15. 1. Heb. 8. 11. Iâ—hn 14. 26. and by intellâ—ctuall visions Num. 12. 6. to the phantasie God revealed his will by imaginary visions to Prophets awake and by dreames to Prophets asleepe Gen. 40. 8. 41. 8 9. Acts 16. 10 10. 3. Num. 14. 4. to the senses God revealed his will and that either by vision to the eye or lively voyce to the Eare Gen. 3 9. 4. 6. 15. 4 5. Exod. 20. 1 2. 3. 1 2 3 33. 17. And Lastly by writing This Revelation was sometimes immediate by God himselfe after an unspeakable manner or by meanes viz. Angels Vrim Thummim Prophets Christ himselfe and his Apostles The written word forthematter contained in it is called the word of God Rom 9. 6. for the manner of Record the Scripture John 10. 35. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 1 Pet. 2. 6. or Scriptures Matthew 22. 29. John 5. 39. Romans 15. 4. 2. Pet. 3. 16. By an Antonomasie or an excellency of phrase as the most worthy writings that ever saw the light Sometimes with an Epithite the holy Scriptures Rom. 1. 2. 2 Tim. 3. 15. the Sâ—riptures of the Prophets Rom. 16. 26 Some thinke thâ—t Enoch the seventh from Alâ—m wrote but Jude 6. 14. speakâ—th onely of his prophesying which might rather be by word of mouth then writing because our Saviour citing Scripture ever gives the first place to Moses and undertaking by the Scriptures to prove himselfe to be the Messiah that he ought to suffer began at Moses Luke 24. 27. No doubt if there had beene any more ancient then Moses our Saviour would have alleadged it because all the Scripture that was before him was to give testimony of him Of the authority of the Scripture The Author of the Scriptures was God himselfe they came from him in a speciall and peculiar manner commonly called inspiration which is an act of Gods Spirit immediately imprinting or infusing those notions into their braines and those phrases and words by which the notions were uttered 2 Tim. 4. 16. All Scripture is given by Divine inspiration or by inspiration of God Prophesie came not of old time by the will of men but holy men of God spake as they were moved or carried by the Holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. 21. They did not write these things of their own heads but the Spirit of God did move and worke them to it and in it 2 Sam. 23. 2. The Spirit of the Lord spake by me that is did immediately guide me and tell me what matter to utter and in what words Stephen saith they resisted the Holy Ghost when they did disobey the Scriptures The Holy Ghost by the mouth of David and the mouth of Esay spake Acts 1. 16. 28. 25. The Inscriptions of many Propheticall bookes and Epistles Apostolicall run thus The word of the Lord which â—ame to Hosea Amos Joel Paul Peter JAmes a servant of God and an Apostle of Christ. The proeme that is set before divers prophecies is this Thus saith the Lord and the Prophets inculcate that speech the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it because they would take off the thoughts of the people from their own persons and lift them up to consideration of God the chiefe author It is all one to say the Scripture saith Rom. 4. 3. 10. 11. 11. 2. Gal. 4. 30. 1 Tim. 5. 10. and God saith Rom 9. 25. Heb. 4. 3. 8. 5. 13. 5. and the word Scripture is put for God speaking in the Scripture the Scripture saith to Pharaoh Rom. 9. 7. and the Scripture hath shut up all men under sinne Galat. 3. 22. for which in another place God hath shut up Rom. 11. 32. All other disciplines were from God and every truth whosoever speaks it is from the holy Ghost but the Scripture in a singular manner is attributed to the Holy Ghost he immediately dictated it to the holy men of God The efficient principall cause then of the Scripture was God the ten Commandements of which most of the rest is an exposition were writen after a secret and unutterable manner by God himselfe therefore they are called the writings of God Exod. 32. 16. Secondly all the rest which was written though men were the instruments was done by his appoinment and assistance Exo. 17. 14. Esay 8. 1. Jer. 30. 2. The Scripture is often attributed to the holy Ghost as the Author and no mention is made of the Pen-men Heb. 10 15. The Prophets and Apostles were the Pen-men of the Scripture whose calling sending and inspiration was certainly divine for whatsoever they taught the Church of God or left in writing they learned not before in the Schooles 1 Cor. 2. 13. The Divine authority of thâ— word may be defined a certain dignity and excellency of the Scripture above all other sayings or writings whatsoever whereby it is perfectly true in word and sence it deserves credit in all sayings narrations of things past present and to come threatnings and promises and as superiour doth binde to obedience if it either forbid or command any thing 1 Tim. 1. 15. 2 Pet. 1. 19. John 5. 39. Heb. 6. 18. Rom. 1. 5. 2 Cor. 10. 5 6. 13. 3. 12. 12. Gal. 1. 1 12 13. though the things in mans judgement seem unlike or incredible or the Commandements hard and foolish to the carnall minde Hereticks have laboured to prove their corrupt and damnable opinions out of the Scripture and have received some bookes if not all as Divine The Turkes at this day so esteem the five books of Moses as they will kisse such patches of Paper as they finde having any part thereof written in the same Aristaeus an Heathen when he had determined to have disputed against Scripture confesseth that he was forbidden by God in a dreame Plato is termed Moses Atticus Moses speaking Greeke The holy Scripture in it selâ—e is Divine and Authenticall though no man in the world should so acknowledge it as the Sunne in it selfe were light though all the men in the world were blind and could not or would not see it but in respect of us it is Divine and Authenticall when it is acknowledged and esteemed so to be The Scripture is the word of God written by holy men as they were inspired by the holy Ghost divinely containing all Divine truth necessary to salvation for the edification and instruction of Gods Church thereunto and for the glory of God That the Scriptures were from God may appeare by reasons contained in or cleaving to the Scripture 1. From the excellency of their matter which is Heavenly the divine and supernaturall matter contained in it It telleth us of such things as doe farre exceed the reach of mans reason and which it was impossible for any man to counterfeit and faine and which being told are so correspondent to reason
been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a finall stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the word of the Gospell to listen unto it and with a kind of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the ministery of the Church as an externall meanes to move us to imbrace the word of God but we deny the authority of the Church to be the principall meanes When we call the Scriptures Canonicall we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and rule to us The office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in foure things 1. To distinguish Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall although the determination of the Church be not the onely or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithfull keeper of those books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publique writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a cryer with a loud voyce ought to pronounce the Kings edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a generall Councell nor the Church virtuall which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essentiall the congregation of all faithfull believers the House of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essentiall piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Lawes in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to posts in market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sence Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say that the Church may condere artioulos fidei facere canonicum quo ad nos and though they talke of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospell of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historicall and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infured faith besides the authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every booke and comparing of it with other Scriptures doe serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Ob. We are sent to the Church to determine all controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either dogmaticall concerning faith or rituall concerning true order the proposition is about these not the first Secondly from this fundamentall truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the basis indeed of all religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknowne tongue nor in private by the common people without speciall leave and certaine cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the doctrine and practice of the Church but the doctrine and practise of the Church must be the interpreter and judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to meane none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeable to that which the Pope doth teach and practice There cannot be a surer signe of a bad cause then that it feares to be tried by the writings which it selfe cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproofe for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine l. 2. de verbo Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosiua The Papists object the obscursity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the vulgar translation and thinke they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that give not holy things to dogs cast not Pearles before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents glosse a beast might not touch the mount a lay-man might not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvâ— traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutherarum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat rule for what we believe or doe in all Theologicall matters they call us Scripturarios Scripturemen and atram entarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoffe we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae Traditionaries Saint Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learne the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4. epist. 