occasion of the Death of Pope Julio is to be seen Lastly she was no good Queen not onely because she gave up the Peoples Liberties in Ecclesiasticall matters to the forrain Jurisdiction of Rome but undertook too much therein by far upon her own account and in Civil Affairs though De jure She was not inferior to any of her Progenitors yet She would have it declared by the Parliament as if the consideration of her Sex or birth had made som hesitation in her minde and when she had made all clear she commending her self thereby to the Prince of Spain with her self indangered likewise that trust of the Nation which she had received and cast such a shadow upon her own Supremacy as in many things it is hard to be discerned Lastly In her whole course uneven sometimes appearing like the eldest Daughter of Henry the Eighth at other times like a Fem covert led by the will of her Lord and Husband that wanting Supremacy himself rendred her thereby beneath her self For First She married by Act of Parliament as if She were not at her own disposing professing as much in her speech to the Londoners upon the Kentish rebellion so a difference was made between the two Sisters the marriage of the one being by advice of Parliament and the abstinence of the other against the same Nor is the same altogether irrationall for by the one the Government of the Nation is indangered and by the other otherwise Secondly By her marriage She became doubly married one way relating to her Person unto her King the other relatintog her trust unto her Councell For where a Forraine mighty King is so nigh the Helme its dangerous to trust the same to his Wife without the joynt concurrence of the Lords The matter in fact declared no less for many times She had steered quite wide had not the Lords been more stiff to their principles then She. The first yeare of her marriage was Hony-moon with her She thought nothing too dear for the King and that her self was but meanly married unless her Husband were as compleat a King in her Nation as any of her Predecessors although contrarily the higher he was advanced the meaner She became Thirdly By her marriage She adventured her Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction For Phillip as King had the Honour stile and Kingly name and so had the precedency he had to do also with the jurisdiction for by the Articles of the marriage he was to aid the Queen in her administration of the Kingdome and maintenance of the Lawes Writs and Commissions passed under his name He also sate in Parliament voted therein and joyned in the Royall Assent Lastly Joyned in the publication and execution of all Lawes To him also was Allegiance due and therefore the Crime of Treason was equally against his as the Queens Crown and Dignity saving that it was reserved to be as against him onely during the time of Coverture and yet had the Queen left issue by him it would have been a hard adventure for the Lawers to have given their opinion in that case seeing the King had been Guardian to his Children during their minority Lastly The whole power and jurisdiction resting in them both joyntly could not inable them to make or dissolve Courts at will nor conclude orders and directions in cases of Plea and conveyance nor process concerning the same I shall sum up all in this on econclusion if neither of these three had an absolute Legislative power either in matters concerning the Church or Common-Wealth if no absolute jurisdiction in case either of Life Member or Estate If they neither can create unite or alter any Court either concerning the Triall and determining the Estates of the People or their own Revenue If not alter or make any new process in Courts of Law If not order common assurances of Lands or Estates And Lastly If they have no power in determining the last appeal and definitive sentence in matters of controversy but all must rest upon the sentence by Parliament there must certainly be found out a further sense of that grand Title of Supremacy of jurisdiction power superiority pre-eminence and Authority then by the common vogue hath bin made The Title of supremacy was first formed in the behalf of Henry the eighths Claime in matters Ecclesiasticall which by the Statute is explained under these words of power To visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities This Power and no other did Queen Elizabeth claime witness the words of the Statute in her own time But in the framing of the Oath of Supremacy in her time not only in causes Ecclesiastical but temporal which never came within the Statutes and publique Acts in Henry the sevenths time are inserted and if any thing more was intended it must come under the word Things which also was inserted in the said Oath and yet if the words of the Statute of Queen Elizabeth formerly mentioned be credited the word Things ought to comprehend no more then the word Causes and then the Power of Queen Elizabeth in the Common-Wealth will be comprehended in these words of Supremacy to visit correct repress redress Offences and Enormities for the Supremacy in the Church and Common-Wealth is the same in Measure and what more then this I cannot understand out of any publique Act of this Nation Now in regard Offences and Enormities are properly against Lawes the power to visit and correct must