of water out of a flint 2. These Points of the Popish false Doctrines are 1. Thir Doctrine of Free will 2. Their Doctrine of the Merit of Works 3. Their Doctrine of Purgatory 4. Their Doctrine of the Sacrifice of the Masse for the sins of Quick and Dead 5. Their Transubstantiation 6. Their Popes Supremacy 7. Their Superstitious Fasts 8. Their Worshipping of Images 9. Their praying unto Saints 10. Their praying for the Dead 11. Their Satisfaction 12. Their Forgivenesse by Works of Penance 13. And for many more the like Points of their false Doctrine 2. 1. And therefore they will be rather Tried and Judged by the Writings of the Fathers then by Scriptures 2. Although for a Fashion in Defence of some of the Points above propounded they pretend Scriptures Yet being easily beaten from them they fall at last to Rail on Them as not containing sufficient Doctrine and rather will be Tried and Judged as we have said By the Writings of Fathers 3. At whose Hands albeit they find not such Relief as they would make Men to Believe in no one Point of Controversie between us and them As hath been oftentimes plainly proved by many Doctors of the Reformed Church And by Bishop Jewel notably 4. 1 Notwithstanding by Reason of the Fathers manifold oversights and slips 2. And the Corruption that daily increased in the Church They may bring somewhat such as it is for their Maintenance 5. Wherefore in That we Reformed will not admit the Fathers for Judges in Matters of Religion but hold them hard to the Trial of the Scriptures 6. Which the Papists cannot abide This puts them out of patience and driveth them into vehement passions 7. But let them mend themselves where they can They shall never get more at our Hands Then that which we have said before concerning the Scriptures and the Fathers 8. This is then a very true saying that our Adversaries Doctrine cannot stand unlesse we Reformed will allow for Good those Things That in the writings of the Fathers are most Faulty §. Again of this Matter more briefly 1. IT is a peculiar Thing to the Popish Doctors that they even greedily hunt after and pursue whatsoever is Faulty in any Ancient Author As if all the Fathers Errors served to make up the Body and Faith of their Religion 2. They rake up even out of the Fathers oversights watsoever seemeth to favour their Errors Papists suck Errors from the Fathers unsound Speeches And of a small Error of the Fathers do occasionally procreate a great one 1. AS Horseleaches suck the naughtie blood out of the veins So Papists excerpt that which is most imperfect and unsound from the Fathers 2. And thus Popery according to D. Whitaker is a patcht Coverlet framed of the Fathers Errors and sewed together 3. Moreover the Papists of a small error of the Fathers may occasionally procreate a great one As from praying for the dead used in one respect by the Fathers The grosse praying for the dead with a reference to purgatory 4. And so we have great cause to tax the slipperie dealing of Popish Hucksters in abusing the Fathers Frauds concerning Councils Another Principle of the Church of Rome 1. Fraud Of many Frauds and Slights committed in the last Councils of the Church of Rome 1. THat before they were Assembled their Decisions were Debated And concluded at Rome 2. That notwithstanding all Disputations And Proof done on the contrarie they passed by absolute Authority 3. That the Holy Ghost or rather the Spirit of Satan was brought there from Rome weekly by the Post 4. That the Presidents in them and those who did Dispute in them and those who Concluded in them did Respire nothing but the good will of the Popes And did Aime onely at this to obey and please Them 5. By that it evidently appears That it is not much needful to produce Proofs that such Assemblies might have erred 6. On the contrarie it should be found strange if they could have concluded any thing without Error 2. Fraud This is a great slight of the Popes in these last Times to oppose themselves to the holding of Councels believing that they would Decree against them Against the Roman Clergie And against the Court of Rome CLement the 7 th Pope of Rome very much versed in Affairs of State even during the Life of his Predecessor Adrian the 6th had still maintained That in the Occurrences of that Time the Councel to make use of the Mean of Councels was most pernitious 2. And commonly did say That Councels were profitable whensoever any other thing should be Handled then the Popes Authoritie But when it came to be Debated That then there was nothing more pernicious 3. For as in former times the Popes weapons were to have Recourse unto the Councels So in those Times the Safety of the Papacy did consist to shun and avoid them 4. And so much the more that Leo the 10. his predecessors having already condemned Luthers Doctrine This same matter could no more be referred to a Councel to Examine it And Deliberate upon it without wronging the Authority of the Holy See 3. Fraud Observation This was a great Fraud and Sleight in the Court of Rome to endeavour as much as could be done to suppresse the Relation of what was passed in the Councel of Trent 1. MAny clear sighted persons have done what they were able to do to suppresse the Historie and Relation of that which did passe in the Councel of Trent 2. Whereupon we say That it is true That the Great Things deserves to be held in some Mysterious Secret But it is when the publick Good requires that it should be so 3. But when the Ignorance of the whole is notably wrongful to one of the parties and Advantagious to the other It is no marvel if in Contrarie Intentions and Ends it is proceeded also by opposite and contrarie waies 4. And here it is true and received the Common and Famous Sentence That with more Reason it is endeavoured to avoid Losse then to get profit Addition Of the History of the Council of Trent written by Patre Paulo 1. AS the Council of Trent holds the first Ranck among the Affairs happened in Christendome in the former Age and which also may happen in the following Times 2. So may it be said in very Truth That the History which we have of the said Council by Patre Paulo is the most Excellent of the Histories that have been written in that time and perhaps surpassing the others which had been written afore 3. For if we have a Regard to the Matter which it contains we shall find there those of the Religion and of the State and if exactly we consider the Form of it we shall find that nothing is wanting in it 4. He that shall Read it carefully shall not be ashamed to confesse that he hath received much profit by the Reading of it For in the Discourses which by Digression are
made in it by its Author concerning Religion and the Church There is a Depth of Learning A Clearnesse of Wit And a Solidity of Judgement most Admirable As also a true free and bold Decision of many Points of Importance which are in Controversies between the Reformed Churches and the Romane Fraud The Acts of the Councels have been falsified for the most part And things have been supposed which never were 1. FOr they have been during a long time shut in the Convents And for the most part did passe by the Hands of the Monks who have cut off them and added unto them whatsoever they would 2. And in that Regard the Greeks do complain That the Latins have corrupted and falsified the Councels And the Latins frame the same accusation against the Greeks To whom shall we Hold 3. The Frauds in this Matter are so Auncient That from the sixth Councel of Carthage the Bishops of Romes Legates did produce the Acts of the first Councel of Nice falsified in an horrible Manner And although that Falsification was even then solemnly Discovered yet Rome which hath Drunk all Shame is often relapsed in the same Crime that was Reproached in full Councel of Florence to the Popes Legates But they were not much astonished thereby 4. The whole Code of the Ecclesiastical Canons hath been not long since set out by one Denis Petit But we find that this Author hath Ecclipsed from the Laodicean Council the Enumeration of the Canonical Books which was to be in the last Canon And it cannot be said that he hath done that for brevity sake For the same Author in the same Code hath inserted the Enumeration made by one Synod of Carthage because without doubt he did like it better then the other 5. And so every one give us that which his passion or affection doth approve And an Indiscreet Zeal doth hide and suppresse from us That which is Best and of greatest Edification It is with Just Causes that the Council of Trent is Rejected and Condemned by the Reformed because it may be rightly called the Iliade of our Age. 1. FOr this Council greatly desired and procured by Good Persons to Reunite the Church which did begin to Devise it self did so bend and harden the Parties that it hath Rendered the Differences Irreconcileable 2. And the said Council negotiated by the Princes to Reform the Ecclesiastical Order hath caused the greatest Deformity which ever was since the Christian Name is in Being 3. Besides the said Council hoped by the Bishops to Recover the Episcopal Authority which in a great part was faln to the alone Pope of Rome hath been the cause that they wholly have lost it Reducing