doctrines of faith and discipline and the sence of Scripture being examined by ordinary ministeriall knowledge may by common consent be explained and decided that there may be an agreement also about the proper forme of speaking and proceeding agreable to the phrase and sence of the holy Scripture and of the Church and that it may appeare what those Churches hold which set forth those Confessions and Canons and what they judge out of Scripture that all those Orthodox with whom they will keepe communion should hold that there may be a restraint of licentiousnesse in inventing new opinions and orders to distract and trouble the Church and lastly that there may remain a testimony to posterity of the faith and doctrine of their ancestors that vicious or unnecessary and unprofitable innovations may be avoyded and the purity of doctrine and discipline the concord and peace of the Churches the better preserved They are usefull therfore for the understanding divine Scripture as handmaids with due subjection without any absolutely necessary prescription of using them so that there be an agreement in one and the same true sense but are impediments and hinderances to those only who with Licentiousnesse rather then Liberty endeavour to overthrow and feare not to call in question those principles which are as the foundations of our faith and Christian discipline and who assume to themselves a power to thinke and even to speake what they list which the Scripture doth every where reject as being farre from Christian modesty 4. We attribute therfore to these Formes only an hypotheticall necessity for we acknowledge that necessary occasions of this kind of writings arise only from the Reformations of Churches hereticks and erroneous persons contentions or sophistications fraudulent expressions and interpretations or the adversaries calumnies or the necessity of instructing the ignorant or the testification of a consent with other Churches both ancient and present or a necessary declaring the union of concord and consent 5. Therfore these Formes of faith and discipline are to be composed by the gift of prophecy out of all places of Scripture compared And cannot be prescribed to Churches but by Colledges of Prophets to whom Ecclesiasticall power of government is committed Hence the meeting of Apostles and Elders did by common consent compose explications out of Scripture of opinions in controversy Act. 15. and set out an Epistle wherein by a Form of confession concerning the Question in controversy it was decided and a Canon prescribed to other Churches 6. Wee consider these Forms either as touching the Matter of them which is divine being deduced from Scripture which wee make use of as Indices in explaining and determining dubious senses of Scriptures and Controversies for being searched out by so great diligence of godly Teachers and approved by their consent and received by those Churches wherein wee live wee cannot see that there is too much attributed to these Forms being examined and tryed by Scripture if they be looked upon as Indices of some controverted doctrine or sense of Scripture of which the meditation even of a private Christian much more of a numerous company of Prophets may be an Index Or they are considered Formally as they are Synodicall determinations duly concluded confirmed with Ecclesiaasticall authority carrying in them the unanimous consent of the Prophets as a badge of Ecclesiasticall union and communion and thus wee make use of them as Ecclesiasticall Judges in deciding and explaining Ecclesiasticall controversies in preserving the purity of doctrine and the peace of the Churches And when we consider them jointly wee attribute to them this authority which wee propose in Vrsin's words Their authority saith he is shewed in that it is not lawfull for any one to recede from those doctrines which they recite out of the Word of God nor is any thing to be innovaâ—â—â— in form of exposition or speech without just and necessary causes Yea and if they either have indeed or seeme to have any thing blame-worthy nothing yet is to be attempted in a rash disorderly and turbulent manner nothing to be spread abroad to the contrary without a previous communicating of opinions with such as are teachers and others able to judge of doctrines and the common knowledge and consent of those Churches wherein those Forms of Confessions are received and approved Though therfore the authority and power of Synods which prescribe those Forms be not of it self infallible nor instituted by God to be the supreme and infallible rule of our Faith and therfore cannot by itselfe and its own authority oblige beleevers to beleeve that which is determined in those Forms Yet wee acknowledge in Synods which constitute those Forms the supreame power of Ecclesiasticall judging and determining controversies given by God for avoiding confusion and rending of Churches whereby they may inflict Ecclesiasticall censures on such as openly oppose their decrees Hence have those Forms an excellent force and efficacy to beget in the minds of all a perswasion of the true doctrine therein contained For as the Learned Camero well noteth tom 1. Prelect de Ecclesia in that discourse concerning the Infallability of the Church