Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n king_n power_n successor_n 2,893 5 9.1968 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A70306 The true Catholicks tenure, or, A good Christians certainty which he ought to have of his religion, and may have of his salvation by Edvvard Hyde ... Hyde, Edward, 1607-1659.; Hyde, Edward, 1607-1659. Allegiance and conscience not fled out of England. 1662 (1662) Wing H3868; ESTC R19770 227,584 548

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and Lord of lords Wherefore those men that under pretence of setting up Christs kingdom do fight against the power and authority of earthly Kings and powers do directly oppose this Text as well as very many other for they would so make Christ a King and a Lord as not a King of kings and Lord of lords but as a king and lord of the meanest of the people whereas though there be never so many kings and potentates and lords yet he is truly the onely Potentate the onely King the onely Lord because he is so in and of himself for all others have power and kingship and lordship from him as himself hath taught us S. Mat. 28. 18. All power is given unto me in Heaven and in Earth It will be a hard task for any man to shew who it was that took this power from Christ and gave it to the people that kings and princes here on earth should have their power derived from them and not from Christ but yet least we should think the Power and Kingdom of Christ not the same with the Power and Kingdom of God we finde them both joyned together Rev. 11. 15. where it is said The Kingdoms of this world are become the Kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ he shall reign for ever and ever He not they to shew there is but one kingdom but one power of Christ and of God and lest we should further think the kingdom of Christ could not be set up without pulling down other kingdoms it is made evident in the 17 v. that his kingdom is set up by taking to himself his great power to reign not by giving it to the people v. 17. We give thee thanks O Lord God Almighty which art and wast and art to come because thou hast taken to thee thy great power and hast reigned where we see the Elders in heaven give thanks to God for taking to himself his Almighty power In imitation whereof our Church hath taught us to say We praise thee we bless thee we worship thee we glorifie thee we give thanks to thee for thy great glory O Lord God heavenly King God the Father Almighty joyning also God the Son and holy Ghost in the same power in the praise and without doubt we have little reason to persecute but we have great reason to honour a Church that teacheth us so to praise God here on earth as we shall hereafter praise him in heaven for thus is God the Father Son and holy Ghost Almighty in power and therefore thus to be praised for being so If then thou murmure and repine under this power when it punisheth thee or presume upon it much more rebel against it when it sustaineth thee thou art as far from heaven as thou art from true thankfulness But if God hath this Almighty power that he can do all how is it that S. Paul saith He cannot deny himself 2 Tim. 2. 13. The answer is easie God cannot do what he cannot will and he cannot will any thing of impotency for that were directly to overthrow his Omnipotency and in this sense did Nazianzene speak like a Divine saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 One kinde of impossibility with God is his unwillingness as the text plainly saith of the Son of God That he could there do no mighty work S. Mar. 6. 5. that is he would there do no mighty work because of their unbelief which unbelief of theirs was so great a miracle to him as that it hindred his working all other miracles accordingly Divines do say That some things are impossible to God in regard of his own will because he cannot will them as to give a new Gospel to make a new Religion to destroy the whole world with a second deluge to extirpate the Catholick Church which imply no contradiction in themselves and therefore might be done though God having promised the contrary cannot now will to do them Habent rationem factibilium sed non habent rationem factoris Other things are impossible to God in regard of themselves because they are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non habent factibilium rationem are not things to be done nec rationem factoris and therefore God cannot do them as those things that imply a contradiction as for the same thing to be and not to be at the same time for this being a contradiction cannot be without a lie and therefore that was a strange assertion of Bellarmines lib. 3. de Euchar. cap. 7. deinde and not maintained for its own sake when he said Per divinam potentiam posse ab homine tolli facultatem seu potentiam intelligendi interim ut maneat homo That God can take away a mans reasonable faculty or power of understanding and yet leave him still a man for that is all one as to say That God can make the same man reasonable and unreasonable for if he take away his reasonable faculty he makes him unreasonable and yet if he leave him still a man he leaves him reasonable for this indeed were Impotency in God not Omnipotency if he could make both parts of a contradiction true because they cannot both be made true without a lie And thus also is Religion Omnipotent by vertue of Gods Omnipotencie for it hath power to do all hath power over all Casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalteth it self against the knowledge of God and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ and having in a readiness to avenge all disobedience 2 Cor. 10. 5 6. The power of the sword may cast down images but 't is onely the power of Religion that can cast down Imaginations and they no less then the other do exalt themselves against the knowledge of God the power of the sword can bring into captivity every man to the obedience of the Conquerour but 't is onely the power of Religion can bring into captivity everythought to the obedience of Christ That power can avenge the disobedience without which is but half disobedience but 't is onely this power can avenge the disobedience within as well as without that is all disobedience Will you raise an army against Religion Alas That can scatter a people that delight in war for when Christ shall come to judge among the nations they shall beat their swords into plow-shares and their spears into pruning-hooks Isa. 2. 4. And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down and the haughtiness of men shall be made low and the Lord alone shall be exalted in that day v. 17. and this being the signe the prophet hath given us of the coming of Christs kingdome let not those who are of a quite contrary disposition pretend to be under Christs government who labour to exalt man not Christ for as Dagon fell before the Ark so must all ensignes of hostility fall down before Christs banner and if they that carry them do not fall
