that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
misericordia eius nos in omnibus praeuenit cōsentire verò vel dissentire propriè voluntatis est to consent or not consent vnto it for God forceth no man vnto his freindship As to the second kind or way of gouerment Christ the son of the Virgin Mary was * Aug. 95. haer filius hominis venit magnus medicus quia magnus iacebit aeger ipse medicus factus est medicamentum phraenetici a great mercifull phisician vndertaking the Cure of a great infirm patient which was all mankind afflicted with sundry mortall infirmityes in healing wherof he applied no other remedy then himselfe he was made both the phisician and the phisick to shew his mercifull greatnes (d) Christ In the pursuance of the generall redemption performed all the seuen works of mercy and in the Cure of each infirmity he perform'd a work of mercy Man was halfe dead with hunger himselfe gaue him Heauenly (e) Jo. 6. Christ is named bread of life bread his own body vnto euerlasting life Man was halfe dead with thirst himselfe ministred drink made of his own blood that he might be no more a thirst Man was a very Idiot as to the knowledg of his Creatours glory and his own happines himselfe taught him (f) t' was foretold Ierem. 31 that the law of grace should be giuen in the inward parts and writ in the hearts of the faithfull and writ his holy ordinances in his heart Man in a journy between Ierusalem and Ierico met with thieues that robbed him of his garments wounded and left him for halfe dead himselfe was the charitable Samaritan that took compassion of him (g) Lut. 10. he went to him and bound vp his wounds and powred oyle and wine bound vp his wounds powred in oile and wine of seuerall graces and made full prouision for him Man was detained in prison for a debt that was not in his reach to discharge himselfe visited him wiped out and cancelled (h) Coloss 2. Christ is said to haue cancelled the handwriting of the decree that was against us the handwriting of the decree that was against him and fastened it vpon his Crosse wherin he dying spoiled the principalities and powers of death and hell triumphing ouer them which had brought all the fore mentioned infirmities vpon mankind CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST THE CONTENTS Of the Cross of Christ came all our happines honour and worship due to the Cross the custome of ancient and modern Christians to make the sign of the Cross in their foreheads the ground manner and meaning thereof THe Cross of Christ is the Altar of generall redemption that is the Tree that was erected in Mount Calvary wherin Christ the second Adam by a supream sacrifice of his pretious body and blood redeemed the generall loss that the first Adam made in the tree planted in the terrestiall Paradise diuine providence fore ordaining so that the deuil * Canit Ecclesia inpraefatione de Dominica passione vt qui in ligno vincebat in ligno quoque vinceretur S. Ignatius mar Epis ad philad Crucis signum inquit est trophaeū contra virtutem principis mundi quod videns expauoscit audiens timet who in wood ouercame should in wood be ouercome And as a stagg worsted in single fight by another of his fellows euer after stands in awe of the Conquerour waues his walk or if by accident or necessity he passeth by him bowes his lofty head in recognisance of his inferiority and the others superiority (a) S. Damascene calleth the Cross of Christ a sign or token of his victory ouer the deuil and erected to the intent the conquered enemy may not dare to come near the place wherin it is exposed and S. Chrisostome expresly affirmes that deuils cannot abide near such as make the sign of the Cross on their forcheads Again Origen Hom. 8. in locis diuerfis calleth the Cross of the son of God our victory at the sight wherof deuils tremble Nothing affraid saith he of golden Capitolls they stand in fear of the Cross so the deuill standes in fear of the Cross that subdued him runneth from it and though he make light of guilded pallaces and contemne the Scepters of kings neuertheless he is afraid of the weapon that wounded him and trembles as often as he sees the sword that depriued him (b) Io. 12. Christ said the Prince of this vvorld the deuil shall be cast out and vvhen I shall be exalted from the earth that is put vpon the Cross I vvill dravv all men vnto me Wherefore S. Ignatius the Martyr calleth the Cross a trophy or sign that is set vp against the power of the Prince of this world who while he see it is afraid and while he heares the naming of it trembles of his principallity and power This is one reason of the generall practice vsed by Catholick Christians in making the * S. Chryfost si vultui tuo signum sanctae Crucis affixeris nullum daemonium propè stare poterst sign of the Cross on their forheades on their meat and drink (c) S. Hieron Epis ad Eustoch exhorteth this holy virgin to make the sign of the Cross with her hand in the doing of euery worke and in all their conuersations and exercises at their going out and coming into their houses at their going to bed and rising and this pious and religious vse hath descended from Father to son euer from the beginning of Christianity Tradition left it saith Tertullian custome confirmed it and faith practized it Another reason is because the Cross is a liuely representation of the Generall redemption vnto conseruing the memory of Christs passion who did chuse saith S. Austin in exposit Euang. S. Ioan. trac 43. That kind of death to hang on the Crosse and to fasten the same Crosse in the foreheades of the faithfull that a Christian may say God forbid that I should glory saue in the Crosse of our lord IESUS Christ Besides Christians by imprinting the sign of the Cross in their foreheades and saying in the name of the Father and of the son and of the holy Ghost doe confess and profess together with the mystery of generall redemption the mystery of the holy Trinity for they mention expresly the three diuine persons and in as much as they say In the name of the Father c. and not in the names vsing the singular number only they signifie implicitly the individuall or singular vnity of the individuall or singular diuine nature equally participated by each person Also they plainly and orderly express the marueilous order that the diuine persons had from all eternity for example they name the Father in the first place the son in the second the holy ghost in the last And in regard the diuine Father is a beginning without a beginning and as it were the head of the other two diuine persons in making the sign of
and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin◠is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
deuotion wheras the feruour and humility in the vnlearned doe compence euen the want of an exact and distinct vnderstanding howeuer it is very expedient that euery belieuer say our lords prayer in the tongue he knowes for it is not enough to vnderstand confusedly that the petitions therin contained are good and profitable but likewise to know them distinctly Wherfore sundry constitutions set forth by Synods of Bishops require vnderstanding of words and sense as to our lords prayer CHAR. III. OF MELCHISEDECH THE CONTENTS Melchisedech a type of Christ by diuine dispensation invested in holy Priesthood offered a proper sacrifice of thanksgiuing in bread and wine Melchisedech's sacrifice figured the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood vnder the elements of bread and wine Christs vnbloody sacrifice sulfilled the figuratiue of Melchisedech Those which deny that Christ appointed Priests as his Vicars to offer in his room daily sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine of necessity destroy his euerlasting Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech the practice of Priestly blessing MElchisedech was king of * Fuit salem vrbs terrae Chananaeae vt constat ex historia Genesis quae fuit filijs Israel à Deo promissa iam dicta Iudaea Palestina seu terra sanctae salem that it by interpretation of iustice and Peace (a) According to holy scriptures Melchisedech was a Priest priesthood taken in the proper sense for he is called the Priest of God most high Gen. 1. and Hebrae 7. and this catholick assertion the ancient Fathers haue vnanimously taught as likewise Philo Iudae l. de Abraham a Priest of God most high counted without Father and mother without kindred without beginning of daies or end of life the holy Scriptures no where making mention of his genealogic He met the great Patriarch Abraham as be returned from the slaughter of the kings brought forth bread and wine which he (b) All the ancient Fathers that florish'd in the years 100.200.300.400 namely S. Irenaeus S. Hypolitus S. Chrysostomus S. Ambrose S. Hierom S. Austin c. teach that Melchisedech offered a sacrifice of bread and wine and S. Cyprian Epis 63. ad Caecil saith expresly that Melchisedech Priest of God most high made an offering of bread and wine and in an other place he calleth the sacrifice of Melchisedech the Image of Christs sacrifice offered vnder the forms of bread and wine so that according to S. Cyprian Melchisedech said Mass figuratiuely his sacrifice being a Type or figure of the sacrifice of the Eucharist and doubtless Melchisedech brought forth bread and wine with an intent to offer a sacrifice of thanksgiuing for the great victory Abraham had won and not precisely to refresh the souldiers who needed no meat hauing refresh'd themselues afore Gen 14. Howeuer t' is probable that Melchisedech did distribute amongst the souldiers of Abraham the bread and wine which he had consecrated in representation of the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper wherin he consecrated bread and wine and after gaue them to his Apostles and indeed Clemens Alexand. l. 4. stroma Calleth the meat Melchisedech distributed sanctifyed nourishment and S. Epipha ser 55. affirmes that Melchisedech gaue to Abraham and his souldiers consecrated bread and wine offered in sacrifice to giue thanks to him whose Priest he was for the obtained victory and afterward blessed him which shews his excellency aboue Abraham who was a Priest also and consequently aboue Leui and all the Priests of the old law that came out of the loyns of Abrahā (c) S. Paul Hebrae 7. saith that without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better signifying therby that Melchisedech was a greater Priest then Abraham whom he blessed moreouer the Scripture Text teacheth that to bless after a sacred manner is proper to Priestly function in consequence of which without all contradiction a Priest is greater in dignity then any temporall Prince that wanteth authority to giue sacred benediction As Melchisedech blessed Abraham so Priests num 6. were commanded to bless the people and Christ Mark 10. blessed young children and his Disciples Luk 24. and after the same manner the Bishops and Priests of the catholick Church bless lay-people and other creatures namely Agnus Dei bead's Crosses medal's candles Ashes Palmes Belles new shippes c. all which creatures are sanctifyed by the word of God and prayer for so the Church blesseth all such things by express invocation of God alwaise vsing this preface Adiutorium nostrum in nomine Domini Our helpe is in the name of our lord and so beseecheth God to bless consecrate and sanctifie his creatures in vertue of his passion and death suffered on the Cross that so they may be deliuered from the power of Satan and become beneficiall to men and the Church concludes all benedictions Per Christum Dominum nostrum For it is the prerogatiue of the greatest Priest to blesse the lesser besid's Abraham gaue him tithe which doth euidence the others exceeding dignity yet in these excellencies Melchisedech was a type only of Christ in whom the reall verity was contained Melchisedech as king of iustice and peace by interpretation was but a shadow of Christ who was and is actually and indeed king and Authour of both for he came into the world * Zachar. 9. Ecce Rex tuus venit iustus Saluator a just and peaceable king that * 1. Cor. 1. qui factus est nobis iustitia sanctificatio redemptio justified and reconciled man to God and his Angells Melchisedech as Priest of God that offered a sacrifice of bread and wine was a figure of Christ the son of God who being anointed Priest by the holy ghost offered (d) S. Austin in psal 33. saith that Christ instituted a sacrifice of his body and blood according to the Order of Melchisedech that is vnder the forms of bread and wine And l. 6. de ciuit c. 22. speaking of Melchisedech's sacrifice therin saith he first appeared the sacrifice which Christians offer to God and therby is fulfilled the propheticall saying Thou art a Priest according to the Order of Melchisedech a sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine at his last supper Melchisedech as Priest without beginning of daies or end of life signifieth the continuance of Christ his Priesthood for euer in as much as Priests instituted by and substituted vnder Christ as his proper Vicars shall continually offer to the end of the world the vnbloody sacrifice that Christ himselfe celebrated in his last supper neither can any man in reason deny but that Christ euen then offered an vnbloody sacrifice for that were to auerre that Christ did not fullfill the figuratiue sacrifice of Melchisedech and consequently that he was no Priest according to his order or similitude since it cannot be proued that Christ at any other time did offer a
A man must be made a christian through baptism before he can make a progress in christianity through confirmation A man must be made a member of Christ through baptism before he can be a soldier of Christ through confirmation A man must be endued with faith through baptism before he can be deputed to a speciall office in the exercise thereof which is to defend it against the assaults of Tyrants through confirmation A man must be invested with * Hieron diolog con Lucifer cap. 4. quemodo inquit ab Ecclesia recipiet confirmationeÌ„ qui nec dum remissionem peccatorum coÌ„secutus est Docet Arianos qui errabant contra formam baptismi non accepisse spiritum sanctuÌ„ per Sacramentum CoÌ„firmationis grace vnto remission of sins through baptism before he can receiue the holy Ghost vnto perfection through confirmation which does not confer sanctity after the manner of other Sacraments only but also doth * Omnes S. Patres qui agunt de Sacramento confirmationis doceÌ„t baptismi gratiam perfici consummari per gratiam coÌ„firmationis increase and perfect the sanctity receiued afore by baptism it being the complement or consummation thereof Whereby it is plainly euident that albeit this Sacrament is not as baptism a requisite absolutely necessary vnto obtaining eternall blessedness neuertheless it is conditionally necessary to wit as to the armour of grace and (h) According to Pope Vrban dist 5. de consecratione there is no perfect christian that hath not receiu'd the holy Ghost through the imposition of Episcopall hands and Hugo de S. Vict. l. 2. de Sacram. par 7. cap. 3. countes it dangerous to dye without being confirm'd afore which is conform to the doctrine of ancient Fathers S. Dionys Lâ—de Eccles Hierar c. 4. S. Cypr. Epis 72. ad Iubaian which assert that then a man has fulnes of sanctity and is made an adopted son of God when he receiues both the Sacraments baptism and confirmation perfection therof as also to a more ample measure of blessedness then baptisme alone doth effect so that christian catholicks especially such as liue vnder persecution ought to vse extraordinary endeauours for their admittance to this Sacrament the proper office there of being to strenghten them by grace that they may not fall from the Church of Christ * In Epis ad Fabium vti refert Eusebius l. 1. cap. 35. S. Cornelius affirmeth that Nouatus fell into Heresie for the want therof If they haue no conueniency in their own country to repaire vnto a catholick Bishop the spirituall aduantages which they may reape from the Sacrament of confirmation will compence the charges of a journey into forrain parts where catholick Bishops are to be found but this is to be vnderstood in reference to such catholicks as haue ability of body and a competency of temporall fortunes As touching the sensible rites or ceremonies employed in or about the Sacrament of confirmation the most remarkable are two only For example a Bishop in making of chrism breatheth three times in form of a cross on the mouth of the pot or flagon that containeth the said Chrism signifying thereby that euen at that time through episcopall consecration Chrism receiueth virtue from God wherby it is impowered as his instrument to confer strengthning grace to such as doe receaue the Sacrament aright and