church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election and ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body Of this Proposition there be three Branches 1. That the Brethren of a particular church of a Congregation are the first subjects of church-liberty 2. That the Elders of a particular church are the first subjects of church-authority 3. That both the Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subjects of all church-power needfull to be exercised in their own body Now that the key of church-priviledge or liberty is given to the Brethren of the church and the key of rule and authority to the Elders of the church hath been declared above in Chapt. 3. But that these are the first subjects of these keys and first the church the first subject of liberty may appeare thus From the removall of any former subject of this power or liberty from whence they might derive it If the Brethren of the congregation were not the first subject of their church-liberty then they derived it either from their own Elders or from other churches But they derived it not from their own Elders for they had power and liberty to choose their own Elders as hath been shewed above and therefore they had this liberty before they had Elders and so could not derive it from them Nor did they derive it from other particular churches For all particular churches are of equall liberty and power within themselves not one of them subordinate to another Wee reade not in Scripture that the Church of Corinth was subject to that of Ephesus nor that of Ephesus to Corinth no nor that of Cenchrea to Corinth though it was a church situate in their vicinity Nor did they derive their liberty from a Synod of churches For we found no foot-step in the pattern of Synods Act. 15. that the Church of Antioch borrowed any of their liberties from the Synod at Jerusalem They borrowed indeed light from them and decrees tending to the establishment of truth and peace For upon the publishing of the decrees of that Synod the Churches were established in the faith or truth Act 16.4 5. and also in consolation and peace Act. 15.31 32. but they did not borrow from them any church-liberty at all 2. Now the second branch of the Proposition was That the Elders of the church of a particular Congregation are the first subject of rule or authority in that church or congregation over which the Holy Ghost hath made them over-seers 1. From the charge of rule over the Church committed to them immediatly from Christ For though the Elders be chosen to their office by the church of Brethren yet the office it self is ordained immediatly by Christ and the rule annexed to the office is limited by Christ only If the Brethren of the church should elect a presbyterie to be called by them in the Lord this will not excuse the Presbyters in their neglect of rule either before the Lord or to their own consciences For thus runneth the Apostles charge to the Elders of Ephesus Act. 20.28 Take heed to your selves and to the whole flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you over-seers 2. The same appeareth from the gift of rule required especially in an Elder without which they are not capable of election to that office in the church 1 Tim. 3 4 5. He must be one that is able to rule well his own house or else how shall he order the church of God The like gift of rule is not necessary to the admission of a member into the church as to the election of an Elder If a private brother be not so well able through weaknesse in prudence or courage to rule his own house it will not justly debarre him from entrance into the church but the like defect will justly debar a man from election to the office of an Elder Neither hath God given a spirit of rule and government ordinarily to the greater part of the body of the brethren and therefore neither hath he given them the first Receit of the key of Authoritie to whom he hath not given the gift to employ it If it be objected How can the brethren of the Church invest an Elder with rule over them if they had not power of rule in themselves to communicate to him Ans They invest him with rule partly by chusing him to the office which God hath invested with rule partly by professing their own subjection to him in the Lord we by the rule of Relatives doth necessarily inferre and preferre the authoritie of the Elders over them For in yeelding subjection they either set up or acknowledge Authoritie in him to whom they yeeld subjection Ob. 2. The body of the Church is the Spouse of Christ the Lambs wife and ought not the wife to rule the servants and stewards in the house rather then they her Is it not meet that the keyes of Authoritie should hang at her girdle rather then at theirs Answ There is a difference to be put between Queens Princesses Ladies of great Honor such as the Church is to Christ Psal 45.9 and Countrey huswives poore mens wives Queens and great persons have severall offices and officers for every businesse and service about the house as Chamberlains Stewards Treasurers Comptrollers Vshers Bayliffs Groomes and Porters who have all the authoritie of ordering the affairs of their Lords house in their hands There is not a key left in the Queens hand of any office but onely of power and libertie to call for what she wanteth according to the Kings royall allowance which if she exceed the officers have power to restrain her by order from the King But countrey huswives and poore mens wives whose husbands have no Officers Bayliffs or Stewards to oversee and order their estates they may carry the keyes of any office at their own girdles which the husband keepeth not in his own hand Not because poore huswives have greater authoritie in the house then Queens but because of their poverty and mean estate they are fain to be in stead of many servants to their husbands Obj. 3. The whole body naturall is the first subject of all the naturall power of any member in the body as the facultie of sight is first in the body before in the eye Answ It is not in the mysticall body the Church in all respects alike as in the naturall body In the naturall body there be all the faculties of each part actually inexistent though not exerting or putting forth themselves till each member be articulated and formed But in the body of the Church of Brethren it is not so All the severall functions of Church power are not actually inexistent in the body of Brethren unlesse some of them have the gifts of all the officers which often they have not having neither Presbyters nor men fit to be Presbyters Now if the power of the Presbytery were
