Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	confirm_v	new_a	testament_n	8,389	5	9.6949	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46354	Several sermons preach'd on the whole eighth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans eighteen of which preach'd on the first, second, third, fourth verses are here published : wherein the saints exemption from condemnation, the mystical union, the spiritual life, the dominion of sin and the spirits agency in freeing from it, the law's inability to justifie and save, Christ's mission, eternal sonship, incarnation, his being an expiatory sacrifice, fulfilling the laws righteousness (which is imputed to believers) are opened, confirmed, vindicated, and applied / by Tho. Jacomb.	Jacombe, Thomas, 1622-1687.	1672 (1672)	Wing J119; ESTC R26816	712,556	668

shall it be condemn'd and you too shall Christ suffer the penalty due to it and you too O no! as God was just to punish it once so he is gracious and just too not to punish it twice What this condemning of sin is you have heard if you follow the word the comfort lies thus a condemnatory Sentence is by God upon Christ's account pass'd upon it he hath adjudg'd it to die for all the mischiefes done by it both against himself and against you too this cursed Tyrant this heinous Malefactor is under a sentence to be cut off that it may no longer either dishonour God or hurt you and should not you rejoyce in this who fears a condemn'd person what do the accusations of a condemn'd man signifie sin is a condemned thing fear it not If you leave the Word and come to the main import of it then the comfort lies thus the guilt of all your sins is fully done away and expiated by Christ's Sacrifice this Lamb of God as offered hath taken it all away his blood hath cleansed you from all sin your Scape-goat hath carried all your iniquities into the land of forgetfulness Oh your guilt was charg'd upon Christ and it shall not be charg'd upon you too you are to mourn over it but yet know he hath fully satisfied for it what would you have more You have in the former Verse the power of sin abolish'd by the Law of the Spirit in this the guilt of sin abolished by the Sacrifice of Christ O how compleat is your redemption the plaister is every way as large as the sore What holy triumphs may you now make over all which may seem to endanger you Rom. 8.34 Who is he that condemneth it is Christ that * Mortuum Caesarem quis metuat sed morte Christi quid efficacius Cyprian de dupl Martyrio died c. 4. Observe 't is Sin that was condemn'd The Apostle speaks of it in the lump and mass and so he saith 't is expiated Our Lord's Sacrifice did not take off the guilt of this or that particular sin but of all sin his expiation was totall and universal Under the Law-Sacrifices the blood was to be sprinkled * Levit. 16.19 seven times thereby to prefigure the thoroughness and perfection of the expiation of sin by Christ's Sacrifice 5. This is brought in as God's act God sent his own Son and for sin condemned sin He that was the persona laesa the injur'd person the just Judge against whom sin was committed and who therefore was to punish it he who is the supream and authoritative Agent in and about the great concerns of Souls he appointed Christ to be a Sacrifice owned and accepted his sacrifice and upon that acquits Sinners from all guilt Oh there 's much in this to encourage the drooping Christian Rom. 8.33 Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's Elect it is God that justifieth The Father cannot but be well-pleased with Christ's propitiatory Sacrifice since this was of himself Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation c. 6. This was done too in Christ's Flesh which also hath great sweetness in it 'T is added saith * Deodat inloc One for our further assurance to the end that we may not doubt of the forgiveness of our sins which are destroy'd in our proper Nature which the Son of God took upon him Had Christ done and suffered what he did in the Nature of Angels we might have question'd whether any good would thereby have accrued to us but all being done in * Addit Paulus in came quo certior sit nostra fiducia dum videmus peccatum in ipsâ Naturâ nostrâ fuisse devictum abolitum sic enim sequitur naturam nostram vere fieri participem ejus victoriae Calvin our Nature surely he did it for us and we shall reap the benefit thereof 7. To all this let me add one thing further and 't is a great one namely That by this Sacrifice of Christ you have not only the bare condemnation or expiation of sin but with that you also have a right and title unto and collation of all Gospel-blessings and priviledges whatsoever Was it only the taking off of guilt and the appeasing of divine wrath that would be very much but over and beyond these there is Christ's active fulfilling the Law being taken in a positive righteousness made over to you an interest in God's fatherly love the purchase of Heaven and in this sense we are for a redundancy of Christ's merit The benefits of Christ's Sacrifice to Believers are not only those which are privative such wherein they are freed from all evil but there are also those which are positive such wherein they are intitled to and instated in the possession of all good yea even of the heavenly blessedness it self Heb. 5.9 And being made perfect he became the Author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him Heb. 9.12 having obtained eternal redemption for us it comes in as the effect of Christ's blood and Sacrifice