might be otherwise he did not like it This Example of Constantine was followed by succeeding Emperors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Justinian we Condemn every Heresie and lest the Books of Hereticks should transmit their ill Opinions to Posterity Theodosius and Valentinian did Command by a Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that their Writings should be cast into the Flames We Read that they were debarred from the common Priviledges of Orthodox Christians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Civil Law and it instances in several particulars 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We decree that Hereticks shall be uncapable of any Publick Imployment whether Military or Civil nor might they be admitted as Witnesses in their Courts of Judicature 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let not an Heretick's Testimony be received against an Orthodox Christian nay more 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 No Heretick shall Inherit the Estate of his Father In short we find Hereticks Deposed Degraded Banished and sometimes Fined Witness that Law of Theodosius mentioned by the Council of Carthage which Enacted that in some Cases Hereticks should pay as the Canon words it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ten Pounds of Gold Now we do not Write this with any design to encourage the Governours of our Church or State to exercise any Severity towards our sober and peaceable Dissenters who differ from us only in the Circumstantials of our Religion but we mention these things to confirm our present Argument and to shew that our present unlimited Toleration of all Opinions and Practices in Matters of Religion is quite contrary to the Judgment Usages and Laws of the Antient Church who punished such as held and taught Heterodox Opinions and would not be otherwise reclaimed 5. 'T is certain that an unlimited Toleration of all Opinions and Practices in Matters of Religion is directly contrary to the Divine Law to the Will of God revealed in his written Word The Jewish Church was never permitted to teach and do what they pleased about the things of God they were not allowed to serve their Maker as they Listed they were obliged to Sacrifice when where and what they were Commanded It was not left to them as a matter of Choice whether they would Circumcise their Infants or not no the Law was this the Uncircumcised Man child shall be cut off Nor were they left to their own Liberty whether they would come to Jerusalem to eat the Passover or not no the Text saith of good Josiah The King commanded all the people saying keep the Passover We do not find any indulgence in matters of Religion granted to the Jewish Church by Almighty God or any of their good Kings And as there is no such thing to be found in the Law or the Prophets so there is very little or nothing to be met with in the whole Gospel that gives any Countenance to such a Practice the main place which seems to look that way is in the Parable of the Tares of which 't is said Let them grow until the Harvest what means our Lord by this Is it indeed his pleasure that ill Men and ill Opinions should be indulged and countenanced in his Church St. Chrysostom gives us another Interpretation of our Saviour's words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our Lord doth here forbid us to kill and slay Hereticks but is there no difference betwixt a Sword and a Rod Is a Bridle and a Halter the same thing The Heretick must not be destroyed but may he not be restrain'd St. Chrysostom answers thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 our Lord doth not here forbid to curb Hereticks to stop their Mouths to check their boldness dissolve their Conventicles c. as he goeth on Of the same mind was St. Paul who saith Their Mouths must be stopped but how can that be done if there may be no Penal Laws And if an Universal Liberty of Conscience in Opinion and Practice about matters of Religion be indeed agreeable to the Gospel of Christ what meant St. Paul by that demand of his Shall I come to you with a Rod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 shall I bring a Rod to whip and scourge you So St. Chrysostom And since St. Paul who well knew the Mind of Christ did upon just occasion make use of his Apostolical Rod to punish not only Immoralities in Life but Errors in Judgment too we may thence infer that an unlimited Toleration of all Opinions in Matters of Religion hath no manner of Countenance from the Law of Christ we read that St. Paul made use of this Rod to strike Elymas blind and why he did so that Expression intimates Wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord It was for his opposing the Gospel and that in all probability arose from the Error of his Judgment But the Case is yet more plain in the Example of Hymenaeus and Alexander of whom St. Paul saith I have delivered them to Satan a severe Punishment surè futuri judicii praejudicium 't is a fore stalling the dreadful Judgment of God So Tertullian But why did St. Paul inflict it He gives this Reason Concerning faith they have made shipwrack or as he elsewhere expresseth it They have erred concerning the Truth It was for their ill Opinion about one Article of our Creed These Instances are enough to shew that a Toleration of all Opinions and Practices in Matters of Religion was never thought to be lawful and consequently such an unlimited Liberty of the Press as tends to bring in and spread Errors and Heresies ought not to be allowed And now I shall take my leave of my Reader when I have admonished him that in all this Discourse I plead for the Regulation of the