the arms of God how admirably doth it set him forth in all his Attributes his eternity is the rock of ages his immutability an invariable and inconvertible Sun his righteousness like the great mountains his decrees and judgments a mighty deep his mercy a glory a mass of riches never to be told over his holiness as the pure unmixed light his justice as the devouring unquenchable fire In a word there all the glory of his Attributes pass before the believers eye such a book as this must needs be divine Secondly These marks or characters in Scripture cannot be known without supernatural light Meer reason receiveth them not like the child Samuel it hears a voice a sound of words but it knows not that it is the Lord insomuch that some have slighted the Scriptures Politianus said that he never spent time to less purpose then in reading them and Julian that there was as good stuff in Pindars Odes as in Davids Psalms Had they known the word or testimony of God in them they would not have crucified them by their wretched blasphemies But when the light of Faith comes the Scripture appears not in letters and words only but in the divine and heavenly characters and by these it bears witness to it self that it is the word of God There is a double cause of Faith an effective cause and an objective the effective cause is the holy spirit inlightning the understanding and moving the will and the objective is the Scripture it self by its own innate light and Majesty revealing its divinity to the inlightned soul Tertullian having this holy light in him adored the fullness of Scripture St. Austin seemeth to be taken to admiration with the purity of it as not admitting so much as an officious lyc Wheresoever the supernatural light comes the Scripture manifests it self to be divine Fourthly The fourth step of knowledge in order to Faith is Deus revelavit Evangelium God hath revealed a Gospel a way of salvation and eternal happiness Faith as I shall shew hereafter is not a meer belief of the divine testimony but a dependant resignation to God and Christ and to this resignation no man arrives unless he first see an overtopping superlative excellency in the Gospel outbidding the world and all the lusts thereof and verily believe that there and there only is the way of life and happiness And thus to see and believe is beyond the line of reason and all it s acquired notions The natural man in the midst of all his notions carries a false ballance in his heart which makes as if every trifling vanity did out-weigh God and Christ and heavenly things and whilest the ballance is thus he cannot resign and thus it will be till supernatural light come then and not till then doth the ballance turn by a right estimate of the Gospel and the promises thereof The spirit inlightning and not humane reason takes the things of Christ and shews them forth in their glory Joh. 16.14 And in this way God works the heart to resignation CHAP. III. Of the second part of Precious Faith the belief of the Testimony of God in the Scriptures What manner of belief it is and the consequents of it in order to an holy self-resignation THUS far of the first thing in Faith supernatural illumination I now proceed to the second A belief of the testimony of God in the Scriptures and here I need use no words to prove this belief an ingredient in Faith for faith in the Grammatical notion of it is nothing else but a belief of a Testimony and being applied to God it is a belief of his Testimony in Scripture Only I shall open two things first what manner of belief of the divine testimony in Scriptures this is and then what the consequents of it are in order to resignation First What manner of belief this is And this I shall explain in these particulars First This belief is divine and congruous to the divine testimony Such as the testimony is such must be the ratio credendi the Scriptures being a divine testimony must be believed for themselves because of the divine authority stamped upon them Thus the Thessalonians received the word not as the word of man but as it is in truth the word of God 1 Thess 2.13 they lodged the divine truth in a divine faith which was a suitable entertainment Humana omnia dicta testibus egent Dei autem sermo ipse sibi test is est saith Salvian humane words want witness but divine carry their own testimony in themselves To believe the Scriptures because God speaks in them is a divine faith but to believe them upon any other account is below their divine authority and but an humane faith For example to believe the Scriptures for the saying of the woman for the Churches testimony is but an humane faith for it stands on no higher fulciment then an humane testimony and therefore can be but an humane faith Here the subtile Jesuite would help out the Papist at a dead lift that faith saith he which is resolved into the Churches authority is neque purè divina neque purè humana sed quasi media inferioris cujusdam ordinis but what saith the learned Pemble to him Just so men use to speak when they cannot tell what to say It is Quasi and Aliquomodo and Alicujus generis it is somewhat if they could tell what thus he 'T is undoubtedly clear that that faith which calls any man Master on earth and centers on an humane testimony such as that of the Church made up of men must needs be can be no other then humane Indeed the Churches testimony may be inter motiva fidei but if the faith be divine it cannot be inter formales rationes sidei