Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	peter_n	pope_n	successor_n	2,110	5	8.9988	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A95627	A sermon preached at the primary visitation of the Most Reverend Father in God Michael Lord Arch-Bishop of Armagh, primate and metropolitan of all Ireland, and lord high chancellor of the same. Held at Drogheda, August 20. 1679. / by Rich. Tenison ...	Tenison, Richard, 1640?-1705.; Boyle, Michael, 1609?-1702.	1679 (1679)	Wing T683; ESTC R184950	25,194	36

did reform Religion and banish Idolatry and in the New Testament Christ and his Apostles were all obedient to the Heathen Emperours paid them Tribute and owned their Authority in appealing to them from inferior Jurisdictions And long after them The Bishops of Rome were so far from having Supremacy over Kings that other Bishops would not yield to their Usurpation for Ann. 325 when Constantine called the Council of Nice the four Patriarkships were setled by the Suffrage of 318 Bishops and then it was decreed that the Bishop of Alexandria should have as much Authority in his Patriarkship as the Bishop of Rome had in his only the first Place was allowed him in General Councils he being Bishop of the Imperial City The Council of Constantinople in which were 150 Bishops and which was called by the Emperour Theodosius granted only a Primacy of Order to the Bishop of Rome and no more and Ann. 434 the Council of Ephesus which was summoned by the Emperours Order as the Acts do often shew which was honoured with the presence of 200 Prelates ordered no Bishop should usurp any Authority but what was always his And about eighteen years after when 430 Mitred Heads did adorn the great Council of Chalcedon they declared that though the Roman Bishop had the Precedency of Place yet was the Bishop of Constantinople equal to him in all things St. Peters Charter was not then urged Thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church and I will give unto thee the Keys of Heaven they knew no more was meant by the words than that as Peters Name signified a Rock such should he be strong and solid in the building of the Church and that nothing should prevail against the Faith he then had publickly professed so Chrysos Hil. and Cypr. understood it and so did St. Bernard long enough after them for he loudly inveighs against the Tyranny of the Roman Bishop and says to Eugenius who was Pope about 1145 Quid vos alienos fines invaditis disce tibi sarculo opus esse non Sceptro he denies St. Peters Charter and says Esto ut quacunque aliâ ratione hoc tibi vindices non tamen Apostolico jure nec illud dare tibi Petrus potuit quod non habuit He thought a Sheephook did better become that great Shepherds hand than a Scepter and that Peter could not consign that power to others which was never granted to him and as to the power of the Keys Christ gave it equally to all the Apostles Joh. 20.21 He did not then give it but according to his promise I will he afterward imparted it unto them so that 't is clear Peter had no personal Authority from Christ over the rest of his Brethren neither did he arrogate the Name of Universal Bishop as Pope Gregory himself declares l. 4. Epis 76 and much less should his Successours claim that Title His Age and Gravity might give him a Primacy of Order but more we do not find And therefore the Priority of place was all that the first General Councils would allow to the following Bishops of that See and that only because Rome was the Seat of the Empire and when the Emperour removed to Constantinoplo or Ravenna the Bishops of those Places did contend with him for superiority Neither would the Bishops of Carthage Alexandria Millain and other Places yeild any thing more to Rome but said they were equall in their several Precincts The Greek and Roman Patriarcks and Archbishops governed their own Provinces without Usurping upon each other according to the Division of the Roman Empire they were quietly setled in the Principle City of each Province where the Roman President lived there did the Christian Metropolitan dwell the Bishops were Placed in their several Diocesses and were subordinate to their own Metropolitan and no other This was the true State of the Church then the Bishop of Rome had no Supremacy over Forraign Bishops much less over Kings but gave both that honour which was due unto them And thus did it continue till about 606 when Boniface the Third and sixty sixth Bishop of that See according to the best Chronologers usurped the Title of chief of the Bishops by the help of the cruel Phocas for Sabianus his Predecessor had it