40. ad Theodorum medicum Proving further that obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to read them that it should rather incite them to greater diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compares the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostome held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audite quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca Saint Jerome did exhort divers women thereto and commended
he praised God Joseph was no King aud therefore had no Scepter to fall down before In the Hebrew Gen. 47. for top we read head which by a Metaphor signifies the top because the head is the end and highest part of man and consequently of any thing else And for staffe we now read in the Hebrew bed which fell out because the word mittah there extant pricked with other Vowels signifies a staffe for in the Hebrew matteh is a staffe and mitteh a bed The Septuagint whom the Apostle followes read it matteh and so translated it staffe otherwise thâ—n wâ— now read it in the Hebrew Text. If we follow the Hebrew Text as it is now extant the sence will be That Jacob because he could not raise his body out of his bed therefore he bowed his head forward upon his beds head and so worshipped God Bezâ— speaking of the divers Latine translations of the New Testament onely he saith of the vâ—lgar Latine that he followeth it for the most part and preferreth it before all the rest Maximâ— ex parte amplector claeeris omnibus antepono He speakes of the new Testament onely and of that Latine translation of the new Testament in comparison of all other Latine translations which were before him as Erasmus Castalion and such like These placâ—s may serve to shew that the vulgar Latine is corrupt no Book being entire or free fron errour Isidore Clarius Brixianus praefâ—â—t in Biblia a great learned man of their own affirmeth that it hath 8000 places in which the sense of the Holy Ghost is changed Since the Councell of Trent 2 Popes have set forth this vulgar Edition diversly which of these shall be received as authenticall How often doe the Papists leave the vulgar in all their controversies when it is for their advantage so to doe it is a matter ordinary with them and needlesse to be proved There is no Edition Ancienter then the Hebrew if the Latine have been used a 1000 yeares in the Church the Hebrew hath been used almost 3000 yeares the Chaldee Arbicke Syriacke and Greeke Editions also have beene used above a 1000 yeares and so should be authentique by the Papists argument Having spoken of the authority of the Scriptures the Canonicall Books and the Authenticall Editions I now goe on to treate of the end of the Scripture its adjuncts or properties fitted to that end and the Interpretation of Scripture The end of the Scripture comes next to be considered of this I have spoken somewhat afore but shall now inlarge my selfe The end of the Scripture is considered 1. In respect of God 2. In respect of us In respect of God the end of the Scripture is a glorifying of him by it we may learne to know love and feare him and so be blessed The glory of God is the chiefe end of all things Prov. 16. 4. In respect of us The end of the Scripture is 1. Intermediate temporall edification which is fitly referred to 5 principall uses the two first respect the mind the other three the heart will and affection It is profitable for Doctrine it serves to direct to all saving truth nothing is to be received as a truth necessary to salvation but what is proved out of Scripture Where that hath not a tongue to speake I must not have an eare to heare Hoc quia de scripâ—uris non habet autoritatem eadem facilitate contemuitur qua probatur Hieron 2. Reproofe or Confutation to refute all errours and heterodoxe opinions in Divinity By this sword of the Spirit Christ vanquished Satan Matth. 4. 4. 7. 10. by the Scripture he opposed the Jewes John 5. 45. 46. 47. and 10. 34. by this he refuted the Scribes and Pharisees Matth. 9. 13. and 12. 1. Luke 10. 25. 26. 27. Matth. 19. 34. and 21. 12. 13. the Sadducees Matth. 22 29. By this Austin refuted the Pelagians Irenaeus the Valentinians Tertullian the Mâ—rcionites Athanasius the Arrians In comitijs Vindelicorum cum episcopus Albertus aliquando legeret Biblia referente Luthero in Sermon Convival interrogasset quidam è consiliarijs quid libri hic â—sset nescio equidem respondet qualis sit liber sed omnia quae in eo lego nostrae religioni planè sunt contraria 3. Correction of iniquity setting streight that which is amisse in manners and life 4. Instruction to righteousnesse Instruunt Patriarchae etiam errantes Basil saith the Psalmes are a common Store house and Treasury of good Instruction The Title of the 32 and some other Psalmes is Maschil that is a Psalme of instruction 5. Comfort in all troubles Psal. 19. 8 and 119. 50. and 92. the Greek word for Gospell signifieth glad-tidings The Promises are the Christians best Cordials as Gods Promises are the rule of what we must pray for in faith so they are the ground of what we must expect in comfort 2. Ultimate and chiefest our Salvation and life Eternall John 5. 39. and 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 15. It will shew us the right way of escaping hell and attaining Heaven It will shew us what to beleeve and practise for our present and eternall happinesse This was Gods aime in causing the Scripture to be written and we shall find it fully availeable and effectuall for the ends for which it was ordained by God CHAP. VIII THe properties of the Scripture fitted to that end The properties which the Scripture must have for the former end are these It is 1. Of Divine Authority 2. True and Certaine 3. The rule of faith and manners 4. Necessary 5. Pure and Holy 6. Sufficient and Perfect 7. Perspicuous and Plaine 1. It is of Divine Authority and so greater then all exception It is Divine 1. In its efficient cause and Originall which is God the Father dictating in his Sonne declaring and publishing by his holy Spirit confirming and sealing it in the hearts of the faithfull He wrote the Decalogue immediately with his own finger and Commanded the whole Systeme and all the parts of Scripture to be written by his servants the Prophets and Apostles as the publike Actuaries and Pen-men thereof therefore the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost who did dictate both the matter and words those speeches are frequent the Lord said and the mouth of the Lord hath spoken 2. In the subject matter which is truth according to godlinesse certaine powerfull of venerable antiquity joyned with a sensible demonstration of the Spirit and Divine presence and with many other things atteâ—â—ing its divine authority Whence it follows that the authority of the Holy Scriptures is 1. Infallible which expresseth the minde and will of God to whom truth is essentiall and necessary 2. Supreame and Independent into which at last all faith is resolved from whiâ—h it is not lawfull to appeale By which singular authority the Scripture is distinguished
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
