Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	king_n	law_n	legal_a	2,470	5	10.2354	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88211	The lawes funerall. Or, An epistle written by Lieutenant Col. John Lilburn, prisoner in the Tower of London, unto a friend of his, giving him a large relation of his defence, made before the judges of the Kings bench, the 8. of May 1648. against both the illegal commitments of him by the House of Lords, and the House of Commons, ...	Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657.	1648 (1648)	Wing L2130; Thomason E442_13; ESTC R210612	38,933	34

of Justice where the cause dependeth And saith Bracton the King can doe nothing but what he can doe by Law So as saith the Lord Cooke the command of the King is as much as to say as by the Kings Courts of justice for all matters of Judicature and proceedings in Law are distributed to the Courts of Justice and the King doth judge by his Justices 8 H. 4. fol. 19. 24. H. 8. chap. 12. and regularly no man ought to be attached by his body but either by proces of Law that is as hath been said by the Kings Writs or by Indidctment or lawfull warrant as by many Acts of Parliament is manifestly inacted and declared which are but expositions of Magna Charta and all Statutes made contrary to Magna Charta which is Lex terrae from the making whereof untill 42 Ed. 3. are declared and inacted to be void and therefore if this Act of Westminster 1. concerning the extrajudiciall commandement of the King bee against Magna Charta it is void and all resolutions of Judges concerning the cōmandement of the King are to be understood of judiciall proceedings a part insti fo 186.187 Therefore Mr. Justice Bacon it is to no purpose for you to tell me I am committed by a higher Court and therefore you cannot legally deliver mee for I aver unto you and have already sufficiently proved it that I am commitmitted contrary to Law and Justice and therefore you being Judges of the Law and not of Presidents grounded upon will and pleasure You are to take notice of nothing but Law and therefore I demand and require my liberty at your hands as my undoubted right and due by Law which you can neither in justice honour nor conscience deny unto me But admit the Lords to be a superiour Court of justice to the Kings Bench in some cases yet if they walke beyond their bounds and limits set them by the Law and meddle with that which by Law they have no Jurisdiction of in that case they are no Court of Justice either to you or me but a company of despisers and contemners of the Law all whose actions and decrees made and done in such cases are but meere affronts unto the Law and unvalid and unbinding either to you or me or any other man in England in disobedience to which they by Law are not capable of a contempt or affront nor cannot legally punish any in such a case either with fine or imprisonment as for instance First if a court of SESSIONS which is a Court in many cases by Law questions me for my Freehould and I give them contemptuous words for medling with that which they have no Jurisdiction of they by Law can neither fine nor imprison me therefore Secondly the same holds good in the COMMON PLEAS which is an unquestionable administrative Court of Justice in divers cases yet if they go about to hold plea of murder before them if the party refuse to answere them It is in Law no contempt of the Court And if the Court shall therefore fine and imprison him it is illegall erronious and unbinding because in Law they have no Jurisdiction of such cases Thirdly and pertinent to this purpose is BAGGS CASE in the 11. Part of Cooks Reports who being summoned before the Mayer of Plimoth in open Court called him cozening Knave and bade him come kisse c. For which the Mayor Disfranchised him and it was resolved in Law that the the Disfranchisment was illegall and the reason of is was because it was not according to Law for that the Mayor in Law had no power to doe it Fourthly sutable to this is the complaint of ARCHBISHOP BANCROFT and the Judges answer to it which said Archbishop in his 22. Article to the Lords of the Privie Counsell in the 3. of King James complaines against the Judges of the Courts of Justice in Westminster Hall for affronting the actions proceedings and Censures of the High Commission Court which was erected by Act of Parliament viz. 1 Eliz. and had power by King Iames his Letters Patents to Fine and IMPRISON and yet as he complaines as you may read 2 Part. instit fo 615. 4 Part. instit fol. 335. The Judges were growne to that innovating humor of late that whereas certaine lewd persons two for example one for notorious Adultery and other intollerable contempts and another for abusing of a Bishop of this Kingdome by threatning speeches and sundry rayling tearmes no way to be endured were thereupon fined and imprisoned by the High Commissioners till they should enter into bonds to performe further orders of the said Court the one was delivered by HABEAS CORPVS out of the Kings Bench and the other by a WRIT out of the Common Pleas and sundry other prohibition have been likewise awarded to His Majesties said Commissioners upon these suggestions that they had no authority to fine or imprison any man c. Which practices and doings the Judges in their answers thereunto justifie to be legall and no more then that which they are bound