being in it self Spiritually Visible and Visibly Spiritual must needs have a Head proportionable to it in all degrees otherwise it cou'd but appear a monstrous Body the Head and Members being of different Natures That it is not so I prove out of the very words of Christ establing his Church and that drawn out of your own English Bible But give me leave my Lord to gloss a little first on your own words and you will see I will not forget my positive Proofs of Scripture In the mean time you must needs know I admir'd much your vehemency in protesting against that Church which allows of any Visible Spiritual Head you flew to such eagerness of Contradiction against this Spiritual Supremacy that I thought sure you had some solid authority to disprove the pretended abuse till at last I found you had no such Proof in Nature only probare idem per idem viz. that the Church had no such Head at all but a politick one such as King Saul was to the Jewish Church This was gratis said without the least Proof of Scripture or Reason which Circular way of Proof is to be exploded out of all Schools But will you give me leave to tell your Lordship that the Bible cou'd afford a fitter Example to your purpose then that of a King reproved by God for his Presumption in Church-authority for all the World knows that God Almighty abandon'd Saul because he presumed in Samuels absence to offer Sacrifice which is a sign he never intended to make him Head of the Jewish Church But why did not your Lordship take a better example out of the 14th Chap. of Gen. Where Melchisedec King of Salem was mightily pleasing to God for offering Bread and Wine in an action of Grace for Abrahams Victory over his Enemies Here you may find one man King and Priest together for he is call'd in the self-same place Sacerdos Dei Altissimi The Priest of the highest God. You omitted him I suppose because he is call'd Sacerdos if he had been call'd Minister Dei Altissimi sure you would not miss to make him Head of the Church of his Kingdom and a Protestant Head too seeing he offer'd the self-same substance you offer now viz Bread and Wine the figure of the Flesh and Blood of Jesus Christ But this very thing was able to hinder your Lordship from making use of Melchisedeck's example for his Bread and Wine being own'd by all to have been the Type of the Sacrament we adore on our Altars it cou'd but seem very strange to your Flock that the Son of God shou'd take so much pains in establishing a Figure that was so many Ages ago establish'd already and that by the appointment of God himself and sure no man of sense cou'd miss to find such an establishment of an idem per idem contrary to reason and much more to the infinite Prudence of an All-seeing God for God and Nature have done nothing in vain Deus natura nihil fecerunt frustra which he must needs have done if it be true what Protestants say that he left us barely the Figure of his most precious Flesh and Blood in Bread and Wine having had the same Type already since the time of Abraham But of this we will say more in its own place now let us turn to the Church Supremacy and see whether it be Civilly or Spiritually Establish'd by Christ on Earth and I will begin by pressing home the matter to your Lordships own doors Tell me I pray whether your power in Bath and Wells be Spiritual or Civil Not Civil for then you shou'd take your Rank amongst the Lords Temporal in Parliament your Lordship ergo must own your self to be Spiritual Head of your Flock and it is so indeed if any What priviledge I pray can your private Diocess have of enjoying a visible Spiritual Head and not the whole Church For it is more repugnant to Scripture and Reason that a private Bishoprick shou'd have that blessing which you deny to the Universal Church then that the whole Church Hierarchically govern'd shou'd have a Spiritual Head and that by the very Institution of Christ This I prove by Scripture as I promis'd and do begin with St. Peter his change of name which was first Simon Read I beseech you without your Spectacles of selfishness and interest all the following Proofs drawn out of your own Bible and begin with the 16th Chap. of St. Matth. 