as occasion did require What the People knew of it is uncertain but what they did so was quickly lost The Consistory or great Sanhedrim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they call it the House of Judgement of Seventy and one was more faithfull in its charge Hence Rab. Moses in the same Book Tractat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Rebells or Transgressors teacheth us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The great Consistory or House of Judgement at Jerusalem was the foundation of the Orall Law These are the Pillars of Doctrine from whom Statutes and Judgements went forth unto all all Israel And he afterwards affirms with what Truth may be easily judged 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whilest this great Consâ—story continued there was no dissention in Israel For not only the famous differences between Hillel and Shammai with their Disciples which involved all the Schools Scribes and Lawyers among them arose and were propagated whilest that Consâ—story continued but also the Atheistical Sect of the Sadduces rose unto that height and interest as to obtain the Presidentship in the Sanhedrim its self But the High Priests are those whom they fix upon as the principal Conservators of this Orall Law To this End they give us Catalogues of them from first to last that by their uninterrupted Succession we we may be secured of the incorrupt preservation of their Original Traditions Only it may here be added by the way that they bind not themselves precisely in all their Religious Observances unto this Oral Law whereunto they assign a Divine Original but ascribe an Authority unto the Sanhedrim and the High Priest to constitute things of themselves in the Worship of God besides and beyond the word For whatever they pretend of their Orall Law when they come unto particular Instances they would fain educe the Constitutions of it from some Word or Letter or manner of Interpretation of the Scripture its self But those Constitutions of the Consistory and Wisemen they ascribe unto their own Authority Some of these are recounted by Maimonides in his Preface unto Jad Chazaka as the Reading of the Book or Roll of Esther with Fasting lights on the Feast of Dedication The Fast on the seventh of Ab. or July various Mixtures and Washings of hands things plainly of that nature which our Lord Jesus condemned amongst them And it is observable how he frees them from transgressing that Precept Deut. 12.32 Thou shalt not add unto this word by this Constitution 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For saith he they say not that the holy blessed God hath commanded these things that there should be such Mixtures that the Book of Esther should be read with fasting for if they should say so they should add to the Law but thus we speak such and such a Prophet or the Consistory commanded and appointed that the Book of Esther should be read with fasting to celebrate the Glory of the Holy Blessed God in our Deliverance and so of the rest It seems then they may add what they will of their own so they entitle not the Name of God to their Inventions by which means they have set themselves at liberty to multiply superstitious Observations at their pleasure which they had actually done in the dayes of our Saviour and thereby made the Law of God of none effect In all these things are they followed and imitated by the Romanists In the same manner do they lay up the stock of their Traditions In general they make the Church the repository of them although they do not so distinctly explain the way and means whereby they were committed thereunto as the Jews do Unto the Sanhedrim Councils are succeeded in the same Office But their Nature Work Authority Assistance and Use are so variously disputed amongst them that nothing of certainty from them or by them singly considered is to be obtained It is the High Priest or Pope that is the Principal Conservator of this Sacred Treasury of Traditions Upon their Succession doth the certainty of them depend And whilest there is a Pope at Rome the knowledge of the new Orall Law will not fail as the Old one did not whilest the Jews had an High Priest though in the pursuit of it they Crucified the Messiah and continue to reject him unto this day Besides like the Jews they content not themselves with what they pretend to be of antient Tradition but assume a Power of making new Constitutions in the things of God whereby they would have us to think they do not violate the prohibitions of adding because they ascribe them not unto the Word of God but to the Authority of the present Church Thus far therefore they are fully agreed Thirdly The Jews in favour and unto the Honour of these Traditions affirm that the § 18 written Word without them is imperfect and not to be understood but as it is interpreted by them This they are constant unto and earnestly contend for Aben Ezra in his Preface to the Law discourseth at large of five several wayes of the Interpretation of it but concludes at last that the whole written Law of Moses is founded on the Orall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and this is a sign unto us that the Law of Moses is founded on the Orall Law which is the joy of our hearts so apt are they to rejoyce in a thing of nought To the same purpose are the words of another Famous Master amongst them Rabbi Bechai in Cad Hakkemach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Orall Law is the Foundation of the written nor can the Written Law be expounded but by the Oral By this being the Foundation of the Written Law they intend that the sense of it is so enwrapped and contained therein that without the Explications thereof it cannot be understood And to this End Manasse one of their late Masters expresly disputes that in many things it is defective and in some things redundant so that it is not able to give us a full and clear direction in the things of God without their Traditional Explications and in the confirmation of his opinion he instanceth in sundry Precepts and Prohibitions that he would prove so obscure as that no Obedience can be yielded unto them in a due manner without the help of the Cabala which because for the most part his Exceptions from them are Childish Cavils and have been answered by others shall be here passed over This they are arrived unto this is the common perswasion of them all and we shall yet hear what farther Progress they have made And herein are they imitated by their Successors Their Orall Law also is made by them the foundation of the Written As those Hereticks of old who having got some Sophistical Cavils about Evil where ever they met with any one not of their mind they presently fell upon him with their Vnde maluâ—n whence had evil its Original so thinking to bring them to the acknowledgement of two
Law is perfect and requiring no more in his Worship but what is in that Law prescribed See Psal. 19.8 Prov. 30.5 6. Deut. 4.1 2. And this perfection of the Written Law though it be perfectly destructive to their Tradions not only the Karaei among themselves do earnestly contend for but also sundry of their Gemarists do acknowledge especially when they forget their own concernments out of a desire to oppose the Gospel And to this head belong all the Arguments that Divines make use of to prove the perfection of the Scripture against the New Talmudists in Christianity 5. God every where sends his people to the Written Law of Moses for the Rule of their Obedience no where unto any Kabal Deut. 11.32 and chap. 10.12 13. Chap. 28.1 Josh. 1.7 8. Chap. 23.6 2 Chron. 30.18 Isa. 8.20 If there be such an Orall Law it is one that God would not have any man to observe which he calls none to the Obedience of nor did ever reprove any man for its Transgression And many more Arguments of the like nature may be added to prove the vanity of § 14 this pretence And yet this Figment is the bottom of the present Judaical Religion and obstinacy When the Apostle wrote this Epistle their Apostacy was not yet arrived at this rock of offence since their falling on it they have increased their blindness misery and ruine Then they were contented to try their cause by what God spake to their Fathers in the Prophets which kept open a door of hope and gave some advantages for their Conversion which are now shut up and removed untill God shall take this vail away from their faces that they may see to the end of the things that were to be done away By this means principally have they for many generations both shut out the § 15 Truth and secured themselves from Conviction For what ever is taught and revealed in the Scripture concerning the Person Office and Work of the Messiah seeing they have that which they esteem a Revelation of equall Authority herewithall teaching them a Doctrine quite of another nature and more suited unto their carnal Principles and Expectations they will rather rest in any evasions than give way to the Testimony thereof And whilest they have a firm perswasion as they have received by the Tradition of many Generations that the written Word is imperfect but an half Revelation of the mind of God in its self unintelligible and not to be received or understood but according to the sense of their Orall Law now recorded in their Talmuds what can the most plain and cogent Testimonies of it avail unto their Conviction And this hath been the fatall way and means of the grand Apostacy of both Churches Judaical and Christian. How far that of the Jews was overtaken with it in the dayes of our Lords Conversation on the Earth the Gospel doth abundantly declare and how they have brought it unto its height we have given now some brief account That of the Roman Church hath been the very same and hath at length arrived unto almost the same issue by the same degrees This some of them perceiving do not only defend the Pharisaical Opinion among the Jews about the Orall Law and Succession of their Traditions as consonant to the pretensions of their own Church but also openly avow that a very great number of their several respective Traditions are either the same or that they nearly resemble one another as doth expresly Josephus de Voysin in his Proaemium to the Pugio fidei of Raimundus Martini And because it is evident that the same have been the way and means whereby both the Judaical and Roman Church have apostatized and departed from the Truth and that they are the same also whereby they maintain and defend themselves in their Apostacy and refusal to return unto the Truth I shall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 manifest their Consent and Agreement in this Principle about their Traditions and Authority of them which have been the Ruine of them both First The Jews expresly contend that their Orall Law their Mass of Traditions was § 16 from God himself Partly they say it was delivered unto Moses on Mount Sinai and partly added by him from Divine Revelations which he afterwards received Hence the Authority of it with them is no less than that of the Written Word which hath all its Authority from its Divine Original and the usefulness of it is much more For although they cannot deny but that this and that particular Tradition that is Practice Custom or Exposition of any place of Scripture was first introduced expressed and declared at such or such seasons by such Masters or Schools amongst them yet they will not grant that they were then first invented or found out but only that they were then first declared out of the Cabalistical Abyss wherein they were preserved from their first Revelation as all of them agree who have written any thing about the nature propagation and continuance of their Orall Law And this is the perswasion of the Romanists about their Cabal of Traditions They plead them to be all of a Divine Original partly from Christ and partly from his Apostles What ever they have added unto the written Word yea though it be never so contrary thereunto still they pretend that it is part of the Orall Law which they have received from them by living Tradition Let one Convention of their Doctors determine that Images are to be adored another that Transubstantiation is to be believed a third add a New Creed with an equall number of Articles unto the old let one Doctor advance the Opinion of Purgatory another of Justification by Works all is one these things are not then first invented but only declared out of that unsearchable Treasure of Traditions which they have in their Custody Had they not inlaid this Perswasion in the minds of men they know that their whole Fabrick would of its own accord have long since sunk into Confusion But they highly contend at this day that they need no other Argument to prove any thing to be of an Heavenly Extract and Divine Originall but that themselves think so and practise accordingly § 17 Secondly This Orall Law being thus given the Preservation of it seeing Moses is dead long ago must be enquired after Now the Jews assign a threefold Depository of it First The whole Congregation Secondly The Sanhedrim and Thirdly The High Priest To this End they affirm that it was three times repeated upon the descent of Moses from Mount Sinai as to what of it he had then received and his after additions had the same promulgation First It was repeated by himself unto Aaron Secondly By them both unto the Elders and Thirdly By the Elders unto the whole Congregation or as Maimonides in Jad Chazakah Moses delivered it unto Eleazar Phineas and Joshuah after the Death of Aaron by whom the Consistory was instructed therein who taught the People
reproved l. 30. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 256. l. 31. large Discourses p. 260. l. 16. also r. after l. 10. à fine commission r. omission p. 275. l. 2. r. Judicial p. 276. l. 16. Sanction r. Section p. 290. l. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 308. l. 5. who thought l. 26. and other p. 311. l. 17. laying r. flaying p. 315. l. 4. serebrito r. seretrio There are sundry other mistakes in pointings changes and transpositions of letters in the Hebrew and English which a diligent and Candid Reader will easily observe and amend And it is not worth the while to collect them for those who are otherwise Exercitatio I. The Canonical authority of the Epistle to the Hebrews Notation of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kaneh a measuring reed The beam of a ballance Thence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same signification Metaphorically a moral rule Rectum and Canon how far the same The Scripture a rule Canonical The Antiquity of that Appellation The Canon of the Scripture What required to render a book Canonical All books of the holy Scripture equall as to their divine Original Jews distinction of the books of the old Testament as to the manner of their writing disproved All equally Canonical No book Canonical of a second sort or degree The Epistle to the Hebrews Canonical Opposed by Hereticks of old Not received into the Latin Church untill the dayes of Hierome Proved against Baronius Not rejected by any of that Church only not publiquely approved The Church of Rome not the sole proposer of books Canonical Occasion of its nâ—n-admittance at Rome Boldness of some in rejecting and corrupting the Scripture By whom this Epistle opposed of late The objection of the uncertainty of the Pen-man Answered Citations out of the old Testament not found therein Answer Citations not to his purpose Answer Countenance to old Heresies Answer General heads of Arguments to prove its Canonical Authority Characters to discover between books of divine inspiration and others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The General Arguments of books truly Canonical Subject Matter Design Style Of the style of the Sacred writings Mistakes of many about it The nature of Eloquence Excellency of Scripture Style Energie Efficacy Tradition concerning the Authority of this Epistle not justly lyable to any exceptions from the Author Circumstances Subject Matter Style Testimonyes Conclusion THe Canonical Authority of the Epistle unto the Hebrews having § 1 been by some called into Question we must in our entrance declare both what it is which we intend thereby as also the clear interest of this Epistle therein for this is the foundation of all those ensuing discourses from it and that exposition of it which we intend The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which gives rise unto that term Canonical § 2 seems to be derived from the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Kaneh and this as it sometimes denotes an Aromatical cane that contained spices in it used in the worship of God as Isai. 43. v. 24. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou hast bought me no sweet Cane with silver for this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 precious Cane growing not in their own Countrey was bought from a far off Jer. 6.20 so in general it signifies any reed whatever 1 Kings 14.15 Isai. 42.3 whence a multitude of fierce and wicked men compared to the devouring Crocodile whose lurking place is in the canes or reeds are termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the beast of the reed Psal. 68.30 Particularly it signifies a reed made into an instrument wherewith they measured their buildings containing six Cubits in length Ezek. 40.7 Chap. 42.16 And hence indefinitely it is taken for a Rule or a Measure Besides it signifies the jugum or scapus or beam with the tongue of a ballance keeping the poyse of the scales equal and discovering the rectitude or declensions thereof Isai. 46.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they weighed silver on the Cane that is saith the Targum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the ballance the supporter and director of the scales being put for the whole The Rabbins call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reed of the scales that which tryes and weighs and gives every thing its just moment § 3 And this also is the first and proper signification of the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Canon So the Scholiast on that of Aristophanes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tells us that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly that which is over the scales bringing them and the things weighed in them to equality The very same with the Hebrew 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from which it is derived So Varinus tells us that it is properly the tongue in the ballance and in use 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thus Aristotle sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by that which is right we know its self and that which is crooked for the Canon is judge of both where he useth the word for any kind of rule or measure answering unto the other signification of Kaneh in the Hebrew Rectum and Canon that which is right and the rule are one and the same the one expression denoting the nature of any thing the other its Use and Application § 4 From this original proper importance of the word is its metaphorical use deduced which is most Common and therein it signifiâ—s a moral Rule or a measure for direction tryall and judgement Hence the Philosopher calls the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the rule of the administration or government of the Common-wealth that whereby all the parts of it arâ— disposed into their proper places whereby they are regulated and all things done in it are tryed and judged And in this sense it is applyed by St. Paul unto divine Revelation Gal. 6.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as many as proceed orderly that is in a direct way for so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 denotes according to this rule or Canon And to the same purpose he useth again the samâ— expression Phil. 3.16 For as the words of the Scripture are in themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 words of Truth so the writing it self is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a right writing or as the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is written in uprightness to be a rule and Judge unto all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is Genitivus adjuncti not materiae declaring the property of the writing not the subject matter that is it is Canonical for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is right and a rule we have shewed to be the same And from hence it is that the Scripture or written Word of God being in it self every way absolutely right and perfect and appointed by him to be the Rule or Canon of the Churches faith and obedience requiring trying regulating judging wholly and absolutely of them is become 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
