saith he if they that did observe a certain shadow and figure did so greatly reverence the Sabbath Day that they wholly abstained from all work how is it not fitting that those should reverence that day that is honoured of God who love the light of grace and the truth it self 4. Lastly the rule of equity and justice requires the same if we look at what time the Lord hath indulged us for our uses whose large benevolence hath allowed us six whole dayes to overcome the labours of this world and dispatch our own business with Why should it therefore be tedious to us weighing this in an equal ballance for to set apart one whole day for his praise and sincere worship Neither can any one think this an absurd form of arguing who shall but observe Chrysostom arguing in this matter from the duty of servants towards us to our observance towards God he judgeth it ridiculous if we would have our servants alwayes employed in our business and and we give no service to God And we likewise contending for the sanctifying of the whole day do say that it is much more ridiculous if we should reckon those dayes for whole ones which are allowed us to dispatch the affairs of this life in for our use and interpret a day set aside for Gods worship by Divine authority not an entire one but a small part thereof to be dedicated to Divine worship It would be ridiculous yea plainly impious to arrogate to our selves and our affairs what we refuse to bestow on God Chrysostom judgeth it an irreligious thing to consume six dayes in carnal and be unwilling to spend one in spiritual matters So also Leo in the foresaid place How is it not the part of a wholly dissolute Religion whereas one of the seven dayes is consecrated to the honour of God not to preserve it inviolate to God but to make it common But we must not contend with reasons but testimonies for the prejudices of some men who condemn the truth in this matter as novelty and he that shall undervalue the foresaid testimonies of greatest authority will esteem at little reasons although every way valid like the Leviathan that esteemeth iron as straw and brass as rotten wood And therefore I will put an end to this labour And thus far being furnished with the authorities of the ancients I have taught you that they have stood for sanctifying of the whole day which they have judged necessary for the Church How the sacred Exercises of Divine worship performed on that day were so disposed that in performing thereof the whole day was spent by the ancients when I shall speak of the sanctifying of the Lords Day then by the grace of God shall be made manifest CHAP. VII The Ordinance of the Lords day is not to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church Things ordained of the Apostles are Divine WHen the Jews had observed John to use another form of Doctrine than was commonly received and to begin a new Ceremony of Baptisme they ask who he was i. e. by what authority he did set upon these new things and unheard of in former ages that being informed in that thing they might in time consider what they should do So since that we have found out of Scriptures and Fathers that the Lords day was solemnized by the Church under the Gospel insomuch that mens minds are to be masculously applied to the duties of Piety not on the last as under the Law but first day of the week a question is made by what authority Gods Holy Church doth this thing For it was not so kept holy from the beginning from whence even till the happy Resurrection of our Saviour the Lord commanded that the Seventh day in every week should be held holy and for sanctifying the first day of every week divers men seek for a command which they confidently enough cry out is not extant in all the holy Scriptures and divers more other wise Divines of great note do greatly toyle in heaping up arguments whereby to enervate the Divine Authority of this day It is an ordinary thing with sundry of the Papists although some amongst them especially of the School-men do think otherwise who strenuously contend for unwritten Traditions on whose weak authority as on a solid foundation many of their dotages are grounded to reckon up the observation of the Lords Day among this sort of Traditions which cannot be fince the mention thereof doth so often occurr in the Sacred Word of God Whilst the most learned Dr. Whitaker doth studie soberly to prevent as his manner is this errour of the Papists he is scourged of Gretser Yet the learned Vedelius in his notes upon Ignatius doth strongly defend Whitaker against the vain fooleries of Gretser Others contend that the Lords day should be held solemn â—ure divino Lastly Others do acknowledge it received from Apostolical ordination We will by Gods assistance shew that solemn celebration of the Lords day was instituted of God by the Apostles The Holy Scriptures do testifie that the Lords day was observed of the Church while the Apostles were yet alive nor is there much doubt of this observation This is the onely thing as I said of which the question is Whether this solemnity was instituted of the Apostles or of the Church according to that power allowed them by the Lord And if it be ascribed to the Holy Apostles Whether they of themselves and by their own authority or by Divine command have prescribed it to the Church since the observation of the Lords day grew in use with the Church of Christ while the Apostles were yet alive it seems equitable and agreeable to sound reason to take them for the authors of this observation because the chief care of Ecclesiastical Government was by God devolved upon them every one whereof as a wise master-builder laid a foundation upon which their successors builded and all other modern Doctors of the Church how great soever they were gave place unto them Ignatius for that reason saith of himself I do not command as an Apostle And elsewhere in an Epistle Ad Philadelphienses he doth not challenge Apostolical authority to himself Neither would Ambrose claim Apostolical glory to himself which he acknowledgeth is by right due to them whom the Son of God hath chosen and he affirmeth that by how much we are inferiour to the Apostles in time we are so much inferiour to them in merit Chrysostom also confesses that he is far from the Apostles dignity neither doth he account himself worthy to be called their shadow and Christ hath deservedly joyned them to him as individual companions out of the number of all his Disciples or that I may speak with Tertullian lateri suo adlegavit i. made themselves Legates a latere Secondly He hath sent
But yet since it 's no casie thing to obliterate and wholly to eradicate the matter of that Law which commands us to set apart a whole day within the compass of a week and refer it for Spiritual Labour therefore that sly Adversaries by his Emissaries whose wit is ready and that have a mercenary tongue for colouring Impostures changing their opinion at pleasure with the inconstant Ecebolius at the first only desputes after his crafty manner whether such a time be ordained of God These men more boldly than truly acknowledge the authority of time to be received not from Gods but Mens constitution as though the Lords-Day were like the Holy-dayes which were commanded the Romans namely such as the Praetors according to their arbitrary power did proclaim And so its observation should depend upon the civil Magistrate and Churches authority These things thus being handled after these mens will and others not strenuously applying their minds to retard the speedy course of their enterprises reasons are found out with a little ado for errour is a fruitful thing by which men not very religious and observant of piety may at last rush upon the constant sanctification of this time with unwashen hands and feet as the Proverb is and tread it under feet as if it were only instituted of God not for the sake of any Spiritual work but carnal idleness These things courteous Reader have given me occasion more narrowly to search out both the Institution and Sanctification of this time namely whether first it could be shown from the Fountain of holy Writ from whence wise men know we must always judge what is to be defined of every Divine Truth and the ancient practise of the following Church which learned it from the Apostles any part of time weekly be destined to performe the holy exercises of Religion Secondly by what Authority that time is imposed upon the Church Divine or Humane Thirdly in what things the solemn sanctifying thereof consisteth Touching all which what may be shown from the foresaid Fountains the following pages will briefly without prejudice of others judging according to truth by the grace of God inform us These are I say the things of which I have purposed to treat God assisting which before I enter on some things remain of which the Reader studihus of truth is timely to be admonished First of all though there be none of any authority and name amongst the Professors of more pure Christianity who beareth not most clear testimony to the Lords Festival yet in no case must we expect that all things which chiefly make for the illustrating it can be demonstrated out of the papers of the most approved Fathers in one age Nor can any one of right be offended or wonder at this since the reverend authority of the Fathers especially in the controversies that unhappily sprang up in their age is to be attended in weighing whereof they have professedly and openly declared what their mind was but in other things which they have touched upon only by the bye they have not so roundly shewed their judgements Besides we know there is no point of Christian Religion the illustration whereof hath not more and more increased in the Church by progress of time to effect which the succeeding Church was enforced through a certain necessity for sometimes the foolish frowardness of adversaries and sometimes the lewdly-imployed manners of their own men have required this that diverse Canons about some heads of Religion the knowledge whereof formerly increased in the Church should be appointed I believe none will deny that the most profound mystery of the Holy Trinity was known to the Christian Church from its infancy yet in several Councils of the succeeding Church diverse Canons were ordained about it The Reverend Fathers in the Council of Nice ordain that our Lord Jesus Christ is not a Creature and this they did according to Pauls word In the Council of Constantinople all profess they did believe that the Holy Ghost is true God as co-essential to God both Father and the Son In the Council of Ephesus under the Emperor Theodosius the younger the Divinity of the Son is again concluded These mysteries were illustrated by these new constitutions and yet who will be so mad as for that cause to contend they were first then known to the Church when these new Canons were set forth about them which only the Holy Fathers ordained to obviate the frowardness of Hereticks that either denyed er adulterated the received Truth that the Divine verity which the former Church embraced being obscured and held down by the wicked artifices of adversaries might be restored to its ancient vigour But not onely the madness of Hereticks but sometimes also the inordinate manners of Christians have occasioned new Canons ordaining about things formerly known for it was an usual thing for the Fathers to inquire into the manners of those Churches that were commended to their care and when they observed that their Christian people were ensnared in errour or wandring from the path of truth or at least walking not uprightly according to the received rule of piety they straightway used new Canons as medicines congruous to both these evils and so in the Church as in the Commonwealth good Laws grew out of evil manners And although the things that were before ordained were abundantly sufficient to quench those errours newly sprung up or reform their lewd manners yet either the new breaking out of errour or dilating of manners not at all consonant to the holy light of the Gospel and creeping every way like leaven were stopped by the bar of new Canons But thereupon we must not think that the former Church was not bound to the truth which was by a Postliminium established with new sanctions or to manners reformed by their authority Which is easie to be observed in this business of the Lords Day The succeeding Church through the care of the best Emperours having obtained peace established divers things about the Lords Festival which are not now extant in the Doctors of the Primitive Church But who will say that the piety established by new Canons for observing that solemnity was not known to the former Christians whenas even in the Apostles age as it shall afterwards appear from the Scriptures the Lords Day was solemnly used for all the exercises of Religion in which the true manner of keeping it holy doth consist And the Fathers of the succeeding Church ordaining new Canons about its solemnity have not concealed this as is to be seen in the second Council at Matiscon Can. 1. in which they gravely study to set forth the Lords solemnity but to this they were moved by the rash custome of some as they say who exposed the Lords day to contempt In Concil Cabilon held about the year 664. caution is taken for prohibiting Country labours on that day which thing when the Fathers did ordain they confess they did
not appoint any new thing but renew the old Moreover in the Council of Friuli Can. 13. all Christians were commanded to observe with all reverence the Lords Festival in which as in other Canons of that Council they acknowledge they do not institute new rules but having recited the sacred pages of their fore-fathers Canons they persist to embrace with greatest devotion and 〈…〉 with a fresher style the things that were digested by them and promulgated by a wholsome pen. There came out also a new Decree in a Council at Paris for the strict observing the Lords day of which this reason is assigned by the Fathers because a due observation and the religious devotion of that day was in a great measure neglected That was not then the first time they decreed a religious institution of the Lords day but it being grown into a disuse they labour Postliminio to renew it and call to remembrance the neglected or obscured use thereof and the dissolute manners of Christians in performing on that day the exercises of Religion have produced new Canons about observing this solemnity whenas yet the solemnity it self and the holy duties thereof were well enough known to the former Church and so the things which were neglected through the carelesness of the people were afterwards with great labour inculcated Another reason also is to be added for the ordaining new Canons about this Festival The Heathen Emperours being haters of the Christian name provided by their Laws that the Christians should not have liberty on the Lords day to keep their meetings Which the wicked Edict of Dioclesian touching this thing informs us of How therefore would they observe out of the writers of that age all the mysteries of godliness to be performed on that day whenas not without great peril of life they did celebrate the Lords dayes not on the day time but on the night yet all Authors of any note as I said do acknowledge that the day it self was to be celebrated from the beginning of the Church and if they had had liberty they had executed the same offices of Religion on that day by which it was celebrated in the succeeding Church And these are the things for whose cause the Fathers of the succeeding Church being moved have treated more at large concerning the Lords day duties than those of the foregoing There remains one other rock upon which lest any dash I judge them also to be advertised Many of the Canons upon whose authority a great sort of the duties of Religion on that day to be performed do lean were set forth by Councils which were Provincial perhaps therefore some will object that none but the Churches of those Provinces are obliged to keep those Canons But indeed since the Decrees of Provincial Councils serve for the profit of the whole and not of any particular Church onely why should they not be received of other Churches professing the same Faith with them although not by vertue of any Provincials authority but of Divine truth albeit determined in a particular Province And since the reason of a Provincial Synods determination is universal why should not Canons so determined even in that respect oblige other Churches although not to undergo the punishment For the imposing of the punishment is particular where the Law in respect of equity may be general And whenas we see the authorities of particular Fathers to be esteemed amongst all we should be too partial towards them if we should set at nought the Canons of Provincial Councils at which several Fathers and Bishops were present unless some body will think that a sentence approved by the judgments of many be of less weight and authority than when it 's pronounced by one single person apart Because Pauls Epistles were written to particular Churches they are not therefore rejected of others for that in Gods intention they pertain to the Churches of all ages and Nations nor do they less agree with their moral state and condition than with those for whom they were primarily designed Moreover if in any Province there be Churches rightly constituted and according to the rule of Gods Word doubtless they are to be honoured with the name and title of Churches and the right hands of Christian fellowship are to be given them neither is there extant at this day a Church which upon occasion does not freely use the authorities of some Provincial Councils in confirming the truth to which yet this is by none imputed as a fault and why may not its assertors sometimes have liberty to use the Provincial authorities of Canons for propagating the truth about the Lords day The Orthodox Fathers anciently when any question arose by which the peace of the Church was disturbed did advise and mutually help one another The French Bishops in the case of communion with Felix consulted the Bishops of Rome and Millain whose Letters were read in the Council of Tauritan as appeareth by the fifth Canon of that Council The Spanish Bishops in the case of the Priscillianists profess they will not communicate with the lapsed although reclaimed without the consent of the Roman Bishop and Simplicianus of Millain Liberius Bishop of Rome writes to Athanasius and begs it of him before God and Christ that if he be of his mind he would subscribe his Epistle A pud Athanas p. 397. That was indeed a sweet communication and modest prudence in the ancient Bishops that one act and one consent should be kept according to Gods Laws amongst them all And hence it was that they entirely studied to use one common counsel about the profit of Church-administration and did not reject with a supercilious disdain that which seemed best to be done to their fellow Bishops although distant from them in other Provinces but the association of Priests although large was so coupled together with the glew of mutual-concord and bond of unity that one falling into danger the rest helped him Whatever therefore was thought just by Pastors of other Churches especially those that were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Petrus Alexandrinus sayes in Sozomen of the Roman Bishop although congregated in a Provincial Council or out of Council was by good desert not rejested of other Bishops of the same Faith but they helped one another by mutual counsels and labour Whence it follows that Canons ordained although in Provincial Councils about the Lords Festival are not to be rejected But I will stay no longer to take this remora out of the way One Objection remaineth which lest any thing be wanting to the knowledge of the truth must be prevented Some having no care of the Lords Festival do contend that the Fathers in those latter Councils do stick in small things and do mingle I know not what matters of little value with their Canons about observing the Lords solemnity for whose sakes they judge whole Canons to be nothing worth as in some Councils it 's