ceremonies signifying the thing that is done for the time they are employed are profitable by the confession of such * Caluinus in sua harmonia ad cap. 7. S. Marci fatetur caeremonias illas quae habent significationem eius quod tunc fit duÌ„ exercentur esse vtiles as impugne catholick ceremonies The other ceremonie is the reuerence a Bishop exhibiteth to the consecrated Chrism bowing down his head he saluteth saying Haile holy Chrism This ceremony hath nothing of Idolatry for an vnliu'd thing may challenge religious adoration in reference to an other distinct wherin excellency is contained to which religious adoration is due The ancient Iewes adored the Ark of the Testament because of the relation it had to God that is an increated excellency and all Christians doe religiously worship and adore the sacred books of the new Testament in reguard of the word of God therin comprehended And subjects of a temporall Prince do render ciuil reuerence to his chaire of state in relation to his sacred Person if a king or Emperour to which is due ciuill adoration by the law of God and nature in like manner religious worship is exhibited to holy Chrism in as much as it is the effectuall instrument of God to giue armour of grace to such as are baptised and is by speciall benediction deputed to the effecting therof CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE EVCHARISTE THE CONTENTS Christ the night before his passion made his last Testament gaue vnto his Church a legasy of his body and blood in the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form's of bread and wine for to continue the spirituall food of souls till he come to Iudgment The express words of the Testament This is my body This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood exclude each figure that is inconsistent with the litterall sense intended by the Testatour that vseth not to say one thing literally and mean an other mystically because Christ Said this is my body this Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood no man in reason ought to doubt of it Authorities of Councils testimonies of ancient Fathers and the warrantable practice of both primitiue and modern Churches euince the reall presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Euchariste in vertue of the same word that was made flesh and made all things of nothing bread is transubstantiated in to the body and wine in to the bloud of Christ who is in Heauen and in the Sacrament at once One body can agree with many places by diuine dispensation Requisit's necessary to a worthy receiuing of Christs body and bloud in the Sacrament THe Euchariste is the (a) The blood of Christ shed vnto remission of sinnes is the proper legacy of the new Testament according to Christs owne words set down 1. Cor. 11. This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood legacy of the new Testament vnto eternall life that Christ bequeathed to his Church in a Sacrament of his body and blood the night before he suffered his passion in the presence of witnesses without exception which were his Apostles The same body and blood that Christ offered in a sacrifice on the cross visibly to the redeeming of man kind vnto liberty he left in a Sacrament vnder the elements of bread and wine invisibly to the feeding of man vnto eternall life In the bestowing of this legacy Christ who is faithfull in all he promiseth fulfilled the promise he had made long afore and which is set down Io. 6. (b) Christ Ioan. 6. promising and recommending the Sacrament of his body and blood said
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
he carryed himselfe in his own hands while giuing his body he said This is my body But truly he had not done what no other could doe if he had carried in his hands a meer figure or sign of his body onely Again S. Cyril Hieros Catech. mysti affirmes that the wine is as truly chang'd into the blood of Christ as water was conuerted into wine in Cana-Galilaea Moreouer S. Cyprian ser de Domi. coena asserts that the bread Christ gaue vnto his Disciples is chang'd saith he not as to the form or figure that is as to the accidents thereof but as to the nature that is as to substance through the Omnipotent power of the worde that was made flesh plainly and euidently otherwise the mystery established vnto saluation might leade into errour and damnation since a thing deliuered in Tropes and figures is subiect vnto vncertainty and intricacies Again the words afore mentioned set down by three Euangelists and one Apostle importe the new Testament made by Christ himselfe the night before his passion and it is vncredible that a Testatour expecting death suddenly should say in express tearmes what he meaned not In regard whereof the ancient Fathers doe vnanimously declare that the cited words of institution vêªt videlicet This is my body This is the blood of the new Testament ought to be taken in their proper sense that no man according to reason might doubt of the â—â—all and substantiall presence of Christs reall and substantiall body and blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist Christ the diuine Testatour expressing himselfe therein plainly and clearly Wherfore it is an infallible Article of christian faith that vnder the elements of bread and wine is contained Christs true reall and substantiall body and blood through a maruelous transubstantiation that is to say substantiall (h) Transsubstantiation signifies conuersion of one substance into an other conuersion of the bread into his body and the wine into his blood in vertue of the word that was made flesh which the word made that made all thinges of nothing Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that changed Lots wife into a piller of salt Gen. 19. that turned Moyses rod into a serpent Exod. 4. that conuerted the riuers and fountaines of Egypt into blood Exod. 7. that made wine of water Io. 2. that created man of the dust of the ground and breathed in his face breath of life Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that was God Io. 10. Wherfore since the omnipotency of the word can work such marueilous effects it is euidently plain that Christ who is this omnipotent word to wit the son of God can conuert bread into his flesh and wine into his blood and the diuine omnipotency as to transmutation of one created substance into an other in like manner created the Deuil did acknowledg when he said vnto Christ If thou be the son of God command that these stones may be made bread Mat. 4. Wherfore such as deny transubstantiation in the Sacrament of Christs body and blood as an action impossible are worse then Deuills and doe not consider the infinite power of God according to the innate vertue therof Besides if the nutritiue faculty of nature can turne bread into the substance of him that eateth it and change wine into the blood of him that drinketh it if art can make Iron of earth and glass of ashes why cannot God that is aboue nature and art conuert bread into Christs body and wine into his blood Christs body and blood being created substances Furthermore it is extream weakness in a Christian that ought in the mysteries of christian doctrine to be ruled by faith which is a conuiction of thinges not seen to think that he cannot receiue in the Sacrament with his corporall mouth the true reall and substantiall body and blood of Christ because he doth not see them for indeed he might as to reason think as well that there are not three persons in God and one substance two natures in Christ and one person or that there was neuer such a man as Salomon or any such as are called his great Grand-Fathers and Grand-mothers because he hath not seen them or to thinke he is not endued with an immortall soul which quickneth each part of his body because he cannot see it and t' is as great weakness to think that if all the belieuers had eaten of Christs reall body from the first age for 1662. it would haue been wasted and spent long agoe though it had been as big as a great mountaine for Christ's (i) T is no strange thing for the substance of Christs body to exist after an indiuisibie manner since according to true Philosophy the substance or essence of euery real thing hath an indiuisible existency body by diuine dispeÌ„sation is spiritually cloathed in the Sacrament being inuisible indiuisible and incorruptible and consequently deuested of outward extension in order to place and therfore not subiect to naturall alterations which doe accompany common bodies As Heate brightness of fire sweet odour of a rose doe not suffer prejudice for as much as they be communicated to many and as the pot of meale and vessel of oile did not faile or diminish though the widow of Sareptha and her family did eat thereof continually while the Heauens were shut froÌ„ rayning through the prayers of Elias 30. Regum so the body of Christ in the Sacrament is not wasted spent or prejudiced albeit that the whole Church doth dayly feed thereof Likewise t is extream weaknesse to think that Christ cannot be in * Chrys l. de Sacerd. ait qui Christus cum patro sursum sedet in illo ipso temporis momeÌ„to omnium manibus pertractatur Heauen and in the Sacrament at once in as much as one body is not capable according to Philosophy to possess two places together for God is not confined to Aristotles principles The diuine omnipotency transcend's Philosophy her Rules and all the works of nature God made all thinges of nothing contrarie to the maxime of Aristotle Nothing is made of nothing Furthermore in Christ are two natures and one sole person Christ was conceiued of the Virgin Mary without prejudice to her virginity and in the day of his Ascension penetrated the Heauens which are solid bodies without boring into them and other effects which vnto Philosophy are impossible to God are possible Howeuer one body and many places are not inconsistent together as to naturall Philosophy especially when a body is in many places after the manner of a spirituall substance deuested of outward extension in order to the places that containe it and so Christs body is in many consecrated Hosts at once or when one body is in one place with it's quantity extended outwardly thereunto and in another depriued therof at the same time and so Christs body is in Heauen and in the Sacrament together all which according to naturall Philosophy ought not to seem thinges
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
signification doe constitute the body only vnder the forms of bread and the words which consecrate Christ's blood according to their proper signification doe put the blood only vnder the form's of wine neuerth eless in vertue of naturall concomitancy that is to say of the naturall connection which is between all the naturall part 's of Christ now inuested with immortality it is manifest by necessary consequence that wheresoeuer Christ's body and blood is there is all Christ vndeuided and so it is alike in the mystery of the blessed Trinity that includes three Persons really distinct though the word Father according to it's proper signification be appropriated to the first Person only notwithstanding whersoeuer the first diuine Person is who only layeth claim to the name Father taken in the proper sense there also is the second Person the son and the third Person the holy Ghost in vertue of the naturall connection that one Person has with an other Hence it is plainly euident that the Euchariste distributed vnder one kinde only ought not to be counted a lame Sacrament since one sole species contain's as much of Christ as both together to wit all Christ entirely Neither is a greater measure of grace conferred Ex opere operato that is by the Sacraments working precisely when it is taken in one sole or in both kind's the spirituall effect thereof which is supernaturall grace vnto refreshing and feeding of the soul being equally diuided to all such as receiue the Sacrament with the same worthines whether vnder one only or both kind's and all such are * 1. Cor. 10. multi vnum corpus sumus qui de vno pane participamus one bread and one body in as much as all are partakers of one bread 1. Cor. 10. which is an other effect of the Sacrament Also he that shall eate of this bread worthily which is conuerted into the body of Christ shall liue for euer 10. 6. And as * 2. Cor. 8. qui multum non abundauit qui modicum noÌ„ minorauit Et Exod. 16. filij Israel colligerunt Manna alius plus alius minus nec qui plus collegerat habuit amplius nec qui minus parauerat r. perit minus an Israëlite that gathered much Manna had nothing ouer and an Israëlite that gathered little had not the less so a Christian that receiueth the Sacrament vnder both kind's hath no more of Christ or of sacramentall grace then he that receiueth vnder one kinde only if there * Gratia sucramentalis confertur iuxta dispositiones supernaturales eorune qui recipiunt Sacramenta be parity as to the disposition of the receiuers notwithstanding all these premises it cannot be said in proper speech that he that eateth Christ's body doth drinke his blood or that he that drinketh Christ blood vnder the forme of wine doth cate his blood albeit that whosoeuer receiueth his body receiueth his blood withall and whosoeuer receiueth his blood receiueth his body withall for the reason of difference in order to the proper form of speech doth not proceed from the absence of the one and the sole presence of the other but from a different manner exercised in the conueyance of the consecrated elements * Innocentius III. ait quod quamuis dum bibitur sanguis Christi simul accipiatur eius corpus quod tamen tune non dicitur propriè â—â—aÌ„ducari vnder both of which be contained as well the body as the blood of Christ from the mouth into the stomach no man eating and thinking alike Secondly lay-communion vnder one kinde only is continued because of other modern sectaries that lay claim to a diuine precept to proue a necessary vsage of both kinds which is a manifest weakness for * Jems 6. hic est panis de coâ—le descendens sâ— quit 〈◊〉 ipso manducauevit non morictur Et v. 52. 〈…〉 si quit manducâ—â—erit c hoc pane viuet in aterâ—â—â— Rursiam qui maÌ„ducâ—t â—â—am 〈◊〉 viâ—â—t in aeternum many scripture-testion onies doe declare communion in one kinde to be enough for one obtaining eternall life and not any one doth exprosse an obsolute command to oblige the Church vnto lay-communion vnder both kinds For of all the three Euangelist's which set down the Institution of the Eucharist only S. Luk cap. as mentioneth an absolute precept given by Christ viêªt videlicet Doe this in 〈◊〉 of me but from this scripture no man ought to argue an obligation euen for consecration in both kinds and consequently much less for lay-communion vnder both kinds because the precept doth immediatly follow the consecration of the bread asone and was enjoyned afore Christ did institute the chalice and though Christ Mat. 6. after he had consecrated the chalice said drink yee all of it yet that was a precept giuen to the Apostles only which were present for S. Mark chap. 14. says And they All drank of it that is all the Apostles then sitting at the last supper Furthermore Christ by giuing the afore said precept Doe this in remember ance of mee wherby is commanded the execution of all the actions ioynt and separate that Christ then did cannot be meant vniuersally in order to all the faithfull ioynt and separate the said actions being inconsistent with meer lay-people who are not invested with power to offer proper sacrifice consecrate Christs body and ordaine Priests for the distributing the Euchariste to others which were the actions that Christ exercised and proper only to the Episcopall and Priestly function * Trident. sess 22. cap. 1. can 1. ait per verba hoc facite Christum ordinasse Apostolos Sacerdâ—tes that Christ instituted at his last supper Amongst the Apostles S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. only relateth the Institution of this Sacrament and according to his Testimonie the absolute precept Doe this in remember ance of me is giuen also before Christ consecrated the chalice and albeit that S. Paul mentioneth a conditionall precept that felloweth the institution of the said chalice to wit This doe as oft as ye drinke it in remember ance of me neuertheless as no man ought to argue according to the rules of true Logick from a condititionall proposition an vniuersall absolute so no man ought to infer from a conditionall an absolute precept vniuersally obliging the whole Church ioynt and separate and consequently there cannot be produced out of the three Euangelists and S. Paul which set down the words Christ vsed in the institution of this SacrameÌ„t any warraÌ„table ground to proue a diuine precept obliging all belieuers vniuersally to coÌ„municate vnder both kind's and although S. Iohn the EuaÌ„gelist chap. 6. doth shew an express warrant from Christ coÌ„manding as it were communion vnder both kinds in order to the whole Church joynt and separate The warrant runs thus Except ye eate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye haue no life in you howeuer modern sectaries and Caluinist's especially cannot in
