to be gouerned and preserued not by ordinary succession S. Paule doth witnesse the same Ephes 4. Hee hath giuen giftes vnto men that the Apostles Prophets c For hee teacheth that that is properly the Church wherein Christ is effectuall woorker and giueth true Teachers Therefore when as the name of the Church and the authoritie thereof is obiected vnto vs Let vs first consider whether mention bee made of the true Churche eyther els of the multitude of Bishops and the politique succession thereof neyther let vs suffer our selues to be terrified or discouraged from the worde of God vnder a false pretence of the name of the Church Secondly after that wee haue declared which is the true Churche let vs nowe adde therevnto that this true Church which is but small and a cōpany of holy ones doth retein the true doctrine of the Gospel or the articles of the faith like as S. Paule calleth the same The seate of trueth But this selfe same true church hath her doctrine sometime more and sometime lesse pure manifest She hath also in her many weake and feeble members as the Apostles were the church but yet they vnderstood not before the resurrectiō of Christ what should bee the kingdome of Christ For Peter after the holy Ghoste was geuen did yet suppose that the rites and ceremonies of the lawe was needefull to be vsed but when he was admonished frō heauen he then knew that the kingdome of Christ was not a Iudaicall pollicy but spirituall and continual woorshipping of God Afterwards whē the Apostles begā to prech there did shine in thē a pure cleare doctrine yet notwithstāding in mean seasō there were many weake mēbers w c albeit they were true mēbers of the church held stil amōgst them the articles of the faith yet they added herevnto some error as they which obserued the ceremonies of the law did not sufficiently well vnderstand the abrogation of the law what was the true worshipping of God This was no small error brought in with it some obscurity to the articles of the faith so did christ foreshew as touching the churche in the latter age that there should happen great darknes which shoulde hinder the very electe ones of God Whereby they shoulde the lesse inioy amongst them the true doctrine Therfore yet remaineth the true Church in some place w c retaineth the articles of y e faith but now thē lesse pure obscured with some hurtful opinions which haue some error in thē And as yet I speake of the true members of the church of the holy ones not of others w c hauing lost the light of the word do leese y e holy Ghost follow the iudgment of reason when they thinke that they deliuer very godly things they yet say cleane cōtrary things and vngodly Like as euē at this day also ther are excellently learned of good conuersation and outwarde shewe of holinesse which seeme to themselues to speake most holy thinges when in deede they are farre of from the true light that is from the true vnderstanding of the worde of God Concerning such persons I speake not as yet but I onely make mention of the true members of the Churche which for the more parte are weake and infirme So therefore saith Saint Paule 1. Cor. 3. No man can lay any other foundation then that which is already layde But some man buildeth vpon it Golde other wood and other straw or stubble c. By the foundation he meaneth The Articles of the faith that is to say the whole summe and scope of Christian doctrine and the doctrine of Christes benefites but hereunto saith be some shall adde profitable doctrine and interpretation and true spirituall honouring of God and these he calleth Golde Some other shall adde straw and stubble that is hurtful opinions and which are infected with some erroures Like as in the first age of the world ther were ordained ceremonies which brought with them false opinions As I do iudge S. Ambrose to be a true mēber of the Church And yet euen he thus speaketh of the Lent faste Caetera ieiunia sunt voluntatis hoc necessitatis est That is other fastings are voluntary but this is of necessity This opinion of Ambrose is straw stubble added to the doctrine of fayth So Basilius addeth Monkerie as straw and stubble and commendeth this kinde of life with immoderate and false commendations when as in deede hee was therefore reprehended of his owne Bishop Butch at it is no small faulte too ordeine newe woorshippings of God the Scripture warneth vs hereof and this one sentence sufficiently sheweth the same In vaine doe they woorship me with commaundementes of man Matth. 