them out furnished with special authority to gather the Church to lay whose foundations belong to the Apostolical dignity out of the promiscuous multitude of all nations and so they were sent out by Christ to all Nations without any exception for which cause when a Church was planted in any part of the world whither they came they fixed not but removed some other way Thirdly They were endued with that abundance of Grace of the Holy Ghost for the Ministry committed to them by the Lord that they preached the truth of the Gospel infallibly I know sayes Hierom how to esteem of the Apostles in one manner of other Doctors after another that those alwayes taught the truth these in some things did erre as men Whence the Doctrine commended to the Church by the Apostles was alwayes accounted for the rule and Canon of all Christian Religion Fourthly The Apostles at the beginning of the Church by the visible sign of imposition of hands conferred the gifts of the Holy Ghost upon others that were instructed of them in the Doctrine of the Gospel and they were endued with divers other gifts of Miracles by which their call was rendred clear both to themselves and others Matth. 10. 8. And these are the signs by which the blessed Apostle teaches us that he had executed the office of a true Apostle in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12. 2. Deservedly for these causes were they that were elected to the honourable state of Apostolical dignity preferred to other Ministers of the Church not only in the chief eminency of Order but of Power and hence it was that all questions respecting the affairs of the whole Church were propounded to be discussed by the Apostles whom all the Churches consulted in doubtful cases as may be seen Acts 15. 2. 1 Cor. 7. 1. and whatever they determined the whole Church every where embraced which made a conscience of departing a fingers breadth from those things that were committed to them by the Apostles If therefore the solemnity of the Lords Day was celebrated while the Apostles were living which the Scriptures testifie was done as we have seen chap. 2. it must of right chiefly be imputed to their ordination otherwise without doubt the Universal Church had not followed it Baronius thinks that all who are well in their wiâ—â— will say that since it is found that it was done in the Apostles times it could not be ordained and commanded to be kept of any other but of themselves Neither is any thing worthy consideration brought to the contrary except it be because the Blessed Apostles have left no singular command with the Church for the observation of this day although he that shall attend their practise may lawfully deny this since their example and practise hath the force of a precept But who will deny that some things were instituted of the Apostles in the Church whose use while they were alive I pass not for Traditions introduced into the Church when the Apostles were dead was grown out with the primitive Christians of whose first institution or necessary continuation afterwards no precept is extant in the Scriptures yet who will be bold to extenuate the authority of these commands or will affirm that the Church at this day is not obliged to observe them because their observation being mentioned in Scripture is as it were a command by vertue whereof the Church is bound to continue them The thing will be more plain by examples The Apostles ordained Deacons Act. 6. and Elders in every Church Act. 14. 23. In the Ordinations of all Ministers imposition of hands was used but where is there extant an express commanâ— from Christ for perpetuating the ordination of those the institution of these or for the use of this ceremony yet none doubts but that the Apostles in performing of these were acted by a Divine instinct of the Spirit and that the Church at this day is bound to them by vertue of Apostolical institution But that I may briefly shew that the blessed Apostles and no others were the authors of this solemnity that which follows may suffice If it were observed while they were yet living which the Scriptures do evidently enough manifest it is deservedly to be ascribed to their ordaining it for it was either instituted by them and their authority or by some other Doctors of the Church without their consent a third way is not given the latter whereof is absurd and never to be admitted of any exercised in the Christian Faith because the Apostolical authority as formerly we have abundantly enough shewn was supreme in the Church it belonged to them to declare to the Christian flock what was best to be done in all things and not to the Church to prescribe them Statutes and Laws Why therefore did it not appertain to the Apostles the faithful founders of the Church amongst other things to commend this also to the Church and not to the Church to prescribe it the blessed Apostles Moreover the general consent of all Churches in celebrating this festival evinceth the same otherwise they had dissented from one another as in other observations not received from the Apostles but observed for a time by the succeeding Church as in the Feast of the Passover in observing Fasts c. so doubtless it would have happened in celebrating the Lords Day if by Divine authority received from the Apostles its observation had not been used amongst the Christians Thirdly if the Christian Church had ordained that day to be celebrated without the advice of the Apostles either those that turned Christians from Jews or Gentiles had done this but not those to whom the cessation of their old Sabbath was not known but by the Apostles much less would they attempt to do this by themselves or on their own authority Neither will any wise man think that those whom the Apostles invited from Heathenism to embrace the Christian faith were the authors of this Festival because it is not usual with them to Sabbatize after the manner of the Church unless so far as they were instructed to it by the Apostles Fourthly if the Holy Apostles by authority committed to them from Christ had not instituted the Lords Day but had left its observation free to the judgment of the Church then we might on good reason have called the Church the Queen of the Sabbath which yet is a very clear argument of Christs Divinity as the Learned Dr. Paraeus piously for none is Lord of the Sabbath but he that hath instituted the Sabbath c. The Sabbath is of the Lord they God Lastly if its authority did depend upon the Churches institution then it may by it be again abolished when it shall think good but this was never hitherto since Christs ascension attempted because the Lords day being taken away the publick worship of God must of necessity fall Since therefore the observation of the Lords day was used while the Apostles were
profit of the Church From the three foresaid places of the New Testament and testimonies of various Divines and Versions of the Scripture the learned Wallaeus concludes that the use of the Lords day is to be referred to the Apostles And whatever is brought of some in their Expositions to the contrary is solidly by him weighed and refuted Lastly We have shewn in the second chapter of this Treatise that the Lords day was ordinarily solemnized by the Church while the Apostles were living and the preheminence of it above other dayes which the succeeding Church hath consecrated to Gods worship in the third Chapter Since therefore the Holy Scriptures do plainly bear witness of the name and use of this day for the name which the Church ever after used is by St. John expressed Rev. 1. 10. and since it is by the Apostles charge destined to the sacred assemblies of the Church and gathering of almes 1 Cor. 16. And lastly since at the same assemblies the Apostle and Church spent it in hearing the word of God and communicating the Eucharist Act. 20. what man is there that can rightly deny that its authority in the Church was established by the testimony of Holy Scripture of which in the third place we have undertaken to enquire in ch 7th since it is bottomed upon the ordination and practice of the blessed Apostles which are recorded in the Scriptures amongst un-written traditions it cannot be reckoned I deservedly therefore affirm that its observation is commended to us in the Scriptures Because we so often read in the Scriptures that the Apostles and the whole Church of Christ did unanimously hold their assemblies on that day to whom will it not be thought a needless thing to dispute the authority of its institution especially since we read this was done of the Church while the Apostles were alive For it is dangerous either to say or write that the Apostles in some things used a divine inspiration and in others their own prudence and that in those things which are found written If the Apostles in Scripture admonish Christians that they receive no opinion from those to whom they have given no Commandment Act. 15. 24. if they ordained in all Churches what they received from the Lord 1 Cor. 7. 7. if Christians must imitate the Apostles 2 Thes 3. 7. and withdraw themselves from every one that walketh not after the tradition received of the Apostles 2 Thes 3. 6. Surely it seems just to think that the Christian Church in all Nations would not yield to those that obtrude the Lords solemnity upon them unless they knew for certain that this burden was imposed on them of God by the Apostles Lastly if those things be to be done by the Church which it hath learned and heard of the Apostles Phil. 4. 9. why should it not keep holy the Lords Day since the Apostolical Church kept its meetings on that day and who will say that the Apostles do not command us to imitate them when in holy records their example is represented unto us And these are the things with which I am perswaded to believe that the Sabbaths festival by Divine authority which proceeded from God by the Apostles was translated to the Lords day for he onely who is Lord of the Sabbath can change the Sabbath day Mar. 2. 28. Besides this all men know that that is grounded on the word of God which is either expressed in so many words in Scripture or else by virtue of necessary consequence is drawn out from thence and in this later way the best of our Divines affirm that we meet with in Scripture the institution of the Lords day as at large and pithily the famous Mr. D. G. First saith he in the Old Testament a parallel precept occurrs as all know in the Decalogue from which any may know that it seemed just and good to the Divine Majesty to set apart a whole day of the seven for the worship of God Secondly Apostolical practice is a sign of Gods will in this business they observed this day and commended it to be observed by others and if their practice in this particular had been doubtful the perpetual and constant custome of the Church from the Apostles age which illustrates their practice in doubtfuls and confirms it in plain things doth most evidently demonstrate this For although we reject â—n vritten traditions yet may the inviolate custome of all Churches from the Apostles times interpret to us their writings If we could have the interpretation of some place of Paul allowed of in the judgment of all his auditors who would not prefer this far to the Commentaries of all others deeds do as well speak as sayings Since therefore we see this a confirmed practice of all Christians we should be too unjust and hard if we should deny our belief With these same arguments doth that famous and learned Divine teach the Church to defend the truth against its adversaries As in the point of Infant-baptisme we suppress the bawling Anabaptists with these weapons whom we cannot smite with clear testimonies First from a parallel precept about Circumcision Secondly Apostolical practice which since it is somewhat more dark we add the custome of the whole Church from the primitive and heroical times Which things although they will not move the obstinate Anabaptists yet will they prevail with prudent obedient and equal estimators of things The Church alwayes ordained that sacred Baptisme is not to be repeated touching which prohibition we meet with nothing in the sacred Records but because Circumcision into whose place Baptisme succeeded was not repeated because it 's agreeable with reason that regeneration no less than generation should be but once because in the Scriptures examples of once sprinkling only do occurr and lastly because the Orthodox Church of God hath hitherto abhorred Anabaptisme therefore all grant that Baptisme is not to be repeated I will add no more What hath been said declares to them that despise not truth that the Lord made the day on which the Stone which the builders refused was made the head stone of the corner that on it we should rejoyce But since it is not my purpose to handle any questions on this subject but leave them to others to be discussed I will return to my undertaken task namely to enumerate the testimonies of the ancients on this particular by which it will be made manifest that the Fathers were of no other mind because they contended that this day was religiously to be observed and fetch'd the Doctrine wherein they asserted this out of the holy Scriptures To the truth of which thing we will first bring Athanasius Homil. de semente In time past with the ancients the Sabbath was of great account which solemnity the Lord translated to the Lords day neither do we set light of the Sabbath by our selves Where first he with the finger points at the author of the Lords
rural works have been slain with Lightning others punished with contraction of their limbs others having their bodies and bones also consumed in an instant by visible fire and on a sudden resolved into ashes have died in great torment as many other terrible judgments have been and to this day are by which it is declared that God is offended at the dishonour of so great a day These tremendous judgments of God do shew that God the avenger of all sin is angry as the Fathers speak at the impious violators of this solemnity But if the holy festival of the Lords Day were not Gods own ordinance his severe anger would not be so hot upon those that are guilty of the violation thereof We therefore of right do esteem the Lords Day above other dayes and that by reason of its solemnity because it was by a positive determination of Christ by the Apostles set apart from other days in the week that it might supply the room of the ancient Sabbath that it might preserve Religion and the external Worship of God both publick lest the disorderly congregating of the people should diminish their faith in Christ and also private that all might be obliged to attend meditations and pious exercises on a certain stated day which otherwise would seldome or never be done by men attending on the world rather than God therefore is the Lords day ordained that they being at liberty from worldly things might give up themselves wholly to Divine matters Lastly It only remaineth that this question may sufficiently be satisfied Whether it be in the Churches power to abrogate the Lords Day and substitute another in its room Surely he that saith that so innocent a custome so long received of the Church and that through authority of God by the Apostles caught not to be troubled with a change seems to be in the right unless any think that now greater authority doth reside in the Church than the Apostles were endued with wherewith it being endued it can change those things which were ordained of the Apostles or unless some greater occasion than the Resurrection of Christ do occurr than which the world never saw a greater miracle And Chrysostom calls the Lords day or the first day of the week Hom. 2. Tom. 6. because of Christs Resurrection the birth day of the whole humane nature Lastly if the custome of the Church from which arguments are not once fetched by the Apostle as 1 Cor. 11. 26. grounded on the word of God be of any right amongst Christians I see not why the Lords Festival celebrared first by them of Hierusalem secondly by them of Troas thirdly by the Galatians and Corinthians fourthly by them of the Isles Rev. 1. fifthly by the Greeks and Latines and lastly by the whole Churh through the world professing Christs name I say why this innocent custome which is attended with no incommodity but much profit happily continued from the very Apostles age hitherto should not be by us derived to our posterity Whilst Julius blames the preposterous irruption of Georgius the Arrian into the Bishoprick of Athanasius he uses this argument It is not fitting that this new manner of canons should be brought into the Church for where is there such an Ecclesiastical Canon or such an Apostolical tradition so we say here It is by no means fitting that a new custome should be introduced against an innocent order so long received by the Church which is neither supported by the Canons of the Church or tradition received from the Apostles None in this found mind can grant that things ordained by the Apostles can be changed of the Church I confess all the ordinances of the Apostles were not of the same kind for some of them pertained to Doctrine some to rites as Wallaeus observes chap. 7. those are perpetual neither any wayes obnoxious to change he must be anathematized that preacheth any other Gospel than what we have received from the Apostles Gal. 1. 