Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n church_n receive_v tradition_n 2,719 5 9.4211 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A29194 The consecration and succession, of Protestant bishops justified, the Bishop of Duresme vindicated, and that infamous fable of the ordination at the Nagges head clearly confuted by John Bramhall ... Bramhall, John, 1594-1663. 1658 (1658) Wing B4216; ESTC R24144 93,004 246

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to produce the same Registers when they were so hardly pressed by their Adversaries These are but empty pretenses there was no pressing to produce Registers nor any thing objected that did deserve the production of a Register That which was objected against our Orders in those dayes was about the Form of Ordination published by Edward the sixth and the Legality of our Ordination in the time of Queen Elisabeth the Nagge 's head Consecration was never objected in those dayes Besides Registers are Publick enough themselves and need no production and yet our Registers were produced produced by the Parliament 8 Elisab who cited them as authentick Records produced and published to the world in Print that was another production They adde Or that so many Catholicks should have been so foolish to invent or maintein the Story of the Nagge 's head in such a time when if it had been false they might have been convinced by a thousand Witnesses Feare them not they were wiser then to publish such a notorious Fable in those dayes they might perchance whisper it in Corners among themselves but the boldest of them durst not maintain it or object it in print for feare of shame and disgrace It was folly to give any eare to it but is was knavery to invent it and to doe it after such a bungling manner whosoever was the Inventer was knavery and Folly complicated together If the Fathers write any more upon this subject I desire them to bring us no more hearesay testimonies of their owne party whatsoever esteeme they may have themselves of their judgment and prudence and impartiality It is not the manner of Polemick writers to urge the authority of their owne Doctors to an Adversary or allege the moderne practise of their present Church We have our owne Church and our owne Doctors as well as they If we would pinne our faith to the sleeues of their Writers and submit to their judgments and beleeve all their reportes and let all things be as they would have it we needed not to have any more controversy with them but we might well raise a worse controversy in our selves with our owne consciences CHA. XI Of our formes of Episcopall and priestly ordination of Zuinglianisme of Arch Bishop Lavvd of ceremonies Our assurance of our Orders WE have done with the Nagge 's head for the present That which followeth next doth better become Schollers as having more shew of truth and reality in it They object that in all the Catholick Ritualls not onely of the west but of the East there is not one forme of consecrating Bishops that hath not the word Bishops in it or some other words expressing the particular authority and power of a Bishop distinctly But in our Consecration there is not one word to expresse the difference and power of Episcopacy For these vvordes receive the holy Ghost are indifferent to priesthood and Episcopacy and used in both Ordinations I answer that the forme of Episcopall Ordination used at the same time when hands are imposed is the same both in their forme and ours Receive the holy Ghost And if these words be considered singly in a divided sense from the rest of the Office there is nothing either in our forme or theirs which doth distinctly and reciprocally expresse Episcopall power and Authority But if these words be considered coniointly in a compounded sense there is enough to expresse Episcopall power and authority distinctly and as much in our forme as theirs First two Bishops present the Bishop elect to the Arch-Bishop of the Province with these words most Reverend Father in Christ we present to you this godly and learned man to be Consecrated Bishop There is one expression Then the Arch-Bishop causeth the Kings Letters Patents to be produced and read which require the Arch Bishop to consecrate him a Bishop There is a second expression Thirdly the new Bishop takes his oath of canonicall obedience I A B elected Bishop of the Church and See of C. do professe and promise all reverence and due obedience to the Arch Bishop and Metropoliticall Church of D. and his Successours So God help me c. This is a third Expression Next the Arch Bishop exhorts the whole Assembly to solemne praier for this person thus elected and presented before they admit him to that office that is the Office of a Bishop whereunto they hope he is called by the holy Ghost after the example of Christ before he did chuse his Apostles and the church of Antioch before they laid hands upon Paul and Barnabas This is a fourth expression Then followeth the Litany wherein there is this expresse petition for the person to be ordeined Bishop we beseech thee to give thy blessing and grace to this our brother elected Bishop that he may discharge that office whereunto he is called diligently to the Edification of thy Church To which all the