Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	peter_n	pope_n	successor_n	2,110	5	8.9988	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29084	A defence of the Kings authority and supremacy in the church & church-discipline and that he is supream head and governour over all persons, in all causes ecclesiastical : against these disciplinarians, the Pope and his clergy, the bishops and episcoparians, the Scottish and English Presbyterians, with the independents ... / by Theophilus Brabourne.	Brabourne, Theophilus, b. 1590.	1660 (1660)	Wing B4091; ESTC R25285	18,498	27

Hezekiah and Josiah commanded the Priests and Levites and so I come to prove the point 1. The censure and punishment of Excommunication must either belong to the Bishop or Minister or to the Magistrate But it belongs not to the Bishop or Minister as I have abundantly proved before Therefore it belongs to the Magistrate 2. The Princes and Elders in Ezra's time commanded the people to come to Jerusalem to take the Covenant and threatned those that refused with excommunication or separation from the Congregation or Church Ezra 10.3.7 8. whereby you see that excommunication was in the power of the Magistrate 3. King Solomon degraded Abiather the Priest from his spirituall office which was a spirituall punishment 1 King 2.27 Now if Kings and Magistrates will imitate Solomon then they must excommunicate scandalous persons Solomon put off the Priest from medling in holy things so should Magistrates cut off scandalous sinners from the communion of Saints at the Lords Table and from medling with these holy things 4. If the Magistrate may command spirituall duties then he may inflict spirituall punishment for neglect of them as in Excommunication He that may command a duty hath power to punish the neglect of it or else he hath no power to command to command without a coercive power to compell is but an image or scare-crow But the Magistrate may command spiritual duties 1 Chron. 16.7 2 Chron. 35.15 2 Chr. 29.1 4 5. 2 Kings 23.4 And therefore the Magistrate may inflict the spirituall punishment of Excommunication 5. Excommunication is a punishment and so called by all men and so it is called in Scripture 2 Cor. 2.6 and a punishment is a revenge Now to punish and revenge is proper to the Magistrate for he is the Minister of God to punish and to take vengeance on him that doth evill Rom. 13.4 Wherefore the censure of Excom upon the scandalous sinner belongs to the office of the Magistrate 6. The severall acts of authority used in Excom belongs to Magistraticall power as to summon into Court and to examine witnesses against one and to examine the person complained on And without these precedent acts there can be no Excom Now to whom belongeth these acts to him belongeth the censure of Excom that is to the Magistrate By these particulars it appears that by the Word of God the Bishop in his Consistory doth usurp the Magistrates office Quest 10. Do Bishops devest the King of his supremacy I answer yes and thus I prove it 1. It is clear by the Word of God as hath been proved that Bishops do usurp the Magistrates authority and office Now he that usurps the Magistrates authority he usurps the Kings authority for the Magistrates authority is the Kings and he that usurps the Kings authority in causes Ecclesiasticall he denies and devests the King of his supremacy in causes Ecclesiasticall For if you deny him authority you devest him of and deny his superiority and supremacy in authority If a Master gives his servant five pounds to dispose of by his order and the servant be robbed of it by the way not onely the servant is robbed but his Master also and then his money being lost he can exercise neither authority nor superiority over it So it is if a Bishop takes from the Magistrate the Kings authority with it he takes the Kings superiority and supremacy in Ecclesiasticals But Bishops will say they had the Kings Commission for it and the King gave them this authority But say I Christ forbad them to take it Mat. 20.25 and 1 Pet. 5.3 Secondly they say the King gave it them and so doth a true man give his purse to a Thief but it is out of fear So these Kings afore-time gave their authority to Bishops but they got this gift by fraud For the Pope perswaded Kings that the Key of Discipline and Jurisdiction was a Legacy left by Christ first to Saint Peter and so to his successors Mat. 16.19 which is false and more then can be proved Besides Christ forbad the Pope and Bishops to exercise Lordly authority Mat. 20.25 1 Pet. 5.3 Now as the Pope so did those Bishops falsly plead that Legacy and so got it by fraud and subtlety