Gâ—neral In which I intend to shew that they have departed from the Tradition of the Church much more evidently than they can pretend that we have done And this is concerning the Popes power oâ— Deposing Kings which they who live under so mighty a Monarch have very prudently renounced But whether they have not more plainly contradicted the Tradition of the Church than the Reformers did shall appear by the sequel of this Discourse In order to which I shall lay down two grounds that seem undeniable in their own principles The one is That the Tradition of any Age or Ages of the Church when it is universal and undisputed is of the same authority with the Tradition of any other Age whatsoever For the promises made to the Church last continually and have the same force at all times And therefore a Tradition for these last six hundred years is of as strong an authority as was that of the first six Ages The second is That a Tradition concerning the measures of mens Obedience and actions is of the same authority with a Tradition concerning the measures of their Belief The one sort are practical and the other are speculative points and as more are concerned in a practical truth than in a speculative point so it has greater effects and more influence on the World therefore it is as necessary that these be certainly handed down as the other And by consequence a Tradition concerning any Rule of Life is as much to be received as that concerning any point of Belief for the Creed and the Ten Commandments being the two Ingredients of the positive part of our Baptismal Vow it is as necessary that we be certainly directed in the one as in the other and if there were any preference to be admitted here certainly it must be for that which is more practical and of greater extent Upon these two grounds I subsume that all the Characters of Oral Tradition by which they can pretend to find it out in any one particular agree to this Doctrine of the Popes power of deposing Princes that are either Hereticks or favourers of them The way sof searching for Tradition are these four First what the Writers and Doctors of the Church have delivered down from one age to another The second is what the Popes have taught and pronounced ex Cathedrâ which to a great part of that Communion is Decisive their authority being held Infallible and to the rest it is at least a great Indication of the Tradition of such an Age. The third is what such Councils as are esteemed and received as Oecumenical Councils have decreed as General Rules The fourth is the late famous Method of Prescription when from the received Doctrine of any one Age we run a back-scent up to the Apostles upon this supposition that the Doctrine of the Church chiefly in a visible and sensible thing could not be changed These are all the ways imaginable to find out the Tradition of past Ages and they do all agree to this Doctrine All the Writers for five or six Ages both Commentators on Scripture the School-men the Casuists and Canonists agreed in it so that Cardinal Perron had reason to challenge those of the contrary persuasion to shew any one Writer before Calvin's time that had been of another mind We do not cite this as a proof because Cardinal Perron said so but because the thing in it self cannot be disproved and in the Contests that fell in between the Popes and those Princes against whom they thundred no Civilian nor Canonist ever denied the Popes power of deposing in the case of Heresie It is true when the Popes pretended to a Temporal Dominion and that all Princes were their Vassals some were found to write against that other Princes contended about the particulars laid to their charge and denied that they were either Hereticks or favourers of Hereticks But none ever disputed this position in general that in a manifest case of Heresie the Pope might not depose Princes and it is too well known what both the Sorbonne determined in the case of Henry the Third and likewise how the body of the Clergy adhered to Cardinal Perron in the opposition he made to the condemnation of that opinion The next mark of Tradition is the Popes pronouncing an opinion ex Cathedrâ that is in a solemn Judiciary way founding it on Scripture and Tradition If Popes had only brutally made War upon some Princes and violently thrust them out of their Dominions this indeed were no mark by which we could judge of a Tradition But when we find Gregory the Seventh and many Popes since his time found this authority on passages of Scripture as that of the Keys being given to S. Peter Jeremiah the Prophet's being set over Kingdomes to root out to pluck up and destroy and that all power in Heaven and Earth was given to Chrâ—st and his bidding his Disciples to buy a Sword we must look on this as the declaring the Tradition of the Church So that it must eitâ—er be confessed that they are not faithful conveyers of it or that this is truly the Tradition of the Church And this has been done so often these last six hundred years that it were a needless imposing on the Readers patience to go about the proving it The Third Indication of Tradition is the Declaration made by Synods but chiefly by General Councils I need not here mention the many Roman Synods that have concurred with the Popes in the Depositions which they thundered out against Kings or Emperours since we have greater authorities confirming it The Third Council of Lateran declared that all Princes that favoured Heresie fell from their Dominions and they granted a Plenary Indulgence to all that fought against them The Fourth Council of the Lateran vested the Pope with the power of giving away their Dominions if they continued for a year obstinate in that their merciful disposition of not extirpating Hereticks The first Council of Lions concurred with the Pope in the deposition of the Emperour Frederick the Second which is grounded in the preamble on the power of binding and loosing given to S. Peter After these came the Council of Constance and they reckoning themselves superiour to the Pope lookt on this as a power inherent in the Church and so assumed it to themselves and therefore put this Sanction in many of their Decrees particularly in that for maintaining the Rights of the Church and in the Passports they granted which had been often added in the Bulls that confirmed the foundations of Monasteries that if any whether he were Emperour King or of what Dignity soever he might be opposed their Order he should thereby forfeit his Dignity The Council of Sienna confirmed all Decrees against Hereticks and the favourers of them that had been made in any former Councils and by consequence those of the Third and Fourth Councils in the Lateran The Council of Basil put
and theirs is the affirmative and since all Negatives especially in matters of Religion prove themselves it falls to their share to prove those Additions which they have made to our Faith and to the Doctrine contained in the Scriptures 3. Though this is a sure Maxime yet our Plea is stronger for there are many things taught by them against the express words of Scripture as their worshipping Images their noâ— drinking all of the Cup their worshipping of Angels their not worshipping God in a tongue which the unlearned understand and to which they can say Amen their setting up more Mediatoâ—â— between God and us than one Whereas S. Paul exhorting us to make Prayerâ— to God tells us there is one Mâ—diâ—tor which shews that he spake there his single Intercession with God on our behalf 4. We do not only build our Doctrine upon some few passages of the Scripture in which perhaps a Critical Writer might easily raise much dust but upon that in which we cannot be so easily mistaken which is the main scope of the whole New Testament and the design of Christianity which we believe is reversed in their Church by the Idolatry and Superstition that is in it 5. As for the particulars which they call on us to prove as they are very few so scarce any of them is of the greatest consequence The first is a speculative point about which we would never have broke Communion with them For the second that we receive Christ only by Faith if the third is true that the Sacrament is still Bread then that must be also true Now S. Paul calls it so four several times as also our Saviour calls the Cup the Fruit of the Vine As for our denying Purgatory it is a Negative and they must prove it Nor should we have broken Communion for their opinion concerning it if they had not added to that the redeeming Souls out of it with Masses by which the Worship is corrupted contrary to the institution of the Sacrament And for the last in the sense in which many of them assert it we do not raise any Controversie about it for we know that God rewards our good works or rather crowns his own Grace in us The fifth Method IS the Peaceable Method and without dispute founded on the Synod of Dort which all the pretended Reformed Churches of France have received and which has defined according to the Holy Scripture that when there is a dispute concerning any Controverted Article between two parties that are both within the true Church it is necessary to refer it to the judgement of the Synod and that he who refuses to submit himself becomes guilty of Heresiâ— and Schism Now if we will run back to the time in which the dispute began concerning any Article for instance that of the Real Presence both the parties in thâ— debate as well the Ancestors of those of the P. R. Religion as ours were in thâ— same Church which was the true Church for there was no other before the Sâ—paration which was not then made Then their Ancestors who would not submit to the Iudgement of the Church and have separated from her on no other account but because she had condemned their sentiments were Schismaticks and Hereticks And those who at this day succeed them are in the same manner guilty since they follow their opinions And to this they can make no other Answer but that which the Hereticks that have been condemned in all Ages might have made This Method is proved in all its parts in the little Treatise that has been made about it Remarks IT is not unwisely done to call this a Method that is to pass without dispute for it will not bear one And 1. There is this difference between the principles of Protestants and those of the Church of Rome that whereas the latter are bound to justifie whatever has been decreed in a General Council as a rule either of Faith or Manners the sormer are not so tied and much less are they bound by the decision of a National Council though never so solemn It is natural for all Judicatories to raise their own authority as high as they can and so if any Synod has made any such Declaration it lies on them to justifie it but the rest of those who have separated from the corruptions of the Church of Rome are not concerned in it 2. The principle of Protestants with relation to the majority even in a General Council is That when any Doctrines are established or condemned upon the Authorities of the Scriptures those who differ from them and do think â—hat the Council misunderstood the Scriptures are bound to suspect themselves a little and to review the matter with greater application and not to adhere to their former opinions out of pride or obstinacy They are also bound to consider well of their opinions though they appear still to be true yet if â—hey are of that importance that the publishing them is necessary to Salvation for unless it is so the Peace of the Church is not to be rent by them Yet if they are required to profess that they believe opinions which they think false if tâ—ey were never so inconsiderable no man ought to go against his Conscience But if a man after his strictest enquiries is still persuaded that a Council has decreed against the true meaning of the Scriptures in a point necessary to Salvation then he must prefer God to Man and follow the sounder though it should prove to be the much lesser party And if any Company or Synod of Protestants have decreed any thing contrary to this in so far they have departed from the Protestant principles 3. Difference is to be made also between Heresie and Schism in a Legal and a Vulgar sense and what is truly such in the sight of God The Sentence of a Supream Court from which there lies no Appeal makes one legally a Criminal But if he is innocent he is not the less innocent because a hard Sentence is past against him So Heresie and â—chism may take their denominations from the Sentence of a National or General Council But in that which is the sense of those words that makes them Criminal Heresie is nothing but an obstinate persisting in errours contrary to Divine Revelation after one has had a sufficient means of Inâ—truction and Schism is an ill grounded Separation from the Body of the Church So it must be the Divine Revelation and not the authority of a Synod that can prove one who holds contrary opinions to be an Heretick and the grounds of the Separation must be likewise examined before one can be concluded a Schismatick 4. Though the Conclusions and Definitions made by the Synod of Dort are perhaps generally received in France yet that does not bind them up to subscribe every thing that was asserted in that Synod Nor do they found their assent to those opinions on the authority of that Synod but upon the