the particulars to whom any portion of power can be supposed to be committed That look what ever power or right any of the possessours and subjects thereof may have they have it each alike immediatly that is in respect of a mediation of delegation or dependance on each other from Christ and so are each the first subjects of that power that is allotted to them And for the particular subjects themselves hee follows that division in the handling of them which the Controversie it self hath made unto his hands To wit 1. What power each single Congregation which is indowed with a Charter to be a body-politique to Christ hath granted to it to exercise within it self And 2. What measure or rather kinde of power Christ hath placed in Neighbour-Churches without it and in association with it For the first As hee supposeth each Congregation such as to have the priviledge of injoying a Presbyterie or company of more or lesse Elders proper unto it self so being thus Presbyterated hee asserteth this incorporate body or society to be the first and primary subject of a compleat and entire power within it self over it's own members yea and the sole native subject of the power of Ordination and Excommunication which is the highest Censure And whereas this corporation consisteth both of Elders and Brethren for as for women and children there is a speciall exception by a Statute-law of Christ against their injoyment of any part of this publique power His scopeis to demonstrate a distinct and severall share and interest of power in matters of common concernment vouchsafed to each of these and dispersed among both by Charter from the Lord as in some of our towns corporate to a company of Aldermen the Rulers and a Common-Councell a body of the people there useth to be the like He giving unto the Elders or Presbytery a binding power of Rule and Authority proper and peculiar unto them and unto the Brethren distinct and apart an interest of power and priviledge to concurre with them and that such affaires should not be transacted but with the joynt agreement of both though out of a different right so that as a Church of Brethren only could not proceed to any publique censures without they have Elders over them so nor in the Church have the Elders power to censure without the concurrence of the people and likewise so as each alone hath not power of Excommunicating the whole of either though together they have power over any particular person or persons in each And because these particular Congregations both Elders and People may disagree and miscarry and abuse this power committed to them He therefore secondly asserteth an association or communion of Churches sending their Elders and Messengers into a Synod so hee purposely chooseth to stile those Assemblies of Elders which the Reformed Churches do call Classes or Presbyteries that so hee might distinguish them from those Presbyteries of Congregations before mentioned And acknowledgeth that it is an Ordinance of Christ unto whom Christ hath in relation to rectifying Mal-administrations and healing dissentions in particular Congregations and the like cases committed a due and just measure of power suited and proportioned to those ends and furnished them not only with ability to give counsell and advice but further upon such occasions with a Ministeriall power and authority to determine declare and injoyn such things as may tend to the reducing such Congregations to right order and peace Onely in his bounding and defining this power he affirms it to be First for the kinde and quality of it but a dogmaticall or doctrinall power though stamped with authority Ministeriall as an Ordinance of Christ whether in judging of controversies of faith when they disturb the peace of particular Congregations and which themselves finde too difficult for them or in decerning matters of fact and what censures they doe deserve but not armed with authority and power of Excommunicating or delivering unto Satan either the Congregations or the Members of them But they in such cases having declared and judged the nature of the offence and admonished the peccant Churches and decerned what they ought to do with their offending members they are to leave the formall act of this censure to that authority which can only execute it placed by Christ in those Churches themselves which if they deny to do or persist in their miscarriage then to determine to withdraw communion from them And also for the extent of this power in such Assemblies and Association of Churches he limits and confines that also unto cases and with cautions which will appear in the Discourse to wit That they should not intrench or impair the priviledge of intire Jurisdiction committed unto each Congregation as a liberty purchased them by Christs blood but to leave them free to the exercise and use thereof untill they abuse that power or are unable to manage it and in that case only to assist guide and direct them and not take on them to administer it for them but with them and by them As for our selves we are yet neither afraid nor ashamed to make profession in the midst of all the high waves on both sides dashing on us that the substance of this brief Extract from the Authors larger Discourse is That very Middle-way which in our Apologie we did in the generall intimate and intend between that which is called Brownisme and the Presbyteriall-government as it is practised whereof the one doth in effect put the chief if not the whole of the rule and government into the hands of the people and drowns the Elders votes who are but a few in the major part of theirs And the other taking the chief and the principall parts of that rule which we conceive is the due of each Congregation the Elders and Brethren into this Jurisdiction of a common Presbyterie of severall Congregations doth thereby in like manner swallow up not only the interests of the people but even the votes of the Elders of that Congregation concerned in the major part thereof Neither let it seeme arrogance in us but a testimony rather to the truth further to Remonstrate that this very Boundary platforme and disposement of Church power as here it is we speake for the substance of it set out and stated as also that the tenure and exercise thereof in all these subjects should be immediate from Christ unto them all is now new unto our thoughts yea it is no other than what our owne apprehensions have beene moulded unto long since And this many of our friends and some that are of a differing opinion having knowne our private judgements long as likewise our owne Notes and transcripts written long agoe can testifie besides many publike professions since as occasion hath beene offered Insomuch as when we first read this of this learned Author knowing what hath been the more generall current both of the practice and judgement of our Brethren for the Congregationall way