In his great undertaking to redeem and save Sinners we may suppose him to have two things in his eye the one was that he should have a people in the world the other was that through him this people should partake of all blessings requisite to their happiness now both of these were effected and secured by his Sacrifice As to the first that was made sure by this according to that promise or prediction Isa 53.10 11. When thou shalt make his soul an offering for sin he shall see his seed c. He shall see of the travel of his soul and shall be satisfied in relyance upon which he himself said And I if I be lifted up from the earth will draw all men unto me Joh. 12.32 and that upon his death and Sacrifice he had a people and a numerous people too the Evangelical History doth abundantly testifie Then as to the second that also was promoted and secured by his Sacrifice inasmuch as thereby the Covenant of Grace the summary of all blessings was ratify'd and confirmed 'T was an * Et caesâ jungebant foedera portâ Virgil. See Mr. Medo on Mal. 1.11 ancient custom used amongst men at the sanction and ratification of their Covenants to make use of Sacrifices as we find Gen. 21.22 23 24 c. Jer. 34.18 Exod. 34.7 8. in allusion to which custom 't is said Psal 50.5 Gather my Saints together unto me those that have made a Covenant with me by Sacrifice Answerably now to this Christ by his Sacrifice confirm'd and ratify'd the Covenant of Grace 'twixt God and Believers wherefore he said This cup is the new Testament in my blood i.e. the seal and ratification of the new-Covenant Matth. 26.28 1 Cor. 11.25 and the Apostle doth in special insist upon this in Heb. 9.15 16 c. Well then by Christ's Sacrifice the blood of the Covenant as

several other Texts in order to the more undeniable proving of the Proposition before us as also to answer the various replyes evasions misinterpretations about them by such who dissent and yet I could most willingly engage therein did I think such an undertaking would be proper in such a Discourse as this or tend to the advantage of any but the truth is I fear I should but perplex private Christians with things that possibly would be too high for them and I 'm sure I should do that which is needless for Others who know where this is * Arnold Catech. Racov. major p. 27● Galov Socin proflig p. 285. Cocceius against Socin in cap. 1. Joh. cap. 15. Bisterf against Crellius p. 564. Jacob. ad Portum against Ostorod p. 166. Owen against Biddle ch 13. p. 289. c. done already And indeed the whole matter in this Controversie is by Crellius himself brought into a narrow compass wherein we are very willing to joyn issue with him for he grants if Christ did praeexist before he was incarnate that then his incarnation must needs be believ'd and own'd according to our stating of it but I have * See p. 284. c. already proved and Others do it much more fully that he did so praeexist therefore upon that Concession the thing is clear and I need say no more upon it Only let me leave this one word with our Opposers their Homo Deus factus is the greatest falshood but our Deus Homo factus is the greatest truth 2. Prop. Christ the Second Person only was incarnate The second Proposition is this that Christ the Son of God the second Person in the ineffable Trinity he only was incarnate 'T is here said God sending his own Son in the likeness c. the taking then of flesh was that personal act which was proper to the Son alone and in that so often alledged Text 't is said * Joh. 1.14 the Word was made flesh which Title the Word is never attributed to the Father or to the Spirit but alwayes to the Son and you see he 's the person who was made flesh 'T is true Incarnation was the act of the whole Trinity approbativè but 't was only the Son's act terminativè all the Persons approved of it and * Sola persona Filii incarnata est operante tamen eandem incarnationem totâ Sanctâ Trinitate cujus opera sunt inseparabilia August Quest de Trinit tom 3. p. 1040. Vid. Anselm de Incam Verbi cap. 3. 4. concurred to it but it was terminated only in Christ the second Person The Schoolmen compare Christ's Flesh to a garment made by three Virgin-sisters which yet but One of them only wears A † See Lombard lib. 3. Dist 1. Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book p. 255. Question is commonly here started why the second Person rather than the first or the third was thus incarnate which Some do venture to answer by assigning the Reasons of it I humbly conceive there is too much of curiosity in the Question and too much of boldness in the Answer why Christ was incarnate I can give several Reasons but why he rather than the other Persons there I must be silent 'T is also query'd * Of this see Zanchy de tribus Elohim l. 5. c. 6. p. 546. c. Tilen de Incarn Filii Dei Disp 1. Sect. 20. Aug. Serm. 3. de Temp. there being such an oneness betwixt all the Persons how the Son can be said to assume the Humane Nature and yet the Father and Spirit not assume it to which the Answer is obvious this difference might very well be upon that personal distinction which is betwixt them for this assumption of flesh being not the act of the Nature which is common but of the Person which is limited the second Person might so assume and yet the other Persons not 3. Prop. Christ not incarnate till the fulness of time Thirdly Christ's incarnation was in time and not till the fulness of time He was alwayes God for he that is not alwayes God is never God the Divine Essence admitting neither of beginning