of peace yet they needed such a one as consists in the continuance of that peace which they had before The Lord hath now so fully reaveled himselfe and his excellencies vnto them and his love and favour the necessitie of their being obedient that they cannot but continue to obey and serve him they were not so farre inlightened and sanctified at the first creation but that thē in respect of themselves there was a possibilitie of sinning as well as of theirs that did sinne but now they are so confirmed by the cleare sight they have of God that they cannot be willing to sinne against him The Angels which abode in the truth are called good Angels not onely in respect of the righteousnesse which God bestowed upon them at their creation but also in respect of the obedience which they performed and their confirmation in that good estate The causes why they abode still in the truth are the firme and unchangeable decree of God 1. Tim. 5 21. his free grace Phil. 2 13. wherewith they were holpen and their owne free choise of will cleaving firmely unto God The ninth and last question concerning Angels is How can they be happy in enjoying Gods face and yet be on the earth Matth. 18 10. By heaven there is not meant the place but their heavenly estate and condition now though thy goe up and downe doing service yet this hinders not their happinesse for they doe not this with distraction and these things are appointed as meanes for the end viz. enjoying of God and as the soule is not hindred in its happinesse by desiring the bodie againe so it is here 1. Wee should imitate the Angels 2. It shewes us how much wee are beholding to Christ no Angels could love us if it were not for him How much are we to love God who hath provided helps for man especially Christ who tooke our nature upon him not that of Angels Gods Angels are our Angels to defend and keep us God hath committed the care of us to these ministring Spirits 3. It shewes the wofull condition of the impenitent when Christ shall come with all these Angels when those great shoutes shall bee come thou swearer drunkard how terrible will this be The more potent God is in himselfe and in his ministers the more wretched are they and the surer is their destruction 4. This confutes the Papists in three errours 1. In that they hold nine orders of Angels They are distinguished ratione objectorum et officiorum in respect of the object and massage they goe about 2. They would have them worshiped but the Angell forbad John 3. They say every one hath his good Angell to keep him so Bucan thinkes in his common places 2. The Saduces who said there was neither Angell nor Spirit Acts. 24 8. but held good Angels onely to bee good thoughts and evill Angels to be evill lusts and affections There names offices actions apparitions shew plainely that they are not bare qualities but true substances It serves for instruction 1. To see the blindnesse erroneousnes of mankind in that a great number of men of learning and wit and parts good enough and that such as lived in the Church and acnowledged the five bookes of Moses to be divine should yet make a shift to winke so hard as to mainaine that there were no Angels What falsehood may not the Devill make a man entertaine and defend and yet seeme not to denie the Authoritie of Scripture If a man confessing Moses writings to be true will yet denie that there be either Spirits or Angels which are things so plainely revealed by Moses that a man would account it impossible to receive his writings and not confesse them But if God leave man to the Deuill his owne witte he wil make him the verier foole because of his wit he will erre so much the more palpably by how much he seems better armed against errour euen as a mans owne weapon beaten to his head by a farr stronger arme will make a deepe wound in him Se wee our aptnesse to run into and maintaine false opinions and let us not trust in our owne wittes but suspect our selves and seeke to God for direction Secondly Let us learne humilitie from this and by comparing our selves with these excellent Spirits learne to know how meane we be that we may be also meane in our owne esteeme So long as a man compares himselfe with those things and persons which are baser then himselfe he is prone to lift up himselfe in his owne conceit and to thinke highly of himselfe but when he doth weigh himselfe in the ballance with his betters he begins to know his owne lightnesse The Lord hath set us men in the midst as it were betwixt the bruite beasts and the celestiall Spirits we doe so farr exceed them as the Angels exceede us as for bodily gifts the beasts in many things goe beyond us some are more strong swift have more excellent sight smell then wee but in few things doe we equall the Angels They are swifter and stronger then we and their excellēt reason goes beyond ours in a manner as the understanding which is in us excelleth the fancie of the beasts they know a thousand things more then we doe or can know One Angell can doe more then all men can speake more languages repeate more histories in a word can performe all acts of invention and judgement and memorie farre beyond us Thirdly Since God hath made Angels to serve and attend him should not we that are farre Inferiour to them be content also to serve him yea exceeding glad and thankfull that he will vouchsafe to admit us into his service Doth he need our service that is served with such ministers and messengers Let us frame our selves to obedience and doe Gods will on earth with all readinesse and cherefulnesse seeing there is soe great store of more worthy persons in heaven that doe it An Angell will not esteeme any worke too difficult or base why should wee Fourthly The Angels which waite about the throne of God are glorious therefore the Lord himselfe must needs excell in glorie Esa. 6 1 2. Ezek. 1 28. Of the Devils or evill Angells The Angels which persisted in the truth are called good Angels Luke 9 26. but those which revolted and kept not the law were called evill Angels or evill Spirits Angels of darknesse Luke 8 20. and 19 42. and Angels absolutely 1 Cor. 6. because they were so created of the Lord. In respect of their nature they are called Spirits 1. King 22 21. Matth. 18 16. Luke 10 20. In respect of their fall they are called evill Spirits 1. Sam. 18 10. Luke 8 2. uncleane Spirits Matth. 10 1. Zach. 13 2. not so much because of their instigation to lust as because their natures are defiled with sinne lying Spirits 1. King 22 22. John 8 44. Devils Levit. 17
to thy face curse God and die and that Psal. 14. 1. Some answer thus these places are historically inspired not dogmatically Another question is whether preaching be not divinely inspired as well as the word written The Preaching of the Prophets and Apostles was divinely inspired but the preaching of our Ministers no further then it agrees with the word Some say the Scriptures are but a device of mans braine to give assistance to Magistrates in civill government Nothing is more repugnant to prudence and policy What policy was it in the Old Testament to appoint circumcision to cut a poore child as soon as he came into the world Two and twenty thousand Oxen were spent at the dedication of one Altar to sacrifice so many Oxen and Sheep such usefull creatures Christ chose silly illiterate men to propagate the Gospell This serves for information of our judgement and assures us of divers truths 1. That the Scriptures are for themselves worthy to be believed they have authority in and of themselves not borrowed from any persons in the world by which they binde the consciences of all men to receive them with faith and obedience for their Authors sake alone and the divine truth which shines in them though they should not be commended unto men by any authority of any creature Such as is the authority of the Authour of any writing such is the authority of the writing it selfe for all the strength of the testimony depends upon the excellency of the person which gives the testimony now God is the authour of these writings Thus saith the Lord therefore such authority as he hath such must they have a supreme highest authority which borroweth from none and is subject to none So this acknowledgement of their originall teacheth that we must not believe them for the authority sake of any man or men for Gods word can borrow no authority from men John 5. 34. I receive not testimony from man saith Christ that is need no mans testimony As the first goodnesse is to be loved for it selfe so is the first truth to be believed for it selfe saith Aquinas And as Christ by himselfe could demonstrate that he was the Messias so the Word by it selfe can prove that it is the Word of God We affirme that the Scriptures are known to be of God by themselves the Papists maintaine that we cannot be certaine of the Scriptures divinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propound unto us what is to be believed what is not to be believed and Hermanus saith that the Scripture is no more worth then Aesops Fables without the testimony of the Church As in other Sciences there are alwaies some principles per se nota indemonstrabilia whence other things are proved so in Divinity all conclusions in point of beliefe and practice are proved by the Scripture The Scriptures prove themselves by their own naturall light manifesting their divine originall whence they are and their right meaning how they must be understood They are like light primum visibile which maketh all other things manifest and it selfe too by it own proper qualities 1. The Church rather depends on the Scripture which is an object not principle of Divinity the Church ought to be subject to Christ Ephes. 5. 24. the Scripture is the word of Christ Col. 3. 16. 2. All the words of the Scripture are words of truth Dan. 10. 21. some words of the Church are words of error Esay 1. 21 24. 3. 8 9. 5. 13. But the authority of him that speaks alwaies truth is greater then of him who sometimes lies ergo the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church Goodnesse it selfe cannot deceive wisdome it selfe cannot be deceived God is both Titus 1. 2. The voice of the Scripture is the voice of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. but the voice of the Church is the voice of men Acts 14. 14. 15. 17. 17. 30. 3. Faith and a firme consolation in temptations ought to relie on a sure that is a divine foundation for every humane testimony is uncertaine 4. In vaine shall we dispute against the wicked concerning Religion and divine truth if we shall say it comes from God because we affirme so 5. This is proved by Scriptures John 5. 34 35. Christ in his humiliation did not receive the testimony of John much lesse will he receive the testimony of others now he is glorified John 5 34 35 36. 