unto by their Oath for that the high Commission had gone beyond the legall power of their jurisdiction having no power by law to fine and imprison in those cases and therefore the Law being the surest Sanctuary that a man can take and the strongest fortresse to protect the weakest of all it ought not to be denied to the meanest man that demands it against the greatest seeming legall oppressor that act of violence or wrong being most hatefull of all others when it is done by uncontinuance of justice and therefore that man which legally indeavours deliverance from it ought from the judges of the Law by Magna Charta to have it freely without sale fully without any deniall and speedily without delay in which regard the aforesaid Judges did not only justifie their forementioned legall practice but also fall very foule upon the Arch-Bishop c. for taxing the Judges and Iustice of the Kingdom confidently aver●ing that for lesse scandalls then his c. in taxing the Iustice of the Kindow divers have been severely punished And Sir Edward Cooke in the 4 part of his institutes Chap. of the high Commission Court in causes Ecclesiasticall fo 331.332.333.334 335. instances divers others that for notable Ecclesiasticall crimes were fined and imprisoned by the high Commissioners and upon demanding their right from the Judges of the Courts of Justice in Weslminster Hall they were relieved and released by them by the strength of those nerves and sinewes of the Law Prohibitions and Habeas Corpusses But above all the rest that he there mensions Iohn Simpsons case in the 42. Eliz. is the most remarkable to my purpose which Simpson being accused for committing adultery with the Wife of Edward Fuste over which case by Law the high Commissioners had Iurisdiction whereupon the high Commissioners issued out there warrent to Richard Butler Constable of Aldrington in the County of Northamton for

told them I was willing to give the Lords as much Jurisdiction without dispute as they desired to Judg condemn and destroy one another so they would not meddle with me nor my fellow Commoners and I was confident if the Lords distinctly as a single House had any Jurisdiction at all in Law it was but over themselves and as much of which as they please to take I am willing without dispute to grant them the second place That the House of Commons have no judgment or Jurisdiction by Law clearly appears by their own confession in the roul of Parlialiament in the 1. H. 4. Membr 14. Num. 79. which this present April I had under Mr. William Riley the Record-Keepers hand which at the Bar I am ready to produce and which thus in English verbatim followeth The third day of November the Commons made their Protestation in manner as they made it at the beginning of the Parliament and over and above declare to the King That forasmuch as the Judgment of Parliament belongs only to the King and to the Lords and not to the Commons unless it please the King of his grace especially shewed them that the said Iudgment was for their ease and no record shall be made in Parliament against the said Commons that they are or shall be parties to any judgments given or to be given hereafter in Parliament To which was answered by the Archbishop of Canterbury by the Kings command that the said Commons shall be Petitioners and Demanders and that the King and the Lords at all times have had and shall have by right the Iudgment in Parliament in manner as the said Commons have shewed unless it be in Statute affairs or in grants and subsidies or in such things and affairs for common profit of the Kings Realms the King will have their especial advice and assent and that this Order be kept in all times to come And so much at present for the 2d essential of a warrant And now I come to give a touch and but a touch only upon the third ingredient to make a mittimus lawful and that is that it be under hand and seal expressing the office and place of him which makes it unless the party be committed in the sight of the Judg sitting in open Court but there is no seal to mine and therefore it is illegal for I was not in the view of my pretended Judges when they committed me But Mr. Justice Bacon I come to the fourth thing upon which at present as one of the principal essentials I shall stifflly stand which is That the warrants of my Commitments both from Lords and Commons now returned before you are illegal there being nothing but generals laid unto my charge by them which is no charge nor crime in Law and therefore both my warrants wanting a legal and a particular cause in them there is no colour in Law to keep my body in prison by vertue of them Now to prove that Generals are no crimes nor charges in Law though the dayly and continual practises of all the Courts of Iustice in England prove it yet for illustration sake I shall crave leave to alledg some legal Authorities And in the First place I shall begin with the Judgement of Sir Edward Cooke upon the Statute of breaking of prisons made 1 Ed. 2. who in his 2. part institutes fo 591. expresly saith seeing the weight of this businesse touching this point to make an escape either in the party or in the Gealours Fellony dependeth upon the lawfulnesse of the Mittimus it will be necessary to say somwhat hereof First it must be in writing in the name and under the seale of him that makes the same expressing his Office place