Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	doctrine_n	scripture_n	tradition_n	2,740	5	9.3074	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A67886	The perfection, authority, and credibility of the Holy Scriptures. Discoursed in a sermon before the University of Cambridge, at the commencement, July 4. 1658. / By Nathanael Ingelo D.D. and Fellow of Eton Coll.	Ingelo, Nathaniel, 1621?-1683.	1658 (1658)	Wing I185; ESTC R202593	49,263	216

every good work He that hath lodged these provisions in his soul may bring out of his treasures new and old like a Scribe throughly instructed to thè Kingdome of God So that if the Grace which Christ hath brought to light in the Gospel hath taught us Godlinesse Righteousnesse and Sobriety we may say with Tertullian Nobis curiositate opus non est post Christum Iesum nec inquisitione post Evangelium Hoc enim prius credimus non esse quod ultra credere debemus The Scripture is so far from defect in this kind that it is redundant we have many things very profitable added besides the necessary and both these more then once or in one book See a strange appetite when men have more then they will do though it be necessary yet they would have more to do though it be not necessary nor it may be at all profitable What folly is this This is a design not to be keepers but makers of Commandements praeceptorum emendatores as Hilary calls them not to do Gods will but serve their own Our Saviours words do easily accommodate themselvs to such people You teach for doctrines the Commands of men and make the word of God of no effect by your Traditions But at what perill any can adde to Gods word the second Argument will shew which is That the Scriptures are also strict injunctions of Divine Authority concerning our duties The reason of our faith and obedience to the Scriptures is resolved into their divine Authority which as it is the greatest of all so upon lesse we may not depend Of his Authority we may truly say that it is {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} God is infallible in his understanding faithfull in his declarations and so highly deserves our Assent He is Almighty and most true and therefore we believe and hope in the promises of his word As God he hath a Right to command and we as creatures are obliged to obey and so we receive his commands Gods authority onely could justly make us believe obey and fear what is there declared promised commanded and threatned There is a place of Scripture which the Papists do impertinently alledge for the obscurity i. e. the dishonour of Gods word which as it is nothing to their purpose so it doth most excellently serve to prove what we have in hand {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} Knowing this first that no prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation The designe of the Apostle was the same with mine to exhort Christians to give heed to the Scriptures as such Oracles which would not deceive them He affirms the prophetick word surer then a private revelation which he Iames Iohn had in the Mount and commends the diligent heed they gave to it till the day-star should arise peradventure till the truth of the prophesies of Christ shined forth in their accomplishment But the stresse of all this hope in the Scriptures lies upon this that none of them were {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} of pri 〈…〉 impulse meaning as Saint ●aul sayes in other words {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} All Scripture is divinely inspired And this appeares by the verse that followes For the prophesie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost So that {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} signifies they are not of mens private will but from the divine spirit The Prophets did not go on their own head as we say but on Gods errand When God reproved those that went without his bidding he sayes thus {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} I sent them not and yet they ran So that the sence will be those holy men who deliver'd the Scriptures upon which you relie w 〈…〉 ot what came into their minds as from themselves but they set down Gods will The other sence of {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} for solution or explication in which some worthy persons do take it and in which sence it is used in good authors for so Iamblicus in the 21 Chapter of his Protrepticks being about to expound Pythagoras his short precepts sayes {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} I will give the exposition of every precept is so far from disagreeing with the former that it is a necessary consequence from it as the best ground for if the Prophets deliver'd not their own will but Gods mind we must not resolve them into our sence but take his The Scriptures were given to expresse Gods meaning not to have ours impressed upon them So that take the word in any possible sence this place is pitifully urged against the plainnesse of the Scriptures unlesse we imagine that the Apostle should urge good men to trust the Scriptures because they could not tell what they meant which as it is most absurd to his purpose so all that it does afford for argument to prove the obscurity of the Scriptures is but this Because a man will not let me put what sence I please upon his words therefore I cannot tell what he sayes But as we see what little reason there is for that triumph in which the Papists bring this particular Scripture to accuse the whole of obscurity for it neither speaks of their obscurity nor plainnesse so we see by it how great reason we have to believe the Scriptures since their authority is from God It is a plain consequence since the holy perimen neither invented them by their wit nor writ them of their own will but delivered Gods sence at his appointment that we ought to give them all possible credit and observance But what should I speak of mens authority or of believeing Moses the Prophets or Apostles upon their own account Moses was but a servant and once so disobedient that for it he was kept out of Canaan and if his design had been to have had credit for his own authority he would never have lessened it with that story The Prophets were subject to like passions with our selves i.e. they were men The Apostles were weak in themselves and so far from being the New Wine of the Gospel that till Christ had strengthened them with new principles they were like old torn bottles they could not receive it But this hinders not their acceptance their authority is from God He took the stammering Moses and made him a God i.e. a divine teacher to the Church Moses was conscious of his own inability and loth to stir but at Gods command he took up his bundle of ceremonies and carried an Vmbrella to the Sun of Righteousnesse The Prophets as was said just now spake not of private impulse but God spake by the mouth of his holy Prophets ever since the world began The Apostles were commanded to stay till they were cloathed with power from on high and when they had