by way of eminency to be called Canonical or regular as the Book wherein it is contained is called the Bible though in it self that be the Common name of all Books § 5 And this Appellation is of ancient use in the Church The Synod of Laodicea supposed to have praeceded the Council of Nice makes mention of it as a thing generally admitted for the Fathers of it decree 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That no private Psalmes ought to be said or read in the Church nor any uncanonical Books but only the Canonical books of the new and old Testament whose names they subjoin in their order And some while before the Bishops who joyned with the Church of Antioch in the deposition of Paulus Samosatenus charge him as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that in the introduction of his heresie departed from the Canon or rule of the Scripture Before them also it was called by Irenaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Chrysostome calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sentence of the divine Laws 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the exact ballance square or rule and Canon of all truths and duties wherein he hath evidently respect unto the original use and importance of the word before explained and thereupon calls on his hearers that omitting the consideration of what this or that man sayes or thinks they should seek and require 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 all these things of or from the Scriptures which are the Canon of our faith and obedience And Austin demonstrent ecclesiam suam non in rumoribus Africorum sed in praescripto legis in Prophetarum praedictis in Psalmorum cantibus hoc est in omnibus canonicis Sanctorum librorum authoritatibus Let them demonstrate their Church not by the rumors of the Africans but by the praescription of the Law the praedictions of the Prophets the Songs of the Psalms that is by the Canonical Authority of the holy books of the Scriptures And he pursues the Metaphor of a scale and a measure in many words elsewhere And thus Aquinas himself confesseth the Scripture is called Canonical because it is the Rule of our understanding in the things of God And such a Rule it is as hath Authority over the Consciences of men to bind them unto faith and obedience because of its being given of God by inspiration for that purpose Moreover as the Scripture upon the accounts mentioned is by way of eminency § 6 said to be Canonical so there is also a Canon or rule determining what books in particular do belong unto the Holy Scripture and to be on that account Canonical So Athanasius tells us that by the Holy Scripture he intends Libros certo canone comprehensus the books contained in the assured Canon of it And Ruffinus having reckoned up those books concludes hi sunt quos patres intra Canonem concluserum These are they which the Fathers have concluded to be in the Canon that is to belong unto the Canonical books of Scripture And Austin to the same purpose Non sine causa tam salubri vigilantia Canon Ecclesiasticus constitutus est ad quem certi Prophetarum Apostolorum libri pertinerent not without good reason is the Ecclesiastical Canon determined by wholsome diligence unto which certain books of the Prophets and Apostles should belong About the Assignation of this Canon of the Scripture or what books belonged unto the Canonical Scripture there have been some differences in the Church since the time of the Synod of Carthage confirmed by that in Trulla at Constantinople The first Church having agreed well enough about them excepting the haesitation of some few persons in reference unto one or two of them of the New Testament From this rise and use of the word it is evident what is intended by the Canonical § 7 Authority of the Scripture or of any particular book thereunto belonging Two things are included in that expression First the spring and Original of any book which gives it Authority and Secondly the design and end of it which renders it Canonical For the first it is required that it be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 given by immediate inspiration from God without this no book or writing can by any means any acceptation or approbation of the Church any usefulness any similitude of style manner of writing unto the books that are so any conformity in matter or doctrine to them have an interest in that Authority that should lay a foundation for its reception into the Canon It is the impress of the Authority of God himself on any writing or its proceeding immediately from him that is sufficient for this purpose Neither yet will this alone suffice to render any Revelation or writing absolutely Canonical in the sense explained There may be an especial Revelation from God or a writing by his inspiration like that sent by Elijah unto Jehoram the King of Judah 2 Chron. 21.12 which being referred only unto some particular occasion and having thence Authority for some especial end and purpose yet being not designed for a Rule of faith and obedience unto the Church may not belong unto the Canon of the Scripture But when unto the Original of divine inspiration this end also is added that it is designed by the Holy Ghost for the Catholick standing use and instruction of the Church Then any writing or book becomes absolutely and compleatly Canonical The Jews of latter Ages assign some difference among the books of the old Testament § 8 as to their spring and Original or manner of Revelation though they make none as to their being all Canonicall The Book of the Law they assign unto a peculiar manner of Revelation which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mouth to mouth or face to face which they gather from Numbers 12.8 whereof afterwards Others of them they affirm to proceed from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the gift of Prophesie whereof as they make many kinds or degrees taken from the different means used by God in the Application of himself unto them belonging to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of divine Revelation mentioned by the Apostle Heb. 1.1 so they divide those books into two parts namely the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or former Prophets containing most of the historical Books after the end of the Law and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the latter prophets wherein they comprise the most of them peculiarly so called The Original of the remainder of them they ascribe unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or inspiration by the holy Ghost calling them peculiarly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 written by that inspiration as though the whole Canon and systeme of the books were not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Scripture or writing and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or divine inspiration the only means of their writing But they do herein as in many other things The distribution of the books of the old Testament into the Law
Psalms and Prophets was very antient in their Church We have mention of it Luke 24.44 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and in the Psalms that is in the whole Canonical Scripture And evident it is that this distribution is taken from the subject matter of those principal parts of it This reason of that distribution which they have by Tradition they not knowing or neglecting have feigned the rise of it in a different manner of Revelation and cast the particular books arbitrarily under what heads they pleased as is evident from sundry of them which they reckon unto the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cethubim or Hagiographa which are with them of least esteem But we have a more sure rule both overthrowing that feigned distinction and perfectly equalizing all parts of divine Scripture as to their spring and original St. Peter calls the whole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.19 the word of Prophesie and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 v. 20. Prophesie and therefore it belongs not unto any peculiar part of it to be given out by Prophesie which is an affection of the whole And St. Paul also terms the whole Scriptuâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16.26 prophetical Scriptures or writings of the Prophets And when he demanded of Agrippa whether he believed the Scriptures he doth it in the same manner 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 28.23 believest thou the prophets that is the Scriptures written by the spirit of Prophesie or by the inspiration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 Pet. 1.12 of the spirit of Christ that was in them God of old spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 1.1 in his Revelation of himself unto them and in them and equally spake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 1.70 unto them by the mouth of his holy Prophets from the beginning And thus not this or that part but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Tim. 3.16 all Scripture was given by inspiration And herein all the parts or books of it are absolutely equall And in the giving out of the whole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Pet. 1.21 holy men of God spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost So that whatever different means God at any time might make use of in the communication of his mind and will unto any of the Prophets or penmen of the Scripture it was this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and being acted by the holy Ghost both as to Things and Words that rendred them infallible Revealers of him unto the Church And thus the foundation of the Canonical authority of the books of the Scripture is absolutely the same in and unto them all without the least variety either from any difference in kind or degree § 9 The same is their condition as to their being Canonical they are all so equally Some of the Antients used that term ambiguously and therefore sometimes call books Canonical that absolutely are not so as not being written by divine inspiration nor given by the Holy Ghost to be any part of the Rule of the Churches faith and obedience Thus the Constantinopolitan Council in Trulla confirms the Canons both of the Synod of Laodicea and the third of Carthage which agree not in the Catalogues they give us of books Canonical which without a supposition of the ambiguity of the word could not be done unless they would give an assent unto a plain and open contradiction And the Council of Carthage makes evident its sense in their Appendiâ—e annexed to the one and fortieth Canon wherein they reckon up the books of the holy Scripture Hoc etiam say they fratri consacerdoti nostro Bonifacio vel aliis earum partium Episcopis pro confirmando isto Canone innotescat quia a patribus ista accepimus legenda liceat etiam legi passiones Martyrum cùm Aniversarii dies celebrantur They speak dubiously concerning their own determination and intimate that they called the books they enumerated Canonical only as they might be read in the Church which priviledge they grant also to the stories of the sufferings of the Martyrs which yet none thought to be properly canonical The same Epiphanius testifies of the Epistles of Clemens But as the books which that Synod added to the Canon of Laodicea are rejected by Melito Origen Athanasius Hilarius Gregorius Nazianzen Cyrillus Hierosolimitamus Epiphanius Ruffinus Hierome Gregorius magnus and others so their reading and Citation is generally declared by them to have been only for direction of manners and not for the confirmation of the faith even as St. Paul cited an Iambick out of Mâ—nandâ—r or rather Euripides 1 Cor. 15.33 an hemistichium out of Aratus Acts 17.28 and a whole Hexameter out of Epimenides Tit. 1.12 non sunt canonici sed leguntur Catechumenis saith Athanasius They are not Canonical but are only read to the Cateâ—humeni And Hierome the Church reads them ad aedificationem plebis non ad Authâ—ritatem Ecclesiasticarum dogmatum confirmandam for the edification of the people but not for the confirmation of any points of faith But although some books truly Canonical were of old amongst some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Epiphanius speaks doubted of and some were commonly read that are certainly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and rejectitious yet neither the mistake of the former nor later practice can give any countenance to an Apprehension of a second or various sort of books properly canonical For the interest of any book or writing in the canon of the Scripture accrewing unto it as hath been shewed meerly from its divine inspiration and giving by the Holy Ghost for a Rule measure and standard of faith and obedience unto the Church whatever advantage or worth to commend it any writing may have Yet if it have not the propertiâ—s mentioned of Divine inspiration and Confirmation it differs in the whole kind and not in degrees only from all those that have them so that it can be no part regulae regulantis but regulatae at the best not having 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or a self-credibility on its own account or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a self-sufficing Authority but is truth only materially by vertue of its Analogie unto that which is absolutely universally and perfectly so And this was well observed by Lindanus Impio saith he sacrilegio se contaminant qui in scripturarum christianarum corpore quosdam quasi gradus conantur locare quod unam eandemque spiritus sancti vocem impio humanae stultitiae discerniculo audent in varias impares discerpere disturbare Autoritatis classes They desile themselves with the impiety of Sacriledge who endeavour to bring in as it were divers degrees into the body of the Scriptures for by the impious discretion of humane folly they would cast the one voice of the Holy Ghost into various forms of unequal Authority As then whatever difference there may be as to the subject
matter manner of writing and present usefulness between any of the books that being written by divine inspiration are given out for the Churches rule they are all equall as to their canonical authority being equally interested in that which is the formal reason of it so whatever usefulness or respect in the Church any other writing may have they can no way give them any interest in that whose formal reason they are not concerned in In the sense explained we affirm the Epistle to the Hebrews to be Canonical that is § 10 properly and strictly so and of the number of them which the Antients called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 every way genuine and Catholick In the confirmation whereof we shall first declare by whom it hath been opposed or questioned and then what reasons they pretend for their so doing which being removed out of our way the arguments whereby the Truth of our assertion is evinced shall be insisted on We need not much insist on their madness who of old with a sacrilegious licentiousness § 11 rejected what portion of Scripture they pleased The Ebionites not only rejected all the Epistles of Paul but also reviled his person as a Greâ—k and an Apostate as Irenaeus and Epiphanius inform us Their folly and blasphemy was also imitated and followed by the Helescheitae in Eusebius Marcion rejected in particular this Epistle to the Hebrews and those also to Timothy and Titus as Epiphanius and Hierome assure us who adds unto him Basilides And Theodoret as to the Epistle unto the Hebrews joyns unto them some of the Arians also Now though the folly of those Sacrilegious persons be easie to be repelled as it is done by Petrus Cluniacusis yet Hierome hath given us a sufficient reason why we should not spend time therein Si quidem saith he redderent causas cur eas Apostoli non putant tentaremus aliquid respondere sorsitan satisfaciere lectori nunc vero cum haeretica autoritate pronunciant dicunt illa Epistola Pauli est haec non est ea autoritate refelli se pro veritate intelligant qua ipsi non crubescant falsa simulare They did not so much as plead or pretend any cause or reason for the rejection of these Epistles but did it upon their own head and Authority so they deserve neither answer nor consideration It is of more importance that this Epistle was a long time though not rejected by § 12 yet not received in the Church of Rome Eusebius informs us that Cains a Presbyter of that Church whom he much commends for his learning and piety admitted but of thirteen Epistles of St. Paul rejecting that unto the Hebrews as Photius also affirms And the same Photius acquaints us with the same Judgement of Hippolitus another eminent member of that Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Among other things not exactly answering the truth he saith also that the Epistle to the Hebrews was not Pauls And Eusebius adds unto his information of the Judgement of Cains that it was not generally received in the Church of Rome in his time Neither is it any way acknowledged as St. Pauls by either Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius or Macrobius Yea the same Eusebius affirms that some excepted against it upon this account because it was opposed as none of St. Pauls in the Roman Church Hierome grants that Latinorum consuetudo non recepit Epistolam ad Hebraeos inter Canonicas Scripturas The custome of the Latines that is the Roman Church did not receive this Epistle among the Canonical Scriptures And speaking elsewhere of it he adds the same words Licet eam latina consuetudo inter Canonicas Scripturas non recipiat And elsewhere also he confirms the same Assertion It cannot then be denied but that it was four hundred years at least after the writing of this Epistle before it was publickly received and avowed as Canonical by the Româ—n Church Nor will the quotation of it by Hilary and Ambrose prove any general admission of it as such it being their custome not to restrain the Testimonies they made use of unto Books absolutely Canonical § 13 Baronius ad An. 160 labours to take of this failure of the Latine Church The testimony of Eusebius he rejects because as he sayes he was Arianorum gregalis of the Arian faction and willing to call the authority of this Epistle into Question in complyance with them who some of them as we observed before refused it n. 42. The Judgement of Caius he resolves into the Testimony of Eusebius which because of his partiality as he pleads is not to be admitted And lastly opposeth the witness of Hierome as a person who had suffered himself to be imposed on by Eusebius whose words in his reports of Caius he makes use of n. 50. Concluding upon the whole matter that it was a meer false calumny of Eusebius against the Church of Rome which Hierome by too much facillity gave credit unto But I must acknowledge that these Answers of his which indeed are nothing but a rejection of as good witnesses in matters of fact as any we have upon the Roll of Antiquity are not unto me satisfactory no more than the testimony of its acceptance which he produceth in the Epistle of Innocentius to Exuperius which is justly suspected supposititious with the Council at Rome against Apollinaris under Damasus wherein no such thing appears Though I will not deny but that about that time it came to be publickly owned by that Church and was reckoned unto the Canon of the Scripture by Ruffinus § 14 But wherein doth it in the least appear that Eusebius reports the Judgement of Caius or the Roman Church in complyance with the Arians He himself evidently admits the Epistle to be Canonical and confirms it by the testimonies of Clemens Origen and others What would it advantage him or the cause which some pretend he favoured by reporting the opposition of others to a part of divine writt which himself accepted Besides they were not the Arians of the first rank or edition for an inclination unto whom Eusebius is suspected but some of their off-spring which fell out into such Sacrilegious opinions and practices as the first leaders of them owned not that are accused in this matter much less can he be thought to design the reproach of the Roman Church Nay these answers are inconsistent as any one may perceive He could not at the same time design the rejecting of the Epistle in complyance with the Arians and the calumniating of them by whom it was rejected and on whose Authority his intentions must be founded But indeed his words plainly manifest that he gives us a naked account of matter of fact without either prejudice or design It is yet more incredible that Hierome in this matter should suffer himself to be imposed on
by Eusebius That he was the most eminently learned and knowing person of the Roman or Latine Church in those dayes will I suppose not be greatly questioned Now to suppose that he knew not the customes opinions and practice of that Church but would suffer himself to be imposed on by a stranger destitute of those advantages which he had to come unto an unquestionable certainty in it is a very fond thing Besides he doth not any where speak as one that reported the words and Judgement of another but in three or four places expresly affirms it as of his own knowledge when at the same time in opposition thereunto he contends that it was received by all other Churches in the world and all Writers from the dayes of the Apostles § 15 Neither yet doth it appear from any thing delivered by Caius Hippolitus Eusebius or Hierome that the Latine Church did ever reject this Epistle Yea we shall find that many amongst them even in those dayes reckoned it unto the Canon of the Scripture and owned St. Paul as the Penman of it Eusebius himself acknowledges that Clemens useth sundry Testimonies out of it in his Epistle ad Corinthios And others also there were concurring with his judgement therein But these two things I allow on the testimonies insisted on 1. That sundry particular persons of note and esteem in the Roman Church owned not the Canonical authority of this Epistle as not esteeming it written by St. Paul 2. The Church it self had not before the dayes of Hierome made any publick Judgement about the Author or Authority of this Epistle nor given any Testimony unto them For it seems utterly impossible that if any such Judgement had passed or testimony been given that Hierome living in the midst of that Church should know nothing of it but so often affirm the contrary without haesitation And this undenyably evinceth the injustice of some mens pretensions that the Roman Church is the only proposer of Canonical Scripture and that upon the Authority of her proposal alone it is to be received Four hundred years were passed before she her self publickly received this Epistle or read it in her Assemblies so far was she from having proposed it unto others And yet all this while was it admitted and received by all other Churches in the world as Hierom testifies and that from the dayes of the Apostles whose judgement the Roman Church it self at length submitted unto No impeachment then of the Authority of this Epistle can be taken from this defect and inadvertency of the Roman Church it being convinced to be so by the concurrent suffrage and Testimony of all other Churches in the world from the dayes of the Apostle as we shall afterwards more fully declare Neither are the occasions of this haesitation of the Western Church obscure The Epistle was written it may be in Rome at least it was in some part of Italy Chap. 13.24 There no doubt it was seen and it may be Copied out before its sending by some who used to accompany the Apostle as Clemens who as we have shewed not long after mentioned divers things contained in it The Originall was without question speedily sent into Judea unto the Hebrews to whom it was written and directed as were all others of the Epistles of the same Apostle unto those Churches that were immediately intended and concerned in them That Copies of it were by them also communicated unto their Brethren in the East equally concerned in it with themselves cannot be doubted unless we will suppose them grosly negligent in their duty towards God and man which we have no reason to do But the Churches of the Hebrews living at that time and for some while after if not in a seperation yet in a distinction by reason of some peculiar observances from the Churches of the Gentiles especially those of the West they were not it may be very forward in communicating this Epistle unto them being written as they supposed about an especial concernment of their own By this means this Epistle seems to have been kept much within the Compass of the Churches of the Jews untill after the destruction of the Temple when by their dispersion and coalescency with other Churches in the East it came to be generally received amongst them and non solum ab Ecclesiis orientis sed ab omnibus retro Ecclesiis Graeci sermonis Scriptoribus as Hierom speaks But the Latin Church having lost that advantage of receiving it upon its first writing it may be also upon the consideration of the removall of its peculiar Argument upon the finall destruction of the whole Judaical Church and Worship was somewhat slow in their inquiry after it Those that succeeded in that Church it is not unlikely had their scruples increased because they found it not in common use amongst their Predecessors like to the rest of St. Pauls Epistles not considering the occasion thereof Add hereunto that by that time it had gradually made its progress in its return into the West where it was first written and attended with the Suffrage of all the Eastern Churches began to evince its own Authority sundry persons who were wrangling about peculiar opinions and practices of their own began to seek advantages from some expressions in it So did in particular the Novatians and the Donatists This might possibly increase the scruple amongst the Orthodox and make them wary in their admission of that Authority which they found pleaded against them And well was it for them that their opinions about which they disagreed with their Adversaries were according unto truth seeing it may justly be feared that some then would have made them their Rule and Standard in their reception or rejection of this Epistle for it was no new thing for the Orthodox themselves to make bold sometime with the Scripture if they supposed it to run cross unto their conceptions So Epiphanius informs us in Ancorat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And also he wept for so it is read in the uncorrected Copies of the Gospell according to Luke and St. Irenaeus useth this Testimony in his Book against Heresies for their confutation who affirmed that Christ took flesh only in appearance but the Orthodox or Catholicks being afraid of the importance of that expression took away that word out of the Copies not understanding its use and sense So also Sixtus Sinensis after he hath informed us out of Hilary that many Orthodox persons denyed the story of our Saviours Agony and bloody Sweat adds of his own Suspicor à Catholicis sublatam esse pio sed simplici zelo quod favere videbatur Arianis I suspect that the Story was taken out of the Copies by some Catholicks out of a godly but simple zeal because it seemed to favour the Arians So great is the power of prejudice and so little occasions have men taken whom others have esteemed Orthodox and pious to make bold with that word whereby both we