so often as any thing is decreed by an Assembly of those who are placed in Auâ—â—ority in the Church it makes that this is not rashly and without accurate and grave observation to be rejected For a Synod hath a peculiar assistance of the holy Ghost and so a greater then that which belongs to teachers judging singly and apart They have also more certain meanes of finding out the truth to wit the Prayers and Fastings Disputations c. of the principall Pastors of the whole Church They have also a better course to know what is the opinion of the whole Church concerning a controversie raised and what course the Churches observe therein So that they who doubt of the truth of the Formes constituted in a Synod or upon light and probable reasons judge them to be false and so doe not certainly know them so to be are bound so farre to yeeld obedience to the Formes decreed as may be agreeable to Order and decencie in that Case which obedience is an observance of Christian humilitie and modâ—stie whereby the faithfull in such cases abstain from publike or open Profession of their opinion and condemnation or confutation of the opinion determined in those Formes And this evident because for giving obedience to the decrees of Churches we have the certaine and manifest authority of God commanding to obey them Heb. 13. 17. But for opposing them we have only uncertaine and probable conjectures and in such a case the common rule is to be followed Hold that which is certaine and leave that which is uncertaine Againe to oppose openly the Formes of Churches upon arguments but probable and lesse evident gives an unbridled and endlesse licence of contradicting any Ecclesiasticall decrees whatever Yea when there is any thing of falshood prescribed in those Formes of Churches
and that golden rule is to be followed To obey God rather then men yet a pious sonne of the Church will not rudely insult on them but with a reverentiall bashfulnesse avoid them as Waldensis elsewhere speakes But when Formes are composed and established by Synod call authority for the promoting and deciding of truth the establishing integritie and order in Church Government they have then Ecclesiasticall and definitive authority whereby they may be imposed on particular Churches in Doctrinall Causes and Ecclesiasticall affaires under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure For the spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 32 and all the Sonnes of the Church are to be subject to the Discipline of the Church Matth. 18. 17 18. We hold therefore that to Churches congregated in Synods there belongs power by the Word of God that they may be Ecclesiasticall authority prescribe and impose Formes both of Confession of Faith and Ecclesiasticall Government which particular Churches and their Governours and private members are bound to confesse and receive under paine of Ecclesiasticall censure This Assertion is proved 1. Because the Synod at Jerusalem by an ordinary Power Ecclesiasticall did prescribe and impose such a Forme to other Churches in a question in controversie Acts 15. 22 29. and 16. 4. 2. Because those things which the Churches of God ought to beleeve with the certainty of Divine Fiath and undoubted Conscience these may Synods also injoyne by Ecclesiasticall authority to particular Churches For by the Word of God their power extends to require of others obedience to the Faith and may in the Name of Christ with spirituall power bring under those that are obstinate and who stubbornely oppose themselves against the decrees and constitutions of those that are to governe the Church They may therefore by Ecclesiasticall authority impose on others Formes of Faith and of obedience to the Faith drawn up according to the Scriptures 3. Churches have Ecclesiasticall Power to prescribe just and approved meanes for preserving the purity of true Doctrine and the peace and union of Churches and for overthrowing the wicked counsels and endeavours of Hereticks and disturbers 2 Cor. 10. 4 5 6. and 13. 10. Gal. 5. 12. 1 Cor. 4. 21. But Formes of service and confessions determined concerning questions in controversie are approved and just meanes for preserving the purity of Doctrine and the peace of Churches that they be not indangered by distractions and the poison of errours Act. 15. 23 24. c. They may therefore be imposed on particular Churches by Ecclesiasticall authority Accordingly in the ancient Synods of Churches such Symbols Ecclesiasticall Canons Confessions and Declarations of Faith were set forth that they might thereby testifie not only what themselves did beleeve but also what ought to be beleeved by others with whom they would hold their Ecclesiasticall Communion as all the acts of Synods doe testifie in which where they speake concerning Doctrines of Faith they doe by Paul's example Anathematize those who thinke or teach otherwise whence also is that Preface of the Athanasian Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Whosoever will be saved before all things it is necessary that he beleeve c. And Calvin rightly Epist 87. to the Protector of England It is requisite to provide against petulant wits who assume to themselves too great a licence and the gate is also to be shut against curious doctrines