not and Gregory who was just before him did sharply exclaime against the Bishop of Constantinople who then began to assume it he called it Nomen Blasphemiae L. 4. Epis 76. and in his 83 Epis In isto scelesto Vocabulo nihil est aliud quàm fidem perdere But the judgment of that good Pope weighed little with his successours they Triumphed in that swelling Title But tho they dealt thus injuriously with their Brethren the Bishops to which some near them were soon drawn to consent but others in Africk and Cappadocia would not hear of it but severely rebuked them for their Pride they themselves did meekly Submit to the Authority of the Emperours De. Concil L. 3. C. 6. who did then and long after convocate and Dissolve Synods And as Cardinal Cusanus himself confesses did in Person or by their Deputies preside in Eight General Councills which they could not have done had the Pope been then Head of the Church They disposed of spiritual preferments and judged made Laws in Ecclesiastical affaires one was made by Honorius about the very Election of the Pope Gratian Dist 63. C. 23. what Edicts they decreed Damasus and other Popes made be read in all the Churches of Rome see the decree for the Consecration of Leo the 8. and the Council which gave Jus et potestatem eligendi pontificem to Charles the Great when he had secured and setled the western Empire which power his successours held till the Reign of Henry the fourth who confirmed the Election of Gregory the 7. C. 16.17 but was afterwards excommunicated by him There also will you find that the Pope durst not Consecrate Colonus without the Emperours licence There was no opposing them in any thing then the very time and place for holding Councils were ascertained by them You find Pope Leo with weeping Eyes begging Theodosius to have a Council in Italy which he refused Epis 24. and kept at Chalcedon and Commanded him to attend it and in all Places the Bishops then obeyed the Princes they lived under and did not pretend the Popes supremacy to defend them they thought it a sin as the sixth Council of Toledo declares it to question his Power to whom God hath given Authority over all but did every where patiently submit to what they inflicted upon them How silently did Eusebius Bishop of Samosatena go into banishment at the Emperours command and did not St. Cyprian do the like at the Injunction of the Proconsul of Affrick was not St. Cyril imprisoned by Theodosius junior and St. Chrysostom banished by Arcadius and many more by other Emperours what need I insist longer on this the greatests Bishops

and Fathers of the Church did throughout the world submit to their Kings and gave them all imaginable Honour and Reverence This they did till Boniface the Eight about 1295 advanced the Papal Grandeur and claimed Authority over Princes and by degrees and with difficulty he and his successors obtained it Generally beyond Seas In which yon may observe the policy of the Popes first they did exact Superiority over the Bishops and then over Kings To ascend the Throne they pull down the Mitre In which method they were lately followed by the aspiring Separatists of these nations but neither abroad nor here could Princes be brought under till the Bishops were first cast down whence by forraign and domestick Experience we may conclude that Aphorism of King James will be eternally true No Bishop No King They who rob the Bishops of their honour will next fly at the Kings If they once get the Rich Stones out of Aarons Ephod the Jewells of the Crown will be thought too Splendid If they get the Crozier in one hand they will be impatient till they hold the Scepter in the other Thus did the Pope Thus did the Kirk But though the Pope did exalt himself above many forraign Princes our Kings would not submit to such Usurpation most of them before and since the Conquest opposed it and his Nuncio's and Legats have been often rejected and his Bulls and Breves vilified and contemned his Supremacy denied the Clergy consenting thereunto and Appeals to Rome most strictly Prohibited forbdiden of which our ancient and modern Historians give many instances too tedious now to mention Do but consult the Acts of Parliament made in the Reigns of Edw the 1st Rich the 2d Edw the 3d. Henry the fifth and you 'l find they unanimously declared that the King of England ought not to answer before any Judge Ecclesiastical or Secular and that the Crown of England was subject to none but to God and ought not to be submitted to the Pope and that he was to exercise no Jurisdiction in England And Anno 601 Dionothus Abbot of Bangor proved by many Arguments