and all our opinions must be judged But it being manifest at length that no colour was given unto the unjust severities of the Novatians by any thing in this Epistle it was generally embraced And by the conquest of this opposition established its Authority for the future § 17 Bellarmin chargeth Luther Brentius Chemnitius and the Centuriators with the rejection of this Epistle But because I know that some of them are falsly accused by him I am apt to suspect the same of the rest which I have not the opportunity to consult And so I shall not reckon them amongst the opposers of this Epistle The matter is more certain concerning Cajetan and Erasmus the former in his Preface unto the other in his last Annotation on this Epistle denying it to be St. Pauls and questioning yea indeed rejecting its Canonicall Authority To them we may add Eniedinus proceeding upon the same principles and making use of their Arguments to the same purpose These are the chief if not absolutely all who have at any time made any scruple at the Authority of this Epistle The reasons they make use of to justifie themselves in their conjectures are amassed together by Erasmus in his Note on the 24. Verse of the last Chapter of it But because he mixeth together the Arguments that he insists on to prove St. Paul not to have been the Penman of it and the exceptions he puts in unto its Canonicall Authority which are things of a diverse consideration I shall separate them and first take out those that seem absolutely to impeach its Authority leaving them that oppose its Penman to our ensuing Discourse on that question in particular § 18 The first thing generally pleaded is the uncertainty of its Author or Penman Sola omnium Pauli nomen non praefert saith Erasmus How unjust and groundless this pretence is we shall afterwards fully manifest At present I shall only shew that it is in generall of no importance in this cause The Author of a Writing being certainly known may indeed give some light unto the nature and Authority of it When it is confessed that the Penman of any Book was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or divinely inspired and that by him it was written for the use of the Church there can be no question of its Authority But this last of his design directed by the Holy Ghost must be no less known than the former For a man may write one Book by inspiration and others by a fallible humane Judgement as Solomon seems to have done his Philosophicall Discourses that are lost Again when the Penman of any Writing pretending unto Divine Authority is not esteemed nor doth manifest himself in any thing to have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 immediately acted by the Holy Ghost the writing it self must needs be lyable unto just Exception Wherefore it is confessed that when the Author of any Writing is certainly known much light into its Authority and Relation unto the Canon of the Scripture may be thence received But when this is doubtfull nothing can thence satisfactory on either side be concluded And therefore it hath pleased the Holy Ghost to keep the names of the Penmen of many parts of the Scripture in everlasting obscurity for he borrows no Countenance or Authority unto any thing that proceeds by Inspiration from himself from the names of men There is not then the least strength in this exception for be it granted that we are altogether uncertain who was the Penman of this Epistle yet no impeachment of its Authority can thence be taken unless it can be proved that he was not Divinely inspired But yet to shew the insufficiency every way of this Objection we shall abundantly evince that indeed the very ground and foundation of it is feeble and false The Penman of this Epistle being as well and certainly known as those of any portion of Scripture whatever that are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 some whereof were never doubted nor called into question And at least we shall so far evince St. Paul to have been the Author of it as although we shall not from thence take any Argument to prove its Canonicall Authority because it hath it self been called into question yet as to render an Objection from the uncertainty of its Author altogether unreasonable § 19 The remaining Objections are more particular and direct to their purpose by whom they are pleaded As First that the Author of this Epistle cites sundry things out of the Old Testament which are not therein contained Such are many of the Stories related unto in the 11. Chapter and that in particular in Chap. 12. verse 21. where he affirms that Moses upon the Terror of the sight that appeared unto him said I exceedingly quake and tremble This place Erasmus supposeth Hierom to have intended when he sayes that some things are mentioned in this Epistle that are not recorded in the Old Testament And Aquinas perplexeth himself in seeking for a Solution unto this difficulty For First he would refer the place to Moses sight of the Angell in the Bush and not the giving of the Law contrary to the express Discourse of the Context And then he adds dixit saltem facto though he said not so yet he did so And lastly worst of all vel fortè Apostolus aliâ utitur literâ quam nos non habemus or it may be the Apostle used another Text that we have not But there is no need of any of these evasions The Author quotes no Book nor Testimony of the Old Testament but only relates a matter of fact and one circumstance of it which doubtless he had by Divine Revelation whereof there is no express mention in the place where the whole matter is Originally recorded Thus in the beginning of the Chronicles sundry particular Stories as that about the Children of Ephraim Chap. 7.21 no wher 's before written are reported from the same infallible directions that others of the same time were written withall when they were omitted And it is uncouth way of proving an Author not to write by Divine inspiration because he writeth Truths that he could no otherwise be acquainted withall Neither is it unmeet for him that writes by Divine inspiration to mention things recorded in other Stories whose Truth is unquestionable as those are related unto Chap. 11. It seems to be of more importance that if the Objectors may be believed the § 20 Writer of this Epistle citeth Testimonies out of the Old Testament that are no wayes to his purpose nor at all prove the matter that he produceth them for discovering at least that he wrote with a fallible spirit if not also that he dealt scarcely bona fide in handling the cause which he undertook Cajetan insists on that of the first Chapter verse 5. I will be unto him a Father and he shall be unto me a Son taken from the 2 Sam. 7.14 or 1 Chron. 17. ◠which words as he supposeth no
to oppose its Canonical Authority with their frivolous Cavils and Objections Neither is this Experience meerly satisfactory to themselves alone as is by some pretended It is a thing pleadable and that not only in their own defence to strengthen their Faith against Temptations but to others also though not to Atheistical Scoffers yet to humble enquirers which ought to be the frame of all men in the Investigation of Sacred Truths § 34 Unto what hath been spoken we may add that the Canonical Authority of this Epistle is confirmed unto us by Catholick Tradition By this Tradition I intend not the Testimony only of the present Church that is in the world nor Fancy a trust of a Power to declare what is so in any Church whatever but a generall uninterrupted Fame conveyed and confirmed by particular Instances Records and Testimonies in all Ages In any other sense how little weight there is to be laid upon Traditions we have a pregnant instance in him who first began to magnifie them This was Papias a contemporary of Policarpus in the very next Age after the Apostles Tradition of what was done or said by Christ or the Apostles what Expositions they gave he professed himself to set an high value upon equal to if not above the Scripture And two things are considerable in his search after them First That he did not think that there was any Church appointed to be the Preserver and Declarer of Apostolical Traditions but made his enquiry of all the individual ancient men that he could meet withall who had conversed with any of the Apostles Secondly That by all his pains he gathered together a Rhapsody of incredible Stories Fables Errors and useless Curiosities Such issue will the endeavours of men have who forsake the stable Word of Prophesie to follow rumors and reports under the specious name of Traditions But this Catholick Fame whereof we speak confirmed by particular Entrances and Records in all Ages testifying unto a matter of Fact is of great importance And how clearly this may be pleaded in our present case shall be manifested in our Investigation of the Penman of this Epistle And thus I hope we have made it evident that this Epistle is not destitute of any one of those 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or infallible proofs and Arguments whereby any particular Book of the Scripture evinceth its self unto the Consciences of men to be written by Inspiration from God It remaineth now to shew that it is not liable unto any of those Exceptions or Arguments whereby any Book or Writing pretending a claim to a Divine Original and Canonical Authority thereupon may be convicted and manifested to be of another Extract whereby its just priviledge will be on both sides secured § 35 The first consideration of this nature is taken from the Author or Penman of any such Writing The Books of the Old Testament were all of them written by Prophets or holy men inspired of God Hence St. Peter calls the whole of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Prophesie 2 Pet. 1.21 Prophesie delivered by men acted or moved therein by the Holy Ghost And though there be a distribution made of the several Books of it from the Subject Matter into the Law Prophets and Psalms Luke 24.44 and often into the Law and Prophets on the same account as Acts 26.2 Rom. 3.22 yet their Penmen being all equally Prophets the whole in general is ascribed unto them and called Prophesie Rom. 1.8 Chap. 16.26 Luke 24.25 2 Pet. 1.19 So were the Books of the New Testament written by Apostles or men endowed with an Apostolical Spirit and in their work equally inspired by the Holy Ghost whence the Church is said to be built on the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone Ephes. 2.20 If then the Author of any Writing acknowledgeth himself or may otherwise be convinced to have been neither Prophet nor Apostle nor endued with the same infallible Spirit with them his work how excellent soever other wayes it may appear must needs be esteemed a meer fruit of his own Skill Diligence and Wisdom and not any way to belong unto the Canon of the Scripture This is the condition for instance of the second Book of Maccabees In the close of it the Author being doubtful what acceptance his endeavours and manner of Writing would find amongst his Readers makes his excuse and affirms that he did his utmost to please them in his Style and Composition of his words So he tells us before Chap. 2. v. 24. that he did but Epitomize the History of Jason the Cyrenean wherein he took great pains and labour The truth is he that had before commended Judas Machabaeus for offering Sacrifices for the dead which indeed he did not but for the living no where appointed in the Law and affirmed that Jeremiah hid the holy Fire Ark Tabernacle and Altar of Incense in a Cave that the same person Antiochus was killed at Nanea in Persia Chap. 1. v. 16. and dyed in the Mountains of torments in his Bowels as he was coming to Judea Chap. 9. whom the first Book affirms to have dyed of sorrow at Babylon Chap. 6. v. 16. who affirms Judas to have written Letters to Aristobulus in the one hundred eighty eighth year of the Seleucian Empire who was slain in the one hundred fifty second year of it Lib. 1. Chap. 1.3 that is thirty six years after his death with many other such mistakes and falshoods had no great need to inform us that he had no special Divine Assistance in his Writing but leaned unto his own Understanding But yet this he doth as we shewed and that openly For the Holy Ghost will not be an Epitomator of a Profane Writing as he professeth himself to have been nor make excuses for his weakness nor declare his pains and Sweat in his Work as he doth And yet to that pass are things brought in the World by Custome Prejudice love of Reputation scorn to be esteemed mistaken in any thing that many earnestly contend for this Book to be written by Divine Inspiration when the Author of it himself openly professeth it to have been of another Extract For although this Book be not only rejected out of the Canon by the Council of Laodicea Hierom and others of the Antients but by Gregory the Great Bishop of Rome himself yet the Church of Rome would now by force thrust it thereinto But were the Author himself alive again I am so well perswaded of his Ingenuity and Honesty from the Conclusion of his Story that they would never be able to make him say that he wrote by Divine Inspiration and little reason then have we to believe it Now this Epistle is free from this Exception The Penman of it doth no where intimate directly or indirectly that he wrote in his own strength or by his own ability which yet if he had done in an Argument of that
evident but also by all acknowledged who are able to judge of them Want of Catholick Tradition in all Ages of the Church from the first giving forth of § 39 any Writing testifying unto its Divine Original is another impeachment of its pretence unto Canonical Authority And this Argument ariseth fatally against the Apochryphal Books before mentioned Some of them are expresly excluded from the Canon by many of the antient Churches nor are any of them competently testified unto The Suffrage of this kind given unto our Epistle we have mentioned before The Doubts and Scruples of some about it have likewise been acknowledged That they are of no weight to be laid in the ballance against the Testimony given unto it might easily be demonstrated But because they were levied all of them principally against its Author and but by consequence against its Authority I shall consider them in a Disquisition about him wherein we shall give a further confirmation of the Divine Original of the Epistle by proving it undenyably to be Written by the Apostle St. Paul that eminent Penman of the Holy Ghost Thus clear stands the Canonical Authority of this Epistle It is destitute of no evidence § 40 needful for the manifestation of it nor is it obnoxious unto any just exception against its claim of that priviledge And hence it is come to pass that what ever have been the fears doubts and scruples of some the rash temerarious Objections Conjectures and Censures of others the Care and Providence of God over it as a parcel of his most holy Word working with the prevailing evidence of its Original implanted in it and its Spiritual Efficacy unto all the ends of holy Scripture hath obtained an absolute Conquest over the hearts and minds of all that believe and setled it in a full possession of Canonical Authority in all the Churches of Christ throughout the world Exercitatio II. Of the Penman of the Epistle to the Hebrews Knowledge of the Penman of any part of Scripture not necessary Some of them utterly concealed The Word of God gives Authority unto them that deliver it not the contrary Prophets in things wherein they are not actually inspired subject to mistake St. Paul the Writer of this Epistle The haesitation of Origen Heads of Evidence Vncertainty of them who assign any other Author St. Luke not the Writer of it Nor Barnabas The Epistle under his name Counterfeit His Writing of this Epistle by sundry Reasons disproved Not Apollos Nor Clemens Nor Tertullian Objections against St. Pauls being the Penman Dissimilitude of Style Admitted by the Antients Answer of Origen rejected Of Clemens Hierom c. rejected likewise St. Paul in what sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 His Eloquence and Skill Causes of the difference in Style between this and other Epistles Coincidence of Expressions in it and them The Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Answer of Hierom Rejected Of Theodoret. Of Chrysostome Prejudice of the Jews against St. Paul Not the Cause of the Forbeâ—rance of his Name The true Reason thereof The Hebrews Church State not Changed Faith Evangelical educed from Old Testament Principles and Testimonies Thâ—se pressed on the Hebrews not meer Apostolical Authority Haesitation of the Latin Church about this Epistle answered Other Exceptions from the Epistle it self removed Arguments to prove St. Paul to be the Writer of it Testimony of St. Peter 2 Epist. 3. v. 15 16. Considerations upon that Testimony The second Epistle of St. Peter Written to the same Persons with the First The First Written unto the Hebrews in their Dispersion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what S. Paul wrote an Epistle unto the same Persons to whom St. Peter wrote That this Epistle Not that to the Galathians Not one lost The Long-suffering of God how declared to be salvation in this Epistle The Wisdom ascribed unto St. Paul in the Writing of this Epistle wherein it appears The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of it Weight of this Testimony The suitableness of this Epistle unto those of the same Author Who competent Judges hereof What required thereunto Testimony of the first Churches or Catholick Tradition Evidences from this Epistle its self The general Argument and Scope Method Way of Arguing All the same with St. Pauls other Epistles Skill in Judaical Learning Traditions and Customs Proper to St. Paul His Bonds and Sufferings His Companion Timothy His Sign and Token subscribed SECOND DISSERTATION § 1 THE Divine Authority of the Epistle being vindicated it is of no great Moment to enquire scrupulously after its Penman Writings that proceed from Divine Inspiration receive no addition of Authority from the Reputation or Esteem of them by whom they were written And this the Holy Ghost hath sufficiently manifested by shutting up the Names of many of them from the knowledge of the Church in all Ages The Close of the Pentateuch hath an uncertain Pen-man unless we shall suppose with some of the Jews that it was written by Moses after his Death Divers of the Psalms have their Penmen concealed as also have the whole Books of Joshua Judges Samuel Kings Ruth Esther Job and the Chronicles are but guessed at Had any prejudice unto their Authority ensued this had not been For those whose Authors are known they were not esteemed to be given by Prophesie because they were Prophets but they were known to be Prophets by the Word which they delivered For if the Word Delivered or Written by any of the Prophets was to be esteemed Sacred or Divine because delivered or Written by such Persons as were known to be Prophets then it must be because they were some other way known so to be and Divinely Inspired as by Working of Miracles or that they were in their dayes received and testified unto as such by the Church But neither of these can be asserted For as it is not known that any one Penman of the Old Testament Moses only excepted ever wrought any miracles so it is certain that the most and chiefest of them as the Prophets were rejected and condemned by the Church of the dayes wherein they lived The only way therefore whereby they were proved to be Prophets was by the Word it self which they delivered and wrote and thereon depended the Evidence and Certainty of their being Divinely inspired See Amos 7.14 15 16. Jer. 23.25 26 27 28 29 30 31. And setting aside that actual Inspiration by the Holy Ghost which they had for the Declaration and Writing of that Word of God which came unto them in particular and the Prophets themselves were subject to mistakes So was Samuel when he thought Eliab should have been the Lords Annointed 1 Sam. 16.6 and Nathan when he approved the purpose of David to build the Temple 1 Chron. 17.2 and the great Elijah when he supposed none left in Israel that worshipped God aright but himself 1 Kings 19.14 18. It was then as we said the Word of Prophesie that gave the Writers of it the Reputation and
