowledge of the Gospell of peace to vndertake the combats to sustaine the dangers and to auoid the occasions of falling and offences wherewith as it were with brambles thornes or serpents the feete of the godly are often wounded Further leaning vpon the spirituall staffe of the promises of Gods word they may guide their steppes in their iourney and rayse themselues being fallen whereof Psal 23.4 Thy rod and thy staffe haue comforted me 11 Also they must eate the Lambe 1. standing 2 In haste that is such as doe not tyre in the course of this mortall life doe not linger still in spirituall Aegypt or Babylon but doe with all speede renounce the kingdome of Sathan and as it becommeth holy trauellers doe with all earnestnesse desire to be gonne out of the prison of this life vnto that pompe and manner of life which shall be in the heauenly countrey 12 It must be eaten in one house that is he would haue the spirituall communion of the fulnesse in one bodie and head Christ to be ratified and preserued by this meanes 13 God would haue no bone of that Lamb to be broken mystically to shew what he wold perform in his son he hauing none of his bones broken Ioh. 19.33 might be made famous as it were by a visible mark that might proue him to be the true Passeouer Why did Christ appoint the Supper of the Lord in stead of the Sacrament of the Paschall Lambe To shew that he had fulfilled those things which were prefigured in the shadow of the Iewish Passeouer For in the olde Passeouer there was the bodie and bloud of the Pascall Lambe being a beast and in that feast was yearely iterated the remembrance of the preseruation of the first borne of Israll by the bloud and of their deliuerance out of Aegypt as a prouocation to thankfulnesse and a signe of their redemption which Christ should worke but in the new Testament the bodie of the true and onely Lambe of God being slaine and offered vpon the Altar of the Crosse and his bloud shed for remission of sinnes doth procure vnto vs farre more excellent things then was the deliuerance out of Aegypt to the people of the Iewes And the Supper of the Lord was instituted to this end that by the receiuing of the bodie and bloud of the Lambe of God there might bee made not a yearely onely but a perpetuall communication commemoration and celebration of the most chiefe and eternall benefits as of saluation purchased and other more procured by the death of Christ according to Christs commandement Doe this in remembrance of me Luk. 22.19 As also the Lord saith of the Passeouer This day shall bee vnto you for a memoriall Exod. 12.14 Furthermore as it was said touching the Passouer No stranger or vncircumcised shall eate thereof but such as be borne at home and come to yeares who had learned the mysterie by way of Catechising so also because in the supper our couenant made with God is renued it is to be communicated to none but to them that are of circumcised harts and by Baptisme are made the houshold seruants of God and partners of the couenant but at no hand to the prophane or vncleane and ignorant but onely to the faithfull being purified by faith after that they had giuen their names to Christ and haue beene instructed in the mysterie of his death And as the Paschall Lambe was eaten with giuing of thankes so ought we also to receiue the Supper of the Lord with thanksgiuing Lastly as it was a thing much to bee desired to eate the Paschall Lambe so it is a sweet thing to the beleeuers to eate the bread of the Lord. Seeing there was onely one Lambe offered as a sacrifice for the redemption of the Church why did God commaund a Lambe to be killed in euerie house as though euerie one of them should haue had their sacrifices peculiar by themselues Because although they were all deliuered from destruction by the selfesame bloud yet he would haue each family priuately admonished by speciall application that they might the more sensibly perceiue the grace bestowed vpon them As at this day the selfe same thing is Baptisme vnto vs whereby we are in common ingrafted into the bodie of Christ yet euery one hath his owne Baptisme performed to him to the end that they might more certainly know that they are partakers of the adoption and so the members of the Church Why is Iesus Christ called the Lamb slain euen from the beginning of the world Apoc. 13.8 seeing Paule saith Now once in the latter end of the world was he made manifest to abolish sin by offering vp of himselfe Heb. 9.26 1 Because of the effect of his death whereunto although there was a certaine time prefixed yet the merit and efficacie thereof did no lesse benefit the fathers in old time and was applied vnto their Iustification and Sanctification then now it benefits vs and is applied to vs. 2 Because he is the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world and by his oblation hath consecrated for euer those that be sanctified Hebr. 10.14 3 Because he was slaine for sinne which was committed euen from the beginning of the world 4 Because euen presently