of Edward the Fourth George Duke of Clarence was Attainted of Treason by reason whereof all the Issue of the said George was and is Disabled and Barred of all Right and Claim that in any case he or his Issue might have or challenge by Inheritance to the Crown and Dignity Royal of these Realms After that we consider that you be the undoubted Heir c. And so they proceed affirming that all Learned men in the Laws do approve his Title You see within less than three years before this opinion of the Judges The whole Parliament do not only give their opinion but assure you that all Learned men of that time held clearly that an Attainder did hinder the descent of the Crown and incapacitate the person to take it Nay what goes yet further in this matter Richard himself though he was as jealous to secure his Title as ever Tyrant was and had as good advice to discern the most distant danger though he was always restless in endeavouring to get the Earl of Richmond into his Hands who was a very remote pretender and only descended from a Bastard of the House of Lancaster yet he fear'd nothing on this side He knew how he had wrong'd the Children of his Brother Edward and could not be at ease till he had sent them out of the World but he let the Children of his Brother Clarence live without apprehending any danger from them because their blood was corrupted and all possibility of Descent taken from them by the Attainder of their Father It was this only preserved them alive and not any remorse of Conscience or any niceness in sending another Nephew out of the World after those whom he had dispatcht before This notable case attended with these circumstances will convince every man either that the Judges intended no such thing by their opinion as some men fancy or else at least that extra-judicial opinions were then as Apocryphal as they have been since Consider Lastly the unreasonableness of this Doctrine which tends directly to subvert Government and to put the life of the King Regnant into the hands of his Successor The next Heir may commit Rapes and Murders and Treasons Burn Cities or Betray Fleets may conspire against the life of his Prince and yet after all if by Flight or Force he can save himself till some of his accomplices can get the King dispatcht in spight of all Laws and Justice he must come to the Crown and be Innocent But when I reflect what sort of men I am arguing with and how willingly they use to submit to Authority I think I shall convince them best by citing the opinions of two great men the one a Cardinal the other a Lord Chancellour both of them Martyrs for the Papal Supremacy I mean Fisher and Sir Thomas Moor. And if their Judgments approve the power of Parliaments in the business of the Succession it cannot but weigh very much on such occasions as this 'T is well known how resolution even to death they refused the Oath of Succession which the Parliament had framed Burn. Hist Ref. lib. 2. fol. 156. because therein the Kings Supremacy was avow'd and therefore they cannot be suspected to dissemble when at the very same time they declared that if that of Supremacy was left out they would willingly Swear an Oath to maintain the Succession of the Crown to the Issue of the Kings present Marriage as it was then establisht by Parliament and gave this reason for it that this was in the power of a Parliament to determine but not who was supreme head of the Church Sir Thomas Moor went further and own'd a very strange opinion of their power in this point But he says expresly at the same time that the Parliament had unquestionable Authority in the ordering of the Succession and that the people were bound to obey them therein After the Testimonies of these two great Papists it will be little to add the Testimony of a Protestant But yet I will mention what Sir Walter Rawleigh who was no inconsiderable man though a Protestant says in his Incomparable Preface to the History of the World Without doubt says he Humane Reason would have judged no otherwise but that Henry the Fourth had rendred the Succession as unquestionable by the Act of Parliament which he had procured to entail it on his Issues as by his own Act he had left his enemies powerless But sinking men catch hold of every thing and when they cannot object to the validity they will tell us That such an Act of Parliament to disinherit the next Heir is unjust and without a sufficient ground I will not at present enter into the dispute how far the difference of Religion which will also necessarily draw on a change in the Government does justifie men in seeking to present the two dearest things on earth in an orderly and lawful way I will not though I safely might challenge these men to tell me where ever any settled Nation which had Laws of their own and were not under the immediate force of Conquerour did ever admit of a King of another Religion than their own I will not insist on it that the Crown is not a Bare Inheritance but an Inheritance accompanying an Office of Trust and that if a mans defects render him uncapable of the Trust he has also forfeited the Inheritance I need not say how far a Nation is to be excused for executing Justice summarily and without the tedious formalities of Law when the necessity of things requires haste and the party flies from Justice and his confederates are numerous and daring and the Princes life in danger But this I will say that if