And the ready course for this purpose is one to wit That there be a summe of Doctrine extant to be received by all and this in preaching to be followed by all and to the observance thereof all Bishops and Ministers to be bound by oath so as none be admitted to the Ecclesiasticall Function but who promiseth to retaine that consent of Doctrine inviolate That there be also a common Forme of Catechisme for the use of children and ignorant people Thus will the truth be made familiar to them and withall they will learne to distinguish it from impostures and corruptions which are apt by degrees to creepe upon the slothfull For this you must be certainly resolved of that the Church of God cannot want Catechising for that therein the true seed of sound doctrine is contained from whence a pure and good harvest is afterward to arise and so to be multiplyed more and more c. Nor yet doth the benefit of a Catechisme consist only in the instruction of Children for there is withall this other benefit that both the people being thereby instructed will be better able to profit in the ordinary hearing of the Word and also if any one being puffed up would bring in some new opinion being called to examination by the Catechisme he will straight be discovered Thus Calvin And thus also in our Belgick Churches is that authority applyed to our Formes of Harmony to wit the Confession the Catechisme and Ecclesiasticall Order decreed and confirmed in Synods that the Profession the Doctrine and observation thereof is by Ecclesiasticall authority injoyned to all who will enjoy the dignity of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and who live in the holy union of our Churches See the Syned at Embden Anno 1571. art 2. at Dort Anno 1574. art 2. Anno 1578. art 8. c. We reject therefore The opinion of those who grant it indeed lawfull for a private person or even for a particular Church yea and for all the Churches of a Kingdome to make Confessions and Formes of Doctrine and Discipline but hold it unlawfull and unprofitable to prescribe them either by Ecclesiasticall or Civill authority as binding Rules of Faith and Practise that men should be constrained to observe them in Faith and the practise of Divine Worship But now those things that are to be retain'd with that firme faith and unmoved constancy and certainty of mind as that for the profession thereof all beleevers should not doubt to shed their bloud and suffer Martyrdome and the Churches with the certainty of divine faith judge that so they ought to doe those things surely they may by Ecclesiasticall and spirituall authority prescribe to others and constraine men to observance thereof in faith and practise under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure But for the profession of the pure faith and of the spirituall Governement of Christ's Kingdome all who are faithfull sonnes of the Church are bound to shed their bloud See Rev. 2. 13. Act. 7. 57 58. Luk. 21. 15 16. Therefore Canons and Rules of this profession prescribed out of the undoubted Word of God may be Ecclesiasticall authority be imposed on the Churches of God by those who are by Office to watch over the purity of Faith and integrity of Ecclesiasticall Government Yea and we may bind our soules by Oath to preserve and professe the saving truth of God in faith and the obedience of faith that we fall not away from the holy Profession and exercise thereof See Psal 119. 106. Nehem. 9 38. And if we may lawfully
Profession doth constitute a Church Visible which in Reality and it's internall nature constituteth the Church Mysticall that is Faith Medull lib. 1. cap. 32. thes 7. 3. That there is no visible instituted Church but that which is met together for the performance of all the Ecclesiasticall ordinances of Christ for preaching the word of God and administration of the Sacraments and the exercises of all the offices and spirituall gifts in a constituted Church But Christ speaketh of a Church Mat. 18. 17. met together not for the word and Sacraments but only for the exercise of Church Discipline So likewise is that meeting called a Church wherein the Apostles did not by way of Sermon preach the word nor administer the Sacraments but only told what God had done among the Gentiles Act. 14. 27. 15. 4. or chose some to carry their decrees to others Act. 15. 22. which were acts of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction And therefore that meeting which meeteth only for the exercise of discipline and Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction is allso a Church and so called in Scripture CHAP. IIII. Of Ecclesiasticall power Question VVHether the Ecclesiasticall power or power of the keyes be given by Christ to the multitude or all the members of a Church as the first and immediate subject so as believers not bearing any Church office may by themselves immediately exercise all Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction discipline and causes Ecclesiasticall save only the Sacramēts And cōsequently whether private Christians being Church members have such an Ecclesiasticall power as that they may authoritatively admit Church members to Ecclesiasticall communiō reprove by Ecclesiasticall authority such as cōmit offences bind by