from the verie foundations of the world he was appointed to be slaine 5 Because there is not saluation in any other whatsoeuer Act. 4.12 6 Because Iesus Christ is the same to day yesterday and for euer Heb. 11.1 7 Because that which was not as yet in the order of nature neuerthelesse was extant euer by the vertue and efficacie of faith For faith is that which maketh those things to be present which are hoped for and doth demonstrate those thinges which are not seene Heb. 11.1 8 Because as the same Christ is the head of the whole vniuersall Church so also he is the Author of Election in him of all the faithfull both of the old and new Testament of their vocation Iustification sanctifycation and glorifycation VVhy was not the bloud of the Paschall Lambe drunken or eaten but onely the posts were besprinkled with it Because it was abhomination to eate or drinke the bloud not onely of man but of any liuing creature from Noes time a Gen. 9.4 The vse whereof was granted by the comming of Christ although for the infirmitie and weakenesse of the brethren forbidden for a time b Act. 15.20 29 VVere there no moe Sacraments of the old Testament Yes indeed there were as the Sabbaths the Arke of the Couenant washings and such like yet they are rather to be called Types then Sacraments if we will speake properly because they are neuer compared with the Sacraments of the new Couenant But especially because they serued rather to illustrate the promise of grace then to seale
Gospel wherby are signified those things are done which went before in Christ Neither is therefore any change in God as there is none in the father of a family who commandeth not the same things in sommer and in winter How do the Sacraments of the old new Testament agree In the Author the end the generall parts in the thing signified in manner of Phrase For God is one and the same Author of the Sacraments of each Couenant a Heb. 1 ◠There is the same end that they should bee signes of the fauour of God toward the Church There be the same parts for the Sacraments both of the newe as also of the Old Testament do consist of a signe and a thing signified and in them both the signe is one thing the thing signified another The thing signifyed or the substance is alone and the same Christ and the selfe same benefits of his namely remission of sins iustification regeneration and spirituall nourishment Rom. 4.11 Abraham receiued the signe of the righteousnesse which he had receiued in his foreskin 1. Cor. 10.2 3.4 All were baptized vnder Moses in the cloud and did all eate the meate to wit that wee doe and did all drinke of the same spirituall drinke And cap. 12.13 For by one spirit we haue all beene baptized into one bodie both Iewes and Gentiles both bond and free and wee haue all drunk into one spirit For the same thing which Circumcision did signify doth our baptisme now signifie that which the lamb did doth the Supper And therefore the fathers vnder the Law were partakers by faith of the same Christ and of the same gifts of his that we bee now vnder the Gospell they beleeued in the selfe same Christ and had the verie same promises b Heb. 11 2 c. And Iesus Christ the same yesterday to day and for euer Heb. 13.8 And the Lambe of God slaine from the beginning of the world Re. 13.8 And Augustine saith Whosoeuer did conceiue Christ in the Manna did eate the same spirituall meate that we doe Lastly the manner of speach in them both is the same to wit Sacramentall that is fytting and well agreeing to that argument Of what sort be the Sacramentall speeches Sometime they be proper to wit when that which belongeth to the signe is attributed to the signe or that which belongeth to the thing signifyed is ascribed to the thing distinctly or else when the vse and office is plainely expressed As Circumcision is the signe of the Couenant betweene mee and you Gen. 17 11. The bloud of the Lambe shall bee a signe to you of the Passeouer Exod. 12.13 Abraham receiued the signe of Circumcision and the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4 11. Baptisme is that whereby the filth of the flesh is washed away 1. Pet. 3.21 But for the most part they are figuratiue when the names and effectes of the things signifyed are attributed to the signes And on the contrary when the names of the signes and their effectes are attributed to the thing signified by a Mutonimie or changing of the names And such phrases are in indeede vsuall in the holy Scripture and so be placed in the common vse of the Church and yet figuratiue which may be vnderstood by the nature conference of the words and things whereof the words speake or by the coherence of the parts Yet cleare because eloquent and manifest types do not obscure but illustrate an oration Now they are such because the nature and essence of a Sacracrament doth require the same which commonly is defined to bee a visible signe of sacred things And therefore if the words in the Sacraments be vnderstood nakedly without a trope simply they shall be no longer Sacraments because they shall bee no longer signes but the things themselues Now they are of the number of those which haue relation to another thing Therfore the trope is not in the things but in the words 1. Because of the analogie proportion and relation of the signe vnto the thing signified 2. Because of the similitude and comparison of the effects Whereupon Augustine saith that Sacraments from the likenesse of those things whereof they are Sacraments doe for the most part borow the names of the things themselues Quest vpon Leuit. 