wherefore as I conceive the gift of those Kings and their Commissions was a nullity Cromwell of late got off the Kings head by force and thus Bishops got away those Kings regall authority in the Church by fraud and subtilty Would it not grieve a man to see his friend cheated of his money at Dice And how can it but be grievous to a loyall Subject to see his Kings just and Royall prerogative wrested out of his hands by the wit of Bishops In King Henrie the 8. the Bishops of England took an Oath to the Pope whereupon the Lord Cromwell then informed the King of it saying that he was but half King and his subjects but half-subjects to him As I conceive that the King was King but over the bodies and Bishops were Kings over the souls of the people so they fell into a premunire which cost them 100000. pounds The Bishops in those dayes could not by flattery and subtlety perswade the King and his Council that St. Peters keyes did hang on the Popes girdle or on the girdle of English Bishops he would not be so cheated of his supremacy for they got it by fraud 2. The Pope holds his office Jure Divino so did those Bishops and so do our Bishops for all these plead for Peters keys and such like Scriptures Now though our Bishops take a commission from the King and say he is supreme yet they hold a higher commission namely from God and Christ and the Scriptures How then can the King be supreme in causes Ecclesiastical for Bishops have a commission higher then the commission which they have from the King And how can he be next under Christ when the Bishops have gotten the higher Commission The King may be supreme over the State but Bishops are next to Christ and supreme over the Church and in causes Ecclesiasticall for they say they have an immediate commission from Christ If so their commission from the King must be an inferiour commission 3. If a Bishop hath this Lordly authority to Excommunicate then if he makes conscience of his office he must do justice to and upon all men rich and poor noble and ignoble even to the K. as well as to the pesant God is no respecter of persons a Bishop must not be partiall Now if a King be subject to a Bishops Court and the Bishops there sits as Lord and Judge over him where is the Kings supremacy in Ecclesiasticals Notwithstanding Bishops consciences and doing of justice I know they dare not summon the King into their Consistory Yet I know and they know too that by their principles and the power of Peters keyes which hang at their girdle as they make the world believe they are bound to make no scruple

Court to examine them and to examine witnesses against them and then if guilty to judge and censure them to punishment all these are acts of Magistraticall authority and we daily see Magistrates exercising this authority Now for Bishops to use these severall acts in their Consistorie it is an usurpation of the Magistrates office and authority and therefore this authority belongs not to a Bishop or a Minister nor to the Pope and without these precedent acts of authority there can be no Excommunication 3. Christ hath forbidden the Pope the Bishop of a Diocess and the Minister of a Parish to exercise Lordly authority in the Church for he said The Lords of the Gentiles exercise dominion and they that are great exercise authority But it shall not be so among you Mat. 20.25 Christ forbad his Apostles to Lord it and St. Peter to like purpose said That Ministers must not be so much as or like unto Lords over Gods heritage 1 Pet. 5.3 Now for a Bishop to punish with the Rod of Excommunication it is a Lordly authority for punishment is Lordly and for a Bishop in his Consistory to examine one and witnesses against him and then to judge and condemn him to punishment this is Lordly authority wherefore the censure of Excommunication belongs not to a Bishop I shall prosecute this point further by sundry absurdities which depend upon it as 1. If Excommunication be proper to a Bishop or a Minister why doth the Bishops Chancellour meddle in it for he is a Lay-man and why do the Ministers Elders meddle in it for these are Lay-men 2. If the Bishop will punish some sins by Excommunication as Adultery then he must punish all sins with Excommunication for if he doth not he is partiall and unjust The Bishop hath but one salve for every sore but one last for every foot which is Excommunication for greater and lesser sins wherefore he must inflict this one punishment upon every sinner and then he must excommunicate every thief every traytor and every murtherer before they are hanged and there are a multitude of trespasses by the Common Law the which are sins also Now all these the