them to a greater Bondage 4. On the contrary the said Council having been feared and shun by the Court of Rome as a powerful Mean to temper the excessive Power which from small beginnings was mounted by degrees to an extremity without bound and limit hath so confirmed and propped to Her over the Party which is remained subject unto Her That is was never so Great nor so well setled Concerning the Council of Trent 1. The Rhetorical Commendations of it by the Jesuites 1. THe Councel of Trent saith a Jesuite The Elder it waxeth By so much more it shall flourish daily And continually 2. O with what Diversitie of People out of all Countries With what Choice of Bishops throughout all Christendom With what Excellence of Kings and Common-weales With what Profound Divines With what Devotion With what Lamentations With what Abstinence and Fasting With what Flowers of Universities With what knowledge of Strange Tongues With what Sharp Wits With what Studie With what Endlesse Reading With what Stores of Virtues And Exercises Was that Sacred Place Replenished 2. The Reformed say That it is without Cause that such Commendations are given to this Council 1. FOr they know very well The Notable Cariage and Behaviour of that Synod so much Extolled by the Jesuite 2. And besides they say That every one knoweth thus much That it was not to be Esteemed a Council of the whole Christian State But rather a Conventicle of few Men Running together into the same Place 3. There was there present a sort of silly Friers which did sustain the greatest part of the Burthen By Disputings Writing And playing the Orators 4. For as for the Bishops and the Chief Cardinals They busied their Heads about other Matters for which They were specially Assembled 5. No more will we say of this Council 6. Others have spoken of it those things that are most True Both how it was Called How Handled And how it was Dismissed 7. Among Them chiefly is considerable Patre Paulo in his Admirable History of the Council of Trent 3. Of the Decrees of the Council of Trent THe Tridentine Decrees which the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors Commend being set forth as They write by so many Excellent godly and Learned men and say That it were Impiety to compare with them All the scattered Synagogues of Lutherans have been Tried and Examined by more Godly and Learned Men then ever were in that Synagogue Assembled wherein prevailed neither Godlinesse nor learning but Antichristian Tyranny 4. Of the Examen of the Council of Trent by Kemnitius Jesuites Kemnitius saith a Jesuite gained but Infamy by his Examen of the Council of Trent Answer to That by the Reformed 1. IF Kemnitius have not the Jesuites good word it is no great wonder For he hath Atchieved that by his Learnings Vertue and Industry that he may seem worthy of Envie and Hatred from such as the Jesuites are 2. But if true and deserved Praise be due to good Deeds he hath obtained an honourable Reward even the everlasting glory of a good Name 5. For what Reasons the Protestants made no great haste to goe to the Council of Trent Jesuites VVHy say the Jesuites did not the Protestants 1. Called to the Synode of Trent And secured by the Caution of publick Promise make all haste to come unto it Answer of the Reformed VVhat should they have done there Or to what end should they have undertaken so long a Journey 1. Either that having been mocked and abused they might have returned home again 2. Or having been burned in the Council the Protestants should have been paid for their Rashnesse 1. For in Regard of the First What place of Disputation was left among those who had every man plighted their faith to the Pope and had Religiously bound themselves by Oath That they would never either do or say any thing against his dignitie and pleasure What therefore might have been hoped for from those which might have drawn any to Disputation 2. And in Regard of the second Did not the Calamitie of John Husse of Bohemia and of Hierome of Prague who were burned in the Council of Constance give just cause of fear And yet Husse came to the Council trusting in the protection of a publick promise Of the Historie
should raze their Names out of the Calender of Gods Saints or think otherwise then Reverently of them § Objection of the Popish Writers against this Declaration of the Reformed HOw say they can we esteem them to be Holy teaching that they did Erre Answer to that Objection 1. VVE Reformed do Answer That the Ancient Fathers are not in such Assertions contrary to themselves 2. Were not the Apostles Holy Men when they dreamed of an Earthly Kingdom in this World Yet this Opinion is contrarie to a principal Article of our Faith Were They void of Holiness when they believed that the Gospel was to be preached to the Jews onely Which is greatly Derogatory to the Grace of God and Salvation of his people Then every Error doth not overthrow all holiness in the servants of God 3. In the Primitive Church many Holy Fathers were infected with the Error of Christs Reigning a thousand years on earth who notwithstanding are worthily accounted Saints of God 4. Cyprian and many Godly Bishops with him erred about the Baptism Ministred by Hereticks Yet lost they not for all that the Opinion and Name of Holy Bishops and Fathers 5. All such errors mentioned were such as in the before named Fathers did not raze the Foundation of the Gospel § There is great difference between the Errors of the Antient Fathers And those of the present Church of Rome And Popish Doctors 1. THe Fathers slipt a little The Popish Doctors and Papists are fallen headlong into the pit 2. The Fathers were overseen through infirmide The Popish Doctors and Papists are blind of Malice 5. The Fathers scattered some Darnel in the Lords Field The Popish Doctors and Papists have plucked up by the Roots the good Corn. 4. The Fathers have suffered losse of this building being not agreeable to the foundation yet are saved The Popish Doctors and Papists overthrow indirectly and by good consequence the foundation it self And therefore continuing in these opinions what hope can they have to be saved § Examination of these words of Luther repreved by the Popish Writers That he was not moved though a thousand Austins Cyprians Churches be against him The Popish Writers BY these words say the Popish Writers Luther did shew that he was unmeasurable Arrogant and wilful Answer to that Accusation and Presumption 1. LVther's Spirit was far from this Insolent and Immoderate Presumption as may by his own words appear ‖ Contra Regem Angliae For he saith not that he more setteth by his own private judgment then he doth by all the Fathers and Doctors But he saith That he setteth against the sayings of the Fathers of Men of Angels of Devils the Word of the onely Eternal Majestie the Gospel And again immediately he saith The Word of God is above all The Majestie of God maketh with me That I care not though a thousand Augustines and Cyprians stood against me 2. Is this to set his private judgment against All the Fathers Is this Pride Is this Presumption Must Gods word and Majesty and Gospel yield to the judgment of Fathers be they never so many 3. Luther did not think so but meant this by the words alledged against him If Augustine or Cyprian or any other Father maintain any thing against Gods Word Luther or any other Minister of Christ may in such Case preferre his Judgement warranted by the word of God before theirs 4. If the Popish Doctors deny this they are not worthy to be called Christians 5. And yet closely They doe deny it in that they reprove Luther and condemn him for saying the same §. Objections against this Answer of the Reformed by the Popish Writers 1. Objection YOu Reformed say the said Writers can bring no Instance that ever the Ancient Fathers did so Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. HAve the Popish Writers forgotten what fell out in the first Council of Nice when the Fathers agreeing to dissolve the Marriage of Ministers were withstood by Paphnutins and yielded in the end Here one Paphnutius Judgement was preferred before all the other three hundreds of Fathers 2. And so oftentimes the Judgement of many hath been corrected by one S. Augustine saith Whether of Christ Contra Petil. lib. 3. cap. 6. or of his Church or of any other thing that appertaineth to or Faith and Life I will not say We not to be compared to him that said Though we But as he added If an Angel from Heaven shall Preach any thing besides that ye have received in the Legal and Evangelical Scriptures let him be accursed If we may accurse them how many and whosoever they be that Teach contrary to the Prophetical and Apostolical Scriptures then may we prefer our Judgement in such Cases before them 3. In another place S. Augustine saith August Epist 19. For all these namely Fathers yea above all these the Apostle Paul offereth himself I flie to Him I appeal to Him from all Writers that think otherwise Thus was S. Augustine bold to write even to S. Jerome and feared not any suspicion either of Arrogancy or of Heresie for the same 4. Such Account then must we make of the Truth that we must stand with it against all the world and not for the Reverence of mens Persons give