A man in the dark labyrinth of nature may be led out by the Churches lamp but when he is out he sees the Sun by its own light he believes the Scriptures for their own divinity though per ministerium Ecclesiae yet not propter authoritatem Ecclesiae Divine faith hath its Master in heaven and its record on high Secondly Which follows on the other this belief is a firm and stable thing because built on the divine authority of Scripture we believe and are sure saith Peter Joh. 6.69 Nothing on earth can so ascertain things unto us as faith in the divine testimony Julian the Apostate glorying in the Pagan learning jeered at the Christians because all their wisdom was but in that one word Credo I believe but divine faith for all his prophane taunt hath more firmness and real certainty in it then all the Sciences in the world for it sees things in lumine veritatis primae in the light of the first truth and sits even in the infallible chair so that non potest subesse falsum a lye cannot sit under it and glues the heart to the truth in that manner Eonav l. 3 disi 23. quest 4. that
as the Schoolman hath it true believers nec per argumenta nec per tormenta nec per blandimenta inclinari possunt ut veritatem saltem ore tenus negent nothing could turn them away from the truth So strong a thing is faith when it is set upon the rock the testimony of God but if it have an humane bottom only such as the Churches authority it is weak and wavering more like a fluctuating opinion then a faith Durandus asserts that Science is more certain than faith and to that strong objection that the divine authority by which we believe is more certain then any humane reason by which we know he answers thus Divina autoritas propter quam credimus licet sit certissima in se non tamen nobis qualitèr enim certi simus L. 3. dist 23. quest 7. quod Deus dicat ea quae credimus non nisi quia sic tenet Ecclesia Observe how this great Scholar abates the certainty of faith because he takes up the divinity of Scriptures upon trust from the saying of the Church those who build their faith purely on the divine word speak after another rate Junius reading the first chapter of St. John cried out in a kind of amazement Divinitatem argumenti authoritatem sentio and Reverend Calvin putting the question how we shall be perswaded that the Scriptures did flow forth from God answers as roundly as a man doth touching that which is obvious and before his senses Instit l. 1. c. 7. perinde est saith he ac si quis roget unde discemus lucem discernere à tenebris the Scripture reveals it self as the light doth and to the pure eye of faith it appears divine from its own innate excellency and so establishes the heart in its holy truth To conclude this point faith is a stable and firm thing but by the estimates and lives of men there seems to be but a very little of it in the world Did men as they profess firmly believe the Scriptures could they vilifie the commands of the great God as they do The injunctions of earthly Princes are not served so Would they slight that wonderful charter of grace and glory in the Gospel a Patent of petty dignities and possessions here below will be highly valued by them durst they sin as they do in the face of hell and wrath flashing out of the divine threatnings a Princes sword or Gibbet would cast them into a fit of trembling O how soon would the things of God cast the ballance in the heart and outweigh all the world if the Scriptures were indeed believed but there being in men only levis opinatio a light opinion rather then a solid faith touching the same there necessarily ensues a monstrous disproportion between their faith and their life Thirdly This belief must be explicite as to the fundamentals of Religion A meer implicite faith as to believe in the lump that all things contained in the holy Scriptures are true will not serve the turn In Coloss 2. v. 2. Non est divina sed belluina fides quae nuliam habet conceptionem five comprehensionem illarum rerum quae creduntur saith the excellent Davenant A meer implicite faith without understanding is a bruitish thing an explicite faith as to fundamentals is required this will appear by these ensuing considerations First A meer implicite faith if at any time might have passed for currant in the days before Christs Incarnation whilest religion was wrapt up in vails and shadows but even then faith in holy men was explicite according to the measure of divine light imparted unto them all along they looked to the Messiah the promised seed and probably in an obscure manner to his future sufferings Whilest Adam was in Innocency there was no promise of a Messiah no footstep of a sacrifice but as soon as man was fallen out came that first Gospel the seed of the woman shall bruise the serpents head Gen. 3.15 and sacrifices were set up without doubt not without Gods appointment for God had respect to Abels sacrifice which had it been a piece of will-worship could not have been and Abol offered it up by faith Heb. 11.4 which without a divine word moves not in the least measure These sacrifices were as it were visible Commentaries on that first Gospel and types of a suffering Messiah And if so and so by Gods own institution it is not at all probable that God should hide the sacred meaning thereof totally from the faith of the first believers Adam then as I conceive by the eyes of Faith saw the Messiah in that first Gospel and withall some glimmering of his sufferings in