17 18th Vers And there you will find Jesus Christ ordaining St. Peter Spiritual Head of his Church First he gives him his blessing and calls him by his proper name blessed art thou Simon Barjona for Flesh and Blood have not reveal'd it unto thee You see then how he purifies him from Flesh and Blood and consequently spiritualizes him In the Verse following he changes his Name in saying And I say unto thee that thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it What can be more formally positive for St. Peters Spiritual Supremacy and for that of his Successors than this But I will give your Lordship yet the trouble to see more Proofs out of your own Bible for this Spiritual Supremacy and I defie all the World to shew me as much as one passage out of Scripture that shall be formally positive to the contrary I say the same of all other Controvertable Points But to come to my purpose I desire you to read the 22th Chapter of St. Luke 31 32th Vers Simon behold Satan hath desired to have you that he may sift you as Wheat but I have prayed for thee ut non deficiat fides tua Remark that Satan desir'd to sift all the Apostles but we see that Jesus Christ did Pray here for St. Peter only Rogavi pro te Petre that his Faith may not fail Wherefore according to the words of your own Bible St. Peters Supremacy remains yet in his Successors and shall do to the Worlds end Vt fides tua non deficiat What sayeth St. Matthew concerning the Infallibity of this Spiritual Supremacy It is in the 23th Chap. 2 Vers The Scribes and Pharisees sit on Moses's seat all therefore they bid you observe that observe and do how cou'd Christ bid the Jews observe and do all that he should bid by those that sate in Moses Chair if they could err And why should not we conclude that Christ hath no less preserved the Truth of Christian Religion in the Chair of St. Peter which is in the New and not in the Typick Law Therefore the power St. Peter received once for himself and his Successors did never fail nor ever shall St. John in the 11th Chap. of his Gospel and 51 Vers Speaking of Caiaphas the High Priest says much to this very purpose And this he spake not of himself but being High Priest that year he prophesied that Jesus should die for that Nation Will
And he led them out as far as to Bethany and he lifted up his hands and blessed them You see therefore that blessing and signing with the Cross are founded on holy Scripture That it was the Primitive practice of the true Church used in all Ages since the Passion of Christ cannot be denied I call to witness all the Crosses that ever have been Erected in High-ways and on Eminent places some by the Apostles some by their Successors others by devout Lay-men and all by the Authority and Example of the Church Witness that great Cross found not many Ages ago in the Indies where St. Thomas the Apostle Preached the Gospel of Christ Witness all the Crowned Heads of Christian Kings that are now or ever have been in the World witness in fine all the Church-Pinacles that ever were seen as well in England as in any other part of Christendom We ought not sure to forget Chairing-Cross supposed by many to have been the richest of most Crosses after that on which our sweet Redeemer has suffered Now I leave to your own Judgement Impartial Reader to consider the difference between the Church that Erected all of those Monuments of Christian Piety and the pretended Church that levell'd all to the Ground and endeavour'd to bury the memory of Primitive Piety and ancient Devotion Do not we find in History that it was revealed from Heaven to the first Christian Emperour an English-man born and his Mother an English-woman also quod in hoc signo vinces you will overcome in this sign and well it became him for he was never ashamed thereof but shewed himself all his Life time a true worshipper of the Cross and for that he had always the better of his Enemies both visible and invisible and it is well known that all the true Worshipers of the Cross do the like But some body will say that I mistake in Protestants that they are not at all such Enemies to the Cross that many of them can very well abide a Crucifix in their Chambers and pay to it due Respect and Veneration And why not I pray a Roman Catholick Cannot he have the Spirit of discerning the Honour due to a Crucifix as well as a Protestant Sure that zealous Church of England Worshipper of a Crucifix intends to perswade the world that what may be a respectful Ornament in his Chamber must needs be a Golden Calf in that of a Roman Catholick and why Because he supposes that He alone has the Spirit of discerning the Honour due to a Crucifix let him shew me this in Scripture otherwise I will shew him that he judgeeth most rashly for there can be no rasher judgement than that of ones interiour which is only known to God scrutator cordium renum Deus true or false Worwip must come from the interiour witness these words of our Saviour populus hic labiis me honorat cor autem eorum longe est a me This People honour me with their Lips hut their heart is far from me You see then that there is but God only that knows their heart beware therefore gentle Reader never to offer at being Judge of that Court wherein God only is Supream Judge and each particular a sub-altern-one none knowing effectually what passeth in foro Conscientiae but God and himself You must needs then be very