Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n church_n ecclesiastical_a jurisdiction_n 2,674 5 9.0374 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A85444 The right of the Church asserted, against the povver usurped over it. By J. Gailhard, A.M. & D. Gailhard, J. (Jean) 1660 (1660) Wing G127; Thomason E1046_7; ESTC R208052 21,398 25

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

doth protect and preserve it providing it with all necessary Graces This is the end of his giving some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists c. for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ Eph. 4. This is a Song proper to the Church to say I am my beloveds and my beloved is mine Cant. 6.3 So that to find her other Lords is to make her an Adultresse I am jealous over you with a godly Jealousie saith Paul to the Corinthians for I will present you as a chast Virgin to Christ for I have spoused you to one Husband 2 Cor. 11. Let therefore no man no not the Angels themselves pretend any Power and Superiority over the Church of Christ for the Lord Jesus hath purchased his Church a Freedom from all other powers but from his own And to speak more exactly to this No man in civil or ecclesiastical Office ought to pretend any Right and Authority over the Church 1. No civil Magistrate for as we render to Caesar the things that are Caesars so we must render to God the things that are Gods It is ordinary in Scriptures to make a difference between civil and Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions Christ's Kingdom is described Psal 45. His Government spoken of Isaiah 9.6 7. It is seen in a Dream by the Stone cut out without hands which broke the Image of all other Dominions Dan. 2.34 Christ doth profess His Kingdom is not of this world and he makes a clear difference between civil powers and that of his Church when he said to his Disciples The Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominion over them but it shall not be so among you Matth. 20.25 In such a case therefore let every one abide in that whereunto he is called There is indeed a gracious Promise made of God that Kings should be nursing Fathers to the Church which began to be fulfilled in the time of Christian Emperors It is now continued and I believe it will be to the end of the world but there is never a Promise to any Prince Except to the Prince of Peace Isaiah 9.6 to receive any power or Dominion over the Church It is one of the greatest points of the Popes Usurpation that he will confound these two Jurisdictions and assume not only S. Peters Keyes but also S. Pauls Sword as they call it so that which the one cannot open the other shall cut it In a word He will undertake the Ecclesiastical and Civil Government since he boasteth to have power in spiritual and temporal things But thus much here is not approved of by the Word of God As the Pope is a temporal Prince so let him govern his Subjects as he is a Bishop let him use tyranny as he doth over his Church But every Christian Reformed Prince ought to be careful not to Administer the Goverment of State and Church together But besides the not preaching of the Word there are two things specially which the civil Magistrate may not do The First He may not ordain Ministers because he hath not Commission to that effect it belongs to those that have already been ordain'd themselves and this would be to destroy Ministry by way of office in the Church this was the practise in the Primitive Church that Bishops or Pastors were chosen by other Bishops and the people that is the Representatives of the people without any civil Monarch or any one pretending Monarchy in the Church as it will at large be found written by Cyprian who lived 250. in his Epist 55. and 68. But the Second thing that the Civil Magistrate must abstain from is The Administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline For though his Office be about the Church yet it is not in the Church Although some Magistrate may be an Officer and Ruler in the Church but not as he is a Civil Magistrate for under that notion it doth not belong to them It is indeed the Right of Kings to call COUNCELLS to see the Church Reformed for he is the Keeper of both Tables yet in this they must make use of Church Officers He also must protect the Church from the power of her Enemies for to that effect he is called the Servant of God Rom. 13. So it becometh Princes to protect Ministers from the Power usurped by their Fellow-Servants as it is Observed of the Duke of Lancaster who to his great commendation secured Wickliffe from the malice and power of his enemies that were Bishops as is observed by FOX in his Book of Martyrs Fol. 413. But we have briefly yet clearly spoken to this Power of the Civil Magistrate in the Churches affairs in a Latine EPISTLE as an Answer to a Letter from a Learned Friend only I do adde this If the Civil Magistrate doth not pretend any Power over the Church this is so far from tending to his Prejudice dishonour and discredit as that it is the greatest glory to abstain from that which doth belong to him yet it will be their highest prasie to submit to the Church Rules as they are Members of the Church It is well known how Ambrosius used this Right with Theodosius and the words of Chrysostome shewing the Power of the Church in administring Discpline in relation to any one are very notable If any wicked man saith he come to the Table of the Lord give him not the Body or Blood of Christ but if he will not desist tell it me and I will rather shed my bloud than to admit such a one And as it is the right of the Church not to be subject to the power and dominion of any Civil Magistrate so Christ hath not purchased this freedom that it should be subject to any Officers and Ministers in it but this liberty will be encroached upon if any Monarchy or Hierarchy be setled in the Church which do follow one another For when there is a Prince and a Soveraign there will be Lords and persons of a quality superiour to the common people Now I say any tittle signifying Monarchy in the Church is tyrannical such as the Prince of the Church or the Supream head thereof and it is necessary for any Christian to abstain from such a Title For 1. It is known out of Scriptures that Christ Jesus is the only Head of his Church One Text will serve for all it is Eph. 1.22 So that to talk of any other Head under the notion of ministerial or subordinate it is to form a monstrous body with two heads for in the same place v. 23. The Church is said to be the Body any one that doth aspire to the title of Head of the Church must have these three qualifications 1. Excellency above the members in power and dignity 2. Perfection in himself greater than any of the members have 3. Infusion of all things which the body hath need of But these three qualities are to be found in Christ Jesus alone who being God and man a