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. 1 John 5. 9. 6. The authority proving is greater more certaine and more knowne then the conclusion proved by the â—ame Autoritde probans is greater then probata The Papists to prove the authority of the Church flie to the Scriptures For I demand whence doe we understand that the Church erres not in delivering the Canon of the Scripture they answer it is governed by the Holy Ghost and therefore cannot erre in its decrees But how appeares it that it is so governed alwaies they answer God hath promised it and then they alleage those places to prove it Ob. The Church is ancienter then the Scripture because it was before Moses ergo it hath greater authority Sol. 1. The Prophets and John Baptist were ancienter then Christ yet not of greater authority 2. Consider the word 1. quoad formale externum as written and clothed with words so the Church was before the Scripture 2. quoad formale internum the matter and sence or meaning so the Scripture was more ancient than the Church because the Church is gathered and governed by it 1 Pet. 1. 23. John 17. 20. JAmes 1. 18. Semen semper sobole illa cujus est semen antiquius esse necesse est In the thing it selfe the being and substance of the word was before the Church although in this circumstance and manner of being it was after Ob. 2. Non erederem Evangelio nisi me commoveret Ecclesiae Catholicae authoritas saith Augustine Sol. These words saith Whitaker are so well known to the Papists that one can hardly exchange three words with them but they will produce them It is true indeed that we may at the first be much moved to receive and hearken to the Scriptures because the Church gives testimony of them as the woman of Samaria by her speeches of Christ was a meanes of moving the Samaritans to believe but when the men of Samaria had heard Christ himselfe speake they believed in him more for his own words then the womans John 4. 39 41. In which sence those words of Austin so frequently quoted by the Papists are to be interpreted Austin spake this of himselfe being a Manichee when he was a Manichee he was first moved by the authority of the Church to believe the Gospell His meaning is that he had never believed the Gospell if the authority of the Church had not
Chapters Obadiah He was almost contemporary to Jeremy It is but one Chapter Doctor Rainolds hath well expounded this prophesie The destruction of the Enemies of the Church is handled in the 16. first verses the Salvation thereof by the Ministery of Pastors in the five last Jonah He prophesied in the time of Jeroboam 2 King 14. 25. Jerome proves by the authority of the Hebrewes that he was contemporary with Hosea and Amos. It consists of foure Chapters Abbots and King have both commented well in English on this prophesie Micah Humiliatus sic dictus Propheta ab insigni miranda humilitate He prophesied in the times of Iotham Achaz and Hezechiah Kings of Judah as appeares by the inscription Ch. 1. v. 1. and was almost contemporary with Isay with whom he agreeth in many things He exceeds all the Prophets in this one thing that he determines the place of Christs Birth 5. Chap. 2. v. It consists of 7. Chapters Daneus and Chythraeâ—s have done well on it Nahum It is probable that he lived before the Babylonish captivity and was contemporary to Micha but 90 yeares after Jonah It consists of three Chapters which containe both a prediction of the destruction of the Assyrians Ch. 1. and also an Explication of the causes of it Chap. 2. and 3. Daneus is the best Expositor of this Book The Hebrews think that both Nahum and Hibacuc wrote in the times of Manasseth Both the order in which these bookes were Anciently placed and the things themselves which are contained in their writings doe intimate as much Grotius Habacue Luctator It is probable that he lived about Jeremies time or a little before It consists of three Chapters Grineus and Daneus have done well on him Zephanie He prophesied in the times of Josiah King of Judah and was contemporary to Jeremy He prophesieth especially of the overthrow of the Kingdome of Judah It consists of three Chapters Daneus hath done well on this prophesie Haggai Chag signifieth a Feast in Hebrew his name signifieth Festivus laetus aut festum celebrans vel diligens quòd templi Hierosolymitani aedificationem post Captivitatem maximè urserit He began to prophesie after the Babylonish captivity in the second yeare of Darius King of Persia Esd. 5. 1. Hag. 1. 1. Grineus and Daneus have done well on this Zacharie He prophesied after the Babylonish captivity and followed Haggai within two moneths he handleth the same subject it consists of 14. Chapters His Booke is more large and obscure then any of the 12. Prophets Daneus hath done well on the whole and Master Pemble on 9. Chapters Malachie Nuncius seu Angelus meus Mal. 4. 4. 5. He was the last Prophet of the old Testament See Grotius of him Tertull. cals him the limit land-marke of both Testaments limes inter vetus novum Testamentum It consists of foure Chapters Daneus and Polanus and Stocke have commented well on this Book So much concerning the severall Books of the old Testament CHAP. IV. THe new Canon is that which the Christian Church hath had written in Greek from the time of Christ and his Apostles and it summarily containes the word published by Christ and his righteous acts The History of which is in the foure Bookes of the Evangelists the examples in the Acts of the Apostles the exposition in the 21. Epistles and lastly the prophesie in the Revelation All the Bookes of the new Testament were written in Greeke for divers reasons First because that tongue in the time of Chist and his Apostles was the most excellent of all among the Languages of the Gentiles Secondly because it was then most Common as Latine is now Tullie shewes orat pro Archia poeta how farre the Greeke Tongue spread Thirdly because in this tongue all the Philosophie and Sciences of the Gentiles were written The Greeke tongue by the writing of Philosophers Orators Historians and Poets was fraught with the best learning which Heathenisme afforded It came to passe by the singular providence of God that this Testament was written in one tongue onely for what Nation else would have yeelded to another that the Scriptures in their tongue were authentique and so the seeds of debate might have beene sowne amonst them All almost agree in this that all the Bookes of the new Testament were written in the Greeke tongue it is onely doubted concerning three of them the Gospell of Matthew Marke and the Epistle to the Hebrewes many affirm that the Gospell of Matthew was written by Matthew in Hebrew or rather in Syriacke the Language used by Hebrewes in the time of Christ and his Apostles that the Epiâ—â—le to the Hebrews was written in Hebrew Mark in Latin It is certaine that the Primitive Church from the first times used the Gospell of Matthew written in Greeke and counted it authenticall If any one say that the Latine Edition of Marke in the vulgar is not a version but the first Copie he may easily be refuted from the uniforme stile in it with other Latine Gospels and it will appeare to any Reader that the Gospell of Marke which the Roman Church useth is later then the Greeke and that the Latine was made from it For the Epistle to the Hebrewes though many among the Antient thought it was written in Hebrew yet all agree that the Greek Edition was in use thence from the first times of the Church Glassias saith Matthew wrote his Gospell first in Greek for his stile agrees with Marke Writers acknowledge that there is an Ancient Hebrew Copie of Matthew but upon good ground deny that it is the originall truth for besides that by received Tradition it is held otherwise Matth. 1. 23. and other such like places doe evince it for why should he writing in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to them which understand that Language Hieron in quatuor Evangelia and Salmasius hold that Matthew was written in Hebrew Evangelium Matthaei Hebraicè ab auctore scriptum esse nemo non veterum tradidit Hebraeum illud Syriacum esse quod in usu tunc temporis in Judaea fuit Hieronymus docet qui Evangelium Matthaei scriptum fuisse testatur Chaldaicâ— Syroque Sermone Salmas de Hellenistica Erasmus Cajetane Calvin Junius Whitaker Gomarus Causabone Gerhard deny that Matthew was written in Hebrew Chamier de Canone l. 12. c. 1. saith we have the new Testament in Greek for although some contend that the Gospell of Matthew and the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Hebrew yet saith he it is very uncertaine and so propius falso I thinke saith Rivet that the Epistle to the Hebrewes was written in Greeke a tongue then most common and which was used by many Hebrewes which were called Hellenists That Marke should be written in Latine originally is improbable many of the reasons alleaged to prove that Matthew was not written in Hebrew are of force here also the Jewes at
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