nothing but what no body else can see your own holiness Come and see a Dead King ruling in his true Subjects souls whom whilest he was living you would not suffer to rule over your bodies but now he is dead you must and God grant onely you may I say you must expiate his death either with your eyes or with your hearts wash away the guilt of it either with your tears or with your bloud beleeve it all annals and among the rest some Dypticks or Church-Calenders will speak of him as a most glorious Saint but I will not tell how they will speak of you and now if you can come and call this doctrine Court-flattery which was preached not when the King was on his Throne but when he was going to the Bar and published now he is in his Grave then perchance it might have been thought Flattery when there was a Scepter to adorn it and a Sword to defend it but now that 't is so generally decried so publickly discountenanced so resolvedly detested and opposed it can be thought no other then a most divine soul-saving truth which forceth consciencious Ministers to hazard their temporal safety by proclaiming it because they see you hazard your eternal salvation by resisting it and yet to speak but the plain truth it is flattery at no time to say of Kings Ye are Gods for the Text avows it But 't is most desperate flattery at any time to say of Subjects Ye are Kings for the Text denies it and 't is not to be doubted but those men who have already flattered Subjects into Kings to make us slaves will as easily flatter those their Kings into Tyrants to perpetuate our slavery For my part this I will say boldly in regard of my calling as a Minister of the Church of England not in regard of my person who am the unworthiest of all the Ministry and I am not afraid of saying it before men because I am not afraid of saying it before God If I am deceived in this Doctrine of Allegiance and Supremacy 't is my Church hath deceived me and I humbly conceive the Church will yet further say for her self If I am deceived God hath deceived me Domine si decipimur a te decepti sumus Lord if I the now distressed Church of England or the poor Ministers who are truly of my Communion be deceived in the points of Allegiance and Supremacy 't is thou hast deceived us for we are deceived by thy holy Word and now let 's hear that Word speak for it self Eccles. 8. 2 3 4. ECCLES 8. 2 3 4. I counsel thee to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God Be not hasty to go out of his sight stand not in an evil thing for he doth what soever pleaseth him Where the word of a King is there is power and who may say unto him what doest thou ALlegiance and Supremacy do belong to Kings by the appointment and from the authority of the King of Kings 't is from him they have the right to govern 't is from him they have the inseparable Rights of Government to be above and over all which we call Supremacy to be truly and faithfully loved served honoured and obeyed of all which we call Allegiance two doctrines upon which Christians did heretofore more severely insist then other men and the Reformed Churches have hitherto more insisted then other Christians So that we cannot fall from them but we must fall both from the glory of the true Christian Religion and from the present most glorious part of that the Reformation we must turn Papists nay the worst of Papists Jesuited Papists and renounce our Reformation Doctrines both of a heavenly descent for had they risen out of the earth they would have been more agreeable with the tempers of men who had their original from thence and still have their affections there but now they are so opposite so repugnant to flesh and bloud corrupt flesh and bloud which is too proud and rebellious to endure a Supremacy over-awing it too unfaithfull and licentious to endure an Allegiance bounding and confining it that the most powerfull Doctour of the Gentiles writing of this Argument is observed to labour exceedingly for variety of expression as if his adversaries who before calumniated the weakness of his presence would now also in this calumniate the want of Power in his writings and not so much as say his Letters are weighty and powerfull though his bodily presence is weak and his speech contemptible 2 Cor. 10. 10. for though that blessed Apostle write very fully and expresly of all points of Divinity yet doth he seek out for demonstrations chiefly in these three Justification by Faith in Christ Resurrection from the dead and Obedience to the Civil Magistrate and he is particularly urgent and pressing in this latter to shew us that we ought most carefully to lay it up in our Consciences and most conscionably to practise it in our lives and conversations preparing and fore-arming the Church of Christ against those wolves in sheeps clothing those Godly seditious men which should arise after his departing and speak perverse things to draw away disciples after them Act. 20. 30. the like method did God himself observe in the Old Testament and I hope that we Protestants who take the Word of God onely for the Rule of our Faith will not at one time reject both the New and the Old Testament for least men should at any time among the Jews as stiff-necked a people as our selves either for Apostasie refuse or for hypocrisie dissemble or for timorousness conceal this heavenly doctrine which is so necessary for the salvation of souls he which before with Abraham did provide himself a sacrifice doth here with his posterity provide himself a Priest sends such a Preacher as can neither be seduced with Apostasie nor corrupted with flattery nor silenced with fear even his own holy Spirit to preach it in these words I counsel thee to keep the Kings Commandment c. Which words are not a Text but a Sermon concerning Allegiance and Supremacy due to Kings wherein you have these three parts First The Preacher 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I. Secondly The manner of his Preaching I Counsell I counsel thee Thirdly The Doctrines of his Sermon and they are two 1. That of Allegiance to keep the Kings Commandment and that in regard of the Oath of God Be not hasty to go out of his sight v 2 3. 2. That of Supremacy where the word of a King is there is power and who may say unto him what doest thou v. 4. I will handle these in their order and First of the Preacher in this particle I and who this I is we may learn from the first words of the Book The words of the Preacher the Son of David King in Jerusalem that is the words of Solomon without question for no other Son of David was King in Jerusalem but
