Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	artery_n	heart_n	vein_n	9,504	5	10.0908	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A68467	A treatise of the sacraments according to the doctrin of the Church of England touching that argument Collected out of the articles of religion, the publique catechism, the liturgie, and the book of homilies. With a sermon preached in the publique lecture, appointed for Saint Pauls Crosse, on the feast of Saint Iohn Baptist, Iune 24. 1638. / By T.B. Pr. Pl.	Bedford, Thomas, d. 1653.	1638 (1638)	STC 1789; ESTC S113179	66,854	266

for the Sacrament of Baptism that which is signified by the water to speak exactly is the blood of Christ not the blood in the living bodie but the blood that was spilt and shed upon the ground prefigured in the Law by the blood of the sacrifices which was sprinkled upon the unclean for the purifying of the flesh The blood of Bulls and Goats were shaddows of prefiguration but the body is Christ whose blood doth wash and cleans the soul from sinne and is signified by the water in Baptism Q. How can this be may some say when as the blood of Christ is signified by the Wine in the Lords Supper For answer hereunto we shall do well to remember what Saint Iohn hath related in his Gospell viz. That upon the pei●cing and goring of Christs side there came forth blood and water what water was this not any miraculous humour much lesse the corruption of blood in Pleuritick bodies but that watery substance which Anatomists do find in the Pericardium placed there by nature as it may seem for the refrigeration of the heart Now for the full manifestation of the death of Christ it pleased the providence of God to make use of the malice of the Souldier to peirce the Pericardium and gore the heart which being done it is impossible for any one to live And this watery substance is that which the water of Purification and the water of Baptism doth properly signifie the which t●o in propriety of nature it differ from the blood of the vitall vessels viz. the heart and the liver running in the veins and arteries yet in common phrase it is called the blood of Christ which blood of Christ is represented in both the Sacraments Hence there is a different respect of the blood of Christ shed for expiation and a two-fold use of it after the effusion viz. partly for Nutrition in the Supper partly for ablution and purgation as in the Sacrament of Baptism hence are those phrases of washing and cleansing so frequent in the new Testament this is that fountain which is set open for sinne and for uncleannesse thus in the new Testament as well as in the old all things are purged by blood Hebrews 9.22 Thus both Sacraments have speciall Relation to the death of Christ which the phrase of Scripture doth manifest for of Baptism it is said that by it we are baptised into his death and buried with Christ Rom. 6.4 Col. 2.12 and the Supper is the remembrance and commemoration of the death of Christ 1 Cor. 11 26. and this doth fully manifest unto us what that grace is which is signified in the Sacrament and how the word Grace used in the definition of a Sacrament is to be understood Doubtlesse hereby is meant not a quality infused but a gracious gift bestowed upon us Now of Gods gracious gifts some are corporall and reach no further than the body Others are spirituall touching the state and welfare of the soule and such is that Grace or gracious gift presented in the Sacraments Again whereas there be divers sorts of these spirituall graces that Grace which is the ground-work of the Sacraments is not any among the Gifts and Graces of the Spirit but the gracious Gift of the Father who gave his own Sonne for us indeed Christ himselfe is that gracious gift of God which is presented to us in the Sacrament Christus quâ passus the body and blood of Christ given for mankind in the work of redemption are by the Sacrament given to mankind for the application of that redemption Bellarmin is deceived while in the heat of his scholasticall discourse he will needs have the Grace of Justification or as we do better stile it sanctification to be the thing which is principally signified in the Sacrament That is an effect and consequent but Christ crucified is the speciall signification of the Sacrament Reason giveth it for it is against the nature of the cause especially of the instrumentall cause to represent the effect which it self produceth Adde this the nature of a sacramentall sign consisteth in analogicall proportion now this is most apt betwixt these Elements and the body and blood of Christ so also of the operation of the one upon the body and of the other upon the soul but no similitude at all betwixt these Elements and the grace of Justification To conclude this both the doctrine of the Schoolmen and that common saying of the ancients received from Saint Augustine doth shew that Christus passus Christ on the Crosse is that grace which is primarily and principally signified in either Sacrament CHAP. V. A Corollary drawn from this part of the Definition NOvv from this first part of the Definition wherein we have heard the Essence and Originall of the Sacrament we may justly collect this Corollary viz. That if either part be wanting that is if either there want a visible sign or an invisible grace there can be no Sacrament And thus doth the Church teach her children that the parts of every Sacrament are and must be two the outward visible sign and the inward spirituall grace How can this be might some curious Critick say is the Genus and and common nature of a Sacrament the sign of grace and is grace now become part of the Sacrament Is not this all one as if the man should be called a part of the picture which is the representation of the man in very deed to speak properly grace is no part of the sign but Subjectum or Substratum praesuppositum the ground-work thereof but when we speak in the vulgar phrase we call those things parts which are any way Essentiall and so grace is a part of the sign that is essentiall to it for except it be a sign of grace it is not a Sacrament adde this also that howsover the School saith that the sign is properly as indeed properly it is the Sacrament and doth relatively oppose it to the grace signified yet the Church speaking to the capacity of the simple calleth the whole sacred action of Baptism and of the Supper by the name of the Sacrament which taken in this larger signification is as it were compounded of two things one earthly the other heavenly and these vulgarly are called the parts of the Sacrament as being both of them essentiall to the constitution of a Sacrament Hence is an argument fetcht to overthrow Transubstantiation which by changing the bread into the very body of Christ hath taken away the sign and so spoyled the Sacrament for as the soul departed and the body separated is not the man so neither the sign without the grace nor the grace without the sign but being both together considered relatively do make a Sacrament there may be therfore no change of the one into the other Hence also fetch arguments to convince those five obtruded by the Roman Church to be no true born Sacraments properly so called

