but this may serue for a tasse in the interim vntill we discourse hereof more particularly in the second Chapter of the Treatise following Now this is sufficient to shew the falsitie and pouertie of the Translator and his Notes and Obsernations vpon S. AVSTINES Confessions wherein most simply and weakely hee endeuoureth to make that worthie Father of his partie Quid est egere sayth S. AVSTINE de Vit. Beat. And he answereth Sapientiam non habere And againe he sayth Nihil est aliud habere egestatem quam habere stultitiam So that by Saint AVSTINES iudgement this man being void of Wisdome and full of Foolerie is but a poore Translator wracking himselfe vpon S. AVSTINE vpon whom he meant to lay the ground of his foolish and vaine Religion Therein also we may percciue how vainely our Aduersaries boast of Fathers and especially of S. AVGVSTINE who in all important matters of Faith are directly opposite vnto them But leauing all further preambular speeches we will now begin to handle such matters as the rinegned Translator doth principaelly insist vpon THE VNMASKING of a Masse-monger WHO In the counterfeit habit of S. AVGVSTINE hath cunningly crept into the Closets of many English Ladyes OR The Vindication of S. AVGVSTINES Confessions from the false and malicious Calumniations of a late noted Apostate CHAP. I. That S. AVSTINE neuer knew either the Decrees of the conuenticle of Trent enacted against vs or that part of the Romish Religion which the Church of England admitteth not and which the Apostate and his consorts hold to bee Catholicke MVch doe our Aduersaries insist vpon the name of Catholikes and title of the Catholike Church So doe also all other Heretikes as saith Lactantius lib. 4. Diuin instit c 30. Singuli quique haeriticorum caetus se potissimum Christianos suam esse ecclesiam eatholicam putant But if that be Catholike which at all times of all Christians and in all places hath beene holden as Vincentius Lirinensis aduers haeres teacheth vs then certes the Doctrine of the Church of Rome is not Catholike In the judgement of S Augustine it cannot be accompted either Catholike or soundly Christian For first S. Austine referreth himselfe in all matters of faith to holy Scriptures and speaketh most reuerently of them Canonica scriptura veteris noui Testamenti saith he Lib. 11. contr Faust c. 5. Est in sede quadum sublimiter constituta cujus authoritati seruiat omnis fidelis pius intellectus Hee placeth their Authoritie aboue all Councels Fathers and Popes and would haue all pious Christians to submit their vnderstanding vnto them but such as rayled vpon them and called them a dead and killing letter and said they were imperfect obscure ambiguous and flexible he neuer did acknowledge to be Catholikes or Christians He neuer beleeued nor knew the traditions of the Church of Rome concerning the consecrating of Crosses and Images their greasing and crossing of Altars their-hallowing of Churches with oyle holy-water and ashes their consecrating of paschall Lambes Salt Holy-water Ashes the baptizing of Bells the blessing of Priests garments the mysseries of the Masse their shauing and greasing vsed in giuing Orders nor the rest of their traditions He beleeued not that traditions not written were to be receiued with like affectiō as we receiue holy Scriptures Nay contrary he gaue the highest place to Canonicall Scripture That traditions should be added to the rule of Faith was more then he could euer imagine Sancta scriptura saith he Debon viduit c. 1. Nostrae doctrinae regulam figit Holy Scripture giueth vs a fixt and certaine rule And l. 2. con Donatist He accounteth the Scriptures to be a diuine ballancer wherein Doctrines may be justly weighed But other ballancers he accounteth deceitfull Non afferamus stateras dolosas saith he Vb◠appendamus quod volumus quomodo volumus pro arbitrie nostro dicentes hoc graue hoc leue sed afferamus diuinam stateram de Scripturis sanstis tanquam de the sauris Dominicis in illa quid sit grauius appendamus imò non appendamus sid à Domino appensam recognoscamus The Church of Rome beleeueth that the old vulgar Latine translation of the Bible is authenticall and neither the Hebrew text of the old nor the Greeke of the new Testament But S. Austine gaue no such credit to that or any other tranflation Nay contrary lib. 15. de ciuit D.c. 13. hee preferreth Originals before all Translations Ei linguae potius credatur saith hee vnde est in aliam per interpretes facta translatio And lib. 2. de doctr Christ c. 11. He would haue men to haue recourse to the Hebrew and Greeke text for the variety of Translations Lib. 2. de doctr Christ c. 15. he saith Translations ought to giue place to the Greeke text of the New Testament To come to the Pope who is the founder of the grand Idoll of the Masse and the Oracle from whom his followers deriue the certainty of their Romish traditions S. Austine neuer knew the man Nay if any man in his time had said that the Bishop of Rome had two Swords and power to depose Kings and dispose of their Kingdomes and that he was the Vniuersall Bishop of the Church the head foundation and Spouse ministeriall of the same and finally that hee was the supreame judge of Faith and had Authoritie to make new Articles of the Faith doth any man thinke that so holy and wise a man could haue contained himselfe within the limites of patience hearing such monstrous Paradoxes The Schoole doctrine concerning Merites of congruitie and condignitie Iustice by workes bodies being in many places at once and filling no place accidents nourishing like substances and yet subsiding without any subiect Popish dispensations for all flagitious sinnes Diuels tormenting just mens soules in Purgatory satisfactions for sinne by Whipping and going Bare-foot washing away sinnes with Holy-water and expiating them by knocking the brest and the Priests blessing and such other Schoole-points were not knowne to S. Austine nor heard of in his time All the