and gives this reason why he requires it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We were ordained and appointed of God to preserve the faith holy and incorrupt as we received it the Pope will now tell the Emperour so sed non fuit sic ab initio from the beginning it was not thus no nor in many hundreds of years after and in the sixteenth Action of this Council the acclamations of the Bishops to the Emperour at first calling him Another Constantine another Martian another Theodosius another Justinian are a proof beyond exception for no History is so irrefragable as the Acts of a Council that those Emperours had called the forementioned Councils and the petitions at last of the same Bishops praying for him as the Defender of the Orthodox Religion as the bulwark of the Church and as the Defender of the Faith cannot but assure us that they thought it the Emperours duty to call those Councils because they thought them bound to defend the Faith and to protect the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 You see the title of Defender of the Faith to a King is of much greater antiquity then our Henry the eight as well as the reason of it and so many several laws in the Code and in the Novels of the Catholick Faith of the Sacraments of Churches of Bishops of Synods of Hereticks will be an evidence to the worlds end of the Supremacy of Kings in causes Ecclesiastical no less then those other titles in the institutes and digests that concern liberty and property and the affairs of this world will be an invincible evidence of their Supremacy in civil causes But I may not insist longer upon this Argument such kinde of quotations being fitter for the school then for the pulpit I will onely add this one more from Pope Adrian's own mouth to Charles the Great of France whom he calls Spiritualem Compatrem that is either his Spiritual Godfather for his patronage and care over his Person or his Fellow-Father in spirituals for his jurisdiction and government over the Church and he labours to give him such punctual satisfaction in all particulars concerning the second Nicene Council as if he feared that of Franckford called by Charles would as indeed it did over ballance that of Nice procured by himself no less in truth then it did in authority but we think his Compater to his Lord and Master a little too high though his Successours will not stoop so low for as we allow the Supreme no superiour so we must allow him no equal which is my second conclusion No person but is inferiour to him in power as no power but is inferiour to his in causes whether Ecclesiastical or Civil so no person or persons whether Ecclesiastical or Civil but is and are inferiour to him in power we understand not that Singulis major Universis minor or if we understand it think that Omnis anima speaks as well Universis as Singulis and therefore not onely one and one by himself but also one and all Subjects together all are inferiour to their Sovereign because they are all bound to submit unto him Let every soul be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13. 1. Their convening together doth as much take off their souls as it doth their subjection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can never agree but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is joyned with the universis in the text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore of them also no less then of single persons must the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the next verse be necessarily understood Whosoever resisteth or How many soever resist both alike are comprehended in They that resist and they shall receive to themselves damnation The word here used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subordinetur let every soul be subordinate a word that more particularly points at the Ordines regni in the very signification of it because they can never want power to make resistance and seldom want chaplains that encourage them to make it but Ordines sunt ordinandi and subordinandi or else Ordines will be Confusiones Orders must be ordered and subordinate or though called States yet will be Ruines though called Orders will turn Confusions both of the text and of the kingdom and certainly the reasons alledged by S. Paul as equally concern Ordines regni as other Subjects and those as well all as some Universos as well as Singulos First Gods ordinance which may no more be rejected by all then by some by all together then by single persons in particular Secondly Damnation which may be incurred by all as well as by some by a Parliament as well as by Private Gentlemen 'T is true the King may not be so great a terrour to all as to some because all joyning together may not be afraid of his power What then yet I hope all have consciences as well as some and though happily it may not be said of the all of the whole kingdom Ye must needs be subject for wrath because all subjects holding together need not fear their Kings wrath yet it may and must be said of them all Ye must needs be subject for Conscience sake as 't is in the first verse For be they never so many that combine together that will give no satisfaction to the Conscience in regard of it self nor release in regard of God and yet even this very objection is sufficiently answered in the verse before in that he is said To bear the sword as the Minister of God and therefore Not to bear the sword in vain For though happily or rather unhappily in regard of his Person he may bear the sword in vain and perish under it yet in regard of his office he cannot for so he is the Minister of God and consequently a revenger of wrath that cannot fail of his revenge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Epiph. Haer. 40. adversus Archontichos He hath from God the right of the sword not from any other and he hath it for revenge Would to God those men who follow these Hereticks in multiplying powers and principalities though not in heaven yet in earth and in some other things too for these Archontici did abhor baptism and slight the Communion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiph. ibid. I say would those men who follow these Hereticks in this gross opinion would likewise seriously go along with this learned Father in his solid confutation there would never again be any cavilling disputes upon the 13 to the Romans His confutation in brief is this You Archontici think by multiplying powers in heaven to overthrow the dominion and power of one God but indeed you rather establish it For if in earth there may be so many principalities and powers in one kingdom all subject not repugnant to one King then much more so in heaven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In every kingdom upon earth there are many principalities but they are all under one King Nothing
Thou art God from everlasting that is without beginning and thou art God to everlasting that is without end And so also is Religion Eternal both from everlasting and to everlasting from everlasting in the reason of it because it is a service or reverence due to God by vertue of his excellent Majesty and consequently that due is Eternal with his very Being but onely to everlasting in the practise of it because there was no creature from everlasting to practise it how then should we exceedingly desire to know Religion how to love it how to practise it whereby alone our souls are prepared to believe Eternity and to enjoy it and to employ it an irreligious soul could it possibly get to heaven would not know what to do there for there is nothing but the practise of Religion or praising God Rev. 19. 