Press as to such Books only as concern Morality Faith and Religious Worship of which our Learned Ecclesiastical Governours are the most proper Judges But as to Policy and State Affairs they fall under the Cognizance of the Civil Magistrate whose Province it is and whose Care it should be to prevent the publishing of all such Pamphlets as tend to promote popular Tumults Sedition Treason and Rebellion And had this been carefully done some Years ago it might have happily prevented those dreadful Confusions under which our Church and State now do and still are too like to groan Farewel FINIS BOOKS printed for Richard Sare at Grays-Inn Gate in Holborn THE Fables of Aesop with Morals and Reflections Fol. Erasmus Colloquies in English Octavo Quevedo's Visions Octavo These Three by Sir Roger L'Estrange The Genuine Epistles of St. Barnabas St. Ignatius St. Clement St. Polycarp the Shepherd of Hermas c. translated and published in English Octavo A Practical Discourse concerning Swearing Octavo The Authority of Christian Princes over Ecclesiastical Synods in Answer to a Letter to a Convocation Man Octavo Sermons upon several Occasions Quarto These
convinced as well he may be by such Texts of Scripture as cannot with any tolerable Sense be otherwise interpeted that our Blessed Saviour is truly God and truly Man What need such a Person to see the Opinions and weigh the Arguments of Arians and Socinians against this fundamental Point of our Christian Faith To him whose Belief is already grounded upon the infallible Word of God being rightly understood the sight of different Opinions and the Arguments for them signifieth nothing such a Man doth not need the confutation of heretical Cavils to confirm that Faith of his which is already bottomed upon a Rock which is immoveable And as the sight of different Opinions and the examination of Arguments pleaded for them is not needful to confirm a strong and well grounded Faith so it is dangerous and tends to impair and shake a weak one For well meaning Christians bred up in the true Religion being of too easie Belief of slender Judgments and not well acquainted with the Word of God may probably be perverted by heretical Books as being unable to discern the Fallacies contained in them and to cite such Texts as might confute them But here it may be demanded Who must judge whether such or such an Opinion be justified or condemned by such or such a Text I answer where Texts are plain and obvious every discreet and intelligent Person may judge for himself but when Texts are somewhat abstruse and difficult when knotty Questions and Controversies are raised about them then the Judge must be no single Person no nor any small Party of Men who are byassed prejudiced and wedded to their own Opinion but the Judge must be the Catholick Church I mean its Representative in the four first general Councils which consisted of Men not over-aw'd by Authority nor tempted by Interest but Men as Religious as they were Learned as well Versed in Holy Writ as able Interpreters of Scripture as any sort of Men born since those early days And this I think to be the greatest human Authority to warrant the Sense of such and such Texts and prove the Doctrins grounded on them Now Since we of the Church of England are blest with the free use of our Bibles and favoured with the judgment of the best Expositors about the sense of those Texts which tend most to determine those Disputes which have arose betwixt Protestants and Papists betwixt Trinitarians and Anti-Trinitarians we can have no need of any search for Truth to consult the printed Papers of this Age many of which do tend to promote Error much rather than discover Truth And verily when the Licenser of Books doth reject and suppress Heretical Papers he doth good service both to God and Men and if such Papers chance to Steal the Press they ought to be treated like other Thieves who to prevent their doing any future mischiefs are Apprehended Condemned and Executed And so I quit this Argument and proceed to the next SECT V. 3. THIS Authors third Allegation against the restraint of the Press runs thus The Restraint of the Press hinders Truth from having any great influence on the minds of Men which is owing chiefly to examination because that which doth not convince the Understanding will have but little or no effect upon the Will I answer thus What this Author doth here assert in relation to the influence of the Understanding upon the Will and Affections is true in general nor can it be justly denied that a strict examination of Religion is the proper means to convince the Understanding of its Truth But although the subject matter of this Allegation be true in the general yet here it is misapplied and very impertinent to the Case now in hand For this Argument as the former did doth proceed upon a false Hypothesis for it supposeth that if the Press should chance to be restrained for time to come Men would be deprived of all sufficient means for the due examination of their Religion 'T is St. Paul's Command Prove all things 'T is St. John's Command Try the Spirits whether they are of God These Commands must needs suppose that in those days there was a certain Rule by which Religions might be tried and the same Rule in its full force and vertue is standing still Tell me then are our Bibles out of Print or taken from us Have we no Catechisms no Systems of Divinity left amongst us Nay are there not Books of Controversies exposed to Sale in our Cities greater Towns and both our Universities Nay more are there not Popish and Socinian Catechisms to be had in England Do not these Books already Extant contain the strongest Arguments which the most learned