authenticall Doctrine of the Romish Synagogue is contayned in the Popes decretals and decrees and was published and confirmed in the second Nicene Synode in the assemblies of Laterane Constance Florence and Trent How then could that holy Father know a Faith that was so long after his time established Could he Prophecie that the men of Trent would decree that Christians should be justified by the Popes law That the Images of the Trinitie should bee worshipped with Latria That Saints and Angels should be inuocated That men should beleeue Transubstantiation auricular Confession seauen Sacraments and such like late doctrines S. Austine lib 11. contr Faust c. 5. Would haue all pious vnderstanding made subiect to the high authority of Scriptures Neither did he beleeue that the same might be confirmed by any mans writing Is it then likely that he should teach or thinke that Scriptures in respect of vs receiued their
authority from the Churches of Romes decrees or from the Pope That the Pope should bee an infallible Interpretor of Scripture and supreame Moderator of Religion S. Austine neuer heard Nay disaduowing all the Popes decretals and other mens writings he signifieth that hee oweth his consent without all exception onely to canonicall Scriptures In quorumlibet hominum scriptis saith he lib. de natur grat Liber sum quia solis canonicis scripturis debeo sine vlla recusatione consensum S. Austine neuer prayed to the Virgin Mary nor call vpon her and other Saints and Angels or teach that they were to be worshipped with Dulia If he had dedicated his Confessions to the Virgin Mary as doth the Apostate his absurd translation I should beleeue that he had learned somewhat from that holy Father He neuer beleeued that the Virgin Mary was conceiued without sinne or that she was the mediatrix or redemptrix of Mankind together with her Sonne or that her body is already assumed into heauen as this Apostate her deuout slaue and others hold Nor did hee euer teach that Saints in heauen heard the prayers and vnderstood the thoughts of all men and in all places here on earth or that they could helpe them giue them grace and deliuer them Hee might make a commemoration of the names of the faithfull hence departed and commend his Mother to God But neuer taught or beleeued that his mothers and other faithfull mens soules which he mentioned at the Lords table were tormented in Purgatory Hee was no Masse-priest nor euer offered Christs body really for quicke and dead nor said Masse for sicke horses as Masse Priests doe That Christs body and blood should bee contained vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine and that seuerally is so extrauagant a Paradoxe that it could neuer be found in the holy Fathers writings Nor could he beleeue that either reprobates or brute beasts did eat Christs flesh and drinke his blood The Sacrament hee neither adored nor carried it about nor put it into a Pixe neither did he allow any such thing done by others He neuer confessed his sinnes to the Virgin Mary or to Angels or Saints or pray them to intercede for him as doe Masse-Priests Much lesse did hee pray for Christs body that it might bee graciously accepted as was the Sacrifice of Abell and Melchisedech and carried into heauen as doe the Apostates consorts This Apostate cannot demonstrate that St. Austine euer thought that Salt and Water consecrated would cause Thunder to cease and driue away Diuels Let him bring forth the testimony of any man or Diuell to proue this and then his deuoted followers may perchance beleeue him That Christians should be burned for holding that flesh may be eaten on Frydayes or Saints Vigils as this vncharitable Apostate and his Teachers beleeue he cannot prooue that so holy a Father as S. Austine eyther taught or allowed The Precepts of the Romish Church concerning Holy-dayes Fasts Masses auricular Confession and prohibition of Marriage were neuer knowne to S. Augustine nor could be being brought in by diuers Popes that liued since his time Neyther did he teach or beleeue that Treasons against Princes and States heard by Priests in Confession were not to be reuealed or that the seale of Confession of which the Masse-Priests talke as of a diuine Mysterie was ordained by God Of the cases reserued to the Pope which are a principall bulwarke of the Papall authoritie S. Austine neuer heard newes Neyther was hee acquainted with the Popes Penitentiarie Taxe or the rules of his Chancerie nor thought it fit that Periurie Incest Murder and all irregularities should bedispensed withall or pardoned for Money Finally all those Heresies and Nouelties which the Romanists now hold and maintaine with all sraud and force were eyther reiected by S. Austine or vtterly vnknowne vnto him CHAP. II. That those principall points of Romish Religion which we reiect are also reiected and contradicted by S. AVSTINE NEyther doth S. Austine onely passe ouer in silence the new-forged Religion of Papists maintained by this Apostate but also directly oppugne the same They euery where vilifie holy Scriptures as imperfect difficult ambiguous calling them a Nose of Wax a Delphian Sword a dead Letter Matter of Contention S. Austine contrariwise extolleth them as placed in a sublime place of authoritie and from them he would haue none to depart Extat authoritas sacrae Scripturae vnde mens nostra deuiare non debet saith he Lib. 3. de Trinit cap. 11. They admit Traditions and the Popes Definitions for a Rule of Faith but this holy Father admitteth no Rule but holy Scripture Canon Ecclesiasticus saith he constitutus est ad quem certi Apostolorum Prophetarum libri pertinent The words are extant Lib. 2. contr cresc gram c. 31. In the same place he would not haue any to iudge of Scripture but to iudge according to it but the Pope taketh vpon him to taxe and iudge of Scripture yea to pronounce without it and against it The Apostate and his Consorts esteeme the Scriptures to be hard and ambiguous