that the Church of England owed no subjection to the Pope of Rome and as Bede assures you Neque precibus L. 2. C. 2. Ecles Hist neque hortamentis neque increpationibus Augustini c. They would by no means recede from their own ancient Customs and traditions they would not at all submit to what he desired nor own him for their Arch-Bishop tho he came from the Pope the Abbot owned they had love and service for the Pope and for every true and pious Christian but he knew no other obedience to be due unto him whom they called the Pope Neither was he Father of Fathers and moreover they were under the Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Caerleon The Britains and Saxons would not in those early times own the Pope for an Infallible judge tho he sent Preachers among them they consulted him as a Patriarch but no more and did not follow the Rites of the Roman Church till the Reign of Henry the first They were subject to their own King and he only subject to the King of Heaven and memorable are the words of William the Conqueror to Greg. the 7th I neither have nor will own Fealty to you neither do I find that my predecessors did ever doe it to yours which is fully made out by the Sages of our Law The Kings of Scotland have anciently done the like as is Evident from their Historians and by the advice of their Bishops and Clergy they prohibited Legats from Rome to enter the Kingdom And in this Country Fealty was sworn by the Clergy and Laity at Lismore to Henry the 2d He convened a Synod at Cashel and there and at another General meeting of the Clergy at Ardmagh was the Kings Soveraignty acknowledged and the conformity of this Church with that of England in all divine offices agreed on and in Henry the Eights time they did not only unanimously by act of Parliament but particularly under their hands to the then Lord Deputy renounce the Papal jurisdiction and then did all the Bishops of England but one take the Oath of the Kings Supremacy The Convocation which is a National Council consented to it and they gave under their hands that the Pope had no Jurisdiction in England Nay Q. Mary her self commanded the Popes Nuncio not to come into England Thus did these three Kingdoms both of old and of late disown the Popes power tho they were all then of the Romish Religion Notwithstanding all which the Scripture Councils Fathers say the Pope has no authority over Princes yet has he usurped it their Subjects who would not submit unto him have been absolved from their Allegiance and instigated by his Emissaries to Rebell and Kings have been Excommunicated deposed and Murthered and none has violated this Canon of St. Peters more then his pretended successors I need not instance in P. Zachary who deposed Childerick and Ordered Pipin the Kings high Steward to Govern France In the Histories of Greg. the 7th and Vrban the 2d you 'l find the Emperours Son urged to Rebell against his Father the Bishop of Leige excommunicated and he and his Clergy commanded to be put to death for not renouncing their fidelity but giving that honour which this Text injoyns to their Native Soveraign You know Pius Quintus urged the English to Rebell against our own Queen E. And the Divines of Salamanca and Valadolid incouraged the Irish to rise up against her and Gauran their Primate was killed in the head of the Rebels tho I now find him enrolled with many other such Subjects among the Martyrs of this Nation in the Tripartite Epitome of their Modern Saints who had many contrivances to destroy that good Queen The like practices they had in the Reigne of K. J. and how much they contributed to the Ruine of the late King and how zealously they have of late attempted the destruction of this is obvious to all their Clergy being the Chief Incendiaries to all these Villanies And that which is most lamentable is John Gavan alias Gawen lately Executed all these Mischiefs proceed from the Principles of their Religion for these Actions have been Justified by many of their best writers and greatest Jesuits On which allow me to enlarge a little seeing one who was lately executed for the Plot did out of zeal to his order and knowing how apt the words of dying men are to melt and Influence the too Credulous vulgar openly and solemnly deny it 't is strange he could remember but one of his Brethren who allowed of that Doctrine when many of their books run that way Becanus will not suffer us to question the Lawfulness of Killing refractory and disobedient Princes Angl. Cont. 1.15 p. if the Pope so Order it And Lessius thought it surely the doctrine of the Church when he says 't is heretical