her is but simply the power of her own act in which her own concernement which doth intrest her free by an intrinsecall right The like difference would appeare if we had seene a Governement tempered of an Aristocracy and democracy in which suppose the people have a share and their actuall consent is necessary to all lawes and sentences c. whereas a few Nobles that are set over them whose concernement is lesse generall in whom the formall sanction of all should lye in these it were Rule and Authority in that multitude but Power and intrest and such an Authority is to be given to a Presbytry of Elders in a particular Congregation or else as wee have long since beene resolved all that is said in the New Testament about their Rule and of the peoples Obedience to them is to be look't upon but as Metaphors and to hold no porportion with any substantiall reallity of Rule and Governement And in this Distribution of power Christ hath had a sutable and due regard unto the estate and condition of his Church as now under the New Testament He hath qualified and dignified it Vnder the Old Testament it was in its infancy but it is comparatively come forth of its nonage growen up to a riper age both as the tenure of the Covenant of grace in difference from the old runs in the Prophets as Paul to the Galatians expresseth it They are therefore more generally able if visible Saints which is to be the subject matter of Churches under the N. Testāent to joyn with their Guides Leaders in judging discerning what concernes their own their Brethrens consciences And therefore Christ hath not now lodged the sole power of all Church matters solely intirely in the Churches Tutors Governors as of old when it was under age He did But yet because of their weaknes unskilfulnes for the generality of them in comparison to those whō He hath ascended to give gifts unto on purpose for their guidance the Government of thē He hath therefore placed a Rule and Authority in those Officers over them not directing onely but binding so as not onely nothing in an ordinary way of Church government should be done without them but not esteemed validly done unlesse done by them And thus by meanes of this due and golden ballancing and poysing of power and interest Authority and Priviledge in Elders and the Brethren this Government might neither degenerate into Lordlynesse and oppression in Rulers over the Flocke as not having all power in their hands alone nor yet into Anarchy and confusion in the Flocke among themselves so as all things belonging to mens consciences might be transacted to common edification satisfaction For the second Let it not seeme a paradoxe that a Ministeriall Doctrinall Authority should be found severed from that power of Excommunication to second it if not obeyed Every Minister and Pastour hath in himselfe alone a Ministeriall Doctrinall authority over the whole Church that is his charge and every person in it to instruct rebuke exhort with all authority By reason of which those under him are bound to obey him in the Lord not only vi Materiae by vertue of the matter of the commands in that they are the commands of Christ for so he should speake with no more authority then any other man yea a Child who speaking a truth out of the word should leade us as the prophet speakes But further by reason of that Ministeriall authority which Christ hath endowed him withall he is to be look't at by them as an Ordinance of His over them and towards them And yet he alone hath not the authority of Excommunication in him to inforce his Doctrine if any doe gainesay it Neither therefore is this authority as in him considered to be judged vaine and fruitlesse and ineffectuall to draw men to obedience Neither let it seeme strange that the power of this Censure of cutting men off and delivering them to Satan in which the positive part and indeed the controversie betwixt us others of Excommunication lyes should be inseperably linked by Christ unto a particular Congregation as the proper native priviledge hereof so as that no Assembly or company of Elders justly presumed and granted to be more wise judicious should assume it to themselves or sever the formall power thereof from the particular Congregations For though it be hard to give the reason of Christs institutions Yet there is usually in the wayes of humane wisedom and reason something analogous thereunto which may serve to illustorate if not to justifie this dispersion of intrests And so if we mistake not there may be found even of this in the wisedome of our Ancestours in the constitutions of this Kingdome The sentencing to death of any subject in the Kingdome as it is the highest civill punishment so of all other the neerest and exactest paralell to this in spiritualls of cutting a soule off and delivering it to Satan yet the power of this high judgement is not put into the hands of an Assembly of Lawyers onely no not of all the Judges themselves men selected for wisedome faithfullnesse and gravity who yet are by office designed to have an inerest herein But when they upon any speciall Cause of difficulty for councell and direction in such judgements doe all meete as sometimes they doe Yet they have not power to pronounce this sentence of death upon any man without the concurrence of a Jury of his Peeres which are of his owne ranke and in Corporations of such as are Inhabitants of the same place And with a Jury of these men of themselves not supposed to be so skilfull in the Lawes c. two Judges yea one with other Justices on the Bench hath power to adjudge and pronounce that which all of them and all the Lawyers in this Kingdome together have not without a Jury And we of this Nation use to admire the care and wisedom of our Ancestors herein do esteeme this priviledge of the Subject in this particular peculiar to our Nation as one of the glories of our Lawes and doe make beast of it as such a liberty and security to each persons life as we thinke no Nation about us can shew the like And what should be the reason of such a constitution but this which in the beginning we insisted on the dispersion of power into severall hands which in capitall matters every mans tryall should runne through whereof the one should have the tye of like common intrest to oblige them unto faithfullnesse as the other should have skill and wisedome to guide them and direct therein And besids that intrest that is in any kind of Association fraternity yea or neighbourhood or like wise that which is from the common case of men alike subjected to an Authority set over them to sentence them there is also the speciall advantage of an exact knowledge of the fact in the hainous