and authority by force whereof he makes the Mittimus and it is to be directed to the Goaler or Keeper of the Goale or Prison Secondly it must containe the cause as it expresly appeareth by this Act * 25. Ed. 3. Coran 134. and 32. Ed. 3. Coram 248. and 9. Ed. 4. fol. 52. unlesse the cause for which he was taken c. but not so certainly as an indictment ought and yet with such convenient certainty as it may appeare judicially that the offence requires such a judgement as for High-Treason to wit AGAINST THE PERSON OF OVR LORD THE KING or for the counterfetting of the money of our Lord the King or for petty Treason namely for the death of such a one being his Master or for Fellony to wit for the death of such a one c. or for blurgary or robbery c. or for Fellony for stealing of a horse c. or the like so as it may in such a generality appeare judicially that the offence required such a judgement and he there further goes on gives divers arguments reasons scites abundance of law authorities to prove that a particular cause ought by Law to be expressed in every Mittimus or Warrant of Commitment My second proofe to prove generalls are no charge in Law is the deliberate and resolved opinion of all the Judges of England in the 3 yeare of King Iames which was a time of full peace wherein the law had its free currant without the threates of Marciall or the checks of Prerogative arbitrary power and therefore the Judgement is of more weight who in their answer to the 22. object on or article of Archbishop Bancroft and to the whole Clergy of England hath those very words we do not neither will we in any wise impugne the Ecclesiasticall authority in any thing that appertaineth unto it but if any by the Ecclesiasticall authority commit any man to prison upon complaint unto us that he is imprisoned without just cause we are to send to have the body and to be certified the cause and if they will not certifie unto us the particular cause but generally without expressing any particular cause whereby it may appeare unto as to be matter of ecclesiasticall cognizance and his imprisonment be just then we do and ought to deliver him and this say the Judges is the Clergies ●ault and not ours and although some of us have dealt with them to make some such particular Certificate to us whereby we may be able to judge upon it as by Law they ought to do yet they will by no meanes do it and therefore their errour is the cause of the thing they complaine of and no fault in us for if we see not a just cause of the parties imprisonment by them then we ought and are bound by Oath to deliver him and sutable to this is their answer to the Clergies 21. Article which Articles and answers are recorded in 2. part instit fo 614.615.616 My 3. proofe to prove that Generalls are no crimes in Law is out of the 4. part instit fo 39. where the Lord Cooke expresly saith That a man by law cannot be attainted of High-Treason unlesse the offence be in Law high treason for

attaching and arresting of the body of the said Simpson which in Law is an imprisonment upon the attachment of his body and the Constable takes on William Iohnson servant of the said FVSTE to assist him in the serving of his Warrant which warrrant the Coxstable served upon him and read it unto him notwithstanding the Said SIMPSON resisted him and in his owne dofence shewed him slew the the said Iohnson that came in aide of the said Constables for which he was as a wilfull murderer Committed to Northampton Goale and indicted before the Judge by the coroners inquest of wilfull murder supposeing the said Warrant to Lawfull but the matter being very mighty the Justices of assise thought not good to proceed against him at those assises but deferred it till the next assises at what time after this long time of deliberation and upon conference with other judges of the law it was resolved that the statute of the 1 Eliz. gave no power to the high commissioners to make any warrant to arrest the body of Simpson in that case but that they ought to have proceeded by citation And therefore going beyond there legall power although by the Queens letters patents expresse authority is given to the high comissioners to send for the body of any offender c. Simpson in killing the said IOHNSON had committed no wilfull murder but only defended himselfe and his liberties and so it was found by the Jury he acquitted of murder From all which I observe first that all Iudges of all Courts of Justice in England are bound toact within the compasse of there jurisdiction given them by Law 2 I observe that the Iudges of any Court going beyond their legall Iurisdiction may and ought by Law to be resisted which resistance is no contempt of the law not punishable by it 3 That the Iudges of the Law are bound in duty and concience by Law to judge all causes that comes before them according to Law which both the single order of the Lords and the single order of the Commons is inferiour or in subordination unto as well as the royall letters pattents of ●●e King or Queen which yet those Noble Iudges according to Law threw behind their backs and acquitted the said SIMPSON of Murder inkilling of IONHSON in his doing actions in pursuance and by vertue of the authority of the said Letters Pattents And therefore much more ought you to acquit and set my body at liberty without any more adoe from the Lords 7. yeares