congregation answer Heare us O Lord we beseech thee Here is a fifth expression Then followeth this praier wherewith the Litany is concluded Allmighty God the giver of all good things which by thy holy Spirit hast constituted diverse orders of Ministers in thy Church vouchsafe we beseech the to looke graciously upon this thy servant now called to the Office of a Bishop This is a sixth expression Next the Arch-Bishop telleth him he must examine him before he admit him to that administratiō whereunto he is called and maketh a solemne praier for him that God who hath constituted some Prophets some Apostles c. to the Edification of his Church would grant to this his servant the grace to use the authority committed to him to edification not destruction to distribute food in due season to the family of Christ as becommeth a faithfull and prudent Steward This authority can be no other then Episcopall authority nor this Stewardship any other thing then Episcopacy This is a sevēth expressiō Then followeth imposition of hands by the Arch-Bishop and all the Bishops present with these words Receive the holy Ghost c and lastly the tradition of the Bible into his hands exhorting him to behave himself towards the flock of Christ as a Pastour not devouring but feeding the flock All this implieth Episcopall authority They may except against Christs owne forme of ordeining his Apostles if they will and against the forme used by their owne Church but if they be sufficient formes our forme is sufficient This was the same forme which was used in Edward the sixths time and we have seen how Cardinall Pole and Paul the fourth confirmed all without exception that were ordeined according to this forme so they would reunite themselves to the Roman Catholick Church They bring the very same objection against our Priestly Ordination The forme or words whereby men are made Priests must expresse authority and power to consecrate or make present Christs body and blood whether with or without transubstantiation is not the present controversy with Protestants Thus far we
in the Commission or in the Register Regall Commissions are no essentialls of Ordination Notariall Acts are no essentialls of Ordination The misnaming of the Baptise● in a Parish Register doth not make voide the Baptisme When Popes do consecrate themselves as they do sometimes they d● it by the names of Paul or Alexander o● Vrbanus or Innocentius yet these are not the names which were imposed upon them at their Baptismes or at their Confirmations but such names as themselves have been pleased to assume But to come to more serious matter There are two differences betweene these two Commissions The first is an aut minus Or at the least foure of you which clause is prudently inserted into all Commissions where many Commissioners are named least the sicknesse or absence or neglect of any one or more might hinder the worke The question is why they are limited to foure when the Canons of the Catholick Church require but three The answer is obvious because the Statutes of England do require foure in case one of the Consecraters be not an Arch Bishop or deputed by one Three had bene enough to make a valide Ordination yea to make a Canonicall Ordination and the Queene might have dispensed with her owne lawes but she would have the Arch Bishop to be ordeined both according to the canons of the Catholick Church and the known ●awes of England The second difference betweene the two Commissions is this that there is a Supplen●es in the later Commission which is not in the former Supplyng by our Soveraigne authority all defects either in the Execution or in ihe Executers of this Commission or any of them The Court of Rome in such like instruments have ordinarily such dispensative clauses for more abundant caution whether there be need of them or not to relaxe all sentences censures and penalties inflicted either by the law or by the Iudge But still the question is to what end was this clause inserted I answer it is en● enough if it serve as the Court of Rome useth it for a certeine salve to helpe any latent impediment though there be none A superfluous clause doth not vitiate 〈◊〉 writing Some thinke it might have reference to Bishop Coverdales syde woollo● gowne which he used at the Consecratio● toga lanea talari utebatur That was uncanonicall indeed and needed a dispensation fo● him that used it not for him who was consecrated But this was so slender a defe●● and so farre from the heart or essence o● Ordinatiō especially where the three othe● Cōsecraters which is the canonicall number where formally and regularly habite● that it was not worth an intimation und●● the great seale of England This Miles Coverdale had been both validely and legally ordeined Bishop and had as much power to ordeine as the Bishop of Rome himself If he had been Roman Catholick in his ●udgment he had been declared by Cardinall Pole as good a Bishop as either Bon●er or Thirleby or any of the rest Others thinke this clause might have relation to the present condition of Bishop Barlow and Bishop Scory who were not yet inthroned into their new Bishopricks It might be so but if it was it was a great mistake in the Lawiers who drew up the Commission The Office and the Benefice of