as infallible as the Scripture which I expresly deny and lay the rationem credendi all the weight burden and warrant of the obligation of conscience that the decrees or constitutions of an Assembly can lay on not on the fallible and weake authority of the Church or men but on the matter of the decrees because or in so farre as it is the necessary matter of the word or agreeable to the word of God Now may not the Reader consider this logicke The Gospell that M. Burton preacheth obligeth all his flocke absent or presenct for their presence maketh it not to bee Gospell and that not because of the authority of M. Burton who is but a sinfull man but because the Gospell he preacheth is necessary truth and agreeable to the Scriptures ergo whatsoever M. Burton preacheth is no lesse infallible then the decisions of the Apostles The Antecedent is most true and more I doe not say but the consequence is most blasphemous and false yet are all the lawfull Pastors in Britaine to preach the sound word of God after the example of the Prophets the Apostles ergo whatever all the faithfull Pastors in Britaine preach is as infallible as the decisions of the Apostles the Antecedent I can owne as a truth of God but the consequence is M. Burtons 2. He addes to my words and saith M. Rutherfurd tells us whatsoever is by these Commissioners determined and concluded is matter necessary and agreeable to the word of God This I say not I never thought whatsoever they say is matter necessary find these words under my hand and I will crave M. Burton and all the Church of England pardon But I know Generall Assemblies can reele and erre Every man is a lyar I never say whatsoever is concluded by them is necessary I say what is determined by them is de jure that is ought to be agreeable to Gods word for I shew that Generall Assemblies have their warrant from Act. 15. and my meaning and words are clear These are M. Burtons words not mine What is determined by them binds not as or because it s from men but as agreeable to the word of God M. Burton expones my is as hee pleaseth best and hath need to crave God pardon for that hee rashly and ignorantly I say no more fathers untruths on his innocent brother who writeth and speaketh honourably and respectively of him for let logicke of conscience be judge if this be a good consequence What a Generall Assembly determines bindeth no farther but as it is necessary and as it is agreeable to the word ergo Whatsoever a Generall Assembly determines is necessary and is agreeable to the word of God it followeth in no sort at all yea the â—uâ—t contrary followeth ergo if it be not necessary and in so farre as it is not agreeable to the word it obligeth-neither these that are present nor absent and is not infallible at all 4. I may say without any just ground of offending either M. Burton or any of his way that write against Synods that had they rightly understood the state of the question between Pâ—otestants and Papists they would not have so inconsiderately clashed with the word of God and all the Reformed Churches in Christendome for we deny 1. All absolute unlimited and infallible authority to Synods Papists presse that Councells cannot erre and in so doing they make them Lords and Masters of the conscience of the people of God and Independents and others charging this upon us cannot before the barre of the alone King and head of the Church beare out their charge and the like unlimited and boundlesse power of Civill and politick ratifying and passing in penall lawes what the Church or Synods determine we deny to any Magistrate on earth M. Burton 9 10 11 12. will not and cannot make good his bitter virulent and unchristian challenge he layes on his innocent brethren who may and I hope doe in humility and confidence claime a Saintship and interest in the Lord Jesus as well as he That they with Diotrephes exalt mans power above all that is called God are Antichrists Apostates from the truth doe carry on the mystery of iniquity this he also must answer for as a slander laid on all our Reformers Calvin Luther Beza yea on Reynold Whittaker Perkins c. all the Protestant Churches all the hoast of Protestant Divines But 2. All the power and authority of Synods we conceive to be ministeriall not Lordly limited regulated by the onely word of God in the scripture and in matters circumstantiall of order and decency as time place persons observe I say not in mysticall Religions Ceremonies called but unjustly indifferent or the like by the law of nature rules of pietie charity and Christian prudency for the edification of our brethren and the glory of God and a lawfull Synod wee judge hath power ministeriall from Christ to passe constitutions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 decrees Acts 16.4 Lawes I doe not call them because Christ is the onely Law-giver King and head of his Church his Officers are onely servants and Heralds to hold forth his Lawes and these constitutions condemning