the Reformed Church with one consent admit this Epistle for Canonicall Vide Polani Syntagma I light upon an old Dutch Testament of Luthers Translation saith Wâ—itaker against Raynolds with his preface wherein he writeth that JAmes his Epistle is not so worthy as are the Epistles of St Peter and Paul but in respect of them a strawen Epistle his censure I mislike and himselfe I thinke afterwards seeing these words in a latter edition are left out It is nowhere found in Luthers workes that he called the Epistle of JAmes inanem stramineam Edmund Campian was convicted of falshood about that in England where when he had objected that he could finde no such thing at any time in the Bookes he produced Some in the preface of the German edition say that Luther wrote that it cannot contend in dignity with the Epistles of Paul and Peter but is strawie if it be compared with them Which judgement of Luther we approve not of and it is hence manifest that it was disliked by him because these words are found in no other edition from the yeere 1526. Luthers disciples now hold that it is Canonicall and Apostolicall and they answer the arguments of those that are opposite thereto as we may see in the exposition of that Article concerning the Scripture by that most learned and diligent man John Gerard. Gravitatem ac zelum Apostolicum per omnia prae se fert saith Walther We may reply against the Papists who often object this opinion of Luthers that Cajetan their Cardinall denieth the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonicall yea which is far worse he affirmeth that the Authour thereof hath erred not onely in words but in the sence and meaning of the Scriptures Nay Cajetan saith Whitaker rejected JAmes second of Peter and second and third of John and Jude It consists of five Chapters Pareus and Laurentius have done best on it First of Peter This Epistle is called in the Title Catholicall because it is not written to any one person as that of Paul to Timothy Titus and Philemon nor to any one particular Church as those of Paul to the Romans Corintâ—s but to the converted of the Jewes dispersed here and there as appeares by the inscription It consists of five Chapters Gerhard Laurentius Gomarus and Dr Ames have expounded both these Epistles Bifield hath interpreted part of the first Epistle Second of Peter Some in the Primitive Church doubted of its authority and the Syriack hath it not but the Church generally allowed it and many reasons may perswade that it is Apostolicall and was written by Peter 1. Because the Authour of It expresly calleth himselfe Simon Peter the Apostle of Jesus Christ. He wrote it in his old age to confirme them in the doctrine which before he had taught them 2. It s inscription is to the same Jewes that the former viz. dispersed by the Romane Empire and converted to Christ whose Apostle Peter was 3. It shewes an Apostolicall spirit 4. It s stile and composition is agreeable to the former Epistle 5. The Authour of this Epistle witnesseth that he was a Spectator of the transfiguration in the mount Chap. 1. v. 16. now Peter together with JAmes and John were present with Christ. 6. He makes mention of the Former Epistle Chap. 3. v. 1. 7. He cals Paul his deare brother Chap. 3. v. 15. It consists of three Chapters First of John consists of five Chapters Second and third of John They were also in times past doubted of by some as Erasmus Cajetan but there are good reasons to prove them Canonicall 1. Their Authour cals himselfe an Elder so doth Peter 1 Pet. 5. 1. by which name an Ecclesiasticall office is often signified but here age rather now it is manifest that John came to a greater age then the rest of the Apostles 2. The salutation is plainly Apostolicall Grace mercy and peace 3. In sentences and words they agree with the first Epistle 4. The Fathers alledge them for Johns and reckon them among the Canonicall bookes Each of these Epistles is but a Chapter Jude This Epistle also in times past was questioned by some but that it is Apostolicall first the inscription shews the Author expresly cals him a servant of Christ and brother of JAmes 2. The matter it agreeth both for words and sentences with the second of Peter of which it containes as it were a briefe sum and recapitulation That the writer of the Epistle doth not call himselfe an Apostle is of no moment to infringe the authority thereof for the judgement of the writer is free in that case that Title was specially used by Paul and Peter JAmes and John quit the same Title yea Paul in his Epstles to the Philippians Thessalonians and Philemon doth not call himselfe an Apostle and yet those Epistles were never doubted of It is but one Chapter Willet and Mr Perkins have done well upon it Revelation It is called according to the Greeke Apocalyps and according to the Latine Revelation that is a discovery or manifestation of things which before were hidden and secret for the common good of the Church Eusebius l. 3. c. 17. saith Domitian cast John the Evangelist into a fornace of scalding Oyle but when he saw he came forth unhurt he banished him into the Isle Pathmos where he writ this Revelation This booke describeth the state of the Church from the time of John the last of the Apostles untill Christs comming againe and especially the proceedings pride and fall of Babylon the great whore with all the Kingdomes of Antichrist The holy Ghost therefore foreseeing what labour Satan and his instruments would take to weaken and impaire the credit and authority of this above all other Bookes wherein he prevailed so far as some true Churches called the truth and authority of it into question hath backed it with a number of confirmations more then are in any other Booke of Scripture First the Authour of it is set in the forefront or face of it the Revelation of Jesus Christ Chap. 1. vers 1. who professeth himselfe to be the first and the last vers 11. so in the severall Epistles to the Churchs in severall stiles he challengeth them to be his Thus saith he 1. that holdeth the seven starres in his right hand 2. He which is first and last which was dead and is alive 3. Which hath the sharpe two edged Sword 4. Which hath eyes like a flame of fire and his feete like brasse 5. Which hath the seven Spirits of God and the seven starres 6. He who is holy and true who hath the key of David 7. He who is Amen the faithfull and true witnesse the beginning of the creatures of God Secondly the instrument or pen-man his servant John the Evangelist the Apostle the Divine who for the farther and more full authority of it repeateth his
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
adulterate corrupted by the addition of certaine bookes written in those times when God raised up no more Prophets among his people Drus. praeterit l. 5. Annotat. ad Act. Apost c. 6. Jun. Animad in Bell. cont 1. l. 1. c. 4. l. 2. c. 15. sect 21. Tertul. in Apol. c. 19. They are called Apocryphall i. secret and hidden not because the names of the writers are unknowne by that reason Judges and Ruth should be Apocryphall but because they were not wont to be read openly in the Church of God as the Canonicall bookes but secretly and in private by private persons or because their authority was obscure and doubtfull with the Ancient These bookes our Church rejecteth as not written by Divine inspiration for these reasons All the Canonicall bookes of the old Testament were written by the Prophets but none of these bookes were written by any of the Prophets for 1. The last of the Prophets of the Jewes was Malachy Mal. 4. 4 5. between whom and John Baptist came no Prophet Marke begins with the same words almost with which Malachy ended a good argument to prove that the new Testament is next to the old But these Bookes were written by such who lived most of them after Malachy 2. All the Prophets wrote in Hebrew the language which the Jewes understood but the Fathers affirme and Papists acknowledge that most of these bookes were written in Greeke ergo being not written by the Prophets they are not Canonicall 2. All the bookes of the old Testament were committed to the Jewes and safely kept by them Rom. 3. 2. our Saviour Christ which reproved the Jewes for corrupting the sence of the Scripture did yet never reprove them for rejecting those bookes which were divinely inspired which sacriledge he would not have concealed yea our Saviour sendeth us unto the Scriptures as they received them John 5. 39. Eâ—ras after the captivity is reported to have gathered all the Bookes of holy Scripture and safely to lay them up If the Jewes should have rejected or not received any bookes being Canonicall they had grievously erred which the Papists themselves will not affirme Yea there should have been some Canonicall Bookes which no Church received for besides the Church of the Jewes at that time there was none in the world The Canonicall Bookes of the old Testament were divided into Moses the Prophets and Psalmes with which agreeth the old distribution of the Hebrews into the Law Prophets and Hagiographa 3 There are two waies to know a booke to be Canonicall one by the testimony of some Prophet or Apostle the other by the certaine testimony of them which did live when the booke was published who did witnesse that the booke was written by some Prophet or Apostle But these bookes are known to be Canonicall neither of these waies they were rejected by the Jewes who lived in the times when they were written our Saviour Christ nor his Apostles never commend these Bookes unto us as endited by the Spirit They are cited by Christ and his Apostles for the confirmation of their doctrine All the Canonicall Bookes in generall John 5. 39. 10. 35. Rom. 16. 26. Luke 16. 29 31. Ch. 24. v. 25 27 44. The most of all in speciall Genesis Matth. 19. 4 5 6. Exodus Matth. 