8. but these which respect the rites or circumstances of Divine worship are of a double nature for either their causes were singular and such as perpetually should not have place in the Church therefore these ordinances were to be varied because when the cause was taken away the ordinances themselves ceased but other ordinances respecting rites were not to be changed whose occasions perpetually continued in the Church such was the laying on of hands in the ordinations of Ministers and therefore when the causes of ordinances made by the Apostles are changed the ordinations themselves are to be changed but while the cause remains the ordinances also remain unmoved Which things being considered it 's easie to see that the ordinance about the Lords day is not to be varied because no greater cause than what it 's bottomed on can ever occurr for whose sake it should be changed neither hath the Church ever thus far since the Apostles age once attempted this Therefore the foresaid question is superfluous that I may say no worse and altogether unworthy a farther answer especially whenas we know that many priviledges necessary for a Church to be founded were granted by God to the Apostles which were not derived from them to the Doctors of the Church founded for they were personal and could not lawfully be challenged by others which is shewn more at large in the seventh chapter CHAP. XI In what things the sanctification of the Lords day doth consist Where about resting from gainful labours which the Fathers carefully cautioned against that they should not be used on that day A place of Chrysostom Gregory and the Council of Laodicea is explained also a Canon of the Council of Matiscon WE have seen by the judgment of the Fathers that the Lords Day is to be sanctified and that by Divine authority Now it remaineth which we undertook in the third place to be proved to find out in what the solemn observation thereof consisteth The Fathers think that to Christians the Lords day succeeded in place of the old Sabbath and therefore as Hilary speaketh is to be celebrated with the festivity of the Sabbath that is as August Serm. de Temp. 251. even as the ancients observed the Sabbath Now it appeareth by the Scriptures of the Old Testament that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath consisted first in the rest and secondly in the sanctification of this rest and in the observation of these things their records will inform us that the Lords day was solemnized by the ancients As for the rest the Church of Christ hath used it not as necessary of it self to the worship of God but only as an help thereto without which the worship commanded of God could not conveniently be performed of the people For while men are intangled in the affairs of this world they cannot religiously attend as is fitting on the things that pertain to God and his worship The Sabbath was not allowed for idleness but that men
of mind that the State of his Kingdom waxed worse and that he fought with unhappy success against the Goths the source of so great an evil being a little more deeply sought out he reproved the Bishops which sed not with Gospel Doctrines the people committed to them who by their profligate manners stirred up the wrath of a revenging God against him to prevent which evil for the future it was ordained in a Council That the Lords day should be kept religiously The pattern of this most Christian King while the victory in this our age inclineth to the enemies perswades us devoutly to keep the L. day solemnity for which we have â—ought unsuccessfully almost these twenty years against the enemies of our liberty that have roared in the Churches of God to our great sorrow When we count the causes of this will why should we not apply our minds with Gunther amnus to bewail the heynous violation of the Lords day and with the ancient Fathers who observed that the Lords day was not reverently kept ordained That first of all the Priests then Kings and Princes and all the Faithfull should chiefly see to it that the due observation and Religious Devotion of so great a Day now in so great a part neglected be hereafter for a sign of Christianity more devoutly exhibited and that the Christian Magistrates excellency be humbly desired of the Priests that in honour and reverence of so great a Day all may be put in fear that men presume not to keep markets do their own pleasure and works on this Holy and Venerable Day For when this solemnity is either taken away or neglected there is no more hopes of the other parts of Religion than there is of the bodies safety when the head is cut off Neither can there be used a more excellent remedy for curing the other malady than the holy observation of this Festival for the zeal of Religion waxing cold and purity of holy Doctrine being obscured what will be more fit to heal errours and stirr up the languishing strength of zeal than that an entire Worship be offered up both publickly and privately to God on this day while the holy Word of God is piously preached attentively heard the Sacred Mysteries devoutly and according to Christs institution celebrated Prayers poured into the hearts of the Faithful by the Holy Ghost are with all humility offered up to God Sacred Hymns sound in the Church with a godly joy the afflicted members of Christ and the poor provided for bountifully by the rich and those that are sound in mind do mercifully comfort them that are sorrowful These are those exercises of the Lords Day which will uphold Religion when it is falling which if they be religiously observed of the Church every one seeth how great an access will be made from thence to the Christian Religion which we all profess And these are the things Most Holy Church of Christ which in this elaborate Treatise I do not utter foolishly of my self but humbly offer all things to Thee as they are taken out of the Holy Scriptures where they afforded me any light in discussing of this dispute and the lights of purer Christianity not because as sometime Chrysostome Homil. post prioris exilii reditum Thou stand'st in need of my Doctrine which indeed I acknowledge to be but small but that I might testifie my good will to thee and that at length thy natural Sons to whom Religion is both their care and their pleasure may in some sort see what works they are to attend on that Day and from what to abstain and with what authority the institution of this solemnity is supported With Gods assistance I will briefly shew from the Holy Scriptures and Fathers of better credit asserting all these things Thou hast therefore most Beloved Mother the purpose of my mind in sending forth this little work Do thou then of thy humanity to thy friends pardon the mistakes how great soever they be in collecting these things and take in good part the slenderness of my wit which endeavoured according to its power to benefit chiefly thy natural sons that sojourn in Germany which I love upon many accounts This doth he humbly ask of thee Who loves Thee and Thine with a sincere Love in Christ Theophilus Philo-kuriaces Loncardiensis AN INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS BOOK 1. THe Preface in which first is propounded the Scope of this Treatise Secondly is shewn why we meet with more things about the duties of the Lords Day in the later than in the former Councils Thirdly how far the Church at this day may be obliged by the authorities of Provincial Councils that ordain these duties although some things of lesser value be put among their Canons Fol. 1. Chapter 1. That to the solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how they were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath day 1. Chap. 2. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. and Rev. 1 10. are briefly weighed 14. Chap. 3. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The antient Christians observed the Sabbath not as an holy day the differences between the observation of the Lords day and Sabbath How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords days anciently they bowed not the knee on the Lords Day 30. Chap. 4. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords day solemnity the authority whereof depends not upon the Emperours Constitutions When it was first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on the Lords day the Christians were punished for observing it VVhat it is Dominicum agere 52. Chap. 5. The reason of observing the Lords Day It 's called the first day of the week by the Evangelists and Fathers and the Lords day Sunday also and why the Sabbath and Christian Sabbath VVhy the Fathers used so seldome the name Sabbath VVhat Synaxis may signifie with the Ancients 66. Chap. 6. The whole Lords Day is to be sanctified to God and not onely some part thereof 77. Chap. 7. The ordinance of the Lords day is not properly to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church the things ordained by the Apostles are of Divine right 90. Chap. 8. In the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world This is affirmed by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath Mention of a seventh day observed amongst the Heathen The authorities are weighed wherein the observation
Gentes Parisiis 1605. Athanasius Graeco Latin ex officina Commetiana 1601. Athenaeus Lat. Lugduni 1583. Augustinus Basileae 1556. B Baronii Cardin. Annales Moguntiae 1691. Basilius Mag. Graece Basileae 1551. Basil Magn. Lat. Basileae 1565. Bellarmini Cardin. Controv. Coloniae 1620. Bernardus Antuerpiae 1616. Bibliotheca Patrum Parisiis 1614. C Canones Ecclesiae Afric per Justellum Parisiis 1614. Casauboni exercit in Baron Annal. Francof 1615. Centuriae Magdeburgicae Basilae 1624. Chrysostomus Graece Londini Chrysostomus Latine Basileae 1530. Clement Constitut Graeco-Latin Parisiis 1618. Clemens Alex. Graeco-Lat Lugduni 1616. Conciliorum Tomi per Severinum Binium Coloniae 1606. Corpus Juris civilis Genevae 1626. Cyprianus apud Joannem le Preux 1593. Cyrillus Alexandrinus Lat. Paris 1615. D Damascenus Graeco-Lat Paris 1575. Dionysius Areopagita Graeco-Lat Paris 1625. E Epiphanius Graece Basileae Epiphanius Latine Coloniae 1617. Eusebii hist Graeco-Lat Colo. Allobrogum 1612. Eusebius de praep Evangel Lat. Paris 1534. Examen Concil Trident. per Chemnit Francof 1599. F Flavius Josephus Lat. Colo. Agripin 1693. G Gratiani Corpus Jur. Canon Paris 1507. Greg. Nazianz. Graec. Basileae 1550. Greg. Nazianz. Lat. Basileae 1671. Greg. Nyssenus Lat. Basil 1571. Greg. Magnus Paris 1518. Galatinus apud haered Andreae Wecheli c. 1603. Gelasius de artis Concil Nicaeni Paris per Marcellum H Hieronymus Basiliae 1526. Hilarius Basileae 1560. Hist Ecclasiasticae Scriptores Graec-Lat Colo. Allobr 1612. Hist Ecclestiastica Tripart Parisiis 1574. I Ignatius Graeco-Lat Genevae 1623. Iâ—enaeus Basileae 1572. Isidori Pelus Epist Graeco-Lat Parisiis 1585. Isychius Parisiis 1584. L Lactantius Basileae 1563. M Macrobius Lugduni 1628. Minutii Felicis â—ctâ—avius Paris 1605. Mortonii Apologia Londini 1605. N Nicephori Historia Paris 1576. Nomocanon Phothii Paris 1615. O Origenes Basileae 1572. Optatus apud Commelinum 1599. P Philo Judae Graec-Lat Colo. Allobrogum 1613. Plutarchi vitae Lat. Basileae 1558. Plutarchi Moralia Lat. Basil 1570. Platina de R. Pontificum vitis Colon. 1600. Primafius in Epistolas Lugduni 1537. R Ruffinus Parisiis 1580. Rivetus in Decalogum Leidae T Tertullianus Antuerpiae 1584. Theodoret. Lat. Colon. Agripp 1527. Theodoreti Questiones Graece Paris 1558. Z Zonaras in Concilia Graeco-Lat Parisiis 1618. The Lords Day The first day of every week is to be sanctified in the exercises of Religion whose institution is Divine Sanctification consisteth in ceasing from worldly matters A. attending on Divine Worship B. A. Therefore not to be profaned by gainful labour or by Surfeiting Sports B. Here the duties of Religion are of right publick private C. in every Chur. meeting as namely the Ministry of the Word in and Prayer Singing Psalms Administration of the Sacraments reading expounding of Scripture C. When the faithful were dismissed from the publick Assembly in contemplating of the works of God Eternal Life or in meditating discoursing of what they had heard comforting the weaker relieving the poorer brethren A PREFACE TO THE READER In which is propounded first the scope of this Treatise Secondly is shewn why we meet with more things about the duties of the Lords Day in the latter than in former Councils Thirdly how far the Church at this day may be obliged by the authorities of Provincial Councils ordaining these dayes although some things of smaller value be put amongst their Canons THat old Serpent the perpetual hater of Divine truth and true piety hath busied himself to remove every stone since the first promulgation of the Holy Gospel that he might turn aside the minds of men bewitched with an impure hatred of light and godliness from a sincere love to the same Therefore having stirred up a terrible flame of persecution he hath sometimes disheartened the favourers of the Gospel from all affection to godliness by most crafty means to hinder the happy progress of Gods Word sometimes by the diligent care of pious Princes ihis unhappy flame of persecution being quenched he hath not feared either to set together by the ears the very Professors of Religion not attentively enough observing his tricks and snares or shamefully to alienate them mens minds being inclined to lust and a too great love of this present world from the holy practice of godliness and from all exercise of true Religion But this in vain For so long as a door is open to hear Gods Word at a time solemnly observed for the publick Worship of God and the private practice of Godliness not neglected through the Divine Providence it shall happen that maugre the enemies of the Gospel godliness shall flourish Faith shall abound and Charity the manifest token of Christs Disciples shall not wax cold and mens minds shall be stirred up with a greater desire of unfeigned love to the Gospel and the violent shall take the Kingdome of Heaven by force This thing that masked Serpent observeth with no small disdain whilst that he considers he is a falling like lightning from Heaven by the power of Apostolical preaching and upon that account by his Emissaries employes all his power that he might retard the course of preaching the Gospel Nor could he take a more ready way to promote this unhappy enterprize than either by utterly abolishing the time appointed from heaven for this work or by corruptly perverting the use thereof Which being once obliterated out of mens minds at length piety would decay and all care of Religion would lye extinct For it 's well enough known that the Professors of Christian Religion do there most endeavour after godliness and that Church by God is most abundantly adorned with all manner of gifts where with greatest reverence and strictest observation the Lords Day is wholly spent in Divine exercises For if the Lords Day be the Queen of Dayes that Church which gravely studieth the setting forth of this solemnity is deservedly to be reputed the Queen of Churches But the deadly enemies of piety with all their strength endeavour to relax the observation of the Lords day whereon they willingly suffer not themselves to be holden bound by the exercises of godliness and to extricate themselves from this burden thereby rovingly to give up themselves without check to impiety and idleness Wherefore Constantine the Great that most godly Emperour not ignorant of these mens temper when he determined with himself to obviate this evil and begun with greatest care to practise the true Religion of Christ and provoke his Subjects to observe it he made a law for a diligent observing the Lords solemnity as witnesseth Sozomen For since it 's the Churches part intermitting the affairs of this world to meet together for the exercises of piety such Conventions cannot fitly be holden without a certain and determinate time The time therefore destined for performing the the holy duties of Religion being abolished the minds of men will not be intent upon the offices of Religion Whence of necessity piety must fail and that being extinct what other thing can men expect but that a tempest of all evils should be ingruent