Authority of Prophets and their being Prophets gave not Authority to the Word they declared or wrote as a Word of Prophesie Hence an anxious enquiry after the Penman of any part of the Scripture is not necessary But whereas there want not Evidences sufficient to discover who was the Writer of this Epistle whereby also the exceptions made unto its Divine Original may be finally obviated they also shall be taken into Consideration A Subject this is wherein many Learned Men of Old and of Late have exercised themselves until this single Argument is grown up into entire and large Treatises and I shall only take care that the Truth which hath been already strenuously asserted and vindicated may not again by this review be rendred dubious and questionable St. Paul it is by whom we affirm this Epistle to be written It is acknowledged that § 2 this was so highly questioned of Old that Origen after the examination of it concludes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What is the very Truth in this matter God only knows However he acknowledgeth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Antients owned it to be written by Paul and that he sayes not without good Reason whereas the ascription of it unto any other he assigns unto a bare report It may not then be expected that now after so long a season the Truth of our Assertion should be so manifestly evinced as to give absolute satisfaction unto all which is a vain thing for any man to aim at in a Subject wherein men suppose that they have a liberty of thinking what they please yet I doubt not but that it will appear not only highly probable but so full of Evidence in comparison of any other Opinion that is or hath been promoted in competition with it as that some kind of blameable pertinaciousness may be made to appear in its refusal Now the whole of what I shall offer in the proof of it may be reduced unto these six Heads 1. The manifest failure of all them who have endeavoured to assign it unto any other Penman 2. The insufficiency of the Arguments insisted on to disprove our Assertion 3. Testimony given unto it in other Scriptures 4. Considerations taken from the Writing it self compared with other acknowledged Writings of the same Author 5. The general suffrage of Antiquity or Ecclesiastical Tradition 6. Reasons taken from sundry Circumstances relating unto the Epistle its self Now as all these Evidences are not of the same nature nor of equal force so some of them will be found very cogent and all of them together very sufficient to free our Assertion from just Question or Exception First The Vncertainty of them who question whether Paul were the Writer of this § 3 Epistle and their want of probable grounds in assigning it unto any other hath some inducement in it to leave it unto him whose of Old it was esteemed to be For when once men began to take to themselves a liberty of Conjecture in this matter they could neither make an end themselves nor fix any bounds unto the imagination of others Having once lost its true Author no other could be asserted with any such evidence or indeed probability but that instantly twenty more with as good Grounds and Reasons might be entitled unto it Accordingly sundry Persons have been named all upon the same account that some thought good to name them and why should not one mans Authority in this matter be as good as anothers Origen in Eusebius affirms that some supposed Luke to have been the Author of § 4 this Epistle But neither doth he approve their Opinion nor mention what Reasons they pretend for it He adds also that some esteemed it to be written by Clemens of Rome Clemens of Alexandria allows St. Paul to be the Author of it but supposeth it might be Translated by Luke because as he saith the Style of it is not unlike that of his in the Acts of the Apostles Grotius of late contends for Luke to be the Author of it on the same account but the instances which he gives rather argue a Coincidence of some Words and Phrases than a similitude of Style which things are very different Hierom also tells us that juxta quosdam videtur esse Lucae Evangelistae by some it was thought to be written by Luke the Evangelist which he took from Clemens Origen and Eusebius only he mentions nothing of the similitude of Style with that of St. Luke but afterwards informs us that in his Judgement there is a great Conformity in Style between this Epistle and that of Clemens Romanus None of them acquaint us who were the Authors or Approvers of this Conjeciure nor do they give any credit themselves unto it Neither is there any Reason of this Opinion reported by them but only that intimated by Clemens of the Agreement of the Style with that of the Acts of the Apostles which yet is not allowed by Hierom whereon he doth not ascribe the Writing but only the Translation of it unto Luke Grotius alone contends for him to be the Author of it and that with this only Argument that sundry words are used in the same sense by St. Luke and the Writer of this Epistle But that this Observation is of no moment shall afterwards be declared This Opinion then may be well rejected as a groundless guess of an obscure unknown Original and not tolerably confirmed either by Testimony or Circumstances of things If we will forego a Perswasion established on so many important Considerations as we shall manifest this of St. Pauls being the Author of this Epistle to be and confirmed by so many Testimonies upon every arbitrary ungrounded Conjeciure we may be sure never to find rest in any thing that we are rightly perswaded of But I shall add one Consideration that will cast this Opinion of Grotius quite out of the limits of probability By general Consent this Epistle was written whilst James was yet alive and presided in the Church of the Hebrews at Jerusalem and I shall afterwards prove it so to have been What was his Authority as an Apostle what his Reputation in that Church is both known in general from the nature of his Office and in particular is intimated in the Scripture Acts 15.13 Gal. 2.9 These were the Hebrews whose instruction in this Epistle is principally intended and by their means that of their Brethren in the Eastern Dispersion of them Now is it Reason to imagine that any one who was not an Apostle but only a Scholar and Follower of them should be used to write unto that Church wherein so great an Apostle a Pillar among them had his especial Residence and did actually Preside and that in an Argument of such huge importance with Reasons against a practice wherein they were all ingaged yea that Apostle himself as appears Gal. 2.12 Were any one then alive of more esteem and Reputation in the Church than others certainly He
was the fittest to be used in this employment and how well all things of this nature agree unto St. Paul we shall see afterwards § 5 Some have assigned the Writing of this Epistle unto Barnabas Clemens Origen Eusebius make no mention of him Tertullian was the Author of this Opinion and it is reported as his by Hierom. Philastrius also remembers the report of it And it is of late defended by Camero as the former concerning Luke by Grotius whose Reasons for his conjecture are confuted with some sharpness by Spanhemius mindful as it seems of his Fathers Controversie with some of his Scholars The Authority of Tertullian is the sole foundation of this Opinion But as the Book wherein he mentions it was written in his Paroxysme when he uttered not that only unadvisedly so he seems not to lay much weight on the Epistle it self only preferring it unto the Apochryphal Hermes Receptior saith he apud Ecclesias Epistola Barnabae illo Apocrypho pastore Maechorum And we have shewed that the Latin Church was for a time somewhat unacquainted with this Epistle so that it is no marvel if one of them should mistake its Author Grotius would disprove this Opinion from the dissimilitude of its style and that which goes under the name of Barnabas which is corrupt and barbarous But there is little weight in that Observation that Epistle being certainly spurious no way savouring the Wisdom or Spirit of him on whom it hath been vulgarly imposed But yet that it was that Epistle which is cited by some of the Antients under the name of Barnabas and not this unto the Hebrews is well proved by Baronius from the names that Hierom mentions out of that Epistle which are no where to be found in this to the Hebrews But that Epistle of Barnabas is an open fruit of that vanity which prevailed in many about the third and fourth Ages of the Church of personating in their Writings some Apostolical Persons wherein they seldom or never kept any good decorum as might easily be manifested in this particular instance As to our present Case the Reason before mentioned is of the same validity against this as the other Opinion concerning Luke whereunto others of an equal evidence may be added Barnabas was not an Apostle properly and strictly so called nor had Apostolical Mission or Authority but rather seems to have been one of the LXX Disciples as Epiphanius affirms And Eusebius a Person less credulous than he acknowledging that a just and true Catalogue of them could not be given yet placeth Barnabas as the first of them concerning whom all agreed Much weight indeed I shall not lay hereon seeing it is evident that the Catalogues given us by the Antients of those Disciples are nothing but a rude Collection of such names as they found in the Books of the New Testament applied without Reason or Testimony but Apostle he was none Many circumstances also concurr to the removal of this conjecture The Epistle was written in Italy Chap. 13.24 where it doth not appear that Barnabas ever was The fabulous Author I confess of the Rhapsedy called the Recognitions of Clemens tells us that Barnabas went to Rome taking along Clemens with him and returning into Judaea found St. Peter at Caesarea But St. Luke in the Acts gives us another account both where Barnabas was and how he was employed at the time intimated by him who knew nothing of those things For whilst St. Peter was at Caesarea Acts 10.1 Barnabas was at Hierusalem Acts 9.27 being a little while after sent to Antioch by the Apostles chap. 11.22 Again Timothy was the Companion of the Writer of this Epistle chap. 13.23 a Person as far as appears unknown unto Barnabas being taken into St. Pauls Society after their difference and separation Acts 15.39 chap. 16.1 He had also been in bonds or imprisonment chap. 10.34 whereof we cannot at that time learn any thing concerning Barnabas those of St. Paul being known unto all And lastly not long before the Writing of this Epistle Barnabas was so far from that Light into and Apprehension of the nature use and expiration of Judaical Rites herein expressed that he was easily mislead into a practical miscarriage in the observation of them Gal. 2.13 wherein although some after Hieroms fancy that the difference between St. Peter and St. Paul was only in pretence have laboured to free St. Peter and his Companions on other grounds from any sinful failing as it should seem in a direct opposition unto the Testimony of St. Paul affirming that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that particular he was to be blamed or condemned vâ—r 11. not unlike him who hath written a justification of Aaron in his making the Golden Calf yet that Barnabas was not come up unto any constancy in his practice about Mosaical Institutions is evident from the Text. And shall we suppose that He who but a little before upon the coming of some few Brethren of the Church of Jerusalem from St. James durst not avouch and abide by his own personal Liberty but deserted the use of it not without some blameable dissimulation Gal. 2.13 should now with so much Authority write an Epistle unto that Church with St. James and all the Hebrews in the world concurring with them in Judgement and Practice about that very thing wherein himself out of respect unto them had particularly miscarried This certainly was rather the work of St. Paul whose Light and Constancy in the Doctrine delivered in this Epistle with his engagements in the defence of it above all the rest of the Apostles is known from the story of the Acts and his own other Writings Apollos hath been thought by some to be the Penman of this Epistle and that because § 6 it answers the Character given of him For it is said that he was an Eloquent man mighty in the Scripture fervent in Spirit and one that mightily convinced the Jews out of the Scripture it self Acts 18.24 28. all which things appear throughout this whole Discourse But this Conjecture hath no Countenance from Antiquity no mention being made of any Epistle written by Apollos or of any thing else so that he is not reckoned by Hierom amongst the Ecclesiastical Writers nor by those who interpolated that work with some Fragments out of Sophronius Nor is he reported by Clemens Origen or Eusebius to have been by any esteemed the Author of this Epistle However I confess somewhat of moment might have been apprehended in the Observation mentioned if the Excellencies ascribed unto Apollos had been peculiar unto him yea had they not all of them been found in St. Paul and that in a manner and degree more eminent than in the other But this being so the ground of this Conjecture is taken from under it Origen Eusebius and Hierom in the places forecited mention a report concerning some § 7 who ascribed this Epistle unto Clemens Romanus
None of them give any Countenance unto it or intimate any Grounds of that supposition only Hierom affirms that there is some Similitude between the Style of this Epistle and that of Clemens which occasioned the suspition of his Translating of it whereof afterwards Erasmus hath since taken up that Report and seems to give credit unto it but hath not contributed any thing of Reason or Testimony unto its Confirmation A Worthy Holy Man was this Clemens no doubt and Bishop of the Church at Rome But none of the Antients of any Learning or Judgement ever laid weight on this Conjecture For what had he who was a Convert from among the Gentiles to do with the Churches of the Hebrews what Authority had he to interpose himself in that which was their peculiar concernment Whence may it appear that he had that Skill in the Nature Use and End of Mosaical Rites and Institutions which the Writer of this Epistle discovers in himself Neither doth that Epistle of his to the Church of Corinth which is yet extant though excellent in its kind permit us to think that he wrote by Divine Inspiration Besides the Author of this Epistle had a desire and purpose to go to the Hebrews chap. 13.22 Yea he desires to be restored unto them as one that had been with them before But as it doth not appear that this Clemens was ever in Palestine so what Reason he should have to leave his own charge now to go thither no man can imagine And to end this needless Debate in that Epistle which was truly his own he makes use of the Words and Authority of this as Eusebius long since observed § 8 Sixtus Sinensis affirms that the Work whose Author we enquire after was by some assigned unto Tertullian A fond and impious imagination and such as no man of Judgement or Sobriety could ever fall into This Epistle was famous in the Churches before Tertullian was born is ascribed by himself unto Barnabas and some passages in it are said by him to be corrupted by one Theodotus long before his time From the Vncertainty of these Conjectures with the Evidence of Reason and Circumstances whereby they are disproved two things we seem to have obtained First That no Objection on their Account can arise against our Assertion And Secondly that if St. Paul be not acknowledged to be the Writer of this Epistle the whole Church of God is and ever was at a total loss whom to ascribe it unto And it may reasonably be expected that the weakness of these Conjectures should if not add unto yet set of the credibility of the Reasons and Testimonies which shall be produced in the Assignement of it unto him § 9 The Objections that are laid by some against our Assignation of this Epistle unto St. Paul according unto the Order proposed are nextly to be considered These I shall pass through with what briefness I can so as not to be wanting unto the Defensative designed Dissimilitude of Style and manner of writing from that used by St. Paul in his other Epistles is pressed in the first place and principally insisted on And indeed it is the whole of what with any colour of Reason is made use of in this Cause This the Antients admitted The Elegancy propriety of Speech and sometimes Loftiness that occurr in this Epistle difference it as they say from those of St. Pauls writings 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Oecumenius it seems not to be St. Pauls because of the Style or Character of Speech For this cause Clemens of Alexandria supposed it to be written in Hebrew and to be translated into Greek by St. Luke the Evangelist the Style of it as he sayes being like unto that which is used in the Acts of the Apostles and yet that is acknowledged by all to be purely Greek whereas this is accused to be full of Hebraisms so little weight is to be laid on these Critical Censures wherein Learned men perpetually contradict one another Origen also confesseth that it hath not in its Character 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Idiotism or propriety of the Language of St. Paul who acknowledgeth himself to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 11.6 rude in Speech and this Epistle is saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the composition of its Speech Elegantly Greek in comparison of his which if we may believe him any one will discern who can judge between the difference of Styles And Hierom Scripserat autem ad Hebraeos Hebraice id est suo eloquio disertissimè ut eo quae eloquuntur scripta fuerant in Hebraeo aliquatenus verterentur in Graecum hanc causam esse quod a coeteris Pauli Epistolis discrepare videatur It seems to differ from the rest of St. Pauls Epistles because of its Translation out of Hebrew wherein he speaks not with his wonted confidence And elsewhere he sayes that the Style of this Epistle seems to be like that of Clemens Erasmus presseth this Objection Restat saith he Jam argumentum illud quo non aliud certius stylus ipse orationis Character qui nihil habet affinitatis cum Phrasi Paulina The Style and Character of Speech have no affinity with the Phrase of St. Paul This Consideration also drew Calvin into the same Opinion and it is insisted on by Camero and Grotius to the same purpose The summ of this Objection is that St. Paul was rude in Speech which is manifest in his other Epistles but the Style of this is pure elegant florid such as hath no affinity with his so that he cannot be esteemed the Penman of it As this Objection was taken notice of by them of old and the matter of it admitted § 10 as true so because they constantly adhered to the Assignation of it unto St. Paul they gave sundry Answers unto it Origen gives us his Judgement that the Sense or Subiect Matter of this Epistle was from St. Paul which are excellent and no way inferiour to those of the same Apostle in any other Epistles as every one exercised in the Reading of his Epistles will grant but the Structure and Phrase of it he supposeth to have been the Work of some other who taking the Dictates of his Master from thence composed this Epistle But this Answer can by no means be admitted of nor accommodated unto any Writing given by Divine Inspiration For not only the Matter but the very Words of their Writings were suggested unto his Penmen by the Holy Ghost that the whole might have no influence from humane frailty or fallibility which alone renders the Authority of their Writings Sacred and Divine But this intimation would resolve the Truth in this Epistle into the Care and Diligence of him that took the sense of St. Paul and thence composed it wherein he was liable to mistakes unless we shall vainly suppose that he also was inspired Wherefore generally they who admitted of this Objection
Joseph or Ephraim Armillus having received § 15 a defeat by Nehemiah Ben Husiel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he shaâ—â— gather the forces of all the Nations of the world into the vallâ—y of decision 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and shall fight with Israel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And they shall slay of them of Armillus his Army heaps or multitudes on heaps and they shall finite a few of Israel and they shall slay the Messiah of the Lord. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the ministring Angâ—lls shall come and perfuming his body shall lay it up with the antient Fathers where it is to be kept many dayes without putrefaction as Hâ—ctors Body was in Homer after he was slain by Achilles And it is not unlikely but that they may allude somewhat to the Prophesie of the two Witnesses Rev. 11. who were to be slain and afterwards called up to Heaven Thus do they at their pleasure dispose of this creature of their own for having framed him themselves he is their own to do with him what they will alive and dead But that which is the poyson and sting of this Fable is that the death of this fictitious Messiah must amongst them bear all that is spoken in the Scripture or continued by Tradition concerning the Humiliation suffering and death of the true Messiah of the Lord. § 16 We need not stay long in the removall of this Mormo out of our way Should they invent twenty other Messiahs as they have done this and which on the same grounds and with as good Authority they may the case would still be the same Who gave them power to substitute themselves in the place of God to give New Promises to appoint New Saviours and to invent new wayes of Deliverance The Scripture is utterly silent of any such person nor have they any Antetalmudical Tradition concerning him And what their Masters have invented in the Talmuds is of no more Authority then what they coyn every day themselves The truth is this whole story of Armillus and Ben Joseph is a Talmudical Romance the one the Giant the otheâ— the Knight But these fictions seria ducunt Poor creatures are hardened by them unto their eternal destruction But is the world bound to believe what every one whom they are pleased to call Rabbi can imagine though never so contrary to the Principles of that Religion which themselves pretend to own and profess so indeed some of them say that if their Masters teach the right hand to be the left yea Heaven to be Hell yet their Authority is not to be questioned and as I remember others say some such things of the Pope But God I hope of his Goodness will not suffer poor mankind to be alwayes so deluded All the Promises of God all the Prophesies from the foundâ—tion of the world concern only one Messiah of the Seed of Abraham of the Tribe of Judah and of the family of David All the faith of the Church of old as we have proved respected that one only And who will lay any weight upon what is spoken foretold or promised concerning him if the Jews have power to invent another at their pleasure § 17 Again Their Masters have not only dealt dishonestly and blasphemously but foolishly also in this matter in that they have not suited their own creature unto the Ends for which they have made him The End as was shewed before why they advanced this imagination was to give countenance unto what is spoken in the Scriptures or retained by themselves in Tradition concerning the sufferings of the Messiah And it is somewhat strange to me that having raised up this Ben Joseph they did not use him worse then they have done but by a little foolish Pity have spoiled their own whole design They have a Tradition among themselves that the Messiah must bear a third part of all the afflictions or persecutions that ever were or shall be in the world And what proportion doth a mans being slain in battel where his Army is victorious which is all the hardship this Ben Joseph is to meet withall bear unto the Afflictions which befall the Church in every Age And for the Scripture it is meer lost labour to compare the death of this Warriour with what is delivered therein concerning the sufferings of the Messiah Every one not judicially blinded must needs see that there is no affinity between them The fifty third Chapter of Isaiah is acknowledged by their Targum and sundry of the principal Masters of their faith to be a Prophesie concerning him and we shall afterwards undeniably prove it so to be Now the Person there spoken of is one whom the Jews are to reject and despise whom God is to aâ—flict and bruise by causing the sins of the whole Church to meet upon him One who by his sufferings is to fulfill the pleasure of the Lord making his Soul an Offering for sin justifying the Elect and conquering Satan by his Death This fictiâ—â—ous Messiah is to be honoured of all the Jews to raise Armies to fight a Battel and therein after the manner of other men to be slain So that a story was never worse told nor to less purpose No other use can be made of it that I know of but only to consider in it the blindness of poor obstinate sinners given up unto hardness of heart and a spirit of folly for the rejection of him whom God sealed annointed and sent to be the Saviour of the world Leaving them therefore in the embraces of this cloud we may consider the other expected Messiah whom they call Ben David in whom principally they place their confidence § 18 The Endless Fables of the Jews about their Messiah as they have been in part discovered by others so I design not here at large to recount them The chief Masters of them in the Talmud are full of disputes and contradictions about him and those of after Ages succeed them in their uncertainties Such will the conceptions of all men be when they take up fancies and opinions of their own in matters of Divine Revelation But some things there are wherein they all generally agree and those relating unto his Person Work and Office which it shall suffice to give an account of as answering our present Design First Therefore they contend that he shall be a meer man and there is nothing that they strive to avoid more then the Testimonies of Scripture which shew that the promised Messiah was to be God and man in one Person as hath been already evidenced They contend also that he shall be born after the manner of all men not of a Virgin but of a married Woman begotten by her Husband About the place of his birth they are not fully agreed for although they all acknowledge the Prophesie of Micah about Bethlehem to relate unto him Chap. 5.2 yet knowing that Town now to have been desolate for many Generations and waste without inhabitant which would seem to