Protestants and Papists yet wee crave leave to expresse what in it doth not fully satisfie us Foure things in it seeme defective to us 1. That any key of the kingdome of heaven should be left without power For here in this distribution the key of knowledge is contradistinguished from a key of power 2. There is a reall defect in omitting an integrall part of the keys which is that key of power or liberty which belongeth to the Church it self But no marvell though the Popish Clergie omitted it who have oppressed all Church-libertie and Protestant Churches having recovered the libertie of preaching the Gospel and ministery of the Sacraments have been well satisfied therewith so as some of them have looked no farther nor so much as discerned their defect of Church-power or liberty due unto them in point of discipline and others finding themselves wronged in withholding a key or power which belongs to them have wrested to themselves an undue power which belongs not to them the key of authority 3. There is another defect in the Distribution in dividing the key of order from the key of Jurisdiction of purpose to make way for the power of Chancellours and Commissaries in foro exteriori who though they want the key of order having never entred into holy orders as they are called or at most into the order of Deacons onely whereof our Lord spake nothing touching Jurisdiction yet they have been invested with Jurisdiction yea and more then ministeriall authoritie even above those Elders who labour in word and doctrine By this sacrilegious breach of order which hath been as it were the breaking of the Files and Ranks in an Armie Satan hath routed and ruined a great part of the libertie and puritie of Churches and of all the Ordinances of Christ in them 4. A fourth defect but yet the least which we observe in this distribution is that order is appropriated to the Officers of the Church onely For though wee be far from allowing that sacrilegious usurpation of the Ministers office which we heare of to our griefe to be practised in some places that private Christians ordinarily take upon them to preach the Gospel publickly and to minister Sacraments Yet we put a difference between Office and Order Office we looke at as peculiar to those who are set apart for some peculiar function in the Church who are either Elders or Deacons But order speaking of Church-order properly taken is common to all the members of the Church whether Officers or private brethren There is an order as well in them that are subject as in them that rule There is a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The maid in Athenaeus is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well as her Mistresse Yet if any man be willing to make office and order aequipollent we will not contend about words so there be no erroneous apprehension wrapt into the matter To come therefore to such a distribution of the keyes as is more suitable to Scripture phrase For it becomes true Israelites rather to speak the language of Canaan then the language of Ashdod When Paul beheld and rejoyced to behold how the Church of Colosse had received the Lord Iesus and walked in him he summeth up all their Church estate to wit their beautie and power in these two Faith and order Col. 2.5 6. There is therefore a key of Faith and a key of Order The key of Faith is the same which the Lord Iesus calleth the key of knowledge Luke 11.52 and which he complaineth the Lawyers had taken away Now that key of knowledge Christ speaketh of was such that if it had not been taken away they that had it had power by it to enter into the kingdom of heaven themselves and it may be to open the doore to others to enter also Now such a knowledge whereby a man hath power to enter into heaven is onely faith which is often therefore called knowledge as Isa 53.11 By the knowledge of him shall my righteous servant justifie many that is by the faith of Christ And Ioh. 17.3 This is eternall life to know thee that is to beleeve on thee This key therefore the key of knowledge saving knowledge or which is all one the key of faith is common to all beleevers A faithfull soul knowing the Scriptures and Christ in them receiveth Christ and entreth through him into the kingdom of heaven both here and hereafter Here he entreth into a state of grace through faith * Heb. 4.3 and by the profession of his faith he entreth also into the fellowship of the Church which is the kingdom of heaven upon earth and by the same faith as he beleeveth to justification so he maketh confession to salvation which is perfected in the kingdom of glory Rom. 10.10 The key of Order is the power whereby every member of the Church walketh orderly himself according to his place in the Church and helpeth his brethren to walk orderly also It was that which the Apostles and Elders called upon Paul so to carrie himself before the Jews in the Temple that he might make it appear to all men that he walked orderly Act. 21.18.24 Orderly to wit according to the orders of the Iewish Church with whom he then conversed And it was the commandment which Paul gave to the whole Church of Thessalonica and to all the members of it to withdraw themselves from every brother that walketh disorderly 2 Thes 3.6 This their withdrawing from him that walked disorderly was the exercise of their key of order And it was a like exercise of the same key of order when he requireth the Brethren to warne the unruly which is in the originall the same word to admonish the disorderly 1 Thes 5.14 And this key of order to wit order understood in this sense is common to all the members of the Church whether Elders or brethren Furthermore of Order there be two keyes a key of power or interest And the key of Authority or Rule The first of these is termed in the Scriptures Liberty So distinguishing it from that part of Rule and Authority in the officers of the Church We speak not here of that spirituall liberty whether of impunitie whereby the children of God are set free by the blood of Christ from Satan hell bondage of sin curse of the Morall Law and service of the Ceremoniall Law nor of immunitie whereby we have power to be called the sons of God to come boldly unto the throne of grace in prayer and as heirs of glory to look for our inheritance in light but of that externall libertie or interest which Christ also hath purchased for his people as libertie to enter into the fellowship of his Church libertie to chuse and call well gifted men to office in that his Church libertie to partake in Sacraments or seals of the Covenant of the Churchs libertie and interest to joyn with
