in and run in It is dangerous to have or to suffer any to stand at the head of that way to call in Passengers from that road which leadeth unto life since men of themselves are apt and prone enough to turn from it and go in the contrary path 5. Religion is the foundation of States and Kingdoms and diversity of foundations will never keep up long a building herein we find those States in Scripture to stand surest whose Kings feared God and they that feared put down all false worship 6. Religion is the band and cord by which the unity of the State is preserved if there be heard diversities of Doctrine and the unity of Faith broken either the people are divided in their affections or among themselves and against their Princes or their Governours Hence proceed burnings emulations strifes envy malice sedition faction Rebellion Innovation treachery and disobedience and infinite more mischiefs Let me add two more 7. Let all diligence be used to keep out or subdue false Religions Satan will keep them in we know by the Proverb Where God hath his Church the Devil will whatever man do to the contrary have his Chappel A toleration seems to bring stones and timber for the enlarging of it and making it a Synagogue 8. The Angels of the Churches of Pergamos and Thyatira Rev. 2. are blamed for tolerating false Religions taking it for granted that there is but one true ziz the Catholick one of them had them tolerated possibly not by Law but by connivance and indulgence who taught the Doctrine of Balaam to eat things sacrificed to Idols and to commit fornication whether natural or spiritual and the Doctrine of the Nicholaitans which God did hate then and yet in this Age it passes for true Divinity with many The other suffered Iezâ—bel who called her self a Prophetess first to teach and then as a proper consequence to seduce our Praedicantiffs do the same and yet plead for a toleration since Paul gave out a Law concerning womens teaching I Tim. 2.12 we finde none but this Iezabel undertaking such an Office It is observable that the Angels of the Church are reproved for bearing with or suffering them so to do and they were the Church Officers Ministers or Bishops by which it seems they had power and authority to restrain and controul them to pull them out of their pulpits and to stop their mouths Whether they were Lords or no let their power and authority speak to do this was Lord-like in my apprehension and not to do it was a ground of Gods accusation Rev. 2.19 20. This Authority was it from heaven or of men If from Heaven then Church Officers have power to controul and put down both Balaam and Iezabel and to stop their mouths and yet not to be accused for Factious If of men then Church-Officers ought to put their power in execution and resist and stop the proceedings of lawless persons command that none hear Iezabel and stop the mouths of all irregular and presumptuous Teachers and not to be accused as busie-bodies and though they be yet let rather men accuse them for performing then God should accuse them for not doing their duty Yet if the Religions be such as do not overthrow the fundamentals of Truth or such as disturb not the Government established in that State Church or Kingdom wherein they be and that the Professor of those Religions be not factious ambitious or pertinarious having no other end in holding their opinions but Gods glory and the satisfaction of their own consciences and willing to be taught and be convinced of their errors diversities of Religions may be tolerated but in private only time may produce a renoâ—ncing of them when violence might harden them God hath his own times of Calling men and let the humble good honest Christian have his time Wise States Kings and Princes for this cause have granted a private toleration The very Turk who is zealous in his Religion grants this it is especially to be granted in times of great infection then indeed a total suppression in private of different opinions might prove and end in a great disturbance both to Church and State but Philosophandum est sed paucis Quest. 8. Wherein consists the Individuality or singleness the Vnity or Oneness of the true Church That the Catholick Church is but one is both asserted in Scripture and believed in our Creed and though it be scattered up and down through the world in every Kingdom Nation People Province Common-wealth Countreys and Dominions that are known in the earth from La Mairs Straits to Greenland from Sancta Creek to S. Ians yet differs no more then one member of the body differs from another the question then is this what is it that like Arteries and Ligatures Sinews and Nerves holds such a vast body together that the Church of God in this place is not a distinct Church of it self from that that is in another but only a part of it differing as a bone in the neck from that in the foot of the self same body one may be preaching or hearing the word in the Country of the Great Mogul another in Iapan and another in Pauls at London and yet he in one and the self same body And as the Sea receives divers names according to the Countreys she runs through though all but one Sea so the members of the Church Triumphant above in heaven and those of the Church Militant beneath make but one body differing only as a mans upper from his lower parts this Unity consists 1. In a consenting of all of them to the truth and doctrine of the Gospel for we know no Church but the Christian what ever is written by the holy Ghost through the Ministery of the Apostles and Disciples the best expositors of the prophets Psalms and Moses whether made in it and to be done or said to be fulfilled in it and done the whole society of the Church whereever they be scattered believes it and readily consents