17 Whereupon also that Rule is to be kept the vse whereof is vsuall and much in the Scriptures The names and properties of things which be most diuerse because of some proportion similitude and likenesse of the effects are oftentimes changed and affirmed mutually one of another for instruction and admonition sake So Christ and a vine bee the names of diuerse things yet Christ doth tearme himselfe a Vine a Ioh. 15.1 for the likenesse of the effects Againe because of the pawne and certainty of the promise of God added to the signes as the Rainebowe or the bowe in the clouds is the Couenant of God b Gen. 9.9 Circumcision is the Couenant c Gen. 17 10 The Lambe is the passouer or the passing ouer of the Lord d Exod 12 11.27 So Baptisme is the lauer of Regeneration e Tit. 3 5 and the stipulation of a good conscience f 1 Pet. 3.21 The like speaches are vsed in the types and shadowes as Gal. 4.24 those two mothers Agar and Sara are two Testaments In the holy Supper the breade broken is the bodie of Christ the wine the bloud of Christ The cup is the New Testament in the blood of Christ Not because of the chāging of the signe into another thing as our Transubstantiaries would haue it Or the including of another thing in the signe as the Consubstantiaries say Not properly and of themselues but because by a Metonimie or changing of the name they are signes and testimonies pawnes yea euen meanes or instruments of the Holy Ghost in the lawfull vse whereof there is wrought through the free operation of the holy Ghost a true and not an imaginarie communication of the things which are promised in the word beeing added to the Sacraments no lesse certainly then the Minister of the Church doth certainely exhibite the sacred signes which are called Sacraments This Rule is also perpetuall in the nature of things that in the affirmation of things that bee diuerse one from another and affirming of one of them of another the speach must needes be euer tropicall or figuratiue in any kinde of things and neuer proper For as oft as in any proposition the verbe Substantiue est doth ioyne together things that bee diuerse which differ in their speciall formes then the affirmation is not proper but figuratiue As so often as the first substance or this singular Indiuiduum existing truely and actually without the minde is affirmed of another first substance such an affirmation is figuratiue But yet these figuratiue speaches must bee reduced to proper and bee explained by them as Circumcision is the Couenant that is to say it is the signe
the grounds of Doctrines or of the Articles of faith and of the commandements of God alwaies to be taken without figures altogether as the words doe sound No seeing that there is no lesse certaintie in a figuratiue speech which may bee applyed to the nature of the thing concerning which it is spoken then in a proper Like as the first promise of the Gospell was published by God in a figuratiue speach The seede of the woman shall breake the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 which Iohn declareth in a proper speach 1. Epistle chap. 3. verse 8. The sonne of God appeared that hee might dissolue the works of the Diuell And the first chapter of Iohn is the ground of Doctrine concerning the person of Christ and yet in it are figuratiue speeches Verse 4. 5. That light was the light of men And that light shineth in the darkensse and the darkenesse comprehended it not But is it not absurd that Christ spake tropically and therefore enigmatically that is obscurely or doubtfully in the institution of his supper with the Disciples which were rude and simple In no wise for the thing it selfe sheweth that that Metonymicall speech was not enigmaticall doubtfull or darke to the Disciples for vnlesse it had come into their minde that bread was called of the Lord his bodie because it was a signe thereof doubtlesse they had beene troubled at so prodigious a thing as followeth vpon the proper and literall sense of the words And that so much the more because almost at the same time they could not vnderstand farre more easie things a Iohn 14.8 16.17 a seeing therefore they are not trobled with these words it is plain that they vnderstood those things Metonymically after the mnaner of the Scripture Especially as a little before they had eaten the Lambe which in the same sense is called Pascha that is the Passeouer Exod. 12.27 Which is the other part of words of Christ concerning the bread Which