prophesie some things are revealed according to the Apostle whilst other sit by Yea men of every age studiously following after the known truth even while they diligently apply their ages to the study of the Scripture are blessed with a New-light of knowledge not observed by their Predecessors It sometimes also falleth out that some things may be revealed to men of inferiour condition which are hid to others of greater name and authority as may be seen in St. Paphnatius who being armed with the Divine authority of the Epistle to the Hebrews wherein it 's asserted that Marriage is honourable in all opposed in that famous Council of Nice the Bishops that ordained an excess of rigour or studiously endeavoured to prejudice the Church with an intolerable inconveniency of too severe a prescription yet all that famous convention of Holy Bishops Presbyters and Deacons yielded to Paphnatius his opinion Chrysostom gives leave to the weaker although the least to speak any thing that 's profitable even in the Church-assembly Moreover one and the same understanding at the same moment receiveth not all the sacred mysteries of Faith but the Holy Ghost the onely teacher of truth openeth to men their understanding at divers times And most commonly it happens that he that cannot have the first place for wisdome may have the second for modesty by retracting what he hath inconsiderately spoken Now as in the Expositions of other Scriptures there are more Masters when they judge diversly and contradictorily amongst themselves so it falleth out in the gloss of the foresaid Texts For some of them whereof the first and second do note that the offices of Religion are to be performed by the Christian Church on that day the third its name being supported by testimonies do piously and modestly defend the authority of the Lords day which others of them contend cannot be defended by those authorities The former of these opinions is more common and received of more both ancient and modern Divines Neither doth the latter want asserters of great authority in the Church Mr. Calvin of blessed memory in his Learned Commentaries so interprets that place Act. 20. 7. that it seems to bring little help to prove the Lords day solemnity Whose opinion I see divers do embrace whose temper I cannot enough wonder at in this because in this point they stifly-adhere to Learned Calvins opinion from which in other matters of Christian Faith they are altogether aliens and cry out that the vilest Comments of the Papists are far to be preferred to his elaborate Expositions which breath forth Piety and excellent Learning and whatever is approved by the judgment of that well exercised Divine Mr. Calvin they little esteem it and that because the most famous Calvin sometimes thought so Yet in this business they judge nothing ought to be approved but what forsooth seems good to Calvin When I consider these mens temper it comes into my mind what Theophilus sometime did to the Monks sirnamed Longi at whom he was displeased He conspired with the common sort of Monks who affirmed with Origen that God had an humane shape although he thought otherwise against those Friars Whence arose a great contention amongst the Monks who turned themselves to rail and not dispute So divers who matter not Mr. Calvins judgment do yet under a pretence of his authority studiously defend their own opinions to the end they might set by the ears those whom they observe to admire and love famous Calvin's judgment as reason requires in other things while some of them adhere to and others dissent from his opinion when yet in the mean time they value not Mr. Calvin a straw Whoever knows the Learned Calvin cannot but acknowledge him for a most stout maintainer of Gods truth by whose auspicious labours in this age through Gods mercy an admirable course hath been made to all excellency of Doctrine and Religion which might have perished had not he being stirred up by Gods grace as another Atlas upholden the ruinous affairs of the Church He was also a most earnest restorer of Christian liberty which with might and main pursued about the use of meats and dayes against the Papists and other adversaries of the truth And let none think it strange if upon the matter he find the same happen to him which does to the diligent Husbandman after that his good seed sprouts out in his field who perceiving Darnel and Tares while he goes about to root them out contrary to his purpose he plucks up some of the Wheat with the Tares Whilst that famous Divine observes the observation of the Jewish Sabbath to cease and that upon Apostolical authority he thought it congruous to truth to pronounce the Christian Church free from observing the Weekly Sabbath This opinion he manifested especially when he set himself against the unnecessary Festivals of the Papists from whose most grievous yoke he had an earnest desire to free the Church of Christ It will not be well taken for me to dissent from Calvin together with the Learned Beza Gallacius on Ex. 31. and Fajus Mr. Calvins most intimate Colleagues and other Divines of great name though it be done with never so great modesty and craving his pardon however I judge him worthy to be reckoned amongst our greatest Writers But I will come now to weigh the foresaid Texts whereof the first is in Act. 20. 7. where St. Luke sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Upon the first day of the week when the Disciples came together to break bread Paul preached unto them ready to depart on the morrow and continued his speech until midnight Where the Church-assembly is as they say painted to the life by all its circumstances and first from the time then from the duties performed of the Church in that assembly concerning all which a double question is moved of some that seek a knot in a bulrush In the one whereof what Luke means by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. the first day of the week in the other they discuss what must be understood by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. breaking of bread In describing the Church of Troas first the time is noted namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where some interpret it not for the first but one day of the week as if Luke had signified nothing else by that phrase than that they met on a certain day of the week when St. Paul was there They eat according to the Proverb with very tender jaws to whom these dainties relish But with their leave what they say cannot agree with the genuine sense of that place For in that place Sabbatum must needs be taken either for the whole week as the Hebrews usually speak or for the last day in the week We must not understand it here in the latter sense because the Apostle abode at Troas only seven dayes Act. 20. 6 and in that space only one Sabbath properly so
called did occurr therefore since he tarried there but only for one Sabbath it cannot be said he preached to them on one of the Sabbath◠neither is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as divers observe ever read in the New Testament for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It follows therefore from thence necessarily that Sabbatum should be taken for the whole week and then on one or the first of the Sabbaths will be all one In which sense that phrase occurrs else where as in Mar. 16. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. very early in the morning the first day of the week as in the ninth verse of the same chapter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there the Evangelist expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. one by the first And so the Greek Fathers next the Apostles times interpreted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr Dial. cum Tryph. sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. One of the Sabbaths remaining the first of all the dayes according to number the spaces of all the dayes being run again into a circle is called the eighth and remaineth the first as it is p. 201. Chrysoft Hom. 43. in Act. Apostol expounds one of the Sabbaths by the Lords Day So Hieronymus Nor otherwise Augustine Ep. 86. One of the Sabbaths sayes he was then called that day which now is called the Lords which is more plainly found in the Gospel Some also by breaking of bread understand a private banquet not the Lords Supper of which doubt this seems to be the cause In that age the Christians meeting in the Church did sup together and also received the H. Eucharist and so both tables the common and sacred were joyned together as Chrysostom teaches Hom. 26. in 1 Cor. Upon set dayes they made common tables and when the assembly was ended after communion of the Sacraments they went to eat and drink together And hence it was as Chrysostom thinks that they Acts 20. 7. met to break common bread because when the communion was celebrated the common table followed and Chrysostom affirms in the beginning of that Hom. that the day on which they met was the Lords and that all things that there were done were joyned to preaching But the breaking of bread in the foresaid place is to be expounded of the Holy Eucharist for there were sundry there and Paul took bread not at Supper time but mid-night In that Text therefore the duties of a Christian Sabbath such are an holy assembly breaking of bread or admistration of the Lords Supper preaching of the Word devout Prayers c. are read to be performed of the Church on that day which holy duties were not performed of them on another day otherwise Paul having stayed there the space of seven dayes could not have deserred them to this day especially when he was to depart the day following neither doth Luke affirm the Apostle to have proclaimed this meeting of the Church as extraordinary because he was to depart the day after but he teacheth that the Church met namely as it was wont to break bread and not to take leave of the Apostle and St. Augustine consesses that Pauls departure was the express cause of continuing his speech because he desired sufficiently to instruct them The received custome therefore of the Church and not the blessed Apostles departure from Troas gave occasion to this assembly For he stayed there seven dayes not so much for the Eucharist as waiting for the Lords Day Whence it appears that that Text shews that the Apostolical Church kept solemnly the Lords Day in the publick exercises of Religion But upon what authority the Christians met on that day we will afterwards examine here it 's enough for me only to demonstrate that they did meet on that day The second Text out of which the celebration of the Lords Day is shown is 1 Cor. 16. 1. 2. Now concerning the collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. upon the first day of the week c. The former place taught us that the Apostle Paul did celebrate the Lords Day with the Church this that he commands it to be celebrated by the Church And his practise is not here only recorded but here is mention made of his Apostolical ordination about that thing Where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be taken distributively for upon the first day of every week In which Apostolical command nothing is commanded the Church of Corinth which is not also required of the whole Church of Christ according to the golden rule of Tertullian very profitable for understanding of the Scripture Some things saith he uttered specially are to be understood generally which rule cannot but have place in this Text because what things the Apostle writ to the Church of Corinth the same belong to all that call upon the name of Christ in every place he himself being witness 1 Cor. 1. 2. Moreover who will deny that all who have given their name to Christ are bound to relieve their necessities For you must not think sayes Chrysostom that these things were written to the Corinthians alone but to every one of us and all that shall be after us Let us do therefore as Paul prescribes us and let every one of us lay by him at home on the Lords Day the Lords riches i. to be employed for such use as the Lord hath prescribed and hereupon let it become a low and immutable custome c. Therefore in Chrysostoms judgment the Apostle applies the manner of the Church in collecting almes on the Lords Dayes for the benefit of afflicted brethren which were then at Hierusalem which office of Christian Charity although no brethren liv'd in that place ought not to be omitted of Christians but in Chrysostoms opinion is to be established by an inviolable law for ever as it was done even as it appears by Justin Martyr and Tertullians Apologies in the succeeding Church I only add this Although a general law for making collections on that day to the use of the poor be set down by the Apostle yet they that at this day do it at other times must not be judged transgressors of the Apostles law That kind of collection was not so affixed to the Lords Day as it could not be done on other dayes although a peculiar reason was in it why they did rather on that than another day namely for the Church-assemblies held at that time and no time as Chrysostom witnesseth which we shall see afterwards is more fit to perform that office on than the Lords Day Others again set to another Engine by which they oppose the usual interpretation of the Apostles foresaid phrase and contend that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie every day of the week singulam Sabbatum This they assert not because it 's the probable construction of the Apostles words but that they might
They of Asia contend it must be celebrated on the fourteenth day they of the West on the Lords day only and which is more those acknowledge their opinion received by tradition from John these from Peter and Paul This controversie Eusebius Hist l. 5. explains more at large Who therefore can be brought to believe if the festivity of the Passover was ordained by the Apostles authority that so soon divers Churches that were governed of the very Apostles Scholars would make a departure from so holy a precept and that in celebrating the Lords day all the Churches of Christ through the whole world should follow one and the same rule Why had they not also done the like in the Feast of the Passover if it had been instituted by Apostolical authority It is not likely therefore it was ordained of the Apostles And yet I cannot but wonder at the wit of some men who hold the Passovers festivity which the Scriptures are silent in for divine and yet they repute the Lords day whose observation we meet with in Scripture for Ecclesiastical and humane If therefore the Passovers festivity was instituted of the Apostles no man can justly prefer it to the Lords day ordained of Christ by his Apostles Nor must we judge otherwise of the Feast of the happy Nativity of Christ whose solemnity was anniversary but on what day of the year to be celebrated it 's uncertain Chrysostom although he conjectures Christ was born on the eighth before the Calends of January in December recites divers opinions about this matter but follows his own opinion without condemning of others and permits every one to abound in his own sense till such time as the Lord shall reveal to every one of us what must be holden for certain St. Hierom if so be that Sermon de Nativitate Domini which goes commonly under his name be Hieroms saith Whether the Lord Jesus was born to day or baptized to day a different opinion is carried about in the world and according to the variety of traditions is the sentence diverse In this authors judgement whoever he was it was uncertain what day the blessed Nativity of Christ fell out on The Learned Casaubon Exercit. ad apparat Bar. annal num 68. tells us there were of old divers opinions in the Church about Christs Nativity Some writing that he was born on the sixth of January others on the nineteenth of April others on the nineteenth of May some in the month of September most on the twenty fifth of December Now these divers opinions about these feasts which are taken for chief ones do teach us that they were ordained by no law of the Apostles otherwise in their writings without doubt we should have met with a direct assigning of the time to be set aside for keeping them in Memory as it is observed of the Lords day which yet it 's plain no where can be found Moreover if their ordination had been derived from the Apostles they had either all been equal among themselves or it had been known some way to the Church which amongst them had been of greater authority and right But the contrary appeareth from the most grave Fathers which differ from one another about this thing and therefore one is sometimes preferred before another of them Chrysostom calls the Feast of Christs Nativity the Mother of all Feasts Orat. de Philognio Gregory Nyssen calls it the holy of holies and feast of feasts Gregory Nazianzen judgeth it to be preferred far before all others that are Christs and are celebrated in honour of him Since therefore it is not agreed on amongst the Fathers of the Church of the first institution of these Festivals and their prerogatives none will doubt that their institution was not received from the Apostles Which things being supposed it can be inferred by no necessary consequence that these are to be compared much less to be preferred to the Lords day From all which it appeareth that the observation of the Lords day was far different from that of the Sabbath and other dayes because the Sabbath day amongst Christians had on it no cessation from worldly labours neither was it observed with such solemnity of the whole Church as was the Lords day yea the Sabbath is not read to be observed of the whole Church whenas yet the premises do evince that the Lords day was ever solemnized from the very Apostles age in the Church dispersed through all Nations and we have observed that other Festivals of Christs are not to be compared with much less to be equallized or preferred to the Lords Day CHAP. IV. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords Day its authority depends not on the Constitutions of Emperours when it was at first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on that day the Christians were punished for observing it What it is Dominicum agere BEtter to manifest the celebrity of the Lords Festival I will moreover bend my mind to two things by which in the first place I will demonstrate that the Lords Day all along in the Church from the very Apostles age was consecrated to perform religious exercises on Secondly that on all that day the Church was wont to be vacant from all worldly matters which two things will clearly enough shew its solemnity above all other dayes to which these things agree not amongst men that relish the truth In demonstrating the fiâ—st of these we will prove that the Lords day was alwayes celebrated and will briefly open both the reasons of its solemnity and its names which we meet with amongst the ancients Let it be sufficient to illustrate the first that there is none of any note in the ancient Church who doth not give an ample testimony to this its solemnity Amongst the renowned witnesses of this truth let St. Ignatius come forth who thus charges us Let every lover of Christ celebrate the Lords day which was consecrated to the Lords Resurrection as the Qneen and Prince i. the chief day as Constantine the Great in Euseb de vit ejus lib. 4. cap. 18. of all other dayes Justin Martyr in the end of his second Apology confesseth that on that day which they call Sunday were holden solemn assemblies of all that lived both in villages and cities and he tells us more at large what was done in those assemblies of which afterwards we shall hear more Dionysius Bishop of Corinth when he mentions Clements Epistle to the Corinthians in Eusebius saith he kept holy the Lords day Tertullian reckoneth the Lords day which he calls the eighth namely from the Creation amongst the Christians solemnities The same doth Origen although otherwise he was not at one with himself about the times for performing Religious exercises lib. 8. contra Celsum Eusebius when he speaks of the Ebionites whom he reports did observe the Lords dayes after the same