officers in the due censure of offenders and the like This libertie and the acts thereof are often exemplified in the Acts of the Apostles and the Apostle Paul calleth it expresly by the name of libertie Brethren saith he you have been called unto LIBERTY onely use not your liberty as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another Galath 5.13 that the Apostle by that libertie meaneth Church libertie or power in ordering Church affaires will evidently appeare if we consult with the context rather then with Commenters For the Apostle having spent the former part of the Epistle partly in the confirmation of his calling partly in disputation against justification by the works of the Law to the end of v. 8. of Chap. 5. in the ninth Verse he descendeth not to exhort unto bonos more 's in generall as usually Commenters take it but to instruct in Church Discipline in which he giveth three or foure directions to the tenth v. of Chap. 6. 1 Touching the censure of those corrupt Teachers who had perverted and troubled them with that corrupt Doctrine of justification by works Chap. 5. ver 9. to the end of the Chapter 2. Touching the gentle admonition and restoring of a brother fallen by infirmitie Chap. 6. ver 1. to 5. 3. Touching the maintenance of their Ministers ver 6 7 8. and beneficence to others ver 9 10. Touching the first the censure of their corrupt teachers 1 He layeth for the ground of it that which himself gave for the ground of the excommunication of the incestuous Corinth 1 Cor. 5.6 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump vers 9. 2 He presumeth the Church will be of the same mind with him and concur in the censure of him that troubled them with corrupt doctrine v. 10. from fellowship with which corrupt doctrine he cleareth himself v. 11. 3 He proceedeth to declare what censure he wisheth might be dispensed against him and the rest of those corrupt teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you cut off to wit by excommunication ver 12. Now lest it should be objected by the brethren of the Church But what power have we to cut them off The Apostle answereth they have a power and libertie to wit to joyn with the sounder part of the Presbyterie in casting them out or cutting them off For brethren saith he you are called unto liberty If it should be further objected Yea but give the people this power and libertie in some cases either to cast off their teachers or to cut them off the people will soon take advantage to abuse this libertie unto much carnall licentiousnesse The Apostle preventeth that with a word of wholsome counsell Brethren saith he you have been called unto libertie onely use not your libertie as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another v. 13. and thereupon seasonably pursueth this counsell with a caveat to beware of abusing this liberty to carnall contention an usuall disease of popular liberty and withall dehorteth them from all other fruits of the flesh to the end of the Chapter Evident therefore it is that there is a key of power or libertie given to the Church to the Brethren with the Elders as to open a doore of entrance to the Ministers calling so to shut the doore of entrance against them in some cases as when through corrupt and pernicious doctrine they turn from Shepherds to become ravenous wolves Having spoken then of that first key of order namely the key of power in a more large sense or liberty in the Church there remaineth the other key of order which is the key of Authority or of Rule in a more strict sense which is in the Elders of the Church Authoritie is a morall power in a superiour order or state binding or releasing an inferious in point of subjection This key when it was promised to Peter Matth. 16.19 and given to him with the rest of the Apostles Ioh. 20.23 they thereby had power to bind and loose and it is the same Authority which is given to their successours the Elders whereby they are called to feed and rule the Church of God as the Apostles had done before them Act. 20.28 And indeed by opening and applying the Law the spirit of bondage accompanying the same they bind sinners under the curse and their consciences under guilt of sin and fear of wrath and shut the kingdom of heaven against them And by opening and applying the Gospel the Spirit of Adoption accompanying the same they remit sin and loose the consciences of beleeving repenting souls from guilt of sin and open to them the doores of heaven By vertue of this key as they preach with all authoritie not onely the doctrine of the Law but also the Covenant of the Gospel so they administer the seals thereof Baptisme and the Lords Supper By virtue also of this key they with the Church do bind an obstinate offender under excommunication Matth. 18.17 18. and release and forgive him upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 This Distribution of the keyes and so of spirituall power in the things of Christs kingdom we have received from the Scripture But if any men out of love to Antiquitie do rather affect to keep to the terms of the former more ancient Distribution as there be who are as loath to change Antiquos terminos verborum as agrorum we would not stick upon the words rightly explained out of desire both to judge and speak the same things with fellow-brethren Onely then let them allow some spirituall power to the key of knowledge though not Church-power And in Church power let them put in as well a key of liberty that is a power and priviledge of interest as a key of Authoritie And by their key of order as they do understand the key of office so let them not divide from it the key of jurisdiction for Christ hath given no jurisdiction but to whom he hath given office and so we willingly consent with them CHAP. III. Of the subject of the power of the keyes to whom they are committed and first of the key of knowledge and Order AS the keyes of the kingdom of heaven be divers so are the subjects to whom they are committed divers as in the naturall body diversitie of functions belongeth to diversity of members 1. The key of knowledge or which is all one the key of Faith belongeth to all the faithfull whether joyned to any particular Church or no. As in the primitive times men of grown yeers were first called and converted to the faith before they were received into the Church And even now an Indian or Pagan may not be received into the Church till he have first received the faith and have made profession of it before the Lord and the Church which argueth that the key of knowledge is given not onely to the Church but to some before they enter into the Church And yet to Christians for