to it as a Canon of faith and manners 2. It consists in the consenting and unity in reference to the Sacraments of the Gospel the same Sacraments for number for nature that one part holds to be profitable for the Souls of men the same doth the other it is true there are many Churches that differ from another in more externall and Ceremoniall points it is the current doctrine of all reformed Churches and of England Art 34. that it is not necessary that ceremonies be alike in all places but may be altered as the People or Officers may teach and think meet but as touching the essentiall and necessary truths as the ends the uses the Author the profit of them all Christians of the Catholick Church hold one and the same thing 3. I consists in the consenting to and unity in holding the utilâ—â—y and necessity of hearing and obeying a Gospell ministery where it is to be had it is a Catholick
the Church is founded on a rock and neither Iew nor Greek Tâ—ik nor Infidel shall be able to prevaile against her c. 5. For the greater honour fo the Lord Iesus Christ the Iews kept the Law that was given by Moses but behold one greater then Moses is here who hath altered the day by which there is more inquiry made of him his power his person who thus alters the Law who thus changeth the sabbath had the Gentiles come in to the Iewis sabbath Christ had not been so much magnified by it as he is when both Iew and Gentile come into a sabbath never known before and that upon the authority of Christ it tends to his honour much and respect among the people of both sorts It follows therefore that we in this age are to keep that sabbath kept by the Apostles inspired thereunto by the Spirit of God and approved of by the Prophets and people of GOd that then were and blessed by God in all ages of the Church that hath been since what ever ignornant factious Spirits say to the contrary c. SECT V. Questions resolved Quest. 1. Whether the keeping of a sabbath be a Ceremony and so abolished by Christ Quest. 2. Whether it be lawful to make feasts on the sabbath Quest. 3. Whether sporting or gaming are to be done upon the sabbath Quest. 4. Why did God give charge concerning the resting of beasts upon the sabbath Quest. 5. Why did not God give charge concerning a wifes resting upon the sabbath Quest. 6. Why is not the change of the sabbath mentioned in Scripture Quest. 7. Whether the Church may command any other day to be rested on beside the sabbath Quest. 8. Why doth God put a Remember before the commandement of the sabbath Quest. 9. Whether the first day of the week may be termed â—â—â—bath or sunday Quest. 10. Why is the sabbath called Holy Quest. 1. Whether the keeping of a Sabbath be a Ceremony and so abolished by Christ. This age fruitful in nothing more then in false doctrine hath brought forth them that affirm it is purely Iewish to keep a sabbath at all it being a pure Ceremony abolished by Christ since whose death every day is Holy and to be kept alike but we have no such custome neither the Churches of God the keeping of a sabbath being moral and for ever binding and therefore not ceremonial For 1. It was instituted and appointed before sinâ—it came not upon neither was it imposed to man by reason of transgression therefore was no bondage that he should be freed from it by Christ fin never brought it on for which he wanted no Redeemer to take it off 2. It is one of the ten Commandements written in Tables of stone it is equally moral with the Law against Idolatry with the Law against Adultery they were equally pronounced from the mouth of God Deut. 4.13 14. Now Ceremonies were all of them instituted by Moses as sent of God 3. It is not a Ceremony for it was established or ratified by Christ which no Ceremony was for Matth. 24.20 speaking of Ierusalems visitation he bids them Pray that their flight be not on the sabbath day so that there must needs be a sabbath that is a day of rest after Christs death 4. Ceremonies were as a partition wall between Iews and Gentile to difference the one from the other but now in this there is no difference but equally binding all as is manifest in the Particle Thou in all the Commandements 5. Ceremonies were abrogated not changed but now this Law of the sabbath is changed only nor abrogated for what we finde the people of God under the Law doing or what they ought to have done by vertue of that Law given upon the Mount upon the seventh day we finde the people of God doing under the Gospel by vertue of that Law given either by Christ or by his Apostles through the Spirit upon the first day of the week so there is no abrogation but a change which is to be seen in no pure Ceremony Quest. 2. Whether it be Lawful to make feasts on the sabbath The Disciples going through corn fields upon the sabbath day being hungry rubbed some of the corn and did eat Matth. 12.2 if they could have dined better they would and it is hard to say that a man is onely to supply the necessities of nature since the day is Holy to the Lord he may eat of the fat and drink of the sweet he may refresh himself 1. With the society of good and godly people he may be in that multitude at the Table as well as go with that multitude that keeps Holy day Psal. 42.4 2. With a more enlarged receiving of the creature comforts God gave man wine which makes glad his heart oyl to make his face shine and bread to strengthen his heart Psal. 104.15 He may therefore dayly drink that wine eat that bread that new kinde of religion that holds the necessity fasting upon the sabbath in our days hath no ground in Scripture in spite yea rather in sight of these may the Christian spread his Table he is this day to meditate upon the works of God chearfully to praise him the comforts of the choicest food