excommunication and Church censures absolve from excommunication and authoritatively remit sinnes whether to them also belongeth the conferring the power of the keys on the Ministers and Pastors of the Church and that power which giveth to the Ministers an Ecclesiasticall office and consequently the examination of Pastors the sending unto and confirming them in that Church office by imposition of hands and againe authoritative suspending and removing Pastors from that function Answer THe Reformed Divines teach that none in the Church of Christ which is his Kingdome may arrogate any power to himselfe but from a divine calling and delegation from Christ for whereas those Ecclesiasticall affaires are administred in the Church in the name of Christ and with his power none may performe them but he to whom they are committed by Christ 1 Cor. 4. 1. and 5. 4. 2 Cor. 5. 20. and when as Christ hath vouchsafed this calling and delegation to administer those holy functions not to all in the Church but to some only 1 Cor. 12. 28 29. Rom. 12. 4 5 6. they therefore deny that this power belongeth to all They allow indeed to all beleevers and godly members in the Church visible a spirituall dignity and authority of Grace whereby they are Kings and Priests to God for divine Grace hath a heavenly authority and majestie accompanying it but deny that authority of Office and Ecclesiasticall power or jurisdiction belongeth to them all We grant in this controversie 1. That the power of the Keyes is given by Christ for the benefit of the whole Church and of all beleevers for their spirituall edification Ephes 4. 11 12. 2. That to all the members of the Church belongeth power to choose their Ministers and Pastours either by suffrages or by free consent For this power is found grounded on rules of holy Scripture Act. 1. 23. and 6. 2 3 4. 14. 22. But by this Election the beleevers doe not conferre or derive the power of the Keyes on the Ministers or Pastours chosen but only designe him on whom the power of that Church office is by divine Institution to be conferred by Ecclesiasticall Ordination The whole derivation of Ecclesiasticall authority and spirituall power on Ministers so farre as it can be ministerially secondarily and subordinately performed by the Church is by the whole Ecclesiasticall Vocation But by Election is only the designation of the person on whom that power is to be conferred and by Ordination he is authoritatively sent and put into possession of that function to which he was by Election designed to be ordained Ordination therefore is an act of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction as the Bishop of Spalato righly discourseth De repub eccles lib. 2. cap. 3. num 54. but the act of Election or Nomination is not an act of jurisdiction or Ecclesiasticall authority but of the gift of discretion whereby they prove the spirits and discern the voice of the shepheard and choose him by whose teaching they will be lead For the better clearing of this businesse When we consider of a Pastors Calling intirely and absolutely and not in reference to some part of it by it is the whole derivation of Ecclesiasticall right on this or that person performed And thus it comprehendeth Election and Ordination Election hath three parts Examination Approbation and Nomination Examination consists in the triall of his Learning and Gifts and former Conversation Approbation lieth in two things Judgement and Assent Judgement we call that sentence whereby the person examined is judged fit to undertake the Ministery and may profitably performe it Assent is of them who rest satisfied in this judgement Nomination is when one by name is by common advise decerned to be invited to the Ministery of a Church Ordination comprehendeth Mission and Admission Mission or sending is an authoritative act of the Presbytery whereby the Office is conferred on the person elected and he sent and commended to the Church for which he had been designed and put in possession of his Ministery Initiation or Admission is the publike administration of an outward rite wherby the person elected is established in the ministery of that Church and is performed by explaining the divine Institution Prayer and a solemne blessing the common Symbol of this Ordination is Imposition of hands In this whole businesse therefore of Vocation we grant to the people Nomination which was at first in the power of the Presbyters and people in common The Governours of the Church meane while moderating the whole action for they being better able to judge of the quality of their learning and gifts were therefore to performe this charge that according to the canons they were not to follow the people but to leade them for the Election was chiefly the act of Ministers the worke of the faithfull people to consent to that Election distinct 63. cap. Nosse cap. Cum longè For it is cleare by Apostolicall examples and the practise of the Ancients that the Ministers were first to Nominate and the people to assent to that Nomination duly performed or to consult in common about the person to be nominated or lastly if they have any cause why they might justly oppose that Nomination freely to produce their judgement to the Governours of the Church Their consent they signified anciently as Junius acknowledgeth disput