Men of all Parties were able to urge in favour of their respective Opinions And may not Men by weighing these Reasons which are already made publick give a judgment which Religion is true and which is false as well as by any new Papers yet to be printed But although there be a great variety of Books which may help to guide us in our searching after Truth yet I must still mind my Reader that the Scripture is the only Adequate and Authentick Rule whereby the Truth or falshood of any Religion must be determined And certain it is that those Convictions of Man's Understanding which arise from the Immediate word of God are like to have a more powerful influence upon the Will and Affections than any other Convictions arising from any such Arguments as are no more than the Dictates and Collections of humane Reason which is fallible and may deceive us whereas the word of God well understood cannot do so And this I think is a sufficient answer to this Authors third Allegation SECT VI. 4. THE Fourth is this The Restraint of the Press is that which tends to make Men hold the Truth if they chance to light on any Guilty and the Reason which he gives is this Because that will not be accepted if it be not the effect of an impartial Examination To which I answer thus I cannot pass by this without observing that this Author hath hitherto much harped upon the same thing and hath hitherto bottomed all his Arguments upon the same Ground and a very slippery one too he hath proposed his Allegations as distinct in their Number but in their Proof there is little or no difference to be found For he tells First That the Restraint of the Press tends to make Men blindly submit to the Religion they chance to be educated in Secondly That it deprives Men of the most proper and best means to discover Truth Thirdly That it hinders Truth from having any great influence upon the minds of Men. Fourthly That it tends to make Men hold the Truth if they chance to light on any guiltily These indeed are very considerable Objections against the Restraint of the Press were they true But how doth our Author prove them so to be To prove them all he hath yet made use
one Theodatus Artemon and Beryllus and Sabellius in the Fourth Century by Arius Eunomius and some others And in the same Age the Personality and Divinity of the Holy Ghost was denied by Macedonius and some others who were there branded by a particular Name and called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oppugners of the Holy Ghost These Heterodox Opinions beginning to spread and disturb the Peace of the Christian Church and some other ill Opinions arising too several General Councils were summoned by several Christian Emperors the Nicene Council by Constantine the Great whose main work was to examine the Opinion of Arius the Council of Constantinople called by Theodosius the First to debate the Opinion of Macedonius the Council of Ephesus called by Theodosius the Second to consider the Opinion of Nestorius and the Council of Chalcedon summoned by the Emperor Martian to consult about the Opinion of Eutyches These Councils consisting of some Hundreds of Bishops having the Glory of God in their Hearts the Settlement of the Church in their Eyes and the Bible in their Hands did after a mature deliberation pronounce the Opinions of these Men to be contrary to the Doctrine of the Gospel and the obstinate defenders of them to be Hereticks And certainly the determinations of these General Councils which were made up of Persons exemplary for their Piety and eminent for their Learning who resolved on nothing without mature Advice and Deliberation are of as great Authority and afford as much Satisfaction in Matters of Religion as any thing of Man can be or do For the Truths of God once taught the World by Christ and his Apostles being unchangeable for ever and our Bibles which are the only Rule to measure Religions by continuing one and the same for ever that which was an Error in those early days must needs be an Error still and that which was a Truth then must needs be a Truth now And if we cannot think of any more proper means for the right understanding of Scripture and the discovery of Truth and Error than the deliberate and unanimous Judgment of so many hundred pious learned and unbiassed Men assembled together then certainly the determinations of those antient Councils are very considerable Evidences for Truth and against Error And the rather because they consisted of such Persons who besides their eminent Piety and Learning had the great Advantage of living nearer the Apostles age and thereby were the better able to inform themselves and us what was certainly believed and done in the very infancy of the Christian Church SECT IX 3. THE Writings of the Antient Fathers those especially that lived within the first six Centuries where-ever they agree and are not since corrupted or maimed by the Frauds and Forgeries of the Roman Church are of singular use in this Matter too That Ignatius Clemens Origen Athanasius Cyril Nazianzene Basil Chrysostom Hierom Austin and many others both in the Eastern and Western Churches were indeed Persons of great Piety and excellent Parts our Socinians without breach of Modesty cannot deny And although some of these great Names in some particular Matters had their peculiar mistakes and shewed themselves to be but Men yet in all Points where we find an unanimous Consent amongst them we are to have so much Veneration for their Authority as not easily to suspect or contradict it True it is if we take these Fathers singly Man by Man where we find any of them alone in their Opinions as Origen in reference to the Punishments of Hell and