manner as the Church did in remembrance of the Lords Resurrection doth make mention of this day whence it is collected that the Church did celebrate the Lords day otherwise Eusebius had not affirmed that the Ebionites had done it after the same manner as the Church did And the testimonies which follow teach us the same Cyprian mentions this day which he calls the first after the Sabbath Basilius M. saith the Church standing up made their supplications on the first day of the week which he calls the beginning of dayes De Sp. Sanct. c. 27. Chrysostom saith on the first day of the week or the Lords day the Christians ceased from all labour that by their relaxation and holy dayes the minds of the offerers might become more cheerful Ambrose on the Lords day after the readings and treating of the Creed communicated Baptism to the Competentes i. to those who being instructed in the Christian faith sought Baptism Aug. Retract lib. 1. ch 17. libro de Fide operibus cap. 6. at the Fonts of the Church We meet with frequent mention of this day in St. Austin Ep. 119. c. 13. and in the end of those Books De Civit. Dei lib. 22. c. 30. also Serm. 15. de verbis Apostoli and many times elsewhere Hilary saith the Church doth joyfully celebrate a Festival on the eighth day which is also it self the first of a perfect week Prol. in Psalmos Amongst the Holy-dayes confirmed by the laws of the Emperours Valens Theodosius and Arcadius the Sundayes which their Ancestors rightly called the Lords-dayes were reckoned Leo also and Athenius ordain the Lords day to be alwayes venerable and honoured a Leo in the same place by his eleventh law ordains that all should cease from their labours on the Lords dayes I can also bring forth many more testimonies for confirming the truth of this solemnity yea of all that have flourish'd in the Church of Christ to this very day But I will add no more lest I should seem to lend light to the Sun and those that have been cited hitherto do abundantly enough declare that the Lords day was alwayes solemnly kept of the Church because the holy Fathers acknowledge it for the chief yea for an holy day On it the Church ceased from their labours on it solemn assemblies were kept or they rejoyced in the festival of the Sabbath perfected on it the Scriptures were handled the Sacraments were administred on it the Church made supplications and therefore it is numbred amongst the chief solemnities of the Christians and is provided for by the laws of godly Emperours that studied all they could to promote the Worship of God that the holy solemnity of that day should not be defiled by labours or any pleasures But although those most Religious Emperours ordained the Lords day as was fitting to be celebrated it would be ridiculous from thence to conclude that the Lords Festival was not celebrated in the Church before they came to the Empire The Christians as hath appeared from the premises attended to celebrate this Festival when as yet there were no Magistrates Christian on whose authority the ordination of the Lords day doth not depend even over the whole world when the preaching of the Gospel came For which cause as we shall by and by hear divers under Dioclesians Reign were punished But when the Emperours became Christian they ordained that the solemnity which was before observed of the Christians by Christs authority should also by their own laws be celebrated and took care that others should not defile it by worldly businesses or the pleasures of the Flesh but they did not institute it at the first Constantine the Great the first of the Christian Emperours having got the whole Roman Empire by publick Edict commanded his Subjects that they should observe the Christian Religion as witnesseth Sozomen yet no man well in his wits will thence inseâ—r that the Christian Religion was then first known to the world although the free exercise of it was not safe before he was set happily over the Government of the Empire So must we think of the Lords solemnity which the Church of God observed not without great danger before the Emperours embraced the Christian Faith but after that the Emperours became nursing-fathers of the Christian Religion they did it freely a Law being made of the Emperours for this end Moreover let none be offended that before the times of Constantine publick Judges did attend the hearing of Law-suits on the Lords day which to do was declared unlawful in his Reign as though if the Lords day had been formerly known to the World Magistrates had been forbidden the exercise of publick judicatures on that day that most godly Emperour greatly contended by all means that he could to promote our Religion and for the greater solemnity of this Festival provided that all Court clamour should on that day cease Before his most auspicious Government the publick Magistrates did attend Judicatures even on the Lords day and no wonder for before he got the stern of Government the Judges were not Christian but under his Reign the Christians began to bear almost all the Offices of the Roman Empire most whereof he dignified with authority some with the Senators office many also with the Consular dignity But after the Judges embraced the Christian truth they submitted themselves to this law of celebrating the Lords day with greatest good will and did rest the parties from their controversies in honour of that day I might also add this It was needful that one law being made for observing the Lords day by another he should interdict the Judges from the cognizance of causes on that day For it was provided by the Roman Laws That no Judge should presume on his own authority to make any holy dayes He therefore made this Law in favour of the Judges who might know on what dayes they should attend the Office which the Emperour committed to them and on what they should keep holy dayes free from the same These things thus being weighed in an equal scale it appeareth that the Law for not hearing Law-suits on the Lords day doth detract nothing from the honour of its solemnity but rather much conduce to favour it That I may at length put an end to this Chapter We have seen how the Fathers have piously admonished the Church to celebrate the Lords day and the Emperours by their Laws made for this purpose very carefully provided that the Christian people should obey their admonitions so also we may find it observable from the Writers of those times that the Christians did celebrate this day's solemnity with as much devotion of Religion as they could and therefore while they prayed on that day towards the East they fell into a suspicion of worshipping the Sun with the Heathen amongst whom they lived that hated the Christian name Yet could they by
nata have so named that day but when they speak of it properly then they call it the Lords day which cannot but appear to him that vieweth their writings And thus far of the reason of observing this solemnity and of its names CHAP. VI. The whole Lords day is to be sanctified to God and not onely some part of it THus far these notes although scribled with an hasty pen have told us that Christians must keep holy the Lords day and that they largely enough shew was done from the very Apostles age The second Question which I have propounded follows namely Whether the Church must keep the whole Lords day holy Some there are who grant that the Lords day must be sanctified yet contend that the whole and entire day is not to be celebrated in the religious devotion of Piety in whose judgment as much as this solemnity requires is done if onely some although but some small part thereof be dedicated to Divine Worship neither do they judge otherwise of the Lords day alwayes to be counted dear amongst Christians than the Heathens anciently did of those dayes amongst them called intercisi which were common to the Gods and men for at some hours of them it was lawful to sit in judgement and in some not But who well in his wits shall judge that a day in this manner is to be dedicated to the Good and Great God The Lord hath not reckoned the other dayes of the week thus for our use neither will he suffer willingly his day to be sanctified of us by halves It was provided under the Law that if any had by vow consecrated a thing to God and he afterwards repented of his vow and would not suffer that thing to be sold or prized openly but determined to keep it to himself then was he to be fined in a fifth part over and besides the ordinary estimation of the thing for his levities sake If nothing must be diminished of those things that are dedicated to God although once they were in our own power much less will it be safe to detract any thing from the time consecrated to God but rather add something to it of our own for what is consecrated to God must not be be converted to another use Therefore they that compare the Jews inhabiting Tiberias with others that dwell in the Mountains do judge those and deservedly far to be preferred to these for it was a familiar thing with them who had the shorter day to add something of the profane to the sacred but these that were sited in the Mountains who had the longer day added to the profane taking something from the sacred If it be better in those mens judgment to add of the profane to the sacred than to take from the sacred and add to the profane in what case are they to be reckoned who are not afraid to steal a great part of time from the Lords day consecrated of the Lord by his Apostles to sacred uses and apply it to profane Yet although some here impatient of true Piety do seek a knot in a bulrush as the Proverb is yet by these mens leave I will say He that will follow the wholsome counsel of Irenaeus shall indeed find it is no Gordian Knot Irenaeus gives pious counsel in any question when a disputation doth arise we must have recourse to the most ancient Churches from whom may be learned what we must judge of the present question Indeed if we would but here follow the advice of this Reverend Prelate it will be an easie thing to untie that knot by the authorities of the ancients In the first place when the Fathers speak of sanctifying a day they make mention not of some small portion thereof but of a whole day and to what end should not a day consist of the same termes with us as it did with the ancients Since Austin piously teacheth us that in the equality of all modern years and dayes which have terminated in the same space of time in former ages as have now being determined within the diurnal and nocturnal course of twenty four hours there is the same space of time with the former And for what he addeth of the forty dayes whereon continual great rain is mentioned which were not determined in the space of two hours or little more the same we may safely conclude of the Sanctification of the Lords day since it consists of the same term of hours that other dayes in the week do the manner of its solemnity is not to be judged by the space of two or three houres Nor doth Austin think otherwise if that Sermon may be reckoned among his genuine writings who judgeth that on the Lords dayes we must attend Divine worship only and exhorts to celebrate the Lords day with a religious solemnity as the ancients were commanded about the Sabbath yea and not without indignation doth he reprove those that refused to follow the custom of the Church in this thing who as he speaketh reckon one point of this day to the service of God and the remaining space of the day together with the night to their pleasures According to the grave judgment of this Author whoever he was the entire day and not some small part of it is to be assigned to the service of God and that according to the custom of the Church and though he differ from some others in defining the period of time at which the sanctification of this day should begin namely from Evening yet hath he others agreeing with him in the continuance of this sanctification for before him Origen upbraids some that reckoned one or two hours of the whole day to God and came to Church to Prayer or heard the word of God in transitu but spent their chief care about this world and their belly The same thing doth St. Chrysostom require who thinks that the whole day must be sanctified I think saith he that one of these seven dayes and that of right is to be spent in the worship and service of the God of us all Hom. 3. in Joh. Chrysostom shews that a day must be sanctified and he his own best interpreter will teach us what he understands by the name of a day From the beginning sayes he God insinuated this Doctrine to us teaching us that in the compass of a week one whole day is to be set apart and reserved for our spiritual work Hom. 10. in Genes From his authority it also appeareth that a whole day and not some small portion thereof is to be set apart from other affairs to perform the duties of piety thereon in a spiritual manner The same author more plainly doth seriously contend with his Auditors in another place for sanctifying the whole day Hom. 5. in Math. The Sabbaths according to Irenaeus did teach persevering to serve God the whole day what other thing doth perseverantiam totius diei mean but that a
living it must altogether be ascribed to them as the first founders of the Church Moreover if it should be granted that this solemnity was instituted of the Apostles others ask Whether therefore doth this Ordination lean upon a Divine right We passing by this rather curious than sound Disputation Whether the Ordinance of the Lords day be an institution of God or his Apostles discussed by some doltish and drowsie men do acknowledge with all willingness as the ancients did that it was introduced by Divine authority And although its authority should be granted to be of Apostolical institution it would not thence follow that it is not Divine unless something be ordained in the Church by the Apostles which the Holy Ghost did not inspire them with which will not easily be admitted of any that is in his senses because the postles in all matters delivered those things to the Churches which they received from Christ as St. Paul witnesseth 1 Cor. 11. 23. and according to Christs precept taught men that embraced the Gospel to observe those things which Christ had commanded them Matth. 28. 20. So judgeth Tertullian The Apostles saith he chose nothing which they brought in at their own pleasure but faithfully appointed to the nations that discipline they received from Christ. And why should I believe that the Apostles were less acted with the Divine Spirit in their Sacred Institutions which they imposed upon the Churches than in promulgating the Doctrine of the Gospel For there is nothing Apostolical done by a right that is not Apostolical i. e. Divine and nothing done by them but the Holy Ghost endites it to them and therefore what they did they did by Divine right and that their facts which are certain and not onely their saying or writings are of Divine right cannot be denied The Apostle shews it necessary that he that is a Prophet or spiritual man must acknowledge that they are the Lords Precepts which he hath written to the Churches 2 Cor. 14. 37. Surely nothing was enjoyned the Church by the Apostles which was not first prescribed by the Lord because the Apostles were to teach what they learned of Christ which thing they performed with great faithfulness neither will any one who savours the things of the spirit deny this and yet I acknowledge that some things were instituted of them for a time inasmuch as whose occasions were singular and not to be continued wherefore those ordinations were mutable which yet cannot be affirmed of the Lords Day If there be any of the Fathers therefore who think that the institution of the Lords day was made by the Apostles they are not so to be understood as if they acknowledged it not for Divine but Humane because the same Fathers elsewhere are not affraid to ascribe it to God and Christ and they acknowledge that the blessed Apostles were not the authors of this solemnity but the Holy Ghosts amanuenses i. e. as Leo interprets it who writ their Decrees by virtue of a Divine authority in propounding it to the Church For which cause the most pious Leo hath ordained abstinence from labours on the Lords Day because this seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted thereby and confesseth that that day was abundantly honoured by the Lord. The Lords Day therefore was instituted of the Apostles as the faithful Architects of the Christian Church by extraordinary power which continues not now in the Church and by inspiration of the Holy Ghost that Christians might be obliged not by Humane but by Divine authority to keep holy Convocations and to celebrate the private exercises of godliness on that day Apostolical grace saith Ambrose hath raised up the dead which although it was not the grace of the Apostles but of Christ as the Apostles themselves confess Acts 3. 12. 16. is called Apostolical because it was poured out upon them and by his help they raised up the dead So here the Lords day is called an Apostolical Institution not because it is a mere ordinance of the Apostles as they were Christians but because it was instituted of Christ by those who were endowed with extraordinary power But as I have said this is the onely thing that vexes them that call in question the authority of this institution that there is no place extant in Scripture in which by Divine authority the solemn observation of this day seems to be enjoyned These are men of subtil wits who as the Proverb goes cannot see the wood for trees Whose opinion when I consider that in the Author Oper. Imperf in Matthae comes into my mind where the Priests of old that rail'd upon the people that paid not their tythes are sharply reproved for not reproving those that sinned against God If any of the people faith he offer not his tithes the Priests did so reprove him as if he had committed some great fault because he had not offered the tenth part of any thing though never so little but if any of the people had sinned against God or injured any one or done any such thing none cared for reproving him as though he had committed no fault who had sinned against God and very careful they were of their own gain but careless of the glory of God and salvation of men Whose fault in this thing he accommodates to the Bishops Elders and Deacons of the Church as guilty of this crime Even so must we judge of these men With what heat of mind and earnestness do the very authors of this doubt contend for tythes which they cry out that the Lord hath indulged to the Church under the Gospel by a Divine right whenas yet they cannot produce one plain testimony out of the New Testament for their bestowing on the Ministers of the Gospel but about the Lords Day whose being observed more than once by the Christian Church is plain enough in the Scriptures their faith is wavering nor can they be perswaded to believe that its authority can be demonstrated out of the Word of God Let others judge whether they be worthy Tenths who deny Sevenths if I may say so to God But for their sakes admitting the Law about Tythes I would ask this Whether it 's likely that the most good great and wise God who hath put the seasons of times in his own power Act. 1. 7. would determine any thing certain of a Salary to be bestowed on the administrators of his Worship when yet he left nothing certain in the Church of the time in which his worship should be performed It 's a wise mans part first to determine the work and a fit time to do it in and then the wages where with they that under went it are to be rewarded The Parable Math. 20. relates how the housholder hired Labourers but first he signified what he would have them do and then he agreed with them for a penny a day If therefore they assert that Tythes are allowed
