Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	peter_n	pope_n	successor_n	2,110	5	8.9988	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A68918	An excellent new commedie intitutled, The conflict of conscience contayninge a most lamentable example of the dolefull desperation of a miserable worldlinge, termed by the name of Philologus, who forsooke the trueth of Gods gospel for feare of the losse of lyfe & worldly goods / compiled by Nathaniell Woodes, minister in Norwich ...; Conflict of conscience	Woodes, Nathaniel, fl. 1580.	1581 (1581)	STC 25966.5; ESTC S111762	42,953	72

demaund According to my conscience Goddes worde being my warrand Cardinall To begin therfore orderly how saist thou Philologus Haue I authoritie to call the me before Or to be short I will obiect it thus Whether hath the Pope which is Peters successor Then all other Bishops preheminence more If not then it follow that neither he Nor I which am his Legate to accompts may call thee Philologus The question is perillous for me to determine Chéefely when the party is Iudge in the cause Yet if the wholl course of Scripture ye examine And wil be tryed by Gods holy lawes Small help shall you finde to defend the same cause But the contrary may be proued manifestly As I in short wordes will proue to you breefely The surest ground wheron your Pope doth stand Is of Peters being at Roome a strong imagination And the same Peter you do vnderstand Of all the Disciples had the gubernation Surmising both without good approbation Vnlesse you will by the name of Babylon From whence Peter wrote is vnderstanded Roome As indéed diuers of your writers haue affirmed Reciting Ieromy Austine Primasius and Ambrose Who by their seuerall writinges haue confirmed That Rome is new Babylon I may it not glose But it were better for you they were dumbe I suppose For they labour to proue Roome by that acception The whore of Babilon spoke of in the Reuelation But graunt that Peter in Roome setled was Yet that he was cheefe it remayns you to proue For in my Iudgement it is a playne case That if any amongst them to rule it did behooue He should be chéefe whom Christ most did loue To whom he bequethed his mother most déere To whom in reuelation Christ did also appéere I meane Iohn Euangelist by birth Coosin germaine To our Sauiour Christ as storyes do vs tell From whose succession if that you should clayme Superioritie you should mend your cause well For then of some likelyhood of truth it should smell Where none so often as Peeter was reproued Nor from stedfast fayth so often tymes remooued But graunt all were true herein you do fayne Marke one proper lesson of a Greeke Oratour As a good childe of his fathers welth is inheritour So of his fathers vertues he must be possessour Now Peter folows Christ and al worldly goods forsakes But the Pope leaueth Christ himselfe to glory takes And to be short Christ himselfe refused to be a Kinge And the seruant aboue the Master may not be Which being both true it is a strange thing How the Pope can receiue this pompe and dignitie And yet professe himselfe Christes seruant to be Christ wil be no King the Pope wil be more The Pope is Christes Master not his seruant therefore Cardinall Ah thou arrant Heretike I will thée remember I am glad I know so much as I doo I haue wayed thy resons and haue found them so slender That I thinke them not worthy to be answeared How say you Master Hipocrisy HIP. I also thinke so But let him go forwarde and vtter his conscience And we will awhile longer here him with patience Cardinall Say on thou Heretike of the holy Sacrament Of the body and bloud of Christ what is thine opinion Philologus I haue not yet finished my former argument Cardinall Say on as I bid thée thou art a stoute Minion Philologus I shall then gladly it is a signe of vnion The which should remaine vs Christians among That one should loue another all our life long For as the bread is of many Cornells compounded And the Wine from the Iuce of many Graps do discend So we which into Christ our Rocke are ingrounded As into one Temple should cease to contend Least by our contention the Church we offend This was not the least cause among many more Which are now omitted that this Sacrament was geuen for The chéefest cause why this Sacrament was ordained Was the infirmitie of our outwarde man Whereas Saluation to all men was proclaymed That with true fayth apprehend the same can By the death of Iesus Christ that immaculate Lambe That the same might the rather of all men be beleued To the word to ad a Sacramēt it Christ nothing greued And as we the sooner beléeue that thing true For the tryall whereof more witnesses we finde So by the meanes of the Sacrament many grue Beléeuing creatures where before they were blynde For our sences some sauour of our fayth now do finde Because in the Sacrament there is this Analogy That Christ féedes our soules as the bread doth our body Cardinall Ah thou foul Heretike is there bread in the Sacrament Where is Christes body then which he did vs giue Philologus I know to the faythfull receiuer it is there present But yet the bread remaineth stil I stedfastly beléeue Cardinall To here these his errors it doth me greatly gréeue But that we may shortly to some issue come In what sence sayd Christ Hoc est Corpus meum Philologus Euen in the same sence that he sayd before Vos estis sall terrae vos estis Lux mundi Ego sum ostium and a hundreth such more If tyme would permit to alleadge them seuerally But that I may the simple sorte edifie You aske me in what sence these wordes I verifye Where Christ of the bread sayd this is my body For answere herein I aske you this question Were Christes disciples into salt transformed When he sayd ye are the salt of the earth euery one Or when the light of the world he them affirmed Or himselfe to be a dore when he confirmed Or to be a Vine did his body then change If not then why now this to me séemeth strange Cardinall Why doest thou doubt of Christ his omnipotencye But what so he willeth doth so come to passe Philologus God kéepe me and all men from such a frencye As to thinke any thing Christes power to surpasse When his will to his power ioyned was But where his will wanteth his power is vneffectuall As Christ can be no lyer God cannot be mortall Set downe therefore some proofe of his will That he would be made bread and then I recant Cardinall This Caytif myne eares with winde he doth fill His wordes both trueth and reason doth want Christes word is his will this must thou néedes graunt Philologus He spake the word likewise when he said I am the dore Was his body transformed into tymber therefere Cardinall Nay if thou béest obstinate I will say no more Haue him hence to prison and kéepe him full sure I will make him set by my friendship more store But herest thou Zeale go first and procure Some kinde of new torment which he may not indure Tiranny I am here in redines to do your commaundement And will returne hither agayne incontinent Hypocrisie At thy returne bryng hether Sensuall Suggestion That if néede be he may vs assist Least that both I and Carefull prouision The zeale of Philologus may not fully