St. Austin in reference to Infants that die unbaptised we are not in this case much more obliged to accept their Judgment than the Judgment of some single Person yet alive But if we take All the Fathers who lived within six hundred Years after Christ together and in a lump where we find them One in Judgment they are enough to make a wiser Council than any hath been since their time they are enough to inform us what is Error and what is Truth But SECT X. 4. BEcause Learned Men whose Fortunes are Mean cannot purchase and unlearned Men whose Intellectuals are weak cannot read and understand the voluminous Writings of the Fathers we have several Systems of Divinity Confessions of Faith short Abridgments of Christian Religion which are especially to unlearned Persons great helps in this matter too And here methinks those antient Creeds of the Apostles Nice and Athanasius which are so generally received by the Church of God are of great Authority to settle our Judgment in the main and most necessary Points of Faith Besides we have many Choice and Excellent Catechisms composed by Men that were Pious Judicious acquainted with Scriptures well versed in the Primitive Councils and Fathers These short Catechisms compiled by Persons of singular Endowments and approved by the Church are little less than contracted Bibles containing in them whatever Man is obliged to know and delivering enough in easie Terms to inform us in Matters of Practice to secure us from Errors and confirm our Judgments in all the great Points of Faith In short the substance of my Answer to this Argument is this since we have the written Word of God to be our Rule and since this Word in some material Cases according to the different Fancies and Interests of Men hath different Interpretations given concerning its true Sense and Meaning 't is our safest way for our better Satisfaction to betake our selves to the most able faithful and unbiassed Judges and they are the most antient Councils and the Primitive Fathers whose Judgments are declared in our several Creeds in other publick Confessions of Faith and Orthodox Catechisms set forth or approved by the Church of God And since we are very well stored with these excellent Helps I do once more conclude that no Man whether learned or unlearned can need any new Arguments from the Press to confirm his Judgment in Matters of Religion SECT XI 7. THis Author's seventh Allegation against the Restraint of the Press runs thus If it be unlawful to let the Press continue free lest it furnish Men with the Reasons of one Party as well as the other it must be as unlawful to examine those Reasons To this I answer thus We must distinguish between Party and Party between one who is Orthodox and one who is Heretical this distinction being premised I shall resolve this Hypothetical Proposition into these two Categorical ones That it is not lawful for many Orthodox Christians to Examine those Reasons which Hereticks may urge in defence of their ill Opinions And therefore that the Press should not be permitted to furnish such Christians with any such Reasons 'T is notoriously known that there are amongst us vast numbers of Persons who are of weak Judgments not firmly established in their Faith not able to distinguish Truth from Falshood in a fallacious Argument and therefore are apt to be Tossed up and down by every wind of doctrine now for such
judicious Divine of ours did mean that the Church of England would rather encourage than forbid Persons so qualified to read and Examine the Books of our Adversaries as well as our own to me seems evident from that reason which he subjoyns as the only end of an impartial Examination namely this That they may see the difference between Truth and Error Reason and Sophistry with their own Eyes This Expression doth plainly import the Persons fit to Read Books of Controversie in matters of Religion are only such as have Eyes of their own i. e. clear Heads enlightned Understandings able to discern Truth from Falshood And verily could the Books of our Socinians be confined within the Libraries of learned and judicious Men whether of the Clergy or of the Laity could they be surely kept from purblind Eyes and weak Judgments that unlimited liberty of the Press which this Author doth so earnestly contend for were the more allowable But since this can never be since Heretical Books are and ever will be exposed to common Sale though the Church of Rome doth ill in restraining their Laity from the use of good Books yet the Church of England would do very well in restraining the Press from putting ill ones into the Hands of unskilful Men where they would be more dangerous than edge-Tools in the Hand of a Child who knoweth not how to use them And so much in answer to this Objection SECT XIV 10. THIS Author begins his Tenth Allegation thus I cannot see how they that are for tying Men to that Interpretation of Scripture which a Licenser shall approve and therefore put it in his power to hinder all others from being published can with any Justice condemn the Popish Clergy for not Licensing the Bible it self for the Laity to Read I answer Here are two Suppositions both which are either impertinent to us or false in themselves if the Church of England be not the Persons here charged the Charge is impertinent but if they be it is false For 1. The Church of England doth tie none of her Members to that Interpretation of Scripture which such or such a Licenser of hers shall approve 'T is well known that we have many Interpretations of the Scripture which never were under the Inspection of any English Licenser the Expositions of the Fathers Schoolmen and many other Divines are brought us