nor end but he was not * Neque enim Caro issa quae ex came Virginis nata est semper fuit sea Deus qui semper fuit ex carne Virginis in carne Hominis advenit Cassian de Incar Dom. Lib. 6. alwayes man there never was a time in which he was not God but there was a time in which he was not Man His Generation as the Son of God was eternal but his Generation as the Son of Man was but temporal In the fulness of time God sent his Son made of a woman c. Gal. 4.4 The Evangelist sets him forth in his two Natures Joh. 1. with respect to his Divine Nature he shews that he was from everlasting In the beginning was the Word c. the same was in the beginning with God c. then he comes to his Humane Nature and that he shews was in time the Word was made Flesh he was not so ab aeterno but he was made so in time In such a sense Christ may be said to be incarnate from all eternity viz. in regard of God's eternal parpose and decree as in reference to that he is said to be the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world Rev. 13.8 but as to the actuality of his Incarnation that was but 1600 and odd years ago A double enquiry here will be made As 1. if this was deferr'd so long what then became of those who lib'd and dy'd before Christ was inearnate The efficacy and benefit of Christ's Incarnation to those who lived before it if that was so necessary as hath been shown what became of the Patriarchs of all who liv'd under the Law before that was in being I answer they had the merit virine benefit of the thing though they had not the thing it self for God having decreed it and Christ having covenanted and ingaged to the Father that in the fulness of time he would take flesh the Father all-along look'd upon it as actually done and accordingly dealt with Believers under the Law as though it had been actually done insomuch that they had the same benefit by a Christ in Flesh which we now have Therefore 't is said Rom. 3.25 Whom God set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the trrnsgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Whatever our Lord is now since the actual exhibition of him he was the same before effectively and virtually for 't is Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13.8

the Scripture doth not only in general speak of Christ's taking away or expiating of Sin but it shews in what manner he did it and wherein the nature of that expiation did consist as namely that he did expiate it in that way which was agreeable to what was done in and by the old Sacrifices and that according to the notion proper to their expiation so his must be understood For in speaking thereof it uses those expressions which point to those Sacrifices and to their expiation thereby noting 1. that Christ did expiate in that very way wherein they did and 2. that therefore his expiation in the nature of it must run parallel with theirs Take a few Instances Heb. 9.13 14. For if the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh How much more shall the blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God † 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purge your Conscience from dead works to serve the living God Vers 22 23. And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding blood is no remission It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the Heavens should be ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purified with these but the Heavenly things themselves with better Sacrifices than these Heb. 1.3 When he had by himself * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 purged our sins or as 't is in the Greek he having by himself made purgation or expiation of our sins 1 Joh. 1.7 and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son † 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cleanseth us from all sin by which cleansing the Apostle meant the expiation or remission of sin for Vers 9. he puts them together he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness Heb. 10.22 having our bearts * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sprinkled from an evil Conscience and our bodies † 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 washed with pure water Revel 1.5 Vnto him that loved us and ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 washed us from our sins in his own blood Now pray observe from these Scriptures 1. That the expiating of sin under the terms of purifying purging cleansing washing sprinkling is expresly attributed to Christ 2. That he as being a Sacrifice by dying and shedding his blood so did expiate sin 3. That the proper and primary effect of his death and blood was the expiation of sins guilt and as a consequent thereof its remission Matth. 