what is the true sense of those passages that are in dispute but by that same Church which conveys it to you This is S. Austin's method in many places but above all in his Book De utilitate Credendi and in his Book Contra Epistolam fundamenti In which he says I would not believe the Gospel if the authority of the Church did not oblige me to it This Method is handsomely managed in the Treatise of the true Word of God joyned to the Peaceable Method Remarks 1. GReat difference is to be made between the conveyance of Books and an Oral Tradition of Doctrine It is very easie to carry down the one in a way that is Morally Infallible An exact copying being all that is necessary for that Whereas it is morally impossible to prevent frauds and impostures in the other in a course of some Ages especially in times of Ignorance and Corruption in which the Credulity of unthinking people has made an easie game to the Craft and Industry of covetous and aspiring Priests Few were then at the pains to examine any thing but took all upon Trust and became so ready of belief that the more incredible a thing seemed to be they swallowed it down the more willingly 2. If this way of reasoning will hold good it was as strong in the mouths of the Iews in our Saviours time for the High Priest and Sanhedrim might have as reasonably pretended that since they had conveyed down the Books in which the Prophecies of the Messiah were contained they hâ—d likewise the right to expound those Prophecies 3. A Witness that hands a thing down without Additions is very different from a Judge that delivers things on his own Authority We freely own the Church to be such a Witness that there is no colour of reason to disbelieve the Tradition of the Books but we see great cause to question the credit of her decisions 4. In this Tradition of Books we have not barely the Tradition of the Church for it We find in all ages since the Books of the New Testament were written several Authors have cited many and large passages out of them We find they were very quickly translated into many other Languages and diverse of those are conveyed down to us There were also so many Copies of these Books every where that though one had resolved on so Sacrilegious an attempt as the corrupting them had been he could not have succeeded in it to any great degree Some additions might have been made in some Copies and so from those they might have been derived to others but these could not have bâ—en considerable otherwise they had been discovered and complained of and when we find the Church engaged in contests with Hereticks and Schismaticks we see both sides appealed to the Scriptures and neither of them reproached the other for violating that Sacred Trust. And the noise we find of the small change of a Letter in the Aâ—ian Controversie shews us how exact they were in preserving these Records As for the Errours of Transcribers that is incident to the Nature of Man and though some Errours have crept into some Copies yet all these put together do not alter any one point of our Religion so that they are not of great consequence Thus it appears how much reason we have to receive the Scriptures upon the credit of such a Tradition But for Oral Tradition it is visible how it might have been so managed as quickly to change the whole Nature of Religion Natural Religion was soon corrupted when it passed down in this Conveyance even during the long lives of the Ancient Patriarchs who had thereby an advantage to keep this pure that after ages in which the life of Man is so shortned cannot pretend to We also see to what a degree the Iewish Tradition became corrupted in our Saviours time particularly in one point which may be called the most essential part of their Religion to wit concerning their Messias what the nature of his Person and Kingdome were to be So that they all expected a Great Conquerour a second Moses or a David so ineffectual a mean is Oral Tradition for conveying down any Doctrine pure or uncorrupted The Ninth Method IS to tell them the Church in which they were before they made the Separation was the true Church because it was the only Church so that they could not Reform the Doctrine without making another Church For then she must have fallen into Errour and by consequence the Gates of Hell must have prevailed against her which is directly contrary to the Promise of Iesus Christ that cannot fail The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against her Remarks 1. A Church may be a True Church and yet be corrupted by many Errours for a â—rue Church is a Society of men among whom are the certain means of Salvation and such was the Iewish Church in our Saviours time For their Sacrifices had still an Expiatory Vertue and the Covenant made with that people stood still and yet they were over-run with many Errours chiefly in their notions of the Messias And thus as long as the Church of Rome acknowledges the Expiation made by the Death of Christ and applied to all that truly believe and amend their lives so long she is a True Church So that those of that Communion who adhere truly to that which is the great fundamental of the Christian Religion may be saved But when so many things were added to this that it was very hard to preserve this fundamental truth pure and entire then it was necessary for those who were better enlightned to call on others to correct the abuses that had crept in 2. It is hard to build a great super-structure on a figurative expression of which it is not easie to find out the true and full sense And in this that is cited there are but three terms and about every one of them great and just grounds of doubting do appear 1. It is not certain what is meant by the Gates of Hell which is an odd figure for an assailant If by Gates we mean Councils because the Magistrates and Courts among the Iews sate in the Gates then the meaning will be that the Craft of Hell shall not prevail against the Church that is shall not root out Christianity or if by Gates of Hell or the Grave according to a common Greek Phrase Death be to be understood it being the Gate through which we pass to the Grave then the meaning is this that the Church shall never die or be extinguished Nor is there less difficulty to be made about the signification of the word Church Whether it is to be meant in general of the body of Christians or of the Pastors of the Church and of the majority of them The Context seems to carry it for the Body of Christians and then the meaning will be only this That there shall still be a Body of Christians in the World And
had opinions different from others separate themselves from them but remained in the Communion and Unity of the same Church with those from whom they differed That is to say they waited till the Church should have decided the difference and after he had resumed a little of what he had formerly said he concludes thus If then the Church was lost for holding that the Baptism of Hereticks was good they cannot shew the Original of their Communion But if the true Church did still subsist they cannot justifie their Separation nor the Schism that they have made One may say all this against the Waldenses the Lutherans the Calvinists and the other Hereticks who cannot mount higher than to Waldo to Luther to Calvin or their other Heads This Method of S. Austin's is most excellent But if our Brethren the pretended Reformed will defend themselves by saying as in effect they do say in some of their Books That it was not they who made the Separation but rather that it came from us and that we have cut them off from our Communion To this it must be answered That there are two sorts of Sâ—paration the one is Criminal the other is Iudicial In the first one separates himself from his Pastor by a manifest Disobedience in the second the Pastor separates him from the Flock who is making a party and refuses to submit to the Orders of the Church The one is a Sin and the other is the Punishment The one is a voluntary departure the other is the being cut off by a Sâ—ntence even as the Iudge pronounces a Sentence of Condemnation against one that has killed himself The proof of those two different Separations is to be found in the Thirty eighth Letter of S. Cyprians where he speaks of one Augendus who had gone over to the party of Felicissimus the Deacon and it appears that that great Saint had suspended and excommunicated him for having withdrawn himself from his Obedience and for having engaged others in the same Separation Let every one says he that has folfollowed his Opinions and Faction know that he shall communicate no more with us in the Church since of his own accord he has chosen to be separated from the Church In his Seventy sixth Epistle he says the same thing of Novatian and those who had joyned with him in his Revolt Because they leaving the Church by their Rebellion and breaking the Peace and Unity of Jesus Christ have endeavoured to establish their authority and to assume a Supreme Jurisdiction to themselves and to usurp power to Baptize and to offer Sacrifice This Distinction is also clearly stated in the fourth Action of the Council of Chalcedon where those two Ancient Canons of the Council of Antioch that were drawn out of Canons of the Apostles were cited The first is concerning those that were separated the other is concerning those who of their own accord did separate themselves The Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It was thought proper for this purpose to transcribe here those two Canons which are the fundamental Laws of the practice of the Church with regard to Hereticks and Schismaticks whom she throws out of her bosome and who have separated themselves from her These Canons are the Fourth and Fifth of the Council of Antioch and the Twenty seventh and Thirtieth of the Apostolick Canons and the pretended Reformed cannot reject their Authority since they observe among themselves the same Discipline