the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are one bread and one body for we are all partakers of that one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words thus That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans thus in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former Chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs will and Legacie But 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wills and Testaments for Iacobs Will shews the contrary Gen â—9 And Moses's Deut. 33. David's 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant Maniâ— cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deity and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is presented by the bread as by a symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speak of others is to seal our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithfull with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shall eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptism not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptism is the sign of spiritual Regeneration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptism is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptism is used but once the Lords Supper often times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharistical and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but â—hey will have Christ to be offered in their Mass. 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remain onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the Holy Supper they all drank of the câ—p as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denied the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christs body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the Nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace Now follows the external society of the visible Church where by all that be called are accounted for members of the Church For the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and outward administration The visible Church then is a visible society of men called to the state of grace by the Word and Sacraments The RULES I. The name of Church and Synagogue is the same with the Hebrew Kahal and Edah but the society of Christians is mâ—re usually called the church II We must carefully here observe the distinction of the word that we may know of what Church we speak III. For whereas it is distinguished into the triumphant and militant that belongs to the doctrine of the state of glory this is for our present consideration IV. The militant Church is divided into the visible and invisible V. The invisible Church is the company of the Elect onely This is called invisible not as if the men that belong to her were not visible as they are mâ—n but that they are not perceived as they are elect for the Lord knows only who are hiâ— 2 Tim. 2.19 VI. This belongs to the doctrine of special vocation for by her proper effects to wit faith charity and such like the elect which are the invisible Church are known VII The visible Church is the company of all that are called in common as well Reprobates as Elect. VIII This word Church visible is ambiguous for properly it is meant of the universal Church dispersed through the whole World more strictly of any particular Church as of France England Holland c. but most strictly of the representative Church or the company of Pastors and Elders IX Her efficient cause in common is the holy Trinity in particular Christ. X. The matter of the Church are they who are called in common and received into the Covenant of grace and Infants that are born in the Church XI Neither unbaptised Infants nor Catechumeni nor excommunicate persons are to be excluded out of the number of the Churches members The two foâ—mer soâ—ts of men belong to the Church by the righâ— of covenant though nâ—t of profession but for the third kinde though they be cast out of some particular Church yet they are not simply ejected out of the catholike though the Papists excommunicate them XII The form of the Church consisteth in a double union the first is of her conjunction with Christ her
Psal. 47.6 Ezek. 48.35 Like testimonies are in the New-Testament Mat. 26.26 27 28. While they were eating Iesus took bread and when he had blessed brake it and gave it to his Disciples saying Take eat this is my body likâ—wise taking the cup and having given thanks he gave to them saying Dâ—â—nk ye all of this for this is the blood of the New Testament c. See the like places in Marke Luke and 1 Cor. 11. so 1 Cor. 10.4 And the Rock was Christ. Eph. 5.26 That he might sanctifie his Church having purged her with the washing of water Col. 2. v. 12 â—eing buried with him in baptisme Heb. 9.13 For if the blood of buls and of goats and the ashes of an heâ—fer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the flâ—sh Yea the very same is seen in other speeches besides sacramental as Gen. 4â— 27 The seven cows are seven years that is types and figures of seven years Râ—velations 17 9. The seven heads are even hills and verse 12. The â—on horns are ten Kings XIX This kinde of speaking is called a Sacramental Metonymie of the thing signified for the signe Now it is not material whether the trope be in the attribute or in the copula or coupling of the words for though the trope may be in the attribute yet the cause