her exemption from the guilt of Originall sin according to Pope Alexander the seuenth who hath declared in a speciall Bull put forth 1661. that by the feast which the Church celebrates of the Immaculate Conception is meant the blessed Virgins preseruation from Originall sin This feast of the Immaculate Conception was as to the western Church first celebrated in England and afterwards in France by the canons of lyons and though S. Bernard reprehended the practice there of as to the same canons neuertheless he was not against the feast it selfe being offended only because the said canons had introduced it by their own priuate auctority But in the Greek Church the feast of the Conception was celebrated before the year 1000. as attestes Gailatinus l. 1. c. 4. Besides since God in the creation of our first Adam prepared for his entertainment a terrestiall paradise beautified with all manner of pleasant trees bearing fruit and flowers breathing sweet smells (e) S. Austin l. de nat gra c. 36. giues euidence enough of the blessed Virgins preseruation euen from the guilt of originall sin for prouing there against the Pelagians that young children are not without sin which of necessity is meant of originall young babes not being capable of actuall offence refuseth to bring in question the Virgin Mary Now if S. Austin had impugned the Pelagians as to actuall sin he ought not to except the Blessed Virgin only but likewise all young children these hauing nothing of actuall or personall transgression whereby plainly appeares that S. Austin did not thinke that the Virgin Mary was guilty of originall sin doubtles in the incarnation of our second Adam he made his spirituall paradise to wit the Virgin Mary fan beyond the other as to beauty goodnes and splendour * S. Ansel l. de Concept Virginali c. 18. decens inquit crat vt ea puritate qua maior sub Deo nequit intelligi Virgo illa Deipara niteret In her he planted spirituall trees of all vertues and flowers of all the graces that euer had been distributed to any human or Angelicall creature And as God in the temporall generation of his onely son thought fit waueing other feisable waies of his mercy to make the Virgin Mary an Instrument of vniuersall redemption so with reference to the merits of the said son he constituted her a meanes of particular saluation he in fused into her soul the plenitude of celestiall gifts wherby it plainly appeares that all necessary requisits to the purchase of eternall life proceed from God by the Virgin Mary through the merits of her son IESUS and therefore both primitiue and modern times haue stiled her (f) S. Athanas ser in Euan. prayeth thus to the mother of God we together with the Angell Gabriel extoll thee saying Hail Mary full of grace our lord is vvith thee pray for us ô Mistris ô Lady ô Queen ô mother of God queen of mercy that opens the bowels of Gods charity and compassion to whom she will (g) S. Ephrem in quadam Orat. de Deipara makes his prayer to the blessed Virgin thus Virgin before and after trauell by tsiee we are reconciled to Christ our God thy son thou art the helper of sinners the Heauen of such as are lost with tempests the worlds comfort the deliuerer of the imprisonned and the Redeemer of Captiues S. Austin de fide symbolo de agone Christiano saith that as Adam and Eue procured our fall so both sexes conduced to our saluation insomuch that the most grieuous sinner cannot perish injoying the support of her protection As Christs saying to S. Peter feed my lambs feed my sheep was directed to one and intended to many lawfully succeeding him that gouernment being of necessary and continuall vse in the Church soe his saying to S. Iohn behold thy mother was addressed to one and meant to all * Aug. ser 18. de sanctis Tom. 10. vel vt alij sentiunt S. Fulgentius habet haec verba sancta Maria succurre miseris inua pusillanimes refoue fiebries ora pro populo ... intercede pro deuoto femineo sexu that none at all might want a powerfull and tender mother of loue and mercy to fly vnto for protection in their necessity Hence is euidenced * S. Ansel apud S. Antonium 4. p. tit 15. cap. 14. item S. Bernardus sic alloquitur Deiparam quemadmodum ô beatissima omnis à te auersus à te despectus necesse est vt intereat ita omnis ad te conuersus à te respectus impossibile est vt pereat that as it is necessary for such as are auerse from the Virgin Mary and by her despised to perish so it is impossible for such as are conuerted to her and by her respected not to be saued CHAR. V. OF THE SON OF THE VIRGIN MARY THE CONTENTS The promised Messias mediator of God and men his aboundant loue shewn in the pursuance of his mediatiou and the blessed effects thereof THe son of the Virgin Mary is Iesus-Christ (a) According to S. Austin ser 3. de Ascens to assert Christ to be man only is to deny the glory of the maker and to say that he was God only is to deny the mercy of the Redeemer for neither God alone could haue suffered nor man alone ouercome death perfect God and perfect man God the second person in the blessed Trinity made * Aug. ser Nat. Domiui Deus filius inquit se hominec fecit vt homo fieret Deus himselfe man to make man God not by the conuersion of his diuinity into mans flesh but by the assumption of human nature to his diuine person so that in this mistery of Hypostaticall vnion God and man are not two but one Christ containing three substances the diuine of his person the spirituall of his soul and the materiall of his body (b) The Prophet Daniel cap. 3. and sundry other texts of the old Scripture giue clear evidence of Christs comming into the world his destroying of sin and his redeeming of mankind By the vertue of his Incarnation he finished preuarication put an end to sin abolished iniquity brought euerlasting grace and accomplished the visions and predictions of the holy Prophets who is the anointed holy of holyes the promised Messias that came into the world a * Timor 2. vnus Deus vnus mediator Dei hominū mediator of God and men for peace and in fauour of these so charitably mediated that he gaue his body in a sacrifice for the effecting of it (c) S. Iohn the Euangelist cap. 3. calleth Iesus-Christ the lamb of God that taketh away the sinns of the world he wash't away their sinns the sole ground of Gods heauy displeasure in his own blood * Jsai 53. tanquam ouis ad occisionem ductus as an innocent lamb caried to the slaughter-house he emptied his veines superabundantly bleeding euen to the
separation of his soul from his body in euidence of his superabundant loue (d) According to S. Ambrose one sole drop of Christs precious blood had been sufficient to redeem all mankind for one only drop of that precious liquor had been sufficient for the redemption of all mankind His extraction as man is deriued from the most illustrious Tribe of (e) Rom. 15. Isaias saith there shall be the root of Iesse and he that shall rise to rule ouer the Gentiles in him shall the Gentiles hope Christ was the flower that grew out of the root of Jesse that came of the stock of Iuda Iuda wherof he was * Apoc. 5. ecce vicit leo de tribus Iuda the conquering lyon he ouercame the world the deuil and the flesh the world by contemning it the deuil by putting down his principallity the flesh by Crucifying it As a lyon he appeared in his natiuity for it is the innate propriety of that royall Beast to wipe out with his sterne the prints of his feet that his steps may not be discouered and Christ in his Natiuity hid with the stern of his humanity his God head that it should not be perceiued by the deuil as a lyon * Gen. 49. requiescens accubuisti vt leo quasi leaena quis suscitabit eum he slept in his sepulchre none daring to awake him as a lyon he waked himselfe rising gloriously * Mat. 27. soluite hoc templum e in triduo reaedificabo illud in the third day of his dead sleep by the vertue of his own power and as a lyon he will come to the generall judgment to put down the authority power and principallity of all his enemies * 1. Cor. 15. cum tradiderit Regnum Deo Patri and deliuer the kingdom which is the Congregation of the faithfull neuer after to be exercised by the tyranny of the wicked to his diuine Father to whom as God he is equall as man inferior CHAR. VJ. OF THE NAME ISEVS THE CONTENTS The origen excellency and marueillous vertue of the name IESUS IESVS is the proper name of the son of man * Luc. 19. venit filius hominisquaerere saluum facere quod perierat that came into the world to seek and saue that which was lost and to heal and quicken that which was mortally wounded This is to say that the son of the Virgin Mary who is also the son of God is properly named (a) Isaias cap. 62. prophesied of the name IESUS and thou shalt be called saith he by a nevv name vvhich the mouth of our lord hath named That is the Angell of God whom the Prophet Zachary calleth the mouth of our lord and t is set down Mat. 1. that the words thou shalt call his name Iesus c. were vttered by an Angell IESUS which signifieth Sauiour being born to saue his people from their sins (b) S. Austin treating of Christs comming into the world writeth thus take avvay vvounds take avvay death if man had not perished the son of man had not come because there vvould haue been no need of remedies wherby he meaneth that if Adam had not sinned the son of God had not been the son of man which are the wounds and death that procured his coming or temporall generation As in the administration of Ecclesiasticall and ciuill gouernment names are giuen to men sutable and proper to the charges or offices they vndergoe for example the names Pope Bishop Emperour King Generall Admirall Maior c. so the son of the Virgin Mary was by * Mat. 1. vacabis nomen eius Iesum ipse enim saluabit populū à peccatis eorum diuino dispensation named IESUS Sauiour the generall redemption being committed to his charge And allbeit that this name was giuen to some others long afore for the holy Scriptures make mention of (c) Iesus Naue according to Ecclesiast 46. was a valiant warrier one IESUS Naue and (d) Iesus the son of Iosedech succeeded his Father in the office of high Priest Hag. 5. IESUS the son of Iosedech high Priest yet it was new and extraordinary in the son of the Virgin Mary first as to his Person being God and man and consequently far more excelling the other two then substances their shadowes or things figured their naked figures And Iesus Naue though a Gallant Captain howeuer he conducted only the people of Israëll into the land of promise which Moses before had brought out of Egygt but Iesus the son of the Virgin Mary came a guide to all nations vnto conducting them into the kingdom of Heauen of which the land of promise was a figure only as likewise Iesus Naue was a Type onely of Iesus the son of the Virgin Mary And though Iesus the son of Iosedech was a high Priest yet he did not perpetuate his Priesthood that dying with him but Iesus the son of the Virgin Mary * Hebr. 6. tu es Sacerdos in aternum is a Priest for euer enjoying an euer lasting Priest hood Besides Iesus the son of the Virgin Mary saued his people from their sins of slaues vnto Satan (e) S. Iohn the Euangelist cap. 5. writeth that Christ gaue power to be the sous of God vnto as many as receiued him he made Children of God and shewed mercy * Isai cuius misericordia super omnem carnem on all flesh Secondly as to the name it selfe that was new and marueillous also (f) Philip. 2. at the name of Iesus euery knee shall bovv of those vvhich are in heauen of those vvihch are on Earth and of those vvhich are vnder the Earth that is in Purgatory for those which are vnder the earth in the hell of the damned giue nothing of reuerence to the name of Iesus being obdurate in an abhorrence from it S. Hieron l. 3. Comment in Isa attesteth that in those daies bowing at the name of Iesus was counted à distinctiue sign wherby Christians were known from Iews which shewed noe more respect and reuerence when they heard Iesus named then when they hear'd the name of Satan or Pharaoh Howeuer Catholicks doe not honour the name of Iesus in regard of the Syllables letters or sound that it carries but because of the relation it has to the Son of God called Iesus Neither does this exhibition of Religious worship render them more guilty of superstition then are the subjects of a king when they shew a ciuill reuerence while they heare him named for at the name of Iesus the Son of the Virgin Mary euery knee bow 's of Creatures in heauen in earth and vnder the earth * Act. 4. non est aliud nomen in quo homines saluari possūt nisi in nomine Iesu Nazareni and it is the sole name that procureth saluation for man in respect and consideration wherof it hath been a holy constant custome amongst ancient Catholick Christians to bow at the name of
vnto making it warme and therby drawes it into whatsoeuer sin he pleaseth besides * Isa 54. ecce ego creaui fabrum diabolum sufflantem in igne prunas proferentem vas in opus suum the bellowes of the deuils own mouth wherwith he blowes the coales in this sire of luxury he bringes forth other instruments to the worke for example old whores which keep a school of incontinency instruct young maides in all vnclean acts of carnall wantonnes and sell their * Ioel. 3. puellam veÌ„diderunt pro vino biberunt Virginity for wine to drink are the deuils incendiaries that worke in the furnace of luxury I * Ierâ—m 1. ollam incensam ego video id est vetulam nigram Olla enim quantumcunque alba si ad ignem frequeÌ„ter ponatur denigratur see saith the holy Prophet a seething pot that is an old harlot who boileth young women in the pleasures and lusts of the flesh vnto destruction both of body and soul As sire makes a pot black as a coal that was white afore and consumes it so at last the most beautifull men and women that frequente the fiery furnace of luxury become deformed and withered like a stock as to their bodies and in order to their souls most hatefull vnto God that * Deutro 23. Endures no whores of the daughters of his people nor no whore keepers of the sonns of his people for the one and the other is abomination in his sight Because the people of Israël began to commit whore dome with the daughthers of Moab God commanded Moses to take all the heads that is the principall among them and hang them vp against the sun in regard phinias slew Zambry fornicating with an Midianitisht woman he merited his priestly charge and dignity for euer Num. 25. and it matters not that lawes of some places namely in Italy suffer whores for the said lawes doe not consider the sin of whoredome but the peace and tranquillity of the common-wealth obtained through that indulgence in as much as adulteries and other great inconueniences tending to the disturbance therof are preuented and auoided therby to permit and to commit sin is not the same thing God permitteth wickednes which he doth not commit himselfe And though whores be exempt in regard of whore dome presisely from penall lawes of Magistratos which tollerat them neuertheless they are not deliuered therby from the tribunall of God that punisheth all wicked sinners In consequence of the premises t' is euident that no man ought (a) The common saying of two euills the lesser ought to be chosen is not meant of two sinnes which be spirituall euils but of corporall harms or dammages for according to the Apostle Rom. 8. noe man can lawfully commit the least sin although much good may come of it to commit a lesser for preuenting the doing of a greater sin wherfore S. Austin condemneth the fact of lot Gen. 19. that offered his innocent daughters to be deflowred for preuenting the filthy lusts of the Sodomits all though Lot was worthy of praise in regard of his abhorrence of so detestable a sin yet he deserued blame in seeking vnlawfull meanes to auoid it No wickednes ought to be done that good may come therby Furthermore the company * Tritum adagium est mare ignis mulier tria mala sed tamen minus tempestuosum est mare ignis minus inflammat in muliere omnia nocent oculi instar Basilisci vel solo aspectu venenant labia ora flammas vomunt vel leuis attactus inficit Et mulierem sacrae literae cum lcone vrso pardo colubro serpente comparant of wanton women is the deuils instrument that blowes the coales in this fire of luxury for through it loue is kindled as a fire vnto destruction Eccle. 