Arminianisme Socinianisme Familisme Antinomianisme c. as sometimes Mr. Burton being but one single Pastor by word and writ condemned them and that in the name and authority of Christ as hee then said and commanding in the Lord that they consent to the forme of sound doctrine rebuking all that subvert soules and trouble the Churches Acts 15.23 24. are to be obeyed and the conscience submitted to them not absolutely not for the sole will and meere authority of the Heralds as if they were infallible not with blind obedience not without reclamation or appeale if they be either contrary or beside the scriptures but conditionally in so farre as they are agreeable to the Word of God even as the single Independant Congregation is to be heard in things lawfull under paine of excommunication as our brethren say from Matth. 18. and yet Matth. 18. sets not up Antichrist and caries not on the Mystery of iniquity And wee teach that the Magistrate as the Minister of God after due examination according to the word is obleiged to adde his civill sanction to these constitutions and to guard the Ministers with his Sword and to punish Arminians Socinians Familists c. as Mr. Burton cryed against them of old and appealed to the supreame Magistrate the Kings Majesty against them though wee judge the Magistrates sword in all this keepes such a distance from the conscience that this is so farre from being a State Government of the Church that these constitutions have no power at all over the conscience from the sword and are alike binding and were Acts 15. Though the Magistrate were not on earth and though hee should oppose them as hee did then And we thinke Arminians Socinians and Familists who deny all power of Synods lesse or more except onely Sir if
the King as lawfull Magistrates I answer its true so would they pray for Nero Dominitian and heathen Justices of peace sent by them as lawfull Magistrates but not as Christian Magistrates nor such as they would chuse to reigne over them because in their apprehension of them they are no lesse without the Church then heathens then let the world be judge of their candor in contending for a power of Premunires and in voting that heathen Justices of peace and unchristian Parliaments should be above a free Generall Assembly of England but they could not endure either Magistrates or Parliaments of the gang they are now in England to be above one of their Congregations though consisting of seven 3. They are jealous of any supremacy of Generall Assemblies But say the Congregations of England were all Independent they would not baptise the children of the twentieth Parliament man Judge and Justice of peace nor of the King or most professors in England as they are now in England nor admit them or their wives or children to the Ordinances because they are no Church-members and no better then Ethiopians or Indians to them and if Parliament or Justices of peace should take on them to judge or punish them for this I beleeve M. Burton and our brethren would tell them these that are without the Church as you are have no power to judge the Church of Christ are to judge of Church administrations or to whom Ordinances should be dispensed or not dispensed Judge if this be not a supremacy given to seven above the Parliament and Judges of the Kingdome which M. Burton so much condemned in a Nationall Assembly of all the godly Ministers and Elders in England But it s a fault that the Generall Assembly hath power to make rules according to the word of God appertaining to the good behaviour of all the members of the Kirke and abrogate Statutes and Ordinances about Ecclesiasticall matters that are found noysome and unprofitable without the Magistrate So did the Assembly at Jerusalem appoint such rules as should binde Caesar so he had been a good Constantine and though they cannot abrogate Ordinances and Acts of Parliament by making or unmaking Acts of Parliament our booke of discipline never meaned that as M. Burton ignorant of the discipline of our Church saith yet as the Ministers of Christ they may juridically declare yea and preach authoritively that Acts of Parliament establishing the Masse are unlawfull and godlesse lawes commanding Idolatry and denounce a woe against unjust decrees and lawes as Esay 10.1 else when M. Burton preacheth against such lawes he then must incurre a premunire before God and set himselfe in a Papall throne above the Parliament and enslave the English Subjects for he preaches that Statutes of Parliament that establisheth Masse and the burning of heretickes that is Protestants are to be abrogated as well as the Generall Assembly of Scotland doth and so M. Burton must set himselfe above Kings and Kesars And when a Synod or Church conveened in the name of Christ bindes on earth according to the word of God Matth 18. there is no lawfull appeal from them to any Civill judicature not because they are not men but because they are a Court acting in the name of Christ according