may be therefore used of him if he see his cup run over let him abound in thankfulness the 92 Psalm is a Psalm or song for the sabbath and in a natural way it is no heresie to say Thou Lord hast made me glad through thy work I will triumph in the work of thy hands vers 4. yet never use the creature so As 1. To be hindered from any part of worship set not the length of thy feast keep thy seat empty in the house of God 2. To be indisposed in any act of devotion wine was made to make the heart of man'glad but not to make him lumpish beware then of drouziness through immoderate feasting Remember that of Solomon hast thou found honey eat so much as is sufficient 3. To forget any act of charity when thou arâ— fareing well remember poor Lazarus at thy door when he calls know thou hast good things which he wants eat not therefore thy morsel alone It is a day wherein God hath blessed thee by thy charity bless thou him it is good husbandry and not impiety this day to cast thy seed upon the furrows of the faces of the poor that with the fields of the earth they may clap their hands shout yea also sing Quest. 3. Whether sporting or gameing is to be followed upon the sabbath The sabbath is appointed for the service of God and not for the pleasuring of men by denying sports is not here meant that men should be sour sullen or peevish but whether or no plays wrestling bowling fouling or fishing and the like be to be used this day or any thing in the like nature it is denyed it is unlawfull so to do For. 1. The Scripture forbids all manner of works in regard
is a sin not supposed only but really and in its own nature he ought to take the admonition 1 As from God 1 Sam. 25.31 32. 2 Meekly as from thy Brother 3 Thankfully as from both SECT VII Quest. 1 Whether a Heathen may not be admonished Quest. 2 Whether Admonition be alike to be given to all Quest 1 Whether a Heathen may not be admonished In reâ—ard that the Scripture calls upon us to admonish a Brother we are not altogether to neglect any of whom we have hâ—pes of bâ—â—â—ering of what professioâ— soever he be For 1 By nature all men are our Brethen we are all of one stoâ—k and kind as through that relation may admonish him when he doth offend 2 By providence the Heathen Turke or Jew may be our neighbour and upon that relation he may be admonished at least as to civil crimes and as far as you can do good in spiritual but if he will not hear never bring it before the Church since she judgeth none that are without 1 Corinth 5.12 13. 3 By Law he may be our kinsman and this will lay a more particular engagment upon us to give him our best advice in things that may conducâ— unto his good bâ—t for the making of any judiciall processe for reclaiming of him in an Ecclesiastical way it is not to be done the Church leaving such wholly to the judgment of God When the Scripture calls upon us to reprove a Brother it holds out that above all others we should most heed a Christian not that altogether we should neglect any in whom we see the least hope of good Quest. 2. Whether admonition be alike to be given to all Though admonition be to be dispenced and given to all without exceptions yet it is not to be given without respect of persons we shall lay down several distinctions and so close this chapter 1 Betwixt age and age we ought to have a respect to gray hairs and reverence the hoary head 2 Betwixt person and person some are of a more bashfull and good nature then others 3 Betwixt calling and calling some are Ministers of the Gospel some not We ought to behold him as a Father 4 Betwixt sin and sin there are degrees of sin and there are degrees of temptation which the wife reprover is to observe CHAP. 14. Of Excommunication This is the effect of rejected Admonition so desirous is God of mens good that if they will not amend by wholesome reproof they should be corrected with the sharper censure of Excommunication the last refuge of an offended brother is the Officers of the Church and if their reproof be not accepted it ends in this severe correction which is either the lesser or the greater 1. The lesser excommunication is a keeping back the offending Brother from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper untill that satisfaction be given to the Church-Officer for the sin committed which is an acknowledgement of his sin before the Church in general or the Churches-Officer and the party offended in particular 2. The greater Excommunication is not only a keeping him back that is obstinate against the Churches admonition from that Sacrament of the Lords Suppet but a judicial cutting of him off from the body of the Church which is the Body of Christ and leaving him as a heathen to be judged at the Lords coming down to judgment Of this greater excommunication we shall speak of these following heads 1 The nature of it 2 The ends of it 3 The form of it 4 Resolve some Questions SECT I. The nature of this greater Excommunication will not be unknown to him that considers this description It is a judicial casting out of râ— factory stubborne and obstinate offenders from the Church of Christ and delivering the n over unâ—o Sathan for the preservation of the Churches peace and honour 1 It is a judicial casting out It is not to be done out of rash and furious passion but according to the Law and Rule of God and that not by every one but those to whom the power of binding is given and he not by his own authority but by the advice or at least the knowledge and consent of the most worthy Members of that Church from which the party is to be cast 1 Cor. 5.45 2. Of stubborn c. this is to be done after all admoniâ—ions counsels and reproofs of the Church are slighted and contemned It ought to be the last Act of the offended Church and