not alwayes in things mysterious He that would be further satisfied about the importance of the word may consult Reymandus Porchetus and Galatinus in their Discourses against the Jews on this subject Kimchi Pagnin Mercer Schindler Philip ab Aquino and Buxtorf in their Lexicons Munstâ—r Fagius Drusius Grotius in their Annotations on the Text Helvicus Rivet Episcopius Boetius Hornebecke in their Discourses from it The weight of our Argument lyes not in the precise signification of the word The Messiah it is who is intended in that expression § 29 For first this is manifest from the Context and words themselves The promise of the Messiah was the foundation of that Nation and people the reason of the Call of Abraham and of the erection of a Kingdom and a State in his posterity This we have elsewhere demonstrated This promise concerning him and Covenant in him was alwayes the chief matter and head of the Patriarchal Benedictions when they blessed their Children and posterity Now unless we grant him to be intended in this expression there is no mention of him at all in this Prophetical Eulogie of Jacob. Besides his posterity being now to be distributed into twelve distinct Tribes or Families and each of them having this peculiar blessing appropriated unto him wherein it is certain and confessed by all the Jews that this priviledge of bringing forth the Messiah was henceforth impaled unto Judah It must be done in this place or there is no footstep of it in the Scripture And it is very strange that Jacob in reckoning up the priviledges and advantages of Judah above his Brethren should omit the chief of them from whence all the rest did flow And the very tenour of the words manifest this intention fixing on that which was the fountain and end of all blessing in the promised seed he passeth over his Elder Children and determines it on Judah with the continuance of Rule to the coming thereof § 30 Secondly That which in the Text is affirmed concerning this Shilo makes it yet more evident who it was that is intended 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To him the gathering of the people 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the expectation of the Nations that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to expect or look for So the Vulgar Expectatio Gentium Onkelos 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and him shall the people obey or to him they shall hearken Ben Vzziel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because of him the people shall faint that is â—ease their opposition and submit unto him Targum Hierusal 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and to him shall all the Kingdoms of the Earth be subject all to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in construction from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to hear attend obey The word is but once more used in the Scripture Prov. 30.17 where it is rendered Doctrine or Teaching given out with Authority and therefore to be obeyed So that primarily it may seem to denote obedience unto Doctrines which because men gather themselves together to attend unto it it signifies also that gathering together and so is rendered by Rashi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the gathering together Collection or Congregating And also is it by others who seem to look on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as its root which signifies to gather and collect as well as to hope expect and look after That which in all these Interpretations is aimed at wherein they all agree is one and the same thing namely That the Gentiles People Heathen should be called and gathered unto the Shilo should hear his Doctrine obey his Law and be made subject unto him Now as this was eminently contained in the great fundamental Promise concerning the Messiah made to Abraham namely that in him all the Nations of the earth should be blessed So there is not any description of him in the following Prophets more eminet then this that unto him the gathering of the people should be which in many places is made the Characteristical Note of his Person and Kingdom Hence some of the Jews themselves interpret this place as Rabbi Solomon by that of Isaiah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to him shall Gentiles seek and that of Chap. 42.4 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Isles shall wait for his Law The sense also of the words given by the LXX and that vulgar 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expectatio Gentium have good countenance given unto it in other places of Scripture For as he is called Hag. 2.7 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the desire of all Nations that which they desire and expect so speaking of himself Isa. 60.9 he sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Isles the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Gentiles shall wait for me or expect me Now he to whom the Gentiles shall seek whose Doctrine they shall learn whose Law they shall obey to whom they shall be subject in whom they shall be blessed and to whom they shall be gathered for all these ends and purposes is the true and only Messiah and this is the Shilo here mentioned § 31 We have the concurring assent of all the Targums unto this application of the word Shilo Ben â—V zziel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vntill the time wherein the King Messiah shall come The same are the words in that of Jerusalem both of them as we saw before interpreting the next words also of the Messiah And Onkelos to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Vntill the Messiah shall come whose is the Kingdom Now after the Scripture it self there is no greater evidence of the persuasion of the Old Church of the Jews then what is found in the consent of these Targums and of how little validity the exception of the modern Jews are against their Authority is known to all And we have also the concession of their Talmuds and most Learned Masters fully § 32 consenting in this cause So in the Talmud Hierusul in Chelekâ— The world say they is created for the Messiah 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and what is his name in the house of Rabbi Shilo They said his name is Shilo as it is written untill Shilo come And in Bereshith Rabba on this place of Genesis The Scepter shall not depart from Judah untill Shilo come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is Messiah the Son of David who shall come to rule the Kingdoms with a Scepter as Psalm 2. And in Beresh Rebanna until the Shilo come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For it shall come to pass that the Nations of the World shall bring their gifts unto Messiah the Son of David And Kimchi in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shilo is interpreted his Son and it is a Prophecy of the Messiah and innumerable other Testimonies from them to the same purpose may be produced Yea this sense is so common among them and so known to have been the sense of the Antient Church that
the notions of their more antient Masters For a Close then of these considerations I shall add some of the confessions of the Jews themselves which the evidence of the Truth contended for hath at several seasons extorted from them And this I shall not do as though they were of great importance in themselves or unto us but only to discover their entanglements in contending against the light for the present Masters of their unbelief are more perplexed with the convictions of their Predecessors then with the plainest testimonies of the Scripture The Authority of their Predecessors being equal with them unto if not more sacred then that of the word of God its self First then Being pressed with the Testimonies before insisted on out of Haggai concerning the glory of the second Temple and the coming of the desire of all Nations thereunto they have a Tradition that the Messiah was born the same day that the second Temple was destroyed The story indeed which they make it up with is weak fabulous and ridiculous and he who is offended with the citation of such things out of their Talmudical Doctors is desired only to exercise patience until he shall be able himself to report from them things more serious and of greater importance and yet from them must we learn the perswasions and convictions of the Antient Jews or be utterly ignorant of them Be their storiâ—s what they will also the powerfull convincing Evidence of Truth and the miserable shifts that the poor wretches are put unto to keep off the Efficacy of it from their minds do sufficiently appear in them The Tradition mentioned they give us in Tractat. Bezaroth distinct Hajakorr in § 14 these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Joden in the name of Rabbi Ibbo said the Messiah was born in the day that the house of the Sanctuary was destroyed and the story they tell to this purpose is as followeth It came to pass that as a Jew was plowing his Ox before him lowed and there passed by him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Arabian and he heard a voice saying O Jew the Son of a Jew loose thy Oxen for behold the house of the Sanctuary is destroyed the Ox lowed the second time and he said O Jew the Son of a Jew Yoke thy Oxen for behold Messiah the King is born he said unto him what is his name he answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Menachem that is the Comforter And in Bereshith Rabba on Gen. 30. they have a long story to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rabbi Samuel the son of Nachman said as Elias of good memory was walking on the way on that very day that the house of the Sanctuary was destroyed he heard 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the voice from Heaven crying unto him the house of our holy Sanctuary is brought unto destruction when Elias of good memory heard this he thought the whole world should be destroyed he went therefore and finding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 men plowing and sowing he said unto them the holy blessed God is angry with the world or all this generation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and will destroy his house and send his children into captivity among the Nations of the world and you are solicitous about this temporal life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 came forth again and said unto him Let them alone for unto Israel is born a Saviour he said unto the voice where is he the voice said unto him in Bethlehem Judah he went and found a woman sitting in the door of her house and her Child lying in its own blood before her he said unto her my daughter hast thou born a Son she said unto him yea he said and why doth it lye so long in its own blood she said unto him because of the great evil for on this day wherein he is born the house of the Sanctuary is destroyed he said unto her my daughter be of good Courage and take care of the Child for great salvation shall be wrought by his hand and she was streightway encouraged and took care of him In the process of this story they tell us that this Child was carried away by the four winds of Heaven and kept in the great Sea four hundred years of which afterwards I doubt not but this Tale is hammered out of the second of Luke about the appearance of the Angels to the Shepheards and their finding his Mother in a stable All the use that I intend to put this confession of theirs unto is to urge the present Jews with a conviction and acknowledgement of their fore-fathers that the Messiah was to be born under the second Temple § 15 Again They have a Tradition out of the School of one Elias a famous Master amongst them of the Tannarei or Antetalmudical Doctors which they have recorded in the Talmud Tractat. Saned distinct Chelec about the continuance of the world which is as follows 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is a Tradition of Elias that the world shall continue six thousand years two thousand void which the gloss of Rabbi Solomon Jarchi reckons from the Creation of the world unto the Call of Abraham two thousand to the Law from thence to the destruction of the second Temple and two thousand to the dayes of the Messiah It is incredible how the latter Rabbins are perplexed with this Tradition of their Masters which is recorded in the Talmud as sacred In the account they give in Shebet Sehuda of a Disputation they had with one Hierom a converted Jew before the Bishop of Rome they know not how to disintangle themselves from the Authority of it The summ of their answer is that the next words in the Tradition are that that time is elapsed because of their sins but as others have already manifested that that gloss is no part of the Tradition but an addition of the Talmudists so we shall immediately manifest the vanity of that pretence Others of them say that it sufficeth to maintain the truth and credit of the Tradition if the Messiah come at any time within the last two thousand years But besides that even they also are now drawing towards their period not a fifth part in their computation of that space of time remaining so this gloss is directly contrary to the very words of the Tradition For as two thousand years are assigned to the world before the Law and two thousand to the Law which they reckon from the Call of Abraham to the ruine of the second Temple so the two thousand years allotted to the time of the Messiah must begin with his coming as the other portions do one of them with the Creation the other with the Call of Abraham or else the space of time above sixteen hundred years between the expiration of the second two thousand years and the third must be left out of the computation And the time limited for the duration of the world extended
he should be conceived and born of a Virgin so certain should be their present deliverance which they so desired § 32 It is further insisted on by them that the deliverance promised was to be wrought before the Child spoken of should know to refuse the evil and chuse the good or should come to years of discretion v. 16. and what was this unto him that was to be born some hundred years after Answ. 1. That the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned v. 16. is the same with the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 promised v. 14. doth not appear The Prophet by the command of God when he went unto the King with his message took with him Shear-jashub his Son v. 3. This certainly was for some especial end in the Word or Message that he had to deliver the Child being then but an Infant and of no use in the whole matter unless to be made an instance of something that was to be done It is therefore probable that he was the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the young Child designed v. 16. before whose growing up to discretion those Kings of Damascus and Samaria were destroyed or 2. The Expression may denote the time of any Child 's being born and coming to the maturity of understanding and so consequently the promised Child In as short a space of time as this promised Child when he shall be born shall come to know to refuse the evil and choose the good shall this deliverance be wrought Their remaining Cavils are of little importance The Child intended Chap. 8. § 33 was to be the Son of the Prophet and Prophetess and so not this Child that was to be born of a Virgin Besides he is plainly promised as a sign of other things then those treated of in this Chapter Yea of things quite contrary unto them Again this Child they tell us was to be called Immanuel whereas the Son of Mary was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or as they malitiously write it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But this name is given to signifie what he should be and do and not what he should be commonly called He was to be God and man in one person to reconcile God and man to be every way Immanuel And this kind of expression in the Scripture when a thing is said to be called that which it is the name denoting the Being Nature and quality of it is so frequent that there is nothing peculiar in it as here used See Isa. 1.26 Chap. 8.3 Chap. 9.6 Jer. 23.6 Zech. 8.2 The like also may be said to that which thâ—y except in the last place namely that they know not that Jâ—sus of Nazareth was brought up with Butter and Hony which is foretold concâ—rning this Child For the expression signifies no more but that the Child should be educated with the common food of the Country such as Children were in those places and times nourished withal It being the especial blessing of that Land that it flowed with Milk and Honey And thus have we asserted and vindicated the third characteristical note of the true Messiah he was to be born of a Virgin which none but only our Lord Jesus ever was from the foundation of the world There remain yet other descriptive notes of the Messiah consisting in what he was to § 34 teach and do and suffer all of them guiding the faith of the Church unto our Lord Jesus who in all things fully answered unto them all I shall briefly pass through them according unto our design and purpose and begin with what he was to teach This Moses directs us unto giving that great predescription of him which we have Deut. 18.18 19. I will raise them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto thee and will put my words in his mouth and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him And it shall come to pass that whâ—soever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name I will require it of him This is that signal Testimony concerning the Messiah which Philip urged out of Moses unto Nathaniel John 1.45 which Peter not only applyes unto him but declares that he was soly intended in it Acts 3.22 23. and Stephen seals that application with his blood Acts 7.37 Neither can or do the Jews deny that the Messiah was to be a Prophet or that he was promised unto the Church in the Wilderness in these words but we shall consider the particulars of them Sundry things are here asserted by Moses concerning the Messiah as 1. In general § 35 that he should be a Prophet a Teacher of the Church and not a King only The Jews indeed who greedily desire the things which outwardly attend Kingly Power and Dominion in this world do principally fix their thoughts and expectations on his Kingdom The Revelation of the Will of God which was to be made by him they little desire or enquire after But the common faith of their Ancestors from this and other places was that the Messiah was to be a Prophet and reveal unto the Church the whole counsel of God as we shall evince in our Comment on the first words of the Epistle 2. That this Prophet should be raised up unto them from among their Brethren He shall be of the posterity of Abraham and of the Tribe of Judah as was promised of old or made of them according unto the flesh Rom. 1.3.9.5 So that as to his original or extract he was to be born in the level of the people from among his Brethren was be to be raised up Unto this Office of a Prophet and Teacher of the Church 3. That he must be like unto Moses The words are plain in many places that in the ordinary course of Gods dealing with that Church among the Prophets there was none like unto Moses neither before or after him Hence Maimonides with his followers conclude that nothing can ever be altered in their Law because no Prophet was ever to arise of equal Authority with him who was their Law-giver But the words of the Text are plain The Prophet here foretold was to be like unto him wherein he was peculiar and exempted from comparison with all other Prophets which were to build on his foundation without adding any thing to the Rule of Faith and Worship which he had revealed or changing any thing therein In that is the Prophet here promised to be like unto him That is he was to be a Law-giver to the House of God as our Apostle proves and declares chap. 3.1 2 3 4 5. And we have the consent of the most sober among the Jews to the same purpose The words of the Author of Sepher Ikkarim lib. 3. cap. 10. are remarkable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It cannot be that there should not at some tim◠〈◊〉 a Prophet like unto Moses or greater then he for Messiah the King should be like him â—â— greater then he but thus these words there arose none