weary how you judge what you judge and of whom you judge for fear of being judged It is but what we are commanded to observe in the Gospel Nolite judicare non judicabimini do not judge and you will not be judged This is all the Advertisement I have to give you good Reader before you begin to read the ensuing Treatise Farewell ANIMADVERSIONS By way of ANSWER TO A SERMON Preach'd by Doctor Thomas Kenne Lord Bishop of BATH and WELLS In the Cathedral Church of Bath On ASCENTION-DAY last Being the Fitfh of May 1687. I Was honour'd my Lord with being one of your Auditors last Ascention-day in the Afternoon at the Cathedral Church of Bath Your Lordship I own does not want the parts of an Orator and of an Evangelical one too had you but suck'd your Doctrine as St. John hath done De Sacro Dominici pectoris fonte that is to say within the Bosom of his only true Spouse on Earth the Roman Catholick Church Mother and Mistress of all Visible Churches That you have not suck'd your Learning from the Breast of Christ in his True Church I prove ex ore tuo To enter directly to the matter I begin my Lord with your Text drawn out of the 47 Psalm 5. Ver. Ascendit Deus in jubilo God is gone up with a shout the Lord with the sound of a Trumpet I remarked your Lordship sweated hard to fit this Text more to the Typick ascent of the Ark of Alliance from the house of Obededon to Mount Sion than to the real assent of Jesus Christ from Mount Olivet to the right hand of God the Father You took so much pains in describing to the least circumstance of the first that you had not time enough to enlarge your self much on the latter tho' This was far more to your purpose then That it was not want of time for you were a full hour and a half in Chair All that I cou'd pick out of your tedious description of the Ark was that when you compar'd it to a long Chest with painted Cherubims much like to the Angels you Paint now adays I thought your Church allow'd of no Angels to be Painted at all But now that you speak of them you cannot deny but they were Painted or Engraved on the Ark by Gods own Direction God cou'd never give directions for Idolatry You see then my Lord that to have a Crucifix or Picture of Saints or Angels and pay due respect to them cannot be Idolatry provided still that the Worship of Latria only due to God be not given them but a respective veneration which we call Dulia for Saints and Angels and Hyper-Dulia for the blessed Virgin Mother of God. In the Second place I took notice your Lordship thought it too too long you were without giving a fling at the Popes Supremacy to which you shew'd all aversion imaginable and that because he is call'd Supream Spiritual Head of Christs Church on Earth We call his Holiness it is true Supream Spiritual and Visible Head Vicar of Jesus Christ and Successor to St. Peter the first visible Head our Saviour hath ordained in his Church and we have Scripture enough for calling him so as you shall soon see but you have none to the contrary I remember you said that Jesus Christ was and is the only spiritual Head of his Church A little distinguo here my Lord may do well Jesus Christ is the only Supream Spiritual and Invisible Head of his Church as well Triumphant as Militant Concedo Jesus Christ is the only Spiritual and Visible Head of his Church Militant I deny because this Church
of that Verse I am the living Bread which came down from Heaven if any man eat of this Bread he shall live for ever and the Bread that I will give is my Flesh which I give for the Life of the World. What can be more positive for our purpose Yet Beza had the impudence to translate most perfidiously Life giving Bread instead of Living Bread but in this he was most absurdly perfidious for the Sun is Life giving tho' not living and being granted that this Bread is living it must of necessity be Jesus Christs own precious Body St. Paul 1 Cor. 10. v. 16. Proves it positively as appears by the following words The Cup of Blessing which we bless is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ The Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ And 1 Cor. 12. v. 29. for he that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself not discerning the Lords Body There is none if he be not wilfully blind but may see out of both these passages and out of many more that before Jesus Christ gave this Sacrament to his Apostles at the actual giving it them and after he had given it them and they to others both Christ and his Apostles call it Flesh and Blood Christ sayeth This is my Flesh this is my Blood. And the Apostles name it Corpus Domini the Lords Body Now my Lord I will urge one instance more against your Communion by Faith only and thus I proceed either your Lordships Soul in your actual Communion ascendeth to