it over or betray it or be afraid to defend it 2. Objection THough the Fathers in the Councils of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon had alledged no direct and evident Place against Arius and Nestorius and Eutiches yet the Christian People was bound to believe them grounding themselves onely upon the Catholick and Universal Faith of the Churches before them Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. THis is boldly and bluntly spoken 2. These Godly and Catholick Fathers Assembled in Council against these Hereticks Confuted them by the Authority of Gods Word and as it were did cut the throat of their Heresies with the Sword of the Spirit This is onely the Weapon then used And with this they prevailed 3. As likewise have all other godly Councils ever done against the Hereticks and enemies of the Church The Fathers have Errors and the Doctors of the Roman Church do acknowledge it 1. IT is confessed by our Adversaries that the Fathers had their Errors 2. And themselves in divers cases challenge and censure them 3. There is none of the Fathers saith Stapleton in which something erroneous may not be observed And Anselm saith in the books of those holy Doctors which the Church readeth as Authentical some things are found wicked and heretical And Mulhusinus the Jesuite We know the Fathers were men and erred sometimes 4. Before the Pelagian Heresie arose Augustine was deceived in the matter of divine grace and freewill And although the same Father is many times Orthodox in the Question of Purgatory yet at other times he varieth at least doubtfully from his own sounder judgment The Reformed justly exclude from the rule of Faith The Determinations of the Pope 1. VVE
Exercitations CONCERNING The Pure and True AND The Impure and False RELIGION By CHARLES de BEAVVAIS Rector of the Parish of Witheham In the County of Sussex LONDON Printed by J. R. for Francis Eglesfield at the Signe of the Marygold in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1665. TO THE ORTHODOX AND TRULY Christian Church The Church of the KINGDOM of ENGLAND For the Advancement of the Glory of Almighty God And for Her Confirmation More and More IN THE Pure and True Doctrine of Faith And of Divine Worship CHARLES de BEAVVAIS One of Her most Faithfull And most Affectionate Ministers Doth in all Humility Offer And Dedicate This Present WORK An Humble Request Of the AUTHOR To the Reader THe Reader is Intreated Humbly to begin the Reading of this Book by the Methodical Representation following Because in It He shall clearly perceive all the Chapters or Heads thereof and all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads Besides in It He shall find an Epitomy of the whole Work A Methodical Representation of all the Chapters or Heads and of all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads that are contained in this Work Which is also an Epitomy of the whole Book SECTION I. Chap. 1. OF Religion in General 1 With this Exercitation 1. There is a Religion And that Necessarily 1 Chap. 2. Of the Distinction of Religion in True in Heretical in Schismatical and in False 2 Chap. 3. Of the True Religion in General 3 With these Exercitations 1. The True Religion can be but one 3 2. Of Antiquity concerning Religion 6 3. Nothing must be ordained concerning the Things belonging to Religion without the Word of God 4. The onely Ground and Rule of Faith and of Divine Worship is the Holy Scripture 12 5. The Holy Scripture ought to be among us the Supream Interpreter of Scriptures and the Judge of Controversies 13 6. Consequently this Power and Authority is not to be Attributed to any Creature 14 7. What force have in Religion Arguments taken from Reason 15 8. The Controversies concerning Religion in all Disputations must be decided onely by Holy Scriptures 16 Chap. 4. Concerning the Power and Authority of the Soveraign Prince in regard of Religion 18 With these Exercitations 1. The Supream Authority of Establishing Conserving and Reforming Religion doth belong to him 18 2. He must Order and Settle nothing concerning Religion without consulting the Book of Scriptures and assembling Learned and Godly Divines whose Charge is to Expound them 21 3. In what regard a Soveraign Prince is said to be the Head of the Church which is within his States and Dominions 23 Chap. 5. Of the Marks of the True Religion 24 Chap. 6. Of the True Religion in Particular 25 As such was the Religion of the Ancient Jews And the first Christian Religion Chap. 7. The Ancient Judaical Religion was a true Religion 25 Chap. 8. The first Christian Religion was Pure and True 26 Chap. 9. Of the Agreements and of the Differences between the Religion of the ancient Jews and the true Christian Religion 27 Chap. 10. So there hath been but one way to attain to the Fruition of Salvation since the first sin of Adam 28 Chap. 11. Of the Mutation which happened to the first Christian Religion in General 30 With these Exercitations 1. Vnder the Empire of Constantine the first Christian Religion suddenly changed 30 2. Of the Terms or Words and of the Ceremonies borrowed from the Jews and from the Pagans in the above said change SECT 2. Chap. 1. OF the Corruption which in Particular is happened to the First Religion of the Church of Rome 33 With these Exercitations 1. The Religion and Church of Rome is not Now what it was in the Beginning In the Beginning it was Pure and Orthodox But now it is Impure and Heretical 35 2. 1. Because the Greater part of Her Belief is contrary to Holy Scriptures 36 Art 5. 3. 2. Because besides a great part of the Ancient Heresies are received in Her and Approved by Her 38. Art 7. 4. Answer to four Objections against the above Assertion Of the First see Pag. 41 Of the Second see Pag. 42 Of the Third see Pag. 45 Of the Fourth see Pag. 48 5. Popery is not of the First and Primary Antiquity 49 Ch. 2. Of the Principles of the Roman Religion 51 With these Exercitations 1. Those Principles are Scriptures Traditions of the Apostles The Catholick Church General Councils The Ancient Fathers The Pope 51 2. These Principles are 1. Fraudulous 2. False 3. The Fraudes about the said Principles are 1. Either in regard of them all and Conjointly 2. Or in respect of each of them and separately Chap. 3. Of the Frauds about all the said Principles and conjointly 52 Which are the three following 1. The Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Her Principles but for the last which is the Determination of the Pope 52 2. Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope and take all Authority quoad nos From the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 53 3. The Pope also is thought by the Papists to be the True and Lawfull Interpreter of the Scriptures And the supreame Judge of Controversies about Religion 54 55 Chap. 4. Of the Fraudes about the First Principle which is the Scriptures 57 Which are the two following 1. The Papists making shew to receive the Scriptures for Rule of Faith do disgrace them in joyning Traditions with them 57 2. The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her principles and Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures by reason of the Corruption of the Vulgar Latin Translation which is the Papists Scripture 57 § Of the Corruption of the said Vulgar Latin Translation more fully 58 § Refutation of the Excessive Praises which the Seminary Priests of Rhemes gives to the English Rhemish Translation 59 § Condemnation of the Annotations joyned with the said Rhemish Translation 62 Chap. 5. Of the Fraudes about the Second principle which is the Ancient Fathers 63 Which are these two following 1. That by an Expurgatory Index the Church of Rome causes to be blotted out of the Books of the said Fathers all that is displeasing unto Her Or else doth falsifie them and alter their sense and meaning 63 2. That although the Church of Rome acknowledgeth That there are many Faults and Errors in the Books of the Ancient Fathers which are not to be approved Yet the Roman Religion is as it were a Body consisting for the most part of Rottennesse and Corruption namely the Ancient and new Errors 64 § Again of this matter more briefly 66 § Again Papists suck Errors from the Fathers unsound speeches And of a small Error of the Fathers do occasionally procreate a great one 67 Chap. 6. Of the Frauds about the Third Principle which is concerning Councils 67 These Fraudes are the four following 1. The many Frauds and Slights committed in the last Councils of