5. 21 27 33 38. Leviticus Gal. 3. 12. Numbers John 3. 14. Deuteronomy Acts 3. 22. Joshâ—a Heb. 11. 30 31. Judges Heb. 11. 32. Ruth Matth. 1. 3. First of Samuel Matth. 12. 3. Second of Samuel Heb. 1. 5. First of Kings Matth. 12. 42. Second of Kings Luke 4. 27. First of Chronicles Matth. 1. 3 7 10 13. Second of Chronicles Acts 7. 48. Ezra Matth. 1. 12 13. Job 1 Corinth 3. 19. Psalmes Acts 4. 25. Proverbs Heb. 12. 5 6 7. Esay Matth. 1. 23. Jeremy Heb. 10. 16 17. Ezechiel Matth. 25. 35. Daniel Matth. 24. 25. All the lesser Prophets Acts 7. 42. 15. 15 16. Hosea Matth. 12. 7. Joâ—l Acts 2. 12. Amos Acts 15. 16. Jonah Matth. 12. 40 41. Micha Matth. 10. 35. Naâ—um Rom. 10. 15. Habacuc Rom. 1. 17. Haggai Heb. 12. 26. Zachary Matth. 21 5. Malachy Luke 1. 16 17. These bookes were not cited by Christ and his Apostles for confirmation of their doctrine Ob. If they be not Canonicall therefore because they are not cited then Naâ—um and Zephany are not Canonicall Aratus Menander and Epimenides prophane Poets are Canonicall because they are cited Acts 17. 28. 1 Cor. 15. 33. Titus 1. 12. Sol. They are not therefore not Canonicall onely because they are not cited but especially because they have not the characters of Divine Scripture 2 Nahuâ— and Zephany are implicitely quoted when the bookes of the Prophets are mentioned Acts 7. 41. 15. 15 16. The Poets are not cited as Canonicall but the Apostle applied himselfe to his hearers who did much esteeme their authority Some have well coucluded from Acts 10. 43. that the Apocrypha are not to be received as Canonicall Scripture because they testifie not of Christ. 4 Those bookes which containe manifest untruths coutrary to the Word of God and the books of holy Scripture were not inspired of God for as God is true so is his word John 17. 17 sweetly agreeeng with it selfe and every part with other these bookes commend false things as true and approve things evill as right Judith chap 9 v 2 commends killing the Sichemites against Gen. 49. 6 7. 2 Mac. 14. 42. Razis is commended for killing himselfe the fact is not onely related but commended also in these words nobly manfully and this commendation doth plainly shew that the Authour thereof was not inspired of God when the Donatists out of this booke urged that it was lawfull for them to kill themselves as Razis did Augustine then was forced to acknowledge that the authority of this booke was uncertaine and questionable and proves it by the judgement of the Jewish Church Christ and the Christians Manifest fables are told in some of them for true histories as that of Toby Judith Bell and the Dragon If any desire a particular conâ—utation of the severall Bookes of the Apocrypha I commend to his reading that learned Treatise of Dr Raynolds de libris Apocryphis who hath so exactly handled this subject that to write of it after him were to write Iliads after Homer or to draw a line after Apelles 5. The most ancient Fathers and Councels which lived the best and first 500 yeeres after Christ rejected the same bookes which we doe Jerome on Matth. 23. saith concerning a testimony cited out of the Apocrypha Hoc quoniam ex Scriptura nihil habet authoritatis eadem facilitate rejicitur qua profertur Because this hath no authority out of Scripture it may as easily be rejected as it is offered All that the Papists object for these Bookes in the generall is that the third Councell at Carthage the
Florentine councell and that of Trent doe approve the said Bookes to be Canonicall as also Augustine and Innocentius To which it may be answered 1. That the Councell of Carthage was but a Provinciall Councell and therefore it cannot binde the whole world Moreover in that Councell there are divers things which the Papists will not endure as in the 26 Canon there is a decree that no Bishop shall be called chiefe or universall Bishop no not the Bishop of Rome how should the Papists binde us with the authority of that Councell with which they will not binde themselves 2. The Latine Fathers judged these bookes fit to be read for example of life and instruction of manners but not for confirmation of faith or establishing any doctrine 3. These Bookes are not Proto Canonicall truely and properly Canonicall inspired by God containing the immediate and unchangeable truth of God sanctified by him and given to the Church to be a perfect rule of sound doctrine and good life but Deutero-canonicall or rather Ecclesiasticall as they are stiled In this sence Augustine and Innocentius are to be taken when they reckon these Bookes among the Canonicall 4. No Councell hath authority to define what Bookes are Canonicall what not seeing Bookes truely Divine receive authority from God himselfe and are to be esteemed of undoubted truth although all the world should barke against them These two Councels are of too late standing to oppose against the other ancient Councels which reject these Bookes The coâ—ncell of Trent was gathered and kept against all Civill and Ecclesiasticall right neither was there any forme of justice observed in it 1. It was not kept in a lawfull place for whereas it was intended against the Protestants and the Germans were the parties accused it ought to have been kept in Germany according to the request exhibited by the body of the States of Germany assembled at Noremberg this equity was not observed the parties accused being called into Italy 2. In that Councell matters were concluded and the sentence passed the adversary not being heard speake nor so much as present for the Protestants might not be admitted to hearing neither could they obtaine to propound their opinion in the Councell muchlesse to avouch it by lawfull reasoning Sleidan fol. 29. and yet were condemned against divine and humane law for they both forbid the condemning of any before he have lawfull liberty granted him to plead for himselfe 3. In that Councell the accuser and Judge were the same for the Pope did accuse the Protestants of heresie he did convocate the Coucell he by his Delegates was President and Moderator in it and so together was Accuser Judge and Witnesse whereas the reformation of the Pope was the thing in question Lastly all Councels ought to be free but in this Protestants might not propound their cause nor defend it neither might any thing be proposed but according to the mind of the Legates or otherwise then they approved no man had any voyce in the Councell but such as were sworne to the Pope nothing was there determined which was not first concluded of at Rome by the Pope in the Colledge of Cardinals and sent from Rome to Trent whereupon this Proverbe arose Spiritum Sanctum Roma pâ—r peram mitti Tridentum The Holy Ghost came to Trent packt up in a Cloke-bag We hope therefore since the Apocrypha are justly rejected out of the Canon that hereafter they will neither have the honour to be bound with our Bibles nor read in our Churches The Apocrypha was never received by the Church of the Israelites before Christ his comming nor of the Apostolicke and Primitive Church for more then 300 yeeres after as both Eusebius out of Origen and the Councell of Laodicea Can. 59. confirmed afterward by the sixth generall councell of Constantinople sheweth for the Greeke Church and St Jerome for the Latine CHAP. VI. Of the Authenticall edition of the Scripture NOw we must enquire which is the Authenticall edition of holy Scriptures it being necessary that this heavenly truth committed to writing should be delivered in some forme of words and in some language which may be understood Lawyers from whom the use of the word Authentique seemeth borrowed doe call those instruments and writings authentique which have a certaine and just authority in themselves A booke or writing is authentique either by divine or humane institution those are by Divine appointment and institution authenticall which have from God sufficient and absolute authority to command and approve themselves worthy credit and faith in as much as God himselfe doth approve thtm by humane institution such writings are held authenticall which by the opinion and sentence of learned men in their severall professions may be esteemed worthy credit and beliefe for themselves and for the truth in them There is a great diversity of editions of holy Scripture all cannot be simply and perpetually authenticall in of and for themselves without reference unto another no more then many draughts of the same Lease or Deed or copy of one pardon can be Some amongst many are authentique whence the others are transcribed yea it cannot be that there should be many but although there may be many counterpanes of the deed yet there is but one or two principall Deeds so amongst this great variety of editions one or more ought to be as principall and authenticall Thrre is a question betwixt the Church of Rome and the reformed Churches about the authentique edition of Scripture they say that the edition of the Bible in Hebrew and Greeke iâ— not authenticall but rather the vulgar Latine We hold that the vulgar Latine is very corrupt and false that the Hebrew for the old Testament and the Greeke for the new is the sincere and authenticall writing of God therefore that all things are to be determined by them and that the other versions are so far to be approved of as they agree with these fountaines The Tridentine Councell thus decreeth that in all sermons readings disputations controversies the vulgar Latine Translation should be taken for authentique before the Hebrew or Greeke and that no man should presume upon any occasion to reject it or to appeale from it When the Councell of Trent saith the vulgar Latine is authenticall it compares it with other Latine Translations not with the Hebrew Muis. Andradius the chiefest of the Divines at the Councell of Trent thinketh that the Councell of Trent did not meane either to condemne the Hebrew truth as he calleth it or to acquit the Latine Translation from all errour when they called it Authenticall but onely that the Latine hath no such errour by which any pestilent opinion in faith and manners may be gathered This saith Rainolds against Hart. ch 6. p. 202. Chamier tomo 1. l. 12. c. 2. The Rhemists in their preface to the new Testament translated by them prolixly