1 5 7. Again as God in that he is Eternal oweth his Beginning and Continuance to none but onely to himself and as Eternity because it is from it self is therefore without a Beginning and because it is of it self is therefore without an end so true Religiō hath in some sort its Being from it self for it is bonum in se it is good in and by it self and therefore hath its subsistence in and by it self let the whole world turn Atheist as it is turning apace yet the true Religion will still be the true Religion there may be in the practise of Religion many things good because they are commanded but in the substance of Religion the internal goodness is the reason of the external command so that Religion is indeed a beam of that light which proceedeth from the Father of Lights shewing unto Angels men what they are to know love and do and so leading them both to the Light everlasting for as God himself is so is his service and therefore I could not better explain the properties of Religion then from the properties of God Onely God hath his properties immediately flowing from his own essence but Religion partakes of these mediately from God as it is his service God hath these properties not onely Formally in himself but also Originally from himself Religion hath them Formally in it self but Originally from God Thus hath Religion all those properties of God which are incommunicable to the Creature and thereby appears to have in it self more of Divinity then any Creature whatsoever either in Heaven or in Earth for these being the properties of the true Religion in it self shew it to be spiritual far above the nature of all created spirits whereby themselves draw nearer to the God of Spirits in their affections then in their natures If therefore thou O man desire to be truly Religious thou must desire to be spiritually minded and the way to be so is to have a kinde of Simplicity or Incomposition that is a sincerity of the soul in the love of God To have a kinde of Immutability that is a Constancy to have an Immensity that is a servent Zeal and Alacritie which will not endure to be straitned or confined and to have an Eternity that is an unwearied perseverance in the Faith and Fear and Love of God Nay indeed these same properties are already in thy soul if thou be truly Religious for then thou art spiritually minded and thou canst not but have an uncompounded soul by sincerity of its service not dividing thy affection betwixt God and Baal betwixt Christ and Belial Thou canst not but have a constancy in his service which will let thee be no Changeling a thing as monstrous and abominable in the second as in the first birth thou canst not but have an alacrity and fervency of spirit which will not be circumscribed or confined either to or by time or place neither to a Conclave at Rome nor to a Consistory at Geneva nor to a Conventicle in England for as Christianity it self is not confined so neither the soul as 't is Christian but joyns in Communion with all Christians that ever were or that are or that shall be in the honour and love of Christ thy house is too little thou wilt to the Church nay the Church is too little thou wilt to the Catholick Church the whole Church Militant thy spirit shall be with theirs when theirs is with Christ nay the Catholick Church is too little here on Earth thou wilt up to that part of it which is triumphant in Heaven for Christian duties as they are practised here will cease with our lives therefore the Christian soul will look after such duties as she may practise in Heaven and at least in habit if not in act will even here be eternally Religious as we are divinely taught by our own Church saying with a most Catholick spirit It is very meet right and our bounden duty that we should at all times and in all places give thanks unto thee O Lord holy Father Almighty everlasting God thereby shewing us the Immensity of Religion That it is not to be circumscribed to or by any place for it is meet that we give thanks in all places and also the eternity of Religion that it is not to be confined to or by any time for it is meet that we give thanks at all times Eternity being the blessedness we look for the means whereby we compass it must needs be eternal not onely in the efficient cause God himself but also in the instrumental cause that is Religion And since Omnipotency All sufficiency and Omnisciency are but three branches of Eternity It is necessary before I come to the Communicable Properties that I speak of them for God in that he is Eternal is Omnipotent since there could be no other fountain of power unless we would make two Eternals and the same God as he is Eternal is All-sufficient for having his being of himself he must needs also have it perfectly in himself and lastly the same God as he is Eternal is also Omniscient for it is the Property of Eternity to have all things present to it as to be always present to it self wherefore it will be worth our while briefly to consider these Properties as they are in God and as they are also in Religion the service of God and first of the Omnipotency Gods Omnipotency or Almighty Power appears especially in two things First that he hath power to do all that he will Secondly that he hath power over all when he will had he not the First he could not be Almighty in himself had he not the second he could not be Almighty in our esteem the first tends to the Execution the second to the Declaration of his Almighty power The text doth ordinarily prove them both together as 1 Tim 6. 15. the Son of God is called the blessed and onely Potentate the King of kings and Lord of lords The onely Potentate that hath power to do all that he will and hath also power to do all when he will as King of kings
not in but upon the Temple or Church of God non in Templo Dei sed in Templum Dei sedet tanquam ipse sit Templum Dei quod est Ecclesia as saith S. August l. 20. de Civ Dei c. 19. where also he expounds this Anti-Christ not of one single person but of a whole body of men or a mixt multitude and I pray why may not Anti-Christ reign rather in an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a Government of the many-headed then in any other kinde of Government since this alone is a Government not of Christs making Surely no one character of Anti-Christ but will more exactly befit this then any other Government and if we will suppose which is very probable that those Parables which do shew what Anti-Christ was in the Jew may also teach what he shall be in the Gentile then persecution of those who are sent unto the people much more of those who are set over them by Christ murder committed upon their persons and rapine upon their inheritance must be his chiefest qualities See S. Luk. 10 11 12 13 14. verses where we haue a perfect embleme of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when servants rule their Masters Subjects their King which is the pestilent spawn of that viperous doctrine Dominion is founded in the people and without all question 't is more immediately Anti-Christian to oppose Kingship then to oppose Kings since this may be onely against the persons who are men but that must be also against the authority which is Gods whence they are called his Kings his Anointed 2 Sam. 22. 51. or rather Christs authority for himself saith Mat. 28. 18. All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth and is from him derived unto Kings whence 1 Tim. 6. 