Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	body_n	bread_n	consecration_n	9,959	5	11.0641	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96805	The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled, that it leads us, as it were, by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures. Ordering of common-places. Vnderstanding of controversies. Cleering of some cases of conscience. By John Wollebius. Doctor of Divinity, and ordinary professor in the University of Basil. Now at last faithfully translated into English, and in some obscure places cleared and enlarged, by Alexander Ross. To which is adjoined, after the alphabetical table, the anatomy of the whole body of divinity, delineated in IX. short tables, for the help of weak memories.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English.	Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629.; Vaughan, Robert, engraver.; Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.	1650 (1650)	Wing W3254; Thomason E1264_1; ESTC R204089	204,921	375

Sacrament of the New-Testament in which Christians that are of age receive spiritually Christs body and blood sealed to them in the reception of Bread and Wine according to Christs institution The RULES I. The Lords Supper is called metonimically the Eucharist or Thanksgiving Sinaxis or a collection the Lords Table the New-Testament and Synecdochically the breaking of Bread II. It hath the same efficient causes that Baptisme hath III. The outward matter thereof or Signes are Bread and Wine IV. The Supper is lame without both Signes and to rob the people of the Cup is Sacriledge Mat. 26.27 Drink yee all of this 1 Cor. 10.16 The Cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of Christs blood And 11. v. 26. As oft as you shall eat this Bread and drink of this Cup you declare the Lords death V. The inward matter is Christ with all his satisfaction and merit VI. As it is Jewish superstition to use unleavened Bread so the Popish Penny-Wafers are superstitious reliques VII It s outward form consists in Actions and Words VIII The Actions are the breaking of Bread and powring out of Wine the distribution of both Signes and the receiving thereof with the hand and mouth IX The word is the whole Institution containing the Eucharist the command and the promise but the promise chiefly X. Therefore it is impiety to think that the Bread is turned into Christs body only the bare accidents remaining by the low mumbling of these five words For this is my body and that with one breath and the Priests intention XI The internal form consisteth in the Analogie of the signe and the thing signified in which by Bread and Wine are signified Christs body and blood as spiritual meat and drink but by the breaking of Bread and powring out of the Wine are represented the breaking of his body or crucifixion and sheding of his blood and lastly by the distributing and receiving of both the applying of Christs death XII The breaking of Bread is not a thing indifferent For Christ made use of this himselfe and commanded it to be used saying do this which he himselfe explained adding This is my body which is broken for you From this the Supper is so called by this also the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are made one bread and one body for we are all partakers of one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words these That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans these in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs Will and Legacie Bur 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wils and Testaments for Jacobs Will shews the contrary Gen. 49. And Mose's Deut. 33. David 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no Trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a Trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deitie and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is represented by the bread as by a Symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speake of others is to seale our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithful with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shal eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptisme not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptisme is the signe of spiritual Regeration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptisme is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptisme is used but once the Lords Supper often-times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharisticall and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but they will have Christ to be offered in their Masse 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remains onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the holy Supper they all drank of the cup as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denyed the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christ's body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace follows the externall society of the visible Church whereby all that be called are accounted for members of the Church Now the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and