and Synods that they may so farre as conveniently can be make use of common consent and mutuall assistance especially in those things that are of greater moment But yet how much greater and further space and remotenesse of distance there is between particular Churches so much the lesse also is the visible communion of those Churches because the danger of scandall and infection and the opportunity of mutual edification is lesse or more according as the distinct distance of places is greater or lesse Wherfore there is a more strict visible Ecclesiasticall communion between the Churches of one Province or Nation then between the particular congregations of the Church Universall and consequently the jurisdiction and Ecclesiasticall government is also lesse visible between these then between the Churches of one Nation This communion of Churches in government and Church discipline is not only for the informing of Churches what is commanded by the word of God but also for the governing of them by laws and spirituall jurisdiction for there is an authority and power of rule belonging by the word of God to Churches joyned in Classes and Synods which to particular Churches singly and severally belongeth not to wit a power of making Canons and laws Ecclesiasticall which may bind all the particular Churches of one Province or Kingdome to obey them We grant in this controversy 1. That the power of Classes and Synods doth not take away or hurt the power or liberty Ecclesiasticall of a particular Church for it serveth to direct preserve and promote the power of Synods is not privative but cumulative and granted for this end that the power given to particular Churches may be more efficacious orderly regular able and apt for edifying 2. That there is a power belonging to a particular Church immediatly granted from God not derived from Classes or Synods as likewise there is belonging to Classes and Synods a power of their own immediatly granted by God and not derived from the particular Churches For though in regard of the Originall or the rise and constitution of a Synod particular Churches intire in themselves collaterall one to another and equall in Church power do in common contribute associate and exercise their Church power and so make up a collective and combined body of a Synod yet the Synodicall authority of it selfe is not granted to any other first subject from whence it should be derived to the Synod then to the Synod it selfe to which alone by the word of God and Apostolicall institution that power belongeth for no particular Churches singly and severally considered may exercise a Synodicall power over other Churches But we affirme 1. That this union and communion of particular Churches in a government and discipline Ecclesiasticall in common which is exercised in Synods and Classes is grounded upon the word of God and in the examples of the Apostolicall Church is proposed to us to imitate 2. That these Synods and Classes have a power and authority Synodall and Classicall whereby they do by spirituall jurisdiction authoritatively decerne matters Ecclesiasticall and impose those decrees under paine of Ecclesiasticall censure on particular Churches Our opinion is proved by these following arguments 1. In Act. 15. we have in the Apostles practise an expresse example of a Synod held at Jerusalem about a question concerning the observation of the Law of Moses In which Synod that businesse which had wrought a disturbance in the particular Churches ver 2 4 5 23. is by the deputies of severall Churches ver 2 6 23. Act. 21. 17 18 25. determined with power authoritative to bind particular Churches to obedience ver 22 28. chap. 16. 4. 21 25. And the false doctrine of those who subverted the soules of their hearers is by an Ecclesiasticall judgement condemned with spirituall power ver 28 29. which thing is an act of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction as appeareth Revel 2. 2 14 20. and the determination of this Ecclesiasticall law was not by an extraordinary Apostolike authority but by an ordinary authority Ecclesiasticall for it was done not by the Apostles alone extraordinarily acted by the Spirit of God but by the Elders and brethren of the Church joyned with the Apostles acting not by their Apostololicall but by their ordinary Pastorall authority with great discussion and disputation and the assent of the Churches which argue that the decrees of this Synod were not made by an extraordinary Apostolicall authority but by an ordinary Ecclesiasticall power 2. Our assertion is proved from Christs institution Mat. 18. 