the Things that are hurtful and contrary to Religion And to punish those that are Rebellious For the outward worship of God shall vanish away Heresies will rise and Increase as also Blasphemies unlesse there be one armed with the Sword who may by fear and by a coactive power restrain the perverse and wicked This cannot be done by Ecclesiastical Persons For their Office is to preach to exhort to rebuke and by Spiritual Censures to Correct But they bear not the Sword And they are deprived of that Supream Power which by the fear of punishment may contain the Impious and wicked in their Duty Therefore the very outward face of a Christian Commonwealth shall not be retained if we exclude the Civil Magistrate from the Supream Authority concerning Religion 1. The Prince And Soveraign Magistrate must order and settle nothing Concerning Religion without Consulting the Book of Holy Scriptures 2. And Assembling Learned and Godly Divines whose Charge is to expound them 1. 1. THe Grecians never undertook any matter of great consequence before they received Answer from their Oracles 2. Neither the Jews before they consulted with God by the Ephod 3. Nor the Romans before they had the Approbation of their Sooth-sayers 4. And therefore doubtlesse all Christian Princes and Estates are to expect either a Command Or at least a Warrant from Holy Scripture before they proceed in matter so nearly concerning God and his Service 5. Otherwise they goe about to set the Sun-Dial by their Watch and not their Watch by their Sun-Dial 6. Whether all wise Governours like good Pilates have Manum ad Clavum oculos ad Astra The eye upon the Starres And their hand upon the Helm Steering their Course below by direction from above 2. 1. THough Soveraigns are Supreame Commanders for the Truth yet they are not the Supream or sole directors unto Truth For in Scruples of Conscience And perplexed Controversies of Religion they are to require the Law from the mouth of the Priest That is they are to ask Counsel of the Prophets And generally in all matters appertaining to God to hear the Ministers of God declaring to them the will of God out of his Word 2. Symmachus was bold to tell Anastasius the Emperour that as Bishops owe Subjection to Gods Sword in Princes hands So Princes owe obedience to Gods Word in Bishops mouthes Defer Deo in nobis nos deferemus Deo in te O Emperour hear God speaking by us and we will fear God ruling by thee The same God who hath put a material Sword in thy hands to smite malefactors in their body hath put a Spiritual Sword in our mouth to slay sin in the Soul 3. The Magistrate is the hand of God but the Preacher is his mouth And for this cause all wise and Religious Kings have given them their ears And taken some of them in their bosome As David did Nathan to receive Instruction and direction from them how to sway the Royal Scepter within the walls of the Church In what regard a Soveraign Prince is said to be the Head of the Church which is within his States and Dominions 1. IT is not in the same sense that Christ is called the Head of the Church which is Mystically For this honour is proper onely unto him And cannot without an horrible blasphemy be attributed to any Creature 2. Neither also is it in the same sense that the Popes of Rome do call themselves Ministerial Heads of the Universal Church Pretending thereby to have an Universal and a Supreame Power in Spiritual things belonging to Religion and Conscience As also an Universal Jurisdiction over all Ecclesiastical Persons For this Title belongeth not unto them neither by Divine nor Humane Right But they assume it by a meer Antichristian Usurpation 3. The Soveraign then is called Head of the Church of his States and Countries in the same sense that in Gods Word King Saul is called the Head of the Nations That is to say not only as he is the first the Noblest member of the Church of his States and Countries but because he is her Defendor her Nursing Father and Supream Inspector and who is bound by the vertue of his Supream Authority to establish therein defend and maintain Religion and the Divine truth As also a good and a lawful Government Of the Marks of the True Religion By which it is distinguished from the False Religion of Pagans c. 1. THe First Mark of the True Religion is This That it direct us And all our Religious Service unto the true God Creator of Heaven and Earth The onely Searcher of Mens Hearts Of which chiefly he will be served By this first Mark true Religion is distinguished from all Idolatrous Religions which seek unto Wood to Stone to the Sun to the Moon to Men to Angels and to all the Creatures that are in Heaven and in Earth 2. The second Mark of the true Religion is That the Service of God which Religion is to teach us must be grounded upon his word And Revealed unto us by his own self This Second Mark will serve us to discern the True Religion from the Inventions of Men. And to reject as untruth whatsoever is not grounded upon Gods word 3. The Third Mark of the True Religion is That True Religion must put into our Hands a Mean to satisfie Gods Justice Without the which not only all other Religions but also even that which concerneth the true serving of the true God were utterly vain and unprofitable By this third Mark True Religion is distinguished from all False Religions Man's Reason hath well perceived that some such Mean was needful in Religion But to know what that Mean is was too high a Thing for man's Reason to attain unto 4. The True Religion then And which deserveth the Name of Religion is only that Which hath God for her Scope His Word for warrant of her worshipping And a Mean appointed by him to pacifie him towards us And in that Religion onely and in none other resteth Salvation The Ancient Judaical Religion hath been a True Religion The Jews having had the knowledge of the true God And having served and worshipped him alone 1. AMong the great Nations Of the Assyrians Of the Persians Of the Greeks Of the Aegyptians And of the Romans Whose Religions did not bear the Livery of one onely true God But of Many There was discovered a little Nation called the People of Israel Which worshipped the Creator of the World Acknowledged him for their Father Did call upon him alone in their need And for all the small Account that others made of them Did abhorre all the glistering gloriousnesse of the Great Monarchies and Kingdomes that were out of the way The first Christian Religion was Pure and True 1. FOr it was wholly According to the Will of God Declared by the Prophets by Jesus Christ And By his Apostles 2. It was a Pure and a True Religion Because It Had All the
If they Remember how Christ promised his Spouse Perpetual Preservation Hos 2.19 I will even betroth thee unto me for ever Isa 59.21 As for me This is my Covenant with Them saith the Lord My Spirit that is upon thee And my words which I have put in thy Mouth shall not Depart out of thy Mouth Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seed Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seeds Seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever And Such Like Answer to this Third Objection 1. TO what Purpose doth this Objection serve the Popish Writers Or what Argument may the Perpetuity Of Christs Universal Church afford Them against our former Assertion 2. We Believe and Confesse to the Comfort of our Souls That Christs Church hath continued And shall never fail so long as the world endureth 3. And we account it a prophane Heresie to teach that Christs Universal Church hath Perished from the Earth at any Time For this Assertion shaketh the Foundation of all Faith and Religion 4. But the Popish Writers who makes this Objection Should prove by invincible evidence of Scripture That the Catholick Universal Church of Christ is nothing Else But the Outward Succession of the Roman See If They can Prove This They should Prove their Objection Soundly And should confute our Opinion Truely 5. But it is a Thing which They cannot Doe They cannot bring us Either Texts of Scriptures or Reasons To shew that Christs Church Either is the Popes Succession Or Else dependeth upon the same See 6. For as Touching External Shew And Succession of Churches The Scriptures have foretold Apoc. 12. and 13.16 That Antichrist shall Seduce Great and Small Rich and Poor Free and Bond And that the Church shall flie into the Wildernesse And there Remain Of all which no word could be true If the Catholick Church were tied To the Popes Chaire And the Popes Chaire were the Rock That cannot be removed 7. And yet notwithstanding this General Dispersion And the Flight of the Church under Antichrist The Catholick Church shall for all That Continue 8. Although not in that outward strength And Glory In which sometimes it hath appeared And Flourished 4. Objection Of the Popish Writers Against the above Exercitations That the Now Church of Rome is Changed And is not Now what it was in the Beginning What Impudence is This say the said Writers There was never Heresie that Assaulted the Church of Rome Of which it carried not the Victory As Over the Donatists Over Jovinian Over Pelagius the Britain And over Others Answer to this Fourth Objection 1. THe Triumphs of which the Popish Writers do boast of Are no more proper to the Now or Latter Church of Rome Then the Triumphs of old Rome Over Pyrrhus Over Annibal Over Perses Over Antiochus are to be esteemed the Triumphs of Rome Now Being 2. And for the pretended Victory over Pelagius the Britain we saw that he Triumphed over the Popish Kingdome For did he not Teach That Grace was imbred in Nature And the Popish Crew of Jesuites Defendeth the same Who seeth not then Pelagius sitting in the Popish Triumphant Chariot Popery is not of the first and Primary Antiquity That is many of the present Doctrines of the Church of Rome And in what Time Errors were received in it 1. PApists are not able to produce any Record Expresse and direct testimony Canon of Council or Ecclesiastical constitution For their burning Lights in the Church at noon day before the Decree of Pope Sabinianus in the year of our Lord 605. 