my Disciples and v. 12. There prepare the Passeover v. 15. I have desired to eat this Passeover with you To the purpose serve all those places in which Expiation is attributed to sacrifices and Purificat●on to water and washings also in which the name Jehovah is given to the Ark or to Jerusalem Psal 47.6 Ezek. 48.35 Like testimonies are in the New-Testament Mat. 26.26 27 28. While they were eating Jesus took bread and when he had blessed brake it and gave it to his disciples saying Take eat this is my body likewise taking the cup and having given thanks he gave to them saying Drink yee all of this for this is the blood of the New Testament c. See the like places in Mark Luke and 1 Cor. 11. so 1 Cor. 10.4 And the rock was Christ Ephes 5.26 That he might sanctifie his Church having purged her with the washing of water Col. 2. v. 12. Being buried with him in Baptisme Hebr. 9.13 For if the blood of buls and of goats and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh Yea the very same is seen in other speeches besides sacramental as Gen. 41.37 The seven cows are seven years that is types and figures of seven years Rev. 17.9 The seven heads are seven hils and v. 12. The ten horns are ten Kings XIX This kinde of speaking is called a Sacramental Metonymie of the thing signified for the signe Now it is not material whether the trope be in the attribute or in the copula or coupling of the words for though the trope may be in the attribute yet the cause or ground of the trope is in the copula The material cause of a simple enunciation consisteth in the subject and attribute but the copula being affirmed or denyed makes up the formal part by which it becomes true or false proper or figurative for as often as things of different natures are affirmed or joyned by the copula that speech is false or tropical the seal therefore of the trope is in the predicat but the cause thereof in the copula Whereas then the copula is in this enuntiation This is my Body conjoyns things of different natures to wit bread and Christs body necessarily the speech must be false but to say so were blasphemy or else tropical Therefore the interpretation of such speeches is plain bread is the body of Christ that is a Sacrament of his body Circumcision is Gods covenant that is a signe or sacrament thereof seven Kine are seven years that is figures of seven years so we are said to be cleansed with waters sacramentally because baptisme or washing is the sacrament of cleansing so sacramentally the sacrifices of the Old Testament are said to expiate because they were types of expiation by Christ XX. The end of the Sacraments is the sealing of the Covenant of Grace XXI The effects of the Sacraments are not justification or sanctification as if it were by the work wrought but the confirmation and sealing of both benefits This is plain by the example of Abraham who before he was circumcised was justified Rom. 4.11 Therefore the Pontificians falsely affirm that the Sacraments conferre remission of sins and such like benefits by their own inward vertue out of the work wrought These places then of Scripture in which such things are spoken of the Sacraments are to be expounded by a sacramental metonymie as is said XXII Sacraments are common to all that are in the Covenant in respect of the signes but proper to to the Elect in respect of the thing signified XXIII Sacraments are necessary to salvation not simply and absolutely as if they were the prime causes thereof but hypothetically as they are ordinary means of salvation to be used as Christ hath commanded Hence saith Bernard Not the want but the contempt damneth XXIV The Word and Sacraments agree in substance for what the testament promiseth the seal confirmeth but they differ 1. In that the word is received by the eare the Sacraments perceived by the eye so that the Sacrament is a visible word 2. Because the word of the Gospel is generall but by the Sacrament the promises of the Gospel are applied to every believer 3. Because by the Word faith is ordinarily begot and confirmed by the Sacraments Sacraments are of the Old Testament or of the New Of the Old Testament there were two principal and ordinary to wit Circumcision and the Passeover Of these we have handled in the doctrine of the Ceremonial Law Of the New Testament there are two Baptisme and the Lords Supper The RULES I. The Sacraments of the Old and New Testament agree in the thing signified in respect of substance to wit Christ with his benefits which is the kernel of all the Sacraments Heb. 13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day is the same and for ever Rev. 13.8 The Lamb slain from the begining of the world to wit sacramentally in the Sacrifices and Passeover II. Baptisme doth answer Circumcision analogically so doth the Lords Supper the Passeover For as Circumcision was the Sacrament of initiation or of ingraffing into the Covenant of regeneration or spiritual circumcision so is Baptisme And as the Passeover was the Sacrament of spiritual food even so is the Lords Supper Hence the holy Supper succeeded the celebration of the last Passeover III. The difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testamen● consisteth in this 1. In external signes 2. In the manner of signifying for there was signified that Christ was to be exhibited 3. In number For besides Circumcision and the Passeover they had also other Sacraments We have none besides Baptisme and the Lords Supper 4. In amplitude for the New-Covenant