17 18. where he doth institute such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies as may by Ecclesiasticall authority make provision and prepare efficacious remedies against all scandals and offences If the members of a particular Church do give scandall to one another he bids that it be shewed to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge to wit the Church representative which by Ecclesiasticall authority doth condemne and punish and remove from Ecclesiasticall and brotherly communion the person offending and therefore doth likewise command that if particular Churches give offence to one another it should be carried to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge which may by spirituall authority condemne punish and put from Ecclesiasticall communion the particular Church offending for where the law makes no distinction or restriction there must not we distinguish or restrain And certainly the remedy instituted in this place is ordained by Christ for the removing out of the visible Church all scandals not only caused by particular members but also by whole Churches and therfore there must be acknowledged a superior Ecclesiasticall Assembly which may by authoritative Ecclesiasticall power judge of the scandall of particular Churches as well as a superiour Ecclesiasticall judge in a particular Church is to be acknowledged from this institution for judging the scandalls of particular members For since that according to the holy Scriptures we must grant that there is an Ecclesiasticall communion between the visible Churches of one Province Nation yea and of the whole World as is proved before which communion is not only fraternall but Ecclesiasticall whereby Churches as Churches or bodies Ecclesiasticall are joyned and united in doctrine government worship discipline and Ecclesiasticall polity and seeing that in this holy communion scandals are committed which are unbeseeming those Churches and to be cast forth from that Ecclesiasticall communion therfore both by the law of nature and this divine law here instituted by Christ we must acknowledge a superiour Ecclesiasticall Senat furnished with spirituall and Ecclesiasticall authority which may remove those scandals Hence Parker himselfe de politia Ecclesiast lib. 3. cap. 24. groundeth the authority of Synods on this place And the Professors of Leyden disput 49. thes 10. discourse thus The institution of Ecclesiasticall Assemblies and so also of a Synod is not of humane but of divine right being founded on the words of Christ Tell the Church if he heare not the Church c. Whomsoever ye bind on earth c. Where
whole particular Church or a Church Consistory Christ in Matth. 18. 17 18. establishing the power of Excommunication in his Church by divine institution doth not restraine the exercise thereof to be applyed only to a single brother in a particular Church though he give the instance in such an one for he doth institute that Order in his Kingdome whereby all scandals may be removed out of the Church and cured by spirituall authority whether committed by a particular Church or by a particular person or by whomsoever And therefore if a particular Sister Church in the Ecclesiasticall Society of many Churches doe give a scandall to those other Churches they may by this institution of Christ be brought into order by this spirituall Power And surely it is cleare even out of Parker himselfe that the divine institution of Classes may be proved from Christs institution in Matt. 18. 17 18. For lib. 3. cap. 24. de Politiâ Ecclesiasticâ he thus argues from the proportion Christ Commands that upon the despising one mans admonition we should proceed to admonition by two or three and if that be contemned to the censure of the Presbytery and if that be despised to the censure of the whole Church and why not therefore from the despising of one whole Church to more in a Classis and againe from those more in a Classis to yet more in a Synod And therefore also by this Institution of Christ not a particular Church only but a Classis and Synod also have power given of Excommunicating such as commit scandals if by this institution of Christ the nature and authority of Classes and Synods may be concluded And accordingly in those hard times of the Belgick Churches when the Church amongst us was infested by the troubles and errours of the Remonstrants whole Presbyteries of Churches were exauthorated by the Power of Classes and Synods We reject therefore the contrary Assertions 1. Of those who hold the Power of Excommunication to be so appropriated to a particular Church so that it may not be attributed to Classes and Synods But we hold that a particular Church by reason of that arct Ecclesiasticall Communion which it holdeth with other neighbour Churches in the same Classis or Synod whereby it makes up one Ecclesiasticall corporation or body and one visible sacred Society with the associate Churches hath not an absolute and compleate power to cut off and cast out a member from that particular Church because that member hath a near arct and visible union and communion with the Churches associate amongst whom he doth daily converse and celebrate the worship of God so that he doth occasion to them danger of scandall and infection and receiveth from them meanes of edification wherefore without the judgement and consent of the associate Churches he may not be cast out of that brotherly and visible Church communion by the decree of one particular Church 2. Of those also who make the highest power of Synods and Classes in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall censures toward a particular Church to consist in a denying or withdrawing brotherly communion But this Non-Communion as it is called we conceive to be such an act as a brother may exercise towards a brother a particular Church towards another particular Church who yet cannot exercise any authority or censure of Ecclesiasticall power amongst themselves one over the other nor hath it that Efficacy by Gods ordinance to bind in Heaven nor was it ordained by the Institution of Christ for this end to save the spirit of man in the day of the Lord and to teach from God such as be erroneous not to blaspheme which to the legitimate censure of Excommunication doe appertaine Matth. 