S. Austine lib. 2. de Doct. Christ c. 9. saith That whatsoeuer is necessarie to saeluation is contained in plaine places of Scripture The Iesuits muster against vs Traditions Decretals Fathers and such like testimonies but S. Austine reiecting all the rest would haue all proofes deriued out of Scriptures Lib. de vnit Eccles c. 3. Auferantur saith he ille de medio quae aduersus nos inuicem non ex Diuims Canonicis Libris sed aliunde recitamus They goe about to marke out a Church by Vnitie Vniuersalitie Antiquitie and Succession but S. Austine de vnit Eccles c. 1. would haue the question of the Church to be decided by Scriptures Inter nos Donatistas quaestio est vbi sit Ecclesia quid ergo facturi sumus saith he in verbis nostris eam quaesituri an in verbis capitis sui Domini nostri Iesu Christi These presumptuous fellowes preferre themselues before Scripture determining according to the Popes Decretals what Bookes are Canonicall and what the meaning is of euery Text but S. Austine lib. 2. contr Cresc c. 21. sheweth that neyther any particular man nor the Church it selfe is to preferre it selfe before Christ Now who knoweth not that Christ speaketh to vs in Scriptures Ecclesia saith he non debet se Christo praeponere And Confess 13. c. 23. he would not haue any to iudge of the sublime authoritie of the Booke of God They receiue not holy Scriptures vnlesse the Church that is the Pope propose them and declare them to be Canonicall S. Austine lib. 6. Confess c. 5. blameth such as are not by Scriptures perswaded to accept them They hold the old Latine vulgar Translation to be authenticall but contrarie to S. Augustines iudgement Bellarmine Leo Castrius Lindaue and diuers other Papists taxe holy Scriptures in the Originals of Impuritie and Corruption but contrarie to S. Augustines iudgement
fourthly he was not subiect to the Pope nor liued vnder any certaine Rule fiftly he whipped not himselfe as the Fryars now doe sixtly he retyred not into a solitarie house but into his owne house as Possidonius reporteth Was hee not then ashamed to tell so many vntruths with one breath He addeth that a principall Caualier offered to depend on his aduice in the way of spirit and that there were many Monasteries alreadie erected in S. Austines time A grosse Leasing deuised not without the instigation of some wicked Spirit For first the Monasteries of Aegypt and Syria were of another fashion secondly Benct brought the Orders of Monkes first into Italie thirdly Possidonius calleth the man Agentem in Rebus A Factor for the Emperour fourthly of the dependance vpon S. Austine by way of spirit there is no mention in Possidonius Another grosse Leasing related by the Translator is that which is related concerning a Monasterie built by S. Augustine in a Garden Possidonius sayth it was in the Church and there liued not Canons regular as this irregular and prodigall fellow reporteth but some seruants of God that followed the Apostles rule and not the fashions of Monkes or the Decrees of Popes The Order of Priesthood he tooke but not the Orders of Masse-Priests sacrificing for quicke and dead Nay he preached the Gospel which Masse-Priests doe not and was made Bishop without any Bulls of the Pope being chosen by the Clergie and People That Euangelicall perfection consisteth in Monasticall Obedience hee neuer thought nor did hee found a Monasterie for Canons Regular These be Fictions and Lyes deuised by the Apostate for the maintenance of his Popish Religion the North-starre of his Discourse by which hee directeth his broken Barke He confesseth that hee was frequent in Preaching Catechizing and teaching of youth A plaine conuiction of the sloath and negligence of the Romish woluish Prelates which neither Preach nor Teach nor Catechise He addeth that hee compounded Differences and exercised himselfe in workes of Charity But Popish Prelats enflame Warres vexe poore Christians Murther Innocents and are voyd of Charitie and full of vices and villany That his Bishoppricke should be worth 40. M. Crownes by the yeare is a pleasant conceit of a foolish Factor of the Pope measuring times past wherein the Church was poore and needy with the time present wherein Popish Prelates exceed in Luxurie and Pride To error in beleefe and sensuality of Life he confesseth hee was admirably opposite To which the Apostate and his consorts are admirably addicted being Heretikes by profession and sensuall Epicures in life and conuersation Yet did S. Austine neuer vant of his noble Cooperation with Gods grace or say he made a superabundant satisfaction for his former offences These bee glorious vaunts of Popish Heretikes which take to themselues power of satisfactions and merites due to Christ. Hee maketh S. Austine also vnspeakably pure from a Papist turning to be a Puritane and giueth that to S. Augustine that he neuer tooke to himselfe He addeth that S. Austine did expiate 16. yeares of his Youth vncleanly spent As if a man were able to purge his sinnes and to make an attonement for them Making S. Austine a Redeemer and a teacher of perfect Iustice the first being Blasphemy and the second Pelagian Heresie Of the tendernesse of S. Austines Conscience and the rigour vsed by him in examination of his small imperfections hee talketh idly himselfe and his Consorts hauing Consciences seared with hot yrons and not examining their most flagitious Offences following sensuall Lusts falsifying their Words and Oathes murthering Gods Saints maintaining Stewes teaching Rebellion and open wickednesse He accumulated sayth the Apostate a huge stocke of Merites But S. Austine alwayes disauowed his owne Merites and fled to Gods mercy Cor. 2. in Psal 36. hee saith All thinges are to bee esteemed vile to vs when wee consider what we are to receiue Vt justi ficrent merita non fuerunt sayth he Epist 150. And in his Preface in Psal 31. Nihil boni fecisti datur tibi remissio peccatorum And de Verb. Apost Serm. 2. hee sayth God doth