intituled in the Canon thereof is easily answered Either they were Civill and common-wealth Stories whether the Reader is referred if it like him to read the stories more at large which the Prophets touched shortly or else they are contained in the Books of the Kings which are manifestly proved to be written by divers Prophets in their severall ages wherein they prophesied Salomons Books which he wrote of generall Philosophy fell away but all the other Books of the Scripture do still remain First they are all of God all whose works remain for ever therefore the holy Scriptures being not onely his handy-work but as it were the chief and Master-work of all other must have a continuall endurance Secondly they all are written generally for our instruction and more particularly for admonition and warning for comfort and consolation unlesse we will say that God may be deceived in his purpose and end wherefore he ordained them it must needs be that it must continue whatsoever hath been written in that respect Thirdly if the Lord have kept unto us the whole Book of Leviticus and in it the ceremonies which are abolished and whereof there is now no practice because they have a necessary and profitable use in the Church of God how much more is it to be esteemed that his providence hath watched over other Books of the Scripture which more properly belong unto our times Fourthly let us heare the Scripture it self witnessing of it own authority and durablenesse to all ages Moses thus writeth of it The secret and hidden things remain to the Lord our God but the things that are revealed to us and our Children for ever David also professeth that he knew long before that the Lord had founded his testimonies for ever-more But our Saviour Christs testimony is of all other most evident That heaven and earth shall passe but that his word cannot passe And yet more vehemently that not one jot or small letter prick or stop of his Law can passe untill all be fulfilled Rom 15. 4. therefore none of those which were written for that end are lost Origen in praefat in Cant. Canticorum Augustine l. 18. de civitate Dei c. 38. thought it could not neither stand with the Divine providence nor with the honour of the Church that any Canonicall Books and given for such to the Church should be lost Of this opinion are many worthy moderne Divines Junius Chamierus Tomo 1. L. 9. c. 5. Polanus Wendelinus Waltherus Spanhemius Cartwright Gerardus in exegesi loci primi de Scriptura sacra c. 6. Joh. Camero Tomo 3. in Praelectionibus de verbo Dei Cap. 15. Rivetus in Isagoge ad S. Script c. 6. in Summa Controversiarum Tom. 1. Tract 1. Quaest. 1. Altingi us But Chrysost. and Whitaker also Bellarmine l. 4. de verbo Dei c. 4. Grâ—ther and Becanus hold that some Canonicall Books are lost I rather subscribe to the judgement of the former Reverend Divines who held the contrary The second question is whether the Scripture of the old Testament was punctata from the beginning or whether the Hebrew Text had Vowels or points from the beginning as now it hath Controversiam de punctorum antiquitate vel novitate inter viros eruditos disceptatam non attingo Sententia utraque suos habet assertores magni quidem nominis Cevalerius Buxtorsius Marinus Junius and other very godly and learned men have defended the antiquity of the pricks which to the Hebrews are in stead of Vowels and say that the Bibles were punctata in our Saviour Christs time and that he approved of the same Matth. 5. 18. others hold that the invention of the pricks and the Massâ—reth is to be ascribed to the Tiberian Massorites who flourished about 500 yeares after Christs birth this opinion divers learned men have defended with most weighty reasons as Martinius in Technologia Luther Mercer Scaliger and Drusius Calvin upon the 11. of Zacharie Zuinglius in his Preface on Esay Raynolds in his censure of the Apocryphall Books But above all Capellus in his Book entitled Arcanum punctationis revelatum hath so strongly confirmed that opinion and hath so solidly confuted the reasons which are commonly brought to the contrary that he hath drawn some learned Divines to his opinion which before did stiffely adhere to the contrary opinion and left others very doubtfull He hath well answered that place Matth. 5. 18. l. 2. c. 14. But as Amana saith if any will not be moved from the other opinion that the puncta were invented by the Prophets which many godly Divines doe out of a good zeale stand for suum Cuique liberum sit judicium Vide Fulleri Miscell Sac. l. 4. c. 4. Mercerum ad Gen. 16. 13. Drusium ad difficuliora loca Genes Buxtor fij dissertationem de Ebraeorum literis Our Saviour saith Matth. 5. 18. that not one jot or prick of the Law shall perish whereby it should appeare that the Law and the Prophets for of both he speaketh immediately before had vowels pricks whereunto also belong all those places of Scripture which testifie of the clearnesse and certainty of the Scripture which could not at all be now if it lacked Vowels Yet this is not B. Vshers judgement as himselfe told me Non est improbabile argumentum ex Matth. 5. v. 18. Luc. 16. 17. ubi per 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 puncta accentus commodè intelligi posse docti opinantur inter quos Broughthonius in Daniel p. 45. Polanus Syntagm lib. 1. cap. 37. quamvis argumento illi nolimus insistere Voetius Tomo primo disputat de authoritate Scripturae Sine punctis legere saith Drusius paucis hodie Concessum Serarius de Rabbinis saith Elias Hutter a Lutherane writes thus è mille Praedicantibus ne unum quidem esse qui etiam punctatissina possit Hebraea legere nedum absque punctis CHAP. VII NOw I proceed to shew that neither the translation of the Seventy nor the vulgar Latine are anthenticall 1. The Greek translation of the Old Testament which is commonly ascribed to the Seventy Interpreters is not Divinely inspired The chiefe Pillars of the Primitive Church ranne into this errour whence sprung many other errours The Greek Fathers who were generally unskilfull both in Hebrew and Latine some few excepted were the lesse to be blamed here since they made use of no other Editions therefore they more confidently affirmed their own to be Authenticall Augustine Tertullian and many of the Latine Fathers whom divers Divines follow ascribed too much to the Seventy Interpreters Yet there was a controversie between Augustine and Jerome concerning their authority as is evident by both their Epistles Bellarmine is large in commending this version saying that it is most certain that those Interpreters did very well translate the Scripture and had the Holy Ghost peculiarly assisting them least they should erre
Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chiefe Priest in the New Sol. This one pastor signifieth neither the High Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the New but Jesus Christ the High Shepheard for our soules Ob. Matth. 16. 19. Christ saith to Peter to theâ— will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven therefore the Pope hath authority to expound Scripture Sol. First by the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospell not authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospell is preached the Kingdome of heaven is opened to the beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers 2. That authority of the Keyes was not committed to Peter onely but to the other Apostles also Matth. 28. 18. 