when any particular persons whether Ministers or others of their Communion will not submit to the Decisions of their Synods Remarks 1. FOr the first branch of this Method the Reformed are not at all concerned in it for they do not deny the Church of Rome to be still a True Church and that her Baptism and Ordinations are valid and that they are not to be repeated and therefore though it was very pertinent to urge the Donatists as S. Austin did who held that the Sacraments in an ill mans hands had no vertue at all and that the Church had every where failed so that there was no Church but that which was among them Yet all this is foreign to the state of the Controversie between us and the Church of Rome and we do freely acknowledge that in such a matter as the Re-baptizing Hereticks it had been a very great sin to have broken Communion with the rest of the Church 2. Yet upon this very head P. Sâ—ephen did excommunicate S. Cyprian who yet for all that did not depart from his former opinion or practice So here was such a Schism as they object to us S. Cyprian thought the Rebaptizing Hereticks was well grounded Stephen thought otherwise and did excommunicate him If upon that a lasting Schism had followed in the Church S. Cyprian might have been held the fountain of it by those who condemned his opinion but if his opinion was true he could be no Schismatick So we desire the grounds of our Separation may be examined if they will not bear such a Superstructure we confess we deserve the severest censures possible but if they are solid then the guilt of the rent that is in the Church must lie somewhere else than on us 3. We do not deny but there are two sorts of Separation which are here very well distinguished and without seeking for any proof in so clear a matter We confess that when any separates himself from the Church upon any unjustifiable account those Canons and the highest severities of Church-censures ought to be applied â—o them but all this is upon supposition that the departure is ill grounded and therefore all those Rules that have been â—aid down in general against Heresie and Schism must still suppose the Church to â—e pure and uncorrupted 4. It is plain by these very Canons how much that power of the Church may be and was abused The Council of Antioch being composed of the favourers of Arius deposed Athanasius and resolved to silence him and such other Church-men as receiv'd the Nicene Doctrine in such a manner that they should be no more able to withstand their designs And therefore they made those Canons according to former customes which in the stile of that Age was called the Canon or Rule for none that has considered things will believe that the Canons that are called Apostolical were made by the Apostles and their chief design was levelled against Athanasius and the Orthodox party But at that same time as the Orthodox in the East did not submit to this so neiâ—her did the Bishops 〈◊〉 the West take any notice of it anâ— Chrysostome who was bred up at Aâ—tioch and so could not but know in what esteem those Canons were held did not look on himself as bound by them anâ— made no account of them when they were objected to him Thus though iâ— general these are gooâ— Rules and such aâ— ought to be obeyed where the Synod or the Bishop do not abuse their power yet
Plea of those persecuted men so fully that it may be well concluded that the Spirit that acted in Hilary is not the same with that which now inspires the Reverend Prelates of that Church To this I might add the known History of the Priscillianists that fell out not long after I shall not presume to make a parallel between any of the Gallican Church and Ithacius who persecuted them of whom the Historian gives this Character That he was a vain sumptuous sensual and impudent man and that he grew to that pitch in vice that he suspected all men that led strict lives as if they had been inclined to Heresie And it is also to be hoped that none will be so uncharitable as to compare the Priscillianists with those they now call Hereticks in France whether we consider their opinions that were a revival of the blasphemies of the Gnosticks or their morals that were brutal and obscene even by Priscillian's own confession Now Ithacius prosecuted those in the Emperours Courts and went on in the pursuit though the great Apostle of that age Martin warned him often to give it over In conclusion when Ithacius had set it on so far that a Sentence was sure to pass against them he then withdrew from it Sentence was given and some of them were put to death upon which some Bishops excommunicated Ithacius yet S. Martin was wrought on to communicate with him very much against his mind being threatned by the Emperour Maximus that if he would not do it Troops should be ordered to march into Spain to destroy the rest of them This prevailed on that good man to joyn in Communion with those that had acted so contrary to the mercifulness of their Religion and to the sacredness of their Character But no Arts could work on S. Martin to approve of what they had done The effects of this were remarkable for when S. Martin went home if we will believe Sulpitius an Angel appeared to him and reproved him severely for what he had done upon which he with many tears lamented much the sin he had committed by his communicating with those men and would never after that communicate with any of that party And during the sixteen years that he survived that Sulpitius who lived with him tells us that he never went to any Synod and that there was a great withdrawing of those Influences and Graces for which he had been so eminent formerly And thus if S. Martin's example and practice is of any authority the Cruelty of that Church that has engaged all the Princes of Europe as much as was in their power to do what Maximus then did and the present practices of the Bishops about the Court might justifie a Separation from them But we do not proceed upon such disputable grounds To this I shall only â—dd the aâ—thority of another Father who tâ—oâ—gh he was none of the Gallican Bishops 〈◊〉 since he is more read and esteemed in that Church than any other of all the â—athers it is to be hoped that his authority may be somewhat considered It is S. Austin He was once against all sorts of severity in matters of Religion and delivered his mind so pathetically and elegaâ—tly on that subject that I presume the Reader will not be ill pleased to hear his own words writing against the Manicheans whose impieties are too well known to be enlarged on so as to shew that even in the account which the Church of Rome makes of things they cannot pretend that the Protestants are as bad as they were He begins his Book against them with an earnest Prayer to God that he would give him a calm and serene mind so that he might study their conversion and not seek their ruine to which purpose he applies those words of S. Paul to Timothy the Servant of the Lord must not strive but be meek towards all men apt to teach patient in meekness instructing them that oppose themselves To which he adds these words Let them exercise Cruelty upon you who do not know with what difficulty truth is found out and how hardly errours are avoided Let them exercise Cruelty upon you who do not know how rare and hard a thing it is to overmaster carnal imaginations with the serenity of a pious mind Let them exercise Cruelty upon you who do not know with what difficulty the eye of the inward man is healed that so it may behold its Sun Let them exercise Cruelty upon you who do not know with what groans and sighs we attain the smallest measure of the knowledge of God And in the last place let them exercise Cruelty upon you who were never themselves deceived with any errour like that with which you are now deceived It is true it may be pretended that he became afterwards of another mind but that will not serve to excuse the severities now on foot the case being so very different The Donatists in his time very generally fierce and cruel one sort of them the Circumcellionists acted like mad men They did lie in wait for S. Austin's life they fell upon several Bishops with great barbarity putting out the eyes of some and cudgelling others till they left them as dead Upon this the Bishops of Africk were forced to desire the Emperours protection and that the Laws made against Hereticks might be executed upon the Donatists and yet even in this S. Austin was at first averse It is true he afterwards in his Writings against the Donatists justified those severities of fining and banishing but he expresses both in his own name and in the name of all those Churches great dislike not only of all Capital proceedings but of all rigour and when the Governours and Magistrates were carrying things too far he interposed often and â—ith great earnestness to moderate their severity and wrote to them that if they went on with such rigour the Bishops would rather bear with all the violences of the Donatists than seek to them for redress and whole Synods of Bishops concurred with him in making the like Addresses in their favours And though there were excesses committed in some few instances yet we may easily conclude how gentle they were upon the whole matter from this that he says that the Fines imposed by Law had never been exacted and that they were so far from turning the Donatists out of their own Churches that they still kept possession of several Churches which they had violently invaded and wrested out of the hands of the Bishops It is plain then since he justified those severities only as a necessary restraint on the rage to the Donatists and a just protection of the Bishops that this has no relation to the hardships the Protestants now suffer it not being pretended that they have drawn it upon themselves by any tumultuary or irregular proceedings of theirs So much seemed necessary to shew how different the Spirit of the present Clergy oâ— France is