crowne vs in pitie and mercie of a stocke of Merites he neuer spoke one word Nay so absurd is the Doctrine of Merites of condignitie that the sounder Schoole-men doe disauow it Hee addeth That he came not short in paying his Debts contracted with God and his Church by reason of his erroneous Beleefe But if he came not short of payment what needed he to begge forgiuenesse of Debts If he confuted Pelagius and other Heretikes then he was no great friend of Papists that teaching puritie of Life and perfection of Iustice and the power of Free-will in our Regeneration and doing good Workes ioyne with Pelagius and other Heretikes condemned by S. Austine The Donatists as he sayth pretended that the vniuersall Church hath erred and was perished But he lyeth grossely for they onely sayd that it erred and perished in all places saue in Afrike not as Papists say that it is perished and erreth in all places saue in the Popes Iurisdiction Hee establisheth sayth hee the supreme Authoritie vnder God of the true visible and vniuersall Church of Christ in matters of Faith But if the true Church were visible in S. Austines time then is not the Romish Church consisting of Popes Cardinals Inquisitors dumbe Prelates sacrificing Masse-Priests Monkes Fryars Nunnes fierie Ignatians and such Vermine the true Church for such a Church was not visible in S. Austines time nor long after If the Churches Authoritie be Supreme then is not the Pope Supreme nay God speaking in Scriptures is not Supreme Finally if the Church be Vniuersall then is it not confined within the Limits of the Popes Authoritie Saint Austine certes neuer beleeued the Popes supreme Iudgement nor thought the Church of Afrike to be of lesse Authoritie then that of Rome Concerning the Canon of Scripture it selfe or the Translation or interpretation thereof or the tryall of Apostolicall Tradition or whatsoeuer other Point in difference by the iudgement of great Saint Augustine the Catholike visible Church is that which must be resorted vnto as the Supreme and finall Judge on Earth as hee sayth Hee telleth vs also That hee gaue certaine generall Rules whereby all Controuersies of Faith may bee composed But first the Pope doth much scorne to follow Saint Austines Rules or Iudgement Secondly Saint Austine neuer knew any Rule of Controuersies but holy Scriptures The Rule of Faith sayth he Lib. 5. de Ciuit. Dei c. 33. is sufficiently knowne to the Faithfull by the Bookes of Canonicall Scriptures A Regula Fidei quae per alias eiusdem Authoritatis Sacras Literas satis fidelibus nota est non vberrauimus Thirdly Saint Austine Lib. 2. de Doctr. Christ. c. 11. 15. and Lib. 15. de Ciuit. c. 13. will haue Translations examined by the Originals and inferiour to them Fourthly the blinde Papists doe not follow the Iudgement of the
doe well In his first Booke of Retract c. 21. S. Austine doth vtterly ouerthrow the Popish Doctrine concerning the power of Free-will in doing good For if man cannot change his will vnlesse it be giuen him nor doe good but by grace as hee teacheth then doth it not lye in the power of Free-will to doe well more then it lyeth in the power of the Apostate to be made a Cardinall which is a grace bestowed by the Pope on his fauourites and not obtained by euery loose companions free-will S. Austine doth also confound the Heresie of the Apostate holding iustification by Faith and Workes for if Workes follow him that is iustified and goe not before then doe not Workes iustifie vs. Yet hold we not that Faith deuoid of Workes doth iustifie but that Faith liuely by good Workes doth onely apprehend Christs Mercy and lustice and not our Workes effect Iustice That S. Austine with other Fathers of the Church teach that our Workes are meritorious of Eternall life as this Apostate auoweth is an impudent assertion disauowed by them and meritorious of a sharp censure S. Austine neither in his 105. Epist nor in his 46. Epist ad Valent. doth in one word signifie that Workes are meritorious of Eternal life Nay contrary albeit he doth mention Merits yet he saith men are justified by Grace without merits Which ouerthroweth the Doctrine of Merites de congruo and the Decrees of Trent concerning mens preparations to Iustice Jn Epist 46. ad Valent. he saith Man is conuerted by mercy grace In Conc. 2. in Psal 36. he denieth our Workes to be meritorious of that we shall receiue And in Psal 83. That what soeuer he hath promised he promised to such as are vnworthy And Ser. 16. de verb. Apost He is made our debtor saith he not receiuing anything from vs but promising what pleased him And thus it appeareth that S. Austine is little propitious to Papists euen in those points in which they thinke him to be most fauourable But their maine grounds hee eyther knew not or contradicted them as hath been formerly demonstrated Most idle therefore is his whole Discourse ensuing First he wondreth that any should be so silly or impudent as to auouch S. Austine as a Patron of the Faith which wee professe whom he like a Calfe of the Popes Buls calleth Caluinists But I haue alledged against him so many particulars that I hope he will cease his wonderment I haue also deriued our Faith from Christ his Apostles and not from Caluin or any late teacher S. Austine argued against the Manichies that held Fate and the Pelagians that magnified Free-will and made an Idoll of it But what doth that concerne vs who detest all the Heresies both of the one and the other It rather toucheth the Apostate and his consorts who according to the Doctrine of Thomas 1. P. q. 116. Art 1. 