also be regulated according to Laws either of War or Peace nor do these five words Jurisdiction Power Superiority Pre-eminence and Authority contain any more Supremacy or other sense for two of them speakes only the rank or degree of the Queen in government Viz. Superiority and Pre-eminence belongeth only to her and not to any other Forrain power And two other words do note her Right and Title thereto by Power and Authority committed to her And the other word denotates the thing wherein She hath Superiority and power Viz. In jurisdiction the nature of which word Vlpian speaking of the nature of a mixt government explaineth thus Quando servata dictione juris judiciorum fit animadversio so as this supreame Authority in jurisdiction is no other then supream power to visit correct redress Offences or determine matters in doubt by deputing fit persons to that end and purpose according to the Law and this is all the Supremacy that appeareth to me belonging to the Crown in these times CHAP. XXXVI Of the Power of the Parliament during these times WHen the Throne is full of a King and he as full of opinion of his own sufficiency and Power a Parliament is looked upon as an old fashion out of fashion and serve for little other then for present shift when Kings have run themselves over Head and Eares A condition that those of that high degree are extremly subject unto but where the Crown is too heavy for the wearer by reason of infirmity the
feminine Spirit which they sent over into England to be their Queen and in one Civill Warre shedding more English blood by the English Sword then they could formerly doe by all the men of France were revenged upon England to the full at the English mens own charge For what the English gain by the Sword is commonly lost by discourse A Kingdome is never more befooled then in the Marriage of their King if the Lady be great she is good enough though as Jezabell she will not either reverence her Husband obey her Lord and King nor regard his People And thus was this Kingdome scourged by a marriage for the sinne of the Wise men that building upon a false Foundation advised the King in the breach of Contract with the Earle of Arminiacks Daughter And thus the King also for that hearkning to such Councell he murthered the Duke of Glocester that had been to him a Father yeilded up his Power to his Queen A Masterlesse and proud Woman that made him like a broken Idol without use suffered a Recovery of his Crown and Scepter in the Parliament from his owne Issue to the Line of Yorke then renewing the Warre at his Queens beck lost what he had left of his Kingdome Countrey and Liberty and like the King that forgot the kindnesse of Jehojada lost his life by the hand of his Servant CHAP. XIV Of the Parliament during the Reignes of these Kings THe interest of the Parliament of England is never more Predominant then when Kings want Title or Age The first of these was the Case of Henry the Fourth immediately but of them all in relation to the pretended Law of the Crown but Henry the Sixth had the disadvantage of both whereof in its due place The pretended Law of the Crown of England is to hold by Inheritance with power to dispose of the same in such manner by such means and unto such persons as the King shall please To this it cannot be denied divers Kings had put in their claimes by devising their Crowne in their last Will but the successe must be attributed to some Power under God that must be the Executor when all is done and which must in Cases of Debate concerning Succession determine the matter by a Law best known to the Judge himselfe Not much unlike hereunto is the Case of Henry the Fourth who like a Bud putting up in the place of a fading Leafe dismounts his Predecessor First from the Peoples regard and after from his Throne which being empty some times he pretending the resignation of his Predecessor to him other whiles an obscure Title by descent his Conscience telling him all the while that it was the Sword that wrought the worke But when he comes to plead his Title to Forrain Princes by Protestation laying aside the mention of them all he justifies upon the unanimous consent of the Parliament and the People in his own onely Person And so before all the World confessed the Authority and power of the Parliament of England in disposing of the Crown in speciall Cases as a sufficient barr unto any pretended right that might arise from the House of Mortimar And yet because he never walks safely that hath an Enemy pursuing him still within reach he bethinks himself not sure enough unlesse his next Successors follow the dance upon the same foote to this end an Act of Parliament leades the tune whereby the Crowne is granted or confirmed to Henry the Fourth for life and intailed upon his Sonnes Thomas John and Humphrey by a Petition presented 5. Hen. 4. Thus Henry the Fourth to save his owne stake brought his Posterity into the like capacity with himselfe that they must be Kings or not subsist in the World if the House of Yorke prevailes and so he becomes secured against the House of Yorke treading on his heeles unlesse the Parliament of England shall eat their owne word However for the present the House of Lancaster hath the Crown intailed and the Inheritance is left in the Clouds to be revealed in due time For though this was the first president of this kinde yet was it not the last wherein the Parliament exercised a Power by Grant or Confirmation to direct the Law and Course of the Crown as they pleased The due consideration hereof will make the things that follow lesse strange For the Parliament according to occasion as the Supreame power of this Kingdome exercised Supreame Jurisdiction in order to the safety of the Kingdome as if no King had beene to be found in issuing forth Writs under the great Seale concluding of matters without the Royall assent treating of Peace with Forrain Nations and of other matters and determining their Resolves before discovery made to the King of their Councells making Ordinances and ruling by them 3 H. 6. n. 29. 