to his word and Christ with them bindes or looses in heaven yea there is no reclamation to be made nor any appeale from one faithfull Pastor speaking in the name and authority of Christ according to that He that heareth you heareth me he that despiseth you despiseth me and there is no danger to be feared either of Papall tyranny or Parliamentary breach or premunire But M. Rutherfurd saith The decisive voyces of a Generalâ— Assembly bindes the absent as well as present Answ. So saith the Holy Ghost the Churches of Antioch Syria and Silicia were bound to receive and obey the decrees of the Synod so soon as they heare them Act. 15.22 23 26 27 28. Act. 16.4 Act. 21.25 as they that despise the doctrine of faithfull Pastors dead and buried despise Christ so saith that learned and godly man M. Cotton and all the Churches of N. England who to M. Burton must set up a Papall throne as well as the Church of Scotland if this be Popery for what need Churches absent saith Cotton Keyes of the Kingdome p. 26. send to a Synod for light and direction in wayes of truth and peace if they be resolved aforehand how farre they will goe and if they be not obliged to submit thereunto in the Lord. M. Burton saith further p. 21. that M. Rutherfurd saith ch 20.312 Gov. Chur. Scot. The acts of the Assembly oblige all the absents not present in all their members and that because whatsoever is by these Commissioners determined and concluded is matter necessary and agreeable to Gods word as being no lesse infallible then those decisions of the Apostles Act. 15. Answ. I dare appeale to the conscience of M. Burton well informed and to all the godly if they conceive any such thing to be my judgement to assert with Bellarmine Papists the infallibility of any Councells now on earth yea if he had read what I have said ch 14. p. 209.212 I prove that the Apostles acted not in that Synod as Apostles but as ordinary Elders and Doct. Whittaker and M. Cotton say the same though M. Tho. Goodwin and M. Nye contradict both M. Cotton and Whittaker and Calvin and all both Papists and Protestants yea and Independents who acknowledge Act. 15. to be a paterne for Synods to the end of the world But the Independents now in England and Anabaptists side with Bridgesius Grotius Socinians and Arminians the enemies of Synods and say that Synod Act. 15. was an extraordinary Apostolicke meeting that obligeth not the Churches now The Seekers say there shall never be Synods till Apostles arise againe which they say without all word of Scripture 2. I speake not one word pag. 312. of that purpose but pag. 322. I speake and M. Burton both detracteth from and addeth to and perverteth my words which I impute not to malice as others doe but to his ignorance of the Discipline of the Church of Scotland my words ch 20. pag. 322. are these The acts of the Assembly oblige all the absents not present in all their members as Act. 23 24.28 Act. 15.16.4 ch 21.25 not because of the authority of the Church but because of the matter which is necessary and agreeable to Gods word Beside that M. Burton leaves out all the Scriptures I cite because he could not answer them he leaves out these words not because of the authority of the Church which cleareteh my sense and directly excludeth all infallible authority of Church or Assembly For I hold they oblige the consciences not for men or the Authority of the Church or because so saith the Church as Papists make the testimony of the Church the formall obâ—ect of our faith and the Church to bee
strict conversation and a care by doing to please God any personall walking with God is but a legall bargaining with God to out-buy Christ and evacuate free grace and a mixing of Law and Gospel and confounding of the two Covenants and of heaven and hell and presently upon this the party is as free of doubting till his dying day as if he were in heaven still in a merry pinne as if he were above the starres before the throne under no Law above all duties reades heares prayes none but when some immediate rapts of a living active God comes on him a dead passive block in Christ the Scripture either Law or Gospel is but a dead Letter hee is neither tyed nor awed with Law or Gospel Precept or Command nor preaching nor seales but is acted by a free Spirit an immediate light and speech of a Spirit above and beyond all outward word or Letter of old or new Testament except when the Spirit shall speake or apply them to the heart and then these Commandements tye the outer man and the flesh and then they bind not for any authority of the Law-giver but for the onely Gospel love of Christ as if Christ had put his Father out of office whereas Gospel-love commands obedience upon and for both the authority of the Lawgiver and the love of Christ and when this convert falleth in Adultery murther swearing lying robbing 1. It is not he but the flesh and sense and the outward man that doth these 2. They were remitted and made no sinnes and hee as cleane as