9. a cat that sitteth neer the fire scorcheth her whit skin and a fly that toucheth the candle burneth its wings euen so a man that vseth (b) According to S. Hierom. à woman smiteth the conscience of a man with flams of fire and if young women dwell with men the deuil hath his snares among them the company of wanton women falleth into the snares of concupiscence and defileth his soul Besides as materiall fire is kindled by adding therto wood oyle and pitch so delicat meates * S. Hierâ— venter vino aestuans spumat in libidinem and strong wines taken immoderatly increase the flame of luxury and indeed whosoeuer eates and drinkes wantonly shewes no more willingnes to extinguish the burning coales of fiery lusts then he that castes into a house set on fire wood oyl and pitch shewes an inclination to quench it moreouer the body of man is not made for fornication or carnall vncleanes but for our lord that bought the whole man with the price of his precious blood to the end that both body and soul should serue to his glory our bodies are members of Christ and consequently a fornicatour is sacrilegious in as much as he giueth his body that is consecrated vnto God to any other likewise he is iniurious and contumelious to his body for he that committeth fornication (c) According to the Apostle 1. Cor. 6. fornication defileth the body with a peculiar kind of vncleanes so that carnall sensuality differs exceedingly from the inordinate delights of the other senses which haue nothing of brutall filthines howeuer carnall pleasure has no deformiry as to married people because of the vprightnes and integrity of conscience desire of issue holines of the Sacrament which therfore be called Bona matrimonij sinneth against his own Body where as other sins which a man doth are with out the body that is luxury defileth the body with a sordide brutall filthines which is not common a like to sinns committed by the other senses vix hearing seeing tasting smelling But notwithstanding all this euen among Christians of these daies doe rise cinick Philosophers which so flatter themselues in their carnall pleasures as to think that simple fornication hath nothing of mortall guilt Likewise the Digbean diuins so fool themselues as to beleiue that an outward sin for example outward fornication adultery incest murder doe not of necessity expell the loue of God out of the soul and in consequence therof do not obstruct the passage to Heauen and both the cinick Philosophy and the Digbean Theology lay claime to scripture testimony respectiuely for the proofe therof The cinick Philosophy alledgeth the first chapter of Osea where is mentioned that our lord said to Osea goe take vnto thee a wise of fornications and children of fornications and thence inferreth that luxury is lawfull as to simple fornication but t is a very weak inference for God commanded not the Prophet to commit fornication but matrimony with a woman that had fornicated afore that is to make an honest wife of a dishonest woman vnto representing a diuine mistery that might set forth
of other Saint's and no man hath euer thought fitting * Augus l. 10. de ciuit cap. 4. quis inquit sacrificandum ceÌ„suit nisi ei queÌ„ Deum sciuit vel putauit Et cap. 19. docet daemones ideo velle sibi offerri sacrificia vt sic pro Dijs habeantur Vnde Exod. 22. qui unmolat Dijs occidetur praeterquam Domino soli to sacrifice to any whom he ha h not known beleiued or feigned to bee a God 7. No other object interuening for God alone is the immediate object of proper sacrifice for as much as he containeth in himselfe alone the sole motiue thereof Wherby it plainly followeth that the oblation of tithe that is giuen immediately to the Ministers of God is not a proper sacrifice though it be exhibited for God's sake 8. Vnto destruction in recognition of God's supream excellency and power ouer his creatures this necessary requisite experience sheweth in all the sacrifices of the old law wherin the sensible thing offered was either killed if quick and aliue vêªt videlicet Ox lamb calf or broken or burnt if liueless (h) According to Leuiticus dry-offerings were either broken or burnt and liquid offerings were destroyed by pouring them out whereby appears that an vnbloody manner of effusion nothing derogats to the true nature or essence of a sacrifice hard and drie or consumed by effusion if liquid namely wine in testimony of God's omnipotency therby manifesting him to be Author of life and death and consequently to haue power to conserue his creatures as the thing before oblation was conserued and to destroy his creatures as the thing destroyed after oblation CHAR. II. OF THE SACRIFICE OF THE EVCHARIST OR MASS THE CONTENTS The sacrifices of the old law weak vnprofitable Element's Christ the night before his passion instituted and offered in the room of them all a sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech called sacrifice of the Eucharist sacrifice of the Altar sacrifice of Mass which is a perfect commemoration of the bloody sacrifice Christ offered on the Cross a propitiation whereby grace is obtain'd and sins remitted and the public seruice of euery true christian Church down from the Apostles till these tymes celebrated in one of the three holy tongues which be Hebrew Greek and Latin The Apostle 1. Cor. 14. forbiddeth not saying of publick or priuate prayers in an vnknown tongue THe sacrifice of the Eucharist is the speciall and proper externall sacrifice of the new law instituted and offered by Christ in his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine * Hebrae 7. secundum similitudinem Mâ—lchisedech sic Apostolus interpretatur secundum ordinem Melchisedech after the similitude of Melchisedech his Sacrifice of whose order Christ was annointed high Priest for euer The law of Moyses and sacrifices thereof as they had institution and confirmation of God in respect of Christ only so they were to continue only till * Luc. 10. lâ—x Propheta vsque ad JoaÌ„nem Christ came that was the * Hebrae 6. lex vetus lata fuit duraxat donec veniret semeÌ„ promissum seed to which the promise was made of a new law and a new sacrifice vnto blessedness which the law of Moyses and the sacrifices therof could not effect The law written in Tables could not make the * Aug. lex in tabulis exarata non potuit efficere eam inscriptionem quae est iustificatio inscription which is iustification of life It * Chrysos lâ—x erat tantum iubens nihil afferebat auxilij shewed but could not heale the soar of mans soule And though the old sacrifices conferred * Hebrae 9. exterior legalis mundities appellatur iustitia caâ—nis emundatio carnis legall purity on the body neuertheless they could not giue spirituall sanctity to the soul vnto saluation Besides the commandement that went afore that is to say the old law was peculiar to one people only namely the Iew 's and the sacrifices therof were but (a) According to the Apostle Hebrae 10. the old law had the shadow of good things onely and not the very Image of the things Wherby appear's that the sacrifices and Sacraments of Moyses were vnperfect resemblances and dark representations of the good things procured by the sacrifice and Sacraments of the new law namely generall redemption and sanctifying grace wherfore S. Iohn cap. 1. saith that the Lavv vvas giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Jesus-Christ in consequence of which the new law is called the law of Christ the law of grace Christ being the law-maker and the Grace-giuer holy figures of a better oblation and those polluted through the sins of the Priests that offered them in so much that God had no affection for either of both because * Hebrae 1. Reprobatio quidem fit praecedentis maÌ„dati propter infirmitatem eius imbecillitateÌ„ promde Christus ait Io. 13. mandatum nouum do vobis of the weakness and vnprofitablenes of the sacrifices and the vncleaness and wickednes of the Priests wherfore he sent his own son to giue a new commandement that is the new law of sanctifying grace to the sauing both Iew and Gentile and to institute a new sacrifice of a cleane oblation to the exalting his name euen among the Gentiles that being to be celebrated (b) Malach. 10. From the rising of the sun euen to the going dovvn â—â—n euery place shall be sacrificing and a clean oblation shall be offered to my name In the room of sacrificing beasts and other creatures which were not able to purge out the leauen of sin and likewise often times were polluted through the vncleanes of the Priests that offered them God by the mouth of his Prophet promised a daily cleane and vndefilable sacrifice that should continue in all places of his Church for euer vnto celebrating his name And this is the sacrifice Christ instituted of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers S. Iustin the Martyr in dial cum Triphone S. Cyprian l. 1. c. 14. aduersus Iudaeos S. Damas l. 4. c. 14. de fide orthodoxa S. Austin l. 18. c. 35. de Ciuit. S. Chrysostome in psal 95 ora 2. con Iudaeos and all modern writers that are orthodox wherfore the Prophesy is fulfilled by the sacrifice of the Altar which is daily offered in the Catholick Church from the rising of the sun to the going down in euery place of the world from the rising of the sun to the going down therof according to the Prophecy of Malachias signifying that God was determined to abolish the said weak and polluted sacrifices and substitute in lieu thereof an effectuall and most pure oblation which is that Christ the son of God and man instituted of his body and blood
a perfect representation of Christ's death and Passion suffered on his Cross must precede the eating of that bread and drinking of that drink for Christ's death and Passion was (g) S. Austin l. 13. de Trinit c. 17 Epis 49. quaes 3. attestes that it is foretold in the old Testament that there should be in the law of grace a true proper outward visible sacrifice again it is foretold that in the last age of the new Law that is when Antichrist shall come the vsuall sacrifice shall cease which giue euidence enough of the continuance of som one sacrifice in the law of grace till the time of Antichrist Which cannot be meant of a Metaphoricall and invisible sacrifice being that kind of vnproper sacrifice will not cease in the dayes of Antichrist according to the holy Prophets Dan. 12. and Isaias cap. 10. a proper special sacrifice that cannot be represented perfecttly by a Sacrament but by a sacrifice wherin destruction must interuene necessarily either by death if what is offered by a liuing thing or by fraction if what is offered be a hard and drie thing as breard or by effusion if what is offered be a liquid thing as wine which experience sheweth in all the sacrifices of the law of nature and Moyses And indeed the end and innate propriety of a proper sacrifice being an externall sensible act of supream adoration is to signify God's omnipotency as to his power ouer life and death wheras a Sacrament signifieth the sanctifying of such as belieue in and serue God which is but the product or effect of Christ his bloody sacrifice If perfect representation of the sacrifice of the Cross could be attributed to any Sacrament it were to be ascribed to the Sacrament of Baptism wherby as the Apostle saith Heb. 9. Weare buried with Christ into his death Neuertheless Baptism doth not represent the death of Christ but the death and resurrection of him that is baptised Baptism signifying that he that is baptised doth die as vnto sin and rise as vnto newnes of life neither is Christ said to die in Baptism as he is belieued to be immolated in the sacrifice of the Eucharist Furthermore as * Sanguine hostiae obsignabatur vetus testamētum vt post Moysen declarat Apostolus Hebrae 1. Moyses began and dedicated the old Testament law or Religion in the blood of calfes contained in his cup saying This is the blood of the Couenant c. So Christ began and dedicated the new Testament in his own blood contained in the Chalice of his last supper saying This is the Chalice the new Testament in my blood c. Luc. 22. which the other Euangelist's more plainly expresse introducing Christ to say This is my blood of the new Testament wherby is euidently certaine that Christ's blood in the Chalice shed in an vnbloody manner was the blood of sacrifice and consequently in that sacrifice which is the sacrifice of the Eucharist consisteth the externall Religion and proper seruice of the new Testament as the outward Religion and soueraigne worship of God in the old law did consist in the sacrifices therof vnder which it was established Heb. 7. And though Christ hanging on his cross did confirme and ratify the new Testament yet he made it only at his last supper when he said This is the Chalice the new Testamēt in my blood or this is my blood of the new Testament For then Christ was free and aliue wheras on his cross he was deuested of liberty and depriued of life and consequently not in a condition to make it the making of a Testament being an act of a person free and aliue Also though Christs death and passion was the perfect sacrifice that (h) The Apostle Hebrae 1. teacheth that Christ By one oblation consummated for euer them that are sanctifyed where by one oblation is meant the sacrifice of the Cross which the Apostle there calleth sacrifice of consummation that is of generall redemption and indeed that sacred Text speak's onely of the sacrifice of the Cross not mentioning the sacrifice of application that is the sacrifice of Mass called the sacrifice of the Altar or the sacrifice of the Eucharist wherby the sacrifice of generall Redemption called the sacrifice of the Cross is particularly applyed and offered daily in all places of the Church vnto sanctification of life And indeed to affert that Christ onely once offered himselfe to God the Father were a manifest blasphemy since Scripture Testimonies shew euidently sundry oblations Christ made of himselfe For example he offered himselfe in the tyme of his conception and during his aboad on earth he made seuerall offerings in order to his own person for he offered his body his soul his life his fasting his praying his watching his sighs and teares howeuer the offering of his body in a bloody sacrifice was made once onely consummated the generall redemption or remission of all sins whatsoeuer as to sufficiency neuertheless that bloody sacrifice enduring only for a day of time could not be the externall sacrifice which the people of the new Testament might haue recourse vnto euen to the end of the world and to auerre the taking away of such externall sacrifice is to acknowledge the taking away also of externall Priesthood sacrifice and Priesthood being correlatiues and consequently the * S. Cypria de coena Dom. asserit nullam posse esse Religionem si sacrificium corporis sanguinis Christi auferatur abolishing of the new Testament for if the Priesthood and sacrifice therof be disannulled then of necessity must there be an abrogation of the law that was established vnder them Furthermore it is conuincingly manifest that it was an externall proper sacrifice which Christ offered at his last supper for the one oblation according to the order of Melchisedech which succeeded (i) That one sole sacrifice of Christs body and blood succeded in the room of many sacrifices is a catholick assertion vnanimously taught by the ancient Fathers And S. Aus l. 8. c. 27 l. 17. c. 20. de ciuit l. 3. de bap c. 19. names the sacrifice of Mass the sacrifice that sufficeth for all sacrifices which were offered in the old law for as much as the body of Christ is offered in the room of all those sacrifices in the room of all the sacrifices of the old law was that one or none was that one but that one was an externall proper sacrifice and cannot be meant of the sacrifice of the Cross that being rather after the order of Aaron since it was celebrated in reall effusion of blood then after the similitude of Melchisedech who offered no bloody oblation Besides all the necessary requisits vnto proper sacrifice are plainly obseruable in that action that Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist at his last supper 10. is obseruable Christ himself that is a Priest instituted by legall authority and more solemnly made then all the Priests
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the