judge the world even Angels so in the next Chapter the 6. of that 1 Cor. 1.2 3 4 5. And the same Brethren of the same Church as well as the Elders he intreateth to forgive the same incestuous Corinthian upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 8. If it be said to judge is an act of rule and to be Rulers of the Church is not given to all the Brethren but to the Elders only Answ All judgement is not an act of authority or rule for there is a judgement of discretion by way of priviledge as well as of authority by way of sentence That of discretion is common to all the Brethren as well as that of authority belongeth to the Presbytery of that Church In England the Jury by their verdict as well as the Judge by his sentence do both of them judge the same malefactor yet in the Jury their verdict is but an act of their popular liberty In the Judge it is an act of his judiciall authority If it be demanded What difference is there between these two The answer is ready Great is the difference for though the Jury have given up their judgement and verdict yet the malefactor is not thereupon legally condemned much lesse executed but upon the sentence of the Judge In like sort here though the Brethren of the Church do with one accord give up their vote and judgement for the censure of an offender yet he is not thereby censured till upon the sentence of the Presbytery If it be said again Yea but it is an act of authority to binde and loose and the power to bind and loose Christ gave to the whole Church Mat. 18.18 Answ The whole Church may be said to bind and loose in that the Brethren consent and concurre with the Elders both before the Censure in discerning it to be just and equall and in declaring their discernment by lifting up of their hands or by silence and after the censure in rejecting the offender censured from their wonted Communion And yet their discerning or approving of the justice of the censure before-hand is not a preventing of the Elders in their work For the Elders before that have not onely privately examined the offender and his offence and the proofes thereof to prepare the matter and ripen it for the Churches cognizance but doe also publickly revise the heads of all the materiall passages thereof before the Church and doe withall declare to the Church the counsell and will of God therein that they may rightly discerne and approve what censure the Lord requireth to be administred in such a case So that the peoples discerning and approving the justice of the censure before it be administred ariseth from the Elders former instruction and direction of them therein Whereunto the people give consent in obedience to the will and rule of Christ Hence is that speech of the Apostle Wee have in readinesse to revenge all disobedience when your OBEDIENCE IS FVLFILLED 2 Cor. 10.6 The Apostles revenge of disobedience by way of reproofe in preaching doth not follow the peoples obedience but proceedeth whether the people obey it or no. It was therefore their revenge of disobedience by way of censure in discipline which they had in readinesse when the obedience of the Church is fulfilled in discerning and approving the Equitie of the Censure which the Apostles or Elders have declared to them from the Word This power or priviledge of the Church in dealing in this sort with a scandalous offender may not be limited only to a private brother offending but may reach also to an offensive Elder For as hath been touched already it is plaine that the Brethren of the Circumcision supposing Peter to have given an offence in eating with men uncircumcised they openly expostulated with him about his offence and he stood not with them upon termes of his Apostleship much lesse of his Eldership but willingly submitted himselfe to give satisfaction to them all Act. 11.2 to 18. And Paul writeth to the Church of Colosse to deale with Archippus warning him to see to the fulfilling of his Ministery Col. 4.17 And very pregnant is his direction to the Galatians for their proceeding to the utmost with their corrupt and scandalous false Teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you And that upon this very ground of their libertie Gal. 5.12 13. as hath been opened above in Chap. 2. But whether the Church hath power or libertie for proceeding to the utmost censure of their whole Presbytery is a Question of more difficultie For 1. It cannot well be conceived that the whole Presbytery should be proceeded against but that by reason of their strong influence into the hearts of many of the Brethren a strong partie of the Brethren will be ready to side with them and in case of finding dissension and opposition the Church ought not to proceed without consulting with the Synod As when there arose dissension in the Church at Antioch and SIDING or as the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they sent up to the Apostles and Elders at Jerusalem who in way of Synod determined the businesse Act. 15.2 to 23. A precedent and patterne of due Church proceedings in case of dissension when some take with one side some with another But of that more here after 2. Excommunication is one of the highest acts of Rule in the Church and therefore cannot be performed but by some Rulers Now where all the Elders are culpable there be no Rulers left in that Church to censure them As therefore the Presbytery cannot excommunicate the whole Church though Apostate for they must tell the Church and joyne with the Church in that Censure so neither can the Church excommunicate the whole Presbytery because they have not received from Christ an office of rule without their Officers If it be said the twentie-foure Elders who represent the private members of the Church as the foure living Creatures doe the foure Officers had all of them Crowns upon their heads and sate upon thrones Rev. 4.4 which are signes of regall authoritie The answer is The crowns and thrones argue them to be Kings no more then their white rayments argue them to be Priests ver 4. but neither Priests nor Kings by office but by libertie to performe like spirituall duties by grace which the other doe by grace and office As Priests they offer up spirituall sacrifices and as Kings they rule their lusts passions themselves and their families yea the world and Church also after a sort the world by improving it to spirituall advantage and the Church by appointing their own Officers and likewise in censuring their offenders not onely by their officers which is as much as Kings are wont to doe but also by their own royall assent which Kings are not wont to doe but onely in the execution of Nobles But neverthelesse though the Church want authoritie to excommunicate their Presbytery yet they want not libertie to