Christ from them before they bee committed 3. The Law hath no more to doe with him then the persuer saith Saltmarsh hath to doe with the murtherer who hath fled to the citie of refuge But Saltmarsh's Legall convert he meaneth all not converted the Antinomian way is not our convert as he dreameth 1. Because we look not at conversion meerly as a change in affection and conversation without Christ Faith and saving grace 2. Antinomians make all the change in conversion to be meerely imputative to beleeve that Christ was converted and repents for us and to regard no inward change 3. It is false that Saltmarsh saith That pressing of meere commands from the word may worke a Legall change of affection and conversation For if by meere commands from the Word he meane 1. commands without the Spirit that is such as are written and preached Gospel or Law that of themselves want all grace and joyning of the Spirit Then sure Cicero and Seneca their meere words without God cannot change a Zeno a Xenephon from debauched slagitious men into white civeâ—l Moralists without some Spirit if he meane that the Gospel-letter as a Letter can doe more then the Law-letter without the Spirit he is much deceived for words as words whether of Law or Gospel without God can work no change But Saltmarsh if I mistake not hath a third meaning that meere commands from the authority of God the Law-giver can worke but a Legall and counterfeit conversion this is most false We have a grave controversie with Papists touching the formall object of Divine Faith Whether it bee the testimony of the Church as Papists say or the authority of God speaking in his Word as we teach Now we hold that the testimony of the Church is but the testimony of men and can produce but an humane faith not a Divine but the testimonie of God himselfe speaking in the Scriptures can onely beget a supernaturall and divine faith when the Holy Ghost followeth the Word and rendereth it lively If then we beleeve divine truths and Scripturall commands because so saith the Lord in his Word either Law or Gospel this is a divine and supernaturall faith so to beleeve upon Gods meere commands as Law-giver not because naturall reason so dictateth nor because the Church or man so saith nor because the times favour the Gospel as the seed is received with a sort of beliefe that falleth on stony ground is divine Faith and is not contrary but sweetly complyeth with faith grounded upon the love of Christ and wrought by the grace of God in the Gospel Antinomians dreame that these two are contrary when they are not so 4. It s most false that the Law is in the heart before hand by nature so as wee beleeve it naturally for the authority of the Law-giver for so naturall faith of the Law should fight with naturall unbeliefe and deepe security to laugh and sleepe sound under the curse of God Wee naturally know much of the Law but we have not a Legall faith to beleeve because so saith the Law-giver by nature 5. It s false also that Nature can propound to it selfe life eternall as its end as Saltmarsh saith Balaam could not desire it farre lesse intend it hee onely wished the end of the just 2. The end must bee the last end subordinate to Gods glory Antinomians are Pelagians and poore friends to free grace as I noted before for when salvation is the end all meanes are gone about when the end is intended that may conduce to that end all meanes that may crosse the obtaining thereof eschewed Now naturall Legall converts cannot goe about all for salvation and in reference to it its cleare when gold is a mans end as in the covetous pleasure the end in the voluptuous honour the end in the ambitious if all acts about the meanes or that may thwart the attaining of the end bow not to this end it s not so in Legall converts 3. When the end is attained but in hope and assurance the minde is satisfied and quieted Legall converts are not so satisfied 4. Legall converts order salvation to and for themselves and the happinesse of it not the holinesse to please themselves not to honour God because heaven is a Honey-combe that very Nature beleeving an eternity desires to sucke 5. Severe and strict walking in our sense is walking in all duties by the light and conduct of saving grace and the faith of the elect of God which wee contend for against most Antinomians who are but loose livers and cannot fall on a Legall convert CHAP. LXVIII How the Spirit worketh freely in the Antinomian way SAltmarsh boldly goeth on to hold forth When the Spirit of adoption works not freely but servilly and legally Object 1. When men put something of satisfaction on any performance as if God were prevailed with by any thing of their owne Answ. Satisfaction to revenging justice or of merit or of perfect obedience to the Law in our performances we disclaim or that we prevaile with God by any thing of our owne as if our performances were causes of turning God were any thing without the grace of Christ and his merits but for prevailing with God to obtaine a blessing by prayer and teares we say it with the Scripture Hos. 12.3 Jaakob by his strength had power with God yea hee had power over