is giuen for you In Luke 22.19 or VVhich is broken for you in Paule 1. Cor. 11.24 For in Mathew and Marke this part is wanting the subiect of which member is not bread but bodie expressed in the Pronoune Relatiue which And the Attribute VVhich is giuen or deliuered for you namely vnto death or is broken that is Esay being interpreter Chap. 53.10 He is broken with sorrowes or is crucified and killed VVhat is signified in this proposition 1 The mysticall bodie of Christ is not signified for the mysticall bodie of Christ which is the Church is not giuen or deliuered or broken for vs but the true bodie 2 It is signified that Christ gaue not a glorified and spirituall bodie and therefore that the flesh of Christ is not simple meate in respect that it is glorified but that it is liuing meat vnto vs in respect that it was in time past crucified Iohn 6.51 3 It is gathered by a proper and regular predication that the bread is not called the body of Christ but figuratiuely because it is vniuersally true of a proper and regular signification Whatsoeuer is the predicate of the predicate is also the predicate of the subiect But that which is said heere of the bodie of Christ cannot be spoken properly and regularly of bread For bread is said to be giuen to vs properly not giuen for vs Neyther is wine said properly to be shed for vs by powred in to vs. Againe that which is giuen is but an Enallage of the present time for the future spoken for that which shall be shortly giuen vpon the crosse but not in the Eucharist Because Christ therein offered not or gaue his bodie for a sacrifice but vpon the crosse For it is an vsuall Enallage of scripture to speake concerning a thing now instant to be forthwith as it were of a thing present And so to vse the present tense for the future So Mat. 26.24 Wo be to that man by whom the sonne of man is betrayed And Iohn 10.15 I lay downe my life for my sheepe And the common translation hath VVhich shall be giuen for you VVhich is broken cannot be affirmed of the signe which the Lord had broken alreadie neyther can it be spoken of the bodie of Christ vnlesse it be Metonymically seeing that it was said of the bodie of Christ Exod. 12.46 and Iohn 19.36 yea shall not breake a bone thereof 4 And also the loue of Christ towards vs is commended because when he owed nothing to Death because he was without sinne for he was holy and vndefiled a Heb 17.26 he would vndergo it for vs. 5 Last of all the fruit of his death because he is said to be deliuered vnto death not onely for the Apostles but for many What are the words of the Lord concerning the cup They also consist of two branches the former is in Mathew and Marke This is my bloud of the new Testament Or as Luke and Paule hath it This cup is the new Testament in my bloud The subiect of which speech is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This of the neuter gender but not hic this in the masculine gender as hath the old interpretation which pronounce hoc this is referred to the wine not to the bloud for so it should bee an Identicall proposition which is manifestly plaine out of Luke 22.20 who addeth vnto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is this the Noune 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is cup or wine as as if he had said This which I hold in my hands and giue to you And the predicate is bloud or the new testament in my bloud The couple the verbe substantiue est is which in Luke is wanting In which proposition surely it cannot be said without a Metonymie that the word cup is taken for wine which is contained in the cup and that this cup is that New testament In the one is the continent put for the thing contained in the other of the thing signified is for the signe For properly according to the word the cup it selfe or wine is not the new Testament it selfe but a pledge and seale of the new Testament or rather that wherewith the Testament is established that is to say of the bloud of Christ like as Circumcision was called the old Couenant By all which it appeareth that the words of the Lords supper are ful of figures but yet most vsual easie to be vndestood Whether may this proposition of Christ This is my bloud be so compared with that of Moses saying Exod. 24.8 concerning the bloud of calues this is the bloud of the couenant that both here there bloud being in deed in it owne essence as that being holden in the hands of Moses and this in the hands of Christ be demonstrated properly and not figuratiuely In no wise For Moses truly sprinkled the people with the bloud of the offering taken out of a basen that bloud was a sacramental signe therfore that enuntiatiō of Moses
