Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	prove_v	scripture_n	tradition_n	2,732	5	9.6275	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10151	The right of Kings conteyning a defence of their supremacy, over all persons and in all causes, as well ecclesiasticall as civill, within their severall dominions : herewithall is proved by testimony of Holy Scripture, that Christian Kinges are to haue such dignity, and execute such office in the Christian church, as Gods kinges had exercised in the church under the lawe : which part of the mysterie of Gods will, as it hath been wickedly under poperie shut up from men, so it is in our tymes right needfull that the same be opened to all Christian nations.	Procter, Thomas.	1621 (1621)	STC 20410; ESTC S1281	21,909	36

the Apostle Paul purposely provides that none should conceive him to have received his Doctrine of Man or by Man And as for building upon the Apostle Peters allowance or approbation of his Doctrine it were verily absurd that the Apostle Paul should build or ground himselfe for his Doctrine upon Peters allowance thereof or the authoritie of such allowance when he received his Doctrine from the Lord himselfe for it were truely absurd to seeke an Apostles allowance and to build upon the authoritie of such allowance for that received immediately from the Lord of the Apostles So likewise the Churches who received the doctrine of the Apostle Paule inasmuch as they beleeved that he received it not of Peter but of Christ how sought they eyther or how built they upon the authority of the Apostle Peters approbation There was indeed an approbation Gal. 2.7 but not a building upon such approbation seing the Apostle had a higher warrant and authority for his doctrine Lastly seeing it is very apparant Mark 3.14 that our Lord himself chose the Apostles and authorised thē to the Apostolicall Ministrations seeing the Apostle Paul Gal. 1.1 sayth Paul an Apostle not of Men neyther by Man but by Iesus Christ therefore who received not their Ministration from Peter how should they receive from him the Doctrine wherof they were Apostolicall Ministers I conclude therefore that all the Apostles were not fed with doctrine by Peter consequently that Apostle was not to feed all the Lords sheepe with matter of doctrine And as for feeding them with Government by exercising a supreame Rule over them this also appeares to be a false collectiō frō this Scripture inasmuch as we finde that our Lord expressly forbadd unto his Apostles any one of them to rule over the rest For Mark 10.42 our Lord sayd thus unto the Apostles ye know that they which delight to beare rule among the Gentiles have Domination ouer them and they that be great a-among them exercise authority over them But it shall not be so among you By which scripture appeareth manifestly that how ever every one of the Apostles was to governe and exercise authority over others yet none of them was to governe or exercise Authoritie over the rest of the company of the Apostles It must needes therefore be a false and very pernicious interpretation or collection to affirme that the Apostle Peter was made Governour to exercise authority over all Christs sheepe for then he was to governe and exercise authority over the rest of the Apostles which thing the Lord expressly forbadd Now if the generality hold not in the Apostles how can it hold in all Christs sheepe for ever If Peter exercised not such universall government and authority over all Christs Sheepe why under the pretence of this speech of the Lords should he govern and exercise authority over all Kings And indeed if a man having already diverse Sheepherds say to one of them feede my Sheep should that one Shepherd gather hereupō that now he hath the charge of All his Masters sheepe Why should he not rather understand this of some portion of sheepe onely which his Master would surely allot out to his particular charge for he might well think with himself that where many shepherds are already appointed there all the sheepe shall not be committed to one onely Verily that Apostles excellencie even among the very Apostles themselves was such such will be acknowledged by all good Christians for ever that it needs not to be helped with unsound and false interpretations of and collections from holy scripture Thus having discovered the false use made of the latter of the two scriptures proceede we to the first scripture As for the first scripture from whence some would collect that all doctrine must be received from Peter and all power or offices or at least wise must be authorised by the authority of his allowance or approbation that so they may be built upon the Rock which Christ hath given to be a Rock whereon he will build his Church this collectiō appeares to be a false use of this scripture in asmuch as the rest of the Apostles received not their doctrine nor Power of Apostleship from the Apostle Peter but from Christ himselfe but what they received from the Lord himself it were absurd to seeke to build it upon the Authority of Peters allowance or approbation The Apostle Paul as I haue before noted speaking of the power of his Apostleship saith Paul an Apostle not of men neyther by man but by Iesus Christ why sayd he this but to teach us that we ought not to beleeve that he was such by vertue of the allowance or approbation of any man whatsoever And whilst the Apostolicall power was neither received from Peter nor built nor grounded upon the Authority of his permission approbation or allowance why should this be required of Kings and Princes These scriptures therefore what ever they intend yet this which Papists collect may not be Beleeved to be the thing which they intend for you see that that which is collected from them by Papists is directly cōtrary to a most plaine commandement of our Lord to his Apostles and to the testimony of the Apostle Paul Thus having by testimony of severall scriptures confuted these collectiōs made by some from these scriptures I think it sufficient to oppose both against tradition and also against the greatest Fathers or Bishops this testimony of holy scripture by which is proved that the rest of the Apostles were not fed by the Apostle Peter in matter of doctrine and that he was not to exercise authority or rule over them But if the scripture thus witness that the Apostle Peter himself might not lawfully claime this supreme governmēt or rule over the rest of the Apostles nor consequently over all Christs Sheep how much lesse lawfully then may his Successor claime this For as no Apostle could make an other man an Apostle so no successor could be made an Apostle by the Apostle Peter and not being so much as an Apostle how should he claime the chiefest singularity of the Apostle Peter And that no Apostle could make an Apostle I gather from the Apostle Paul who Gal. 1.1 saith Paul an Apostle not of Men neyther by Man but by Iesus Christ for this argues that an Apostle should not be of Men neyther by Man but by Iesus Christ I conclude therefrom that no Successor could be in all things like the Apostle to whom he succeedeth and much less then in those things by which if by any thing the Apostle Peter was preferred unto the rest of the Apostles If the successor haue conferred upon him all the guifts and prerogatives of an Apostle what is he then but an Apostle But such gifts and prerogatives as by which Apostles were Apostles could not be giuen by men but by Christ onely therefore the Apostle Peter neyther might nor could conferre upon his Successor all the power