18. 17 18. 1 Cor. 5. 4. 1 Tim. 1. 20. In the correction of a Sister Church the same degrees are to be observed by the Ordinance of Christ Matth. 18. 17 18. which are observed in the correction of a brother and therefore we are not to rest in the admonition of two or three Churches but by that order proceed to Excommunication thereby to cast out from the holy Communion of the Churches as a heathen and a publican and to deliver to Satan an obstinate offending Church CHAP. VII Of set Formes Question WHether it be lawfull for Churches to prescribe to themselves constituted lawes and formes and certaine Canons by Ecclesiasticall authoritie wherein Articles of Faith and things necessarily required by God for the Governement and Discipline of the Churches are out of the holy Scriptures expounded and determined and things not necessarily required are by Ecclesiasticall power prescribed according to the generall rules of Scripture from the precepts of the law of Nature and holy Prudence for the edification of the Church and the order and decency of Gods Worship and imposed on particular Churches and Church-Governors as bonds of Peace and Unity Answer VVE grant in this Controversie 1. That these Formes are not absolutely necessary to the constitution of a Church For we know that the antient Church of the Jewes wanted such Formes when as being collected in one people they had expresse rituall lawes and the Prophets frequent directions Nor did the Christian Church want its being or well being before such time as the branches of the Apostles Creed gathered out of severall places of Scripture were in a briefe Abstract joyned together in one 2. We deny that these Formes or declarations of Faith and Church-Government are to have that authority and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or authenticknesse attributed to them which belongs only to the Word of God as that they should be obtruded as a rule of Faith and that in the Examination of Doctrines and of Church Discipline judgement should be made ex formularum terminis as they speake by the letter of such formes We approve not the judgement of those nor would have their practise to be imitated of whom our Divines did heretofore justly complaine in that writing which Zacharias Vrsinus in the name of the Vniversity of Neostad opposed to the Bergenses concordistae who would obtrude the words of the Augustan confession and the writings of Luther as a rule of faith and Ecclesiasticall proceedings See Chap. 4. of that booke where much is said concerning the use and abuse of Confessions 3. We judge formes of confessions and Canons of Ecclesiasticall Government to be declarations of the true faith and discipline badges and tokens of union and communion in the Church collected in the meetings of the godly learned and ratifyed by an unanimous consent after a diligent inquiry out of Scripture wherein those things which are in divers places of Scripture pertaining to the summe of Christian faith and discipline gathered as it were into a bundle are together and at once proposed to a few eyes and by the comparing of all places wherein mention is made of one and the same article the wholsome truth in each one is expressed and explained that the controversies arising concerning the
bind by Oath our owne soules and the soules of others who live under our power to such a profession of saving Faith we may bind them also by Lawes and Canons to the same profession for of like things there is like judgement Question 2. VVHether it be lawfull to use in the Church prescript Formes of Prayer administration of the Sacraments c or whether those Churches who use them be guilty of superstition and will-worship and whether it be lawfull to hold Ecclesiasticall Communion with those Churches where such Formes in the publike worship are in use Answer IN this controversie we easily assent to what is written by Ames upon this question in his Cases of Conscience lib. 4. cap. 17. quaest 4. and to what the professors of Leyden have in their Synopsis Theologiae disput 36. Thes 33 34. And that we may handle the question distinctly 1. We reject such Formes of prayer of Administration of Sacraments c. which for the matter of them are vitious for we may not in prayers and other parts of the publike worship of God propound any thing unlawfull impertinent and unfitting which savoureth of superstition Idolatry or heresy or carnall profanenesse and pomp of the World and which introduceth a communion with the unfruitfull workes of darknesse And for this cause we reject the ceremonies and forms of publike worship introduced in the Church of England in these last corrupt times by the Hierarchicall Bishops as which being superstitious and idolatrous did deface the Church and worship of God and obscure the brightnesse and beauty of a glorious Reformation and a