doctrina testimonium fundamenti vice nobis esset non secus atque ipsius vox doctrina testimonium fundamentum veritatis fuit i.e. That their word doctrine and testimony is no lesse a foundation to us then the Word Doctrine and Testimony of Christ is the foundation of Truth So being well aware that whosoever should lay claim to it either those fifty bold mercenaries at Trent who called themselves an Oecumenical Counsell any other Assembly of Papists the Pope in his chaire or the Romish Church under any capacity if perchance they shall ever agree as they have not yet upon any that they joyntly pronounce Infallible would be questioned concerning the Rightfulnesse of the Title he endeavours therefore to frame them a Commission out of severall Scriptures by which as he doth acknowledge the Soveraign Authority of the Scriptures so with what poor successe he endeavours to get countenance from them for his boldnesse will easily appear if one do but repeat the Scriptures which he alledgeth and joyn with them their true and plain Interpretations which I do more willingly endeavour though I fear to be tedious for two reasons 1. First because they are such considerable quotations in the esteem of his followers that for want of better which they have sought in vain though they be sufficiently impertinent they are fain to make use of them still 2. Secondly because their Interpretations which are our Answers to them may enable some that are weak to defend themselves against disputers who shall endeavour to discompose the quietnesse of their true beliefe from acknowledged grounds of faith misinterpreted His first place is He that heareth you heareth me c. May they therefore say what they will these words were spoken to the Apostles whom Christ commanded to preach and told them what they should say and the Church now speaking as it ought declares nothing but what Christ said before for necessaries and whatsoever it doth according to his sayings is warranted by his authority and so he that heareth them heareth Christ But what proof is here for saying any thing else besides that which is written The second is You are the light of the world c. Yes so they were for Christ shined upon them and they enlightened others but it was by the reflexiou of his beames i. e. the Truths that he taught them and their writings are like Lanthorns of transparent glasse in which that divine light is preserved and through which it shines But those Popish Traditions are like new thick horn through which we cannot discern the old Apostolical Truth only it glimmers through those holes which are necessarily left open because their odde stuffe was irreconcileably unfit to be close and handsomely joyned in one entire body with the verities of the written Word The third is You shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem in Judaea in Samaria and to the ends of the earth It 's true the Apostles were Christs witnesses for they testified his Life and Doctrine and wrote them for memorials to succeding ages but they would have been strange witnesses of his doctrine if they should have told other tales of their own invention and ridiculous assertours of his Institutions if they should have changed them at their pleasure as for Example If after he had given the bread and wine to his Disciples in his last Supper they should upon the first repetition of that Sacrament have given only the bread to the Communicants and so have contradicted Christs order with pretence of Tradition To prove that the Rock in the 16 of Matth. is the Pope whom he calls the supreme Vicar of this Ministery he quotes with it a place of Scripture that overthrowes his interpretation Other foundation can no man lay then that which is laid which is Jesus Christ Which place as it tells us plainly who was meant by the Rock so it is as strong a witnesse against his assertion as any thing that I have the ability to imagine yet as if it were not full enough he addes confirmation unto it though contrary to his intention by citing with it that famous testimony of Eph. 2. where Christ is called the great corner stone and the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles i.e. the foundation upon which they were built themselves and preached as such to others In the close of that paragraph to prove a little better that the Church hath power to teach that which the Scripture doth not he quotes two places I will send you the Spirit of Truth which shall lead you into all Truth and I am with you unto the end of the world And after this triumphs as if nothing could be desired further But for all that what this should be to his purpose I am not able to ghesse For what can be inferred from these places but to the benefit of our assertion for if Christ promised the spirit to lead them into all Truth did he not teach them it perfectly and if he promised to be with them unto the end did he faile to assist them in their work which was to publish the Truth by writing as well as preaching as we learn from S. John These things are written that ye might believe c. where he addes also that this was done so perfectly that whosoever should read and believe through their writing might have eternal life And as it appears from the 20. ver. of the 28. of Mat. read all together all the assistance that the Church for future times could expect from this promise is only while she does teach others to observe what Christ commanded unlesse we will break that sacred connexion which all true Christians know to be between the precepts and promises of God But to what precepts except those which we find upon divine Record the promises should be annexed we understand not nor why they should not invent new promises as well as pretend to other precepts Neither do we trouble our selves at all with those big words which to amuse ignorant people they speak concerning the imperfection of the Scriptures to be supplyed by the dictates of a pretended infallible Church since we could never yet hear of any one Truth necessary to salvation but we found it in Scripture nor had any certain newes of one Tradition that is universall and of Primitive derivation and so of good use in the Church of God but we receive it willingly I have judged this Discourse the more seasonable because the adversaries of our Church make account that we are in such a strong tendency to the Romish belief which contradicts what is here asserted that one of their late Proselytes with high approbation of his Fellowes doth not fear to publish to the world their swelling hopes That the fields are even white unto the harvest and thereupon with other of his companions doth thrust in his sickle which he sharpens with such assertions as these viz. That the Scriptures contain