all means are to be tryed to reclaim an offended brother before this be put in execution and practise an obstiâ—ate offender is properly the Subject of Excommunication The offence is not necessary alwayes to be in matters of fact Drunkenness Swearing Sabbath-breaking Perjury Blâ—sphemy but it will and ought to be extended to matters of another kind as Teachers of false Doctrine Disturbers of the Churches peace and Infringers or Contemners of her Laws 1 Tim. 19.20 Tit. 3.10 2 Thes. 3.6 3. From the Church of Christ Not to speak of those kinds of Excommunication which were used against Offenders in the Church of the Iews proportionable to these now used in the Church of the Christians It is affirmed that the party so judicially cast out is not a member of the Church of Christ nor was not before that is since his refusal to hear the Church in her admonitions at that time he began to be a Heathen and a Publican and these are not of the Church of Christ then he began to be as a Dog and a Swine unto whom holy things are not to be given Mat. 7.6 The Church therefore doth but pronounce the sinner to be what indeed he is that is not a member of the Church by which sentence the Church looks upon him as cast out or cut off from their body 4. And delivering them over unto Sathan this is the fearfull issue of Excommunication and yet no other then the Lords mind against that Corinthian for his sin of incest 1 Cor. 5.7 And Pauls practise for the Apostacy of Alexander 1 Tim. 1.20 Out of the Church is to be out of Christ and to be cut off from Christs body is to be thrown among the branches to be burned As a Judge by his sentence by vertue of that Commission given him from the supream Magistrate gives the Prisoner over unto execution being dead before in Law as soon as his fact was committed so the Church-Officer by vertue of that Commission given him of Christ Iohn 20.23 assisted by the Church-Members as Justices gives the sinner over unto Satan whose he was as soon as obstinacy appeared in him 4. For the preservation of the Churches peace and honour the end of the Church in this act is not the sinners damnation but his salvation Christs honour and her own peace but these things fall more properly under the next Section SECT II. The Church in this her Discipline hath before her eye and in this judicial sentence proposeth to herself
yet converted but to places wherein the Gospel is by law established and the ordinances by law defended In such places constantly to preach without authority from the Church or charge of the soules he preaches to seemes not at all convenient for 1 Preaching is not only necessary for the Churches good the Administration of Sacraments is also to be observed and many things may occurre by providence necessary to be done for the Churches edification which such a one is not able to performe 2 It may breed an occasion of difference between the setled Minister and his people he that hath both authority from the Church and Charge of the peoples soules may by this person secretly be brought out the affections of the people there may be diversity of gifts one of them in speech may be bold the other in doctrin more found one eminent in prayer the other more powerfull in preaching this may open a door of division and be a fire-ball of contention between them 3 It gives too much liberty to passion no face so fair but there may be found some blemish no heart so holy but may have some lust no man so upright but sometimes may halt no preacher so sound but may preach errours Now to suffer one constantly to exercise his faculty of preaching among a people if he have erroneous tenets he may freely utter them having no engagement against them though he by the law of the Church should be made to recant or leave off preaching yet those whom he corupted might never be reduced to order Mr. Brown of Northhamptonshire who was the Father of the Brownists though he renounced his errour and took orders from the Church of England yet those whom he had subverted would never reform It is good therefore to prevent the worst that men oblige themselves to that form of doctrin by law established which will make them rather study to defend it then for the pleasure of any to pick a quarrel with it 4. It is none of those ways that God hath ordained for the building up of his Church such a constant Preacher can never be designed for the work of the Ministry for they are Apostles Prophets Evangelists which had extraordinary calls for that purpose and are now gone or Pastors or Teachers which have ordinary calls and to this day remain Ephes. 4.11 These men therefore having no call that is ordinary and the extraordinary themselves confess they want we may conclude to be none of those that God hath appointed for the carrying on of the work of the Gospel in a publick way 5. By the experience and relation of the aged such tolleration made faction and gave shelter to untained spirits when men would not through wilfulness and peevishness conform themselvs to the Laws of the Church by good and found advice established they were then protected under the notion of Lecturers who to please unsetled heads and some fond persons could inveigh at liberty against the Government ecclesiastical and when Law did lay hold upon them then call out persecution persecution In a word we say he that hath an unchast wife is to keep fast his back-door so those that would have the house of the Church freed from the doctrine of Incendiaries had best keep a bolt upon this Postern gate and suffer none to reach without either of the two things before mentioned Quest. 