the Parliament have power in this thing which I need not prove by shewing that the ordinary course of Law allows Heirs to be disinherited of Fines and Recoveries and that the Parliament in all ages has frequently done it by making Acts to alter the strongest Settlements where Equity has Dictated it though the Heirs were never in any wise criminal There according to Sir Thomas Moors opinion the people are bound in conscience to obey their Laws and must not pretend to enquire whether they were made upon just grounds For by the some Rerson they may pretend that all other Laws were made without just cause and refuse obedience to any of them And surely those that should do so would be an Excellent Loyal Party God defend this Nation from such Loyalty as opposes it self to the King and the Laws and God defend the King from the pretended Duty and Submission of those men who whilst they talk of his power so much Renounce it openly and oppose what would be the greatest security of his person and in effect set up his Successor above him even in his life time FINIS
to it frequently In the 25th year of his Reign an Act passed St. 25 H. 8. cap. 22. wherein the Parliament say they were bounden to provide for the perfect surety of the Succession they did not certainly reckon themselves bound to do a thing that was not in their Power And then they take notice of the great Mischiefs and Effusions of Bloud which had happened by reason of the doubtfulness of the true Title and for the avoiding of all future Questions do Enact That the Imperial Crown of this Realm shall be to King Henry 8th and the Heirs of his Body Lawfully begotten on Queen Anne and the Heirs of the Bodies of such several Sons respectively according to the course of Inheritance and for default of such Issue then to the Sons of his Body in like manner and upon failure of such Issue then to the Lady Elizabeth and after her to any other Issue in Tail and then the Remainder is limited to the right Heirs of Henry the 8th By the same Statute every Subject at his full Age is oblig'd to take an Oath to defend the Contents of it and the refusal is made Misprision of Treason And the next Parliament 26 H. 8. c. 2. which was held in the year following does particularly Enact an Oath for that purpose Some few years after these Acts were Repealed 28 H. 8. Rast Crown 4. and the Parliament Entailed the Crown upon the King and the Heirs of his Body by Queen Jane And Power is given the King for want of Issue of his Body to dispose of the Succession by his Letters Patents or his last Will. It is also made Treason if any Usurp upon those to whom it is so appointed Here the Parliament do not only use their power of changing the Succession but they Delegate it to another And in the thirty fifth Year of this King's Reign 35 H. 3. cap. 1. the Parliament by another Act take notice of the great and high Trust which the Subjects had in him in putting into his hands wholly the Order and Declaration of the Succession Yet the King being then ready to go into France they do Enact that after his Death and the Death of Prince Edward without Issue the Crown should be to the Lady Mary and the Heirs of her Body but both subject to such Conditions as the King should limit by his Letters Patents or by his last Will sign'd with his Hand And if the Lady Mary performed not those Conditions that then the Crown should go to the Lady Elizabeth as if the Lady Mary had been dead without Issue and if the Lady Elizabeth neglected to perform such Conditions then it should go to such other Person as the King should appoint in the same manner as before as if the Lady Elizabeth had been dead without Issue And Authority is given to him by his Letters Patents or his last Will signed with his own Hand to appoint the Crown to remain to such Person or Persons and for such Estate and under such Conditions as he should please An Oath also for observing this Statute is appointed and it is made Treason to refuse it or to disturb or interrupt any Person to whom it is limited by this Act or should be by the King pursuant to the Power given him thereby This is abundantly sufficient to prove That it was the universal Opinion of that Age That the Succession was wholly under the Controul of Parliament who not only limited it as they pleased themselves but subjected it to Conditions and to the Appointments of others But the thing was in its own Nature so evident that they who had the greatest Reason and were most concern'd to do it did never presume to question the Power of a Parliament in this Point Lethington Burn. Hist Reform Collect. 268. Secretary of Scotland in a Letter of his written to Sir William Cecill then Secretary of State here wherein he argues in behalf of the Title of his Mistriss Mary Queen of Scots to succeed Queen Elizabeth against a pretended Disposition made by the last Will of Henry the Eighth to his Neece the Lady Frances Daughter to the French Queen if his own Issue fail'd says of these Statutes that gave the King Power to dispose of the Crown That they were against Equity to disinherit a Race of Forreign Princes and that they were made in an abrupt Time as he terms it but yet he confesses that since the thing was done it was now valid and unavoidable unless some Circumstances did annihilate the Limitation and Disposition made by King Henry's Will And so he proceeds to prove that the power which was given to the