vnto instruction and * Hoc facite in mean coÌ„memorationem id est in memoriam passionis mortis meae Et 1. Pet. 4. Christo passo in carne vos eadem cogitatione armemini Vnde ait S. Bernardus passio Christi est vltimum resugium contra omnes illicitas voluptates visa inquit Christi passione quis tam deliciosus qui non abstineat quis taÌ„ iracundus vt non doleat quis tam malitiosus quem non poeniteat S. Augustinus nullum est ait remedium salubrius quam iugiter cogitare de passionâ— Christi full commemoration of Christ his death and passion in compliance with his own commande as it is plainly obseruable in the garments wherwith the Priest is inuested during the tyme of sacrifice as likewise in the Altar and ornament's therof for example 10. The Amice in as much as it is a linnen cloath which the Priest pulls ouer his face and fasten's in his neck doth signify the ragg of linnen wherwith the Iews blind-folded Christ in mockery when they smote and buffited him saying Prophesie to us o Christ who is he that smote thee Mat. 20.20 The Priests Albe that is a white linnen garment doth represent the rayment in which Herod inuested Christ after that he had despised and mocked him Luc. 23.30 The maniple that the Priest weareth on his left arme and the stole that hangeth about his neck doe figure the cord's and fetters with which the officers of the Iews bound Christ Io. 18. and led him from one place to an other from Annas to Caiphas from Caiphas to Pilat from Pilat to Herod and from Herod to Pilat again 40. The Chasuble that is the vppermost vestment doth express the purple garment the souldiers put on Christ Mar. 25. and the heauy cross also that Christ carried on his shouldiers to mount Caluary 50. The Priests (b) Tonsure that is a round crown made in the heads of Clergy-men is an ancient ceremony and according to S. Bede l. 5. 〈◊〉 S. Peter wore it in remembrance of the crown of thorns wherewith Christ's head was crown'd again S. Anicetus that was Chief Church-gouernour in the first 200. years in a certaine Epistle to the Bishops of France commanded all Priests to cut their haire to the end they might not appear delicate and effeminate like secular men that weare long hair for ornament sake Tonsure that is to say the crown of his head shaued in fashion of a round circle doth shew the crown of thornes which the souldiers platted and put about the sacred head of Christ Mar. 25.60 The sundry crosses that the Priest makes ouer the host and chalice before and after consecration are mysticall representations of the many greiuous torments which Christ endured in pursuance of the generall redemption 70. The eleuation of the host and chalice doth figure the lifting vp of Christ on the crosse and in as much as that ceremony is exhibited a part or seuerally it declares the seperatioÌ„ of Christ's soul from his body and his blood from his veins 80. The diuision of the host into three distinct parts doth shew the three substances in Christ vêªt videlicet the diuine of his person the spirituall of his soul and the materiall of his body and wheras one of the said parts is put into the chalice and as it were buried therin thereby is signify'd Christ's body in the sepulcher likewise the mingling therof with the blood demonstrates that the diuine personality was neuer seperated neither from his soul in his descent into Hell nor from his body lying in the sepulcher 90. The Priest's (c) According to the Decrees of Ancient Councils a Priest ought not to depart from the Altar before he giue his benediction again the people were bound to remaine in the Church till the Priest had blest them and indeed priestly benediction was euer practised In the law of nature Melchisedech blessed Abraham in the written law Moses and Aaron blessed the people of Israel and in the law of grace Christ blessed his Disciples benediction giuen in the end of the sacrifice of Mass relates vnto the peculiar recommendation whereby Christ did recommend his Church at the rendring of his soul into the hands of his diuine Father 10. The Altar representes Mount-Caluary and signifies the cross therin erected on which Christ offering as on an Altar a sacrifice of his own body and blood consummated for euer those that are sanctified Heb. 10. And truly as the name of smoak puts vs in minde of fire because of the necessary mutuall relation to each other for smoak of necessity comes from fire that is the cause therof so the name of an Altar doth relate vnto sacrifice necessarily this being included euen in the definition of an Altar taken in the proper sense for a reall Altar to sacrifice on And such is the Altar employed in the sacrifice of Mass called by the Ancient Fathers the Altar of Christ his body and so meant by the Apostle (d) The Apostle by saying Hebrae 13. that We haue an Altar vvhereof they haue no authority to eat vvich serue in the Tabernacle meant an Altar taken in the proper sense that is an Altar on which is offered the sacrifice of Christs body and blood according to the interpretation of the Ancient Fathers S. Greg. Nazian in ora desorore Gorgonia S. Chrysostom demons an Christus sit Deus S. Austin Epis 86. de ciuit l. 8. Confess c. 27. Theophy in 23. Mat. and of the sacrifice of this Altar those cannot eat which serue in the Tabernacle that is which follow the rites and custom's of the ancient Iews nor those which belieue not in the sacrifice of Christs body and blood But this holy Altar si sometymes cal'd Mensa Dominica The Table of our lord because of the heauenly meat our lords reall body and blood which is eaten and drunk there and indeed Mensa Table according to holy scripture often signifies an Altar namely Isa 65. Malach. 1. likewise S. Austin ser 103. de diuersis discoursing of S. Cyprian's Table so called in order to his holy Reliques which were put vnder the Table or Altar erected in the same place where S. Cyprian had suffered Martyrdom In the same place saith S. Austin a Table though erected to God neuertheless was nam'd S. Cyprians Table not because S. Cyprian had feasted there but in regard he had been sacrificed there and through his Martyrdom procured that Table not that he might feed or be fed at it but that vpon it sacrifice might be offered vnto God to whom himselfe had been made an oblation Haebr 13. saying Wee haue an Altar wherof such haue no authority to eate as serue the Tabernacle and for as much as Christs body is spirituall meate and his blood spirituall drink it is named also our lords Table 1. Cor. 10 you cannot say's the Apostle be partakers of our lords Table and the table of deuills
that is to say such as are not mēbers of Christs Church haue no right to the mysticall meate and drink which is the reall body and blood of Christ 11. The corporall and linnen clothes that couer the Altar doe signify the linnen cloath that wrapped the sacred Body of Christ when he was laid in the sepulcher Io. 19. Furthermore besides the many religious visible ceremonies God commanded to be employed in exhibition of diuine worship during the continuance of the old law Exod. 29. Christ Authour of the new law instituted sundry ceremonies and rites which be of necessity namely washing with water in Baptism imposition of hands and anoynting with consecrated oyle in the Sacrament of Order c. Yea Christ himself practised visible ceremonies for he fell on his face and prayed Io. 26. lift vp his eyes and prayed Io. 11. lift vp his hands and blessed Luc. 24. Besides when he found in the Temple which is a sensible ceremonie too deputed vnto diuine worship those that sold oxen sheep and doues c. Io. 20. he was offended to see his Fathers howse made an howse of marchandice Hereby is euidently plain that Christ when in his conference with the Samaritan Woman Io. 4. said the hower cometh and now is when the true adorers shall adore the Father in spirit and truth he did not meane that he was come to take away sacrifice Sacraments prayers Churches and all other sensible ceremonies practised in the seruice of the new law but for as much as the cited Text is often tymes alledged by ancient and moderne sectaries especially against all visible rites of christian religion it will conduce greatly to vndeceiuing the deceiued in the sense and meaning therof if they consider duely that the Samaritans were Schismaticks as Luther and Zuinglius religious men both and Priests illegally and sacrilegiously marryed against the holy Canons and vowed chastity went out from the catholick Church in the time of Henry the eight king of England and began a schism in Germany likewise as Ballev Peter Martyr Martin Bucher c. Apostat-wedded-priests also in the reign of Edward the Sixt a childe began the schism in England countenanced and supported by Bishop Cranmer specially to which Henry the eight king Edwards Father had opened a doore only so a certain Priest of the Iews called Mansses to retain and enjoy an vnlawfull wife fell from the society of the faithfull Iewes at Hierusalem and broached schism in Samaria Besides as Luther and those other afore mentioned to establish their schisms leaped * Ioseph l. 11. Antiquit cap. 8. est propriū inquit Haereticis Schismaticis transilire capita antiquarum Ecclesiarum vt suam reddant Religionem antiquissimam ouer the heads of all christian Churches then and for many ages before establish't pretending that these were not agreeing with Christ and his Apostles in the essentialls of doctrine worship and gouernment and in consequence thereof made reformation the disguised end of their leape in like manner Manasses to render his schism plausible and taking with that people he leaped ouer the Prophet Moyses to Iacob the Patriarch and ouer the Temple in Ierusalem to the Temple of the Samaritans in Mount Garizim tying thereto the sacrifice of the Iews religion vpon pretence that the said Patriarch Iacob had therin adored long before the Temple of Salomon was built or the law giuen to obtain superiority in his schism he gaue the preeminence in Church-seruice to the place wherin he began it This was the true cause that moued the faithfull Iews to abstain from the company and conuersation of the Samaritans who maintained their adoring in Garizim to be more ancient then the worship of the Iews in Ierusalem In regard of this contention about the Temple in Ierusalem and the Temple in Garizim the Samaritan woman conceiuing Christ to be some Prophet for as much as he had reuealed vnto her the secret passages of her whole life propounded vnto him a Theologicall question touching the afore said controuersy on design to be informed to which of the two publick (e) According to holy scriptures by publick solemn adoration is meant proper sacrifice namely Joan. 12. and There vvere certain Gentils amongst them that came vp to adore at the feast And Act. 8. the Euneuch came vp to adore in Jerusalem in both these scripture-places by adoration which was publick and solemn is vnderstood proper sacrifice that was offered onely in Ierusalem but all other adorations outward and inward might be vsed in any whatsoeuer place besid's Ierusalem adoration or sacrifice was tyed and confined saying Our Fathers adored in this mountaine and ye say that in Ierusalem is the place where men ought to adore that is to offer sacrifice to which Christ replying (f) The Iews and Samaritans contended about the place of sacrifice and for as much as both of them were in fault therefore Christ form'd his answere in order to both Although the Iews sacrifice was the true sacrifice neuertheless it was vnprofitable being not able to procure sanctifying grace but the Samaritans sacrifice was erroneous for they were schismaticks and adored that is offered sacrifice where God would not haue had them that is they offered sacrifice out of Gods Temple in Ierusalem and therefore Christ said to the Samaritan woman Yee adore vvhat yee knovv not said woman belieue me the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Ierusalem adore the Father c. Wherby he for'told her that the adoration or sacrifice as to both the Temples should shortly cease and be disannulled and that the true sacrifice suddenly to be instituted in room therof should not be tyed to one place or nation but should be offered in all the parts of the world according to the Prophecy of Malachias cap. 10. and instructed her with all concerning this new sacrifice signifying that is should not be a gross and carnall adoration exhibited in and by the flesh and blood of goates sheepe oxen c. as afore but that it should be a clean adoration or sacrifice containing in it selfe spirit grace and life which the others wanted yea that it should be the verity it self wherof all former sacrifices were shadowes and figures only wherefore Christ told her that the new adorers should adore the Father in spirit that is to lay should offer to God a sacrifice giuing grace and life Christ did not inculcate adoration of God in spirit to condemne adoration vnder whatsoeuer sensible rites and ceremonies but to exclude the carnall adoration or sacrifice of the Iews that wanted spirit to giue life to the soul In like manner Christ did intimate adoration of God in verity to condemne the erroneous worship of the Samaritās who albeit they did adore the true God of Israel neuertheless being Schismaticks they did not adore him in verity because they adored him out of the communion and vnity of the faithfull Iews and in the mountaine of Garizim
proper to things spirituall Christ meant the orall eating of his flesh and orall drinking of his blood saying The words that I speak vnto you that is those things my flesh and blood are * Trid. sess 13. ait Christum instituisse SacrameÌ„tum Eucharistiae taÌ„quam spiritualem animaruÌ„ cibum spirit and life and that is to say are spiritually cloathed after the imitation of spirituall substances exempted from the carnall proprieties which naturally adhere to flesh and blood in this mortall life but are no essentiall requisits there vnto whereby it is plain that the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist may be said spirituall in reference to the spirituall being they haue therein Besides Christs body and blood be indeed spirituall supersubstantiall meate and drink wherby the substance of humane souls is supported and nourished spiritually As corporall meate doth repaire materiall breaches which naturall heate mak's in a materiall body so this spirituall meate doth repaire the spirituall ruines that the fire of concupiscence doth cause in a spirituall soul Also the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood may bee termed spirituall through faith for as much as a Christian that eateth and drinketh worthily is vnited to Christ by faith which is aspirituall quality Again the eating of Christs body and the drinking of his blood may be styled spirituall because of Christs death and passion figured therein and this Sacrament imports * QuotiescuÌ„quo ait Apostolus manducabitis panem hunc calicem bibetis mortem Domini annunciahitis donec veniat a commemoration thereof so that a Christian receiuing worthily doth communicate with Christs passion suffered on the cross and this manner of spirituall locution is vsed sometimes by ancient Fathers who neuertheless expresly affirm Christ to bee truly (e) The second Council of Nice Act. 6. declares euidently that the Sacrament of the Eucharist ought not to be called the Image of Christs body because he did not say take eate the Image of my body also declares that in the Sacrament is the true body of Christ because he said This is my body really and substantially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist neither is the literall sense of words inconsistent with the spirituall signification of thinges which they express taken in the literall sense For example though Isaac and Ismael doe literally signify the two sons of Abraham as the history of Genesis plainly sheweth neuertheless the Apostle Gal. 4. by Ismael that was born of Agar a seruant spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstands the old Testament that was a law of bondage and likewise by Isaac that was born of Sara a free woman spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstandeth the new Testament which is a law of liberty and grace and indeed all Sacraments whatsoeuer besides * Aug. l. 2. con aduers legis c. 9. ait Christi locutionem nisâ— manducaueritis c. codem modo esse figuratam ac duo filij Abraha fuâ—â—unt duo Test amenta Jsaac Ismael secuÌ„dum literam vere de facto fuerunt filij Abraha figurabant tamen duo Testamenta Idem Aug. l. 3. de doct Christ c. 16. ait illam Christi locutionem nisi manducaueritis c. figuratam esse quatenus praecipit communicandum passioni Christi vtiâ—â—ter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro Christi crucifixa sit Non negat tamen dictam locutionem in sensu literali etïam intelligi de reali oralâ— manducatione corporit Christi bibition◠〈◊〉 sanguinis sub spocicbus consecratis panis vins their literall doe admit a spirituall or figuratiue construction being defined visible figures or signes of spirituall invisible grace The Sacrament of Circumcision according to the literall meaning thereof did signify corporall circumcision as to the foreskin of the flesh called prepuce and according to it 's spirituall and figuratiue signification did import spirituall circumcision