5. Whether he that is a Gospel-Teacher may lawfully own civil Titles of Honour There are spirits and they would be thought holy that are offended if a Preacher be called Lord and there are others they are near of kin that are angry if he be called Master however both may lawfully be done and owned by a Church-Officer 1. From the dignity of their office they are Masters in Israel and Doctors of the Law they are in high places and to them is committed such great power that Whom they bind on earth are bound in heaven anâ— whom they loose on earth are loosed in heaven Mat. 18.18 Unto whom God hath committed such great power they may have honourable titles given them conformable to that power 2. From the acceptance of it by former Prophets and practise of it under the Gospel Elijah was a Prophet yet he could hear Obadiah say unto him Art thou that my Lord Elijah 1 Kings 18.7 and not be angry Obadiah feared the Lord greatly verse 3. and his religion taught him to give honourable titles to Gods Messengers and the Messenger takes them without a check yea that these or such were the common Titles of Teachers by those that feared God may appear by these instances The Sunamite coming and falling down at the feet of Elisha Did I desire a son of my Lord and yet she is not reproved 2 Kings 4.28 neither is Elisha to be thought proud in receiving it Nichodemus came to our Saviour with the title of Rabbi and our Saviour owned him for a Master of Israel Iohn the Baptist is called Rabbi Iohn 3.2 10.26 and his Disciples call Christ by the name of Rabbi which is to say Master 1 Iohn 38. These titles being mutually given and taken by such makes it not unlawfull to receive the same titles of respect and honour now 3. From the Laws of the land if the King who is the fountain of honour put such a peece of Honour whether by Patent or otherwise upon any Church-officer there is there is nothing in the Scripture that contradicts the lawfulness of its receiving Ministers will sometimes own upon the same account the title of an Esquire why may not another own the title of Lord 4. Them that are against that sinless practise they are such as would be very well pleased if there were no Church-officer to be called a Lord that they might lord it over their lands and tenements yea would never be angry at the title if they could obtain it themselves and they who would not have them to be called Masters are such as would have them trod under foot and be Masters of their Pulpits considering this denial of theirs or anger of theirs against these titles is the less with wise men to be regarded Touching that place of Scripture against exercising Lordship Mark 10.42 As it takes not away authority out of the King of the Gentiles hands so neither doth it make it unlawfull for a Church-Officer to be called Lord so he lords it not in a tyrannical and oppressive way that Text purely teaching humility and love and yet we know of late dayes none was more tyrannical none more exercised unlawfull authority nor lorded it over the Clergy then those meek Lambs yet wild foxes that refused to be called Lords As for that place urged against a Ministers being called Master Mat. 23.8 9 10. where our Saviour condemns the Scribes and Pharisees for using of it who were not worthy of it in regard it blew them up with pride when they understand those words going before Call no man Father they
Whether it be a sin to receive the Communion in a mixed congregation and if private examination be necessary By a mixed congregation the age makes us to understand 1. A congregation wherein any Communicant is not of the same judgement principle or opinion though in things circumstantial 2. A congregation wherein there are some Communicans that have sin in their mortal bodyes though it be repented 3. A congregation wherein there be drunkards or sweaters though adhearing professedly to the doctrine of the Gospel Unto which we will add this also though he was never reproved nor admonished by us The Question is then whether a man that hath prepared himself by sound hearty real and holy examination for that Ordinance may altogether forbear it and omit it upon the account of his knowing or foreseeing that such a drunkard will be at that holy banquet It is answered in the negative he ought not to forbeat upon any such pretence For 1. That Ordinance is not arbitrary It is not left to our own will and discretion that we may or may not as we will we ought to do our duty and prepare our selves to be worthy receivers if another neglect his and yet receive let him look to it the Lord is at hand 2. We might neglect other Ordinances as well as that we might refuse to read the Scriptures to pray to hear upon the same reason and indeed this doctrine as it hath kept some from the Chancel that is from receiving it hath kept others from the Church that is from hearing and this again hath kept some from the Scripture resolving to keep company with none but such as are altogether without sin and therefore the light within is their rule 3. God requires no such condition he craves faith repeatance and new obedience on my part but not that my companion should have the same or then I to be refused and my offering not to be accepted one Christian shall never be bound hand and foot and cast into utter darkness because another of the company wants the wedding garment 4. It is plainly against that Text 1 Cor. 11.29 he that eaâ—eth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation or judgement to HIMSELF therefore not at all to another he that prepares himself aright need not fear what the unworthiness of others can do against him 5. It would clearly take away this Sacrament out of the Church who would prepare himself to come if he should be cursed by anoâ—hers unworthiness or approach that table though full of faith with boldness except he knew that every heart at the table were as holy as his own