15. It is a grieuous sinne against the first commaundement to ordeine or allow woorshippinges not commaunded by God For the first precepte seeyng of forbiddeth there shoulde be any straunge Gods doth also forbid strange woorshippinges Cyprian vrgeth canonicall punishmentes which then was vsed and hee confirmeth opinions as though they were necessary that by reason of them sinnes might be forgeuen Sometime againe he saith that without thē absolution of sinnes is vnprofitable Peraduenture hee thought more conuenient heerein then he spake Notwithstanding these are no small erroures but very thicke stubble obscuring the doctrine of Christes benefites and of faith which we shoulde haue in him Furthermore oftentimes writers haue writtē more cōmodiously then they haue spoken because for the most part they were very negligent vnperfect in teaching borowed many sentences and methodes of the common people wherein cōsisted some kinde of errors As for example August borroweth the name of satisfactiō frō the vulgar sort yea although he doth openly reprehēd the errors of satisfactions He troubleth himselfe in the interpretation of this sentence that euery sinne is voluntary where he disputed of the sinne originall when notwithstanding the Sentence is a ciuill saying sette downe concerning external offences So cal they the supper of the Lord an oblatiō after the maner of the people whē it is not an oblation but Christ himselfe was the high Priest which offered his owne sacrifice And indeede in times past there was not made in the ceremony of the supper an oblation of the body and blood but before the consecration there was breade offered and other thinges and the Priest saide that he did offer vp prayers and thankesgeuing and all the seruice which was woont there to be done Although therefore the oblation was not vnderstood after one manner yet notwithstanding the name afterwardes was wrested vnto the oblation of the body wherevppon haue ensued great abuses Dionysius in that booke which containeth ceremonies of the Churche when hee doeth diligently describe the order of the Lordes Supper yet doth he not at all make any mention of the oblation of the Lordes body
feastes of charity And this tradition was receaued of the Ethnicks but somewhat reformed and in better order For the Ethnicks also gaue theyr feasâ—es in the Churches at theyr byrth dayes and burial dayes and afterwardes the Nicene councel and others for bad this pompe at the byrth dayes Therefore like as of the rest I haue declared so heere the testimonies historical in Tertullian doo profit what the former churche did thinke But as for his interpretations and disputations let them not be receaued for good doctrine except so far as they agree with the wryting of the apostles Of Cyprian Cyprian liued about the yeere of our Lorde 275. Hee conteineth profitable testimonies as touching the Trinity as touching baptising of infantes of the vse of the Lordes Supper and of the maner in choosing of Bishops which hee wryteth are to bee elected by them of autority in the church and that the same election is to bee ratified by certaine other bishops dwelling neare vntoo that place which are to be adioyned But the auncient fathers did reproue Cyprian that hee thinketh such are too bee againe baptised of the Heretikes which haue bene once already baptised As he declameth herevppon now and then hee layeth out absurde and corrupt opinions when hee dooth exagerate or amplify with immoderate and superfluous speeches the cause hee taketh in hande as hee wryteth very sharply of Canonicall punishements hee sayeth Absolution of sinnes is not auayleable except those paynes or punishements bee firste performed This saying howe greate inconuenience it hath it is manifest Also hee dooth very vehemently dispute of single life although hee dooth mitigate that place he biddeth those persons contract marriages which haue made their vowes yea if they keepe not promise In his litle booke of Almes hee saith that those sinnes which were committed before baptisme are by meanes of Christes passion forgiuen but hee saieth that after baptisme forgiuenesse of those sinnes then committed must bee sought for and obtained by almose deedes The same man dooth affirme touching such as slyde away from the Church that the benefite of Christe which came by baptisme is vtterly lost But afterwards that remission of sinnes is to be sought for by almose deedes These things are ful of absurdity whereof he being admonished no doubt woulde haue reformed himself Therfore not al his sayinges are to hereputed taken for good doctrine As touching the Lordes Supper hee is wont too vse the woordes of Oblation and Sacrifice lyke as the other wryters before did which say confusedly Wee offer prayers wee offer bread wyne wee offer the body and blood of Christ For that is also founde in Cyprian Heere vpon our aduersaries take their Testimonies too defende the prophanation of the Lordes Supper in their priuate Masse c. Greate is the force of custome and men imitating this doo oftentymes speake improperly As nowe wee cal it the Masse where neuer any man knewe the right sense or meaning of that name So the auncient fathers retained the speeches of oblation and sacrifice not very wel regarding the Etymology or proper signification thereof And bycause Augustyne sawe there was some discommodity in those names hee somwhat mitigateth the same thee sayeth That it is called Sacrifice for the remembrance of the thing Sacrificed and Oblation for the memory of the Oblation These are Metonymiae or figures of denomination as we say the passeouer for the memory or the signe of the passing ouer But I wil not heere subtilly either interprete vpoÌ„ or excuse the vsed phrase of speech in that age For indeede so did the people speake which nowe and then receaued an vnapt phrase of speeche Irenaeus plainly declareth That this oblation is a thankesgiuing The same did others thinke also as the name of the Eucharist or thankesgiuing or supper of the Lorde doth testify wherefore they thought it was a ceremony whereby thankes are giuen That hath no inconuenience in it at al. For we receaue it to the end that we may therby be admonished of the benefit giuen vs by Christ that we may stirre vp and increase our faith thereby furthermore that wee may giue thankes for that benefite Neither doth it therevppon followe That that woorke is to bee doone for others or too bee applyed for others c. These monsters truely were not once thought vppon by the fathers Therefore when wee reade the name of Sacrifice and oblation let vs vnderstande it eyther for a signe of the Sacrifice and oblation or for a thanksgiuing Let vs not imagine that it may be applyed for any others Nowe and then in one woorde they cal oblation all that buysinesse which is there in hande That is too say Prayers and the supper of the Lorde This when it happeneth than are Prayers too bee vnderstoode for oblations Also there are certaine woordes read in Cyprian concerning the dead which the later wryters doo wrest contrary to good meaning Wee offer Sacrifices for them But these thinges hee speaketh as touching Martyrs For of them there was mention made in Prayers when thankes were giuen vnto God that hee had assisted them As the Greeke canon sayeth Wee offer for the Patriarkes Prophetes Apostles that is wee doo giue thee thankes that thou hast chosen thy church vnto thee eueÌ„ from the beginning that thou hast redeemed sanctified c. This was the meaning of those words at the beginning they did not require of God that hee would â— mitigatâ— the paines of those which were dead Afterwards in tyme there hapned euil opinions and the former woordes were partly chaunged partly they of the latter age retayning the forme of those woordes vnderstood yet an otherthing than they of the former age did Ergo the testimonies of antiquity doo not maintaine or defende later abuses which are partly straunge and contrary vnto the state of the tyme present partly if in them they haue any faulte they ought not too be obiected vntoo the firme testimonies of the scripture bycause other ages had also their discommodities These thinges most simply without subtil cautilation doo I aunswere touching the wordes of Oblation and Sacrifice Of Basilius In Basilius there are profitable testimonies of the Trinity and of Repentaunce against Nouatus In his sermon of Humility hee setteth downe an excellent opinion touching righteousnes of fayth which doth manifestly defend vs. Hee plucketh away iustification of good workes without subtil cauillation therevppon neither speaketh he of things ceremoniâ—â— but of al vertues neither speaketh he only of works before reuocatioÌ„ but of the vertues in them which be renewed and hee biddes vs beleue that onely by confidence in the mercy for Christs sake promised we are iust and not otherwayes His wordes are these And the Apostle sayth 1. Cor. 1. He that reioyceth let him reioyce in the Lord saying that Christ is made for vs wisdom froÌ„ God righteousnes sanctification redeÌ„ption that as it is
these later dayes differed nothing at all from the manifest Idolatry of the Ethnickes in tymes past For they nowe called vppon S. Anne S. George and others none otherwyse then the Ethnicks did vpon Iuno Mars or Hercules They ranne to theyr Images and the Bishops with greate autority confirmed that same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idolomaniam mad woorshipping of Idols yea and theyr doctors and learned men commended them for so dooing And in such kinde of worshippinges consisted the whole suÌ„me of religion But al this while touching inuocation vpon Christe touching fayth in him there was greate silence amongst them The beginnings therefore of such and so greate impiety were too bee taken heede of which indeede Gregory himselfe greatly confirmed who first than instituted the publique ordinaunce of calling vppon sainctes who commaunded that Temples shoulde bee dededicated too the bones and dust of those Sainctes And also at that tyme crept in an opinion touching the oblation of the body and blood of Christe too bee made for the dead This opinion brought foorth horrible prophanation or abuse of the Sacrament Therefore although after Gregories tyme greater darkenesse ensewed yet notwithstanding these errours at that tyme remained in the Churche A false perswasion brought in by Monkery Of woorkes deuysed without the commaundement of God praying vntoo Sainctes and the oblation of the body of Christ for the dead These errors afterwards haled with them greate ruyne of GODS Churche Therefore the state of Gregories tyme may not bee a sufficient rule too reforme the Churche which thing the more euident that it may appeare I wil firste recite more manifest faultes in Gregory and afterwardes I wil dispute vpon a fewe things pertayning to the Lordes supper Gregory in Libro 3. Epistol in that his Epistle vntoo the Bishoppe of Catanea in Cilicia giueth charge that Subdeacons or Deacons shoulde not vse the company of theyr wyues which they had maried before they were ordered When as in deede the people Siculi before theyr tyme had obserued the maner of the Grecians and did not forbid the husbands to vse the company of theyr wyues This faulte is heere nowe sufficiently manifest For no godly person can allowe the separation or diuorse of lawefull matrimony Hee telleth that there was one called Speciosus which had rather leaue and forgo his function of beeing Subdeacon then too wante the company of his wyfe This whosoeuer hee was no doubt was indewed with sounder iudgement in this poynt then they which sought the separation or diuorses of such marriages This increased the offence of Gregory that hee woulde haue this tradition to be receaued in the Churches of those people called Siculi Which at that tyme according to the decrees of auncient Synodes or Councelles retayned still marriages in all theyr Ecclesiasticall degrees neyther did they burden theyr Deacons with vowes or any other persons Why dooth Gregory heere take vppon him the rule and gouernement of other Churches When as indeede hee declameth so tragically that hee abhorreth from the name of the vniuersall Bishop Further more why dooth he there disanul marriages where the Deacons are not burdened with vowes Why doth he not heere stande in awe of the autority of former Councels This faulte where it containeth manifest vngodlynes and tyranny it is very euident that this age wherein Gregory liued was not without greate errors And howe vniust is hee againe towardes those which at theyr fathers requeste were froÌ„ theyr infancy brought vp in monasteries and afterwardes beeing young men desired an other kinde of lyfe Touching these hee aunswereth againe that it is wickedly done of such too forsake that monastical life This straitnesse is not so much therfore to be found fault with bycause it was made an iniury too that young age but also bycause it greatly stablished superstitious opinions touching Monkish tradiâ—ions The thirde offence in him I wil also adde heerevntoo which is manifest Hee was seduced with night visions too allowe or bring in the oblation of the sacrament for the dead Hee maketh mention of twoo which after theyr death had serued in bathes Whereof the one requyred that oblation of the Sacrament might bee made for him that hee might bee deliuered out of those paynes and punishementes From these visions he groundeth doctrine in the Churche contrary too the expresse woorde of GOD as it is written Deut. 18. Thou shalte not aske counsel at the dead and as it is also written Esay 8. Should not a people in quyre at theyr GOD from the liuing too the dead Ergo what kinde of state â—oever the soules of those departed are in after this life Yet notwithstanding from visions orsights wee ought not to take any dotrine of confirmation or otherwyse And againe who seeth not that it is a fained fable wherehee saieth that after death men became bath keepers This fable is lyke the fayned tale of the daughters of Danaus which drawe vp water with a siue We haue not here determined to recite this Catalogue bycause we would adde herevntoo the confutations of his errors which else where are 〈…〉 I onely meant here to rehearse his faults to the end it might appeare that they are 〈◊〉 which were so greatly in loue with the fathers as though they had bin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aliaâ— Innoxii Men blamelesse or without fault and neuer doo disagree from the expresse woorde of God Allthough therefore the better learned Fathers now and then do somewhat to the purpose admonish vs yet we must euen iudge of them by the worde of God Therefore omitting other confutations I will nowe further adde certaine thinges briefly touching oblation for the dead Wee neede not inquyre whether there be any Purgatory yea or not this question pertaineth nothing too the oblation Although there were a Purgatory yet it is wickedly doone too offer the Sacrament for the dead There are many most stronge argumentes to prooue the same The first is vngodlynesse too ordayne a tradition in the Churche without the commaundement of God Againe the application of the Lordes supper for others is made without any commaundement of God or testimony of Gods will Ergo without all doubting this application is wicked Many sentences confirme the Maior as namely this Thou shalt haue none other Gods but mee Exo. 20. Lo heere the worshipping of strange Gods is by expresse commanndemeÌ„t forbidden And hithertoo pertaineth that saying Esay They worship mee in vaine teaching traditions of men Againe S. Paul sayth Rom. 14. Whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne Furthermore woorshippinges or seruice without the commaundement of God can not be done by fayth But the worlde perceaueth not howe greate a sinne it is too ordaine woorshipping without the commaundement of God too departe from the word of God Of this mischief the Prophetes doo greatly cry out bewayle the blindenesse of men which with horrible boldnes do appoynt
rehearse many examples but I surcease and I exhorte al those that are godly to abhorre this mischieuous sophistry of the aduersaries Ezechias king of Hierusalem did not only redresse those superstitious errours and opinions touching woorshipping of the brasen Serpent but hee vtterly destroyed the very Image it selfe So it is a point of true godlynesse to cast a way the traditions themselues togither with their vngodly opinions which traditions are not in proper nature politike customes Lyke as the Scripture commaundeth Idolles to be destroyed So those same traditions of priuate Masses praying vntoo Sainctes obseruing of vowes superstitious Apparel religious orders of brotherhood the bonde of single life difference of meates and such other lyke foolishe traditions proceeding of superstitions ought vtterly too bee taken away and abolished But what doo I dispute They which describe theyr faulty and corrupt traditiōs with this sophistical doctrine do not this vnfainedly to take away errors out of the Churche but that they might by al meanes defend theyr autority by their comming establishe this vngodlynesse For lewde opinions doo easely afresh bude againe if the very customes do remaine Wherefore needful it is that the godly should be watchful for the deuil stubbornly resisteth the Gospel not only prouoking tyrants vnto cruelty but also craftely laying snares vnder a pretence of wysedome and powring forth pleasant perswasions of the which to beware oftentymes the holy Ghoste commaundeth vs. As the Apostle Paule wryting vntoo Timothy saith That there should come dissembling spirits cap. 4. he saith wryting vntoo the Colos cap. 2. That the traditions of me shal haue in them a shew of wisdom Whereby not onely manifest dreames of men shall bee spread abroade such as for the most part were both they of former later age like as a little before the crafty dealings of pardons were manifest but also subtil crafty felowes shal cūningly depaint out false doctrine vngodly traditiōs to the end they may be entertained with great ioy to the ende they may bee beloued retained in great estimation For hath not the vngodlynes of Samosatenus a certaine shew of wisdome Is not the error of Pelagius plausible too prophane wittes So haue these things a shew of wisedome it is profitable for peace tranquility say the aduersaries to retaine the accustomed maners Therfore let the more absurde or inconuenient opinions be taken away let better interpretations or meanings be giuen vnto them but the rytes or customes themselues let them be retained This kind of speech maketh a fayre shewe when in deede they practise far otherwyse These sycophancies or scoffing kinde of speeches are much alyke signified in the History of Christe whome when the Iewes had blindfilded his enimies which bounde him scoffingly buffetted him they bid him then prophecy who he was that strick him so these excusers of vngodly traditions haue Christ his church in derision at this day After that they haue imagined some one vnsauery straunge phrase they nowe thinke they haue sufficiently blindfilded Christ after this they fal to buffetting of him that is they establishe vngodlynes they inflame the harts of Kinges vnto cruelty they triūphe ouer vs as though they nowe had vtterly extinguisht the trueth Themselues in their owne Theatre carry away the conquest they are praysed of the vngodly they are beloued of Kinges whose appetites and affections they serue But God is in prayer to be called vpon that hee woulde vouchsafe to restraine and brydle this kinde of sycophanty Nicander sayeth there is a kinde of Serpentes which he calleth Hemorrhoydes and they are very litle beastes of one foote length but they haue such force of Poyson in them that sweate most blooddy bursteth out of him which is stoonge with one of them yea from out his whole body out of his mouth nosethrilses and out of his bladder isseweth greate streames of blood so as his eyes sende foorth sparkling teares of blood and so that all his whole body burneth with incredible heate thereby This kinde of beast when as one of them had in Egypt destroyed a Mariner of Helens The noble and hauty woman trode her vnder her foote wherevppon also the posterity of Haemorrhoides is saide to halte and bee maymed by the losse of their sting For the euent declareth that this straunge sophisticall doctrine of interpreting traditions is a poyson not vnlyke the poyson of these Hemorrhoides The vnlearned although they are our aduersaries yet notwithstanding they fight against vs with wilful boldnes and hatred These Hemorrhoydes hy the reason of the defence of their doctrine by meanes of these Sophistries and as Paule calleth them by reason of a certaine outwarde shewe of wisdome which they woulde haue too bee in them are helde in admiration and prouoke the mindes of mighty personages to oppresse the trueth Princes beeing enflamed with this poyson doo conceaue and kindle in their hartes flames of hatred are made bloodsuckers and cruelly raging beyonde measure But Christ wil not suffer the light of his Gospel to be extinguished accordingly as it is written Whatsoeuer is of GOD shal not bee abolished Therefore shall the Churche wherein shyneth true doctrine at length vtterly destroy the stinges from those Hemorrhoydes Those sophisticall interpretations shall not oppresse the trueth neyther shall the crafty and cruel counselles of the vngodly preuayle them But whereas some men desirous of cōcord doo dayly looke for that councels shoulde bee called by Bishoppes and that they hope these shal heale vp the woundes of the Churche or redresse enormities in the same they are far deceaued For the Bishops of Rome theyr champions confederate with them wil neuer stinte from warrying against Christe which that I may so thinke I am not onely moued by mans coniectures which are many and no flender causes I am thorowly mooued with the sayinges of Christe Furthermore by the examples of all ages For Christe denyeth that blasphemers shall bee saued which contrary to theyr owne conscience stryue against the trueth defende open Idolatry embrewe themselues in the blood of the godly ones No doubte fury is allwaies accompanied with blasphemies and murder like as the histories of Cain Pharao Saule and the children of Israel do witnesse the same And God himselfe threatneth blindnes vnto blasphemers as the Psalme sayeth Let theyr eyes bee darkened Therefore dayly doo they encrease their tormentes and they with vngodly leagues doo binde Princes vntoo themselues Neither doo they onely openly swarme abroade but primly lay snares for the lyues of godly Princes Is it not to bee supposed that these will admit moderate or godly councels And other whyles wee haue prooued very many which haue fained a moderation and yet in very deede haue wrought nothing so but that they might catche theyr vauntage howe too subuert vs if they had once ensnared vs and so extinguishe al kinde of good doctrine