a Bishop are two distinct things Ordination is an act of the Key of Order and a Bishop uninthroned may ordeine as well as a Bishop inthroned The Ordination of Suffragan Bishops who had no peculiar Bishoprickes was alwaies admitted and reputed as good in the Catholick Church if the Suffragans had Episcopall Ordination as the Ordination of rhe greatest Bishops in the wolrd But since this clause doth extend ir self both to the Consecration and the Consecraters I am confident that the onely ground of it was that same exception o● rather cavill which Bishop Bonner did afterwards make against the legality of Bishop Hornes Consecration which is all that either Stapleton or any of our Adversaries ha● to pretend against the legality of the Ordination of our first Protestant Bishops that they were not ordeined according to the praescript of our very Statutes I have set downe this case formerly in my replication to the Bishop of Chalcedon But to avoide wrangling I will put i● downe in the very wordes of the Statute King Edward the Sixth in his time by authority of Parliament caused the booke of Common Praier and Administration of Sacraments and other Rites and Ceremonies in the Church of England 〈◊〉 be made and set forth not onely for or● uniforme Order of Service Commō Prayer and Administration of Sacrament● to be used whithin this Realme but also did adde and put to the said booke a very godly Order manner and forme ho● Arch-Bishops Bishops Priests Deacons and Ministers should from time to time be consecrated made and ordered within this Realme Afterwards it followeth that in the time of Queene Mary the severall Acts and statutes made in the secōd third fourth fifth and sixth yeares of King Edward for the authorising and allowing of the said booke of Common praier and other the premisses were repealed Lastly the Statute addeth that by an Act made in the first yeare of Queene Elisabeth entituled An act for the uniformity of Common prayer and service in the Church and administration of Sacraments the said booke of Common Praier and Administration of Sacraments and other the said Orders Rites and Ceremonies before mētioned and all things therein conteined is fully stablished and authorised to be used in all places within the Realme This is the very case related by the Parliament Now the exception of Bishop Bonner and Stapleton and the rest was this The booke of Ordination was expresly established by name by Edward the Sixth And that Act was expresly repealed by Queene Mary But the booke of Ordination was not expresly restored by Queene Elisabeth but onely in generall termes under the name and notion of the Booke of Common Praiers and administration of Sacraments and other orders rites and Ceremonies Therefore they who were ordeined according to the said forme of Ordination in the beginning of Queene Elisabeths time were not legally ordeined And those Bishops which had bene ordeined according to that forme in King Edwards time though they were legally ordeined then yet they were not legall Bishops now because Quee●● Maries statute was still in force and was not yet repealed Is this all Take courage Reader Here is nothing that toucheth the validity of our Ordination but onely the legality of it which is easily satisfied First I answe● that Queene Maries Statute was repeale● sufficiently even as to rhe booke of Ordination as appeareth by the very word of the Statute which repealed it A● that the said booke with the order of Service 〈◊〉 of the administration of Sacraments rites 〈◊〉 Ceremonies shall be after the feast of St. 〈◊〉 Baptist next in full force and effect any thing 〈◊〉 Queene Maries Statute of repeale
accorde to the truth of the presence of Christs body and blood So they leave us this latitude for the manner of his presence Abate us Transubstantiation and those things which are consequents of their determination of the manner of presence and we have no difference with them in this particular They who are ordeined Priests ought to have power to consecrate the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ that is to make them present after such manner as they were present ar the first institution whether it be done by enunciation of the words of Christ as it is observed in the westerne Church or by praier as it is practised in the Easterne Church or whether these two be both the same thing in effect that is that the formes of the Sacraments be mysticall praiers and implicite invocations Our Church for more abundant caution useth both formes as well in the Consecration of the Sacrament as in the ordination of Priests In the holy Eucharist our consecration is a repetition of that which was done by Christ and now done by him that consecrateth in the person of Christ otherwise the Priest could not say this is my body And likewise in Episcopall Consecration Homo imponit manus deus largitur gratiam Sacerdos imponit supplicem dex●eram Deus benedicit potente dex●era Man imposeth hands God conferreth grace The Bishop imposeth his suppliant right hand God blesseth with his Almighty right hand In both consecrations Christ himself is the chiefe consecrater still Then if power of consecratiō be nothing els but power to do that which Christ did and ordeined to be done our Priests