or ground of the trope is in the copula The material cause of a simple enunciation consisteth in the subject and attribute but the copula being affirmed or denied makes up the formal part by which it becomes true or false Proper or figurative for as often as things of different natures are affirmed or joyned by the copula that speech is false or tropical the seal therefore of the trope is in the predicate but the cause thereof is in the copula Whereas then the copula is in this enuntiation This is my body conjoints things of different natures to wit bread and â—hrists body necessariâ—y the speech must be false but to say so were blasphemy or else tropical Therefore the interpretation of such speeches is plain bread is the body of Christ that is a Sacrament of his body Circumcision is Gods covenaÌ„t that is a sign or sacrament thereof seven kine are seven years that is figures of seven years so we are said to be cleansed with water sacramentally because baptisme or washing is the sacrament of cleansing so sacramentally the sacrifices of the Old Testament are said to expiate because they were tipes of expiation by Christ XX. The end of Sacraments is the sealing of the Covenant of Grace XXI The effects of the Sacrament are not justification or sanctification as if it were by the work wrought but the confirmation and sealing of both benefits This is plain by the example of Abraham who before he was circumcised was justified Rom. 4.11 Therefore the Pontificians falsely affirm that the Sacraments confer remission of sins and such like benefits by their own inward vertue out of the work wrought These Places then of Scripture in which such things are spoken of the Sacraments are to be expounded by a Sacramental Metonymie as is said XXII Sacraments are common to all that are in the covenant in respect of the signes but proper to the Elect in respect of the thing signified XXIII Sacraments are necessary to salvation not simply and absolutely as if they were the prime causes thereof but hypothetically as they are ordinary means of salvation to be used as Christ hath commanded Hence saith Bernard Not the want but the contempt damneth XXIV The Word and Sacraments agree in substance for what the testament promiseth the seal confirmeth but they differ 1. In that the word is received by the ear the Sacraments perceived by the eye so that the Sacrament is a visible word 2. Because the word of the Gospel is general but by the Sacrament the promises of the Gospel are applied to every believer 3. Because by the Word faith is ordinarily begot and confirmed by the Sacrament Sacraments are of the Old Testament or of the New Of the Old Testament there were two principal and ordinary to wit Circumcision and the Passeover Of these we have handled in the doctrine of the Ceremonial Law Of the New Testament there are two Baptisme and the Lords Supper The RULES I. The Sacraments of the Old and New Testament agree in the thing sâ—gnified in respect of substance to wit Christ with his benefits which is the kernel of all the Sacraments Heb. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day is the same and for ever Rev. 13.8 The Lamb slain from the beginning of the world to wit sacramentally in the sacrifices and Passeover II. Baptisme doth answer Circumcision analogically so doth the Lords Supper the Passeover For as Circumcision was the Sacrament of initiation or of ingrafting into the Covenant of regeneration or spiritual circumcision so is Baptisme And as the Passeover was the Sacrament of spiritual food even so is the Lords Supper Hence the Holy Supper succeeded the celebration of the last Passeover III. The difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament consisteth 1. In external signes 2. In the manner of signifying for there was signified that christ was to be exhibited here exhibited 3. In number For besides Circumcision and the Passeover they had also other Sacraments We have none besides Baptisme and the Lords Supper 4. In amplitude for the New-Covenant doth not extend it self to one and the same people 5. In continuance for those continued only till Christs first coming but these remain to the end of the World 6. In clearnesse IV. The difference then which the Pontificians feign is false â— That the Sacraments of the Old Testament were types of the Sacraments of the New Testament 2. that the Sacraments of the Old Testament did only shadow out justifying grace but that ours have really in themselves the Body of spiritual good things As for the first dâ—ffâ—rence it is one thing to be a type of Christ another thing to be types of the Sacraments in the New Testament That Circumcision and the Passeover were types of Christ is said but that they were types of our Sacraments I deny â—or it were most absurd to think that they were instituted onely to represent ours The other dâ—fference also is false for both in those Sacraments and in these Christ with his benefits are the mattâ—r and marrow But the diffâ—rence betweene the Sacrament of the Oâ—d and New Testament is rather this that they were shadows of â—piâ—itual good things whereof Christ was the body Col. 2.17 V. Neither will it follow that therefore the Sacraments of the New Testament are not better than these of Old because they do not conferre justifying grace for the work wrought for their prerogatives remain as they are expressed in the third Rule chiefly the second and sixth Here it is wont to be objected that if we acknowledg not this their fictâ—tious difference the Sacraments