2. allow Fate and with the Manichies condemne Mariage in Priests and giue to CHRIST a phantasticall body that is in many places at one time and refuse Flesh and other meates They also magnifie Free-will as being the Cause of mans conuersion and hauing power to prepare vs to Iustification and hold that the Virgin Mary and some others were borne without Originall sinne and that Iust men may liue without sinne for some time and the vniust doe any good by their Free-will all which are Heresies of the Pelagians He addeth that S. Austine beleeued the inuocation of Saints and Angels to bee a Catholike Doctrine and that hee did not onely approue Prayers made to Saints but also recounteth many Miracles wrought by them Lyes idly repeated and formerly refured See S. Austines Confes lib. 10. c. 42. 43. lib. 22 de ciuit Dei c. 10. and you shall finde hee teacheth contrary The miracles reported Lib. 22. de ciuit c. 8. are thrust in there by some falsary and yet is it not there sayd they were wrought by Saints He supposeth that wee inferre that Scriptures containe all things necessary to saluation because as S. Austine saith lib. Confes c. 5. they are excellent meanes whereby God may hee both beleeued and serued But his supposall is ridiculous and false for neyther hath S. Austine in that place any such words nor doe we ground our selues vpon any thing therein contained but vpon diuers other place Lib. 3. de doctr Christ. c. â— Tract 49. in Joan. Lib. 1. de cousens Euangel c. 35. lib. 3. centr lib. Petil. c. 6. and lib. 3. cantr dâ—â—s epist Pelag. c. 4. Farre hee was saith the Apostate from holding Scripture to hee the supriame Iudge of Controuersies Yes lib 3. de Nuâ—â— Coâ—oâ—pâ—â—… c. 33. hee appealeth to Christ and his Apostle He doth also try all questione in all place by Scriptures and no where by the Pope or his 〈◊〉 That the Gospell with hâ—n had beene no Gospell if the authority of the Church had not obliged him is a wicked speech of this blasphemous Apustate and no saying of S. Austine Hee said onely the Authority of the Church moued him which hee might haue affirmed of any godly Preacher yea of his Mother If S. Austines or other Fathers words seeme to fauour vs the Rinegate pretendeth That so many other places are plaine and expresse for his Romish Religion insomuch that some confesse they contradict themselues Both grosse and impudent leasings For the first we haue refuted by many vnanswerable arguments the second hee cannot chuse but confesse vnlesse he can produce such as charge the Fathers with contradictions But saith he The Roman Church hath preserued S. Austines Workes vntouched secondly shee preserued two Orders of Religious men instituted by him thirdly shee permitted his Images and Reliques to bee kept and honoured his Festiuall to bee solemnized and Churches and Altars to bee erected to God in his name I answer that the first is most vntrue for the Popes factors haue not onely added to his Workes many suppositious Bookes but also haue falsified his true works and if any sinceritie haue beene vsed in the edition of his writings it is much against the Popes minde But suppose the Romanists should haue vsed diligence in preseruing his Writings yet is not the same comparable to the diligence of the Jewes in preseruing the Old Testament by which notwithstanding they are plainly conuinced 2. It is false that eyther Hermites or Chanons regular were instituted by S. Austine they hauing receiued their Originall and Lawes from the Pope 3. The Jewes honored the Prophets albeit they regarded not their admonitions and counsailes 4. It is guibrish to say that Churches and Altars were built to God in S. Austines name for S. Austines Church is built to Saint Austine as Baals Church to Baal 5. Not Gods Church but the Sinagogue of Sathan maintaineth the Idotrous worship of Saints of their Reliques and Images He saith wee disclaime S. Austine and call him superstitious and scornefully trample vpon the head and heart of this
weakenesse A place ill translated S. Austines words are Firmit as nostra quando tu es tunc est firmit as cum autem nostra est infirmit as est How then can man of himselfe will or doe that is good or prepare himselfe to iustice or before grace beleeue and repent and loue God Where in the Text S. Austine Lib. 5. Confess c. 1. hath Heale thou all my Bones the Translator in the Margent noteth the powers of his Soule as if his Apostaticall Soule were full of Bones S. Austine also sayth God doth open the heart when he will Which sheweth that man cannot resist his grace nor receiue it before it be giuen him The picture of an Heretike saith hee in a note vpon the 5. Booke and 6. Chap. is set out in Faustus who was very shallow albeit hee made a faire shew What then need wee goe further to seeke out an Heretike then to this shallow-pated Apostate who notwithstanding his shewes and brags is a Translator of small substance such also are his pedanticall Masters the Jesuites that talking brauely of the Church and Tradition runne their barkes vpon the sands of the Popes Decrees impudently bragging and yet performing nothing Like to Faustus who was Magnus laquens Diaboli as S. Austine saith Lib. 5. Confes c. 3. as they are Erat memoria B. Cypriani saith S. Austine Lib. 5. c. 8. This the Apostate translateth there was the Shrine of S. Cyprian As if that godly Martyr were Shrined like Thomas of Canterbury and worshipped with Lights Masses Musicke solemne accesse of Pilgrimes and such like Ceremonies There also he saith S. Cyprians Reliques were kept but he sheweth not what Reliques nor is able to proue that they were there worshipped S. Augustine hath no such thing It was onely a memory of Cyprians martyrdome Monica there prayed to God and not to Cyprian as may bee collected out of S. Austines wordes The Manichees as the Translator noteth Lib. 5. c. 9. beleeued that our Sauiour CHRIST had not a naturall Body And can hee and his consorts beleeue otherwise that in the Sacrament giue him a Body that is neyther felt nor seene nor suffereth any thing There also he addeth that Monica went euery day to Masse corrupting S. Austines wordes who speaketh of an Oblation no day pretermitted by her But I trow the Apostate will not say shee sayd Masse neyther was there any Masse framed by Scholasticus or patched together by Popes in her time Shee went euery day to