by God for the use of the Ministers of the Church they must of necessity grant that God hath appointed a time in which they must attend his worship to whom in their opinion he hath granted Tythes because it is the same authority that must both define the Worship and a fit time for performing of that Worship Now for establishing the Divine institution of this day we must not have recourse to that spurious scroul that as it 's reported in the third tome of Councils was sent down from Heaven to Hierusalem because that what things the Holy Ghost hath revealed to us in Scripture they do demonstrate it to all to be Divine of those that embrace the truth and for the fabulous fooleries about this matter we leave them to the Papists whose Kingdome had long since fallen without their support and we will briefly according to our manner examine what light may be brought out of the New Testament to manifest the truth in this matter Here three things come to be examined First Whether in the compass of every week must the Church keep holy a certain day by Gods institution Secondly Whether the Jewish Sabbath be abrogated Thirdly What can be brought out of the books of the New Testament to confirm the keeping holy the first day in the week The first of these is more obscure the other two may plainly enough be observed out of the Holy Scriptures and Fathers and one of them depends upon another Of the last many things have been observed out of the Scriptures in our second third c. Chapters but the truth about the two former Questions being made manifest by the testimonies of the ancients it will appear with little ado what is to be enquired into in the third place CHAP. VIII Within the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world this is affirmed both by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath The mention of observing the seventh day amongst the Heathens The authorities are weighed wherein the observation of the Sabbath among the Patriarchs is denied Why the Heathens are not upbraided with the abuse of the Sabbath AS to the first Question namely That in the compass of seven dayes one is to be set apart for spiritual operation as saith Chrysostom why should I fear to affirm it Especially since this opinion is approved by the suffrage of the greatest Divines and clearly enough taught by the manifest testimonies of the ancients We shall see that the Church of God since the History of the Creation was known did alwaies set apart one day of the weekly systeme for his worship the verity of which thing may be observed in the three Epocha's or junctures of years the first whereof is from the Creation to Moses the second from Moses till the Gospel was preached by the Apostles the third follows to be considered from that time till the end of the world in all which we shall find that one of the seven was alwayes set apart for the publick worshipping of God We read it was so done from the beginning of the world till Moses from Moses till the Resurrection of Christ from thence to this very day The controversie at this day is chiefly about the first and last Epocha none doubts of the second In demonstrating the first that the Sabbath was observed before Moses yea from the first beginning of the world both the Holy Scriptures and the Reverend Fathers their faithful Interpreters do attest it to prove the truth whereof we will first bring the authority of Moses which is had Gen. 2. 2 3. of which places divers have given the genuine sense and especially the Learned Rivet in Gen. and doth Orthodoxly enough defend his Exposition against those that think otherwise in his dissertation de Sabbato chap. 2. and removes a Prolepsis that is devised by the modern in commenting upon Moses's Text for Moses in the foresaid place doth not relate what God did when he writ the History of the Creation but what God did after that the stupendious work of Creation was finished namely that he ceased from creating any new work and ordained by a Law promulgated that the seventh day should be set apart by men to his worship in memorial of the Creation This is related by Moses Neither was that fore mentioned prolepsis which the best amongst the Christians allow not known to the Jews And if we follow the simple and literal sense of Moses his words they all make for us For how unjust is it when all the Verbs are of the same Mood and Tense Vajecol Vaijsboth Vajebarech and be finished and ceased and blessed to restrain the two former to the present and to extend the latter as some do to a time to come two thousand years after this would be too harsh a construction of the words But let us see how the Jews understood this place Tertullian tells us of them that they affirm that God from the beginning did sanctifie the seventh day by resting on it from all the works that he made and thereupon Moses said to the People Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day c. Where Tertullian delivers the Jews opinion of the Sabbaths observation from the beginning of the world and then he affirms that according to the Jews the Command in the Decalogue for keeping it respects the original observation of the Sabbath namely because God at the Creation sanctified the seventh day This was the opinion retained amongst the Jews in Tertullians age which he produces when he disputes against them and no where doth Tertullian deny that the seventh day was sanctified from the beginning Neither do the Jews themselves deny this The title of Ps 92. apud Jonath who translated the Bible into the Chaldee is thus A Praise and Song which the first man spoke for the Sabbath day From which inscription it appears that the ancient Jews even before the first coming of Christ thought that Adam observed the Sabbath For. Jonathan lived according to Galatinus forty two years before Christs Nativity Josephus a very learned Jew acknowledgeth that God rested on the seventh day and ceased from his works and for that cause do the Jews celebrate a vacation on this day which they call the Sabbath Josephus therefore confesses that the Jews ceased from their works on the Sabbath because the Lord ceased from the Creation on the seventh day Of the same opinion is Philo the Apostles contemporary After saith he that nature was perfected in six dayes the Father added honour to the seventh day following which when he praised he vouchsafed to call it holy Also de vita Mosis lib. 3. he confesses that the Sabbath day had a priviledge by nature since the birth day of the world And a little before in the same book he saith Moses thought it sitting that all those who were enrolled in this City should following the law of Nature
Festival namely Christ whom he tells us translated the Sabbath day into the Lords and then denies that the Church of her self or by her own authority did ordain that translation for saith he we set not light by the Sabbath of our selves Therefore Athanasius being Judge it appears that the Church doth not of her self but by the authority of Christ whereby the Lords day was ordained observe its solemnity and honour it as he else where speaketh And let it move no body that while he expresseth the honour wherewith the Church honoureth it he doth not speak in that manner of its institution as of the Sabbath of which when he speaks he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as God hath commanded but when he mentions the Lords day he only saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we hnour the Lords day Nor doth he say that this honour is given of the Church to the Lords day by authority of any Divine precept Let this I say move no body as if Athanasius had acknowledged the institution of this solemnity to be received from the Churches ordination and not Christs for if this grave Prelate had so meant it he would have contradicted himself as appeareth out of the place forecited Homil de sement in which he plainly acknowledgeth not the Church but the Lord to be the author of the Lords day neither can any thing else be inferred from that later phrase which Athanasius useth When Subjects do openly profess that they with all honour do honour their own Kings and Magistrates shall not I therefore conclude that they are not obliged by Divine authority to this duty No verily but the Subjects perform this to their Princes with a most ready will because by Divine Law and authority they are bound to perform this duty So Christians honour the Lords day because the Divine institution of this Festival by Christ which Athanasius makes mention of in the same place requires this by right of them Chrysostom in the often fore-cited place acknowledges God to be the author of instituting one day in the week to be set apart for spiritual work When Eusebius gathers divers arguments to demonstrate the Divine power of Christ above all the Heroes of the Heathens amongst the rest he adds this Who saith he meaning what God of the Heathen or Heroes hath prescribed to all the inhabitants of the whole world whether they be on land or sea that meeting weekly on one day they should celebrate the Lords Festival and ordain that as they fed their bodies with food so they should refresh their Souls with divine instructions Therefore in Eusebius's judgment the solemnity of this day is ascribed to Christs institution And Leo acknowledges this solemnity to be received from the Holy Ghost and Apostles ordained by him Augustine confesses that the Lords day was consecrated by Christs Resurrection where he intimateth that the Church did not only take occasion from the Resurrection of Christ to celebrate this solemnity on that day but that the very Resurrection of Christ did administer it unto Christians and if the Resurrection of Christ hath consecrated the Lords day which he confesses as well in this place as elsewhere Serm. 15. de verbis Apostoli then Christ and no other is to be reputed for the author of its institution for his Resurrection hath consecrated that day and since that time he began to have his festival Moreover if Augustine had not believed that God was the author of this Festival by what right could he have derided Urbicus speaking after this manner as if there were one Lord of the Sabbath and another of the Lords day if he had not esteemed him for the author of the Lords day who was author of the Sabbath the contrary whereof he thought Urbicus judged Augustine would never have blamed him for that which yet the premises do testifie he did And he that shall look over that Epistle shall see that he in round words doth acknowledge that there is one Lord of the Sabbath and Lords day pag. 389. He adds It was made the Lords Day through Christ pag. 383. And while that Learned Father renders a reason why it is called the Lords day he assigns this because saith he the Lord made it And how since he is the author of all dayes yet may be said especially to make that we have before chap. 4. out of Augustin himself explained And after Augustin the Fathers in Concil Forojubensi have also explained this The Lord hath sanctified it by the glorious Resurrection of Jesus Christ What needs more It 's enough to point at briefly the Divine institution of this day and these things manifest enough do suffice in a matter smelling of Piety Therefore as Basil the Great sometime concluded his Sermon of the perpetual virginity of the blessed Virgin These reasons saith he we think are sufficient because Christian ears cannot endure the contrary so also we being content with these testimonies which although few in number are yet we trust of great authority with equal estimators of things we will add no more And though many badges of this day have thus far been observed as that Christ rose again on that day Luke 24. 6. on that oftener than once he appeared to his Disciples Joh. 20. 19 26. on that day the Apostles taught and administred the Sacraments Act. 20. 7. on that day John received a Divine Revelation Rev. 1. 10. I could also reckon up others mentioned by divers as on this day the world received its beginning on this by the Resurrection of Christ both death received its destruction and life its beginning on this the Apostles took up thetrumpet of the Gospel to preach to all nations on this lastly the Holy Ghost came down from the Lord on the Apostles More badges are also extant in Austin of the Lords Day Serm. 154. de Tempore And others relate that other Miracles were done on that day These are indeed great badges but because amongst certain some of these are reckoned for uncertain they are not proper enough in their judgment to demonstrate the truth only whereas at every perfect period of time the very Heathens do testifie that certain festival dayes were to be celebrated for some eminent benefits of God conserred upon us and when any thing eminent was ordained of God it was done in honour of this day the reason of whose observation arises not from the foresaid prerogatives but is founded in the authority of God the institutor I am more easily induced to believe with the ancients its solemnity was instituted of God Here I could out of the Fathers tell you the punishments of some that violated the solemnity of the Lords Day In Concil Parisiensi so we read Many of us by the sight of our own countrey men and many of us by the relation of others have been informed that certain men exercising on this day their
no weight and in very deed is foolish since not the diligence of husbandry but the virtue of the Sun when it seems good to the bestower of fruits doth afford the abundance of fruits because I say such a law is come forth as vilisies the Lords worship and is a decree differing from those that by the Holy Ghost have gotten the victory against all their adversaries we ordain also which seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted of him that all persons cease from labour that day whereon our innocency was restored he speaks of the Lords day and let neither husbandmen nor any others go about any unlawful work on that day For if they who observed but a certain shadow and figure did so greatly reverence the Sabbath day that they wholly abstained from all labour how is it not reasonable for those who honour the light of grace and the truth it self to reverence that day which is of God enriched with honour and on which deliverance from shameful destruction was wrought for us Thus Leo Novel 54. Leon. And so according to that common Proverb The later day is scholar to the former what by too much facility which suited not with the Lords solemnity was formerly granted by them that followed who saw the inconvenience of the former liberty was afterwards amended In divers Councils also it was ordained that no rural labours should be exercised on that day as about the year 413. in one and the same year all servile and rural labours and markets are forbidden Concil Aceratensi 14. Can. 16. in Turonensi Can. 40. in Moguntino Can. 37. in Rhemensi Can. 35. in Conc. Aurelianensi 3. where they think fit to determine of rural work that is concerning husbandry or the vineyard or pruning or reaping winnowing or cutting hedge that coming to the Church they moght more easily attend upon prayer Can. 27. Also in Conc. Narbonensi cap. 4. it 's ordained that they should not yoke oxen In Concil Antisiodorensi Can. 16. It is not lawful to yoke oxen on the Lords day or to exercise other labours Also in Concil Calibonensi Can. 18. We define that none at all presume to work any rural labours on the Lords day that is to plow to reap make sale or any thing that pertains to husbandry But although these things do very abundantly shew that on the Lords dayes we are not to employ our work for gainful labour since as well they were to be punished by the supreme authority of the Prince as by the censure of the Church who did the contrary yet there are some who having no respect either to the worship of God or to the promoting mens salvation do affirm that Christians may on the Lords day safely attend any labours when the duties of the publick service are ended to establish which opinion they first wrest the authority of Hierom and them of the third Council of Orleans Hierom. in Epitaphio Paulae ad Eustochium tells us that the women returning from the Church on the Lords day with Paula were busie about their task and either made clothes for themselves or others In the Council of Orleans they determine that on the Lords day that to be lawful which was lawful before to be done only rural labours excepted Hence some gather that men are to cease from their labours no loâ—â—â—r on the Lords dayes than while collectam faciunt as Hierom there speaks But first let the Reader well weigh whether Hierom in that place may seem to speak of womens labour which they bestowed about their works on