will when a man disposeth of his goods how they shall be ordered after his death The Grecians doe properly and peculiarly call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 According to the vse of Scripture it is vnderstood to be a couenant or agreement betwixt God and men who before were at variance in which couenant God doth promise to man those benefits which himselfe hath namely saluation and eternall life and man on the other part doth relie vpon God by confidence in his promises and doth confirme his faith nourish it by the testimonie of the couenant a Heb. 7.22 And for this cause is called of the Hebrewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Berith which properly signifieth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greeke that is a couenant betwixt them which liue 3 Metonymically with addition of Old or New it signifieth the bookes and distinct parts of the Bible The old Testament signifieth the writings of Moses and the Prophets and the new containeth the writings of the Euangelists and Apostles 2. Cor. 3 6. God hath made vs able Ministers of the Nevv Testament And verse 14. Euen vntill this day the same veile remayneth in the reading of the Old Testament Seeing the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Berith doth not signifie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a testament but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a couenant amongst them who liue 1. Reg. 5.12 why doe the Greeke interpreters of the Bible call the couenant made by God with men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a testament Because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a generall word signifieth also 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a bargaine or couenant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which generally signinifieth to couenant and agree vpon a bargaine Luc. 23.29 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. I make a couenant with you as the father couenanted or gaue order to me 2 Againe because this couenant of God with men hath some thing common with a testament and differing from other couenants for in other couenants nothing is lesse required then the death of them who enter couenant heere on the contrarie it behooued that the couenant made betwixt God and men should be confirmed by the death of Christ For these causes also the Apostle Hebr. 9.15.16.17 Doth keepe the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and draweth an argument from the proper signification thereof And it is called a testament because it is a certaine testimonie of the will of God Of what parts consisteth the Testament betwixt God and men Of three 1. A free promise on Gods part 2 Faith in the promise on mans part 3 The outward testification or marke of the same euery of which parts by a Synecdoche a part for the whole receiue the name of Testament as Gal. 3.17 The law doth not make void the couenant confirmed before by God where the word Testament is vsed for a promise made by God to Abraham a Gen. 17.7 2. God said to Abraham b v. â— Thou therfore keep my Testament Psal 44.18 All these things are come vpon vs yet doe wee not forget thee neyther deale falsely concerning thy Testament where the word Testament is vsed to signifie the faith of man towards God 3. Gen. 17.18 This is my Testament that euerie male among you be circumcised and Luke 22 20. This cup is the new testament in my bloud and Act. 7.8 God hath giuen to Abraham the testament of circumcision It is vsed Metaphorically for an outward signe or testimonie and badge of the testament Gen. 17.11 Hath God made more or onely one couenant with men As since the time of the fall of our first parents hath beene and is the same way to attaine saluation by Christ so there is one perpetuall couenant or testament of God whereby God bindeth himselfe to giue saluation to all those who beleeue in Christ But doth not the scripture mention two couenants It doth indeed because of the dispensation of the same couenaÌ„t which at diuers times was diuersly appointed by god wherof the one is called the Old Testament the other the New Yet we must note that the old Couenant is vnderstood and called two waies somtimes in respect onely of Moses his lawgiuing and it is called the couenant of the law the sanction and establishing whereof is described Exod. 24. and sometimes to signifie the couenant of grace or free couenant in what manner it was made with Abraham and his posteritie Gen. 17.7 But by the appellation of the new couenant is vndestoode no more then the free couenant Of both these Ierem. 31.31.32 speaketh thus Bebold the daies shall come saith the Lord and I will make with the house of Israell and with the hovse of Iuda my couenant not according to that couenant which I made with their fathers in the day when I tooke them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Aegypt but this is my couenant which I will make with the house of Israell After those daiet saith the Lord I will giue my law in the middest of them and I will write in their heart and I will bee their God and they shall be my people and I will be mercifull to their iniquities After which words the Apostle addeth Hebr. 8.13 VVhen he saith a newe one he hath abrogated the former And Galat. 