of the Old Testament will be clearer than these of the New for the Passeover represents Christs death clearer than the Bread in the Lords Supper But we must know wherein the clarity of a Sacrament consisteth chiefly to wit not in external signes onely but in the Sacramental word Now are not these words very clear This is my body which is given for you This is my blood which is shed for you There is nothing so plain concerning Christs death in the Passeover Besides it is false that the killing of a Lamb was a clearer signe because many more and obscure ceremonies were added to the killing of the Lamb as also because the breaking of Bread the pouring out of VVine and the receiving of both do most clearly represent the breaking of Christs Body the shedding of his blood and the participation of both VI. In vain do the Pontificians reckon among the Sacraments of the New-Testament Confirmation â—enance Extreme Vnction Ordination of Ministers and Matrimony Three thnigs are required to a Sacrament 1. That it be instituted by God under the Covenant of Grace 2. That it may have an external Symbol ordained by God 3. That the Promise of grace may be annexed to it Now these three belong only to Baptisme and the Lords Supper and not to any of the rest Confirmation is a Popish ceremony in which the Bishop or his Suffragan having asked certain questions of the party baptized concerning the Heads of Religion besmears him with a little oyntment putting a linnen cloth on him not to be removed by the witnesses before the third day and he cuffs him the better to remember the matter and that he may be sufficiently furnished with the holy Ghost against Satans tentations But where in Scripture do we read of the institution of this Sacrament and of its ceremonies where is the Promise We may more truly call this the Popes excrement than a Sacrament and that mark which the Beast puts upon the forehead of his worshippers Rev. 13.16 Therefore impiously do they prefer this Sacrament to Baptism for they teach plainly that Baptism is perfected by it and that in this there is a greatâ—r measure of spiritual gifts than in Baptism and whereas any Priest or Pastor may administer Baptism yea any Lay man or woman Confirmation must onely be performed by the Bishop or his Suffragan Penance is a Sacrament with them in which the sinner having given tryall of his repentance is absolved by the Priest We indeed acknowledge that repentance is enjoyned to sinners and that power of absolving is given to Ministers though they feign a far other penance and absolution as shall appear hereafter But in the mean while there is no outward symbol instituted by God which hath a promise neither can these words I absolve thee be in stead of a symbol as Bellarmine would have it Extream Unction is a Sacrament amongst them in which the Priest having rehearsed some Letanies anointeth the party that is dying with hallowed oyl of the Olive in those parts of the body where the seats of the five Senses are and this he doth after the parties confession and absolution to the end he may recover his health if it be expedient for him and that the remainder of his sins after he hath received the other Sacraments may be wiped away Christ indeed promised his Disciples that the sick on whom they were to lay their hands should recover Mar. 16.18 Iames also commanded that the sick should be anointed after imposing of hands and prayer by the Elders which ceremonies were not Sacraments but voluntary rites joyned with miracles which together with the gifts of miracles are expired Therefore between extreme Unction and this there is no similitude For that I may say nothing of that magical exorcism with which the oyle is hallowed it is certain that in the Apostles time not onely dying people as now in Popery but any also that were sick were anointed Ordination is a Sacrament among them in which the Bishop alone or his Suffragan layeth his hands upon the Minister and delivereth to him with solemn words a Book a Platter a a Pastoral staff c. using also the ceremonies of Unction Shaving and imprints on him an indeleble character to confer Justifying grace Whereby he might rightly use the power of the Keyes Now although Ministers may be ordained by imposition of hands and prayers after the example of the Apostles yet this Imposition is a thing indifferent but for the Popish ceremonies they are partly Jewish as anointing partly Heathenish as shaving expresly forbid Lev. 19 27 Marriage is no Sacrament of the Covenant of grace both because it was instituted before the fall as also bâ—cause it is Common to all that are wiâ—hin and wâ—thout the Covenant yet we deny not but that Marriage is a representation of that spirituall wedlock between Christ and his Church but if for this it were a Sacrament then there should be so many Sacraments as there be Parables and Allegories Hence divers Schoolmen have denyed this to be a Sacrament And in what esteeme it is among the Papists appears by this that they make an irreconcileable war betweene Marriage and Oâ—dination and forbid Marriage in their Clergy as if it were an unclean thing CHAP. XXIII Of Baptisme BAptisme is the first Sacrament of the new Testament in which the Elect being received into the family of God remission of sins and