26.28 This is my blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins Eph. 1.7 In whom we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins So Rom. 3.25 4. That as the Jewish Sacrifices were truly expiatory they in their way taking off sins guilt and the punishment due thereupon wherein the formal nature of their expiation did consist so answerably Christ Jesus was a true expiatory Sacrifice he in his way too taking off sins guilt c. wherein the formal nature of his expiation did and must consist also This I ground upon a twofold consideration 1. Because by those very Words which were proper to those Sacrifices and by which their expiation of sin was seth forth I say by those very Words the Sacrifice of Christ and the efficasy thereof is described therefore it must be as truly expiatory of sin as they were this is sufficiently proved in the places that have been cited And I might further add that the words there used are the very same with those which the Greek prophane Authors do always use when they are speaking of their expiatory Sacrifices and of the effect of them of which many instances are given by the * Stuck de Sacrif fol. 148. Grot. de Sat. p. 128 129. with many Others Learned 2. Because the Apostle who most uses these words and in the place too where he most uses them I mean in his Epistle to the Hebrews doth professedly draw a parallel 'twixt Christ and the Law-Sacrifices shewing there was a great analogie and resemblance betwixt them True he asserts a greater excellency and efficacy in the one than in the other and as to the manner of working he shews there was a vast difference between them but yet as to the great effect of a Sacrifice expiation of sin in that so far as the nature of the things would admit of they did agree Well then if they did purifie and expiate so must Christ and as they did purifie and expiate in taking away guilt by death and blood so must Christ otherwise where would the analogie be between them was it not thus there would be expiation in the type and none in the antitype and one way of expiation in the type and another in the antitype both of which are directly contrary to the Apostles scope and design in the forenamed Epistl● Some possibly will ask why I multiply so many words and stay so long upon this point I 'le tell them I do it to vindicate both the reality and also the true notion of our Saviours expiatory Sacrifice For the SOCINIANS who have not left us one fountain of Evangelical Comfort un-poyson'd herein deal with their usual subtilty very fair words are spoken by them as though they were for and did own Christ's * Socin de Serv. p. 2. c. 11.13 14 16 17. Crellius contra Grot. cap. 10. sect 2. expiation of sin but when they come to open it and to shew what they mean by it they make it a quite other thing than what indeed it is they keep the Word but quit the Scripture-sense thereof Christ say they did expiate sin but how why by begetting Faith in the Sinner by working repentance in him by turning and drawing him off from sin by delivering from the effects of it by declaring the Will of God about remission and the way thereunto as his death was an antecedent to his exaltation in Heaven where say they he only expiates sin c. in such things as these but not in Christ's undergoing the punishment due to the Sinner and dying in his stead they make his expiation of Sin to lie Now though much might be and * Grot. de Sat. p. 136. Hoorneb p. 581. c. Franz p. 207. 450. Dr. Stillingst against Crell c. 6. p. 507. c. Turret p. 202. c. Jacob. ad Portum p. 464. c. is said against each of these particularly yet that which I have in the general insisted upon is a sufficient confutation of them all viz. Christ must expiate sin in that way and sense wherein the Sacrifices under the Law did now did they expiate any other way than as they were substituted in the Offenders room and as they dy'd in his stead therefore that must be the way wherein Christ our Sacrifice doth expiate also

death he might give a further proof or evidence thereof Besides if this was the main thing designed and effected thereby then in the remission of sin reconciliation with God c. we should owe as much to Christ's Miracles as to his Death than which nothing can be more repugnant to the whole tenour of the Word 2. This would take away the peculiarity or speciality of Christ's death For if there was nothing in it more than bearing witness to the truth or confirmation of the Gospel-doctrine then all the Apostles and Martyrs who ever died did the same in as much as they by dying bore witness also to the truth and confirmed the Gospel-Doctrine then as he saith to us * Matth. 5.47 What do ye more than others we may say the same to him What blessed Jesus dost thou more than others and would not this be a fine question Certainly the death of the Mediator and the death of the Martyr are two different things not only quoad gradum but quoad speciem but if it was as this sort of Men would have it there might be a gradual difference betwixt them but nothing more Must Christ's dying for us amount only to his dying as a Martyr for the truth here 's the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but where 's the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paul laid down his life upon this account and yet saith he * 1 Cor. 1.13 Was Paul crucified for you 3. Nay thirdly if Christ had dy'd only upon this ground and for this end then several of the Martyrs had gone beyond him How readily and chearfully did many of them die how desirous were they of laying down their lives for the Gospel they did not fear death all their fear was that God would not so far honour them as to call them out to suffer it for his sake And when they came to die what abundance of inward peace and comfort had they how were their Souls brim-full of heavenly consolation they had as much thereof as ever heart could hold so much that all their outward torments were nothing to them But was it thus with Christ true he was very ready and willing to die yet there was a time when he pray'd again and again that the Cup might pass from him * Matth. 26.39 42 44. Father if it be possible let this cup pass from me and he had an innocent sinless fear of death for be was heard in what he feared Heb. 5.7 And had he such raptures and extasies of joy at his death as several of the Martyrs had O no! his Soul was * Matth. 