imprisonment being their imprisonment of me though grounded upon their decree or Judgement is contrary to the expresse declared and constant received fundamentall Lawes of England and though divers men in former ages have been so sottish or fearfull to part with their legall Liberties to the Lords and have stooped unto their Iudgements Orders and Decrees yet that is no prejudice or hinderance unto me from the injoyment of mine who now demands them at your hands as my right by Law 4. And lastly seeing as is before undeniably proved that the King the Major is the primitive and the Lords the Minor are but the derivative and seeing it is before also fully proved that the Letters Pattents of the King the primative is not to be set in compitition with the Law it will strongly and undeniably follow that the orders of the single Lords who are but the derivitive cannot keepe me in prison contrary to the Law but that they ought by you without any further delay being illegall in themselves to be judged so by you as well as the King or Queenes Letters Patents were by your predecessours and my body by you to be set at liberty though it hath seemingly affronted their orders as well as the life of the said SIMPSON was saved by your predecessours although he had slaine the said IOHNSON in affront of their superiours Letters Patents and not to necessitate me for my reliefe and preservation to SIMPSONS remedy which though bloody in it selfe yet is justifiable by Law and reason by which I may defend my liberties and life against all those that in the executing of urjust illegall orders and decries would rob me of them and if in my own defence to save my life I be necessitated and compelled to destroy him or them that without Law would keep me in prison and so destroy me by famine or by sicknesse c. his life be upon his owne score for in such a case I am free from his Blood and therefore Mr. Iustice Bacon to wind up all I shall conclude in the words of learned Sir Edward Cooke in his epilogue to the 4 part of this institutes which I read thur And you honourable and reverent Judges that do sit in the high tribunals and courts or s●ates of Justice feare not to do right to all and to deliver your oppinions Iustly according to the Laws for feare is nothing but a betraying of the succors that reason should afford And if you shall sincerely execute Justice be assured of three things First though some may maligne you yet God will give you his blessing Secondly that though thereby you may offend great men and favourites yet you shall have the favourable kindnesse of the Almighty and be his favourites And lastly that in so doing against all scandalous complaints and pragmaticall devises against you God will defend you as with a shield for the Lord will give a blessing unto the righteous and with his favourable kindnesse he will defend him as with a shield And now dear Sir having done with my set speech being often as before I declare interrupted by both the Judges and compelled to skip over divers remarkable things in it as I have before also noted and declared which in my judgement was not fairely not justly done of the Judges unto me who ought to have given me freedom of speech * As the Lords in 1641. did give me and the Commons in Ian. last as you May reade in my Whip for the Lords pag. 10. 11. 19. and then to have judged what I said so as soone as I had done with a conge made unto them both though I confesse I spoke most commonly to Mr. Justice Bacon because I judged him to be the corum or the senior I said now Sir I have done and shall submit what I have said and pleaded unto your Judgements and Consciences desiring that if you conceive the businesse to be of that weight that it requires any more debate that you will take the time of 2. or 3. seriously to consider of it whereupon Judge Bacon asked me if I had any counsell to maintain what I had said and I told him no neither did I need any for I was able enough my self to do it and did offer him not only in Law but with my life to make it good professing unto him that I was very consident that Lawyer was not in England that durst or would say one quarter of that for

am that the dealings of the Lords and Commons with me demonstrated by their orders of committments flowes not from any power given them either by the Law of the Laud nor from the Indentures betwixt them and their chusers no nor yet from any word or clause in the Writ of there summons or Elections and therefore fourthly it must flow from there CROOKED IVSTS DEPRAVED VVILLS and ARBITRARY PLEASVRES by which with naked faces they declare themselves to be limitted by no boundary unaccountable and obnoxius to no censures for any possible abuse whatsoever that can becommitted by them for by these committments they evidently declare there is no rule whereby to measure the rectitude or obliquitie justice or injustice of their Government and actions and by consequence they are under an impossibilitie to render an account of their wayes and doings and so by consequence the people of England are in the absolutest road way of perfect slavery that is upon the earth this the Parliament or the Lords and Commons would have the World to beleive they abhord in the King as appeares by there last declaration against him in which they shew the reasons of their votes not to make or to receive any addresses to or from