this form of Administration together with the proper element of Baptism by which even the Priests of the worst times baptised Infants into the true faith of Christ and like a leprous and infectious mother is the present Church of Rome she beareth and bringeth forth sound children but presently hazardeth the infection of them with her milk as it were with deadly poyson That this Element together with the Ceremony and the form of words used in the Administration were all of them ordeined by Christ is so plain by that text Mat. 28. that it cannot be denied thus have we manifested both the Essence and Originall of Baptism CHAP. III. The manifestation of the Essence and Originall of the Lords Supper TOuching this our Church saith that the Element or outward part in the Lords Supper is Bread and Wine which the Lord hath commanded to be received thereby teaching us both the number and names of the Elements and also the Originall of this sign or which is all one the ground of our receiving For the NVMBER of Elements there are two yet not two Sacraments no both make but one Sacrament for which they are joyned together in this sacred action to teach us the full sufficiencie of spirituall nourishment which is in Christ. Corporal nourishment must consist of something moist and something dry and he that partaketh not of both hath not sufficient so here we have both in Christ and therefore need not seek elsewhere The NAMES of these two Elements are Bread and Wine not Flesh and Blood which happly would have carried a greater resemblance of that which is thereby signified lest it might have been impiously thought to have been prepared for Cannibals not for Christians but Bread and Wine which have an excellent proportion and Analogicall Representation of what is here remembred as shall be shewed in the seventh Chapter The ORIGINALL of these Elements and the ground of our receiving is the cōmand of the Lord expressely mentioned by S. Matthew Mark and Luke and out of S. Luke repeated verbatim by S. Paul Whence appeareth the abominable impietie and horrible sacriledge of the present Church of Rome which hath not only appointed new ends and uses of the Sacraments Circumgestation and Adoration which Christ and his Church never did once dream of but also hath deprived the Laity of the Cup altogether And whereas Christ saith drink ye all of this She saith no not all of you but only the Clergie must the rest must be content with their wafer cake for more they get not Object That word Omnes All of you is to be restrained to the Apostles who alone were present Sol And to whom must the other Omnes which tho not expressed is yet understood in the precept of eating to whom I say must that be extended To whom doth Saint Paul direct that Canon Cor. 11.28 Let him eat let him drink Why do they not also take away the Bread from the Laitie as well as the Cup since none but the Apostles were present But to let these bellies passe all that desire the benefit of the Sacraments must know it to be their dutie to eat and drink the Bread and Wine which the Lord hath commanded to be received Ob. But blood was never used for nutrition nay the eating or drinking thereof is directly prohibited Gen. 9.4 and Levit. 7.14 and much more the blood of man why then are these men blamed that forbeare to drink that in its type and figure which manifestly was forbidden to be drunk in its proper substance Sol We are not to depart from the letter of Christs Precept because we cannot untie the knots of humane Curiosity Blood indeed was never lawfully drunk much lesse the blood of man but alwayes shed for expiation and therefore it might to carnall reason seem as incongruous to drink it in its type and figure as it is congruous to eat flesh in its figure which was allowed for the proper food and nourishment of the body yet since Christ hath commanded us to drink that Wine which he himselfe hath called his blood we must do what he biddeth and leav him to stop the mouths of Cavillers when God calls for obedience by the letter of his word we must not stand to ask him the ground and reason of his Commandement Duties belong to us Reasons to God Note that as the Bread accidentally was unlevened that Bread I mean which Christ our Saviour used at the first institution so also the wine in the Cup was not intentionally provided for this new Sacrament our Saviour took such ordinary provision as the custome of the country used in the Passeover happily also the wine that he used was mingled with water it being the custome of the country to dash their wine to prevent Drunkennesse which things are fit to be noted lest we should place any superstition in the imitation or not imitation of those things whih were but accidentall The Catholick Church hath appointed Wine to be used yet indulgence was granted to the Norwegians to use other drinks The reformed Churches some of them put leaven into the bread some of them banish water out of the wine And in these things tho the text of Scripture impose no necessity but leav a liberty yet is it fitting that men should in conscience use their liberty according to the Canons and Constitutions of the Church CHAP. IV. The inward Grace signified by the outward Elements THE Sign in either of these two Sacraments as we have heard is externall and visible now what is signified by these Elements cometh to be enquired this is called a Grace and it is said to be inward and spirituall Particularly the inward part and thing s●gnified by the Bread and Wine saith our Church is the body and blood of Christ by the bread is signified the Body and by the wine the Blood both which being found in Christ do set forth the truth of his Humanity but being considered in their separation that is as separated really one from the other they do set forth the truth of Christs death A reall separation of the blood from the body is here in the Sacrament represented and set forth in the locall distance of the two Elements the bread in one vessell by it selfe the wine in another by it selfe for which cause the Elements ought not to be mingled together The Elements are bread and wine Not a sopp because not the blood of Christ while it was running in the veins but when it was shed upon the ground is signified in the Sacrament so much is plain out of the words of our blessed Saviour touching the Cup This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many plain also it is out of the speciall end of the Institution of this Sacrament which saith our Church out of Saint Paul is for a continuall remembrance of the death of Christ c. But of this hereafter Now