Bishop must summon into his Consistory for to undergo his spirituall punishment 3. The Magistrate punisheth in his Court the adulterer drunkard swearer c. Now the Bishop and his Chancellour may not punish these in his Consistory again with Excommunication for if they do they commit injustice For after the Magistrate hath inflicted a full punishment then for a Bishop to bring the matter about again for another punishment this is to punish twice for one fault a double punishment for a single sin It is a torment intollerable and apt to make men run mad to be trounced from the Magistrates Court unto the Bishops Consistory for one crime to be twice examined in severall Courts to have witnesses twice brought against them to be twice censured and condemned and to suffer two sorts of punishments and all for one fault which hath been sufficiently punisht before by the Magistrate this is intollerable To avoid this mischief either let the Magistrate do all acts of authority and justice without the Bishop or let the Bishop and his Chancellor do all acts of authority and justice in things Civill and Ecclesiasticall without the Magistrate For to have two such Magistrates a corporall and a spirituall or a Civill and an Ecclesiasticall is as if we had two Suns in the Firmament or two Kings in England the Pope was the author of it 4. If Excommunication be exercised by a Bishop then he makes himself an Antichrist or Pope For in his Consistory he sits as a Judge over a Magistrate if he be scandalous examines him and witnesses against him censures and condemns him Now the marke of Antichrist is to exalt himselfe above all that is called God 2 Thes 2.4 And the Magistrate is called God Psal 82.6 If therefore a Bishop doth passe sentence upon a Magistrate he makes himself Antichrist Quest 8. Is excommunication a spirituall punishment belonging to Bishops I take this to be a popish device and invented by the Pope For when he encroached upon the authority of Kings that he might with the more colour obtain leave from them to reigne over the souls of the people leaving the bodies and fleshly carkasses for Kings to Reign over then he stifled them with this Dose that Excommunication is no corporall but a spiritual punishment and sutable to his spirituall Clergy and this hath been the dose and plea of our Bishops ever since But why the Clergy should engross this spirituality as proper to them I see no reason For a Magistrate is an Ecclesiasticall person and a spirituall man as well as a Bishop for he is a spiritual man that worships God in spirit and truth and who minds spiritual things and live after the guidance and motions of the spirit John 4.23 Rom. 8.1 5. Rom. 7.6 Now we have as many Magistrates such spirituall men as Bishops and therefore Magistrates are as fit to exercise the spirituall discipline of Excommunication as a Bishop this I thus prove 1. If a Bishops Chancelleour who is a Lay-man or the Lay-Elders of Ministers may meddle in spirituall Excommunication then a Magistrate may do so too though you call him a Lay-man 2. That Excommunication if it be a spirituall punishment yet it is in the power of the Magistrate it is cleer Ezra 10.3 7 8. where the Princes and Elders did by a Proclamation threaten the people with Excommunication or separation from the congregation if they came not to take the Covenant 3. King Solomon put off Abiathar the Priest from his spirituall office of Priesthood which degradation was a spirituall punishment 1 King 2.27 as his office was a spirituall blessing 4. If Excommunication be a spirituall punishment yet it belongs not to a Bishop because it is a Lordly power forbidden by Christ to Ministers Mat. 20.25 1 Pet. 5.3 5. If a Bishop useth this spiritual punishment of Excommunication he makes himself an Antichrist and a Pope as I lately proved Quest 9. Can you prove that the censure and punishment of Excommunication belongs to the Magistrate I answer yes But first give me leave to shew what and how the Magistrate is to act in this his office when he hath summoned into his Court the Adulterer Swearer Drunkard c. and hath examined him and witnesses against him and hath convicted him as guilty of punishment then he is to passe sentence on him publiquely in Court to suffer such punishment as is sutable to his sinne and if the Magistrate judgeth Excommunication to be more sutable then any other punishment then he is to denounce the sentence thereof upon the offender And this done then he is to send his command to the Bishop or Minister of the parish to deny him the Sacrament I doubt not but the Magistrate may command the Bishop or Minister For Moses commanded Aaron