the sacrifices And if he saw it no doubt he did preach and reveal it to others Schola saerif Disp. 4 and probably as Franzius conceives in a solemn manner at the sacrifices Abel saith the Apostle by faith offered up a sacrifice to God not only by such a faith as did it in obedience to Gods command but by such a faith as through his own sacrifice did pierce to the antitype the great sacrifice of the Messiah De satisfact Christi l. 1. sect 5. Thus the learned Essenius cum sacrificia Veteris Testamenti fuerint typi sacrificii Christi ea sides intelligenda est quâ sacrificium illud refertur ad suum antitypum such a faith was proper to his sacrifice In Noahs sacrifice the Lord smelled a sweet savour or a savour of rest such as did saith one of the Rabbins make him ab irâ suâ quiescere rest from his anger Gen. 8.21 and therefore surely there was more in it then meer beasts and fowls Noahs faith fetched in him who was to give himself an offering and sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling savour Abraham saw Christs day that is his coming and suffering in the flesh John 8.56 a very great sight at that distance and no doubt the faithful Seer did not conceal it but tell his children and servants thereof for the glory of the Messiah his joy was too great to hold it in privately to himself and his zeal too hot to hide so much of heavenly glory Under the Levitical Law the Israelites were to lay their hands on the head of the sacrifice as it were to disburden themselves of sin and lay it off upon the sacrifice and by the offering up thereof they were to make an atonement or expiation The unbelievers among them understood the outward rite of the sacrifice and did the faithful ones see no more in it Could or did they imagine that a poor silly beast could stand under the weight of sin or that the blood of bulls or goats could take it away No surely their faith looked through the outward sacrifice to the Messiah for atonement and reconciliation In David the Evangelical day broke out more clearly O how much of Christ is there in the 110th Psalm there 's his kingdom and eternal priesthood there 's
Canon it forbids Christians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to return to their Military Employment and in the Ninteenth it commands Rebaptization of such as were Baptized by Hereticks The Emperour Zeno being expulsed the Tyrant Basiliscus by the perswasion of Timotheus Aelurus wrote Letter in condemnation of the General Council of Chalcedon unto which as impious as they were no less than five hundred Bishops subscribed at the Tyrants Command And touching the Canon if the Council of Laodicea be right in it that of Carthage is not so and consequently that of Constantinople which takes in both must needs be in an Error These things premised Can the unvariable and infallible Scripture hang upon a variable and errable Authority such as Mans is May all the precious Promises of Life and Salvation be precarious and pendent on an Humane Arbitrium Tertullian in his Apology speaking of that old Decree among the Romans that no God should be consecrated without the approbation of the Senate saith Apud nos de humano arbitratu divinitas pensitatur nisi homini Deus placuerit Deus non erit If the Authority of Scripture depend on the Church then we may say Nisi homini Scriptura placuerit Scriptura non erit and by consequence all the Faith of the Saints must be pendulous and hanging on uncertainties If the Churches desinition be so momentous to Scripture let us see what the Church hath done in it Hath it collected the Canonical Books into a body 'T is probable Ezra collected the Books of the Old Testament into a body and so think many of the ancient Fathers And I suppose St. John collected the Books of the New Testament together for he lived after all the other Apostles even unto the time of Trajan that by his vigilancy the Canon of the New Testament might be kept pure and unadulterate When after St. Pauls death there was a Book called Periodus Pauls Teclae spread abroad under the Name and Title of Paul St. John discovered it to be spurious insomuch that the Author of it confessed that he did it amore Pauli And I believe what was done in this collection of the Canon was not done by an ordinary Spirit but by a Prophetical Spirit in Ezra and an Apostolical one in St. John In the mean time it appears not to have been done by an act of the Church but leaving this particular When and how did the Church define the Canon Such a momentous thing should have been done by the Primo-primitive Church in the first Century whilest the Church of Christ was a pure Virgin as Egesippus said Lib. 3. Dist 21. Quest 1. Thus the School-man Durandus lays it down Hoc quod dictum est de approbatione Scripturae per Ecclesiam intelligitur solum de Ecclesiâ que fuit tempore Apostolorum qui suerunt repleti Spiritu sancto No Church so fit to do it as that which had so much of the holy Spirit but nothing was done in it in that Age. The so called Canons of the Apostles which in the 85th Canon take in three Books of Macchabees into the old Canon and the Constitutions and Epistles of Clement into the new are clearly adulterate these condemn second Marriages deprive not a Clergy-man of communion for Fornication or Perjury or Thest and speak of Altars Oblations Vessels of Gold and Silver sanctified Cantors and Lectors and many other such-like altogether unknown in those Apostolical times About these Canons Mirè inter