Church as S. Austine saith a plaine conuiction of Recusants that goe no day to Church Hee addeth that God by his promises maketh himselfe a debtor therefore for mens Merites hee is no debtor remitting daily their debts The Manichees as S. Austine reporteth Lib. 5. c. 10. beleeued that God had the bulke of a Body And doe not the Papists paint figure God the Father and the Holy Ghost and giue them bulkes of bodies As the Manichees salsified the Scriptures as witnesseth S. Austine Lib. 5. Confes c. 11. So doe the Hereticall Papists both by Translations and wicked Interpretations 2. They doe also suppresse Gods eternall Testament prohibitng the reading of it in vulgar Translations without licence 3. They falsifie the Fathers as their Indexes Expurgatory and later Editions compared with Manuscripts and former Prints declare In vaine therefore doth this poore Translator thinke to wipe away so foule a fault with a megre Marginall note S. Ambrose did Preach to the people as S. Austine relateth Lib. 5. Confes c. 13. hee did also substantially teach Saluation whereas Faustus the Heretike did wander vp and downe by certaine fallacies But the Pope and his proud Prelates Preach not The Masse-Priests also and Iesuwides wandring in diuers fallacies and Schoole-trickes teach the Popes fancies and leade their Disciples out of the way of saluation as did the Hereticall Manichees Vpon the 5. Booke 14. Chap. in a Marginall note he saith God deceiueth men of their soules most impiously making God a deceiuer who deceiueth none but draweth men by a right course into the way of Truth Monica as S. Austine testifieth Lib. 6. Confes c. 2. brought Bread and Wine to the memories of Martyrs which this jugler translateth shrines but was forbidden by the doore keeper because it was a Heathenish custome Yet this Heathenish custome the heathenish Priests of Baal leaue not Feasting and Banquetting riotously on the festiuall dayes of their Saints which they worship Idolatrously The Translator in a certaine Note doth insinuate that Ostiarius was then an Office in the Church as it is now But S. Austine doth neyther make an Order of Doore-keepers nor a Sacrament nor can the Translator with any Art draw that out of him The Communion of the Body of our Lord saith the holy Father was celebrated at the Tombes of Martyrs But neyther doth hee mention Masse nor doe Masse-Priests alwayes make this Sacrament a Communion eating and drinking all alone albeit this Iugler would willingly draw his Masse out of these Boxes God hath no Children saith the Apostate in Lib. 6. Confes c. 3. but such as are members of the Catholike Church How then can the Apostate and his fellowes claime to bee Gods children being the members of Antichrist and hauing forsaken the Catholike Church and Faith S. Augustine saith God spirituall Children are by him Regenerated by Grace But the Apostate doth attribute Regeneration to the Priest and Sacrament and that ex opere operato Are they not then rather the Popes Bastards then Gods spirituall Children Persuasisti mihi saith S. Austine Lib. Confes 6. c. 5. non qui crederent libris quos tanta fere in omnibus gentibus authoritate fundasti sed qui non crederent esse culpandos nec audiendes esse si qui forte mihi dicerent vnde scis illos libros vnius veri veracissimi Dei Spiritu humano generi esse ministratos So hee saith first that God perswaded vs to beleeue holy Scriptures to bee of God 2. That Scriptures haue their authority from God and not from the Pope or Church 3. That it is impious to make a question how we know that Scriptures came from God But this false Translator contrary to S. Austines wordes and meaning maketh the Scriptures to receiue Authoritie from the Church in regard of vs. 2. He would haue vs to beleeue the Scriptures not because God perswadeth vs but because the Church teacheth vs as if the Church receiued her perswasion from herselfe and not from God Lastly continually they question vs how we know that the Scriptures are of God which this good Father condemneth as impious To resolue that the Scriptures are Diuine because the Pope saith so is most ridiculous The like fraud this Iugler vseth in a Note vpon the 11. Cap. of this Booke deriuing that Authority which S. Austine giueth to holy Scriptures to his Church that is to euery ignorant and faithlesse Pope Alipius is commended by S. Austine Lib. 6. conf c. 8. for
that hee shut his eyes least hee should behold the Gladiators intimating that we are to auoid all occasions of sinne Why then did not this Translator shut his eyes in Italy and Spaine where are so many baits for sinne Did he drop into the Brothel blind-fold In the Margent Lib. 6. c. 12. he telleth vs that the Diuell is euer putting Tricks vpon him And doe we maruell that he and his fellowes are so lewd and vaine-glorious seeing the Diuell doth put so many Tricks vpon them and hath entangled their feet with his snares Lib. 6. c. 13. he seemeth to insist much vpon Visions and Reuelations But S. Austine sayth Monicaes Visions were vaine and fantasticall and that there was great difference betweene God reuealing and the soule dreaming And such Dreames commonly are the Visions and Reuelations of Monkes and Fryars God therefore directeth vs Isay 8. to the Law and Testimonie and not to Visions nor the Reuelations of Spirits S. Austines Concubine as is related Lib. 6. Conf. c. 11. vowed to God she would no more know man so it may be many beastly women vow they will forsake their lewd life But this is but a simple argument to proue Vowes of Chastitie albeit the best the idle Translator could draw out of Saint Austine who yet hath nothing to say of Nuns or their Rules Lib. 6. c. 16. the Translator noteth Merits in the Margent But he is a poore disputer that out of such Merits as Epicunus had thinketh to prooue that mens Workes doe merit eternall life A fit man rather to follow Epicures then to translate good Bookes Lib. 7. c. 1. he placeth this profound Note in