2. Nor for Rome to be the Head of all Churches before Pope Boniface the Third in the year 606. 3. Nor for the Invocation of Saints in their Publick Lithurgy before Boniface the Fifth in the year 618. 4. Nor for their Latine Service thrust upon all Churches before Pope Vitalian in the year 666 which is the very number of the name of the Beast 5. Nor for the Cutting of the Host into three parts and offering one part for the Souls in Purgatory before Pope Seâ—gius in the year 688. 6. Nor for setting up Images in Churches Generally and worshipping them before Pope Adrian the First and the Second Council of Nice in the year 787. 7. Nor for Canonization of Saints departed before Leo the Third about the year 800. 8. Nor for the Orall Manducation of Christs Body in the Sacrament before Pope Nicholas the Second in the year 1053. 9. Nor for the entire number of seven Sacraments before Peter Lombard in the year 1140. 10. Nor for Indulgences before Eugenius the third in the year 1145. 11. Nor for Transubstantiation of the Bread into Christs body before the Fourth Council of Lateran in the year 1215. 12. Nor for the Elevation of the Host that the People might adore it before Honorius the Third in the year 1216. 13. Nor for any Jubilee before Pope Boniface the Eighth in the yeer 1300. 14. Nor for the Carrying the Sacrament in Procession under a Canopy before Pope Vrban the Fifth In the year 1262. 15. Nor for the Day and half Communion before the Council at Constance in the year 1416. 16. Nor for the suspending the Efficacy of Sacramental Consecration upon the Priests Intention before the Council at Florence in the year 1439. 17. Nor for the Popes Superiority to General Councils before the Sixt Council at Lateran under Leo the Tenth in the year 1517. 18. Nor the vulgar Latine Translation to be held for Authentical And upon no pretended Cause whatsoever to be reiected before the fourth Session of the Council of Trent in the year 1546. 19. Nor for the Second book of the Macchabees and the Apocryphal Additions to Hester and Daniel with the History of Bell and the Dragon which S. Jerome termeth a Fable to bereceived for Canonical Scripture before the said Session in the year above named 1. Fraude 1. These be the Principles and Grounds of Faith and Worship that the Church of Rome doth Produce 1. Scriptures 2. Traditions of the Apostles 3. The Catholick Church 4. General Councils 5. The Ancient Fathers 6. The Pope which she calls the Supream Pastour of the Church 2. These be the Fraudes of the Church of Rome Concerning all the Principles and Rules above Produced The 1. of those Fraudes is That the Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Them but for the last which is The Determination of her Pope 1. THe Scripture must not be Scripture in any other Sense then as the Pope will Expound So that the Scripture being the Meaning of the Scripture And the Meaing of the Scripture being the Popes Exposition Hereof it followeth That the Scripture is nothing else but the Popes Interpretation 2. So Likewise In Traditions In Doctors In Councils In Churches If any Thing Dissent from the Popes understanding and Determination It is Rejected Abolished Condemned 3. And Finally all Faith all Religion all Divinity of the Church of Rome is only the Popes Sacred will and pleasure
Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 1. THe Papists 1. take all Authority from the Scripture 2. They give it to the Church And 3. They give the Churches Authority to the Pope 2. I say 1. That the Papists take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture which appears in that they teach that it is not the ground or pillar of truth Nor properly and of it self any Cause or Means of Belief or of Charity And that God doth not immediately speak by it Neither is the Holy Ghost joined with the writing of the Scripture And that the Church is not subject to the Scripture And that put case any person living out of the Communion of the Roman Church do read or study the Scripture it is not the word of God to them or of greater Authority then Aesops Fables 3. I have said 2. That the Papists give all Authority to the present Roman Church This appears in that they make it the onely External ground and pillar of Truth The sole Judge of Controversies The principle or first ground and foundation from whence the Scripture in regard of men receiveth all Authority 4. I have said 3. That the Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And no Papist in these daies can or will deny This. For 1. the Positive Speeches of their greatest Doctors thereupon manifestly confirms it Ecclesiae nomine saith Gregorius de Valentia intelligimur ejus Caput Romanum Pontificem Tom. 3. Dist 1. q. 1. part 1. pag 30. And Bannes 2.2 q. 1. Ar. 10. Animadvertendum est cum Cajetano c. quod apud Thomam pro eodem omnino reputatur Authoritas Ecclesiae universalis Authoritas Concilii Et Authoritas Summi Pontificis 2. The same Assertion followeth upon the main principles of their Doctrine which are That the Pope is the prime subject of Ecclesiastical Authority And that the whole Authority of all the Body and of all the Members thereof is derived by and from him And that the promise of the perpetual Assistance of the Holy Ghost And the Infallible Judgement and the Supream Authority And other Priviledges are intailed upon his Tribunal The 2. of those Fraudes is That The Pope also is Taught by the Papists To be the true and Lawful Interpreter of the Sense of the Scriptures And the Supream Judge of Controversies Concerning Faith and Divine Worship 1. IT is most clear that the Jesuites make both the Scripture it self and the Interpretation of it to Depend upon the Authority of the Church 2. And the Church they call not the whole Multitude of Christians and Faithful Men. 3. But they Restrain both the Name and the Nature of the Church 1. unto their Bishops 2. If Thereupon we Reformed object That their Bishops may Differ touching the Sense of the Scriptures so shall we be uncertain and shall not resolve which of them to Believe but they help this and Answer That General Councils must Decide and Determine all Questions and Controversies 3. Shall we then Rest in them No more then in then the other For the Pope must be Judge over the Councils 4. So in the Conclusion The whole Interpretation of Holy Scriptures is transferred to the Pope and must be fetched out of his Breast yea and as a proper Right he so challengeth the Power of Interpreting of the Scripture That whatsoever he thinketh That must be accounted the Sense and Meaning of them Refutation of this Doctrine of the Jesuits by the Reformed Doctors 1. THat which hath been said above is the Jesuites constant and perpetual property and disposition in interpreting the Scriptures 2. Which is full of Dotage Error and Falsehood void of Advise Knowledge and Wisdome 3. For what an Absurd and horrible Thing is it that the Sense and Meaning of the Holy Scripture should depend upon one mans Judgement and Voice 4. Specially being such a one as commonly the Bishops of Rome have been Unlearned Wicked Heretical 5. And hence have proceeded all the following goodly Interpretations 1. Take Eate That is you Priests say Private Masses 2. Drink ye all of This That is onely the Priests must Drink 3. Be ye Holy for I am Holy Therefore it is unlawful for the Ministers of the Word to marry a Wife Exception of the Jesuites Which of the Popes or what Catholick Writer ever concluded this out of that place Answer to this Exception Pope Syricius did first of all so Collect And after him Pope Innocent As it may be read in Gratian Dist. 31. cap. Tenere and Dist 82. cap. Proposuisti cap. Plurimos 4. This is another like Interpretation Give not holy things unto Doggs Therefore the people must be forbidden to read the Scriptures 5. What should we number up Innumerable more of the Popes and Papists Interpretations By which they do nothing but pervert and wrest the Scriptures In Particular These be the Frauds of the Church of Rome Concerning Her first Principle Which is the Scripture 1. Fraud The Papists making Shew to Receive the Scriptures for Ground and Rule of Faith Do Disgrace Them in Joyning Traditions with Them 1. FOr as the Scriptures are Grounds And Rule of true Doctrine So are They onely Grounds And Rule 2. And as in Matters of Faith Arguments ought principally to be drawn from Them so such Arguments onely conclude necessarily As even the Schoolman Thomas Aquinas doth Directly confesse 1. Part. 1. Quaest. Artic. 8. Ad. 2. 2. Fraud The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her Principles And Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures For in making an old rotten Translation which we may boldly call so being compared with the Original Word of Scripture to be the Authentical Word of God and denying the Original Faithful Texts which Moses the Prophets the Apostles the Evangelists did write to be the Word of God What doth she else but plainly as it were with one dash of a Penne Cancel the whole Scriptures 2. This Homely Latin Translation is the Papists Scripture 3. Coined and Canonized of late in the Councel of Trent And never before 4. And other Scripture have They none §. Of the Corruption of the vulgar Latine Translation more Fully 1. THe Reader of the vulgar Latin Translation may manifestly perceive That in it are manifold and almost infinite Faults of all sorts 1. By Adding 2. By Omitting 3. By Mistaking Of Letters Of Points Of Syllables And of Words 4. By wrong Interpreting the Original Text. 2. Which Faults The Popish Doctors shall never be able to Approve or Justifie Though They weary Themselves never so much with Traveling and Toiling and seeking some Defence 3. When They have said what They can say for Maintenance of These Corruptions it shall for all that Appear By all Learning and Evidence of Reason that They have Neither the Old nor the New Testament in the Entire and Original