se digladiantur Pontisicii saith one Gelasius in a Roman Synod of seventy Bishops declares them Apocryphal in toto Bellarmine rejects all but the first fifty and I think all the Romanists cast away the 85th Canon touching the Scripture as Supposititious The first Virgin-Century doing nothing in this grand matter one might have lookt for it in the second or third but there is no foot-step of it In the fourth Century about the year 320 came the famous Council of Nice and then it might have been expected as the aptest foundation for their Orthodox Conclusions against Arrius and withal for a stated Rule against all future Heresies but there is a failure also nothing was done in it And into what Heart can it enter that in all those 320 years there was no Canon no Authority of Scripture no foundation for the Primitive Christians to fix their Faith upon In those days Paganism was strong and Persecutions hot and Divine Cordials necessary and yet the Scripture for want of the Churches Definition was not of Authority as to the Christians then living I say according to the Popish Thesis it was not But to go on Afterwards about the year of our Lord 368 came the Council of Laodicea which in the 59th Canon orders That no Books should be read in the Church but the Canonical ones of the Old and New Testament and enumerates as Canonical such as are received in the Reformed Church only omitting the Apocalypse And now had not that Omission been and had this Council been a General one the work had been done But afterwards in this very Century about the year 398 the third Council of Carthage in its 47th Canon reckons up as Canonical Tobit Judith two Books of Macchabees and five Books of Solomon accounting Wisdom and Ecclesiastious to be two of them In this Council St. Austin was present who yet in his Book de Civitate Dei Lib. 17. cap. 20 saith That Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus in the judgment of the more learned were not Solomens and were chiefly received in the Western Church it seems the Eastern received them not In the end of the next Century about the year 494. Gelasius Bishop of Rome with seventy Bishops enumerates the same Books as Canonical which are reckoned so in the Council of Carthage save only that he omits the Book of Nehemiah and names but one of the Macchabees These particular Provincial Councils being of incompetent Authority to desine the Canon for the Universal Church and withal variant nay repugnant among themselves Whither must we go but to a General Council but Oh how late very late doth that come How long will the Authority of Scripture and Faith of Christians be suspended and to how little satisfaction will this desinition be About the year 682 was the sixth General Council of Constantinople in Trullo and as to this Point what did it It consirmed the Canons of the Apostles the Council of Laodicea and the Council of Carthage which three in this Point being totally inconsistent each with other every one by the leave of these Fathers who confirmed them all may chuse what Canonical Books he will have whether those in the Canons of the Apostles or those in the Council of Laodicea or those in that of Carthage and what pitiful incertainties are here And now it is to little purpose to fly over many Centuries more till we come to the Councils of Florence and Trent these are late ones and as our Learned Whitaker
must consider what reason so far as it is pure and right doth dictate to us in this point and what is that but that God as the first unerrable truth must be believed in his words for himself and above all other things even above reason it self Ronand l. 3. dist 23. Justum est saith the Schoolman ut intellecius noster ita captivetur subjacoat summae veritati sicut affectus noster debet subjacere summae bonitati nec potest esse anima recta nisi intellectus summe veritati propter se super omnia assentiat affectus summae bonitati adhaereat It's just and purely rational as to love the supream goodness so to assent to the supream truth for it self and above all that is without any salvocs or exceptions at all the authority being infallible the belief should in all reason be absolute Reason says that God should be believed as a God one that cannot lye no more then cease to be and if as a God then for himself and above all That in the Socinian which adds a salvo to his belief of the holy Scriptures is not his reason but the rust and proud flesh and spiritual corruption of it and to believe such stuff before the truth of God and make it the allay and supream ruler of our faith is desperately and monstrously irrational How this rust grew upon our reason at first is evident in the fall of man the Serpent creeps in upon the woman with an yea hath God said Gen. 3.1 his plot was to weaken the authority of Gods word and when she began to waver about it and diminish the peremptory threatning of death with a least ye dye v. 3. her reason began to corrupt and become dreggy which while pure could not but assert the truth and veracity of God Hence the Apostle speaking to the Corinthian Church as a chast virgin espoused to Christ adds this caution least as the Serpent beguiled Eve so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 11.2 3. ver That is take heed of falling off from the pure doctrine of the Gospel the head of every man is Christ so much adherence and subjection as reason hath unto him and his holy truth so much chastity and virginity it hath