single person for 1. It cannot be demonstrated that Paul alone did it but it is more then probable that he had the Advice and Assent of the Church which these two were of perhaps of the Church of Laodicea whence that Epistle was written for this was his practice 1 Cor. 3. When ye are Assembled and my Spirit with the power of the Lord J. ch 2. Neither must every one draw this Consequence Whatsoever Paul did I may do for his Calling was immediate from Christ and extraordinary in it self The Sentence of the Church in the Execution of this Discipline is passed by the Representative of it and in case the Nature of the thing be such as that because the power of the Party or of some other Consiedration it is not or cannot be decided in particular Congregations by the Pastor and his Elders it must be referred to a Classis from it to a SYNOD according to the Pattern Acts 15. So that It is a Sacrilegious usurpation of any particular one as POPE or any other that will do it alone without the Church or her Representatives in the chusing of which there ought to be such care as that they be not Idiots or Ignorant men but men of Piety understanding and of Credit as much as can be to meet in a certain place and alwayes they must remember that their Authority is not supream but Ministerial and therefore that they are bound onely to the Laws and Rules given by the Holy Ghost in the Word and therefore as in point of Doctrine so as to Discipline in all things they must follow the Word For it doth not belong to the Church now established to make any Lawes different from or contrary to the Rules of the Word The Right of the Church doth in the 4th place consist in the power of advising and voting in Synods Councels and Ecclesiastical Assemblies by their Elders Deputies and Representatives not only Arch Bishops and Bishops as Papists would have and not onely Pastors and those that are professed Divines as the Prelatical Party desireth but also other godly and knowing Persons chosen and sent by the Church afore called Elders Deputies and Representatives are to be admitted to vote in the decision of Controversies this I speak not of my own neither must it be called a new thing since for the confirmation of it I will bring 1. Scripture 2. Antiquity 3. Reason As to the 1. in the Councells Synods or Assemblies held by the Apostles not only the Apostles themselves but also the Elders and Deputies of the people who were not professed Divines were admitted so in the Councill of HYERUSALEM of which we read Acts the 15 out of which place these 2 things do appear 1. that the Church Deputies were admitted into the Assemblies v. 22. It pleased the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church which is interpreted the next Verse The Brethren representing the Church 2. it doth appear that they were admitted not to be simply and meer Spectators but also to be Judges and to decide with their Votes Affairs propounded in the Assembly for they are named among those whom the Letter came from who had not been named in the Letter except they had a Vote in the Decree Wherefore in these times except the Prelatical Party do think themselves wiser and greater than the Apostles they ought not to deprive the Church of this right as they do through Usurpation but rather to restore them to that share which they ought to have in the Government of the Church which to deny is to commit a heynous Sacriledg and to be guilty of as great a tyranny as can be usurped over the people of God And as the Apostles yielded to the Church her right so in the Primitive times the Church was not deprived of it for in the most famous and Oecumenical Councils this was granted to the Church 1. In the First Councel of Nice called by the Emperour Constantine the Great against Arius who denyed the Deity of Christ the Elders of the People and Representative of the Church had their Votes in it So in the First Council of Constantinople called by the Emperour Theodosius the first against Macedonius who denyed the Deity of the Holy Ghost in this also the Deputies of the Church voted in the ARTICLES therein debated as it doth appear by the Subscriptions of the Acts of these Two Synods For further confirmation of this Right of the Church to my judgement no better reason than this can be given These Synods and Assemblies do represent the Church If it be a Provincial Synod it representeth the Churches of a Province if National of a Nation so if universall it representeth the whole Christian Church Now If this Church either Provincial National c. represented by these Synods doth consist not only of Bishops or Pastors Doctors Teachers and Ministers but also of Lay or Secular Persons among whom sometimes there happen to be men no way inferiour in parts and Piety to many of the Clergy So it is of good consequence to say that some of the body of the Church consisting of Lay men are to be admitted to these Church-Assemblies for since they are interessed in the Transactions of such meetings they must send their Deputies to be present to the Conclusions taken there or else all these Assemblies shall be no better than a Councill of Trent called not to debate of but to confirm Errours where one of the Parties shall be excluded and the other shall be the Party and Judg. These Assemblies cannot be said to be free and Lawfull when there is so much violence and corruption as that one shall be admitted as guilty and accused Persons when he should be equal to his Adversary in such a meeting wherefore I say in case a Synod was called in this Nation consisting of Episcopal men for the most if the businesse was to be decided by plurallity of Votes it would not be a right and competent Assembly except things were resolved by strength of Reason and by an equall number of the different Parties But to be brief This right of the Church in the 8th place doth consist in this That the Church is subject to no power but to the power of Christ The Church ownes no Authority but his and it ought to be free from any others Dominion Christ Jesus is the only Lord and Potentate of his Church which to signifie he is called sometimes the King other times the Lord Master Husband Head and Shepherd of his Church If any other Secular or Ecclesiastical Officer doth aspire to this Power He is a Thief and a Robber We must not think that Christ Jesus hath so dearly purchased his Church to submit her afterwards to the will and lust of men He hath Redeemed us saith the Apostle that we should be a peculiar people unto himself therefore not addicted to others One cannot lay any claim to the Church except he hath purchased it except he