neither reading of Scripture nor hearing the Word Preached nor vocall praying in the Spirit of adoption for sure though these must come from the heart yet essentially they are externall worship and something in the outward man beside that which is onely in the heart and something of formes they must have for they are externall visible and audible acts of worship The same was taught by a Silesian Casparus Schunenckfeldius in Luthers time as saith Conradus Schlusdelburgius Catologo Hereticorum lib. 10. pag. 30. Per externum verbum Dei ministerium praedicationem homines non converti non esse homines obligatos ad audiendam praedicationem verbi externam praedicationem non pertingere ad eos tantum herere in externis sensibus testificari duntaxat de Christo fidem aliam non esse praedicationem verbi nisi historicam neque esse fidem accidens aut qualitatem sed esse essentiam Dei Scripturam non esse verbum Dei verbum Dei non esse aliud quam substantiale nempe Christum Luther Tom. 2. in Gen. cap. 19 fol. 133. Answereth externall Ordinances invented by God profit to salvation not these that are invented by men 4. When the heart saith Del is reformed all is reformed and when the heart is right with God the outward form cannot be amisse It is cleare that Del and Antinomians mean there is no externall worship commanded in the New Testament neither hearing reading praying confessing of Christ before men so as we sinne in omitting these or that the Letter of any Command obligeth us to obedience as the Letter of the Law from the authority of the Lawgiver obliged Adam before he fell and the Jewes in the Old Testament For Del saith If the heart be reformed all will be reformed that is If the Spirit be in the heart and act us to reade heare pray confesse Christ before men receive the Seales wee are then obliged to acts of externall worship and not otherwise so that no Command written in Old or New Testament no authority of God speaking in the written word or speaking in the Ambassadors of Christ either preaching the Gospel or commanding by the Holy Ghost in Synods Acts 15.28 doe lay any obliging Commands on us to any externall worship outward Reformation or confession of Christ for the Spirit speaking in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles is but litterall outward externall to beleevers except the Spirit be in their heart acting and immediatly stirring and working there is no obliging power laid on us to externall worship or outward reformation by the Familists and Antinomians way For we know their Doctrine The Holy Ghost comes in place of the naturall faculties of the soule and acteth us immediately to all internall acts of loving and beleeving and to all externall acts of outward worship or reformation and wee are not bound to pray in our Family but when the Spirit moves and stirres us thereunto and Christ works in the Regenerate as in these that are dead and therefore all commands and exhortations are in vaine seeing we have no activitie to obey but the Spirit and Christ onely doth all in us in as much as no written word is an obliging rule to us but the immediate actings of the Spirit onely leadeth us in all wee doe M. Del Pag. 26. denies there should be any Lawes in Christs kingdome but Gods Lawes hee knowes wee are against mens Lawes within the Church and service of God to wit that of a new nature the Law of the Spirit of life that is in Christ the Law of love All these are Lawes within men there is not one word of the Scripture here or of the Gospel preached or of Church-censure Excommunication or rebukes either from the Word preached or the authority of Church all these are without and are not the inward Law of a new nature or of the Spirit or of love 5. If when the heart is reformed all bee reformed the outward man must be under no command or Law of reformation but by a result of curtesie the free Spirit and no written Law must lead the outward man but hee who said purifie your hearts gave a Commandement for the outward man clense your hands and Paul forbids the Saints who are sealed to the day of Redemption of corrupt communication of bitternesse wrath anger clamour evill-speaking and that all fornication uncleannesse covetousnesse should not be once named amongst them as becommeth the Saints yea and filthinesse and foolish talking and jesting which are not convenient because sinnes of the outward man doe also exclud men out of the kingdom of heaven aswell as want of heart-reformation and consider this is an Argument of the Familists for faith and love in the heart onely without all works of Sanctification or walking in Christ and of the Nichodemits who denyed any necessitie of confessing of Christ before before men and of the Anabaptists and their head Muncer as Bullinger tells us that they in his time said The first reformers