and others that were as full of faith as he might hang down the head least his unworthiness procure unto them a judgement and so the devotion even of the devout should receive a bar â—nd be shut from all comfortable actings and holy duties This is not spoken to countenance prophaness but to inform the weak and tender conscience there being Laws in the Church to dâ—bâ—rth scandalous from that table and also thâ— ignorant which may and ought to be put in execution by the Church Officer after his admonishing the one and instructing the other for to exclude either of these without tryal save in case of necessity is arrogant and rash and without Authority but upon certain knowledge to debaâ— such is both religiously and lawfully done No Minister shall in any wise admit to the receiveing of the Holy Communion any of his cure or flock which be openly known to live in sin notorious without repenâ—ance nor any who have maliciously and openly contended with their neighbours until they shall be reconciled c. The scandalous are found out by the ear and secluded by Law the ignorant cannot be found but by discourse conference or examination which leads in the second part of the Question Whether private examination be necessary There is a twofold examination in reference to the Sacrament of the Supper 1. In respect of God 1 Cor. 11.28 men are bound and it is necessary for them to examine themselves 2. In respect of the Church that the ignorant and unlearned make not that Ordinance undervalued the Question is of this latter and amounts to this Whether the Church Officer may lawfully debar a sober pious Christian or one of whom he neither sees nor hears evil purely upon the account he will not submit to his examination a practice of late too commonly known nay several thousands have been excluded except they came under the tryal not of the Church Officers only but of his lay-Elders an office not heard of in the Church until these late years and are parts of the Church no more then those Anticks whose mouths supplie the places of spouts unto the temples but to let them pass it is denied private examination in this sence is not necessary For 1. The Scripture would have given some Item of it when the nature of the Sacrament is stated and examination required 1 Cor. 11. No word that tended in the least to this is written but every man enjoyned to examine himself 2. It cannot be shewed that ever the priests examined the fitness even legal of those that aproached the Paschal and yet the danger of unworthy receiving the one seems as great as the other 2 Chro. 30.20 1 Cor. 11.30 3. That Parable Matth. 22.9 is against this practice wherein the servants are appointed to bring in all that they could find without Order to try if they had the wedding garment the want of which condemned the party but not the servant Yet by the Law of the Church particularly of the Church of England none are to be admitted to that Ordinance until they have given sufficient testimony of their knowledge in the principles of the Christian religion Which Law though not expressed in Scripture in direct terms yet consequently it is approved In regard that the Church Officers are called Watchmen Stewards Shepherds c. which titles denote what a care they ought to have of their people or flock This even this being not taught unto the people was a firebrand of division between the Pastor and his people in these last days examination being by them required and that rigidly not declaring it as necessary in respect of the Church which would have satisfied the minds of all sober Christians but as from Scripture when the people knew that no such thing was required and they themselves not being able â—o produce the Text wherein in it was enjoyned It was pretty sport to hear men publickly and privately affirming that those who submitted not themselves to examination ought to be secluded for breach of that Order or discipline they themselves erected and yet not conforming themselves to those Orders that by Law had been established By which two things to all of understanding occurred First their arrogance to make Laws and compel the people without authority to submit under the pain of leâ—ser excommunication
to leave every thing done and taught in the Churches of France Spaine or Italy for so they should have denyed the Lord that bought them but the errors or false worship of those Churches It is a cause of laughter to read what use men make of that letter the Pope sent Queen Elizabeth of glorious memory promiseing to ratifie the Common-prayer if she would restore his Supremacy It is as clear as the Sun that the Pope and the Guisel will both of them according to the Proverb play a smal game before they stand out It was lately their main study how to reconcile themselves to the independent who had got the start of them and they have now studyed a new art how to reconcile themselves to the Lord Bishop he being now a corner stone in the Church of England if the Pope use the same policy of all men under heaven they have least cause to declare it since they will truckle with Quaker Ranter they whole brood of bastardly Hereticks to procure unto themselves a supremacy It is worthy of observation that by this the Pope could not pick a quarrel even with the Common-prayer all things therein being so lawfull that he had not impudence to speake against and so exactly composed that he would have established it by Papal Authority without diminution or augmentation And yet it gives no strength at all unto his Kingdom that having these three pillars 1. Infallibility 2. Supremacy 3. Purgatory All which the Common-prayer disowns and renounceth yet the Pope will licence it as he doth English bibles that is because he must he will play at a