2 H. 6. n. 27. 8 H. 6. n. 12. referring matters determinable in Parliament to be determined according to their directions Authoritate Parliamenti Confirming Peace made by the King protesting against Peace made without or against their consent making Ambassadours with power to ingage for the Kingdome making Generals of the Army Admiralls at Sea Chancellors Barons and Privy Councellors and giving them instructions 8 H. 4. n. 73. 76. 31. 5 H. 4. n. 57. 31 H. 6. n. 21. and binding them to observance upon Oath 11 H. 4. n. 19.39 Ordering the Person of the King denying his power of Judicature in Parliament and ordering his Houshold and Revenue besides many other particulars Now if such as these things were thus done not by one Parliament which possibly might be overwayed by Factions but by the course of a Series of Parliaments that mightily laboured against Faction and unworthy ends and aimes that man shal determin the same to be unjust or indiscreet should himself first be determined to be very just and exceeding wise Nor was the Parliament partiall in all this but being in a way of Reformation it set upon the work of reforming it selfe Some that are very zealous in the point of Arbitrary and absolute Government of Kings in this Nation and all in other amongst other grounds rest upon this one That an English King hath power to call Parliaments and dissolve them to make and unmake Members as he shal please I do easily grant that Kings have many Occasions and Opportunities to beguile their People yet can they do nothing as Kings but what of right they ought to doe They may call Parliaments but neither as often or seldome as they please if the Statute-Laws of this Realme might take place Nor if they could is that power necessarily and absolutely arising from Supremacy seeing it is well known that such power is betrusted by the Superiour States in other Nations to the Inferiour who dayly attend on publique Affaires and therefore can discern when the generall Conventions are most necessary As touching the dissolving of Parliaments against the wills of
more of that now they devise a way to spoile and prey for themselves and yet neither to rob nor break house To this end they would scatter little Scrolls in writing requiring the party that they intended to prey upon to leave so much Money upon such a day at such a place and this was Sub paena of burning the parties house and goods which many times did insue upon default made this practise was at once made Treason to prevent the grouth of such an evill And the like was done with Robberies and Manslaughters contrary to the Kings Truce and Safeconduct As many or more new Fellonies were also now created One was the cutting out of mens tongues and plucking out of eyes a strange cruelty and that shewed the extreame savagenesse of those times so much the more intollerable by how much the poore tortured creature could hardly be either eye or eare witnesse of the truth of his own wrong A second Fellony was the customary carrying of Wooll or Wool-fells out of the Realme to other places except Callis Another Fellony concerneth Souldiers which I refer over to the next Chapter The last was Servants plundering their Masters Goods and absenting themselves if upon Proclamation made they appeare not this was also made Fellony In the next place as touching forcible entries and riots the remedies so often inculcated and new dressed shew plainly the nature of the times These kind of crimes commonly are as the light Skirmishes in the beginning of a War and follow in the conclusion also as the faintings of a battell fought till both sides be weary I shall not enter into each particular Statute diverse of them being little other then as asseverations annexed to a sentence to add credit and stirr up minding in men that otherwise would soone forget what is sayd or done The remedies formerly propounded are now refined and made more effectuall First in regard of speed which is as necessary in these forces as the stopping of the breaches of waters in the first Act and therefore one Justice of the Peace may proceed upon a holder by force or breaker of the Peace with a Continuando but Riots are looked upon as more dangerous and the first opposition had need be more stiffe least being uneffectuall aggravates the violence and therefore it s required that two Justices and the Sheriffe should joyne in the worke to carry one the worke with more Authority and Power And what they cannot do in the punitive part they must certifie to the King and his Councel or to the Kings Bench if traverse