were not sent of God nor preached the true word of God and that the Letter of the Scripture was not the Word of God but the inward word that commeth immediatly out of the mouth of God should be taught inwardly not by the Scripture and Sermons and that whoredome was the bed undefiled they held all these externals indifferent at least such things as defiled not the conscience They said Dreames and Visions under the New Testament was Gods revealed will and boasted of revelations beside the Scripture and that the Scripture was a dead Letter And so said that prophane Popish Priest the monstrous Libertine Anton. Pocquius Who called the Word of God the Spirit because Christ said The words that I speake are Spirit and life So saith Del. pag. 19. citing the same Text. Pocquius said also That Christ was Spirit that we and our life must bee spirit and that the Scripture taken in its naturall sense doth kill and is but a dead Letter and therefore wee must leave the Scripture and come to the quickning Spirit Bullinger also tells us of a sort of Anabaptists called Libertini or Liberi Anabaptistae free or Libertine Anabaptists who taught That Baptizing of Infants Magistracie Oathes were things free and indifferent which wee may use or not use at our Libertie they judged the Scripture and Preaching of the Word was not necessary because wee are all taught of God beleevers have the Spirit and need not externall Signes or Sacraments it is free to us to confesse or not to confesse Christ if danger be imminent it s enough to keepe the truth in the heart for God delights not in our death and torment After the same manner the best argument that Del hath from the nature of inward reformation will conclude If Gospel reformation because it is the internall destroying of the body of sin and is spirituall changeth the
the Lord against the mighty for sure God onely and Christ gives a peaceable and quiet life in all godlinesse and honesty to his Church as well as God onely Redeemeth onely Governeth onely Protecteth his Church and so we are not to pray for Kings and all that are in Authority that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life under them in all godlinesse as the Word saith 1 Tim. 2.2 3. then away with Magistrates Swords Gunnes warres yea away with Castles Houses Forts for if the Church bee to bee protected Christ onely must protect it So if the Church be to bee fed in Egypt or on earth by bread away with Joseph and his victuall away with tilling sowing earing trades labouring with our hands Let the Millinaries fleshly Paradice or the Adamits world returne for sure Christ onely in his way feedeth cloatheth protecteth saveth his Church 2. So Anabaptists Libertines argue God onely teacheth the heart Christ onely breaketh not the bruised reede then preaching of the Gospel and the sweet comforting promises thereof are not lawfull Let there be no Watchmen no Pastors under the New Testament for sure the Watchmen that goes about the walles will wound and smite the weake ones seeking Christ and the Letter of the Scripture is dead carnall lifelesse Christ is a quickning Spirit 3. And just so reasoned the Libertines to prove That sinne was nothing but an opinion and that wee should not rebuke any for sinne nor praise any for wel-doing Quia Deus efficit omnia in omnibus because God worketh all in all things and the sinner the Creature doth nothing Christ reformeth onely and in a better way then all the Preachers of the world and therefore none are to be rebuked for not reforming nor doe any sinne in not Preaching Law and Gospel For M. Del saith p. 12. As none can redeeme but Christ onely so none can reforme the Church but Christ onely for he onely takes away transgression and is made righteousnesse and wisdome to his people and he onely Esa. 2. Layeth low the loftinesse and hautinesse of men So he onely reformeth inwardly Angels and men cannot doe that but it followeth not therefore men by preaching the Gospel doe not reforme outwardly for then if Pastors turne dumbe dogges and reforme not outwardly they no more sinne nor are they more under any woe if they preach not contrary to 1 Cor. 9.16 Act. 20.28 2 Tim. 4.1.2 1 Pet. 5.1.2.3 then they sinne or are under a woe because they redeeme not the world and take not away transgressions and are not made to the Church righteousnesse wisdome and redemption And M. Del layeth no lesse blasphemy on the Parliaments of both Kingdomes and on the three Kingdomes when they sweare to endeavour in their severall places and callings the reformation of Religion in Doctrine Discipline and Government according to the Word of God and the example of the best reformed Churches then that they have sworne to usurpe the worke of Redemption and the offices of the Mediator By Dels way and the Antinomians in our callings and places wee shall bee Kings heads of the Church Redeemers great high Priests to offer a Propitiatory Sacrifice for the sinnes of the World Prophets by the Spirit to