King by these Statutes was not pursued which it ought to have been most strictly and in a precise Form for that the King never signed the Will but that his name set to it was forged Nay I will venture to say that in all the Books which were written to support the Claim of the Scottish Queen against King Henries Will though the whole power and wealth of the Guises were employed to set every wit at work on that Design there was never any stress laid upon it Treatise of the Title of Queen Mary to the Succession pag. 38 39. c. lib. 2. Dodd Engl. Lawyer pag. 8. or so much as a pretence that these Acts of Parliament were void or ineffectual in themselves In that Discourse which was published by Philips and composed by Sir Anthony Brown one of the Justices of the Common Pleas who was in judge Dodderidges opinion a person of an incomparable sharpness of Wit There was all the help that learning either in Divinity Civil or Common Laws could give yet there the Authority of the Parliament in the case and the validity of these Statutes is all along admitted Indeed they endeavour to put some other construction upon the Statutes but their great Argument is That King Henry as King had no power to dispose of the Crown and therefore these Laws only gave him an Authority and made him only as it were a Commissioner and therefore as all other Authorities especially being in Derogation of the course of the Common Line was to be strictly followed They allow that he had sufficient power to Devise and that he might Honourably have used that Power but that he ever did exercise that Authority is the thing denyed But it is time for us to go on Edward the Sixth succeeded his Father and took upon him a power which surely no King ever had to dispose of his Crown by the Will But that disposition serving to no other purpose but to the Ruine of the Lady Jane Gray His Sister Queen Mary first and after Queen Elizabeth enjoy'd the Crown according to the Limitation of the Statute 35 H. 8. c. 1. and that one of them had no other Title must be agreed by all For Queen Catherine was alive at the time when Elizabeth was born so that if the
in ejus promotionem Willielmo Cantuariensis Archiepiscopo Clericorum Laicorum universitate apud London Jo. Hagulstad 250. Predictus Stephanus à cunctis in Regem Electus Gervas Chron. f. 340. Congregatis Londiniis terrae magnatibus Mat. Paris 74. with the Estates of the Realm to elect him King And in this Charter which he made soon after he owns this Title beginning it thus Ego Stephanus Dei gratia assensu Cleri Populi in Regem Angliae electus c. And the Pope in his Charter of Confirmation sent to him in the first year of his Reign tells him That he was Communi voto unanimi assensu tam Procerum quam etiam Populi in Regem electus And then he adds That since so universal an Assent could not be directed but by the Divine Grace he therefore allows his Title and confirms him in the Kingdom 'T is true that afterwards Mawd the Empress together with her Son Henry having after some years gained many to their side gave him great disturbance till at last Stephen having lost his Eldest Son Eustace in whom he placed his hopes (e) Hen. Hunt l. 8. f. 395. R. Hag. de gestii Steph. 314. and used all means whilst he liv'd to have got him declared his Successor but without Success came to an Agreement with the Empress and her Son and (a) Facto Wintoniae conventu publica Rex Stephanus ipsum Ducem cunctis videntibus adoptavit in Filium utque interposito omnium Juramento concessit confirmarit ei totius Angliae principatum Dux autem suscepit eum in loeum genitoris contendens ei omnibus diebus vitae fuae nomen rem Regij culminis obtinere Gervas f. 1375. In conventu Episcoporum aliorum de Regno optum Mat. Westm f. 246. an 1153. 282. an 1154. Consenserunt in hoc omnes principes Regni Jo. Hagulstad f. 282. Mat. pacis 86. Hen. Hunt l. 8. f. 398. Jo. Hagalstad 282. an 1154. the Parliament who alone could give a Sanction to such Agreement was assembled at Winchester to confirm it and then Stephen publickly Adopts Henry for his Son and with their full consent declares him his Heir and with the same consent Henry gives Stephen the name of Father and agrees that he should continue to be King during his Life and they all Swore That if Henry surviv'd he should without opposition obtain the Crown and Stephen by his Charter which is set down at large in Brompton publishes this Agreement Brompt 1037. In all this Transaction certainly there was no consideration had of any other Right but that which universal consent conferred For if Stephen's Heir had any pretence he had a Son then living whose Name was William and who by the same Agreement was to have all the Possessions which his Father enjoyed before he was made King If the Heir of Henry the first had any Title that was vested in Mawd the Empress who was then also living so that neither of the parties had any other colour of Right to the Crown than what the consent of the People gave them According to this Parliamentary Agreement and Limitation Stephen enjoy'd the Crown peaceably during his Life and after his Death Henry the Second came to it as peaceably but he remembred by what Title and therefore was desirous to secure it to his Son in the same manner that he took a very dangerous and unusual way to do it (b) Convenerunt interim die statuto ex mandato Regis Londoniam totius Angliae Episcopi Abbates Comites