26.38 exceeding sorrowful he was under bitter † Luk. 22.44 agonies and conflicts had great terrors in his Spirit c. Now had he dy'd only as they did meerly to have borne his testimony to the truth and for the confirmation of the Doctrine of the Gospel would it have been thus what Saints so full of joy and God's own Son so full of sorrow Saints in their sufferings to have such a mighty presence of God with them and God's own Son to cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Surely there must be something special and extraordinary in his death above theirs and so there was for he had the guilt of all Believers upon him lay under the wrath of God bare the punishment due to Sinners was under the curse of the Law c. these were the sad ingredients in his death which put such a bitterness into it Had there been nothing more in it than bare Martyrdom or what is proper to that how would he have been said to be * Gal. 3.13 a curse for us what singular thing would there have been in his † Phil. 3.8 being obedient to death even the death of the Cross 2. Secondly 't is said Christ dy'd for this end that he might set before men an example of obedience patience submission to God's Will zeal and the like I answer that this was one end is very true but that this was the only end is very false Christ did not design his death to be only exemplary to us but that it should also be satisfactory to God he had in his eye the expiation of our sin as well as our imitation of his example Christ saith the Apostle also suffered for us leaving us an example that we should follow his steps 1 Pet. 2.21 but was that all no Vers 24. who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree here was substitution in our stead susception of our guilt as well as the propounding of an example If Christ should further the happiness of Sinners only in this exemplary way what then would become of the Fathers and of all those who liv'd before he came and dy'd in the flesh who therefore could reap no benefit by his example And this would make the effects of his death to terminate wholly in us and not at all to reach to God whereas he is a Priest in things pertaining to God Heb. 2.17 3. They say Christ dy'd for this end that by his death he might strengthen and encourage faith and thereby raise up men to the assurance of the remission of sin freedom from eternal death the possessing of eternal life c. Answ We grant that Faith receives eminent support and encouragement from this that it gives the highest satisfaction that is possible as to the certainty of Gospel-blessings yet this must not be look'd upon as the primary much less as the only end of Christ's death For 1. the blessing must be procur'd before there can be any assurance of it the thing must be suppos'd to be before persons can be sure of it now how was that brought about but by the death of Christ and if so then the only end thereof was not assurance but there must be another antecedent end viz. the purchasing or effecting of the thing which was to be the matter of that assurance And by that the Scripture mainly represents Christ's death Matth. 26.28 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins mark it 't was shed for the procuring of this great blessing not for the assuring persons of it 2. This assurance is as much if not more the effect of Christ's resurrection as of his death Indeed for him to die that contributes very much but 't is his dying and rising again that hath the greatest influence upon it 1 Pet. 1.3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by what by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead As to purchase and impetration we owe more to Christ's death than to his resurrection but as to assurance and subjective certainty we owe more to his resurrection than to his death therefore the Apostle brings this in with a rather Rom. 8.34 It is Christ

Creature now he designing Life for Life therefore he pitch'd upon blood wherein the life did lye The Apostle tells us Heb. 9.22 And almost all things are by the Law purged with blood and without shedding of blood is no remission and if you look into the Levitical Sacrifices you 'l find what he saith to be true In the Burnt-offering for private Persons there was killing and blood Levit. 1.5 the same in the Peace-offerings Levit. 3.2 8 13. the same in the Sin-offerings Levit. 4.7 16 17 18. and so in the rest And the observation of these commands which run so much upon blood was so necessary that should any of the Priests have dared to have entred into God's presence in any other way than by Sacrifices and the blood thereof he would not have taken it well at their hands yea should they have brought into the Temple never so many Bullocks Rams Goats c. and not have slain them or having slain them had not presented their blood before him according to his Institution they would have done no good either to themselves or others for God to shew his Justice Hatred of Sin c stood upon blood and blood he would have From all this we may infer that those old Sacrifices did not expiate as bare Antecedents or Conditions without which God would not pardon or as the offering of them carried in it some Obedience to God's Commands both of which were common to many other things as well as to them surely there was more in it than so Dr. Stillingfl against Crell p. 516 c. for can we reasonably think that God would have been so positive and so express in his