Heaven there to feed on Christ by Faith or else Christ descendeth to feed your Soul. What to this my Lord You cannot allow the first for so your unglorified Soul should be in two places at once which you deny even to the very glorified Soul and Body of Christ You do not allow the second for so Christ shou'd be in two places at once and if in two why not in an hundred and an hundred thousand For the one is no more difficult to Gods absolute Power then the other This you do not allow for once granted the rest cou'd not be denied I wou'd fain then know what you are at in your Sacramental Communion for I do not find any third way your Lordship can feed in truth and really on Christs Body in your Sacrament nay I am sure you never found it out yet your self nor ever shall Now I see you must own you cannot well tell the way or manner how your Soul feeds on Christs most Sacred Body in the Sacrament You eat him then non dijudicans Corpus Domini viz. Not discerning the Lords Body Pray then read your own judgement in St. Paul 1 Cor. 22. judicium sibi manducat bibit He eats and drinks his own judgement I shall beg of your Lordship once more to deal sincerely and tell me your own opinion of the Protestant Communion I know full well what you say in the exposition of your Catechism Printed for Charles Brome anno 1686. That I know and will soon bring down your very words which are quite opposited to what I heard you Preach the last Ascention-Day But tell me once more I pray your meaning in this particular For my part I want day to find you out for I see your Sermon contradicts your Writings non es ergo tibi constans i. e. you are not constant to your self For now you receive Christs Flesh and Blood virtually now Figuratively another time spiritually by Faith and in Exposition of your Catechism you contradict all that in teaching the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ to be verily and indeed taken by the Faithful in our Lords Supper Here are your own words Pag. 75. Glory be to thee O adorable Jesus who under the outward and visible part the Bread and Wine things obvious and easily prepared both which thou hast commanded to be received dost communicate to our Souls the Mystery of Divine Love the inward and invisible Grace thy own most blessed Body and Blood which are verily and indeed taken and received by the Faithful in thy Supper for which all Love all Glory be to thee These are your own words my Lord Catholick enough on the Paper but quite contrary to what you teach in the Pulpit for there you say That the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ is verily and indeed taken by the Faithful and here you say not at all but sometimes one way and sometimes another spiriritually to day by Faith only and virtually to morrow and in your Catechism you write indeed and verily So that I cannot compare your Opinion of this Mystery better then to what White of Lincoln chargeth Bishop Ridley with concerning the destruction of Altars and the Erecting of Communion Tables in the beginning of the Reformation You will find it in Doctor Heylins History the 5th year of King Edward the 6ths Reign Pag. 106. Here are the words That when their Table was Constituted they could never be content in placing the same now East now North now one way now another until it pleased God of his goodness to place it quite out of the Church So much out of Heylin I say the same of your Lordships placing the Body and Blood of Christ in the Sacrament now Virtually now Figuratively now Spiritually now by Faith only and in your Catechism verily and indeed until at last it pleased God of his goodness to place himself quite out of your Sacrament Disprove this parity if you can In fine I remember your Lordship protested mightily against Roman Catholicks for Coining and Forgeing new Articles of Faith as well in relation to Transubstantiation as to spiritual Supremacy c. You ought to know my Lord that there is no Church on Earth that protests more against Innovations in matters of Faith Manners and Religious Ceremonies than the Roman Catholick Church As to what belongs to Faith we say write and teach publickly that all Articles of Faith are in themselves un-alterable being they are Eternal Verities whose Objects are eternally true Omnes articuli fidei sunt immutabiles eo quod objecta eorum sint eternae veritatis Nay we say and solemnly protest that St. Peter with all his Successors together if you will in one Chapter cannot alter and much less make one only Article of Faith they all being eternal verities belonging solely to Gods immediate Revelation It is true the Church can declare what is of Faith to be of Faith and what is not of Faith not to be of Faith And this is all the Church of Rome pretends to in the Decision of matters of Faith. So much in answer to your Lordships vehemency against Coiners of new Articles of Faith. Find them out and our Church will condemn 'em with much more Authority than your Lordship who ought rather to charge your own Church with that errour witness your 39 Articles than ours This is the substance my Lord of all