Barones vicecomites prepositi Aldermanit cum sidejussoribus Gervas H 2. f 1412. For Summoning a Parliament to meet at London he procures his Son Henry to be declared King together with himself by their consent and thereupon he was Crowned by the Archbishop of York and Fealty Sworn to him by all This was the occasion of Civil Wars between them for the Father meant hereby only to have secured the Succession to him and the Son was impatient of having only the bare Title of a King all along pretending to an Equal Authority as doth sufficiently appear by what he writes to the Prior and Convent of Canterbury where he takes notice That his Father did attempt some Invasions upon them which he ought not to have done without his assent (c) Gervas H. 2. f 1425. Qui ratione Regiae unctionis Regnum totius Regni curam suscepiemus and therefore he appeal'd to the Pope in that behalf Nay the Father himself paid that Respect to his Sons Dignity That when he at last subdued him and his Rebellious Brothers (d) Brompt f. 1100. he would not suffer him to do him Hommage with his other Sons though he offered it But Henry the Son dying in the Life of his Father Richard was then his Eldest Son surviving and consequently had all the Right which a next Heir could claim But the wise and wary King had not confidence enough to rely upon this now so much talk'd of sacred Right but though he had already suffered so much from disobedient Sons was glad to get the Succession confirmed to him in his Life-time And the Truth is there was reason enough that he should do so for he had all his Children by Eleanor the Daughter of William Duke of Guyen (a) M. Paris 84 who was before the Wife of Lewis the 7th King of France who was still living and she onely Divorced causa Adulterii which being not a Divorce à vinculo Matrimonii she could not either by the Canon-Law universally received or the Laws of England lawfully Marry with any other Husband After his Father's Death Richard came to London to which place all the Clergy and Laity were summoned and (b) Post tamcleri quam populi solennem debitam Electionem R. de daeto f 647. R. H. par 2. f. 6. 56. after he had been solemnly and duely Elected by the whole Clergy and Laity they are the very words of the Historian and taken the usual Oaths he was Crowned And when he undertook the holy War he (c) Flo. Hist An. 1190. declared Arthur Son of his next Brother Geoffery the Duke of Britain the next Heir to the Crown Richard dying without Issue this Arthur ought to have succeeded and his Sister Elianor also had a Title before her Uncle But John the younger Brother without regarding this divine Right of his Nephew applies himself to the People for a more sure though but a humane Title (d) Praelatorum Comitum aliorum Nobilium multitudo insinita Brompt 1281. who being summon'd together elected him King And (e) Mat. Paris 197. An. 1199. Si aliquis ex stirpe Regis Defuncti aliis praepolliret pronius promptius in electionem ejus esse consentiendum Hubert the then Archbishop of Canterbury did at his Coronation preach a Doctrine which would have sounded very strangely to the Convocation in 1640. viz. No one
Edward the Fifth who held it not long enough to have it put on him with the usual Solemnity for though he was Proclaimed he was never Crowned King For his Uncle Richard Duke of Gloucester having secured him and his Brother in the Tower did cunningly insinuate the Bastardy of his Nephew and that Edward the Fourth had another Wife living at the time of his Marriage to their Mother and also at the time of their Birth The Report found Credit universally in so much that the Duke of Buckingham coming to him at Baynards-Castle with most of the great Lords and wise men of the Kingdom and the Mayor and Aldermen of London the Duke did in their Names acquaint him that they had unanimously thought fit to elect him King as being Heir to the Royal Blood of Richard Duke of York upon whom the Crown was entail'd by the High Authority of Parliament 'T is very remarkable that in the midst of their highest Flatteries and Courtship to him they tell him only of this great and sure Title by Act of Parliament although if he had been indeed what was pretended the Heir of the House of York his Right by Descent from Edward the Third was unquestionable Richard after some feigned Excuses did at last accept of their Offer and Election and the Parliament being soon after Assembled Cott. Rec. fol. 709. they presented a Bill to this effect Please it your Grace to understand the Consideration Election and Petition under-written of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and of the Commons c. And thereby they Declare the Children of Edward the Fourth illegitimate Bucks Rich. 3. lib. 1. fol. 22. and that his Brother George Duke of Clarence was attainted of High-Treason by Parliament in the 17th year of Edward the Fourth's Reign by reason whereof all the Issue of the said George were and are disabled and barr'd of all Right and Claim that in any case they might have or challenge by Inheritance to the Crown and Dignity Royal of this Realm by the ancient Laws and Customs of the same After which considering that none of the uncorrupted lineal Blood of Richard Duke of York could be found but in his Person say they We have chosen and do choose you our King and Sovereign Lord. Then the Bill proceeds in reciting that all the Learned in the Laws do approve