as to the foreskin of the heart which is of spirituall vices as also did shadow grace giuen in the new law In like manner the words vttered in baptism I baptise thee taken in the literall sense which is expressed immediatly by the said words doe signify reall washing of naturall water as to the body and taken in the spirituall sense they signify spirituall washing of grace * Aug. vnde tanta vis aquae vt corpus tangat cor vero abluat as to the soul Furthermore the words whereby Christ instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist in full performance of the promise afore mentioned Io. 6. giue cleare euidence of Christs meaning in recognition of a reall eating of his body and reall drinking of his blood The words of institution according to the consenting Testimonies of all ancient and modern writers are these This is my body which is giuen for you Luc. 22. This is my body which shall be deliuered for you This Chalice is the new Testament in my blood 1. Cor. 11. This is the blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for you Mar. 14. This is my blood of thenew Testament that shall be shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. Which words of Christ being as plainly and clearly vttered as to the litterall sense as those of God the Father in the Transfiguration of Christ to wit This is my son Mat. 30. and consequently there beeing no more reason to wrest the former then the latter words to a figuratiue signification it is a manifest blindnes in the Caluinists and other ancienter sectaries to wrest the proper cleare words and to substitute in their room improper obscure tropes and figures without any ground of reason for what can be more vnreasonable then to think that Christ saying This is my body which shall bee deliuered for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood which shall bee shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. meant a figure (f) Both canon and ciuil lawers treating of Testaments legasies and contracts teach that we must not recede from the words of the Testament nor from the rigour thereof and that we ought to presume of the Testatours intent and meaning according to the signification of the words taken in their proper sense of his body only and a figure of his blood only since a figure was not deliuered in a Sacrifice but Christ's true reall substantiall body nor a figure was shed vnto remission of sins but Christs true reall and substantiall blood Besides a thing that is mysterious vnheard of afore and instituted for an article of faith as is the Sacrament of the Eucharist of necessity ought to bee propounded (g) According to S. Chrysostome Hom. 83. in Mat. because Christ said This is my body we must not doubt of but belieue it to be so And S. Austin Tom. 8. in psal 33. saith expresly that when Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Eucharist he did that which no other could do for Christ saith
impossible outward extension in order to place being an accidentall propriety only of a body cloathed with quantity as naturall Philosophy teacheth and consequently the want thereof destroieth not the nature or essence of a body as naturall Philosophy teacheth also Besides though the light of the sun be a corporeall quality neuertheless it is well nigh in infinite places at once likewise the words of a preacher are corporall things which in the same moment of time possesse the eares of all such as are attentiue to his sermon and one man walking in a Chamber where be placed sundry looking-glasses his Image appeareth in each of them at the same time in consequence of which doubtless God in the virtue of his word can put supernaturally one singular Man in many places since his figure which is some thing doth naturally occupate many looking-glasses at once Out of the premises plainly followeth that the Sacrament of the Eucharist hath a singular prerogatiue beyond all the other Sacraments of the new law in as much as it is not an effectuall instrument only to confer diuine grace which is a soueraign Antidote against the poyson of sin but it containes and giues also the Author of grace wherfore it comprehends within it self both the sweetness of inherent sanctity and the giuer therof which is all sweet being the fountaine of sweetness and sweetnes it self whereunto the faire spowse in the Canticles inuiteth saying Tast yee and see how sweet our lord is Howeuer as Manna which was a figure of this Sacrament as to Christs body did seem bitter and loathsome to the ill minded and pleasant only to the good Israelites In like manner Christs body to Christians that receiue it vnworthily is the bitterness of death vnto death and to others that eat it aright the sweetness of life vnto life so fier that purgeth gold consumes wood soe the suns light that recreat's the sound offend's the vnsound eyes so the sweet sauour of an oyntâ—â—ent that refreshes doues kill 's beetles Christians by eating Christs naturall body worthily are not vnited to him only * Eph. 5. quia membra sumus de corpore eius de car ne â—â—us de ossibus cius through faith and charity mystically but really and are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones Eph. 5. To eate worthily vnto a naturall vnion with Christ a christian ought * 1. Cor. probet autem seipsum homo sic de pane illo edat vnde dc Sacramento corporis sanguinis Christi canit Ecclesia mors est malis vita bonis to examine himselfe afore and purge out the leauen of vice Christ hath * Nulla conventio Christi ad diabolum nulla conventio charitatis ad peccatum mortale no concord with sin nor consequently vnion with a soul that sin hath dominion ouer Christs body will not be * Luc. 23. in sindone muÌ„da in sepulchro in quo nondum quisquaÌ„ positus sit wrapped but in a pure linnen cloath that is to say in a clean heart nor will be laid in a Tombe that is not hewen out of a rock wherin neuer any laid afore As there is no agreement betwixt Christ and Belial no communion betwixt sanctity and iniquity no society betwixt light and darkness so there is noe vnion betwixt Christs body and a Christian that serue's Belial delight 's in iniquity and walkes in darkness wherfore let no Christian thinke to tye a knot of vnion with Christ if he shall put his body where allready is * L. 6. super cap. 9. Lucae ait nemo accipit cibum Christi nisâ— fuerit ante sanatus Et Aug. trac 26. in Joan. sic praecipit Innocentiam ad altare portate established Belial that is to say the deuill through mortall sin and truly Christians that * 1. Cor. 11. qui manducat bibit indignè reuâ— erit sanguinis corporis Domini vnworthily receaue the body of Christ as much as lyeth in them doe betray him to the deuill putting him in a place the deuill command's in and consequently become guilty of Christ's body and blood in as high a measure (k) According to S. Chrysostom hom de non contemnenda Ecclesia hom 8 ad popul Antioch those which receiue the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ vnworthily doe an iniury to Christs proper person like the Iewes and Gentils that crucified him as Iudas that betrayed him to the Iewes As the children of Israel were forâ—idden Exod. 12. to cate the paschall lambe which was a figure of Christs Sacramentall body too * Exod. 12. non comedetis ex eo crudum quid nec coctum sed tantum assum igne raw or boiled butrosted only so Christians be prohibited to eat Christs body raw that is before the fire of charity hath prepared them for it or boiled namely in luxury and voluptuousness but rosted only viz. at the fire of a contrite heart inflamed with the memory of Christ * Ecce agnus Dei inquit Apostolus qui tollit peccata muÌ„di the lambe of God that was rosted in the hot furnace of affliction for the taking away the sins of the world CHAR. IX OF COMMVNION IN BOTH KIND'S THE CONTENTS Christ instituted the holy Euchariste vnder the elements of both bread and wine Christ by his institution did not oblige the Church to dispense the Euchariste vnder both kinds Christ left it in the Churches power to giue the Euchariste to lay-people vnder one or both kinds accordingly as she should think fit in order to tymes places and persons those which receiue the Euchariste vnder one sole kind haue nothing less nor such as receiue vnder both kinds haue nothing more of Christ nor of the Sacramentall grace if there be parity in the receiuers as to worthiness obiections answered Communion in both kinds is the receiuing of Christs reall body and blood vnder the two Sacramentall shapes or element's of bread and wine afrer Christ's own institution Mat. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. Howeuer from thence it followeth not that communion vnder both kindes is necessary to the whole Church ioynt and separate vnto saluation for matrimony and the orders of Bishops and Priests doe challenge diuine institution neuertheless none of them be necessary to each member of Gods Church A Priest celebrating as he ought to consecrate the body and blood of Christ vnder distinct elements through distinct form's of words for as much as he then representes Christ's person supplyeth his room and offereth an vnbloody sacrifice on the Altar that is an express remembrance of Christ's bloody sacrifice offered on the cross wherein his blood was seperated from his body in consummation of the generall redemption so he ought likewise to communicate in the distinct consecrated elements but communion in order to lay-people which are no Priest's Christ hath left free (a) According to S. Austin Epis 108. Christ left power vnto
reason lay claim to that passage as a proof of their forbidden doctrine in order to communion in both kind's in regard they deny that any part of the said chapter of S. Iohn is meant of sacramentall eating or drinking lest by assenting thereto they might be forced to grant Christs reall presence in the Sacrament which the chapter plainly declares if it shall beare an interpretation of sacramentall eating and drinking Howeuer the precept so interpreted doth not euince communion vnder both kinds to be enjoyned of necessity in order to each Christian in particular since according to scripture vsage the particle * Julius Paulus insignis Jurisconsultus ait comparatum esse vt coniuncta pro disiunctis accipiantur Di gestis de verborum significatione l. saepe And is frequently taken in a disiunctiue sense only For example S. Peter Act. 3. sayes Siluer and Gold haue I none where the particle And is taken disiunctiuely the true meaning thereof being Siluer or gold haue I none In like manner it is written Exod. 21. He that smiteth his Father and Mother so it is read in Hebrew shall die the death Where And is taken for or Again Math. 20. it is said by thy words thou shalt be iustified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Where likewise the particle And is taken disiunctiuely for Or and Aristotle also taketh And in the disiunctiue sense when he defineth Nature to be Authour or cause of motion and rest all his interpreters vnderstanding the particle And in that definition to signify Or and truly by the latter particle And in the cited passage of scripture vêªt videlicet Except ye cate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood See doubtless was meant Or as doe plainly demonstrate other word 's of Christ there set down wherby he explaines that precept saying v. 47. I am the bread of life v. 50. This is that bread that came down from Heauen If any man eate of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I shall giue is my flesh which I shall giue for the life of the world Whereby is plainly euident that Christ did ascribe the effect of this Sacrament as common alike to the bread alone and to the bread and wine ioyntly Howeuer sectaries haue nothing of aduantage if the latter particle And in S. Iohn ought to be taken in the copulatiue sense for the precept euen so meant and indeed so catholick writers do vnderstand it importes an obligation only in order to the whole Church wherin there is neuer want of Priests that be obliged to communicate in both kinds as often as they offer sacrifice and not to each member therof In the old law God hauing iustituted Circumcision added this precept in generall tearmes viêªt videlicet Ye shall circumcise the foreskin of your flesh and notwithstanding only such had right to exercise that function as were deputed therunto by the Church or Synagegue which sheweth plainly that though the precept did oblige the whole Church or Synagogue yet it did not reach to each member thereof howeuer it seemes as if it had been enioyned in order to all vniuersally Again when God instituted the pascall lambe as a Sacrament and sacrifice also he imposed two precepts Exod. 12. the one Let euery man take vnto him a lambe the other all the multitude of the children of Israel shall kill it which two precepts though they be expressed in generall words to the obliging the whole Synagogue yet euery particular member therof had not right to choose and take vnto him a lamb and sacrifice it but the heads of each family only which executed Priestly function as to that sacrifice being a priuiledge giuen to them before Priesthood was appropriated to the family of Aaron as appeareth manifestly by the said chapter of Exod. As to the passages which some sectaries alledge out of S. Innocent Ep. 26. and S. Augustin lib. 7. against Iulian the Pelagian to proue a necessity of communion vnder both kinds in regard that these ancient Fathers expresly assert that Infants cannot be saued except they eate Christ's flesh and drinke his blood they make not a jot for them who require a presonall act of inward faith to the eating of Christ's body and drinking of his blood Infant 's being vncapable of exercising any such acction in consequence where of the alledged * Agunt Innocen Aug. contra Pelagium qui negabat peccatum originale in infantibus authorities afforde them nothing of aduantage But as to the true sense of these primitiue Fathers doubtless their meaning is only to shew that Infants cannot enter into the kingdome of God except they receiue sanctifying grace in baptism through the merits of Christ's body and blood that were offered for all men vnto remission of sins (d) According to Origin hom 29. in num we are said to drink of Christ's blood not only when we receiue the Sacrament but when wee heare his diuine word preach'd wherein is life according to Christ's own saying the Words vvhich I have spoken are spirit and life in as much as they be dispositions to diuine grace which is the life of the soul through the merits of Christ Again such as hear Mass deuoutly and ioyne in heart with the Priest receiue life and fruit by the Sacrament though they neither eate of Christ's body nor drink of his blood sacramentally Fourthermore in as much as Infants through baptism be made members of that Church which eateth Christ's flesh and drinketh his blood the same Church as it doth furnish them * Aug. Tom. 10. ser 10. de verbis Apostoli Mater Ecclesia inquit accommodat parvults alioruÌ„ pedes vt veniant ad Ecclesiam altorum cor vt credant alioruÌ„ linguam vt fatcantur it a Ecclesia accommodat aliorum ora vt comedant bibant with the feet of others to come vnto it with the heart of others to belieue and with the tongues of others to professe the christian faith in like manner according to a spirituall metaphoricall form of speech it may be said to furnish them with the mouths of others to eate Christ's flesh and drink his blood CHAR. X. OF PENANCE THE CONTENTS Penance hath a iust claim vnto all requisits necessary to a speciall Sacrament of the new law Christ after the similitude of an outward Court of iustice instituted an inward Tribunall where by diuine dispensation Priest's sit as Iudges of sinns committed after baptism whatsoeuer Priests judge here below God approu's aboue the power Christ gaue to the Apostles and heir successors in priestly function and authority was not onely to declare but effect indeed remission of hones in vertue of the word of reconciliation ioynt vnto a sinners sincere sorrow and humble Confession of his sinnes together with a full purpose to sin no more PEnance is a (a) There are three requisits necessary to the nature of a Sacrament of the