doth not extend it self to one and the same people 5. In continuance for those continued only till Christs first coming but these remain to the end of the world 6. In clearnesse IV. The difference then which the Pontificians feign is false That the Sacraments of the Old Testament were types of the Sacraments of the New Testament 2. That the Sacraments of the Old Testament did only shadow out justifying grace but that ours have really in themselves the body of spiritual good things As for the first difference it is one thing to be a type of Christ another thing to be types of the Sacraments in the New-Testament That Circumcision and the Passeover were types of Christ is said but that they were types of our Sacraments I deny for it were most absurd to think that they were instituted only to represent ours The other difference also is false for both in those Sacraments and in these Christ with his benefits are the matter and marrow But the difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament is rather this that they were shadows of spiritual good things whereof Christ was the body Col. 2.17 V. Neither will it follow that therefore the Sacraments of the New-Testament are not better then

those of the Old because they do not conferre justifying grace for the work wrought for their prerogatives remain as they are expressed in the third Rule chiefly the second and sixth Here it is wont to be objected that if we acknowledge not this their fictitious difference the Sacraments of the Old Testament will be clearer then these of the New for the Passeover represents Christs death clearer then the Bread in the Lords Supper But we must know wherein the clarity of a Sacrament consisteth chiefly to wit not in external signes only but in the Sacramental word Now are not these words very clear This is my body which is given for you This is my blood which is shed for you There is nothing so plain concerning Christs death in the Passeover Besides it is false that the killing of a Lamb was a cleerer signe because many more and obscure signs were added to the killing of the Lamb as also because the breaking of bread the pouring out of wine and the receiving of both do most clearly represent the breaking of Christs body the shedding of his blood and the participation of both VI. In vain do the Pontificians reckon among the Sacraments of the New-Testament Confirmation Penance Extreme Vnction Ordination of Ministers and Matrimony Three things are required to a Sacrament 1. That it be instituted by God under the Covenant of grace 2. That it may have an external Symbol ordained by God 3. That the Promise of grace may be annexed to it Now these three belong only to Baptisme and the Lords Supper and not to any of the rest Confirmation is a Popish ceremony in which the Bishop or his Suffragan having asked certain questions of the party baptized concerning the Heads of Religion besmears him with a little ointment putting a linnen-cloth on him not to be removed by the witnesses before the third day and he cuffs him the better to remember the matter and that he may be sufficiently furnished with the Holy Ghost against Satans tentations But where in Scripture do we read of the institution of this Sacrament and of its ceremonies where is the Promise We may more truly call this the Popes excrement then a Sacrament and that mark which the Beast puts upon the forehead of his worshippers Rev. 3 16. Therefore impiously do they preferre this Sacrament to Baptism for they teach plainly that Baptism is perfected by it an that in this there is a greater measure of spiritual gifts then in Baptism and whereas any Priest or Pastor may administer Baptism yea any Lay-man or woman Confirmation must only be performed by the Bishop or his Suffragan Penance is a Sacrament with them in which the sinner having given trial of his repentance is absolved by the Priest We indeed acknowledge that repentance is enjoyned to sinners and that a power of absolving is given to Ministers though they feign a far other penance and absolution as shall appear hereafter But in the mean while there is no outward symbol instituted by God which hath a promise neither can these words I absolve thee be in stead of a symbol as Bellarmine would have it Extreme Unction is a Sacrament amongst them in which the Priest having rehearsed some Letanies anointeth the party that is dying with hallowed oile of the Olive in those parts of the body where the seats of the five Senses are and this he doth after the parties confession and absolution to the end he may recover his health if it be expedient for him and that the remainder of his sinnes after he hath received the other Sacraments may be wiped away Christ indeed promised his Disciples that the sick on whom they were to lay their hands should recover Mar. 16.18 James also commanded that the sick should be anointed after imposing of hands and prayer by the Elders which ceremonies were not Sacraments but voluntary rites joyned with miracles which together with the gifts of miracles are expired Therefore between Extreme Unction and this there is no similitude For that I may say nothing of that magical exorcisme with which the oile is hallowed it is certain that in the Apostles time not only dying people as now in Popery but any also that were sick were anointed Ordination is a