Elders with them or direct them where to procure such to come unto them The like course is wont to be taken when sundry Christians coming over from one countrey to another such as are come over first and are themselves full of company direct those that come after them and assist them in like sort in the combination of themselves into Church order according to the rule of the Gospel Though the Apostles be dead whose office it was to plant gather and multiply Churches yet the work is not dead but the same power of the keyes is left with the Churches in common and with each particular church for her part according to their measure to propagate and inlarge the kingdome of Christ as God shall give opportunity throughout all generations CHAP. V. Of the subject to whom the key of Authority is committed THe key of Authoritie or Rule is committed to the Elders of the Church and so the act of Rule is made the proper act of their office The Elders that rule well c. 1 Tim. 5.17 Heb. 13.7.17 The speciall acts of this rule are many The first and principall is that which the Elders who labour in the Word and Doctrine are chiefly to attend unto that is the preaching of the Word with all Authoritie and that which is annexed thereto the administration of the Sacraments or seals Speak rebuke and exhort saith Paul to Titus with all authoritie Tit. 2.15 And that the administration of the seals is annexed thereto is plain from Matth. 28.19 20. Go saith Christ to the Apostles make Disciples and baptize them c. If it be objected private members may all of them prophecie publiquely 1 Cor. 14 31. and therefore also baptize and so this act of Authority is not peculiar to preaching Elders Ans 1. The place in the Corinths doth not speak of ordinarie private members but of men furnished with extraordinary gifts Kings at the time of their first Coronation give many extraordinary large gifts which they do not daily poure out in like sort in their ordinary government Christ soon after his ascenfion poured out a larger measure of his spirit then in times succeeding The members of the Church of Corinth as of many other in those primitive times were inriched with all knowledge and in all utterance I Cor. 1.5 And the same persons that had the gift of prophesie in the Church of Corinth had also the gift of tongues which put upon the Apostle a necessitie to take them off from their frequent speaking with tongues by preferring prophesie before it 1 Cor. 14.2 to 24. So that though all they might prophesie as having extraordinary gifts for it yet the like libertie is not allowed to them that want the like gifts In the Church of Israel none besides the Priests and Levites did ordinarily prophesie either in the Temple or in the Synagogues unlesse they were either furnished with extraordinatie gifts of prophesie as the Prophets of Israel or were set apart and trained up to prepare for such a calling as the sons of the Prophets When Amos was forbidden by the high Priest of Bethel to prophesie at Bethel Amos doth not alledge nor plead the libertie of any Israelite to prophesie in the holy Assemblies but alledgeth onely his extraordinarie calling Amos 7.14 15. It appeareth also that the sons of the Prophets that is men set apart and trained up to prepare for that calling were allowed the like libertie 1 Sam. 19.20 Answ 2. But neither the sons of the Prophets nor the Prophets themselves were wont to offer sacrifices in Israel except Samuel and Eliah by speciall direction nor did the extraordinarie Prophets in Corinth take upon them to administer Sacraments If any reply That if the Prophets in the Church at Corinth had been endued with extraordinarie gists of prophefie they had not been subject to the judgement of the Prophets which these are directed to be 1 Cor. 14.22 Ans It followeth not For the people of God were to examine all prophesies by the Law and testimonie and not to receive them but according to that rule Psal 8.20 Yea and Paul himself referreth all his Doctrine to the Law and Prophets Act. 26.22 And the Bereans are commended for examining Pauls doctrine according to the Scriptures Act. 17.11 12. 2. A second act of Authoritie common to the Elders is they have power as any weighty occasion shall require to call the Church together as the Apostles called the Church together for the election of Deacons Act. 6.2 And in like sort are the Priests of the old Testament stirred up to call a solemne Assembly to gather the Elders and all the inhabitants of the land to sanctifie a Fast Joel 1.13 14. 3. It is an act of their power to examine if Apostles then any others whether officers or members before they be received of the Church Rev. 2.2 A fourth act of their rule is the Ordination of officers whom the people have chosen whether Elders or Deacons 1 Tim. 4.14 Act. 6.6 5. It is an act of the key of Authoritie that the Elders open the doores of speech and silence in the Assembly They were the Rulers of the Synagogue who sent to Paul and Barnabas to open their mouthes in a word of exhortation Act. 13.15 and it is the same power which calleth men to speak to put men to silence when they speak amisse And yet when the Elders themselves do lie under offence or under suspition of it the Brethren have liberty to require satisfaction in a modest manner concerning any publick breach of rule as hath been mentioned above out of Act. 11.2 3 c. 6. It belongeth to the Elders to prepare matters beforehand which are to be transacted by themselves or others in the face of the Congregation as the Apostles and Elders being met at the house of Iames gave direction to Paul how to carry himself that he might prevent the offence of the Church when he should appear before them Act. 21.18 Hence when the offence of a brother is according to the rule in Matth. 18.17 to be brought to the Church they are beforehand to consider and enquire whether the offence be really given or no whether duely proved and orderly proceeded in by the Brethren according to rule and not duly satisfied by the offender lest themselves and the Church be openly cumbred with unnecessary and tedious agitations but that all things transacted before the Church be carried along with most expedition and best edification In which respect they have power to reject causlesse and disorderly complaints as well as to propound and handle just complaints before the Congregation 7. In the handling of an offence before the Church the Elders have authoritie both Jus dicere and Sententiam serre When the offence appeareth truly scandalous the Elders have power from God to informe the Church what the Law or Rule and will of Christ is for the censure of such an offence And when the