smâ—l gaâ—e because he hath hopes to win the set he proffered to ratifie Common-prayer not for love to it but to get his hand into the Kingdom of England knowing or at least hoâ—ing he might get in his arme and by degrees his whole body for the same reason the Guisel truckeled formerly under the Independent and lately with the Anabaptist and now would hold the stirrop to his spiâ—itual lordship not for love of either but to keep self in credit with the world being concious to himself that from him came all the evils that have befallen either Church or state in the by-past years and least with Cain he should become a vagabond is desireous of any that will befriend him 2. It s giving offence to tender consciences This is a high note and often heard but 1. Who discovered or layd the ground of that offence 2. How easily might that offence be removed if in popular Sermons the innocency and purity of that book were preached the people have for 16 years heard much against it and now they hear nothing at least from you for it no wonder therefore if they be not affected with it We say affected for it seemes to be but a prejudice against that book not conscience that maketh them to oppose the same that being guided by Sripture and reason not spleen and passion When we behold that service rayled at scorned shunned contemned condemned and the users of it scandaled and yet not one sentence word or petition proved unlawfull or not according to scripture we have ground to conjecture that it is stomack not religion maketh them to do so and the over-flowings of their gall not tendernesse of their consciences that makes them to flee out into such depraveing and abusive language They would appear so holy that it is dangerous to offend them or lay a stone of stumbling before them Yet what greater offence can be given then to abuse a national or personall Church by defaming the prayers therein established or by the other made when in the meane time in all their findings one sentence unlawfull in these prayers they cannot find were they as tender as they would seeme to be we should have more argueing lesse rayling The greatest number of them that pretend to receive offence are of that disposition that they desire not to be informed touching those set formes whether by discourse preaching or reading and the other part can produce no unseemly thing in them and yet they being established by good laws and Just authority give still occasion to conjecture that not conscience but wilfulnesse and obstinacy is the mother of their non-conformity There is a God above who often brings mens wicked devices upon their own pate It was piâ—y to see commissioners apointed in every county and ministers as their assistants turning cut ministers from their places to the ruine of their familees for not subscribing to the directory or for reading Common-prayer when they were bound by oath law and allegiance to the same and now men that are enjoyned or desireed to read Common-prayer pretend conscience and cry out they are offended and the same persons complain of persecution when the true owners are restored but c. The Reader can bear us witnesse that we have not mentioned that act of Popish Queen Mary who at her first coming to the Crown seeking to Erect popery in England repealed all acts made in the favour of the Common-prayer and altogether abolished it to facilitate that work Nor of the Practise of those Recusants who being under the penalty of a fine if they came not to the publick Churches of this nation in the days of Queen Elizabeth would commonly refraine themselves from hearing Common-prayer and not enter Church being in this Puritanicall untill the preacher was in the pulpit which are arguments of no smal weight to defend that the Common-prayer is not popishly affected the Papists themselves being witnesses To conclude this question seeing that some men do not grow strong and well favoured through holynesse knowledge and sobriety by other ordinances of the Church Common-prayer which they scornfully call poâ—age is fittest for their weak stomacks and sickly constitutions while those that are strong and of good digestion may receive the more meat and grow in grace and knowledge by their eating that is by a holy using the set formes of the Church together with other dutys Quest. 4. Whether there be not vaine repetitions in those formes This is a grand argument brought by many justifying their non conformity to the Churches liturgy and most heard from those men whose publick prayers were for the most part carried on by empty or at least by many repititons To be brief we must distinguish of repetitions there is a bare repetition and there is a vain repetition 1. Bare repetitions if repetitions of themselves were unlawfull lawfull to be used in prayer that is to repeate or bring over again and again the same thing before asked then many of the Saints of God must be blamed and the son of God must not be Justified who in one prayer repeated the same petition thrice over Mat. 26.44 It is a desireable faculty to vary in prayer yet every one cannot do it and they that can will repeate somtimes 1. Through pinching necessity this made Christ cry earnestly in