the Blessed Virgin Mary the Prayers of St. Briget c. And several other most Devout Prayers to our Blessed Redeemer Also the Vespers or Even-Song in Latine and English as it is Sung in all Catholick Churches Newly Corrected Price 1 s. A Collection of 86 Loyal Poems all of them Written upon the two late Plots viz. The horrid Salmanca Plot in 1678. and the real Fanatical Conspiracy in 1683. To which is added Advice to the Carver Written on the Death of the late Lord Stafford With several Poems on their Majesties Coronation never before Published The second Edition Collected by N. T. Price Bound 2 s. A choice Collection of 180 Loyal Songs all of them Written since the two late Plots c. Intermixt with some new Love Songs With a Table to find every Song To which is added the Musical Notes to each Song The Third Edition with many Additions Price 2. s. The Lawyer Out-law'd or a brief Answer to Mr. Hunt's Defence of the Charter With some useful Remarks on the Commons proceedings in the last Parliament at Westminster in a Letter to a Friend Price 6 d. Janua Scientiarum or a Compendious Introduction to Geography Chronology Government History Philosophy and all gentile sorts of LITERATURE Price Bound 1 s. The State of the Church Affairs in this Island of Great Britain under the Government of the Romans and British Kings Written by a Person of Quality And published by Authority Price 4 s. The Succession of the Church and Sacraments from Christ and his Apostles to the end of the World cleared and stated according to the Ancient Doctrine of the Greek and Latine Churches Price 6 d. A brief Explanation of several Mysteries of the H. Mass and of the Actions of the Priest Celebrating Very necessary for all Roman Catholicks for the better understanding thereof Together with certain Reflections upon the Apostles Creed touching the B. Sacrament and also divers Meditations and Prayers both before and after Communion Price 1 s. Veritas Evangelica or the Gospel-Truth asserted in Sixteen useful Questions being seriously searched into will open the way to find out assuredly the True and Saving Faith of Christ which is but One as the Apostle affirms Eph. 4. One Lord one Faith one Baptism Price 1 s. A Discourse of Confession to a Lawful Priest wherein is Treated of the last Judgement By Peter Manby Dean of London-Derry in Ireland Price 1 s. The Considerations which obliged Peter Manby Dean of London-Derry to embrace the Roman Catholick Religion Humbly Dedicated to his Grace the Lord Primate of Ireland Price 6 d. Some Queries to the Protestants conerning the English Reformation By Peter Manby Dean of London-Dery in Ireland Popery Anatomised or the Papists cleared from the false Aspersion of Idolatry Price 4 d. A Papist Misrepresented and Represented Or a two-fold Character of Popery c. Price 1 s. Ordo Recitandi Officii pro Anno Dommini 1687. Price 6 d. A Net for the Fishers of Men being the same which Christ gave to his Apostles wherein the points controverted betwixt Catholicks and all Sectaries are briefly vindicated by way of Dilemma By two Gentlemen Converts Price 4 d. An Explication of the Holy Ornaments and Ceremonies which the Priest uses at Mass Price 2 d. A Sermon Preach'd before the King and Queen in their Majesties Chappel at St. James on Sunday Octob. 24. 1686. By the Reverend Father Dom. W. Marsh Monk of the Holy Order of St. Benedict Chaplain in Ordinary to his Majesty Published by his Majesties Command price 6 d. A Sermon Preach'd before their Majesties in their Chappel at St. James's the 25th Sunday after Pentecost Nov. 17. 1686. By John Dormer of the Society of Jesus Price 6 d. A Sermon Preach'd before their Majesties in their Chappel at St. James's the 2 d. Sunday in Advent Dec. 6. 1686. By John Dormer of the Society of Jesus Price 6 d. A Sermon of Judgement Preach'd before the Queen Dowager in her Majesties Chappel at Somerset-House on the first Sunday in Advent being the 25th of November 1686. By John Dormer of the Society of Jesus Price 6 d. all Published by his Majesties Command A Sermon Preach'd before the King and Queen at their Chappel at St. James's on the Feast of the Holy Patriarch St. Bennet By J. Cross of the Holy Order of St. Francis. An Apology for the Contemplations on the Life and Glory of the Holy Mother of JESUS shewing the Innocency Equity and antiquity of the Honour and Veneration given to Her by the Holy Catholick-Church By J. C. A New Test of the Church of Englands Loyalty FINIS