regeneration in Christ's blood and the Holy Ghost are confirmed by the outward sprinkling of water The RULES I. The word Baptisme signifieth a dipping and aspersion or washâ—ng That it signifieth aspersion appears in Mar. 7.4 And when they come from the Market they eat noâ— except they be wâ—shâ—d II. Here are four appellations of Baptisme to be considered â— The Baptisme of water 2. Of light or doctrine 3. Of the Spirit or gifts of the Spirit 4. Of blood or martyrdom III. Christ our Lord is the principal efficient cause but the instrumental is the Minister lawfully called IV. Therefore we hold not that baptism lawfull which is administred by any private man or a woman as in Popery For if in earthly Commonwealths that is not accounted of which a private man doth without command how much lesse can Christ be pleased with such disorder in his Church V. The outward matter is water But for oil salt spittle and other things which Papists joyn to this element belong rather to the profanation than administration of baptism VI The internal matter is Christ with his death buriall and resurrection with other benefits VII It 's external form consisteth partly in actions partly in words VIII The action is the aspersion of water which is used for dipping The dipping in and rising out of the water was a clear symbol of Christs burial and resurrection But because of the weaknesse oâ— Infanâ—s in cold countries we use sprinkling which probably was used by the Apostles when they baptâ—zed
in privaâ—e families IX It is not much materiall whether one aspersion or three be used so it be void of superstition and that it be not performed drop by drop or by the finger but so that the symbol may answer the sprinkling or washing X. The word by which Baptism is to be administred is to be comprehended in Christs institution especially in these words I baptise thee in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost XI The Latine tongue in Baptisme and the superstitious consecration or exorcisme of the water are repugnant to the form of Baptism XII The internal form consisteth in the analogy of aspersion and remission of sins as also of regeneration or sanctification In this Baptism answers the legal aspersions by which likewise remission of sin by the blood of Christ was shaddowed Water also as it cleanseth from filthinesse and moistneth the Plants doth adumbrate regeneration whereby we dye to sin and live to righteousness See Rom. 6. v. 1. c. XIII The end of Baptisme besides those which are common to it and the Lords Supper is the sealing of our regeneration and of our reception or ingrafting into the family of God XIV The subject of Baptisme are all that be in the Covenant even the children of those who are reckoned among the number of the Covenanters This rule is grounded 1. on Christs command Matt. 19.14 Suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me they ought not then to be kept off from Baptism whom Christ will have to be brought to him The words used in this place and Luke 18.15 Of little children and infants are emphaticall 2. On the reason alledged by Christ Mat. 19.14 For of such is the kingdome of heaven For if to them the kingdome of heaven and the Covenant of Grace belong the seale of the Covenant must needs appertain to them also but they are capable of this Covenant Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God and of thy seed Act. 2 v. 39. To you and to your children is the promise made 3 On the analogy of circumcision for with this Sacrament Infants were initiated 4. On the example of the Apostles who are saâ—d to baptise whole families Act. 16.15 33. It were a foolish thing to apply that rule 2 Thess 3.10 If any will not work let him not eaâ— to Infants so perversly doe the Anabaptists wrest the places of Scripture to a contrary meaning in which those that are of years are commanded to be taught before they are baptised XV. Infants have both Faith and Reasâ—n although not in the fruit yet in the seed and root though not in the second act yet in the first though not by an outward demonstration of the work yet by the inward virtue of the holy Spirit XVI But concerning the Infants of Infidels the case is otherwise who are not born of Parents even so much as either of them a Believer for they are not to be baptized till they be of discretion and are able to testifie their Faith XVII The Baptisme of Bels is a horrible profanation of the Sacrament and joyned with abominable idolatry XVIII As naturally we are born before we eat so baptisme is before the Lords Supper XIX Baptisme is not to be iterated if the essentials thereof were used Hence it is that our Church ratifies the Baptisme of the Popish Church not as it is abused there but as it is administred in the name of the Holy Trinity XX. Baptism is necessary not absolutely but in respect of â—hrists command neither must we feign such a necessity as permits any other besides the minister to baptise or to cause us think they are excluded out of heaven if they die unbaptised XXI The Baptisme of Christ and of John are in effect the same The Pontificians deny that Iohn's baptisme was instituted by God against these plain testimonies Mat 21.25 Luke 3.2 and 7.30 Joh. 1.33 Neither matters it that Iohn distinguisheth between his baptisme and Christs Mar. 1.8 For there the oppâ—sition is not between baptisme and baptisme but a comparison onely between thâ— office