the margent That the Catholike Church is our Mother A point which no man doubteth But if hee beleeue that the Pope and moderne Church of Rome is the true Catholike Church or the Mother of faithfull Christians hee is foully mistaken not discerning the chaste Spouse of Christ from the abominable Whore of Babilon Further when Rome was the Church yet was shee but a particular Church The cause of sinne is our owne will as S. Austine teacheth vs Lib. 7. Conf. c. 3. And this that worthy man M. Caluin knew very well who neuer said nor thought as the damned Apostate chargeth him that God maketh men to sinne that he may afterward damne them neyther doth he say that any doe sinne by necessarie constraint These are the rayling Rinegates vaine and blasphemous Conceits and no Doctrines of M. Caluin as by the Texts by him falsely cited may appeare The Authoritie of the Church commendeth holy Scriptures to particular persons as S. Austine sayth Lib. 7. c. 7. But he sayth not that holy Scriptures receiue their Authoritie from the Catholike Church as the Aduersaries of the Church and Scriptures conceiue and much lesse from the Pope and Church of Rome For if that were so how could the Church beleeue Scriptures May the Church authorise and deliuer Scriptures to it selfe Lib. 7. c. 18. S. Austine maketh Christ his only Mediator shewing that hee was God and man How then can the Schoole-men and their followers accord with him making the Virgin Mary together with Saints and Angels to be Mediators and holding that Christ is our Mediator according to his Humanitie only That the Virgin Mary being a Virgin still did conceiue and beare Christ Jesus is not doubted by any Christian it is also confessed that Christ was knowne to betrue man by Tradition as S. Austine teacheth Lib. 7. c. 19. But that this was knowne by Tradition vnwritten onely or that holy Scripture is knowne by Tradition as the Translator noteth S. Austine sayth not neyther is it true for the natures of Christ are knowne by Scripture one Booke of Scripture testifieth of another Neyther doth he say that the holy Virgin was conceiued liued without sin these be only Friars fancies dreames and not this holy Fathers doctrine We are to finde the ioyes of Heauen not without Penance in this life sayth the Translator worthie to be translated and made the Popes Penitentiarie to impose Penance and to giue pardon to all that are troubled with the Collick in their Braines And this he noteth in Lib. 8. Confess c. 3. Yet S. Austine neuer thought that the way to Heauen was by whipping knocking the breast wearing hayre-cloth and going bare-foot Vpon the 8. Booke of Confess c. 6. the Translator noteth that Anthonie the Aegyptian was a Monke and that he wrought Miracles and that there were many Monasteries before S. Austines time and one neere Milan But out of all these Monasteries he cannot find one that held the Moderne Romish Religion or that liued in obedience to the Bishops of Rome or receiued their Rules from them Further they now worke no Miracles nor are like to them eyther in their liues or studies nay it appeareth they rather dwelt in Cells and poore Cottages then in any sumptuous Buildings S. Anthonie and S. Austine were conuerted by reading holy Scriptures as is testified Lib. 8. Confess c. 12. Why then are Christians denyed libertie to reade holy Scriptures in Tongues vnderstood by them Why are Scriptures reputed to be dumbe Teachers Finally why are Scriptures denyed to haue power to worke Faith vnlesse the Church propose them Out of Scriptures certes Monkish Vowes and their pretended Euangelicall perfection will neuer be proued albeit the Postiller should resolue himselfe into sweat endcuoring to doe it These words Goe and sell all thou hast Matth. 19. and put on the Lord Jesus belong not to Monkes onely nor did the Romans or the young man in the Gospel put on Monkes Cowles vpon hearing these words Finally he that will find out the originall of Monkes and Fryars he must search not holy Scriptures but the Popes Decretals That man had free-will to do euill S. Augustine confesseth Confess Lib. 9. c. 1. but that he had a power by free-will to doe well that is a surmise of the Pelagianizing Translator for albeit grace moue vs to submit our selues to Christs yoke yet is it not our free-will that worketh what is good but Gods grace Lib. 9. Conf. c. 2. the corrupter of S. Austines Confessions endeuoreth to proue Graduall Verses and Procession out of them but his labor is in vaine he may as well out of them draw from thence the Tricks of the Missall Breuiarie But had the Jewes any such Ascension or Procession yet are not the Traditions of the later Jewish Rabbins any warrant for him his Consorts to warrant their superstitious Deuices Scripsi haec in Caera sayth S. Austine Lib. 9. Confess c. 4. And this the Buzzard translateth This I wrote in Waxe As if men did then write in Waxe and not in Tables layd ouer with Waxe mixed with other stuffe so he thinketh they wrote in Dust where the Writing was on Tables plastred ouer with Waxe and Dust That men went bare-foot in Deuotion S. Austine doth not affirme albeit this thred-bare Translator doth hold that to