him for in Page 12 they s●y the King hath laid a fit foundation for all tiranny by that most destructive maxime of his viz. that he oweth no account of his actions to any but to God alone but by the warrants of my cōmitments it seemes this wicked and heathenish Maxim is Iudged by the makers thereof not to be to sweete a morsell for their own Pallets though in their said declaration they judge it to sweet for the Kings and therefore to conclude this point if this honorable Court of Justice the Judges whereof are sworne to Judge according to the Law and not lust will nor pleasure will Judge these arbitrary Committments of mine to be legal then I make my humble desire unto you the Judges thereof that you would cousen and deceive the people of the Kingdome no longer by assuming unto your selves the name of Judges of the Law but rather translate your Titles into the name of Judges of lust will and pleasure that so the people may expect the legall administration of the Law no longer from you and so I have done with the Fift and last ingredient to a legall Mittimus Now Mr. Justice Bacon seeing it is objected both by you and Mr. Justice Roll that my Commitment from the Lords is rather a Sentence Judgement or Decree hen a bare Mittimus and therefore being a judgement by the Lords a higher Court for 7. yeares imprisonment I cannot be delivered by this Court which being inferiour to it cannot reverse it nor be Judges of it To which Mr. Justice Bacon I answere First I doe not seeke unto you at present for reversement of my Sentence which is 4000. l. fine and perpetuall disfranchisement of the Liberties of an Englishman as well as seven yeares imprisonment But I come unto you as Judges of the Law who are sworne impartially to doe me Law and Justice notwithstanding any command whatsoever by any whatsoever to the contrary for my personall liberty which is my undoubted right by Law for any thing that judicially appeares before you upon the Warrants of my commitments For I have already fully proved unto you there is not legally the least crime in the world laid unto my charge and therefore no rules in Law for you to send me backe againe to prison But secondly I answer that I have already proved the Lords are none of my legall Judges and therefore all their proceedings with me from first to last are corum non judici Yea even their Sentence and Commitment it selfe for being it is against the 29. Chap. of Magna Charta it is void and null in Law which expressely saith That no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or be dissesed of his Freehould or Liberties or free Customes or be Outlawed or exiled or any otherwise destroyed nor past upon nor condemned by the lawfull judgement of his equals or by the Law of the Land which Law of the Land is expounded by the Statute of the 25. Ed. 3.4 37. Ed. 3.18 and Sir Edward Goke in his 2. part instit fo 50.51 to be by due Processe of Law viz That none shall be taken and past upon c. by Petition or suggestion made to our Lord the King or to his Counsell undesse it be by indictment or presentment of good and lawfull men where such deeds be done in due manner or by Writ originall at the Common Law being brought in to answere by due Processes according to the common and olde Law of the Land all which c. is confirmed by the Statute that abolished the Starre-Chamber this present Parliament 17. C. R. and all Acts Ordinances Orders Judgements and Decrees made contrary thereunto or in diminution thereof are thereby declared ipso facto to be null and voide in Law and are to be holden for errors and false judgements which totally barrs and overthtowes all Presidents whatsoever to the contrary yea although the Lords had a million of them And excellent to this purpose is Sir Edward Cookes Commentary upon the 3. Ed. 1. chap. 15 but especially his Commentary upon these words viz. Or Commandement of the King First faith he the King being a body politique cannot command but by matter of Record for the King commands and the Law commands are all one for the King must command by matter of record according unto the Law Secondly When any Judiciall Act is by Act of Parliament referred to the King it is understood to be done in some Court of Justice according to the Law And the opinion of Gascoine Chiefe Justice is notable in this point that the King hath committed all his power judicall to divers Courts some in one Court some in another c. and because some Courts as the Kings Bench are Coram Rege and some coram Justiciariis therefore the Act saith by the commandernent of the King or his Justices Hussey Chiefe Justice reported that Sir John Markham said to King Ed. 4. that the King could not arrest any man for suspition of Treason or Fellony as any of his Subjects might because if the King did wrong the party could not have his action if the King command me to arrest a man and accordingly I doe arrest him hee shall have his action of false imprisonment against me albeit he was in the Kings presence resolved by the whole Court in 16. H. 6. which authority might be a good warrant to defend his said opinion to Ed. 4. The words of the Statute of the 1 R. 2. chap. 12. are unlesse it be by the Writ or other commandement of the King and it was resolved by all the Judges of England that the King cannot doe it by any commandement but by Writ or by order or Rule of some of his Courts