from beyond the Seas and the free choice and use of them is allowed us by our Church And if such Books chance to be Reprinted here in England the care of the Edition is committed not to the Licenser of Books to judg of their matters but to the Composer and Corrector of the Press to see to their Forms Character and exact truth of Printing Now if this be so as indeed it is if we are allowed to consult various Interpreters of our Bibles if we may take our Choice of such or such Expositors and use what Editions we please why should this undeserved imputation be cast upon the Church of England as if she tied all her Sons to such Interpretations of the Holy Scripture as her own Licensers shall Authorise 2. The Church of England doth not give her Licensers a Despotick Arbitrary and Absolute Power to reject every Book every Interpretation of Scripture which doth not please them 'T is certain that our Licensers do not act by any immediate and independent Power of their own but as Delegates and Substitutes by an Authority derived from their Superiors and if any of them shall either allow any Book which tends to mischief or suppress any Book which tends to common good they do abuse their Power exceed their Commission and must answer for it But is the miscarriage of some few Licensers an Argument that they should all be laid aside Some Kings have proved cruel Tyrants Some Judges have been corrupted and must we therefore have neither King nor Judg Sure I am that in this Age of ours we do sufficiently need a discreet and able Judg of Books and the Test and Censure of such a Judg no Man need fear more than our Socinian Writers for they being no great Friends to the Scripture are very odd Interpreters of it not through Ignorance but design I will not say through Rancor and Malice but I will say through Partiality and Prejudice For because the beginning of St. John's Gospel and several Expressions in St. Paul's Epistles being rightly understood and in the sense of the Catholick Church do totally overthrow their dangerous Hypothesis they fix upon those Texts such Interpretations as are childish absurd and even ridiculous such as none of the Fathers Schoolmen or Criticks so far as I can find did even think of And what an ill Cause do these Men manage who endeavour with handfuls of dirt to stop the Mouths of those Witnesses who being permitted to speak their own sense do so loudly proclaim their united Testimonies against them And methinks this one Consideration were there no more is enough to justifie our Church in appointing some fit Persons to be the Judges of Books and the Interpretations of Scripture offered to the Press and the rather because if any Licenser should out of any by respect or for any sinister end Stifle any Papers which deserve to see the light the injured Authors may appeal from the Licenser to the Vice-Chancellors in either of our Universities or to the Lord Bishop of London or to his Grace the Lord Archbishop of Canterbury so that the fate of Books doth not ultimately depend upon the pleasure or sole Judgment of a Licenser Now Those two forenamed Suppositions upon which this Author bottoms this Tenth Allegation proving false the Superstructure which he builds upon them falls to the Ground and there I leave it SECT XV. 11. THE next Allegation against the Restraint of the Press this Author thrusts into the Mouths of other Men and makes them say what perhaps he himself doth not think namely this 'T is no small presumption that the Clergy themselves are Conscious of the falseness of their Religion How the Clergy what the whole Clergy Are ten thousand of us at once presumed to be Hypocrites Juglers and gross Dissemblers with God and Man We who teach Men that a false Religion leads towards Hell do we know our own to be false and yet embrace it still The Martyrs of England in Queen Mary's days died for the same Religion which we now profess and were they also Conscious that this Religion is false and yet in the defence of it shed their blood Certainly this Presumption is not small but very strange 't is a great breach as well of Charity as of Truth for if the Scriptures be true and who dares suspect them We are abundantly convinced that our Religion cannot be false and why then should any Man presume that we have indeed other thoughts concerning it The Reason here given is this Because the Clergy dare not suffer their Religion to undergo a
Death Bellarmine their most illustrious Cardinal spends a whole Chapter in proving that Hereticks posse ac deberi temporalibus poenis atque etiam ipsa morte mulctari that incorrigeable Hereticks not only may but must suffer Temporal Punishments yea and Death itself But there is no Man that speaks more fully to this than Maldonate another Jesuite who expresly saith Comburendi tanquam proditores transfugae discedentes Haeretici Hereticks who depart from the Church are to be burnt as so many Traitours and Renegadoes And whom he means by these Hereticks he elsewhere tells us Calvinistos Lutheranos Haereticos esse quis non videt nullus nunquam Haereticus fuit nullus Haereticus esse potest si illi Haeretici non sunt who doth not know that Calvinists and Lutherans Protestants of both Denominations are Hereticks If they are not no Man ever was nor can be such 'T is boldly spoken but never was never will be prov'd And 't is worth our Observation that the same Jesuit hath left the Kings of the Christian Church this advice Admoneo non licere illis istas quas vocant Conscientiae libertates nimiùm nostro tempore usitatas Haereticis dare I put Princes in mind that it is not lawful for any of them to grant Hereticks i. e. Protestants any Liberty of Conscience of which he complains as a thing too often done These instances are enough to teach us what are the Principles of the Roman Church whereunto their Practice hath been so sutable that it may be a matter of dispute whether Rome Pagan or Rome Papal hath shed the greater quantity of Christian blood And certainly their Persecuting Impopoverishing Imprisoning Tormenting Banishing and Massacring so many Thousands in England Scotland Ireland France and other places barely upon the score of Religion are very sorry Arguments that they do really like any Toleration what Hand so ever the Men of that Religion may have in ours 4. 