other than the Lords dayes and whether revertentes ab Ecclesia in him be the same as if he had said when they are not present at Church they are busie at work Nor doth this sense of Hierom's words want reason especially because Hierom sayes they went only to the Church on the Lords day And in another place Hierom contends that on the Sabbath he speaks to those whom Christ had made free not the Jews men should only do those things which pertain to the salvation of the soul Now if those women had on that day plied their labours they would have done somewhat that had not pertained to the souls salvation which by Hierom's judgment they should not have done And of others Hierom speaks who on the Lords dayes did only attend on Prayer and reading Epist. ad Eustochium de custodia virginit But Hierom sayes not this as if on the Lords day to attend the duties of piety had been only appropriated to the Coenobitae of whom he speaks and other Christians on that day had employed their work oâ—â—â—daily labours from which the Coenobitae ceased No by no means But the Holy Father doth distinguish the works undertaken by the Coenobitae on the Lords day from others which they undertook on the other dayes of the week on which they fell about stated works as he speaks and those being ended they attended on Prayer and reading also which thing they also did every day when they had ended their labours but on the Lords day they were intent on nothing else but the duties of piety Secondly If it should be granted that those women did attend their ordinary works on the Lords day it was proper to them onely and then what we must think of that fact appears out of St. Cyprian who while he affirms that the Aquarians did bottom on no author or will of Christ insinuateth this Doctrine to us namely that the custome of some men is not to be followed unless first we enquire whom they followed whose grave authority we may very fitly accommodate to the aforesaid women We are to consider not only what those women did but upon what authority they did it If they attended on the Lords day their daily works and labours they were invited thereunto neither by the authorities of Christ nor his holy Apostles nor the lawful practise of the Church which restrained Christians from those works And I believe no body of a sound mind will impose as a law on other mens shoulders a certain singular custome confirmed by no law or authority but contrary to the general practice of the whole Church especially when Hierom himself and other grave Fathers do conclude that nothing but the works of piety or of some emergent necessity is to be done on that day as formerly from their writings hath been observed We do with St. Austin commend a custom which is known to usurp nothing against the Catholick faith Thirdly Charles the Great in his Constitutions ordains that on the Lords day women sow not their clothes Now we prefer justly the religious ordinance of a pious Emperour depending upon various authorities of Ecclesiastical Canons to a custome of women confirmed by no antiquity Lastly I 'le only add this What if those silly women believed it to be a work of charity by the
example of Dorcas Now I must answer to the authority of the Council of Orleans which was but a Provincial and consisted onely of twenty five Bishops for performing all labours on that day excepting rural in the same manner as sometimes Hierom to Euagrius while he was shewing what difference there was between a Bishop Elder and Deacon he would not have the custom in some sort contrary to his opinion of one City namely Rome to be brought out against him for he being judge the authority of the world was greater than the Citie 's And so I must say here If an indulgence for them had grown into use with the rest of the Church or had been supported by reason or any authority then the sentence of this though Provincial Council had been of some weight but in this their custome being rejected of the Church up and down dispersed is not to be obtruded as a law upon all Then secondly the Bishops being congregated in that Council purposed to obviate as they speak the Jewish observation of the Sabbath And they yield these things lest they should rather seem to set up a Jewish institution than Christian liberty and the very words of the Canon do intimate that the people were perswaded that these things ought not to be done I 'le add nothing of the corrupting that place which Binius judges to be depraved only let others judge what authority is to be given to it it suffices us that the Fathers with one consent do interdict all Christians earthly affairs and worldly works on Lords days although some abounding in their sense do seem to think otherwise Lastly that I may put an end to this Chapter two things now remain to be considered in the Emperours Laws made about the Lords Day which according to some do mightily prejudice its solemnity the first of these is considered in their Manumissions and the second in some certain transactions to be done on the Lords day and since both of these are a civil office some think that certain worldly things for that cause were to be done on that day which were not works of piety To add somewhat of both these offices will not be far from our purpose The indulgence for making free and manumitting granted by the Christian Emperours and to be done on the Lords day could not hinder its religious solemnity which that it may appear the reason of that institution is a little better to be enquired into Constantine of blessed memory studied by laws and all other means to promote the worship of God amongst other things he granted liberty to the Church by law that whoever were made free the Priests being witnesses they should be inrolled into the number of the Roman Citizens So Nicephorus Hist l. 7. c. 46. and Sozomen Hist l. 1. c. 8. And if any desire to see the form of these Manumissions it is extant in the fragments Conc. Toleran and in the learned Instellus his notes in Canones Africanos Can. 64. whither I refer the Reader because it is only my purpose to touch something of the time wherein these Manumissions were done which by Historians and the Emperours laws we see fall out to be on the Lords day and that especially for the honour of the Church and increase of Christian Religion while they by the Bishops were performed in the Church the Bishops were had in greater esteem among the people till as the learned Instellus very well observeth as formerly servants were manumitted in the Temple of the Goddess Feronia so afterwards by the Emperours Constitutions together with their liberty they obtained to be Roman Denizens in the Church No otherwise then as among the Egyptians the cubit wherewith the inundation of Nilus was wont to be marked was no more brought as the custome was to the Temples of the Heathen but from that time to the Churches of the Christians Sozomen 1. c. 8. After this manner the Emperour did earnestly regard the worship of God in making his laws to encrease which he also established that about Manumissions to be made on the Lords day in the Church Moreover servants those for the most part whom their Masters discharged against their will obtained their freedome not without great difficulty as Sozom. therefore the servants as saith Zonaras in Can. 88. Carthagin fled to the Church and if the Bishop determined equally they were manumitted Thereupon the Emperour ordains that all who were by the Priests testimony set at liberty in Churches should be made Denizons of the Roman Commonwealth And afterwards in process of time the Fathers of the Synod thought good to advise the Emperour that this might be done Conc. Carth. Can. 88. Now the benefit of liberty of which the Emperour was desirous as tending to the glory of God was very acceptable to God and for charity sake on that day whose holiness works of charity do not dishonour was also to be performed I could also name another cause assigned in the fragments Conc. Toletan Some thought that they did a thing very acceptable to God and profitable to their own souls if in the Church of some Saint in the presence of the Bishop or the Priests there standing or the noble Laity before the horn of the Altar of that Church send out their servants free by a charter of absolution and freedom from all bonds of servitude But these superstitious Manumissions for remedy of the soul as they speak were observed about the four hundredth year after Christ but that formerly mentioned by Zonaras Sozomen and Nicephorus was the true cause why first the pious Emperours lookt to that these Manumissions were performed on the Lords day which we do not see hindred the Lords solemnity As Manumissions do not obscure this solemnity so certain transactions are lawful on the Lords day Nor can this hinder it that Leo a most earnest defender of the Lords festival did indulge those that were at odds amongst themselves leave to meet on the Lords day vicaria poenitudine whereon they might conferr of their bargains speak of their transactions These which were offices of charity could not destroy the Lords solemnity For that holy man Leo would have adversaries freely and without fear to meet together vicaria poenitudine which the interpreter of the Law expounds by repentance which ought to return by course that is on the Lords dayes or vicaria poenitudo is that which one expecteth from the other by turn be reconciled to one another to effect which reconciliation they might be at their liberty to confer of their bargains and speak of their transactions But all these things were granted by the Emperour not for any worldly end but for renewing their lost friendship which could not obscure the honour of the festival on which the things that pertained to peace and concord were permitted for they then as it were leaving their gift before the Altar went their way that they first might be
cloyed with luxurious banquets drunken feasts and lewd drunkenness cannot devoutly consecrate the Lords day to God so they that delighting in luxury do give up themselves to pleasures are unfit for the sanctifying thereof because with their pleasures they defile the Lords holy day pleasure is the individual companion of drunkenness and intemperance in many becomes a cause of lasciviousness as we say in the Proverb When the belly is well filled then follow dances we read that these have been condemned with great fervour of mind and most holy zeal with the old friends of sincere piety which Chrysostom Hom. de Eleemosyna would not have any attend on and no wonder for all such worldly spectacles with Chrysostom are called Sathans Festivals from which he exhorts his hearers to abstain and sharply reproveth Parents that bring their children to spectacles and exhort them not to Doctrine Cyril was sorry as we have seen in the former Chapter that Christians should on feast dayes run to playes pageants and dancings because in his judgment these things cannot be done without mocking of Gods name and violation of the day for the holiness of festivals is miserably distained by petulant dancings therefore Leo and Authemius those good Emperours ordain that festivals being dedicated to the most High Majesty are by no pleasures which afterwards in detestation of them they call obscene to be defiled They say also We decree the Lords day alwayes to be so honourable and reverent that it be excused from all executions c. And after Nor yet do we relaxing the rest of this holy day suffer any one to be witholden by obscene pleasures Let the scene of the Theatre or the fights in the Cirque or the doleful sights of wild beasts challenge nothing to themselves on that day and if any solemnity fall out to be celebrated on our Birth-day let it be deferred If any one shall ever be present at â—â—ghts on this Feast-day he shall sustain the loss of his command in the Militia and the sale of his patrimony and likewise the Serjeant of every Judge that under pretence of either publick or private business doth believe that these things which are ordained in this law are to be violated The Fathers in the Council of Carthage were of the same mind who provided that no sights should be shewed on the Lords day or any other of the festivals Yea even in the thickest darkness of Popery so solemn was the splendour of this day that the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism could never overcome it Therefore it was provided Can. 10. part 9. of the Provincial Council of Colen that there should be an abstinence from these Wherefore say they it is our mind that on these dayes they speak of Festivals Fairs be prohibited Taverns be shut Riot Drunkenness Expences Strifes wicked Sports Dances full of madness evil Communication Bawdy Songs be avoided briefly all Luxury for by these and the blasphemies and perjuries which usually attend these the name of God is profaned and the Sabbath which admonisheth us to cease from doing perversly and learn to do well is defiled In the third Council also of Millain they decree Let the Bishop carefully prohibit and see to it that it be done that not only no leapings and dancings but no riot playes in honour of the Saints and other profane actions unmeet for the worship of those festival dayes and pious institutions be any wayes publickly acted on these dayes or brought in under pretence or occasion of them If men brought up in the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism declining the pure light of the Gospel like Owls yet could not through the splendour of truth but bear an illustrious testimony to the Lords festival and thereupon condemned what was opposite to its sanctification as dances which they call full of madness and wicked sports by which the Sabbath on which Christians are to cease from doing evil is violated if by no means under any pretence they permit leapings and danings to be acted to how tremendous a judgment do the ill-employed Libertines of this age expose themselves who now having the face of the Church happily discovered by the sacred Light of the Gospel are not afraid to tread under foot the holiness of this day by giving the reins to pleasures and dances running out into folly so often condemned by the Fathers As if they made haste to pass over into the heretical tents of the Heicetae who in other things following the Churches authority in their Monasteries by a company of Monks praised God using tripudiations and dances thereunto A wickedness indeed more becoming Hereticks than Christians What once the learned Morton in his Catholic Apolog lib. 2. cap. 14. related of Tollet we will apposirely apply to the Patrons of dancing on the Lords day Tollet affirms that a man is bound under a mortal sin to sanctifie a Festival but he is not bound to SANCTIFIE IT WELL. On the other side Morton cryes out and that justly What the foul ill what a sanctifying is this that wants Well without which no action can be acceptable to God So these mens sanctifying of this day while they grant the Lords day must be sanctified but labour not to sanctifie it Well is rather to be reckoned a profanation than sanctification thereof Alas Are these fruits beseeming so long a preaching of the holy Gospel while men do on the Lords day so profusely serve the pleasures of the flesh The primitive Christians whose souls are now in rest celebrated not so the Lords day who made conscience of intermitting its solemnity upon any occasion If on holy dayes we must abstain from lawful and necessary labours must we therefore attend upon unlawful vain and unhonest works God forbid The women of the Jews had better on the Sabbath day spin than dance on their New Moons as Augustin judgeth And on Psal 39. It is better to dig than dance on the Sabbath But these things are not so to be expounded as if St. Austin had commended the undertaking of gainful labour on that day but that grave Father doth praise the scope of those men rather who do apply their just and lawful labour than their unlawful vanities as otherwhere he relates of Socrates that swore by flesh a stone or any thing that was at hand to swear by not that he approved Socrates's fact but by this means he would instruct his hearers that although neither be agreeable to reason yet it is better to transferr Gods honour to Gods workmanship than to the works of mens hands So although we must not attend on the Lords day on labour undertaken for gain-sake but only on Divine worship yet the good Father judged it better on that day to employ our pains about labours lawful on other dayes than about vanities alwayes unlawful and severely condemned of God although neither will very well agree with the solemnity of that day If