Sacrament among them in which the Bishop alone or his Suffragan layeth his hands upon the Minister and delivereth to him with solemn words a Book a Platter a Pastoral staffe c. using also the ceremonies of Unction and Shaving and imprints on him an indelible character to conferre Justifying grace whereby he might rightly use the power of the Keyes Now although Ministers may be ordained by imposition of hands and prayers after the example of the Apostles yet this Imposition is a thing indifferent but for the Popish ceremonies they are partly Jewish as anointing partly Heathenish as shaving expresly forbid Lev. 19.27 Marriage is no Sacrament of the Covenant of grace both because it was instituted before the fall as also because it is common to all that are within without the Covenant yet we deny not but that Marriage is a representation of that spiritual wedlock between Christ and his Church but if for this it were a Sacrament then there should be so many Sacraments as there be Parables and Allegories Hence divers Schoolmen have denied this to be a Sacrament And in what esteem it is among the Papists appears by this that they make an irreconcileable war between Marriage and Ordination and forbid Marriage in their Clergy as if it were an unclean thing CHAP. XXIII Of Baptisme BAptisme is the first Sacrament of the New-Testament in which the Elect being received into the family of God remission of sinnes and regeneration in Christs blood and the Holy Ghost are confirmed by the outward sprinkling of water The RULES I. The word Baptisme signifieth a dipping and aspersing or washing That it signifieth aspersion appears in Mar. 7.4 And when thy come from the market they eat not except they be washed II. Here are four appellations of Baptisme to be considered 1. The Baptisme of water a 2. Of light or doctrine b 3. Of the Spirit or gifts of the Spirit c 4. Of blood or martyrdome d a Mat. 3.11 I baptise you with water b Mat. 22.25 The baptisme of John that is all his ministery both of doctrine and baptisme whence was it Act. 18.25 Apollo knew only the baptisme of John c Act. 1.5 You shall be baptised with the Holy Ghost d Mat. 20.22 Can you be baptised with the baptisme wherewith I am baptised III. Christ our Lord is the principal efficient cause but the instrumental is the Minister lawfully called IV. Therefore we hold not that baptisme lawful which is administred by any private man or a woman as in Popery For if in earthly Commonwealths that is not accounted of which a private man doth without command how much lesse can Christ be pleased with such disorder in his Church V. * A.

consisting of a reasonable soul infused into him by God immediately Here we disallow not the Philosophers definition by which they call man a reasonable creature but we describe man in the Divinity-School more fitly for our purpose as we have now described him The RULES I. There is a threefold miraculous production of mans body mentioned in Scripture the first was of the dust of the earth without father and mother the second production was out of Adams rib without a mother the third was of the blood of the Virgin without a Father II. The soul of man is not propagated of seed by traduction but is immediately created by God and infused into the body Of mans Creation Moses writes thus Gen. 2. ver 5. 7. The Lord breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul In this place three things are mentioned 1. The immediate Creation of the soul for it is called the breath of God 2. His breathing for he saith He breathed into his nostrils 3. The personal union of body and soul in these words And he was made a living soul metonymically that is a living sensitive creature But that the souls now are immediately created by God and infused into the body is proved by these subsequent Reasons 1. Because otherways our souls should have another original then Adams had for ours must proceed of some pre-existent matter whereas Adams proceeded of none Neither will that objection hold concerning the different way or reason of generation and creation for nothing is generated of matter but what in the beginning was created of matter 2. Because the soul of Christ was not formed of seed by traduction for he was conceived not by the help of man but by the operation of the holy Ghost of the blessed Virgins blood 3. Because the Scripture when it speaks of the original of our souls it speaks as of a work of Creation not of nature Job 33.4 The Spirit of God hath made me and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life Zach. 12.1 The Lord stretcheth out the heavens and layeth the foundation of the earth and formeth the spirit of man within him where it is plain that this is reckoned among the works of Creation 4. Such is mans generation as his dissolution is but mans dissolution is that his body returns to dust and his Spirit to God that gave it Eccl. 12.9 Whereas then in mans dissolution the Spirit returns immediatly to God doubtless it was immediatly formed by him 5. Because the Scripture doth plainly distinguish between the parts of bodies and Spirits Heb. 12.2 6. Because the soul is indivisible into parts therefore cannot be produced but of nothing 7. Because if it were generated by traduction either it must be generated of a soul or of a body or of a soul and body together but it is not generated of a