4.24 He teacheth that Agar the seruant was a shadow of mount Sinai from which was giuen the Law and that Sarai the free woman was a fâ—gure of the heauenly Ierusalem from which sprung the Gospell and he addeth that by these are signified the two Testaments the one bringing forth children vnto bondage that is slaues and the other to libertie or free men and in the ninth Chapter to the Hebrewes he maketh a comparison of the Old and New Testament the summe whereof commeth to this purpose that the Old testament was a shadowe of the New and the New a fulfilling of the Old the new was folded vp in the Olde and the New enfolded in the Newe But in this place where the question is concerning the likenes and difference of the Old and New Couenaunt we by the name of old vnderstand onely the free Couenant in such sorte as it was made with our fiâ—st parents straight after the fall and was confirmed to Abraham of which the law of Moses was an helpe and at length it was renued in Christ Dan. 9.27 How are these two testimonies one which are so diuers In substance or in respect of all the causes thereof to wit Efficient Matter Forme and End How do they agree in the efficient cause Because the antecedent cause of both the couenants was the wonderfull descending and as it were abasing of God whereby he stooped so low as to binde men in league and couenant vnto him which thing Moses testifyeth Deut. 8.17 9.5 Offering the pure mercie of God against the merits of the Iewes and Iosua 24.2.3 But the antecedent and meritoriovs cause is the death of
be no more but one alone and an euerlasting Couenant to wit the reconciling of the beleeuers vnto God by the death of Christ 2. Of them who tye the things signifyed to the signes by any meanes or such as make a reall connexion and coexistence of the signe and the things signifyed 3. Which conclude that the sacraments doe pertaine to the vnbeleeuers 4. That the matter of the sacraments is communicated all well to the faithles as the faithfull 5. That will haue no figuratiue speaches in the sacraments 6. Who giue lesse honour to the word of God then to the sacraments for that they imagine greater blessings are offered to men in the sacraments then in the word 9 Of those who not being content with the heauenly simplicitie thinke that they can adorne the excellency of the sacraments with their owne ornaments 10 Of many which liue in the outward assemblie of the Church who being content with the vse of the outward signes haue no care at all of the worke of Regeneration of then communion with Christ our head but remaine still in their sinnes contrarie to that principle of Augustine Not the Sacrament but faith in the Sacrament doth iustifie 11 Of the Papists who imagine without all warrant of the Scripture that there is offered in the Masse a true reall and outward though not a bloodie sacrifice whereby the Priestes doe offer vnto God the bodie and bloud of Christ vnder the kindes of bread and wine which sacrifice is propitiatorie for the quick and dead Of whom some hold that the oblation made in the Masse is the selfesame with the oblation which was made vpon the Crosse and differs onely in the meanes and the maner then which what can be spoken more childish And surely that oblation of Christ of necessitie including his death was so singular that it neuer could bee iterated But others say it is in a remembrance and representatiue which opinion ouercommeth the former For that which is the remembrance of another thing is not the thing it selfe The seuen and fortieth common place Of Baptisme Whereof is it called Baptisme ΠΑÏá½° Ï„ÏŒ Βάτπειν which is to dip or to die moysten consequently to wash whereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to drench to rince to clense and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be dipped or died which notwithstanding differeth from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is to sinke downe to the bottom and to be drowned thereof is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is an immersion tincture so by consequent an ablution and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it were a bathing fonte made of wood or stone wherin we are dreÌ„ched because we wold be washed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that dippeth or as it were dieth where of commeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one rebaptising and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is opposite to a Baptiser or impugneth baptisme How many waies is the word Baptisme taken in scripture Two waies properly and figuratiuely properly for simple clensing and that either legall or leuiticall as Heb. 9.10 which stood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with diuers washings which notwithstanding were types of our baptisme or superstitious as Marke 7.4 The Pharisees comming from the market 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till they haue washed eate not and manie other things there are which they haue receiued to be obserued as the washing of cups pots