Injunctions about somany Sacrifices so severe in the punishing the neglect of them have ordered the taking away the lives of so many Creatures and have so much insisted upon their death and blood in order to expiation had he look'd upon them only as pre-requisite and remoter Conditions of pardon or common acts of Obedience and that as such only they should be expiatory Certainly had there been nothing in them more than this the merciful Creator would have spar'd the blood of the poor Creatures and would have pitch'd upon some other course which might have seem'd at least more consistent with his Wisdom and Goodness We may conclude them therefore to be Means instituted by God in order to atonement and expiation to the effecting of which by virtue of his own institution and the mevit of the great Sacrifice to come they had a direct and effectual tendency This foundation I have laid for the better understanding of the destroying killing shedding of blood that was in the typical Sacrifices I come now to build upon it with respect to the real Sacrifice Christ Jesus In conformity to them therefore Christ was slain died upon the Cross his body broken his blood spilt c. all which speaks him to be a true expiatony Sacrifice Had he not died and suffer'd he could not have been such but upon that he is not only such a Sacrifice really but eminently the dignity of his Person putting a superlative worth and ●fficacy upon his Death and Sacrifice O what was the death of Greatures to the death of God's Son what was the blood of Beasts to the blood of him who was God Acts. 20.28 for such a●person to die to shed his blood for the expiation of Sin here was a Sacrifice indeed And surely one great end of God in ordering the death of the old Sacrifices was to convince the World of the necessity of the death of this far greater Sacrifice by them he designed in ways best known to himself to lead men to a dying and bleeding Christ How much doth the Scripture spake of his blood and though his whole humiliation must be taken in as making up his Sacrifice yet in special what a stress and emphasis doth it put upon his Death and Blood wherein his greatest humiliation lay with respect to their influence upon the good of Sinners Eph. 1.7 In whom we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of sins Rom. 3.25 whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood c. Rom. 5.9 Much more then being now justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him 1. Joh. 1.7 and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin Rev. 1.5 Vnto him that loved us and washed us from our sins in his own blood 1 Pet. 1.19 but with the precious blood of Christ as of a Lamb without blemish and without spot Mat. 26.28 This is my blood of the new-New-Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sins Heb. 9.12 c. Neither by the blood of Goats and Calves but by his own Blood he entred in once into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption for us For if the blood of Bulls and of Goats c. Col. 1.14 having made peace through the blood of his Cross Surely there must be some special reason why this blood of Christ is so often mention'd and why the great benefits which Sinners receive by him are in such a way of eminency ascrib'd to it of which some account will be given in the following particular O the severity of God's Justice which nothing could satisfie but the blood of his own Son O the love of Christ who thought not the best blood in his veins too good for Sinners O the truth of his Satisfaction for what could such blood be spilt for but for that what end could be proportionable to such a medium but Satisfaction O the admirable harmony between type and antitype the shadow and the substance Sacrifice and Sacrifice under the Law 't was blood under the Gospel ' t was blood too only that was common blood but this excellent and precious The Fourth Head of the Ends Effects of the old expiatory Sacrifices and how they are applicable to Christ 4. Fourthly if we compare Christ with the Jewish Sacrifices in their Ends and Effects that will further demonstrate him to be a true expiatory Sacrifice What were they atonement and expiation by them God was to be atoned and Sin to be expiated now both of these were designed and admirably effected in and by Christ therefore he was what I am proving That those Sacrifices were of an atoning nature and appointed for that end what can be more plain Here the so often cited Text which indeed is the key to the whole body of the Levitical-Sacrifices doth recur Levit. 17.11 I have given it to you upon the Altar for what end to make an atonement for your Souls where the word used as in very many other places is Caphar which signifies to * This sense of the word justify'd by all Anti-Socinian Writers Franz Disp 15. th 38. Turretin de Satisf p. 208. Grot. de Sat. p. 39. Hoorneb Socin Confut. p. 607. Dr. Stillingfl p. 509. c. pacify