soul * A. R. The soul could not be produced out of any pre-existent matter neither corporeal because it is not a body nor incorporal because spirits and incorporeal substances admit no change or transmutation because of that which is incorruptible nothing can be generated not of a body because it is not corporeal not of a body soul together because so it should be partly corporeal partly incorporeal seeing then it is produced of nothing it must be produced by God alone whose alone property it is to make things of nothing III. These Physical Axiomes Like begets like and Man begets man remain true also in this case both because man begets man a person begets a person as also because by the work of the Parents the body is begot as it were the subject of the soul and so is united to the soul which is infused by God and so thus the whole man is brought into this world by generation 'T is true that man is the efficient cause of man but not according to all his parts for as he is said to kill a man that kills only his body so man is said to beget man though he begets not the soul Neither again is man in this respect ignobler then other living creatures whereas rather for this very cause mans generation is more excellent in that Gods immediate operation concurs with natures work IV. Mans soul is immortal not simply as though God could not annihilate it but by Gods ordination and that it cannot be destroyed by second causes V. The faculties of the soul are really different from the soul as qualities or proper accidents from their subject The reason of this is taken from the event because the essence of the soul remains entire when the faculties are shaken and weakned VI. The souls faculties are either meerly organicall as the vegitive and sensitive facultie or are such onely in part and for a time as the understanding and will the former operate not when the body is corrupted but these without the help of the body can exercise themselves and operate when the body is destroyed VII Libertie from coaction is an essential property of the will Otherways the will were no will CHAP. VI. Of Gods actual Providence GOds actual Providence is that by which not only he preserveth his creatures but also according to his great wisdom goodness power justice and mercy he governs all things The RULES I. To deny * A. R. For he could not bo God if he did not order things to their end but this is providence 2. He were not God if he were not good but this is seen as well in the ordering as in the creating of the World 3. He were not God if he were not prudent but providence is the chief part of prudence this Providence is to deny God himself II. Actual Providence differs from eternal as Execution from the Decree III. As in Gods eternal Providence the will of his good pleasure so in this his revealed will is chiefly seen IV. Providence doth not only consist in knowledge but also in the Government of all things both great and small V. Gods Providence takes not away but establisheth the second causes VI. What * A. R. The world were not perfect if all things were necessary nothing contingent therefore God would have contingencies to depend from contingent causes and necessities from causes necessary therefore what falls out necessarily is because God hath so disposed it things are contingent in respect of the second causes are necessary in respect of Gods providence but this necessity is of immutability not of coaction VII Gods Providence is far different from the Stoicks fatall necessity For the Stoical fate ties God to the connexion of secondary causes but the Christian fate makes a subordination of the second causes to Gods most free will of which he makes use voluntarily not of necessity out of indulgence rather then indigence VIII By Gods Providence both good and evil are governed IX Good things are ruled by an efficacious action or effectual working to which

it were by Seals of the Covenant of Grace A Sacrament is a sacred action instituted by God in which that grace which Christ hath promised to the Covenanters is s aled by visible signes on G●ds part and they are tied on their part to obedience The RULES I. The word Sacrament which of old was used for a military oath or for money deposited in stead of a pledge by those who were in suit of law is not unfitly applyed in the Church to the signes of Grace For by Sacraments as it were by solemne oaths we are bound to observe what is promised in the Covenant and the same are to us pledges of Grace promised in the Covenant II. It is called also a mystery as it signifieth some secret and divine thing proposed in signes and types yet the word Mystery is further extended then the word Sacrament seeing every sacrament is a mystery but all mysteries are not sacraments III. Sacrament sometimes is taken properly for the whole action as it contains both the signe and the thing signified but Synecdochically it is onely taken for the signe IV. According to the first sense it is already defined but in the other sense it is defined a visible signe of an invisible grace V. The principal efficient cause is commonly the whole Trinitie but particularly Christ that Angel of the Covenant VI. The instruments of administration are the Ministers lawfully called VII The instrument by which the Sacraments are effected or by which the signes are consecrated