19. There is a twofold judgement 1. Of discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of authority as the Parllament judgeth Capitall crimes If the Papists understand the word Judge to â—ignifie Discerning as when we judge of meates by the taste every faithfull person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discerne and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce decrees definitive and infallible judgements touching the sence of the Scriptures thereby to bind other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulinâ— Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the generall consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a generall counsell or to goe up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts doe teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsely charge us that we allow every private mans interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith the opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon better authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation Stapleton saith interpretation is private either ratione personae when the man is private or ratione medij when it is not taken out of the context and circumstances or ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private interpretation in regard of the person if it be publike in regard of the meanes is not forbidden for it is lawfull for one man with Scripture toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is that the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own minds but Gods The Catholickes hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Jerome Chrysostome but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the braine of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private Spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but onely of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident that the exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiasticall either Fathers or Councels which speake not by inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same authority The interpretation therefore that is brought but of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man onely On the other side that interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole Generall Counsels is but private This is a principall meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man father or Master in the earth that is in matter of doctrine we should depend upon the authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but onely upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest judgement and authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the Holy Ghost 1. That which onely hath power to beget faith that onely hath the chiefest authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all controversies concerning faith and religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. the Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolemen infusa fides The faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certaine perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interpret it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himselfe makes the Scripture a Judge John 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers nay have all the men living read them nay can they shew them can they get them I had almost said can they name them In the exposition of those words Tu es Petrus supra hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they dis-agree themselves from the Fathers John 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Jerome Cyrill Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is there designed but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the division of the Law they goe cleane contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers For they divide the Commandements as we doe but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no Father to countenance them in this but Augustine There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 yeares after Christ but some 500 and 600 yeares after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting
hundred thousand witnesses of the Seas rising up in walles Deut. 4. 3. See Matth. 27 45. * See D. Willet on Exod. 7. 9. what a miracle is and how true and false miracles differ and D. Prideaux on Psal. 9. 16. the distinction between miracles signes prodigies and Portenta out of Aquinas To which testimony these things give weight 1. To them were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3. 1. 2. They have constantly professed the truth in great misery whereas by the onely deniing thereof they might have been partakers both of liberty and rule 3. Notwithstanding the higk Priests and others persecuted the Prophets while they lived they yet received their writings as Propheticall and Divine * Vide Crâ—ii observat in novum Testamentum cap. 15. In the two Dominions of France and the 17 Provinces within the space of little more then fiâ—eÌ„ yeeres under Charles the ninth of France and Philip the second of Spaine two hundred thousand suffered as Martyrs * See Foxes martyrologie Meteranus de rebus Belgicis and Fullers profane state of the Duke of Alvap 440. * A martyranswered Bishop Bonnâ—r My Lord I can not dispute but I can die for the truth John Jones said when he had a cap wherein were many painted devils with the title Haeresiâ—cha Shall I grudge to weare this paper cap for Christ who were a Crown of Thorns for me Videtis punctiones sed non unctiones You see their sufferings but not their rejoycings Omnis Christ anus mortis contemptor Photinus * In the primitive times they were wont to call martyrdome by the name of Corona martyrii the Crown of martyedome and Stephen the Protomaryr had his name in Greek from a Crown Erant 〈◊〉 â—â—rquentibus fortiores Cyprian a Non poena sed causâ— facit martyrem * Lib. 2. c. 25. Meminerunt Mosis Didetus Siculus Strabo Plinius Taâ—itus quâ—que posâ— eos Dioâ—ysius Longinus de forâ—â—is sublimitare Jamnia aatem mambris qui in Aegypto Mosi restiterunt praeter Talmunâ—ieos Plinim Apulrius Grâ—e de veris. relig Christ. * Credite me vobis folium recitare Sybillae Bish. Andrews in his large exposition on the 10 Commandements a Vide Spanhem Dub. porte secunda Dub. 34. Sâ—ct 6 7. b Exerciâ— 1. ad Aâ—nal Bar. Esay 8. 20. Psalm 19. The Authors often testifie that they speake not of themselves or by any humane instinct but from Gods command and the Spirit inspiring * Christ commends Moses the Prophets and Psalmes by which names are meant all the bookes belonging to the Canon of the Hebrews * The holy Ghost inwardly witnesseth in the hearts of the faithfull that the Scriptures are the Word of God 1 John 2. 20 27. 1 Cor. 2. 10 11 12. 12. 3. John 16. 23. 14. 26. Esay 51. 16. Esay 59. 21. Rom. 8. 10. 1 John 3. 8. 1 John 2. 20. Fides Christiana non acquiritur sed in sunditur * Leviculum est quod objiciunt qui contra sentiunt Si omnis Scriptura Divinitus sit inspirata sequiuurum inde etiam Graâ—corum Gemilium Scripturas esse divinitus inspiratasâ—nam ut buon respâ—â—det Theopâ—y lactus oportebat eos noviâ—â—e quod Paulus ante dixerat sacras literas nosti Riveâ— Isag. ad Script Sac. a Aliud sanè Prophetas hoc vel illud scripsisse aliud verò scripsâ—â—e ut Prophetas Spâ—nâ—emiâ—s * Nothing crosseth humane wisdom more then the Scripture Authoritas sine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Scripturae Illud authenticum dicitur quod sibi sufficit quod se commendat sustines probat ex se fidem ac authoritatem habet Whitakerus * Every principle is known by it selfe The Scripture is the primum credendum the first thing to be believed we must believe it for it selfe and all other things for their conformity with it a Eccius reckons this among hereticall assertions major est Scripturae quam Ecclesiae authoritas b Nisi Deus hominibus placuerit non erit Deus said Tertul. in Apol. if God please not man he shall not be God as truly and certainly as God is God so truly is the Scripture the Scripture Spiritus sanctuâ— Spiritus veritatis loquitur semper in Scriptura in Ecclesia verò quandoque spiritu◠〈…〉 Thesâ— 3. l. 11. * See Chamiers sixth booke de Canone divers Chapâ—râ—â— and M. Pembles 〈◊〉 Vindicâ—agraâ—iâ— p. 207 to 22â— a Superstâ—us mihi â—ebâ—r videtur oprum quâ—â—adeâ— sollicite illud quoad nos inâ—uisiver 〈◊〉 quia â—e cogitari quidem protest 〈◊〉 corum librerum autorilos nisi quoad 〈◊〉 Cham. * Matth. 28. 20 18. 20. John 15. 26. 16. 13. b Scriptura est velipsa scriptio literarum per lineas certas victura vel ipse doctrina per 〈◊〉 Scripturas significata in iis literis conienta Scriptione fatemur Ecclesiam esse antiquiorem sed negamus esse antiquiorem ea doctrina quae significatur eascriptione Chamier Tom. 19. l. 1. c. 22. * Fuit Scriptura ante Mâ—â—sen materialiter non formaliter Quibus leâ—â—is verbis adeo exultanâ— quasi reperissent id quod pueri in fabase reperisse â—lamitant tamsue confidenter ae si ad plenum victâ—riac fructum sola â—riumpâ—i gloria deesset Chamierus * So Musculus Calvin Peter Martyr and Whitaker expound those words observe the composition of the word is signifieth to more with other things a Gâ—rson saith be taketh the Church for the Primitive Church and that Assembly which saw and heard Christ. * Ecclesia non habet magisterium supra scripturas sed ministerium circa Scripturas There are two causes why the Apocripha are cast out of the canon 1. Externall the authority of the Church decreeing and the quality of the Authours 2. Internall the stile the fabulous and wicked things Chamier a Ecclesiae idest Romano pontifici vel soli vel cum Conoilio magisterium tribuunt summum adeo ut solennis sit apud eas formula indicet magister fidei Amesius b D. Chalonero credo Ecclesiam Catholicam Ecclesia dicitur Fundamentum met aphoricè imptopriè fundamentum secundarium * Rivet and D. Preston De sensu horum verborum vide Caâ—â—ronis myroâ—â—ecium Collaâ—ionem Rainoldi cum â—artâ— c. 8. p. 557. c An allusion saith Bedell to the bases and pillars that held up the veile or curtains in the Tabernacle That distinction of authoritative inâ— se but not quoad nos is absut'd because the authority the Scripture hath is for and because of us * Dr. White of the Church The Spirit witnesseth the Scripture to witnesseth the Church sub-witnesseth b Vt olim Caligula occlusis omnibus horreis publicam populo inediam famem ita illi obturatis omnibus fontibus verbi Dei sitim populo miserabilem induxerant Illi homiminibus famem ut ait Amos Propheta sitimque attulerunt non famem panis non sitim aquaeâ— sed audiendi verbi Dei Iuellus