be made So as though the Power of the County be annexed to the Sheriffe Jure ordinario to maintaine the peace yet the Parliament did delegate the same upon Justices as it thought most expedient To maintaine and recover the Peace when it s broken shewes more Power but to prevent the breach shewes more Wisdome and therefore to all the rest the Wisdome of these times provided carefully First for Guards and Watches according to the Statute at Wint and committed the care thereof to the Justices of the Peace And secondly against the gendring of partyes for its commonly seene that such as are admired for excellecies of Person are so far adolized of some as that their gestures actions and opinions are observed tokens of favour though never so small are desired from such and the Idoll likes it well gives Points Ribbons it may be Hats and with these men are soon gained to be Servants in the fashion and not long after to be servants in Action be it War or Treason or any other way This manner of cheat the former times had been too well acquainted with Knights and Esquires are not feared in times where the word Lord carries the wonderment away their offences against the Statutes of Liveries are all great though in themselves never so small and therefore are sure of Fine and Ransome and it s well if they escape a yeares Imprisonment without baile or mainprize Lords may weare the Kings Livery but may give none Knights and Esquires may weare the Kings Livery in their attendance upon his Person but not in the Countrey The King and Prince may give Liveries to Lords and meniall Servants The summe is that Liveries may be given by the more publique Persons for State not to make parties and Men may weare Liveries in token of Service in Peace and not in Armes One thing must be added to all which may concern triall in all Viz. A Law was now made that Noble Ladies shall be tried by their Peeres a Law now of the first stamp and strange it is that it never came before now into the breast of the Law but that it came now it is not strange no meaner Person then the Dutches of Glocester is first charged with Treason when that could not appear then for Necromancy very fitly that she might be tried by the Ecclesiasticall way of witnesses She is found guilty and a Sentence of Penance and imprisonment or banishment passed thereupon after such a wilde way as both Nobles and Commons passed this Law for the Vindication of that Noble Sexe from such hudling trialls for the future CHAP. XXII Of the Militia during these times THe Title of Henry the Fourth to the Crown was maintained principally by his Tenures which the Courtiers call Knight-Service but the Common People force of Armes and that which destroyed many a man was the principall means of his subsistence Otherwise its clear that his Title was staring naught nor could he outface Mortimars Title without a naked Sword which he used warily for he had Enemies enough to keep his Sword in hand and Freinds enough to keep it from striking at randome for coming in by the Peoples favour he was obleiged to be rather remisse then rigorous yet his manner of comming was by the Sword and that occasioneth men much to debate about his absolute power in the Militia as supposing that what power he had other Kings may De jure challenge the same and let that be taken for granted though it will not necessarily follow in true reasoning And let it also be taken for good that Henry the Fourth entered the Throne by his Sword yet is there not any Monument in Story or Antiquity that favoureth any absolute right in him over the Militia but the current is I think somwhat clear against it First because Henry the Fourth De Jure could not compell men to serve beyond the Seas but raised them by contract and therefore by Act of Parliament he did confirme the Statute 1 Ed. 3. Stat. 2. cap. 5. which Statute was purposely made to that end And the same also is countenanced by another Statute made in these times whereof we now Treat by the words whereof appeareth that the Souldiers for the Forrain Service were levied by Contract between them and the Captain who undertooke to Levy them by
wage so as none were then compelled to enter into Service by imprest or absolute command nor is there any authority amongst all those cited in Calvins Case that doth mention any such thing but contrarily that Opinion of Thirning is expresse That the King cannot send men beyond Seas to Warres without wages and therefore no man is bound to any such Service by any absolute Legiance as the Reporter would understand the point but if he receiveth wages thereto he by that Contract binds himselfe Secondly it seemeth also to be granted that such as went voluntarily in the Kings Service ever had the Kings pay after they were out of their Counties if the King ruled by his Lawes for by the Statute formerly mentioned the King did likewise confirm the Statute of 18 Ed. 3. Stat. 2. cap. 7. which is expresse in that point and the matter in Fact also is evident upon the Records Thirdly touching the Arming of those that were thus Levied as their was a certain Law by which all men were Assessed to certain Armes either by the Service and Tenure of their Lands or by Parliament for such as were not bound to finde sufficient Armes by their Tenure according as is contained in the Statute 