from that which animated the Church in the former and best ages The Reverend Prelates say in their Letter That they hold the same Faith with their Predecessors If this were true in all points it were indeed very hard to write an Apology for those that have separated from them I shall not engage in a long discussion of the sentiments of the Ancient Bishops of the Gallican Church yet that the Reader may not be too much wrought on by the confidence and plausibleness of this expressionâ— I shall only give a taste of the Faith of the first of all the Gallican Clergy whose works are yet preserved and that is Irenaeus I shall instance it in two particulars the one is the hinge upon which all our other Controversies turn that is whether the Scriptures or Oral Tradition is to be appealed to for determining matters of Controversie The other is the most material point in difference among us concerning the presence of Christ in the Sacrament whether in it we really receive the substance of Bread and Wine or only the Accidents As to the first he directly appeals to the Scriptures which he says were the Pillar â—nd ground of Truth and adds that the Valentinians did appeal to Oral Tradition from which he â—urns to that Tradition that was come from the Apostles on which he insists very copiously and puts all the authority of Tradition in this That it was derived from the Apostles And therefore says that if the Apostles had delivered nothing in Writing we must then have followed the Order of Tradition And after he has shewed that the Tradition to which the Valentinians pretended was really against them and that the Orthodox had it derived down from the Apostles on their side he returns to that upon which he had set up the strength of his cause to prove the truth from the Scriptures Now the Scriptures being the foundation on which the Protestants build and Oral Tradition together with the authority of the Church being that on which the Church of Rome builds it will be easie to every one that considers those Chapters referred to in Irenaeus to gather upon which of those he grounded his belief As for the other particular he plainly calls the Sacrament that Bread over which thanks have been given and says our flesh is nourished by the body and blood of Christ and concludes that our flesh by the Sacrament has an assurance of its Resurrection and Incorruptibility More particularly he says Our blood is encreased by the blood of Christ and that he encreases our body by that bread which he has confirmed to be his body and that by these the substance of our body is encreased and from thence he argues that our bodies receive an encrease not by any internal or invisible way but in the natural way of nourishment and so concludes that our bodies being nourished by the Eucharist shall therefore rise again Every one that considers the force of these words must conclude that he believed our bodies received in the Sacrament a real substance which nourished them and not bare Accidents If then upon this essay it appears that the first Writer of all Gallican Bishops does agree with the Protestants both in that which is the foundation upon which they build their whole cause and also in that particular opinion which is believed to be of the greatest importance then the Reader has no reason to believe that the present Bishops of France hold the same Faith which their Predecessors taught who first preached the Christian Religion in that Kingdom But now I come to answer the main Question which is indeed the whole substance of the Letter Why have they made the Schism If such a Letter with such a demand in it had come from the Abassin or Armenian Churches or perhaps from the Greek Churches whose distance from us is such and the oppressions they groan under are so extreme that they have little heart and few opportunities to enquire into the affairs or opinions of others it could not have been thought strange but to hear it from these among whom those live who have so often both in Writings and Discourses answered this question so copiously is really somewhat unaccountable Yet this is not all but it is added That the Protestants upon trial finding they could not shake their Doctrine have charged them only for their ill lives as if that were the ground of the Separation This it must be confessed had better become the affected Eloquence of a Maimbourg than the sincerity of so many eminent men of whom the mildest censure that can be past in this particular is That some aspiring Priest being appointed to pen this Letter that was better accustomed to the figures of a clamorous Rhetorick than the strict measures of Truth gave it this turn hoping to recommend himself by it and that the Bishops signed it in haste without considering it well Who of all the Protestants have made that Experiment and found that the Faith of the Church of Rome was not to be attackt and that she can only be accused for the ill lives of some in her Communion If this were all we had to object we do not deny but that all that the Fathers retorted on the Schismaticks particularly the Donatists did very justly fall on us and that we could neither answer it to God to the World nor our own Consciences if we had separated from their Church on no other account And this is indeed so weak a Plea that the Penner of the Letter shewed his skill at least if he was wanting in his sincerity to set up a pretence which he knew he could easily overthrow though the reasons he brings to overthrow it are not all pertinent nor convincing But this in conclusion is so managed as to draw an occasion from it to complement the present Pope some way to make an amends for their taking part with their King against him All that is to be said on this Head is That Protestants are not so unjust as to deny the Pope that now reigns his due praises of whose vertue and strictness of life they hear such accounts that they heartily wish all the Assembly of the Clergy from the President down to the Secretaries would imitate that excellent Pattern that he sets them A Zeal for converting Hereticks does not very well become those whose course of life has not been so exemplary that this can be imputed to an inward sense of Religion and to the motives of Divine Charity But in this point of the corruption of mens lives we may add two things more material The one is if a Church teaches ill Morals or at least connives at such Casuistical Doctrines as must certainly root out all the principles of moral vertue and common goodness out of the minds of men then their ill Morals may be improved to be a good argument for a Separation from them How much the Casuistical Doctrine of those
who are the Chief Confessors in that Communion has been corrupted of late we may learn from what has been published by many among themselves particularly by their late Address to the present Pope and by the Articles condemned both by Pope Alexander the Seventh and by the Pope that now reigns But yet how faint those censures are every one that has read them must needs observe This is not all The dissolving of Oaths and Vows the dispensing with many of the Laws of God the authorizing Subjects to shake off their Princes yoke if he does not extirpate Heresie and Hereticks the butcheries of those they call Hereticks and that after Faith given to the contrary having been for some Ages the publick practices of the Court of Rome in which several General Councils have also concurred with them are things both of such a nature and have been so openly avowed as well as practised in that Church that this argument from the corruption of their Morals may be well fastened on their whole Church If likewise many opinions are received among them which do naturally tend to slacken the strictness of holiness and give the World more mild Ideas of sin and make the way to the favour of God accessible even without a real Reformation then there will be more weight in this argument than may at first view appear The belief of the Sacraments conferring Grace ex opere operato the Vertue of Indulgences the Priestly Absolution the Communication of Merits the Vertue supposed to be in some Pilgrimages in Images and Priviledged Altars in Fraternities and many consecrated things together with the after-game of Purgatory and of Redemption out of it by Masses these with many more devices are such contrivances for enervating the true force of Religion and have such effects on the lives of men who generally are too easie to hearken to any thing that may make them hope well while they live ill that when we complain of a great dissolution of mens Morals that live under the influences of that Religion this charge is not personal but falls on their Church in common In the next place that vast corruption of Ecclesiastical Discipline and of all the Primitive Rules occasioned chiefly by the exorbitant power the Popes have assumed of dispensing with all Laws the gross sale of such Graces at Rome the Intrigues in the Creation of the Popes themselves the universal neglect of the Pastoral care among the superiour Orders of the Clergy do give men just and deep prejudices against a Church so corrupt in her ruling Members and do raise great dislike of that extent of Authority which the Bishops of Rome have assumed that have cut all the Banks and let in such an inundation of ill practices on the World And if once in an Age or two a Pope of another temper of better Morals and greater strictness arises we are notwithstanding that to judge of things not upon rare and single instances but upon their more ordinary and natural effects Thus laying all these things together it will appear that our exceptions to that Church upon the account of their Morals is not so slight as the Penner of that Letter has represented it and that his Instances for living among ill men have no relation to this matter But this is the weakest Plea we have for our Separation and as strong soever as it may be in it self we build upon solider foundations In order to the opening this I shall premise a little of the true end and design of Religion which is to beget in us so deep a sense of the Divine nature and perfections aâ— may most effectually engage us to become truly Holy There are two Inclinations in the nature of men that dispose him to corrupt the Ideas of God the one is an Inclination to cloath him in some outward figure and present him to our senses in such a manner that we may hope by flatteries or submissions by pompous or cruel services to appease him And the other is a desire to reconcile our notions of Religion to our vicious habits and appetites that so we may some way pacifie our Consciences in the midst of our lusts and passions And thus the true notion of Idolatry is the representing of God to us so as that we may hope to gain his favour by other methods than our being inwardly pure and holy And the immorality of this consists not only in the indecency of such representations and their unsuitableness to the Divine nature but likewise in this that our notions of God which ought to be the seeds of Vertue and true Godliness by which our natures are to be reformed are no more effectual that way but turn only to a Pageantry and spend themselves in dressing up our worship so as we think will better agree with one that is like our selves Now we find the chief design of the Gospel was to root this out of the World and to give us the highest and perfectest Ideas of the purity and goodness of the Divine nature that might raise in us that inward probity of Soul compâ—ehended in the general name of Charity or Love which is the proper Character of the Christian Spirit We have also the Divine Holiness so presented to us that we can never hope to attain the favour of God here or Eternal happiness hereafter but by becoming inwardly and universally holy Now our main charge against the Church of Rome is That this which is the great design of the Christian Religion is reversed among them and that chiefly in four things 1. In proposing visible objects to the adorations of the people against not only the current of the whole Scriptures but the true Idea and right notion of God and this not only by Precept in the Images of our Saviour and the Saints but by a general tolerance in the Images of the blessed Trinity it self Thus the senses having somewhat set before them on which they may work do naturally corrupt the mind and convert Religion which is an inward and spiritual work into an outward gross homage to these objects 2. In setting up the Intercession of Saints as if either God had not a capacity of attending to the whole Government of the World or were not so merciful or good but that as Princes are wrought on by the interposition of their Courtiers so he needed to have such importunities to induce him to be favourable to us The very Plea commonly used for this from the resemblance of Earthly Courts is the greatest debasing of the Divine Nature that is possible And when the Addresses made to these Saints in the publick Offices of the Church are the very same that we make to God or our Saviour That they would pardon our sins give uâ—â—race assist us at all times and open the Kingdome of Heaven to us and when after those things have been complained of for above an Age and that upon a general review of their Offices