of the Minister in Baptisme and Christ for the Minister giveth the Symbol but Christ the thing signified They say that such as were baptised by Iohn were rebaptised Act. 19.1 c. If they were rebaptised by the Apostle we gather that they were not rightly baptised by some who were imitators of Iohn neither yet can we find out of the text that they were rebaptised for those words v. 5. are not Lukes concerning Paul but Pauâ—'s concerning Iohn and his disciples therefore thâ—s place favoureth neither Papist nor Anabaptists CHAP. XXIV Of the Lords Supper THe Lords Supper is the other Sament of the New Testament in which Christians that are of age receive spiritually Christs body and blood sealed to them in the reception of Bread and Wine according to Christs institution The RULES I. The Lords Supper is called metonymically the Eucharist or Thanksgiving Sinâ—xis or a collection the Lords Table the New Testament and Synecdochically the Breaking of Bread II. It hath the same efficient causes that Baptisme hath III. The outward matter thereof or Signes are Bread and Wine IV The Supper is lame without both Sgnes and to rob the people of the Cup is Sacriledge Matth 26 27. Drink ye all of this 1 Cor. 10.16 The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of Christs blood And 11. v. 26. As â—ften as you shall eat this bread and â—rink of this Cup you declare the Lords death V. The inward matter is Christ with all his satisfaction and merit VI. As it is Iewish Superstition to use unleavened Bread so the Popish Penny Wafers are superstitious reliques VII It s outward form consists in Actions and Words VIII The Actions are the breaking of Bread and powring out of Wine the distribution of both signes and the receiving thereof with the hand and mouth IX The word is the whole institution containing the Eucharist the command and the promise but the promise cheifly X. Therefore it is impiety to think that the bread is turned into Christs body only the bare accidents remaining by the low mumbling ef these five words For this is my body and that with one breath and the Priests intention XI The internal forme consisteth in the Analogie of the sign and the thing signified in which by Bread and Wine are signified Christs body and blood as spiritual meat and drink but by the breaking of Bread and powring out of the Wine are represented the breaking of his body or crucifixion and shedding of his blood and lastly by the distributing and receiving of both the applying of Christs death XII The breaking of Bread is not a thing indifferent For Christ made use of this himself and commanded it to be used saying do this which he himself explained adding This is my body which is broken for you From this the Supper is so called by this also
blessed 2. For the production of this visible world which was not altogether destitute of form but of perfection separation and beauty which by degrees then it received 3. For sending in of the primitive Light which was neither the Elementary fire nor a bright Cloud nor any other body but a Quality sent into the air by God who is that inaccessible light This created quality of Light was afterward the fourth day placed in the Stars IX The second day the Firmament was created or the Aerial heaven which by its lower part separates the waters above that is the â—louds from the waters beneath that is the Sea X. The third day God 1. separated the inferior waters which as yet covered the earth and gathered them into certain channels that the rest of the earth called dry land might afford a commodious habitation for man and beast 2. He gave to the earth a fructifying power to produce herbs and plants without the hâ—lp of seed or sun XI The fourth day the Stars and great Luminaries wâ—re placed in heaven whose motion proceedeth not from a soul or any assistant intelligence as the Philosophers affirm but from that power which God gave them in the beginning no otherways than the earth by its innate power stands immovable XII There is a threefold use of the Stars 1. To distinguish the day night 2. To note the times seasons of the year 3. To impart their vertue to inferior bodies XIII The fifth day were made the Birds Fishes and creeping things XIV The sixth day after the earthly Creatures were produced and this whole Vniverse as a large house was furnished with all kinde of furniture Man at last was created Of all these Creatures Men Angels are chiefly considered in Divinity because on them God bestowed his Image The RULES 1. Although the whole World be the Looking-glass of Gods power wisdom and bounty yet properly Gods Image is attributed to Angels and Men onely 2. Gods Image doth partly consist in natural gifts to wit in the invisible and simple substance of Angels and Mens souls in their life understanding will and immortality partly in supernatural gifts to wit in their primitive blessednesse in the uprightness of their intellect will in their majesty dominion over the other creatures Angels are intelligent Creatures void of bodies The RULES I Angels are not accidents nor qualities but true substances II Angels are void of bodies and are not subject to destruction III. The bodies in which the Angels appeared were not meer apparitions nor yet united to them hypostatically but were freely assumed to perform some service in IV. Angels are in a place not by way of circumscription but by way of definition V. Angels