portransibit gladius she endured grieuous afflictions and painefull sorrows S. Iohn Baptist who exceeded in sanctity all others of his sex by Christ's owne testimony did practice extream penance and the calamities that holy Iob suffered were greater then his sin 's required as himself witnesseth in the sixt Chapter of his book saying Oh that my sins were weighed wherby I haue desernad wrath and my miseries together in the ballance as the sand of the sea this would appeare heauier in like manner it may be turly said of the passions endured by other blessed Saint's wherfore since the supream prouidence doth reward euery good work beyond what it deserueth vndoubtedly he hath assigned reward 's suitable thereto that is both in order to merit and satisfaction according to that of S. Luke cap. 21. There shall not an hair of your heads perish Wherby Christ promiseth a recompence to each good work how litle soeuer it be But if the works of blessed Saint's as meritorious only and not as satisfactory should receiue reward many baires of their head 's would perish that is many of their good works as they are satisfactory should not be recompenced which is contrary to Christ's promise Sithence the coÌ„dition of satisfaction is such that it is applyable by him that satisfyes for others distinct from himselfe as appears by S. Paul that wished to be Anathema for his bretheren and by Moses that beseeched God to blot him out of the book of life for the conseruation of the Israëlites it is conformable to reason and diuine iustice which hath a reward for euery good work that the aboundant and exceeding satisfactions of blessed Saints that remaine vprecompenced be laid vp in the Treasury of the Church vnto the remission of temporall paine due to sin which is the reward that good works as satisfaction specially challenge and vndoubtedly * 2. Cor. 12. Ego autem libentissimè impendam super impendam ego ipse pro aniâ—â—bus vestris Et S. Timoth. 2. omnia sustineo propter electos the saints themselues now departed in as much as they were inuested with the grace of charity when they did exercise their voluntary satisfactions and endured their violent passions had at least a virtuall intention to assist and profit therby the rest of the faithfull the law of charity requiring that * Vnum inquit Paulus corpus in Christo sumus Et Gal. 6. alter alterius onera portate all members of the holy catholick Church concurre mutually to the perfecting of the whole body one bearing anothers burthen and one satisfying for an other applying a meer price for temporall paine due to sinne * In Bulla Pij 5. damnatur propositio Michaelis Baij diceÌ„tis per passiones sanctorum coÌ„municatas Jndulgentijs non propriè redimi debita which is the consistency of Communio Sanctorum that christians profess in the Nicene Creed and the Apostle practiced saying Now reioyce I in my suffering's for you and fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christs in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church Neither hence ought any man to infer the saint's to be our Redeemers because their satisfactions for others in order to remission of temporall punishment's if Christ's satisfactions were to be laid aside would signifie nothing being founded therin (g) Though the blood of Christ be sufficient enough to olenst a soul from both the guilt and the pain of sin neuertheless it does not procure that deliuerance vnless it be applyed by the Churches Sacraments or by acts of faith and contrition and indeed euen sectaries assert a necessity of saith and contrition vnto remission of sinnes In consequence wherof wheras Christ is said Hebra 10. with one oblation to haue consummated foreuer them that are sanctifyed it is meant as to sufficiency being that one oblation without the application thereof doth not sanctify indeed and effectually and he alone is properly our Redeemer in and by whose proper merit 's through the effusion of his blood was purchased our redemption vnto forgiueness of sinnes Collos 1. And that was Christ only One mediator of God and man and as no man ought to be said his own Redeemer according to the form of proper speech for as much as through good works of painfull satisfaction he payeth a ransome for temporall punishment's corresponding to his sins or for as much as he exerciseth an act of perfect contrition whereby his sin 's are remitted so the blessed saint's ought not to be called the Redeemers of such as receiue remission of temporall paines due to sinn's through the application of their satisfactions Neither hereby are Christ's satisfaction 's preiudiced For as the prayer that one belieuer on earth maketh for another doth nothing at all diminish the dignity of Christ's dayly praying for vs at the right hand of his diuine Father * Rom. 8. quotidie interpellat pro nobis Rom. S. since the efficacy of it is founded in the merit 's of his death and passion so the satisfactions of the blessed saint's applyed for the remission of paine due to sin doe dot lessen the infinite valour of Christ's satisfactions being they receiue from them all their worthiness and efficacy And doubtless Christ's own will was to haue it so to the end that his faithfull on earth might exercise reciprocall works of charity towards one an other and exhibit honour to such as he had translated to his kingdom of eternall blessedness being the honour done to a seruant doth redound to his lord and Master Power to dispence this spirituall Treasure of Indulgences or pardons is committed to the Catholick Church as appeareth euidently by Christ's own word's Mat. 16. saying And I will giue vnto thee the key 's of the kingdome of Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt binde vpon earth shall be bound also in Heauen and whatsoeuer thou shalt * Quoad verba Christi quodcuÌ„que solueris nomine solutionis non intelligitur sola absolutio iudiciaria sed etiam omnis dispeÌ„satio imo omnis fauor gratia ex vi illius potestatis facta proinde Indulgentia concessa pro extensa ad defunctum à summo Pontifice eius enim solius est dare Indulgentias per defunctis infallibiliter prodest defuncto per modum suffragij id est pro modum auxilij adiutorij Ecclesiastici eidem defuncto applicata si caetera sint paria puta si Jndulgentia fiat ex rationabili causa sique defunctus existat in gratia c. his suppositis Indulgentia applicata defuncto alicui semper est valida rata apud Deum luxta tamen Caâ—etanum Henricum Indulgentia non babes infallibilem effectuâ— respectu animae defuncti sed liberum est Deo eam acceptare vel non acceptare loose an earth shall be loosed also in Heauen wherby Christ promiseth to S. Peter and his successors in Church-gouernment authority and power for the remouing of all
Ansel in cap. 3. 1. Cor. poenam quam patiuntur animae Purgatorij esse grauiorem omni poena huius vita is more grieuous then all the sufferings of this life for therein is the place and time of executing the diuine Iustice the instrument wherof is true and reall fire that is applyed * Aug l. 2. de ciuit c. 10. docet spirituÌ„ posse pati ab igne corporeo per omnipotentiam Dei for the tormenting of such souls truly and really according to the proportion of the guilt of petty-treasons and debt's they stand charged with yet in as much as they being departed in faith hope and charity which be the spirituall chaines of vnion in order to all the good members of Christ's mysticall body and in as much as it is proper and naturall to the (i) According to the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. members of one and the same body can mutuall helpe one another and it is an Article of Catholick faith that the soul 's in Purgatory are members of one and the same Church and can be help'd through her prayers and suffrages And as to this poynt of doctrine there was ful agreement between the Latin and Greek Fathers in the Council of Florence as clearly appear's by the letters ' of vnion Besides Aerius was counted an Hereâ—ick by S. Epipha haer 75. and S. Austin haer because he denyed that the dead might receiue reliefe through the suffrages of the liuing Moreouer this Catholick truth is asserted by the ancientest Fathers namely S Deny's l. de caeles Hierar c. 7. S. Cyprian Epis 66. and S. Austin l de curae pro mortuis agenda ser 22. de verbis Apos expresly teacheth that the doctrine which assert's that the faithfull departed receiue help by prayers sacrifices and Almes-deeds c. is approu'd by the vniuersall Church members of one and the same body to comfort and help one an other doubtless the souls of Purgatory can be comforted and helped by the prayers and suffrages of the liuing as plainly appeares by the testimonies and Liturgies of primitiue Fathers authorities of Councils and the vniuersall practice of the catholick church that offereth dayly and howerly prayers and suffrages for the faithfull souls of such as die in grace that they may be comforted and deliuered out of the grieuous paines which they endure in Purgatory Besides for as much as they are not (k) According to S. Austin l. 20. de Ciuit. c. 9. the souls of the faithfull departed are not seperated from the Church which euen now is the kingdom of God and indeed the good soul 's of Purgatory are vnited vnto us in charity in regard at their departure out of this world they were in the state of grace again they are vnited vnto vs in faith and hope because these two vertues are not euacuated before the soul's admittance into Heauen seperated from the Church they be in a capacity to receiue benefit euen by Indulgences it being in the Churches power to apply those spirituall treasures for the aduantage of all such children as abide in vnion with her through faith Hope and charity And though prayers Church-suffrages Indulgences c. doe not remit sinnes in the next life these requiring necessarily * Trid sess 6. cap. 7. docet peccatuÌ„ mortale non remit ti sine infusione gratiae at sola Sacramenta in re vel in voto suscepta in funduÌ„t gratiam ex eodeÌ„ Concil sess 6. cap. 4. sed Indulgentia noÌ„ est Sacramentum culpa venialis nunquam tollitur sine aliqua displicentia de tali peccato veniali infusion of grace if mortall or a detestation therof if veniall no man can say but that souls be deliuered thereby out of their pames and translated to the kingdome of heauen without contradicting the authority of ancient Fathers the definition of a generall Councill the Ordinances of sundry Popes and the vniuersall practice of the catholick Church For example S. Austin placeth souls after their purgation in the next life in heauen to expect their bodies lib. 15. de Trinitate cap. 25. Again S. Austin puts no longer bounds to tyme in Purgatory then the matter as to satisfaction for each sinne requireth The Council of Florence defineth the transplanting of suffering soul's out of Purgatory into Heauen before the generall Resurrection Pope Benedict the 12. decreto Benedictus Deus in donis suis rancketh such as hold with pertinacy the contrary doctrine in the number of Hereticks Pope Gregory the first and Pope Siluester afore granted (l) Although an Indulgence be an act of iurisdiction and although the Church militant hath nothing of iurisdiction ouer the souls suffering in Purgatory neuertheless she hath power ouer her spirituall Treasure In consequence of which Indulgences are not granted in order to the dead after the manner of a Iudges absolution but in nature of a suffrage vnto helping of such onely as remoue out of their bodyes in communion with Christ's body and blood wherfore when the Church-gouernours grant Indulgences for the dead they insert the particles per modum suffragij after the manner of suffrages wherby is signifyed that they doe not giue Indulgences in order to the dead as if the dead were continued vnder their iurisdiction but they grant them only as competent recompences or conuenient satisfactions for as much as the faithfull aliue offer them as satisfactory works vnto satisfying the pains due to the sinnes which the dead had committed before they were remou'd out of their bodyes Aud doubtless euery particular belieuer that is in the slate of grace may offer to God their fasting praying and giuing of almes as worthy satisfactions vnto compensing of the torment 's which good soul 's endure in Purgatory Indulgences to such Priests as offered the sacrifice of Christ's body and blood in a Chappel dedicated to the blessed Virgin Mary called by the name of Mariae Liberatricis that they might free one soul out of Purgatory as doth appeare by the ancient Records of the said Chappell and Pope Pascall the first gaue deliuerance of one soul out of Purgatory to Priests celebrating fiue Masses in a Church consecrated to S. Praxes which Indulgence eleuen succeeding Popes confirmed whereunto may be added the Indulgence of Pope Iohn the eight that administred supream Church-gouernment in the yeare 878. granted to souldiers that should loose their life 's in the holy warr for the defeÌ„ce of the Church and this practice was neuer yet reproued by any Council Pope or catholick writer wherfore it seen eth a strange thing that Mr. Thomas White a priuate man and in outward profession a catholick christian should assume so vnauthorized a liberty and vnparalelled boldnesse as to publish a writing in the yeare 1653. entitled An Account of his husbanding the midle state of soul's in contradiction of the (m) According to S. Austin Tom. Epis 118. ad Ianua it is a manifest madnes to call in question
Angell is not a Cherubin or Seraphin that being a peculiar Order of Angells distinct from the rest And albeit that S. Hierom and but he alone among all the ancient ecclesiasticall writers doth assert in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius that in the primitiue times a Bishop and a Priest were one and the same thing also that Bishops got superiority ouer meer Priests rather in respect of ecclesiasticall constitution then diuine institution yet no man must argue thence that S. Hierom did deny a Bishop taken in the ordinary ecclesiasticall sense to be distinct from a meer Priest without hauing him contradict what himselfe hath written in sundry other places which were to play the part of an vniust Iudg. Besides it is not consonant at all as to reason that so great a learned Prelate as S. Hierom should be ignorant of bishops superiority ouer meer Priests in regard of iurisdiction and order as to diuine right since Timothy whom all interpreters and Fathers call Bishop was inuested with iudicatory authority ouer meer Priests as doth plainly appeare by the Apostles own words 1. Timoth. 3. Against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses Moreouer S. Hierom doth not deny in the epistle afore alleadged the superiority of Bishops ouer meer Priest's to be grounded in the truth of our lord's disposall for he doth assert only that maiority to proceede rather or more from ecclesiasticall custome then from a true ordinance of Christ for as much as ecclesiasticall constitutions haue rendred the dignity of Bishop's more eminent then it was in primary times adding thereunto preeminence of places in the Church peculiar ornaments and priuiledges to consecrate diuerse thing 's which meer Priest's cannot doe Howeuer S. Hierom doth assert expresly ordination that is power to ordain Priests proper to Episcopall function only in his said Epistle to Euagrius and likewise power to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation in a Dialogue writen against Luciferus But it is conceiued by coniecturall deductions from the writings of S. Hierom that in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius * Credibile etiam est S. Hieron prae oculis habuisse Ioannem Ierosolymae Episcopum qui iniustè afflixerat eum fratrem ipsius voluit deprimere fastum eius Legatur Epis 61. ipsius Hieron he playd the Oratour vsing the figure hyperbole being heartily angry with certain Deacons that ambitiously preferred themselues before Priests or at least suffered themselues to be preferred wherfore to suppress their inordinate ambition and extream insolence he made a parity between Bishops and meer Priest's which doubtless he meant only in respect of the great and maine function in order to the celebration of the holy Eucharist that is equall and common alike to both of them * Est propositio de fide quod sint 7. ordines communiter dicti presbyte ratus Diaconatus c. vt patet ex Concilijs Roma sub Syluestro can 7. Carthag 4. cui interfuit S. Aug. Trid. sess 32. catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine recenset omnes 7. ordines sigillatim As touching the number of ecclesiasticall Orders it is a constant Tenet of catholick faith that there be seuen orders taken in the proper sense viz of Priests Deacons sub-Deacons Acolists Lectours Exorcists and doorekeepers corresponding to as many sundry functions which are exercised in reference to the celebrating of the Eucharist The first is the consecration therof proper to Priest's alone the second administration of the Sacrament which belongeth to Deacons The third is the preparing of the sacramentall matter wherunto Sub-Deacons are ordained the fourth is the presenting of the matter at the Altar and vnto this function doth relate the order of Acolits But the other three orders regarde the disposition of such as be attendants only at the time of celebrating the Eucharist