want not power to consecrate They adde in all formes of Ordeining Priests that ever were used in the Easterne or Westerne Church is expresly set downe the word Priest or some other words expressing the proper function and authority of Priesthood c. The Grecians using the word Priest or Bishop in their formes do sufficiently expresse the respective power of every Order But our Reformers did not put into the forme of ordeining Priests any words expressing authority to make Christs body present I answer that if by formes of ordeining Priests they understād that essentiall forme of words which is used at the same instant of time whilest hands are imposed I denie that in all formes of Priestly ordination the word Priest is set downe either expresly or aequivalently It is set downe expresly in the Easterne Church it is not set downe expresly in the Westerne Church Both the Easterne and Westerne formes are lawfull but the Westerne commeth nearer to the institution of Christ. But if by formes of Ordeining they understand Ordinalls or Ritualls or the intire forme of ordeining both our Church and their Church have not onely aequivalent expressions of Priestly power but even the expresse word Priest it self which is sufficient both to direct and to expresse the intention of the Consecrater Vnder that name the Arch Deacon presēteth them Right Reverend Father in Christ I present unto you these persons here present to be admitted to the Order ef Priesthood Vnder that name the Bishop admitteth them well beloved brethren these are they whom we purpose by the grace of God this day to admit cooptare into the holy office of Priesthood Vnder this name the whole assembly praieth for them Almighty God vouchsafe we beseech thee to looke graciously upon these thy servants which this day are called to the office of Priesthood It were to be wished that writers of Controversies would make more use of their owne eyes and trust lesse other mens citations Secondly I answer that it is not necessary that the essentiall formes of Sacraments should be alwaies so very expresse and determinate that the words are not capable of extension to any other matter if they be as determinate and expresse as the example and prescription of Christ it is sufficient The forme of baptisme is I baptise the in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Not I baptise the to Regeneration or for Remission of sins There are many other kinds of baptismes or washings besides this Sacramentall baptisme yet this forme is as large as the institution of Christ. And these generall words are efficacious both to regeneration and remission of sinnes as well as if regeneration and remission of sins had bene expresly mentioned In this forme of baptisme there is enough antecedent to direct and regulate both the actions and intentions of the Minister So there is likewise in our forme of Ordination Thirdly I answer that in our very essentiall forme of Priestly Ordination Priestly power and authority is sufficiently expressed we need not seeke for a needle in a bottle of hay The words of our Ordinall are cleare enough First Receive the Holy Ghost That is the grace of the holy Ghost to exercise and dicharge the Office of Priesthood to which thou hast been now presented to which thou hast been now accepted and for which we have praied to God that in it thou maiest disscharge thy duty faithfully and acceptably Secondly in these words whose sins thou doest remit they are remitted that is not onely by Priestly absolution but by preaching by baptising by administring the holy Eucharist which is a meanes to applie the alsufficient sacrifice of Christ for the remission of Sinnes He who authoriseth a man to accomplish a worke doth authorise him to use all meanes which tend to the accomplishment thereof That which is objected that Laymen have power to remit sinnes by Baptisme but no power to consecrate signifieth nothing as to this point For first their owne Doctors do acknowledge that a Lay man can not baptise solemnely nor in the presence of a Priest or a Deacon nor in their absence except onely in case of necessity Saint Austin gives the reason because no man may invade another mans office Lay men may and are bound to instruct others in case of necessity yet the office of preaching and instructing others is Conferred by Ordination The ordinary office of remitting sinnes both by baptisme and by the holy Eucharist doth belong to Bishops and under thē to Priests Thirdly this Priestly power to consecrate is conteined in these words Be thou a faithfull dispenser of the word of God and Sacraments And afterwards when the Bishop delivers the holy Bible into the hands of those who are ordeined Priests Have thou authority to preach the word of God and Administer the Sacraments We do not deny but Deacons have been admitted to distribute and Minister the Sacraments by the Command or permission of Priests or as Subservient unto them but there is as much difference between a subserviēt distributiō of the Sacrament and the Dispensing or Administring of it as there is betweene the Office of a Porter who distributeth the almes at the gate and the Office of the Steward who is the proper dispenser of it Looke to it Gentlemen If your owne Ordination