the Sixth and Queen Elizabeth's time when no Persecutions provoked them to them and no Laws gave them any colour for them are a much stronger prejudice against their Church chiefly since these were set on by the Authority and Agents of Rome so that they may well give over the pursuing this matter any further As for the argument set before them from the Greatness and Glory of their King and his Zeal to have all again re-united into one Body how powerful soever it may be to work upon their fears and to touch them in their Secular concerns it cannot be considered as an argument to work on their reasons They expressed their Zeal for their King in his greatest extremity while he was under age and after all the heavy returns that they have met with since that time they have continued in an Invincible Loyalty and submission in all things except in the matters of their God If the Heroick greatness Glorious success and the more inherent qualities of a Princely mind are good Arguments to work on Subjects they were as strong in the times of a Trajan a Decius or a Dioclesian to perswade the Christians to turn Heathens But it is very probable this is the strongest of all those motives that have produced so many Conversions of late while men either to make their Court or to live easie are induced to make shipwrack of the Faith and of a good Conscience And I shall not add that it seems those who are so often making use of this Argument feel the mighty force it has on themselves and so imagine it should prevail as much on others as they find it does on their own Consciences or rather on their Ambition and Covetousness I will prosecute the matter of this Letter no further and therefore shall not shew in how many places the Secretary that penned it has discovered how much he is a Novice in such matters and what great advantages he gives to those who would sift all the expressions the figures and the periods in it But the Respect I pay to those that subscribe it as well as the importance and gravity of the subject stop me So from the reviewing this Letter I go next to consider the Methods laid down by the Assembly for carrying on those Conversions A MEMORIAL Containing diverse Methods of which very great use may be made for the Conversion of those who profess the pretended Reformed Religion The first Method Is that which Cardinal Richelieu used for reducing either in the way of Disputâ— or Conference those of the P. R. R. and to perswade them in an amicable manner to re-unite themselves to the Church THis Method is to attack them by â— Decree of a Synod of theirs thaâ— met at Charenton 1631. by which theâ— received to their Communion those of thâ— Ausbourg Confession who hold the Reaâ— Presence of the Body of Iesus Christ in the Eucharist together with diverse other Articles that are very different from the Confession of Faith of those that are the P. Reformed Vpon which the Minister Dailee in his Apology says That if the Church of Rome had no other errour besides that they had not had a sufficient reason for their separating from her It is certain that none of all the other points of our Belief that are controverted are either of greater importance or harder to be believed than this which has been ever esteemed even by themselves one of the chief grounds of their Separation and is that by which the people are most amused As for that which the Minister Dailee says for eluding the force of this Objection That the Lutherans do not adore Iesus Christ in the Sacrament It is altogether unreasonable since Calvin himself reproves the Lutherans for that and is forced to acknowledge that adoration is a necessary consequence of the real Presence What is more strange says he than to put Jesus Christ in the Bread and not to adore him and if he is in the Bread then he ought to be adored under the Bread Thus since according to the Calvinists in the same Synod one does not overthrow the grounds of Salvation by the belief of the Real Presence and the other points of their Confession concerning which they dispute that Cardinal thought he could convince them of their errour in separating faom the Communion of the Church of Rome in which according to their own Maximes one could be saved It was by the like reasoning that the African Fathers convinced the Donatists called the Primianists that they had unjustly separated themselves from the Catholick Church because it received Cecilian iâ—to its Communion since they had made a decree of Vnion with the Maximianists whom they had formerly condemned It was in the Council of Carthage held under Anastasius that the Fathers used this against those Hereticks and in the Fourth Canon they set this before them That they might see if they would but open their eyes a little to the Divine Light that they had as unjustly â—ut themselves off from the unity of the Church as the Maximianists according to what they said had separated themselves from their Communion Remarks IF Cardinal Richelieu had not â—een an abler States-man than as it appears by this argument he was a Divine the Princes of Europe would not have such cause as they have at present to dread the growth of the French Monarchy of which he laid the best and strongest foundations It is a common Maxime That no man can excel but in one thing so since his strength lay in the Politicks no wonder he had no great Talent for Divinity But if this at first view seemed to him to have somewhat in it to amuse weak minds especially when it surprized them with its novelty yet it is a little unexpected to find it taken up by so great a Body and set in the front of their Methods for making Proselytes after the weakness of it has been so evidently discovered 1. Great difference is to be made between a speculation that lies in the mind and is a mans particular opinion and that which discovers it self in the most solemn acts of Worship for the former unless it is such as subverts the foundations of Religion we can well bear with it These are errours in which the person that holds them is only concerned whereas the other errors become more fruitful they corrupt the Worship they give scandal and infect others Therefore we will without scruple own that whether a man believe Consubstantiation or Transubstantiation so long as that lies in his brain as a notion we may conclude him a very ill Philosopher and a worse Divine for holding it but still we will receive him to our Communion that being a solemn stipulation of the New Covenant made with God through Christ And therefore since such a person acts nothing contrary to that Covenant we ought to admit him to it But Idolatry being contrary to the Laws upon which that
guilty of which is to worship that as a God which we do believe is only a piece of Bread 2. In this very Article it is plain that our Opinion is the surer side For as to the Spiritual efficacy of the Sacrament and due preparation for it which is all that we hold concerning it by their own Confession there can be no sin in that whereas if their opinion is false they are guilty of a most horrid Idolatry So there is no danger in any thing we do whereas there may be great danger on their side all the danger that is possible to be on our side is that we do not adore Christ if he is present which may be thought to be want of Reverence But that cannot be reasonably urged since we at the same time adore him believing him to be in Heaven and if this objection against us had any force then the Primitive Church for twelve hundred years must have been in a state of damnation for none of them adored the Consecrated Elements nor has the Greek Church ever done it 3. It is clear this general Maxime of taking the surer sidâ— is against them There is no sin in not worshipping Images whereas there may be a sin in doing it They confess it is not necessary to invocate the Saints and we believe it is sinful They do not hold that it is necessary to say Masses for redeeming Souls out of Purgatory and we believe that it is an impious profanation of the Sacrament They do not hold it is necessary to take away the Cup in the Sacrament we think it Sacrilegious They do not think those Consecrations by which Divine Vertues are derived into such a variety of things to be necessary we look on them as gross Superstitions They do not think the Worship in an unknown tongue necessary whereas we think it a disgrace to Religion So in all these and many more particulars it is clear that we are of the surer side 4. We own that Maxime That nothing is necessary to Salvation but what is plainly set down in the Scriptures but this is not to be carried so far as that it should be impossible by sophistry or the equivocal use of words to fasten some other sense to such passages in Scripture for then nothing can be said to be plain in any Book whatsoever But we understand this of the genuine meaning of the Scriptures such as a plain well-disposed man will find out if his mind is not strongly prepossessed or biassed with false and wrong measures 5. The Confidence with which any party proposes their opinions cannot be a true Standart to judge of them otherwise the Receipts of Mountebanks will be always preferred to those prescribed by good Physicians and indeed the modesty of one side and the confidence of the other ought rather to give us a biass for the one against the other especially if it is visible that Interest is very prevalent in the confident party The Third Method IS to confer amicably with them and to shew them our Articles in the Scriptures and Tradition as the Fathers of tbe first Ages understood both the one and the other without engaging in reasonings or the drawing out of Consequences by Syllogisms as Cardinal Bellarmin and Perron and Gretser and the other Writers of Controversie have done which ordinarily beget endless disputes It was in this manner that the General Councils did proceed and thus did S. Austin prove Original sin against Julian To this end says he O Julian that I may overthrow thy Engines and Artifices by the opinions of those Bishops who have interpreted the Scripture with so much glory After which he cites the passages of the Scripture as they were understood by S. Ambrose S. Cyprian S. Gregory Nazianzene and others Remarks 1. WE do not deny but amicable Conferences in which matters are proposed without the wranglings of Dispute are the likeliest ways to convince people And whenever they shew us their doctrines directly in the Scripture and Tradition we will be very unreasonable if we do not yield upon that Evidence When they give us good authorities from Scripture and Tradition for the Worship of Images and Saints for adoring the Host for dividing the Sacrament for redeeming Souls out of Purgatory for denying the people the free use of the Scriptures for obliging them to worship God in a Tongue not understood by them we will confess our selves very obstinate men if we resist such Conviction 2. The shewing barely some passages without considering the whole scope of them with the sense in which such words were used in such ages and by such Fathers will certainly misguide us therefore all these must be also taken in for making this Enquiry exactly Allowances also must be made for the heats of Eloquence in Sermons or warm Discourses since one passage strictly and philosophically expressed is stronger than a hundred in which the heat of Zeal and the Figures of Rhetorick transport the Writer And thus if the Fathers disputing against those who said that the Humane Nature of Christ was swallowed up by his Divine Nature urge this to prove that the Humane Nature did still subsist that in the Sacrament after the Consecration in which there is an Union between the Elements and the Body and Blood of Christ they do still retain their proper nature and substance such expressions used on such a design leâ—d us more infallibly to know what they thought in this matter than any thing that they said with design only to beget Reverence and Devotion can do 3. The Ancient Councils were not so sollicitous as this Paper would insinuate to prove a Tradition from the Fathers of the first Ages They took great care to prove the truth which they decreed by many arguments from Scripture but for the Tradition they thought it enough to shew that they did innovate in nothing and that some Fathers before them had taught what they decreed We have not the acts of the two first General Councils but we may very probably gather upon what grounds those at Nice proceeded by what S. Athanasius wrote as an Apology for their Symbol in particular for the word Consubstantial which he proves by many consequences drawn from Scripture but for the Tradition of it he only cites four Fathers and none of those were very ancient They are Theognistus Denis of Alexandria Denis of Rome and Origen and yet both that Father Hilary and S. Basil acknowledge that Denis of Alexandria wavered much in that matter and it is well known what advantages were taken from many of Origen's expressions So here we have only two undisputed Fathers that conveyed this Tradition We have the Acts of the third General Council yet preserved and in them we find a Tradition indeed alledged but except S. Cyprian and S. Peter of Alexandria they cite none but those that had lived after the Council of Nice and Pope Leo's Letter to Flavian