Virginitae mentis est integrasides Aust in Joh. but as soon as it elapes it becomes an adulteress and should not be suffered to speak in holy things Morcover the irrationality of it will further appear if we consider that the sphear of reason and the sphear of revelation are two distinct things The sphear of reason is filled with natural notions the elements of mans spirit but the sphear of revelation is filled with supernatural truths the dictates of God Reason so far as it is reason is a divine spark a petty Prince in its own dominions but when it leaves these and passes over into the supernatural region and there instead of sitting down at Gods se et to be taught and inlightned assumes the magisterial chair and falls a judging divine mysteries it is no longer reason but a fool and a brute and speaks as simply in matters of Religion as a beast if it could speak would do in matters of reason Thus when our Saviour discoursed Nicodemus about regeneration reason prattled after a strange rate How can a man be born when he is old can he enter the second time into his mothers womb and be born So soolishly and absurdly doth carnal reason carry it self in supernatural things To make this more plain let us compare the weakness of reason with the sublimity of holy mysteries and then the fallibility of reason with the certainty of them First Let us compare the weakness of reason with the sublimity of holy Mysteries Reason having a bruise in the fall is weak even in its own sphear With how much toil doth it creep from letters to words and from words to Arts and Sciences And when it is there how little doth it know Can it span the heavens or measure the vast back-side thereof or number those golden letters the stars therein or understand the Sun which to have done Eudoxus would willingly have been burnt up by it or in one of its beams tell what light is touching which there are no less then seven opinions in one of the Schoolmen which verifies the old saying Non constat ex lumine naturae quid sit natura luminis To come lower can it enter into the treasures of the snow or ride a circuit with the winds or take a rational turn with the flux and reflux of the sea or tell how the massie earth hangs upon nothing or unkennel an occult quality and draw it out to an open view or unriddle a loadstone in which a late Philosopher would have the atomes of both Poles to meet and incorporate Nay in a common stone can it dive into the form or nature thereof dic mihi quid est lapiditas said a Learned man can it strip the meanest creature of the investing accidents and look upon the pure naked essence thereof can it comprehend a drop or a dust in which saith the profound Bradwardine there are infinite figures and numbers De Causâ Dei l. 1. c. 1. pars 32. and consequently infinite Geometrical and Arithmetical conclusions following one another in order and having a mutual dependance between themselves such as no Philosophers can ever reach unto because being capable only of finite conclusions they leave behind them infinite unknown Or if it look about its own mansion-house the brain can it tell where the cells of memory or the play-house of fancy or the shop of the animal spirits are scituate or whether all these live together in a family thousands of such things there are which may make every one cry out with Socrates Hoc unum scio quod nihil scio And shall such a weakling as this dunced and posed in every atome within its own sphear usurp the crown and rule over sacred mysteries and pure revelations which come out of the bosom of God to be the wonder of Angels and faith of men and are in a transcendent excess infinitely above and beyond the capacity of both of them shall it take up the ocean in a little shell measure the sacred Trinity in its shallow understanding And if it will not lye in so narrow a room cast it away as no article of Faith as a thing inter impossibilia mentis not consistent with reason shall it s dim eyes pry into the Ark I mean into that great mystery God in the flesh and there because it cannot see how two such natures as mortal and immortal temporal and eternal mutable and immutable can come together into one person throw it away as Smalcius doth with this rationi sanae repugnat it is repugnant to right reason When reason thus exalts it self in the things of God it sinks below it self into brutish
he hath a true perswasion of the things of God but after Experience a Plerophory or full perswasion thereof Here I shall Instance in that one Fundamental Comprehensive Truth which is pregnant with all other viz. that the holy Scriptures are the very Word of God and so to be embraced by all Christians The Papists say That the Authority of the Scriptures depends at least quoad nos on the Definition of the Church and that upon that account chiefly it is to be beloved by us By the Church they mean the Church of Pastors and those gathered in a Council to desine the Canon of Scripture Saint Paul speaks of a Church which is The Pillar and Ground of the Truth 1 Tim. 3.15 But as our learned Whitaker hath observed That is not the Church of Pastors but of Believers and in truth the Word of Life is more purely held forth in the Lives and Experiences of Believers than in the Gifts of Pastors This Thesis some of their Grandees have prosecuted even to Blasphemy saying That without the Judgment of the Church they would give no more credit to Matthew than to Livy and value the Scriptures much as they do Esops Fables That this Opinion is false is as clear as the Light true Faith is a pure infusion which hangs on the irradiating Spirit as a Beam on the Sun and in Scripture sees with the credenda the reason of believing in the Divine Authority stamped thercon The Ministery used about it may be Mans but the Authority on which it leans must be Gods Theol. Nat. Tit. 209. Tota causa tota radix totum fundamentum credendi verbis Dei debet esse quia ipse dicit saith Raimundus De Sabunde Unless we believe God for himself our Faith is not Divine if the Fulciment of it be humane it is such it self Saint Paul would not have Our Faith stand in the wisdom of men Comment in Mich. 7. 