his Title and declaring him King as well by Right of Consanguinity and Inheritance as by lawful Election and entails the Crown on him and the Heirs of his Body and declares his Son Heir Apparent To which the King gave his Royal Assent in these words 〈◊〉 idem Dominus Rex de Assensu dictorum trium Statuum Regni Authoritate praedicta omnia singula praemissa in Billa praedicta contenta concedit ea pro vero indubio pronunciat decernit declarat But the barbarous Murder of his Nephews did soon beget such an universal Detestation of Richard in the minds of the People that they resolved he should no longer Reign over them and so taking hold of a Pretence which Henry Duke of Richmond set up they joyn'd with him against Richard Though Henry's Title was indeed no more than a meer Pretence for not only the Right of the House of York as far as Blood could give Right was before that of the House of Lancaster but also he had no manner of Interest in that Title which the Lancastrian Line had since his Claim was under a Bastard begotten in Adultery and besides his Mother Margaret Countess of Richmond as Heir to whom he pretended he claim'd was then living Therefore Comines the most judicious Writer of that Age and who knew well what was the sence of Europe concerning his Title says plainly though he wrote in the time of Henry the Seventh Qu'il 〈◊〉 Croix ne Pile ne nul Droit comme Jeo Croy 〈…〉 Nevertheless Henry having slain Richard in Bosworth-field the Crown was there put on his Head by the Lord Stanley with the general Acclamation of the People But he was wise enough to think his Title to it was not very good till it was made so by an Act of Parliament and therefore in the first year of his Reign he procured one to pass in these words For the Wealth Bucks Rich. 3. lib. 5. fol. 145. Prosperity and Surety of this Realm of England and for avoiding of all Ambiguities and Questions The wisest of our Princes you see had no little Opinion of the Authority of a Parliament in this point Be it Ordained c. That the Inheritance of the Crown of the Realms of England and France with all the Preheminences and Dignities Royal to the same appertaining and the Ligeances to the King belonging beyond the Seas c. shall be rest remain and abide in the most Royal Person of our Sovereign Lord Henry the Seventh and in the Heirs of his Body lawfully coming perpetually with the Grace of God and so to endure and no other Thus did the wisest of our Kings establish himself Lord Bacon H. 7. f. 11 12. and the best of our Historians mentions it as one of the greatest Instances of his Wisdom That he did not press to have this as a Declaration or Recognition of Ancient Right but onely as an Establishment of the possession which he then had nor to have the Remainder limited to any person after the determination of his Estate but was content with the Settlement upon himself and the Issue of his own Body leaving it to the Law to decide what was to follow upon the failure of such Heirs Nor can any thing be more clear than that Henry the Seventh depended entirely on this Parliamentary Title without extending any pretences of his or his Wives who was Heir of the House of York beyond this Establishment in as much as the Oaths of Allegiance and other publick Tests and Securities which were required at that time of the Subjects were not in general Terms to the King his Heirs and Successors but only to the King Burnet's Hist of the Reformation Collect ad lib. 2. fol. 3 4. and the Heirs Male of his Body lawfully begotten An Instance of this without going any further may be seen amongst the Records Printed at the end of the late History of the Reformation where Cardinal Adrian when he was promoted by Henry the Seventh to the Bishoprick of Bath and Wells renounces all Clauses in the Popes Bulls which may be prejudicial Domini meo supremo Haeredibus suis corpore suo legitime procreatis Angliae Regibus and he does afterwards swear Allegiance to him in the very same Words without taking any notice of Remoter Heirs Henry the Eighth the Heir to this Entail Succeeded his Father and though he attempted as much for Arbitrary Power and used Parliaments with as little respect as any of his Predecessors Yet even he never doubted of their Power in settling the Succession but valued it much and resorted
to shew that all Conquest does not put the Conquerour into an Absolute Right Though it be most evident in the case of William the First who did by his Sword prosecute a claim of another nature and meant only to acquire that Right and after conquest rested in it He pretended to the Crown as the Gift of King Edward and to vindicate that Title he enter'd with Arms. And though his Relation to the Crown was more remote than that of Edgar Atheling then a child yet his Title was better than Harolds the present Usurper who could pretend no kindred at all and who had himself Sworn to support the Grant to William Nor did he claim a Power by conquest though the name of Conquerour was given him by after times says Daniel but submitted to the orders of the Kingdom desirous rather to have his Testamentary Title than his Sword to make good his succession But I will admit that he made an absolute conquest and then these men will grant that he might himself dispose of this conquer'd Kingdom Therefore if he did not leave it to descend in such a manner as they would have it go nor did institute any such sort of