open one anothers heart and inwardly reforme the Churches of Christ in these three Kingdomes which all are onely incommunicable and proper to Jesus Christ the onely reformer as he is saith Del the onely Redeemer and then how durst Del usurpe Christs office in Preaching to the Parliament of England what way they should redeeme the world For sure preaching touching the right of reformation is an act of outward reformation but he did in this in the name of God as a Nathan forbid them to reforme the House of God or build the Temple because they were men of bloud But 1. knowes M. Del of a Parliament of peaceable Salomons that shall arise and build the Temple and intrude on Christs sole prerogative to redeeme and reforme inwardly 2. It was both Typicall Positive and Temporary for Salomon to build and for David not to build nor reforme that way But I hope Gospel-reformation is Morall Perpetuall not Typicall for Salomon was in that a Type of the Prince of Peace 3. He knows the Ministers of the Gospel and the Assembly of Divines by Preaching and Synodicall conclusions doe reforme as did the Apostles and Elders Acts 15. should he not say the Apostles and Elders who reformed externally were either men of bloud or intruded on Christs chaire of Lord Redeemer and the great and true and onely high Priest and that the Divines are men of bloud also and bee they men of peace or men of bloud they must bee too bold to sit in an Assembly as so many sacrilegious intruders and usurping Lord-Redeemers and that by Authority of Parliament For Del applyeth to himselfe in preaching Familisme Socinianisme Popery Libertinisme calling them all the props of the Antichrist who are not Familists Socinians with himselfe that which is peculiar to Christ Joh. 7.12 That some will say Del in Preaching thus is mad as they said of Christ and hee is more then a Nathan but I thinke the truely godly will confesse Christ to be the wisdome of God and thinke him spiritually mad as other Familists and Antinomians are Del Ser. pag. 13. I doubt not saith hee of the Churches Reformation because it is Christs owne worke and hee hath undertaken the doing of it As none can helpe him to redeeme so no power of hell shall bee able to hinder him to redeeme and reforme by his Spirit all belonging to his care and charge the rest of the world he lets lye in sinne as not belonging to his charge so I am at rest and quiet Christ will reforme Answ. So doe the New England Familists who abusing the absolute decrees of grace say None are to bee exhorted to beleeve but such whom we know to bee the elect of God or to have his spirit in them effectually Then the reprobate because absolutely reprobate are not to heare the Gospel nor should the Gospel be preached to them who stumbled at the stone laid on Zion contrary to the expresse Word of God and Gods absolute decrees must take away all industry care paines praying seeking of God for if we be chosen to life Christ hath undertaken to redeeme us if not we must lie and perish in sin M. Del saith He is at rest and quiet because Christ is as able for the reformation of his Church as for the redemption of it Now he meaneth inward reformation and conversion to God then may we all say we are at rest and quiet and will not study inward reformation and conversion of our selves or others and will no more heare the Word pray repent beleeve or preach the Word to others nor labour to bee converted or to convert others then to redeeme them with our bloud we will be at rest and quiet what Christ
of Love H.N. Epistle to the two daughters of Warwicke What H. Nicholas called hâ—mâ—elf H. Nicholas his wicked doctrine (a) H. Nicholas evangel c. 15. b Beacon catâ—â—chis 155 156. c Rise reign er 53 54. d H.N. eâ— â— c. 5. e Rise reig er 11. M. Del and H. Nicholas the familist sympathizâ— in the same Grammer and itâ— to be feared in the same doctrine touching God manifested in the flesh M. Del inclines to deny Christ God incarnate It were good he would cleare himselfe of Familisme and of this point in particular What Christ God manifested in the flesh is to Familists f H. N. â— â—xh cap. 7. g H. Nich. 1 exh c. 17. sect 26. Sect. 9 Sect. 9. Sect. 10. h H. N. Evan. c. 13. Se. 2. H. Nicholas with Antinomians M. Del. M. Beacon reject all ordinances and repute all externall worship and confessing of Christ before men all controversies in religion indifferent this wicâ—ed opinion is reâ—uted by 8 arguments Christ is truely and really perfect man not a holy dispoâ—â—tion as H. N. blasphemously saith Scriptures are not to be exponed allegorically but where the Holy Ghost so exponeth them (a) Luc Osian â—er epiâ—o hist. eccles Centur. 