of beds c 2 Figuratiuely and that diuers waies 1 by an allegory baptisme is called that Deluge of waters wherewith god punished the sins of the world saued Noes familie in the Arke which was a figure of our baptism Also the passing ouer the red sea wherin Pharao and his people were drowned but Israel was saued the abiding vnder the cloud wherof mention is made 1. Cor. 10.2 And some by Allegory add also the baptisme of teares and of Repentance wherewith they say that sinful woman was baptised which washed Christs feet with her hairs a 1 Pet. 3 21 Moreouer the name of baptisme is taken by a metaphor for the crosse or bitter affliction which is coÌ„pared vnto billowes of waters wherwith the afflicted are ouerwhelmed Can ye be baptised with the baptism wherwith I am baptised And hereof it was called by the fathers the baptisme of bloud Mat. 20.22 when Christian martyrs did shed their bloud for the Christian faith 2 By the figure Metalepsis for the promise powring out of the spirit or peculiar gifts of the holy ghost which are conferred vpon the faithful somtimes before the baptisme of water as by the history of Cornelius may appeare somtime after baptisme You shal be baptised with the holy Ghost And here it is called the baptisme of fire Act. 1.5 that is the baptisme of the spirit 3. By a Synecdoche for all the doctrine of Iohn all his ministery The baptisme of Iohn was it froÌ„ heauen that is of God or of men So Act. 19. VVherinto were ye baptised saith Paule that is with what doctrine were ye instructed and taught Into the baptisme of Iohn that is into the doctrine which Iohn declared and signed with the Symbole of baptisme 4. By the figure Antonomafia or in way of excellency for that ordinary Sacrament of the Church wherby we publikely vow Christian warfare as soldiers to Christ our leader sweare to follow his alone colours This they of olde termed the baptisme of the floud i. of water In which last significatioÌ„ we retain the name of baptisme ✿ Baptismus Fluminis rather then the name of washing and vse the same as the Church doth But Fanorinus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in way of praise expoundeth the name of Baptisme thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Baptisme is that into which sin is cast that is doth fall The Greeks also call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is illumination from the effect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of that true light which enlighteneth euery man For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the ancient Church signified to be gathered into the Church by baptisme and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 baptised were distinguished a Catechumenis from catechised Heb. 10.32 whence afterward sprang that great number of wax light at Easter What is Baptisme It is the first or initiating sacrameÌ„t of the new testameÌ„t or a sacred action coÌ„sisting of the washing with water the word wherby according to the appointmeÌ„t institutioÌ„ of Christ a christiaÌ„ man either of riper yeers professing Christ or an infant of the faithfull is drenched washed or sprinckled in simple cleare water by the minister of the Church calling vpon the name of the father the Son the holy ghost The body washed with cleane water as we read in Act. 8.19 was done by Philip to represent the shedding of Christs bloud vpon the crosse to confirme truly and effectually through all our life the couenant of grace made long before to exhibit seal to the
beleeuer righteousnes or the washing away of his sins obtained by Christ his bloud to testify his adoption into the couenant of grace his engrafting into Christ the regeneration renuing of his nature or repentance vnto amendmēt by the grace of the holy ghost procured vnto him by the same bloud his communion or fellowship with Christ in all his goodnes and heauenly inheritance ioynt free denization among the citizens of the visible Church of the kingdom of heauen to be held of them in the number of the children of God to enioy the same priuiledges which they do To witnes also that being in like maner baptised he promiseth himselfe to be willing to be reckoned among the people of God to defie Sathan sin the world the flesh al false sects promiseth professeth that he wil liue to Christ to the glory of God Or thus baptisme is a sacrament or seale of the righteousnes of faith that is of our entrance or beginning of our incorporation with Christ of the forgiuenes of our sins of the gift of the holy ghost of regeneration whereby we are seale◠vnto Christ incorporated buried with Christ that we die vnto sin by the power of the death of Christ that we rise againe to newnesse of life by the vertue of his resurrection a Rom. 6.3 4.5 1 Pet. 3.22 that we are bound to the true worship of God alone to innocency of life and vnity of the Church wheof it is called the stipulation of a good conscience b that is a mutuall obligation of God of man baptised of God witnessing that he receiueth the person