Succession surely this Argument of theirs will fall to the ground Now 't is plain that he never design'd that the Crown should descend but gave it to his second Son and thereby gave an early example of excluding and pretermitting the unworthy Lastly Others object that the Fundamental Laws of the Land against which no Act of Parliament can be of force have so establisht the Succession that the course of it cannot be alter'd This is surely a new discovery unknown to our Fore-fathers as the foregoing History does abundantly prove But let these objectors be asked by what Authority these imaginary Laws were made For if an Authority equal to that which made them be still in being That Authority may certainly repeal them when ever it pleases to exert it self If the King alone made them no doubt but that he may change them too If they will say they were made by the diffusive body of the people they run before they are aware into the guilt of worshipping that Idol The Multitude and make a great step towards placing the foundation of the Government upon contract and consent But then let them produce those Laws or some Authentick memorial of them before it be exacted from us to believe there were ever any such Yes they will say there is such an ancient Law acknowledged by all the Judges and known to every man that the Descent of the Crown purges all Defects whatsoever This Maxim as it is usually repeated is in these words and this might be admitted and yet could not be pertinently apply'd to a case where the Descent it self is prevented by a Law But I will not take advantage of their words but will consider the Objection as it stands in that Book where the first mention of it was made 1 H. 7. f. 〈◊〉 b. Que le Roy fuist person able discharge d'auscun attainder eo facto qu' il prist sur lui le Reign estre Roy. and that is in the Year Book of Henry the Seventh it being said there by the Judges That the King was a person Able and Discharged of any Attainder eo facto that he took upon him the Government and to be King First This was not only an extra-judical opinion but was not pertinent to the Question referr'd to their consideration Whether those who were chosen into the House of Commons and were at that time attainted of Treason might sit in Parliament till their Attainders were Reversed and they all agree that their Attainders should first be annulled But then they proceed to say that there was no necessity that the Kings Attainder should be Reversed for that he might enable himself and needed not any Act of Reversal But surely they said very wisely in what they said for he who had won a Crown in the field had gone a great way towards enabling himself to wear it Most sure it is that if an Act of Reversal were necessary before he could sit that then it was impossible he ever should sit there because no such Act could be made without the Royal Assent Henry the Seventh was then King de facto and in possession of the Throne and it was somewhat of the latest to consider whether he was qualified or not Certainly it had been strange self-denyal in the Judges and a neglect of themselves which is not usual with them to have alledged an Incurable Disability in the King from whom they had their Patents and Authority In the next place let us consider what precedent the Judges cite to justifie this opinion of theirs and how apposite it is Henry the Sixth being driven out of the Kingdom by Edward the Fourth The Conquerour call'd a Parliament and got an Act to pass whereby Henry was disabled to hold the Crown About ten years after Henry regains the Kingdom and upon this re-accession to the Crown as 't is usually call'd This Act is never repeal'd But does not every Child see the Reasons of it For if Henry was Lawful King and before he was not to doubt that The Act it self was void in as much as it wanted the Royal Assent So that for him to have procured an Act of Repeal had been to affirm a Title to the Crown in Edward But without doubt this opinion of the Judges as it is apply'd by the Objectors was new and unheard of before We see the King of France was otherwise informed by the learned men in the time of King John for they thought his Blood corrupted Mat. Westni 275. v. supra and him uncapable of taking the Crown by Descent because he was Attainted of Treason which prevailed with that King to send over his Son Lewis to put in his claim in right of his wife who was the next Heir It also ought to be observed that the true Reason why the generality of the Nation did so long approve the Title of the House of Lancaster was because all the Princes of the House of York were Attainted of Treason and their Blood corrupted But as soon as ever this corruption was purged and Richard Duke of York was declared Heir Apparent by Parliament the people soon forsook the Lancastrians and set the House of York in the Throne Nay the very learned men of the same Age with these Judges though quite otherwise as will appear beyond contradiction in this samous case which follows Richard the Third had two Elder Brothers Edward and George Duke of Clarence Richard designing to secure the Crown to himself had procured the Children of Edward to be declared Illegitimate yet still the Duke of Clarence had Issue living which might pretend But observe what the Parliament say as to this in the first year of Richard the Third V. Sup. Cott. Rec. 709. That in the seventeenth year