15. he is called the onely Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords for Kings are of Christs not of the peoples making the Text shews where Christ hath given his power to Kings but not where he hath given it to the people and consequently for them to assume it without his gift and against his command must needs be Anti-Christian so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are in effect all one to sight against Monarchy is to sight against God who alone originally and against Christ who alone autoritatively is the onely Monarch but to return again to the Church doth not this appeal to the people let in the Rabble over all that 's called God and over all that 's called Christ the Anointedof God and over all that 's called Christian the service of God credenda speranda facienda must we not beleeve and pray and live as the rout will have us or have no outward profession of our faith no publick exercise of our prayers and no communion or Fellowship of our life see what strange calves this rebellious Jeroboam this striver for the people for so doth his Name import hath already set up in this our Bethel the house of God Prayer thrown out of its proper dwelling the publick worship of the Lord forbidden on the Lords own day and in the Lords own house and all because the people will have it so for 't is not the publick circumstances of time and place can make a publick worship when the persons that perform it are not publick because they are no Ministers and the substance of the worship performed is not publick but meerly private both for the matter because the supposed Minister prays onely for his own party and according to his own humour for the form because the people nay most times himself do not know his prayer Is not this truly to prophane the Sabbath in stead of sanctifying it to cry up the day but to beat down the duty of it as if Religion were more in days then in duties more in accidents then in substances more in circumstances which are but shadows then in realities I cannot perswade my self but our late throwing away the publick worship of God exercised in such an excellent Book of prayer as was publick both in its form for known unto and admired of all Christians and in its matter for of such Petitions onely as equally concerned all and introducing a meer priuate worship instead of it if I may call that a worship of God which hath so little reverence towards his Majesty and so few evidences of his authority was the most sacrilegious profanation that ever any Christian people hath yet been guilty of people I say not nation for neither with us is this Apostasie yet become National and God forbid it ever should and yet the reason of all this and much more then this is onely that which formerly was the plea of Comedians not of Divines populo ut placerent quas fecissent fabulas that they might please the people at least with some new invention since they were displeased for some base worldly ends with their old Religion and it makes many a Christian heart tremble to think that we are very near a Babylonian Captivity and the truth of God is breathing its last gasp amongst us because we are come to that desperate condition of the Jews and are as ready as they were to endungeon our Jeremies that tell us of it described by the Prophet Jer. 5. 30 31. a wonderfull and horrible thing is committed in the land the Prophets prophesie falsly and the Priests bear rule by their means and my people love to have it so and what will you do in the end thereof there is a generation of false Prophets in the land and the Priests that bear rule by their means applaud their prophesying for so the 70 render it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and my people love to have it so i. e. to have false Prophets in stead of Priests hoping thereby to save their tithes and what will you do in the end thereof as yet this horrible thing is beautifull in your eyes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Ezra but what will you do in the end when you shall know it will be bitter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 't is now a Naomi that is pleasant but it will then be Marah that is bitter and will say unto your souls Why call ye me Naomi seeing the Lord hath testified against me Ruth 1. 20 21. but I must leave this argument to some better head and more authentick hand I undertake to speak onely the heart of the true English Protestant who bids me tell you that Divinity alone makes him of the true Church which had its being before his Church not with it and much less from it Divinity of the new stamp if it may be called Divinity which hath man not God for its authour must needs on both sides turn faith into faction and Religion into Rebellion that man and the same reason holds in Christian Churches as in Christian men since a Church is but a Congregation of men I say that man
mouth and honoureth me with their lips calling for a Reformation but their heart is far from me for 't is full of rebellion O my blessed Saviour do thou first preach that to mine which thou wouldest have me preach to anothers soul lest I so preach as not to convert others or so convert others as to condemn my self 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as a Preaching soul I counsel thee I warn thee as a Preaching sinner I counsel thee as a preaching soul I warn thee as a preaching sinner who by wofull experience know the shaking palsies and convulsion fits that proceed from sin I counsel thee as a Preaching soul speaking that from mine own heart which I would have enter into thine yet this is not all I command thee as a Preaching Wisedom uttering no other then the truths of God must also come in concerning this doctrine of Allegiance to Kings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that 's 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its other sense I command thee as a Preaching Wisedom It is said of our Saviour Christ S. Mat. 7. 29. he taught them as one having authority and not as the Scribes and the reason of his so teaching is intimated in that question of those who themselves could not teach so in that question of the Scribes S. Mat. 13. 54 whence hath this man this wisedom for Christ was indeed the the wisedom of God and this was the reason he taught in the Power and authority of God so is it with them that preach Christ whether it be as a Saviour or as a Law-giver for they who preach him but one of those two preach but half Christ the more of Gods Wisedom the more of Gods Power is in their Preaching as much as they have of the wisedom of this world whether it be in fancy or faction so much they have of weakness and impotency as much as they have of the wisedom from above so much they have of power and Authority and indeed this is the main thing pointed at in this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a preaching wisedom to shew it was not Solomons but Gods Word and not so much Gods Word as Gods Wisedom and therefore not to be read or heard as the word of man but as the Word of God If we look upon this Sermon in the Text or any of the rest in the whole Book as the word of man though as the wisest of men for so was King Solomon we shall finde work for our wits to censure it if not for our wilfulness to contradict