is the Word of Institution consisting chiefly of two parts to wit a precept of the due administration and receiving and a promise of the fruitful efficacie of Sacraments VIII The word of institution doth not change the quantity or substance of the elements but onely their use and that not by any secret vertue inherent in the words themselves as the Papists say but by Gods ordination As a stone by the by the Magistrates appointment is changed into a land-mark the substance and qualities thereof still remaining so as Austin saith the Word being joyned to the Element it becomes a Sacrament the qualitie and substance remaining onely the common use is changed into a sacred IX It is false also which they teach That the Ministers intention is of such absolute necessity that without this there can be no Sacrament For if the Sacrament depend not more on Gods institution then on the Ministers intention wretched consciences will be deprived of all comfort who know not the Ministers thoughts whilst he administers X. They do also foolishly set in opposition the Word Preached and the Word of Institution for these differ not really but in some respect onely seeing a Sermon is but the explication of the Word therefore the Word of Institution belongs to the essence of the Sacraments but the Word Preached to the manner of administration XI The outward and terrene matter of the Sacrament is the visible Signe XII The inward or heavenly matter is the thing signified to wit Christ with all his benefits XIII The external forme consisteth in the lawfull administration and participation of the Sacrament according to Gods command XIV The internal form is in the analogie of the signe and thing signified XV. Therefore the union of the signe and thing signified is not physical or local but habitual as the signe represents the thing signified and while the signe is given by the Minister the faithful receive the thing signified from Christ XVI Yet we deny not the presence of Christ and of his body and blood in the action of the Sacrament for besides that he is present in his Divine person he is not wanting in the presence of his Spirit to his own body and blood not locally but sacramentally There is a threefold presence besides that which is local 1. Symbolical when things are represented to the mind by some signe or symbol as things by words or voices man by his image 2. Spiritual when we represent to our selves by faith some spiritual thing not existent as Abraham represented to himself and saw the day of Christ Joh. 8.56 3. A Virtual when that which is distant in place is present in power and efficacie as the Sun These three wayes of Presence meet in the Sacrament for the body and blood of Christ are present to us 1. Symbolically as they are represented by an external signe 2. Spiritually as we apply by faith to our selves Christs body and blood with his merits 3. Virtually as we perceive the fruit thereof by faith in our hearts The first degree of Sacramental presence belongs also to the infidels the second and third to the faithful only Therefore although Christs body by local presence is far distant from the symbole as heaven is from earth yet there is a sacramental presence Presence is not opposed to distance but to absence XVII Neither are therefore Sacraments emptie signes because the symbole and thing signified are not locally united for there remain notwithstanding 1. The signes signifying 2. Exhibiting 3. Applying 4. Sealing We must carefully observe these four sorts of signes against those who cry out that we have nothing in the Sacraments but empty signes Signes then are either significant only as a painted image signifyeth a man or exhibiting also as a scepter keys and such like which being exhibited regall power is also conferred and leave to enter the house or they are besides applying signes as that promise of God to preserve the 144000. this the Angel applieth to each one by setting a mark on his forehead Rev. 7.3 Or lastly they are confirming and sealing signs as earnests seals and such like Now these four degrees meet in Sacraments for 1. The outward symbols do signifie and represent Christs body and blood 2. Together with the signe the thing signified is exhibited yet not in the signe but in the Sacramental action the Minister exhibiting the signe and Christ the thing signified 3. The thing signified generally promised to the faithful in the Gospel by the exhibition of the sign is applied to every one of the faithful 4. The same promise is confirmed by the Sacrament whence they are not only called signes but seals also Rom. 4.11 XVIII From the union and relation of the thing signified with the signe there ariseth a sacramental phrase or speech in which the thing signified is predicated of the signe In this manner of speech is expressed what these outward signs signifie rather then what they are in themselves or of their own nature Gen. 17.9 Circumcision by a sacramental phrase is called the Covenant but v. 11. properly the Signe of the Covenant Exo. 12.11 The Lamb is called the Passeover which place is vindicated from our Adversaries exceptions by the like sayings Luc. 22.1 The day of unleavened bread came in which the Passeover was to be killed ver 8. Go and prepare the Passeover for us that we may eat ver 11. There is an Inne where I must eat the Passeover with