cannot be together in many places VI Angels truly move from place to place Man is a creature whose body originally was formed of earth but afterwards is propagated of seed by traduction consisting of a reasonable soul infused into him by God immediately Here we disallow not the Philosophers definition by which they call man a reasonable creature but we describe man in the Divinity-School more fitly for our purpose as we have now described him The RULES I. There 's a threefold miraculous production of mans body mentioned in Scripture the first was of the dust of the earth without Father and Mother the second production was out of Adam's rib without a Mother the third was of the blood of the Virgin without a Father II. The soul of man is not propagated of seed by traduction but is immediately created by God and infused into the body Of mans creation Moses writes thus Gen. 2. ver 7. The Lord breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul. In this place three things are mentioned 1. The immediate Creation of the soul for it is call'd the breath of God 2. His breathing for he saith He breathed into his nostrils 3. The personal union of body and soul in these words And he was made a living soul metonymically that is a living sensitive creature But that the souls now are immediately created by God infused into the body is proved by these subsequent Reasons 1. Because otherwayes our souls should have another original than Adam's had for ours must proceed of some pre-excistent matter where as Adam's proceeded of none Neither will that objection hold concerning the dâ—fferent way or reason of generation and creation for nothing is generated of matter but what in the beginning was created of matter 2. Because the soul of Christ was not formed of seed by traduction for he was conceived not by the the help of man but by the operation of the holy Ghost of the blessed Virgins blood 3. Because the Scripture when it speaks of the original of our souls it speaks as of a work of Creation not of nature Iob. 33.4 The spirit of God hath made me and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life Zac. 12.1 The Lord stretcheth out the heavens and layeth the foundation of the earth and formeth the spirit of man within him where it is plain that this is reckoned among the works of Creation 4. Such is mans generation as his dissolution is but mans dissolution is that his body returns to dust and his spirit to God that gave it Eccl. 127. VVhereas then in mans dissolution the spirit returns immediatly to God doubtless it was immediatly formed by him 5 Because the Scripture doth plainly distinguish between the parts of bodies spirits Heb. 12.9.6 Because the soul is indivisible into parts therefore cannot be produced but of nothing 7. Because if it were generated by traduction either it must be generated of a soul or of a body or of a soul and body together but it is not generated of a soul because of that which is incorruptible nothing can be generated not of a body because it is not corporeal not of a body and soul together because so it should be partly corporeal partly incorporeal seeing then it is produced of nothing it must be produced by God alone whose alone property it is to make things of nothing III. These physical Axiomes like begets like and Man begets man remaine true also in this case both because man begets man a person begets a person as also because by the work of the Parents the body is begot as it were the subject of the soul and so is united to the soul which is infused by God and thus the whole man is brought into this World by generation 'T is true that man is the efficient cause of man but not according to all his parts for as he is said to kill a man that kills only his body so man is said to beget man though he begets not the soul. Neither again is man in this respect nobler than other living creatures whereas rather for this very cause mans generation is more excellent in that Gods immediate operation concurs
pledge by those who were in suit of law is not unfitly applyed in the Church to the signes of Grace For by Sacraments as it were by solemn oaths we are bound to observe what is promised in the Covenant and the same are to us pledges of grace promised in the Covenant II. It is called also a Mystery as it signifieth some secret and divine thing proposed in signs and types yet the word Mystery is further extended than the word Sacrament seeing every sacrament is a mystery but all mysteries are not sacraments III. Sacrament sometimes is taken properly for the whole action as it containes both the signe and thing signified but Synecdochically it is onely taken for the signe IV. According to the first sense it is already designed but in the other sense it is defined a visible signe of an invisible grace V. The principal efficient cause is commonly the whole Trinity but particularly Christ that Angel of the Covenant VI. The instruments of administration are the Ministers lawfully called VII The instrument by which the Sacraments are effected or by which the signs are consecrated is the Word of Institution consisting chiefly of two parts to wit a precept of the due administration and receiving and a promise of the fruitful efficacie of Sacraments VIII The word of institution doth not change the quality or substance of the elements but only their use and that not by any secret vertue inherent in