Church which takes up superstitious and idolatrous ceremonies partakes in superstition and idolatry 2. We reject also those Forms of prayers and publike worship which by a tyrannicall and violent command are imposed on the consciences of men as absolutely necessary and as essentiall parts of Gods worship though for the matter of them they be legitimatly disposed yet for the Form of them and the manner of their introducing they become illegitimate instruments of cruelty and pretences for perverse wickednesse and occasions of violent tyranny against the worthiest and best sonnes of the Church For there are not by Christ or the Apostles whose institutions are not defective in the absolutely necessary parts of Gods worship any Forms prescribed as simply and absolutely necessary wherein they have drawne up an exact and immutable rule for all Christians in Churches in matter and form and method to which all faithfull worshippers of God to the worlds end are to be precisely bound 3. The question is not here of the absolute necessity of Forms whereby they are obtruded as parts of Religion and essentiall meanes of divine worship but of such a prescribing them whereby they are by Ecclesiasticall authority commended for the order and decency of the worship of God as usefull and profitable for those who want either sufficient ability or freedome of exercising it for the seemly expression of those parts of divine worship that they may be as it were guided by them as helps in their meditations petitions words and actions and that the attention of the auditors especially in great Congregations may by those forms be helped and directed and that there may be an Uniformity observed in the exercises of publike worship in all Churches for the preventing of scandalls and for the greater edefication of the Churches But we judge those Forms as well publikely as privatly used to be lawfull and profitable so that they be read out of the booke with due attention reverence faith and spirituall affection and zeale towards God and that not only in case of necessity when he that is to perform those parts of divine worship is destitute of sufficient ability and fit words to expresse the prayers and other parts of divine worship but also for the helping and directing the attention of the auditors thereby and for keeping an uniformity in the exercises of Divine Worship for the edification of the Churches of God This Assertion is proved 1. Because we may in a prescript form sing Psalmes and offer thanksgivings to God with due reverence faith spirituall affection and zeale Asaph and his brethren had Forms for the due praising of God prescribed them by David according to the prescript whereof they were in set words to celebrate publike thanksgivings See 1 Chron. 16. 7 8. So in the dedication of the Temple the Priests and Levites did celebrate the publike worship of God according to the set-Forms prescribed by David 2 Chron. 7. 6. The like examples we have Numb 6. 22 23. 2 Chron 20. 21. Esra 3. 10 11. Psal 92. 1. But now if thanksgivings and singing of Psalmes which ought to be performed with spirituall affection reverence and understanding and joy 1 Cor. 14 15. Ephes 5. 19. Col. 3. 16. both lawfully may be and were performed according to the Word of God in set Forms then also Prayers and other parts of Divine Worship may in set Forms be duly and lawfully conceived and offered to God for thanksgivings and blessing of God are kinds of prayer and of the same nature which require the same affections of mind with other parts of Divine Worship 2. That is a just and lawfull forme of prayers in which are observed the essentialls and necessary requisites to all prayers But all things which in the holy Scripture are required to the due constitution of prayers may be observed and by the godly are observed in a holy manner in prayers conceived in set Forms and pronounced out of a booke Therfore this form of prayers is just and lawfull For what is there in Scripture required to the worship of supplications and godly prayers but that the matters of them be lawfull and stily disposed according to the present necessities that they be offered to God in a holy manner with reverence zeale humility and faith and that they duly expresse our urging necessities But we know by certaine experience that a prayer holy and lawfull for the matter of it may in a set Form be pronounced and offered to God with an humble sence of our necessities desire and zeal holinesse of affections faith and religious motions of our will towards God and that according as our affairs require The faithful reade the text of holy Scripture with understanding humility reverence zeale religious motions of the will and faith in God and application of them to particular necessities and why may not prayers in like manner be pronounced in prescript formes when as prayers differ in this only from hearing and reading the Word of God that in the one our will is moved towards God that we may be moved by him but in the other our will is moved towards God that he may be affected with our desires as Ames elsewhere observeth 3. Our Lord and Saviour Christ hath prescribed us a form of prayer For he hath given us the Lords-Prayer not only as a pattern or platform according to