Evidence of those places of Scripture from which they deduced them 5. Since those of that Communion object a National Synod to the Protestants this may be turned back on them with greater advantage in some points established by Councils which they esteem not only General but Infallible In the Third Council of the Lateran it was decreed That all Princes who favoured Hereticks did forfeit their Rights and a Plenary Indulgence was granted to all that fought against them In the Fourth Council at the same place it was decreed That the Pope might not only declare this forfeiture but absolve the Subjects from their Oaths of Obedience and transfer their Dominions upon others In the First Council at Lions they joyned with the Pope in thundring the Sentence of Deposition against the Emperour Frederick the First which in the preamble is grounded on some places of Scripture of which if they were the Infallible Expositors then this power is an Article of Faith And in the last pâ—ace the Council of Constance decreed That the Faith of a Safe-Conduct was not to be kept to an Heretick that had come to the place of Judgement relying on it even though he would not have come without it When Crueltâ— Rebellion and Treachery were thus decreed in Courts which among them are of so sacred an authority It is visible how much greâ—ter advantages we have of them in this point than any they can pretend against us 6. For the Synod of Dort I will not undertake the Apology neither for their Decrees nor for their Assertions and will not stick to say that how true soever many of their Conclusions may be yet the defining such mysterious matters as the order of the Divine Decrees and the Influences of Gods Grace on the wills of men in so positive a manner and the imposing their Assertions on all the Ministers of their Communion was that which many as sincere Protestants as any are have ever disliked and condemned as a weakening the Union of the Protestant Church and an assuming too much of that authority which we condemn in the Church of Rome For though they supposed that they made their definitions upon the grounds of Scripture so that in this sense the authority of the Synod was meerly Declarative yet the question will still recur Whether they understood the passages which they built on right or not And if they understood them wrong then according to Protestant principles their Decrees had no such binding authority that the receding from them could make one guilty either of Heresie or Schism The Sixth Method IS to shew them that the Roman Church or that Church which acknowledges the Pope or the Bishop of Rome the Successor of S. Peter to be her Head all the World over is the true Church Because there is no other besides her that has that undoubted mark which is a perpetâ—al Visibility without Interruption since Christ's time to this day This is a Method common to all the Catholicks and is very well and briefly set forth in the little Treatise of the true Church joyned to that of the Peaceable Method This is that of which S. Austin makes most frequent use against the Donatists and chiefly in his Book of the Vnity of the Church and in his Epistles of which the most remarkable passages relating to this matter are gathered together by the late Arch-bishop of Rouen in the first Book of his Apology for the Gospel in which he handles this matter excellently well One may add to this Method the Maxims of which Tertullian makes use in his Treatise of Prescriptions against the Hereticks and also Vincentius Lyrinensis in his Advices It is enough to say on this occasion that those two Treatises may satisfie any that will read them without prepossession in order to their forming a just Iudgement of the true Church of Iesus Christ and of all those Societies that would usurp that name Remarks THis Method is so common that there was no reason in any sort to give Mr. Maimbourg the honour of it unless it was that the Assembly intended to do him this publick honour to ballance his disgrace at Rome But let us examine it 1. This asserts that no other Church has a perpetual Succession without interruption but that which derives it from Rome which is so contrary to what every one knows that Mr. Maimbourg was certainly inspired with the Spirit of his Order when he writ it Do not all the Greek Churches and all the Churches that have their Ordination from them all from the Northern Empire of Muscovy to the Southern of the Abassines together with all those in the East derive from the Apostles by an uninterrupted series For till the Authority of the Church of Rome is proved which is the thing in question their being declared Schismaticks or Hereticks by it does not interrupt this Succession 2. The Church of England has the same Succession that the Church of Rome had in Gregory the Great 's time to wave the more ancient pretensions of the Brittish Churches and the Bishops of this Church being bound by one of their Sponsions made at their Consecration according to the Roman Pontifical to instruct their flock in the true Faith according to the Scriptures they were obliged to make good this promise Nor can it be pretended that they have thereupon forfeited their Orders and by consequence their Succession 3. The Succession of the Church of Rome cannot be said to be uninterrupted if either Heresie or Schism can cut it off It is well known that Felix Liberius and Honorius to name no more were Hereticks and if Ordinations by Schismaticks or unlawful Usurpers be to be annulled which was judged in the case of Photius and was often practised at Rome then the many Schisms and unjust usurpations that have been in that See will make the Succession of their Orders the most disputable thing that can be especially during that Schism that lasted almost forty years all the Churches of that Communion having derived their Orders from one or other of the Popes and if the Popes at Avignon were the Usurpers then let the Gallican Churches see how they can justifie the series of their Ordinations To all which may be added the impossibility of proving a true Succession in Orders if the Vertue of the Sacraments depends on the Intention of him who officiates since secret Intentions are only known to God 4. The ground on which the Donatists separated from the Orthodox Churches being at first founded on a matter of Fact which was of the pretended Irregularity of those who ordained Cecilian which they afterwards defended upon this that the Church could be only composed of good men and that the Sacraments were of no Vertue when dispensed by ill hands all that S. Austin says is to be governed by this Hypothesis against which he argues And it being once granted that the Church was not corrupted neither in Doctrine nor Worship we are very ready
to subscribe to every expression of his and do freely acknowledge that the making a rent in a Church that is pure both in Doctrine and Worship upon any particular or personal account is a sin that cannot be sufficiently detested and condemned I shall not enter into a particular discussion of every passage of S. Austin's but if in some he seems to go too far for the authority of the Church I shall only offer two general considerations concerning these The first is That it is a Maxime with Lawyers That general words in Laws are to be restricted to the preambles and chief design of these Laws And if this is true of Laws that are commonly penned with more coldness and upon greater deliberation it is much more applicable to warm discourses where the heat of Contradiction and the Zeal of a Writer makes that things are ofâ—en aggravated and carried too far but still all those expressions are to â—e molliâ—ied and restricted to that which was the subject matter of the debate therefore those expressions of S. Austin's supposing that the Church was still sound in her Doctrine and Worship are to be governed by that Hypothesis The second is That many of those who urge these passages on us do not deny but S. Aâ—stin in the disputes about Grace and Original Sin was carried too far though those were the subjects on which he employed his latest years with the greatest application If then it is confessed that he wrote too warmly against the Pelagians and in that heat advanced some propositions that need a fair construction is it unreasonable for us to say that he might have done the same writing against the Donatists 5. As for Tertullian he that might have conversed with many that could have known S. Polâ—carp who was both instructed and ordained by the Apostles so that he might have been the third person in the conveyance of the sense of what the Apostles had left in Writing could reasonably argue as he did against the Hereticks but certainly no man that considers the distance we live at from those ages and the many accidents that have so often changed the face of the Church can think it reasonable to argue upon that ground now And yet it were easie to bring many citatious out of that very Book of Tertullians to shew that he grounded his Faith only on the Doctrine of Christ delivered in the Scriptures how much soever he might argue from other Topicks against the Hereticks of his time who indeed were bringing in a New Gospel into the World We willingly receive the Characters that Vincentius Lyrinensis gives of Tradition that what the Church has at all times and in all places received is to be believed and are ready to joyn issue upon this and when they can prove that the Church at all times and in all places has taught the Worshipping of Images the Invocation of Saints and Angels the adoring the Sacrament and the dividing of it with many more particulars we will yield the whole cause and confess that we have made a Schism in the Church The Seventh Method IS to let them see that those who at first pretended to Reform the Church in which they were amongst us neither had nor could have any Mission either Ordinary or Extraordinary to bring us any other Doctrine but that which was then taught and that by Consequence