of the Councel of Trent Written by Patre Paulo See the Addition Concerning this Question Whether the Pope be above the Councils Or otherwise Jesuites THe Jesuites puts the Pope above the Councils And they alleadge this Reason Because no Council is of any Authoritie which was not Confirmed by the Pope Answer of the Reformed to that Reason That is false 1. For the Sixth African Council and the Chalcedon Council had their Authoritie without the Pope 2. And Emperours Patriarchs and Bishops have Confirmed Councils 3. And the Council of Constantinople by Letters desired the Confirmation of the Decrees from Theodosius the Emperour Fraud This is a Fraud of the Church of Rome in Regard of another of her Principles That is the Catholick Church That because the Scripture maketh Honorable Mention of the Church The Roman Church is that true Church of Christ of which the Scripture speaketh so often 1. VVE Reformed acknowledge That both in the Old and New Testament there is every where honorable mention made of the Church And that it is called A Holy City A Fruitful Vineyard An High Hill A Direct Path The onely Dove The Kingdom of Heaven The Spouse and Bodie of Christ The Pillar of Truth The Multitude unto which the Holy Ghost being promised poureth all things needful to Salvation The Congregation against which the Gates of Hell shall never so prevail That they shall utterly extinguish the same The Congregation which who so Repugneth though he confesse Christ with his mouth yet hath he no more to do with Christ then hath a Publican and a heathen man 2. The above-said Titles do not belong to the now Church of Rome 1. FOr on the contrary It is the Babylonish Whore A Branch cut off from the true Vine A Den of Thieves A broad way leading to Destruction The Kingdom of Hell The body of Antichrist A Sink of Errors A great Mother of Fornication The Church of the wicked out of which every Christian ought to depart which Christ shall one day fearfully destroy and give her the just Recompence of all her sins 2. In vain then do the Popish Writers reckon up the praises of the Church unlesse they can demonstrate that they are proper to the Church of Rome 3. Which they shall never be able to do so long as Rome standeth As the Church of Rome is Fraudulous in regard of the Principles of Faith and Worship that she doth produce So is her Doctrine false concerning these Principles 1. Concerning the Traditions that she calleth Apostolical 2. Concerning the Church 3. Concerning General Councils 4. Concerning the Ancient Fathers 5. Concerning the Pope And therefore such Principles are justly excluded by the Reformed from the Rule of Faith 1. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Traditions called Apostolical by the Papists 1. FOr the Popish Apostolical Traditions are but forged and devised Things and therefore no stay for a man to settle his Conscience upon 2. That they are not such as the Papists sayes Let them tell us if they can which be the Apostles Traditions how many and where they may be found If they cannot satisfie this Demand as they cannot indeed How may they then make any Reckoning of that whereof they have no certain knoledge How can They without falling Build their Faith upon Fantasies such as they are 3. The Apostles Doctrine we have in Writing The Apostles Doctrine we have in writing 4. Other Traditions of the Apostles we receive none for our belief The Scripture is the onely Rule of Faith and not Traditions a part of the Rule of Faith that is That Scripture is a perfect Rule 1. THat I prove in this manner 2 Timoth. 3.15 Apoc. 22.18 1 Cor. 4.6 John 20.31 2. That is the onely Rule whereunto the chiefest properties of a rule do solely belong But the properties of a true and certain rule do onely belong to the holy Scriptures in matters of Faith The rule of Catholick Faith saith Bellarmine must be certain and known De verb. Dei libr. 1. cap. 2. Now there is nothing better known or more certain then the Scripture which appears Because Traditions are far more uncertain than the written word and because many of them are false and uncertain 3. The written word is a Rule of Traditions From whence it follows that it is the onely rule That the written word is a rule of Tradition appeareth by the Doctrine of our Adversaries who acknowledge that no Traditions must be admitted but such as agree with the Scripture Bellarm. de verb. Dei libr. 4. cap. 3. And which are derived from the Scripture and the writings of the Primitive Fathers Bellarm. de Script libr. 4. cap. 3. But those Traditions which are derived from the Scriptures have the same to be their rule And there is nothing more common in the Primitive Fathers then to subject all their writings to be Regulate by the holy Scriptures Therefore such Traditions as are found in the works of the holy Fathers have the holy Scripture to be their rule from whence it followeth that the Scripture is the onely primitive rule of Faith 4. It is that which is acknowledged by some of our Adversaries Gabr. Biel Can. Miss Lect. 71. whereof Ferus saith expresly The holy Scripture is the sole rule of veritie and whatsoever differs or contradicteth the same it is error and cokle with whatsoever shew it come forth Ferus in Matth. lib. 2. in cap. 13. pag. 248. col 1. And another saith The Doctrine of the books of the Prophets and Apostles is alone the foundation of truth and the rule c. Villavincen de formand Concion lib. 2. cap. 2. 2. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Catholick Church 1. VVE Reformed do Reverence and Love The Catholick Church as the Spouse of Christ 2. But we know that her duty is to hearken only to the voice of Christ her Husband And that she hath no Authority to adde so much as one iota in his Word or any waies to dissent from it 3. And further we know That the Romish Synagogue is not that Catholick Church of Christ whereof we speak 3. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith General Councils 1. VVE Reformed doe esteem and regard General Councils in their place We thank God for them We Read Allow and Commend them so far forth as they agree with Gods Word 2. Let therefore their Decrees be examined by Gods Word 3. And if they agree let them be received for that Agreement 4. If not let them be rejected for the contrary 5. But the Argument holdeth not in this Form such a Council decreed so and therefore so must we believe 6. If this Principle were set down for certain and perpetual in Divinity we should have strange Beliefs enow yea surely scarcely should we retain any one true Belief 7. Two famous General Councils have been held in Nice The First And the Second In the First is
Religion and Church are not Heretical 1. WHat if the Romish Church condemned Luther Shall we say therefore that Luther is an Heretick 2. The Church of Jerusalem condemned Christ and Him and his they would have denyed to be the true Church but for all their Denial it was not less the true Church 3. The Accusation of being Heretical nothing touches our Reformed Religion and Church For by Gods Grace we are far from all kinde of Heresie and hold no other Doctrine then that which the Prophets and the Apostles and Jesus Christ himself have taught us and which is plainly contained in the Books of Canonical Scripture § The Jesuites maintain the contrary but by a False Ground which is one of their great slights Jesuites 1. THe Doctrine of the Jesuites is That for not to be an Heretick one must have Communion with the Church of Rome and acknowledge the Pope to be Vicar of Christ and Successor of S. Peter in the Quality of Head and Monarch of the Church which Church of Rome they presuppose to be the Catholique Church Answer of the Reformed 1. THe Reformed do answer to that Doctrine of the Jesuites That it must first appear that the Now Church of Rome is the Catholique Church before he that is separated from his Communion can be justly convicted of Heresie which is also to be said concerning the Pope It must appear that he is S. Peters Successor and the Head and Monarch of the Church 2. Which the Jesuites shall never be able to do and yet never have done for since the time that the Ancient Fathers of the Church did call the Church of Rome Catholick Church the course of that Church is turned and the See of Rome hath declined and degenerated from her sincere Faith to detestable falshood 3. Let the Jesuites restore unto us the old Church