1 Cor. 2.5 Saint Jerom saith In homine spes vana vera in Deo est and a little after Nolite credere in ducibus non in Episcopo non in Presbytero non in Diacono non in quâlibet hominum dignitate If Believers believe the Scriptures upon the Authority of Pastors Pastors believe them upon their own Or if they say that they have the Testimony of the Spirit all Believers may say the same and thereby believe as well as themselves and without their Authority The Thessalonians Received the Word as the Word of God without asking the Judgment of the Church 1 Thess 2.13 The Bercans Received it with all readiness and instead of consulting the Church Searched the Scriptures Acts 17.11 The true Church cannot be known but by the Scriptures De Uniâ—â—â— Feel caâ—â— 3. â—â— Thus Saint Austin writing against the Donatists saith Sunt certe libri Dominici quorum Autoritati utrique consentimus utrique credimus ibi queramus Eccl siam ibi discutiamus cansam And again Ecclesiam suam demonstrent si possunt non in sermonibus rumoribus Afrorum non in Conciliis Episcoporum non in literis disputatorum non in signis prodigiis fallacibus sed in preseriptâ— legis in Prophetarum praedactis in Psalmorum cantibus in ipsius Pastoris vocibus in Evangelistarum praedicationibus laboribus hoc est in omnibus Canonicis Sanctorum Librorum Autoritatibus And if I must know the Church by the Scripture I must in all reason own the Scripture before I own the Church or its Decisions The Church may bear witness to the Scripture but in a subordinate Ministerial way The supream adequate witness thereof is only that Spirit which outwardly indited it in the letter and inwardly imprints it on the Heart The Church may bear witness to the Scripture but it can add no Authority to it If the Church hath Authority to define the Canon it must have it from Scripture and then the Scripture must have Authority even quoad nos before that Definition unless they will absurdly distinguish and say That the Scripture-Authority before the Definition is only as to Pastors and not as to Believers till after it All the Churches Authority is from Scripture and How can the derivative Authority add to the Primitive The Scripture is Principium scientificum and therefore to be received by its light without a quare or reason why it is so the Scripture is a Foundation to the Church Eph. 2.20 and such a one that the Church is no further a Church than as it is built thereon and How can the Church be a Foundation to the Scripture The Scripture is a Law to the Church every Soul must be under it and How can the subject-Subject-Church give Authority to the Law which it Self is under The Judgment of the Church hath been variable in the Council of Carthage under Cyprian it was Decreed that those which were baptized by Hereticks returning to the Church should be rebaptized the one Baptisin being only in the Church and none without it Vbi Ecclesia non est Baptisma non est Afterwards the first Council of Carthage called the First not as if it had been first in time but as omitting the first Cyprianical Council as antiquated enacted that Baptism made in the name of the Sacred Trinity should not be reiterated all crying out Absit against reiteration In the seventh General Council of Constantinople the 338 Bishops cried down Images might and main Quomodo Dei matrem quam obumbravit plenitudo Deitatis vulgaris Gentilium ars pingere audet non fas est Christianis qui spem Resurrectionis babent demonum culturae consuetudinibus uti flagitium est as Gregorius Theologus said Fidem habere in coloribus non in corde Quis gloriam splendorem Christi effigiare posset mortuis coloriius said Eusebius Pamphili in his Letter to the Empress Constantia One would have thought that the broken Images would never have been set together again but within less than half a Century comes the second Council of Nice and there the 350 Bishops bring in Images again under the wings of the old Cherubims and set them up upon Jacobs Pillar and back them with Fathers and Miracles They throw out Anathema's against the Iconoclasts and reject with a Curse the Books of Eusebius as a Man delivered over in reprobum sensum And are well perswaded that Angels are Corporeal and may be pictured A little after and within the same half-Century comes the Council of Francford halting between both the former speaking half in the Language of Ashdod and half in the pure Language allowing Images but denying any Worship to them And as touching the Canon it will afterwards appear how the Council of Laodicea differs about that from the third Council of Carthage and how the fixth Council of Constantinople in confirming them both varies from it self The Judgment of the Church hath been subject to Error the famous Council of Nice had two lapses in it in the twelfth