it for no one book in all the Bible hath been more upon the rack more stretched upon the tenter-hooks by all sorts of men then this but if we look upon it as the Word of God which is our duty not onely for this Sermon of Allegiance but also for all the rest contained in the Book we shall finde matter for our consciences diligently to observe and for our conversatious dutifully to practise and as concerning this particular Sermon of Allegiance and Supremacy here in these verses of my Text it hath a peculiar preeminence of perspicuity above any other in the whole Treatise so that he that runs may reade and he that reades must understand and he that understands cannot gainsay it whereas in many other doctrines of this Book there is something which through errour may be mistaken but more which through contumacy may be contradicted Insomuch as Aben-czra tells us that the wise men of the Hebrews had once a consultation of concealing this Book from their children because many things in it seemed to incline to a side or party and that an heretical party 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and he instanceth in that place of cap. 11. v. 9. which though it carry much horrour in the conclusion Know that for all these things God will bring thee to judgement yet it seems to open a gap to all manner of Licentiousness in the precedent concession Rejoyce O young man in thy youth and walk in the wayes of thy heart and in the sight of thine eyes but here our preaching wisedom is so very plain that there is not so much as a seeming concession though that be indeed the strongest prohibition for the least disloyalty against Kings either in thought word or deed all three are captivated under an absolute necessity of being true and faithfull The thought v. 2 because of the Oath of God for he knows the heart the word v. 4. who may say unto him what dost thou the deed v. 3. Be not hasty c. all which must needs recommend this doctrine to our great attention for the observation but much more to our good affection for the practise of it for we cannot but take notice that this Book which was penned of purpose to shew the vanities of all things in the world hath been abused by all sorts of men to the patronage of their several vanities onely the disloyal subject never yet brought a proof from hence for his disloyalty the whole book is nothing else but Speculum vanitatis a Looking-glass for men to see therein their vanities not onely the vanities of their possessions riches and honours but also of their actions and affections and administrations and the best of those too their actions and affections in the study of wisedom c. 1 v. 12. and performance of divine service c. 5. v. 1. and their administrations even whilest they administer justice saith Tremellius upon my Text Civilis administrationis vanitatem ostendit ex abusu Tyrannico administrantium he shews here the vanities of civil Government and Administration of Justice because of the Tyranny and Oppression of those that administer it But though we can willingly grant the discovery of Vanities in the administration of Government yet we cannot finde the least pretence for resistance against that administration no more then we can for defiance of wisedom and publick devotion because of our mixing vanities with both this very book that was made to shew men the vanities of their best actions hath in many others been alledged to maintain the vanities of their worst the solitary Monk from this omnia vanitas hath erected his exemption from common Offices of humanity under pretence of meditating onely on Divinity the inquisitive Schoolman hath from hence raised his doctrine of perpetual doubting from cap. 9. v. 1. to the great discomfort and greater destruction of souls the profane Libertine hath from cap. 3. v. 19. learned to scoff at the thought of the resurrection or eternal life and the stupid worldling from cap. 2. v. 14 15. hath learned to slight the thought of death and so we might instance in many more particulars Onely the sin of undutifulness and unfaithfulness to Kings never yet from any part of this Book hath obtained so much as a seeming defence which shews that our Preacher in this matter laboured to be a Preaching Wisedom not onely to the wise and learned
but also to the ignorant and foolish to leave even the meanest of the people inexcusable for this sin this horrid sin of disloyalty which though it least lodgeth in their hearts and is never to be contrived by their heads yet is alwaies acted by their hands Let a man be never so impatient in hearing as Festus was to S. Paul Act. 26. 24. which made him lay the imputation of madness upon the Apostle for the words of truth and soberness v. 25. Let him be never so inconsiderate in censuring as the Barbarians were to the same S. Paul Act. 28. 4. thinking him at first a murderer whom presently after they were ready to worship as a God Lastly let him be never so imprudent in collecting and observing looking rather upon the sound then upon the sense of the Text like those Interpreters of weak judgements but strong perswasions complained of 2 Pet. 3. 16. which were so unlearned as to understand nothing yet so unstable as to wrest every thing yet this doctrine of Allegiance cannot possibly be mistaken much less depraved either by his impatient hearing or by his inconsiderate censuring or by his imprudent collecting Let him run a way with what piece of it he can and take it without respect or relation to the whole which hath hitherto much wronged Gods Word both written and preached yet'tis not possible for him to take so little of the Text but it will be able both to stop his mouth and condemn his heart So that here we may forgoe that incomparable Rule of the Civilians Incivile est particulam aliquam Legis sumere non perspect â totâ Lege 't is very uncivil to lay at the catch with the Law and take that onely which serves our own turn I say we may forgo this Rule which yet is much more true of Gods then of mans Law and notwithstanding fear no mischievous tenents or practises to be deduced from this portion of the Text In a word let any seditious miscreant deal here with Solomon as Saul did with Samuel as he turns about to go away from him being resolved not to serve his purpose lay hold upon the skirt of his mantle and rent it of yet that very little parcel will signifie unto him that if he persist in his willfull disobedience The Lord will rent him from his Kingdom and that the strength of Israel will not lye nor repent 1 Sam. 15. 27 28 29. but teacheth Israel there is no way for them to be saved that are guilty of such a dismal lie but by repentance which may satisfie us that our Preacher here in this Doctrine of Allegiance is a Preaching Wisedom beyond himself in other Doctrines that begin and end where you will catch what you can of the Text it will wholly speak for your King and will silence you I know not how I have been over pressive in this patticular almost to a Tautology But that can never be too much spoken which can never be enough understood a preaching sinner a preaching conscience a preaching wisedom I hope we shall accordingly open not our ears but our hearts to his doctrine a preaching sinner who hath sin in his person not in his Sermon is fittest to admonish us a preaching conscience is fittest to advise us a preaching wisedom is fittest to overrule us here is not onely conscience and wisedom preaching this doctrine that we may not sin against it but here is also a sinner preaching it that we may repent us after we have sinned Solomon preaching before his Apostacy at the dedication of the Temple 1 King 8. 