of which you reade Gen. 15.16 1. Thes 2.16 neither is it the compleating or perfecting of it as we commonly take the word in which respect Christ is said to be the author and finisher of our faith Heb. 12.2 and to finish what he had to do and suffer Joh. 17.4 19.30 but 't is as follows the making an end of sin such a finishing as is destructive not perfective by Christ's Sacrifice sin was destroy'd he thereby made an end of it or seal'd it up as the word signifies so as that it should never be seen or come forth again to the hurt of God's people Again 't is set forth by the putting away of sin Heb. 9.26 but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself the word is rendred by disannulling Heb. 7.18 by making void or abrogating Mark 7.9 set it as high as you will the virtue and efficacy of Christ's Sacrifice will reach it by the oblation of himself he hath quite disannull'd or abrogated and put away the guilt of sin Put all together here 's purging cleansing washing taking away putting away finishing making an end of sin all of which are the same with the condemning of sin in the Text do not all prove the real expiation of the Sin of Believers as the result and issue of the Sacrifice of Christ I having in what goes before said enough for the opening of the true notion of our Saviours expiating of sin under the present Head I have but two things further to speak unto the one referring to the nature of the act the other to the extent of the act Of the nature of the expiation of Sin by Christ 1. As to the nature of the act know that Christ hath so expiated sins guilt as that it shall never be imputed to the believing Sinner in order to the inflicting of eternal punishment upon him this must be rightly apprehended or else we shall run our selves upon great mistakes When you read of the expiating condemning taking away of sin and so on in the other expressions named but now you are not only to understand them as pointing to the removal of sins guilt in their proper and primary intention but also as holding forth no more about that removal of guilt than the non-imputation thereof to punishment Christ indeed by the Sacrifice of himself hath done all that which I am speaking of but how not but that believers have yet guilt upon them that that guilt as consider'd in it self makes them lyable to the penalty threatned that the formal intrinsick nature of guilt viz. obligation to punishment doth yet remain and is the same in them which it is in others all therefore which it amounts unto is only this that this guilt shall not be charged upon such or imputed to them for eternal condemnation Sin is Sin in the godly as well as in the ungodly thereupon there 's guilt on them as well as on the other upon this guilt they are equally obnoxious to the Laws sentence but now here comes in the expiation by the Obedience Death Satisfaction of Christ by which things are brought to this happy issue that though this be so yet these persons shall be exempted from wrath and Hell and the punishment deserved shall not be inflicted Thus far we may safely go but beyond this we cannot we may for the encouraging of Faith the heightning of Comfort set this Sin-expiatory act of Christ very high but we must not set it so high as to assert Contradictions But these things will be more fully stated when I shall come to the handling of the main Doctrine of Justification Of the extent of this act with respect to the Subject and Object 2. For the extent of the act that must be consider'd two wayes either as it respects the Subject for which this expiation was wrought or as it respects the Object the thing expiated 1. As to its extent in reference to the Subject And so Christ's expiatory Sacrifice reaches 1. both to Jew and Gentile not to the one or to the other exclusively but to both 1 Joh. 2.2 And he is the propitiation for our sins and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world 2. To those who liv'd under the Law as well as to those who now live under the Gospel the former had the benefit of Christ's expiation of sin as well as the latter Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God where by Sins past you are to understand those that were committed under the first Testament before Christ's coming in flesh so the Apostle opens it Heb. 9.15 And for this cause he is the Mediator of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Nay 3. there is a a sufficiency of virtue and merit in Christ's Sacrifice to expiate the sins of all men in the world Yet 4. in point of efficacy it extends no farther than to true believers others may receive some benefits by a dying Christ but this of the full and actual expiation of Sin belongs only to those who have saving faith wrought in them As this which I here assert is matter of Controversie I have no mind to engage in it as it is practically to be improv'd and enlarg'd upon so I shall speak to it in the Vse therefore at present I 'le say no more to it All Sins whatsoever expiated by Christ's Sacrifice 2. As to its extent in reference to the Object or the thing expiated it reaches to all and every sin Christ is such a Sin-offering as doth take off from those who believe in him all guilt whatsoever by his Sacrifice for sin he condemned sin that is all sins whatsoever 't is indefinitely express'd to be understood universally Take sin collectively in the whole heap or mass of it or take it distributively for this or that particular sin all is expiated and done away by Christ's blood the expiation is so full and compleat that there is not the guilt of any one sin little or great left unremov'd 1 Joh. 1.7 the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin Acts 13.39 And by him all that believe are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the Law of Moses Whether the Jewish Sacrifices did expiate all Sins Whether the Levitical Sacrifices did thus universally expiate sin is a controverted point wherein the Socinians hold the Negative the Orthodox the Affirmative The * Socin de Servat p. 2. c. 11 12 18. former say those Sacrifices did free from the guilt of lesser sins such as were sins