16. l. 2. c. 29. (b) Schlusselburgiâ—â— S. Theol. Doctâ—r Gymnasio Tralesundâ—nsiâ—iâ— pomerama in suo â—atologo â—aerâ—ticorum lib 4. p. 35 36. (c) Osiander ibi (d) Sleidanus 〈◊〉 l. 7. (e) Gualterius in tabula Chronographica sâ—cul â—6 c. 36. D. M. Luth. vehement against Antinomians who abolish the Law setteth downe the Recantation of John Islebius in the name of Islebius (a) This was no custome in the Apoâ—â—oâ—â—cke Church but by superstition keeped for the times being the dawning of Reformation Contrary to thâ—s Towne the Antinomian saith assert â—ree grace p. 3. we are â—reâ—d from the Morall Law or Decalogue with all its authority domiâ—ion offices and effects so Saltm free grace p. 140. (b) But our Antinomians say we can no more sin being once Justified then Christ himself Eaâ—on honey comb c. 3. p. 25. Saltmar fr. g. 140.146.41 honey com c 4.5 Satan removing the law which is deeply ingraven in the heart would drive men to all kind of sensuality Justifâ—ed persons have sin dwelling in them yet is it the cuâ—rent doctâ—ine 〈◊〉 the Antinomiâ—â—s of our time to teach that a beleever is not to sorrow for sin nor to fear either ill of sin or punishment but to live for ever in a merry pin yeâ— he waâ—ts nothing that the glorified in heaven have saith Saltmarsh frâ—e gra p. 140. but beleeve he is in heaven and is in heaven The preaching of the Law necessary both before and after conversion 〈◊〉 Town asser grace p. 76.77 pleadeth for perfection both of persons and works of beleevers all Antinomians doe the same as I prove Antinomians will not yeeld it lawfull to a beleever to pray for remission of sins Towne saith David in the flesh and out of weaknes prayed for it Psal. 51. asser p. 103. The Law preached witâ— Christs sufferings for the preaching therof terrifieth more Germany a stoole for Catts Antiâ—omians are against all Law humiliation that goeth before conversion contrary to Luthers method in this passage Conceit of singulariâ—y an occasiâ—n of Antinomianisme 1 Luthers suffering from Sects 2 A warning to the following generations to look for sectaries such as Antinomians Familists Anabaptists and yet to beleeve that the power of Christ shall preserve his owne Church Lucas Osiander ubi enim Lutherus docet ut saepe com supeâ— epis ad Galatas paeniâ—entem peccatorem non debere audire Mosâ—m per legem peccata accusantem sed in Christum salvatorem oculos conjiciendos qui sanet co â—rita corda inde Eislebius et alij colligerunt legem non esse docendam The tenents of Eislebius and other Antinomians in Luthers time (d) Schlusselbu cat hereticorum l. 3. p. 45 46 47. (e) Town asser p. 35. (f) Saltmarsh free grace· 154. (g) Honey combe c. 3. pag. 35. (h) Saltm fr. gr p. 140. i. Sermon the man of sin discovered rather vailed p. 10.11 The old Antinomians are not so grose as Saltmarsh and our new Antinomians Sclusselbur p. 46 47 48 49. The state of the question touching the Law as the old Antinomians framed it Antinomians say that the Law is a meer patient to a beleever and doth neither command direct nor give him any glance of light to doe Gods will the spirit is his onely light k Saltmarsh fr. gr p. 146 147. l Town asser gr p. 10. what if it be affirmed that even in true sanctification the law of workes is a meere passive thing as the Kings high way which a christian freely walketh iâ— you can never have face to deny it Psal. 119. â— 2. (i) Saltmarsh free grace 140. pag. 142. (k) Towne asser grace pag. 34. (l) Schlusseâ— catalogo haeriticorum l. 3. pag. 47 48 49. Novus homo â—ustus regeneratus renatus perfectus in Christo Iesu et completus in ipso Sanctus justus innocens unum cum Christo caro de carne et os ex ossibus eius illud ipsum denique ex gratia side et imputatione quod Christus est natura in quo Christus vivit loquitur facit et operatur omnâ—a nam omnia opera eius sunt opera Christi â—uius ipse est mera passiva maâ—er a. (m) Towne ass grace pag 41 42 43. (n) Mâ—t. 10.18 19 20. Ioh. 16.1 2. Luk. 21.15 â—6 17 18 19 20. Ioh. 21.18 19 20. 1 Pet. 3.14 15 16 17. (o) Schluss cat haer l. 3. p. 82. (p) Honyâ—co c. 4 43 44 45 46 47 48 c c. 3.23 24 25. (p) Honyâ—co c. 4 43 44 45 46 47 48 c c. 3.23 24 25. (q) Tow. ass gra p. 95 96 97 c. (r) Salt free grace 144 145 146. c. Mart. Luther more agâ—inst Antinomiaâ—s then any man Divers usefull distinctions touching the law and the beleevers freedome from it tending to cleare the minde of Luther and Protestants Three speciall uses of the law according to M. Luther (a) Luther to 2 in Gen. c. 18. fol 18. b Luther writeth against the Antinomianâ— by name Luther â—o 2. in Gen c. 18 f. 119. Luthâ—r â—â—fuâ—eth the Antâ—nomians under the name of Antinomians is enemies to the law of God c Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 18. fo 119. d 19. fo 118. e Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 19. f. 132 f Luther tom 2 in Gen c 2. fol 132. g Luther tom 1. pa 555. Luther extolleth good works against all Antinomians h Luther tom 3. fol. 109. I Luth. ttm. 3 fâ—l 165 l Luth tom 1 fol 449. m Luth tom 1 fol 522. n Luther to 2 in Gen. c. 15. fol. 57. (o) Luther to 2 in Gen. Luther teachâ—eth that only faith justifieth and yet faith is not alone with out good workes Luther tom 2 fol. 517. How faith and workes are contrary to Luther (a) Luther to 2 in Gen.