baptised into grace and of the person baptised couenanting with God that he will duly worship and loue him wherof it commeth that none are admitted to the holy supper of the Lord but such as are first baptised because he must first be admitted into the church before he be nourished in the same c Mat. 28.19 Act. 2.41 Ioh. 4.1.2 Mat. 3.11 Ioh 3.5 7 Gal 3 27 1 Cor 6 11 10.2 Tit 3.5 Eph 5.26 How many fold is Baptismes Baptisme in specie or kind is one One Lord one faith one baptisme But seeing in baptisme not the water external actiō is to be considered only but also the inward operation of God in this respect Baptisme is twofold External which is also called the baptisme of water wherwith the minister of the word doth baptise and Internal which is also of the spirit wherby Christ only doth clense our hearts by his blood and giueth his holy spirit and yet the one is not to be separated from the other For the externall is a testimony of the internall that is the Baptisme of water is a pledg of spirituall baptisme and of inward washing and clensing which is done by the blood and spirit of Christ And therefore Christ is said 1. Iohn 5.6 to come in water in the spirit in blood VVho is the author or instituent cause of Baptisme God the father the sonne and the holie ghost 1. by the ministery of Iohn Baptist for it is certaine that Iohn was called of God and sent to baptise and preach repentance amongst the Iewes and therefore Christ saith the baptisme of Iohn was by a metonymie from heauen d Luk. 3.2.3 Ioh. 1.38 that is of God and not of men 2 Further Christ by his owne example confirmed baptisme when he suffered himselfe to be baptised of Iohn e Mat. 21.25 Mat. 3.15 And the whole trinity with most plaine and euident testimonie allowed the same in the baptisme of Christ 3 Besides Christ before his passion sent his disciples to baptise a Ioh. 4.1.2 againe after his resurrection he instructed the same his disciples their successors how to teach and baptise among all nations by this commandement Go thorough the world preach the gospell to euerie creature baptizing them in the name of the father and of the sonne and of the holy ghost Mat. 28.19 whereby it appeareth how greate the dignitie of Baptisme is with what reuerence it should be vsed What is the efficient cause The primarie and true efficient cause is Christ himselfe for he indeede it is who baptiseth vs properly truly into himselfe into his death and resurrection Ephes 5.18 It is Christ that clenseth his church with the washing of water in his word The secundary and instrumentall causes are the ministers for so saith Iohn I baptise you with water b Mat. 3 11 Christ commanded them saying baptise c Mat. 28.19 VVhether may ministers be truly said to baptise that is to clense from sinn and to regenerate No doubt they may for Christ did not restraine his commandement to the washing of water but in general termes said baptise them and Iohn 20.23 they are said to remit sins to beget againe or regenerat 1 Cor. 4.15 I haue begotten you againe in Christ by the Gospell And 1. Cor. 3.6 the Apostle saith that he ministred vnto them the spirit not the Letter but yet sacramentally that is so farre forth as he hath administred those sacraments by which as by instruments Christ himselfe doth wash and regenerate Whose office is it properly to administer Baptisme Theirs to whom the Ministerie of the word is commttted for to whom Christ said Preach the Gospell to them also hee said Baptise And Ephes 5.26 the Apostle conioyneth the washing of water with the word of the Gospell So Iohn Baptist and the Disciples of Christ Baptised who also preached the Gospell Whether may many Ministers baptise any one together They may not for none is said perfectly to baptise but hee who vseth these words saying I baptise thee and therefore that he may speake truly the same men must also administer water VVherin differ the Baptisme of Iohn Baptist and of Christ or his Apostles or those Ministers that followed them Not in the Author in substance in doctrine in signe or ceremonie neither yet in effect or signification For the same sacrament is instituted of God and the same forgiuenesse of sinnes and grace of the holy Ghost is signified offered and sealed whether it bee Iohn that administer or the Apostles or the suceeding Ministers a Luk. 1.3 2.3 The onely difference is touching the verie circumstance and maner of the manifesting of Christ for the same baptisme ia called Iohns because he baptised first and Christs because baptisme hath respect vnto him Again Iohn baptised into him which came immediatly after him that is into Christ who should shortly suffer rise again b Act. 19. ◠But the Apostles after thē all Minsters now baptise into Christ that hath suffered and is risen againe VVhy doth Iohn say then Mat. 3.11 I baptise you with water and attributeth onely vnto Christ that he baptiseth with the holy Ghost and and fire Not that he denieth that forgiuenes of sins is giuen by his ministerie and the holy Ghost also for