none ought to believe them since they had no authority to Preach as they did How can they Preach if they are not sent This is the ordinary Method that puts the Ministers to the necessity of proving their Mission which is a thing that they can never do This cuts off all disputes and is one of the Methods of Cardinal Richelieu Remarks 1. IF the first Reformers had delivered a new Doctrine which was never formerly taught it had been necessary for them to have had a very extraordinary Mission and to have confirmed it by very extraordinary signs but when they grounded all â—hey said upon that very Book which was and is still received as the unalterable Law of all Christians then if every man is bound to take care of his own Salvation and is in Charity obliged to let others see that same light that guides himself then I say an extraordinary Mission was not necessary when the thing in dispute was not a new Doctrine but the true meaning of those Writings which were on all hands acknowledged to be Divine 2. If notwithstanding the necessity of not raising War in Civil Government without an express Commission from the Prince or Supream Authority yet in a General Rebellion when the ways of intercourse with the Prince are cut off if it be not only a lawful but a commendable action for any subject even without a Commission to raise what force he can for the service of the Prince Then if it be true that the Western Churches had generally revolted from the rules of the Gospel that was a sufficient warrant for any person to endeavour a Reformation 3. The nature of the Christian Religion is to be well considered in which all Christians are a Royal Priesthood And though it be highly necessary for all the ends of Religion to maintain peace and Order and to convey down an authority for sacred administrations in such a way as tends most to advance those ends yet this cannot be lookt on as indispensable and absolutely necessary Among the Iews as there were many services in which none but Priests and Levites could officiate so the Succession went in the natural course of Descent But in the Christian Church there are no positive Laws so appropriated and therefore in cases of extream and unavoidable necessity every Christian may make use of that dormant priviledge of being a Royal Priest and so this difficulty must be resolved by examining the merits of the whole cause for if the necessity was not extream and unavoidable we acknowledge it had been a Sacrilegious presumption for any that was not called in the ordinary manner to meddle in Holy things 4. It is but a small part of the Reformed Churches that is concerned in this Here in England our Reformers had the ordinary Mission and in most places beyond Sea the first Preachers had been ordained Priests And it will not be easie to prove that Lay-men yea and Women may baptize in cases of necessity when that is often but an imaginary necessity and that yet Priests in a case of real necessity may not ordain other Priests For all the Rules of Order are superseded by extraordinary cases and in Moral as well as in Natural things every Individual has a Right to propagate its kind and though it may be reasonable to regulate that yet it can never be wholly cut off The Eighth Method IS to tell them You do not know that such or such a Book of the Scripture is the Word of God but by the Church in which you were before your Schism So that you cannot know
up by the Earth So that by this diversity of the punishments one may know that Schism is a greater crime than Idolatry We may likewise see how upon the same subject he exhorts the Donatists to renounce their wicked Schism in his â—71 Epistle in which among other things he has those excellent words Why will you tear the Lords garments and why will you not with the rest of the World leave that Coat of Charity entire that is all woven of one Thread which even his Persecutors themselves would not rend And a little after this You pretend that you would avoid that Cockle that as you alledge is mixt among us and that before the time of Harvest whereas indeed it is you your selves that are this Cockle for if you were the good grain you would bear with it and would not separate your selves from the Corn of Jesus Christ. We need only change the name Donatists into Calvinists This is it that shews to what degree the Church ever was and ever must be acknowledged to be Infallible since we must submit to its Decisions and the Fathers have established this so strongly that one ought never to separate from her and that one is by so much the more obliged to continue united to her because she never refuses to hear the Remonstrances made to her by her Children Remarks 1. IT was observed before how unreasonable it was to build much on â—n Allegory but on this occasion the Allegory is so clearly forced that it gives just cause of Suspicion that the cause is weak that must be supported by such Arguments For our Saviour makes it so plain that the Harvest is the end of the World that the Reapers are Angels and that upon his last coming they shall gather together the wicked and cast them into Hell and that the Righteous shall shine in Heaven That the applying this to a General Council in which Heresie shall be condemned is such a fetch that it must be confessed they have as easie Consciences as they have warm Fancies that are wrought on by it 2. As for that which S. Austin drew from this against the Donatists who justified their Separation on the account of the sins of those who were in the Communion of the Church it was as pertinent as this is strained for the ground of the Schism being only the mixture of the Cockle with the Wheat nothing could be more strongly urged against them But it is quite out of the present Controversie between them and us who do not separate for this mixture but finding the Wheat it self so much corrupted took care to cleanse it 3. We freely acknowledge the great sin of Schism and the severe punishment due to it but for all the severity of the punishment inflicted on Corah and his Partners we do not doubt but when the Temple was so defiled by Idolatry under the Kings that polluted the Altar and the Courts of the Lords House with Idols it was not only no sin but a commendable piece of Religion in such cases to have withdrawn from so impious a Worship This is our present case and if what we object to their Worship is true then our Separation from it is as necessary a Duty as is the preserving of our lives from Poysons or Infectious Diseases 4. The true scope of that Parable seems to be a reproof to the Violence of such Church-men as are too apt to condemn and pluck up every thing that they think to be Cockle and when the declaring what is Cockle is lodged with them they will be sure to count every thing such that does not please them And then that same heat that makes them judge those opinions to be Cockle sets them on to root them out with such violence that much good Wheat is in danger to be pluckt up Therefore to repress this our Saviour commands them under that figure to let both grow till the end of the World that is not to proceed to extremities and to rigorous Methods but to leave that to God who will judge all at the last day If this were well considered it would put an effectual stop to that Spirit of Persecution which ferments so violently in that Church The language of which is always this Let uâ— go and pluck up the Tares or that of the two Disciples who would have called for Fire from Heaven and because Heaven will not answer such bloody demands they try to raise such Fires on Earth as may burn up those whom they call the Tares Not knowing what the true Spirit of Christianity is and that the Son of Man came not to destroy mens lives but to save them And forget that our Saviour commanded them to let the Tares grow till the Harvest But this is one of the mischiefs that follows the humour of expounding the Scriptures fancifully That the plain meaning of clear Texts is neglected while forced and Allegorical expositions are pursued 5. When it is clearly proved that the majority of the Pastors of the Church is Infallible then we shall acknowledge that all Separation from them is simply unlawful But till that is done we can no more think it a sin when in obedience to the Rules of the Gospel we withdraw from such false Teachers as corrupt it Then it were for Common Subjects to refuse to obey the Subordinate Magistrates when they clearly perceive that they have revolted from their duty to their Supream Authority And since we are warned to beware of false Teachers we know no other way to judge of them but the comparing their Doctrine with that which is delivered to us in Scripture The Fourteenth Method IS for the Confirmation of the former In order to which we must ask the Calvinists upon all their Articles that which S. Austin asked of the Donatists when the Church reconciled to her self Hereticks that were penitent without re-baptizing them For Example Whether was the Church still a True Church or not when before the Schism was made Iesus Christ was adored in the Holy Eucharist If she was the true Church then none ought to have separated from her for any practice that was authorized by her If she was not the true Church from whence came Calvin out of what soil did he grow or out of what Sea was he cast or from which of the Heavens did he fall From whence are these Reformers come From whom have they received their Doctrine and the authority to Preach it Let those who follow them consider well where they are since they can mount no higher than to those for their Original For us we are secure in the Communion of that Church in which that is to this day universally practised that was also practised before Agripinus 's time and also in the interval between Cyprian and Agripinus And afterwards he subjoyns these excellent words that are Decisive But neither did Agripinus nor Cyprian nor those that have followed them though they