be considered § 18 And these in general were of two sorts First Ecclesiastical Secondly Civil Ecclesiastical penalties were the Authoritative Exclusion of an offending Person from the society of the Church and the Members of it That such an Exclusion is prescribed in the Law in sundry cases hath in several instances been by others evidenced Many Disputes also have been about it both concerning the causes of it the Authority whereby it was done with its ends and effects But these things are not of our present consideration who intend only to represent things as they are in Facto instituted or observed Of this Exclusion the Jews commonly make three Degrees and that not without § 19 some countenance from the Scripture The First they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Niddui The second 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cherem and the Third 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shammatha That which they call Niddui from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to expell to separate to cast off is with the most of them the first and lowest degree of this separation and exclusion And Persons who are to pronounce this sentence and put it into execution are according to the Jews any Court from the highest Sanhedrin of seventy one at Jerusalem to the meanest in their Synagogues Yea any Ruler of a Synagogue or Wise Man in Authority might accorcording unto them do the same thing And many ridiculous stories they have about the mutual Excommunication and Absolution of one another by consent The time of its continuance or the first space of time given to the Persons offending to repent was thirty dayes to which on his neglect he was left unto sixty and then to ninety when upon his obstinacy he was obnoxious to the Cherem As the Causes of it they reckon up in Jerusalem Talmud moed Katon twenty four crimes on the guilt whereof any one may be thus dealt withal 1. He that despiseth a Wise Man that is a Rabbi Master or Doctor even after his death 2. He that contemneth a Minister or Messenger of the House of Judgement 3. He that calleth his Neighbour Servant or Slave 4. He to whom the Judge sends and appoints him a time of Appearance and he doth not appear 5. He that despiseth the words of the Scribes much more the words of the Law of Moses 6. He that doth not obey and stand unto the sentence denounced against him 7. He that hath any hurtful thing in his power as a biting Dog and doth not remove it 8. He that sells his Field to a Christian or any Heathen 9. He that gives witness against an Israelite in the Courts of the Christians 10. A Priest that killeth Cattle and doth not separate the guifts that belong to another Priest 11. He that profaneth the second Holy-day in Captivity 12. He that doth any work in the afternoon before the Passeover 13. He that taketh the name of God in vain on any account 14. He that induceth others to profane the name of God 15. He that draweth others to eat of holy things without the Temple 16. He that computes the times or writes Kalendars or Almanacks fixing the Moneths out of the Land of Israel 17. He that causeth a blind man to fall 18. He that hindereth others from doing the work of the Law 19. He that makes profane the killing of any Creature by his own fault 20. He that killeth and doth not shew his Knife before hand before a Wise Man whereby it may appear to be fit 21. He that is unwilling to or makes himself difficult in learning 22. He that putteth away his Wife and afterwards hath commerce with her in buying and selling which may induce them to cohabitation 23. A Wise Man of evil Fame and Report 24. He that excommunicateth him who deserveth not that sentence Aâ— instance of this exclusion we have expresly in the Gospel John 9.20 The Jews § 20 had aâ—ready agreed that if any Man should confess He was Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he should be put out of the Synagogue He should be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Menuddeh put under the sentence of Niddui And according to this sentence they proceeded with the blind man whose eyes were opened by the Lord Christ v. 34. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is saith the Margin of our Translation they excommunicated him But that is not the signification of the word it denotes only their causing him to be thrust out of the Synagogue by their Officers although there is no doubt but that at the same time they pronounced sentence against him § 21 If a Man dyed under this sentence they laid a stone upon his Beir intimating that he deserved Lapidation if he had lived Howbeit they excluded him not from teaching or learning of the Law so that he kept four paces distant from other persons He came in and went out of the Temple at the contrary door to others that he might be known All which with sundry other things were of their Traditional Additionals to the just prescriptions of the Word § 22 In case this Process succeeded not and upon some greater demerits the sentence of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cherem was to be proceeded unto This is an high degree of Authoritative Separation from the Congregation and is made use of either when the former is despised or as was said upon greater provocations This sentence must not be denounced but in a Congregation of ten at least and with such a one that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus Anathematized it is not lawful so much as to eat The third and last sentence in this kind which contains a total and irrecoverable Exemption of a person from the Communion of the Congregation is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Shammatha Some of the Talmudical Rabbins in moed katon give the Etymologie of this word as if it should be as much as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sham metha death is theâ—e But it is generally agreed that it is from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to exclude expell cast out that is from the Covenant of Promise and Common-wealth of Israel And this the most take to be total and final the Persons that fall under it being left to the judgement of God without hope of Reconciliation unto the Church Hence it is called in the Targum Numb 21.25 Deut. 7.27 The Curse the Execration of God and by the Talmudists 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the anathema of the God of Israel But yet it cannot be denyed but that in many places they speak of it as the general name for any Excommunication and so as not at all to difference it from Niddui which is taken to be the least degree thereof The most learned Buxtorf hath given us out of an antient Hebrew Manuscript a form of this Excommunication which is truly ferale carmen as sad and dismall an imprecation as according to their principles could well be invented It is indeed by him applyed unto the Cherem but as L'Empereur hath observed
and that by it to declare his rule even over his enemies and to make his people those given unto him willing and obedient v. 3. The inheritance given by the Father unto Christ being wholly in the possession of another it became him to take it out of the Vsurpers hand and deliver it up to him whose right it was and this he did and doth by the Revelation of his mind in the preaching of the Word Col. 1.12 13. And from these considerations it is that 4. The whole Revelation and Dispensation of the will of God in and by the Word is as was said eminently appropriated unto the Father Eternal life the counsel the purpose ways means and procurer of it was with the Father and was manifested to us by the word of truth 1 Joh. 1.1 2. And it is the Father that is his will mind purpose grace love that the Son declares Joh. 1.18 in which work he speaks nothing but what he heard from and was taught by the Father Joh. 8.28 And thence he says the doctrine is not mine that is principally and originally but his that sent me Joh. 7.16 And the Gospel is called the Gospel of the glory of the blessed God 1 Tim. 1.11 which is a periphrasis of the Person of the Father who is the Father of glory Ephes. 1.17 And we might also declare that the great work of making this Gospel effectual on the minds of men doth peculiarly belong unto the Father which he accomplisheth by his Spirit 2 Cor. 3.18 c. 4.6 But that is not our present business Thus the Revelation of events that should befall the Church to the end of the world that Christ signified by his Angel unto John was first given him of the Father Revel 1.1 And therefore though all declarations of God and his will from the foundation of the world were made by the Son the second Person of the Trinity and his Spirit speaking in the Prophets 1 Pet. 1.11 12 13. yet as it was not by him immediately no more was it as absolutely so but as the great Angel and Messenger of the Covenant by the will and appointment of the Father And therefore the very Dispensers of the Gospel are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to treat as Embassadours about the business of Christ with men in the name of God the Father 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Apostle as if God the Father exhorted in and by us 2 Cor. 5.20 For to him doth this whole work principally relate And from the appropriating of this work originally and principally to the Father there are three things that are particularly intimated unto us 1. The Authority that is to be considered in it the Father is the Original of all power and Authority of him the whole Family of Heaven and Earth is named Ephes. 3.15 He is the Father of the whole Family from whom Christ himself receives all his Power and Authority as Mediator Mat. 28.18 which when his work is accomplished he he shall give up again into his hand 1 Cor. 15.28 He sent him into the world set him over his house gave him command unto his work The very name and Title of Father carries Authority along with it Mal. 1.6 And in the disposal of the Church in respect of this paternal power doth the Son affirm that the Father is greater than he Joh. 14.28 And runs up the contempt of the word in the preaching of it by his Messengers into a contempt of this Authority of the Father he that refuseth you refuseth me he that refuseth me refuseth him that sent me The Revelation then and dispensation of the mind and will of God in the word is to be considered as an act of Supream Soveraign Authority requiring all subjection of Soul and Conscience in the receiving of it It is the Father of the Family that speaks in this word he that hath all power and Authority essentially in him over the souls and eternal conditions of them to whom he speaks And what holy reverence humility and universal subjection of soul to the word this in a particular manner requires is easie to be apprehended 2. There is also Love In the Oeconomy of the blessed Trinity about the work of our Salvation that which is eminently and in an especial manner ascribed unto the Father is Love as hath been at large elsewhere shewed 1 Joh. 4.9 10 16. God that is the Father saith he is Love And how he exerts that property of his nature in the work of our Salvation by Christ he there shews at large So Joh. 3.16 Rom. 5.7 8. To be Love full of Love to be the especial spring of all fruits of Love is peculiar to him as the Father And from Love it is that he makes the Revelation of his Will whereof we speak Deut. 7.8 c. 33.3 Psal. 147.19 20. 2 Cor. 5.18 19. It was out of infinite Love mercy and compassion that God would at all reveal his Mind and Will unto sinners He might for ever have locked up the treasures of his Wisdom and Prudence wherein he abounds towards us in his word in his own eternal breast He might have left all the Sons of men unto that woful darkness whereunto by Sin they had cast themselves and kept them under the chains and power of it with the Angels that sinned before them unto the judgement of the great dâ—y But it was from infinite Love that he made this condescension to reveal himself and his Will unto us This mixture of Authority and Love which is the spring of the Revelation of the Will of God unto us requires all readiness willingness and chearfulness in the receipt of it and subâ—ission unto it Besides these also 3. There is Care eminently seen in it The great Care of the Church is in and on the Father He is the Husbandman that takes Care of the Vine and Vineyard Joh. 15.1 2. And thence our Saviour who had a delegated Care of his people commends them to the Father Joh. 17. as to whom the Care of them did principally and originally belong Care is proper to a Father as such to God as a Father Care is inseparable from paternal Love And this also is to be considered in the Revelation of the Will of God What directions from these Considerations may be taken for the use both of them that dispense the word and of those whose duty it is to attend unto the dispensation of it shall only be marked in our passage For the Dispensers of the Word Let them 1. Take heed of pursuing that work negligently which hath its spring in the Authority Love and Care of God See 1 Tim. 4.13 14 15 16. 2. Know to whom to look for supportment help ability and encouragement in their work Ephes. 6.19 20. And 3. Not be discouraged whatever opposition they meet with in the discharge of their duty considering whose work they have in hand 2 Cor. 4.15 16. 4. Know how they ought to dispense the
all the concernments of it Nothing is in it needless nothing useless Men sometimes perplex themselves to find out the suitableness of some Testimonies produced out of the Old Testament unto the confirmation of things and Doctrines in the New by the Pen-men of the holy Ghost when all the difficulty ariseth from a fond conceit that they can apprehend the depth and breadth of the Wisdom that is laid up in any one Text of Scripture when the Holy Ghost may have a principal aim at those things which they are not able to dive into Every letter and tittle of it is teaching and every thing that relates unto it is instructive in the Mind of God And it must be so because 1. It proceeds from infinite Wisdom which hath put an impress of it self upon it and filled all its capacitie with its blessed effects In the whole Frame Structure and Order of it in the Sense Words Coherence Expression it is filled with Wisdom which makes the Commandment exceeding broad and large so that there is no absolute comprehension of it in this life We cannot perfectly trace the foot-steps of infinite Wisdom nor find out all the Effects and characters of it that it hath left upon the Word The whole Scripture is full of Wisdom as the Sea is of Water which fills and covers all the parts of it And 2. Because it was to be very Comprehensive It was to contain directly or by consequence one way or other the whole Revelation of God unto us and all our Duty unto him both which are marvelous great large and various Now this could not have been done in so narrow a room but that every Part of it and all the Concernment of it with its whole Order were to be filled with Mysteries and Expressions or intimations of the Mind and Will of God It could not hence be that any thing superfluous should be put into it or any thing be in it that should not relate to Teaching and Instruction 3. It is that which God hath given unto his servants for their continual Exercise day and night in this world And in their enquiry into it he requires of them their utmost Diligence and endeavours This being assigned for their Duty it was convenient unto Divine Wisdom and Goodness to find them blessed and useful work in the whole Scripture to exercise themselves about That every where they might meet with that which might satisfie their Enquiry and answer their Industry There shall never be any Time or Strength lost or mispent that is laid out according to the Mind of God in and about his Word The matter the Words the Order the Contexture of them the Scope Design and aim of the Holy Ghost in them all and every one of them may well take up the utmost of our Diligence are all divine Nothing is empty unfurnished or unprepared for our spiritual use advantage and benefit Let us then learn hence 1. To admire and as one said of old to adore the fulness of the Scripture or of the Wisdom of God in it it is all full of Divine Wisdom and calls for our Reverence in the Consideration of it And indeed a constant Awe of the Majesty Authority and Holiness of God in his word is the only teachable frame Proud and careless spirits see nothing of Heaven or Divinity in the Word but the humble are made wise in it 2. To stir up and exercise our Faith and Diligence to the utmost in our study and search of the Scripture It is an endless store-house a bottomless Treasure of Divine Truth Gold is in every sand All the wise men in the world may every one for himself learn somewhat out of every Word of it and yet leave enough still behind them for the Instruction of all those that shall come after them The fountains and springs of Wisdom in it are endless and will never be dry We may have much truth and power out of a word sometimes enough but never All that is in it There will still be enough remaining to exercise and refresh us anew for ever So that we may attain a True sâ—nse but we can never attain the full sense of any Place we can never exhaust the whole impress of infinite Wisdom that is on the Word And how should this stir us up to be meditating in it day and night and many the like inferences may hence be taken Learn also 2. That it is lawful to draw consequences from Scripture Assertions and such consequences rightly deduced are infaliibly true and de fide Thus from the Name given unto Christ the Apostle deduceth by just consequence his Exaltation and Preheminence above Angels Nothing will rightly follow from Truth but what is so also and that of the same nature with the Truth from whence it is derived So that whatever by just consequence is drawn from the Word of God is it self also the Word of God and of Truth infallible And to deprive the Church of this liberty in the interpretation of the Word is to deprive it of the chiefest benefit intended by it This is that on which the whole Ordinance of Preaching is founded which makes that which is derived out of the Word to have the Power Authority and Efficacy of the Word accompanying it Thus though it be the proper Work and Effect of the Word of God to quicken regenerate sanctifie and purifie the Elect and the Word primarily and directly is only that which is written in the Scriptures yet we find all these effâ—cts produced in and by the preaching of the Word when perhaps not one sentence of the Scripture is verbatim repeated And the Reason hereof is because whatsoever is directly deduced and delivered according to the Mind and Appointment of God from the Word is the Word of God and hath the Power Authority and Efficacy of the Word accompanying of it 3. The Declaration of Christ to be the Son of God is the Care and Work of the Father He said it he recorded it he revealed it This indeed is to be made known by the Preaching of the Gospel but that it shall be done the Father hath taken the care upon himself It is the design of the Father in all things to glorifie the Son that all men may honour him even as they honour the Father This cannot be done without the Declaration of that Glory which he had with him before the world was that is the Glory of his Eternal Sonship This he will therefore make known and maintain in the world 4. God the Father is perpetually present with the Lord Christ in Love Care and power in the Administration of his Office as he is Mediator Head and King of the Church He hath taken upon himself to stand by him to own him to effect every thing that is needfull unto the Establishment of his Throne the enlargement of his Kingdom and the Ruine and Destruction of his Enemies And this he will assuredly do to the
God speaketh and I suppose we need no interposition of Church or Tradition to give Authority or Credit unto what he says or speaks This then is the sum of these words of the Apostle Again in another place where the Holy Ghost fore-tells the bringing forth into the world and amongst men him that is the Lord and Heir of all to undertake his work and to enter into his Kingdom and Glory the Lord speaks to this purpose Let all the Angels of God worship him To manifest this testimony to be apposite unto the confirmation of the Apostles assertion three things are required 1. That it is the Son who is intended and spoken of in the place from whence the words are taken and so designed as the Person to be worshipped 2. That they are Angels that are spoken unto and commanded to worship him 3. That on these suppositions the words prove the Preheminence of Christ above the Angels For the two former with them that acknowledge the Divine Authority of this Epistle it is sufficient in general to give them satisfaction The place is applied unto Christ and this passage unto the ministring Angels by the same Spirit who first wrote that Scripture But yet there is room left for our enquiry how these things may be evidenced whereby the strength of the Apostles Reasonings with them who were not yet convinced of the infallibility of his Assertions any farther than they were confirmed by testimonies out of the Old Testament and the faith of the Antient Church of the Hebrews in this matter may be made to appear as also a check given to their boldness who upon pretence of the impropriety of these Allegations have questioned the Authority of the whole Epistle And our first enquiry must be whence this testimony is taken Many of the Antients as Epiphanius Theodoret Euthymius Procopius and Anselm conceive the words to be cited from Deut. 32.42 where they expresly occur in the Translation of the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rejoyce ye Heavens with him and let all the Angels of God worship him But there are two considerations that put it beyond all pretensions that the words are not taken from this place of the LXX 1. Because indeed there are no such words in the Original Text nor any thing spoken that might give occasion to the sense expressed in them but that whole Verse is inserted in the Greek Version quite besides the scope of the place Now though it may perhaps be safely granted that the Apostles in citing the Scripture of the Old Testament did sometimes use the words of the Greek Translation then in use yea though not exact according to the Original whilst the sense and meaning of the Holy Ghost was retained in them yet to cite that from the Scripture as the word and testimony of God which indeed is not therein nor was ever spoken by God but by humane failure and corruption crept into the Greek Version is not to be imputed unto them And indeed I no way question but that this addition unto the Greek Text in that place was made after the Apostle had used this testimony For it is not unlikely but that some considering of it and not considering from whence it was taken because the words occur not absolutely and exactly in the Greek any where inserted it into that place of Moses amidst other words of an alike sound and somewhat an alike importante such as immediately precede and follow the clause inserted 2. The Holy Ghost is not treating in that place about the Introduction of the First-born into the world but quite of another matter as is evident upon the first view of the Text so that this testimony is evidently not taken from this place nor would nor could the Apostle make use of a testimony liable unto such just exceptions Later Expositors generally agree that the words are taken out of Psal. 97. v. 7. where the Original is rendred by the LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which with a very small variation in the words and none at all in the sense is here expressed by the Apostle And let all the Angels of God worship him The Psalm hath no Title at all in the Original which the Greek Version noteth affirming that it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but it addes one of its own namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Psalm of David when his land was restored Hence it is referred by some to the time of his return unto Hierusale◠after he had been expelled the Kingdom by Absolom by others with more probability to the time of his bringing the Ark into the Tabernacle from the house of Obed-edom when the land was quieted before him And unquestionably in it the Kingdom of God was shadowed out under the Type of the Kingdom of David which Kingdom of God was none other but that of the Messiah It is evident that this Psalm is of the same Nature with that which goes before yea a part of it or an Appendix unto it The first words of this take up and carrie on what is affirmed in the tenth verse or close of that so that both of them are but one continued Psalm of Praise Now the Title of that Psalm and consequently this is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A new song v. 1. which Psalms as Rashi confesseth are to be referred unto the World to come that is the Time and Kingdome of the Messiah So Kimchi affirms that this Psalm and that following respect the time when the people shall be delivered from the Captivity out of all Nations that is the time of the Messiah And Rakenati affirms that the last verse of it He cometh to judge the earth can respect nothing but the coming and reign of the Messiah Thus they out of their Traditions Some of the Antients I confess charge them with corrupting this Psalm in the version of the 10 verse affirming that the words sometimes were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Lord reigned from the Tree denoting as the say the Cross. So Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho And after him the same words are remembred by Tertullian ad Judae cap. 10. ad Marci lib. 3. And Augustin Enarr in Psal. 95. And though the fraud and corruption pretended be improbable indeed impossible nor are the words mentioned by Justine acknowledged by the Targum or any Greek Translator or Hierom yet it is evident that all parties granted the Messiah and his Kingdom to be intended in the Psalm or there had been no need or colour for the one to suspect the other of corruption about it It is then evident that the Antient Church of the Jews whose Tradition is herein followed by the Modern acknowledged this Psalm to contain a description of the Kingdom of God in the Messiah and on their consent doth the Apostle proceed And the next Psalm which is of the same importance with this is entituled by the Targumist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A Prophetical Psalm namely
