Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n church_n ecclesiastical_a power_n 7,773 5 5.2326 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33237 Second thoughts, or, The case of a limited toleration, stated according to the present exigence of affairs in church and state Clarendon, Edward Hyde, Earl of, 1609-1674. 1660 (1660) Wing C4425; ESTC R15288 7,331 10

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of the Nation dos in a great measure consist of Non-conformists and that much of the Wealth and Stock of the Kingdom is lodged in their Hands who have no great Devotion for the present Liturgy Hierachy of the Church of England Wherefore we need go no farther to find out the cause of that general Damp upon Traffique and Commerce than the Strictness of our Laws upon that Sort of People by which some of them are Disabled and others Discouraged from Employing their Industry and their Stock for Carrying on the Trade of the Nation But whilst upon these Motives I plead for a Toleration of Non-Conformists thereby I intend no more than a bare Exemption from Penalties with a Liberty of Exercising their Religion under such competent Restrictions as shall be judged Necessary both to Secure the Publique from a Riot and Sedition and to put a Difference between their Conventions and the Religious Assemblies of the Church Established by Law Moreover I think it necessary that they should be Excluded from Offices and places of eminent Trust both Civil and Ecclesiastical Because should they be Admitted to an Equality of Power and Authority in the Kingdom their Oppression and Natural endeavour to Advance their own Ways in Religion might Tempt them to push forwards and Struggle for the Right-hand of Fellowship So as the Peace of the Nation might be Endangered I should here have closed up this discourse did I not find that many Reverend Members of the Clergy have been lately great Opposers of a Toleration which leads me to Consider whither the Admission of it be prejudicial to the Safety and Interest of the Church If we call to mind by what means True Religion was first Planted Propagated in the World we shall find that Force and Compulsion had no hand in the Work Both the Precepts and Example of our Great Master and his Disciples are directly Opposite to it For my part I think that Humane prudence as well as Christian piety Obliges their Successors to follow the same Method of reclaiming Dissenters by Gentleness and meek Exhortations according to the Direction of St. Paul For since the chief Designe and most incumbent Duty of the Church is to Convert Misbelievers and to bring back into the Fold those who have straied Away there is nothing so Necessary and Conducing to this Work as to procure in the Minds of Dissenters a good Opinion and esteem of the Charity and Paternal Care of those who undertake to Instruct them in the Right Way This was the Method of our Saviour himself who began his great Business of Converting Mankind by first Obliging the People with Temporal Blessings that so he might Win them to Spiritual Happiness for this Reason he Miraculously Fed so many Thousands in the Desert and so often Cured their Bodily Infirmitys in order to the Healing and Nourishing their Souls But the Infliction of Corporal punishment or pecuniary Mul●ts is so far from producing this effect of Love and Esteem in their Minds whom we are to make our Proselytes that it constantly begets an Aversion and Hatred in the Punished against the Authors and Promoters of this punishment so that Churchmen must either necessarily give over the design of Converting Dissenters which is a principal part of their Function or the practice of Abetting the Infliction of Penalties upon them If Excommunication which is a Seclusion from joyning with the Congregation in Religious Worship be the proper and just Punishment of Error in Religion according to all the Primitive Rules and Practice of Christianity is it not strangely preposterous that these Dissenters instead of being shut out should be violently forc't into the Church and even during their Non-Conformity of Judgment be compelled to a participation in Divine Worship with the Faithful by all those sharp paenaltys which the Law inflicts upon Recusancy Instead of the Gospel Rule which Commands us to avoid their company we set up a Law of our own which injoyns our meeting together even in the House of God whereby the partys compelled Act no less against their Conscience than the Compellers against the plain Letter of Scripture Methinks in this Case the Example of our Saviour ought to be our Rule Who in person Whipt out of the Temple those who came thither upon the Score of Interest and nor of Religion but always used the most Benign and Gentle means imaginable to Win people into the Church What can be more contrary to the Honour and Dignity of True Religion than that it should appear to stand in need of Force to draw Men to it We shew a mistrust of it's Verity when we dare not leave Men the liberty of their Judgement and Conscience in imbracing it Is not this that very Thing wherewith formerly we have so often reproacht our Adversaryes and have we not other lawful Advantages enough over all Dissenters and Sects without calling in the Brachium Saeculare to Confute our Opponents and using means much more becoming a preaching Collonel of Cromwels Army than a Prelate of the Church of England Have we not Truth on our Side the only Invincible Champion of Religion Are we not Establisht by the Law of the Land whereas others will at most be only Suffered Are not all Ecclesiastical Promotions in our Power and Occupation So that having the strongest Motives on our side both Temporal and Spiritual to bring Men fairly to us why should we keep up a Spanish Inquisition of Force and Violence and so discredit and Weaken our Cause whilst mistakingly we endeavour by undue means to strengthen it Let the Presbyterians meet in their Halls the Fanaticks in their Barns the Papists in their Garrets shall the Church of England Assembled in her Cathedralls fear the Competition of Rivals every way so inferiour to her in force of Arguments and Reason in exterior Decency and Gravity and in the Credit of Publick Authority It would Argue not only want of Courage but even Weakness of Faith and Reason too should we be Jealous that a permission granted to those Sects of having Publick Meetings would diminish the number of the Orthodox in our Religious Assemblys for as all contrarys are best set off distinguisht when together expos'd to Publick View we may Presume that nothing would more advantageously fill our Churches and Empty their Conventicles than a Liberty given them to appear in a full Light that so all Eyes might Judge of the Difference between Order and Confusion and between the Decency of our rational Worship Modeld according to the best Patterns of sound Antiquity and the Homeliness and clownish manner of their Addresses to Heaven form'd out of their own Fancy by a Cynicall kind of Pride which Scorns the Direction of their Primitive Guides Let us not therefore give them that only Advantage they have over us which is of suffering for their Religion for if we look into Scripture we shall find that Persecution in the Sufferers is one of the most conspicuous Marks of Truth and in the Inflicters of Error as most evidently appears in the Example of that great Apostle Saint Paul than whom before his Conversion none more Zealous and fierce in the Prosecution of Christians and after his Conversion none more Compassionate and Charitable towards his dissenting Brethren the Iews THE END