of Rome and we will never separate our selves from her Communion 4. But of that Church they have nothing left but the Walls and old Rubbish 5. And yet still they brag of the Name of the Catholique Church Exception of the Jesuites SO indeed Calvin answereth say the Jesuites But it shall not serve the Reformeds turn for Optatus say they proveth himself to be in the Catholique Church because he joyned himself to S. Peters Chair Answer of the Reformed to that Exception ANd what do the Jesuites call S. Peters Chair 1. Is it the external Seat or the Succession of the Bishops They shall never prove it 2. And the contrary say the Reformed we can easily object out of Optatus himself Optatus calleth Syricus Bishop of Rome his Fellow and the companion of other Bishops who held a sound and Catholique Judgement with all those Syricus agreed in one Society and Fellowship By their Letters sent one to another as Witnesses of their consenting in Doctrine and lawful Ordination Optatus then proveth that he was a Catholique because he kept the Catholique confession and conjunction with Syricius and with others Bishops 2. Secondly the Reformed do answer that Optatus Argument was good against the Donatists who did separate themselves from the Communion of the Catholique Church while they consented not with these Churches where the Doctrine of the Apostles and a lawful Ordination of Bishops did ever flourish 3. But that is nothing to us Reformed and specially to the Reformed of the Church of England It is not a sound Argument to convince the Reformed of Schisme because they have separated themselves from the Church of Rome The Jesuites do maintain the contrary 1. ANd in that regard thinking to touch the Reformed who have separated themselves from the Church of Rome they produce the Authority of Optatus who did reprove the Separation of the Donatists and did argue them to be Schismatical because they had separated from the communion of the Catholique Church Answer to the Jesuites and Refutation of their Argument 1. A Very good Argument indeed and Augustine observed the same course and it was a good Argument That the communion of the Church should be objected to the Schismatical Donatists which seditiously without cause separated themselves from the Church 2. But this Argument employed by Optatus against the Donatists makes nothing against the Reformed who have separated Themselves from the Church of Rome For the said Reformed deny the Church of Rome to be the Catholique Church 3. And therefore the Jesuites cannot by this Argument of Optatus convince us of Schisme although Optatus might thereby confute the Donatists 4. It must first appear that the Church of Rome be the Catholique Church otherwise the Reformed cannot be convicted of Schisme 5. In the time of Optatus the Church of Rome was the Preserver of Religion the Maintainer of the True Faith and she shined like a Star in the sight of all other Churches 6. No marvel then if the most holy Fathers esteemed much and reverenced this Church and urged the Schismaticks with the example of it and also the Hereticks of their time as a great prejudice unto them 7. But since that time the course of that Church is turned and the See of Rome hath declined and degenerated from her sincere Faith to detestable Falshood 8. Let the Papists as we have said before restore us the old Church of Rome and we will never separate our selves from Her 9. But of that old Church of Rome they have nothing left but the Walls and old Rubbish 10. And yet they still brag of the Name of the Catholique Church Of the Differences in Religion between the Calvinists and the Lutherans 1. THe Jars and Dissentions between the Lutherans and Calvinists are neither many nor so material as to shake or touch the Foundation easily reconcileable if men of any moderation had them in handling 2. The bitter speeches of Luther none can excuse and much less the virulent Pamphlets and Proscriptions of some of his Disciples who in a preposterous imitation of his Zeal are little less then furious But the consequence of Opinions must not be measured by the Passions or Outrages of opiniate men Two Brothers in their choler may renounce each other and disclaim their amity yet that heat cannot dissolve their inward and essential Relation 3. The Divisions of the Lutherans and Calvinists namely of the moderate of either side are rather in formes and phrases of Speech then in substance of Doctrine 4. The first and main Controversie between them is that about Consubstantiation which after occasioned that other of Ubiquity 5. In both these Controversies the main Truth on both sides is out of Controversie That Christ is really and truly exhibited to each faithful Communicant and that in his whole person he is every where The doubt is only in the manner how he is in the Symboles and how in Heaven and Earth which being no part of Faith but a curious nicity inscrutable to the Wit of Man we should all here believe where we cannot understand and not fall a quarrelling about that which we cannot
only 3. Having begun first at the Diet of Ausbourg we are enforced to use it The Reformed are truely Christians and Catholicks 1. VVE Reformed tell the Papists notwithstanding their Opprobrious Names that if a Christian be he that believeth in Christ according to his word and if Catholicks be they that professe the universal Faith of Christ we are truely Christians and Catholicks believing so and professing so 2. And are content with these Names and desire no other §. Let the Papists be called as they will the Reformed who Reprove and Confute the multitude of their Namss will not be grieved at them 1. LEt the Papists be called Diversly Franciscanes Benedictines Dominicanes And whatsoever other Title they can take up the Reformed are not grieved at the multitude and variety of their Names 2 Who being in Truth almost any thing rather then Christians delight in any Name rather then in the Name of Christians Against the Reconcilement and Reunion of the two Religions the Reformed and the Roman 1. BEing true that the Roman Church is Heretikcal and Impure And on the contrary the Reformed Churches Orthodox and Pure It follows manifestly that there can be none well grounded hope to agree and reunite Popery with the Reformed Churches And therefore that the labour of those who would think upon such a thing were not a seasonable labour 1. Because that in the differences which are amongst us we are so contrary one to the other that the one do clearly maintain the Negative and the others the Affirmative Now it must necessarily be that one of the Propositions be true and the other false Because two contradictories cannot be together true And it is not possible to soulder them by the mastick of some distinctions having no ground in the Word of God 2. The Errors of the Church of Rome have been solemnly ratified and confirmed by the Council of Trent upon pain of Anathema And therefore since that Ratification and confirmation there is no way nor mean left of reconcilement and Agreement For if there were the said Church should be bound to acknowledge her Errors to the end that they may be reformed And to disanul and abrogate concerning them the Canons of the said Council of Trent which is not to be expected from her as long as she shall maintain this poin as she doth vehemently that she cannot Erre And that she layes down and propounds no other Principle of Faith than her belief Against Toleration of false Religions with the pure and Reformed when they differ in Fundamental grounds 1. IT is not onely evil to do but also to suffer evil when it is in our power to hinder it Therefore Religion differing in Fundamental Grounds are not to be Tolerated together 2. This is proved by many Arguments Drawn 1. From the Law forbidding to plow with an Ox and an Asse And punishing Idolaters with Death Deut. 22.10 11. and Deut. 19.6.8 9. 2. From the Gospel denying the service of two Masters Mat. 6.24 And interdicting all fellowship and communion of light with darkness or Christ with Belial 2 Cor. 6.14 15 16. 3. From the Spirits Bill of enditement framed against the Angels of Pergamos and Thyatira for tollerating the Nicolaitans Rev. 2.15 20. 