all Nations for his Inheritance and the utmost parts of the Earth for his Possession Psal. 2.8 Upon this grant a twofold Right ensued 1. A Right to call gather and erect his Church in any Nation in any part of the World to give unto it his Laws and Ordinances of Worship to be owned and observed by them in a visible and peaceable manner Matth. 28.18 19 20. 2. A Right Power and Authority to dispose of and Order all Nations and Persons for the Good Benefit and Advantage of his Kingdom In pursuit of this Grant and Right erecting his Church and therein his visible Kingdom in the world great Opposition is made unto him by all sorts of persons stirred excited and instigated thereunto by Satan And as this Enmity was first acted against himself in his own Person Psal. 2.1 2 3. So it hath continued against him in his Church in all Ages and Places and will do so unto the End of the world The world understands not his Right hates his Government and would not have him to reign Hence hath been all that Rage which hath been executed upon the Professors of his name Kings Rulers Potentates Counsellors the multitude have set themselves against him They are many of them and have been his Enemies Great havock and Destruction have they made of his subjects all the world over and continue to do so in most places unto this very day Especially in these latter Ages after other means failed him Satan hath stirred up a fierce cruel subtle Adversary unto him who he hath foretold his Disciples of under the name of Anti-christ the Beast and false Prophet After the ruine of many other this Enemy by various subtilties and pretences hath drawn the world into a new combination against him and is at this day become the greatest and most pernicious Adversary that he hath in this world Now the aym and design of all these is to dethrone him by the ruine of his Kingdom which he hath set up in the world And this in every Age they have hoped to accomplish and continue to do so unto this day but in vain For as hitherto his Kingdom and Interest in the world hath been maintained against all their enmity and opposition themselves been frustrated and brought to destruction one after another so by vertue of this Promise he shall reign in Security and Glory until all their hearts be broken their strength ruined their Opposition finished and themselves brought under his feet unto all Eternity as our Apostle declares 1 Cor. 15.24 25. And this may suffice to declare the meaning of these words Thirdly We are to consider by whom these Enemies of Christ shall be made thus his footstool I will make them saith God the Father unto him And this Expression wanteth not its difficulty For is it not the work of Christ himself to subdue and conquer his Enemies Is it not said that he shall do so So doing is he described in the Revelation with Glory and Power Chap. 19.11 12 13 14. From Isa. 63.2 3 4 5 6. Who should this work more become or belong unto than him who was persecuted and opposed by them And doth it not directly belong unto his Kingly power Whence is it then that he is here described as one resting in glory and security at his Fathers Right Hand whilest he subdues his Enemies Answer There is no doubt but that the Work of subduing the Enemies of the Mediation and Kingdom of Christ is immediately wrought by himself All Prophecies of him all Promises made unto him the nature of his Office do all require that so it should be and so the Apostle directly expresseth it 1 Cor. 15.26 But yet there are sundry Reasons why that Work which is immediately wrought by the Son may by the way of Eminency be ascribâ—d unto the Father as we see this to be First Power and Authority to subdue and conquer all his Enemies is given unto the Lord Christ by the Father in the way of Reward and it is therefore said to be his work because the Authority for it is from him See Isa. 53.12 Joh. 5.27 Phil. 2.9 Rom. 14.9 This Power then I say of subduing all his Enemies being granted unto the Lord Christ in the love of the Father as a Reward of the Travail of his soul which he underwent in his work on the earth is ascribed unto the Father as his And this Expression signifies no more but that as God hath given him Authority for it so he will abide by him in it until it be accomplished And on this account he takes it on himself as his own Secondly The Work of subduing Enemies is a work of Power and Authority Now in the Oeconomy of the Holy Trinity among the works that outwardly are of God those of Power and Authority are peculiarly ascribed unto the Father as those of Wisdom or Wisdom in the works of God is unto the Son who is the Eternal Wisdom of the Father And on this account the same works are ascribed unto the Father and the Son Not as though the Father did them first or only used the Son as an immediate instrumental cause of them but that he worketh by him as his own Eternal and Essential Wisdom John 5.17 19. But there is also more in it as the Son is considered as Mediator God and man for so he receives and holds his especial Kingdom by grant from his Father and therefore the works of it may be said to be his VI. The last thing remaining for the Exposition of these words is the consideration of the appearing Limitation of this Administration of the Kingdom of Christ in his sitting at the right hand of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill untill I make thine enemies c. First It is confessed and may be proved by Instances that those Particles thus used are sometimes exclusive of all things to the contrary before the time designed in them but not assertive of any such thing afterwards In that sense no limitation of the Duration of the Kingdom of Christ is here intimated but only his secure and glorious Reign unto the accomplishment of his work in the subduing of his Enemies is asserted The only time of Danger is whilest there is Opposition but this saith God I will carry it through unto the end And this sense is embraced by many to secure thereby the Promises that are made unto the Lord Christ of the Perpetuity of his Kingdom So Isa. 9. v. 7. Of the increase of his Government there shall be no end upon the Throne of David and his Kingdom to order it and to establish it with judgement and justice from henceforth even for ever His Kingdom shall not be destroyed but stand for ever Dan. 2.24 it is an everlasting Kingdom Chap. 7.27 Others suppose that this Perpetuity of the Kingdom of Christ is not absolutely exclusive of all Limitation but that these two things only are intimated in those Prophecies and
thus stedfast upon the account of its being spoken from God and stands in no need of the contribution of any strength Authority or Testimony from men Church Tradition or ought else that is extrinsecal unto it The Testimonies given hereunto in the Scripture it self which are very many with the general Grounds and Reasons hereof I shall not here insist upon and that because I have done it elsewhere I shall only mention that one consideration which this place of the Apostle suggests unto us and which is contained in our second Observation from the word stedfast Take this word as spoken from God without the help of any other Advantages and the stedfastness of it is the Ground of Gods inflicting Vengeance on them that receive it not that obey it not Because it is his Word because it is cloathed with his Authority if men believe it not they must perish But now if this be not sufficiently evidenced unto them namely that it is his Word God could not be just in taking vengeance of them for he should punish them for not believing that which they had no sufficient Reason to believe which suits not with the Holiness and Justice of God The Evidence then that this Word is from God that it is his being the foundation of the Justice of God in his proceeding against them that do not believe it it is of indispensible necessity that he himself also do give that Evidence unto it For whence also should it have it from the Testimony of the Church or from Tradition or from probable moral inducements that men can tender one to another Then these two things will inevitably follow 1. That if men should neglect their duty in giving Testimony unto the Word as they may do because they are but men then God cannot justly condemn any man in the world for the neglect of his Word in not believing it or not yielding obedience unto it And the Reason is evident because if they have not sufficient Grounds to believe it to be his without such Testimonies as are not given unto it it is the highest Injustice to condemn them for not believing it and they should perish without a cause For what can be more unjust than to punish a man especially eternally for not doing that which he had no just or sufficient Reason to do This be far from God to destroy the innocent with the wicked 2. Suppose all men aright to discharge their duty and that there be a full Tradition concerning the Word of God that the Church give Testimony unto it and Learned men produce their Arguments for it if this all or any part hereof be esteemed as the sufficient Proposition of the Scripture to be the Word of God then is the Execution of infinite divine Justice built upon the Testimony of men which is not divine or infallible but such as might deceive For God on this supposal must condemn men for not believing with faith divine and infallible that which is proposed unto them by Testimonies and Arguments humane and fallible quod absit It remaineth then that the Righteousness of the Act of God in condemning unbelievers is built upon the Evidence that the Object of Faith or Word to be believed is from him And this he gives unto it both by the Impression of his Majesty and Authority upon it and by the Power and Efficacy wherewith by his Spirit it is accompanied Thus is every Word of God stedfast as a Declaration of his Will unto us by what means soever it is made known unto us V. Every Transaction between God and man is alwayes confirmed and ratified by promises and Threatnings Rewards and Punishments every trespass VI. The most glorious Administrators of the Law do stoop to look into the Mysteries of the Gospel See 1 Pet. 1.12 VII Covenant transgressions are attended with unavoidable penalties every transgression that is of the Covenant disannulling of it received a meet recompence of reward VIII The Gospel is a Word of Salvation to them that do believe IX The Salvation tendered in the Gospel is great Salvation X. Men are apt to entertain thoughts of escaping the wrath of God though they live in a neglect of the Gospel This the Apostle insinuates in that interrogation How shall we escape XI The neglecters of the Gospel shall unavoidably perish the wrath of God How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation These last Observations may be cast into one Proposition and so be considered together namely That the Gospel is great Salvation which who so neglecteth shall therefore unavoidably perish without remedy We shall first enquire how the Gospel is said to be Salvation and that Great Salvation and then shew the equity and unavoidableness of their Destruction by whom it is neglected and therein the vanity of their hopes who look for an escaping in the contempt of it By the Gospel we understand with the Apostle the Word preached or spoken by Christ and his Apostles and now recorded for our use in the Books of the New Testament not exclusively unto what was declared of it in the Types and Promises of the Old Testament But by the way of Eminency we appropriate the whole name and nature of the Gospel unto that delivery of the Mind and Will of God by Jesus Christ which included and perfected all that had preceded unto that purpose Now the Gospel is salvation upon a double account First Declaratively In that the Salvation of God by Christ is declared taught and revealed thereby So the Apostle informs us Rom. 1.16 17. It is the power of God unto salvation because therein the righteousness of God is revealed from faith to faith that is the Righteousness of God in Christ whereby Believers shall be saved And therefore it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Titus 2.11 the saving or salvation bringing Grace of God The Grace of God as that which teacheth and revealeth his Grace And thence they that abuse it to their lusts are said to turn the grace of God into lasciviousness Jude 4. that is the Doctrine of it which is the Gospel And therefore under the Old Testament it is called the Preaching or declaring of glad tydings tydings of peace and salvation Nahum 2.1 Isa. 52.7 and is described as a Proclamation of Mercy Peace Pardon and Salvation unto sinners Isa. 61.1 2. And life and immortality are said to be brought to light thereby 2 Tim. 1.10 It is true God had from all Eternity in his infinite Grace contrived the salvation of sinners but this Contrivance and the Purpose of it lay hid in his own Will and Wisdom as in an infinite Abysse of darkness utterly imperceptible unto Angels and men untill it was brought to light or manifested and declared by the Gospel Ephes. 3.9 10. Coloss. 1.25 26 27. There is nothing more vain than the supposals of some that there are other wayes whereby this Salvation might be discovered and made known The Works of Nature
not put in subjection unto Angels in its Erection or Institution That work was not committed unto them as the Apostle declares in the entrance of this Epistle They did not reveal the Will of God concerning it nor were intrusted with Authority to erect it Some of them indeed were employed in messages about its preparatory work but they were not employed either to reveal the mysteries of it wherewith they were unacquainted nor authoritatively in the Name of God to erect it For the Wisdom of God in the nature and mystery of this work they knew not but by the effects in the work it self Ephes. 3.9 10. which they looked and enquired into to learn and admire 1 Pet. 1.12 and therefore could not be intrusted with authority for its Revelation and the building of the Church thereon But things were otherwise of old The Law which was the foundation of the Judaical Church-state was given by the Disposition of Angels Acts 7.53 Gal. 3.19 And our Apostle here calls it the Word spoken by Angels They were therefore intrusted by God to give the Law and the Ordinances of it unto the people in his Name and Authority which being the foundation of the Mosaical Church-state it was so far put in subjection unto them Secondly It is not put in subjection unto Angels as to the Rule and disposal of it being erected Their Office in this world is a Ministery chap. 1.13 not a Rule or Dominion Rule in or over the Church they have none but are brought into a co-ordination of service with them that have the testimony of Jesus Rev. 19.10 chap. 22.9 being equally with us subjected unto him in whom they and we are gathered into one head Ephes. 1.10 And from their ministerial presence in the Congregations of Believers doth our Apostle press women unto modesty and sobriety in their habit and deportment 1 Cor. 11.10 And the Church of old had an apprehension of this truth of the presence of an Angel or Angels in their Assemblies but so as to preside in them Hence is that caution relating to the Worship of God Eccles. 5.5 6. Better it is that thou shouldst not vow than thou shouldest vow and not pay suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin neither say thou before the Angel that it was an errour why should God be angry at thy voice and destroy the work of thine hands By vowing and not paying a man brought upon his flesh that is himself and his posterity a guilt not to be taken away with excuses of haste or precipitation made unto the Angel presiding in their Worship to take an account of its due performance It is true the absolute sovereign power over the Church of old was in the Son of God alone but an especial immediate power over it was committed unto Angels And hence was the Name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God Judge Mighty One communicated unto them namely from their Authority over the Church that Name expressing the Authority of God when unto him ascribed And because of this their acting in the Name and representing the Authority of God the Saints of old had an apprehension that upon their seeing of an Angel they should die from that saying of God that none should see his face and live Exod. 33.20 So Manoah expresly Judg. 13.22 He knew that it was an Angel which appeared unto him and yet says to his wife We shall surely die because we have seen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an Angel vested with the Authority of God And hence it is not unlikely but that there might be a respect or Worship due unto the Angels under the Old Testament which themselves declare not to be meet for them under the New Rev. 19. not that they are degraded from any Excellency or Priviledge which before they enjoyed but that the Worshippers under the New Testament through their Relation unto Christ and the Exaltation of their nature in his Person are delivered from that under-age estate wherein they differed not from servants Gal. 4.1 and are advanced into an equality of liberty with the Angels themselves Heb. 12.24 25. Ephes. 1.10 chap. 3.14 15. As amongst men there may be a respect due from an inferiour to a superiour which may cease when he is advanced into the same condition with the other though the superiour be not at all abased And to this day the Jews contend that Angels are to be adored with some kind of Adoration though they expresly deny that they are to be invocated or prayed unto Furthermore about their Power and Authority in the disposal of the outward concernments of the Church of old much more might be declared from the Visions of Zechary and Daniel with their works in the two great typical deliverances of it from Aegypt and Babylon But we must not here insist on particulars Thirdly as to the power of judging and rewarding at the last day it is openly manifest that God hath not put this world to come in subjection unto Angels but unto Jesus alone This then is the main Proposition that the Apostle proceeds upon in his present Argument The most glorious effect of the Wisdom Power and Grace of God and that wherein all our spiritual concernments here are enwrapped consists in that blessed Church state with the eternal consequences of it which having been promised from the foundation of the world was now to be erected in the days of the Messiah That you may saith he no more cleave unto your old institutions because given out unto you by Angels nor hearken after such works of wonder and terrour as attended their Disposition of the Law in the Wilderness consider that this world so long expected and desired this blessed estate is not on any account made subject unto Angels or committed unto their disposal the Honour thereof being entirely reserved for another Having thus fixed the true and proper sense of this verse we may stop here a little to consult the Observations that it offers for our own instruction Many things in particular might be hence educed but I shall insist on one only which is comprehensive of the design of the Apostle and it is That This is the great priviledge of the Church of the Gospel that in the things of the Worship of God it is made subject unto and immediately depends upon the Lord Jesus Christ and not any other Angels or Men. That this is the priviledge thereof and that it is a great and blessed priviledge will both appear in our consideration of what it is and wherein it doth consist And among many other things these ensuing are contained therein 1. That the Lord Christ is our Head So it was promised of old that their King should pass before them and the Lord on the head of them Mic. 2.13 He shall be their King Head and Ruler God hath now gathered all things all the things of his Church into an Head in Christ Ephes. 1.10 They were all scattered and