which we have separated from the Church of Rome are not to be found among those Churches Such as the adoring the Consecrated Elements the denying the Wine to the People the saying Masses for Redeeming Souls out of Purgatory the having Images for the Trinity the immediate Invocation of Saints for the pardon of Sin and those blessings which we receive only from God Besides an infinite variety of other things Not to mention their denying the Popes authority And to turn this argument on them Those parts of their Worship in which they differ so much from the Eastern Churches do afford us very good arguments to evince that they are Innovations brought in since these ages in which those Churches held Communion with the Roman Church And do prove that at the time of their Separation they were not introduced in the Western Church For when we find such a keenness of dispute concerning one of the most indifferent things in the World as whether the Sacrament should be of Leavened or Unleavened Bread can we think that if the Latines had then worshipped the Sacrament they had not much rather have objected to the Greeks their Irreverence upon so high an occasion than have insisted on the matter of unleavened Bread As for the conclusion we do acknowledge it is such as becomes an Assembly of Bishops But whether it becomes men of their Characters of their Birth and of their Qualities to pretend to such gentleness and meekness when all the World sees such notorious proofs given to the contrary I shall not determine but will leave it to their own second thoughts to consider better of it We find both the King and the Clergy of France expressing great tenderness towards the persons of those they call Hereticks togetherwith their resolutions of gaining them only by the Methods of Persuasion and Charity and yet the contrary is practisâ—d in so many parts of France that considering the exact Obedience that the Inferiour Officers pay to the Orders that are sent them from the Court we must conclude these Orders are procured from the King without his being rightly informed concerning them And since we must either doubt of the sincerity of the Kings Declarations or of the Assemblies we hope they will not take it ill if we pay that Reverence to a Crowned Head and to so illustrious a Monarch as to prefer him in the competition between his credit and theirs and they must forgive us if we stand in some doubt of the sincerity of this Declaration till we are convinced of it by more Infallible proofs than words or general Protestations The Conclusion THus I have made such Remarks on these Methods as seem both just and solid I have advanced no assertion either of Fact or Right concerning which I am not well assured and which I cannot justifie by a much larger series of proofs than I thought fit to bring into a Discourse which I intended should be as short as was possible But if that be necessary and I am called on to do it I shall not decline it I have with great care avoided the saying any thing meerly for contentions sake or to make up a Muster of many particulars for I look on that way in which many write for a cause as some Advocates plead for their Clients by alledging every thing that may make a shew or biass an unwary hearer as very unbecoming the profession of a Divine and the cause of Truth which we ought to assert And there is scarce any thing that shews a man is persuaded of the truth he maintains more evidently than a sincere way of defending it For great subtilties and deep fetches do naturally incline a Reader to suspect that the Writer was conscious to himself of the weakness of his cause and was therefore resolved to supply those defects by the quickness and nimbleness of his parts But having now said what I think sufficient in the way of Remâ—rks upon the Letter and the Methods published by the late Assembly General of the Clergy of France I now go on to some Methods which seem strong and well grounded for convincing those in Communion with the Church of Rome that they ought to suspect the ground they stand on In which I shall observe this Method First I shall offer such grounds of just suspicion and jealousie as may dispose every considering man to fear and apprehend that their Church is on a wrong bottom from which I shall draw no other Inferences but that they are reasonable grounds to take a man a little off from the engagement of his former Education and Principles and may dispose him to examine matters in dispute among us with more application and less partiality And then I shall shew upon more demonstrative grounds how false the foundations are on which the Church of Rome is established both which I shall examine only in a general view and in bulk without descending by retail unto the pâ—rticulars in Controversie between us 1. And first It is a just ground to suspect any Church or Party of men that pretend to have every thing pass upon their word or authority and that endeavour to keep those who adhere to them in all the Ignorance possible that divert them from making Enquiries into Religion and do with great earnestness infuse in them an Implicite Belief of whatsoever they shâ—ll propose or dictate to them The World has found by experience that there is nothing in which fraud and artifices have been more employed than in matters of Religion And that Priests have been often guilty of the basest impostures And therefore it is a shrewd Indication that any sort of them that make this the first and grand principle which they infuse into their followers that they ought to believe every thing that the majority of themselves decree and do therefore recommend Ignorance and Implicite Obedience to their people and keep the Scriptures out of their hands all they can and wrap up their Worship in a language not understood by the vulgar are not to be too easily believed But that they may be justly suspected of having no sincere designs since Truth is of the nature of Light And Religion was sent into the World to enlighten our minds and to raise our understandings 2. It is a just ground of Jealousie of any Church if she holds many opinions which have a mighty tendenâ—y to raise the Empire and Dominion of the Clergy to a vast height A Reverence to them for their works sake is due by the light of Nature But if Priests advance this further to such a pitch that every one of them is believed qualified by his Character to work the greatest Miracle that ever was The change of the Elements of Bread and Wine into the Body and Blood of Christ besides all the other Consecrations by which Divine Vertues are brought down on such things as they bless If it is also believed necessary to enumerate all secret sins to them and
as that without which we can never be certain of the Faith But if this is true then into what desperate scruples must all men fall For the resolution of their Faith turns to that which can never be so much as made probable much less certain The efficacy of the Sacraments depending on the intention of the Priest none can know who are truly Baptized or Ordained and who are not And it is not to be much doubted but that many profane Priests may have in a sort of wanton Malice put their Intention on purpose cross to the Sacrament For the Impiety of an Atheistical Church-man is the most extravagant thing in the World Beside this what Evidence can they give of the Canonical Ordination of all the Bishops of Rome The first Links of that Chain are so entangled that it is no small difficulty to find out who first succeeded the Apostles And it is not certainly known who suceeeded them afterwards for some few Catalogues gathered up perhaps from report by Historians is not so much as of the nature of a Violent presumption If we consider Succession only as a matter of Order in which we go on without Scrupulosity I confess there is enough to satisfie a reasonable man But if we think it indispensable both for the conveyance of the Faith and the vertue of the Sacraments then it is impossible to have any certainty of Faith all must be sounded on conjecture or probability at most It is but of late that formal Instruments were made of Ordinations or that those were carefully preserved and transmitted In a word difficulties can be rationally enough proposed concerning Succession that must needs drive one that sets up his Faith on it to endless scruples of which it is impossible he should be ever satisfied There is one thing of great consequence in this matter that deserves to be well considered Under the Mosaical Law God limited the Succession to the High Priesthood so that the first-born was to succeed and the great Annual Expiation for the whole people was to be performed by him Yet when in our Saviours time this was so interrupted that the High Priesthood was become Annual and wassold for money God would not suffer the people to perish for want of such Expiation but the Sacrifice was still accepted though offered up by a Mercenary Intruder And Caiaphas in the year of his High Priesthood prophesied So that how great soever the sin of the High Priest was the people were still safe in him that was actually in that Office And if this was observed in a dispensation that was chiefly made up of positive Precepts and carnal Ordinances it is much more reasonable to expect it in a Religion that is more free from such observances and is more Spiritual and Internal 2. Another ground on which those of the Roman Church build is this That a True Church must hold the truth in all things Which is so Sophistical a thing that it might have been expected wise and ingenious men should have been long ago ashamed of it It is certain the Iewish Church was the true Church of God in our Saviours time for their Sacrifices had then an Expiatory Vertue in them So that they had the certain means of Salvation among them which is the formal notion of a True Church And yet in so great a point as what their Messias and his Kingdome were to be we find they were in a very fatal errour The opinion of his being to be a Temporal Prince had been handed down among them so by Oral Tradition that it had run through them all from the Priests down to the Fisher-men For we find the Apostles so possessed with it that at the very time of Christs Ascension they were still dreaming of it And yet this was a gross Errour and proved of most mischievous consequence to them Of this they were so persuaded that the Supream Judicature or Representative of their Church the Sanhedrim that had much more to shew for its authority than a General Council can shew in the New Testament erred in this fundamental point and condemned Christ as a Blasphemer and declared him guilty of Death So that while they continued to be the True Church of God yet they erred in the point which was of all others the most important upon which it is evident that it is no good Inference to conclude that because a Church is a True Church therefore it cannot be in an Errour 3. Another pretence in that Church on which they build much and which makes great Impression on many weak minds is the Churches Infallibility in deciding Controversies by which all disputes can be soon ended and they conclude that Christ had dealt ill with his Church if he had not provided such a Method for the end of all Disputes But it is certain they have lost this Infallibility if they ever had it unless it be acknowledged that it is lodged in the Pope against which the Gallican Clergy has so lately declared And yet it can be no where else if it is not in him for as they have had no General Council for about one hundred and twenty years so they cannot have one but by the Popes Summons and if the Pope is averse they cannot find this Infallibility so at best it is but a Dormant Priviledge which Popes can suspend at pleasure In the Intervals of Councils where is it Must one go over Europe and poll all the Bishops and Divines to find their Opinions So in a word after all the noise about Infallibility they can only pretend to have it at the Popes Mercy And indeed he that can believe a Pope chosen as he generally is by Intrigues and Court factions to be the Infallible Judge of Controversies or that a Council managed by all the Artifices of crafty men as that at Trent appears to have been even by Cardinal Pallavicini's History was Infallibly directed by the Holy Ghost is well prepared to believe the only thing in the World that is more Incredible which is Transubstantiation There was as good reason for lodging an Infallible Authority among the Iews as among Christians for their Religion consisting of so many External Precepts concerning which Disputes might rise it seemed more necessary that such an authority should have been established among them than under a Dispensation infinitely more plain and simple And the Supream Authority was lodged with the Sanhedrim in much higher expressions under the Old Testament than can be pretended under the New as will appear to any that will read the fore cited place in Deuteronomy There was also a Divine Inspiration lodged in the Pectoral by which the High Priest had immediate Answers from the Cloud of Glory and when that ceased under the Second Temple yet as their Writers tell us that was supplyed by a degree of Prophecy which is also confirmed by what S. Iohn says concerning Caiaphas's Prophecying and yet after all this thâ—t