the words themselves as the Papists say but by Gods ordination As a stone by the Magistrates appointment is changed into a landmark the substance and qualities thereof still remaining so as Austin saith the Word being joyned to the element it becomes a Sacrament the quality and substance remaining onely the common use is changed into a sacred IX It is false also which they teach That the Ministers intention is of such absolute necessity that without this there can be no Sacrament For if the Sacrament depend not more on Gods institution than on the Ministers intention wretched consciences will be deprived of all comfort who know not the Ministers thoughts whilst he administers X They do also foolishly set in opposition the Word preached and the Word of Institution for these differ not really but in some respect onely seeing a Sermon is but the explication of the Word therefore the Word of Institution belongs to the â—ssâ—nce of of the Sacrament but thâ— Word Preached to the manner of administration XI The outward and terrene matter of the Sacrament is the visible Signe or Element XII The inward or heavenly matter is the thing signified to wit Christ with all his benefits XIII The external form consisteth in the lawful administration and participation of the Sacrament according to Gods command XIV The internal forme is the analogie of the sign and thing signified XV. Therefore the union of the sign and thing signified is not physical or local but habitual as the signe represents the thing signified and while the signe is given by the Minister the faithfull receive the thing signified from Christ. XVI Yet we deny not the presence of Christ and of his body and blood in the action of the Sacrament for besides that he is present in his Divine Person he is not wanting in the presence of his Spirit to his own body and blood not locally but sacramentally There is a threefold presence besides that which is local 1. Symbolical when things are represented to the mind by some sign or symbol as things by words or voices man by his image 2. Spiritual when we represent to our selves by faith some spiritual thing nor present as Abraham represented to himself and saw the day of Christ Ioh. 8.56 3. A Virtual when that which is distant in place is present in power and efficacy as the Sun These three ways of Presence meet in the Sacrament for the body and blood of Christ are present to us 1. Symbollically as they are represented by an external sign 2. Spiritually as we apply by faith to our selves Christs body and blood with his merits 3. Virtually as we perceive the fruit thereof by faith in our hearts The first degree of Sacramental presence belongs also to infidels the second and third to the faithfull only Therefore although Christs body by local presence is far distant from the symbole as heaven is from earth yet there is a sacramental presence Presence is not opposed to distance but to absence XVII Neither are therefore Sacraments empty signes because the symbole and thing signified are not locally united for there remain notwithstanding 1. The signes signifying 2. Exhibiting 3. Applying 4. Sealing We must carefully observe these four sorts of signes against those who cry out that we have nothing in the Sacraments but empty signes Signes then are either significant only as a painted image signifieth a man or exhibiting also as a scepter keys and such like which being exhibited regal power is also conferred and leave to enter the house or they are besides applying signes as that promise of God to preserve the 144000. this the Angel applieth to each one by setting a mark on his fore-head Rev. 7.3 Or lastly they are confirming and sealing signs as earnests seals and such like Now these four degrees meet in Sacraments for 1. The outward symbols do signifie and represent Christs body and blood 2. Together with the signe the thing signified is exhibited yet not in the signe but in the Sacramental action the Minister exhibiting the signe and Christ the things signified 3. The thing signified generally promâ—sed to the faithful in the Gospel by the exhibâ—tion of the sign is applied to every one of the faithfull 4. The same promise is confirmed by the Sacrament whence they are not onely called signs but seals also Rom. 4.11 XVIII From the union and relation of the thing signified with the sign there ariseth a sacramental phrase or speech in which the thing signified is predicated of the sign In this manner of speech is expressed what these outward signs signifie rather than what they are in themselves or in their own nature Gen 17. 19. Circumcision by a sacramental phrase is called the Covenant but v. 11. properly the Sâ—gn of the Covenant Exod â—2 11 the Lamb is called the Passeover which place is vindicated from our Adversaries exceptions by the like sayings Mar. 14.12 And the first day of unleavened â—read when they killed the passeover Luc. 22.7 The day of unleavened bread camâ— in which the Passeover was to be killed ver 8. Go and prepare the Passeover for us that we may eat ver 11. There is an Inne where I must eat the Passeover with my Disciples and v. 12. There prepare the passeover verse 15. I have desired to eat this Passeover with you To this purpose serve all those places in which Expiation is attributed to sacrifices and purification to water and washings also in which the name Iehovah is given to the Ark or to Ierusalem