4. From Gods threatning to cut off all such as swear by him and by Malcham Zeph. 1.5 5. From the Imputation which is laid by the Spirit upon many Kings of Israel and Judah for not taking away the High places 1 King 15.14 6. From the Examples of Asa Josiah Ezekiah Constantine Jovian Theodosius and other Religious Princes who by severe Laws restrained Heresie and Idolatry and constrained the true worship of God 7. From the great danger of Heresie which like a Canker soon spreads over the whole body of the Church and if it be not looked into killeth and that eternally thousands of souls breaketh the bands of Nature and cutteth in sunder all sinews of human Society Putteth enmity variance and implacable discords in families Soweth seeds of Sedition in the State and Rebellion against the Prince Refutation of this Slander of the Popish Doctors That the Reformed are Enemies to Scriptures 1. THe Reformed say that this is indeed a very impudent Slander 2. For who ever thought and spoke more Honourablie Reverently and with more due Regard of the Scriptures then they Who have received and imbraced all Scripture given by Inspiration as the very voice of God himself Holding it for the onely Ground and Rule of their Faith and Religion And so resting in it as that they desire no other help as necessary to Salvation Which if they had not with more diligence and devotion defended then the Romanists ever did long ere this the glory of it had perished and it had been counted as a dead Letter 3. For what have the Reformed done for these many years with more endeavour and diligence then to maintain the Majesty and Excellencie of the Scriptures 4. Which the Romanists have so unworthily violated 5. And yet they blush not to match the Reformed with the Manichees and Ebionites who have violently laid villanous hands upon those Sacred Books Of the Apocryphal Books excluded from the Canon by the Reformed Churches Jesuits THe Jesuites and other Papists do demand of the Reformed by what Authority they Maime and Rob the Corps of the Bible Answer of the Reformed to that Demand 1. WE offer no violence to this Body neither do we cut off any which do appertain to the substance and perfection of it we pull away no Member 2. For we do not cut out any true Canonical Scriptures but cull out such as are not Canonical but foisted in and Counterfeit 3. Herein we do the Canonical Scriptures no injury dividing them from such Books as are not of that absolute Authority That they which are in truth Canonical may remain intire and whole together no more then the Shepheard doth injury to the Sheep in sorting the Goats and orher Cattel from them The Doctrine of the Reformed Churches and particularly of the Church of England that the Ministers of God hath power to Forgive Sins if the Sinner repent and believe the Gospel maketh not the English Reformed Ministers to be Priests as they are called in the Church of Rome 1. VVE Reformed say that the Ministers of God hath power to forgive sins not in some Cases only but in all whatsoever if the sinner repent and believe the Gospel 2. This Authority is given unto him by Christ 3. This in the State and Church of England the Parliament and the Communion Book confesse 2. 1. NEvertheless a Popish Writer is far from his purpose to prove thereby the Popish Order of Priesthood 2. For this maketh not the English Reformed Ministers to be Priests as they are called in the Church of Rome but Preachers of Repentance which bring the glad Tidings of the Gospel to all those that be heavie laden and desire to be refreshed 3. 1. NEither have they power
us to naughtiness and spiritual lewdness 6. Let us have no part with them that have no part in God or who have part with abominable Idols 7. Nay furthermore let us detect such Persons to publick Authority that they may learn not to blaspheme the truth of our Religion nor seduce his Majesties Subjects from their Allegiance unto him and conformity to his Laws Of the Contentions and Differences which happens in the Church about Religion 1. IT is the craft and practice of Sathan sworn enemy to Christ and to his Church to rise and excite Contentions and Differences in the same He sowes his Tares in the Field of the Lord and at the coming up of the Heavenly Doctrine he raises great Fogs as some do rise at the rising of the Sun 2. Which he doth to hinder to his utmost power the vertue and efficacy of the said Divine Doctrine and to maintain his Kingdom which is not destroyed by any thing so much as by preaching of the Word of God 3. From the beginning of the Christian Church we have some examples of such differences among the Faithful Then there was a great controversie concerning the Ceremonies of the Law Act. 15.5 some thought it needful to keep them and others were against them 4. Since Divisions and Differences are also crept in the Churches which were founded by the Apostles in the time of Ireneus what contention was it between the Eastern and Western Churches concerning the time of the Celebration of Easter or Pasch and how long did it last The Eastern Churches maintaining that it was to be kept as the Jews did the fourteenth day of the Moneth after the Equinox of the Spring And the Western onely the Sunday following In the time of S. Cyprian the Council of Affrick had a belief quite contrary to that of the other Churches Having decreed that those should be rebaptized who before had been baptized by Hereticks Is it not also that which by the craft of the same Enemy is happened immediately after the last Reformation of the Church when then the first Reformers did imploy themselves about the Discovery and Refutation of the Errors of the Roman Church on one side the Anabaptists did arise in great number and with a wonderful fury opposing the Power and Authority of the Civil Magistrate And on the other side the Sacramentary War did become hot That is to say the difference concerning the presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist Is it not besides that which since some years we have seen in this Church and State where the Arminians did trouble the peace of both And now it is troubled by Anabaptists Separatists Antinomians and by sundry other dangerous Sects 5. Now when we say that Satan is the cause of the contentions and differences which happens in the Church We do not mean that he be the onely cause of them For it is certain that there are some other As 1. Pride and Self-love And 2. Ignorance 1. Pride and Self-love is a firebrand of contention and discord whereas on the contrary Humility entertains peace and concord For Humility seeks the last places for which there is no debate and so peace is conserved 2. Ignorance also is a great cause of contentions and differences For the Faithful may be ignorant of many things and yet be too-confident in their knowledge Of the Troubles and Contentions which happens in the Church about Religion 1. IT is a thing which is to be noted that the contentions and differences which happens in the Church commonly begins by the most weak and ignorant but who with their ignorance are stubborn and obstinate 2. The reason thereof is rendered by S. Cyril who sayes that there is nothing more audacious than ignorance and that there is none so enormous crime but that it hath the boldness to reach unto it 3. So do we read John the third 25 26. that the contention which was moved between the Disciples of John the Baptist and the Jews which followed Christ did first arise from the Disciples of John who were rude and impertiment men As it is to be seen in the History of the Gospel and particularly in the Answer of John their Master which he gave unto them 4. And this is too much confirmed by the Examples of the dangerous contentions moved in these times by the dangerous sects of Anabaptists Of all Sectaries none are so ignorant as they and yet none so quarrelsome and who are the first to debate 5. They are like unto Sarah Abrahams Wife who in the difference concerning Hagar although she was the weakest and had the wrong on her side Yet she did rise against Abraham her Husband and said unto him the Lord judge between me and thee Gen. 16.5 Of the Remedy to the Contentions and Differences which happen in the Church about Religion 1. VVE read Acts 15.5 6. that the way which the Apostles and the Elders did take to compose the great dissention which was arised touching Circumcision was to meet in Council for to consider of this Matter 2. Which is a commendable way and most fit to compose differences and contentions when some are happened in the Church 3. And therefore which ought to be the way that the Prince and Supream Magistrate most use when some happens in the Churches of his States and Dominions Then he must assemble a Synod or Council as he calls a Parliament to compose the civil differences and to order the things belonging to the State 4. So did the Apostles as hath been said so did afterwards the Primitive Church And so did the Antient Emperours who did desire the Union of the Church which did succeed very well unto them For as by the Council of the Apostles was decided and composed the difference concerning Circumcision and the Ceremonies of the Law Acts 15. So the first Council of Nice did condemn the Heretick Arius who denied the Divinity of Christ The council of Constantinople did condemn the Heretick Macedonius who denied the Divinity of the Holy Ghost The council of Ephesus did condemn Nestorius who denied the Unity of the Person of Christ And the council of Chalcedon did condemn the Heretick Eutiches who confounded the two Natures of Christ 5. An Universal council is most useful when it can be called and assembled But it is not absolutely necessary for the conservation and maintenance of the Church 6. And therefore National Churches may commodiously enough be Ruled and Governed by National Synods 7. For that cause and in that regard the care of the Prince and Soveraign Magistrate ought to be that such a National Synod be settled and established in the National Churches of his Dominions and States Let us be careful to entertain Peace and Concord in the Church of England and to avoid all Divisions among us 1. FOr it is the Axiom of our Saviour That A Kingdome divided against it self cannot stand 2. It is the Maxim of Philosophy Omne