22. where he was first a Preacher had his first Congregation and afterwards in his Proverbs and Canticles is a miracle and monument of grace but preaching in Ecclesiastes after his wives had seduced him to be a Chaplain to Chamosh the abomination of Moab 1 King 11. 7. he is a miracle and monument of mercy O the infinite comfort from such a preacher if we follow him O the infinité condemnation if we do not And so it is high time I should pass from the Preacher and the manner of his preaching to the matter of his Sermon To keep the Kings Commandment c. wherein are comprised two doctrines that inseparably belong to Soveraignty the one of Allegiance the other of Supremacy the doctrine of Allegiance is clearly set down v. 2 3. and that of Supremacy v. 4. the first teacheth the duty of Subjects the second sheweth the reason of their subjection Allegiance is the duty of Subjects and Supremacy is the reason of their subjection In both it must be my endeavour onely to make my self and you truly understand this Preachers Sermon and so lay it to our consciences as he propounds it for Solomon here speaks both of Allegiance and Supremacy as they concern the conscience and divine obligation not as they concern humane conveniences or consultations therein shewing himself a true Preacher speaking to mens souls by which they hope to live in the next not to their interests by which they do live in this world first of the Allegiance A Sermon of Allegiance can never be unwelcome to a good Subject or a good Christian not to a good Subject because it puts him in minde of that condition wherein God hath placed him not to a good Christian because it puts him in minde of that duty which God hath commanded him and here is a Sermon of Allegiance briefly but fully setting it forth in its positive and in its privative act 1. In its positive act to be true and faithfull to the King in loving honouring and obeying him loving his person honouring his authority and obeying his commands I advise theè to keep the Kings Commandment and the reason thereof and that because of the Oath of God 2. In its privative act not to be guilty of any disloyalty or dis-allegiance either in affection Be not hasty to go out of his sight or in action stand not in an evil thing and the reason thereof for he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him First Of the positive Act of this Allegiance to be true add faithfull to the King in loving honouring and obeying him in these words To keep the Kings Commandment 't is in the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Os Regis observa observe the Kings mouth to observe argues an act of loving honouring and obeying In this sense doth God say unto the Jews Ye shall observe all my statutes and Christ saith unto his Apostles Teaching them to observe all things Matth. 28. 20. that is to love honour and obey them So here to observe the mouth or command of the King is to love honour and obey his commands with an unwearied diligence with an undisturbed patience First It is to love them for who cares to look after that which he doth not regard Ubi amor ibi oculus is as true when made convertible ubi oculus ibi amor the eye is the quickest messenger
keep his Oath in slaying those who brought him the head of Ishbosheth so carefull was God of David and David of himself that though he were made King yet he made not his own way to the possession of the kingdom nay yet more after another persecution he is still the same man 1 Sam 26. 8 9 10 11. and will rather flie for the safety of his own life then seek to destroy his Sovereign he was afraid to go a King-catching for fear that might teach him to go a King-killing therefore he saith There is nothing better for me then that I should speedily escape into the land of the Philistines 1 Sam. 27. 1. and at last when the Amalekite had done this horrid act of killing King Saul for no Israelite would do it the Armour-bearer that was not afraid to kill himself was afraid to kill his King 1 Sam. 3. 4 5. you see how David punished him for doing it caused him to be put to death and said unto him Thy bloud be upon thy head for thy mouth hath testified against thee saying I have slain the Lords Anointed 2 Sam. 1. 14 15 16. and moreover cursed the place where it was done v. 21 The mountains of Gilboa must have no more dew nor rain because upon them had been spilt the Kings bloud and He bids not tell it in Gath nor publish it in the streets of Askelon lest the daughters of the Philistines rejoyce lest the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph v. 20. He looks upon this act as the reproach of Israel though it were done by an Amalekite how much more if the Israelites themselves had done it and in truth they were very much guilty of it for it was their not destroying Amalek within that made God leave Amalek without to destroy them for as this Amalekite had not been left to kill King Saul if Saul had obeyed Gods commandment of utterly destroying Amalek 1 Sam. 15. 3. so questionless If Israel had destroyed the spiritual Amalek for warring against them which is the reason why Amalek was to be destroyed 1 Sam. 15. 2. That is the sinfull lusts of the flesh which warred against the Spirit and made them in their hearts return into Egypt God had not suffered Saul to spare the temporal Amalek without them 't was once in their power to have destroyed Amalek but now 't is in Amaleks power to destroy them and they may pronounce that as a sentence which their brethren afterwards pronounced onely as a wish or imprecation His bloud be upon us and upon our children 't is our not destroying the spiritual Amalek hath given the temporal Amalek power to destroy both our King and us and our childrens children In all these particulars of Samuels mourning of Davids relenting lamenting and weeping of Sauls perishing not by an Israelite but by an Amalekite of the Amalekites being put to death and mount Gilboas being put out of heavens blessing the Word of God doth as it were make Proclamation in the name of the King of heaven That it is it can be no other then a fire from hell that cannot be quenched but by a Kings bloud But what should the Preacher talk of hell to Amalekites that look not after another world so they may enjoy this Let us therefore see what success of disloyaltie he bids them expect even in this world and sure 't is like to be none of the best for there is upon earth a Power if not a Person left to punish it even the very same power which such men abuse and therefore will not be tardie may not be sparing 1. their punishment as it follows in the next words For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him Be not hasty to go out of his sight much more Be not hasty to