author desires only to be understood chap. 9. Quest. 5. and such infallibillity to be in a Presbytery that the Laws thereof ought not should not be debated in a counsell this also by this oath denyed and that justly To exclude therefore chiefly the Popes authority is his Majesty to be accounted Supream in all causes and over all persons that is hath jurisdiction and power over all men whether Clergy or others not the Pope When God instituted the Church oâ— the Jews the Priests and the Levits had their orders and laws for their spiritual government as clear and open as the Presbytery can plead for in the new Testament yet that Kinâ—s had power over them and made Laws for them and were obeyed of by them is clear to him that not manum sub pallio 3 It is in his Majesties own dominious his jurisdiction is bounded within the limits of his own territories right and dominions All which considered it is no derogation to Christs honour to accept that oath but consequentially a supperiater and upholder of it Thus much of the third and last ordinance we undertook to defend in the beginning which was prayer Laus Deo dedit enim vâ—lle etiam perficere Si quid novisti rectius istis utere si non his utere mecum FINIS ERRATA OF the errours that happened in the printing of this treatise these following are some of these viz. p. 7. l. 16. r. slighting p. 11. marg l. 1â— r. use p. 17 l. 16. r. altered 27. r. fondly p. 18. l. 7. r. Instâ—â—â—â— p. 21. l 25. r. such laws p. 29 33. r. commanded p. 29. l. 7. r. will not p. 33. l. 1. r. regard p. 39. l. 1. r. creature p. 41. l. 36. r compleated p 45 l. 35. r. benâ—â—ecessi p. 53. l. r. persecutâ—on p. 57. l. 10. r. perform without p. 62. l. 33. r. own p. 73. l. 23. r. inlarge p. 81. l. 30. r. Adoption p. 86. l. 6 r. praedicantisses p 104. l. 9 r. Word p. 150. l. 9. r. explanatory p. 107. l. 26. r. intâ—lligentâ—a p. 118. l. 2. r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 159. l. 16. r had p. 169 l. 1. r. refute p. 173. l. 17. r. but and 18. r. grand p. 177. l. 3. r. Mâ—tta l. 25 r. were not p. 181. l. 21. r. p. 193. l. 5. r. Some p. 2. 13. l. 26. r. lively p. 252 l. 13. r. concupiscence p. 255. l. 22. r. Bâ—vt Noble p. 266 l. 13. r. feast p. 275. l. 33. r. vigorous p. 277. marg l. 28 r veneras l. 40. r. 111. p. 214. l. 25. serve p. 288. 22. r. sacred p. 294. l. 18. r. bulk l. 25. r. fonts p. 30.7 marg l. 5. r. pleading l. 11. r Offer them p. 328. l. 16. r. sacred p. 294. l. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 361. l. 2. r. Guisel marg l. 3. r. Antiepiscopal p. 37.5 l. r. repealed p. 383. l. 10. r. figurat ea 25. r. per visum marg l. 3. r. 24. permittitur l. 13. r. 23. p. 10. l. 5. r. Reipturis p. 422. l. 10. r. praestat p. 490. l 11. r. Mathew The other faults are left to the Readers charity and inquisition the Author being necessarily detained from the presse A small Coâ—ncell being called and gathered at Spir. March 15. 1629. decreaed severall things against the Catholick Doctrine to maintain the Tenets of the now Church of Rome as the Communion under one kind c Which decree was opposed by severall of the German Princes wht cast in a Protestation against it in writing those that subscribed that were called Protestants whence the pose of the word came to be given to all that protest or declare against the errours of the new Church of Rome Syn. Trip. pag. 51. Thes. 10. His Majesty pag. 5. to M. Hen. His Mâ—jâ—sties Declar for â—ffaiâ—s Eccl. In an indiâ—ect sence she may preach and teach theiâ— neccesity for he that resisteth lawfull commands â—â—neth against Coâ— If Kings and Princes do tolerate such it were best not to let them know it meekness never doing good to their humour If they be suffered by Law they will have lawless meetings as appeared whereever they were Those that reason our no being gospel Ministers because we are not called as the Apostles were may argue that we are not men since we were not made as Adam was From that charity love that burned always in him towards Christ and his Church he was cast to hungry Lyons by Trajan August An. Clâ— 1556. Altare Christia num pag. 8. Ex. â—ren lib. 3. c. 3 â— 5. Those in some points teach one and the same doctrine Epist. con Manich. c. 4 tom 6. Calv. Inst. lib. 4. S. 15. For Act. mon. p. 34 Ex Eus. lib. 3. c. 3. Carnifrira na Prophetarum The broacâ—er of this doâ—t iâ—e was â—ill Hethingâ—on by Trade a Box maker Theâ—e might have been another argumentâ— given for since the wrâ—â—ing of al is they appear no Churches but nâ—sts of wasps Traytors all our Hereticks being of one stamp and carrying Treason in their bosoms ' as appears by their seditious and murtherous and Treasonable attempts in London jan 6. 1660. They being now un Churched by Law I wish it may be my happinesse to be the last in this Kingdome that shal have ever occasion to handle this Question more I know so much of all or most of them this I desire it heartily Gffiâ— Beat. Ma. ad Mat. pag. 18. meaning Tho Bec. a fancy impudent Rebel yet made a S. by the Pope Apolog. par 5 c 13 D. 1. 2. Apolog. c. 1â— Not that Coloss. in the Isle of Rhodes most Geographer is making this to be the City written to not that this Epistle speaking of Laodicea Hierapolis Cities of Nâ—tolia as boâ—dering upon Colos. and near to each other intimates the same these 3. Cities were overthrown together by an Earthquake A.C. 68. Pisc. in loc Terrent He flourished Ann. Chr. 385. An upstart Preacher in the audience of some of the Authors Parish defâ—nding the Contraâ—y Dâ—ctrine did occasion the staâ—ting of this Question next Sabbath and shewing it to be the Doctrine of Devils one gave the Author freely hish and never to hear such Teachers more It is wished the Reader reap the like profit * * Discessuri ab invicem Apostoli normam praedicationis in commune constitu unt Cyp. ex Alst. Chi Symo. c. Iob is said to have flourished Anno 2330. Moses brought the people 〈◊〉 of Aegypt An. 2453. He came out of his afflictions An. 2332. * * April 6. Anno 1654 There was a solemn fast kept at Oxon for rain there being none for a long time together whereby the corn was much in danger before the Churches broke up there was a great and a plentiful shour and moderate rain a great while after whereby the fields did laugh and sing Charity here begun at home * * Witness their