'T is certain that an unlimited Toleration of all Opinions and Practices in the matters of Religion is directly contrary to the Commands and Edicts of good Kings both in the Jewish and Christian Church 1. The good Kings of Israel and Judah did not permit all their Subjects to do what they pleased in the matters of their Religion We cannot doubt but there were in those days many Men of erroneous Judgments who thought they did well when they Worshipped God by an Image St. Paul mentions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Conscience of the Idol i. e. a false Opinion that there was some thing of Divinity in it and accordingly did such Men Sacrifice to it But was this Opinion and Practice allowed by any of their religious Kings because it was sutable to the mistaken Consciences of some of their Subjects did Hezekiah did Josiah nay did Jehu grant a Publick Indulgence for the Worship of Idols because many both Laicks and Priests were for it It was so far from this that although a great number of their Subjects were too much inclined and had been too long accustomed to it they took care to root it out 2. Nor was such an Universal Tolleration of all Religions ever known in former Ages in the Christian Church since the Religion of Christ was own'd by Kings and Emperors It s true Socrates tells us that the good Emperor Theodosius did bear with the Novatians but he bore with none besides what he said to Demophilus an Arrian Bishop we have from the same Historian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I command thee to quit the Christian Churches 'T is also true that the good Emperor Constantine the Great did once sign a Royal Edict for such a Toleration the sum of which is thus Recorded by Eusebius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Let us give both to the Christians and to all others the free Choice of their Religion And hereunto he added this Charge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let no Man disturb his Neighbour in point of Religion but let every one do as his Soul desires This indeed was Constantine's Act and a wise Act it was and all that could then be done considering in what Circumstances he then stood for Constantine and Licinius were then Co-Emperors Constantine favoured the Christian Religion Licinius favoured the Pagan Worship Heathenism was the Religion then Established by Law Christianity was under Hatches the Pagan Religion did not need a Toleration the Christian did In such a juncture of time as this it was very worthily done of Constantine to get the consent of his Colleague Licinius to a General Toleration of all Religions that so the Christian might be Comprehended in it and such a present Toleration did he procure in order to a future Establishment of the Christian Faith And that this was indeed his present Design is Evident from what he afterwards did for when he became the sole Emperor and was well settled in the Throne he made it his great business to suppress all false Religions and Establish that of Christ Eusebius tells us that there was sent out by him a Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Restraining the abominable Idolatries that had hitherto been practised in Cities and Countries and again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law Commanded that none should dare to set up any Images The same Historian saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by his Command the Gates of Idol Temples were shut up Nay another Historian tells us that he did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quite pluck down the Temples of Venus And as he had no kindness for any ill Religions without the Christian Church so did he give no Countenance to any Sects and ill Opinions which arose within it That he Banished Arius though Baronius denies it we have the Authority of Sozomen who saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arius was called back from Banishment not long after the Council of Nice and how he dealt with other Hereticks the same Historian informs us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By a Law he Commanded that the Oratories of Hereticks should be took from them and that they should hold no Assemblies either in Publick or Private places And as this good Emperor took care to root out all false Worship and to suppress ill Opinions so did he by his Royal Authority promote the true Service of God To that end he set forth a Law for the observation of the Lords day So Eusebius tells us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or as the same Historian saith in another place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He Exhorted nay by a Law he required the universality of his Subjects to cease from all their worldly business upon the Lord's daies that therein they might attend the Exercises of Religion Certainly these and the like proceedings of his are infallible Evidences that although this good Emperor did once in Christian Policy and for an excellent end Sign a Royal Edict for a General Toleration of all Religions yet when it