put him out of thy sight stand not in this evil thing For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him This doctrine of Allegiance is inforced by reasons that concern both the inward and the outward both the spiritual and the carnal man that if it work not upon us as called to the inheritance of another world yet it may as loving the inheritance of this The Preacher sets down both reasons The first concerns the spiritual man who looks after his conscience to him he pleads the Oath of God The second concerns the carnal man that looks after his interest to him he alledgeth the power of Kings For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him And this is S. Pauls method after him who writes the most demonstratively of all the Apostles in all the doctrines of Christianitie yet in this doctrine doth he after a sort strive to go beyond himself for in this he doth not onely use demonstrative or convincing arguments taken from the nature of the cause but also prevailing or perswading arguments taken from the condition of the Person this great Doctour in other doctrines thinketh it enough to use those prooofs which we call argumenta ad rem but in this he is moreover industrious to apply those proofs which we call argumenta ad hominem not onely fit to prove the thing but also fit to reprove and charm the man that gainsays it In other documents of Christianity he preacheth by the demonstration of the spirit 1 Cor. 2. 4. But in this he useth another kinde of demonstration which we may call A demonstration of the flesh for so he argues Rom. 13. 4. He is the minister of God to thee for good as if he had said If not for Gods sake yet for thine own sake thou must be subject if not for thy Conscience yet for thy convenience if not for the good of thy soul yet for the good of thy body if not for thy everlasting salvation yet for thy temporal preservation Thus after the confounding arguments of resisting Gods Ordinance and receiving damnation to work upon the Conscience he brings his perswading argument He is for thine own good to work upon the man He is the minister of God to thee for good and the same method that he useth in his preaching he useth also in his praying 1 Tim. 2. 1 2 I exhort therefore that first of all supplications prayers intercessions and giving of thanks be made for all men For Kings and for all that are in authoritie that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty Nor are these very words In all godliness and honesty an argument to work onely upon the conscience but also upon the condition or the person of the man who though he may cast away the practice yet is loth to cast away the repute of godliness for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is honestie properly Honesta quaedam morum gravitas quae reverentiam conciliat saith Beza so then he that will be godly or will be thought godly must zealously pray for Kings he that will have the power of godliness in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the form of godliness in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reason will extend to
can be more plainly spoken to set up Ordines Regni powers and principalities in kingdoms and yet not to set them up against much less above their King And this may serve to prove That no person or persons Civil but is and are inferiour to him in power It now remains that we prove the same of the Ecclesiastical And we must still have recourse to St Pauls Every soul Rom. 13. 1. where St Chrysostoms gloss is most irrefragable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 't is manifest that he requires this subjection of all not onely secular men whom he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as looking chiefly after the affairs of this life but also spiritual men Priests and Monks because he saith Every soul though you be an Apostle or an Evangelist or a Prophet or whatever else you must needs be subject 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for subjection doth in no kind impair Religion so St Chrysostome Subjection doth not impair Religion and why then should Religion seek to impair subjection and that not onely in Babylon but also in Jerusalem unless this impairing of subjection hath made it lately become Babylon Most admirable is that publick and open profession of all the Fathers in the fourth Council of Constantinople being the eight general in account to their Emperour Basilius in the ninth Action 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We know very well O Emperour that there are Arch-Prelates and Prelates and Abbots and Priests and Monks in your Dominions and that you are the Prince and President or Governour of them all but because these testimonies of the Greek Church may be thought of less validitie in this case which concerns the pretended Supremacie of the Church we will add a testimony of their own writers and that shall be Saint Bernards which if true concerning the Arch-Bishops examption from Papal much more true concerning his or the Popes exemption from Regal power for that is the power alone that bears the sword of which the Apostle speaks Rom. 13. 4. Si quis tentat excipere conatur decipere Epist. 42. ad Archiepisc. Senon He that upon the Apostles words will come with an exception must come with a deception Nay more then their own writers a testimony of their own Popes Nec animam Papae excipit he excepts not so much as the soul of the Pope saith Aeneas Silvius who was himself a Pope in gestis Concil Basil. A Pope indeed but so a Pope that he may well shame not onely Papists but also Protestants as some of their late principles and practices have been for never since Christs time was such a notorious scandal given to the Church of Christ by Church-men as hath been of late by some who would be thought the best of Protestants but in this have shewed themselves the worst of Christians that a whole Company of Divines should so forget if not renounce the Supremacie and Allegiance due to their King for which he had the Oath of God and their own multiplied oaths as to consult of Religion in his Dominions without his consent to change that Religion without his authority and as much as in them lay to force him to change it against his Conscience O Dear Jesu blot this sin out of the monuments of mens memories that it be not our lasting shame here and out of the Book of Gods remembrance that it be not their everlasting confusion hereafter Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ait Dositheus Graecus Concil Flor. sess 25. Addit Ecclesia Anglicana 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will ye that we betray our Divinity the Doctrine of our Church I will rather die then either Latinize or Scotize FINIS Errata prior numerus paginam alter lineam notat PAg. 33. l. 8. leg the. ibid 13. errours 40 9. del or 55 22. the. 109 9. usum sarum 20 19. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 155 7. imperfect 159 5. admirabiles amores 285 2. breasts 310. 19. salvatur 335 27. man 338 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 387. ● pro word leg which 391 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 397 19. leg in an high