among which some are vnbelieuers and doore-Keepers are ordained to debarre and keeper of such Persons others haue a desire to belieue aright but are not sufficiently enough instructed for the perfecting of these Lectours are ordained Others though they are true belieuers and want no instructions yet in as much as they be possessed with deuills or otherwise vexed by them Exorcists are ordained for their meet help (f) According to Pope Innocent the third and other Orthodox writers before him namely Steph. Eduensis In opus de Sacra Altaris pr. 6. all the functions proper to the seuen orders were represented in the outward actions of Christ And S. Austin and other ancient Fathers affirme that Christ represented the Sacrament of penance in the raising of Lazarus for as much as he commanded the Apostles to vntye the cords that bound him Again S. Austin Comment In Ioan. c. 9. says that the washing of the mans eyes that was blind from his birth in the water of Siloe was a figure of christian baptism And all these seuen ecclesiasticall orders are figured and represented by sundry actions which Christ exercised on earth For example Christ Io. 3. made a scourge of small cordes and droue out of the Temple of Ierusalem those that sold oxen sheep Doues and changer's of money wherby are figured Door-keepers whose office is after Christ's example to shut the Church doores againsT the vnworthy and open them to the worthy Christ Luc. 4. read the Prophesie of Isaias wherin the Order of Lectours is signified their office being to read the holy Prophesies Christ Mark 8. cast out Deuills wherby Exorcists are represented Christ Io. 8. sayes I am the light of the world Wherunto doe relate Acolites the carrying of burning candles to enlighten being their function Christ Io. 13. preparing to celebrate the Eucharist tooke a Towell girded himselfe and powered water into a bason to wash his disciples feet in which action Sub-Deacons be expressed for one office of these Ecclesiasticall Ministers is to prepare water for celebrating of the Eucharist and to wash the Corporalls as is prescribed in the Roman Pontificall Christ Mat. 26. at his last supper distributed to his Apostles the Sacrament of the Euchariste and afterward Io. 13. preached vnto them in these two actions are shadowed deacons whose office is to preach and sometimes to distribute the Sacrament of the Euchariste as doth appeare plainly by the hystory of S. Steuen and S. Lawrence which as Deacons exercised the said actions Again Christ at his last supper did offer the sacrifice of the Euchariste that is of his body and blood which is proper to Priestly function * S PP Aug. Gregor alâ—â— testaÌ„tur Christum actione illa qua suscitauit LazaruÌ„ iussitque eum vinculis quibus erat ligatus ab Apostolis dissolui adumbrasse nostraÌ„ poeniteÌ„tiam potestateÌ„ traditaÌ„ Ecclesiae pro remitteÌ„dis peccatis Et Aug. comment in Euang Ioan. dicit ablutionem oculorum caeci naii ad natatoria Siloe tepraesontasse ablutionem nostri Baptismi In like manner Christs actions expressed in raysing vp of Lazarus and in commanding
him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
mercy Whereby it is euident that the Apostle did not conceiue that our prayers might benefit the Saints vnto the obtaining of mercy or an encrease of glory but that wee might be saued and glorified through their prayers 2. S. Basil in his lyturgy prayeth thus O lord let none of vs receiue the holy body and blood of thy Christ vnto iudgment or condemnation but vnto finding of mercy and grace in the society of all the Saints vvhich haue been pleasing in thy sight Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs Confessors .... specially the holy Immaculate Virgin blessed lady Mother of God through vvhose intercession visit vs o God After the same manner S. Chrys prayeth in his lyturgy but Mr. White conceals these parts of the lyturgyes as all moderne sectaries haue done afore altering the lyturgyes as he doth to proue that souls departed are not translated into Heauen before the generall resurrection Nicolaus Cabasalas a Greek Author who about 300. yeares agoe set forth an exposition of the Greek lyturgy affirms cap. 33. that to offer sacrifice for the Saints is to giue God thanks for them For the Saints saith he the Church offereth this rationall vvorship and honour as a thanks giuing to God and especially for the blessed Mother of God vvho exceeds all others in sanctity from whence he infers that a Preist prays not for the Saints but prayeth them that he may be assisted by them in his prayers And cap. 49. saith expresly that if a Preist should properly pray in the Mass for the Saints it would follow that he should pray for the blessed Virgin who is aboue all intercession and more holy by many degrees then the Apostles themselues Besids in the whole Chapter 49. he impugnes those who taught that a Preist prayeth in the Mass for Saints and shews clearly that the Latin praeposition pro. in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in English for is not alwaies a token of intercession but sometymes of thanksgiuing which he proues euidently enough from the words of the lyturgy Again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometymes signifies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in the room of an other so that to offer sacrifice for the Saints may signifie to giue thanks to God in the name or room of the Saints in order to the many graces and benefits which his diuine goodness hath confer'd vpon them And though this Author was a schismatick neuertheless he deliuered plainly the sense of the Greek Church and his authority is warrantable being put with the ancient Fathers lyturgies giue clear euidence of prayers and intercessions made to the blessed Saints for the releife of all the faithfull both liueing and dead that stand charged with any guilt or defiled with any vncleanes Again to shew the extreame wantonnes of Mr. Whites witt in order to singularitie t is certaine that down from the first age of the Church to these times he cannot produce one amongst all the ancient and moderne orthodox writers that interprets the said Masses or liturgyes in his sense to wit of prayers and sacrifices offered for the aduantage of the blessed these hauing noe need in regard they are satiated with the plenty of the house of God satisfyed with the fountaine of life conforted with the son of light and inebriated with euerlasting pleasurs Psal 35. wherby t is euidently manifest that although blessed Saints be commemorated in the lyturgyes of the Church and the August sacrifice of Christs precious body and blood is said to be offered for them Neuertheless it is neuer said or meant that such commemorations and offerings were done to benefit them and indeed to offer the Churches sacrifices for the ancient Fathers Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs according to the approued interpretation of all orthodox writers is thereby to celebrate their memory vnto honoring and reuerencing them and to beseech God that through their prayers and intercessions he will heare our prayers and supplications We all saith S. Cyrill Hierosoll catechesi 5. mystigogica where he explaines the words of the Greeke lyturgy beseech thee and offer vnto thee this sacrifice in commemoration euen of those who are dead from amongst vs. First of the Patriarcks Apostles Martyrs that God through their intercessions may receiue our prayers After the same manner speaks S. Austin in his 17. Sermon vpon the words of the Apostle 'T is saith he the practice and custome of the Church which the faithfull know that when martyrs are commemorated at the Altar of God we pray not for them but for the rest commemorated which are dead from amongst vs wee doe pray because it is an iniurie to pray for a Martyr to whose prayers we ought to be recommended Hereby is further euidenced that albeit the lyturgyes especially some of those which Mr. White alledges on his side seem to direct the suffrages of the Church wherof the sacrifice of the Altar is Cheife euen to the helping of such as be departed in the faith of Christ rest in peace and are counted for eminent Saints already Howeuer that seeming apparence ought to be ascribed to the intricacy of the lyturgyes wherin words and sentences are obscurly set down and the meaning of the Church thereby is to be vnderstood in order only to such faithfull departed as haue need of helpe Wherfore S. Tho. supp q. 71. art 8. teacheth that the blessed Saints in regard they haue full enioyment of all things in as much as they are satisfied with the fatnes of the house of God haue noe need of the Churches suffrages and S. Cyrill Cateches afore mentioned where he explicats the words of the Greek lyturgy writeth thus We pray to God for the common peace of the Church for the tranquility of the whole world for kings for souldiers for the sick for the afflicted in sum for all which haue need of help Which shows euidently enough that the ancient Churches neuer offered their suffrages for the helping of the blessed Saints that suffer nothing of want But lord God what crafty dealings Mr. White vseth to bring the stream of Church lyturgyes to run on his side some words he cuts of others cites amiss and especially omits what concernes the B. Mother of God as likwise the ad dresses the Church maks to the Saints of God for helpe through their supplications and intercessions besides to proue more particularly that S. Iames lyturgy of the Hierosolomitan Church allows of prayer for the benefit of the dead vniuersally in as much as it saith be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Mr. White addeth these words But let vs consider more particularly the point of praying for the blessed the Hierosolymitan Church is by origine the Chief the begining from the iust Abell cannot certainely be supposed to exclude any and S. Cyril the Heire of S. lames in his first Catechesis will assure vs she
hereticall interpretations Howeuer an answer shall of Mr. Whits proofes To wit nor is it saith he infrequent among the pious when they name a Saint or Martyr to adde whose glory God increase Hereby Mr. white either means essentiall or accidentall glory if he vnderstand an increase of essentiall glory in order to the intensnes therof he teacheth an heresy for the Church of God ascribes such an increase of blessednes * Concil Flor. in dee vnionis desinit animas beatorū videre clarè Deum sicut◠est sed alian◠alia perfectius pro diuersitate meritorum Et definitum est sess 6. can 32. iustificatum bonis operibus augmētum gratiae mereri ita profit entur veteres Patres Et ratio distributiua iustitiae exigit vt plus merenti maior reddatur morces to the Saints own merits and not to the prayers of their friends according to that saying of the Apostle 2. Cor. 9. He that soweth sparingly reapes alsoe sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reap also liberally and indeed it is the proprietie of distributiue iustice to better the reward in order to such as deserue better and God compenseth the merits of his faithfull according to destributiue iustice but if Mr. White vnderstand an increase of accidentall glory either in order to speciall reuelations of mysteries whereof the Saints were ignorant afore or in order to a greater measure of honour and reuerence from the faithfull aliue that makes nothing to his purpose and in that sense may be meant that saying (n) According to the Roman Catholick Church a Priest preparing himselfe to say Mass prayeth thus I vill say Muss and offer in saecrifice the body and blood of our lord Iesus Christ to the prayse of God and the vvhole triumphant Court Now if by praying soe he prayeth for the blessed he prayeth for God also being he promiseth therby to offer sacrifice to the praise of both in cosequence of which S. Paul likwise 1. Tim. 1. prayed for God when he said vnto the king of vvorlds immortall inuisible sole God be bonour and glory for euer and euer amen But were it not an extream madness to think that S. Paul by praying so conceiued that he might bring vnto God an encrease of glorie Howeuer Mr. White will needs haue the words of the prayers set down in the Roman lyturgie after the offertorie Receiue vvhat vve offer to the honour of thy Saints c. to proue it lawfull to pray for Saints that thereby they may find mercy and encrease of glory But S. Thomas 3. p. q. 71. art 8. in resp ad 1. obiec saith that when we celebrate the feasts of Saints their glory is not augmented by that solemnity but we receiue greate benefit thereby and euen so saith he when we giue praise to God we and not God receiue benefit thereby from the premises clearly appeares how vnaduisedly Mr. White in the 3. account of the midle state of souls alleageth S. Greg. to proue that the blessed receiue encrease of glory through the prayers of the faithfull liuing Sed mira sunt qua docet Albius noua sunt mira stupemus noua cauemus Aug. l. 3. con Iulia. Whose glory God encrease and after that sense Christians pray Glory be to the Father to the son and to the holy Ghost Amen CHAR. XXIJ. OF FOVNDAMENTALL AND NOT foundamentall Articles of faith T' Is a moderne distinction that was ingeniously contriu'd by (a) Marke Anthony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatto became an Apostate fled out of Italy into England in the Reign of king Iames of happy memory and taught that a Christian might be saued in any sect professing the foundamentall Articles of Christian faith as for example said he euery one may attaine vnto saluation either by adhering to S. Thomas doctrine or the doctrine of Scotus Marke Anthony de Dominis Arsh-Bishop of Spalatto and brought into the Protestant Church in order to the said Churches claim vnto as to foundamentall and disclaim from the Roman Church as to not foundamentall Articles of faith that is as to errours in order to such Articles of faith as may be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation though sufficiently propounded in regard whereof they beare the name of not foundamentall * Protestātes communiter constituunt hocdiscrimen inter fundamentales non fundamentales quod scilicet damnabile sit ab illis dissentire cū sufficienter proponūtur non item dissentire à nō fundamentalibus dum sufficienter proponūtur vt vniuersalitatem amplitudinē suae Ecclesiae estendant as disinct frō foundamētals which cā not be reiected without incurring both loss of faith and saluation in consequence wherof Protestans of theses dayes commonly represent the Roman Church as a naturall body that is partly sound and partly vnsound infected with sundry soares and vlcers which is to say that although the Roman Church hath continued alwaies sound at heart hauing neuer deuiated from the true doctrin of Christ as to foundamentall requisits vnto saluation neuertheless she still retaines sundry errours in order to not foundamentall requisits which they pretend to haue purged away and therby make their Church to be the same with the Roman Church as to the sound part therof Marke Antony de Dominis saw a necessity of inuesting the Protestant Church with visible existence least it might appeare to haue perished afore and with perpetuall succession of Pastors and Teachers these being of necessary vse in the gouernment therof for as much as they be essentially required to the professing of faith preaching the diuine word instructing the illiterat and administring the Sacraments which functions could neuer haue been performed if the Church of God wherof these be necessary markes had been inuisible and therby destitute of Pastors for the work of the ministery wherfore to fit vnto the Protestant Church visible existence and a series of Pastors and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from the Apostls he aduiced such as carried on the Protestant Reformation not to quitte all claim to the Roman Church without which visible existence and perpetuall succession of their Church had been impossible since no one society of Christian belieuers appeared vpon earth when the Protestant Reformation begun that was seperated from the Church of Rome Again he saw that by asserting the Romā Church to haue in all times reserued necessary requisits vnto saluation that is foundamentall Articles of faith it might seem as to reason consonant that the Protestants departure from it had been without cause and thereby they as to reason might be counted guilty * Secundum Aug. l. 1. con Epis Parm. cap. 4. schisma omnia scelera supergreditur of deadly schism for going out from and breaking vnity and communion with a Church wherin if they had continued they might haue attained vnto saluation therfore to escape this rock he aduiced again that Protestants should represent the Roman Church
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt