this matter may be fully cleered it is to be obserued as we said before that times are made holy and places two manner of wayes so things are made holy either by some inherent qualitie of holynesse or by consecration of them to holy vses After the first manner Angels and men were made holy in the creation sinners are made holy by regeneration and sanctification of the holy Ghost and of this holynesse God onely is the author Next things are made holy by consecration of them to holy vses which vses are either mysticall or politicall The consecration of things to holy mysticall vses as of water in Baptisme to be a signe of the bloud and Spirit of Christ the elements of Bread and Wine in the Supper to be the Sacrament of his Bodie and Bloud the Sabbath to bee vnto the Iewes a memoriall of the Creation a type of signification and a badge of their profession the Temple the Altars the Sacrifices and Priests to bee shaddowes of things to come all these and such like are made and ordayned holy by God but the consecration of things to holy vses for policie as for maintayning religion or for order and decency to be obserued in the worship of God is not onely Gods prerogatiue but a priuiledge and liberty granted by him to the Church for example to build and consecrate places to be Temples houses to bee Hospitals to giue rent lands money and goods to the Ministry poore to appoint Vessels Vestures Instrumēts for the bublike worship as Tables Table-clothes Napkins Basens Cups and Lauers for the holy Sacraments these things and the like are made holy by the dedication and consecration of men After this last manner the Church hath power to consecrate the fiue Anniuersary dayes to the commemoration of our Sauiour his benefits to separate them from all other ordinary workes and so to make them sacred and holy dayes It was I grant a part of Idolatry to proclaime a holy day vnto the golden Calfe or to any Idol or Creature as ye affirme but it will not follow that it is Idolatry to proclaime a holy day for the honour and worship of the true God And as it was one of Ieroboams sins to despise the Festiuities appointed by God for his worship and instead of these to ordaine a Feast after the deuise of his owne heert so if we should despise the Lords Sabbath and instead thereof appoint some other as the Machomet hath done it were a presumptuous sinne But this wee are farre from acknowledging the Lords Day to bee holy by his institution and appointing the rest to bee kept only for his worship PP We come from priuiledge to fact as de iure none may The third Reason so de facto none did appoint holy dayes vnder the Law but God and that eyther by himselfe or by some extraordinary direction Therefore none can bee allowed vnder the Gospell without the like warrant Seeing the times vnder the Gospell are not so ceremonious as the times vnder the Law ANS I answered before that if holy dayes bee taken for times whereunto God did appropriate the exercise of some particular forme of worship or for times clothed with some relatiue and respectiue holinesse as to bee signes or types of things to come God only may make dayes holy but if by holy dayes wee vnderstand times dedicated to Gods worship and the commemoration of his benefits as mee to circumstances for Discipline Order and Policie such as our Diuines hold the holy dayes vnder the Gospell to bee I denie that either they might not or did not lawfully appoint such dayes vnder the Law or yet may not be appointed vnder the Gospell The answeres which you make to the dayes of Purim instituted by Queene Estther and Mordecai and the Feast of Dedication instituted by Iudas Macchabaeus are not solid First where ye say that the obseruation was ciuill because Hospinian sayes they might haue wrought vpon the dayes of Purim his opinion in that is not probable seeing these dayes were instituted to bee dayes of feasting and ioy and sending of portions one to another and gifts to the poore because on them God had giuen rest to his people from their enemies It is not probable when rich and poore did feast in remembrance of the rest that God had giuen them from their enemies that they did not rest and obserue the dayes according to the Institution for the Text sayes expresly Est. 9.17 That they rested and kept a day of feasting and gladnesse with the which seruile labour sorts not Neither will it follow that these dayes were not kept for holy Festiuities albeit in them they might haue wrought some kind of labour for on the sixe dayes of the Passeouer and on the sixe dayes of the Feast of Tabernacles seruile worke was not vtterly prohibited but on the first and eight only yet all these dayes are called Festiuall and holy Finally dayes instituted for Documents and Memorials of holy things as of their Fasting and Prayers by which they obtayned deliuerance such as yee affirme these to haue beene cannot bee called nor counted Ciuill And Willet compares them not euill with the fist dayes of August and Nouember but hee does not say this as counting them Ciuill but because they were not diuina sed Ecclesiasticae institutionis non mysterij sed politias and if ye thinke the fift of August and Nouember to be ciuill dayes in so farre as vpon them Commemoration is made of his Maiesties Deliuerances with Preaching Thankesgiuing and Prayer you are in a manifest errour for a day which is dedicated to diuine Seruice and the honour of God not to a ciuill vse cannot be esteemed ciuill but sacred and holy Againe where yee say that these dayes had more then humane warrant because it is thought that Mordecai was the Penman of the Booke of Esther and consequently a Prophet and that it appeares that these dayes might not haue beene altered by the Iewish Church which if they had bin of Ecclesiasticke Constitution might haue bin done thoughts and appearances are not sure probations to conclude a certaintie as yee doe of a more then humane warrant And if they had receiued from God any particular direction concerning them the Prophet of God would not haue omitted the same in the Historie A generall warrant they had such as the Church must haue for the determination of circumstances in the worship of God as that of the hundred and fifth Psalme Giue thankes to the Lord call on his Name make knowne his deeds amongst the people Sing vnto him sing Psalmes vnto him talke of all his wondrous workes that he hath done But to say that they had any particular warrant is to be wise aboue that which is written As to the Feast of Dedication yee answere first that if it were Anniuersary in Salomon and Zorobabels time Iudas Macchabaus followed the example of these who had Propheticall direction and if it
breach of the Institution made by kneeling is the change and restraint of the commandement giuen to many in the plurall number Eate yee drinke yee to one in the singular number Eate thou drinke thou ANS This is a calumny we neither change the command nor so much as a iot contained in the institution For first wee consecrate the Elements vsing the words of Saint Paul and the Euangelists without altering a sillable Thereafter when we giue the Elements seuerally to euery person wee apply the generall command to euery one in particular which if we did not euery worthy receiuer ought to apply vnto himselfe else he cannot communicate in faith for he that esteemes not that command to belong to himselfe in particular hath no warrant for his taking eating and drinking This application therefore made by the Pastor to euery communicant is not a breach but a meane seruing to the right and precise obseruation of the Institution PP The fift breach of the institution made by kneeling is the altering of the enunciatiue words of Christ This is my body which is broken for you This is my bloud which is shed for you in a prayer To blesse our body and soule saying The body of our Lord Iesus Christ c. ANS This also is a calumny for these words wee vse not in stead of the sacramentall words because then there should be no Sacrament at all for by the sacramentall word This is my body the bread is made the Sacrament of Christs body and by this word This Cuppe is the New Testament in my bloud the Cuppe is made the Sacrament of his Bloud and without this word whereby the will of our Sauiour is declared which makes the Sacrament all our prayers and wishes should serue to no vse It is true after the Sacrament is made by the sacramentall word these or the like words are vttered by the Pastor at the deliuery of the Elements whereby the generall prayer and blessing wherewith the action beginnes is applyed particularly to euery Communicant and they admonished and instructed to apply it to themselues This is the dutie both of the Pastor and of the people for as in the prayer it is our duetie to wish in generall that all who are to participate the bodie and bloud of Iesus may be preserued thereby to euerlasting life so it is our duetie to wish the same to each one seuerally at the instant when he is receiuing And as it is the Peoples dutie when the prayer is conceiued for all to wish that Christs body and bloud may preserue all the receiuers thereof so when they receiue seuerally to wish that themselues in particular may be preserued thereby For if this be one of the principall ends wherefore they come to receiue can they receiue worthily without this or the like wish No man without blasphemie can call this an idle battologie PP The sixth breach of the Institution made by kneeling is the taking away of the distribution that ought to be amongst the Communicants When Christ sayd Take yee eate yee he insinuates that they should take and diuide amongst themselues A little after In the first Booke of Discipline penned Anno. 1560. it is ordained that the Minister break the bread and distribute the same to those that bee next him commanding the rest euery one with reuerence and sobrietie to breake with other because it is neerest to Christs action further we haue a plaine precept Luke 22.17 Diuide it amongst you c. ANS If yee stand to that which yee alleadge out of Scaliger was the custome of the Iewes and vsed by our Sauiour in the Institution yee haue no cause to quarrell the distribution of the bread for the Master of the feast vfed to breake the berad in so many peeces as the number of the Feasters were giuing to euery one a peece neither did each person measure his owne portion giuing the rest to his neighbour according to our custome But leauing this if we shall consider by the Institution what part is proper to the Pastor and what to the People wee will finde that as it is the Pastors part to take bread to blesse and giue thanks so is it his part first to breake the bread then to giue it with this precept Take eate and so that it is the Peoples part not to breake it but to take it broken for as it was the part of Christ first to giue his flesh for the life of the World when he did offer himselfe in a sacrifice for our sinnes which he will haue represented in the Sacrament by the Pastor in breaking the bread so it was his part to giue his flesh to the faithfull not to be broken and sacrificed by them but to bee eaten after it was once broken sacrificed by himselfe If therefore it be not the part of the people either to represent the oblation of Christs body or the donation thereof to vs but the part of the Pastor properly who in these actions represents Christ it cannot be the part of the people to breake the bread nor to giue the bread one to another For this cause in the ancient Church it was euer giuen either by the Pastor himselfe or by his Deacon who supplied his place and helped him in the action but neuer by any of the people to others And Clemens Alexandrmus in the place which your selfe quotes saith not that the people diuided the bread but that it was permitted to euery one of the people to take a part of the Eucharist after that some doubtlesse the Masters of the Church had diuided it in peeces as their custome was The learned Musculus in his common places De coena Domini pag. 444. speaking of this purpose saith Fregit dedit Discipulis suis fregit ipse manusuapanem ac fractum à se dedit Discipulis non dedit integrum ab ipsis frangendum fed à se fractum panem Non dedit vt ipsi distribuerent fed vt à se distributum acciperent ederent Erant Apostoli in ca coena Domini non vt dispensatores mysteriorum Dei sed vt conuinae vt fideles vt Discipuli vt Communicantes Christus verò vt Conuiuator vt Dominus eadem opera instituens ac suiipsius manibus dispensans gratiae suae sacramentum That is to say Christ Iesus brake and gaue to his Disciples hee brake the bread with his owne hand and when it was broken he gaue it to his Disciples he gaue it not whole vnto them to be broken by them but he gaue them that which he had broken he gaue it not to them to be distributed by them but that they should take it being distributed by him and eate it The Apostles were in that Supper not as dispensers of the mysteries of God but as Guests as the faithfull as Disciples and as Communicants but Christ was as the maker of the Feast as the Master at one time both instituting and
of his grace and glory in the one and other this religious worship no man wil deny to be lawfully performed as well by the worthy receiuer of the Sacrament as by the reuerent hearer of the Word for as we bow not to the letters and syllables and sounds of the words of the Gospell but to him whose minde and will is declared therein So doe wee not bow to the elements of bread and wine in the Sacrament but to him whose body and bloud we receiue thereby But you to make the world beleeue that the Churches of Scotland and England kneele to the elements of bread and wine in the Sacrament at least haue ordained so to be done you alledge against the Church of England the Ministers of Lincolne their defence in the third part thereof referring the Reader to their proofes touching which part I only reply this that there be sufficient answeres made to these proofes by learned and reuerend men in that Church whereto also I remit the Reader Against our Church you lay a false imputation and frame thereupon all your discourse against kneeling as it is a breach of the second Commandement which we will now examine PP In the late act wee are ordained to kneele for reuerence of the diuine mysteries I see not wherein this differs from the Bishop of Rochesters argument that great and reuerend dreadfull mysteries must be receiued with great and dreadfull humilitie of soule and humiliation of body therfore in the act of receiuing we must kneele if this argument were good then the Sacraments and sacrifices of the old Law should haue been thus worshipped and if we will measure by the sight the Sacraments and sacrifices of the old Law were more dreadfull then are the Sacraments of the new for the slaughter of beasts and shedding of blood was more dreadful then the powring out of wine The Ancients held the sight of this Sacrament not only from Pagans but also from the Catechumenists this doing was not commendable it made the mysterie of this Sacrament both darke and dreadfull Augustine saith they may bee honoured as matters religious but wondered at as matters of maruell they cannot But to returne to the purpose to kneele for reuerence of the mysteries is nothing else but to worship the mysteries ANS Heere you set your selfe against three parties the Bishop of Rochester the Ancients and the Assembly at Perth For the Bishop of Rochester I answere shortly That he takes the mysteries with Chrysostome for the body and blood of Christ represented in the Sacrament by the elements of bread and wine In which sense they are truly called great and dreadfull and ought to bee receiued with great humility of soule and humiliation of body Non enim peccatur adorando carnem Christi sed peccatur non adorando We sinne not saith Saint Augustine in adoring Christs flesh but we sinne if wee adore it not in the Sacrament That which you blame in the Ancients of withholding the sight of the Sacraments not only from Pagans but also frō the Catechumenists Chrysostome iustifies with great reason Hom. 7. 1. Cor. on these words We speak the wisdome of God which is hid Alia videmus saith he alia credimus aliter afficior ego aliter infidelis Infidelis si lauacrum audiat aquam simpliciter cogitat c. ideo fidei arcana non sunt temerè apud indignos evulgāda We see one thing saith Chrysostom we beleeue another I who beleeue am otherwise affected then an Infidel is if an Infidel heare of washing in Baptisme he thinkes there is nothing there but water c. For this cause the mysteries of our faith ought not rashly to be divulgate to the vnworthy This iudgment of Chrysostomes is not crossed by S. Augustines testimony but confirmed rather for if the Sacraments should be honoured as matters religious then as Chrysostom saith Pretiosae margarita est à contemptu vindicanda that is a pretious jewel ought to be preserued from contempt Where you alledge against the Assembly at Perth that in the late act therof we are ordained to kneele for reuerence of the diuine mysteries you are guilty of manifest falshood for in reciting the words of the act you blot our some change others and thereby corrupt purposely the whole sense and meaning of the act You blot out these words of God and in due regard you change the word mystery in mysteries these you interpret to be the elements whereas in the act the word mystery signifies not the elements but the receiuing of the blessed body and blood of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ But that your deceit may be manifested I will set downe the act as it is extracted forth of the Register of the Assembly vnder the hand of the Clerke thereof Since we are commanded by God himselfe that when we come to worship him we fall downe and kneele before the Lord our Maker and considering withall that there is no part of diuine worship more heauenly and spirituall then is the holy receiuing of the blessed body and blood of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ like as the most humble and reuerent gesture of the body in our meditation and lifting vp of our hearts becommeth well so diuine and sacred an action Therefore notwithstanding our Church hath vsed since the reformation of Religion heere to celebrate the holy Communion to the people sitting by reason of the great abuse vsed in the idolatrous worship of Papists yet now since all memory of by-past superstition is blotted out of the hearts of the people praised be God in reuerence of God and in due regard of so diuine a mysterie and in remembrance of so mysticall an vnion as wee are made partakers of thereby the Assembly thinkes good that that blessed Sacrament bee celebrated hereafter to the people humbly and reuerently kneeling vpon their knees This is the true copie of the act differing in many things from that which you sette downe Pag. 34. in the narratiue thereof the reasons are set downe wherefore the people should kneele when they receiue the Sacrament which are repeated orderly in the conclusion as the causes of the same The first reason is Since we are commanded by God himselfe that when we come to worship him wee fall downe and kneele before the Lord our Maker Relatiue vnto this we haue in the conclusion Therefore in reuerence of God the Assembly thinkes good that the Sacrament be giuen to the people kneeling The second reason in the narratiue is And considering withall that there is no part of diuine worship more heauenly and spirituall then is the holy receiuing of the blessed bodie and blood of our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ Relatiue to this wee haue these words And in due recard of so diuine a mysterie Wee say not in regard of the diuine mysteries which you interpret the elements but Mysterie that is the holy receiuing of the body and blood of Iesus Christ mentioned
whereby we may bee stirred vp to worship yet are they not actually such except they bee applyed and accommodate to that vse either in the ordinary publique ministerie or in a mans priuate meditation and deuotion or extraordinarily vpon some present and great occasion as when the fire came downe at the prayer of Elias and consumed the sacrifice When the Signes Sacraments or Works of God are after that manner propounded and insinuated they are in statu accommodato adorandum and then men ought to adore and worship God yet it is not necessary that they should vpon all such occasions fall downe and kneele as yee conclude For when in our priuate meditation and deuotion or when by some present great occasion wee are inwardly moued and affected to worship our externall gesture of adoration is arbitrarie and lest to our owne priuate election to doe what is most conuenient decent for that time Sometime the discouering of the head is sufficient sometime the listing vp of the eyes onely and sometime no gesture at all is required but in the ordinary Ministerie when the works of God or his benefites are propounded and applyed publikely to stirre vs vp to worship in the assemblies of the Church then our gesture ceaseth to bee arbitrarie for it must be such as is prescribed and receiued in the Church where we worship So when by the sight of the Sacraments onely or by the sight of holy signes or creatures of God wee are moued priuately to worshippe wee may vse or not vse what gesture we thinke meetest yet when we come to the table our selues not to be spectators but to communicate with others we ought to receiue and worship after the forme and custome of that Church in which we are If they sit with their heads discouered so should we If they stand or passe by so should we If they kneele so should wee for vniformity and peace sake Saint Angustine in his 118. Epist Ad quam fortè ecclesiam veneris eius morem serua si cuiquam non vis esse scandalo nec quenquam tibi that is Keepe the custome of the Church whereunto thou comest if thou would be offensiue to no man and wouldst haue no man offensiue to thee This Saint Augustine learned of Saint Ambrose and as he saith hee did neuer thinke of it but he esteemed it as an oracle that he had receiued from heauen As to those in the Reformed Churches who allow the historicall vse of Images they condemne with vs both the externall and internall adoration of Images Therefore by their doctrine wee may not kneele before the Crucifixe because it is a sort of externall adoration PP All the parts of Gods worship ought to be direct and not oblique Perkins saith It is idolatry to turne dispose or direct the worship of God or any part thereof to any particular place or creature without the appointment of God and more specially to direct our adoration to the bread or to the place where the bread is what is it lesse then idolatrie ANS If by the Act of Porth wee had beene ordained to kneele to the Sacrament either in stead of Christ or coniunctly with him you might call it an oblique worship that were enioyned but seeing we are commanded in receiuing the holy Sacramet to bow our knees to God only and to nothing with him or in his stead our worship is direct and not oblique Therefore wee subscribe to the iudgement of Perkins But I must tell you that hitherto your disputation hath not only been oblique but impertinent for you haue impugned nothing set downe in the Act only you haue set your selfe against a position forged by your selfe in falsifying the Act. Thus while you haue intended that you shall neuer be able to performe namely to proue that by kneeling at the Sacrament a breach is made of the second Commandement you haue made a manifest breach of your credit and honesty PP Knee ling before the Elements referred directly to Christ is either a gesture signifying the humble submission of the minde in generall whereby wee make obeysance as if hee were bodily present or else it signifieth more particularly our humiliation in prayer This is but a speciall the former was agenerall the like reasons serue against both It is true wee cannot kneele to God in prayer but there are many things before vs a Church a house a wall a tree a staire c. But wee set them not before vs purposely wee are by no direction tyed vnto them they stand only before vs by casuall position neyther can we choose otherwise to doe ANS Your former dispute was founded on falschood this runnes all vpon ambiguity of speech To kneele before the Elements hath two senses either it signifies to kneele to the Elements as wee are said to kneele before God when we kneele vnto him and Papists before their Images when they kneele to them In this sense it is a lye to affirme that we kneele before the Elements Next to kneele before any thing signifieth to kneele hauing some things before our eyes or in our sight or obiect to our senses either by casuall position as you say or purposely To kneele to God before any thing standing or set casually before you you doe not condemne but to kneele to God hauing any thing purposely before vs as the sacramentall Elements that yee insinuate to be idolatrie but I hope you shal neuer proue it for a Penitentiary kneeles to God purposely before the Congregation and with a respect to the Congregation namely that they may concurre with him in prayer he may testifie to them his vnfained repentance and they being satisfied therewith may receiue him againe into their fellowship Heere is a kneeling to God before something purposely and with respect which is not idolatrie When wee come to our common tables before we eate either sitting with our heads discouered or standing or kneeling we giue thanks and blesse with a respect to the meat which is purposely set on table yet this is not idolatry And to draw somewhat nearer to the purpose The Pastor when he begins the holy action hath the bread and the cup set before him purposely vpon the table and with respect to them hee giues thankes to God for that it hath pleased him to institute the Sacrament in these Elements that hee might thereby communicate to vs the body and the blood of Iesus And thus hee ought to blesse the Elements for which the Apostle saith The Cup of his blessing which wee blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ Heere is a praying a blessing a thankesgiuing to God before the Elements purposely set before vs and not by casuall position And it is true that if any may bee said to kneele before the Elements it is the Pastor in this part of tho action and not the people For when they receiue they do not set the bread before them as Papists doe the
met together is not our Sauiour in the middest of them Further when he saith of the bread This is my Body and of the Cup This is my Blood doth it not import a coniunction betweene his Body and the Elements and a spirituall presence of his Body in the Sacrament And should not his body and blood be as present to the eyes of thy minde thy knowledge and vnderstanding and to the hand of thy heart thy faith and confidence as are the Elements to thy externall senses and bodily hand Haue we not taught our people to this day and yet should teach them that in this action there is an internall and externall receiuer the hand and the heart that there is an earthly and spiritual gift the Elements of the Sacrament and the body and blood of Christ And should we not beleeue that Christ God and Man is as really present in the Sacrament according to his Diuinity as we beleeue him to bee bodily present in heauen giuing and applying the selfe-same bodie which is in heauen as really to the inward man as the Pastor is giuing the Elements to the outward How dare you then affirme that the Sacrament hath not such a presence of Christ as the Arke the Propitiatory and the Cherubins had O but he said that he would dwell betweene the Cherubins That dwelling was typicall but Christ hath promised to dwel spiritually and really in the hearts of the worthy receiuers The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ The cup which we blesse is it not the communion of the blood of Christ And saith he not of this communion Hee that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood remaineth in me and I in him God called the Arke his foot-stoole but Christ calleth the sacramentall Elements his body and blood Sometime hee called the Arke his face and glory because it was a type of his face and glory but the Sacrament is not a bare type but a powerfull instrument whereby Christ is communicate vnto vs that wee may bee made partakers heere of his grace and hereafter of his glory Finally when we are commanded to doe this in remembrance of him we are commanded to adore him for according to the interpretation made in the Confession of Faith confirmed by act of Parliament which yee professe your selfe to haue sworne To doe this in remembrance of Christ is to magnifie declare extoll and praise his death till his comming againe And this is a reall act of adoration PP Worship is tyed no longer to any certaine thing or or place on earth ANS That is true yet worship stands in certaine actions which must bee performed in some conuenient place as Prayers Supplications Intercessions Thankesging and Praises whersoeuer these actions are performed in these places God must bee worshipped and if the blessed Sacrament bee an action of that kinde in it God must bee worshipped and in the place where it is celebrated PP Adoration is tyed in the new Testament to the Manhood of Christ the true Arke and Propitiatory and is carried to that place in which wee certainly know the said Manhood to exist substantially saith Perkins and therefore it is that wee lift vp our eyes to the heauens where hee is and direct our very externall worship to him ANS We doe fully agree with Perkins in all this for wee neither direct our internall nor externall adoration to the sacramentall Elements nor to the place where they are but to the Manhood of Iesus which wee acknowledge and beleeue to be locally only in heauen Therfore in the ancient Church when the people came to the Sacrament the Deacon cried Sursum corda Lift vp your hearts and the people answered Habemus ad Dominum Wee haue our hearts lifted vp to the Lord. But what is this to the purpose in hand For the question is not in whom God should bee worshipped or in what place Christs Manhood is wherin God should be worshipped but the question is whether at the Sacrament in the act of receiuing the sacramentall Elements externally and the body and blood of Iesus Christ internally we may bow our knees and lift vp our hearts and adore that Manhood by reason of the personall vnion that it hath with the Godhead and the Godhead dwelling in the Manhood corporally This is the only true relatiue worship acceptable to God in the Humanitie to worship the Diuinitie and the Humanitie with the Diuinitie in one Person the inuisible God in his owne essentiall and incarnate Image the Lord Iesus That such worship may and should bee performed in receiuing the blessed Sacrament neuer any Diuine ancient or moderne hath doubted to this day except Anabaptists and Arrians who deny Christs Diuinity and will neither adore him in the Sacrament nor any other action of Diuine worship PP It is obiected and said that we may pray in the act of receiuing Therefore we may kneele in the act of receiuing Ans This Obiection insinuateth that kneeling is the proper and only commendable gesture of prayer and therefore the Bishop of Rochester expounds the standing of the Publican Luk. 18.11.13 to haue been kneeling because saith hee the Iewish custome was to pray kneeling But if he had remembred the Lords owne saying Ier. 15. Though MOSES and SAMVEL stood before me c. he might haue vnderstood that they prayed standing as well as kneeling c. ANS The obiection yee bring concludeth that wee may kneele not that we ought to kneele therefore no man will thinke that the obiection insinuateth kneeling to be the proper and only commendable gesture of praying but that it is a very commendable gesture such as may be vsed that which you ay me at in answering this obiection is to confute the Bishop of Rochester his opinion that by standing kneeling Luk. 18.11 13. is meant But the Bishops opinion is not so absurde as you would haue men to thinke for by standing in the Scripture any diuine seruice is signified Therefore the Lords Prophets Priests and Angels are said to stand before him that is to serue him In the first of the Kings 8.22 it is written that Salomon stood before the Altar of the Lord and prayed but in the second of the Chronicles 6.13 It is said he kneeled downe and prayed vpon his knees So standing in the booke of the Kings is taken for kneeling But leauing this I come to your next words PP The prayer meant of is either some publike prayer vttered by the Minister or the mentall prayer of the Communicant ANS This is a needlesse distinction for the mentall prayer of the Receluer should not bee different from the prayer vttered by the Minister at the deliuery of the Elements and ought only to bee an Amen to the Ministers prayer The ancient custome of the Church was such for in the dayes of Cornelius Bishop of Rome anno 251. as Eusebius records l. 2. c. 32. when Nouatus gaue the Sacramēt to
meditation an Hypocrite and Reprobate may haue at the Table therefore it cannot be the principall worke of the minde which distinguisheth the worthie from the vnworthie Receiuer When we heare and reade the Word the principall work of our mind should not be a meditation vpon the forme of the characters the sound of the letters the coniunction of them their sounds in the syllables the syllables in the words or the force and vertue of the words to signifie the matters but the chiefe work of our mind should be to conceiue vnderstand and consider rightly what is spoken So when we come to the Sacrament the chiese employment of our minde should not be to consider the proportion that is betweene the naturall vse of the Elements and the spirituall vse of Christs body and blood but a meditation and spirituall action correspondent and analogicke to the externall sacramentall actions As therefore the principall externall sacramental actions are to take eate and drink reuerently the symbolick Elements the bread and wine so the principall worke of the soule correspondent by analogie thereto is to remember the sacrifice of Christ the breaking of his body and shedding of his blood to consider the benefit that we haue thereby to put our confidence therein and for all to praise and magnifie his name with thankfulnesse This worke and meditation is proper to the worthy Receiuers and stirreth vp in the soule that most reuerent estimation and affection towards our Sauiour with an humble submission of our minds vnto him which we call adoration whereof the outward testimonie and figne is the humble and reuerent gesture of the body prescribed in the act which is also a gesture most conuenient for prayer So this gesture prescribed in the act doth not only attend the prayer vttered by the pastor and conceiued by the people in the act of receiuing but is proper to that which is indeed the chiefe and principal exercise work of the mind in al worthy receiuers PP The soule may send forth in the meane time some short eiaculations and darts of prayer to heauen to strengthen her owne weakenesse and returne to her principall worke of meditation and application of the benefits represented These short eiaculations of the minde are onely occasionall as a Christian feeleth his owne present estate and are incident to all our actions both ciuill and religious in the act of receiuing our earthly food in going on the way in hearing the Word If a man bee moued inwardly when he heareth that the Word was made flesh shall he kneele as they doe in the Romane Church If a man should kneele at euery inward motion of the minde when hee heareth the Word what confusion would there be in the Congregation ANS The verball prayer vttered by the Pastor and the mentall conceiued by the people in the act of receiuing is not an eiaculation but necessary to be vsed in the action by the worthy Receiuers for no man can receiue the body and the blood of Christ worthily without a spirituall hunger and thirst after the righteousnesse and life that is in him which spirituall appetite and desire being declared by the Pastor in these or the like words when he deliuereth the bread Grant Lord that by the vertue of thy body which wereceiue we may haue life eternall and be raised vp at the last day And when hee deliuereth the Cup Grant Lord that by the vertue of thy blood which we receiue we may be purged from our sinnes and filled with thy Spirit And the Receiuers conceiuing and confirming the same by saying with their mouthes as the custome was in the ancient Church or in their hearts Amen They send not vp occasional eiaculations but necessary and ordinary prayers such as the nature of the action requires Therefore as I said before although occasionall secret prayers may be offered to God without any externall gesture or with such as the worshipper thinks meetest for the time yet these which are purposely conceiued in the ordinary and solemne act of diuine worshippe should be presented to God with such a gesture as is conforme to the order prescribed and receiued in the Church PP A man looking occasionally to a Crucifixe may remember Christ and send vp some ejaculations shall hee therefore kneele The three children prayed mentally no doubt when they were brought before the golden Image but lawfully they might not kneele before it ANS Here yee affirme againe that which yee falsely alledged before namely that the Sacrament or any other creature differs not in the case of adoration from the Papists Images and therefore as it is vnlawfull to kneele before the Crucifixe or Nebuchadnezzars golden Image albeit wee may pray mentally before them so is it vnlawfull to kneele and pray at the Sacrament that is hauing the sacramentall elements before vs or obiect to our senses This comparison is odious false for there is no worship more lawfull then the prayers blessings vttered by the Pastor hauing the Elements disposed on the Table before him at the consecration for this agrees both with the Institution hath our Sauiours example as we said before These comparisons serue to no other vse but to extenuate idolatry and discredite the Sacrament PP Perkins distinguisheth notably betweene publike priuate and secret worship The secret and mentall worship must bee yeelded vnto God and the signes thereof concealed from the eyes and hearing of men as Nehemiah when he prayed in presence of the King Nehem. 2.4 In a word the Institution and the second Commandement hinder kneeling at this time suppose mentall praier were the principall exercise of the soule ANS Perkins speakes rightly for if the worship be secret and mentall it must be concealed from the eyes of men but if it be mentall and publike such as are the prayers of the people in time of diuine Seruice who mentally follow the prayer publikely vttered by the Pastor these mentall prayers must be offered with such external signes of adoration as are vsed in the Congregation But in the act of receiuing say yee that cannot bee because it is a breach of the second Commandement and of the Institution I answere That reason of yours is the caption called Petitio principy to take that for granted which is in question and I may truely say already confuted So that there remaines now no more question but that wee may both pray and kneele in the act of receiuing without breach of the second Commandement and most agreeably to the Institution PP I heare there is alledged a third sort of prayer to wit that the very act of receiuing is of it selfe a reall prayer Is not this as much as to say That crauing and receiuing is all one Bellarmine saith that prayer of it selfe and of the owne proper office doth impetrate and that a sacrifice hath the force and power of obtaining and impetrating because it is quaedam oratio realis non verbalis a certaine reall
The watchmen are sometime ignorant or negligent many want doctrine it is better to fill vp the pit then to set one beside it to warne the passengers that they fall not in such ceremonies ought to be appointed which by their goodnesse and edification may helpe the preaching of the Word and not such as the Word daily must haue need to correct the strength of many poore Christian soules should not bee tryed by bringing them to the very brinke of danger ANS Your fourth breach is the occasion and danger of idolatry But kneeling imports no more danger nor occasion of idolatry then sitting doth of prophanation and contempt of the Sacrament and with vs there be many moe prophane Christians then idolatrous Papists and people are farre more ready by sitting to take occasion of despising the Sacrament their senses leading them to esteeme basely of it then by kneeling to thinke the bread and wine to be the body and blood of Christ materially the same being against sense and reason and the doctrine of the Word which teacheth them the contrary The Virgins in Cyprians time by walking and talking and lying with yong men did expose themselues to vncleannesse and as Cyprian saith gaue place to the Diuell but the lawfull vse of a religious ceremony can neuer be the occasion of idolatrie nor can the vse of it giue place to the Diuell Res bonae neminem scandalizant saith TERTVLLIAN de velandis Virginibus nisi malam mentem That is good things giue offence to none but an euill minde The iudgement of the Belgick Churches we reproue not because they know best what serues to the edification of their Churches nor will they I hope reprooue our iudgement concerning kneeling which is grounded vpon reasons as expedient for our estate as any can be alledged by them for their owne but the liberty which they giue to celebrate the Sacrament with the gesture of sitting standing or passing condemnes flatly your opinion of the necessity of sitting which neuer any Church or Diuine ancient or moderne did hold except your selfe yet pardon me for reckoning you amongst the Diuines As to the feare of Bread-worship it will neuer be caused by the religious vse of kneeling but by some peruerse disposition of the Receiuer which nothing can remedie sufficiently but right information made by sound doctrine It is true that to the vncleane all things are vncleane a soule that is euill disposed may like a Spider conuert into poyson the iuyce of the same flower which the Bee turneth into hony out of the sacramentall Word This is my body which is broken sor you the Papist draweth the poyson of Transubstantiation but the true Christian the sweet and spirituall participation of the body of our Lord. The word giues not to the Papist an occasion of his errour but he takes occasion at the Word because of the peruerse disposition of his minde so kneeling being a religious ceremonie and commanded by God when it is lawfully vsed at the receiuing of the Sacrament can neuer giue occasion of Bread-worship although superstitious men hauing corrupted their mindes may make it an occasion of that and worse The gesture of sitting is at this day abused by Arrians and made a signe of their deniall of the God-head of Christ and prophane Christians haue taken and daily take occasion thereby to fall into the pit of contempt and prophanation of this Sacrament from which inconuenience no ceremonies that can be chosen will preserue them except they be warned daily and directed by the Word how to carry themselues and if we neglect this committing their safetie to the ceremonies of sitting standing walking or kneeling we shall not only bring them to the brinke of danger but shall drowne them in the depth either of prophanenesse or of superstition and idolatry Now if you thinke that there is greater danger of idolatrie to be feared from kneeling then of prophanenesse from sitting you are much deceiued for if wee consider the disposition of our people amongst whom some I confesse haue vnderstanding yet are inclined to superstition idolatry the greater company are simple ones that neuer did nor euer will as it is to be supposed take occasion by kneeling to thinke the bread the bodie of Christ or yet to adore it for his body This errour was brought in by the Clergie and Scholastickes wherof the people could neuer haue dreamed if it had not been daily inculcate into their eares and they perswaded so to thinke by the false interpretation of the words This is my body The right exposition of the same hath remoued that error and must still debarre it not the gesture of sitting for thereby simple ones are ready by their owne inclination to take occasion as wee haue knowne in time past of contemning the holy Sacrament and so from superstition to runne into a profanation of the Lords Body from eyther of these extremities no thing can preserue them but the trauels of a faithfull Pastor in Catechizing and Preaching As to men of vnderstanding they are in lesse danger and howsoeuer they receiue sitting standing or kneeling they know the Elements in the Sacrament to retaine their former substance and that they are changed in the vse onely Neither haue such of them as are inclined to Papistrie beene conuerted a jot by sitting from their former errors but to the contrarie confirmed in their erronious opinions disdayning our profession for the irreuerent celebration of the holy Sacrament If at any time by the doctrine of truth they shall be conuerted from their errors this gesture that is required of kneeling shall bee a meanes to preserue them in a constant profession and as I haue sayd keepe them also from the other extremitie of contempt PP The fisth breach of the second Commandement made by kneeling is a shew of wisedome in will-worshippe and humilitie Coloss 2.23 This their pretended humilitie is a naturall humilitie like vnto Peters when he refused that Christ should wash his feete Obedience is better then sacrifice FENNER in the doctrine of the Sacraments hath a notable saying That the whole honor of the Sacraments is that they remaine within the Church of GOD in that simplicitie he left them ANS The fifth breach yee alledge to be will-worshippe The Apostle Coloss 2. defines will-worshippe to bee wilfull condemning or thralling of men to the obseruation of such things in Gods worship as necessarie whereof there is no certaintie in the Word of God the Authors of the said obseruation being rashly puft vp by the mind of the flesh ver 18. Now whether yee that haue no certaintie in the Word for sitting at the Sacrament but such reasons onely as we haue cleerely shewed to be rashly forged out of the minde of the flesh and yet doe wilfully condemne and thrall mens consciences to the obseruation of that as necessarie or wee who neyther vrge sitting nor standing nor kneelâ—ng as necessary but esteeming all indifferent leaue
of God By this meanes men are brought to misse-regard all Religion and wee that are the Preachers of the Word come to bee despised In the meane time it is not to be denyed but they are ceremonies which for the inconuenience they bring ought to be resisted and if wee bee pressed with such it is our part to expone our dislike of them in modestie and by the best wisest meanes we can vse to decline these which wee esteeme to bee hurtfull Not as our follies haue beene great in this kinde to runne before the time and seeke to amend matters by declinators and protestations whereby wee haue profited nothing onely wee haue incensed authoritie and hastened vpon our selues the same things which wee laboured to eschue Well these things cannot bee made vndone yet they should make vs wise for afterwards And now Brethren because the resolution we take at this time touching the Articles propounded will giue to the world a testimonie what manner of men wee are whether such as rule their proceedings by iudgement or are carried head-strong with conceits and opinions that wee bee nor misse-led by ignorance for that is the fault of many amongst vs wee inquire not of matters nor take paynes to vnderstand what hath beene the iudgement of the most wise and learned but follow vpon trust the opinions we haue beene bred with and of such as we affect to helpe this I say I will with your patience spend some time in the question of Ceremonies see what warrant they haue and how they should bee appointed then from the generall descend to speake of our particulars touching which I shall freely deliuer my owne minde and so conclude First then concerning Ceremonies howsoeuer some haue imagined them to bee superfluities which might well bee spared and that the Church of Rome hath made the very name of them hatefull aswell because of the multitude of them wherewith she oppressed Christians as for the ridiculous choice she made of most of them are such things as without which no publike action either Ciuill or Ecclesiastique can be rightly performed To this purpose a Politike Writer hath said well That as the flesh couereth the hollow deformity of the bones and beautifieth the bodie with naturall graces so Ceremonies such specially as ancient custome hath made reuerend couer the nakednesse of publike actions and distinguish them from priuate businesse that otherwise should not bee so well knowne The neglect of this in any State breedes confusion and with confusion the ruine and abolishment of the State it selfe whereof the examples were easie to be giuen in the Romane Republike and others if that were our subiect But wee are speaking of Church-Ceremonies concerning which no man will deny this generall truth That in euery publike dutie which God craues at our hands there is besides the matter and forme wherein the substance of the dutie consists a certaine externall forme required to the decent administration of the same As for example God hath commanded his Word to bee preached and the holy Sacraments to be ministred Baptisme by the Element of Water and in a prescript forme of words such as you know wee vse and the Sacrament of his blessed Body and Bloud in the Elements of Bread and Wine with certaine mysticall words added thereunto heere is the dutie to bee done and the substance of it yet for the ministration of the same in a due and decent manner there is place time and other circumstances moe required The substance of the dutie God hath giuen vs in the Word from which we may not goe but for these things that belong to the outward administration Ecclesiasticall wisedome hath to define what is conuenient what not Neque tamen permisit Dominus vagam effraenamque licentiam sayes Caluine sed cancellos vt ita loquar circudedit That is God hath not giuen his Church an illimited power to establish what Ceremonies she lists but hath enrayled her authoritie within borders which she may not passe 1 Cor. 14. and these are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let all things bee done honestly and by order Honestly that is after a good fashion in a decent sort and to the right ends namely the aduancement of Gods honour and the edification of his Church This is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then they must be done 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by order that is appointed with deliberation and by such as haue the authoritie to ordaine them and being once appointed and concluded by Constitutions they must bee kept and performed by all that are subiect to the same This as one speakes well is that great Ecclesiasticall Canon by which all other Canons must bee squared this is the true Touch-stone of trying Ceremonies and the ballance wherein all Church Orders must be weighed The Ceremonies of the Church must be decent and comely without vanitie without all meretricious brauerie not superfluous but seruing to edification They must also be done to God honour and not be idolatrous or superstitious Generally in the Church all things must be done in order and no confusion be either of persons or proceedings for order hath proceeded from the Throne of the Almightie This fabricke of the World that wee see is vpholden by it States and Kingdomes are maintayned by it and without it nothing can flourish or prosper And if Order should haue place in all things sure the Church of God should not be without Order for our God whom wee serue is the God of Order and not of Confusion as the Apostle speakes These things will be easily condescended vpon I meane that religious duties cannot bee performed without externall Rites that these Rites should bee qualited as I haue said established by Lawes and after they are established obeyed by such as are subiect Si enim velut in medio positae fingulorum arbitrio relictae fuerint quoniam nunquam futurum est vt omnibus idem placeat breui futura est rerum omnium confusio This is Caluines saying in the fourth Booke of his Institutions and tenth Chapter which Chapter I would earnestly recommend to your reading for these matters chiefly In such generals it may bee wee all agree but when wee come to particulars Tanta moribus hominum inest diuersitas tanta in animis varietas tanta in iudicijs ingenijsque pugna Such is the varietie of mens minds and opinions that scarce shall they euer bee brought to agree vpon any one thing For the Ceremonie which to one will seeme decent and comely will to another appeare not to be so Now in this case what is to bee done Some would haue vs search into the Apostolike times examine what then was in vse to bee done and follow that But this cannot well be the rule seeing the Apostles haue not deliuered in writing all that they did and diuers of the formes vsed by them which by occasion wee haue recorded are vnfit for these times and inconuenient such as the assembling of people
potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is to say kneeling at the Sacrament hath a shew of holy and Christian worshippe and therefore of old might haue been fruitfully vsed Whereby yee see he condemneth not simply the ceremonie but witnesseth that there was a time when the same did edifie and profite Caluine before him called it Cultum legitimum that is a Lawfull adoration being vsed in the action of the Supper and directed to Christ Petrus Martyr saith Multi piè genua flectunt adorant that is Many in receiuing the Sacrament doe bow their knees religiously and adore Christs flesh Paraeus speaking of the same gesture esteemes it an indifferent ceremonie And that which so great and learned Diuines iudged to bee lawfull what are we to condemne Next I answere That the credite of the Pastours should not be maintained with the discredit of the Prince amongst his Subiects for if they who should be patternes of reuerence and obedience to others shall in their owne persons withstand the lawfull desires godly intention of a Christian Prince the same cannot but breed disobedience and a hard conceit of the Prince amongst his people which we haue already found and perceiued As for the inconueniences feared they are friuolous and should neuer fall out if Pastors were peaceable and prudent But when they are all put together that can bee alledged if they shall bee laid in a ballance there is one commoditie which the alteration imports that shall preponder them all to wit Our vnitie and conformitie with the Primitiue Church and with the greatest number and best Reformed Churches in Europe in points of policie that most assuredly tend to farre greater deuotion piety and edification then our formes vsed in former times This being his Maiesties principall designe in vrging these Articles giueth to the world an euident testimony of his Princely zeale to procure the peace and good of the Church so farre as is possible and therefore none will charge his Maiesty with the vniust imputation of tyranny but malicious and seditious spirits whom by this pestilent Pamphlet ye trauell to perswade for feare of periury to periure themselues as is manifest in the words yee subioyne PP Our assertory Oath is already past and wee become periured if we come in the contrary This is an high degree of periury when not onely we contrauene our oath by practise but make lawes in the contrary therafter inueigh against our oath as Puritanisme If sincere and constant professors shal be still pursued for their constancie in their Profession and the conscience they make of the Oath doe we not expone the whole Nation to a wofull vengeance and perpetuall ignominy ANS Our assertory Oath touching the Articles controuerted condemneth those onely in the guilt of periury who hold that policy and order in ceremonies may not be altered when necessity requireth and being altered ought not to bee obeyed And indeede it is a profound point of infernall policy not only by an exemplary practise of disobedience against the lawes of Ecclesiasticall Discipline to contrauene the Oath in your owne Person but also vnder pretext of constancy of Profession and conscience of the Oath to perswade others for feare of periury to periure themselues Whereby yee both expose your selues to the fearefull iudgement of Gods vengeance and drawe others with you to the same perdition Your sophisticke cauillations whereby yee intend seditiously to proue the vnlawfulnesse of the Articles concluded at Perth shall now bee answered and the truth cleared to the satisfaction of all men who are not contentious An answere to the arguments brought against kneeling in the act of receiuing of the holy Communion PP IT hath been the vniforme and constant order of this Church since the Reformation that the Communicants should receiue the Sacramentall elements of Bread and Wine sitting at the Table In the second head of the first booke of Discipline are set downe these words The Table of the Lord is then rightly ministred when it approacheth most neere to Christs owne action But plaine it is that at that Supper Christ Iesus sate with his Disciples and therefore we doe iudge that sitting at that Table is most conuenient to that holy action In the generall Assembly holden in Decemb. 1562 it was ordained That one vniforme order should be obserued in the ministration of the Sacraments according to the order of Geneua And in December 1564 It was ordained That Ministers in ministration of the Sacraments shall vse the order set downe in the Psalme bookes In the Assembly holden anno 1591 It was ordained that an Article should bee formed and presented to his Maiesty and the Estates crauing order to be taken with them who giue or receiue the Sacrament after the Papisticall manner In the Kings Confession of Faith subscribed and sworne by persons of all estates are contained these words We detest all the ceremonies of the Romane Antichrist added to the ministration of the Sacraments we detest all his Rites Signes and Traditions This laudable order was altered at the pretended Assembly holden last at Perth in August anno 1618. The tenor of the Act followeth as it was formed by some of the Bishops and their Followers a The Libeller cites the Acte of Perth most corruptly which the Reader shall mend by the notes in the margine Since wee are commanded by God himselfe that when wee come to worship him we fall downe and kneele before the Lordour Maker and considering withall that there is no part of Diuine worship more heauenly and spirituall then is the holy receiuing of the blessed body and blood of our Lord and Sauiour lesus Christ like as the most humble and reuerend gesture of the body in our meditation and lifting vp of our hearts best becommeth so diuine and sacred an action Therefore notwithstanding that our Church hath vsed since thereformation of Religion to celebrate the holy Communion to the people sitting by reason of the great abuse of kneeling b The Acte saith Vsed in the Idolatrous worship at the worshipping of the Sacrament by the Papists yet now seeing all memory of by-past superstition is past c These words yee haue added of your owne head to the Acte and no perill of the same againe is feared in reuerence d These words are to be read thus In reuerence of God and in due regard of so Diuine c. of so diuine a mystery and in remembrance of so mysticall an vnion as wee are made partakers of e The words in the Acte are not such but thus it is The Assembly thinkes good that that blessed Sacrament c. thereby doe ordaine that that blessed Sacrament be celebrated hereafter weekely and reuerently vpon their knees This alteration is to vs vnlawfull for that which hath bin established by so many lawes Ciuill and Ecclesiasticall by so long custome and prescription of time confirmed by our oathes and subscriptions we may not lawfully alter But
it is not certaine that they sate at the Receiuing If yee reply it is not written that they did alter the gesture of sitting to that I answere before and it is the Papists argument against the giuing of the Cup to the Layickes it is not written say they that the Cup was giuen in this place Therefore c. Also yee know that the time of Christ his sitting heere with his Disciples at Emmaus was the night season the place a priuate Inne that the breaking and giuing of that bread was before or after another ordinary supper and that onely men were there present and not women all which points being certaine according to your first reason whereby yee intended to proue sitting to haue been instituted it will follow that all these circumstances and things were instituted to be obserued as well as sitting because our Sauiour retained all these things hauing no necessity at this time to celebrate the Sacrament Thirdly I say if the Sacrament was here ministred we haue an expresse warrant for priuate Communion which yee impugue for Iesus heere ministred vnto two onely and yee will not content to haue it ministred to three Lastly it is the iudgement of the learned Caluine That there was no celebration of the Sacrament at that time and that Christ was knowne to these Disclples by an ordinary prayer which he vsed in blessing of the Table and not by the celebration of the Sacrament which opinion he saith although it seeme plausible is no more then a coniecture which leanes to no probable reason Then yee see that it is vncertaine whether Christ gaue this Sacrament at Emmaus and if he did that there sitting at the Receiuing is also vncertaine And therby your argument is nought and serueth only to establish priuate Communion Thus haue you gained nothing by this testimony but lost much PP Last of all after his Ascension and glorification in the heauens the Apostolike Church sate at Table The manner of the partaking of the table of Diuels was by formall sitting at table in the house of the Idoll Ionathan the Chaldee Paraphrast Amos 2.8 interpreteth the garments whereon the Vsurer sate beside euery Altar to haue been beds prepared in the houses of their gods to sit on when they feasted vpon things sacrificed to Idols The people of Israel sate downe to eate and drink at the jdolatrous feast of the golden Calfe The Apostle compareth the partaking of the Lords Table and the table of Diūels 1. Cor. 10.21 Next they sate at the Loue feasts we cannot thinke that they rose from the Tables to receiue the Sacrament ANS To proue that the Apostolike Church sate at Table you bring the comparison that the Apostle makes betweene the partaking of the Lords Table and the table of Diuels and the partaking of the table of Diuels you say was by a formall sitting at table in the house of the Idoll for which yee alledge Ionathan the Chaldee Paraphrast vpon the eight verse of the second chapter of Amos but neither the Text nor his interpretation proues the formall sitting yee speake of for the text saith they laid themselues downe vpon clothes by euery Altar and not that they sate And the Paraphrast as Mercerus expounds him saith That those clothes were Parapetasmata that is couerings or mattes whereupon they laid themselues downe and not sate by euery Altar and not in the Idols house And for the place of the Apostle Yee cannot be partakers of the Table of the Lord and of the table of Diuels there is no materiall or artificiall table vnderstood either by the one Table or the other and by participation formall sitting is not meant This is manifest by these words Yee cannot be partakers for certaine it is that they might haue sitten formally at table in the house of the Idoll and eaten of their sacrifices and might also haue sitten at the Lords Table formally and receiued the external elements But the Apostle saith That these two Tables and the participation of them are so opposed as they could not be partakers of both Therfore by the table of Diuels in that place we vnderstand the sacrifices offered to Diuels and by participation we vnderstand the eating of these sacrifices with a conscience toward the Idoll where euer it was done whether in the Idols Temple as 1. Cor. 8.10 or in the priuate houses of Idolaters as 1. Cor. 10.27.28 And by the Table of the Lord we vnderstand the body and blood of our Sauiour in the Sacrament and by the partaking of the Lords Table the spirituall eating and drinking of his flesh and bloud in the Sacrament by a true and liuely faith These two Tables and partakings could not stand together And so by the Table of the Lord the Apostle meanes not a material table at which the Communicants sate but the body of Christ in the Sacrament According to this Causabone in his Exercitations against Baronius 16.36 citing these words Non potestis mensae Dominiparticipes esse c. saith Hîc mensa Domini est ipsa Eucharistia quam exemplo Pauli Patresita saepè nominant That is The Table of the Lord in this place is the Eucharist it selfe which the Fathers often call by this name of the table following Saint Pauls example Now where yee adde that the people of Israel sate downe to eate and drinke at the feast of the golden Calfe I am assured yee thinke not that the Israelites had a materiall table at which they sate in that feast so as their sitting will make nothing for the formall sitting which yee would conclude And for that which yee tell vs of the Loue feasts that people sate at them and that yee cannot thinke they rose from the table to receiue the Sacrament yee must know that your thoughts are no probation and whatsoeuer yee thinke it is the Apostles expresse minde that they who discerne not the body of the Lord from that and all other carnall feasts are guilty of his body And if yee thinke these holy mysteries were worthily receiued if after the same manner and at the same time and table they receiued without making discretion between the one feast and the other yee thinke not according to the truth Nam hîc coena à mysterijs toto genere diuersa erat as Causabone speakes in the same booke of his Exercitations 16.31 Then to conclude neither haue yee proued that the Apostles or Apostolike Church receiued the Sacrament sitting formally at a table nor if they sate that their sitting was exemplary for Whatsoeuer is exemplary in Christ his actions or in the Apostles or in the Apostolike Churches is either morall and commanded in the Decalogue generally or then it is some action or circumstantiall ceremony of Religion enioyned by precept in the Gospell But sitting at the Sacrament is neither morall and so commanded in the Decalogue or is it an action or circumst antiall ceremony of Religion enioyned by precept in the Gospell Therefore sitting
in the narratiue Our third reason is the correspondence which ought to be betweene the outward gesture of our body and the meditation and lifting vp of our hearts when we remember and consider the mysticall vnion betweene Christ and vs and amongst our selues whereof we are made partakers by receiuing of Christs blessed body and bloud This is expressed in these words Like as the most humble and reuerent gesture of the body in our meditation and lifting vp of our hearts becomes so diuine and sacred an action Relatiue to this in the conclusion we haue these words And in remembrance of so mysticall an vnion as we are made partakers of thereby for this remembrance is a part of our meditation So to conclude we come to worship at the Sacrament the Lord our Maker who hath not onely made vs by creation but who by redemption hath made vs his people and the sheepe of his pasture Psal 95.7 Psalme 100.3 that is God manifested in the flesh We come to receiue his flesh and bloud and in reuerence of him wee are commanded by the act to kneele As yee then inferre vpon your forgery and falshood that to kneele for reuerence of the mysteries is nothing else but to worship the mysteries so I inferre vpon the very words wherein the act is conceiued That to kneele for reuerence of God in due regard of the diuine mysterie that is the receiuing of Christs body and bloud in remembrance of the mysticall vnion whereof thereby we are made partakers first with our Head and Sauiour and next through him with God and amongst our selues to kneele I say at the Sacrament for the reuerence and respects aforesayd is to worship God rightly and that is the due obseruation of his commandement PP Wheresoeuer the publike intent of a Church is to worshippe the Sacrament euery priuate man following that intent is formally an idolater If his priuate intent be diuerse from the publike yet he is still materially and interpretatiuè an Idolater c. ANS Yee begin now to manifest your selfe yee peruerted the words of the act to draw vpon our Church the vile imputation of idolatry and now yee seeke to diuide the Church and perswade people to disobedience vnder that colour But the publike intent of our Church was neuer to worship the Sacrament but was and is to worship the Lord Iesus of whose flesh and bloud wee are made partakers in the Sacrament And they who follow the Church in this are neither formally nor materially idolaters but true and sincere worshippers of God PP Kneeling directed to the bread and wine in the hands of the Minister is idolatry howbeit the inward motion of the minde and affection of the heart be directed onely to God or his Sonne Christ as the onely obiect of adoration ANS Still you build vpon the false ground you haue layd that kneeling is direct to the bread and wine in the hands of the Minister which is a manifest calumny for the act doth appoint no such thing To direct our knees to the signes and the affection of our heart to the thing signified is not onely idolatry but a kinde of hypocrisie and mixture of worship which God abhorres Neither did our Church euer allow it in our doctrine prayers and exhortations which are vsed at the Ministration this is condemned and the very act ordayning that we should kneele before the Lord our Maker forbids the same PP This immediate conuoy of worship to the principall obiect is nothing else but that finer sort of idolatry and relatiue worship which Durandus Holcot Mirandula Alphonsus Petrus Cluniacensis and others giue to their Images ANS If wee did kneele to the Sacrament that by it our worship might bee conueyed to God our kneeling were such a relatiue worship as yee affirme but we kneele at the Sacrament and not to the Sacrament as wee kneele at â—…yer and not to the words and oration of the prayer but to God to whom wee direct our prayer When God spake Abraham fell on his face not to the sound of words which he heard but to the Speaker When the fire came downe at Elias prayer the people fell on their faces not to the fire which they saw but to God who wrought the myracle This kneeling and falling on the face before God in the act of prayer in the act of seeing in the act of hearing is a worship done to God immediately and so it is in the act of receiuing the Sacrament PP They say Images are not otherwise adored then that before and about them are exhibited the externall signes of honour The inward affection is directed onely to the principall obiect as the seruices done at a Funerall shew to an empty Coffin as if the corps were present ANS To make it appeare that there is no difference betweene our kneeling at the Sacrament and the kneeling of the Papists to their Idols the Pamphleter such is his malice trauels so farre as lyes in him to extenuate the idolatry of Papists and to obscure their opinion and doctrine of kneeling to Images which I will therefore set downe distinctly and shortly out of their owne Writers The Doctrine of Papists touching the honour of Images THe Papists professe that they giue to their Images two kindes of honour The one they call Proper the other Accidentall and improper The proper they say is due to the Image as it is an holy thing such as the honour which is giuen to the Euangell to holy Vessels and Vestures and it is proper because it rests in the Image as in the proper obiect and is not conueyed by the Image immediately to the principall and archetype albeit it be giuen to the Image for the respect and reuerence which is carryed to the principall and so by consequence redounds to the principall This honour they affirme to differ not in specie but in degree onely from the honor which is properly due to the principall Bellar. lib. 2. de Imag. cap. 21. 25. Before wee proceede to the improper and accidentall adoration of Images we haue here to consider that albeit no honour but contempt and destruction onely be due to Papisticall Images because they are not holy things but detestable abominations yet therefore we must not thinke that to such things as are truely holy and applyed to religious vses reuerent and religious respect is not due as to the holy Sacraments and to the Euangell which honor rests in them and is giuen to them in respect of him whose word and Sacraments they are and so redounds to him consequently such an honour I meane as is the hearing of the Word reuerently and the handling of the Sacraments with the preseruing and vsing of them decently It is true this honour is not properly a spece of adoration but a religious reuerence onely which we must not reiect because the Papists giue the same or the like to their Idols for they giue to things which are not
to vse any Image in the worship of God for a signe an occasion or a middesse to stir vp a man to worship God for they are prohibited in the second Comandement and by the Prophet they are called Teachers of lyes because by them properly and truly nothing can be brought to our remembrance for which we should adore God but on the other part it is not possible that either our mindes can be informed to know God or our affections moued to worsh ippe him except by the contemplation of the creatures the meditation of the Word and the consideration of the holy Sacraments take these occasions middesse and signes away yee abolish Religion and all the worship of God out of the Word I hope the Reader by this shall see the difference to bee as great in this case as is betweene a lawfull meane of Gods worship commanded by himselfe and the inuention of man prohibited by God Next the Papists will haue these middesse occasions signes not onely obiects of diuine worship actiue that is seruing to stir vp and moue men to worship which is the first degree of their idolatry but they will haue them likewise passiue obiects such as are to be worshipped either in stead of the principall or coniunctly with him this is a higher degree of idolatry In this then they differ also from the Word Sacraments creatures that these being the ordinary obiects instruments whereby men must be stirred vp to worship God so the obiects of diuine adoration actiuely they neither are nor should they be esteemed passiue obiects of adoration that is such as should be adored either coniunctly with God or in his stead This we condemne detest yet must not run on with you to the other extremity say that howsoeuer they were ordained of God to be signes seales of his graces yet they are not in statu accōmodato ad adorādū for although by them before thē that is to make the obcurities which ye affect plaine albeit they should neither be adored in place of God his Son or coniunctly with God his Son as the Papists professe to adore their Images yet certaine it is that there is nothing in nature or religion fit apt to stirre men vp to worship God if the Sacraments be not meet Shall our corporall food when it is presented on table before vs bee in such state as is proper to stir vs vp to worship God with thanksgiuing praier Shall the consideration of the benefit which we haue by the light of the day by our rest sleepe in the night be esteemed motiues of such moment that he who is not thereby moued in the morning when he riseth and at night when he goeth to bed to pray and giue thanks is esteemed a slothfull and ingratefull Christian Shall a seasonable seede time shall the first and latter raine and a faire haruest bee pregnant occasions to remember vs both in priuate and publike to giue thanks and praise God for his goodnesse And shall the blessed Sacrament of the body and bloud of Iesus Christ in the very act when it is in giuing and receiuing not be esteemed to be in proper state to moue vs and stirre vp our hearts to pray and giue thanks for that inestimable benefite euen when our Sauiour hath cōmanded that we should do this in remembrance of him It is an absurd opinion Then to conclude If yee hold these two points which ye haue propounded to wit that the Sacrament and creatures of God should not be vsed as occasions middesses and signes to moue vs by the fight and meditation of them to list vp our hearts to the spirituall obiect of our saith that is to God in Iesus Christ because Suarce saith that their Images haue that vse then certainely you must hold that God should not bee knowne nor worshipped in the World for without this vse of the Word Sacraments and Creatures God cannot bee knowne nor worshipped So whilst yee flye idolatry yee fall into Atheisme Next if yee hold that the Sacraments in the very act of the administration are not in statu accommodato adadorandum you must take away the chiefe and principall ende of the Sacrament commended to vs by the Lord himselfe in these words Doe this in remembrance of me Saiut Paul interprets these words thus So often as yee eate this bread and drinke of this Cuppe yee shall declare the Lords death till he come againe that is as the Confession of our faith which yee haue sworne and subscribed explaines it Yet shall extoll magnifie and prayse his death Now this is a reall act of adoration which both the Lord himselfe and his holy Apostle would haue vs moued vnto by this Sacrament So by these your positions and assertions yee mutilate the Sacrament of one of the most principall ends for the which it was instituted And generally yee take from the Creatures of God and the holy Sacraments the most excellent vse for which they were appointed namely to be meanes and motiues to stirre vs vp vnto the worship of our Creator and Redeomer PP If this kinde of relatiue worship were to be allowed then the holy signes both in the olde and new Testament should haue serued to the same vse then they who are farre distant from the Table should kneele for the Elements are to them obiectum à quo significatiuè then at the sight of the Sunne or any beautifull Creature we should kneele seeing they put vs in minde of Gods incomprehensible beautie and seeing many of them allow the historicall vse of Images we may fall downe before the Crucifixe prouiding the action of the minde be abstracted from the Image ANS We allow no worship whether it be relatiue or absolute that is either giuen to Sacrament or Creature But it is a grosse error to thinke that the worship which is onely giuen to God immediately or directly is relatiue because it is motioned and occasioned by the consideration of Gods Creatures and blessed Sacraments for so all the worship of God must be relatiue because it is all occasioned either by the Word the Sacraments or the Creatures whereas indeede there is no worship relatiue but that which is giuen to some mediate thing for the relation it hath to the principall and as for vs wee neyther giue to the Word the Sacrament or any Creature diuine worship but onely to God whom by the Word the Sacrament and the Creatures wee are taught and admonished to worship The relatiue worship is onely that which Papists giue to their Idols for the relation they haue to the principall which we detest and condemne as much as your selfe Where you say that the signes of the olde and new Testament and the sacramentall Elements when they are onely seene as likewise the Sunne or any beautifull creature might then moue vs to adore I answere that although they be potentially obiectū à quo obiects
his people he held their hāds insteed of the blessing which he should haue vsed at the deliuery of the Elemēts he cōceiued an oath made the people sweare by that which was in their hands insteed of Amen which they should haue answered the blessing with he made the people say That they should not returne to CORNELIVS Whereby it is manifest that the blessing vsed by the Pastor at the deliuery of the Elements differed not at that time from the mentall prayer of the Communicant neither ought it now to differ but be the same in substance PP As for the prayer of the Minister in the act of distribution it is flat against the Institution as I haue already said The Minister is ordained by the Institution to act the person of Christ and pronounce the words of promise This is my body and not change the promise into a prayer Fenner in his Principles of Religion layeth this downe for a ground that in the second Commandement we are forbidden the practise and vse of any other rite or outward means vsed in the worship or seruice of God then he hath ordained Ioh. 4.22 2. King 18.4 And that by the contrary we are commanded to practise all these parts of his worship which hee in his word hath commanded and to acknowledge only the proper vse of euery rite and outward meanes which the Lord hath ordained Dent. 12.32 2. King 17.26 ANS It is false that yee say we change the promise into a prayer for at the Consecration wee obserue precisely the words of the Institution In the deliuery of the elements we vse a prayer that is not contrary but most agreeable to the Institution for directing the hearts of the people in the receiuing that they may worthily communicate So doe the Pastors in France at the deliuery vse a short speech and it was the custome of late in our Church to vse some exhortations before the distribution at euery Table wherein neither we nor they did or doe practise any rite or vse any means which God hath not ordained to bee vsed in his worship For although the particular forme of speech vsed in the French Church and the exhortations and prayers vsed by vs bee not expressely set downe yet being agreeable to the Word and the nature of the action in hand they haue sufficient warrant by these generall precepts Let all things be done to edification Let all things bee done decently and in order And with these precepts Fenners grounds doe agree Otherwise by what warrant is it appointed in the forme set downe before our Psalme bookes touching the celebration of the Lords Supper that during the time of the distribution some place of Scripture should bee read which doth liuely set forth the death of Christ to the intent that our eyes and senses may not onely be occupied in these outward signes of bread and wine which are called the visible word but that our minds and hearts also may be fully fixed in the contemplation of the Lords death which is by this holy Sacrament represented This ordinance is not contained in the Institution yet I hope yee will not say that it is flat contrary thereto but that it hath sufficient warrant by the generall Apostolike precepts before expressed and so hath the prayer vsed by vs in the acte of distribution But yee subioyne another reason to prooue the prayer vsed at this time vnlawfull PP Further wee are forbidden by the second Commandement to pray by direction before any creature ANS Why do yee then pray at the table when your meate is set before you and at the Consecration hauing the sacramentall Elements before you And when you visite the Sicke why direct yee your face and senses towards the person and the place where he lyes while yee are praying to God for him PP This publike prayer is but a pretended cause of kneeling as the Ministers of Lincolne make manifest in their Abridgement c. ANS To the Abridgement of these Ministers sufficient answeres are made by the learned Diuines of that Church and the Canons and Customes thereof defended against their calumnies Therefore let vs come to our owne touching which yee say PP As for our Church no such prayer is ordained to bee vttered by the minister Therefore no such prayer can be pretended Iu the late Canon it is said That the most reuerend and humble gesture of the body in our meditation and lifting vp of our hearts best becommeth so diuine an action Meditation is no prayer and the heart may be lifted vp by the act of faith and contemplation aswell as the action of prayer So that neither publike nor mentall prayer is expressed in our Act. ANS Albeit neither mentall nor publike prayer be expressed in the Act yet prayer thankesgiuing and praise are all insiuuated for albeit all meditation bee not prayer yet euery prayer is a meditation and although in the act of faith and contemplation the heart may bee lifted vp yet that eleuation of the heart requireth not the most humble and reuerent gesture of the bodie as kneeling In the ancient Church they were not accustomed to kneele when they made confession of their faith but to stand as Christian souldiers Our act insinuateth such a meditation and lifting vp of the heart as is vsed in actions of deuotion such as prayer and thankesgiuing which are practised by all who giue obedience to the act or doe worthily communicate But put the case that by the act no such thing were ordained expresly yet vpon this antecedent which yee vse namely wee are not ordained by any act of our Church to pray at the receiuing this conclusion will not follow Therefore we may not pray at the receiuing For wee are not ordained by any act of our Church expressely to discouer our heads in the act of receiuing May wee not therefore discouer our heads But any shew of reason is good enough to deceiue simple people PP But let the words be interpreted of mentall prayer euen mentall prayer is not the principall exercise of the soule in the act of receiuing the sacramentall Elements the minde attending on the audible words the visible Elements the mysticall actions and making present vse of them men should not be diuerted from their principall worke and meditation vpon the analogie betweene the signes and the things signified ANS The meditation vpon the analogie betweene the signe and the thing signified cannot be the principall worke of the soule it being nothing else but the consideration of the similitude that is betweene the natuall vse of the signes and the spirituall vse of the thing signified Namely that as the Elements serue to nourish the outward man so the body and the bloud of Christ hath a vertue to nourish the inward man and by eating and drinking the Elements are applied to feede the body So by faith the body and the blood of Christ are applied to feed the soule Such a
all the parts of this holy ministration are actions of thanksgiuing ANS Although the name were taken as Causabone saith from one part of the action yet it is giuen to the whole action not by reason of this part onely but because it declares the nature and chiefe end of the action and albeit all the parts of this holy ministration seuerally considered are not actions of thanksgiuing yet the whole action which consists of these parts being performed Gratitudinis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Paraus saith that is with a purpose of thankfulnesse to celebrate the death of Christ is Eucharisticke or an action of thankesgiuing The hand or foot being seuerally considered is not the bodie yet the whole which consisteth of all the parts is the body So it is true to take the bread is not an action of thankesgiuing nor to breake it nor to giue it being seuerally considered but to take breake blesse and giue with intention by these actions to represent the death of Christ and the application thereof to the faithfull for the praise of his glorious grace is an action of thankesgiuing Therefore to conclude as wee come to the Sacrament to bee made partakers of Christs death by faith vnto saluation so wee come to the Sacrament to celebrate the remembrance of his death to his glory In respect of the first end it is The Communion of his body and bloud in respect of the last it is a reall predication and celebration of his death till his comming againe which should bee often performed because as Paraeus speaketh Mors Domini perpetuis laudibus celebranda est that is The death of Christ is to be celebrated with perpetuall praises these are specially offered at the celebration of the holy Sacrament and in this respect it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sacrifice of praise and thankesgiuing PP Obiect What we may craue of God vpon our knees we may receiue on our knees Answ It is false I may pray vpon my knees Giue vs this day our daily bread but I may not receiue it on my knees The people of Israel prayed for food yet they were not esteemed vnthankful for not kneeling when they receiued the Manna ANS I neuer heard this obiection vsed by any man but by you in this place therefore if it bee false your selfe that forged it is author of the falsehood The Bishop of Galloway who is now at rest hath this obiection in his Treatise which is not yet answered as he alledgeth Whatsoeuer spirituall benefit I may lawfully aske on my knees the same I may lawfully receiue vpon my knees with thankesgiuing But I may lawfully with supplication aske saluation by Iesus Christ on my knees Therefore I may lawfully receiue it on my knees Another argument was propounded in the Assembly at Perth which neither at that time nor since hath been answered and it is this Whatsoeuer spirituall benefit we should receiue in a solemne act of diuine worship with thankesgiuing and prayer that wee may receiue on our knees The body and blood of Iesus Christ in the Sacrament is a spirituall benefit which in a solemne act of diuine worship wee ought to receiue with thankesgiuing and prayer Therefore we may receiue the body and blood of the Lord Iesus Christ in the Sacrament vpon our knees The proposition of this argument at that time denied was proued thus Whatsoeuer benefit we ought to receiue with thankesgiuing and prayer that we ought receiue with the gesture that is most agreeable to thankesgiuing and prayer Kneeling is such a gesture c. Ergo c. In the Assumption it is affirmed that Christs body and blood in the Sacrament should be receiued with prayer and thankesgiuing This we proue by this reason Whatsoeuer spirituall benefit we should receiue with a spirituall hunger and thirst and with a spirituall appetite and desire after the grace and vertue that is therein to saluation the same we should receiue with prayer which is nothing else but such an appetite and desire But the body and blood of Christ is such a benefit c. Next that it should be receiued with thankesgiuing I proue Whatsoeuer benefit we should receiue by extolling and preaching and magnifying and praysing the inestimable worth and excellence thereof the same we ought to receiue with thankâ—sgiuing But in the Sacrament we should receiue the body and the blood of Christ with extolling and preaching c. Ergo c. The Assumption is confirmed by the words of our Sauiour Doe this in remembrance of me and by the words of Saint Paul So oft as yee eate this bread and drinke this Cup yee shall declare that is extoll magnifie and praise The Lords death till hee come againe Because I finde you fighting against your owne shadow I thought good to set downe the very obiections which were vsed in the Assembly at Perth that as yet are not nor I hope shall euer be answered PP It is againe obiected That in the act of receiuing we receiue from Christ an inestimable benefite ought not a Subiect kneele when he receiueth a benefite from a Prince to testifie his thankfulnesse Answ This relation from Christ to the Sacrament as betweene the Giuer and the gift is common to all the Sacraments both of the old and new Law ordinarie and extraordinarie ANS The relation betweene the Giuer and the gift in the old Testament is not so euident because they wanted a cleare and expresse Word to expound the mysterie Where haue yee such a Word concerning Circumcision This is the putting off of the bodie of sinne by the vertue of Christs Death and Resurrection COLOS. 2.11 or concerning the Passeouer This is the body of Christ that is broken for you this is his blood that is shed for you The Law had but the shaddow the Gospell hath the expresse Image of good things to come In the Law they had the shadow of the Giuer and the gift but in the Gospell we see him with open face Now although to the shadow of the Prince men fall not downe nor doe reuerence they are to be excused but he must bee reputed a contemner who will not doe homage at the presence of his Prince Further as I said before the externall actions of their Sacrament could not bee commodiously performed with such a gesture as is kneeling but the action of our Sacrament may PP Next we receiue the mysticall pledges not out of the hands of God himselfe or his Sonne Christ immediately but out of the hand of the Minister The person who receiues the gift from the King is supposed to receiue it immediately and suppose mediatly yet ceremonies of Court and mediate ciuill worships are not rules of religious adoration which should euer be immediate ANS Wee kneele not to receiue the mysticall pledges but to receiue the bodie and blood of Iesus Christ which the mysticall pledges signifie and are deliuered immediately by the hand of the Lord Iesus
himselfe PP Thirdly the manner of deliuery of the gift and the will of the Giuer are to be considered If the Prince call his Nobles to a banquet it is his will that they sitte at table with him as Ionathan and Dauid sate at King Sauls table Christ hath declared by the Institution after what manner he would haue vs to receiue these mysticall pledges Kneeling cannot agree with the actions and precepts of the Institution ANS If we consider the manner of deliuery of the gift and the will of the Giuer it fauoureth kneeling rather then sitting for although we be inuited to a banquet yet it is not a bodily repast such as Ionathan and Dauid receiued at Sauls table That required leisure and time and such a site and position of bodie as is most commodious for ease but by the Institution it it manifest that the banquet whereunto wee are called is the body and blood of Iesus giuen externally in a little quantitie of bread and one Cuppe diuided amongst many and ministred internally with Christs owne hand Neyther come wee to this banquet to feede our bodies but to feede our soules and to extoll and praise his death as I haue ofte said before Whereupon the Apostle inferreth that wee should receiue worthily that is with such a reuerence both externall and internall as is worthie the Giuer and the gift and is most meete to set foorth the praise of the Giuer and the worth of the gift In this respect kneeling is most agreeable both to the actions and precepts of the Institution PP The second breach of the second Commandement made by kneeling is the shew of conformitie with the Papists The Lord forbade his people to bee like the Gentiles Leuit 18.3 and 19.27 and Deut. 12. The Christians were forbidden to decore their houses with Bay-leaues and greene bonghes because the Pagans vsed so to doe or to rest from their labours vpon the dayes that the Pagans did If conformitie in things not hauing state in idolatrous seruice but onely glauncing at the honour of the Idoll bee condemned farre more is conformitie in the grossest act wherein the life and soule of their idolatrie standeth Such is the gesture of kneeling amongst the Papists this outward conformitie tickleth the Papists and offendeth the godly ANS A shew of conformitie with the Papists in Idolatrie is a breach of the second Commandement But to kneele at the Sacrament our hearts being freed of the opinion of Transubstantiation and our mouthes confessing and professing that we doe onely kneele to God and our Sauiour Iesus Christ is no more conformitie with them in idolatrie then in the action of prayer to kneele when we direct our prayers to God and not to Angels or Saints or other creatures For example To kneele and say the Lords Prayer in honour of the Saints and to offer it as a libell of request to be presented and commended by their prayers to God which Papists professe themselues to doe Costeri Enchiridion de veneratione Sanctorum is idolatrie yet to kneele and offer that prayer to God only as wee doe is not idolatrie although both in the gesture of kneeling and in the substance of the prayer there bee a conformitie our Faith and profession being contrarie to theirs freeth vs of all shew of conformity with them in superstition and idolatry But the Lord forbade his people yee say to be like the Gentiles yet did he neuer forbid them to knele and lift vp their hands to him in their prayers although the Gentiles kneeled and lifted vp hands vnto their gods when they prayed The things wherein God forbade his people a conformity were vncleannesse idolatry superstition witcheraft c. and not such ceremonies of diuine worship as are by himselfe commanded yet abused by Idolaters And where yee say that Christians were prohibited to rest those dayes on which the Pagans rested I hope yee will not haue vs to worke on the Lords day because the Papists rest that day Finally when yee say that the life of Popish idolatrie consisteth in kneeling yee speake falsely for the life of their idolatrie consisteth in a professed adoration of the bread with opinion of Transubstantiation and not in the outward gesture of kneeling which being lawfull and religious in it selfe is onely abused by them to idolatrie And doe not all they who sitte at the Sacrament keepe an outward conformitie with the Arrians who will needs sitte to declare that they esteeme Christ Iesus to bee onely a meere man By your argument all they are transgressours of the first Commandement that communicate with them in sitting Now to that which yee adde in the end that this outward conformitie tickles the Papist and offends the godly yee are greatly mistaken it is your contentious opposition against the truth and disobedience of the lawfull ordinances of the Church which tickles the Papist and grieues all good men and not our conformitie in a lawfull and religious ceremonie PP The third breach of the second Commandement made by kneeling is the retaining the monument of vile idolatrie all human inuentions polluted with idolatrie except they be of necessarie vse ought to bee remoued from Gods seruice This gesture had a spot of prophanation from the beginning being at the first birth in this act dedicated to idolatrie The brasen Serpent set vp at Gods owne command was not spared when it was abused Wee detest the very garment of a theefe or a whoore though it bee innocent BEZA saith many things may bee tollerated for the weake which may not bee restored after they are taken away he commendeth them who abolished kneeling amongst other things Tanquam apertas idolomanias ANS You make the third breach of the second Commandement by kneeling the retaining of a monument of vile idolatrie and in this yee erre for kneeling is a religious ceremony appointed by God himselfe to bee vsed in all actions of adoration and was not of humane inuention therefore cannot be a monument of idolatrie in this or any other act If it be abused to idolatry although abuse the thereof should bee abhorred yet the religious gesture it selfe is not to be detested Let the theefe bee hanged and the whoore drowned yet the religious ceremony must bee restored to the right owner to whom all knees should bow The burning of Incense was a part of the ceremoniall worship vnder the Law and abused to idolatrie when it was offered to the brazen Serpent yet that part of worship was not abolished but the Idoll it selfe destroyed and the ceremony restored to God vnto whom of right it belonged Neither hath your comparison of the brazen Serpent and kneeling any force in it for the brazen Serpent in the time it was abolished had no vse that ceased with the vertue of the cure that the Israelites receiued by looking vpon it the act of kneeling continueth alwayes in a necessary vse for the better expressing of our thankfulnesse to God And where you say
body he meanes the body of Christ lying in the Manger and these wicked and barbarous men leauing their houses and Countrey hauing finished a long iourney and comming to the place they adored with great feare and trembling Let vs therefore sayeth hee that are Citizens of heauen imitate these Barbarians Thus farre Chrysostome Now to imitate them is not to come with inward reuerence onely but to shew it also in outward gesture for of them the Scripture saith That falling downe they adored CHRIST And it is manifest by the words following that Chrysostome meanes not of the inward adoration onely but also of the outward Non solum hoc ipsum corpus vides sicut illi c. Thou doest not onely see the same body as they did but thou knowest both his power and dispensation and thou art ignorant of no thing done by him as being exactly and accurately imitated in all mysteries Let vs therefore stirre vp our selues with feare Et longe maiorem quà m illi Barbari ostendamus reuerentiam that is Let vs shew foorth much more reuerence then these Barbarians The word Ostendamus manifestly shewes that Chrysostome exhorteth his people not to the inward adoration of Christ onely at the Sacrament but to the externall also The practise of all Churches since the dayes of Christ confirmeth the same for there was neuer any Church wherein the Sacrament was receiued without some externall signe and gesture of adoration To stand before the Lord in a solemne act of diuine worshippe is a gesture of adoration and as yee obserued before out of Drusius in the 51. Page of this Pamphlet standing is taken for prayer because it was the vsuall gesture at prayer The discouering of the head in our Church is an externall signe of adoration otherwise our people who are wont to sitte at the reading of the Word singing of Psalmes and publike prayers did vse no externall signe at all And as in these actions the discouering of the head is a signe of adoration so is it in the receiuing of the Communion and was so euen when wee did sit at the receiuing for the reuerence of the bare head was not giuen at that time to the externall Minister nor to the externall Elements but to Christ himselfe his body and bloud Now it is certaine that the externall reuerence giuen to Christ in an act of diuine worship is diuine and therefore the reuerence of adoration as your selfe affirmed pag. 48. This conslant and vniuersall practise compared with the testimonies of the Ancients cuidently shewes the vanitie of your answeres against externall adoration vsed in all ages at the receiuing of the Sacrament Leauing them therefore I come to your conclusion PP The proofes already made for standing vpon the Lords day for 1000. yeeres in the Church doe euince that geniculation had no place in the act of receiuing all that time It hath therefore followed vpon bodily presence and transsubstantiation ANS Your proofes haue euinced nothing except yee grant that to receiue the Sacrament is an act of adoration for all the testimonies ye bring runne that way And at most yee haue onely proued that on the Lords day they stood at the Sacrament whereupon if yee conclude that geniculation had no place yee must vpon the same ground that sitting had no place yea it shall euince that sitting had no place in the Church vnto the yeere 1560. at which time it was receiued in our Church for after these 1000. yeeres wherein yee proue that standing was vsed kneeling succeeded and hath continued euer since in the Church vntill the time of reformation So sitting was neuer in vse by your owne argument As to the gesture vsed by our Sauiour at the Paschall Supper which yee affirme was continued at the institution of the Sacrament it was not sitting at a Table vpon fourmes or chaires but lying and leaning vpon beds and it is vncertain as I shewed before whether that gesture was continued or not and albeit it had beene continued there was neuer Church or Diuine that thought it exemplary for if they had done they would neuer haue vsed standing or passing or kneeling in stead of it If we might bee bold to coniecture with what gesture the Apostles receiued the Sacrament as yee are bold to affirme that they sate or what gesture Christ would haue vs to obserue it were doubtlesse surest to thinke that the Apostles receiued with that same gesture which they vsed at the thanksgiuing and blessing wherewith the Institution begins and therefore that the gesture which the Church thinketh most meet to be vsed at the thankesgiuing is the gesture fittest for the people to receiue because the action it selfe is a reall thankesgiuing and should haue conioyned with it the thankesgiuing and blessing wherewith the action beginnes in the minde and affection of the receiuers and because euer since the first Institution wee finde the Church to haue vsed the same gesture at the receiuing that they vsed at the thankesgiuing and prayer For when for the space of a thousand yeeres they stood and prayed as you your selfe affirme and so doth your namelesse Master of table gesture then they stood and receiued the Sacrament and after that when on the Lords day the Church began in stead of standing to vse kneeling at prayer they began also to receiue the Sacrament kneeling which forme of receiuing hath continued to our times But to returne againe to your argument where yee say that the proofes made for standing doe euince that for the space of a thousand yeeres kneeling had no place I will let you see how futile your argument is The Church stood on the Lords day at the Sacrament for the space of a thousand yeeres Ergo say yee they kneeled not for the space of a thousand yeeres May you not by the very same reason conclude The Church laboured not nor fasted on the Lords day for the space of a thousand yeeres Ergo they neither fasted nor laboured at all for the space of a thousand yeeres If during all that time the Sacrament had been onely celebrated on the Lords day your argument were probable but seeing the Sacrament as S. Augustine writes was giuen euery day and to giue it on the first fourth and sixt dayes of the weeke was held to bee an Apostolike constitution Therefore as on the rest of the weeke dayes except the Lords day they prayed fixis in terram genibus with their knees close to the ground so with that same gesture they receiued the Sacrament for the Church did euer receiue with the same gesture which they vsed in prayer as I haue proued by induction The Apostles receiued with the same gesture which they vsed at the thankesgiuing This yee cannot denie except yee ouerthrow all the grounds that yee laid for the example and precept of Christ to bee obserued The Church on the Lords day hath euer vsed to stand at the Sacrament when they stood at prayer and if you
coniunctly present with the head where the person is and so as Christ is personally present at the Sacrament so is his Diuinitie and Humanity coniunctly present in the Person That to conclude it is no errour according to the Confession aboue expressed to beleeue the spirituall powerfull and personall presence of Christs bodie at the Sacrament and in that respect to worship his flesh and blood there yea Saint Augustine saith That it is sinne not to worship his flesh there But you must be excused to exclude all from your Communion that beleeue any such thing because yee haue denied before that the Sacrament hath such a promise and presence of Christ as the Temple or Arke had vnder the Law pag. 51. And pag. 50. yee denied that it was a signe that should moue vs vpon the sight thereof to lift vp our hearts to the spirituall obiect of Faith I vse your own words or a meanes or occasion to stirre vp men to adore the Principall that is Christ And so yee doe acknowledge that they are ordered of God to be signes only and seales of his graces without any promise power vertue or presence of the bodie of Christ that is the opinion of the Anabaptists If these be they whom yee call the purer sort amongst the Bohemians I know not this I know that the Polonian Church esteemes them Arrians who sitte at the Sacrament whom I hope yee will not repute to be the purer sort or reckon amongst the Reformed Thirdly if yee debar from the communion of the well reformed Churches all who are of the Bishop of Rochester and Suttons minde who commend their simplicitie that beleeue Christs presence and are not inquisitiue of the maner but professe with Durandus saying modum nescimus praesentiam credimus then shall yee excommunicate from your societie all that preferre the peace of the Church to the loue of contention and curious disputes that haue disquieted the Church rent the body therof asunder and diuided the same in factions Where yee say that if the maner of Christs presence be not determined there can arise no other but a confused worship of such a confused and indetermined presence your allegation is but rash and prophane Can yee determine the maner of Christs presence in heauen particularly or the manner of God the Father his presence in heauen and earth albeit we beleeue that God is in essence and power euery where and that Christ is bodily in the heauens These determinations are but generall and confused notions yet God forbid wee should say as yee doe that the presence of the Father and the Sonne in heauen and in earth are confused or that the worship is confused that is giuen thereto according to Gods Word As to the Papists who acknowledge as yee say that there ought to be no adoration but where there is a bodily presence acknowledged in the Sacrament although yee be of the same minde and thereupon condemne all adoration of Christ in the Sacrament yet we attribute no more to that their opinion then to the rest of their errours and therefore affirme with the learned and Diuine Bishop IE VVEL That it is without doubt our dutie to adore the body of Christ in the word of God in the Sacrament of Baptisme in the mysteries of the body and blood of Christ and wheresoeuer any foot-step or signe of it appeares hut chiefely in the holy mysteries in which we haue a liuing expresse I mage of all Christs peregrination in the flesh To conclude if yee except out of the number of the reformed Churches all that thinke that Christ is present in the Sacrament and in the Sacrament to be adored I feare yee draw the number of the reformed Churches to a very small count whom yee call the purer sort such as Arrians Anabaptists and their followers But if by the reformed Churches yee vnderstand those who distinguish betweene the signes and the things signified giuing to the signes the reuerence due to them and adoring onely the thing signified to wit the body and blood of Christ in the Sacrament of these some I confesse do erre in esteeming Christs bodie to bee really and locally present and yet seeing they agree with vs in the chiefe and principall grounds of Religion wee must not excommunicate them from the number of the reformed But let vs lay aside these whom yee call Vbiquetars If yee hold the rest for Reformed Churches that are in Germanie Polonia Bohemia Hungaria Denmark Norway and great Britaine with the Church of Ireland for one that sitteth at the receiuing of the Sacrament in all these Churches they are an hundred that kneele I mention not the Church of France where they stand and sit not whom yee condemne by your doctrine of breaking the Institution and transgressing the Precept and precedent of our Sauiour and with them the ancient Church for the space of a thousand yeeres that stood and receiued as also others of the Reformed who follow their example for when yee maintaine sitting as necessarie by institution example and precept yee condemne all that do otherwise Yet yee could presse heere to excuse them or rather to mitigate your censure of them saying first that by standing men accommodate themselues to a table to participate of the dainties set thereon Next that standing hath neuer beene abused to idolatry as kneeling hath bin but these abuses are friuolous and nothing worth for in the Church of France where they receiue standing they doe no more accommodate themselues to a table then they who kneele for neither doe they reach their hand to the table to take any thing to themselues therefrom receiuing all from the hand of the Minister nor doe they stand socially as yee will haue sitting to be vsed for society and familiar entertainment but first one or two commeth and hauing receiued they passe to giue place to others Secondly yee forget or then are ignorant that the Priest standeth whilest hee saith Masse and receiueth adoring the Elements And therfore kneeling was neuer more abused by the people then standing is by the Priest So as by these your excuses the reformed Churches of France and others that stand at the receiuing of the Sacrament are not liberate frō the breach of the Institution second Commandement wherewith yee charge those that kneele In the end hauing condemned all for Idolaters who kneele on earth at the Sacrament yee ascend to heauen and there yee deny that we are able to conclude that they who are called to the Supper of the Lambe kneele at the Supper of the Lambe but if this be sure that all who are in heauen bow their knees to the Name of Iesus it followes necessarily that all who are called to the Supper of the Lambe kneele at the Supper of the Lambe because all the Saints in heauen that are called to the Supper of the Lambe are continually and without intermission at the Supper and so if they bow their knees at
all they must kneele at that Supper for as on earth a good conscience is a perpetuall feast so in heauen the fruition of eternall felicitie is the perpetuall Supper of the Lambe Then where yee say that we cannot conclude a materiall geniculation of the Saints in heauen because they haue not bodily knees I confesse that is true yet wee conclude well a spirituall geniculation proportionable to the materiall otherwise they could not bee sayd to bow their knees if in their humiliation and adoration in heauen there were nothing in substance answerable to that bodily geniculation of the Sains on earth Yee demand If they drinke continually the felicitie of heauen on their knees I answere Although they drinke not on bodily knees yet they drinke with signes of greater humilitie and reuerence to GOD then any humane creature is able to expresse by any bodily gesture The standing of thousands before God which signifies seruice sitting at Table with Abraham Isaack and Iacob which signifies the fruition of pleasure takes not away their humble adoration and spirituall kneeling They performe their seruice with humilitie and with humilitie they enioy their pleasures And howsoeuer symbolicall Theologie cannot prooue that the formes of adoration vsed in heauen by the Saints is a kinde of bodily geniculation yet it proues that on earth that gesture properly should bee vsed and is most commonly vsed by the Saints in adoration which is attributed to the blessed Spirits in heauen metaphorically and therefore that on earth there is no gesture more proper to be vsed in adoration then the reuerend gesture of kneeling Last of all by the falling downe of the twentie foure Elders it is euidently prooued that thanksgiuing and praise may be offered to God on our knees or in a gesture more humble whether they bee interpreted to bee the Church militant or triumphant Now to conclude When all your reasons and discourses shall be considered by the iudicious Reader he shall finde that they all tend to the contempt of the Sacrament and to leade men to a prophane estimation thereof For first yee maintaine that it is to be celebrated with no other gesture then a common banquet for bodily repast Secondly that it is not in statu accommodatâ— ad adorandum that is to say That it is not a signe or middest appointed to stirre vp the receiuers to worshippe their Sauiour Thirdly that Christ is eyther not present in the Sacrament at all or that his body is not to bee esteemed present after any manner Fourthly that at the Sacrament neither his person nor his body and bloud that is neither the giuer nor the gift is to be adored Finally that all who at the Sacrament adore him by bowing of their knees are Idolaters breakers of the second Commandement and violators of the Institution These are assertions very contrarious to the iudgement of the Primitiue Church touching the Sacrament which of all the parts of Gods worshippe they esteemed the most principall as Casaubone obserues out of the Ancients in his 16. Exercit. Sect. 58. which hee concludes with these words Ex Augustini disputatione contra Faustum Maniâ—…aum lib. 20. cap. 21. discimus veterem Ecclesiam in illa quam sape diximus commemoratione passionis sacrificij Christi quae ipsa sacrificium dicebatur posuisse praecipuum Des cultum quam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocabant That is By Saint Augustine his dispute with Faustus the Manichean wee learne that the ancient Church did place the chiefe worshippe of God which they called adoration in the commemotation of the passion and sacrifice of Christ which commemoration was also called a sacrifice it selfe I shall now adde the iudgement of the reformed Churches and Diuines touching adoration and the externall forme thereof to be vsed in receiuing the Sacrament Confessio Bohemia c. Regi Viennae Austria Anno Domini 1535. oblata ARt 13. De coena Domini Ministri verè Dominicae coenae verbaresere tes plebem ipsam ad hanc sidem hortantur vt corporis Christs praesentiam adesse credant procumbentibus in genua distribuant that is The Ministers rehearsing the words of the Lords Supper exhort the people to beleeue the presence of Christs body and distribute the Sacrament to the people kneeling on their knees Sententia Petricouiensis Synodi generalis Anno Dom. 1578. Conclus 4. sub finem CEremonias libertati Christianae donamus ac permittimus vt stantes vel genua flectentes pij sacramentum corporis et sanguinis Christi sumant sessionis verò ad mensem Domini quia prater ritus in omnibus per Europam Ecclesiis vulgo consuetos illi internos primi auctores extiterunt qui omnia temere in Ecclesia mutantes et sine scientia Christum quasi imitantes à nobis ad Arrianismum transfugae facti quare hanc propriam ipsis vt Christum et sacra eius irreuerenter tractantibus tanquam inhonestam irreligiosam simplicioribusque admodum scandalosam ceremoniam reijcimus That is For Ceremonies we remit them to Christian liberty and permit the godly to receiue the Sacrament of Christs body and bloud standing or kneeling but because sitting at the table of the Lord by and besides the custome commonly vsed in the Churches of Europe was first inuented by these that changed all things temerariously in the Church who counterfaiting Christ without knowledge haue played the fugitiues from vs to Arrianisme we reiect this ceremony as vnhonest irreligious and extremely scandalous to the simpler sort leauing the same to them that handle the sacred things of Christ vnreuerently as they doe himselfe Wlodislauiensis Synodi generalis Auno 1583. Iunij 19. Conclus 6. QVod attinet ad ceremonias coenae Domiuicae sententia iam olim in Sendomiriensi Synodo agitata conclusio in generali Cracouiensi atque Petricouiensi Synodo facta at repetita in hoc etiam Wlodislauiensis Synodi consessu approbata est nempe Ne in vsu sit sessio ad mensam Domini in vllis huins consensus Ecclesijs Poloniae Lituania c. Nam haec ceremonia licet cum cateris libera Ecclesijs Christianis caetibus Euangelicis non est vsitata tantúmque infidelibus Arrianis cum Domino pari solio sese collocantibus propria Hortamur itaque vt administretur cana Dommi stantibus vel genua flectentibus cum protestatione contra artolatriam Papistis consuetam That is Concerning the ceremonies of the Lords Supper the opinion agitated long agoe in the Synode of Sendomire with the conclusion taken in the generall Synode of Cracouia and Petricouia now also repeated in this Synode of Wlodislauia is approoued namely That sitting at the Table of the Lord be not vsed in any of the Churches of Folonia Lituania c. that are of our profession for this ceremony howbeit free and indifferent as other ceremonies are is not receiued in Christian and Euangelicke assemblies but is onely proper to the vnfaithfull Arrians who place
themselues with the Lord vpon an equall Throne Therefore we exhort and desire the Sacrament of the Lords Supper may bee administred to the people standing or bowing their knees with protestation against the bread-worship maintayned by Papists Paraeus 1. Cor. 11. Controuersia 2. De fractione panis in sacra Eucharistia NEque conuellitur instantijs quas quidam alioqui eruditus Theologus obijcit quod si singula nobis imitanda essent etiam prius agnum paschalem nos edere in mensa sedere duodenos tantum communicare in domo vel palatio et nocte oporteret Hasce enim peristaseis non sacramenti proprias de quibus solis propositio haec omnis Christi actio est nostra institutio loquitur sed accidentarias fuisse iam modo ostensum est That is this proposition is not improoued by the instances which a Theologue otherwise very learned obiects saying If wee should imitate all Christs actions then it behooued vs first to eate the Paschall Lambe sit at a Table and twelue persons only communicate in a priuate house or Palace and in the night season for these circumstances are not proper to the Sacrament but accidentary onely as wee haue shewed And it is of the proper actions of the Sacrament that this proposition Euery action of Christ is our institution speakes Caluinus Instit Lib. 4. Cap. 17. Sect. 37. CHristo inquiunt hane venerationem deferimus Primùm si in coena hoc fioret dicerem adorationem eam demum esse legitimam quae non in signo residet sed ad Christum in coelo sedentem dirigitur That is Wee giue this worshippe say they to CHRIST First if this were done in the action of the Supper I would confesse the adoration to bee lawfull which resteth not in the signe but is directed to Christ sitting in heauen Beza Epist 12. pag. 100. GEniculatio denique dum symbola accipiuntur speciem quidem habet piae ac Christianae venerationis ac proinde olim potuit cum fructu vsurpari That is Kneeling at the receiuing of the Elements hath a shew and forme of holy and Christian adoration and therefore of olde might haue beene vsed profitably Petrus Martyr Class 4. locus 10. Sect. 49. 50. IN Sacramento distinguimus symbola à rebus symbolis aliquem honorem deferimus nimirum vt tractentur decenter non abijciantur sunt enim sacrae res Deo semel deputatae quo verò vel res significatas eas promptè alacriter adorandas concedimus inquit enim Augustinus hoc loco Non peccatur adorando carnem Christi sed peccatur non adorando Adoratio interna potest adhiberi sine pericul◠neque externa suâ naturâ esset mala Multi enim piè genua flectunt et adorant That is In the Sacrament we distinguish the symboles from the things signified and some honour wee yeeld to the signes namely that they bee decently handled and not cast away for they are sacred things and once dedicate to God As to the things signifyed we confesse these should bee readily and cheerefully adored for Saint Augustine in this place sayes That it is no fault to adore Christs flesh but it is a sinne not to adore it In the next Section Inward adoration may bee vsed without perill neyther is the outward euill of it selfe for many bow their knees religiously and adore Iewell in the 8. Art of Adoration BVt they will reply Saint AMBROSE sayes We adore Christs flesh in the mysteries heereof groweth their whole error for Saint AMBROSE sayth not Wee adore the mysteries or the flesh of Christ really present or materially contayned in the mysteries as is supposed by Master HARDING onely hee sayes we adore Christs flesh in the mysteries that is in the ministration of the mysteries And doubtlesse it is our duetie to adore the body of Christ in the Word of God in the Sacrament of Baptisme in the mysteries of Christs body and bloud and wheresoeuer wee see any steppe or token of it but especially in the holy mysteries for that there is liuely layd foorth before vs the whole Historie of Christs conuersation in the flesh But this adoration as it is sayd before neyther is directed to the Sacraments nor requires any corporall or reall presence So Saint HIEROME teaches vs to adore Christs body in the Sacrament of Baptisme CHRYSOSTOME in MARKE Hom. XIV An Answere to the reasons vsed by the penner of the Pamphlet against the Festiuall DAYES PP FRom the beginning of the Reformation to this present yeere of our Lord 1618. the Church of Scotland hath diuers wayes condemned the obseruation of all Holy-dayes the Lords day onely excepted In the first Chapter of the first Booke of Discipline penned Anno 1560. the obseruation of Holy-dayes to Saints the feast of Christmas Circumcision Epiphanie Purification and others fond Feasts of our Lady are ranked amongst the abominations of the Romane Religion as hauing neither commandement nor assurance in the Word It is further affirmed that the obstinate maintainers and teachers of such abomination should not escape the punishment of the Ciuill Magistrate The Booke aforesaid was subscribed by the Lords of secret Counsell ANS This Booke was neuer authorised by Act of Counsell Parliament or by any Ecclesiasticall Canon and Iohn Knox as we said before complaines of some in chiefe Authoritie that called the same Deuote imaginations yet let vs giue vnto it the Authoritie which yee require the same will not serue your purpose For in the explication of that first head which yee cite we haue these words which yee haue omitted In the Bookes of old and new Testaments We affirme that all things necessarie for instruction of the Church and to make the man of God perfect are contained and sufficiently expressed By the contrarie doctrine wee vnderstand whatsoeuer men by Lawes Councels or Constitutions haue imposed vpon the consciences of men without the expresse commandement of Gods word such as be the vowes of chastitie forswearing of Marriage and keeping of Holy-dayes of certaine Saints c. By which words it is manifest that the obseruation of dayes here cōdemned is not that which was in the Primitiue Church and now is vsed in the Refōrmed Causa ordinis politeias as our Diuines speake that is for order and Policie sake But such as are imposed vpon the consciences of men as a necessarie point of Diuine worship This obseruation vrged vpon the people of God and practised with opinion of necessitie and merit was vtterly to be abolished And to banish this opinion together with the superstitious Idolatrie and prophanenesse which was otherwise conioyned of banqueting drinking playing quarrelling and such like enormities it was thought expedient that on these dayes the people should be discharged rest from their ordinarie labours and that no Diuine seruice should be done in places where there was not a dayly Exercise of Religion as well because of the raritie of Pastors to informe people touching