25 Ed. 3. Stat. 5 cap. 8. So did Henry the Fourth by the Statute formerly mentioned to be made in his time Confirm that Law of Edward the Third In the Argument of Calvins Case it is much insisted upon to prove the Legiance of an English man to the King to be absolute because he hath power to send men to Warre at his pleasure and he hath onely power to make Warre and if so then hath he absolute power in the Militia As touching the power of sending men to Warre hath been already spoken but as touching the power to make Warre there is no doubt but where a King hath made a League with another King he onely can break that League and so make Warre and that Opinion of Brian must be agreed for good in that sense But if a League be made by Act of Parliament or if the King will have Warre and the Parliament will make a League without him no authority doth in such case avouch that it is the right of the King or that he hath a Legall Power to break that League as he pleaseth Neither in the next place hath the King any right or Legall power to make War with his own Subjects as he pleaseth but is bound to maintain the Peace not onely by his Oath at his Coronation but also by the Lawes whereto he is bound if he will reign in right of an English King For every man knoweth that the grounds of the Statutes of wearing of Liveries was for the maintaining of the Publique Peace And Henry the Fourth amongst other provisions made against that trick hath this That the King shall give onely his Honourable Livery to his Lords Temporall whom shall please him and to his Knights and Esquires meniall and to his Knights and Esquires which be of his retinue and take of him their yearely Fee for Terme of Life and that no Yeoman shall take or weare any Livery of the King nor of none other Lord. And another Law was made within one yeare ensuing confirming the former and providing the Prince may give Liveries to such Lords as he pleases and to his meniall Gentlemen and that they may weare the same as in the Kings Case By both which the King and Prince are both in one Case as touching the power of giving Liveries if the one hath absolute power then hath the other the like If one be under the Directory of Law in that point then is also the other For it is clear that the King is intended by the Statute to be bound from giving Liveries and the people from wearing them otherwise then in especiall Cases and then the Conclusion will be that if the King may not give Liveries to prejudice of the Peace then may he much lesse break the Peace at his pleasure or Levy Men Armes and Warre when he shall think most meet Take then away from the King absolute Power to compell men to take up Armes otherwise then in case of Forrain Invasion power to compell men to goe out of their Counties to War power to charge men for maintenance of the wars power to make them find Armes at his pleasure and lastly power to break the Peace or doe ought that may tend thereto Certainly the power of the Militia that remaineth though never so surely setled in the Kings hand can never bite this Nation Nor can the noise of the Commission of Array Intitle the King unto any such vast power as is pretended For though it be granted that the Commission of Array was amended by the Parliament in these times and secondly that being so amended it was to serve for a President or Rule for the future yet will it not follow that Henry the Fourth had or any Successours of his hath any power of Array originally from themselves absolutely in themselves or determinatively to such ends as he or they shall thinke meete First as touching the amendment of the Commission it was done upon complaint made by the Commons as a greivance that such Commissions had issued forth as had been greivous hurtfull and dangerous And the King agrees to the amendments upon advice had with the Lords and Judges and if it be true that the amendments were in the materiall Clauses as it is granted then it seemeth that formerly a greater power was exercised then by Law ought to have been and then hath not the King an absolute power of Array for the just power of a King can be no greivance to the Subject Secondly if the Commission of Array thus mended was to serve as a rule of Array for the future then there is a rule beyond which Henry the Fourth and his Successors may not goe and then it will also follow that the power of Array is not Originally nor absolutely in the King but from and under the Rule and Law of the Parliament which rule was not made by the Kings own directions but as we are told beyond expectation alterations were made in materiall parts of the Commission and the powers in execution there whereof no complaint of greivance had been made The issue then is if the King had an Universall Power in the Array the Parliament likewise had a generall Liberty without any restriction to correct that power Lastly suppose that this power of the Parliament is executed and concluded by the Commission thus amended and that thereby the Kings Power is established yet can it not be concluded that this Power is Originally or absolutely in the King It s not absolutely in him because it is limited in these particulars First it s not continuall because its onely in case of eminent danger Secondly It s not generall upon all occasions but onely in case of a