tell us that they delivered unto us what they received from the Lord and command us not to be wise above what is written But I know not how it is come to pass that these men think that the Lord Christ is not a compleat Head in this matter that he hath not instituted all Rules and Laws that are needful and convenient for the right discharge of the Worship of God and Obedience of the Church therein at least that somewhat may be added unto what he hath appointed that may be much to the advantage of the Church And this they take to be their work by vertue of I know not what unsealed warrant unwritten commission But to adde any thing in the Worship of God unto the Laws of the Church is to exercise Authority over it dominion over its faith and to pretend that this world to come this blessed Gospel Church-state is put in subjection unto them although it be not so to Angels A vain and proud pretence as at the last day it will appear But you will say Christ gives his Laws only unto his whole Church and not to individual believers who receive them from the Church and so he is not an immediate Head unto every one in particular I answer That the Lord Christ commits his Laws unto the Churches ministery to teach them unto believers but his own Authority immediately affects the soul and conscience of every believer He that subjects himself aright unto them doth it not upon the authority of the Church by whom they are taught and declared but upon the authority of Christ by whom they are given and enacted 3. It appears from hence that as he is our only Head so he is our immediate Head We have our immediate dependance upon him and our immediate access unto him He hath indeed appointed means for the communicating of his grace unto us and for the exercising of his Rule and Authority over us Such are all his Ordinances with the Offices and Officers that he hath appointed in his Church the first whereof he requires us to be constant in the use of the latter he requires our obedience and submission unto But these belong only unto the way of our dependance and hinder not but that our dependance is immediate on himself he being the immediate Object of our Faith and Love The soul of a believer rests not in any of these things but only makes use of them to confirm his faith in subjection unto Christ. For all these things are ours it is appointed for our use and we are Christs as he is Gods 1 Cor. 3.21 22 23. And so have we our immediate access unto him and not as some foolishly imagine by Saints and Angels and by him to God even to the Throne of Grace 4. This priviledge is greatly augmented in that the Church being made subject unto Christ alone and cast into a dependance upon him he will assuredly take care of all its concernments seeing unto him only doth it betake it self The Church made it of old part of her plea that she was as one fatherless Hos. 14.3 that is every way helpless that had none to relieve or succour her And the Lord Christ giveth this as a reason why he stirreth up himself unto the assistance of his people because there was no man that appeared for their help no Intercessor to interpose for them Isa. 59.16 Now God having placed the Church in this condition as to be oft-times altogether Orphans in this world to have none to give them the least countenance or assistance and the Church it self chusing this condition to renounce all hopes and expectations from any else beside betaking it self unto the Power Grace and Faithfulness of the Lord Christ alone it cannot as it were but be a great Obligation upon him to take care of it and to provide for it at all times They are members of his Body and he alone is their Head they are Subjects of his Kingdom and he alone is their King they are Children and Servants in his Family and he alone is their Father Lord and Master and can he forget them can he disregard them Had they been committed to the care of men it may be some of them would have fought and contended for them though their faithfulness is always to be suspected and their strength is a thing of nought Had they been put into subjection unto Angels they would have watched for their good though their Wisdom and Ability be both finite and limited so that they could never have secured their safety and shall not the Lord Jesus Christ now they are made his special care as his Power and Faithfulness is infinitely above those of any meeâ— creature excel them also in care and watchfulness for our good And all these things do sufficiently set out the Greatness of that priviledge of the Church which we insist upon And there are two things that make this Libâ—rty and Exaltation of the Church necessary and reasonable 1. That God having exalted our nature in the Person of his Son into a condition of Honour and Glory so as to be worshipped and adored by all the Angels of Heaven it was not meet nor convenient that it should in our persons when united unto Christ as our Head be made subject unto them God would not allow that whereas there is the strictest union between the Head and the Members there should be such an interposition between them as that the Angels should depend on their Head and the Members should depend on Angels which indeed would utterly destroy the Union and immediate entercourse that is and ought to be between them 2. God is pleased by Jesus Christ to take us into an holy communion with himself without any other medium or means of communication but only that of our nature personally and inseparably united unto his own Nature in his Son And this also our subjection unto Angels is inconsistent withall This order of dependance the Apostle declares 1 Cor. 3.22 23. All things are yours and you are Christs and Christ is Gods As there is no interposition between God and Christ no more is there between Christ and us and in and by him alone do we relate unto God himself And this should teach us 1. The equity and necessity of our universal obedience unto God in Christ. He hath freed us from subjection unto men and Angels that we might serve him and live unto him He hath taken us to be his peculiar ones his lot and portion from whom he expects all his Reverence of Glory out of this world And he hath left us no pretence no excuse for the neglect of any duties of obedience that he requireth of us We cannot plead that we had other work to do other Lords and Masters to serve he hath set us free from them all that we might be his If a King take a servant into his family and thereby free and discharge him from being liable unto any
to be laid on that duration which he hath here in this world in that he takes many from the very womb who scarce ever beheld the light into the participation of his own eternal Glory Thirdly This earthly frail man hath made himself yet more unspeakably vile by sin this sets him at the utmost distance from the glory of God and utterly foils every thing that is in him which of it self is worthy of consideration All these things being put together they make the Condescension of God in remembring man and setting his heart upon him exceedingly to be admired and adored And this also will farther appear if we might consider what are the blessed effects of this mindfulness of him but these the Apostle insists upon in the next verses whether we may refer our meditations on them Only the Duty it self arising from hence may be here pressed upon us And this is that upon the accounts mentioned we would live constantly in an holy adoration of this infinite condescension and grace of God To this end First let us exercise our selves unto holy thoughts of Gods infinite Excellencies Meditation accompanied with holy adoration is the fountain of this duty Some men have over-busily and curiously enquired into the Nature and Properties of God and have foolishly endeavoured to measure infinite things by the miserable short line of their own reason and to suit the deep things of God unto their own narrow apprehensions Such are many of the Disputations of the School-men on this subject wherein though they have seemed wise to themselves and others yet indeed for the most part they have waxed vain in their imaginations Our duty lies in studying what God hath revealed of himself in his Word and what is evidently suitable thereunto and that not with curious searchings and speculations but with holy admiration reverence and fear This the Apostle adviseth us unto Heb. 12.28 29. In this way serious thoughts of God's Excellencies and Properties his Greatness Immensity Self-sufficiency Power and Wisdom are exceeding useful unto our souls When these have filled us with wonder when they have prostrated our spirits before him and laid our mouthes in the dust and our persons on the ground when the glory of them shines round about us and our whole souls are filled with an holy astonishment then Secondly Let us take a view of our selves our extract our frailty our vileness on every account How poor how undeservable are we What is a little sinful dust and ashes before or in the sight of this God of glory What is there in us what is there belonging unto us that is not suited to abase us alive one day dead another quiet one moment troubled another fearing caring rejoycing causelesly sinning always in our best condition altogether vanity Though much may be said unto this purpose yet it must be said after all that in our selves we are inexpressibly miserable and as the Prophet speaks less than vanity and nothing Would we be wise we are like the wild Asses colt would we be honourable we have no understanding but are like the beasts that perish would we be strong we are as a reed shaken with the wind And Thirdly Let the result of these thoughts be an holy admiration of Gods infinite Love Care Grace and Condescension in having any regard unto us So doth the Psalmist teach us to do hence will Praise hence will Thankfulness hence will Self-abasement ensue And this will be a good foundation as of obedience so of comfort and supportment in every condition Verse IX THese things being spoken indefinitely of Man by the Psalmist the Apostle in the application of them unto his present purpose proceeds to shew who it is that was especially intended and in whom the words had their full accomplishment But saith he we see Jesus c. Many difficulties the words of this verse are attended withall all which we shall endeavour to clear First by shewing in general how in them the Apostle applies the testimony produced by him unto Jesus Secondly by freeing them from the obscurity that ariseth from a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or transposition of expression in them Thirdly by opening the several things taught and asserted in them And fourthly by a vindication of the whole interpretation from exceptions and objections First The Apostle positively applies this testimony unto Jesus as he who was principally intended therein or as he in whom the things that God did when he minded man were accomplished And this the Syriack Translation directly expresseth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but him whom he made lower a little while than the Angels we see that it is Jesus That is it is Jesus concerning whom the Psalmist spake and in whom alone this testimony is verified Two things are expressed concerning Man in the words 1. That he was made lower than the Angels 2. That he had all things put in subjection unto him Both these saith the Apostle we see accomplished in Jesus for that is the meaning of that expression We see Jesus that is these things fulfilled in him And as he had before appealed unto their faith and experience in his negative that all things are not made subject to man in general so doth he here in his affirmative We see Jesus Now they saw it partly by what he had before proved concerning him partly by the signs and wonders he had newly spoken of whereby his Doctrine was confirmed and his Power over all things manifested partly by his Calling and Gathering of his Church giving Laws Rules and Worship unto it by vertue of his Authority in and over this new world And as unto the former part of the testimony by what they had seen with their eyes or had been otherwise taught concerning his low estate and humiliation These things saith he we see they are evident unto us nor can be denied whilst the Gospel is acknowledged Now this confession on the evidences mentioned he applies to both parts of the testimony First saith he We see that for a little while he was made lower than the Angels or brought into a state and condition of more exigency and want than they are or can be exposed unto And hereby he evidently declares that those words in the Psalm do not belong unto the dignity of man spoken of as if he had said He is so excellent that he is but little beneath Angels for as he ascribes unto him a Dignity far above all Angels in as much as all things without exception are put under his feet so he plainly declares that these words belong to the depression and minoration of Jesus in that he was so humbled that he might die And therefore he proceeds to shew how that part of the testimony concerned his present purpose not as directly proving what he had proposed to confirmation concerning his Dignity but as evidently designing the Person that the whole belonged unto As also he takes occasion from hence to enter upon the
with his arm and carry them in his bosome and shall gently lead those that are with young These Sons are of various sorts and degrees the best and strongest of them are but sheep poor infirm and helpless creatures and amongst them some are young and tender as Lambs some heavy and burdened with sins and afflictions like those that are with young In tender compassion he condescends unto all their conditions feeds and preserves the whole flock as a shepheard gathers in his arm and bears in his bosome those that otherwise by their infirmity would be cast behind and left unto danger Compassion he hath for them that err and are out of the way seeks for them that wander heals the diseased feeds them when they are even a flock of slaughter And where these two concur Care and Compassion there can be no want of any thing Psal. 23.1 Indeed Sion is ready sometimes to complain that she is forgotten The Sons in great Distresses Afflictions Persecutions Temptations that may befall them in their way to glory are apt to think they are forgotten and disregarded that they are left as it were to shift for themselves and to wrestle with their difficulties by their own strength and Wisdom which they know to be as a thing of nought But this fear is vain and ungrateful Whilst they are found in the way following the Captain of their Salvation it is utterly impossible that this Watchfulness Care Love and tenderness should in any thing be wanting unto them Thirdly He leads them with Power Authority and Majesty Mic. 5.4 He shall stand and rule in the strength of the Lord in the Majesty of the name of the Lord his God and they shall abide The name of God is in him accompanied with his Power and Majesty which he puts forth in the feeding and ruling of his people whereon their safety doth depend They shall abide or dwell in safety because in this his Glory and Majesty he shall be great or be magnified unto the ends of the earth So also is he described in his rule Zech. 6.13 Even he shall build the Temple of the Lord and he shall bear the glory and shall sit and rule upon his Throne and shall be a Priest upon his Throne Having built the Temple raised an House and Family to God he shall be the Ruler of Captain of it to preserve it unto Glory and this in a glorious manner bearing the glory of God sitting upon a Throne in the whole discharge of his Office both as a King and Priest Unto this end is he entrusted with all the Power and Authority which we have before described God having given him to be head over all things unto his Church There is nothing so high so great so mighty that lyes in the way of his sons to glory but it must stoop to his Authority and give place to his Power The whole Kingdom of Satan the strong-holds of sin the high imaginations of unbelief the strength and malice of the world all sink before him And thence are they described so glorious and successful in their way Mich. 2.13 The breaker is come up before them they have broken up and have passed through the Gate and are gone out by it and their King shall pass before them and the Lord on the head of them Many obstacles lye in their way but they shall break through them all because of their King and Lord that goes before them And those Difficulties which in this world they meet withal that seem to be too hard for them their Persecutions and Sufferings though they may put a stop unto somewhat of their outward Profession yet they shall not in the least hinder them in their progress unto glory Their Captain goes before them with Power and Authority and breaks up all the hedges and gates that lye in their way and gives them a free and abundant entrance into the Kingdom of God Secondly As the manner how so the Acts wherein and whereby this Antecessor and Captain of salvation leads on the Sons of God may be considered and he doth it variously First He goes before them in the whole way unto the end This is a principal duty of a Captain or Leader to go before his Souldiers Hence they that went unto the War were said to go at the feet of their Commanders Iudg. 4.10 Barak went up and ten thousand men at his feet that is followed him and went where he went before them And this also became the Captain of the Lords Host even to go before his People in their whole way not putting them on any thing not calling them to any thing which himself passeth not before them in And there are three things whereunto their whole course may be referred 1. Their Obedience 2. Their Sufferings 3. Their Entrance into Glory and in all these hath the Lord Christ gone before them and that as their Captain and Leader inviting them to engage into them and couragiously to pass thorough them upon his Example and the success that he sets before them 1. As unto Obedience he himself was made under the Law and learned obedience fulfilling all righteousness Though he was in his own Person above the Law yet he submitted himself to every Law of God and righteous Law of men that he might give an Example unto them who were of necessity to be subject unto them So he tells his Disciples as to one instance of his humility I have given you an example that ye should do as I have done John 3.15 As he calls on all to learn of him for he was meek and lowly of heart Matth. 11.29 That is learn to be like him in those heavenly Graces This the Apostles proposed as their pattern and ours 1 Cor. 11.5 Be followers of me as I am of Christ. That is labour with me to imitate Christ. And the utmost Perfection which we are bound to aim at in Holiness and Obedience is nothing but conformity unto Jesus Christ and the Pattern that he hath set before us to mark his footsteps and to follow him This is our putting on of Jesus Christ and growing up into the same Image and likeness with him 2. He goes before the Sons of God in sufferings and therein is also a Leader unto them by his Example Christ saith Peter hath suffered for us leaving us an example that we should follow his steps that is be ready and prepared unto patience in sufferings when we are called thereunto as he explains himself Chap. 4.1 Forasmuch as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh arm your selves therefore with the same mind that you may follow him in the same way And this our Apostle presseth much in this Epistle Chap. 12.2 3. Look unto Jesus the Author and finisher of our faith who for the joy that was set before him endured the Cross despising the shame for consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself lest you be wearied and faint
had somewhat of his own to offer unto God other Priests had somewhat to offer but nothing of their own only they offered up the beasts that were brought unto them by the people But the Lord Christ had a Body and Soul of his own prepared for him to offer which was properly his own and at his own disposal chap. 10.5 3. He alone was set over the whole spiritual House of God the whole Family of God in heaven and earth This belongs unto the Office of a High Priest to preside in and over the House of God to look to the rule and disposal of all things therein Now the Priests of old were as unto this part of their Office confined unto the material House or Temple of God but Jesus Christ was set over the whole spiritual House of God to rule and dispose of it chap. 3.6 4. He alone abides for ever The true and real High Priest was not to minister for one Age or Generation only but for the whole people of God unto the end of the world And this Prerogative of the Priesthood of Christ the Apostle insists upon chap. 7.23 24. 5. He alone did and could do the true and proper work of a Priest namely make reconciliation for the sins of the people The Sacrifices of other Priests could only represent what was to be done the thing it self they could not effect for it was not possible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sin as the Apostle shews chap. 10.4 but this was done effectually by that one offering which this High Priest offered verse 11 12 13 14. All which things must be afterwards insisted on in their proper places if God permit This then is his Prerogative this is our priviledge and advantage II. The assumption of our nature and his conformity unto us therein was principally necessary unto the Lord Jesus on the account of his being an High Priest for us It behoved him to be made like unto us that he might be an High Priest it is true that as the great Prophet of his Church he did in part teach and instruct it whilst he was in the flesh in his own Person but this was in a manner a meer consequence of his assuming our nature to be our High Priest For he instructed his Church before and after principally by his Spirit And this he might have done to the full though he had never been incarnate So also might he have ruled it with supreme Power as its King and Head But our High Priest without the assumption of our nature he could not be because without this he had nothing to offer and of necessity saith the Apostle he must have somewhat to offer unto God A Priest without a Sacrifice is as a King without a Subject Had not God prepared him a body he could have had nothing to offer He was to have a self to offer to God or his Priesthood had been in vain For God had shewed that no other Sacrifice would be accepted or was effectual for that end which was designed unto this Office On this therefore is laid the indispensible necessity of the Incarnation of Christ. III. Such was the unspeakable love of Christ unto the Brethren than he would refuse nothing no condition that was needful to fit him for the discharge of the work which he hâ—d undertaken for them Their High Priest he must be this he could not unless he were made like unto them in all things He knew what this would cost him what trouble sorrow suffering in that conformity unto them he must undergo what miseries he must conflict withall all his life what a close was to be put unto his pilgrimage on the earth what woful temptations he was to pass through all lay open and naked before him But such was his Love shadowed out unto us by that of Jacâ—b to Rachel that he was content to submit unto any terms to undergo any condition so that he might save and enjoy his beloved Church See Ephes. 5.25 26. And surely he who was so intense in his love is no less constant therein Nor hath he left any thing undone that was needful to bring us unto God But we are yet farther to proceed with our explication of the words The Apostle having asserted the Priesthood of Christ describes in the fifth place the nature of the Office it self as it was vested in him and this he doth two ways 1. By a general description of the Object of it or that which it is exercised about 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the things appertaining unto God 2. In a particular instance taken from the end of his Priesthood and the great work that he performed thereby to make reconciliation for the sins of the people First He was to be an High Priest in the things pertaining unto God that is either in things that were to be done for God with men as the Apostle speaks We are Ambassadors for Christ as though God did beseech you by us 2 Cor. 5.20 Or in things that were to be done with God for men For there were two general parts of the Office of the High Priest the one to preside in the House and over the Worship of God to do the things of God with men This the Prophet assigns unto Joshua the High Priest an especial Type of Christ Zech. 3.7 Thus saith the Lord of hosts If thou wilt walk in my ways and if thou wilt keep my charge then thou shalt also judge my house and thou shalt also keep my courts And of Christ himself even he shall build the Temple of the Lord and he shall bear the glory and shall sit and rule upon his throne and he shall be a priest upon his throne chap. 6.13 that is the High Priest of our profession chap. 3.1 He was set authoritatively over the House of God to take care that the whole Worship of it were performed according unto his appointment and to declare his Statutes and Ordinances unto the people And in this sense the Lord Christ is also the High Priest of his Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 feeding and ruling them in the Name and Authority of God Mich. 5.4 Yet this is not that part of his Office which is here intended by the Apostle The other part of the High Priests Office was to perform the things toward God which on the part of the people were to be performed So Jethro adviseth Moses Exod. 18.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Be thou unto the people before God which words the LXX render 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the phrase here used by the Apostle Be thou unto the people in things appertaining unto God And this was the principal part of the Office and Duty of the High Priest the other being only a consequent thereof And that it was so as to the Office of Christ the Apostle manifests in the especial limitation which he adjoyns unto this general assertion he was an High