every week and a fit place now we find that the Lords day was destined to keep them on and that while the Apostles were living and faithfully discharging the ministry committed to them of the Lord. For on no day was there wont to be a more solemn and frequented convention of the people in the Church to hear Sermons and partake of the holy Communion than on the Lords day and this we have proved in the two first chapters of the precedent book to be a very ancient custome The Church therefore as saith Isychius hath sequestred the Lords day for Divine conventions in which the Worship of God was religiously celebrated for the dispatching whereof the Christians met together as often as they could commodiously Yet this must be marked of him that observes the meetings of the Church that there is a rehearsal made of more meetings which were kept by the later than the former Church on the Lords day by Historians and others that treat of them not because the former Church if it could for the daily persecutions it met with did not so often hold their meeting especially whenas we see that the first Christians did sharply contend in Book 1. ch 5. about sanctifying the whole day but because it being hindred with the cruel flames of persecutions did meet as often as occasion did occurr but the following Christians were at liberty to meet oftner under the Christian Emperours and therefore we read that they met twice upon the Lords day in the former meeting whereof they begun the day and with the other they ended the day and upon that reason they afterwards called the one their Matins and the other their Vespers But what and how many hours were spent at both of these conventions is not well known because there was not the same manner of meeting every where but according to the necessity and profit of the Church they held their meetings on the night and day The Apostle taught the Ephesians both night and day Act. 20. 32. At Troas he continued his Sermon till midnight Act. 20. The Corinthians met in the evening 2 Cor. 11. for about supper time or after they were gathered together But as I said necessity commanded their night-meetings because the Christians being moved with the fear of Tyrants could not safely meet on the day time The Christians of the following age retaining their night-meetings as also many other things out of which an huge heap of superstitious rites flowed by which the clear face of truth breaking out of darkness was filthily darkened called them Vigils and turned them into the Fasts of the night which went before the Holy day in which sometimes they continued till midnight witness Hierom in Parab Virgin And sometimes they began their meeting at mid-night So it appears out of Basil who performed an office in another Church before he came to some other that were met at mid-night and waited for his coming But at this day because of the wickedness committed in these nocturnal Vigils Bellarmine thinketh they are justly abrogated Bellarm. de cultu sanctorum lib. 3. cap. ult Tertullian amongst others makes mention of night-meetings lib. 2. ad uxorem c. 4. at which he saith that an Heathen husband did not willingly suffer his Christian wife to be present Souldiers at the command of Constantine the Arrian Emperour came to apprehend St. Athanasius while the people were keeping a meeting in the night with him Theodor. Hist l. 2. c. 13. There are testimonies also extant of meetings before day which are to be reckoned with them of the night Tertul. de corona milit cap. 3. and the Epistle of Plinius Secundus ad Trajan mentions them apud Tertull Passing by the meetings which were in the night and before day we will enquire of those that were kept on the day where assoon as the Church had obtained peace by the authority of the great Emperours we shall find that they held their ordinary meetings for the exercise of Gods worship on the day time and for that end some certain hours of the day were destined for performance of the publick offices of Religion For the religious Fathers did with great care provide that they should neither weary themselves nor the people committed to their care with continual labours in setting all care of refreshing themselves aside And they judged it more advised to teach often than long they therefore selected some hours out of the whole day for publick assemblies Julian the Apostate is reported that he ordered the Greeks to live after the same manner as did the Christians and therefore amongst other things he ordains that certain prayers for certain hours and dayes after the custome of the Church should be selected Niceph. Hist. 10. c. 21. which he would never have done if it had not been a familiar thing with the Church after whose rule he laboured to regulate the Heathen to select certain hours of the day for this peculiar use But on what dayes or what houres of the day prayers were made by the Church unto God Nicephorus adds not only he tells us that certain hours were select for this office Athanasius witnesseth that the Arrians who raged against the Orthodox even as they were met on the Lords day being guarded with a company of Souldiers found but a few together for many of them were gone home for the hour of the day that is after the assembly was ended which the Church observed at stated hours or as Tertullian speaks after the solemnities were done and the people dismissed But neither Athanasius nor Tertullian do assign the hours at which the Church met Ambrose mentions the morning hours at which the people met lib. 5. Ep. 33. where what was read on t of Psal 78. The Gentiles are come into Gods inheritance he afterwards calls his hearers to mind for the morning hours Zeno also Bishop of Majuma although he was well struck in age yet was he alwayes present at the morning hymns and the other holy service or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unless hindred by sickness The Eucharist was administred at their morning meetings which appears out of Cyprian while he disallows the custome of those that in the morning only offered water lest they should smell of wine for which cause he calls that the morning sacrifice In their morning assemblies they sung the 63 Psalm to God Witness Clement Constitut Apost lib. 2. cap. 59. The morning meetings were kept about nine of the clock Therefore in Conc. Laodic it is ordained that the publick service should be performed at nine of the clock and at their Vespers And these solemn assemblies broke up about noon as witnesseth Chrysost Orat. de Philogonio The Church also met in the Evening For they had hymns appointed as well for the evening as morning meetings Niceph. Hist l. 12. c. 47. Clemen Constitut Apost lib. 20. c. 59. The Bishops
which argument I will point at three things namely first I will shew what Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly secondly whose office it was to do this thirdly I will add something of the place out of which the Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly It is evident out of divers authors that those Scriptures were read by whose reading faith was nourished And that is thought by divers men of great name in imitation of the Jews by whom it was an ordinary thing to read Moses and the Prophets in the Synagogues every Sabbath day Acts 13. 15. and 15. 21. This custome of the Jews omitting ceremonials was not onely profitable to the Apostles who upon that occasion every where preached Christ in the Synagogues out of Moses and the Prophets Act. 13. 15. and 17. 2 3. but also was commended by the Apostles to Christians as often as the Church met namely that the writings of the old Prophets should be read and expounded by the modern Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 29. Origen also witnesseth although he be deceived in giving the cause for which this was enjoyned the Church of the Apostles that the Apostles ordained that the books of Jewish Histories should be read in Churches by the Disciples of Christ So he initio Hom. 15. in Josh Moreover there be some that gather out of 2 Cor. 8. 18. where the Apostle saith of Luke With Titus we have sent our brother whose praise is in the Gospel throughout all the Churches that not only the Scriptures of the Old Testament were wont to be read while the Apostles were alive but also of the Evangelists about the History and Sermons of Christ Where according to them we may not unfitly observe that even at that time the Gospel of Luke was wont to be read in Churches Paul is not afraid to adjure the Thessalonians that when that Epistle to them was finished it should be read to all the holy brethren 1 Thes 5. 27. and he requires the Colossians that they read the Epistle written from Laodicea and that they should cause that which he sent unto them to be read in the Church of the Laodiceans Col. 4. 16. And Eusebius out of Clement relates that Peter ordained that the Gospel of Mark was to be read in Churches So Euseb Hist l. 2. c. 4. and the same author our of Irenaeus asserteth that Matthew set forth his Gospel for the Hebrews in their own tongue while Paul and Peter preached the Word at Rome After the Apostles death the writings not only of the Prophets and Evangelists but of the Apostles themselves were read in the Church-assemblies as I have said from 1 Thes 5. and Col. 4. Justin Martyr saith that the writings of the Prophets and Apostles were read on Sunday in their assemblies Others afterwards confess the same thing Origen when he reckons up the works to be performed on the Christian Sabbath he mentions the sacred reading in their assemblies where also he speaks of Reading and Treatises and in Ex. Hom. 7. he saith The Lord alwayes rains down from Heaven namely when the holy Oracles were read as he afterwards explains it Manna on our Lords day whence he concludeth that the Christians Lords day is to be preferred to the Jewish Sabbath Tertullian confesses that the Church assembled for to remember those Divine things that were read And elsewhere amongst the Lords day solemnities he affirms that the sacred Scriptures were read de Anima c. 9. Cyprian mentions this reading Ep. 33. in which he writes to the Clergy and people of one Aurelius that was ordained a Reader of him to read the Gospel in the Church c. Eusebius acknowledges that both the Old and New Testament was read in Churches Ambros in Epist ad Soror Ep. 33. Aug. de Civitate Dei lib. 22. cap. 8. These things shew that the Scriptures both of the Old and New Testaments were read and in the fifty ninth Canon of the Council of Laodicea it is ordained that only the Canonical books should be read and in the sixtieth Canon they reckon up the names and order of Canonical Books of both Testaments The same provision is made in the 27th Canon of the Council of Carthage apud Zonar That beside the Canonical Scriptures nothing be read in the Church under the name of Divine Scripture Only they add the Books of Tobit Judith and Esther Yet this must not be concealed not only the writings of the Apostles and Prophets but of divers others who were famous for piety and of great authority in the Church were anciently read in the Church-assemblies Dionysius Corinthiacus apud Euseb reports that Clements Epistle ad Corinth was read on the Lords day Hierom. in Cat. Script Ecclesiast witnesseth that Effraemus Deacon of the Church at Edissa came to such renown that after the reading of the Scriptures his writings were publickly read in some Churches The sufferings of the Martyrs were also read upon their Feasts Concil Carthag Can. 50. But the Commentaries in which the Martyrs conflicts were described were only read over on those dayes whereon their memory was annually celebrated witness Zonaras in Concil Carthag Can. 50. And such humane writings as were read in the Church are to be understood chiefly of the Psalms and Songs which were devised of them to praise God by Eusebius mentions these lib. 5. cap. 28. and lib. 2. 17. Afterwards through the Devils subtilty tares sprung up in the Church and under pretence of these writings Hereticks sowed their false Doctrines which the Fathers in Trull Can. 2. observe in the Constitutions ascribed to Clement to which some things sorged and some things repugnant to Faith are annexed which evil that the Fathers might feasonably prevent they frequently ordained that no Books should be read in the publick Church-assembly but the Holy Scriptures much less that it ever should be safe through them that many dreams which they babled out with a rash attempt like old wife's dotages of vain-talking men should be read among the Holy Scriptures as afterwards by use it fell out because as we have seen they ordained that nothing but the Scriptures should be read in Churches Now for the order according to whose rule all reading of the Scriptures among the ancients was disposed we meet with a few things to be observed out of their Records Whether namely in the primitive Church there were selected parts of the Scriptures which they read or as it was familiar with the Jews on their Sabbath-dayes they read the Scripture in order as the Lords dayes returned till they had finished that work this I say is not certainly known onely what parts of Scripture they read they explained the same for the peoples use as the necessity of the present times did require Tertul. apo c. 39. Ambr. l. 5. ep 33. But afterwards it doth appear that there was an order observed in reading the Scriptures St. Austin mentions the order observed by
other interpreting of the law used under the former Temple besides that which the Prophets being extraordinarily called undertook Which opinion being once admitted it will not be easie to avoid the aforesaid incommodities as to any one it will appear by a more narrow search into them Unto whose conjecture we will with their good-leave oppose the authorities both of Jews and Christians in that particular being bottomed upon the Holy Scripture Flavius Josephus whom according to Cunaeus we are to believe next to the Pen-men of Holy Writ pleading the Cause of the Jews against Appion in his Apology which in the famous Cunaeus opinion is learned to a miracle in express words affirms that Moses would have us hear the Law not once or twice or oftner but he commands all men leaving their other works to meet together to hear the Law and perfectly to learn it c. Thus he And if this Ordinance of a weekly meeting to hear and learn the Law was in force in Moses age then was it long before the Babylonish Captivity While Philo Judaeus contends that the Playes and ridiculous spectacles of Fools and Dancers ought to be put away he saith that it was the manner to study Philosophy on Sabbath dayes the Prince going before and teaching what was needful to be done or spoken the rest giving ear Whereupon he also affirms that they now should play the Philosophers upon Sabbath dayes more patrio in their country manner and he acknowledgeth that Oratories in Cities were for Schools of Virtue More credit therefore is deservedly to be given to the Jewes relating their countrey customes than to other mens conjectures of them Among the Christians divers very learned men treating of the Hebrews Common-wealth have taught the same Amongst whom Carolus Sigonius de Rep. Hebraeorum l. 5. c. 10. and Cornelius Bertramus p. 96. The famous Cunaeus to whom the Christian Church is much beholden for his labours in explaining the antiquities of the Hebrews saith that the right observation of Sabbaths consisted in the holiness of all their words and deeds and in Divine worship and Prayers All which doth plainly evidence that they used to read the Law and interpret it to the peoples capacity on the Sabbath dayes otherwise neither their words nor deeds had been noted for holiness or how else could the minds of the Jews have been furnished piously to conceive Prayers on Sabbath dayes without the explaining of the Scripture Yea the Learned Cunaeus confesses that the Levites in the Synagogues did deliver to the people in the Towns of Judaea the chief knowledge of all Laws both of Humane and Divine things and when could the Levites do this with greater profit than on the Sabbath dayes In a word although we deny that at that time the Talmudical interpretation of Scripture was grown in use which we confess the ancient Church of the Jews knew nothing of yet we cannot affirm this of the vocal interpretation of the Scriptures by the Levites But to return to our purpose We find that under the Old Testament the Scriptures were read and opened in the Jews assemblie even the Holy Ghost being witness although some doubt of the period of time at which their interpretation on Sabbath dayes began As for the Churches in the New Testament planted by the Apostles they could not so long as their Peace was disturbed with a storm of Persecutions meet together without very great difficulty for which cause as we said Chap. 1. they had their meetings sometime on the night and sometimes on the day neither again was it safe for them to hold a meeting all the day For which cause Tertullian judges that it was best for Christians if the Lords dayes solemnities could not be celebrated on the day time for persecutions whereof he speaks then ought they to keep them on the night if not with every one of them yet at least with three These things teach us that the Church was not permitted in that age with safety and as often as they list to meet together on the day time to perform the exercises of piety He therefore that requires of us some one example for expounding Scripture twice while the fire of Persecution raged with which that age abounded I desire him to tell me whether the Christians did during that Persecution twice every Lords day keep their meetings For if it were safe for them to meet why may they not as well be believed to meâ—t for interpreting of Scripture and Prayer to God since these duties are joyned by the Apostle 1 Cor. 14. and observed by Cyprian as he faithfully expounded the Scriptures Especially when it was the custom of the Church so often as Scripture was read to interpret the same This we have largely enough shewn out of Justin Origen Tertullian Ambrose Augustine and other Fathers of great authority chap. 4. Since therefore in the Jewish Apostolical and other Churches succeeding the Apostles there followed after the reading of the Scriptures an exposition of them it seems necessarily to follow that if they had liberty to meet on Lords dayes then they used to treat twice out of Scripture of which there is frequent mention in their assemblies And it 's certainly evident from the continual practiâ—â— of the Church that from the very Apostles times prayers and reading were reckoned both together which were celebrated both morning and evening No man therefore can judge it unreasonable to say that there followed an interpretation of those things which were read because reading was used to instruct the people But how could the people be instructed in the Scripture read without an interpretation The Eunucâ— answered Acts 8. 31. that he could not understand what he read except some one should guide him Yea they were wont to Treat out of the Reading or Lesson as was formerly said The calamitous condition also of those times wherein so many cruel persecutions were stirred up required the same Daily exhortations were very needful to the Christians for to bear the Cross of the Gospel patiently Neither must we think that these skilful Pastours who were set over the Church by the Apostles and Apostolical men did not endeavour as often as they could to instruct the People committed to them in the matters of Faith St. Cyprian Ep. 40. professes that he was sore troubled when he could not go to and exhort every one as the Lords and his Gospel Ministry required while he was in his banishment If it were a grief to this vigilant Bishop that because being hindred by his exile he could not provoke all who were commended to his inspection and care by his holy Exhortations to piety and patience certainly when he was with his people if he took care that by a Reader the bare reading of the Gospel was recited to them although he stirred not them up by his Exhortations to practise what they had heard read he would never in very deed have thought