to bee followed Was not then this Rinegate impudent that tooke the Authority which S. Austine bestowed on Scriptures and by a tricke of Legierdemaine conueyed it to the Church of Rome and to euery blind Pope That one place of Scripture hath diuers sences as the Apostate blindly auoweth in his Notes on the 12. Booke of S. Austines Confessions Chap. 18. hee shall neuer bee able to proue by the testimony of that Father who confirmeth that to be the sence of Scripture which the Enditor meant who is Truth and speaketh but one thing Thus wee see for a Translator we haue here a corrupter falsifier of S. Austine Afterward lib. 12. c. 20. he sayth diuers Expositors may diuersly interprete one place but he sayth not that one place hath diuers sences as the Apostate without all sence inferreth For how can that which differeth be true And how can God in one sentence vnderstand diuers things he being alwayes one and vnchangeable The Postiller vpon the Margent of this 12. Booke c. 25. sayth Truth is a Catholike Benediction and S. Austine there confesseth that Truth belongeth not to any one man but is common to all the louers of Truth But he is an absurd fellow to suppose the Pope and his followers embracing the refuse Doctrine of Trent and the Schooles to be Catholikes or Truth to be a Benediction bestowed on Papists that wee haue found and declared to be forgers lyars slanderers and a packe of Heretikes Further if Truth belongeth not to any one man why doth euery false Pope that is but a priuat man pretend that he is the onely supreme Iudge of Truth and infallible interpreter of holy Scriptures In the Title of the 30. chapter of the 12. Booke of S. Austines Confessions the Translator sayth Charitie is to be maintained among men of contrarie opinions So hee pronounceth sentence against the Pope and his Inquisitors and all their Faction which persecute Christians and cut their throats for not holding euery one of their trifling Heresies S. Augustine would haue Truth to make friends But the Apostaticall Sect will not heare him being offended for nothing more then that we teach Truth against the Brood of Antichrist and their wicked Errors Lib. 13. Confess c. 1. the Postiller noteth that without Gods inspiration a man cannot thinke a good thought which is also S. Austines Doctrine and both contrary to the Popish Doctrine of Papists that giue free-will to a naturall man both to say well and to doe well Cap. 7. the Translator intimateth that man riseth from sinne and is iustified by the helpe of Charitie inherent in vs. And this he endeuoreth to picke out of S. Austine but sooner shall hee picke Gudgeons out of Flint stones for that holy Father doth not speake there of Charitie inherent in vs but of Charitie giuen vs and working in vs by Gods holy Spirit Lib. 13. c. 9. ridiculously he endeuoreth to proue his Popish Procession by the example of the Jewes who as he sayth did sing Psalmes as they went vp the stayres of the Temple As if euery Masse-Priest singing Letanies as they goe vp Newgate stayres or as they goe to Tiburne doe walke in Procession By the Psalmes of the Jewes this Apostate will neuer proue his Letanies or Procession for they sung Psalmes to God Masse-Priests in their Letanies pray to dead men Where S. Austine lib. 13. c. 13. speaketh of the expectation of adoption and the redemption of his body the false Postiller noteth that S. Paul saued Christians by praying for them after his glorification of which that Father giueth not the least signification nay contrarie he expected the fruits of his owne adoption and the redemption of his owne bodie of which other Christians were no members Cap. 14. he sayth the Caluinists affirme their Church to consist only of the elect But the lying Apostate sheweth not who these Caluinists are and where they write so much as he chargeth them with Caluin himselfe saith only that the Catholike Church is a Communion of Saints and properly consisteth of the Elect to whom remission of sins eternall life belong albeit many wicked men may seeme to be of the Catholike Church in regard of their profession are reputed members of particular Churches Quis nisi tu Deus noster fecisti nobis firmamentum authoritatis super nos in scriptura tua diuina saith S. Austine Lib. 13. Confes c. 1.5 that is who but thou our God hath giuen vs a foundation of authority aboue vs in thy diuine Scripture which clearely refuteth the blasphemous Postill of this Apostate who saith the Church that is the Pope hath power to make Scriptures Canonicall to vs. For if they receiue authority from God only how commeth the Pope or the Church to giue them authority and how doth the Church know them to be Canonicall but by diuine Authority Cap. 19. the Translator corrupteth S. Austines text by adding to it about the middle of the Chap. these words a word of Counsell following as it seemeth his Spanish notes and translation He intimateth also that Fryers and Monkes the scum and refuse of the world are an elected generation which S. Austine neyther meant nor could speake of Finally he saith Religious men and Priests are a middle kind of Creatures as you would say Centaures Satyrs Monsters being neither Saints therfore not belonging to the Church that is a Communion of Saints nor ordinary Christians and therefore not belonging to Christ or to the King because they clayme themselues to bee exempt By creeping things Confes lib. 13. c. 20. the Postiller vnderstandeth Masse-Priests Monkes Friers who indeed creepe and crawle like Snakes leape like Toades and swarme like Lice But yet hee is much deceiued if he thinke there were any such vermine in the world in S. Austines time Lib. 13. c. 21. the Translator seeketh for Masse-Priests Monks and Friers in S. Austine and in the 1. of Genesis declaring that they are men as it were seuered from the world But the poore Ideot is as farre wide as Genesis is from the Apocalipse where he may find Locusts newly come out of the bottomlesse pit and Masse-Priests are no where found but in the Popes Decretals and Pontificall Both most noxious Serpents and giuen to carnality and worldly pleasures Spirituales ergo siue qui praesunt siue qui obtemperant spiritualiter iudicant sayth S. Austine Lib. 13. Confess c. 23. that is spirituall men iudge whether they rule or obey but of the sublime authoritie of Gods Booke he will admit none to iudge but would haue all men to submit their vnderstanding vnto it How then doth the Pope take vpon him to be that spirituall man that iudgeth all things Can Boniface the eight c. vnam sanctam extr com de Maior Obed. iudge better then S. Austine What audacious boldnesse is it for euery Pope to challenge a power to himselfe ouer Scriptures to make them authenticall to vs Euery Preacher may expound