given to a particular Church of Brethren as such primo per se then it would be found in every particular Church of Brethren For a Quatenus adomnia valet consequentia Obj. 4. But it is an usuall tenent in many of our best Divines that the government of the Church is mixt of a Monarchy an Aristocracie and a Democracy In regard of Christ the head the government of the Church is soveraigne and monarchicall In regard of the Rule by the Presbytery it is stewardly and Aristocraticall in regard of the peoples power in elections and censures it is Democraticall which argueth the people have some stock of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and authority in the government of the Church Answ In a large sense Authority after a sort may be acknowledged in the people As 1. when a man acteth by counsell according to his own discerning freely he is then said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominus sui actus So the people in all the acts of liberty which they put forth are Domini sui actus Lords of their own action 2. The people by their acts of liberty as in election of officers and concurrency in censure of offenders and in the Determination and Promulgation of Synodall acts they have a great stroke or power in the ordering of Church affairs which may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or potestas a POWER which many times goeth under the name of rule or authoritie but in proper speech it is rather a priviledge or liberty then authoritie as hath been opened above in Chap. 3. For no act of the peoples power or liberty doth properly bind unlesse the authoritie of the Presbytery concur with it 3. A third argument whereby it may appear that the Elders of a particular Church are the first subject of authoritie in that Church is taken from the like removall of other subjects from whence they might be thought to derive their authoritie as was used before to prove the Church of Brethren was the first subject of their own libertie in their own Congregation The Elders of Churches are never found in Scripture to derive their authority which they exercise in their own congregation either from the Elders of other Churches or from any Synod of Churches All particular Churches and all the Elders of them are of equall power each of them respectively in their own Congregations None of them call others their Rabbies or Masters or Fathers in respect of any authoritie over them but all of them own and acknowledge one another as fellow Brethren Matth. 23.8 9 10. And though in a Synod they have received power from Christ and from his presence in the Synod to exercise Authoritie in imposing burthens such as the holy Ghost layeth upon all Churches whose Elders are present with them Act. 15.28 for the Apostles were Elders in all Churches yet the Elders of every particular Church when they walk with the brethren of their own Church in light and peace they need not to derive from the Synod any power to impose the same or the like burthens upon their owne Churches For they have received a power and charge from Christ to teach and command with all authoritie the whole counsell of God unto their people And the people discerning the light of the truth delivered and walking in peace with their Elders they readily yeeld obedience to their Over-seers in whatsoever they see and hear by them commended to them from the Lord. 3. Now we come to the third branch of the third Proposition which was this That the Church of a particular congregation Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election or ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body The truth hereof may appear by these Arguments 1 In point of ordination From the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling oven to the satisfaction of his own and the peoples conscience when both the Brethren and the Elders of the particular Church whereto he is called have put forth the power which belongeth to them about him As when the Brethren of the Church have chosen him to office and the Presbyterie of the Church have laied their hands upon him and both of them in their severall acts have due respect to the inward ministeriall gifts whereunto God hath furnished him he may then look at himself as called by the holy Ghost to exercise his talents in that office amongst them and the people may and ought to receive him as sent of God to them What defect may be found in such a call when the Brethren exercise their lawfull libertie and the Elders their lawfull authority in his ordination and nothing more is required to the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling If it be said there wanted imposition of hands by the Bishop who succeedeth in the place of Timothy and Titus whom the Apostle Paul left the one in Ephesus the other in Crete to ordain Elders in many Churches Tit. 1.5 Ans Touching ordination by Timothy and Titus and upon pretence of them by Bishops enough hath been said by many godly learned heretofore especially of later times The summe cometh to these conclusions 1 That Timothy and Titus did not ordain Elders in many Churches as Bishops but as Evangelists Timothy is expresly termed an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4.5 And Titus is as clearly decyphered to be an Evangelist as Timothy by the characters of an Evangelist which either Scripture holdeth forth or Eusebius noteth in his Ecclesiast histor lib. 3. cap. 37. Gr. cap. 31. Lat. Not to be limited to a certain Church but to follow the Apostles finishing their work in planting and watering Churches where they came They did indeed ordain officers where they wanted and exercised jurisdiction as the Apostles did in severall Churches yet with the rest of the Presbyterie and in the presence of the whole Church 1 Tim. 5. But for the continuance of this office of an Evangelist in the Church there is no direction in the Epistles either to Timothy or Titus or any where else in Scripture 2. Conclusion Those Bishops whose callings or offices in the Church are set forth in those Epistles to be continued they are altogether Synonyma with Presbyters Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Tim. 3.1 to 7. 3. Conclus We read of many Bishops to one Church Phil. 1.1 Act. 14.23 and Chap. 20.17 28. Tit. 1.5.7 but not of many Churches much lesse all the Churches in a large Diocesse to one Bishop 4. Conclus There is no transcendent proper work cut out or reserved for such a transcendent officer as a Diocesan Bishop throughout the New Testament The transcendent acts reserved to him by the Advocates of Episcopacie are Ordination and Iurisdiction Now both these are acts of Rule And Paul to Timothy acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church above Pastors and Teachers who labour in